►
Description
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Call
this
meeting
to
order
and
I'm
gonna
read
this
statement
earlier.
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
couple
hands
of
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
listed
as
item
one
to
five
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
for
the
item
just
mentioned.
Only
those
who
make
oral
submission
today
or
written
submission
before
their
mental
or
adopted
may
appeal
to
the
matter
to
the
local
planning,
Appeal
Tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
a
local
planning,
an
appeal
tribunal.
A
Declaration
of
interest
I
would
I
would
like
to
declare
interest
my
declaration.
It's
myself,
our
counselor
Eli
of
Chantilly
declare
a
potential
Director
criminal
interest
on
item
5
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
agenda
9
zoning
bylaw
amendment
2019
flood
relief
provisions
as
I
own,
a
property
in
the
area
affected
by
their
May
2017
flooding
event.
A
So
we're
gonna
go
through
our
consent
agenda
and
we'll
hold
the
item
and
we
do
have
a
presentation
I'm.
The
item
number
five.
We
just
talked
about
just
a
short
presentation:
declaration
of
interest
any
other
than
myself
now
confirmation
of
minute
minute:
eight
meeting
October
3rd
2019.
Okay,
thank
you
item
number
one
plan
and
infrastructure
and
economic
development
department
plan
service,
zoning,
bylaw,
56:51,
first
line,
Road
and
I
think
we
have
technical
amendment
from
councillor
Moffat.
A
B
B
B
A
So
the
item
map
wanted
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
recommend
console
approved
an
amendment
to
zone
and
bilah
2008
2
5
0
4
56:51,
first
line
Road
to
permit
as
a
residential
plan
of
subdivision
as
detailed
in
document
1
and
3.
An
item
to
the
agricultural
fair
committee
approved
the
consultation
details
section
of
this
report.
We
do
have
two
speaker
but
I
believe
the
two
speaker
in
favour
of
this
item
am
I.
Correct,
I,
see
some
knowledge
so
for
our
committee
member
and
me
I
can
carry
as
with
the
amendment
from
councilor
Moffitt.
B
A
A
Eighty
eight
principal
drive
for
the
proposed
of
rezoning
than
land
from
agriculture,
subs
on
383
to
agriculture,
sub-zone
8a
g8,
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
a
retaining
farmland,
as
detailed
in
document
two
and
again
item
number
two:
is
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details
section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
brief
explanation
so
on
the
item?
I?
Don't
believe
we
have
any
speaker
for
item
two.
So
item
number
three:
is
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
one
seven-year
Abbott
path
and
what's
culture?
A
The
item
number
one:
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee,
the
comment'
Council
approved
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
to
54
part
of
117
rabbit
paths
for
the
purpose
of
rezoning,
their
land
from
agriculture,
sub-zone
to
AG,
to
agriculture,
sub-zone,
eighth
row:
Roxanne
Chen,
a
g8
to
prohibit
the
residential
uses
on
the
retaining
farmland.
As
detailed
in
document
to
item
number.
Two,
the
agricultural
rural
affair
committee
approved
the
consultation
detail
section
of
this
report
to
be
included
as
part
of
the
previous
planation
on
the
icon.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Item
number
for
economic
development
and
long-range
planning,
City
of
Ottawa
zoning
bylaw,
2008,
250
almond
spoons
amendment
their
q4
2019
at
number,
one
that
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
recommend
consul
approve
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2000,
a
2
5
0,
as
shown
in
document
1
in
detail
in
document
2
and
for
item
number
two
that
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
approved
the
consultation
details
section
of
this
report
to
be
included
as
a
part
of
previous
planation,
and
we
do
have
a
technical
amendment
by
the
vice
chair.
Mr.
vice
chair.
C
Whereas
the
report
recommends
zoning
changes
for
multiple
properties
throughout
the
City
of
Ottawa,
including
the
lands
municipally
known
as
two
seven,
two,
six,
two:
seven:
six:
zero,
two:
seven,
seven
five
and
two
seven
eight
moody
drive
and
whereas
the
zoning
details
specific
to
implementing
schedule
hour,
14
of
the
Official
Plan
for
the
lands
municipal,
a
known
as
two
seven,
two,
six,
two,
seven,
six
zero,
two,
seven,
seven
five
and
two
seven
eight
moody
drive
failed
to
include
provisions
recognising
the
existing
uses.
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
following
changes
be
made
to
the
staff
report.
