►
From YouTube: SLSA Positioning Meeting (December 6, 2022)
Description
Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tpPOXVzNSwtpWA7cXhTPLAO6HIP50obUvoP85XqgVHM/edit#heading=h.yfiy9b23vayj
SLSA repo: https://github.com/slsa-framework/slsa
B
You
know
what
coming
close
to
the
to
the
end
of
the
year
and
I'll
be
we'll
be
lucky
if
it's
not
just
us,
yeah.
A
It
might
be,
it
might
be,
I
know
also,
people
are
getting
sickness.
C
A
My
entire
family
was
sick,
starting
Thanksgiving,
so
I
was
the
last
one
to
catch
something.
So
it's
it's
been
rough
and
I
see
people
getting
knocked
down
slowly
but
surely
for
us
it
was
RSV,
but
I
know
some
other
people
are
catching
the
flu
and
so
between
sicknesses
and
vacation
I'm,
not
sure
why
people
won't
join,
but
they'll
probably
won't
join
for
one
of
the
two
yeah.
B
A
Yeah
I
was
gonna
put
that
on
the
agenda
on
what
what
we
think
we
should
do
for
the
for
the
positioning
meetings,
because
there's
the
13th,
the
20th
and
27th
I
think
I
feel
like
the
20th
and
27th
we're
not
going
to
have
anyone
and
actually
I
see.
Most
of
the
meetings
are
gone
so.
B
Oh
yeah,
most
of
them
even
gone
that
week
and
you're
going
to
see
a
lot
you're
going
to
see
a
lot
more
of
these
meetings
disappear
next
week
as
well.
I
mean
it's
just
I
I
mean
I,
don't
know
about
you,
but
when
it
comes
to
when
it
comes
time
for
the
I
usually
disappear
like
in
the
middle
of
next
week.
I'm
here,
oh.
B
You
want
to
send
me
a
slack.
You
want
to
send
me
a
DM
or
something
like
that.
I'll
respond
to
you,
but
you
know
I
kind
of
taper
off
like
taper
off
yeah.
A
B
A
Okay,
so
let
me
for
the
27th
I
actually
don't
have
it
on
the
calendar.
So
that
means
that
it's
not
nothing
scheduled
on
the
27th.
So
it's
really
just
the
20th
and
the
third
that
we're
we're
wondering
about,
and
maybe
the
13th
I'll
be
here
next
week.
It
looks
like
most
of
it
looks
like
you
all
are
still
having
your
meeting
I
wish.
A
I
could
attend
that
I
have
a
volunteer
session
right
after
this
meeting,
so
I
have
to
go,
drive
there
and
be
there
by
2
30
at
central
time,
so
I'm
never
able
to
to
make
those
meetings.
Unfortunately,
but
it
looks
like
you
all
are,
are
having
that
next
week,
but
not
the
20th.
A
What
do
you
think
Bruno
in
terms
of
canceling
meetings,
because
of
vacation
and
stuff
like
that,
coming
up.
A
Thinks
he
might
be
able
to
cover
it,
I'm
worried
about
my
family.
Getting
sick,
I
have
visitors
coming
out
and
the
baby
always
gets
sick.
So
it
says
that
the
host
doesn't
allow
a
mute.
What
I
I'm,
not
the
host,
so
I
I,
don't
know
I.
B
A
B
Maybe
hey
Bruno,
maybe
if
you
joined
again,
unmuted
you'd
be
you'd,
be
good
to
go.
Maybe
Jeff.
Can
you
unmute.
A
D
B
I
think
it's
just
I
think
I
think
it's
just
discriminating
against
you.
Bruno.
A
So
Jeff
I
know
Bruno
will
come
back
and
he'll,
probably
chime
in
we're
talking
about
the
next
couple
meetings.
If
we
should
keep
them
or
cancel
them,
I'll
be
here
the
13th
and
the
20th,
the
27th
there's
nothing
on,
but
then
there's
a
third
so
we're
just
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
who's
going
to
be
around.
