►
Description
To learn more about critical open source JavaScript projects like Appium, Dojo, jQuery, Node.js, and webpack, and 27 more checkout The OpenJS Foundation: https://openjsf.org/
B
All
right
so
I
think
we're
live.
Here
Comes
Michael
thanks
everybody
for
joining
another
session
of
the
openjs
foundation's
Cross
project
council
meeting.
Today's,
like
October,
25th
and
I'm,
happy
to
see
everyone
here.
Thanks
for
joining
so
do
we
have
any
announcements.
C
Well,
we
had
a
big
announcement
yesterday.
The
open
ssf
project,
Alpha
selected
jQuery
as
its
next
project
to
support
from
a
security
side
chain
perspective,
so
we
announced
that
we
also
announced
some
Security
Experts,
who
will
be
helping
include.
We
haven't
named
all
of
those
folks
we'll
use
that
in
our
next
blog,
but
Toby
is
going
to
be
part
of
that
team.
It's
going
to
help
us
we're
excited
about
that.
A
D
A
C
A
Hi
nice
to
meet
everyone.
If
I,
if
I
haven't
met
you
already
I
see
you
know
many
familiar
faces:
yeah
I'm
new
on
board,
Technical,
Community,
director
and
program
manager,
yeah
very
excited
to
be
here.
A
Yeah
hi
I'm
jagis
I'm
an
objects
core
collaborator,
just
like
two
two
three
weeks
old,
so
I'm,
quite
new
and
I'm
here
to
find
lots
my
place
in
what
can
I
do
to
improve
and
contribute
to
JavaScript
how
many
so.
Thank
you
welcome.
B
Any
other
announcements
before
we
get
into
things
or
or
anything
from
the
board
side
I
think
is
there
a
meeting
on
Friday?
Is
that
right
or
was
that
last
Friday
I.
C
Need
to
probably
cancel
that
we
have
our
next
board
meeting
at
our
member
Summit
in
the
second
week
of
November,
so
considering
just
a
week
off,
I
need
to
send
out
a
cancellation
and
I
think
our
next
one
is
probably
the
day
after
Thanksgiving,
so
I
need
to
sort
that
out
as
well.
But
we're
going
to
be
doing
this
will
be
face
to
face
at
the
LF
member
Summit,
we'll
be
doing
some
budget
planning
for
next
year
and
just
some
other
strategic
plannings
that'll
be
good
to
be.
B
Great
cool,
I
guess
I'll
also
mention
there's
a
security
meeting
after
this
meeting.
So
if
any
wants
to
hang
on
and
hang
out,
that'd
be
great.
Are
there
other
meetings
that
we
should
talk
about?
It's
the
program
committee
is
not
meeting
regularly
yet
right.
C
No,
we
just
had
a
program
committee
do
a
special
meeting
because
we
are
participating
Venus,
which
is
the
fintech
open
source
foundation.
In
an
event,
that's
posting
on
December
8th,
so
the
program
committee
helped
develop
that
list
of
speakers
so
we'll
be
announcing
those
probably
in
the
next
week.
B
We
will
get
into
the
agenda
here
and
if
anyone
I
tried
to
throw
a
couple
a
little
bit
into
the
announcements,
but
if
anyone
can
help
flesh
that
out,
that
would
be
great
notes.
Note
taking
is
greatly
appreciated.
B
So
the
first
agenda
item
for
today
is
issue
923.
This
is
clarify
voting
processes
and
I
think
that
we
use
this
to
this
issue
to
drop
in
any
things
that
we
think
we
could
improve
in
terms
of
voting
and
elections
and
selections,
and
all
that
kind
of
goes
along
with
that
I
think
the
plan
is
to
try
and
work
on
some
of
this
in
a
a
working
session
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
so
you
may
have
any
comments
on
this
issue.
B
No
well,
if
you
think
of
any
election,
related
stuff
drop
it
in
there
and
we'll
try
to
make
some
progress
there.