C
That
agricultural
and
rural
affairs
committee
amend
the
staff
report
with
the
following
that
the
zoning
details,
four
to
seven,
twenty,
six
to
seven,
six:
zero,
two,
seven,
seven
five
and
two
seven:
eight
moody
Drive
contained
within
document
to
zoning
details
for
review
by
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee,
be
amended
by
adding
the
following
amends
schedule
to
40
rural
exemptions
by
adding
a
new
exception.
Xxx
are
one
with
provisions
having
the
general
intent
as
follows:
column
two
applicable
zones
to
read
our
G
xxx,
our
one
column.
Three
additional
land
use
is
permitted
to
read.
C
Agricultural
use,
detached
dwelling,
amends
schedule,
240
rural
exceptions
by
adding
a
new
exception
XXR
to
with
provisions
having
the
general
intent
as
follows:
column
to
applicable
zones
to
read,
RG
xxx
are
two
column.
Three
additional
land
use
is
permitted
to
read.
Detached
dwelling,
a
men
scheduled
to
forty
rural
exceptions
by
adding
a
new
exception.
C
Xxx
are
three
with
provisions
having
the
general
intent
as
follows:
column
two
applicable
zones
to
read
RG
x
XX
are
three
column:
three
additional
provisions
to
read:
minimum
lot:
width,
75
meters,
minimum
lot
area,
0.5
Hector's
the
document
1e
be
replaced
with
the
following
and
there's
a
map
included
with
the
motion.
It
be.
It
further
resolved
that
no
further
notice
be
provided
pursuant
to
section
34
17
of
the
Planning
Act
did
I
get
all
the
X's
right.
Yes,.
A
B
Quickly
thank
staff
for
one
of
the
sections
the
portion
pertaining
to
Fair
Mile,
Road,
Fairmont
Park.
That's
been
something
that
my
office
has
been
working
on
for
quite
some
time
to
create
a
actual
proper
park
involved,
the
closing
of
road
allowance,
the
acquisition
of
two
properties
and
this
rezoning,
which
allows
which
allows
us
to
now
go
to
the
next
step
of
actually
creating
a
park
in
this
space
for
the
residents.
So
I
just
appreciate
that
it's
in
their
support
we
can
move
on.
B
A
You
thank,
you
comes
from
office,
so
I'm
the
vice
chairs
amendment.
Okay,
on
the
item.
Okay,
as
Amanda.
Thank
you
item
for
item
five.
As
earlier,
we
do
have
a
presentation
from
our
staff,
its
zoning
bylaw
amendment
2019
floods,
relief
provision
so
will
hold
item
number
five
item
number
six
is
the
hobbs
municipal
drain
outlet
and
we
do
have
a
speaker
I
believe
on
the
item.
Mister,
the
Bruce
Krusty.
Are
you
here?
Okay,
mister
Krusty?
D
A
Well,
we
didn't,
we
have
our
staff
here
and
you
have
I,
don't
think
that's!
The
committee
need
a
presentation
on
this
item
committee.
Familiar
with
the
item,
so
you
have
five
minutes
riad
rest,
us
about
that
item
and
your
concern
and
we
have
staff
here.
We
can
ask
them
after
so
go
ahead.
Your
five
minute
begin.
Thank.
D
You,
sir
I,
am
a
landowner
within
the
Hobbes
municipal
drain
basin.
I
came
to
the
City
of
Ottawa,
asking
for
maintenance
on
the
hobbs
municipal
drain.
I
have
never
asked
for
drainage.
Improvements
on
my
land.
I
specifically
asked
that
action
be
taken
to
stop
the
flooding
of
my
land,
there's
an
excess
of
1500
acres
in
my
area
that
experienced
flooding
due
to
the
hobbs
municipal
drain.
D
Fortunately,
we've
had
robinson
consulting
mr.
andrew
robinson
appointed
to
address
this
he's
come
back
and
stated
that
there
was
insufficient
outlet.
If
you
read
top
of
page
four
out
of
five
of
his
reports
and
his
dialogue
with
the
Rideau
Valley
Conservation
Authority,
he
has
determined
that
there
was
insufficient
outlet.
He
can
comment
accordingly.
The
City
of
Ottawa
has
an
obligation
to
provide
sufficient
outlet
to
a
municipal
drain.
We
understand
the
impacts,
don't
believe
what
I
say.
Mr.
Robinson
is
well
respected.
D
He
has
provided
expert
opinion
evidence
countless
times,
and
the
city
has
left
us
off
for
over
30
years.
