►
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
A
B
Is
Robin
hi,
just
kind
of
the
same
message
from
last
week
on
open
joyous
world
that
we
are
still
looking
to
make
a
go/no-go
decision
in
early
May,
so
don't
buy
plane
tickets,
but
content
is
on
track,
so
if
it
does
become
a
virtual
event
which
is
likely
we're
on
track
for
content,
though
our
speakers
are
being
notified
for
some
of
the
CFP
submissions,
our
keynote
invitations
are
pretty
much
on
track.
So
please
just
watch
for
updates
on
the
event
page
as
well
on
the
on
the
kovin
19.
A
So
you
know
we're
we're
making
plans
on
that
side
of
things
to
see
how
much
we
can
do
virtually
and
try
to
put
together
a
collaborator
summits
so
fashion,
which
is
I,
don't
think
ever
been
done
before.
In
fact,
I
think
we
usually
even
have
trouble
just
roping
folks
in
virtually
in
the
in-person
sessions,
but
I
feel
pretty
confident
that
we'll
figure
out
some
so.
B
C
Right
this
challenge,
I,
think,
is
gonna,
be
around
time
zones.
We're
we've
been
discussing
like
next
next
ten
years
of
node
in
the
on
the
node,
TSC
and
collaborator
side,
and
that
seems
to
be
like
for
digital
conference,
where
you
can
do
some
recordings.
You
might
get
around
that
for
a
collaborator
summit.
The
biggest
challenge
I
think
just
to
get
people.
Thinking
is
how
do
you
cover
the
time
zones,
because
usually
one
of
the
benefits
you
get
from
people
being
in
person?
Is
that
at
least
we're
all
in
the
same
time
zone.
B
If
we
do
a
virtual
event
for
open
J's
world
we're
going
to
stay
with
the
Austin
time
zone,
so
that's
definitely
something
a
good
thing
to
consider
as
well.
I
think,
just
the
cultural
aspect
of
trying
to
replicate
that
you
know
hallway
track
is
important.
Too.
Jori
has
organized
a
hollow
deck
meetup
on
Fridays,
we
had
our
first
one,
this
last
Friday,
which
was
cool
just
with
no
agenda
just
getting
to
know
each
other
better,
just
playing
around
with
this
platform.
D
A
D
There
is,
there
is,
if
you
have
ever
wanted
to
say,
hello
or
get
to
know
the
wonderful
node
TSC.
We
are
doing
an
AMA
for
our
social
media
channels
tomorrow,
where
you
can
dial
in
on
YouTube
and
ask
the
know:
TSE
reps
anything
questions
now
or
later,
via
Twitter
or
via
our
Google
forum,
which
I'm
sure
we
will
tweet
out
later.
But
these
are
super
fun
and
really
looking
forward
to
hanging
with
our
node
TSC
reps.
Tomorrow,.
A
D
Beth
Beth
is
one
I,
know,
I,
think
Matteo.
You
Michael
obviously.
A
Great
excellent
cool
I
think
that
that
covers
everything.
I'll
just
give
a
quick
shout
out
as
well
that
Tiffany
is
sitting
in
today,
she's
from
tectonic
ax
and
she
and
Robyn
have
been
talking
about
things
as
well
as
I
think
miles
and
some
other
folks
figuring
out
ways
to
work
together.
Oh
no,
do
you
want
to
just
take
a
quick
minute
and
the
traditional
different.
F
Hi
everyone,
my
name-
is
Sydney
Kwok
and
I'm,
the
partnerships
manager
at
text
hanukkah,
and
we
are
a
nonprofit
organization-
that
partners
with
tech
companies
to
provide
six
months
of
free
software,
engineering,
training,
living
childcare,
stipends
and
laptops
job
placements
to
woman
and
non-binary
adults
with
low
incomes.
Specifically
in
the
Bay
Area.
We
have
an
open-source
curriculum
and
we
teach
in
full
sack
JavaScript
so
about
it,
be
cool
to
chime
in
and
seeing
ways
that
we
can
collaborate.
F
A
C
Board
was
last
Friday:
I,
don't
have
anything
specific
to
bring
back
I
do
know.
