►
From YouTube: (Ͼ˳Ͽ)...Check-my-repo!!! - Paloma Oliveira, Sauce Labs
Description
A demanding and complex Open Source Program Offices’ task is to guarantee the health of its organization repositories. Aiming to help OSPOs and OS communities, we, at Sauce Labs, created Check-My-Repo, an automated tool built upon Repolinter, that verifies the main necessary parameters to comply with OS best practices: from Readme to License. By automating this verification OSPO’s maintenance is more effective and effortless, and can help your organization to have compliant software projects easier to service, test, upgrade, and maintain. Built with Node.js, Repolinter and Vue.js, it is designed to run local and automated, displaying results on GitHub page. Just fork it and adjust it to your own configurations using a simple json file. That easy :) This talk is about the importance of such a tool, how it was designed and the benefits it brings to your organization.
A
A
A
This
is
where
we
come
up
with
those
common
agreements.
I
will
give
you
an
example
in
my
house.
I
live
with
george
george,
that
happens
to
be
a
cat
by
nature
likes
a
lot
birds
like
this
dove
with
the
air
on
it
and
when,
in
the
spring
like
an
hour,
the
birds
start
coming
and
they
are
super
hungry.
So
I
feed
them.
I
live
in
front
of
a
park
they're
here
all
the
time
I
feel
they're
hungry.
A
I
just
feed
them
and
george,
of
course,
wants
to
play
with
them,
but
when
he
plays,
they
got
hurt,
so
it's
not
cool.
Then
we
got
together
me
the
birds,
george,
I
got
let's.
No.
We
need
an
agreement
here.
This
is
not
working,
so
the
deal
is
george.
You
cannot
eat
the
birds
nor
try
to
play
with
them
because
they
get
hurt,
but
you
you
get
cookies
and
then
the
birds
are
happy.
A
A
A
For
example,
in
the
most
of
the
western
places
we
tend
to
form
the
lines,
there's
a
lot
for
limes
and
no
one
likes
it,
but
it
works.
And
if
I
wake
up
in
the
morning-
and
I
just
want
a
warm
bread,
I
just
there's
five
different
people.
We
kind
of
understand
who
arrived
first
and
we
form
a
line
and
wait,
and
we
kind
of
know
the
time
we'll
get
there.
A
A
I
am
the
first
one
to
raise
my
hand
and
say
please
reinvent
this
room.
This
is
not
working.
Just
like
mr
duro
wrote
in
his
fabulous
resistance
to
civil
government
book
as
known
as
aka,
civil
disobedience
and
disobedience
is
great.
It's
awesome.
This
is
why,
for
example,
we
have
open
source
right,
open
source
was
started,
was
born
when
someone
defied
a
rule
say
no.
No,
I
don't.
I
don't
want
copyright,
I
don't
want
this
law
by
that
is
by
default
to
exist.
A
A
Well,
one
could
say
that
open
source
is
a
very
technical
definition
about
source
code
that
is
open
again
to
copy,
modify
and
distribute
traditional
by
the
book.
Others,
by
the
other
hand,
may
defend
that
before
you
even
think
about
open
source.
You
have
to
participate
and
understand
what
collaboration
means,
what
it
means
to
collaborate.
This
is
the
basic
so
start
to
get
together
the
open
with
the
collaboration
principles.
A
A
Means
that
I'm
open
to
the
other
this
one
I
do
not
know
it's
not
me,
and
this
author
should
be
able
to
participate
somehow
in
the
project.
That's
the
meaning
and
the
idea
of
open
right,
but
people
are
very,
very
confident
independent
of
your
definition.
What
you
want
to
do,
how
do
you
think
about
open
source?
Can
we
have
reading?
One
thing
I
mean
to
think
about
open
sources
to
think
about
sharing
and
having
this
property
of
enabling
sharing,
but
to
share.
We
need
to
communicate
something,
and
this
is
another
very
complex
human
thing,
communication.
