►
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
All
right
and
let's
see
it's
like
we
are
live.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
open,
Jas
foundations,
cross-project
Council
meeting
today
is
the
7th
of
April
and
I'll
start
by
adding
my
name
to
the
to
the
list
here.
If
I
can
we're
doing
we're
doing
that
thing
where
we
run
over
each
other
in
the
Google
Doc,
so
other
folks,
please
add
your
name
to
the
Google
Doc
for
minutes,
and
if
you
can,
please
help
us
take
notes
in
the
minute
stop
here.
A
Yeah
the
office
hours
this
week
is
kind
of
an
open
meeting
last
session.
We
did
a
lint,
but
this
session
we
don't
have
any
projects
lined
up.
If
you
are
involved
in
a
project
that
you
would
like
to
do
an
open
office
hours,
let
me
know
yes,
lint
one
was
great.
The
Express
one
was
really
good
as
well
and
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
good
model
for
the
open
office
hours
to
focus
on
a
project,
and
that
way
the
recordings
can
be
helpful
for
folks
in
the
future.
C
A
E
A
A
I
commented
a
day
ago
that
you
know
I
propose
that,
after
the
current
election
period,
which
should
wrap
up
in
about
a
week
that
we
go
through
this
process
for
nominations
and
voting
for
two
up
to
two
voting
members
that
may
be
nominated
by
non
impact
projects
based
on
a
process
set
by
the
CPC
or
sorry
I
read
that
wrong
up
to
two
voting
members
may
be
nominated
by
the
regular
members
once
nominated.
These
members
must
be
ratified
by
the
secrecy.
A
A
Toby
had
spoken
to
Coraline
about
the
pull,
requests
and
I
believe
the
the
decision
was
that
there
were
too
many
community
specific
items
in
the
pull
request
personally
I
feel
like
we
should
that.
Well,
there
are
a
number
of
things
we
can
do
here
and
Brian
is
suggested
a
few
here,
but
I
I
wonder
about
breaking
that
pull
request
into
specific
things
that
might
be
mirja
Bulai,
don't
know
what
Coraline
thinks
about
some
aspects
of
the
for
quest.
Does
anybody
have
any
context?
They
want
to
add.
F
B
A
D
I
think,
for
me,
it's
figuring
out
our
approach
going
forward.
We,
we
had
an
approach
if
that
this,
if
our
experience
means
that
we
can't
follow
that,
we
should,
you
know,
figure
out
a
new
one
and
because
some
of
these
sort
of
more
technical
things
of
how
we
might
manage
something.
The
first
thing
in
my
mind
anyway,
is
agreeing
on
what
our
strategy
going
forward
is
going
to
be
so
yeah.
A
D
A
So
we'll
talk
more
about
this
next
week,
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it's
you
know
mega
urgent.
A
A
B
A
Amendment
to
the
bylaws.
The
next
item
is
amendment
to
the
bylaws
to
ensure
a
sign-off
between
voting
CPC
members.
I'll
start
by
saying
this
is
the
particular
issue
that
spawned
this.
This
work
is
is
kind
of
moot
because
we're
switching
out
impact
voting
members,
but
I
think
that
the
update
is
still
a
good
one
and
it
looks
like
maybe
Christian
replaced
a
replaced
wording
from
Michael's
suggestions,
and
that
happened
yesterday.
So
it's
not
too
much
of
an
update
if
folks
want
to
check
it
out
and
prove
or
comment
that
would
be
great.
D
A
H
D
H
A
A
Started
the
voting
process.
I
know
we
said
we
do
it
today
we
started
a
little
bit
early
because
Jory
and
I
realized
that
we
had
a
very
long
list
of
people
that
we
were
expecting
to
have
need
some
extra
time
to
get
them
to
engage,
but
the
email
with
details
was
sent
out.
I
hope
everyone
received,
that
does
anybody
have
anything
they
want
to
add
here.
I.
B
Just
would
love
to
make
a
note
for
us
too,
for
those
interested
too,
like
post-mortem
on
this,
when
when
it's
done
because
the
you
know
election
process
that
we've
imagined
this
is
the
first
time
that
we've
actually
gone
through
the
execution
of
it
and
I.
Think
that
there's
some
points
at
which
there
are
some
some
problems
that
I
would
love
to
work
work
through.
A
A
B
D
A
A
D
A
D
A
D
Basically,
you
know
the
on
this
link,
which
I'll
paste
into
the
chat
says
that
the
board
will
be
populated
by
one
foundation
executive
director,
one
member
of
the
board,
when
the
CPC
member
one
member
of
the
open,
GS,
Marketing,
Committee,
and
then
each
top-level
project
may
optionally
provide
one
member.
