►
Description
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
B
C
We
like
to
would
like
to
continue
our
meeting
but
I
liked
before
we
start
I'd
like
to
call
mr.
James
Graham
when
James
did
his
presentation.
I
didn't
ask
my
colleague
on
committee
if
they
have
any
question
for
James
and
he
had
asked
if
any
a
question
from
my
colleague
about
his
presentation,
has
that
been
given
the
opportunity
when
he
was
here
earlier
any
question
for
mr.
Graham?
Okay.
Thank
you
mr.
Graham,
but
I'm
glad
you
asked
me
about
this
next
speaker.
We
have
Rosie
MacNeil.
Oh,
it
was
she's
right
here,
I'm
ready
to
go.
D
Chairman
and
members
Iraq
committee,
can
you
hear
okay
good
afternoon
my
name
is
Rosie.
Mcneese
I've
lived
in
Koz
for
over
30
years.
We
live
about
two
kilometers
away
from
the
416
and
Rajat
Stephens
on
the
east
side
of
the
highway.
My
husband
and
I
have
a
small
farm
alongside
Stevens
Creek
I
work
on
the
land
and
for
many
years
have
done
a
lot
of
horseback
riding
on
the
land
right
across
the
highway
from
the
proposed
site.
In
fact,
sometimes
we
ride
right
across
Roger,
Stevens,
Drive,
so
I
know
the
area
very
well.
D
I
have
two
important
points
to
make
my
first
point
and
one
that
I
noticed
was
not
included
in
your
list
of
issues
and
I
support,
valid
and
realistic
studies.
However,
as
the
previous
speaker
Bruce
pointed
out,
the
e
is
submitted
by
moncaster
environmental
planning
to
broccolini
included
with
the
proposal
to
build.
The
white
house
is
clearly
insufficient,
knowing
the
land
so
well
directly
across
the
highway
from
the
proposed
site.
D
I
know
that
displacing
all
living
life
from
a
large
portion
of
rural
site
will
create
a
major
loss
of
habitat
for
many
different
species
of
our
native
wildlife
birds,
plants
and
insects,
some
of
which
I
actually
see
when
I'm
writing
some
of
these
species
at
risk.
I
see
when
I'm
writing
the
Bobolink
bond,
swallows
traumatic,
decimation
of
their
dens
nests
as
food
caches
for
the
winter
will
result
in
wildlife,
freezing
or
starving
to
death,
and
at
other
times
of
year
there
will
be
roadkill,
increased,
roadkill,
orphaned,
offspring
and
injured
wildlife.
There
is
no
recommend.
D
Recommendation
made
in
Hmong
custody
is
to
abide
by
the
city's
handbook
protocol
for
wildlife
protection
during
construction
and
I
have
a
copy
with
me
here
and
I
would
suggest
for
any
development
on
this
site
following
this
guideline
should
be
a
mandatory
requirement
and
rigorously
followed
and
monitored.
Remember
this
is
a
rural
area
which
has
been
home
for
many
many
years
to
many
different
species.
Is
it
acceptable
to
turn
a
blind
eye
to
their
eviction
and
suffering
for
our
economic
growth?
Already
half
of
canada's
wildlife
species
are
in
serious
decline
and
I
have
the
backups
here.
D
My
second
point,
as
has
been
referred
to
already
ottawa
city
council,
declared
a
climate
emergency
for
the
purposes
of
deepening
its
commitment
in
protecting
our
ecosystems
and
our
community
from
climate
change.
Council
has
also
adopted
a
long-term
community
target
of
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions
by
80%
below
2012
levels
by
2050.
D
Looking
at
this
proposal
to
build
a
mega
warehouse
with
63
truck
bays
in
a
rural
area,
no
public
transit,
no
city
services,
increased
carbon
imprint,
bringing
its
own
air
light
and
noise
pollution
encouraging
of
an
industrial
stroll
to
spread
into
the
rural
area.
Everything
about
this
proposal
is
contrary
to
the
city's
declaration
of
a
climate
emergency
and
the
city's
stated
targets
for
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
As
one
of
your
councilors
councillor
I,
said
back
in
April.
D
D
We
need
to
consider
whether
the
benefits
of
this
type
of
developed
development
in
an
agricultural
area
for
the
short
term
being
tax
dollars
and
a
handful
of
minimum-wage
jobs
are
outweighed
by
the
harm
that
such
projects
caused
to
our
communities,
a
wild
life,
the
rural
landscape
and
the
people
who
live
there.
Now
who
are
trying
to
steward
that
land
for
future
generations,
their
children
and
their
grandchildren.
The
City
of
Ottawa
has
committed
in
its
document
on
intensification,
30-second.
C
D
Stop
urban
sprawl
do
your
own
statements
mean
nothing
in
closing,
as
our
councillors
and
as
members
of
the
agriculture
rural
affairs
committee,
we
would
like
you
to
be
able
to
sincerely
look
your
children
and
grandchildren
in
the
eyes
and
say
you've
done
everything
possible
to
preserve
our
environment
and
the
rural
part
of
the
Ottawa
city
or
the
city
of
Ottawa's
way
of
life.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
express
my
concerns.
Thank.
E
Name
is
Gordon
kuba
neck
I'm,
a
professional
engineer,
Green
Party
candidate
and
I've
lived
in
the
village
of
cars
for
the
past
16
years
on
first
line
Road
I'm
gonna
focus
primarily
on
the
chunk
of
land
in
the
middle
of
the
property.
It
is
a
recharge
zone
and
under
the
current
zoning
it
is
not
to
be
built
on
or
developed
as
it
currently
stands.
I'm
gonna
mention
a
little
bit
about
the
supporting
the
land
use.
E
Supporting
the
farm
community
is
secondarily
the
central
zone
of
this
land
has
been
identified
in
the
2018
Mississippi
Rideau
source
protection
plan
as
being
part
of
a
significant
groundwater
recharge
area.
The
2003
hydrological
report
indicated
that
this
land
could
only
be
developed
if
this
drumlin
zone
was
not
disturbed
as
the
rest
of
the
property
is
covered
with
clay
and
does
not
permit
recharge.
That
is
why
the
current
zoning
quite
correctly,
does
not
allow
construction
on
the
middle
part
that
only
on
the
east
and
west
edges
of
the
property.
E
Therefore
I
recommend
that
you
rekt
reject
the
current
proposal.
The
removal
of
this
recharge
zone
risks
increasing
local
spring
flooding,
which
is
already
a
problem,
especially
for
those
on
the
third
line.
The
current
zoning
aligns,
with
the
current
on
Ontario
Ministry
of
Environment
guidelines
that
state
that
rural
development
must
not
threaten
the
water
quality
or
drainage
of
the
region,
especially
when
closed
to
private
wells
or
near
flood
plain.
This
proposal
does
not
meet
that
criteria.
I
have
attached
the
2017
technical
rules
under
the
Clean
Water
Act,
which
support
that
statement.
E
The
reports
in
the
proposal
do
not
identify
how
much
land
is
to
be
paved,
but
the
removal
of
the
drum
runs
with
the
high
water
requirements
and
the
buildings
coverage
means
that
groundwater
will
be
adversely
affected.
In
addition,
North
grow
North
Gore
has
grown
significantly
since
the
2003
report
and
also
has
currently
550
homes
on
the
works.
Groundwater
needs
for
the
development
or
future
expansion.
The
village
or
for
future
communal
wells
should
not
be
compromised
by
this
kind
of
development.
E
A
farm
related
commercial
and
farm
related
industrial
and
it
must
be
compatible
with
and
not
hinder
agricultural
operations.
Additionally,
those
guidelines
state
that
you
should
be
appropriate
to
available
service
available
in
the
rural
areas.
That
means
road
access,
water,
sewage
utilities
etc
and
the
if
it
requires
that
that
that
sort
of
industry
should
be
placed
in
an
appropriate
settlement
area.
E
Additionally,
it
is
both
illogical
because
of
the
lack
of
mapping
and
the
concerns
about
overtaxing
of
the
groundwater
supplies
is
logical
that
the
cities
had
some
understandable
fears
that
groundwater
extraction
should
be
minimized,
at
least
until
there's
a
detailed
map
of
the
water
table.
Several
post
Walkerton
reports,
which
I
have
referred
to
support
that
which
say
the
following
non
agricultural
activities
such
as
large
water
intakes,
must
also
consider
the
context
of
local
rural
groundwater
protection.
E
The
relevant
procedures
must
be
reviewed
with
respect
to
their
impact
on
groundwater
quality,
due
to
the
fact
that
there
are
no
specific
client
analysis
or
recognition
of
the
impact
no
mitigations
proposed
22nd
and
the
uncertainty
I
propose
that
this
should
not
be
approved.