You
know
in
the
in
the
coming
days
weeks,
whatever
cool
moving
on.
The
next
item
is
issue
910
ad
patching
script
for
COC
modifications:
tyranny.
Do
you
have
an
update
on
this.
E
B
That's
right,
I
have
I,
have
to
find
my
notes
on
that.
So
there
was
progress.
We
we
had
a
working
session
last
week
and
it
was
kind
of
a
you
know,
ad
hoc
working
session,
where
folks
sort
of
just
tried
to
make
progress
on
things
and
Tierney
and
I
think
it
was
Michael
Champion.
Is
that
right
attorney
that
was
helping
us
I.
E
Don't
think
I
unless
I
don't
think
his
last
name's
Champion,
but
I
could.
B
Yeah
yeah
sorry
I
mixed
that
up,
so
there
was
some
progress
there
on
on
the
patching
scripts
and
I
need
to
take
what
Tierney
and
Mike
put
together
and
try
to
integrate
it.
So
hopefully
more
on
that
soon.
B
I
will
add
a
note
to
the
issue
and
the
notes
in
a
few.
Unless
somebody
beats
me
to
it,
was
there
I'm.
B
Since
it's
related,
I'm
gonna
adjust
the
minutes
here,
issue
or
sorry
pull
request.
851
is
sort
of
related
to
that
patching
issue.
I
think
the
plan
is
to
get
the
the
patching
work
sorted
before
we
merge
this,
but
man
I
am
really
eager
to
merge.
This
I
will
try
to
get
that
patching
work
done
pronto.
B
D
E
B
B
We
have,
thankfully
Tierney
put
put
these
things
in
and
Mike
put
these
things
in
gists,
so
I've
got
a.
D
B
A
C
Yeah
topic
of
our
program
committee
meeting
that
we
recently
had
was
to
look
at
proposals
from
the
LF
event
team.
There's
two
new
Concepts
now
that
you
may
be
familiar
with,
but
they're
splitting
less
co-locating,
where
you
do
the
day
before
or
the
day
after.
The
other
was
a
micro
conference
which
they
used
to
call
co-locating
and
those
are
under
the
the
same
days
as
the
primary
event
for
the
LF,
so
whether
it
be
an
open
source,
Summit
or
a
kubecon.
So
the
program
committee
is
recommending
the
micro
conference.
C
We
get
actually
more
sessions
about
15
sessions,
no
cost
to
the
foundation,
which
is
great,
which
then
leads
more
budget
to
invest
in
third-party
events.
Like
you
know,
all
of
our
favorites
and
Kylie's
going
to
be
creating
kind
of
a
Outreach
campaign
to
start
up.
Curate
everybody's
favorite
wish
lists
on
those
third
parties
and
we'll
bring
that
back
to
the
program,
so
yeah
good
outcomes,
good
outcomes.
There.
F
Thank
you
Mateo.
You
had
a
question.
Yes,
are
the
plans
for
like
open,
Jess,
World
2023
or
an
analog
finalized,
or
is
this
part
of
this
conversation?
Oh?
How
is
it.
C
That
was
openjs
World
2023
will
be
a
micro
conference
at
open
source
Summit
North
America,
which
is
May
the
second
week
of
May
in
Vancouver
BC.
F
C
F
F
So,
if
especially
want
to
coordinate
for
a
collaborative
Summit
and
people
to
travel
and
everything
else,
we
should
probably
start
working
on
it
as
as
soon
as
possible,
as
especially
I
am
more
concerned
on
the
collaborative
Summit
than
on
the
on
the
micro
conference,
because
we
have
great
people
great
stuff
to
do
to
do
the
conference
stuff
I'm,
not
I,
I
I've
just
done
one
I,
don't
want
to
do
another
one,
but
I'm
very
happy
to
to
help
with
the
follow-up
Summit.
B
Great
yeah
I
agree.
