►
From YouTube: CPC Meeting - 9 June 2020
Description
The OpenJS Foundation is a member-supported non-profit organization that provides a neutral home for some of the most important project in the JavaScript ecosystem.
Learn more and join us at https://openjsf.org
A
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
open
das
foundation.
This
cross-project
council
meeting
today
is
the
9th
of
June
2020
oops
Oh
Michael.
Will
you
let
Benin
I'm
not
hosting
morons?
Like
you?
Thank
you
great
and
now
you
can
watch
the
attendee
list
for
me
sure
cool.
So
you
know
a
reminder
to
folks
to
add
their
names
to
the
dock
and
also,
you
know,
please
help
take
notes,
we'll
probably
be
able
to.
A
Crank
through
the
agenda
and
then
maybe
get
back
to
some
of
the
code
of
conduct
process
discussions
that
we
had
we've
been
having.
So
before
we
get
into
the
agenda.
Do
we
have
any
announcements
or
anything
I
know
that
jewelry
is
not
on
so
you
know
to
expect
there.
Anybody
else
got
any
announcements,
I.
B
A
A
C
A
really
quick
update
this
complete
non-sequitur
from
this
discussion.
Oh
so,
a
while
back
a
believe
was
no
project
had
asked
about
a
Duns
number,
which
is
necessary
for
registering
installers,
and
things
like
that.
Just
wanted
to
give
a
heads
up
that
we
called
in
today,
we've
gotten
the
name
up
from
node
foundation
to
open
jazz
foundation.
So
if
you
are
involved
in
that
process-
and
you
need
a
Duns
number
for
some
reason
or
another-
you
can
reach
out
to
me
or
you
can
reach
out
to
Robin
and
we'll
take
care.
You
great.
C
No,
we
have
a
big
call
planned
for
later
on
this
week,
where
we'll
be
going
through
a
number
of
the
things
which
we've
been
discussing,
and
you
know
various
different
forums
discussing
a
couple
of
potential
revisions
to
the
bylaws,
we'll
be
going
over
the
crowdfunding
guidance
which
the
board
has
been
discussing
at
length
for,
as
you
know,
quite
quite
some
time.
This
is
something
that's
been.
A
long-standing
agenda
item
be
discussing
some
requests
from
the
amp
project
and
discussing
DCO
remediation,
so
it'll
be
it'll,
be
an
epic
all.
A
A
Probably
working
on
minutes
as
well
and
yeah
I've
gotten
good
at
keeping
my
eye
on
that
attendee
list
cool.
So,
let's
see
if
we
are
to
get
into
the
agenda,
then
yeah.
The
the
first
agenda
item
is
issue
559.
Oh,
this
is
my
issue.
Cpc
collab
summit
sessions,
yeah
I,
don't
know
which
of
these
are
in
the
schedule,
which
are
these
we
should
put
in
the
schedule.
A
If
anybody
has
any
thoughts,
Peele,
please
feel
free
to
drop
them
in
this
issue,
and
I
will
try
to
sort
out
what
we
have
and
perhaps
any
gaps
that
we
may
have.
You
know
with
regards
to
these
sessions
being
in
the
club
summit
and
I'll
see
how
they
can
work
into
the
schedule.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
hit
on
all
these
frankly,
but
you
know
I
know,
there's
kind
of
a
lot
going
on
so
we'll
see,
but
if.
E
You
help
faulty
defines
sub-points
here,
for
example,
the
standards
working
group
session.
You
know,
do
you
want
to
cover
explicitly
like
what
we'd
like
to
talk
about
over
that
period
of
time?
You
know,
for
example,
we're
working
on
a
liaison
relationship
between
unicode
and
open
jazz
and
which
would
fit
within
that
context,
which
can
be
a
bullet
point
within
that
time
period.
Should
we
define
that
I
think.
A
Just
figuring
out
whether
we
want
to
have
a
standards
one
to
begin
with
and
then
add
those
sorts
of
bullet
points
makes
sense
to
me
yeah
so
I
don't
know.
Maybe
then,
if
you
want
to
mention
this
in
the
standard
slack
channel,
just
the
idea
of
whether
we
should
have
session
or
not,
we
can
kind
of
go
from
there
and
I'll
try
to
follow
up
on
any
of
the
other
ones
as
well.
Joe.
