►
From YouTube: 2022-06-29 meeting
Description
Open Telemetry Meeting 1's Personal Meeting Room
C
C
C
C
D
Yeah
sure
yeah
I
want
to
discuss
about
the
c
plus
plus
currency
service
that
we
are
doing
for
hotel
demo
and
demo
application.
C
D
Last
couple
of
yeah
last
monday
I
didn't
join
the
meeting
though,
but
yeah
I'm
there
on
the
channel.
So
I
posted.
C
C
C
C
D
Come
up
with
the
with
apache
as
a
proxy
somewhere
in
the
front
or
somewhere.
C
Yes,
yeah,
I
mean
that's
what
I
was
even.
I
was
thinking
that
there
are
two
options:
one
is
haven't,
have
c,
plus
plus
grpc
service
or
something
instrumented
with.
D
C
And
you
have
a
separate,
apache
or
nginx
proxy.
D
Yeah
that
can
be
somewhere
in
the
yeah
that
can
be
somewhere
in
the
front.
C
D
C
This
is
yeah,
this
is
it
or
I
mean,
even
if
they
don't
want
that.
We
can
have
this
just
to
demonstrate.
We
can
have
this
apache
nginx
web
proxy
just
front
ending
this
sequence
here
this
grpc
service,
even
that
is
also
possible
if
we
want
to
really
do
that.
C
That
does
not
look
nice
approach,
but
I
think
probably
it's
good
to
convince
them
if
they,
if
they
agree
to
have
an
apartheid
proxy
that
gives
us
you
know,
or
other
I
mean
apart
from
I
mean,
if
that's
not
possible,
then
have
a
c
plus
plus.
D
C
I
mean
it's
something
like
so.
You
have
so,
basically,
I'm
not
sure
how
it
works,
whether
it's
more
cgi
I
mean.
How
can
we
write
a
c
plus
plus
service,
which
gets
invoked
through
apache,
whenever,
through
I
mean
through
apache,
just
like
we
have
php,
we
can
have
a
mod
php
through
which
we
can
invoke
a
php
service
with.
D
C
Awesome
I
have
done
that.
I
have
done
that
in
the
past.
I
know
we
I
mean
for
c
plus
plus
we
may
have
either
it's
more
chi
cgi
or
we
have
to
write
a
separate
c
plus
a
party
module
which
works
which
which
gets
invoked
so
that
see
that
c,
plus
plus
module
itself
would
be
handling
doing
the
application
logic
for
the
currency
service.
C
C
So
yeah
I
mean
both
are
possible.
I
think
it
just
depends
on
how
hard
you
want
to
approach
it.
The
first
first
option
is
a
better
option,
if
that
that
allows
us
to
have
both
c
plus
plus
jrpg
service,
which
we
can
demo
and
also
apache
proxy.
D
Yeah
but
but
we
might
have
to
propose
this
solution
or
or
to
the
community,
and
then
they
might
have
to
accept
it
right
before
we
decide.
C
Yes,
that's
exactly
that's
what
that's
all
I
I
put
this
option
couple
of
times
I
mean,
but
probably
they
were
not
really
really
really
interested
to
work
on
the
proxy
any
proxy.
As
of
now,
they
thought
first,
first,
let's
let's
focus
on
the
actual
services
and
then
we
will
see
what
would
whether
yeah.
D
For
them
for
them,
it's
it's
a
bigger,
bigger
thing
right,
it's
just
it's
not
just
only
the
c
plus
plus
they
have
to
yeah.
D
Like
the
whole
application
has
to
be
up
and
running
and
then
finally,
they
can
think
of
enhancing
it
with
all
those
whatever
we
are
suggesting
so
yeah.
E
D
Sense,
they
are
very
much
primarily
interested
into
happy
and
give
the
service
up
and
running
so
like
the
plane,
c,
plus,
plus
grpc
service,
ready
and.
D
Yeah
exactly
looking
at
the
first
option,
even
if
we
start
with
the
grpc
service.
Now
we
can
add
a
separate
apache.
E
D
Extensible
second
option
is
something
which
which
might
need.
So
if
we
go
with
the
grpc
service
now
and
later
on,
we
decide
okay,
we'll
go
to
the
second
option,
then
that
might
need
lots
of
changes.
C
D
Yeah,
I
I
feel
option
once
seems
to
be
the
like
the
easiest
one
for
for
now
to
start
with,
and
we
can
anyway
have
an
extension
of
apache
nginx
proxy
in
front
of
them
once
one
like
grpc
service
is
ready.