Are
they
actually
going
to
join?
If
not,
we
can
cancel
some
of
the
meetings
and
give
people
you.
A
E
A
D
A
So
and
I
can't
expel
people
either
so
so
yeah
from
Bruno
and
Jeff
like
what
are
your
thoughts
on
the
next
couple
of
meetings
and
whether
or
not
we
should
keep
them
or
or
cancel
them.
A
The
13th,
the
20th
and
the
third,
the
27th
there's
nothing
but
the
13th
20th
and
the
third.
There
are
meetings
but
I,
don't
know
how
many
people
are
going
to
be
around
well.
E
13
I
will
be
here
so
for
me
there
is
no
problem.
20
I
do
not
know,
to
be
honest,
still.
E
Yeah
and
the
third
I
mean
I
I'll,
be
here:
I
can't
attend
this
wow
I
can
also
host
that
meeting.
If
you
need
it,
but.
D
E
A
A
A
Don't
worry,
I
wasn't
yeah
I
wasn't
around
last
week,
unfortunately,
because
my
entire
family
caught
RSV
and.
E
The
same
here,
everybody
in
my
house
was
sick
as
well
with
H1N1
and
I.
I
saw
your
message,
but
it
was
too
late
because
it
was.
E
A
Yeah
yeah
no,
no
worries
it.
You
know
it
happens,
so
the
Third
we
could
potentially
cancel
the
third.
It
looks
like
even
the
the
well
Monday's
a
holiday,
so
it
makes
sense
why,
on
the
second
there's,
nothing
even
there's
not
even
a
tooling
meeting
on
that
on
that
Friday.
So
maybe
we
give
people
actually
I,
don't
see
any
tooling
meeting
over
here.
Oh,
it
looks
like
stuff
expires
because
I
don't
see
positioning
meeting,
that's
weird.
I
only
see
the
working
sessions.
A
I'm,
looking
there's
nothing
on
the
10
there's
something
on
the
17th.
Okay,
I'll
have
to
fix
a
calendar.
It
looks
like
only
the
working
sessions
are
on
the
calendars
now,
so
I'll
have
to
to
revisit
that.
So
there's
something
wrong
with
the
calendar.
Maybe
that's.
Why
there's
nothing
on
the
20th,
maybe
no
no
27.
A
yeah!
It
looks
like
it
okay,
so
let
me
let
me
cancel
this
one.
A
A
Submit
okay
so
canceling
that
one!
What
about
the
20th.
A
Okay
so
no
meeting
on
the
27th
and
the
third,
but
we'll
keep
the
rest
of
the
meetings.
Okay
sounds
good.
Let
me
write
that
down.
Cancel
27th
and
January
3rd
excuse.
The
meeting.
A
One
of
the
things
that
Josh
those
two
things
that
came
up
in
the
slack
channel
one
was
from
Josh
about
the
definition
of
you
know:
packaging
ecosystems,
so
I
thought
this
was
a
good
one
for
us
to
go
through,
because
it's
somewhat
about
positioning
right.
If
we
think
about
the
different
personas
right
packaging
ecosystem,
they
mean
something
different,
and
so
we
we
should
probably
chime
in
on
this
of
like.
A
Do
we
like
package,
ecosystem
or
packaging
ecosystem
Mark
suggested
you
know,
maybe
distribution,
I,
I
didn't
like
distribution
because
of
you
can
distribute
software
right
like
once.
You
have
something
right
as
a
software
vendor,
you
can
distribute
it,
and
that
means
something
different
than
a
build
environment
right
and
then
the
software
development.
A
A
Is
this
the
way
we
should
call
it,
which
is
I,
think
he
said
package
a
packaging
ecosystem
and
I
can
zoom
in
this
is
a
definition
in
the
in
the
GitHub
issue.
A
I
feel
like
most
of
the
time
when
I
hear
ecosystem
I.
