►
From YouTube: 2023-03-02 Governance Committee private meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
D
D
E
By
the
way,
I'm
in
the
same
bucket
as
trash
I,
I,
I
technically
could
get
travel
funny
to
come,
but
the
price
of
flights
and
hotels
and
the
people
I
need
to
get
approval
from
are
sufficiently
high.
That
scares
me
so
I
will
be
joining
the
moment.
B
E
A
E
C
I
I
tried,
I
I
started
floating
it
in
early
January
yeah,
and
it's
been,
you
know,
bouncing
around
between
like
three
to
five
levels.
Above
me
for.
E
A
But
Trask
are
you
coming
next
week
to
to
San,
Francisco
or.
D
A
A
Week,
oh
I
was
talking
about
Amsterdam
that
I.
A
In
yes,
yeah
I'm
going
in
person
but
for
the
I'm
not
coming
because
I
don't
wanna
deal
with
that.
E
Okay,
if
we
don't
have
any
topics.
A
For
for
the
next
week,
I
have
one
thing:
can
we
send
a
calendar,
invite
with
the
location
and
how
to
get
there,
whatever
not
I
mean
navigate
the
building,
probably
whatever
we
need
to
do
there.
B
A
calendar
invite
for
next
week
yeah
with
like
a
zoom
link
or
whatever
or
just
to
put
it
on
a
calendar.
B
A
A
C
E
D
C
Right
before
we
dropped,
if
there's,
if
we're
done
with
that
topic,
I
just
wanted
to,
you
know,
give
a
heads
up
about
the
ECS
discussions
going
on,
that
ECS
is
discussing,
contributing
their
or
elastic,
is
Con,
discussing
contributing
the
elastic
common
schema
to
open
Telemetry
and
we're
considering
aligning
with
Riley
is
working
on
a
doc
right
now
to
kind
of
outline.
You
know,
benefits
they
discussed
it
and
that
I
believe
Ogden
and
Yuri.
C
You
all
discussed
it
briefly
in
the
TC
meeting
yesterday,
and
so
we
probably
will
need
eyes
from
this
group
also
soon,
but
I
will
I
think
once
we
have
kind
of
a
list
of
why
we
think
a
good
doc
on
why
we
think
that
we
should
consider
this,
then
that
would
be
the
time
I'll
push
out
ping.
You
up.
F
Yeah-
and
it
seems
like
a
good
thing
to
discuss
at
the
summit
next
week,
but
we're
only
going
to
have
tigrin
on
Tuesday,
I,
believe
and
I
know
he
wanted
to
be
part
of
that
discussion.
F
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
it's
could
we
just
maybe
pencil
that
in
for
the
the
two
things
where
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
t
grin
would
be
about
project
management
of
the
spec
and
this
this
particular
item.
So
it
would
be
great
if,
if
we're
going
to
talk
about
those
things,
we
do
it
on
Tuesday.
A
A
F
I
I've
asked
them
for
that
information
on
it.
I'll
I'll
ask
them
again,
but
they
haven't
responded
yet
to
to
when
I
asked
him
yeah,
but.
A
F
We
we
had
a
zoom
call
with
them
and
on
that
call
they
express
willingness,
but
they
emphasized
that
it
was
going
to
take
years
to
put
something
like
that
into
effect.
So
that
was
the
thing
they
wanted
to
caution.
They
were
willing
to.
You
know,
come
to
a
new
version
of
the
spec
that
wasn't
fully
backwards
compatible
with
what
they
had,
but
in
practice
you
know,
ECS
is
out
there,
so
we
would
decide
to
merge,
but
it
was
gonna.
F
It
would
take
a
long
time
for
what's
actually
out
there
in
the
wild
to
converge
on
anything,
but
but
they
did
say
that
they
were
willing
to
to
do
that
kind
of
work,
at
least
of
some
degree
I've.
D
F
F
C
F
D
C
Land,
if
we
aligned
and.
F
D
F
Were
doing
your
the
HTTP
working
groups
like
proposing
improvements
to
the
stuff
that
we
have
right?
That's
kind
of
my
understanding,
like
moving
around
things
like
user
agent
and
stuff,
like
that,
where
we
were
saying
like
actually
there's
some
ways,
some
better
ways
to
organize
this,
that
give
us
benefits
independent
of
whether
a
merger
with
ECS
happens
and
that's
I,
think
the
part
we
should
maybe
sort
out
next
week,
because
that's
that's
kind
of
just
like
about
like
independent
of
ECS.
What
are
our
heart
boundaries
around?
C
We
should
touch
base
Ted
because
I'm
not
sure
I'm,
not
really
clear,
on
that.
There
was
brought
up
in
tigrin,
brought
up
his
concern
in
the
Tuesday
spec
meeting,
but
all
of
the
PRS,
so
I
have
like
several
issues
open
in
the
spec
about
what
it
would
require
to
align
http
attributes
to
ECS,
but
the
our
the
working
group.
Currently,
we
are
only
our
goal-
is
to
make
all
the
changes
that
we
recommend
short
of
ECS,
not
considering
ECS
alignment
at
all.
E
C
Our
goal
is
to
have
all
of
that
work
by
the
our
our
timeline
was
end
of
next
week
for
having
all
of
that
submitted.
D
F
I
may
be
conflating
two
things
here
that
changes
the
working
groups
recommending
and
the
ECS
work.
C
No,
and
that
was
yeah
and
I
I
acknowledged
tigrin
in
the
spec
meeting
on
Tuesday,
that
that
was
my
bad.
There
was
one
PR
that,
or
there
was
one
of
the
issues
that
I
had
like
written
as
a
benefit.
This
is
also
what
ECS
is
doing,
but
that
was
right.
Okay,
only
as
a
bonus
and
I
went
through
and
I
struck
that
out,
yeah
I
think
that
caused
a
lot
of
confusion.
Okay,
yeah.
F
My
my
fault
I'll
go
back
and
re-review
all
of
those
proposals.
F
A
E
Mostly
here
my
wife's
going
to
a
baby
shower
tomorrow
and
wanted
to
do
some
work
stuff
in
Redmond
and
I
just
want
to
see
some
of
your
friends,
but
Steve
was
here
yesterday.
So
it's
nice
to
see
him
and
then
other
people
think
yeah.