►
From YouTube: 2021-12-08 meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
B
Evil
are
you,
hopefully,
you
have
good
heating
in
your
place
there
in
estonia.
C
Is
a
lot
luckily,
heating
didn't
freeze,
yeah.
C
Yeah,
quite
a
lot
of
calls
saw
quite
a
few
of
the
cars
that
deal
with
those
frozen
pipes
on
the
streets.
Luckily,
none
of
them
stopped
by
my
house.
A
All
right,
it's
it's
five
after
let's
get
started,
so
the
only
thing
that
I
do
have
on
my
agenda
is
just
to
give
everyone
an
update
on
the
the
resource
attributes
discussion.
A
If
you
have
not
been
following
so
I
I
opened.
Let
me
show
my
screen
real,
quick.
A
A
What's
this
guy,
where
it
stands,
that's
kind
of
where
it
stands.
I
in
this
in
this
pr
that
I
just
opened,
I
listed
kind
of
the
requirements
that
I
think
we
have.
A
I
mean
there's
in
summary,
there's
the
ability
to
identify
the
type
of
telemetry
using
using
like
namespace
or
names
of
attributes
that
are
intuitive,
define,
define
common
attributes
like
the
name.
That
would
be
always
always
there
for
any
type
of
telemetry
and
then
also
there's
been
discussion
around
backward
compatibility
with
service
name
because
serve
because
service
name
is
currently
required
field
in
in
the
specs.
A
I
think
in
the
meantime,
this
this
other
pr
now
is
is
getting
stale
the
one
with
the
app
attributes
and
it's
it's
marked
to
be
closed,
I'm
thinking
of
maybe
separating
the
browser
attributes
into
a
different
pr,
because
I
don't
think
those
are
controversial,
so
at
least
that
could
get
merged
and
then
the
app
name
space
goes
with
the
source
name
vote.
B
My
suspicion
is,
there
will
be
a
lot
of
resistance,
but
I
still
think
it's
an
important
thing
to
make
sure
we
discuss,
especially
hopefully
we
can
get
the
like
the
network,
the
network,
folks
and
evpf
folks
to
chime
in
on
this,
because
it
feels
like
that
network
network
hardware
is
also
not
a
service.
So.
A
A
Yeah
so
so
like
it
looks
like
it
likes,
it
does
look
like
it
needs
broader
discussion
and
I
think
it's
probably
gonna
take
take
a
long
time,
probably
to
get
it
to
get
it
through.
A
B
A
B
B
A
I
think
we,
I
think
we
had
some
examples
in
that
plan
document,
but
I
think
we
need
to
have
probably
a
discussion
on
what
those
events
actually
should
be
and
should
look
like.
B
A
Okay,
anything
else
to
shoot,
so
I'm
not
thinking
hey,
so
I
I
I
would
like
I
would.
I
know
that
this,
like
this
discussion
like
on
the
attributes,
has
been
taking
a
long
time
and
I
would
like
to
like
move
a
little
bit
faster
on
other
things.
So
that's
why
I'm
asking.
A
B
A
Okay,
well
yeah,
so
in.
If
and
if
nothing
else,
then,
if
maybe
you
can
just
think
about
like
the
the
next
things,
the
next
things
we
we
should
work
on,
maybe
you
can
come
up
like
with
some
kind
of
plan
like
a
project
plan
or
something
like
that.