Think
of
you
know
npm
right
or
python:
I,
don't
consider
GitHub
an
ecosystem,
but
I
think
someone
from
GitHub
said
that
they
do
use.
B
B
Honestly,
I
I,
don't
but
but
I
but
I
think,
but
but
if
like,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
walking
down
the
hall
and
so
and
I
hear
somebody
say:
distribution,
ecosystem
or
package
ecosystem,
the
the
natural
course
of
action
is
well.
What
do
you
mean
by
that
and
then,
when
they
tell
you
what
they
meant
it's
like?
Well,
why
don't
you
just
say
that
then,
because
I
I.
D
B
You
see
it's
like
something
that
can't
be
explained
well
enough.
You
just
throw
the
term
ecosystem
in
there
and
I
think
this
needs
to
be
very.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
super
specific,
but
it's
got
to
be
specific
enough.
That
there's
no
I
mean
we're
talking
about
something
that
people
are
going
to
attest
to
right
about
me
again.
You
can't
attest
to
an
equal
I
mean
that's
that
could
be
any
damn
thing:
Jesus
the
testing
to
an
ecosystem.
B
B
So
you're
talking
about
a
formal
or
ad
hoc
set
of
conventions
or
tooling
for
package
distribution.
That's
not
even
that's
not
even
secure
by
Nate,
but
by
the
nature
of
that
there's,
not
there's
no
security.
There
there's
no
security
in
an
ad
hoc
or
formal
right.
You
need
to
be
able
to
build
controls
around
them.
You
can't
how
can
the
same
controls
be
used
for
a
formal
or
ad
hoc?
B
That's
right,
I
mean.
Do
you
understand
what
I'm
saying
like
I
like
that,
like
that's?
Not
you,
you've
got
you've
got
to
get
a
little
bit
more
specific
as
a
little
bit
more
specific
than
that,
especially
when
you
then
define
whether
formal
and
then
what
an
informal
one
is
and
they're
both
extremes
convention
used
within
the
company
such
an
informal
as
a
language
distribution.
B
Well,
what?
If
a
company
decides
that
their
formal
ecosystem
in
terms
of
the
language
distribution
being
used,
maybe
they
have
a
policy
in
place
that
says
that
this
package,
this
language
distribution,
is
this
so
This
versus
versus
that
and
then
what,
if
a
company's
ecosystem
isn't
informal?
Maybe
it
is
a
convention
used
to
come.
Maybe
that's
that's
formal,
I,
I,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
I.
Think
I.
Think
do
we
decide
that
amongst
ourselves,
though,
what
that
means,
I
I,
think
that's
something
that
we
go
back
back
to
Speck
with
I.
B
Yeah
I
say
all
I
mean:
maybe
we
go
back
to
openness
and
stuff
with
this
right?
Maybe
we
go
back
to
the
I
I
and
I'll.
Keep
saying
this
too
I
I
said
this
before
I'll
say
it
again
and
while
I
will
also
say,
we
can
give
as
much
as
we
get
with
this
one,
meaning
they
have
a
whole
glossary
of
terms
that
they're
working
on
under
the
best
practices
working
with.
B
B
A
I
forget
the
gentleman's
name
that
leads
that
group.
It's
not.
B
Cool
I
think
well,
I
think
crop
leads
the
best
practices
group
as
far
as
the
crowd
yeah.
He
leads
the
best
practices
group
see.
C
B
B
Hold
on
one
second
he's
definitely
on
GitHub.
Let
me
let
me
see
I'll
give
you
his
his
handle
in
in
two
seconds
here.
We
just
opened
up
one
of
his
one
of
his
repos.
B
May
not
let
me
try
to
pull
up
where,
where
he's
at
anyway,.
A
A
I
would
think
it's
just
syrup,
but
but
you
know,
let
me
go
back.
Go
back,
go
back.
A
I,
don't
know
why
it's
not
showing
I
think
because
he's
not
part
of
it.
It's
also
a
a
repo
or
something.
A
So
that's
that's
pretty
much
stuff.
