►
From YouTube: 2022-06-01 meeting
Description
Open Telemetry Meeting 1's Personal Meeting Room
A
A
Hey
hi
there
widget.
Can
you
hear
me.
C
D
B
A
C
A
Yeah
we
started
going
to
office,
it's
more
of
a
hybrid
culture
like
we
are
going
three
days
a
week,
so
started
going,
but
I
mean
I
got
covet
last
week,
so
I
think
I
was
so.
I
think
now
now
I'm
working
from
home
only
for
a
couple
of
weeks,
I'll
work
from
home.
A
A
B
Yeah,
even
if
it
goes,
I
guess
it
won't
be
so
little
as
it
was
earlier.
Maybe
oh.
A
A
A
A
B
Yeah,
so
it
seems
you
have
to
write
a
new
c
plus
plus
service
like
they
exist,
rewrite
the
existing
c
plus
service
in
c
plus,
plus,
that
seems
to
be
the
currency
service
and
the
ticket
is
assigned
to
both.
You
and
me
so
wanted
to
understand
the
scope
of
this
work
or
like,
if
you
have
any
idea
or
what
are
the
timelines
or
how?
What
is
the
procedure
there,
yeah.
C
B
This
was
the
review
and
enhanced
it.
It
will
have
a
reimplement
ticket
somewhere
in
the
next
page.
A
A
Yeah
this,
I
just
wanted
to
understand
your
feedback
on
this,
because
if
we
want
to
host
it
on
apache,
is
it
possible
to
do
a
c
plus
plus
application?
I
mean
that
application
has
to
be
written
as
a
module
right
as
a
passive
audio
right.
B
No,
when
we
talk
about
apache
module,
those
are
like
part
of
apache,
this
c
plus
plus
whenever
so.
This
c,
plus
plus
service
will
be
using
c
plus
plus
sdk,
like
you
need
to
call
spans
and
traces
manually
in
the
c
plus
plus
code.
If
we
write
currency
service.
A
B
This
this
is
irrespective
of
apache,
so
what
I
was
mentioning
to
use
apache,
but
that
has
been
delayed
for
now.
They
were
mostly
in
favor
of
having
the
service
in
c
plus
plus
for
the
time
being
right.
So
this
service
will
be
written
in
this.
What
what
I
understood
is
this
service
has
to
be
written
in
c,
plus,
plus
and.
B
B
A
Yeah,
so
that's
what
I
understand:
we
have
to
basically
write,
so
it
has
to
be
a
grpc
web
server
or
grpc
server
yeah.
This.
D
A
Will
run
as
a
grpc
server
and
it
will
take
the
request
through
grpc
protocol
and
it
will
handle
this.
It
will
create
a
spanning
traces.
Just
like
this.
Probably
we
already
have
an
example,
something
like
this
in.
A
Should
have
gre
something
like
grpc
example:
we
have
a
client
in
server,
so
this
service
should
act
as
a
grpc
server
just
like
this,
and
it
should
accept
all
the
web
requests
the
http
request.
So
this
basically
will
take
the
http
request
and
process
that
and
send
the
response
and
create
the
spam
like
for
every
http
request.
This
creates
a
span
and.
D
A
Now
I
think,
by
default,
this
just
create
the
span,
and
probably
this
service
is
writing
it
almost
on
the
web.
I
don't
know
which
exporter
uses,
probably
o
stream
exporter
it
uses,
but
we
may
want
to
use
the
exporter
which
all
other
services
are
going
to
use.
So
this
this
would
be
using
host
streamer
thing
here.
A
So
I
think
it
would
be
something
some
something
in
this
line:
creating
a
web
grpc
web
service
and
the
discussion
which
was
happening
for
apache
or
engine
express
basically
for
php,
oh
okay,
because
the
php
yeah,
because
there
is
no
way
of
hosting
php.
A
Like
apache,
mysql
and
php,
so
I
think
php
is
well
suited
to
integrate
with
apache.
So
I
think
that
was
a
discussion
going
on
that
if
we
can
use
apache,
instrumentation
and
host
this
php
service
on
using
the
apache
server
so.
B
In
that
case,
the
instrumentation
will
be
purely
on
the
apache.
A
The
application
yeah
the
application
level
instrumentation-
would
be
in
php,
but
apache
would
be
doing
its
own
instrumentation
and
just
to
demonstrate.
