►
From YouTube: SLSA Specifications Meeting (December 12, 2022)
Description
Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kMP62o3KI0IqjPRSNtUqADodBqpEL_wlL1PEOsl6u20/edit#heading=h.yfiy9b23vayj
A
Hey
everybody
hope
you
all
had
a
good
weekend.
A
I
think
Joshua
is
out
on
vacation
for
the
rest
of
the
year
and
I
actually
hurt
my
back
so
I'm
going
to
be
in
reduced
capacity
for
the
next
several
weeks.
So
just
FYI
for
the
the
schedule
for
the
rest
of
the
year.
I
guess
we
could
figure
out
because
the
holidays
are
coming
up
as
well.
A
We
could
figure
out.
You
know
if
there's
anything
we
want
to
discuss
today
and
then
also
if
we
want
to
just
cancel
the
rest
of
the
month
and
then
meet
back
up
in
January.
A
C
Yeah
yeah,
likewise
sorry
to
hear
that
yeah
on
the
meeting
side,
I
was
going
to
say
like
on
the
six
door.
Community
we've
pretty
much
I
think
this
is
the
last
week
of
meetings
and
then
we've
canceled
for
the
end
of
the
month
and
also
the
first
week
of
January.
Just
we
know
a
lot
of
folks
won't
be
around.
A
All
right
so
then
I'll
put
in
the
notes,
so
we'll
cancel
for
the
19th,
26th
and
2nd,
which
is
a
New
Year's
Day
observed
anyway,
and
then
so
we'll
resume
on
the
ninth
Okay.
So.
A
Okay,
anyway,
I'll
do
the
the
meeting
notes
to
just
to
mark
them
as
canceled
in
the
next
three
weeks.
A
And
on
the
specif
any
other
gender
items,
I
know
that
Arno
has
sent
out
the
specification
stages,
pull
request
that
we
discussed
last
week.
A
The
dock
I
think
is
basically
ready
to
be
submitted
and
the
next
step
would
be
actually
just
adding
those
tags
on
every
page.
So
thank
you,
Arno
for
that
yeah.
A
Great
okay,
you
might
see
some
pull
requests
from
people
doing
cleanup
work.
This
is
folks
from
cycle
who
we
hired
to
do
some
just
website.
Cleanup
work,
they're
doing
I
think
they
sent
it
for
so
far
and
they're
doing
more.
A
It's
not
any
content
changes,
but
just
fixing
up
the
implementation
to
make
it
easier
to
maintain
and
adding
some
some
future
requests
so
that
should
wrap
up
by
the
end
of
the
year,
such
as
FYI.
If
you
see
those
anyone's
welcome
to
review
them
or
obviously
comment
on
them,
yes,
you
know
just
like
anything
else:
I
don't
have
any
update
on
the
specification.
A
I
I
haven't
been
able
to
spend
any
time
on
that
is
Chris
here
you
know,
Chris
is
not
here.
Oh
Chris
is
out
sick.
I
know
that
Chris
was
I.
Think
you
mentioned
last
time
was
looking
on.
I
think
he
he
published
the
draft
document
on
verifying
builders.
A
B
A
Yeah
the
last
comment:
yeah.
B
C
Yes,
gonna
just
briefly
say
it's
an
update
on
the
conformance
side,
I
think
yeah
personally,
I've
just
been
in
a
bit
of
catch
up
and
travel,
so
no
progress.
There,
though
I'm
still
trying
to
understand
kind
of
like
what
the
formats
are.
We
should
put
the
proposal
in
for
the
governing
board
so
yeah
a
bit
of
playing
catch
up,
but
hopefully
things
are
still
sticking
along
and
like
looking
forward
to
next
year
kind
of
keeping
that
moving
forward.
C
C
So
while,
while
that's
shipping
out
I
think
this
is
a
good
place
to
to
keep
the
discussions.
Co-Located
yeah
and
it's
just
yeah
Jason
Lutz,
who
was
working
on
it-
is
kind
of
focusing
elsewhere
at
the
moment,
so
yeah
apologies.
We
haven't
got
back
to
that,
but
yeah
I
do
plan
to
take
a
look
at
some
point.
D
D
So
I
just
you
know
it
wasn't
clear
in
the
I
mean
I
understand
for
now
it's
just
the
beginning
of
it's
like
a
proposal
type
of
thing,
but
it
would
need
to
be
fleshed
out
a
bit
more
in
terms
of,
like
you
know,
clearly
designating
the
resources
that
will
be
required
because
the
governing
board,
if
you
want
to
go
to
the
gardening
board
with
that
proposal,
this
is
what
they're
going
to
want
to
know
right.
It's
like
well.
How
much
is
that
going
to
cost
us
absolutely
like
every
governing
board
right?
A
D
Have
similar
program
and
they
have
a
person
who
is
constantly
monitoring
this,
because
people
don't
come
back
and
say:
oh,
we
release
the
new
version
of
her
product
and
we're
not
compliant
anymore.
Yes,
we
are
still
compliant
right,
so
that
means
the
practically
speaking
keep
chasing
people
all
the
time
to
say
Hey.
You
know
like
two
versions
beyond
the
version
that
you
said
was
compliant.
Is
that
still
true?
D
C
Good
point-
and
your
comment
makes
me
think
actually
maybe
a
good
approach
here
is
to
get
someone
in
from
the
cncf
and
the
kubernetes
conformance
program
to
kind
of
give
us
a
like
experience.
Report
like
I
was
hoping
to
chat
with
someone,
but
maybe
we
could
do
it
as
a
group
like
have
them
come
in
talk
about
those
aspects
and
maybe
give
us
some
key
considerations
as
a
community.
We
should
be
thinking
about.
D
C
Yeah
and
certainly
at
mine,
I've
been
talking
to
Mike
Dolan
who's
kind
of
the
the
lead
counsel
at.
C
I
love,
who
do
you
have
any
names
of
people
on
the
cncf
side
who
we
could
reach
out
to
maybe
I
could.
D
I
can
I
I'll
I
can
get
back
to
you
and
find
out
from
my
colleague.
I
need
to
it's
going
to
be
civil
hops,
but
I
can
probably
get
the
name
on
the
other
side
who
is
involved
in
this
on
cncf
site
yeah
thanks.
B
D
A
Yep
I
don't
have
anything
more.
B
Well
sounds
good
yeah
all
in
between
I'll
go
ahead
and
try
to
comment
on
some
of
those
pieces
as
well
and
make
a
commitment
for
that.
A
Great
cool
all
right:
well,
if
we
don't
speak
in,
everyone,
have
a
happy
holidays
and
we'll
meet
up
again
in.
A
There's
might
be:
is
there
a
community
meeting
still
coming
up,
I
think
there's
one
Community
salsa
community
meeting
on
the
19th,
but
otherwise
I'll
see
everyone
in
January.