C
I
I
think
so
I
mean
as
long
as
I
mean
this
dev
should
not
have
any
issue.
If
we,
if
the
scope
of
the
I
mean
we
have
to
discuss,
I
mean
at
least
if
we
want
to
front
end
this
apache
proxy
for
all
the
services,
then
probably
we
have
to
discuss,
but
if
we
just
scope
it
for
our
erpg
service,
I
mean
for
our
c
plus
plus
service.
Then
we
should
not
have
any
issue
probably
have
a
single
container,
which
runs
both
of
them,
which
is
should
be
fine
to
them.
C
So
I
mean
I,
I
think
we
should
go
for
the
option,
one
that
that
that
gives
a
better
demonstration
I
mean
one
is
that
gives
a
better
demonstration
for
hotel,
c,
plus
plus,
and
also
I
think
that.
C
D
Yeah
yeah,
because
the
main
main
objective
of
this
overall
demo
application
is
to
demonstrate
each
and
individual
language,
sdk
or
language
agents,
and
how
they
are
performing
in
the
open
telemetry.
How
they're
telling
emitting
the
telemetry
data
so
look
in
that
sense.
Having
a
standalone
c
plus
plus
application,
makes
more
sense
for
the
end
user
right
for
them
to
just.
E
D
C
Yeah
I
agree
on
that
yeah.
So
probably
I
think
the
first
option
makes
sense
and
I
think
probably
we
can.
We
don't
need
to
communicate
much
with
the
with
the
team.
I
think
we
can
start
working
on
the
grpc
service
first
and
then
probably
I
think,
once
we
come
to
the
apache
module,
I
think
we
can
have
more
discussions
at
that
time.
D
Right
right,
yeah
yeah,
so
on
this
I
was
I
was.
I
sent
a
slack
message
on
the
on
the
on
the
channel
that
I'm
I'm
planning
to
use
use
ubuntu
for
this
to
start
with
and
provide.
E
D
E
C
C
Don't
I
think
that
should
be
fine,
unless
until
they
have
decided
to
use
a
consistent
version
of
probably
the
distribution
or
something
they
unless
until
they
have
planned
that,
I
think
it's
going
to
come
in.
D
Yes,
but
the
architecture
document
of
what
I
read
it
seems
like
going
forward.
The
ideal
solution
would
be
have
to
would
be
to
have.
All
of
this
service
should
be
supported
on
multiple
platforms,
including
linux,
windows
and
mac
os.
So.
E
D
C
Yeah
that
should
be
okay.
I
think
I
don't
think
there
should
be
any
issue
in
portability
at
least,
notably,
fitness
is
portable
to
run
it
across
all
the
platforms,
and
if
we
ensure
our
service
also
not
using
any
os
specific
calls,
I
think
we
should
be
good.
C
Yeah,
so
so
there
is
you're
going
to
work
on
this
I
mean
I
think
I
I
saw
that
issue.
I
think
it's
a
time
to
both
of
the
both
of
us.
I
mean
I'm,
I'm
totally
fine.
If
you
want
to
share
something
or
if
you
want
to
start
something
working
as
a
flower
and
then
probably
you
want
me
to
join
or
you
want
to
take
it
forward.
I
mean
totally
up
to
you.
How
do
you
really
want
to.
D
Yeah,
so
I
would
like
to
start
now
like
from
next
next
week.
I
will
be
focusing
fully
on
this
and
once
I
am
in
some
position
to
get
it
reviewed,
maybe
from
that
point
I
need
your
inputs
and
guidance
on.
How
do
we
proceed
like
in
terms.
C
D
C
C
D
C
D
I
we
raised
a
pier
and
I
was
expecting
someone
to
review
like
same
colors,
because
the
other
other
day
he
was
in
a
meeting,
and
it
seems
he
is
busy
in
something
else
so
will
be
anywhere
merging
the
changes.
The
first
pr-
and
there
are
some
couple
of
bugs
we
have,
and
since
this
is
we'll,
be
we'll,
be
working
on
this
and
submitting
those
bulks
and
then
finally,
maybe
the
end
of
july.
We'll
will
kind
of
communicate
that
our
nginx
module
is
ready.
So.
C
Fine
thanks
yeah
mark,
I
think
that's
just
for
your
information.
I
mean
this
devajit.