We
have
one
board
vote
which
we,
which
was
done
through
email,
I,
haven't
seen
it
close,
but
I
think
I've
seen
quite
a
few
votes,
so
we
should
be
able
to
close
that
one
and
then
land
the
the
updates
to
the
onboarding
list
and
that
kind
of
stuff.
A
A
So
if
we
jump
into
the
agenda,
then
the
first
issue
is
from
the
summit
repo
around
the
treble
fund
questions,
and
we
looked
at
this
last
week,
Debbie
who's
on
the
call
of
put
together
the
PR,
and
once
we
got
kind
of
some
of
the
stuff
cleaned
up
that
the
linter
introduced.
You
know
it's
a
it's
a
pretty
easy
PR
to
digest
we've.
If
anybody
wants
to
double
back
on
it
or
first
look
and
just
make
sure
it
looks
good,
we'll
merge
it
pretty
soon.
A
That
is
pull
request
492
in
the
cross
project,
Council,
which
I
can
drop
a
link
to
in
the
chat.
If
anybody
wants
a
quick
view
into
that
cool
next
on
the
agenda
is
voting
members
chosen
by
regular
members
when
I
was
updating
the
voting
nominees
member
nominees
and
another
issue
that
we'll
touch
on
in
a
minute.
I
noticed
in
our
governance,
this
clause
here
that
up
to
up
to
two
voting
members
may
be
nominated
by
the
regular
members
once
nominated.
These
members
must
be
ratified
by
the
CPC
voting
members
before
becoming
a
voting
member.
A
A
Count
of
non-voting
regular
members-
that
is
a
good
question.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
quickly
take
a
look
regular
members.
It
looks
like
we
have
five
six
seven
I
think
I
counted
that
correctly,
and
it's
important
to
note
too
that
we
currently
have
five
voting
members
from
non-impact
projects
and
that
will
drop
down
to
two.
So
I
assume
that
three
of
those
folks
will
probably
go
over
to
regular
members
and
continued
involvement.
C
G
Like
the
idea
we
are
current,
I
mean
effectively.
What
I
feel
like
is
that,
with
the
number
of
voting
members
we've
had
over
the
past
year,
the
things
have
gone
decently
well,
and
we
are
about
to
lose
three
voting
members.
So,
at
the
same
time,
adding
two
more
via
this
other
method
does
not
sound
like
a
bad
idea.
I
agree.
A
A
H
Yes,
so
this
is
something
I've
been
working
on
for
a
little
bit
here
and
it's
the
output
of
a
desire
to
have
various
groups
to
be
able
to
maintain
their
own
mailing
lists.
It
is
possible
to
do
that
through
groups
io.
However,
it
requires
me
to
promote
you
to
be
a
moderator
and
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
transparency
as
to
who
is
actually
on
the
list,
except
for
the
person
who
is
the
moderator,
the
goal.
H
The
overarching
goal
here
is
to
remove
myself
from
the
critical
path
of
things
which
the
community
should
really
you
know
be
able
to
do
and
manage
by
themselves,
and
mailing
lists
are
a
really
good
example,
whether
it's
a
list
of
maintained
errs
or
whether
it's
the
folks
who
are
on
the
code
of
conduct
panel
for
a
project
or
if
it's
work,
groups
like
the
standards
working
group.
You
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
is
easy
for
you
to
main
to
maintain
without
having
to
go
through
me.
So
what
I
put
together
here?
H
The
other
thing
that
this
does
we
we've
been
discussing
in
general.
You
know
how
do
we?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
the
CPC
can
communicate
with
the
various
project
leaders?
This
also
takes
the
maintainer
lists
and
syncs
them
against
a
meta
list
which
I'm
calling
technical
leadership
right
now,
but
the
idea
would
be
that
if
the
CPC
needs
to
go
out-
and
you
know-
survey
the
maintainer
x'
of
all
the
projects
or
let
people
know
that
there's
you
know
something
coming
up
or
or
something
like
that.
H
We'd
have
a
relatively
easy
way
to
reach
everybody.
That
is
a
moderated
list.
The
goal
is
not
to
create
traffic
on
that.