You
want
right
see
if
they
have
something,
but
if
they
don't,
it
sounds
like
we
don't
necessarily
like
the
word
ecosystem
and
so
I
was
trying
to
see
if
there
was
a
different
word
that
we
could
use.
B
So
what
whether
we?
Maybe
that's,
because
what
are
we
trying
to
say
whether
we,
whether
we
are
we
trying
to
say
they're,.
A
Trying
to
Define,
you
know,
I
think
it's
for
the
purposes
of
obviously
the
spec
to
say
this
is
what
a
package
ecosystem
means
and.
B
Yeah
well,
yeah
I
mean
I
got
you
know
to
say
well
what,
when
you
say,
package
ecosystem?
What
do
you
actually
referring
to
it,
because
it
can't
just
be
a
formal
or
informal
that
the
me
you
immediately
well
you'll
lose
me
immediately.
If
you
say
formal
and
informal,
I'm
going
to
say
dude
pick
a
struggle
like
you
know,
I
mean
I
did
but
but
but
but
to
say
what?
What
exactly
are
you
referring
to
as
a
package?
And
you
say:
well,
it's
a
convention
of
tools.
C
C
B
B
To
sound
over
overly
overly
educated,
using
terms
that
that
are
that
well
they're,
using
terms
that
are
ambiguous,
fluff,
I,
I,
don't
I
mean
I'm
I'm
talking
a
lot
with
that
one,
let's
say
it's:
fluff,
I
I,
think
I.
Think
I
think
you
can
get
smaller
and
more
concise
and
more
literal
without
having
to
sound
super
hello.
C
E
B
I
mean
we
I
think
you
know
I
think
we
can
ask
them
to
get
a
bit
more.
You
know
in
an
effort
to
sound
super
techie.
You
can
just
call
it.
What
it
is
I
mean
I
doesn't
take
away
from,
doesn't
take
away
from
the
the
smartness
of
its
application.
It
just
makes
it
so
that
everyone
can
understand
it.
You
know.
A
D
D
I
I
well,
I
definitely
agree.
The
ecosystem
is
is
wrong.
We
just
can't
use
that,
but
whether
we
use
I
I
kind
of
agree
with
Jay,
you
know,
maybe
toolkit
or
or
something
like
that.
You
know
to
make
matters
more
confusing.
I
know
what
what
our
company
is
has
done
is.
Is
we've
actually
called
it
consume,
but
but
let's
not
go
there,
because
that
makes
it
even
even
harder,
but
yeah
I,
think
I.
D
Think
if
we're
going,
if
we're
going
to
use
the
term
package
I
think
that's
better
than
distribute,
because
not
always
for
distribution,
sometimes
or
it
sometimes
is
for
consumption,
but
but
definitely
definitely
I.
Think
ecosystem
is,
is
nebulous
and
Broad.
E
I
agree
with
the
comments
about
air
conditioning
for
true:
it's
not
a
good
one,
but
at
the
same
time
we
have
to
try
to
figure
out
what
what
could
be
a
better
term,
because
it
looks
like
that.
Everything
that
you
look
you
come
out
like,
for
example,
two
key
to
you
or
something
like
that.
You
can
also
lead
to
a
different
direction.
E
A
A
So
something
like
toolkit,
sorry,
packet,
yeah
and
and
Mark
here
had
voiced
the
concerns
that
we
were
kind
of
voicing
here,
which
is
why
he
he
chose
distribution
instead,
where
you
know,
ecosystem
has
too
much
emphasis
on
formal
Packaging
Systems
like
npm.
This
is
kind
of
what
we
were
talking
about
earlier
right
and
then
that
whole
company
Central
infrastructure
right
but
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
the
distribution,
so
I
think
Mark
had
the
right
mindset
of
hey.
A
Let's
try
to
pick
a
different
word
like
what
we're
doing,
but
distribution
is
distribution,
ecosystem,
build.