Six
months
is
not
very
far
away,
so
we
mentioned
the
program
committee
earlier.
We
should
probably
get
that
going
again.
C
Yeah
we
typically
yeah
yeah.
We
won't.
We
won't
have
our
typical
Keynotes,
although
one
of
the
ideas
combining
two
of
our
breakout
sessions
for
the
start
of
each
day
to
be
like
a
keynote
but
we'll
be
feeding
ideas
into
the
main
keynote
at
open
source
Summit,
but
Wally
I
think
has
been
doing
an
awesome
job
leading
our
collab
Summit
effort
with
with
the
team
support,
so
I'll
just
get
those
going
again:
Thursdays
8
A.M
Pacific.
C
If
that
still
works
for
everybody
anybody's
enjoyed
it
invited
to
participate
in
those
program
committees,
so
we'll
get
the
cfps
out.
We
typically
would
get
them
out
the
end
of
January
for
a
June
event,
so
we
can
get
started
on
getting
those
out.
F
C
Had
the
other
22
and
Montreal
three
years
ago,
we
had
about
double
that,
but
we
had
five
tracks.
Yeah
yeah
I
think
we're
finding
that
fewer
tracks
works
best.
Even
in
all
of
the
other
events,
I've
been
attending,
people
are
still
enjoying
the
hallway
track.
More.
G
C
Well,
I
I'd,
like
our
board
to
you,
know
kind
of
approve
our
plans.
Again,
we
don't
have
budget
impact
for
openjs,
North
or
Summit
North
America.
There
would
be
some
with
kubecons,
so
I
think
we
need
to
evaluate
that
in
our
budget
meeting
in
November,
but
I
think
we're.
We
can
be
pretty
well
set
for
open,
open
source,
Summits
and
actually
I,
don't
think
the
open
source,
Summit,
Europe
venue
and
dates
have
been
publicly
disclosed
I
have
that,
but
that
should
be
announced
shortly
as
well.
C
F
F
A
C
They
were
streaming
so
I
can't
quite
disclose
that
but
yeah
and
actually
I
think
the
event
team
at
the
Linux
Foundation
has
found
the
attendance
to
be
better
in
Europe
than
it
has
been
in
the
U.S.
That's
interesting.
C
Don't
know
but
anecdotally,
one
of
our
colleagues
at
Finos
at
the
LF
runs
the
London
JavaScript
Meetup
and
his
first
one
returning
postcovid
last
month,
Netflix
host
it,
which
was
cool
in
their
London
headquarters.
They
had
150
people
signed
with
150
people
on
a
wait
list,
so.
B
I
think,
historically,
we
haven't
seen
that,
like
we
used
to
do
the
node
interactive
stuff
and
the
one
in
app
stream
was
great,
but
yeah
I
think
we
figured
it
wasn't
working
so.
C
A
B
Is
that
something
we
would
plan
to
discuss
in
a
program
committee
type
meeting?
Would
that
kind
of
follow-on
instance
now
yeah,
okay,
great
yeah,
all
right
cool?
B
Where
am
I
here,
the
this
is
rights.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
905.
Cpc
impact
voting,
member
selection,
so
I
think
we're
just
waiting
for
the
openjs
website
stuff.
Before
we
close
this
one
out
updates
on
that
I
don't
know
if
there
is
anything
Luke
put
on
your
on
your
list,
I'll
text
you
about
it
later,
all
right
cool,
so
we'll
we'll
we'll
look
at
that
later.
Oh
I'm,
actually
gonna
just
text
this
to
you
right
now.
B
Cool
next
thing
on
the
agenda
is
licensed,
check,
support,
tooling,
I.
Think
if
I
remember
correctly,
no,
but
they
go
a
different
issue,
but
this
is
probably
I.
Don't
know
if
this
is
on
your.
C
Yeah
I
met
with
niroff
who's,
the
new
CTO
at
the
Linux
Foundation
and
that
team.
