►
From YouTube: CPC Meeting
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
B
C
So
a
really
big
week
we
have
extended
the
CFP
deadline
for
open
Jas
world
through
Friday.
So
please
tell
your
friends,
get
those
talks,
admissions
and,
and
apologies
for,
of
course,
the
the
minor
issues
on
the
on
the
submission
tool
last
week,
but
we're
extended.
So
we
should
get
get
all
your
talks
and
the
other
thing
is
of
course
we
are
excited
about
open,
open,
Jas
collaborations
of
it.
There
is
a
collab
summit
planning
meeting
immediately
following
the
CPC
meeting
at
1:00
p.m.
Eastern
and
then
a
standards
meeting
at
2:00
p.m.
Eastern
today.
C
C
Yeah
and
registration
is
open,
it's
Michael
to
shared
and
so
definitely
get
your
go
ahead
and
book
your
ticket.
As
soon
as
you
can
book
your
hotel
as
soon
as
you
can,
we
do
expect
that
I
Hotel
block
two
to
fill
up
really
quickly
and
at
the
same
time,
you
can
also
register
for
the
collab
summit
and
you
can
register
for
a
discount
discounted
ticket
on
the
open
source
summit,
north
america
or
in
Linux
conference.
B
Cool,
thank
you
anything
else.
Folks
for
announcement
say:
I
have
had
one
that
I
can
share
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
I
did
an
open
office
hours.
I
did
one
before
the
holidays.
That
was
focused
on
nodejs
and
over
the
holidays.
I
thought
about
it
and
I
created
miss.
You
I
think
I've
kind
of
gone
over
this
already,
but
I
I
didn't
open
office
hours
two
weeks
ago.
I
have
another
one.
B
B
D
D
D
D
I
did
I
did
mention
that
the
comment
was
sometimes
it's
good
to
have
had
that,
like
someone.
Sometimes
we
need
the
private
section
to
discuss
things
so
that
we
can't
include
them
in
the
public
session,
so
you'd
potentially
lose
that
and
that's
where
the
counter
suggestion
was
to
try
and
extend
the
meeting
so
that
we
have
more
time
now
I
just
trying
to
think.
Let
me
look
at
the
previous
one.
When
did
it
start
because
I
don't
think
we
changed
that.
C
C
D
E
B
F
D
G
So
the
first
thing
sorry
I
cut.
One
thing
just
thought:
I'd
mention
it
here:
we
need
to
read
sooo
now
open
up
the
nominations
for
the
next
year's
non-impact
developing
CPC
members
there's
a
two-week
period,
and
this
current
term
that
we've
got
is
ending
at
the
end
of
March
and
I've
just
realized
that
this
means
that
we
need
to
start
working
on
this
within
like
the
next
week
or
two
at
the
very
most
in
order
to
actually
hit
that
deadline.
Just
thought
I'd
mentioned
this,
but
I
find
an
issue
about
it.
Momentarily.
G
D
G
Sort
of
harder
deadline
of
having
imposed
a
two-week
nomination
period
before
the
tea
election,
but
yes
that
also
needs
to
start
happening
so
that
brought
the
impact
projects
are
aware
of
this
amend
my
issue
to
cover
them
myself
and
file
it
within
the
next
five
minutes
or
so
sounds
good.
You
know
thank.
B
B
C
Yeah
sure
so-
and
we
opened
this
after
discussion
on
our
last
collab
planning
meeting
about
the
fact
that
when
we
go
to
to
share
you
know
news
and
information
about
the
event
or
maintain
errs
and
their
communities.
One
of
the
questions
we
really
want
to
be
answer
for
them
as
thoroughly
as
possible.
Is
you
know?
How
can
you
make
use
of
this
fund?
You
know
and
what
we
realized
was
that
we're
we're
possible.
C
C
C
C
It's
you
know
the
process
for
a
person
to
make
the
application,
like
oh
I'm,
enjoying
I'm
gonna,
buy
for
support
on
the
hotel
and
ticket
cost
or
whatever
that's
clear.
What's
less
clear
is
like
that
verification
step
that
says,
Jory
is
in
fact
you
know
a
contributor
to
jQuery
and
should
is
eligible
right
like
what's
the
beyond
being
you
know
the
honesty
policy
and
self
reporting
what
what
guidelines
do
we
have
for
both
the
person
applying
and
also
the
Meteor
to
say,
here's
how
you
like
here's,
here's,
what
we're
looking
for.
