►
Description
To learn more about critical open source JavaScript projects like Appium, Dojo, jQuery, Node.js, and webpack, and 27 more checkout The OpenJS Foundation: https://openjsf.org/
A
Got
it
all
right,
great
I
never
know
when
it's
actually
live,
because
the
webpage
doesn't
say
that
I'm
live
yet,
but
we'll
consider
it
live.
Welcome
everyone.
Thank
you
for
joining
another
episode
of
the
openjs
foundation's
Cross
project
council
meeting
today
is
the
11th
of
October
in
2022.
A
and
I'm
going
to
drop
this
recording
link
into
the
to
the.
Why
does
it
do
that?
Sometimes
it
doesn't.
Let
me
paste
into
Google
Docs,
which
is
just
really
weird.
A
I,
will
add
that
later
I'm
going
to
drop
the
link
in
here
for
folks
in
the
chat,
so
please
make
sure
you're
mark
this
present
and
if
you
can
help
take
notes,
that
would
be
great
to
get
things
started.
Do
we
have
any
announcements.
B
We
have
a
program
committee
meeting
on
Thursday,
it's
kind
of
a
special
one.
If
that's
something
you're
interested
in
you're
welcome
to
join,
it
is
8.
A.M,
Pacific
I'll
make
sure
it's
on
the
public
calendar
as
well,
but
some
of
our
old
folks
have
been
on
there,
not
old,
literally
but
anyhow,
we'll
be
talking
about
2023
and
also
an
event
that
we're
working
on
programming
for
in
December
the
fintech
event
we're
working
on
with
Thanos.
C
A
Anything
else
announcement:
why
is
anything
related
to
the
board
to
share
or
talk
about.
B
No
I
think
our
board
meetings
are
usually
the
third
Friday
we're
going
to
probably
consolidate
our
October
meeting
into
November
because
we'll
be
meeting
at
the
member
Summit
in
California
the
first
week
of
November,
so
we'll
be
working
on
consolidating
that
we'll
be
doing
some
long-term
planning
there.
So
if
you
have
any
think
big
that
you'd
like
the
board
to
tackle,
we
have
some
great
folks
on
the
call.
So
we
can
be
doing
some
more
also
budget
planning
for
2023.
A
Cool,
so
let's
jump
into
the
meeting
here
and
or
the
agenda
I
mean
the
first
item
on
the
list
here
is
clarified
voting
process.
This
is
issue
923,
we're
using
this
to
kind
of
drop
things
into
this
list
of
things
that
could
be
improved
in
terms
of
the
voting
stuff.
A
You
know
one
thing
I've
already
talked
to
Luke
about
is
maybe
helping
me
work
through
some
of
this
and
documenting
things
better
and
just
have
it
feel
like
a
process
that
you
know
we
won't
trip
over
or
anything
like
that.
So
Toby
get
your
hand
up.
A
Oh
I
forgot
that
that
was
that
was
in
a
previous
part
of
this
meeting,
yeah
just
talking
to
a
friend
we'll
talk
more
about
that
next
week.
I
guess
so
great
yeah,
hopefully
I
can
make
some
progress
on
this
sometime
and
if
anybody
ever
wants
to
jump
in
and
try
to
clarify
any
of
the
stuff
feel
free
to
open
a
PR
and
help
us.
You.
B
Know
I
think
we'd
also
talk
not
only
just
the
process
and
getting
the
timing
right,
but
do
we
have
the
right
kind
of
governance
and
representation
like
you
know
the
way
it
was
initially
set
up
three
years
ago?
Should
every
at-large
project
have
a
rep?
You
know
so
just
taking
a
little
bit
more
holistically
about
it,
because
it
was
a
little
confusing
I
think
when
it
was
initially
set
up.
A
Yeah,
it's
an
interesting
Point.
B
A
Yeah,
if
anybody
has
any
thoughts
on
that
and
wants
to
propose
something
in
an
issue
or
a
PR
I'm,
certainly
curious,
but
I
wouldn't
mind
fleshing
out
like
the
process
stuff
too,
to.