I
think
their
team,
cisco
and
afghanistan
has
been
working
on
developing
the
apache
and
nginx
instrumentation
or
modules
which
can
be
attached
to
engineers
and
apartheid
web
servers
with
the
hotel
sequence
press
instrumentation.
C
So
that's,
that's!
That's
something
which
devoted
is
actively
involved
along
with
that
he's
also
working
on
hotel,
demo,
c,
plus
plus
service.
So
so
there
is
an
initiative
where
we
will
have
a
hotel
demo
microservice,
which
will
have
all
the
languages
right
so
in
active
development
should
develop
their
service,
and
that
probably
should
be
part
of
that
microservice
and
I
think
c,
plus
plus,
have
will
have
one
of
the
service,
so
they
will
also
be
involved
in
that.
B
C
B
C
Yeah
anything
else,
there
was
it.
I
mean
you
wanted
to
discuss.
D
C
D
Yeah
yeah,
I
would
leave
leave
the
meeting
today
because
I
have
some
urgency
tomorrow.
So,
okay.
A
C
C
Yeah,
I
I
have
been
reviewing
it.
Basically,
I'm
concentrating
more
on
the
on
the
http
operation,
these
two,
these
two
files,
which
operations,
curl
and
client.
A
C
The
client
curl
and
this
operation's
gone
it's
taking
a
bit
of
time
for
me
to
really
comprehend
how
it
has
been
implemented
would
have
been
good.
I
I
just
gave
a
comment.
If
we
can
add,
I
just
put
a
comment:
if
you
can
add
more
comments
in
the
code,
so
really
yeah
make
it
clear
or
if
we
have
to
have
some
kind
of
sequence
of
flow
diagram
to
really
understand
yeah.
That's.
D
C
A
A
We
can
sync
also
think
of
life.
I
think
you
have
more
context
on
this
and
if
you
can
share
more
like
the
design
like
all
this
file,
maybe
I
can
also
review
with
more
detail.
C
C
C
In
the
same
part,
I
mean
the
existing
functionality
and
it's
just
the
async
part
which
probably
in
the
future
flag.
I
think
we
should
be
even
good
and
we
can
test
it
afterwards
and
probably.
A
C
I'm
not
sure
this
studio
was
existing.
I
think
it
is
not
put
by
me
because
this
part
of
the
code
was
not
totally
okay,
but
let
me
see
if
there
is
if
there
is
a
total
which
was
already
existing.
I
think
it's
not
clear
for
him
for
asking
to
change
do
it,
but
if
there
is
any
new
to
do,
I
think
probably
we
can
ask
him
to
create
a
at
least
creative
issue
for
that
for
any
of
those
students
if
they're
existing
okay.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
agree
for
me.
I
think
we
should
take
more
time
to
review,
but
also
keep
in
mind
that
this
is
a
big
pr.
If
we
keep
it
open
and
yeah,
it
needs
to
resolve
conflicts.
I
think
very
often
right
for
each
new
merge,
maybe
like
from
niche
each
new
merch
pr
this.
This
challenge
to
be
maybe
conflict
or
resolve
conflict,
so
maybe
also
annoying.
C
Yes,
exactly
so
I
think
it's
it's
I
mean
the
more
we
keep
this
pr
open.
I
think
it's
more
time.
I
think
movement
has
to
spend
to
resolve
the
conflict
and.
C
D
C
I
think
we
wanted
to
start
like
for
hotel
http
matrix.
We
are
not
doing
anything
till
this
vr
is
merged,
so
I
think
it's
better
to
really
decide
on
this
as
soon
as
possible.
I
think,
hopefully,
this
weekend
yeah.
A
C
Yes,
he
should
be
doing
it.
I
think
he
just
came
from
vacation,
I'm
not
sure
how
how
much
involved
he
is
so
yeah.
I
think
probably
it
would
be
good.
I
think
if
we
can
start
looking
into
this
also,
okay.
A
C
A
Yeah,
I
think
yeah,
if
we're
ready
to
merge
this
as
soon
as
possible,
maybe
review
this
and
the
mergers.
Maybe
if
owen
can
put
some
like
documents,
that
would
be
great
if
he
can't
do
due
to
them.
A
C
C
E
C
B
C
Okay,
yeah
for
matrix
changes.
It's
just
a
thing
here.
C
That
needs
some
changes
in
the
existing
code,
and
I
think
that
will
take
some
time
some
of
my
time
and
I've
already
assigned
it
to
me.
