►
From YouTube: CPC Meeting - June 16, 2020
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
All
right
thanks
everybody
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
open,
J's
foundations.
Oh,
can
you
make
me
host
again
Brian
and
I.
Can
let
folks
in
to
be
great
yeah
thanks
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
open,
J's
foundation
in
this
cross-project
council
meeting
today
is
the
16th
of
some
month
in
the
20/20
year.
What
is
it
June
right,
great
yeah,
thanks
everybody
for
joining,
make
sure
to
add
your
name
to
the
Google
Doc
the
minutes
and
we
can
get
started.
Do
we
have
any
announcements
before
we
get
into
the
agenda?
B
A
B
C
D
A
E
Audio,
like
my
zoom,
was
not
connecting
hi
everyone.
I
do
have
some
announcements,
probably
the
most
important
was
already
shared,
which
is
that
next
week
is
open,
Jas
world,
it's
actually
a
whole
loop
of
JavaScript,
the
most
JavaScript
week
that
ever
was
is
beginning
next,
because
we
have
collabs
on
it
and
the
nodes.
The
node
community
are
having
a
bunch
of
meeting
in
the
ant
community
or
having
veg
meetings.
We
have
mocha,
we
have
webdriver,
we
have
jQuery,
just
a
bunch
of
groups
are
getting
together.
E
We
want
everybody
to
be
there
and
you
know
get
involved.
So
we're
very
excited
about
that.
Also.
Today
we
have
the
summit
planning
meeting
the
last
summit
climate
meeting
before
the
summit,
and
then
we
have
the
standard
speed
meeting
and
then
we
have
the
marketing
team
meeting.
So
it's
like
today,
Tuesday
is
open,
Jas
were
foundation
meeting
fun
times
day,
and
so
those
are
the
biggest
biggest
announcements
because
that's
basically
all
I
can
fit
in
my
brain
right
now,
anyway,.
F
F
E
Then
look
for
the
most
part
on
a
new
contributor
day.
What
we
have
are
several
projects,
doing
an
introduction
style
workshops
and
how
to
contribute
style
workshops,
so
I
think
the
best
way
to
see
about
getting
involved
there.
If
you
want
to
help
out,
is
to
ping
the
session
facilitators
to
see
if
they
would
like
some
extra
hands
in
the
room.
Just
to
you
know,
provide
support
foundation.
Staff
are
gonna,
be
there
myself,
Celia
Robin
others
from
from
the
events.
Team
are
gonna,
be
there
in
case
people
have
any
questions
about
the
platform.
E
If
you
were
interested
in
kind
of
getting
a
look
at
what
that
is,
which
is
Kiko
chat,
I
popped,
a
link
to
a
video
I
made
yesterday
two
days
ago.
I,
don't
remember
about
how
that
platform
works.
So
just
take
a
look
at
that.
Let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions
about
about
Kiko
chat,
but
you're
welcome
to
come
and
there's
ad
hoc
rooms,
there's
plenty
of
space
for
discussion
and
all
that,
even
if
you're
not
necessarily
going
to
up
into
a
workshop.
If
you
just
want
to
come,
hang
I'll
be
there.
E
A
E
So
the
collab
summit
schedule
can
be
viewed
two
locations
now,
so,
if
you
are,
if
you
are
registered
to
attend,
you
can
build
your
schedule
in
schedge
for
the
first
day,
I'm
hoping
to
and
I
have
a
couple
more
like
last
minute
sessions
that
have
been
popping
in
on
the
summit
repo
to
get
booked
up,
but
we're
gonna
have
those
added
to
shed
as
well
by
the
end
of
this
week.
So
people
can
build
their
schedule
in
scheduling
with
their
open,
Jas
World
schedule.
E
G
A
I'm,
sorry
to
interrupt
you
Jory
go
ahead,
no
good
I'm!
Just
going
to
ask
I
know
in
the
past,
things
have
been
a
little
fluid
right
down
to
the
last
moments.
