►
From YouTube: 2022-10-06 Governance Committee private meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
I
say
I
still
still
I'm
planning
to
submit
an
application.
Okay,.
B
C
B
I
mean
I
I,
don't
know,
I
feel
bad
for
not
having
enough
diverse
candidates.
I
would
say
not
not.
Yes,.
A
Yes,
yeah
I
am
looking
at
the
photos
and
yeah.
C
B
D
A
Am
sorry
that
I'm
stepping
back
but
yeah
I
would
like
foreign.
C
C
All
right
we
have
Yuri
also
here
so
I
think,
let's
look
at
our.
B
Yeah,
we
have
pretty
much
everyone
two
minutes
to
people
who
mentioned
they
wouldn't
be
here
so
Ben
mentioned
that
he
wouldn't
be
able
to
join
today.
Morgan
also
noted
here
that
he's
on
a
plane.
B
All
right,
but
we
don't
have
many
things
today:
I
guess
I'll
start
with
the
second
item,
so
today's
the
last
day
for
nominations.
So
there
is
a
tweet
from
the
open,
Telemetry
account
official
account.
So
if
you
could,
you
know
help
spread
the
word
as
a
Louis
was
saying
we
could
see.
You
know
a
a
more
diverse
pool
of
candidates
in
their,
but
we
we
can't
do
much.
If
we
don't
have
you
know,
I
mean
we
can't
help
the
deceiving
diversity
of
the
candidates.
B
And
I
guess
the
second
item,
which
is
first
is
I.
I've
got
a
question
from
Char
I
guess
asking
how
about
doing
rate
votes
for
2022.
I?
Don't
think
we're
doing
that?
Are
we.
A
No
Helios
does
not
support
rent
votes,
but
it
does
support
approval
voting
where
you
can
pick
as
many
or
as
few
people
as
you
like
right,
Tom.
B
That's
my
recollection
as
well:
I
have
so
and
and
then
apparently
it
was
something
that
was
supposed
to
be
discussed
last
year,
I
mean
after
the
elections
last
year
was
it
discussed
it.
A
Was
discussed,
you
know
we
did
look
at
at
civs
versus
versus
electo
versus
versus
Helios,
and
it
basically
boils
down
to.
It
is
difficult
to
do
fully
Anonymous
voting
where
the
votes
are
not
visible
or
possible,
possibly
visible
to
administrators.
C
A
Is
rigged
if
it
is
fully
ranked
choice
and
also
many
of
the
other
systems?
Actually
Electro
is
fine,
but
sieves
requires
us
to
know
everyone's
email
address,
which
we
do
not
necessarily
know.
So
it
was
strongly
important
to
us
to
have
something
that
was
Zero
version
based
off
of
GitHub
usernames,
all
right.
So.
B
A
You
know
writing
down
some
kind
of
requirements
for
election
systems
that
we
use
is
important.
So
you
know
you
can
judge
whether
you
is
anonymity,
more
or
less
important
than
is
it
more
or
less
important
than
being
able
to
do
rant
choice.
D
C
B
Yeah,
that's
what
I
was
going
to
ask
I
mean.
Is
it
more
important
for
us
to
have
fully
Anonymous
voters-
or
you
know,
be
careful
more
about
that
at
open
television
side?
Or
do
we
care
about
that
more
than
the
cncf
itself?
I!
Guess
that's
the
question
you
know.
So
the
center
does
not
care
that
much
about
that
I
guess
but
I
do
have
email
addresses
addresses,
so
they
you
know.
Do
we
care
more
about
privacy
than
they
I,
don't
think
that's
the
case.
I
mean
I,
do
care
about
privacy,
but.
C
But
it
depends
depends
they
have
to
actually
explicitly
get
permission
from
the
in
order
to
carry
out
that
kind
of
a
system,
because,
typically,
what
I've
seen
is
that
you
need
to
get
some
kind
of
an
acknowledgment
that
they
understand.
You
know
that
the
those
that
their
information
is
available,
yeah.
D
C
C
Answer
your
question
you're
asking
like.
B
C
B
It
does
I
mean
if
the
systems
were
perfect
in
terms
of
you
know
allowing
GitHub
users
to
vote.
Would
we
still
choose
Helios
versus.
