►
From YouTube: CPC Meeting 08-25-2020
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
B
I
want
to
welcome
martian
and
and
darcy
as
regular
members.
I
merged
their
prs
before
the
meeting
and
yay.
C
I
see
martin
is
on,
but.
D
E
D
B
E
A
Welcome
mary
to
the
party
and
mary
and
joe
have
been
doing
some
awesome
stuff
on
the
on
the
survey
which
I
think
is
have
we
wrapped
the
survey
or
is
the
survey.
B
No,
the
survey
is
wrapped.
I
think
we
got
just
about
2500,
maybe
24
or
something
and
the
mary
tweeted
out
the
the
raw
results.
But
I
think
that
rachel
is
gonna.
Work
with
some
folks
on
the
foundation.
Side
to
you
know,
glean
any
insights
from
them
and
put
it
into
a
nice
little
format
so
that
the
data
is
easy
to
kind
of
digest
and
and
then
we
can
promote
the
results
even
more
and
of
course,
you
know,
push
that
back
up
to
otsc.
A
A
Crazy
busy
week-
and
I
think
that's
it-
for
a
foundation
meetings
this
week.
B
D
C
Bad,
I
was
typing
something
and
it's
clicky.
Sorry,
no
words.
B
G
G
A
And
I
just
want
to
say
thanks
so
much
to
dylan
and
james
and
sarah
and
toby,
and
also
michael
too,
for
for
running.
That
was
a
really
tight
election.
It
was
fun
to
and
to
see
so
many
awesome
people
participate.
So
thank
you.
Yeah.
A
All
right,
I
think,
that's
quite
a
few
announcements
I
think
we're
we're.
We
can
probably
dip
into
our
regular
agenda
now.
B
Yep
just
a
reminder,
though,
for
folks
drop,
your
name
into
the
notes.
A
Okay,
so
we'll
start
with
issue
617,
which
is
also
my
area
code,
which
is
to
fastify
charter
review.
A
This
is,
has
been
open
for
14
days,
so
that's
hit
the
kind
of
length
requirement
there.
There
have
been
a
handful
of
suggestions
and
comments,
but
lots
of
plus
ones
and
looks
good,
looks
good
to
me
anything
else.
We
need
to
say
or
do
to
address
this.
H
E
G
A
Awesome
so
I
think
then
the
action
is
we
can
remove
the
cpc
agenda,
tag
and
close
the
issue
and
then,
as
michael
pointed
out,
issue
626,
which
is
the
pull
request
that
would
add.
Fastify
to
the
appropriate
stage
is
open,
we're
seeking
everyone's
plus
ones
on
that.
That's
sort
of
the
last
sort
of
symbolic
thing
that
we
need
to
do
to
move
them
off
to
graduate
them
and
send
them
their
diploma
down.
B
A
Awesome
so
we
will
be:
we've
been
working
on
a
blog
post
about
that
as
well,
and
so
that
should
come
out
this
week
and
thanks
very
much
to
matteo
and
rachel
and
everyone
who
has
helped
bring
bring
this
to
close.
Congratulations
all
right.
Moving
on,
I
would
have
got
your
cake.
H
We
do
I
have
a
meta
issue
on
on
what
we
are
effectively
doing
with
with
the
graduation
process
at
the
moment,
which
is
like
modeling
a
full
review,
except
we're
doing
it
via
an
issue
and
clumsily.
H
J
I'm
I'm
pretty
against
that.
I
think
having
that,
in
the
actual
context
of
the
the
repo
is
pretty
important
there,
largely
because
it
actually
helps
give
guidance
to
the
project
rather
than
saying.
Oh
yeah
go
to
this
repo
in
this
org
and
have
to
like
look
at
something
about
our
project
somewhere
else.
That's
not
our
project.
It
makes
it
makes
very
little
sense
to
me
to
have
that
outside
and
I
agree
it's
super
clunky
to
do
it
in
an
issue.
So
maybe
there's
a
different
way.
B
J
B
Can
that
even
be
the
pr
that
moves
them
into
the
the
read
me
also,
you
know
the
link,
maybe
there's
a
link
in
that.
I
don't
know
something
simple,
I
think,
would
make
sense.
A
May
I
request
that
we
open
an
issue
on
this
on
the
mechanics
of
this
specifically,
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
fair
point
that
it's
it's
clunky,
but
there
there
were
are
reasons
why
we
did
it
the
way
we
did-
and
I
think
that's
worth
talking
about-
but
possibly
not
on
this
issue.