A
And
somebody
mentioned
artifactory
our
artifact
repository,
which
I
don't
like,
because
when
it
comes
to
evidence,
collection
and
you
talking
about
compliance,
artifact
means
something
completely
different.
Artifact
means
evidence
not
like
a
package
I
think
artifact
is
used
very
much
from
a
software
development.
Standpoint
of
you
know,
there's
just
package
repository,
but
not
in
the
compliance
world.
A
Sorry
I'm,
not
a
fan
of
that
word
either.
Repository.
D
Well,
yeah,
no
I
think
if,
if
we
use
repository
by
itself,
it
might
be
okay
because
it
could
be
a
public
repo.
But
if
we,
if
we
say
the
words
artifact
repository,
then
it
gets
loaded
with
that.
That
to
me
implies
a
vendor
solution.
A
It
is
okay,
here's
a
package
and
then
the
consumer
can
grab
it,
or
is
this
more
of
pay
I'm
going
Upstream
to
go
grab
my
dependencies
because
I'm
seeing
this
right,
I'm,
not
sure
what
this
means
right
here
when
it
comes
to
distribution,
because
Josh
didn't
put
a
picture
only
marked
it
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
this.
This
part
right
here
is
this
purely
just
once
everything's
built,
including
the
dependencies
it's
being
distributed
to
the
consumer,
yeah.
D
You
know
we
we've
used
a
graphic
very,
very
similar
to
this,
and
what
that
dependencies
means
you
know.
The
reason
it's
kind
of
circular
is
that
dependency
management
is
ongoing
and
continuous.
So,
even
even
when
you've
got
a
distribution,
you
always
have
to
continue
with
that.
With
that
dependency
management.
D
Intended
to
me,
but
so
whether
whether
you
know
Source
control
Bill
distributes-
and
maybe
it's
just
distributes
versus
distribution,
because
to
me
once
it's
built,
you've
got
a
package
yeah
I,
guess
it
depends
on
how
how
granular
we
want
to
get
because
you
can
build
it
and
then
package
it.
But
to
me
when
you've,
when
you've
actually
built
it,
you
have
a
package
so
now
you're
ready
to
distribute.
D
Or
consuming,
and
and
that's
why,
like,
what
we've,
what
we've
always
used
and
when
we
talk
about
source
code,
we
talk
about
import,
so
we'll
say:
import
build
consume
as
as
the
three
steps
but
consume
is
kind
of
loaded.
Also.
A
A
Distribute
your
word
okay
and
let
me
copy
and
paste
this
somewhere
else,
so
I
don't
lose
it
because
I
would
hate
for
GitHub
to
time
me
out
and
then
there
goes
all
these
comments.
Okay,.
A
So
that's
number
actually
I
should
put
it
in
here.
Oh
that's,
ugly.
I'll
fix
that
later.
Okay,
so
I
think
we've
beat
that
one
to
death.
The
other
thing
that
came
up
was
about
to
have
a
open,
ssf
landing
page
for
salsa,
so
Tracy
seems
to
have
done
that
with
six
store.
A
So
if
you
click
on
this-
and
she
was
saying
that
she
could
help
us
and
yeah
see
I,
don't
know
open,
ssf
landing
page
for
six
store,
but
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
where
Community,
okay,
aha
I
see.
So
she
wants
to
do
one
for
salsa,
so
I
feel
like
this
is
part
of
our
domain
because
of
positioning.
A
It's
not
part
of
tooling
so
I
think
it's
part
of
our
domain
to
to
work
on
this.
So
not
sure
what
folks
thoughts
are
on
trying
to
take
this
on
to
kind
of
help,
broaden
the
visibility
of
salsa.
A
Right,
we
would
just
have
to
work
with
her,
but.
C
A
First
question
is:
should
we
right
do
we
think
it's
within
our
scope
and
then
we
can
kind
of
get
the
ball
rolling
with
her.
B
Well,
given
that
there
are
already
like
two
or
three
different
blogs
are
landing
places
for
salsa,
who,
who
did
those
and
should
there
be
someone
that
we
consult,
that
did
those
like
the
salsa.dev?