C
C
Want
to
say
it's
like
we
define,
you
know
how
the
how
the
maintainer
wants
to
define
contribution
is
up
to
them.
Right,
like
I,
mean
I
would
encourage
contribution
to
be
inclusive
of
you
know.
This
person
has
been
running,
our
Twitter
account,
you
know
and
attending
PSC
meetings
and
see
what
that,
in
addition
to,
or
you
know,
the
the
classical
sense
of
contribution
this
person
has
been
submitting
PRS
and
stuff
yeah.
I
J
Yeah
I
mean
I,
guess,
there's
I
like
the
idea
of
leaving
it
up
to
individual
projects
and
I
like
the
idea
of
automating
it.
So
it
seems,
like
I,
mean
I
I'm
at
risk
of
being
voluntold
to
build
this
myself,
it
seems
like
we
could
do
something
like
a
full
request,
template
with
a
checklist
that
says
like
check
the
projects,
project
or
projects
that
you're
contributing
on
and
then
whatever
you've
checked,
we
have
some
sort
of
github
action
that
automatically
adds
as
reviewers
the
you
know.
D
J
Sure
I'm
just
thinking
but
like
in
terms
of
scale
right
like
at
the
moment
the
foundation
has
I,
don't
know
dozens
of
projects,
maybe
tens
of
projects
and
like,
but
it's
at
some
point.
It
may
have
hundreds
of
projects
and
like
just
kind
of
setting
it
up
so
that
it
just
works
as
long
as
as
long
as
the
person
claims
there
with
some
projects
and
then
the
maintainer
zuv.
Those
projects
have
validated
that
claim.
We
can
clean
up
anything
else
later
and
that
can
just
like
you
don't
need
manual
involvement
beyond
that.
I.
D
D
J
J
H
Just
just
a
couple,
thoughts
to
Jordan
to
your
point
about
like
scaling
I'd
like
to
encourage
not
necessarily
thinking
about
this
problem,
setting
in
a
in
a
way
that
could
scale
to
hundreds
of
projects,
maybe
because
it's
unclear
to
me
that
our
foundation
has
the
intention
to
scale
to
that
size
to
begin
with
and
separately
I.
Think
that,
like
we
I
think
we
actually
already
have
the
solution
to
this
in
place.
H
We
have
a
number
of
voting
members
that
are
elected
to
this
council
that
you
know
have
volunteered
to
help
lead
that
is
separate
from
whether
or
not
they
are
doing
that
job.
That's
not
the
purpose
of
raising
this
that
you
know
each
of
the
individual.
Each
of
the
impact
level
projects
has
two
reps.
In
theory,
those
reps
can
act
as
people
who
should
be
able
to
review
this
for
their
projects.
H
H
The
the
CPC
reps
that
currently
exist
should
be
sufficient
to
be
the
people
who
can
kind
of
do
this
stamp
or
do
the
research
to
ensure
that
this
stuff
can
move
forward,
and
if
we
find
that
things
are
getting
blocked
or
not
moving
fast
enough,
then
we
can
maybe
try
to
find
a
solution
that
would
be
faster,
but
I
do
think
we
should
I
would
urge
against.
You
know
any
engineering
solutions
or
anything
much
more
complicated
than
that
until
it
actually
proves
to
be
a
scaling
issue.
Yeah.
B
I
agree,
I
agree.
No,
we
have
been
talking
about
this
for
a
bit,
so
maybe
we
should
move
on
I
I.
B
B
Yep
Scott
Thank
You
miles.
It
seems
like
the
list
that
Joey
has.
There
is
a
good
starting
point
to
perhaps
open
a
PR
and
I
encourage
anyone.
You
know
to
take
that
on
and
and
see
how
it
fits
into
the
travel
fund,
documentation
that
we
already
have
I'm
n
in
that
PR.
We
can
kind
of
discuss
it
further
and
and
see
if
there
any
other
questions
that
need
to
be
answered
before
we
start.
D
B
B
So,
okay,
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna,
move
on
to
the
next
issue.