A
You
think
about
communication
theory,
for
example,
you
need
someone
giving
the
message
and
someone
receiving
the
message
with
a
medium
that
will
get
in
between,
in
this
case,
like
a
the
sound
voice,
my
brain
receiving
the
mouth.
So
there's
the
message,
the
myth,
emitter
and
the
ones
receiving
it,
and
the
medium
in
between
this
is
basics.
Theory.
A
A
You
whisper
something
and
then
the
other
will
hear
and
will
pass
along
to
the
next
to
the
next
next
and
to
the
end,
and
then
the
fun
part
is
that
the
first
one
will
compare
with
the
last
one
and
it's
it's
super
fun
when
they
are
not
the
same,
and
I
mean
if
you
said
in
the
beginning,
I
want
to
play
with
george
and
at
the
end
I
hear
I
wanna
kick
george.
I
would
be
super
mad
super
super
mad,
but
then
you
just
wanted
to
play
right.
A
A
A
This
is
nice,
I
guess,
but
this
we're
talking
about.
That's
last
well,
one
of
the
theories
right.
We
could
use
this
this
person
there
communication
message
medium
receiver,
the
effect
it
calls.
This
was
like
a
an
image
for
that,
and
this
is
linear
and
you
got
into
this
whole
complexity.
No
one
understanding
anything!
George.
It
happened
something
to
him
that
we
don't
know
what
happened
noise,
but
an
open
source
project.
A
It's
not
a
linear,
and
usually
there
are
several
messages
coming
from
all
around
asynchronously
and
then
whoa.
How
how
we
can
imagine
so
we
give
this
example.
Just
this
linear
really
control
thing,
but
an
open
source.
That's
not
as
controlled.
It's
very
basically
the
centralized
thing
most
of
the
time
or
partially
one
other
way
to
explain
or
try
to
think
about
it.
A
It's
mcluhan
mcluhan,
it's
a
canadian
philosopher,
it's
one
of
the
cornerstones
of
media
theory,
and
there
is
this
really
famous
phrase
from
him
where
he
says
the
medium
is
the
message
or
it
could
be.
In
that
case
the
whisper.
The
whisper
is
by
the
force,
something
that
it's
not
clear
and
loud,
and
it's
meant
to
be
a
little
disturbing,
but
he
also
said
the
medium
is
the
massage,
and
what
does
he
mean
by
that?
A
By
massage
he
meant
to
denote
the
effect
of
numerous
medias
and
how
they
massaged
the
human
censorion
he's
talking
not
about
the
proper
content
but
all
the
surroundings
and
how
we
are
perceiving,
because
humans
are
made
of
several
types
of
perceptions.
Work
not
only
reading
or
not
only
hearing
or
not
even
the
something
in
between
that
we
haven't
named
yet
or
will
never
do
so.
Not
only
the
message
comes
to
play,
but
also
how
this
message
is
sent.
A
A
Let's
take
this
image.
For
example,
here
you
have
a
case
of
a
doctor
that
contains
some
information:
hey,
it's
free
free
data,
use
it
all
there.
But
if
I
do
not
have
this
specifically
knowledge
or
before
this,
it's
created
an
asymmetry
of
knowledge,
where
only
me
who
detains
the
the
corner,
sensitive
knowledge,
can
actually
understand
or
decipher
this
data,
this
information
and
that's
information,
imbalance.
A
What
happened
is
that
we,
of
course,
by
nature
like
I
can
have
my
pit
maintainer
and
just
send
a
signal
message
and
say:
yo:
let's
do
that
cool,
but
what
about
all
the
other
people
that
wants
to
contribute
so
think
about
this
wall?
We
have
this
closed
wall,
but
what
it's,
after,
behind
this
wall,
we
should
make
have
mechanisms
or
ways
to
communicate
in
a
way
that
everyone
is
in
equal
footing
index
in
terms
of
access
to
information
and
the
ability
also
to
influentiate
this
project.