In
summary,
because
the
appropriate
mandate
is
an
up-to-date
water
studies
have
not
been
carried
out
because
the
recharge
zone
which
is
currently
excluded,
is
now
to
be
built
on
and
because
of
this
being
prime
agricultural
land.
This
should
not
be
approved.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
G
C
C
H
You
very
much
for
providing
this
opportunity
to
comment
at
this
forum.
My
presentation
looks
at
section
3
of
the
PPS
that
directs
development
away
from
natural
hazards
and
human-made
hazards
when
there
is
an
unacceptable
risk
to
public
health
and
safety.
We
believe
that
it
was
important
to
prepare
this
presentation,
because
the
planning
documentation
is
a
little
thin
on
this
subject
and
there's
some
key
issues
that
are
high
in
the
public
consciousness
and
very
important
for
which
there's
little
or
no
information
provided
I'm
going
to
focus
on
two
of
those
issues:
air
pollution
and
climate
change.
H
Air
pollution
is
a
vital
consideration
associated
with
compatibility
of
land
use.
Given
the
residential
and
agricultural
zoning
surrounding
this
site
plan
and
if
Ottawa's
declaration
of
a
climate
emergency
means
anything,
it
means
that
careful
planning
is
more
important
now
than
ever
for
not
only
our
long-term
survival,
but
also
our
well,
not
only
for
our
long-term
prosperity,
but
also
for
our
long-term
survival.
I
have
submitted
a
longer
document
to
the
chair
with
statistics
and
references
to
support
this
presentation.
I'm
going
to
start
with
air
pollution.
H
Air
pollution
kills
thousands
of
Canadians
every
year
and
contributes
to
millions
of
symptom
days
for
asthma
sufferers
and
people
with
respiratory
problems.
It
is
a
likely
impact
of
the
logistics
activities
associated
with
the
proposed
warehouse,
a
likely
health
impact,
research
consistently
links,
traffic
emissions
to
negative
impacts
on
human
health
and
diesel
freight
vehicles
are
the
major
source
of
near
Road
air
pollution.
This
issue
should
be
at
the
forefront
of
the
proposal
because
of
the
proximity
of
the
development
to
residential
dwellings,
which
are
always
considered
sensitive
uses.
H
It
seems
as
though
the
proposal
presents
a
prima
facie
indication
of
a
lack
of
compatibility
and
land
use,
given
the
likelihood
for
negative
impacts
on
adjacent
residential
uses.
Section.
One
point
two
point:
six
point:
one
of
the
PPS
requires
attention
in
planning
to
land
use
capacity,
compatibility
of
adjacent
lands.
This
is
supposed
to
prevent
problems
that
could
arise
due
to
the
encroachment
of
sensitive
land
uses
and
industrial
land
uses
on
one
another.
H
These
problems
include
the
adverse
effects
of
to
residents
from
contaminants
which
under
Ontario's
guideline
to
help
implement
the
PPS
obligation,
includes
air
emissions
through
traffic
and
transportation
associated
with
the
facility.
There
is
no
information
to
suggest
that
this
obligation
was
thoroughly
assessed
in
the
decision-making
around
the
warehouse
proposal.
One
recent
Canadian
study
found
that
a
buffer
of
at
least
500
metres
is
required
to
protect
citizens
from
negative
health
impacts
of
large
diesel
trucks.
H
This
would
require
revisiting
the
buffer
proposed
in
this
staff
report
and
the
buffer,
the
additional
the
additional
buffer
proposed
this
morning
between
the
facility
and
the
residents
of
third
line
Road.
Moreover,
the
adverts
that
we're
adverse
effects
are
established
for
adjacent
residential
uses
in
a
village
such
as
north,
core
section
3
of
the
Official
Plan,
requires
that
the
city
will
not
permit
industrial
uses
on
village
land
where
there
are
likely
to
be
negative
impacts
on
adjacent
residential
uses.
More
information
is
needed
to
properly
address
this
potential
impact.
H
The
second
issue
that
could
be
more
present
in
the
project
proposal
is
climate
change.
There
is
a
growing
consensus
that
climate
changes,
the
public
health
emergency
and
the
w-h-o
is
declared
at
the
defining
public
health
issue
of
the
21st
century.
Briefly,
impacts
include
more
incidences,
extreme
weather,
that
is
more
dangerous
and
more
deadly.
Increased
exposure
to
disease,
deteriorating
air
food
insecurity
and
increasing
mental
health
problems
in
April
list
this
year,
as
we've
heard,
the
City
of
Ottawa
declared
a
climate
emergency.
H
If
this
is
to
mean
anything,
it
should
involve
a
review
of
policies
and
programs
to
bring
them
into
line
with
the
consensus
science,
such
as
that
represented
by
the
Intergovernmental
Panel
on
Climate
Change.
Just
to
be
clear,
the
IPCC's
forecasts
for
the
climate
and
for
the
planet
are
dire
just
last
year.
It
suggested
the
negative
impacts
of
1.5
degrees.
Celsius
of
global
warming
will
be
far
greater
than
expected
and
could
be
reached
in
as
little
as
11
years
and
almost
certainly
within
20
years,
at
current
levels
of
emissions.
H
Could
follow
its
own
directions
in
the
official
plan
to
incorporate
climate
change
into
all
levels
of
city
decision-making?
This
should
be
applied
to
help
identify
unacceptable
levels
of
risk.
Pursuant
to
section
3
of
the
PPS.
There's
no
evidence
that
this
was
done
in
this
proposal
for
any
issue
beyond
flooding
which
which
did
not
consider
climate
change
and
was
based
on
out-of-date
information
and
deferred
until
site
plan
approval,
Ottawa
has
itself
identified
buildings
and
transportations
as
two
major
emitters
of
greenhouse
gases.
Yet
there
is
no
reference
in
the
material
to
assure
the
building.
H
Design
must
promote
energy
efficiency
and
adopt
forward-looking
construction
codes.
Cars
are
the
single
largest
admission
emitters
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions
within
the
transportation
sector
in
Ottawa
and
elsewhere,
and
in
the
context
of
this
climate
emergency
it
makes
no
sense
to
build
such
a
large
project
on
attractive
land
with
so
many
people
driving
to
and
from
work
and
I.
Think
we
heard
some
great
statistics
about
that.
A
few
minutes
ago,
I
I
think
that
we
need
more
information
to
properly
address
this.
C
H
G
H
G
C
H
I
Okay,
good
afternoon
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Colleen.
Murphy
I
have
been
a
resident
of
North
Gore
for
over
20
years.
I
live
on
third-line
North
with
my
family,
my
husband
and
two
children.
My
topic
today
is
public
engagement
in
2008,
the
community
of
North
Gore
and
the
City
of
Ottawa
worked
together
to
finalize
the
North
Gore
secondary
plan
residents
involved
in
that
process
felt
that
the
resulting
plan
reflected
the
rural
character
of
their
community.
I
I
The
city,
it
seemed,
listened
and
had
a
clearer
sense
of
what
the
villages
priorities
and
their
preferred
path
forward
would
be,
interestingly,
as
long-term
resident.
Mr.
Tupper
has
pointed
out
earlier
today
there
is
a
provision
in
the
secondary
plan
for
the
height
of
church,
steeples
and
I
quote
a
white
church.
I
Spire
is
the
tallest
structure
in
the
village
fast
forward
to
2019,
and
if
the
proposed
make
aware
host
becomes
a
reality,
it
will
then
become
the
tallest
structure
in
our
village,
how's
that
for
a
statement
of
rural
character
and
charm,
a
change
in
zoning
not
only
ignores
the
rural
identity
of
the
area.
It
ignores
the
many
concerns
outlined
to
you
today
by
my
fellow
neighbors
in
north
core
and
our
surrounding
communities.
How
is
it
that
our
voice
has
not
been
heard?
I
I
If
you
look
at
the
five
pillars
of
public
engagement,
developed
by
the
International
Association
of
public
participation
and
adapted
by
the
City
of
Ottawa
in
their
public
engagement
strategy,
public
engagement
for
the
proposed
zoning
changes
for
this
mega
warehouse
has
been
limited
to
date.
To
the
first
two
stages.
I
The
first
stage
to
inform
constitutes
a
low
level
of
public
engagement
on
July
30th.
The
first
trickle
of
information
was
received
as
Debbie
Bishop.
My
neighbor
indicated
there
was
a
letter
sent
to
residents
bordering
the
this
site,
but
no
one
else,
not
even
those
across
the
street.
It
seems
the
rules
the
city
has
in
place
to
inform
affected
residents
are
very
urban
centric
and
notice
to
property
owners
within
a
hundred,
and
twenty
meters
of
the
proposed
site
does
not
translate
to
sufficient
notice
in
a
rural
community.
