►
From YouTube: 2022-05-18 meeting
Description
Open Telemetry Meeting 1's Personal Meeting Room
A
A
B
Okay,
anything
we
want
to
add,
I
mean
probably
which
we
want
to
discuss
upfront,
I'm
just
adding
some
of
the
topics
from
the
last.
A
A
C
B
B
A
Mean
okay
right
now,
I'm
not!
This
is
not
urgent
for
me
right
now
so,
but
I
think,
for
the
long
term
will
be
important
for
I
thankful
for
the
storm
for
the
area
I'm
looking
into
soon.
I
can
follow
up
on
this
threat,
yeah
and
another
issue
to
see
how
we
can
proceed.
B
There
yeah
I
mean
whenever
you
feel
that
it's
probably
something
which
we
need.
I
mean
definitely
probably
it's
good
to
have
a
discussion
with.
Probably
I
think
this
is
something
which
probably
I
also
feel
always
good
to
support
it,
but
probably
it's
important
to
discuss
how
how
should
we
support
here,
yeah
yeah,
it's
max.
It's
matt.
B
And
it's
as
of
now
I
mean.
B
B
I
see
there
are
lots
of
things
which
we
still
have
to
add,
not
a
big
items,
but
there
would
be
some
small
item
here
and
there
which
we
have
to
add,
I'm
going
to
create
the
bit
of
issues
for
them
and
I
added
in
the
beta
release,
but
you
feel
free
if
you
feel
anything
there
is
anything
which
we
are
not
specs
compliant
and
we
feel
free
to
add,
create
an
issue
for
that
and
probably
add
it
in
the
beta
release.
B
So
at
least
I
think
for
the
beta.
I
think
it's
good
to
be
a
feature
complete.
We
should
try
to
ensure
that
there
would
be
there
should
not
be
anything
which
we
are
missing
in
terms
of
any
feature
which
is
there
in
the
specs
and
that
that
should
be
added
like
subscribe.
Yesterday
I
just
saw
the
in-memory
battery.
Exporter
is
something
which
is
not,
which
is
there
in
the
specs,
but
we
are
missing
it.
Exponent.
B
Exponential
histogram
aggregation
is
something
which
we
are
not
supporting
as
of
now
so
there
may
be
some
more
items
like
this.
It's
probably
good
to
really
go
through
the
specs
and
see
the
things
which
we
are
missing.
I
I'll
be
doing
that
anyway,
but
just
in
case
I
mean,
if
you,
if
you
find
out
anything
which
is
missing,
feel
free
to
add
it
in
this.
B
B
Apart
from
that
anything
else,
I
mean
sr
tom
and
you
feel
them
in
something
which
we
are
lagging
in
the
matrix
which
we
should
have
done
as
of
now
I
mean
at
least
for
the
alpha,
probably
something
which
you
can
improve.
B
B
Yeah
there
is,
there
was
a
request
for
the
python
and
I
think
he
also
this
guy
also
opened
a
issue
in
the
in
the
in
the
python,
sick,
repo,
also
and-
and
also
this
has
been
discussed.
B
Okay,
it's
probably
open.
This
has
been
discussed.
I
mean,
if
you
remember,
I
think
tom.
There
was
a
issue
which
was
raised
long
back
yeah
and
they
having
some
discussions
on
this,
but
I
think
still
there
is
no
conclusion
how
we're
going
to
proceed
for
this.
What
exactly
has
to
be
done,
or
whether
it's
it's
purely
as
interest
issue
or
it's
something
which
has
to
be
done
from
the
language
perspective
I
mean
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
probably.
We
need
something.
B
B
How
should
we
do
that?
Because
this?
This
definitely
is
not
specific
to
c
plus
plus,
it
could
be
basically
within
across
any
two
languages.
C,
plus
plus,
definitely
something
which
is
one
of
the
main
languages
which
has
bindings
with
lots
of
other
languages,
but
I
think
it
would.
It
should
be
a
more
of
a
wide
wider
discussion.
B
Yeah,
I
mean
it's
something
something
like
if
I
have
an
instrumentation
library
in
a
given
language.
