►
From YouTube: Education SIG (August 17, 2022)
Description
Meeting minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Lt8uGpiMFfgws8VF36xtTMaJAeHufha-7Dqz1tjrPGY/edit
A
B
A
B
C
I
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
myself.
I'm
I'm
you've
saw
you've.
Seen
me
in
previous
calls,
I'm
new
I'm
here,
I'm
a
new
person
here
at
sneak
and
I'm
just
kind
of
like
coming
in
and
joining
a
few
open
ssf
calls
to
get
the
lay
of
the
land.
So,
but
if,
if
you're
looking
for
a
sneak
contact,
I'm
I'm
an
additional
contact,
so
just
wanted
to
say
hi
excellent.
Thank.
A
C
A
C
A
It
looks
like
I
believe
emily
gave
us
a
much
more
thorough
description.
So
five
three
now
reads:
identify
areas
where
developers
are
copying
or
extracting
insecure
code
snippets
and
work
to
correct
the
most
widely
applied
vulnerable
snippets
in
order
to
address
common
problems
and
challenges
such
as.
A
A
C
E
D
C
F
A
A
D
E
So
I
work
a
fair
bit
with
lpi,
as
people
know,
linux,
professional
institute
and
that's
this
is
all
we
do
at
lpi
is
certifications
and
I'll
tell
you.
It
is
remarkably
difficult
to
both
gather
the
metrics
of
whether
they
were
able
to
get
some
sort
of
change,
but
also
just
sorry
still
coffee's
still
kicking
in
this
morning,
but
also
just
following
up
about
employability
things
it
all
becomes
anecdata
rather
than
actual
data.
E
D
D
E
And
there's
certainly
a
lot
of
value
in
being
able
to
show
that
we're
making
a
difference,
because
otherwise,
why
bother
frankly?
So
I'm
just
not
sure
that
is
the
right
metric.
Perhaps
there's
a
way
for
us
to
rephrase
this,
so
we
can
be
a
little
more
vague
about
what
the
metric
is
until
we
can
determine
what
that
is
and
put
that
as
a
dvd.
A
And
that's
an
awesome,
segue
vicki.
What
we're
doing
today
is
we're
trying
we're
agreeing
with
the
general
direction.
Does
the
team
like
this
idea
enough
to
carry
it
forward
and
if
we
do
ideally,
this
is
going
to
be
more
fully
refined
by
a
small
group
of
people
and
be
much
more
precise
towards
goals
we
want
to
meet
or
commit
to,
and
then,
if
we
need
to
make
it
bigger
or
more
specific,
we
can
do
that.
A
A
E
I
am
generally
in
favor
of
what
we
have
right
now.
I
do
think
the
scorecards
bit
while
valuable
may
need
to
be
that's
while
that's
metrics,
I
feel
that's
a
different
sort
of
metrics
and
should
be
placed
elsewhere
in
the
document,
perhaps
but
otherwise
yeah
in
favor
and
to
get
to
the
judy's
question.
A
A
A
B
B
A
But
again
much
like
judy
you're
kind
of
looking
into
the
future.
That's
going
to
be
one
of
our
next
tasks
is
to
based
off
of
our
agreed
upon
body
of
work.
We're
going
to
go
in
and
start
to
get
our
pencils
out
and
go
through
and
make
sure
you
know
is
six
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Do
we
feel
that's
sufficient
for
continuing
the
partnership
office
and
we'll
need
to
kind
of
put
some
analysis
into
that
to
before
we
make
that
proposal
final.
D
If
this
is
a
number,
this
is
a
number
from
the
migration
from
the
plan,
and
I
think
most
of
those
numbers
were
you
know
quick
estimate
of
people
times
a
dollar
per
year
figure.
So
if
there's
a
little
bit
more
but
not
much
more
behind
this,
these
numbers,
for
you
know,
obviously
some
real
analysis
would
be
awesome.