I
The
second
stage
of
public
engagement
consult
was
limited
again
to
a
select
number
of
residents
with
minimal
feedback
from
the
city.
As
a
result
of
those
consultations,
so
if
you
look
at
the
five
pillars
of
public
engagement,
the
last
three
involve
collaborate
and
empower
have
really
been
restricted
to
those
to
the
city
and
the
developer.
Broccolini.
I
The
scope
of
sorry
best
practices
of
public
engagement
indicate
that
the
scope
of
engagement,
Prout,
the
scope
of
the
engagement
process
should
align
with
the
magnitude
and
complexity
of
the
decision
being
made.
In
other
words,
if
this
zoning
change
only
affected
a
few
residents,
then
the
public
engagement
we
have
had
to
date
might
have
been
adequate.
However,
as
you
have
heard
from
many
of
my
neighbors,
there
are
far-reaching
effects
of
this.
The
zoning
change
and
most
of
us
were
only
provided
details
at
the
meeting
on
October
17th.
I
G
F
G
About
the
engagement
in
the
collaboration
aspect,
a
lot
of
it,
the
changes
that
I
try
proposed
to
this
site
to
try
to
address
concerns
came
directly
from
residents
when
I
met
with
Carlos
Adamson's
not
too
long
ago
and
showed
him
the
motion.
We
had
word
that
the
report
had
40
meters.
Carlos
said
it
would
be
a
lot
better
if
that
was
a
hundred
meters.
That's
in
the
motion
today,
when
I
met
with
James
Graham
we
talked
about.
G
There
was
a
lot
of
concern
about
losing
the
recreational
aspect
losing
that
future
ability
to
have
recreational
uses
in
the
community
that
was
designed
for
this
site.
So
we
included
that
in
I
made
you
to
roughly
include
operated
use
on
the
entire
site.
There
was
there's
been
more
to
that
that
the
volumetric
zoning
came
up
from
one
of
those
one
of
those
meetings.
The
volumetric
zoning
came
up
from
one
of
those
public
meetings
that
we
had
one
of
the
meetings
I
had
with
residents.
G
Is
there
a
third
line,
Road
resident
that
suggested
that
volumetric
zoning
model
that
isn't?
We
don't
use
that
anywhere
else
in
the
city,
but
we
developed
it
for
this
site
just
based
on
that
feedback
from
residents
out
of
data
meeting.
So
those
things
don't
exist
without
that
consultation
that
I
had
with
residents
and
broccolini
involved
well.
I
C
F
J
Afternoon,
chair
counselors,
thank
you
for
hearing
me
today.
I
have
a
number
of
matters
that
I'd
like
to
speak
about
apologize
for
my
rough
voice.
You've
heard
from
many
people
today
about
sort
of
the
in
congruence
of
this
proposal.
The
zoning
and
official
plan
amendment
with
the
provincial
policy
statement.
J
I
won't
get
into
the
details
and
give
you
the
subsection
numbers
as
to
how
it
doesn't
mesh
up
with
the
prevention
policy
statement
and
cascading
ly
down
with
the
City
of
Ottawa
official
plan
and
the
village
secondary
plan,
I'd
like
to
speak
to
you
a
bit
about
sort
of
the
macro
level.
You've
had
introductions
about
that
already
today.
The
effects
of
climate
change.
J
There
are,
you
know,
numerous
studies
that
have
spoken
about
than
making
effects
of
climate
change.
What
I
haven't
heard
today
and
what
you
haven't
heard
today,
I'm
sorry,
is
how
that
translates
into
cost
to
both
government
to
private
citizens
insofar
as
insurance
risk.
There
are
a
number
of
studies
that
have
been
done:
I've
researched
extensively,
a
20-18
Parliament
of
Australia
report
that
speaks
to
just
that
and
I've
had
the
good
pleasure
of
being
in
Australia.
J
A
number
of
times
over
the
past
year,
they
are
like
us
heavily
reliant
upon
extractable
resources
and
they
are
facing
intense
weather
events
that
have
led
to
the
loss
of
life
and
thousands
or
millions
of
dollars
of
damage.
The
one
of
the
things
in
that
report
is
that
climate
change
projections
are
conservative
and
you've
heard
already.
The
plus
20%
for
the
one
and
100
year
were
scanning
planning
worst
case
planning
benchmark
is
no
longer
applicable.
J
Then
you
get
into
the
heart
of
the
matter.
On
insurance,
the
insurance
company
I,
a
Financial
Group,
which
has
worldwide
reach,
has
stated
that
current
planning
and
zoning
requirements
do
not
reflect
the
level
of
risk
communities
will
face
in
the
future.
The
IAG
argue
that
a
thorough
review
is
needed
of
planning
and
zoning
requirements
to
ensure
that
they
are
changed
to
reflect
the
range
of
scenarios
and
forecasts
in
risk
exposure
that
will
occur
with
climate
change.
J
Ie
G
argued
that
current
land
planning
and
zoning
requirements
are
misaligned
with
a
church
risk
and
that
this
places
pressure
on
the
affordability
of
insurance.
What
it
also
speaks
to
is
the
fact
that
insurance
cost
projections
are
done
over
a
12-month
basis,
whereas
mortgage
they're
done
over
a
longer
term
period
of
time
and
the
higher
the
costs
of
insurance
goes
up.
The
lower
the
property
values
become.
You
are
talking
about,
and
you've
heard
many
proposals
and
seeing
photos
of
the
downstream
effects
of
the
flooding,
which
would
be
exacerbated
by
the
runoff.
From
creating
this
project.
J
We
respectfully
request,
as
others
have
said,
that
you
reject
this
proposal,
based
on
the
fact
that
there
is
insufficient
study
done
on
a
number
of
environmental
aspects.
In
addition
to
what
I've
just
raised
here
with
respect
to
insurance,
I'd,
also
like
to
state
a
bit
about
the
fact
that
ecommerce
nobody's
done
of
well.
J
My
colleague
said
he
did
a
bit
of
a
discussion
on
that,
but
insofar
as
social
cohesion
in
the
public
Paul
were
the
provincial
policy
statement,
the
Ottawa
Official
Plan,
the
sort
of
multinational
large
businesses
that
would
come
in
give
low
skill
low,
paying
jobs
such
as
the
ones
that
would
be
at
this
warehouse
they're
sounding
a
death
knell
for
local,
small
and
medium-sized
businesses.
You've
heard
Cochrane
speaker's
today
talk
about
that
fact.
J
The
competition
that
will
drive
people
away
the
City
of
Ottawa
in
its
planning
and
forecasting
is
looking
to
the
youth
to
become
better
educated
and
to
go
and
work
in
high-tech,
high-skilled
jobs
and
I'm
not
even
going
to
get
into
the
fact
that
we
need
trades
people.
We
need
sufficient
trades
people
to
be
able
to
keep
half.
J
Thank
you
I
just
like
to
wrap
up
with
a
little
bit
about
the
need
for
social
cohesion
writ
large
in
the
face
of
what
will
be
a
very
dire
climate
change
consequences,
including
mass
migration
to
Canada,
and
we
will
have
to
absorb
larger
populations
from
areas
that
are
no
longer
habitable,
and
for
that
we
all
need
to
pull
together.
Thank.
K
Mr.
chairman
committee
members,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
Randy
LaVere
I
own
the
property
directly
east
of
the
proposed
changing
property,
I'm
speaking
here,
primarily
on
issues
that
I
am
opposed
to,
as
well
as
a
number
of
the
other
residents
in
the
area
and
I'm.
Quite
certain
everybody's
aware
that
there's
a
lot
of
people
upset
over
the
thing:
I,
don't
I'm,
not
gonna,
dwell
on
a
lot
of
things
that
have
already
been
said.
I
had
prepared
that
but
I'm
gonna
move
on
to
what
what
the
crux
of
my
argument
is.
K
I
was
the
one
that
opposed
it
at
OMB
and
I
took
it
to
OMB
at
that
time
and
OMB
got
in
touch
with
me
and
said:
could
we
send
a
mediator
and
maybe
work
with
some
of
these
issues?
I
said
sure
a
mediator
would
be
much
better
than
causing
the
cost
of
an
OMB
hearing
and
everything
else,
but
I
had
issued
an
OMB
I
had
filed
for
OMB.
At
the
time,
I
was
told
that
Rideau
Township
in
order
to
be
a
good
corporate
citizen
or
a
Township
citizen
in
regional
Cartland,
Carlton
County.
K
They
didn't
have
a
park
at
that
time.
That
would
generate
commercial
taxation
to
add
to
the
pool
I
was
we
had
a
number
of
concerns,
and
the
number
of
our
concerns
at
the
time
were
very
similar
to
concerns
that
everybody
has
stated
here
today.
One
of
the
concerns
was
we
wanted
to
have
a
listing
of
the
type
of
properties
or
commercial
industries
that
went
in.