H
Did
you
mean
that
the
link
to
the
rebel
repo
would
be
a
comet
specific
link,
because
I'm
entirely
behind
that.
J
I
I
don't
don't
totally
understand
what
you
mean.
I
am
more
meant
like
have
a
file
that
has
links
to
the
specific
charters
or
whatever
it
is
governance
files
that
then
can
be
approved,
but.
H
A
All
right
issue,
number
616
nominations
open,
is
not
true
anymore,
because
nominations
are
closed
and
we
have
elected
michael.
So
we
can
close
this
issue
and
share
the
news
with
with
folks
in
a
blog
post
on
our
open
jsf
blog
so,
and
I
think
overall,
the
process
was
pretty
smooth.
I
was
really
the
voter
turnout
was
extremely
high.
K
A
H
Two
questions
on
that
are
you
gonna
actually
share
the
actual
results
and
the
second
one.
The
end
of
the
voting
was
not
sufficiently
specific.
That
should
be
in
in
later
times
be
a
time
in
a
given
time
zone
because,
on
a
friday
kind
of
means
all
sorts
of
stuff.
A
Okay,
fair
point:
we,
it
was
something
we
discussed
verbally,
but
probably
needs
to
be
more
specific,
fair
enough.
All
right.
A
G
H
I
meant
effectively
what
opelvote
has
told
at
least
jewelry,
and
I
don't
know
who
else
was
running
it,
but
they
can
see.
Oppo
vote
does
a
pretty
good
set
of
results,
there's
just
poor
statistics
and
doesn't
say
who
voted
what.
But
it
does
say
who
got
how
many
votes
and
how
they
ended
up,
ranking.
A
Yeah
just
to
be
super
clear,
the
tool
doesn't
record
or
surface
for
me
like
who
voted
what
way
or
anything
like
that.
Just
a
total
number
of
voters-
and
you
know
the
different
since
we
use
the
single
transferable
vote
method,
how
the
each
round
goes
to
results,
and
so
it
does
give
you
a
report.
We
could
share
that
report.
If
that
were
I
mean
my
one
concern
about
that
as
a
pattern
is
that
it
might
be
there's
you
know,
discouraging
of
other
people
who
might
be
interested
in
running.
A
G
G
A
Cool
issue
number
607
is
next
steps
for
the
supporter
program,
which
is
I'm
not
gonna
lie
my
favorite
issue
right
now,.
M
Sarah
would
you
like
to
share
yeah
yeah,
so
I
put
in
a
pull
request
with
some
of
the
details
from
our
last
meeting.
A
lot
got
fleshed
out
in
that
meeting,
which
is
exciting,
got
some
good
feedback
already
about
from
chris
borchers.
Thank
you.
M
I
don't
think
you
can
make
this
call
the
I
think
interested
to
hear
feedback,
but
I
think
a
good
next
step
here
would
be
to
have
a
meeting
to
put
together
and
we
can
either
do
this
async
or
in
a
meeting
I
think,
putting
together
a
spec
of
what
we
would
need
in
order
to
launch.
This
is
possibly
a
good
next
step,
because
then
we
can
start
breaking
down
the
work.
M
I
think
that's
the
biggest
thing
I
see
in
front
of
me
there's
also
some
things
that
we
need
to
discuss.
Chris
brought
up
the
auto
renewal
question,
apparently
the
jquery
foundation,
when
they
would
do
the
auto
renew
there'd,
be
a
lot
of
people
reaching
out
and
saying.
Why
is
this
happening?
I
didn't
know
this
was
a
subscription
or
like
people
whose
cards
got
cancelled
or
had
a
new
card,
and
so
it
didn't
work
and
we
had
to
reach
out
to
them.
M
So
I
think
that's
a
discussion
worth
having
would
be
interesting.
Yeah,
so
I'll
send
out
a
an
email
to
the
cpc
list
and
share
another
doodle
to
get
together
and
talk.
Spec.
Does
that
make
sense
as
a
next
step
or
does
anyone
have
any
thoughts.
N
A
A
All
right
moving
on
down,
I
guess
5.99.
We
should
try
an
earlier
cpc
meeting
time.
We
did
try
an
earlier.
F
Cpc
meeting
timeline,
I
had
a
dentist
appointment,
so
I
missed
it
though,
so.
B
Well,
it
was
about
as
good
as
a
dentist
appointment.
