►
Description
en Español from OpenShift Commons Gathering Buenos Aires August 2018
A
A
The
area
of
you
for
approximately
15
years.,
Today
I,
come
to
talk
a
little
about
what
is
the
previous
network
in
which
we
are
currently
developing.,
How,
this
new
technology
and
other
topics
or
benefit
paradigms
that
we
have
been
using
along
the
way,
helped
us.
Well,.
We
begin
for
those
who
do
not
know.
Previred.
This
is
a
technology
company
that
is
in
charge
of
collecting
the
pension
system
in
other
countries.,
It
is
known
as
the
Social
security
is
already
the
most
important
company
and
the
one
that
is
generating
the
highest
collection
of
this
type.
A
This
new
service
called
like
that
cook
that
xico
the
judicial
collection
system,
so
that
they
know
a
little
about
the
current
model
of
this
system
that
exists
in
chile.
The
current
model
of
operation
contemplates
that
there
are
many
provisional
institutions
that
deliver
information
to
each
legal
study
that
information
deliver
all
the
debt
existing
in
the
pension
system
of
a
person
when
a
payment
was
not
made
something
they
inform
that
this
previous
debt
exists
network
and
the
corporation
of
the
judiciary
are
in
charge
of
delivering
to
a
new
legal
study.
A
The
information
that
the
institution
is
requesting
and
for
this
that
study
legal
is
in
charge
of
carrying
out
the
collection
manually,.
It
is
in
charge
of
delivering
the
money
back
to
each
institution
when
it
performs
this
collection
and,
as
you
can
see
in
this
drawing,
there
are
many
manual
tasks,.
Many
processes
that
each
institution
carries
out
in
different
ways:
legal
studies
that
have
different
systems.
A
If,
you
see
these
points,.
Each
of
them
has
an
important
point
of
improvement
to
take
into
account
when
developing
a
project
new
project.
We
of
these
points
achieved
that,
with
this
new
system
change,
the
design
a
bit.
If
you
see
in
the
image
above
is
the
previous
model
full
of
lines
manual
tasks.
The
new
model
shows
us
that
the
same
pension
institutions
develop
through
this
new
service
that
is
developing
and
implementing
a
prior
network
through
its
application,
si
cook
that
a
law
firm
performs
the
entire
operation
electronically.
A
Well,
below
you
can
see
the
architecture
that
we
are
using
for
this
implementation,,
which
is
basically
based
on
the
new
master,
three
infrastructure
nodes,
and
we
have
eight
nodes
that
correspond
to
the
application.
Basically,
this
is
distributed
in
four
nodes
that
share
the
development
area
and
cua
and
four
nodes
that
are
in
charge
of
the
productive
part.
A
A
We
have
a
base
that
corresponds
to
the
cluster
model.
Cluster
system.
This
is
a
technology
that
does
not
provide
bars,,
which
is
to
use
persistent
storage,.
That
layer
is
at
the
bottom
and
we
use
it
both
to
store
or
save
all
that
openshift
requires
and,
in
turn,.
Everything
that
the
application
generates
as
persistent
data
is
also
does
nothing
in
this
way
in
the
part
At,
the
top.
We
also
have
a
node
that
corresponds
to
doing
it..
We
have
thought,
and
we
generate
automated
tasks
through
this
node.
In
addition
to
this,.
A
It
is
related
through
another
application
that
does
not
appear
to
go
but
corresponds
to
bivouac,
and
basically,
we
are
looking
for
a
development
that
generates
this
new
implementation
to
generate
this
type
of
code
that
triggers
it
within
the
bid
back
and
generates
the
commit
and
launch
the
task
automatically
within
jenkins.
Additionally,
we
have
cloud
phone
for
what
is
monitoring
and
the
en
agio
tool
is
being
implemented
now,
in
parallel
to
cloud
four,
to
also
deliver
an
additional
plus
to
what
we
already
have.
A
Good
of
what
that
we
recently
reviewed,,
we
took
out
the
following
paradigms
that
I
think
are
basically
trusting
in
the
decision
to
make
a
stern
with
bars
and
in
the
new
technology..
I.
Think
that
a
strong
point
in
this
is
thinking
that
what
is
being
done
is
correct
and
not
It
has
the
option
to
improve.
Good
for
us
to
make
this
known
within
the
company.
A
Our
first
way
of
convincing
or
adapting
to
people
was
to
tell
them
that
these
technologies
were
not
coming
and
we
were
doing
things
correctly,,
but
they
could
give
us
the
help
we
needed
due
to
Due
to
the
large
number
of
new
services
that
the
network
is
generating,.
We
currently
have
75
services
that
we
deliver.
This
is
a
new
additional
service
to
what
is
already
being
delivered..
A
The
next
thing
is
to
understand
that
we
must
focus
not
only
on
In,
technology,
I,
believe
that,
in
order
to
generate
this
change
within
Previred,,
we
also
had
to
teach
or
learn
that
this
change
is
also
based
on
the
current
processes
that
were
previously
reused,.
In
addition
to
the
need
for
people
later
on,,
they
will
understand
a
little.
Why
At
this
point,?
A
Another
lesson
learned
was
that
this
type
of
project
must
be
addressed
jointly
between
the
area.