I
want
to
use
it
through
some
other
language,
so
the
span
is
getting
created
in
the
in
the
span
getting
created
through
that
instrumentation
library,
but
actually
it
should
get
exported
through
the
exporter
which
is
created
through
the
application
application
language,
something
I
think
it's
it's
a
bit.
It's
not
going
to
be
very
straight
forward.
B
It's
not
just
creating
the
binding
between
for
a
given
language
like
if
I
have
to
call
c,
plus,
plus
instrumentation
library
from
python.
It's
not
just
creating
a
binding
for
c
plus
plus
to
be
called
for
from
python,
but
any
span
which
is
created
in
c
plus
plus
that
has
to
be
exported
through
the
exporter
which
is
created
from
by
then
something
I
think
which
would
be,
which
has
to
be
probably
given
more
thought
and
more
discussion
may
be
required
how
what
support
to
what
level.
So
we
need
to
support
it.
B
But
I
think
good
good
to
probably
raise
this
in
the
maintainers
meeting
and
let's,
let's
take
a
wider
opinion.
A
And
it
seems
there's
no
such.
I
think
this
break
doesn't
define
any
such
a
behavior
right
into
language.
B
B
B
So
if
we
are
talking
about
interoperability,
probably
for
c
plus
plus
we
should
have.
We
also
have
to
think
about
the
c
wrapper
on
top
of
c
plus,
plus,
not
sure
yeah,
because
most
of
the
language
they
have
a
abi
compliant
more
stable
bindings
for
with
c,
not
b,
c
space.
B
Yeah,
apart
from
that,
I
think
log
sdk.
I
think
we
are
good
right
now.
If
I
please
correct
me,
I
think,
with
the
pr
which
has
raised
and
in
the
current
rally
that
we
should
be
good
with
this
specs
compliant
for
log
sdk,.
A
B
B
A
A
I
mean
for
windows
currently
generated
alarming.
The
one
number
is
it's
a
generic
one,
let's
say
496
right,
many
warnings
are
under
this
number.
Oh
there's
no
warning
for
this
number
I
mean
no,
I
mean
there's
no
dedicated
warning
for
the
deprecated.
B
Okay,
so
so
how
can
how
can
it
be
done?
I
mean?
How
can
this
be?
I
mean
specifically
this
warning:
how
to
disable.
I
mean
not
to
break
the
build
with
this
morning
in
windows
when
you're
saying
it
is
not
possible.
A
B
B
B
B
Yeah,
I
don't
see
today
anyone
from
no,
I
don't
see
anyone
from
the
app
dynamics
team
joining,
but
I
think
they
have
planned
to
provide.
I
had
a
discussion
with
ajay
and
I
think
he
they
are
interested
to
have
to
include
or
to
integrate
the
existing
apache
instrumentation
in
the
in
the
demo
service.
B
B
B
B
Service
for
this,
so
I
mean,
let's
see,
probably
if
they
are
doing
it.
I
think
we
are
good
that
we
had
wonderful
representation
for
superstitious
in
in
the
demo
application
in
case
there
is
any
change
in
the
plan
from
their
site.
Probably
we
have
to
see
if
you
can,
one
of
us
can
really
create
a
new
service
for
c
plus
plus.
B
B
Good
to
create
it
is
it
possible
to
add
attributes
to
the
instrumentation
scope.
This
was
created
by
ty
tigran,
nothing.
I
already
replied
to
him
that
this
is
not
api
breaking
change,
but
it
will
definitely
have
an
abi
issue
with
the
agent
okay,
so
yeah.
I
think,
probably
he's
creating
this
disc.
He's
asking
this
question
across
all
the
languages
before
deciding
whether
we
should
add
in
attributes
or
not.
B
B
B
C
A
B
So
if
we,
if
we
increase
the
origin,
that
would
be
something
probably
kind
of
kind
of
a
breaking
build,
change
may
be
customers
who
may
be
using
the
older
version,
and
they
won't
be
able
to
use
our
library.
They
won't
be
able
to
build
our
library.
A
B
A
I
remember
I
think
in
the
past
there
was
some
customer
who
was
asking
for,
I
would
say,
make
version
and
I
can't
remember
maybe
in
some
issues.
