►
From YouTube: Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee – March 7, 2019
Description
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee meeting – March 7, 2019 - Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Good
morning,
everyone
and
welcome
to
our
agricultural
rural
affair
committee
meeting
to
my
colleague,
one
of
our
colleague
senator
grat,
his
dad
just
passed
away
a
couple
of
days
ago.
Counselor,
the
ruse
will
not
be
in
a
meeting
today
declaration
of
interest,
none
confirmation
of
minute
minutes,
February
22nd
2019
of
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
on
a
minute.
Okay,
thank
you.
We're
gonna
go
through
consent
agenda,
but
before
we
go
through
consent,
agenda
I'd
like
to
read
this
statement.
A
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
listed
as
item
two
and
three
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
just
mentioned.
Only
those
who
make
oral
submission
today
or
written
submission
before
the
amendment
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning,
Appeal
Tribunal,
formerly
known
as
o
and
B.
A
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
a
pre
tribunal,
if
counsel
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
hundred
and
fifty
days
of
recipients
of
this
application
for
zoning
210
days
for
an
official
plan.
Amendment
a
comment
sheet
as
available
at
the
door
for
anyone
wishing
to
submit
a
written
comment
on
these
amendments
and
before
I
start
the
meter
like
to
welcome
out
our
new
member
councillor,
Caroline
Meehan
and
to
to
era
so
looking
for
water
with
you
and
she
brought
her
audience
with
her
item
number
one.
A
A
Is
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
seven
zero,
six,
five
snake
island
Road
in
what
20
oz
good
that
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
recommend
canceled
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2
0,
0,
8,
2,
5
0
for
a
part
of
seven
zero;
six
five
snake
island
Road
for
the
purpose
of
rezoning,
a
portion
of
their
land
from
agriculture,
subdued
agriculture,
sub-zone
six
to
hit
residential
uses
on
the
retaining
farmland
and
detail.
In
document
two
and
item
number
two:
the
Agricultural
Fair
Committee,
approved
this
consultation
detail
on
this
item.
A
B
B
The
intent
of
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
is
to
add
a
concrete
batching
plant
as
an
additional
permitted
use
on
a
portion
of
the
subject
property
while
maintaining
the
current
Earl
general
industrial
zoning.
The
intent
of
the
amendment
is
also
to
establish
a
permitted
height
of
24
meters
in
relation
to
the
concrete
batching
plant.
B
B
There
is
an
existing
rural
estate
lot
subdivision
located
at
the
east
of
the
subject
property,
which
is
identified
in
green
on
the
map.
There
is
also
additional
existing
residential
development
along
Richards
and
side
road
to
the
south
and
on
Oak
Creek
Road
to
the
east,
as
well
as
an
other
rural
estate,
lot
subdivisions
to
the
west,
which
is
located
on
the
far
left-hand
side
of
the
image.
B
There
is
additional
light
and
heavy
industrial
uses
that
surround
the
site.
So
there
are
two
existing
industrial
parks.
There
is
a
waste
transfer
facility
that
is
located
along
Richardson
side,
Road,
concrete,
forming
business
that
fronts
on
to
Karp
Road,
the
Carson
quarry
and
the
West
Carlton
land.
As
per
section
2.1
of
the
carp
road
corridor
community
design
plan,
there
should
be
a
gradual
intensification
of
uses
from
the
north
at
the
carp
airport
to
the
south
at
highway
417
transitioning
through
highway
commercial
light,
industrial
and
heavy
industrial
uses.
B
There
are
other
required
approvals
prior
to
development
of
the
concrete
batching
plant.
There
is
currently
an
ongoing
site
plan
control
application
with
the
City
of
Ottawa.
Through
this
application,
we
will
be
looking
at
impacts
of
traffic.
This
has
been
determined,
as
there
are
many
existing
uses
that
are
permitted
under
current
zoning,
which
are
similar
in
intensity
in
traffic
counts.
So,
therefore,
it
was
more
appropriate
to
deal
with
traffic
concerns
through
the
site
plan
control
application.
A
permit
to
take
water
has
been
issued
by
the
Ministry
of
the
Environment
Conservation
and
Parks
on
February
13th.
B
There
is
also
the
need
for
an
air
noise
and
dust
environmental
compliance,
approval
which
is
currently
under
review
by
the
Ministry
of
the
Environment
Conservation
and
Parks,
and
there
is
also
the
the
requirement
for
a
stormwater
management,
environmental
compliance
approval,
which
has
yet
to
be
submitted
to
the
Ministry
of
the
Environment
Conservation
and
Parks.
This
type
of
environmental
compliance
approval
is
typically
submitted
at
the
end
of
a
site
plan
control,
review.
B
B
Concerns
have
been
raised
by
the
public
at
the
time
of
writing
and
preparation
of
the
presentation.
32
comments
were
received.