D
A
Level
instrumentation
would
be
in
php,
but
I
think
so
so
this.
B
Application
is
something
where
both
will
have
two
level
of
instrumentation,
the
apache
and
the
php,
and
both
will
work.
Yes,.
A
A
No
yeah,
that
was
a
discussion,
so
there
were
two
discussion
happening.
I
mean
I
was.
I
was
talking
about
having
the
a
stand-alone
reverse
proxy
server,
which
we
can
use
in
either
nginx
or
apache
as
a
reverse
proxy
for
all
the
services
which
probably
we
can
decide
afterwards.
A
A
It's
in
contribution
to
your
thread,
which
you
started
so.
A
B
A
A
Will
look
like
this
may
need
some
discussions
with
the
php
team
also
because
they
may
have
to
create
a
service
which
can
get
integrated,
which
can
get
hosted
on
the
apache
php
right
through
what
we
have
here.
Yes,
yes
yeah,
so
probably
that
needs
discussion.
So
I
think
good
to
add
it
here,
they're
here
in
this
in
this
database,
that.
B
C
B
So,
finally,
on
the
c
plus
plus
side,
we
just
have
to
write
that
kind
of
an
c
plus
plus
application.
There,
like.
A
Yes,
plus
side
yeah,
we
just
need
to
write
a
see
that
this
c
plus
percent-
this
should
not
be
a
bit
bigger.
A
bigger
task.
I
mean,
let
me
know,
I
think
it's
a
sign
to
you.
I
mean,
let
me
know,
because
I
think
if
you
have
more
bandwidth
going
there,
I
think
probably
I
can
take
it
over,
but
as
far
as
for
how
you
want
to
take
it
forward.
B
Yeah
yeah,
so
what's
any
any
idea
on
how
the
timelines
are,
are
managed
for
this?
How
the
timelines
are
decided
for
this,
like
I.
A
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
I
don't
know.
Any
timeline
is
because
this
neat
collaboration
with
the
all
these
sick
language
owners
right
and
I
don't
think
it's
it's
something
like
in
probably.
We
need
something
in
couple
of
weeks
so
like
that.
I
think
it
will
take
some
time
and
I
checked
with
kata.
I
think
he
didn't
reply.
A
B
So
yeah,
so
just
to
give
you
an
update,
I
will
be
on
leave
from
next
week
for
two
weeks
I'll
be
I'm
late,
so,
okay
and
depending
on
my
bandwidth,
there
is
one
more
person
in
abdi
who
will
be
just
looking
at
it.
I
will
be
anywhere
guiding
him
and
the
other
person
will
be
working
on
this.
So,
okay.
A
A
A
And
yeah,
apart
from
that,
I
think
probably
I
mean
there
is
a
github
issue
which
is
based
for
the
batch
processing
and
yeah.
This
is
raised
by
oven
and
I
think,
probably
need
to
start
reviewing
it
I'll
be
reviewing
it
and
probably
tom.
Whenever
you
have
time
to
review
this,
please
please
I
will
look
into.
C
D
A
A
A
C
A
C
C
B
D
Okay,
I
think
maybe
yeah
someone
also
be
interested
to
review
this
change
right.
A
D
A
A
Okay,
I
think,
let's
start
from
this
sr,
I
think
he
mentioned
check
some
of
the
release
in
the
release
notes.
I
don't
think
this
is
possible.
You
can
remove
it
tom.
A
A
Supporting
dll,
I
think
this
that
guy
was
still
interested.
A
A
Matrix
progress,
I
mean
we
did,
have
alpha
release
and
need
to
create,
go
through
the
specs
and
create
the
issues
for
missing
features.
Here
I
have
to
try
to
start
working
on
the
release
candidate,
so
I
think
what
I
have
done.
As
of
now
I
mean
just
show
right
now
we
have
project
microphones.
A
I
think
we
have
I
mean
instead
of
having
a
beta,
I
think
it's
better
to
have
a
direct
release
candidate.
I
I
don't
see
having
a
beta
release.
I
think
we
have
in
alpha
release.
I
think
we
have
covered
lots
of
features
set
already.
So
probably
I
think
I
find
it's
good
to
have
a
release
candidate
and
then
probably
we'll
go
for
the
links.
A
I
mean
I,
I
just
felt
that
probably
we
have
done
substantial
work
already
in
the
alpha
release.
There
is
no
point
to
have
another
beta
release.