That's
the
team
that
initially
had
the
briefing
with
Jordan
and
shubra
back
in
the
day.
They
are
in
hiring
ramp
up
mode,
they're
short
staffed.
So
initially
we
were
nearing
the
top
of
the
list
said
they
probably
can't
start
until
January,
but
they
also
have
a
request
from
the
security
foundation
for
something
similar.
But
if
someone's
interested
in
the
engineering
position,
it's
the
LF,
you
know
go
to
the
career
board
and
check
it
out,
but.
B
Good
luck
with
hiring
and
everything
hope
that
works
out
well
and
then
the
final
item
here
on
the
agenda
is
clarify
requirements
around
COC
violation,
Toby
I
know
this
one's
on
your
plates,
no
pressure
but
again,
I
think.
D
Yeah
this
one
and
the
other
one
we
need
to
sort
of
like
move
out
of
the
sink
like
do
so.
We
actually
stop
talking
about
them.
I
I
can
actually
work
on
on
this
this
week.
So
I
can
I
can
I
can
make
some
progress.
There
I
think
I
have
an
open
pull
request
on
it.
I
need
to
check
I'll.
Do
that
cool
great.
B
Awesome,
thank
you.
That's
it
for
the
agenda,
which
is
great,
although
I
know
that
Mateo
opened
an
issue
not
that
long
ago,
and
maybe
we
should
take
a
moment
to
talk
about
that.
That's
issue,
953
I,
hope
I'm.
Not
so.
F
Yeah
I
promised
I
would
so
it
was
very
late.
It
took
me
a
month
or
so
to
write
it
down.
You
know:
I
I
ended
up
having
putting
it
into
into
the
list.
I
I
promise
I
promised
on
the
that
we
would
that
I
would
collect
some
of
the
feedbacks
that
we
were
discussing
the
email
on
privately
on
providing
some
more
discretionary
funds
for
projects
for
staff
where
the
volunteer-based
community
Community
model
that
we
Foster
is
inefficient.
F
Okay,
mainly
because
it's
silent,
so
it's
this
goes
for
security
for
or
for
infrastructure.
For
me
for
some
maintenance
task
that
its
volunteers
would
really
volunteer
for.
Essentially.
So,
if
so,
that's
that's
the
the
comment.
Everything
is
more
or
less
up
to
discuss.
I
might
have
even
get
some
of
the
points
from
from
there
that
were
done
from
from
the
private
email
thread,
so
I
copied
some
paragraph
formative
from
both
tabi
has
written,
so
thank
you,
tobby
and,
and
the
other
other
bits
and
Bobs.
F
So
I
just
wanted
to
to
mention
that
this
is
I
think
this
is
like.
We
should
do
something
on
this
topic
in
term
of
supporting
the
projects
that
might
need
something.
F
I
might
need
some
some
help
on
their
infrastructure
or
their
some
of
the
tasks.
It's
we
all
know
that
the.
F
The
the
current
funding
model
for
open
source
is
more
or
less
broken,
so
we
should
try
to
do
something
about
it.
Okay,
it's
essentially
that's
that,
where
these
false
this
proposal,
Falls
in
so
I,
opened
an
issue
and
more
or
less
I
will
leave
the
floor
for
people
to
discuss.
D
I
mean
I
feel,
like
you
summarize
at
least
the
points
I
made
well
in
that
issue.
So
from
my
perspective,
like
John,
Walnut
I,
don't
know
if
others
also,
you
know
that
also
make
comments
feel
the
same
way,
but
if
so
I
think
I
think
that's
a
good
framework
to
start
having
a
conversation
about
anyway.
G
I
see
your
comment
about
the
cap,
although
I
think
the
advantage
I
can
see
in
terms
of
the
cap
outline
there
is
that
that
can
be
translated
into
what
budget
item
might
need
to
be
approved
by
the
board
and
that
you
can
do
a
you
can
do.