It's
a
well
documented.
This
issue
I,
would
like
to
see
the
committee
today
send
the
engineer's
report
back
to
engineer
and
look
at
two
potential
alternate
routes
through
lot:
15
North
concession,
five
to
the
existing
upper
flowing
Creek
municipal
drain,
to
alleviate
the
flooding
or
southwards,
through
lot
15
to
Fallowfield
Road
to
alleviate
the
drain.
D
If
he
cannot
obtain
a
permit
in
either
of
those
two
routes,
he
has
an
obligation
to
provide
injuring
liability
to
those
1500
acres
that
are
being
impacted
from
flooding.
This
is
well
documented.
Mr.
Robinson
can
speak
to
this
much
better
than
I.
He's
worked
on
a
similar
I
would
expect
several
similar
situations
like
this,
but
simply
closing
the
file.
We're
gonna
find
ourselves
in
court
battling
this
out.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
B
Mr.
Krusty,
as
you
know,
the
hobby
strain
has
been
there
for
several
years
and
it
is
designed
to
enter
it
into
the
Richmond
fen
the
challenges
with
extending
it
through
the
fan.
Of
course,
our
environmental
and
the
RVCA
is
not
on
for
that,
since
the
Richmond
fan
is
a
naturally
occurring
wetland
and
a
PSW,
and
it's
quite
important
in
the
search
of
the
ecosystem
in
the
richmond
area,
the
when
did
you
buy
your
property
I.
D
B
B
That
I
know
that
there's
been
complaining
about
flooding
in
that
area,
primarily
at
the
north
end
of
the
Hobbs
drain
and
its
relationship
with
the
extension
of
flowing
Creek,
which
never
unfortunately
happened,
which
would
have
helped
Hobbs
drain,
because
it
would
have
diverted
a
lot
of
the
flow
from
Fernbank
area
into
the
hubs
into
the
flowing
Creek
musical
drain
yep
Plum
Creek.
What?
Unfortunately,
that
petition
was
abandoned?
Okay,.
B
Is
just
so
nice
just
curious
on
that,
because
I
think
the
challenge
is
there
are
mercies
historic
issue
here,
but
that
would
have
been
also.
You
would've
been
well
aware
of
that
before
you
purchased
your
property
and
I,
don't
know
if
all
the
other
land
owners
on
the
hob
strain
water
shed
and
then
now
you're
talking
about
bringing
in
another
watershed
upper
flowing
Creek,
they
would
all
have
to
pay
into
it.
Just
for
one
property
that
has
always
flooded.
That's
a
tough
one.
B
D
Not
a
tough
issue
back
to
your
commentary
on
the
diversion
from
upper
flowing
Creek.
Mr.
Robinson
came
back
to
you
in
2006
and
said
fix
the
diversion
it
went
to
Eric
went
to
City
Council
that
work
is
approved,
but
my
friends
in
the
drainage
superintendent's
Department
never
followed
through
in
the
work.
Okay.
A
B
E
E
Required
there
has
been
maintance
done
in
the
Hobbs
dream
to
councillor
Moffitt's
point.
If
the
upper
flowing
Creek
petition
had
have
proceeded,
it
probably
would
have
helped
the
situation.
But
again,
the
issue
here
is
the
engineers
presented
several
options
to
the
conservation
authority
and
they've
rejected
all
of
those
options
because
of
the
Richmond
fan.
A
Mr.
Ryan,
can
you
on
page
six
document
one
can
explain
just
so
that
mean
is
what
I
see
in
the
map.
Is
that
mean
you're
gonna?
If
we
go
with
the
work
just
for
that,
the
land
traditionally
been
flooded,
you
have
to
assess
all
the
way
down
to
if
I
see
it
on
a
map,
as
I
understand
correctly,
ask
constant
love
to
explain
it
here.
You
knows
the
area
more
than
we
do
on
document
one
location
plan,
yeah.
E
So
currently
counselor
the
work.
If
we
do
any
work
on
the
drain,
we
can
only
assess
from
that
point
upward.
Ok
upstream.
Yes,
if
the
drain
was
to
be
extended
downwards
than
those
properties
would
be
assessed
and
they
were
future
maintenance
and
for
construction.
As
with
the
upper
of
the
benefiting
upstream
properties
and.
A
C
Question
for
staff
again
I,
understand
well
I,
understand
within
the
drainage
act
that
in
this
case,
the
recommendation
from
the
engineer
coming
back
to
us
includes
that
the
city
would
be
paying
the
eighty
or
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
of
the
work.
