►
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
A
Great,
so
we
are
live
and
thank
you
all
for
joining
another
edition
of
the
open,
J's
foundation.
Cross-Project
Council
meeting
today
is
February
18th
of
2020,
thanks
again
to
everyone
for
joining
a
reminder
to
drop
your
name
and
your
github
handle
into
the
into
the
meeting
notes.
Please
we
can
start
off
with
any
announcements.
Unfortunately,
we
don't
have
jewelry,
so
you
know
we
don't
have
her
cheery
list
of
things
that
she
would
usually
share.
A
A
Happy
to
have
him
join
I
know
he's
been
active
and
some
of
the
notes
stuff
in
the
past
and
I've
seen
him
getting
involved
in
issues
already
in
PRS,
and
so
that's
I'm
happy
to
have
you
no
more
hands
to
make
light
work.
Also,
the
CFP
closes
for
the
open
day.
It's
world
conference
on
the
21st
right.
Somebody
from
the
foundation
can
correct
me,
which
is
Friday.
A
A
B
I
read
through
it
and
basically
Jory
is
suggesting
in
that
issue
kind
of
the
qualifications
that
we
define
for
taking
advantage
of
the
travel
fund,
and
this
is
in
the
context
of
you
know
of
the
in
the
summit.
They
want
to
make
it
clear
like
who
who
can
take
advantage
of
it
as
one
of
the
resources
for
getting
there
and
my
take
is
you
know
she
has
a
pretty
good
list
in
terms
of
the
qualifications.
B
B
B
Absolutely
if
you
know
if
we
agree
that
this
is
the
list,
we
should
add
that
in
there
somewhere
to
say,
here's
here's,
the
general
guidance
in
terms
of
who's
who's
who
qualifies
you
know.
Even
on
the
node
front
it
we
once
had
a
very
clear
spec,
which
was
you
know
you
needed
to
be
a
member.
An
individual
member,
an
individual
membership
was
free,
for
collaborators
remembers
the
or
agui.
Don't
really
even
have
that
anymore,
so
I
think
getting
something
like
this
captured
and
document
is
good
for
every
project.
Great.
A
B
A
I'm
glad
thank
you
on
that
note.
200
mentioned
I.
Think
I
mentioned
this
in
slack,
but
I
created
a
slack
channel
in
the
open,
Jas
org
that
is
cross
project
Council
github
and
that
has
like
kind
of
a
stream
of
activity
and
the
cross
project
council
recall
just
in
case
anyone's
curious
to
monitor
some
of
that
stuff.
It's
made
it
easy
for
me
to
kind
of
keep
on
top
of
what's
been
happening
so.
A
Cool
all
right,
great,
so
moving
on
this
next
one
is
something
that
I
threw
on
so
for
context.
I
wanted
to
start
like
kind
of
an
open
office
hours
as
a
part
of
the
nodejs
community
committee
and
I
did
one
back
in
November
or
December
of
last
year
before
the
holidays,
and
it
worked
really
well.
I
was
proactive
in
reaching
out
to
some
people
that
I
thought
would
be
interested
in
working
on
node
in
a
variety
of
manners,
and
so
it
was
fairly
successful.
A
I
had
you
know
several
people
on
the
call
and
eventually
came
away
with
some
actionable
items
to
get
help
them
get
involved.
My
thinking
is
it's
sort
of
a
organic
hands-on
way
to
engage
with
folks
that
might
be
interested
in
working
on
node
and
I,
put
more
thought
into
it
over
the
holidays
and
thought
that
it
might
be
better
to
even
take
level
and
make
it
more
of
an
open
joyous
thing.
Obviously,
I
would
I
would
focus
on
node
as
that's.
A
A
I
could
have
promoted
a
little
bit
more
and
got
more
people,
but
there
are
a
few
people
on
and
and
have
some
action
items
from
there
as
well
and
after
the
meeting
I
spoke
to
West
Todd
about
you
know,
making
a
setting
aside
some
time
to
focus
specifically
on
Express,
and
we
can
kind
of
promote
that
as
well
and
try
to
get
folks
who
might
be
interested
in
contributing
to
Express
on
the
call
for
next
time
and
anyway.
So
this
is.