You
can
multiply
times
the
number
of
impact
projects
and
the
number
of
at-large
projects
and
get
an
upper
limit
right
so
that
it
seems
interesting
and
obviously
like
if
there's
some
other
well-scoped
issue,
that's
slightly
outside
that,
then
that
could
be
handled
as
a
one-off
right.
G
I,
read
it
as
one:
that's
the
limit
for
a
per
year
per
project.
Okay,
like
I
was
gonna,
say
like
I,
don't
know
how
many
impact
projects
do
we
have
if
we
have
say
six,
that's.
You
know
worst
case
60k
and
if
we
have
30
at
large
projects,
then
that's
another
60k
like
you
can
do
and
you
can
calculate
what
that
number
is
no.
D
E
I
agree:
I
I
that
number
needs
to
be
or
per
approved
project
not
per
year
I.
Think
per
year,
that's
like
I
mean
the
the
thing
that
node
currently
has
proposed.
I
believe
blows
nodes
budget
out
of
the
water
for
this
year
right,
and
so
that
gives
us
like.
If
that's
our,
if
that's
our
measuring
stick
that
gives
us
one
project
a
year.
E
But
like
that,
the
current,
but
the
current
thing
that's
proposed
for
node
is
10K
right
so
that
that
would
mean
like.
That
is
the
one
thing
we
could
do
like
Theo.
You
know
it's
this
this
year.
It
doesn't
matter
because
it's
like
the
end
of
the
year,
we're
not
going
to
ask
for
another
10K,
but
that's
10K
for
a
year
I
mean
maybe
but
like
I
I,
don't
know.
I
feel
like
that.
I.
D
E
D
Yeah
I
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
a
and
I
mean
we
need
to
have
a
line
item
in
the
budget.
So
we
need
to
have
like
an
envelope
or
I
mean
just
for
Robin's
sake.
You
know
at
the
very
least
right
like
we
need
to
have
like
an
envelope
of
like
how
much
money
can
the
foundation
actually
spend
on
this
stuff
for
a
year
right.
So
then
I
agree.
We
need
to
like
have
a
fixed
amount
for
then
I
am
fair.
D
Maybe
we
should
have
like
a
deadline
by
which
those
projects
have
to
be
given
to
your
foundation
and
the
foundation
votes
on,
like
we
vote
on
the
ones
that
we
believe
should
be
funded,
and
then,
when
there's
no
money
left
and
there's
no
money
enough
for
that
year.
Oh
something
like
that.
A
Emily-
let's
just
save
you
here
for
myself
in
that
I,
don't
think
assigning
the
limits
like
that
seems
like
a
preemptive
fix
for
a
problem
that
might
actually
not
actually
occur.
We're
gonna
need,
in
any
case,
an
annual
overall
budget
for
this
effort.
A
This
is
this
has
been
sufficient
so
far
for
the
travel
budgets
and
they're
sponsoring
that
way,
I
would
rather,
we
start
with
that
and
then,
if
it
turns
out
that
we
really
need
to
have
a
project
or
per
project
annual
limit,
then
we
add
those
when
the
need
for
them
has
been
I
actually
identified
rather
than
preemptive.
C
A
Community
Fund
this
year
was
sort
of
divided
in
three,
but
you
all
never
put
specific
numbers
against
it.
It
was
travel
by
maintainers.
It
was
scholarships
and
it
was
a
thank
you
program
so
and
again,
each
sort
of
group
sort
of
determines
how
that
money
has
spent,
but
all
under
the
CPC
umbrella,
for
example,
the
standards
working
group
would
approve
the
the
Smee
that
traveled
to
w3c,
for
example,.
C
A
C
D
From
a
budgeting
perspective,
do
you
have
a
leeway
to
move
stuff
from
one
to
the
other?
Does
that
have
to
go
to
the
board.
C
No,
we
have.
We
have
the
way,
particularly
a
lot
of
the
the
travel
budget
was
used
by
CPC
mainers.