Unless
anyone
stops
me
in
this
right
here
so
moving
on.
The
next
issue
is
4
6
9
and
the
cross
project
council
repo.
This
is
populate.
The
Code
of
Conduct
panel,
Jory
and
I
were
talking
about
this
as
the
meeting
started.
I
think
we
just
need
to
reach
out
to
folks
and
start
to.
I
G
D
C
B
B
B
B
B
Great
so
we'll
move
on
from
this
one.
Let
me
take
a
action
item
to
check
in
with
Toby
and
Brian.
B
We
were
wondering
how
many
voting
members
there
are
and
if
we
were
over
the
50%
mark,
which
we
are
there's
9
of
15
voting
members
who
have
approved
this.
Oh
okay
and
Gary
pooped
as
well,
although
I'm
not
sure,
he's
a
voting
member,
but
regardless
we
have
approvals
here.
So
this
is
another
one
that
I
will
check
with
Toby
on
and
see
how
we
can
move
this
forward.
B
B
D
H
This
for,
like
the
found,
why'd
recording
stuff
yeah,
there's
been
no
movement
on
it
that
I've
been
involved
in,
but
to
be
completely
honest,
I
I've
been
swamped
and
just
catching
up
so
to
be.
You
know
really
blunt
to
everyone.
Don't
really
expect
much
from
me,
probably
into
mid
March
I'm,
coming
out
of
two
weeks
on
the
road
about
to
go
on
the
road
two
weeks
again
so
I'm
about
a
useful
as
like
a
blob
of
clay.
B
B
B
B
D
B
B
D
D
B
B
B
L
B
All
right
that
is
the
end
of
our
agenda
here.
Is
there
anything
else
that
anyone
wants
to
discuss?
Should
we
call
it
a
wrap.
G
B
C
B
B
G
G
So
this
is
in
the
governance
document
election
process
for
non
impact
felt
in
CPC
members
and
the
first
step
there
is
that,
once
a
year
an
issue
will
be
opened
in
the
CPC
repo
announcing
that
at
the
period
for
nominations
it
is
open
and
then,
after
that,
any
member
from
one
of
the
non
impact
projects
can
self
nominate.
Email
in
the
chair
of
the
CPC
with
their
interest
in
running
for
the
CPC.
This
period
will
be
open
for
two
weeks
which,
for
the
CPC
chair
will
list
the
nominees
in
the
issue.
G
Then
each
of
the
candidates
listed
will
be
asked
to
open
an
issue
in
the
CPC
refer
which
includes
details,
and
then
the
project
will
be
asked
to
confirm
membership
as
identified
by
the
nominees.
Then
each
non-impact
roger
will
nominate
to
voters
through
a
process.
After
choosing,
then
each
voter
will
be
able
to
vote
for
as
many
or
as
few
candidates
as
they
wish
don't
candidate.
G
So
we
see
if
the
greatest
number
of
votes
will
be
confirmed
as
the
winners
in
case
of
a
dying
da
da
da,
in
other
words,
all
of
this
we
have
in
our
governance
and
we
ought
to
follow
it,
given
that
we've
specified
it,
I
never
actually
gone
through
it
yet
so
yeah.
This
is
all
gonna
take
time
over
the
next
month.
We
ought
to
stop
it
as
soon
as
possible.
B
G
C
So
there's
two
parallel
processes
right
that
I.
That
I'm
hearing
like
one
is
confirmation
or
re
confirmation
that
the
impact
project
representatives
will
be
sticking
on
for
the
next
or
they're
gonna
source,
someone
else
from
within
their
project,
and
we
don't
really
care
how
they
do
that
so
long
as
they
do
it.
And
then
the
the
second
process
is
the
the
one
prescribed
for
the
elected
at
large
and
growth.
C
A
C
B
D
C
I,
don't
know
that
all
the
projects,
so
what
we
did
last
year
for
this
was
I,
opened
an
issue
on
all
of
the
impact
project
repositories,
letting
them
know
that
they
needed
to
do
and
then
I
circled
back
like
periodically
to
see
you
know
how.
How
are
you
coming
along
on
deciding
who
your
rep
is
going
to
be,
and
so
I'm
I'm
happy
to
just
repeat
that
if
that
is
fine,.