A
So
that's
all
I
put
this
on
the
agenda
just
to
kind
of
put
it
on
everybody's
radar.
If
there's
anything
in
particular,
you
think
you
know
you'd
like
to
take
advantage
of
an
open
office
hours
I'd
be
happy
to
help
and
facilitate,
and
you
know
beyond
that,
I
may
you
know
reach
out
to
folks
in
the
different
projects,
because
people
come
with
different
areas
that
they
want
to
focus
on
like,
for
example,
somebody
mentioned
mocha,
so
I
reached
out
to
Chris,
and
you
know
we
might
try
to
onboard
them.
C
A
Some
some
work
on
node
translation
and
things
like
that
so
anyway,
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
folks.
Radar
I
can
take
the
agenda
label
off
of
this
and
just
try
to
do
it
every
other.
Every
other
Thursday
which
do
I
have
that
written
down
here.
You
know
I,
guess:
I'll
have
more
comments
to
to
get
more
information
here.
I
even
wondered
if
I
you
know,
if
I
should
have
something
somewhere
a
document
or
a
repo
or
I,
don't
know
I'll
think
about
that
offline
but
anyway.
C
I
think,
okay,
this
is
Robin
and
I.
Think
it's
great
I
I
included
it
in
my
keynote
I
had
a
slide
I
sent
to
Joe
it's
a
great
way
for
people
to
get
started,
so
they
may
not
feel
like
they're
jumping
in
the
middle
of
something,
so
if
they
just
want
to
use
it
as
a
time
just
to
learn
more
so
I
think
this
is
great
but
yeah
making
it
more
discoverable.
Perhaps
we
can
maybe
put
it
on
our
website
or
or
more
visible
links
on
readme
or
something
like
that.
A
Yeah
I'm
open
to
any
of
those
ideas,
and
also
I
wanted
to
point
out
to
you
know
if
we
have
this
regularly
happening,
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
you
know,
try
to
if
you
notice
someone
who
might
be
interested
in
some
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
you
have
somewhere
to
point
them
to
say,
hey,
you
know,
jump
on
this
call
and
chat
with
general
Roberts
on
there.
We
can
help.
D
B
B
We
agreed
that
as
a
bootstrap,
the
everybody
who
had
volunteered
to
be
part
of
that
code
of
conduct
working
group
would
be
the
sort
of
bootstrap
members,
and
so
now
we
need
to
go
through
the
steps
of
getting
the
representatives
from
the
different
groups.
So,
for
example,
I
think
Brian
had
volunteered
to
you
know
basically
make
the
call
for
volunteers
election
for
the
board
representative,
the
CPC
representative.
B
We
need
to
do
the
same,
though,
for
the
projects,
so
each
impact
project
can
optionally
have
a
representative
and
I
think
we
said
you
know
a
representative
from
the
the
non
impact
projects
as
a
whole.
There's
a
PR
that
I
open
based
on
our
discussion
to
add
in
a
representative
from
the
Marketing
Committee.
So
we
just
need
to
kick
into
gear.
The
process
of
you
know
identifying
the
people
who
are
gonna
end
up
being
the
the
C,
the
C
OPC
members
going
forward.
B
C
A
A
A
So
next
on
the
agenda.
Unless
anybody
wants
to
chat
more
about
the
COC
work
Nixon,
the
agenda
is
pull
requests
for.
One,
for
this
is
the
ad
foundation
way.
Copyright
guidance
would
kind
of
keep
this
on
the
agenda.
I
know
everybody's
been
busy
about
trying
to
get
this
over
the
finish
line,
Toby's,
not
on
the
call,
but
I
don't
know.
If
you
have.
E
E
E
A
A
A
B
B
A
A
Highlights
that's
in
the
bottom
of
this
issue:
I
captured
three
of
the
areas
of
action
here:
Toby's
conversation
in
the
amp
project
just
checking
to
see
if
there's
no,
there
has
been
some
more
activity
here,
but
I
don't
see,
I
see
miles
mentioned,
but
not
involved.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
sort
of
an
update
here
miles
or
if
which
this
wait
until
Toby
or
Marcin
or
McCall.
A
F
Not
any
particular
movement
there
to
be
honest
with
you,
although
you
know
like
no,
it
has
an
ongoing
an
ongoing
program
with
hacker
one.