A
A
D
A
A
Great
alright,
so
we'll
figure
it
out,
but
if
anybody
has
anything
they
want
to
add.
Please
drop
it
in
this
issue
and
I'll
try
to
follow
up
on
it.
Cool
thanks
next
up
is
the
project
Charter
Review
for
amp
I
think
that
this
is
good
to
go.
We
just
needed
to
approval
Michael
and
I
approved.
It
feel
free
to
take
a
look
other
folks,
but
oh
yeah
Toby's
on
the
call
here.
We
should
be
good
here
right,
Toby,
that's.
B
A
All
right
two
approvals,
no
objections
good
to
go
cool
as
done
Thank,
You,
Toby,
together
great.
So
next
on
the
agenda
is
issue
549.
This
is
the
CPC
chair
election.
As
we
have
been
discussing,
the
idea
was
that's.
Over
the
last
week
we
would
have
nominations
and
starting
today
we
would
have
an
election
I'm.
A
The
only
one
that's
nominated
I,
don't
know
if
I
should
leave
it
open
until
the
end
of
the
day,
I
mean
I
think
we
were
thinking
that
it
would
be
like
meeting
to
meeting
so,
but
I
don't
feel
comfortable
really
making
that
decision.
Necessarily
since
I'm
the
only
one
you
know
nominated
somebody.
Any
thoughts
on
this.
B
A
A
B
B
F
H
A
B
B
B
I
mean
maybe
for
the
consensus
seeking
part
of
things
we
should
just
say
you
know,
there's
only
one
nominee
unless
there's
any
objections
within
the
next
week,
we'll
consider
you
reelected
right,
that's
kind
of
with
the
consensus.
If
somebody
has
an
objection,
they
can
speak
up,
otherwise
we
assume
and
people
can
plus
one
as
well.
You
know
if.
F
A
A
A
All
right
so
I
made
a
note.
There
should
be
good
moving
on
as
I
mentioned
earlier
with
chatting
with
Brian.
We
have
an
issue
5:43.
Should
outgoing
voting
members
become
regular
members,
we've
basically
decided
that
they
should
Brian
has
a
PR
open.
It
touches
on
governance,
so
we
could
have
consensus
in
a
meeting,
but
I
don't
think
that
we
do
today
and
I'm
not
sure
we
did.
A
Last
week
we
just
decided
to
leave
it
open
for
the
14
days,
so
we
can
merge
that
in
tomorrow
and
then
close
this
issue,
unless
anyone
has
anything
to
add
to
that,
I
will
continue
on
the
open.
Jas
collaboration
network
is
the
next
item.
This
is
issue
474
Michael.
You
want
to
give
us
an
update
if
there
is
anything
really.
B
The
only
update
is
there
are
some
additional
comments
and
asking
for
clarification
and
expanding
some
of
the
text
which
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
do
so.
I
will
do
that
sort
of
some
requests
before
it
lands
at
stage.
I
think
it
was
going
to
stage
two
before
it
lands.
There
was
requested
that
we
do
these
updates
cool.
A
A
A
A
C
Was
this
is
live
reporting
on
the
spot?
I
just
pushed
this
about
three
minutes
ago,
but
basically
it
is
a
document
which
lays
out
kind
of
what
what
the
board
does
in
general
and
what
the
expectations
are
for
a
community
board
member
in
terms
of
representing
their
community,
as
well
as
the
time
commitment
and
so
forth.
I
think
the
main
thing
to
keep
in
mind
here
is
that
this
is
a
general
set
of
outlines.
The
estimates
are
general.
C
F
C
A
Great,
thank
you
yeah.
It's,
it's
very
helpful,
I
appreciate
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
had
decided
what
we
do
after
this,
maybe
leave
it
open
for
a
week
and
then
figure
out.
I
mean
I
think
that
we
need
to
really
figure
out
what
the
process
is
going
to
be
here
and
what
the
parameters
are
of
filling
this
seat.
So
you
know
people
want
to
think
about
that
for
a
week.
Look
at
the
document
and
we
can
hash
that
out
next
week
or
comment
in
this
issue.
What
are
people's
thoughts.
F
F
B
I
Yeah
I
think
we
should
set
a
deadline
of
a
week
or
two
for
people
to
self
nominate
or
get
nominated
based
on
this,
and
then
that
gives
us
still
like
this
at
the
end
of
23rd
of
June,
and
we
want
to
decide
by
July
right
yeah,
so
maybe
a
week
to
review
and
decide
if
they
want
to
do
it.