We
used
our
scholarship.
We
have
a
separate
scholarship
fund
for
openjs
world
that
does
not
impact
the
CPC,
so
the
CPC
has
typically
not
spent.
Of
course
it's
been
odd
because
of
covet
and
this
year
was
still
covid
impact.
So
if
we
go
back
to
a
normal
travel
year,
I
don't
know
what
that
looks
like.
C
F
F
Looking
at
at
us,
we
have
a
lot
of
projects
here.
Okay,
most
of
them
would
probably
don't
need
the
money.
That's
less.
To
be
honest.
Let's,
let's
face
literals.
Some
of
them
will
totally
take
the
opportunity
to
do
some
stuff
with
this.
If
we
put
it,
if
we
put
it
in
place,
so
you
know
even
picking
a
number
okay.
So
even
let's
even
pick
a
number
okay,
let's
say
by
total
Randomness.
F
We
we
pick
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
as
total
maximum
limit
for
all
the
activities,
which
is
a
a
number
as
as
as
good
as
any
okay.
We
will.
You
know
it's
kind
of
impossible.
It's
consider
knowing
us
that
we
allocate
more
than
one
tenth
of
it
to
where
each
one
activity
specific
activity.
F
You
know
it's
it
will.
If
a
project
can
say,
oh
I,
see
that
there
is
a
100K
100K
of
of
budget
available.
Can
I
do
a
project
for
the
whole
100K
I
look
I
despite
You
know,
despite
everything,
I,
don't
think
that
will
happen.
I,
don't
know
if
what
other
people
think
okay,
so
maybe,
instead
of
putting
a
cap
on
the
individual
project,
you
know,
let's
put
a
cap
on
the
initiative,
so
I
use
this
term.
That
is
that
there
is
an
initiative.
Okay,
let's
put
a
cap
on
the
initiative.
F
Let's
say
that
each
initiative
can
have
at
most
can
can
can
have
at
most
10k
of
budget
and
putting
it
as
a
number
that
are
easily
multiplied
easily
a
week
we
have
10
fingers.
So
it's
it's
very,
it's
a
very
easy
to
count
with
them.
F
So
let's
put
10
10K
as
the
number
for
initiatives
like
that's
my
that
can
be
a
good
way
of
saying,
and
then
you
know
we
can
decide
that
the
the
budget
for
for
these
activities
can
be
decided
to
some
extent
post
fact
pause
this
decision
in
the
sense
of
okay,
depending
on
what
other
activities,
what
other
things
are
available.
It
can
be
80
activities,
eight
activities
or
it
can
be
20
activities,
okay,
depending
on
what
can
be
make
made
available.
So
I,
don't
know
this
two
cents,
Toby.
D
Yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
know.
My
understanding
is
that
we
probably
need
to
ask
a
budget
from
the
board
to
do
this
and
that
we
need,
like
fix
I
mean
we
need
to
ask
for
a
number
and
so
I
I
think
we
need
to
sort
of
like
figure
out
what
number
would
make
sense
for
first
year
and
decide
on
that
number
and
then
once
we
have
that
number.
Let's
say:
let's
say
that
we
have
100K
like
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
have
100K.
Let's
say
we
have
100.
D
Okay
to
you
know
keep
that
number
around.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
we
want
to
proceed.
I,
don't
think.
D
Do
we
want
to
have
like
a
deadline
for
projects
for
the
year,
which
we
say
hey
now
we're
gonna,
you
know
like
allocate
every
project
for
the
year
or
is
it
as
project
asking
on
my
first
term?
First
come
first
serve
basis,
I
think
that's
the
kind
of
stuff
that
we
have
to
decide
because
it
sort
of
like
changes.
The
Dynamics
of
how
people
are
going
to
ask
for
this.