C
Sorry,
I
think
I
might
have
answered
my
own
question.
I
was
just
asking
for
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
scholarships
thing
and
understanding
if
it
was
aimed
at
underrepresented
groups-
and
I
see
that
there's
a
link
to
the
linux
foundation.
Diversity,
inclusion,
lift
scholarship
thing
so
yeah,
okay,.
F
Hello,
actually
I
put
my
camera
on
hello,
everybody.
I
just
look.
I
was
looking
at
these
figures
and
it
just
seems
really
really
small
like
if
this
university
in
the
u.s,
exactly
one
person
or
two
people
like
what
kind
of
a
difference
are
we
planning
to
make
here.
So
I
like
the
idea
of
pairing
with
an
existing
scholarship
program,
because
I
think
it
would
cost
an
enormous
amount
of
money.
Consider
our
own
scholarship
program,
and
I
was
talking
somebody
I
I
yeah.
F
A
E
E
D
Yeah
I
I
will
quickly
note
that
the
the
the
fundamentals
course
and
the
skf
course
are
free
retake
free
for
free
to
earn
the
certificate
of
completion.
Obviously,
universities,
that's
a
different
state
state.
We
maybe
we
need
to
be
more
specific
about
what
we
mean
to
as
far
as
how
to
apply
these
scholarships,
but
I
will
say
if
you
plan
to
send
folks
to
university.
Typically
scholarships
don't
cover
all
of
the
costs.
They're
a
cost
reduction,
not
a
not
a
a
full,
a
free
ride.
B
A
I
think
that's
an
excellent
addition.
We
want
to
change
the
wording
from
scholarships
to
the
scholarships
fellowships
or
other
means
something
along
those
lines
to
account
for
that,
and
then
we'll
get
more
details
as
we
continue
to
build
out
the
plan.
Is
that
agreeable
or
not
or
do
you
need
to
want
a
whole
separate
item
specific
to
fellowships
and
research.
E
E
But
I
do
think
it's
the
other
side
of
the
coin
that
we
have
to
you
know.
If
we're
giving
people
money
to
learn,
we
have
to
make
sure
there's
any
people
there
to
teach
them,
and
so
that
perhaps
might
be.
It
might
be
a
note
in
this
item
or
it
might
be
a
separate
item,
rant
yeah
endowed
chair
sort
of
thing,
although
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
have
the
millions
for
that.
But.
E
E
E
C
D
C
D
C
C
To
get
but
I'd
like
to
see
you
know,
building
on
increasing,
I
like
to
see
where
people
are
rewarded
for
actioning
making
actionable
some
of
the
some
of
these
education
practices
like,
for
example,
I
think
of
six
store
and
the
nyu
people.
You
know
saying
I
actually
contributed
to
a
project,
openness
of
otherwise
it's
security
related.
I
improved
security.
I
took
the
things
I
learned
and
put
them
into
practice.
A
Judy
and
eric
all
right,
so
we
need
to
make
a
decision.
We
have
the
plan,
the
bones
of
it
are
set
now
and
we
need
to
decide
operationally.
How
do
we
want
to
proceed
going
forward?
Some
of
the
other
teams,
I
I
interact
with
or
work
with.
They
have
moved
their
work
from
google
docs
into
github
and
then
working
through
the
prs
and
issue
process
to
make
changes.
So
I
would
like
a
plus
one
or
a
thumbs
up
who
thinks
moving
to
an
md
file
in
github.
D
A
A
A
A
A
So,
for
example,
dave
russo
might
want
to
be
the
leader
of
collecting
curate
content,
so
he
would
organize
a
call
with
folks
and
we
would
march
they
would
talk
about
in
a
small
group
about
writing
up
things
as
a
specific
goal.
Providing
an
explanation
of
what
that
goal
means
writing
down
the
key
steps
and
milestones
we
want
to
achieve.
This
is
the
detail.