K
They
also
told
us
that
this
part
was
being
designed
very
closely
to
the
parks
in
Osgood
being
Greeley
Park
and
in
the
township
of
South
Gore,
which
is
now
the
municipality
of
North
Granville,
a
south
core
business
park.
They
wanted
a
park
like
that
I
couldn't
argue
with
it.
I'm
a
major
landowner
in
that
Park
and
my
businesses
have
been
working
there
for
35
years.
I
still
have
it,
they
told
us
that
we
would
be
getting
services
like
electrical
plumbing,
etc.
K
K
K
Thank
you
very
much,
I
think
that
that
that
the
committee
has
to
look
at
the
fact
that
this
is
one
of
the
only
pieces
of
property
in
the
area
to
support
the
area
as
the
area
has
grown
in
20
years,
I
think
that
if
you
shut
this
down
or
return
or
accept
the
broccoli
nice
proposal,
you're
going
to
deprive
the
community
of
the
services
that
could
be
in
this
on
this
type
of
property,
there's
no
other
property
set
aside
for
it.
Thank
you
very
much,
gentlemen.
I
think
thank.
K
L
Thank
you
good
afternoon.
I
am
Joseph
Sullivan
and
I
live
in
Rogers
Stevens
Drive
within
walking
distance
of
the
proposed
warehouse.
Thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
speak
to
you
regarding
the
proposed
zoning
change
to
incorporate
it.
A
seven
story
warehouse
in
to
the
village
of
North
Bourne,
the
City
of
Ottawa
has
declared
a
climate
emergency.
Yet
our
councillor,
Scott
Moffat,
chairman
of
the
Environmental
Committee,
is
in
favor
of
the
change
in
zoning.
L
This,
where
her
warehouse
will
create
air
pollution
from
traffic
noise
pollution,
24/7
light
pollution
and
water
pollution
already
to
endangered
species,
have
been
affected,
butternut
trees
have
been
cut
down
and
the
barn
is
gone
where
the
barn
swallows
used
to
nest.
We
hope
the
remaining
members
of
the
committee
are
more
open-minded.
I
am
new
to
the
village
of
North.
Garth
I
have
only
lived
there
45
years.
It
is
a
very
old
village.
There
are
families
that
have
been
there
five
or
six
generations.
There
has
been
a
lot
of
change
in
45
years.
L
I
had
no
neighbors
when
I
first
arrived.
The
first
neighbors
were
the
Township
office
and
garage
now
known
as
the
city
service,
center
and
transportation
garage.
We
have
a
large
subdivision
of
expensive
homes
across
from
us
and
the
third
line
home
subdivided
of
off
subject
property
are
equally
beautiful.
The
holy
pilgrim
church
has
changed
to
become
a
Tamil
temple
in
2001,
we
became
part
of
the
amalgamated
City
of
Ottawa.
At
that
time,
a
city
planner
came
out
to
North
Gore
and
met
with
the
village
residents.
L
They
work
not
hours
but
years
to
come
up
with
the
2008
approved
plan
for
the
village
of
North
Gore.
That
was
acceptable
to
both
the
village
and
the
City
of
Ottawa.
That
was
just
over
10
years
ago.
The
property
we
are
discussing
is
within
the
village
boundaries
of
North
Gore.
It
is
now
zoned
commercial,
industrial.
The
commercial
is
on
the
site
of
the
property
where
a
highway
beside
for
highway
416
and
the
plan
was
for
a
service
center
restaurants,
perhaps
a
small
hotel
for
the
traveling
public.
L
There
could
also
be
craft
shops,
antique
shops,
farmers,
market,
a
farm
equipment
or
snowmobile
dealership,
a
recreation
area
or
dome
could
be
in
the
center.
The
industrial
is
on
the
west
side
of
the
property
and
would
be
similar
to
colonnade
Road,
a
welding
shop,
car
body,
shop,
landscaping,
company,
electrical
plumbing
or
furniture
repair
business.
All
of
it
would
be
on
individual
Wells
and
septic
systems,
and
no
higher
than
three
stories.
It
was
all
to
be
to
the
benefit
of
the
rural
agricultural
farming
community.
That
zone
II
is
still
in
place.
L
The
warehouse
is
to
be
seven
stories:
high
1,500
employees
driving
their
own
cars.
We
do
not
have
bus
service,
240,
18,
wheelers
trucks
a
day
24/7.
It
will
have
wells
that
what
will
happen
to
our
water
table,
it
will
have
runoff
ponds
and
its
own
sewage
plant,
the
effluence
or
sewage
from
the
plant
will
run
into
the
Johnson
drainage,
ditch,
which
is
presently
used
for
flood
water.
The
sewage
will
then
drop
drain
into
Stevens
Creek
past
cars
into
the
Rideau
River,
that
is
part
of
the
world
heritage
canal
and
pass
Moniz
Bay
Beach.
L
We
do
not
want
a
warehouse
with
the
within
the
village
boundaries
of
North
Korea
I
have
a
question
mr.
de
Roos.
How
would
your
village
of
Osgood
like
a
seven-story
warehouse
beside
their
fire
station
or
in
Metcalf
on
the
fairgrounds
or
in
Greely
highway
31,
runs
north
to
says
for
easy
access
to
the
401?
All
it
takes
is
a
zoning
change.
Ms
me
Ottawa
South
is
a
beautiful
new
suburb
and
you
have
a
large
park
on
a
river
on
the
river
beside
the
River
Site
Road.
L
L
Your
village
of
done
Robin
had
a
tornado
and
Constance
Bay
had
a
flooding
a
rough
couple
of
years,
but
they
are
rebuilding.
How
would
they
like
a
warehouse?
You
two?
You
do
have
warehouses
on
the
cart
Road,
but
not
in
a
village.
How
would
the
villagers
feel
about
a
warehouse
on
the
south
entrance
of
carp
are
looming
over
the
in
Scotland
I
would
like
to
read
a
quotation
deep
within
its
conscience.
L
M
Segen
afternoon,
thank
you
for
your
patience
this
afternoon
in
listening
to
us
all
speak.
My
name
is
lee
andrea
brunei,
I
live
at
21,
11
Stratton
Drive
in
North,
Gore
and
I
am
opposed
to
the
proposed
zoning
and
official
plan
amendments
at
just
over
eight
months.
Pregnant
I
am
operating
unlimited
lung
capacity
right
now,
so
I
do
ask
that
your
bear
with
me.
My
husband
and
I
both
grew
up
in
small
agricultural
towns.
M
We
want
that
same
experience
for
our
children,
so
we
chose
to
move
from
the
city
to
north,
for
we
made
the
decision
to
pay
higher
taxes
for
Less
services,
because
I
meant
we
had
beautiful
little
piece
of
property
in
a
beautiful
growing
community
and
it
took
us
away
from
the
traffic
in
the
congestion.
So
it's
the
flaws
and
the
lack
of
proper
study
included
in
the
transportation
impact
study
presented
by
no
attack.
That
is
what
originally
brought
me
to
oppose
the
proposed
zoning
and
official
plan
amendment
in
the
report.
M
Section
4.1.1
roadways
mentions
third
line
as
a
two
lane,
undivided
collector
high
uhsorry
roadway
with
a
rail
cross
section.
It
omits
the
fact
that
this
road
bottlenecks
down
to
one
lane
over
a
small
bridge
and
it
does
not
mention
the
lack
of
shoulder
or
sidewalks
under
forecasting
trip,
distribution
and
assignments.
Section
five
point:
one
point:
two
employees,
the
trip
distribution
for
employees
expected
to
be
seventy
eight
percent
to
and
from
the
north
Kanata
Nepean
bar
haven
manitech.
M
M
These
employees
will
not
be
using
the
four
sixteen,
as
that
suggested,
to
make
the
best
possible
time
during
their
commute.
They
will
head
down
Prince
of
Wales
via
third
line,
we're
at
bottlenecks
to
meet
at
Roger
Stevens,
and
that
percentage
works
out
to
approximately
four
hundred
and
twenty
nine
vehicles
per
shift.
The
figure
sorry
figure
three
insight
generated
traffic
volumes
projects.
Twenty
four,
so
allow
me
to
reiterate
that
429
potential
vehicles
versus
25
per
shift
figure
3
also
shows
at
this
intersection
at
third
line
and
Roger
Stevens
Drive
remains
uncivilized.
M
This
Hill
creates
a
blind
for
three
driveways
and
all
of
those
turning
on
to
and
off
of
Stratton
Drive
at
third
line
commuters
will
quickly
discover
that
turning
back
onto
Prince
of
Wales
can
prove
difficult
with
sight
restrictions
and
the
lineup
of
possibly
429
vehicles
per
shift
will
cause
a
backup
and
congestion
along
the
third
line.