Whoever
did
this
I
mean?
Should
we
be
Consulting
that
those
individuals
or
that
person
did
this.
A
I
think
Google
created
this
okay
yeah,
and
so
we
can
always
consult
with
remember
creative
yeah,
I'm,
pretty
sure
Google
created
it,
because
it's
not
notice
it's
not
under
open
ssf
right.
So
this
was
before
they
became
part
of
open,
SSL
and
I.
Think
maybe
yeah.
Let's
see
if
I
put
a
sixth
score,
okay
and
it
goes
to
the
GitHub
page.
So
it's
almost
like
it
almost
seems
like
it
wants
to
be
a
replacement,
maybe
but
I'm
not
100
sure
is
there.
Do
we
know
if
there's
a
six
door.dev
website.
A
A
Let's
see
what
the
sixth
reductive
website
says,
yeah
I
was
wondering
about
that.
It
almost
seems
like
it's
supposed
to
replace
the
salsa
Dev,
because
I
suspect
that
six
door
also
had
a
regular
dip,
which
is
why
they
have
the
dot
done,
but
it
looks
like
it's
not
being
used
for
anything
but
the
status
right
now.
Does
anybody
have
any
contacts
in
six
store?
Oh
there,
it
goes
I,
don't
know
what
happened.
I,
don't
mind.
A
So
they
still
have
it
so
I
think
it's
just
more
visibility,
then
to
say
these
are
the
pieces
of
salsa.
A
A
This
salsa
GitHub
generator
and
then
there's
also
this
salsa
verifier
right.
So
there's
a
couple
of
things:
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
put
that
there,
but
maybe
maybe
we
talk
about
it
in
the
next
overall
social
media.
A
B
But
we've
gotten
some
traction
on
that,
also
from
the
end
user's
working
group,
who's
interested
in
understanding
the
work
that
we've
done
as
well
as
a
matter
of
fact,
they're
working
on
some
type
of
a
pitch
to
the
attack
on
some
work
that
they
want
to
do.
B
A
Yeah
I
think
I
put
it
on
there
on
the
notes,
but
here
here's,
the
link,
yeah
I,
know
you
had
commented
on
it:
I
didn't
get
to
like
go
through
it.
I
mean
it's
very
short,
but
yeah.
B
But
we
do,
we
definitely
need
to
come
back
to
it
and
do
more
and
and
do
more
work
more
work
on
it,
especially
with
the
changes
that
are
occurring
with
the
with
the
salsa
spec
I
was
in
the
meaning.
I
was
like
yeah
I
mean
you.
Were
there
too,
when.
C
A
B
That
that's
a
that's
believe
it
or
not.
That's
a
huge
change
hell,
that's
a
huge
change
that
affects
our
our
blog
post.
A
A
A
B
Was
that
oh
yeah,
we
well,
we
what
we
put
out
blogs
from
both
internal
to
Microsoft,
and
then
we
put
out
one
over
the
SS
open,
that's
the
stuff
as
well.
Okay,
that
was
just
to
announce
the
contribution.
That's
all
that
was
got.
B
But
we
also
inside
of
the
one
from
the
openness
itself
we
mentioned
it
being
in
parallel
and
being
being,
you
know,
being
able
to
be
bridged
with
salsa.
We
mentioned
that
in
that
blog
post
as
well.
So
this
so
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
Pathways
and
ways
to
play.
I
did
that
on
purpose.
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
I
don't
know
Bruno
or
Jeff.
If
you
want
to
be
part
of
these
conversations,
this
happened
because
of
the
supply
chain
Integrity
meeting,
but
this
obviously
is
part
of
the
salsa
positioning,
also
right,
because
we're
trying
to
position
salsa
in
comparison
to
S2
c2f.
A
D
A
Okay,
we
have
15
minutes
left.
The
last
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about
Jay
was
that
supply
chain
security
ecosystem
diagram.