C
No,
there
is
no
pr
for
this.
As
of
now
it's
still
not
to
the
stage
where
I
can
raise
a
pr
or
even
a
draft
pr
I'll.
Let
let
me
see
if
I
can
do
it.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
possible
this
week,
but
probably
next
week.
I
think,
let
me
see
if
we
can.
I
can
do
some
changes
on
this,
and
but
I
think
we
could
definitely
need
this.
C
At
least
this
support
to
be
available
for
multiple
using
callback
callbacks
to
be
supported
before
we
really
think
about
the
really
spending
market,
and
I
think
this
should
be
not
a
bit
complicated.
They
should
be
straightforward.
Aggregation
temperatures,
temporarily,
control
support
for
exponential
histogram,
aggregation
in
memory
matrix
exporter,
mr
min
max
support
and
add
complication
options
for
aggregation.
C
A
C
C
Yes,
let's
see
if
we
can
do
it
before
that,
okay,
I'm
expecting
assange
to
start
working
on
some
of
them.
I
think
once
it
comes
comes
back
on
become
more
active
in
this
I
mean
I
was
just
hoping
hoping,
let's
see
how
it
goes
I'll
check
with
him.
I
think,
and
then
I
think
we
can
take
it.
We
can.
We
can
decide
on
this.
Okay,
so
I
think,
let's,
let's
take
one
one
one
at
a
time.
C
Let's
try
to
see
next
week
end
of
next
week,
where
we
are
on
this
and
then
then
decide
on
the
actual
date.
Don't
want
to
rush
it
right
on
that
without
without
we
have
proper
support
for
all
of
these.
A
Okay,
I
see
yeah
that'll
make
sense.
So
at
the
end
of
the
next
week
next
friday,
that's
july
8,
we
should
see
whether
we
can
do
a
new
release
right.
B
C
It's
a
good
question:
it's
not
part
of
the
milestone.
We
do
have
to
do
a
cleanup,
but
I
think
it's.
The
plan
was
that
which
we
will
do
a
cleanup.
I
think
once
once
we
release
do
I
have
a
release
kind
of
at
least
candidate
for
the
new
implementation.
I
think
then
we'll
plan
to
do
a
cleanup.
C
C
Yes
and
then
probably
we
need,
we
need
to
communicate
it
kind
of
replicate
before
it
is
doing
the
cleanup
or
so
give
some
time
for
for
the
people
to
really
migrate.
The
people
who
have
been
using
the
existing
the
world
implementation-
let's
let
them
migrate
to
new
and
then
do
a
cleanup.
D
D
C
C
So
I
I
mean
really
don't
see
that
we
should
probably
wait
for
a
long
time
to
really
clean
up,
even
if
we
can
communicate
it
and
then
just
take
a
couple
of
weeks
and
then
do
a
cleanup.
That
should
be
totally
fine,
I
mean
but
totally
agree.
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
there
would
be
somebody
I
mean
using
it
on
production.
C
C
C
Yes,
anything
else
on
this
I
mean
okay
at
all.
I
think
we
can
go
to
the
next
point,
update
and
into
instrumentation
library,
by
scope,
spans
yeah.
A
Currently,
I
think
we
just
before
the
our
last
release
altitude.
I
think
we
updated
our
proto
proto
files
right.
By
always,
I
mean
in
that
version
the
protocol
changed
there's
some
kind
of
brick
change
which
introduced
the
scope,
scope,
scopes
fans
when
I'm
doing
to
replace
the
instrumentation
libraries.
A
Yeah
for
the
protofire,
it
tries
to
achieve
some
backward
compatibility
by
keeping
the
old
instrumentation
libraries
that
move
that
to
a
later
movie
that
can
give
it
a
big
value.
I
think
so.
The
problem
for
us
is
that
we,
our
code,
our
top
exporter,
is
still
referencing
the
instrumentation
library
field
in
the
profile.
A
So
with
the
new
proto
product
library,
when
we
set
the
instrument,
instrumentation
live
response,
we
actually
give
it
a
higher
higher
offset
in
the
proto
in
the
binary
protocol,
so
not
the
same,
not
the
same
offset
as
as
a
original
instrumentation
library,
which
means
we
break
our
wired
wired
format
right.
C
E
A
This
is
the
latest
part
it
removed.