Road
and
therefore
will
they
will
undoubtedly
cut
across
Stratton
Drive
Stratton
Drive
does
not
have
sidewalks.
There
are
children
who
play
on
the
street
walkers
runners
and
dogs
and
the
speed
in
which
the
commuters
will
travel.
M
This
shortcut
is
a
safety
issue
for
the
residents
and,
although
one
could
take
from
my
statements
what
they
will
and
turn
my
argument
into
a
not
in
my
backyard
reaction,
it
is
legitimate
concern
that
the
infrastructure
is
not
in
place.
Studies
are
incomplete
and
this
is
a
matter
of
the
wrong
vision
and
the
use
of
this
land
with
a
growing
list
of
negative
impacts
to
its
surrounding
community.
During
this
process,
I
actually
started
to
see
the
similarities
between
what
I
do
for
a
living
and
what's
happening
here
and
every
day.
M
My
job
is
a
trusted
advisor
for
my
clients
is
to
break
down
information
into
simple,
understandable
terms,
research,
the
validity
of
the
product
names,
investigate
possible,
negative
impacts,
side
effects,
all
possible
contraindications
and
ultimately
ensure
that
what
I
recommend
to
my
clients
aligns
with
their
best
interests.
What
we
have
here
essentially,
is
an
emperor's
new
clothes
situation,
we're
being
marketed
a
package
with
invisible
contents.
In
this
case,
broccoli
sales
reps
are
trying
to
sell
us
on
packaging
that
will
hopefully
contain
something
of
worth
or
value.
M
We've
all
read
the
brochure
some
of
us
at
some
point
might
have
even
bought
into
the
claims,
but
my
neighbors,
the
community
we've
poked,
so
many
holes
in
that
brochure.
We
have
brought
to
light
additional
information
flaws
or
missions
and
oversights,
and
we
brought
the
undeniable
research
to
you.
So
I've
come
to
see
the
proposal
for
the
fancy
marketing
package
that
it
is
and
I
hope
that
you
recognize
that
as
well
and
that
you
also
don't
buy
into
it.
M
Multiple
users
and
opportunities
for
diverse
growth
that
are
beneficial
to
their
surrounding
community.
That
is
what
aligns
with
your
clients
a
Cade
North
Gore's,
best
interests.
That
is
not
only
what
aligns
with
our
current
going
future
goals,
but
they
aligned
with
those
of
Eric
itself.
This
is
not
the
right
fit.
This
is
not
the
appropriate
location.
Please
vote
no
to
these
proposed
zoning
and
official
plan
amendments.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
M
C
M
N
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
and
the
council,
members
I
am
William
Duffy
and
I'm
occurs
in
residence
in
north
core
maple
forest
Drive.
I
am
opposed
to
these
developments
I'm
here
today
to
speak
to
the
community
regarding
the
large
warehouse
development
on
Roger
Stevens
Drive
on
the
16th
of
April
2019,
the
City
of
Ottawa
declared
a
climate
emergency
regarding
the
validity
of
the
city's
motions.
Mr.
Moffitt,
you
were
quoted
in
a
CBC
article
as
saying.
If
it
was
symbolic,
I
would
not
be
here
and
I.
Wouldn't
let
it
get
to
this
point.
N
I
know
it's
time
to
actually
stand
behind.
What
you
in
the
city
said:
Roger
Stevens
proposal
as
a
sense
now
seems
to
totally
contravene
what
the
city
and
new
mr.
Moffitt
said
that
you
stand
for
in
respect
to
the
environment,
Environment
Canada
states
on
their
website,
then
in
2017
the
transportation
sector
was
the
second
largest
source
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
Accounting
for
24%
of
all
emissions
in
Canada,
59.9
megatons
of
co2
per
year
are
produced
from
freight
trucks.
Passenger
vehicles
account
for
thirty
four
point:
six
megatons
and
light
trucks
account
for
50
percent.
N
Given
these
statements,
how
is
this
even
that
a
development
like
this
gets
this
far?
If
you're
talking
about
1,700
people
working
at
the
site,
how
are
they
gonna
get
there?
There's
only
one
way
to
get
into
north
core
and,
as
there
is
no
public
transportation,
that
means
an
increase
of
1,700
cars
on
the
road
each
day.
N
C
N
In
the
system
of
the
19th
19th
of
November,
saying
big
emission
reduction
gains
depends
on
the
mastership
in
the
transportation
sector,
especially
the
automotive
sector.
How
is
this
supposed
to
propose
proposal
on
the
Roger
Stevens
conducive
of
the
statement?
How
can
you
stand
behind
a
climate
emergency
declaration
when
you,
on
the
other
hand,
supported
development
on
this
type,
where
there
is
no
infrastructure
in
place
to
lessen
the
environmental
impact
of
the
development
decisions
that
are
made
today?
Will
impact
community
for
years
to
come?
N
It's
my
generation
in
the
generations
after
me,
they'll
have
to
deal
with
the
fallout
from
these
decisions
again
I'm,
quoting
the
interview
that
you
gave
the
citizen.
It
states
that
you
believe
that
what's
good
for
the
economy
and
what's
good
for
the
environment,
aren't
mutually
exclusive.
Well,
in
this
case,
they
are
economic
seems
to
be
the
driving
force
to
push
this
development
through
without
any
consideration
of
the
environmental
or
the
spirit
of
the
climate
emergency
declaration
that
you
championed.
N
C
O
Great
thanks
very
much
before
I
get
started
today,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
that
the
land
we're
meeting
on
is
the
traditional
and
unseated
territory
of
the
Algonquin
initiative,
a
people's,
so
my
name
is
Jennifer
Conlon
I
am
probably
a
third
or
fourth
generation
resident
of
the
North
core
area.
For
all
of
the
reasons
stated
earlier
today,
with
respect
to
objection
on
the
proposal,
I
too
strongly
urge
the
committee
to
reject
the
proposal
in
front
the
proposal
in
sight.
O
I
wanted
to
talk
about
perhaps
some
different
factors
today,
and
that
is
the
archaeological
and
cultural
significance
to
go
back
in
time.
I
guess
ten
thousand
years
in
sort
of
four
minutes
or
less
be
a
pretty
quick
trip,
but
I'll
try
to
hit
a
couple
of
the
salient
points.
So
this
area
in
question
is
sort
of
marked
by
the
the
two
arrows
at
the
bottom
that
note
the
wellington
ridge,
cars
on
the
right
and
North
Gore
on
the
left.
O
This
area
historically
has
been
just
a
rich
and
diverse
ecological,
architectural,
archaeological
and
cultural
mix
because
of
the
water
because
of
the
proximity
to
eskers
drama
ones.
That
have
been
already
mentioned.
The
glacial
flue
fold
deposits,
there
is
historical
evidence
of
a
number
of
family
groupings
and
settlements
around
today.
O
What
is
known
as
the
village
of
north
core,
including
the
Riverwood
drumlin,
there's
linkages
directly
to
the
ancestral
Rita
River,
a
key
migratory
and
transportation
around
itself,
and,
as
many
of
you
are
aware,
the
Rideau,
River,
UNESCO
and
Canadiens
natural
heritage
designations
do
apply
to
the
lower
Ruidoso
sub
watershed
which
Stevens
Creek
plays
such
an
integral
role.
So
it
receives
runoff
from
and
is
adjacent
to,
the
property
in
question
and,
of
course,
is
integrated
with
elements
of
the
floodplain
itself.
O
So
it
requires
our
protection.
In
addition,
this
area
has
a
significant
cultural
aspect
related
to
indigenous
peoples,
so
both
oral
and
written
history
notes
that
indigenous
people
in
the
North
Korea
and
surrounding
area
developed
a
trail
on
the
height
of
the
land
through
the
forests
and
the
topography
of
north
core
demonstrates
that
this
portion
of
1966
Roger
Stevens
Drive,
is
in
fact
highest
elevation
in
the
area.
There's
also
stories
of
old-growth
forests
and
trails.
O
In
2008
we
had
an
excavation
around
the
cars
drumlin
or
210
artifacts
over
210
artifacts,
representing
indigenous
peoples,
were
discovered
on
it's
pictured
pictured
here.
There
are
many
other
historical
references
that
cite
trading
between
settlements
and
proximity
to
the
Rita
River
from
the
st.
Lawrence
heading
north
through
Burroughs
Rapids,
up
through
North
Cora
to
the
mouth
of
the
Ottawa
River,
and
we
also
have
many
historical
references
to
the
Algonquin
residing
in
the
Rideau
Valley
and
I.