B
Should
we
just
probably
have
a
look
into
what
what
would
it
be,
what
it
will
take
to
change
the
code
to
remove
these
I
mean,
probably
if
it
is
not
a
bigger
change.
I
think
that
probably
it's
good
to
get
rid
of
these,
I
mean
I'm
just
feeling
bad
that
we
have
to
increment
the
cma
version
just
for
the
test
code,
yeah,
okay,
yeah.
B
So
probably
I
think
it
is
good
to
see
how
I
don't
think
it
should
be
a
bigger
change.
Probably
it's.
B
Nothing,
probably
I'm
not
very
sorry.
I
think
there
is
some
problem
in
the
clarity
at
my
side.
A
A
B
A
C
B
Let
me
see
how
this
is
open
source,
so
I
think
I
can
open
that.
There's
no
problem.
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Add
support
for
exponential.
I
already
created
this
yeah.
I
think
instruments
pass
the
state
to
the
callback.
This
is
also
part
of
beta
and
instrumentation
scope
and
deprecate
instrumentation
library,
that's
something
which
is
still
pending
for
logs,
sorry
for
traces
and
matrix.
We
have
to
add
it.
So
I
think,
let's
keep
this
open.
B
C
Now,
now
that
we
are
here,
I
I
have
cmake
super
built
for
open
telemetry.
B
C
B
B
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
it's
best
for
contenders
if
it
runs
our
host,
you
better
check
whether
the
local.
B
B
B
A
Okay
for
the
version
required
for
the
dependence
hard
coded
here
right.
C
A
B
B
B
Okay,
this
probably
let's
see
we
have
15
minutes.
I
think,
let's
quickly
go
through
rest
of
the
thing
which.
B
B
A
B
Okay,
I
think,
let's
quickly
go
through
this
now
document
for
getting
started,
primitive
grandfather.
I
think
thanks
the
sun.
You've
already
got
so
already.
You've
done
that
and.
B
Aggregation
temporarily
controlled-
I
just
created
this
probably
part
of
the
beta
and
support
receiving
multiple
async
callbacks.
Also,
this
is
in
the
beta
undefined
behavior
sanitizer
defect.
I
don't
really
want
to
see
more
into
that.
No,
we
haven't.
We
are
not
being
using
this
sanitizer
to
test
it.
B
B
This
is
which
we
are
already
doing
it,
and
it's
probably
I'll,
be
raising
most
of
the
changes
which
are
done
by
owen
and
devoji.
They
are
part
of
the
feature,
branch
and
probably
sometimes
I'll-
create
a
pr
from
the
feature
to
the
main
branch,
and
that
probably
will
need
a
thorough
review
and
tom
I'll
be
needing
your
help.
Also,
I
think,
during
that
time,
for
reviewing
it.
Okay,
that
would
be
a
bigger
vr.
I
suspect-
and
I
think
probably
we
can
take
some
time
to
really
review
it.
B
B
Would
be
a
bigger
change
and
would
be
around
around
something
in
thousands,
so
I
think
it
will
take
some
time.
Probably
maybe
it's
still
open
by
the
time
comes
back
from
vacation.
B
Shooting
document
for
vc
package-
I
I
look
into
that-
I
see
tom
has
already
reviewed
it.
Let
me
see
add
the
attribute
and
dimension
to
matrix
or
stream
exporter.
I
just
created
this.
It's
it's
a
small
change.
Probably
I
think
if
somebody
somebody
can
just
look
into
that,
it's
just
that
the
hosting
exporter
was
not
dumping.
The
attributes.
I
just
changed
the
code
to
let
it
dump
the
attributes,
also,
along
with
the
value
value,
is
already
been
dumped.
So
this
attributes
were
not
there.
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
Yeah
yeah:
we
can't
we
can't
really
do
it
without
the
without
adding
anything
else
as
argument,
so
this
this
command
will
definitely
run
correctly.
So
it's
okay
for
that.
As
of
now,
I
think,
probably
what
the
margin
please
go
ahead
and
merge
it.
This
is
this
is
even
really
has
approved
it.
Okay,
go
ahead
and
merge
it.
I
think.
Probably
we
can
look
for
the
cleanup
I
mean
separately.