A
Otherwise,
why
would
that
be
open
right
and
that
could
be
in
a
number
of
ways,
procedural
and
daily
communication
and
long
term?
What
do
I
mean
by
that
procedural?
It's
like
the
way
we
do
things,
for
example,
having
one
public
issue
tracker
instead
of
having
two
different
ones,
very
close
and
a
very
open.
The
other
one
is.
How
do
I
remedy
and
then
making
this
available
for
people
to
have
a
chance
to
sit
on
the
table
and
having
a
proper
discussion
about
the
changes
that,
in
its
opinion,
needs
to
be
made
and
on
daily
communication?
A
Is
the
basic
stuff
like
how's
the
status?
Is
this
just
a
proof
of
concept
it's
been
actually
becoming
active?
Is
that
deprecated
or
things
just
like?
How
do
I
even
submit
an
issue?
This
is
daily
worries
or
long-term
long-term
communication
like
how
I
was
recommended,
because
I
just
arrived.
I
want
to
start
now,
but
I
don't
know
where
you
were
where
you
are
you
project.
A
A
Two
we
already
understand:
why
does
the
rules
are
therefore
right?
I
think
I
think
yeah,
I
think
so.
I
hope
I
convinced
you
enough,
but
can
you
imagine?
How
can
you
apply
all
these
rules
if
you're,
maintaining
or
overseeing
or
making
sure
hundreds,
dozens
or
hundreds
of
repositories
are
healthy,
are
having
this
clear
communication?
This
is
crazy
and
we
understand
that
maintainers
needs
to
be
multitasking.
A
A
It
is
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
interwoven
work
and
more
recently,
there
is
also
someone
else
in
the
game
which
are
the
ospos,
the
open
source
program
office.
Those
are
the
ones
that
yeah
they
have
to
take
care
of
a
lot
of
places
and
a
lot
of
places
has
to
be
really
healthy,
because
ospo's
main
thing
is
to
make
sure
the
organization's
repositories
are
healthy
and
aligned
with
the
company's
strategies,
and
this
is
why
check
my
ripple
was
created,
hey
to
make
sure
that
we're
helping
you
to
have
healthier
repositories.
A
A
Neutral
as
possible,
so
more
like
a
rgb,
colors,
dark
mode,
high
contrast,
complying
with
accessibility
using
view
axe
check
for
lackey,
so
it
is
made
to
be
a
website
that
you
can
just
use
it
and
call
your
own.
It
does
uses
github
actions
behind,
so
we
just
grab
your
repository
and
link
it
all
and
make
sure
it
is
complying
with
open
source
best
practices.
It
is
built
with
ripple
enter,
which
is
another
open
source
project
maintained
by
to
do
group,
which
is
super
important
for
the
open
source
community
and
that's
what
it
does.
A
A
Before
I
get
into
what
each
rule
does
and
why
they're
important,
I
just
want
to
say
that
this
is
automated.
This
is
why
I
use
like
a
github
actions
for
it
because
we
used
to
have
in
my
department,
I
am
from
south
labs,
open
source
program
office
department
and
before
we
create
that
we
used
to
do
that
by
hand
using
an
classic
excel
spreadsheet
and
it
was
cool
for
a
while,
but
we
supervise,
we
make
sure
the
repositories
are
healthy.
We
do
not
maintain
them
per
se.
A
So
one
day
you
have
it
all
updated
and
the
next
day,
maybe
all
they're
done
or
do
you
have
200
other
rules
failing
because
they
just
change
everything
which
is
their
freedom
to
choose
right.
This
is
why
automation
is
so
helpful.
It
makes
this
multitasking
complex,
word
effortless
and
makes
you
with
much
more
tools
to
being
able
to
act
upon
what
it's
failing
and
what
you
need
to
do
to
improve
your
organization
repositories.
A
A
Those
are
the
dangerous
one.
First
of
all,
the
binaries
is
the
security
rule.
It
looks
for
binary
files,
executables
and
passwords,
which
of
course,
should
not
for
security
reasons
contained
in
an
open
source
project.