C
C
D
C
A
Think
we
should
update
our
safe
place,
fasten
the
utility
portal
to
use
the
scope
expanse
instead
of
the
instrumentation
library
spans
right,
counting
our
code.
I
think
let
me
take
a
look
in
our
otp
recordable
utils.
In
our
code
we
index
just
we
reference.
We
use,
like
I
add,
instrumentation,
like
response
which,
how
to
code
into
the,
let
me
share
the
file
path.
If
you
use
t
to
certify
okay
now,
file
name
is
otp,
underscore
recordable
underscore
utils.
C
C
C
C
A
A
C
Okay,
I
was
expecting
that
as
part
of
this
issue,
we
are
going
to
do
a
clean
up
for
both
for
the
for
instrumentation
library
from
here
and
also
from
the
sdk.
C
C
C
B
C
Yeah
I
mean,
oddly,
we
should
definitely
update
to
the
latest
proto
engine
when
it's
possible,
as
long
as
there
is
no
breaking
changes
coming
in
between
for
in
the
new
proto
version,
and
I
don't
think
those
breaking
changes
are
coming
too
often.
This
is
one
of
the
scenarios
where
one
of
the
breaking
change
is
there.
We
have
to
add
instrumentation
scope,
but
here
to
your
answer,
your
question
yeah.
It
should
always
I
mean
as
soon
as
possible.
We
should
be
always
use
the
latest
proto
version
and
update,
update
that
and.
A
A
Some
some
issue
like
either
just
for
sale
plus
fast,
like
we
like.
Maybe
we
need
to
support
some
older
tcc,
which
probably
there
could
be
some
issue
to
compile
the
new
quarterfinal
right.
Maybe
we
need
to
take
that
into
consideration.
Upgrading
like
we
need
to
have
grpc
as
well.
C
C
Yeah
I
mean
that
that
probably
may
depend
like
if
we
have
to
use
the
prototype
of
the
version
of
protobuf
if
the
new,
if
the
new
profiles
are
using
some
of
the
features
which
are
not
provided
by
by
the
old
protobuf
compiler
and
that
old
photo
of
compiler,
and
we
if
we
have
to
update
a
new
prototype
compiler
that
is
somehow
not
compatible
with
the
old
gcc
versions.
So
all
those
compatibility
issues
which
we
have
to
take
care
sometime,
yeah.
A
A
C
A
Yeah,
I
don't
remember
exactly
for
the
last
update
because
I
think
before
the
last
update,
the
previous
update
was
some
sometime
in
the
last
year
right.
So
we
so
it
took
us
maybe
almost
one
year
to
update
the
photopath
file,
so
I'm
not
sure
which,
which
issue
blocked
that
okay.
C
But
yeah
mark,
I
think,
that's
to
answer
the
question
yeah.
It
should
be
always
latest
I
mean
as
soon
as
we
can
do
it
it's
good.
We
have
not
been
doing
on
this
update
once
the
traces
got
we
had
traces
got
released.
I
think
we
didn't
do
update
very
frequently.
Okay.
The
last
update
was
done,
probably
once
the
traces
was
released
on
the
stable
version
1.0
and
after
that
I
think
we
didn't
do
very
regularly.
It
should
be
done.
Okay,.
C
C
Owen
has
planned
to
take
this
up
further,
but
he
wants
to
take
it
only
once
the
async
changes
are
merged
this
just
he
don't
want
to
have
any
other
conflicts
coming
in.
I
I
don't
think
it
should
be
totally
dependent
on
the
yeah
tom
once
muted,
again,
sorry,
yeah
so
yeah.
I
think
owen
has
plans
to
take
it
further.
C
Okay,
anything
else
we
wanted
to
talk
on
the
agenda.
I
just
just
quickly
looking
on
the
previous
week
agenda,
something
we
are
still
supporting
dll.
I
think
I
don't
think
there
is
any
new
update
on
this
log
sdk
still
we
have
to
do
the
change
and
I
think
this
log
emitter
changes
are
still
pending
and
I
think
probably
owen
has
some
plan
to
do
it.
C
Yes,
yeah
so
grpc
c,
plus
5,
1.4.
6
will
be
the
latest
release.
Supporting
safety
plus
11
and
future
release
will
require
simply
choose
14
or
more
yes.
So
that's
that's.
Probably.
