►
From YouTube: 2021-07-29 Governance Committee private meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Does
it
warm
there,
apparently
it's
going
to
be,
although
the
forecast
just
got
reduced,
never.
C
E
It's
pretty
warm
here
right
now,
but
not
not
insanely,
so
it's
like
85
or
86
degrees.
Oh
that's
kind
of
pleasant
right
now.
It's
humid,
michigan,
85
or
86
is
really
uncomfortable.
B
E
E
B
B
B
D
D
B
E
I
don't
really
have
anything
to
say
about.
I
haven't
done
anything
on
zoom
meetings
or
improvements.
I
don't
know
if
sergey
has.
A
E
So
as
a
maintainer
that
runs
a
sig
meeting
every
week,
I
wouldn't
mind
at
all
formally
starting
a
meeting
if
it
meant
that
it
would
be
easier
to
find
them
on
youtube.
E
A
So
for
governance
meetings,
what
we
did
is
I
created
a
current
meeting
as
we
discussed
last
time.
You
can
only
create
a
current
meeting
for
so
long.
I
think
I
will
our
meeting
will
end
like
maybe
next
summer
or
something
and
then
this
meeting
is
specific
and
we
have
a
hardcoded
value
for
it.
So
it
goes
to
a
specific
playlist,
but
nothing
else.
Changes
like
everybody
can
join.
Who
knows
link
so
then,
if
you
want
the
same
for
javascript
like
I
definitely
like
you
can
do
that.
A
D
D
A
Yeah
zoom
accounts,
like
I
mean
first,
somebody
like,
I
think
I
don't
remember
the
name
who
created
like
requested
one
password
access
for
us.
So
once
you
have
one
password,
it
will
be
easier
to
share
passwords.
C
A
Accounts,
the
problem
with
sharing
zoom
accounts
is
all
the
settings
there
are
so
fragile.
Like
I
mean
one
incorrect
check
box
and
like
you
screwed
up
so
many
sig
meetings,
so
I
don't
know
like
how
much
you
want
to
share
it
and
how
much
you
want
just
have
some
subset
of
people
just
maintaining
for
everybody.
A
I'm
I'm
fine
either
way.
I
I
guess
to
the
first
big
screw-up.
D
Yeah,
I
guess
that's
the
the
only
problem
with
centralizing
it,
since
someone
has
to
to
do
it
or
all
of
a
sudden,
like
a
bunch
of
meetings
will
like
end
and
we'll
have
to
scramble.
So
I
guess
that's
the
only
only
downside
of
putting
the
bird
in
on
one
admin,
but.
E
A
Yeah
yeah
right
now,
austin
from
lightstep
like
edgy
from
microsoft,
maybe
from
cncf
have
password.
I
do
have
passwords,
but
I
think
morgan
had
them
at
some
point.
B
A
C
Yeah,
I
know
I
think
morgan
lost
all
this
yeah.
E
C
Now
I
think,
daniel
what
I
remember
we
discussed
it.
We
agreed
upon
it,
but
I
don't
think
anybody
picked
up
ownership
for
implementing
no.
A
No
just
yesterday
I
saw
update
on
that.
Did
we
find.
C
A
Yeah,
it's
alex
button,
she's
doing
it.
I
will
paste
it
link.
E
A
A
B
All
right,
next
sergey,
is
you
again
flo
mill
donation,
update.
A
So
in
flomio
we
I
mean
we,
as
a
governance
committee,
decided
like
technical
committee.
We
did
a
technical,
due
diligence
found
some
potential
problems
like
potential
red
flags,
namely
that
the
back
end
is
not
universal.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
I
mean
we
talked
with
data
dogs.
They
happy
to
jump
on
this
bandwagon
as
well.
They
want
to
like
they
already
have
ebpf
provider,
but
all
they
want
to
do
is
to
make
sure
that
their
approach
to
ebpf
can
be
extended
out
of
flowmeal.
A
So
they've
been
talking
about
receivers
like
actual
data
collectors
that
collect
specific
signals,
they
have
receivers
for
more
than
network
and
they
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
pluggable.
They
also
have
specific
back
end,
that
is
event
driven,
not
matrix
driven,
so
they
want
that
part
to
be
also
extensible
enough.
