►
From YouTube: 2021-12-08 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
jump,
I'm
gonna
click
on
a
link
and
see
if
I
join
the
same
one,
if
not
I'll,
do
it.
A
C
A
D
A
D
A
D
C
D
I'm
pretty
sure
ted
is
on
vacation.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
of
dennis
is
on
vacation
dennis.
D
D
Okay-
well,
I
guess
we're
here,
so
we
can
see
if
there's
any
topics
or
we
can
look
at
like
if
there
was
any
items
from
the
previous
week.
I
do
have
to
jump
off
here
in
about
10
minutes,
because
I
have
to
go
pick
up
my
kid,
but
at
least
we
can
see
if
there's
some
agenda
and
then,
if
we
can,
we
talk
about
that.
Otherwise
we
can
cancel.
D
A
There's
a
couple
of
things
that
I
couldn't
make
this
meeting
there's
a
couple
things
there
I'd
like
to
speak
to
a
little
bit.
The
first
thing
there
is
the
test
harness.
There
was
something
something
about
test
harness
mentioned,
I'd
like
to
see
what
what
kind
of
what
would
that
kind
of
look
like?
Oh
maybe
anarag
knows
because
it
says,
can
help
there
but
be
interested
to
see
what
kind
of
that's
a
kind
of
integration
test
across
lots
of
languages
that
can
verify
the
instrumentations
across
all
the
languages.
A
C
A
B
A
Yeah,
that's
a
decent
idea.
I
like
that
idea.
What
is
it
which
language
is?
I'm
not
exactly
sure
which
languages
are
needing
more
help
on
the
instrumentation
side
is
is
go
one
of
those
languages.
I
know
that
there's
some
instrumentation
there,
but
is
it
like
not
at
a
heaps
advanced
stage
or
anything.
A
The
other
thing
that
I
saw
on
that
agenda
is
regarding
the
security
requirements
for
v1
on
the
semantic
convention.
This
is
something
that
sean
and
I
were
talking
about
to.
A
A
But
I
know
that
dennis
and
ted
may
disagree
with
me
there,
but.
C
I
thought
at
the
last
meeting
they
discussed
that
sort
of
the
same
direction
that
it
is
too
much
for
v1
and
so
like
it
would
be.
A
very
important
thing
after
v1
seem
to
be
the
consensus,
but
otherwise
it's
a
bit
too
fuzzy
right
now
to
be
able
to
implement
for
ev1
yeah.
D
C
Definitely
agree
yeah,
yeah
and
since
people
would
still
have
some
control
on
the
collector,
what
data
gets
sent?
It's
still,
okay,
I
think
that
was
sort
of
the
like
sdks
shouldn't
be
as
concerned
with
this,
as
they
need
to
be
because
at
least
there
is
the
collector
to
do
the
lesson
processing
for
everyone.
A
A
D
C
A
Well,
I
think,
yeah.
I
think
the
responsibility
is
still
just
on
the
application
owner
to
make
sure
that
there
is
no
ugc
pai
going
into
their
observability
systems.
Like
there's
I
mean
that's
always
going
to
be
the
case
anyway
right,
but
there's
just
going
to
be
some
features
in
hotel.
That
will
aid
that
right,
but
I
think
those
features
require
more
thought
than
just
then
we
can
probably
make
capacity
for
in
v1.
D
D
Then
you
know,
maybe
that
you
can
keep
that
in
within
your
logs
and
just
follow
whatever
security
standards
that
you
have
within
your
logs,
but
just
not
for
your
actual
span
event
generation
for
tracing,
and
then
I
guess,
alternatively,
folks
can
you
know,
have
like
some
scrubber
service
or
something
to
you
know,
look
for
it.
I
mean
we're
not
doing
that
right
now,
but
you
can
drop
any
of
that
any
of
those
events
if
it
did
contain
sensitive
information.
D
A
Yeah
I
know
sean
also
has
been
thinking
about
security
and
has
a
kind
of
solution.
An
otep
regarding
attribute
hints,
so
an
application
could
hint
and
attach
a
kind
of
hint
to
the
data
to.
A
I
guess
indicate
what
kind
of
what
kind
of
category
it
falls
in.
Is
it
like
pii,
ugc
or,
and
then
you
know
kind
of
downstream
or
can
handle
that
a
bit,
but
yeah
sean
can
talk
about
it
all
day.
He
says
there
is
no
tech
regarding
that,
but
I
think
yeah.
It
is
something
that
it
is
a
big
topic.
You
know,
so
we
can
probably
not
put
it
in
for
v1.
I
guess
yeah
and-
and
I
think
that's
a
good
thing,
because
then
we
can
just
get
v1
done
earlier.
A
D
But
yeah,
I
think
I'm
gonna
try
to
follow
up
with
dennis
tomorrow
to
figure
out
what
action
items
are
remaining
because
I
don't
know.
I
know
he
was
trying
to
follow
up
with
some
folks
on
the
technical
committee,
and
I
don't
know
where
we
kind
of
stand
on
that.
But
yeah.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
get
that
additional
information
and
then
and
then
we
can
progress
further,
trying
to
get
try
to
get
b1
established
sooner
than
later,.
D
I
have
to
drop,
but
folks
please
continue
on,
but
but
yeah
I'll
follow
up
with
dennis
tomorrow
on
that.
But
please
continue
thanks
folks.
B
A
All
right
now,
one
thing
I
anna,
I
remember
we
talked
about
this
a
week
or
two
ago
regarding
like
stability
in
instrumentation
stability,
depending
on
kind
of
telemetry
stability,.
C
A
C
A
C
A
C
A
Yeah
yeah
all
right
well
seems
like
there's
nothing
else
to
bring
up
unless
you
have
something.