How
often
does
something
like
that
happen?
No,
my
understanding
is,
is
usually
any
engineering
report
and
subsequent
work
is
covered
by
the
landowner.
So
in
this
case
this
is
coming
back
to
the
city
in
its
entirety.
So
I've
never
seen
that
before
and
I'm
curious
about
the
the
context
behind
that
three.
E
E
Don't
believe
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
Andy
Robinson,
but
I,
don't
believe
in
his
forty
or
fifty
years
of
doing
this
that
he's
ever
used
section
for
either
it
was
always
our
understanding
with
with
different
pieces
of
provincial
legislation
and
we've
had
committees
at
the
province
where
the
conservation
authority
and
Emin
are
in
the
jury,
and
the
OMA
have
been
at
the
table
that
the
answer
is
not
supposed
to
be.
No,
there
should
always
be
a
compromise
solution.
Numerous
solutions
were
proposed,
the
RVCA
and
they
they
said.
E
No,
so
I
expect
this
might
that
this
will
be
appealed
at
some
level
and
there
may
be
an
opportunity
to
recover
some
of
the
costs
through
that
process.
So
I
don't
think
they're
at
the
end
of
the
process
at
this
point,
but
this
is
the
first
time
we
that
I've
seen
a
section
40
report
and
it's
the
first
time
I
believe
again,
but
I
think
that
it's
that
he's
used
section
40s.
Well,
we've
never
had
this
situation
before
as.
C
We
and
we've
previously
in
this
term
of
Council
approved
at
least
one,
if
not
two
engineering
studies
but
I,
don't
think.
We've
ever
had
a
discussion
around
the
potential
risk
back
to
the
city
that
you
know
the
engineer
could
could
refer
the
cost
back
to
us.
But
what
you're
saying
is
it's
a
rare
occurrence?
So
it's
not
something
that
you'd
be
normally
advising
this
committee
about
that
financial
risk.
Typically.
E
Not
I
think
in
the
future,
though,
moving
forward
that
it
when
there
is
a
significant
environmental
feature,
such
as
a
wetland
involved,
we
may
have
to
either
elaborate
on
the
financial
implications
potential
implications
or
maybe
not
even
appoint
the
engineer
and
let
the
landowners
appeal
to
the
whatever
bodies
they
see
fit.
Okay,
I.
C
A
Question
mr.
Vyse
sure
thank
you.
I
would
read
the
item
that
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
recommend
that
council
considered
the
engineer's
report
prepared
by
Robinson
consultant
Inc
in
title
hobbs
municipal
drain
outlet.
Extension
works
cannot
be
constructed,
section
40,
engineer's
report
data
are
dated
august
2019
and
instructed
drainage
engineer
to
determine
any
further
work
on
the
proposed
drainage
works
in
accordance
with
the
section
40
of
the
drainage
at
ontario
on
the
item.
A
A
Sorry
so
this
I'm
gonna
transfer
that
chair
to
the
vice
chair,
so
mr.
vice
chair
I,
would
like
to,
whereas,
if
it's
appropriate
to
consider
this
motion
in
timely
manner
that
there
is
an
as
an
actual
complaint
on
both
of
the
property
discussed
below,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
rules
procedure
be
suspended
to
permit
the
consideration
of
this
following
motion.
There's
a
motion
carried.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
the
motion
moved
by
himself
and
let
me
read
it
for
you,
because
the
word
asses
is
really
explaining
what
we're
trying
to
do
here.
A
An
additional
provided,
a
means
by
which
to
adverse
their
businesses
advertise
their
businesses,
thereby
increasing
rural
economic
growth
and
whereas
rural
signage
for
home-based
business
would
be
a
part
of
the
2020
permanent
sign
on
private
property
by
law.
Review,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
agricultural
rural
affairs
committee
recommend
that
council
grant
fallen
exemption
from
the
permanent
sign
on
a
private
property.
Bylaw
2016
3
to
6
item
number
1
trim
and
proper
3570
done
Robin
Road
in
Woodlawn
KOA
3
MO
shall
be
permitted
to
have
a
sign
that
is
3
square
meter.
A
A
nearly
two
point,
four
meter
in
height
in
the
current
location
property
item
number
two
alleys,
fencing
solutions,
36
38
done
Robin
Road
wood,
long,
KOA,
3
mo
shall
be
permitted
to
have
a
sign
of
that
1.8
to
4
square
meter
in
area
2.4
million
height
and
located
one
meter
from
the
front
of
the
property
line.