Do
we
expect
that
it
being
in
sched
or
schedge
or,
however,
you
say
that
that
it'll
be
a
little
bit
more
locked
in
or
do
you
think
we'll
still
have
some
fluidity
so.
E
What's
what's
on,
the
schedule
is
going
to
be
locked
in
and
we
to
do
that,
you
all
be
just
because
it's
a
remote
event.
This
year
we
were
dealing
with
multiple,
multiple
time
zones.
That
doesn't
mean
that,
if
you
think
of
something
last-minute
that
there's
not
time,
you
know
that
you
can't
do
it.
We've
got.
We've
got
lots
of
room
for
you
in
ad
hoc
space.
We
can
build
more
rooms
out.
Just
just
let
me
know
if
that
happens
day
of
we
can.
E
H
E
You
can
use
it
or
not,
use
it,
and
and
with
when
you
log
into
Kiko
chat,
you
navigate
to
an
ad
hoc
room,
there's
an
ether
pad
in
there.
So
the
plan
is
just
okay.
It's
a
community
space.
If
you're
in
there
having
a
conversation
say
Jory
and
Jenna
are
talking
about.
You
know
revitalizing
the
CPC
repository,
that's
not
even
the
thing,
but
we
would
pop
it
on
the
ether
pad
and
just
say:
hey,
Jory
and
Joe.
We're
talking
about
this
and
people
could
navigate
to
it.
E
A
I
Better,
okay,
sorry,
so
a
couple
of
quick
updates
here,
so
we
had
had
the
legal
committee
meeting
last
night
or
last
week
there
were
a
couple
of
things
which
I
had
said.
I
would
give
you
some
updates
on
the
there's,
some
bylaws
changes,
which
we're
looking
at,
which
you
know
it
looks
like
those
are
gonna,
be
relatively
non-controversial.
There
was
some
discussion
about
some
updates
to
the
CLA,
basically
changing
over
from
the
existing
Jas
Foundation
style,
CLA
to
the
more
common
apache
style.
I
Cla,
there's
a
little
more
discussion,
that's
needed
on
this
one,
but
all
the
same,
the
general
feeling
was
there's
it's
better
to
use
something
that's
more
standard.
There
are
some
other
questions
which
should
come
in
from
amp
as
well,
which
those
are
also
under
discussion.
You
need
to
follow
up
meeting
on
that
one,
and
we
had
very
briefly
gone
through
this
question
which
had
been
raised
by
node
about
you
know:
what's
the
proper
way
to
handle
DC
over
mediations
and
that
also,
unfortunately,
we
ran
out
of
time.
I
There
weren't
any
big
surprises
on
the
call
I
think
mainly
it's
it's
giving
people
a
little
bit
of
time
to
chew
things
over
so
they're
able
to
advise
their
board
reps
appropriately
when
the
things
do
come
up
for
a
vote.
So
that's
where
we
are
I
think
we're
making
good
progress.
If
anybody
has
any
questions,
then
you
can
ping
me
and
I
can
take
you
through
it.
A
Anything
else
before
we
get
into
the
agenda:
no
cool
I
thought.
So
the
first
item
on
here
is
an
issue
I
created
just
trying
to
spur
some
CLAB
summit
sessions.
I
thought
I
had
removed
the
agenda.
I
did
yesterday,
but
I
guess
right
after
the
meeting
was
built.
I,
don't
think,
there's
really
too
much
to
talk
about
here.
I
think
we'll
kind
of
fill
in
some
CPC
sessions
on
one
of
the
days
so
we'll
work
that
out.
A
A
F
A
It's
busy
busy
time
so
just
to
provide
a
little
more
information.
You
do
have
a
pull
request
open
to
move
it
to
stage
two,
and
there
are
some
questions
on
that,
but
you're
addressing
correct,
okay,
cool
all
right,
I
popped,
the
link
to
the
pull
request,
five,
five,
seven
into
the
chat
case.
Anybody
wants
to
take
a
look
at
that,
but
otherwise
we
will
move
on.
A
M
A
K
I
think
the
main
thing
at
this
point,
as
far
as
I
understand,
is
to
get
feedback
from
the
projects.