I
think
should
be
good
if
we
can,
if
I
mean
the
current
current
set
of,
is
current
center
of
issues,
which
you
know,
tasks
which
we
have
in
in
this
already
are
good
enough
for
a
release.
Candidate.
A
So
I
mean
that's
what
I
felt
that
probably
let's
go
for
a
release
candidate
instead
of
having
another
release
and
then
increasing
the
timelines
that
will
get
increase
the
timelines.
D
Yeah
and
then
after
this
mouse
we're
going
to
release
the
release
candidate
published,
but
I
think
that's
right
for
the
I
remember
for
the
log
api.
We
did
some
change
in
the
last
month
which
removed
the
logger
name,
but
we
duplicated
it
and
do
you
think
we,
but
maybe
from
us
we
can
remove
it
or
yes,
we
because
maybe
for
the
next
month,
we
will
release
release
metrics
sdk,
but
I
think
we
maybe
we
don't
want
to
make
that
log
api.
Changing
you
know,
release
you
know,
release
view
or.
B
D
A
Yeah,
I
think,
let's,
let's
create
an
issue
for
that
and
probably
let's
let's
see,
I
think,
based
on
the
available
bandwidth,
which
is
a
good
good
way
of
doing
it.
I
I'll
prefer.
A
D
A
Let
me
check
with
them.
I
didn't
really
check
with
the
current
set
of
questions
if
they
are
okay
with
that,
so
I
think
I'll
check
with
that
and
if
they
are
okay-
and
I
think
one
thing
is
that
they
may
not
have
planned
to
really
upgrade,
which
is
which
is
okay,
and
I
think
we
can
tell
them
that
if
they
are
going
to
upgrade
that
needs
a
code
change.
A
C
A
A
A
Interoperability
with
other
languages,
nothing
done
as
of
now.
This
is
something
has
needs
more
discussion.
We'll
raise
this
on
maintainers
meeting.
I
haven't
attended
the
meeting
from
past
two
weeks,
but
I
think
it's
good
good
to
raise
it
because
that's
some,
so
that's
a
discussion
which
is
not
just
specific
to
sweet
express
but
for
other
languages
also.
A
Log
sdk,
we
have
specs
compliant,
yes,
the
log
name
doing
it.
Even
it's
already
there
so
yeah.
We
will
do
a
cleanup
for
this.
A
Cmake
version,
I
think
we
have.
We
discussed
right
tom,
that
we
are
not
going
to
upgrade
the
cv
version.
Yeah.
A
A
A
A
A
Yeah,
I
think
it
just
creates
this
file
and
creates
and
creates
a
git
tags,
we'll
just
update
this
update
to
check
in
this
file
I'll
see.
Okay,.
D
Okay,
I'll
make
sure
we,
if
I
do
a
next
release,
I'll
run
this
script
and
yeah.
I
think
there's
one
still
one
you
should
like.
We
have
a
variable
called
view.
The
date
right
so
bill
date.
So
that
same
is
not
the
re
bill
date
of
the
library,
because
we
release
in
source
source
package.
So
that
means
that
the
date
is
we
we
publish,
that's,
maybe
more
appropriate
to
call
it
publish
date
or
something
like
that.
C
D
D
A
No,
not
everything
is
coming
from
the
convention.
This
was
this
is
not
coming
from
any
convention.
I
don't
think
so.
It
was
just
added.
A
I'm
not
sure
from
where
it
was
taken,
but
there
is
no
convention.
I
don't
know
there
is.
I
don't
think
there
is
any
convention
to
be
followed.
I
I
probably
I
copied
it
from
somewhere
else,
some
part
and
other
parts
I
added
myself,
okay,
but
no,
no
conventionally.
I
think
that
we
feel
free
to
change
it
based
on
what
is
what
is
correct
for
our
releases.
D
D
Okay,
let's
start
to
populate
these
variables
in
our
next
video.
A
D
D
A
D
A
D
I
mean
the
concern
is
for
the
membrane
this.
Well,
this
variable,
usually
in
you,
stay
alright,
it
means
the
last
release
date,
because
that's
why
this
variable
will
only
be
changed
at
release.
Time
like
for
now,
if
we
have
this
variable
for
now,
it
should
be
like
may
15
or
so
the
builder
date.
Even
we
have
many
changes
after
that
for
our
membranes.