A
Yet
next
up
is
how
does
that
mean
kind
of
echoing
I'm
looking
at
the
list
here,
because
I
think
we
have
a
couple
that
are
sort
of
related
the
contributor
Covenants,
so
I'm
gonna
just
kind
of
move
this
one
up
here,
I
was
hoping
actually
to
steal
some
time
today.
A
Excuse
me
and
land
this
contributor
covenants,
PR,
I'm,
gonna
open
it
up
here.
This
is
pr851.
It's
been
open
for
a
while
March,
29th
and
I.
You
know
I
think
the
agreement
is
to
to
land
it
matching
the
contributor
covenants
and
then
have
a
process
to
Overlay
any
changes
or
updates
or
tweaks
to
it,
so
that
we
can
have
a
consistent
process
in
keeping
up
to
date
on
the
contributor
covenants,
but
also
having
our
changes
on
top
of
that.
A
A
And
the
same
for
the
one
after
it,
which
is
the
patching
scripts
for
the
code
of
conduct,
modifications,
that's
issue,
910
I,
don't
know!
If
anyone
has
any
comments
about
that
either
consider
them.
C
What
do
we
think
about
banging
all
these
out
and
like
either
a
working
group
or
the
second
half
of
this
session,
or
just
seeing
how
many
we
can
get
through
in
an
hour.
C
Sorry,
what
if
we
use
the
next
working
session
or
I,
don't
know
one
of
these
meetings
to
get
through
these
like
just
get
because
I
understand
that
that
there's
like
stuff
outstanding
and
it
might
be
helpful
to
get
folks
all
in
a
room.
Yeah.
A
A
Yeah,
so
if
somebody
wants
to
skip
the
working
meeting
and
have
their
own
working
meeting
and
do
it
that's
an
option,
I
think
the
main
blocker
here
is
just
and
I'm
not
super
awesome
with
with
Git,
but
I
just
wanted
to
research
more
how
you
know
you
apply
these
sorts
of
patches
on
on.
You
know
some
sort
of
Upstream,
so
if
anyone's
good
at
that-
and
they
want
to
figure
it
out
or
at
least
have
a
first
stab.
That
would
be
great.
A
D
Toby
I
think
Sarah
has
a
point,
though,
which
says
that
there
was
a
bunch
of
stuff
and
pull
requests
and
I'm
like
I.
Have
the
oldest
of
all
of
those
open,
pull
request
issues
so
I
I
am
not
throwing
stones
at
people
here,
but
there's
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
actually
doesn't
take
a
lot
of
time.
D
That
is
like
95
there
and
it
might
make
sense
to
just
sit
together
at
some
point
and
actually
do
that
stuff,
and
the
other
thing
we
could
do
at
the
same
time
is
actually
go
through
all
of
the
open
issues
that
we
have,
because
we
can
probably
remove
like
half
of
those
at
a
like,
no
longer
valid
or
have
been
done
or
like.
We
no
longer.
B
D
About
and
it
would
be
kind
of
nice
at
some
point
to
actually
do
that
or
just
call
like
bankruptcy
on
a
bunch
of
those
I,
don't
know
just
do
something
about
it.
A
Yeah
yeah,
we
would
all
sit
in
a
room
together,
but
we
would
do
maybe
different
things
and
and
but
also
talk
like
oh
there's,
an
issue.
Does
anybody
have
any
comments
on
this
and
we
can
close
it
and
I
might
be
researching
a
patching
script
and
Toby
might
work
on
his
PR.
We'll
just
have
an
ad
hoc
hang
out
in
a
room
together,
gets
work
done
kind
of
thing.
C
Yeah
I
can
come
up
with
the
system
but
to
Share
Board
slides
I've
surreptitiously,
just
like
not
created
an
issue
for
that.
A
Okay,
we
want
to
do
that
next
time
that
that
sounds
fine
to
me.