E
I
also
just
want
to
add
to
that
that
I
think,
like
you
know,
if
I
I'd
be
fine
with
the
the
year
thing,
I
mean,
like
the
budgeting
reasons,
make
sense,
but
if
we
can
do
like
you
know
if
it
if
something
comes
up,
that's
like
oh
no
needs
15K
like
being
able
to
writing
in
this
documentation
that
it's
like
okay
for
us
to
go
to
the
board
and
say
like
hey.
E
We
want
15K
for
this
right
or,
if
you
know
I,
don't
think
this
is
gonna
happen
like
if
electron
needs,
somebody
for
something
right
like,
and
it's
like
12K
for
some
CI
Bill
like
being
okay,
to
go
to
the
board
and
ask
for
that.
I
think
I,
I'm
I'm,
fine
with
that
and
the
stuff
is
written
with
the
year
boundary.
G
Sorry
right,
I
was
just
saying,
like
I,
think
it's
sometimes
good
to
set
expectations
so,
like
I
kind
of
agree
with
the
the
sentiment
that
we
don't
need
to
make
a
hard
limit,
and
you
know
it
should
we
should
do
the
right
thing
as
it
comes
along,
but
I
think
it
does
help
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
an
expectation
to
the
projects
like
don't
go
and
plan
something
for
a
scope.
That's
unlikely
to
be
accepted.
Like
here's,
something
like
if
you're
in
this
ballpark,
then
you
know,
you've
got
a
better
chance.
C
Yeah
and
I
also
want
to
clarify
an
infrastructure.
We
get
a
lot
of
sponsorships
on
our
infrastructure,
from
jQuery
to
node,
wonderful
partners,
digitaloce
and
cloudflare
I
know,
Azure
has
credits
and
other
tech
companies,
so
I
wouldn't
ever
want
to
say
we
couldn't
afford
infrastructure,
we
would
make
it
happen
or
to
sets
yeah.
E
Okay,
yeah
I
mean
like
electrons.
Infrastructure
is
currently
sponsored
by
slack
and
Microsoft
for
the
most
part,
but
there
it
is,
like
you
know,
mid
six
figures,
so.
B
A
D
Can't
we
just
use
what
we
use
for
like
the
travel
funds.
I
mean
the
same
kind
of
process,
the
same
kind
of
system
like
can
we
just?
Can
we
usually
copy
whatever
works.
C
The
band
last
year
was
to
move
it
into
LFX
crowdsourcing.
The
problem
with
that
is,
you
need
one
person
who's,
not
an
LF
employee,
to
administer
that
and
to
be
the
approver
so
having
that
process
before
so
how
it
has
been
working
is
it
goes
to
the
PM
in
this
case,
it'll
be
luke.
Who
then
works
with
the
LF
Finance
team
to
get
reimbursements
so
from
an
approval
process,
people
typically
open
a
PR
to
make
the
request.
G
My
preference
is
always
if
we
can
PR
it
in
like
because
long
term,
like
an
issue,
is
fine
for
discussion,
but
like
the
rubber
hits
the
road
when
you've
got
a
PR,
that's
going
to
be,
and
then
you
can
maintain
that
over
time
with
the
change,
log
and
everything
so
I
think
a
PR
somewhere
that
says
here's
a
program
we
run
I
think
we
I
think
somewhere
in
the
tech
strategy
would
make
sense
in
my
mind,
like
we
but
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
that
we,
if
we
ever
move
the
like
the
we
certainly
didn't
update
the
the
program
that
covers
the
travel
fund
to
the
latest
I,
don't
know
if
we
moved
and
covered
it
there
or
somewhere
else
or
but
wherever
it
is
wherever
it
is
getting.
D
I
have
a
vaguely
real
related,
just
quick
ask
if
I
may.
D
There
is
a
lot
of
meeting
notes
in
the
in
the
issue.
Tracker
and
I
I'm
I
mean
I'm.
I
have
the
same
issue:
I'm
like
trackers
for
projects
I
own,
so
I
know
what
the
problem
is
right,
like
I'm
not
trying
to
throw
stones
here.