We
certainly
don't
want
spam
going
across
that,
but
you
know
it
makes
it
easier
for
the
CPC
to
reach
out
to
its
constituency,
which
would
be
the
maintainer
of
the
project
or
one
of
its
constituency.
So
what
we
have
right
here
is,
if
you
go
into
the
issue.
One
of
the
last
comments
that
I
posted
has
a
link
off
to
what
we
currently
have
for
the
CPC
message.
H
Format
did
kick
the
tires
on
this
last
week,
so
thanks
to
Emily
for
volunteering
message
format
for
that
we
also
have
Express
setup,
maintainer
x'
and
the
code
of
conduct
lists
are
set
up
in
here
and
then
the
link
you
can
see
with
the
CPC
directory.
It
would
look
like
Michael
had
just
post
a
comment
a
few
minutes
ago
about
you
know.
Maybe
we
should
not
include
a
link
to
people's
emails,
even
though
it
has
to
be
in
the
mo
file,
obviously
to
add
mailing
list.
I
can
take
that
and
push
the
change
upstream.
H
H
Let's
see
here,
we
go
alright,
so
this
is.
This
is
one
of
the
things
that
comes
out
of
this
is
that
we
are
able
to
create
directories
and
here's
an
example
of
what
the
cross
project
council
list
would
generate.
You
know
as
an
automatic
that
disk
is
generated
at
any
time
that
the
config
file
is
updated.
H
It
automatically
builds
a
list
of
the
current
voting
members
and
in
the
in
the
file
where
all
the
stuff
is
configured,
then
there's
there's
a
way
to
designate
that
somebody
should
appear
on
this
list
as
well
as
their
terms,
and
then
we
get
down
into
the
members.
Each
member
has
their
own
profile,
its
linkable,
for
example.
H
Here's
Joe
Joe
sent
me
his
pictures,
so
we
have
Joe's
picture
as
well
as
his
role
as
CPC
chair
and
his
current
status
as
impact
representative
for
nodejs,
as
well
as
who's
participating
on
behalf
of
email,
we'll
get
rid
of
that
link
to
a
skid
hub
profile,
link
to
his
Twitter
link
to
his
LinkedIn.
Now
all
of
this
stuff
is
optional.
It
is
possible
to
just
have
somebody
have
their
name
on
here
as
well,
but
I
figured
well
we're.
H
You
know,
well
we're
collecting
information
or
well
we're
publishing
information
that
makes
it
easier
to
know
who
the
folks
are
who
are
represented
on
these
committees.
If
we
want
to
add
additional
things
like
github
profiles,
pronouns,
etc,
then
this
is
a
good
place
to
do
it.
So
that's
a
brief
introduction
to
what
this
is.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions?
I.
C
H
J
H
So
yeah,
so
let
me
maybe
explain
what
the
what
the
Union
does
here.
So
the
code
of
conduct
lists
themselves
are
not
combined
right,
so
it's
each
each
list
stays
separate.
It's
just
that.
There's
one
separate
list,
which
is
the
union
of
all
the
which
you
can
reach
everybody
if
you
need
to
so,
for
example,
if
we
have
the
CPC
code
of
conduct
and
now.
H
So,
for
example,
if
we
look
here
express
establish
the
code
of
conduct
team,
it
has
these
five
members
on
it.
If
you
send
an
email
to
Express
Co,
see
it
listed
open,
JSF,
dot,
org,
it
only
goes
to
these
people.
So
it's
it
functions
like
a
typical
mailing
list,
and
if
you,
if
you
were
to
look
at
the
the
total
number
of
lists
that
we
have
on
the
list,
I'd
open,
JSF
total
works
server.
H
It's
gone
up
by
you
know
thirty
to
one
for
each
project,
plus
it'll-
probably
go
up
by
another
thirty
to
one
for
each
code
of
conduct
team
for
each
project.
If
they
decide
to
use
this
in
each
one
of
those
is
by
itself,
but
then
there's
also
this
additional
list
called
technical
leadership
at
list
open,
JSF
org,
and
that
one
is
the
Union.
So.
J
So
my
question
was
thanks
for
explaining
and
I'm
afraid.