B
Another
question
that
comes
to
my
mind
is
the
activity
of
folks
who
are
you
know,
board
members
from
the
different
projects
you
know:
do
we
need
to
clarify
a
certain
level
of
activity
or
you
know
if
someone
hasn't
been
active
and
they
get
reconfirmed?
What
does
that
mean?
Do
we
need
to
kind
of
work
through
that
process
at
all,
as
well.
G
H
We
haven't
really
been
like.
We
haven't,
really
changed
the
time
or
done
much
work
to
like
I.
Don't
know
when
the
last
time
we've
changed.
The
time
of
this
meeting
is
so.
You
know,
I
think
that
there's
a
couple
people
I,
don't
know
if
I
don't
think
Chris
is
on
today.
The
Chris
Chris
is
on
today
hi
Chris,
but
I
know
that,
like
your
schedule,
has
not
necessarily
made
this
time
the
best.
So
we
may
probably
want
to
revisit
the
time
separately
from
that.
H
What
we
may
want
to
try
to
draft
and
put
into
the
governance
before
the
next
elections
is
maybe
some
rules
around
expectation
of
engagement,
I
know
the
no
TFC
has
some
of
this
in
place,
like
I,
think
you're
expected
to
participate
in
votes
and
participate
in
at
least
like
a
quarter
of
all
the
meetings
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
think
we
have
any
bylaws
or
any
governance
I'm.
K
B
G
So
as
to
also
your
thing
is
not
just
sorry
Section
five,
this
is
what
you
were
looking
for.
Actually,
in
Section
four
talking
about
voting
members,
the
voting
members
are
expected
to
make
a
time
commitment
which
allows
them
to
be
responsive
to
CPC
business,
participate
regularly
in
meetings
and
participate
in
all
voting
matters.
They're
all
also
expected
to
help
to
enable
work.
Our
regular
CPC
members
for
providing
leadership
help
with
interactions
with
the
board
and
foundation
staff
and
to
generally
help
keep
things
moving.
D
Right
and
that's
actually
supplemented
by
the
part
under
regular
members
that
says
regular
members
remain
for
as
long
as
they're
active
in
within
the
work
that
CPC
regular
members
have
not
been
active
in
the
github
participating
means
or
other
work,
as
a
CPC.
Three
months
may
be
removed
from
the
list.
D
E
E
A
H
Yeah,
it's
a
clarify,
my
point
Robin
because
maybe
maybe
I
miss
communicated.
My
concern
is
more
specifically
about
current
members
of
the
committee
who
have
not
been
basically
coming
to
the
plate.
There
are
some
individuals
who
have
not
attended
a
single
meeting
or
participated
in
a
single
vote.
I
think
there's
probably
a
more
inclusive
way
to
handle
this,
but
I
do
think
that
it's
important
that
we,
you
know
like
are
aware
of
who
of
our
voting
members
and
regular
members
have
been
active
and
you
know
for
the
for
those
who
haven't.
H
E
H
H
E
B
So
say,
for
example,
I'm
I'm,
the
chair
currently
through
the
elections.
What
happens
if
I
no
longer
the
chair?
How
does
that
sort
of
process
work
in
terms
of
I
mean
I?
Guess
you
would?
We
would
just
have
another
election
and
then
the
new
chair
would
take
over
any
of
those
sort
of
responsibilities.
I.
G
Do
believe
that
you'll
be
chair,
at
least
until
the
end
of
March,
and
then
it's
on
the
new
board.
You
sorry
new
CPC
voting
members
to
select
the
next
chair.
In
the
same
sense,
it
would
be
really
really
good
for
us
to
at
least
get
some
voting
members
ratified
or
elected
by
the
end
of
March,
because
otherwise
we
can't
do
the
things
without
any
voting
in
April.
B
All
right,
great
cool,
so
we
have
some
action
items
from
there.
I
start
to
work
on
this
as
well
and
I.
Think
to
some
of
the
other
previous
points
too,
as
we
do
work
through
figuring
out
who
representatives
might
be
any
any
way,
we
could
drive
more
diversity
in
the
voices
at
the
table.
I
think
it's
really
appreciated.
G
C
Happy
to
like
draft
and
share
with
the
CPC
mailing
list,
you
know
just
to
get.
You
know:
I
iZON
before
I
go.