Would
it
be
possible
for
something
like
that
to
maybe
add
like
a
a
label
to
this
and
also
a
label
to
on
the
Travel
funds?
D
And
you
know
if
we
have
funds
like
this
in
the
future
to
like,
so
that
we
can
easily
sort
of
triage
what
these
are,
because
I
think
that
would
make
at
least
my
life
extremely
more
easy.
If
I
had
a
good
sense
of
these
issues
of,
like
you,
know
their
fun
requests,
those
are
meeting
notes
Etc,
it
sounds
it's
a
small
thing,
but
I
think
it
would
be
very
helpful.
B
Yeah
we
used
to
have
a
meeting
label
that
was
on
the
meetings,
but
maybe
I'm
even
thinking
of
like
node
or
something,
but
we
can
certainly
work
that
out.
I'd
have
to
look
at
the
meeting,
Builder
tooling,
that
we
have
currently
in
place
figure
that
out,
which
is
something
I
can
look
at,
because
I
need
to
do
that
for
the
security
meeting
stuff
as
well.
So.
D
And
I
was
also
wondering
if,
for
the
funds,
oh,
we
have
like
it
feels
like
those
linger
before
being
approved
for
like
a
long
time,
all
the
time
and
I
never
really
know
what
the
process
is
and
it
feels
like
it
would
be
useful.
Maybe
if,
like
a
smaller
group,
was
in
charge
to
approve
those
or
something
like
that,
I
mean
I.
Don't
want
to
create
some
companies
for
everything,
but
to
the
point
that
you
know
if
we
need
to
disperse
funds
like
there
needs
to
be
a
non-lf
employee.
D
D
B
Yeah
I
agree,
but
maybe
that
maybe
a
process
like
that
would
would
be
like
if
we
had
a
form
you
know
and-
and
it
comes
in
and
Luke
or
whomever
fires
off
an
email
that
says
hey.
This
is
in
here
here's
the
process.
If
nobody
objects,
you
know
we're
gonna,
merge
it
in
in
72
hours
or
something
but
I
agree
with
you.
Tommy.
It's
been
a
little
haphazard.
Lately,
yeah.
G
I
think
I
think
the
if
nobody
objects,
but
I
probably
suggest
a
little
bit
of
due
diligence
go
along
with
that.
It's
like
you,
know,
hey
I've,
looked
at
it
and
they
seem
to
meet
the
criteria
for
the
travel
Fund
in
terms
of
like
they're
from
this
project
or
whatever,
like
some
due
diligence
that
says,
hey
Luke's
looked
at,
it
looks
reasonable.
Then,
if
nobody
objects,
it
can
go
home.
That
kind.
B
A
C
A
B
Anything
else
that
we
want
to
talk
about
build
up
the
time,
actually
what
what
I
opened
the
issue,
but
I
can't
remember
looking
at
it
here
here.
It
is
the
next
working
meeting
is
November
1st,
and
we
have
a
note
in
here
in
the
issue.
That
is
the
CPC
meeting
schedule,
that
is,
to
find
a
framework
for
Project
funding
requests.
Is
that
something
we
want
to
hack
on
next
week?
Or
what
do
we
think.
B
Would
we
rather
swap
that
in
there
it
seems
like
it's,
you
know,
Mateo's
issue
is
welcomed
and
we
kind
of
just
need
to
start
I.
F
B
I
feel
like
that
process
could
be
worked
on
asynchronously
yeah
yeah.
That's
that's,
yeah,
okay,
all
right!
So
I'll
change
the
meeting
and
next
week
we'll
work
on
code
of
conduct,
stuff,
cool,
yep,
all
right,
great,
well,
I'm,
happy
to
give
folks
back.
You
know
eight
or
nine
minutes.
So
if
we
want
to
call.
B
C
F
B
Cool
thanks,
YouTube
folks.