So
my
guess
is
that
this
is
about
like
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
scale
that
to
multiple
projects
within
the
foundation.
Yeah
I
think
that
you
know,
there's
still
a
whole
bunch
more
work
to
do
to
see
how
about
about
making
this
a
broader
program.
F
I
also
know
that,
like
note
as
part
of
the
IBD,
which
is
the
Internet
bug
bounty,
which
I
don't
know
that
other
projects
will
necessarily
qualify
for.
So
if
we
wanted
to
do
bug
bounties,
there
be
some
work
to
figure
out
where
that
would
come
from.
But
I
am
not
aware
of
any
specific
movement
on
this.
Okay,
I.
A
F
B
And
I
didn't
think
you
did
I
just
it
sounded
like
there
might
have
been
some
feeling
that
we
needed
to
get
some
stuff
from
the
other
projects.
I
think
we
could.
We
could
start
with
something
which
is
generic
and
could
be
used
by
projects
that
don't
have
anything
and
then
figure
out
the
longer
there's,
probably
a
larger
set
of
issues
and
discussions
around,
for
example,
I.
My
impression
was
that
you
know
maybe
amp
through
Google
actually
pays
larger
bounties.
Then
we
would
get
even
through
the
IBB
right.
So
it's
not
necessarily
that
you
know.
B
A
Yeah
and
and
I
I
pasted
the
link
to
a
gist
that
Marcin
had
started
assembling
and
it
is
trying
to
collect
what
he's
seeing
as
the
ways
that
that
people
are
handling
this
and
I.
Think
especially
folks
from
the
nodes
I
mean
everyone
should
take
a
look
at
it
and
see
if
it's
accurate
according
to
their
project,
but
especially
on
the
node
front.
We
may
want
to
comment
any
other.
You
know
he
just
has
hacker
one
listed.
A
If
there's
any
other
things
that
we
want
to
highlight,
we
may
want
to
drop
a
comment
on
here
too,
or
just
let
them
know
cool
crates.
We
will
move
along
then,
unless
anybody
has
anything
else
they
want
to
add
to
that.
The
next
issue
is
this
is
issue
185.
There
is
a
corresponding
poor
quest,
I
think
Ben's
on
the
call
he
and
I
were
going
to
tag
team.
Just
getting
these
admin
Doc's
over
the
finish
line.
I
don't
have
any
sort
of
an
update,
I,
don't
know.
If
you
have
any
update,
then.
A
A
B
Sent
an
email
to
the
other
board
members,
because
I
thought
we
we
had
some
agreement
in
one
portion
of
the
area.
Brian
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
so
anyway,
I
have
sent
an
email
to
see
if
it's
what
I
understood
was
correct.
We
might
be
a
you
know
if
we
could
share
that.
If,
if
I'm
wrong,
then
maybe
isn't
something
but
I
hope.
E
Sharing
it
yeah
I
think
maybe
a
good
way
to
do.
This
would
be
that
in
the
board
meeting,
which
is
coming
up,
not
this
Friday,
but
next
Friday,
you
know
right,
Robin
and
I
can
work
together
to
put
together
some
final.
You
know
final
language,
a
final
proposal
here
that
we
could
then
hopefully
get
to
agreement
on
and
then
get
to
some
closure
on
this
issue.
Okay,
that'd.
B
A
A
F
There's
an
active
interest
in
the
team
in
moving
forward
with
with
being
chartered
and
specifically
I
mean,
like
the
scope
of
it,
I
think,
there's
still
a
little
bit
work
to
be
done
in
the
standards,
repo,
specifically
solidifying,
a
little
bit
more
of
the
governance
and
in
the
scope.
We
are
at
least
the
discussion
so
far
as
to
base
this
process
over
how
chartering
in
the
no
js'
work
goes,
and
so
the
standards
would
already
have
like
a
pretty
in-depth
readme,
as
well
as
an
in-depth
governance
document.
F
So
I
think
the
the
only
thing
is
kind
of
missing
right
now
is
something
that's
just
a
little
bit
more
explicit
about
what
the
team
is
asking
for.