You
know
that
gives
us
two
weeks
to
decide
how
we're
going
to
vote
if
there
is
a
vote
that
needs
to
happen.
A
I
A
B
I
Yeah,
that's
right:
okay,
I
mean
I.
Think
at
this
point
we
should
it
felt
like
we
had
sort
of
needled
on
the
idea
of
like
well.
If
someone's
gonna
do
this,
they
should
already
like
I
felt
at
least
a
precursor
to
being
on
the
board
today
should
be
that
you're
actively
involved
in
the
CPC,
because
otherwise,
if
you
just
come
in
and
say,
hey
I
want
to
be
on
the
board
and
I
haven't
done
anything
for
the
foundation
at
all.
It's
you
know
it's
just
it
just
feels
safer
to
me
to
do
that.
H
My
recollection
of
where
we
left
this
is
that
we
were
waiting
for
the
document
that
God
now
I'll
be
out
in
ten
minutes
ago,
and
then
this
would
enable
people
who
might
be
interested
to
step
up
to
take.
One
of
the
community
seems
to
do
so
to
announce
themselves,
and
then
we
could
figure
out
who,
who
is?
What
is
the
scope
of
candidates
that
we
ought
to
be
even
considering
yeah.
I
A
D
F
A
A
A
All
right,
so,
how
about
we
publicize
this
document?
And
you
know
if
anybody
wants
to
take
a
stab
at
a
draft
of
what's
the
requirements
and
process
would
look
like
for
the
director
seat.
The
second
director
seat
drop
it
in
that
issue
and
then
we'll
take
a
look
at
it
again
next
week,
let's
seem
reasonable.
The.
B
A
F
B
B
Just
think
because
they
were
you
know,
because
the
elections
for
both
will
be
coming
up.
It's
it's
worthwhile,
knowing
like,
if
we
have
one
candidate
who's
willing
to
do
either
or
if
we
have
10
candidates
that
want
to
do
the
two
of
them,
then
it
will
that
may
affect
our
choice
for
the
second
one
right.
H
B
B
F
B
Forward,
if
that's
part
of
what
is
up
for
the
CPC
to
decide,
what
is
that
role
in
terms
of
and
I
think
it
was
mentioned?
You
know,
I
think
there
was
some
wording
in
there.
That's
a
community
community
director,
so
it
you
know
but
I
think
there
is.
We
do
have
some
some
room
in
terms
of
saying
what
do
we
want
the
rule
to
be.
A
A
I
I
I
mean
I
think
originally,
it
was,
but
you
know
before
the
merger
node
had
a
lot
more
experience
doing
this
stuff
than
any
of
the
other
projects,
so
it
was
really
nice
to
have
their
help
and
just
give
them
the
seats
of
the
making
up
some
continuity
and
some
experience
doing
that
and
then
from
here
you
know
I
think
from
here.
It's
like
do.
We
want
to
just
keep
it
the
way
it
is
or
do
we
want
to
rotate
it
a
bit
between
people
that
are
interested
no.
H
I'm
still
of
the
opinion
here
that
the
number
of
potential
candidates
for
idea
of
these
two
seats
is
so
really
honest
and
small
that
we're
better
off
now
that
we
have
some
slight
description
of
it
and
off
the
tasks
and
expectations.
If
we
could
get
some
tentative
signs
of
interest
being
shown
the
worlds,
for
example
Joe
or
about
to
be
re-elected
chair,
it
would
really
help
in
being
able
to
drive
the
process
here
on.
H
Saying
I
would
be
interested
in
tentative
signs
of
interest
being
communicated
to
Joe
so
that
when
we,
for
example,
meet
a
week
from
now
or
later,
we
can
know
whether
we
really
are
in
a
situation
where
we
have
more
than
two
persons
who
might
be
interested
in
either
of
these
roads,
because
if
the
grand
total
of
interested
people
is
two,
then
it
kind
of.
Why
are
we
really
bothering
about
talking
about
the
other
details
when
we
only
have,
in
the
end
two
candidates
to
choose
from
for
two
positions?
Well,.
I
H
I
H
A
I
A
I
think
Emily's
got
a
point
to
like
you
know
if
we
can
cut
down
on
the
bike
shedding
to
move
this
forward.