No
I'm
just
kidding.
B
It
was
great
and
we
had
good
turnout
and
I
commented
on
the
issue
about
doing
this
week's
meeting
in
an
earlier
time,
but
the
weeks
go
by
so
fast
and
I
didn't
feel
like
we
really
had
time
to
say
yes
or
no
or
even
let
people
know
so
we
just
kind
of
went
ahead
with
this
meeting
time
today,
but
the
question
remains:
should
we
do
it
in
two
weeks
and
alternate
with
the
with
the
later
time
slot
that
we
currently
have
in
place,
which
seems
to
make
sense
to
me?
B
I
know
it
may
make
some
west
coast
folks
not
be
able
to
attend,
but
if
we
want
to
try
this,
I
think
it's
it's
a
good
thing
to
try.
B
C
O
Coming
cam,
can
we
push
that
another
week
like,
for
example,
take
three
weeks
and
then
extensively
market
this
and
then
send
twitter,
send
tweets,
or
things
like
that,
so
we
can
announce,
give
some
time
for
them
to
join
there.
B
Yeah,
the
the
reasoning
for
doing
it
in
two
weeks
is
because,
right
now
we
alternate
between
1600
and
1800
and
at
1800
we're
alternating
with
the
standards
meeting
and
so
the
thinking
is.
We
leave
our
1800
alternating
meeting
with
the
standards
meeting
as
is
and
then
the
earlier
meeting
at
1600.
We
move
that
forward,
which
would
be
today
and
then
you
know
in
two
weeks
from
now
we
would
start
the
earlier
meeting.
B
So
that's
the
reasoning
for
the
the
thinking
of
two
weeks,
so
we
don't
disrupt
the
other
scheduling
we
have
in
place.
Okay,
thanks
thanks
for
the
explanation.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
question.
How
many
instances
of
this
earlier
time
should
we
plan
to
do
two?
Three.
Four.
It's
a
good
question
I
mean.
Maybe
we
can
engage
that
as
we
go,
but
thanks
michael
take
care
bye.
B
How
about
we
do
yeah,
let's
do
two
and
and
evaluate
at
that
point,
but
but
if
I
could
ask
folks
to
help
promote
the
the
movements
and
we
can
see
how
many
more
people
we
are
able
to
stir
up.
H
A
So
the
action
here
is
to
promote
the
earlier
time
that
will
commence
on
september.
The
8th
is
that
right.
A
No,
I
don't
think
it
was
well,
it
was,
but
it
was
added.
It
was
a
kind
of
a
late
change
but
joe-
and
I
are
now
both
able
to
update
the
the
calendar
so
we'll
do
that
and
immediately
post
this
meeting
so
that
those
next
at
least
alternating
two
are
reflected
at
the
newer
time.
So
that's
a
good
action
too.
K
A
K
Yeah,
I
have
an
action
item
on
this
that
I'm,
I
was
actually
fixing
right
before
this
call
so
I'll,
be
able
to
ship
that
and
organize
a
meeting
for
this.
A
So
what
is
the
what's
the
status,
I
guess
to
be
more
clear.
K
H
H
A
P
A
P
We
we
did
talk
about
this
on
the
board
and
you
know
at
this
point
I
haven't
heard
any
major
objections
or
concerns
with
this
other
than
really
just
questions
on
what
does
this
mean
for
people
who
signed
the
jsf
cla,
which
I
think
we
have
a
fairly
well
developed
answer
for
so
I
think
other
than
that.
We're
probably
ready
to
move
this
one
forward.
D
J
A
All
right,
doc,
547
next
issue,
governance
changes
for
collaboration
network.
This
is
one
that
michael
dawson
was
driving.
Does
anybody
else
happen
to
have
updates
on
this?
One.
B
A
Back
to
it
in
a
second
okay,
just
yeah,
we'll
we'll
skip
ahead,
and
if
there
is
an
update,
he
can
provide
a
syncfin,
great,
so
skipping
down,
then
to
514,
which
is
the
an
ad
foundation
wide
copyright
guidance.
That
is
also
brian
and
toby.
K
So
I
think
we
made
good
progress
on
this
and
ended
up
at
a
point
where
we
needed
to
have
more
concrete
guidance
for
actually
implementing
and
then
using
either
the
cla
or
either
acla
or
the
dco
on
sort
of
like
a
day-to-day
basis.
K
Merge
the
current
document
and
then
work
on
those
additional
documents
separately.
