►
From YouTube: 2022-09-29 Governance Committee private meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
How's,
the
how's,
the
elections
set
point.
C
It's
moving,
I
just
got
the
water
roll
today
with
Elites
and
it's
one
of
the
topics
for
today.
So
let's
talk
about
that
later,
but
it's
going
yeah,
it's
going
fine.
C
The
first
item,
the
first
item,
links
to
a
discussion
on
oh
okay,
so
there's
an
update
and
delaying
approval
is
Jeffrey's
checking.
So
this
is
about
the
screenshot
that
we
have
down
here
right.
D
B
I
mean
I
understand
what
this
means,
but
since
open
Telemetry,
IP
and
trademark
are
already
owned
by
a
cncf,
it
seems
like
kind
of
a
sure,
I
mean
it
doesn't
affect
anything
as
far
as
I
can
tell
at
all
I
think.
It
means
that
if
cncf
wants
to
buy
some
stuff
from
GitHub,
then
we
have
access
to
it.
Although
I
don't
think
we're
using
anything,
that's
not
free
today,
correct
so.
D
E
A
D
A
B
With
the
justification
being
that
cncf,
you
know,
owns
IP
seems
like
a
totally
innocuous
change.
What
it's
worth,
I,
I'm
less
freaked
out,
not
that
it
really
matters
but
life
stuff
went
through
this
exercise
really
joined
servicenow
and,
like
our
GitHub
thing
from
an
account
standpoint,
is
part
of
servicenow's
account
and
it's
literally
invisible
from
like
a
external
perspective,
so
I
think
it's
safe.
D
A
A
D
A
A
E
A
E
D
D
Next
one's
from
alalia,
who
I
think
can't
make
it
today,
kubecon
blog
post
draft
in
progress
yeah.
She
let
me
know
about
that
as
well.
We'll
share
the
doc
link
working
with
Morgan
on
the
post.
I
I
haven't
seen
it
yet,
but
but
she
is
working
on.
It
also
worked
with
Morgan
to
further
Define
Hotel
cubecon
participation.
I
I
met
Valley,
the
last
Friday.
We
just
went
over
the
various
meetings
and
things
that
are
happening.
D
I
think
this
actually
ties
into
Ally
to
Second
point
where
she
was
looking
to
get
more
Hotel
unplugged
info
I,
don't
know
when
she
wrote
this
because
Austin
shared
a
planning
doc
with
me
that
I
then
sent
to
her
so
I'm
guessing
this
is
moot.
Now
she
probably
wrote
this
a
few
days
ago.
D
Yeah
over
email
I
saw
that
too
yeah,
so
I
I
think
I
assume
everyone's
all
good
there
I
to
be
clear.
Austin
is
the
person
planning,
Hotel,
unplugged
I,
only
know
what
I've
read
from
the
docs,
but
I
I
feel
like
I'm
up
today.
C
That's
that
says
it
all:
there's
a
link
to
a
GitHub
issue.
There
I
just
uploaded
a
motor
role
so
check.
You
know
so
at
least
checked
already.
The
number
of
contributions
that
look
right
and
the
number
of
eligible
people
eligible
voters
look
right
as
well,
but.
C
It
never
hurts
to
get
any
other
next
repair
advice
to
verify
that
file.
There
was
a
small
glitch
on
Helio's
website.
Actually,
so,
when
I
uploaded,
there
were
like
505
voters
and
there
are
like
actually
504
on
the
file,
so
I'm
I'm
checking
with
them
what's
wrong,
seems
to
be
like
a
not
by
Warner
or
some
of
some
sort,
but
the
UI
actually
shows
505
people
so
and
I
I
just
won't
check.
You
know
because
the
pagination
is
odd,
so
it's
I
just
want
to
check
one
by
one.
C
It's
it's
not
visible,
and
the
next
step
is
then
she
automate
commenting
on
GitHub
issues
or
one-on-one
specific
GitHub
issue
to
Ping
people,
letting
them
know
that
they
are
eligible.