We
have
further
resolved
that
side.
Pyramids
are
still
required
for
each
side.
It
will
be
responsibility
of
the
business
owner
to
secure
the
permit.
So
folks,
this
is
part
of
you
know.
A
We
will
be
reviewing
the
sign
bylaw,
because
the
last
time
we
establish
that
was
in
2016
and
some
of
those
signs
been
permanently
there
before
that
time
and
those
two
of
the
businesses
we
have
on
done
robin
road
where
the
speed
limit
is
80
and
when
people
drive
almost
hundred
and
you
can
impossible
to
see
a
sign.
If
it's
you
know,
if
it's,
if
the
original
requirement
be
adopted,
so
we're
asking
the
committee
and
of
the
asking
council
to
support
the
exemption.
A
They
still
have
to
come
to
the
city
for
a
permit,
but
the
reason
they
didn't
apply
for
a
permit
before,
because
the
size
of
the
sign
was
not
suitable
for
that
area
and
they
and
their
would
been
in
business
much
longer
than
2016.
So
I'm
asking
for
your
support
on
this
motion
and
we
can
send
it
to
council
and
we
will
be
working
with
staff
from
the
building
code
about
future
review
of
the
sign
and
bylaw
in
because
at
the
time
when
we
allow
home-based
business,
we
thought
the
small
sign
will
be
sufficient.
A
F
F
F
There
specifically
people
live
on
highway,
31
and
then
Robin
I'm
glad
to
see
you
doing
that,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
we
need
an
assurance
that
staff
are
really
following
up
on
that
and
our
review
for
2022
making
sure
that
we
have
a
proper
implementation.
We
don't
need
to
come
back
to
this
committee
every
time
someone
put
a
sign
and
every
entrepreneur
or
business
people
out
community.
A
Thank
you,
I'm
Sebastian,
for
all
the
to
council
jealous
no,
this
this
name
is
Ilya
and
my
name
is
Eli.
So
let's
clear
that
away
and
thank
God
I,
don't
own
any
other
business,
because
I
have
enough
problem
on
in
one
house
and
a
floodplain.
Every
time
we
thought
about
floods,
I
have
to
declare
conflict
of
interest,
but
you're
right.
We
did
speak
with
with
there
with
a
staff
from
the
building
permit
and
that
the
one
who
building
codes,
who
the
one
working
with
us
on
assigned
by
law.
But
we
don't.
A
These
two
businesses
they've
been
visited
by
the
bylaw
and
they're,
not
in
violation
and
they're,
hesitant
to
apply
for
a
permit
because
the
current
bylaw
it
allowed
them
small
sandwich.
It
doesn't
serve
the
purpose
so
I'm
hoping
to
buy
them
a
little
bit
more
time.
They
still
have
to
come
to
the
city
for
a
permit,
but
at
least
would
they
can
have
a
larger
sign
for
the
time
being
until
I
believe
Richard
asked
from
building
code
here,
and
he
helped
us
to
draft
this
motion
and
staff
I
believe
they're.
Okay,
with
this
motion.
B
It
was
referred
to
a
staff
person
who
was
then
impacted
during
the
2016
organizational
changes
at
the
City
of
Ottawa
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
staff
are
gonna,
go
back
and
look
at
that
and
that
direction
that
we
had
had
I
think
I
was
actually
posed
to
be
part
of
some
of
that
works.
One
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
it
at
the
time
was
something
as
simple
as
guiding
people
to
Osgood.
You
know
this.
B
There's
there's
roads,
there's
River,
Road
and
stagecoach
in
terms
of
getting
people
to
Osgood,
but
they
had
signs
on
the
on
the
on
the
periphery
of
Osgood
to
direct
people,
and
all
those
signs
are
illegal.
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
look
at
through
this
through
this
review
in
the
rural
area
is
coming
up
with
some
sort
of
creative
solution
that
can
allow
the
food
lands
of
the
world
to
actually
advertise
on
those
main
bypass
roads
and
get
people
into
town
without
putting
up
illegal
signage.
B
C
A
H
So
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
again
for
the
opportunity
to
come
before
you.
We
have
a
good
news
story,
I
believe
to
come
before
you
today.
Ottawa
is
in
a
changing
climate.
We
have
different
weather
systems
that
are
coming
along.