You
know
how
would
complying
with
that
policy.
Look
like
if
there's
anything
that
we
need
to
update,
modify
where
it
just
so
like
giving
a
shout
out
to
projects
to
comment
on
that
PR
I
think
would
be
the
top
thing.
F
A
A
A
You
know
what
the
expectations
are
and
such
so
that
is
pull
request
562
and
we
had
decided
last
meeting
in
an
effort
to
avoid
any
unnecessary
bike,
shedding
that
we
would
have
folks
express
interest
directly
to
me.
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
you
know,
I've
got
a
handful
of
interested
parties,
I,
don't
know.
What's
the
best
way
to
kind
of
move
forward
on
the
seat
and
I
guess
overall
board
seats.
A
L
Understanding
Joe
was,
the
idea
was
that
you
would
get,
and
they
you
know
out
of
those
people
saying
that
they
were
interested
in
get
an
idea
of
like
whether
it
was
a
done
deal
was
like
basically
one
person
being
interested
or
whether
it
was
more
than
that,
and
you
had
to
like
look
into
something
deeper.
So
I
think
that
was
the
outcome
of
I
mean
that
at
least
it
was
my
understanding,
yeah.
A
So
I
guess
I'll
try
to
summarize
without
what
things
were
made
in
not
anonymous.
Still,
you
know,
there's
one
person
who's
interested
who
is
completely
new
to
the
project
than
the
work
and
then
the
other
one.
Two
three
four
or
five
people.
Excuse
me
our
folks
who
are
active
in
the
work
already
they're.
All
you
know
some
form
of
member
of
the
CPC
already
voting
and
regular
members.
A
You
know
so
we
we
have
some
interested
parties
as
I
understand
it's
the
CPC
director
seat.
That
goes
to
the
board
that
is
elected
from
voting
members,
and
then
this
second
seats
you
know
is,
is
yet
to
be
determined
of
the
list.
I
have
two
of
them
are
voting
members,
I
kind
of
wonder
about.
Do
we
do
both
seats
at
the
same
time,
do
we
do
the
the
director
seat
first
and
let
voting
members
work
on
that
and
then
you
know
we
can
do
this,
the
second
seat
after
that.
A
F
D
F
A
A
Think
Jory
stepped
away
her
I
would
I
would
ask
her
directly
but
I
think
that
was
the
plan.
I,
don't
see
it
in
the
agenda
like
sort
of
CPC
sessions,
there's
open,
Jas
collaboration
and
governance,
but
that's
only
an
hour.
Oh
that's
on
the
new
new
contributors
day.
So
I
expect
that
there
will
be.
You
know,
maybe
a
whole
day
of
open
time
for
cross
project,
Council
and
open
Jas
working
groups
to
work
on
things.
F
A
F
A
Yeah
I
I'd,
like
to
to
you,
know,
draft
a
proposal
on
this.
I
hesitate
to
volunteer
because
I'm
already
late
on
my
open,
Jay
commitments,
world
commitments
but-
and
things
are
busy
right
now,
but
I
kind
of
I
feel
like
we
have
the
CPC
director,
which
is
from
the
voting
members,
and
we
should
run
that
election
and
then
we
should
do
the
second
seat
immediately
after
that,
and
we
should
figure
out
how
to
do
that
in
a
more
broad,
open
way.
A
You
know,
in
terms
of
who
can
nominate
I
think
we
talked
last
week.
That's
even
if
someone
who
nominated
and
is
new
to
the
work.
You
know
the
the
people
who
are
involved
in
the
work
they're
more
of
a
known
entity,
so
they
would,
it
would
seem
likely
that
would
they
would
get
more
votes
regardless.
So
I
don't
expect
that
somebody
new
can
just
come
in
and
you
know
take
over
or
what-have-you,
but
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
be
as
open
as
possible
to
get
more
people
involved.
A
So
that
would
perhaps
be
along
the
lines
of
what
I
would
propose.