That
I
think
the
ass
to
the
CBC
would
be
like
what
kind
of
documentation
the
CPC
would
require
in
order
to
do
this,
my
guess
is:
it
probably
needs
to
be
paired
with
a
polar
Polar
quest
against
the
CPC
repo
outlining
kind
of
like
what
working
groups
are,
how
to
create
a
working
group.
F
What
it
means
to
be
a
working
group
with
the
purview
of
it
is
thinking
about
it
in
the
same
sense
of
how
no
at
least
the
context
I
have
to
compare.
We
know
the
working
group
that
is
chartered
by
the
technical
steering
committee,
one's
the
space
that
they're
overseeing
and
if
the
TSC
kind
of
wanted
to
override
decisions
by
that
group,
they
would
have
to
be
tarter
them.
That
is
pretty
like
salty
earth
words
the
way
it
said,
I'm
talking
about
a
man,
and
that
really
has
never
happened.
F
So
I
think
it's
very
important
that
if
the
standards,
if
the
standards
working
group
is
capable
of
doing
that,
that
they're
chartered
with
the
ability
to
do
so
by
the
by
the
CPC
I
I,
don't
think
it's
in
the
best
interest
of
anyone's
time
to
have
to
kind
of
go
back
and
forth
and
ask
for
permission
every
single
time.
We
want
to
do
something
on
behalf
of
the
foundation.
A
Yeah
so
one
of
the
policy
Docs
that
is
in
flight
in
this
draft
PR
I
mentioned
previously
443-
is
the
node
working
groups
documents,
and
so
perhaps,
if
you
know
banner,
myself
can
get
this
over
the
finish
line
and
actually
move
this
from
draft
to
an
open
PR.
We
can
comment
on
this
PR
as
it
relates
to
you
know,
chartering
groups
that
were
looking
to
charter.
F
A
F
What
the
group
has
not
been
able
to
do
right
now
that
we're
kind
of
skating
on
it
is
sending
representatives
to
particular
standards
bodies,
as
if
India's
representatives,
we
kind
of
have
been
doing
it
but
like
right.
It
feels
like
it
is
in
a
grey
zone
right
now
and
I
would
personally
I
think
the
group
would
feel
far
more
comfortable
operating
as
if
that
was
explicit,
yeah.
B
F
That's
actually
an
interesting
one.
Michael
I
personally
remember
that
charter
working
groups
had
charters
was
how
I
was
thinking
about
it.
When
I
talked
to
people
in
the
group
about
it,
but
when
I
actually
went
through
an
audited,
the
various
working
arts
and
no
they
do
not
I,
could
not
find
us
in
the
working
group
that
actually
had
a
charter.
They
have
read
me
a
tinderbox.
B
If
I
go
to
the
the
TSE
repo
I
think
in
there
might
be
in
the
administers
a
working
group,
MD,
there's
bootstrap
governance
like
we
basically
in
there.
So
this
is
in
the
working
groups
under
the
TSE
repo.
We
have
the
list
of
the
working
groups
and
their
responsibilities,
so
I
think
in
terms
of
a
charter.
That's
what
the
list
was
like.
What
do
they
have
ownership
over
right,
yeah.
F
B
F
Yeah,
this
gets
interesting
so
like,
for
example,
in
ECMO.
Every
single
individual
tc2
getting
engaged
in
requires
signing
a
different
royalty-free
or
patent
license
agreement
on
a
participation,
I
believe
but
I'm,
not
a
hundred
percent.
The
w3c
might
be
somewhat
similar.
So
if
we
agree
that
we
want
to
do
and
work
in
exa
like
do,
we
need
to
put
on
in
the
CPC
agenda
every
single
time
we're
joining
a
new
Technical
Committee.
Or
can
that
just
be
like
a
request
straight
to
the
board
from
the
standards
group?
That
is
just
like
a
high-level
question.
B
Like
so
joining
act,
my
I'd
still
think
you
know
we
at
least
want
the
CPC
to
be
aware
and
whatever,
but
then
once
you've
done.
That
yeah,
like
the
delegation
of
hey
making
the
request
of
the
board
and
getting
the
right
sign-off,
doesn't
seem
like
something
that
the
CPC
would
necessarily
have
to
be
in
the
middle
of
yeah.