So
the
comment
that
I'm
gonna
make
this
year
first
is
going
to
be
automated,
so
we're
using
GH
and
the
second
is
letting
people
know
how
many
contributions
they
had
and
for
each
comment
based
on
on
feedback
that
I've
seen
from
last
year's
issue
on
the
top
of
each
comment.
C
Do
we
I
think
there
is
no
I
think
only
I,
don't
know.
Let
me
check
the
member
standing
rules
because
I
don't
think
we
have
anything
like
that.
I
think
we
discussed
that
for
for
people
to
be
eligible
for
people
to
be
elected,
I
think
we
talked
about
that,
but
not
for
people
to
vote.
E
Hello
sooner
we'll
have
more
voters
than
than
U.S
has
at
the
election.
D
C
D
C
There
was
another
comment
or
I
made
earlier
by
Liz
when
we
were,
you
know
when
she
was
showing
the
the
how
to
get
the
list,
and
she
made
a
comment
that
we
looks
like
ute's
cast
last
year,
that
the
number
or
or
that
the
threshold
will
be
elevated
to
five
to
50
50
contributions
instead
of
20,
but
that
didn't
made
to
the
to
the
official
documents.
So
we
still
have
to
do
like
20
this
year
and
perhaps
Preparatory
increase
that
to
50
for
the
next
one.
E
Yeah
I
I
think
if
it
includes
comments
and
everything
we
should
have
a
bit
more
than
20.,
not
a
bad
idea
to
include
all
of
this,
because
all
of
them
are
contributions,
but
probably
something
closer
to
50
or
hundreds
is
more
realistic.
D
E
A
E
C
E
A
C
All
right,
so
if
we
were
to
include
now
to
50
so
just
I,
think
you
know
we're
not
going
to
do
that
for
this
time,
but
we
wouldn't
have.
Let
me.
D
E
A
B
Election
related
question:
one
list
is
empty
you
at
the
moment,
which
is
a
list
of
candidates.
Typically,
this
corrects
itself
to
the
in
the
like.
You
know,
20
seconds
prior
to
the
deadline
or
whatever,
but
I
would
just
say
you
know.
If
you
have
friends
and
family
who
might
want
to
run,
we
are
definitely
losing
one
person
you
know
tier,
so
you
know
we
wouldn't
want
to
have
an
election
with
no
candidates
and
also
without
mentioning
any
names.
B
In
past
years
there
have
been
some
candidates
that
I
really
did
frankly
did
not
want
to
have
on
the
GC
and
I
think
they
didn't
do
very
well
in
the
elections.
Probably,
but,
like
you
know,
we
want
to
have
some
people
who
are
actually
involved
good
project,
yeah
yeah
and
you
know.
Obviously
you
know
you
can't
make
him
and
run.
But
if
people
like
oh
I'm,
not
going
to
win
I,
think
maybe
you
should
send
them
the
currently
blank
list
of
candidates
as
motivation
to
apply
so
I
agree.
C
I
I
picked
a
couple
of
people
or
I
think
to
one
person
that
I
think
would
be
a
nice
candidate
for
the
GC.
This
is
from
a
an
end
user
company,
but
and-
and
his
concern
was,
the
board
would
not
be
diverse
enough
if
he
were
to
to
join
the
board.
So
his
concern
was
really
you
know,
we're
we're
losing
diversity.
If,
if
you
would
join
and
I
think
that's
a
very
fair
point,
so
I
think
we
should
really
focus
on
on
on
on
this
message.
C
When
recruiting
candidates
are
recruiting,
you
know
and
and
she's
a
a
concern.
Also,
you
know
to
I
think
we
don't
have
such
a
role
now,
but
I
think
we.
It
does
bring
a
good
point
for
the
next
elections.
So
how
do
we
want
the
board
to
look
like.