Work
we've
been
alluding
to
the
whole
time
and
then
providing
a
time
and
resource
estimate
for
each
one
of
those
goals.
A
So
do
we
have
anyone
brave
enough
or
interested
enough
that
wants
to
potentially
head
up
one
of
these
three
smaller
group
conversations,
and
it's
not
that
everyone
is
welcome
to
participate,
but
ideally
we'll
get
some
more
velocity.
If
we
have
a
smaller
group
focused
on
tactically
a
smaller
chunk
of
the
plan,
as
opposed
to
all
of
it,
and
then
that
group
would
come
back
and
report
back
to
everybody.
C
A
Is
anyone
interested
in
heading
up
the
rewarding
and
incentivizing?
This
is
a
lot
about
the
scholarships
we've
talked
about
about
building
those
relationships
with
you
know
the
partnership
offices
and
such
this
is
where
a
lot
of
that
work
went
into
that
section.
Anyone
interested
in
leading
section
three.
C
A
C
A
Oh
absolutely,
but
I
would
like
to
have
one
person
that's
going
to
commit
to
setting
up
some
calls
facilitating
some
meetings
and
then
kind
of
being
scope.
Cop.
You
know
we
have
this
goal,
for
example,
1.1
existing
materials
from
the
open
ssf,
but
other
groups
will
be
collected
and
analyzed
and
analyzed
for
gaps.
C
C
A
And
then
now
it
also
would
be
helpful
like,
for
example,
if
randall
can't
come
to
the
section
one
call
but
is
still
interested,
he
could
watch
the
video
potentially.
So
I
will
work
with
jory
from
the
foundation
to
get
those
zoom
calls
set
up
as
long
as
somebody
can
help
kind
of
facilitate
a
doodle
or
whatever
mechanism
to
get
the
time
hashed
out.
A
B
B
I
dropped
this
in
the
chat,
but
I
also
wanted
to
highlight
it
here
in
case
folks:
didn't
have
the
chat
open.
There
may
be
issues
that
come
up
in
the
form
of
these
discussions.
That
really
need
the
larger
group
to
weigh
in
and
having
that
on.
The
open
issue
is
one
mechanism
to
do
that.
Asynchronously.
F
A
A
These
are
the
goals
we've
agreed
on,
so
we're
not
going
to
be
debating
on
removing
things,
we'll
change
wording
slightly,
but
those
are
the
goals
we've
agreed
on.
I
would
like
to
get
things
more
in
a
standardized
format
and
then
get
those
key
steps.
Milestones
and
estimates
start
to
be
refined
in
small
groups.
A
Do
we
have
any
questions
about
that
or
comments
yeah?
We
need,
I
think,
that's
probably
what
we'll
do
next,
as
our
group
judy.
The
first
task
for
our
next
call
would
be
a
to
read
out
like
when
the
small
meeting
times
are,
but
then
b
to
let's
hammer
out
our
mission
statement
and
that'll
help
inform
david,
and
I
dave
russo
and
I
will
write
kind
of
the
market
problem
kind
of
the
overarching
framing
language
for
the
whole
plan.
A
B
A
A
A
And
my
I
told
I
reported
to
the
attack
a
couple
weeks
ago,
just
very
basic
status
that
the
group
was
forming
and
I
estimated
we
would
have
this
mobile.
Our
revision
of
the
plan
done
sometime.
Fourth
quarter
so,
however,
quickly
we
can
move
to
get
these
things
refined,
we'll
set
a
formal.
How
long
would
we
want
that
comment
period
to
be
two
weeks.
A
Okay,
so
we'll
have
a
formal
two-week
comment
period
and
at
that
point
we
would
share
it
specifically
to
the
attack.
We
would
need
to
have
a
little
presentation
and
then
there's
going
to
be
a
committee
of
the
governing
board
that
actually
redoes
the
finance
approval,
so
we'd
show
the
attack
first
and
then
formally
present
to
the
governing
board.