A
D
D
A
A
D
D
D
Yeah,
like
if
the
user
writes
a
lot
about
this
variable
to
to
say
for
not
like
for
troubleshooting
like
which
to
meet
the
current
library,
it
is
writing
the
source
that
okay,
there's
a
commit
hash
variable.
Maybe
that's
the
one
user
should
build
at
the
library,
but
that's
not
correct
if
the
user
is
using
our
development
branch.
A
So
if
they
use,
if
they
use
any
any,
probably
the
bra,
if
they
use
the
main
branch
in
between
the
two
releases,
they
may
not
have
the
correct
comment.
Id.
A
I
don't
think
even
that
would
be
that
should
be
possible
to
do
it
to
to
to
update
this
file
with
every
pr
merge
so
that
at
least
the
commit
hash.
A
D
A
Should
we
change
the
names
to
release
major
version
release
minor
version
release
patch
version,
maybe
maybe
prefix
release
with
everything.
A
A
D
Well,
you
found
the
issue,
I
think,
for
the
next
release
I'll
try
to
populate
these
variables
and
so
so
far
it
was
actually
so
far.
It
looks
fine
right
because
the
besides
the
version,
the
other
variables,
are
empty
right.
We
actually
don't
don't
put
anything
there,
so
it.
A
A
Yeah,
we
don't
we
don't
change
anything
in
the
ocean
yeah
other
than
that.
I
think.
That's
all.
If
you'll
be
updating
that
yeah.
Okay,
I
think
the
third
one
enable
arm64
build
in
ci.
I
think
tom.
D
D
D
A
A
A
A
C
D
A
A
Okay,
next
one
I'll
creating
attribute
value
from,
I
need
to
see
that
what
exactly
it
is.
A
A
C
A
C
It's
I
have
to
see
this
global
log.
Headlight
is
not
unique.
I
think
there
are
multiple
copies
of
this.
Yes,
yes,.
A
A
A
Tracer
sdk
a
secure
connection,
configuration
options.
We
don't
support
as
of
now,
because
we
don't
have
a
support
of
client
authentication
in
our
in
our
in
our
existing
current
library.
I
mean
we
don't
support
that
client
authentication,
so
we
don't
support
all
these
parameters,
so,
okay,
yeah,
so
for
second
and
third
client
key
and
client
certificate.
We
don't
these
two.
We
don't
support,
because
client
authentication
is
not
supported
and
for
rest
for
rest
of
them.
We
should
support
it
for
http.
Also,
here
should
the
studio
export
under
the
same
variables.
Yes,
okay,.
A
Change
it
and
what
does
it
mean
that
we
have
to
find
out
a
way
of
using
a
appropriate
instead
of
the
g
test?
A
Add
test
we
have
to
use
some
other
constructor,
probably
you
think
yeah.
Let's,
let's
see
that
here.
Assan
has
already
mentioned
that
if
you
can
take
it
from
schemic
module
this
one,
if
you
can
just
take
it
and
use
it,
otherwise
we
will
have
to
find
out
something
else.
Let's
see
that
for
me,
yeah,
okay,.
C
A
A
A
D
D
I
think
so
yeah
why?
Okay,
the
async
are
also
attached
to.
A
A
D
A
C
A
A
D
If
we
add
it,
it
don't
create
a
new,
because
in
the
new
directory,
seems
called
also
called
open,
telemetry
right.
So
without
the
slash
it
creates
another
open,
telemetry
inside
of
international.
A
Yes,
that's
what
it
is
yeah,
that's
what
it
was
doing.
I
mean
I
actually
I
did
it.
I
tested
it
just
to
confirm
so
when
we
remove
it
without
without
this,
it
creates
another
open,
telemetry
directory
within
open
telemetry,
and
there
it
copies
this
sdk
code.
But
if
we
add
this,
then
it
will
copy
it
to
at
the
right
location.
A
D
You
tested
it
yeah.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
it's
it's
just
a
small
thing,
however,
just
modify
it
a
bit
so
so
that
log
exporter
and
span
it
can
they
can
reuse
the
same
print
function.
So
the
log
exporter
metric
and
the
spam
exporter,
they
can
use
the
same
print
functions
to
print
the
attributes.
So
I
think
it's
this
just
a
bit
of
reorganization
in
the
new
york
code,
but
it's
a
small
change
on
the
other
ones.
A
I
don't
know
this
is
okay.
This
is
not
of
see
that.