O
In
conclusion,
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
section:
2.1
natural
heritage
of
the
policy
states
that,
of
course,
development
site
alteration
shall
not
be
permitted
on
adjacent
lands
unless
the
ecological
function
of
the
adjacent
lands
has
been
evaluated,
and
it
has
been
demonstrated
that
there
will
be
no
negative
impacts
on
the
natural
features
are
on
their
ecological
functions.
In
addition,
based
on
section
2.6,
cultural
heritage
and
archaeology,
including
those
guidelines
for
consultant
archaeologists.
O
This
proves
that
the
location
of
1966,
Roger
Stephens
drive
is
adjacent
to
it,
incorporates
indicators
of
both
pre-contact
Aboriginal,
as
well
as
historic,
your
Canadian
archaeological
potential.
This
includes
the
proximity
to
historical
transportation
routes,
water
elevation
and
oral
history
recollections
from
indigenous
peoples.
O
In
conclusion,
there's
insufficient
information
within
the
city
or
proponents
documentation
to
really
demonstrate
that
any
of
the
above-mentioned
portions
of
the
PPS
have
been
considered
particularly
consultation
with
indigenous
community
representatives
is
required
and
due
to
the
archaeological
and
cultural
significance
of
this
property,
including
adjacent
lands
and
waterways,
further
assessment
of
the
property
at
1966,
Roger,
Stephens
drive
is
recommended.
I
strongly
urge
the
committee
to
do
just
that
and,
in
conclusion,
I'd
like
to
suggest
rejection
of
this
application
as
proposed.
Thank
you.
B
I
C
P
P
As
my
fellow
community
members
have
already
detailed
a
lot
of
issues
and
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
my
concern
that
this
proposal
is
not
in
line
with
the
the
Iraq
mandate,
just
mentioning
again,
some
of
the
Ishta
Iraq
mandate
to
support
and
encourage
the
appropriate
and
sustainable
use
of
land
for
agriculture,
forestry
and
recreation,
and
actively
encourage
the
establishment
and
prosperity
of
farms
and
related
businesses,
and
also
to
encourage
the
orderly
development
and
management
of
growth.
That
maintains
and
strengthens
the
character
of
the
cities.
P
And
it
in
fact,
has
the
potential
to
destroy
the
the
agriculture
and
rural
nature
of
this
community.
I.
Just
also
would
like
to
just
mention
that
my
residential
area
in
North
Gore
is
expanding,
with
new
houses
being
built
towards
North
Gore
and
those
new
residences
are
being
marketed
as
Country
Living
and,
to
me
this
seems
completely
contradictory
and
somewhat
disingenuous
to
have
area
planners
supporting
the
building
of
residences
with
Country
Living
and,
at
the
same
time
supporting
a
mega
warehouse
development
that
will
literally
be
within
walking
distance
of
these
residences.
P
So
it
just
in
this
era
of
climate
change,
concerns
and
environmental
concerns
and
the
need
to
maintain
rural
and
agricultural
areas.
I
would
just
request
that
the
city
planners
and
the
iraq
community
members
support
our
agricultural
and
rural
areas
as
the
Iraq
mandate
requires
and
reject
the
proposal
as
as
proposed.
Thank
you.
Q
Good
afternoon
committee
members,
my
name
is
Anna
Riley
I
live
at
six
four
four
one.
Fourth
Line
Road
and
not
gone
I'm.
A
very
new
resident
I've
only
lived
there
since
August,
but
I
got
involved
in
this
because
I
heard
about
it,
I
was
on
the
fence
about
it.
I'd
looked
more
into
it,
and
I
came
to
the
conclusion
that
I'm
in
opposition
to
it.
So
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
hearing
our
concerns.
Q
I.
Also
wonder
what
the
future
vision
of
the
city
is
for
our
rural
areas.
I
spoke
to
people
in
other
areas,
with
warehouses
like
economic
development
and
planning
people,
and
everyone.
I
spoke
to
had
long
term
plans
for
their
industrial
areas
and
the
role
that
their
distribution
centers
would
play
in
their
community.
They
were
on
on
industrial
parks.
They
had
a
long
term
plan.
It
was
very
well
thought
out.
It
wasn't.
Q
Sorry,
provincial
policy
statement
policies
to
support
the
proposed
official
plan,
amendment
and
Soni,
so
the
planning
infrastructure
and
Economic
Development
Department
of
the
City
of
Ottawa,
concluded
in
its
November
25th
recommendation
to
Iraq
that
the
proposed
amendments
of
the
north
coast
secondary
plan
is
in
conformity
with
the
City
of
Ottawa
Official
Plan,
and
that
the
OPA
and
ZB
LA
are
consistent
with
the
PPS
2014
part.
5
policies.
I
respectfully
disagree
further
and
further
argue
that
the
proposal
is
not
consistent
with
the
PPS
read
as
a
whole.
Q
I
would
like
to
take
I
would
like
to
highlight
a
few
points.
The
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
departments
conclusion
that
the
OPA
and
ZB
la
are
consistent
with
the
PPS
policies.
Focus
one
focuses
heavily
on
the
proposals,
impact
on
employment
and
economic
development
to
the
exclusion
of
other
relevant
PPS
policies,
and
to
relies
on
a
mischaracterization
of
the
development
as
building
on
the
existing
designations,
zoning
and
permitted
uses
for
the
site.
Q
As
you
know,
municipal
decisions
must
be
consistent
with
the
provincial
policy.
Statements
in
the
term
shall
be
consistent
with
provides
very
little.
It's
any
discretion
in
implying
part,
5
PPS
policies,
municipal
decisions
that
effect
a
planning
matter
cannot
be
in
conflict
with
the
policy
objectives
in
whole
or
in
part.
The
PPS
2014
does
not
promote
employment
opportunities
and
economic
development
and
competitiveness
in
all
instances
and
all
forms
or
to
the
exclusion
of
the
other
policies
within
both
the
city's
official
plan
and
the
PPS.
Q
The
objective
of
economic
development
in
rural
areas
is
always
tied
to
the
objective
of
supporting
farming,
agribusiness
and
the
rural
economy.
Part
3
of
the
PPS
2014
provides
direction
on
the
application
of
the
PPS
and
its
policies
and
specifically
provides
that
the
PPS
is
more
than
a
set
of
individual
policies.
The
PPS
is
to
be
read
in
its
entirety,
and
relevant
policies
are
to
be
a
applied.
Each
situation
when
more
than
one
policy
is
relevant,
a
decision-maker
should
consider
all
the
relevant
policies
to
understand
how
they
work
together.
Q
I'll,
just
summarize,
then,
the
well
warehouse
is
a
permitted
use.
The
proposal
for
this
giant
warehouse
is
so
markedly
different
in
scale
and
nature
from
what
was
originally
contemplated,
that
it
should
be
considered
in
a
totally
different
way.
It
doesn't
leverage
real
assets.
Amenities
does
not
support
the
vitality
and
economic
health
of
the
community
now
or
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
C
R
It
yes,
there
we
go
okay
good
afternoon,
chair
co-chair
and
committee
members.
My
name
is
Janice
beech
I'm,
the
director
of
real
estate
and
development
for
broccolini,
the
applicant
for
the
1966
Roger,
Stevens,
OPA
and
ZB
la
applications
being
presented
here
today.
Thank
you
for
considering
our
applications,
a
city
council
staff
noted
at
the
commencement
of
this
meeting
today.
You
were
here
today
to
consider
amendments
to
the
Official
Plan
and
zoning
bylaws,
currently
governing
the
1966
Roger
Stephens,
industrial
and
highway
commercial
property.
R
R
We
would
like
to
thank
sincerely
thank
the
residents
for
their
comments
to
date,
some
of
which
have
altered
the
language
in
our
application
to
help
altima
mote,
better
less
impactful
development
and
we
hope
to
continue
the
dialogue
in
a
productive
manner
should
our
applications
be
approved
by
the
committee.
We
remain
available
to
answer
any
questions.
I
may
have
arisen
during
this
session.
S
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Steve
pence
from
the
planning
consultant
with
Nova
tech.
We
worked
with
broccolini
and
preparing
the
applications
and
in
particular,
we
prepared
the
planning
rationale
to
support
these
amendments.
I'm
not
here
today
to
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
the
interpretation
of
PPS
policies
and
unofficial,
planned
policies,
as
our
interpretation
in
those
positions
with
respect
to
good
planning
are
represented
in
our
planning
rationale,
and
we've
heard
a
lot
of
comments
today
about
about
the
inadequacy
of
some
of
the
reports
that
were
prepared
into
support
of
the
applications.
S
It's
not
uncommon
when
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
are
prepared
that
the
the
reports
that
accompany
those
applications
are
there
to
support
the
development.
In
principle,
we
often
in
the
development
community
recognize
that
the
details
for
development
come
to
the
site
play
on
stage,
provided
we
can
provide
enough
information
at
the
at
the
principle
of
development
stage,
ie
the
Official
Plan
amendment
and
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment.