The
other
one
is
licensed
because
compliance
with
open
source
software
requirements,
it's
so
necessary
and
most
of
the
projects
are
composed
by
several
open
source,
which
has
had
each
one
it's
on
license,
and
things
can
get
crazy.
A
This
mixing
and
matching
that's
why,
when
you
ensure
you
already
tell
your
user
in
advance
the
permission,
the
mission
is
allowed
or
not
to
do
as
a
it's
essential
for
you
to
use
it,
but
also
to
protect
you
maintainer
legally.
So
this
is
why
license
is
the
first
thing
cool
to
have
in
a
project.
The
other
one
is
to
read
me.
It's
like
at
this
entrance
door
to
your
project
where
it's
like
hi
hello,
welcome.
A
A
First
high
super
do
not
have
a
project
without
that,
and
then,
when
you
have
time,
because
it's
all
about
balance
right,
you
have
the
medium
budget
medium,
not
because
they're
less
important,
but
because
without
them
you
can
kind
of
have
in
an
okay
ish.
But
that
will
of
course
make
your
project
be
much
more
welcome
and
easier
for
people
to
contribute
change.
Log,
for
example,
makes
it
way
much
easier
for
people
to
understand
the
actual
development
state
or
if
it's
lacking
lots
of
maintenance
and
they
decided
to
go
for
it
or
not.
A
The
checkmate
rebel
will
look
either
for
a
document
that
say
change
log
or
if
it
has
a
release,
release
tag
on
github
the
contributing
guideline.
Oh,
this
is
my
favorite,
because
it's
like
a
guiding
hand,
it
will
tell
you,
hopefully
very
didactically,
all
the
resources.
How
do
you
do
it?
How
to
start
step
by
step
is
a
guiding
hand
for
the
eager
contributor.
A
The
ownership
is,
how
do
you
search
for
who
owned
the
things?
So
then
you
can
get
in
touch
and
make
decisions
propose
things
and
the
test
directory
is
what
helps
a
lot.
Your
project
to
keep
a
good
code
without
breaks
and
with
avoiding
lots
of
regressions,
helps
you
assure
your
additional
confidence
of
your
project
and,
of
course,
your
user
satisfaction
makes
sense
right,
and
what
about
what?
I
say
low?
A
A
A
You
cannot
do
something
else
than
love
him,
for
example
right
yeah,
so
that
also
fosters
welcoming
community,
because
me,
if
I'm
very
introvert
or
I
don't
know
what
happens
in
my
life
before
I
can
have
my
own
traumas
and
if
it
state
that
this
project
protects
me
from
that.
Of
course,
I
will
feel
welcome
license
on
readme
license.
It
is
valid
if
it's
just
on
the
readme,
but
if
you
have
a
file
and
also
it's
a
nice
to
have
in
the
readme,
because
again
it's
your
open
door.
A
A
A
A
You
tell
the
deployment
to
happen
using
the
github
pages
and
voila.
You
have
a
check,
my
repo
to
call
you're
on
and
the
first
time
you
do
it.
You
will
see
there.
Is
there
still
sauce
labs
information
on
it?
It's
because
you
have
actions.
It's
set
up
to
run
on
and
redeploy
every
time
you
do
a
push
to
main
or
in
cron
zero,
zero
time
average
kind
of
a
midnight.
A
A
I
am
paloma
oliveira,
probably
part
of
open
source
program
office
and
sauce
labs,
and
if
you
check,
if
you
like
it,
but
you
want
to
change
a
few
things
you're,
it's
open
call.
Your
honor
check
my
repo
in
the
contribution
guidelines.
There's
the
guides
on.
How
can
you
put
more
rules,
less
rules,
change
the
colors
change
the
budgets
and
do
the
adject
adjustments
enough,
but
it
should
all
be
simple
and
will
describe
trying
to
make
it
as
clear
and
less
noisy
as
possible
for.