We
have
different
rainfall
patterns
that
are
beginning
to
occur,
and
the
effects
of
that
in
the
Ottawa
area
are,
of
course
unknown,
and
so
part
of
what
we
have
been
looking
to
do
is
find
new
ways
to
adapt
to
those
changes.
H
Circumstances
to
adapt
to
a
changing
world,
but
also
at
the
same
time,
is
provide
opportunities
to
lift
some
of
those
regular
regulatory
barriers
that
are
getting
in
people's
way
as
they
attempt
to
adapt
as
well
too.
So
I
want
to
thank
the
good
work
of
my
team,
Jacob
Saltillo
who's
sitting
here
beside
me,
but
also
care
already
back
at
the
office
and,
of
course,
the
assistance
of
our
colleagues
over
in
legal
legislative
and
Building
Code,
who
also
participated,
and
in
putting
some
of
these
crafting
these
regulations
together.
H
G
Thank
you.
Okay.
Good
morning
my
name
is
Jacob.
Saltillo
and
I
will
be
making
a
presentation
today
on
the
flood
relief
provisions.
2019
someone
tell
you
what
they
are.
Why
we're
here?
What
the
existing
provisions
are
that
are
going
to
be
changed,
what
those
changes
will
be
and
finally,
I'll
do
a
quick
summary.
G
G
So
what
is
section
73
section
73
was
passed
in
2017
after
a
similar
flood
that
happened
to
address
the
problem
that
people
whose
homes
have
been
damaged
by
flooding
would
be
forced
to
build
in
the
same
spot
where
their
homes
had
been
flooded.
So
what
this
amendment
did
is
it
allowed
people
to
relocate
their
homes
to
a
less
flood
prone
location
on
the
lot
and
be
rebuilt
in
accordance
with
conservation
authority,
flood
proofing
standards
without
the
need
for
a
minor
variance?
G
So
this
would
make
it
easier
to
rebuild
your
home
but
also
easier
to
comply,
provide
an
incentive
to
comply
with
conservation
authority,
flood
proofing
standards
so
that
the
rebuilt
building
would
be
better
able
to
withstand
future
flooding.
As
part
of
this
amendment,
it
also
allowed
people
to
have
an
addition
of
up
to
20%
to
their
rebuilt
home.
G
For
2019,
we
are
going
to
make
some
changes
to
section
73.
One
of
the
features
of
section
73
is
at
that
time
it
was
meant
to
be
a
temporary
provision,
expiring
on
September
13
2020.
What
this
amendment
does
is
it
makes
section
73
permanent
so
now
that
benefit
that
was
applied
to
people
whose
homes
are
being
relocated.
It's
not
time
limited.
It
will
now
be
a
permanent
feature
of
the
zoning
bylaw.
In
addition,
the
other
amendments
to
section
73
are
going
to
clarify
which
dwellings
benefit
from
these
provisions.
G
G
So,
to
summarize,
this
is
a
minor
revision.
It
makes
section
73
flood
relief
provisions
permanent.
It
allows
people
to
either
relocate
their
homes
proactively
or
rebuild
them
as
a
result
of
flooding,
and
it
helps
meet
the
requirements
of
the
floodplain,
which
is
to
restrict
development
subject
to
questions
from
the
care.
The
school
is
my
presentation.
B
C
B
B
H
Previously,
what
we
did
is
section
73
was
crafted
in
reaction
at
the
2017
flood
event.
So
it's
a
very
time
limited
thing
to
respond
strictly
to
how
to
alleviate
property,
so
we're
impacted
by
the
2017
event
when
that
event
happened
again
in
2019,
and
we
looked
and
realized
that
the
1
to
100
1
to
50
those
curbs
may
be
changing
sometime
in
the
future
again
difficult
to
realize.
We
came
to
the
conclusion
that
we
needed
to
provide
some
more
flexibility
within
the
zoning
bylaw
to
make
sure
that
we
had
the
ability
to
adapt
going
forward.
H
So
we
made
the
decision
to
allow
for
any
property
that
is
within
the
floodplain
to
be
covered
by
section
73
again.
If
they
wish
to
relocate
to
a
less
flood
prone
location,
they
would
be
able
to
provide
the
benefit
of
this.
So
it
does
not
expire.
It
will
be
a
permanent
feature
of
the
zoning
bylaw
and
if
you
wish
to
adapt
to
the
changing
flood
conditions,
then
you
have
the
opportunity
to
benefit
from
this
and
have
a
small,
a
little
bit
less
regulatory
barrier.
In
your
way,
great.