That
is
enough
to
go
to
the
site
plan
approval
stage,
so
those
details
will
come
at
a
future
date.
S
S
You've
heard
things
about
the
principle
of
development
on
these
lands
already
being
established
their
industrial.
They
are
commercial
in
nature,
and
the
applications
are
essentially
a
refinement
of
those
designations
to
accommodate
a
changing
market
and
to
take
advantage
of
the
location
and
lot
area.
S
What's
important
about
that
is
the
lot
area
provides
a
considerable
opportunity
to
develop
the
site
in
a
manner
that
would
respect
the
nearest
residential
uses,
so
I
just
wanted
to
touch
on
that
and
just
kind
of
leave
you
with
those
thoughts,
as
these
lands
are
quite
suitable
and
almost
ideally
located
for
this
type
of
use.
Despite
what
you're
hearing
from
the
public
and
again
I
would
I
would
say
that
I'm
available
for
questions
as
well.
Thank
you.
C
T
You
chair,
thank
you
for
for
coming
out
today.
No
that
was
probably
a
bit
challenging
to
think
about
coming
up
with
everybody
opposed
to
it.
Is
it
mr.
Beach?
Mr.
Beach,
can
you
say
that
you
are
not
proposing
the
the
type
of
facility
that
everyone
expects
that
you
are
proposing?
What
what
exactly
can
you
spell
out
what
you
are
proposing.
R
Currently,
we've
submitted
a
zoning
bylaw
application,
an
official
plan
amendment
to
change
the
existing
zoning
and
use
of
the
site
to
permit
warehouse
use
across
the
entire
site
up
to
a
maximum
of
22
meters
in
height.
We
have
not
come
forward
with
a
specific
application
for
a
specific
use
at
this
time.
T
T
R
T
C
T
C
Because
we
we
have
to
deal
with
what's
on
the
front
of
us
today
and
on
the
front
of
us,
is
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
and
I
do
believe
strongly.
The
community
wants
to
engage
in
the
site
plan
approval,
but
I
can't
believe
from
councilor
Moffitt
how
he
will
engage
the
community
and
we
had
asked
earlier
to
put
a
holder
provision,
so
there
will
be
no
permit.
Nothing
happened
before
the
site
plan
approval
deal
with
traffic
water,
groundwater
flooding
all
those.
T
T
R
T
R
S
When
you
look
at
what
the
provincial
policy
statement
talks
about
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
that
sites
are,
are
zoned
and
and
ready
for
this
kind
of
development,
they
are
to
be
located
near
major
transit
corridors.
There
are
they're
there
to
make
sure
that
access
can
be,
can
be
quick
and,
and
another
important
aspect
of
this
site
is
that
it's
a
large
site.
That's
already
has
fundamentally
the
the
principle
development
already
established,
so
it
it
has
a
warehouse
use
listed
already
as
a
permitted
use.
S
The
amendments
here
are
just
really
too
refined
that
to
enlarge
to
allow
for
a
taller
building
to
accommodate
a
bigger
say,
shall
we
say
building
envelope
and
the
Official
Plan
amendment
is:
is
there
just
to
recognize
that
it's
not
only
for
catering
to
the
rural
community?
These
sites
should
cater
to
the
greater
need
for
economic
development
and
warehouse
uses.
So
it's
it's
about
refining
the
economic
reality
of
today
and
the
site
sort
of
ticks
off
those
boxes.
How.
S
Sorry,
what
I
meant
there
was
that,
under
the
current
secondary
plan
policies,
the
industrial
uses
are
to
cater
to
the
rural
to
the
rural
economy.
What
this
application
does
is
not
strip
that
away,
but
it
adds
to
it
to
allow
for
a
greater
range
of
industrial
uses,
not
just
those
that
are
catering
to
the
local
community.
So
it's
sort
of
a
broadening
of
the
policy.
S
S
Yes,
and
with
the
application
for
this,
we
submitted
a
traffic
impact
assessment
as
part
of
the
part
of
the
application
it
was
submitted,
together
with
the
conceptual
servicing
information
and
a
host
of
other
studies
that
were
intended
to
assist
with
establishing
the
principle
of
development.
They
don't
get
to
the
level
of
detail
that
everybody's
asking
about,
because
that's
for
site
plan
approval,
so
we
do
look
at
the
site
in
proximity
to
what
what
transportation
routes
are
nearby.
What
kind
of
development
is
nearby?
What
are
the
land
use
designations
in
place
today?
S
S
But
what
we're
saying
is
that
the
details
of
that
will
come
at
the
site
plan
stage
and,
as
I
said
at
the
outset
today,
it's
not
uncommon
at
all
to
apply
for
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
with
a
sort
of
limited
amount
of
information
to
establish
the
principle
development
and
then
the
details
provided
at
the
site
plan
stage.
That's
when
the
information
is
necessary
to
make
sure
that
mitigation
can
be
implemented
appropriately,
for
the
context
can.
T
You
understand
how
today
they
are
not
going
to
be.
The
people
who
are
still
here
today
will
not
be
happy
knowing
that
that
the
plan
that
you're
actually
proposing
is
not
as
even
as
fleshed
out
as
they
have
good,
led
to
believe,
and
we
want
to
approve
this
and
then
then
go
to
site
plan.
I
I'm
just
I'm
not
sitting
in
the
audience,
but
I'm
I'm
questioning
how
comfortable
I
would
be.
If
we
just
did.
We
did
that
and
we
weren't
sure
exactly
what's
going
to
go
to
the
site
plan.
Next,
that's
all
I'm
like.
T
Please
stop
I
just
I,
it's
a
question.
I
have
as
I
guess
a
committee
matter.
How
confident
should
I
be,
if
I
vote
to
approve
the
amendments
today
that
that
the
site
plan
it's
not
going
to
be
even
granted
like
the
proposal,
won't
even
be
grander
than
what
you're
proposing
Kurt
like
what
they
think
you're
proposing.
Currently,
no.
C
Don't
answer
that
so
counselor
you
heard
us
earlier
say
we
have
a
holding
provision
on
the
application,
so
that
means
nothing
will
be
approved.
No
building
permit
will
be
a
very
sure
before
they
meet
the
conditions
of
the
site
plan
approval
and
the
community
will
have
an
opportunity
to
the
top
to
our
councilor
of
the
area
and
try
to
medicate
the
impact
of
this
application.
So
that's
on
the
site
plan.
It's
not
for
today
today
what
these
people
are
proposing
and
official
plan
amendment
and
zone
change.
C
G
Just
quickly
on
that,
just
to
Rossano
all
rights
respond
to
the
councillor,
but
the
point
of
the
volume
provision
is
that
I
won't
support
a
significant
deviation
from
what
the
concept
plan
has
been,
because
we
started
this
with
the
concept
plan
and,
if
anything
comes
simply
against
what
that
is,
that's
not
something
I
would
be
supportive
of,
and
that's
where
the
point
of
holding
provision
is.
Does
it
give
me
that
extra
control?
That's.
B
You,
mr.
chair,
you
articulated
very
well
just
a
quick
question
around
the
traffic
which
is
not
going
to
detail
of
the
site
plan,
but
usually
when
you,
when
you
put
your
study
on
you,
put
the
application
at
the
supported
document
that
you
put,
this
is
general
general
in
case
of
the
site
was
built
for
that
capacity.
S
Won't
pretend
to
be
a
traffic
engineer,
but
it
was
prepared
by
a
qualified
traffic
engineering
team
and
reviewed
in
under
review
about
the
city.
Given
the
proximity
of
the
site
today
to
the
416
MTO
would
be
quite
extensively
involved
in
any
analysis
of
the
traffic
design
because
they
take
traffic
of
you
know
you
know
very
seriously,
so
I
can
assure
you
that
any
approval
of
site
plan
approval
rules
require
MTO
agreement
to
that.
Thank.
B
C
Well
before
we
go
to
councilor
Moffitt
when
you
are
when
you
are
in
a
close
proximity
to
a
highway
development,
MPL
is
involved
with
that
with
that
with
the
traffic
study
am
I
correct
on
this.
Yes,
okay,
so
any
other
questions
for
the
proponent,
well,
mr.
Beach
and
mr.
pence.
Thank
you
very
much
for
being
here
and.
G
C
Sorry
from
what
we
heard
earlier
from
the
delegation.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
begin
a
sincere
thank
you
to
to
the
resident
who
made
the
trip
today
to
this
building.
I
really
want
to
thank
you
for
your
articulated
to
to
your
points
and
I
hope,
I
hope
we
made
it
clear,
even
with
the
helpful
Eagle
to
define
what
we
are
dealing
with
today
versus
what
the
community
brought
to
us.