I
may
be
a
little
confused
because
I
think
I'm
not
seeing
your
screen
share.
But
my
question
was
more
about
is:
is
simple,
unioning
right,
it's
efficient
for
open,
J's
foundations,
code
of
conduct.
People
may
be
temporarily
ban
someone
from
a
list.
I,
don't
know
enough
about
how
how
code
of
conduct
things
are
handled
to
know
whether
that's
something
they
need
to
be
able
to
do
and
just
raise
it
as
a
potential
concern.
Yeah.
H
There's
yeah,
so
that's
a
good
question
that
that's
more
of
a
mailing
list,
question
like
how
would
we
handle
that?
There's
no
support
built
into
this.
For
that
specific
scenario,
where
you'd
exclude
somebody
from
a
mailing
list-
and
that's
that
comes
back
to
the
mailing
list-
software
that
we're
using
right.
C
H
C
My
experience
like
in
the
node
project
when
we've
been
in
that
situation,
we
we
haven't
used
the
mailing
list.
The
the
challenge
I
see
is
like
you,
don't
want
to
exclude
them
completely
from
the
mailing
list,
necessarily
just
from
the
messages
that
are
related
to
that
particular
code
of
conduct.
Discussion
right,
so
you
know,
I
almost
think
you
need
a
new
mailing
list
or
some
way
you
know
or
just
send
the
you
know
the
some,
the
individual
list
of
emails
that
one
so.
H
I
think
there's,
maybe
two
things
to
consider
here.
One
is
that
if
we,
if
there
was
a
situation
like
that,
we
actually
have
a
mechanism
to
handle
that
and
for
the
individual
projects,
it
would
be
to
escalate
up
to
the
CPC
code
of
conduct
committee.
And
if
the
issue
is
that
there's
an
individual
who's
on
the
CEO
CPC
code
of
conduct
committee,
then
we
have
an
escalation
path
up
to.
C
Not
quite
sure,
that's
I'd
agree
hundred
percent
like
in
terms
of
you
know,
if
we
were
in
that
situation
for
node
the
the
the
TSC
comm
come,
could
choose
to
take
that
report
and
try
and
handle
it
on
their
own.
Before,
like
just
because
it's
reported
against
somebody
on
the
TSE
we
haven't
said
you
have
to
escalate
immediately
to
the
COC
I
think
they
could
optionally.
C
Do
that
and
I
think
the
same
would
be
for
projects
like
they
could
try
and
handle
it
on
their
own,
and
you
know
the
individual
recording
could
escalate
it
if
they
didn't
think
that
was
appropriate,
but
I
don't
think
this
is
making
the
situation
any
worse
than
we
had
before
is
where
I
go.
Is
that
we
probably
you
know,
we
may
not
have
solved
for
do
you
need
in
it
and
the
easy
way
to
spin
up
a
new
mailing
list
easily
versus
just
using
individual
emails
hi,
but
I?
H
Would
also
suggest
to
is
that
one
of
the
advantages
of
doing
it,
this
way
of
having
the
list
memberships
be
open
and
transparent.
Is
that
if
you
did
feel
and
need
to
put
together
a
list
that
you
know
that
didn't
include
one
or
more
members,
you
have
the
information
at
hand
to
know
who
is
receiving
the
email
in
the
first
place
and
what
are
the
emails
of
the
other
people
as
well,
so
I
I
mean
I'm,
not
necessarily
saying
this
would
be
the
way
to
do
this
in
the
general
case,
but
it
does
it.
J
A
It
could
be,
you
know,
worth
exploring
further
in
the
issue
if
people
don't
feel
like
it's
fully
fleshed
out,
but
it's
probably
good
for
us
to
move
on
to
the
next
issue,
but
regardless
thank
you.
Brian
for
putting
this
together,
I
think
it's
it's
valuable.
So,
let's
figure
out
well,
we
need
to
figure
out
yeah
you're.
H
H
C
A
Cool
thanks,
Brian
thanks
everyone
and
again
you
don't
feel
free
to
check
out
the
issue
to
comment
more
and
get
to
the
links
and
everything
alright
right
on
so
moving
on
the
next
item
in
the
agenda
is
issue
488.