My
question,
though,
is
like
how
do
we
like?
How
do
we
elect
these
folks
for
the
director?
It
comes
from
the
voting
members
and
I
think
it
even
says
in
the
Charter
that
voting
members
would
elect
that
person
so
voting
members
votes,
but
for
the
more
community
open
seat.
F
A
C
Just
maybe
some
if
we
have
a
way
to
sort
of
include
all
members,
plus,
maybe
all
active
committers,
to
foundation
projects
if
they
care
I,
don't
if
we
have
like
a
way
to
come
on
the
analyst,
but
like
that,
no
ideas!
You
want
to
get
people
who
are
actively
engaged
at
the
full
community,
but
not
people
who
are
just
kind
of
never
involved
but
I.
Don't
we
don't
even
have
a
list
like
that,
so
I'm
not
sure
how
we
would
silicate
that
yeah.
A
Having
it
that
open
excuse
me
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
like
how
do
we
execute
that,
but
I
do
wonder
about
the
combination
of
regular
members
and
voting
members
voting
as
well
as
perhaps
each
project
gets
one
or
two
votes
which
I
think
that's
how
we
elected
the
voting
member.
That
represents
the
you
know,
at-large
or
you
know
non
impact
projects.
So
we
could
combine
that
perhaps.
K
C
N
F
F
F
So
it's
the
CPC
will
elect
from
amongst
voting
CPC
members,
a
CPC
chairperson
to
work
on
building
an
agenda
for
these
meetings
and
a
CPC
director
to
represent
the
CPC
to
the
board
for
a
term
of
one
year.
According
to
the
open
joseph
bylaws,
the
chair
and
director,
maybe
but
or
not
according
to
st.
personal,
the
CPC
shall
hold
annual
elections
to
select
the
CPC
chairperson
and
director.
There's
no
limits
on
the
number
of
terms
of
CPC,
chairperson
or
director
may
serve.
A
O
F
L
F
It's
in
the
other
parts
that
clear
it
is
clearly
calls
out
what
the
voting
members
do
versus
regular
members.
It's
just
like
in
that
particular
text.
It
doesn't
say
voting
members,
it
says
CPC
right,
so
it's
kind
of
written
so
that
if
it
doesn't
specify
it
implies
all
members
and
then
when
it
means
the
specific.
So.
O
So
I'm
personally
fine
with
seeing
this
reading
as
saying
that
everyone
from
the
CPC
votes
on
the
representation
and
that
representation
does
represent
everyone,
not
only
the
voting
members.
If
anything,
I
would
say,
we
may
want
to
consider
making
this
more
lenient
in
allowing
non-voting
members
to
run
for
these
roles,
but
I
think
like.
That
is
something
that
we
could
follow
up
with
at
another
time,
yeah.
L
L
K
D
B
O
Talked
about
before
that
I
also
think
is
worth
considering,
is
staggering.
The
elections
and
whether
or
not
we'd
want
to
I
think
there's
definitely
value
and
just
moving
forward
with
all
the
elections
at
once,
but
from
an
onboarding
perspective.
As
someone
who's
been
on
the
board,
I
think
it
probably
would
be
better
and
other
folks
feel
free
to
interject.
O
If
you
disagree,
but
I
think
it
would
be
better
to
have
only
one
person
who
you're
onboarding
onto
the
board
at
a
time
and
having
other
community
elected
representatives
have
terms
that
extend
over
if
I
recall
correctly,
like
in
the
node
foundation.
When
we
had
elected
individuals,
they
were
a
turn
to
your
terms
that
overlapped,
so
that,
like
one
person,
was
there
to
kind
of
help
on
board
the
next
person.
O
We're
not
looking
at
to
your
turns
here,
which
I
I
think
it's
absolutely
fine,
but,
like
we
I
think
we
should
maybe
consider
offsetting
elections
by
six
months
to
allow
time,
for
you
know
a
but
the
board,
to
bring
on
new
people
and
give
the
new
person
the
right
focus,
but
also
to
allow
community
reps
to
kind
of
support
each
other
as
they're
joining
and
leaving
I.