A
B
Right
so
I
guess
the
question
is,
then:
do
we
care
more
about
privacy?
B
C
Yeah
yeah,
that's
correct,
but
I
think
durasi
would
have
to
kind
of
discuss
it
as
a
community,
maybe
on
an
issue
or
something
if,
if
we
chose
to
go
that
way
right
now,
we're
not
right.
B
All
right
so
I'll
make
sure
to
document
what
we've
discussed
today
as
part
of
the
markdown
files
for
for
elections
or
for
the
charter.
I,
don't
know
somewhere
so
that
we
know
what
to
do
for
the
next
election.
C
Yeah
and
again,
thanks
to
everyone
on
the
election
team,
which
is
doing
this
because
it's
a
it's
actually
gotten
easier.
As
you
know,
we've
developed
more
Collective
wisdom,
foreign.
C
I
wanted
to
call
out
I.
Did
the
Morgan
and
I
worked
on
a
blog
post
together
in
order
to
kind
of
highlight
all
the
activities
that
are
happening
around
open
at
open,
Telemetry
there's
a
lot
of
talks,
you
know,
Yuri
has
a
talk
and
then
some
of
the
other
folks
have
talks.
Also,
above
and
beyond,
you
know
the
maintainer
track
talks
and
there
are
also
a
whole
bunch
of
events.
You
know
co-located
events
that
are
ongoing.
All
on
you
know
the
two
days
before
the
main
conference
starts.
So
again.
C
You
know
we
did
a
kind
of
in
cumulative
pool
of
all
the
events
and
that's
what
we'll
be
posting
so
just
wanted
to.
Let
you
know,
because
that's
something
that
I
think
would
be
useful
for
anyone
who's.
You
know
kind
of
interested
in
learning
more
and
getting
involved
in
hotel
yeah,
and
then
we
have
a
project
Booth.
So
you
know
that's
something
that
should
be
fun
should
be
good
to
go
and
meet
up
and
I
I
hear
Bogdan.
Maybe
you
can
give
us
some
more
info.
C
Morgan
was
mentioning
that
a
lot
of
the
engineers
from
Splunk
who
are
working
on
Hotel
will
be
at
kubecon.
Are
you
planning
to
be
there
or
others
I'm.
C
C
D
I
guess
just
going
back
to
the
election
stuff,
it
does
seem
like
elective
supports,
both
GitHub
auth
and
ranked
choice.
So
it's
just
a
question
of
of
effort.
Gerasi
I
think
if
we
want
to
have
both
because
we'd
have
to
I.
D
B
All
right,
what
was
the
aspect
of
electoral
list
that
was,
you
know
the
Privacy
aspect
that
was
not.
A
A
So,
even
though
it
supported
GitHub
off,
even
though
it
supported
ranked
Choice
voting
the
fact
that
there
was
not
like
something
where
the
governance
committee
could
be
like
demonstrably
hands-off
was
kind
of
the
thing
that
made
us
go
with
Helios,
because
even
though
it
didn't
support
ranked
Choice
number
one,
it's
offered
as
a
hosted
Free
Solution.
So
we
didn't
have
to
run
it
ourselves
and
number
two
is
cryptographically
secure
such
that,
even
if
you
did
have
access
to
the
instance,
you
could
not
have
our
votes.
Yeah.
D
Foreign,
so
maybe
a
long-term
Middle
Ground
might
be
bugging
the
C.
The
cncf
does
manage
and
maintain
a
certain
number
of
projects
for
its
member
organizations.
I
could
see
something
like
electo
being
a
thing.
They
might
be
convinced
to
manage
on
our
behalf,
because
then
it
would.
It
would
at
least
be
like
a
Linux
Foundation
administrator
and
not
someone
associated
with
a
particular
project
who
had
access
to
all.
D
So
so
we
can
make
an
ask
to
them
to
see
if
that's
something
they're
they're
interested
in
doing
I.
C
B
All
right
yeah,
so
nominations
are
due
today
and
we
we
would
then
still
have
until
the
8th
to
to
verify
and
merge
the
PRS.
B
C
A
B
B
C
C
D
C
C
Yeah
he
posted
the
post,
I
was
looking
at
it
and
I
think
he's
it'll
get
published
shortly,
great,
so
all
good
all
righty
coolness,
okay,.