This
is
around
nominations
for
the
twenty
twenty
one
voting:
CPC
membership
I
posted
six
days
ago,
the
list
of
CPC
nominations
and
and
members
from
the
impact
level
projects
which
we
have
no
dojo
and
jQuery
so
far.
A
Excuse
me,
sorry
and
then
also
the
nominees
for
non
impact
level,
projects
of
which
we
have
six
here,
and
you
know,
as
I
mentioned
in
the
B
in
the
Charter.
It
says
that
two
members
may
be
elected
from
non
impact
projects.
It
doesn't
say
growth
and
at
large.
So
you
know
when
Toby
nominated
I
thought.
That
was
fair,
please,
you
know
raise
any
concerns
to
me
offline
or
in
the
issue.
A
A
So
just
for
folks
who
are
unable
to
jump,
the
link
for
nodejs,
mateo
and
myself
are
continuing
on,
as
voting
reps
for
dojo
is
a
Dillon
is
continuing
on
Dillon
Shimon,
if
I'm
saying
that
correctly,
jQuery,
Dave,
methane
and
and
Timothy
Wilson
are
going
to
continue
as
well,
and
we
still
need
I
think
a
couple
other
projects
to
clarify
there.
They're
voting
members
and
I
can
work
on
that
offline.
A
But
for
the
non
impact
level
projects
we
have
six
nominees
Toby
Lang
go
from
amp
Anton
Malita
from
web
hint
Nick
O'leary
from
node
red
Chris,
Hillier
from
mocha,
Chris,
Porter's
from
architect
and
Emily
arrow
from
message
format
and
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
Emily
and
Chris
both
have
their
issues.
Open,
I
pinged
a
couple
people
directly
to
make
sure
that
they
get
their
issues
opened
as
well
and
we'll
move
forward
on
this.
K
A
Great
so
yeah
and
also
I'll,
encourage
folks
on
the
call
and
folks
who
maybe
check
this
out
later
to
go
to
the
issues
across
a
bunch
of
council
and
check
out
the
folks
who
are
nominated
and
have
kind
of
put
together
their
their
nomination
issue
and
voting
going
soon.
I
actually
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
when
we
do
that
and
I
know
if
Joey
knows
or
anyone
else,
I'm
trying
to
look
it
up
over
here
and.
D
Look,
we
have
everybody's
nominations
and
we
have
candidate
statements.
I
I
would
encourage
everyone
who
hasn't
done
that
yet
to
open
their
issue,
because
it
would
be
great
to
open
that
ballot
ASAP,
given
that
our
new
term
year
starts
literally
tomorrow.
So
if
we
could
try
and
be
able
to
execute
that
by
this
week,
that
would,
by
the
end
of
this
week,
that
would
be
a
super
ideal
and
my.
C
D
C
I
said:
I
think
that
we've
even
used
like
and
on
the
node
side,
the
few
times
we've
used,
one
where
even
the
moderator
can't
see
the
result
like
the
individual
votes,
but.
D
D
A
A
C
G
Going
forward,
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
actually
update
the
governance
doc
to
include
this
explicit
time
limit,
where,
when
does
the
vote
actually
happen,
because
right
now,
I
mean
we
are
now
going
to
to
have
them.
Non-Impact
welding
CPC
members
not
have
a
voting
member
starting
from
tomorrow,
given
that
we
ended
up
starting
that
so
relatively
late.
C
A
A
Doesn't
need
to
be
in-depth,
just
something
that
says
we
need
to
do
this
and
so
just
to
clarify
I'm
going
to
drop
a
comment
into
the
nominations
issue
we
plan
to
start
voting
next
week.
You
know
we'll
announce
it
or
whatever
at
the
meeting
and
we'll
we
just
leave
it
open
for
a
week
or
what's
what's
our
here.
D
A
G
So
two
things
do
we
have
nominations
of
vote
but
to
voters
for
each
of
the
non
impact
projects
known
ahead
of
time
and
if
we
do
not,
I
would
suggest
that
ASAP.