You
gave
me.
B
Yeah,
the
the
one
from
Jonathan
right.
A
A
B
Yeah,
my
my
ping,
my
my
reach
out
to
Jonathan,
was
to
was
to
get
him
to
give
me
the
other
part
to
this.
A
Yeah
yeah
I
think
that
was
my.
My
biggest
question
was
okay.
Well,
where
are
these
numbers
coming
from
right?
How
are
they
calculated,
because
I
think
we
were
trying
to
use
this?
Also
for
that
as
us
also
versus
S2
c2f
right.
B
Yeah
one
one
starts
one
one
finishes:
there
are
also
a
couple
of
other
diagrams
that
I'm
pulling
that
that
we've
done
in
terms
of
the
Microsoft
on
all
of
the
Frameworks
together
to
see
where
they're
see
where
the
overlaps
are.
B
B
Okay,
so
we
said,
we
can
clearly
see
that
as
well,
because
because
there
was,
there
was
a
lot
of
work
done,
especially
I.
Think
Fresco
was
part
of
that
too,
and
and
guac
was
part
of
this
particular
diagram,
along
with
a
couple
of
others
to
say
what
the
well.
These
are,
where
the
overlaps
are,
where
everybody
seems
to
be
overlapping-
and
this
is
what's
still
not
covered
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
yeah.
A
Yeah,
if
we
can
get
more
more
info
from
on
this,
that
would
be
really
helpful,
because
I
think
when
I
was
looking
at
this
too
I
was
also
seeing
I
think
duplicates
of
something
it's
been
a
long
time.
I
think
it
was,
you
know,
is
this
compiled
libraries
here
the
same
thing
as
this
compiled
libraries
over
here
right?
Is
it
different?
A
So
there
was
a
couple
of
other
questions.
I
had
I'll
have
to
look
look
through
it
again.
B
I
know
I
probably
will
do
one
better
and
see
if
I
can't
get
Jonathan
just
to
join
the
meetings
and
have-
and
oh
yes,
talk
to
it-
talk
to
it
himself.
I
I,
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
really
working
on
for
the
next
year-
and
this
is
something
I
I've
taken
as
part
of
my
notes.
This
is
open.
This
is
up
at
large.
B
That's
one
of
my
charges,
I'm
looking
at
the
open
stuff,
all
as
a
whole,
we
really
do
need
to
start
doing
more
cross-working
group
collaboration
and
talks
and
part
of
what's
happening
on
the
the
diagram
of
society.
Our
reference
architecture
group
that
we
meet
is
really
understanding
how
all
of
these
working
groups
fit
together
under
the
open
ssf.
B
B
The
end
user's
working
group
is
one
of
these
working
groups.
That's
a
blend
over
on
purpose.
They
he
should
be
involved
in
these
conversations
because
of
stuff
they're
working
on
salsa
and
s2c2f.
They
both
impact,
you
know
or
have
an
impact
on
on
consumers
on
the
end
users,
so
you
should
be
involved
right,
so
so
I
I
think.
My
next
thing
is
to
get
him
to
join
these
meetings
and
talk
to
these
Frameworks
yeah
that'll
be
that'll,
be
great
for
us
and
good
for.
A
B
A
That
was
the
last
thing
I
had
I
know:
we've
been
working
on
the
development
blog,
but
given
some
of
the
changes
in
that's
been
happening,
it's
also
over
the
past
couple
weeks,
we'll
have
to
revisit
to
make
sure
nothing.
Nothing
significant
is
missing
or
needs
to
be
removed,
but
we'll
we'll
do
that
some
other
time
I
know
we
kind
of
be
working
on
that
blog
for
a
while.
Now
any
other
topics,
questions
concerns
things
that
maybe
we
should
be
focusing
on
sometime
2023.
A
Okay,
well,
I
will
give
you
a
few
minutes
back
to
your
day
and
for
those
of
you
that
are
still
here
next
week.
I'll
see
you
next
week.