We
can
work
on
the
funding
stuff
as
well
at
some
point
soon,.
D
Well,
we
should
just
decide
which
one
we
do
first
and
naturally
allocate
like
in
sessions
and
not
just
say
that
we're
going
to
do
random
stuff
because
then,
like
the
things,
end
up
empty
and
we
don't
know
when
people
don't
show
up
and
it
does
it's
not
very
good.
B
C
I
was
going
to
ask
about
that.
I
I
think
the
the
CPC
meetings,
who's
I'm
gonna,
see
who's
kind
enough
to
be
sending
out
a
meeting
invitation.
A
I
can
read
it
if
you
need
it
and,
and
the
rule
is,
the
working
session
is
always
the
same
time
the
week
after
the
the
proper
meeting
so
next
week.
This
time
is
the
working
session.
If
that's
helpful,
that's.
B
C
B
B
D
A
And
I
have
the
power
to
invite
people
from
the
official
calendar,
but
I
just
have
the
calendar.
You
know
I
subscribe
to
the
calendar
and
my
calendar
so
I
see
it
and
I
can
turn
it
on
and
off
as
needed.
But
I
do
actually
have
a
block
on
my
work
calendar
for
these
meetings
too,
which
is
helpful
people
don't
book
over
it.
A
So
on
that
note,
I
guess
I'll
propose
that
we
have
an
actual
like
ad
hoc
working
session
next
week,
where
we
kind
of
do
a
bunch
of
things
individually
and
kind
of
as
a
group
and
then
the
following
working
session.
We
work
on
the
funding
model
related
stuff.
A
If
someone
wants
to
do
it,
that
would
be
great
at
the
top
of
the
issues
list.
It
should
be
pinned
I'll,
do
that
Thank,
You
Toby
and
welcome
Kylie
cool
all
right.
Well,
that's
great!
That
felt
good
where's
my
list
again,
okay,
so
moving
on-
and
let
me
actually
just
make
a
note
here.
Next
week's
working
session.
D
A
I
feel,
like
the
other
two
are
higher
priority
at
the
moment,
but
I
don't
know
that's
an
important
one
too,
but
I
don't
know.
A
I'm
just
making
a
note
here
on
next
week's
session
in
today's
meeting
notes,
Here.
C
C
A
Great
cool,
so
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
openjs,
World,
2023,
planning,
I,
know
Robin.
You
mentioned
that
we
have
a
meeting
on
Thursday
anything
more.
We
want
to
say
on
this
issue.
B
A
Does
this
one
I
feel
like
I
saw
then
slack
that
this
one
is
closed.
Yep
the
CPC
at
large
voting
member
election
is
closed.
I'm
guessing
the
member
selection
is
also
nope.
This
one's
still
open
updates
are
all
recorded
and
changes
are
in
progress
for
the
openjs
website,
governance,
page
yeah-
so
maybe
we'll
leave
this
open
until
that's
complete
sure,
okay,
great
thanks
for
that
comment.
There
Rob
that's
helpful.
A
The
websites
and
I
think
this
one
was
maybe
close
to
the
Grace
Hopper
Juan.
But
do
you
have
a
comments
on
this
at
all
Robin.
B
I
put
in
links
to
the
blogs
where
we
did
a
wrap
up,
rich
and
team
I
know
have
been
following
up
with
some
folks.
I
have
a
lot
of
folks
to
follow
up
with
as
well
Rich.
Do
you
have
anything
to
add.
C
Nothing
to
add
to
that
well,
I
can
always
speak
extemporaneously
and
not
provide
a
lot
of
information,
but
we've
had
we've
had
two
or
three
people
that
between
Danielle
and
me
that
we've
been
following
up
with
and
trying
to
you
know,
help
them
stay
engaged
and
get
more
engaged.
So
we'll
see
how
that
all
pans
out,
but
everyone
everyone's
been
great.
So
far,
rights
yeah.