C
So
we
heard
you
loud
and
clear,
you're
on
record
with
your
opposition,
whether
to
a
ground
water
tour
traffic
to
to
the
to
rural
for
all
those
area.
Can
you
please
we
didn't
interrupt
you
when
you
were
speaking
so
please.
So
we
heard
you
about
this
now.
What
on
the
front
of
us
is
an
application
for
Opie
amendment
and
that's
what
I
would
like
to
ask
my
colleague
to
focus
their
question
to
staff
about
about
the
application
from
that
perspective?
Okay,
so
counselor
go
mr.
vice
chair.
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair
the
slide
that
was
up
at
the
very
beginning,
showing
the
height
and
the
grade.
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
put
that
back
up
if
it's
still
available,
because
when
I
first
read
the
report,
that's
in
front
of
us
I
made
a
note:
how
did
you
arrive
at
22
meters
and
how
does
that
make
sense?
I
guess
I
want
it.
F
A
So
excuse
me
slide
on
in
front
of
you,
so
what
this
shows
is,
let's,
let's
look
at
the
red
hatched
area
so
today,
as
of
right,
someone
could
build
15
meters
high
on
the
existing
grade.
When
you
look
at
the
proposed
rezoning
for
22
metres,
what
that
shows
is
an
elevation
change
with
respect
to
the
grading
that
probably
will
most
likely
have
to
be
undertaken
on
this
site.
So
in
terms
of
trying
to
rationalize
that
difference
or
looking
that
and
again,
this
is
this:
is
the
concept
there's?
A
No
there's
nothing
accurate
here
at
this
point
and
we'll
receive
this
information
as
part
of
the
site
plan
application
again,
so
we
know
there's
going
to
be
a
great
differential,
it
could
be
3
meters,
it
could
be
5
meters
again.
That's
part
of
the
engineering
aspect
of
this,
so
we're
confident
that
the
the
the
increase
in
height
to
22
meters
well
won't
be
that
much
more
of
an
impact
than
what
they
could
do
today
at
15
meters.
So.
A
F
What
are
the
delegations
made
a
comment
about
how
well
first
I
think
we
need
to
acknowledge
this
idea
of
a
mega
warehouse
for
shipping
or
Amazon.
We
don't
know
for
sure,
assuming
that
it
is
an
Amazon,
like
warehouse
delegation
mentioned
that
definition
of
warehouses
that
might
have
been
10
or
15
or
20
years
ago
may
be
very
different
from
how
we're
thinking
about
warehouses.
Now,
what
is
the
definition
of
a
warehouse
now?
Has
it
changed
since
the
existing
zoning
was
put
in
place
so.
A
In
terms
of
the
business,
of
course,
that
model
has
changed.
We
didn't
have
a
business
type
warehouses
back
25
years
ago,
but
but
the
definition
of
warehouse
hasn't
changed,
we're
still.
We
still
have
the
same
definition
in
her
by
law
today
that
states
warehouse
means
a
building
used
for
the
storage
and
distribution
of
goods
and
equipment,
including
self
storage
units.
Many
warehouses
and
may
include
one
accessory
dwelling
units
so
that
that's
always
been
the
definition
for
a
warehouse
Arabella.
F
T
C
F
That
site
that
you're
speaking
to
at
the
corner
of
Mitch,
Owens
and
boundary
road
I
believe
was
already
zoned
for
that
purpose.
So
they
went
immediately
to
site
plan
approval
where
issues
such
as
traffic
servicing,
stormwater
management,
so
on
were
addressed
through
the
site
plan
approval
process.
What.
B
F
That's
correct:
there's
portions
of
the
site
that
are
already
zoned
for
this
type
of
activity
that
could
proceed
directly
to
site
plan
approval.
If
there
wasn't
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
needed
as
the
proponent
is
described,
they're
looking
for
some
amendments
to
the
zoning
bylaw
to
allow
some
flexibility
and
what
they
intend
to
do.
But
you
are
correct
in
that
a
warehouse
could
be
built
on
this
site
by
going
directly
through
site
plan
approval
without
going
through
the
Arak
Committee.
Thank.
B
C
A
A
chair,
both
zones
permit
a
warehouse,
the
general
industrial
zone
and,
as
you
work
back
to
the
secondary
plan,
provides
only
for
warehouses
that
our
firm
our
benefit
to
the
firming
activity,
the
highway
commercial
zone,
which
also
allows
the
warehouse
is
for
the
traveling
public
and
business
activity.
So
on
that
particular
zone
I,
think
that
was
the
question
the
counter
had,
as
you
could
build
the
warehouse
today
on
that
zone
based
on
this
proposal.
It's
a
smaller
area,
of
course,
but
that
is
currently
permitted
in
the
in
the
highway
commercial
zone.
A
The
amendments
that
we're
seeking
really
is
to,
and
I
don't
want
to
use
toward
tweak,
is
to
amend
the
plan
without
changing
the
the
content
we
want.
The
original
content
remain
in
the
plan,
the
firm
bet
and
benefiting
a
SPECT,
but
we're
adding
this
local
and
regional
use
in
order
to
provide
that
that
provision
for
a
a
warehouse
which
is
currently
being
proposed.
So
that's
that's
the
difference
in
the
two
zones.
Many
of
the
uses
are
similar
as
you
I'm
sorry.
C
Thank
you
for
that.
Mr.
roster
feature.
Another
concern,
I
heard
and
I
think
is
a
something
for
our
clerk
staff
or
legal
to
look
at
it
in
the
future,
because
we're
making
change
to
the
Official
Plan.
And
so
when
we
talk
about
the
rural
area-
and
we
say
the
notification
should
go,
and
this
is
under
the
Planning
Act
I'm,
not
saying
you
guys
doing
something
separately,
but
the
plan
I've
said
150
meter
or
2
or
200
whatever
120.
Okay,
so
we
all
know
in
a
rural
area.
C
That's
really
is
nothing
in
order
to
go,
get
a
bag
of
milk.
You
have
to
drive
20
minutes,
so
it's
still
something
we
can
do
our
own
as
a
rule
of
comity.
When
we
have
something
of
this
magnitude
or
application,
it
will
have
a
larger
impact
to
notify
further
than
120
meter
and
120
meter.
This
is
the
planning
after
you
have
to
do,
but
can
we
do
over
like
I
know
with
today's
technology?
C
C
A
C
Well,
maybe
not
so
much
for
today,
but
I
think
I
would
follow
up
with
with
legal
and
Andrea
and
we're
trying
to
do
something.
We
have
time
and
time
again
about
this.
With
notification
for
120
meter
is
not
sufficient
in
the
rural
area
and
I'd
like
to
see
something
change,
and
even
if
it
means
we
have
to
do
something
over
and
above
the
requirement,
I
think
we
should
do
that
so
to
go
back
to
you
to
what
we
have
on
the
front
of
us
today.
C
C
C
G
Therefore
be
resolved
at
document.
One
location
map
be
replaced
via
attached
map
to
incorporate
an
open-space
buffer
of
hundred
meters
from
the
residential
property
lines
to
the
west
and
be
it
FURTHER
RESOLVED.
The
document
to
details
recommends
owning
reports
in
its
entirety,
be
amended
to
replace
the
following
text.
G
Add
text
RG
exception
with
the
holding
provision
B
in
column.
2
additional
land
use
is
permitted
in
the
following
and
the
following:
bed-and-breakfast
daycare
Park
recreational,
an
athletic
facility
retail
store
limit
to
an
antique
store
craft
shop
and
farmers
markets,
see
in
column,
4
land
use
is
prohibited.
G
Add
the
following
text:
storage,
yard,
waste
processing
and
transfer
facility
D
in
column,
5
provisions
add
the
following
text:
the
holding
provision,
the
holding
symbol,
may
only
be
removed
following
the
approval
of
a
site
plan,
control,
application,
maximum
height
22
meters,
maximum
total
volume
of
all
buildings,
1
million
nine
hundred
fourteen
thousand
35
cubic
meters,
be
it
FURTHER
RESOLVED.
There
be
no
further
notice
pursuant
to
subsection
34
17
of
the
Planning
Act.
So.
C
C
P
F
Think
the
councillors
motion
addresses
certainly
not
every
resident
concern,
but
the
most
significant
ones
moving
to
a
100
meter
buffer
zone,
for
example
in
the
East
Side,
is
almost
oh
sorry
on
the
west
side.
Thank
you.
It's
almost
unprecedented
in
terms
of
the
buffer
area
and
the
holding
provision,
as
we've
heard
from
councillor
Moffat
allows
the
councillor
and
city
staff
to
make
sure
that
the
issues
that
have
been
brought
up
here,
some
very
significant
issues
can
be
addressed
before
there's
any
zoning
approval,
so
I'll
be
supporting
councillor
Malthus
motion.