At
least
for
this.
You
know
round
that
makes
sense,
I
suppose
so.
I
can
I
can
drop
a
comment
into
that
particular
issue.
The
second
director
issue,
which
is
438-
that's
I,
won't
do
it
now,
but
I'll
just
say:
breaths
interest.
D
A
A
F
A
Worries
no
apology
needed
that
sounds
like
a
good
plan
and
then
responsible
security,
disclosures
I,
don't
know
if
Michael
dropped
this
copy
in
here,
but
it's
PRS
ready
at
state
zero.
It's
the
pull
request
is
for
eight.
Nine
I
can
drop
it
into
the
chat
once
it
loads
here.
This
PR
is
basically
stage
zero
and
I.
Think
we've
actually
already
been
working
on
this
for
a
while
and
I.
A
My
suggestion
would
be
that
we
do
skip
the
stage
because
I
think
we've
already
been
kind
of
working
on
this
for
a
while-
and
you
know,
have
a
resolve
this
PR
and
then
open
a
new
one
to
go
to
stage
two
I
think
do
I
have
the
staging
the
open
here
somewhere
I
thought
I
did
what
I
pre
opened
up.
I
mighta
lost
it.
Yeah.
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
So
I
guess
it
you
know
Mike.
My
hope
was:
we've
got
enough,
I
think
approvals.
Now,
unless
there's
objections,
we
should
land
it
today
and
then
it
doesn't
sound
like
anybody's
objecting
to
just
opening
it
as
a
stage
to
PR
or
which
we
could
do
and
just
click
call
out
in
there
that
we're
skipping
one
and
people
can
object
there
if
they
need
they
want
to
yeah.
B
A
All
right,
and
then
that
brings
us
to
a
code
of
conduct-
issue
I'll
drop
this
in
the
chat.
The
folks.
This
is
onboarding,
provide
explicit
feedback
on
what
and
then
quotes
here.
Escalation
path
is
and
how
to
implement
it,
plus
temporarily
address
in
the
onboarding
checklist.
Terney
opened
this
up.
19
days
ago,
we've
had
a
bunch
of
discussion
here.
Michael
you've
been
in
the
discussion.
Do
you
want
to
get
everybody
up
to
speed,
I?
Think.
B
B
It
requires
projects
to
like
include
in
their
COC
an
email
address.
You
know,
basically,
here's
the
escal,
an
email
addresses
we
have
set
up
and
we
have
people
on
there's
been
some
I
guess,
confusion,
difficulty
in
finding
that
and
the
governance.
So
maybe
there's
some
concerns
about
clarifying
that,
but
also,
just
fundamentally,
there's
been
some
issues
raised
about
whether
we
should
have
won
or
not,
and
that's
kind
of
we
had
a.
We
had
discussion
on
that,
but
we
didn't
close
the
discussion
to
say
what
is
it?
What
are
our
next
steps
on
on
that
front?.
A
B
A
J
Think
it
would
be
great
to
plan
to
meet
as
like
as
a
COC
specific.
You
know
thing,
I
would
love
if
we
I
mean
it's
been
one
of
this.
This
has
been
a
thing
that
I've
been
championing
hard,
but
at
the
same
time,
I'm
also
a
little
underwater
with
different
different
things
that
we
have
going
on
with
the
summit
and
the
conference
coming
up
so
I
think
I'd
love
to
kind
of
dig
into
this,
but
I
will
be
honest.
That
I
don't
know
that
I
have
the
capacity
to
do
it.
A
I
kind
of
in
the
same
sort
of
boat,
you
know
some
overlapping
reasons.
What
but
I
wonder
if
we
should,
because
how
many?
How
many
CPC
meetings
do
we
have
before
the
conference.
A
A
A
G
A
A
But
yeah,
so
let's
do
that?
Let's,
let's
call
it
a
wrap
on
the
agenda
and
we
will
plan
to
just
do
another
agenda
session
next
week
and
you
know
I
think
that
we
should
really.
We
may
want
to
block
out
a
good
chunk
of
time
for
code
of
conduct
at
the
collab
summits
and
really
dig
into
these
things
and
any
prep
work
we
can
do
before.
That
would
be
great.
You
know,
identify
what
what
are
the
key
things
we
want
to
work
on
and
what
are
the
parameters
of
those
of
those
issues?