C
C
C
B
Yeah
I
think
the
hard
part
when
you
said
getting
the
getting
people
engaged
and
staying
engaged.
It's
really
hard,
I
think
everyone
knows
how
to
use
our
tools.
I
had
you
know
written
in
my
blog,
but
they
just
don't
know
how
to
participate
and
contribute
a
lot
of
what
women
thought.
Oh
you
just
show
up
with
hundreds
of
lines
of
code
and
solving
a
big
problem.
No
there's
a
there's,
so
we
haven't
quite
figured
out
that
that
on-ramp
completely
yet
so
definitely
work
to
do.
C
A
Cool
all
right
moving
on
the
next
item
is
focus
on
security.
Javascript
security
at
openjs
I
feel
like
we
can
close
this
now,
I
I
opened
up
the
repo
we've
had
a
handful
of
meetings.
The
last
two
items
on
the
checklist
that
a
comment
that
Robin
has
here
is
recruit
more
Champions
and
bring
in
some
Security
Experts
and
that's
you
know
happening
we're
working
on
that.
So
I
feel
like
we
can
probably
close
this
unless
anyone
has
any
objections.
A
Sure
I
think
grab
this
it's
here
in
case
folks,
wanna
in
the
chat
I
mean
basically
it's
just
a
read
me
right
now,
but
I'll
start
bringing
things
over
as
issues
from
the
conversations
we've
been
having.
C
New
repo
there
we
go
and
I
will
just
close
this.
A
Okay,
close
with
comment
moving
on
so
the
next
one
is
license
check,
support,
tooling,.
B
Yes,
I
have
a
meeting
on
Friday
with
the
team
who
met
with
Jordan
earlier
from
lfit.
If
anyone
is
interested,
Michael
Dawson,
if
you're
interested
in
attending
I
was
going
to
see
if
Jordan
wanted
to
come,
it's
10
a.m,
Pacific,
otherwise
I
can
kind
of
report
back,
but
they
were
part
of
that
initial
meeting
and
they
said
open.
Ssf
is
also
interested
in
something
similar.
So
what.
B
A
Great
so
I'll
just
say
meeting
happening
soon.
C
A
Clarify
requirements
around
CLC
violation:
this
is
issue
786.
Toby.
Is
this
the
one
one
of
the
ones
that's
on
your
plate?
Is
that
right,
yeah?
Next.
D
Steps?
Yes,
that's
one
that
we're
actually
going
to
address
in
the
session
next
week,
fantastic.
A
Cool
then
we
will
move
on
to
the
last
one,
which
was
the
recent
one
about
the
slack
inviter,
which
I
think
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
Robin
you've
got
a
ticket
open.
Is
that
all
we.
B
C
B
I
think
I
have
the
ability
to
make
changes.
Let
me
take
a
look
on
and
to
see
what
options
I
have
when
I
make
any
changes.
Okay,.
C
B
C
D
C
B
C
Was
like
yeah
fix
one
and
only
keep
one
we
can
remove
the
other
one
which
doesn't
work,
I,
think
community
and
writer
came
in
because
at
that
time
slack
didn't
sport
to
add
people
publicly
and
now
now
they
do
so.
We,
but
philosophically.
A
Philosophically
you
could
usually
do
you
know
things
multiple
ways
in
JavaScript,
so
I
think
we
should
have
as
many
ways
to
join
slack
as
possible.
I'm.
A
Cool
one
way
is
great:
I
have
one
working
way
is
all
we
need
cool.
That
is
the
end
of
our
agenda.
We've
already
talked
about
the
next
working
session.
A
I'll
just
look
at
our
dates
and
reminders.
Doc
here
and
I,
don't
see
anything
coming
up
there,
no
issues
with
the
quarterly
review
label
I'm
guessing.
But
let
me
look.
A
A
Should
we
call
it
a
wrap?
Is
there
anything
folks
want
to
do
in
private
session,
I,
wouldn't
mind
the
time
back,
but
I'm
open
to
getting
some
things
done?
Maybe.