Just.
J
Like
to
give
a
huge
plus
under
that
I
haven't
been
on
the
board
for
the
node
foundation
at
all
or
for
friend,
a
should
formally
notices
the
node
foundation,
but
in
node
in
specifically
in
the
TSE
in
calm,
calm,
our
elections
are
offset
and
that
has
historically
helped
me
and
help
the
others
from
what
I've
heard
kind
of
come
in
to
things
more
effectively.
So
I'd
give
a
huge,
plus
one
to
staggering
it
like
that.
I.
L
Agree,
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
elections
also
take
time
and
if
we
have
them
every
six
month-
and
we
take
like
two
or
three
weeks
to
handle
those
every
six
months
like
we
end
up
just
doing
only
elections
and
not
much
else
and
so
I
think
like
if
we
have
a
really
solid
system
that
you
know
runs
well
and
it's
simple
and
that
will
agree
to
carry
on
year
after
year.
I
think
that
works,
if
not
I,
want
to
be
careful,
not
be
just
running
in
the
amp
Advisory
Committee.
P
A
I
think
that
it's
the
process
and
I
think
we
kind
of
keep
deliberating.
You
know
how
who
we
choose
and
how
we
choose
them.
So
I'm
hopeful
that,
once
we
kind
of
nail
this
down
that
it
that
it
will
be
routine
and
we
can
just
execute
and
maybe
spend
more
time
promoting
it,
especially
if
we
do
have
a
more
open
community
seat
but
I
hope
that's
moving
forward.
Once
we
nail
this
down,
it
should
be
good
yeah.
A
Yeah
I'm
gonna
drop
I'm
gonna
try
to
drop
something
simple
up
that
you
know,
maybe
isn't
necessarily
governance
and
charter
wording,
but
just
kind
of
outline.
What
I
think
would
make
sense,
but
based
on
what
we've
been
talking
about
and
open
it
up
as
some
sort
of
PR
that
we
can
comment
on
and
hone
and
then
maybe
translate
that
into
you
know
actual
governance
documentation
and
we
can
move
forward
on
that
cool.
It's
good
great,
excellent.
A
F
A
F
H
A
O
To
clarify
there
I
was
definitely
imagining
the
staggering
would
be
not
in
lieu
of
having
anyone
in
place.
So
again,
a
more
like.
We
have
two
people
right
now,
let's
replace
one
rather
than
replace
both,
although
like
for
this
round,
and
they
just
make
sense
to
move
forward
with
like
replacing
everyone
all
at
once.
It
was
more
in
the
future,
especially
as
we
add
this
extra
seat,
if
we're
onboarding
three
new
directors
at
the
same
time
every
year
that
may
end
up
being
a
lot
of
work.
A
Alright
cool
so
I've
taken
some
notes.
I
will
figure
out
some
way
to
propose
something
and-
and
that
will
include
you
know
how
we
move
forward
with
the
current
members
board
members
and
and
staggering,
and
all
this
I'll
try
to
capture
it
all
in
one
document
cool
we
were
I
believe
hoping
to
talk
about
escalation
path,
but
you
know:
we've
definitely
run
out
of
time
there.
A
So
hopefully
that's
another
session
we
can
have
in
the
collab
summit
I,
which
I
think
would
be
great
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
spend
you
know
a
full
hour
or
more
on
escalation
path,
processes
for
code
of
conduct
and
and
all
that
sort
of
goes
into
COC
in
moderation.
So
we'll
try
to
put
something
clearly
on
the
calendar
for
next
week,
and
it
can
talk
more
about
that.
Then.
A
And
then,
beyond
that
I
think
we
had
agreed
to
jump
into
a
private
session
to
talk
more
about
some
some
of
those
matters.
So
unless
we
have
anything
else,
I
guess
we
would
call
it
the
public
session
around
cool
great
all
right,
so
I
will
stop
the
livestream
thanks
everybody
for
joining
in
on
the
public
session
and
we'll
go
to
private
session
Cheers.