I
don't
know
like
ryan-
and
I
didn't
have
time
to
sync
on
this-
I
don't
know
brian
what
your
thoughts
are
here.
K
P
Is
sounds
right
to
me.
Give
me
one
second
to
just
take
a
quick.
K
You
and
I
can
sink
like
off
this
goal,
to
make
sure
that,
like
we're
an
agreement
here
and
then,
if,
if
people
are
happy
with
the
outcome,
have
folks
plus
one
it
and
then
just
merge,
it
sounds.
A
All
right,
so
the
action
is
that
we're
requesting
cpc,
reps
plus
one
toby's
pr
and
then
we
can
revise
and
add
from
there.
G
K
E
A
And
let's
go
on
hop
on
down
to
responsible
security,
disclosures
number
326
and
corresponding
pull
request.
Number
602
marcin
is
here
yeah.
B
I
can
actually
speak
to
that,
so
there
has
been
very
little
progress
on
that
one
in
the
last
few
weeks,
mainly
because
of
my
vacation,
but
I
think
the
last
bit
that's
outstanding
here
is
transferring
the
requirements
that
have
been
agreed
upon
to
basically
all
the
different
policies
that
we
have.
B
Here's
a
I'll
I'll
take
a
sweep
through
all
the
cpc
documents
later
this
week
and
walkman.pr,
and
I
think
that
should
be
everything
that
we
agreed
on
is
required
to
move
this
proposal
to
stage
three.
A
Wonderful
and
thanks
for
all
your
work
on
this,
really
really
appreciate
that.
M
B
Liaison
idea
is
great
too,
so
I
don't
know
if
you're
aware
martin,
but
we
have
the
standards
meeting
every
other
tuesday
alternating,
but
it
happens
today
at
2
p.m,
eastern
time
so
an
hour
and
20
minutes
from
now.
So
I
think
I
think
miles
was
suggesting
that
that
is
where
we've
established
some
liaisons
with
with
other
organizations.
D
B
To
give
everybody
maybe
a
little
bit
of
context,
I'm
also
involved
in
the
very
new
open
source
security
foundation,
which
is
also
a
self-foundation
of
the
linux
foundation.
So
I
had
an
idea
to
like
build
a
bridge
between
those
two
bodies,
but
the
openness
is
a
fairly
new
thing,
so
I
I
think
I'd
like
some
more
time
to
explore
that
with
them
first
and
and
then
I'll
be
super
happy
to
join
the
standards
working
group
to
some
when
I
have
like
a
firmer
idea
of
how
that
might
look
like
sounds
great.
B
Excellent,
so
we're
good
on
that
issue.
I
don't
know
if
that's
you
typing
jory.
I
felt
compelled
to
the
talk
here.
Yes,
it
was.
F
B
P
Oh
just
saying
618
looks
good.
This
is
the
changes
to
the
ip
policy
there's
one
spelling
net,
but
other
than
that
looks
good
to
me.
C
A
Yeah
great
did
michael,
provide
any
quick
update
on
547.
A
All
right
just
no
update
this
week
that
reaches
the
end
of
our
regularly
scheduled
agenda
list
of
items.
Is
there
any
other
business?
B
No
yeah
do
we
do
we
want
to
talk
about
any
other
open
things
that
we
have
happening?
Like
the
I
mean,
I
guess,
there's
a
doodle
coming
for
the
review
stuff
project
review,
I'm
just.
A
P
Yeah,
I
did
actually
so
I'd
asked
legal
about
this
and
they
said
that
it's
it's
something
which
can
be
clarified
in
an
faq,
but
they
had
suggested
to
not
make
any
surgery
changes
like
this
to
the
document,
because
it
then
gets
us.
You
know
in
the
realm
where
people's
legal
departments
would
need
to
go
through
and
review
how
this
changes
things.
P
K
A
A
I
should
have
shared
at
the
beginning,
I'll
pop
it
in
the
slack
jackson
pollock.org.
If
you
need
to
like
doodle
in
a
meeting
or
something
this
website
is
just
it
where's
where's
the
chat.
You
all
need
this.
You
need
this
in
your
lives.
I
promise
just
super
addictive.
If
you
want
to
make
your
own
splatter
paintings,
it's
a
progressive
web
app
and
it's
just
way
too
much
fun.
So
that's
the
thing
I'll
share
today.
D
F
H
A
Then
you
will
really
like
this.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
stop
our
live
stream,
because
this
is
not
interesting.