I,
believe
that
when
we
started
this
implementation
within
previred,,
we
started
without
taking
into
account
the
different
areas
that
make
up
previred,,
both
the
development
area
and
the
appropriate
area,
the
area
of
operations
or
the
end
customer,.
Thinking
that
we
developed
this
project
and
reached
the
end
of
the
stage
and
then
just
let
them
know
about
it.
I
think
that
this
was
a
lesson
learned
and
that
should
be
taken
into
consideration
when
implementing
this
type
of
tools.
A
Finally,
another
of
the
paradigms
and
strong
changes
that
occur
within
the
company,
the
impact
on
the
processes
and
how
the
life
cycle
of
the
application
and
the
operational
model
is
managed,
as
I
mentioned
before.
In
the
search
to
be
able
to
generate
continuous
deployments,
the
amount
of
services
that
are
delivered,
the
constant
changes
that
both
the
country
and
the
need
are
not
generating
a
prior
network,.
A
A
Everything
at
once,
wants
to
have
the
car,
as
indicated
in
the
image,,
not
considering
the
need
or
the
state
of
the
end
user
and
I
think
that
this
was
an
important
thing,
that
the
rescue
consultant
in
this
case
gave
us
to
understand
that
we
should
continue,
as
indicated
the
acronym,
the
minimum
viable
product
from
the
beginning,
and
that
the
user
requires
something
we
are
carrying
out.
An
implementation
in,
let's
make
a
first
deliverable
that
meets
the
need
or
what
the
person
needs.
A
Let's
continue
with
a
next
product,
but
we
are
always
delivering
something
that
we
can
receive
some
feedback
to
receive,
something
that
we
can
generate
an
important
change
and
that
when
we
reach
the
end
of
the
product,
the
final
client
is
happy
and
also
us
for
developing
a
job
in
a
good
way.
Basically,
these
numbers
can
be
considered
as
stages
or
as
months
within
a
project
to
be
able
to
generate
In
a
good
way,.
A
A
Seek
that
with
this
continuous
development
of
implementation
to
generate
through
bakker
a
change
in
the
code
later
and
in
castilla
on
open
chief
each
of
those
tasks
that
we
know
that
what
the
developer
gave
us
was
done
by
cuba
as
a
test
is
what
is
implemented
in
production
many
times,
one
for
more
than
have
clear
controls
have
a
process.
You
always
have
doubts.
A
If
what
is
really
being
implemented,
production
is
what
it
is
started
to
develop
and
did
not
suffer
any
alteration
along
the
way,
along
with
this,
similar
to
what
I
mentioned
before
the
improvement
in
security
controls
with
this
We
prevent
what
came
out
of
development
that
was
reviewed,,
a
security
was
generated
in
between,.
It
was
validated
by
the
Cuba
area
when
it
reaches
production,,
a
changed
part
or
application
arrives.
That
does
not
meet
what
one
expected
or
brings
some
other
unwanted
modification.
A
Another
important
point:
the
growth
of
the
asset
according
to
current,
need
the
services
that
are
not
on
this
platform
when
they
require
elastic
growth.
I
think
that
it
should
occur
to
many
that
they
need
to
prepare
a
server
they
require
preparing
other
configuration
changes
generating
change
at
the
communication
level
is
good.
We
hope
that
by
having
our
systems
within
containers
that
our
first
application
corresponds
to
in
the
judicial
collection
system,
we
can
have
this
elastic
growth,
generating
more
pod,
generating
more
containers
and
the
advantage
that
With
this
change,.
We
can
also
generate
microservices.
A
Want
to
finish.
I
think
that
as
an
important
point
and
for
people
who
are
trying
to
adapt
or
take
these
technologies,.
The
first
thing
is
to
trust
in
these
new
products,
how
we
anticipated.
We
thought
that
we
were
doing
things
well,,
but
when
Rejas
approached
us,,
he
presented
us
with
this
new
tool,.
We
realized
that
we
could
do
things
well
and
more
expeditiously,
with
better
quality,
deliver
a
plus
that
we
were
not
able
to
maintain
for
as
long
as
before.
A
An
important
point
of
this
is
when
they
begin
to
implement
or
seek
to
integrate
into
this
type
of
technology,
make
all
areas
participate.
As,
I
mentioned,.
We
made
the
mistake
when
the
project
began
in
trying
to
get
us
to
take
this
project
forward
and
not
involve
people
who
have
knowledge
in
different
ways,,
which
was
basically
the
development
area,
to
see
how
they
could
adapt
their
application
to
this
new
system
in
the
area
that
impacted
this
change
and
finally
in
production,
and
the
last
point
It
is
what
I
mentioned
about
shipping
the
minimum
viable
product.
When.
A
You
start
with
its
implementation
or
continue
with
your
work,.
Try
not
to
forget
this
terminology,
because
it
is
better
to
have
the
end
customer
make
a
deliverable
and
receive
feedback
in
order
to
generate
a
quality.
Product.
We
tried,
or
had
the
vision
of
wanting
to
implement
this,
to
generate
everything
we
wanted
in
a
way
from
1
to
100,
but
we
were
not
being
able
to
read
or
receive
it
by
the
end
user,
and
this
brought
us
a
delay
at
the
beginning.