I
think
it's
good
to
discuss
this
and
whether
it's
right
for
us
to
start
supporting
seafood
sporting
or
we
should
the
problem
here
is
that
I
mean
the
otlp
exporter
is
just
one
of
the
component
of
what
c,
plus
plus,
and
I
think
that's
the
only
component
which
would
be
affected
with
this.
C
With
this
change
and
rest
all
the
components,
I
think
they
we
don't
see
any
issue,
then
building
with
c
plus
11,
so
whether
it's
right
for
us
to
not
start
to
start
supporting
c
plus
14,
with
that
it
means
whether
we
should
start
using
new
features
so
c,
plus,
plus
14
and
break
any
builds
with
simplifies
11,
whether
it's
good
to
do
it.
C
B
Well,
the
part
I
don't
know
is
whether
taking
your
most
recent
version
for
a
grpc
actually
forces
us
to
use
c,
plus
14
or
not.
I
I
don't
know
if
c
plus,
plus
14
features
show
up
in
the
in
the
interface
of
grpc.
B
But
maybe
they
will
in
the
long
term,
investors.
C
C
Probably
not
they
will
not
be
using
it,
but
I
think
it's
good
to
check
that
here.
Okay
and
yeah,
and
I
think,
even
if
we
have
to
support
c
clips
as
14,
I
think
we
have
to
take
a
call
whether
it
should
be
only
for
otlp
exporter
or
it
should
be,
even
though,
if
we
upgrade
grpc
whether
we
should
make
a
call
that
we
support,
c
c
plus
plus
14
would
be
required
for
otlp
exporter.
C
For
three
for
gcc
1.3.8
for
gcc,
for
if
somebody
is
building
using
vcc
4.8
compiler,
they
have
to
ensure
that
they
should
use
grpc
1.3.
less
than
3.8
or
less
they
should
be
using
it.
C
C
I
else
we
can
quickly
talk
on
the
issues
which
I
I
see
mark
you
have
raised
a
couple
of
them
text
type
provocateur
requires
to
use
runtime
contexts.
I
think
that's
totally
agree
with
you.
I
mean
not
in
case
we
are
not
using
the
runtime
context
and
scope.
I
think
it's
a
bit
awkward
to
really
create
a
new
context
and
then
sit
span
on
that
and
then
just
for
the
sake
of
calling
this
inject
api.
C
C
C
C
C
C
Okay,
yeah,
so
I
think
as
of
now
I
know
it's
a
bit
weird,
but
I
think
that's
the
solution
we
have
so
you
see
any
performance.
So
what
I
didn't
just
come
with
this
well.
B
I
don't
have
benchmarks
yet
it's
just
that.
Looking
at
what
the
code
does,
I
mean
it's
inserting
a
pointer
in
a
linked
list
with
a
key
which
is
this
active,
current
active
active
span.
I
think
and
then
retrieving
it.
D
B
Name
and
it's
it's
a
bit
silly
to
do
that,
yeah.
C
I
mean,
as
I
mentioned,
I
think
it's
probably
the
this
code
was
written,
I
think
even
before
me
and
tom
joined,
and
I
think
it
was
written
by
some
some
interns.
I
mean
I'm
not
saying
that
it
would
be
bad
just
because
it's
written
by
interns,
but
I
think
probably,
if
sometimes
someone
has
to
really
go
through
that
implementation
once
again,
just
to
see
if
there
is
any
improvement.
C
C
B
Declaration,
but
my
point
is
the
context:
value
can
hold
a
span,
so
it's
it's
dependent
on
on
the
on
tracing
for
that
aspect.
Already.
C
B
One
thing
we
could
do
is
inside
the
inside
the
context
store
it
more
efficiently
when
we
start
spawning,
but
it's
it's
a
minor
thing
anyway,.
C
C
C
How
is
that
going
to
help
how
many
times
you're
saying
just
defeat
the
pan
here
being
relieved?
Probably,
I
think
all
you
are
missing
something
else.
B
Having
storing
your
name
and
a
name
and
anarchy
and
retrieving
your.
C
B
C
C
Otherwise,
I
think
we
didn't
get
time
to
go
through
the
english
thing.
B
C
No,
we
don't,
we
don't
need
to
be
totally
compliant.
I
mean
it
says,
an
api
to
record
a
single
link.
If
we
still
have
a
list
of
links
where
we
can
provide
a
simple
link
that
somehow
compliant
with
the
apm
right
coming
to
text,
we
do
provide
our
api
to
record
a
system
link.
Knob
should
be
provided
as
part
of
a
list.