The
top-level
non
top-level
projects
may
optionally
provide
one
member,
and
then
we
can
have
one
optionally,
its
outside
guests,
invited
so
I.
Think
we've
identified
a
few
members
from
so
I
think
like
from
amp
I
believe
and
from
node.
D
A
D
D
F
B
Is
definitely
something
that
we
have?
We
have
prioritized
in
our
outreach
and
you
know
I
think
one
of
the
challenges
is
that
put
bluntly.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
diversity
within
the
projects
and
with
that's
an
area
we
need
to
improve
so
we're
kind
of
we
are.
We
are
absolutely
trying
to
ensure
that
there
is
that
representative.
That
representation
is
at
least
there
on
the
code
of
conduct
moderate
a
panel,
and
but
we
have
to
you,
know,
we're
being
creative
to
find
eligible
candidates.
A
A
A
D
A
A
A
F
A
A
D
Yeah
I
did
meet
with
marsan
last
week
and
we
sort
of
discussed
brainstormed
a
little
bit.
The
next
step,
as
I
understood
it
is
he's
going
to
put
together,
add
a
little
bit
more
to
that
proposal,
which
basically
says
here's
what
we
would
consider
the
minimum
is
for
foundation
projects,
and
we
may
start
with
just
that
or
we
or
he
may,
depending
on
time,
have
two
levels
which
is
like
here's,
the
minimum
and
then
here's.
D
You
know
the
next
level
that
you
can
move
up
to
if
you
have
more
sophisticated
requirements,
but
the
first
thing
will
be
to
get
in
that.
Here's
like
what
we
think
a
minimum
requirement
would
be
for
all
projects
and
start
to
get
some
discussion
on
that
to
see
if,
if
the
project's
themselves
think
it's
feasible
or
not,
okay,
you
know
my
take
is
it
should
be
reasonable
that
every
project
should
some
have
some
level
of
security
reporting.
D
You
know-
and
it
may
be
quite
simple,
as
you
know,
for
example,
an
email
and
hopefully
again
once
we
define
that
if
the
foundation
can
help
to
provide
those
emails
and
and
stuff
like
that,
so
that
it's
fairly
simple
for
projects
to
implement
that
bubble
so
hoping
in
the
next.
You
know
couple
weeks,
maybe
two
weeks
or
so
we'll
see
something
on
that
I.
F
F
F
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
you
know
even
something
like
a
like
a
bi-weekly
call
or
something
like
this.
Where
conversations
would
happen
in
people
because
I
don't
think
that
that
team
actually
really
knows
what's
at
stake
like
it
feels
like
there's
a
lot
of
sort
of
like
fall
away,
stakeholders
to
bring
together
and
sort
of
understand
what
we're
trying
to
solve
here
and
I
personally
I.
So
to
be
very
honest:
I
don't
have
the
bandwidth
to
be
in
the
middle
of
that
conversation,
but
I
can
I
can
sort
of
like
rain
the
people.
F
Sorry
didn't
in
the
Senate
question
like.
D
F
Mean
just
to
be
clear-
and
you
know
this
might
be
very
specific
to
the
end
project,
so
I
don't
want
to
completely
derail
the
needs
of
like
other
projects
in
the
foundation
right,
but
from
how
amp
is
structured
at
Google
there
was
like
the
team
that,
since
charge
of
securities
is
vastly
separated
from
the
team,
that's
actually
building
the
software.
You
know
so
there
are.
You
know
the
team
is
spelling
the
software
and
the
the
open-source
contributors
of
the
software.
F
Don't
really
understand
the
security
concerns
around,
for
example,
maintaining
the
caches
and
all
of
that,
and
none
of
these
two
different
parts
fully
understand
their
role
within
the
foundation
either.
So,
if
your
title
of
this
to
you
know,
if
you
tie
all
of
this
together,
pretty
much,
no
one
knows
exactly
what
you
know
what's
at
stake,
what
could
happen
and
what
they
could
bring
to
the
table?
You
know
so
a
place
where
people
could
find
out
about
that
would
be
like
really
useful.
A
A
A
All
right,
cool
I,
don't
think
that
Brian
has
joined
us,
and
so
we
don't
necessarily
need
to
double
back
to
that
mailing
list
issue
I
think
may
even
be
kind
of
wrapped
up,
but
so
what
with
that
we're?
You
know
a
few
minutes
early
to
move
into
the
private
session,
but
I
think
that,
let's
see
I
think
that
a
few
extra
minutes
might
not
be
bad
to
have
some
of
some
of
the
discussions
around
some
of
the
things
we
need
to
talk
about.
So
with
that,
we'll
we'll
call
it
a
wrap
cool.