We
get
an
email
out
saying
that
hi
by
next
week,
please
nominate
to
voters,
because
the
voting
is
going
to
open
and
be
open
for
about
a
week.
G
And
you
know
these
are
the
things
you
must
do
and
given
that
we've
got
these
all
of
these
rules
about
how
exactly
the
voting
happens
and
given
that
we
have
really
so
few
actual
voters
possible
in
the
whole
system.
Would
it
be
just
easiest
if
we
all
just
email
Joe,
with
whatever
each
individual
wants
to
vote
for
who's
voting
for
a
project.
C
G
Non
impact
projects,
the
rules
and
governance
say
that
each
non
in
bad
project
will
nominate
two
voters
through
a
process
of
their
choosing.
Each
voter
will
be
able
to
vote
for
as
many
or
as
few
candidates
as
they
wish.
Those
candidates
who
receive
the
greatest
number
of
votes
will
be
confirmed
as
the
winners.
In
the
case
of
a
tie
between
two
or
more
candidates,
the
winner
will
be
chosen
randomly
unless
there
are
only
two
candidates
or
all
about
one
of
the
candidates
that
are
tied,
chooses
to
concede.
G
C
C
A
Okay,
so
we
have
a
little
bit
of
work
to
do.
I
I
want
to
move
on,
because
if
we
stop
at
ten
minutes
of,
we
only
have
five
minutes
left
here.
So
I'm
gonna
post
a
comment
here,
our
planets
to
start
voting
next
week.
April
7th
voting
will
remain
open
for
an
week.
Elected
voting
members
will
be
announced
the
following
meeting
April
14th,
but
we
need
to
get
clarity
on
who
will
be
voting
for
the
non
impact
projects
and
and-
and
we
also
need
the
voting
members
figured
out
from
impact
projects
as
well
Jory.
K
A
It
looks
like
we
have
a
number
of
approvals,
so
I
just
want
to
remind
folks
if
they're
on
the
call,
if
they
can
jump
into
this
issue
here
and
take
a
quick
look
shouldn't
take
too
much
of
your
time
and
and
Darcy
and
I'm.
Seeing
your
comment
here.
Voting
is
open
to
voting
members
and
two
people
from
each
non-impact
project,
and
this
is
for
the
voting
representatives
for
non
impact
projects
of
which
there
can
beat
you
if
anybody
needs
any
ok,
great
thanks,
Darcy
cool
jumping
over
to
the
next
issue.
C
A
You
next
issue
is
populate
the
code
of
conduct
panel.
Do
we
have
any
progress
here
or
I
see
that
9
is
that's
how
you
say
her
name
from
from
their
name
from
the
amp
project
said
that
they
would
like
to
help
represent
amp
on
the
CFC
P,
and
you
know,
as
I
think
we
mentioned
this
last
time.
Jordan
will
be
representing
the
node.js
project
on
the
CLC
P.
A
All
right
there's
nothing
else.
There
I'll
move
along.
The
next
item
is
pull
request
for
one,
for
this
is
for
foundation
wide
copyright
governance.
I
know,
Toby
has
been
looking
to
get
some
work
on
this
I'm
trying
to
scroll
to
the
bottom
of
this
issue
and
see
where
we
might
be.
It
looks
like
I'm,
not
sure,
there's
been
much
over
the
last
week,
so
I
will
move
over
that
issue.
If,
if
there's
nothing
there,
the
next
one
is
the
post.
Graduation
checklist,
Michael
I,
see
you
type
with
the
board.
C
A
C
A
Well,
I
dropped
a
link
in
if
anybody
wants
to
check
it
out,
but
we
do
have
a
ton
of
approval,
so
that's
great
cool
so
that
wraps
up
our
agenda
I
will
just
really
quickly
drop
a
link.
I
appreciate,
stiffening,
joining
there's
a
link
to
tectonic
ax
and
the
chat.
If
anybody
wants
to
go,
learn
more
we'll
discuss
that
more
in
the
future
and
I
think
with
that,
we
can
call
it
a
wrap
and
go
to
private
session
for
voting
members.
Regular
members
thanks,
everybody
appreciate
it
stay
safe
thanks,
so
much
Cheers.