So
I
mean,
based
on
the
discussions
like
I
mean,
theoretically
everybody
on
the
same
page,
everybody
wants
the
same
extensibility,
but
now,
like
technical
committee,
can
go
in
deeper
into
like
how
exactly
it
will
look
like.
A
So
we
said
that
please
create
a
working
group
and
discuss
it
among
yourselves
and
like
if
you
get
to
the
conclusion
that
it
works.
Let's
do
it.
If
not,
then,
like
maybe
a
separate
project,
and
I
think.
A
A
Yeah,
so
I
asked
for
meal
people
to
start
like
kick
off
working
group
and
I
think
morgan
and
tigran
help
in
to
set
up
mechanics
of
it.
B
C
B
C
I
already
shared
it.
I
had
shared
it
on
the
thread.
I
also
posted
the
link
here.
You
guys
can
take
a
look
at
add
anything
you
want
to,
and
then
I
think
the
cncf
is
going
to
the
editors
will
draft
and
post
based
on
the
information
we
provide
in
that
google
doc
right.
So
there
is,
I
filled
out
most
of
the
information,
but
if
you
guys,
you
know
think
we
can
add
any
other
links
or
any
other
data
that
it's
all
good,
they
can
use
that.
C
A
C
C
Okay,
okay
I'll
just
send
out
an
explicit
email
to
them
for
review;
also,
okay,
good.
A
Yeah
another
donation
I
got
involved
into,
but
here
I
kind
of
represent
google
here,
so
the
sql
commenter.
I
think
some
people
know-
and
we
discussed
last
time-
that
this
is
nice
to
have
an
open
ceremony,
because
it
sets
up
a
propagation
format.
It
enables
this
communication
between
client,
libraries
and
backend.
A
I
think
last
time
we
discussed,
we
discussed
it
in
the
very
end
and
I
think
we
like
maybe
like
I-
I
understood
that
we
want
to
skip
technical
due
diligence
but
then,
like
I,
don't
know
whether
it
was
it
was
decided
or
not.
So
I
want
to
bring
it
up
again
and
ask
like:
are
we
skipping
technical,
digital
acceptance
or
we
want
technical
due
diligence,
I
feel
like?
We
should
probably
just
run
it
past
the
tc.
F
B
C
A
From
technical
committee
bogdan
was
supposed
to
do
that
so
he's
on
vacation.
It
will
take
another
week
for
him
to
come
back
for
vacation.
I
think.
C
Yeah
that
that
that's
cool
I
mean
sega,
but
it's
just
that
again.
That
was
one
of
the
reasons
I
mean
punia
and
I
were
discussing
this
and
we
were
just
completely
confused
about
you
know.
When
is
the
process
followed
to
go
through
the
tc?
Is
there
an
official
issue
that
is
filed?
You
know,
at
least
it
should.
C
B
Other
contributions,
but
I
suspect
that
this
will
be
a
much
faster
okay
case
right.
C
Mean
that's
not
the
issue,
it's
more
that
you
know.
It's
just
visibility
in
terms
of
you
know
is
that
landing
with
the
dc
is
the
dc
reviewing.
A
A
C
B
C
That's
awesome,
nice.
I
just
had
one,
you
know
quick
update
and
I
forgot
to
add
it
to
the
agenda.
C
I
can
add
right
now,
but
again
just
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
on
the
tracing
ga
progress
for
the
collector,
and
we
have
about
four
issues
left
you
know
to
which
are
in
progress
right
now
and
we
were
you
know,
hoping
to
do
and
a
final
release
end
of
this
month,
but
I
think
that,
given
bogdan
and
tigran
are
both
out-
and
this
is
where
you
know
we
have
this
maintainer,
you
know
dilemma
where
we
kind
of
get
blocked
when
folks
are
out
on.
C
You
know,
regular
vacation
and
stuff
is
that
we
are
delayed.
You
know
by
until
they
get
back
and
can
do
complete
reviews
and
releases,
but
there's
we're
pretty
close.
So
we
will,
you
know
again,
just
that's
the
last
part
in
terms
of
having
the
collector
core.
B
For
for
metrics,
I've
offered
myself
as
a
resource
to
the
metrics
api
and
sdk
groups,
so
I
will
be
oh.
B
I'm
on
all
the
spec
sdk,
the
spec
and
the
sdk
spec
calls.
Oh.