Additional
comments
have
been
submitted
as
well
this
past
week.
These
concerns
by
the
public
generally
fit
into
the
following
categories
that
are
listed
above
traffic,
business
hours,
proximity
and
impacts
on
existing
residential
development,
environmental
impacts
and
the
provincial
classification
of
the
proposed
industrial
use.
B
This
is
a
draft
bylaw
amendment
shows
what
is
being
proposed
through
the
zoning
section
area.
A
is
where
the
concrete
batching
plant
is
being
proposed.
The
zoning
there
would
add
a
concrete
batching
plant
as
an
additional
permitted
use
to
the
existing
rg5
zone,
permit
a
maximum
building
height
of
24
meters
for
the
concrete
batching
plant
and
provide
a
hold
on
the
zoning
which
could
only
be
lifted
once
an
air
noise
and
dust
eca
is
obtained.
B
In
conclusion,
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
complies
with
the
rural
employment
designation
of
the
Official
Plan
acts
as
a
transition
between
heavy
industrial
and
light
industrial
areas
maintains
the
light
industrial
nature
of
the
carpod
corridor.
While
intensifying
the
interior
of
the
lot
maintains
the
rural
zoning
adjacent
to
residential
properties
and
protects
the
Huntley
Creek
for
from
future
development.
Through
the
open
space,
zoning.
A
C
Testing
work
as
councillor
Eli,
I'm,
sorry
Elgin
terry,
has
indicated
I'm
representing
the
Huntley
Community
Association
you've
received
a
message
from
myself
yesterday,
yesterday,
more
no,
you
had
a
very
busy
week
this
week,
but
we
did
outline
the
questions
and
concerns
that
the
Community
Association
has
for
this
development.
We
tried
to
summarize
them.
Our
Community
Association
is
based
in
the
village
of
carp,
but
we
really
do
represent
the
entire
sort
of
area
that
formerly
was
considered.
C
Many
of
our
residents
are
happily
working
in
the
carp
Road
employment
corridor,
and
that
is
no
problem
to
any
of
us.
To
my
knowledge,
our
community
association
has
never
appeared
before
you
to
object
to
any
development
application
ever
this
one
is
very
different.
That's
why
we're
here
today
we
posted
information
on
our
website
on
our
in
our
newsletters.
We've
had
interviews
with
the
local
paper
and
we've
posted
things
on
our
Facebook
page,
because
many
questions
are
being
raised
by
residents.
Regarding
this
application.
We've
tried
to
keep
residents
informed.
C
C
C
Our
local
residents
participated
in
the
CDP
process
as
counselors
want
us
to,
and
we're
asking
you
to
respect
this
plan
on
the
map.
At
the
end
of
my
submission,
you
saw
where
25
96,
cart.
Road
is
located
its
superimposed
on
schedule.
One
of
the
CDP
you'll
note
that
it's
in
the
medium
blue
shaded
area,
which
is
light
industry.
C
The
proponents
identify
this
this
business
as
heavy
industry
and
appropriately.
So
the
continued
assertion
by
by
our
city
planners
that
this
concrete
batching
plant
you
know
is
in
keeping
with
the
intent
of
the
car
approached
CDP.
We
just
do
not
understand
that
and
we've
been
trying
to
inform
ourselves
and
help
you
inform
yourselves
about
how
this
happens.
C
C
C
You
would
want
to
consider
traffic
in
the
environment.
No
amount
of
landscape
buffering
can
mitigate
a
bad
decision
with
regard
to
traffic.
We've
requested
a
traffic
study.
I
know
our
councilor
Eli
has
requested
a
traffic
study,
and
we
don't
understand
why
that
isn't
made
available
to
you
today
to
make
this
important
decision.
It's
essential,
26,
heavy
cement
and
dump
trucks.
Turning
per
hour
on
decart
Road
is
going
to
be
have
a
massive
impact.
C
C
Unless
the
road
is
widened,
it
will
be
a
very
dangerous
intersection
and
it's
just
an
accident
looking
for
a
place
to
happen.
There
are
many
concerns
about
noise
and
air
and
water
and
I'm
sure
my
friends
from
the
community
are
going
to
raise
those
with
you.
Ok,
we're
asking
is
that
you
turned
down
this
this
proposal
today.
A
E
D
A
D
D
D
So
we
did
some
further
research
and
we
went
and
talked
to
the
neighbors
in
cotton.
Please
wake
up
and
I
already
has
a
concrete
patching
plan,
essentially
the
same
idea
couple
our
houses
near
the
batching
plant,
so
the
feedback
that
we
got
from
them.
Essentially,
the
points
that
they
wanted
to
tell
them
was
that
they
made
to
us
was
that
they
absolutely
hate
it.
There
is
no
timing
that
these
bands
can
start
5:00
a.m.
in
the
morning
and
can
end
11:00
p.m.
in
the
night
that
night
pores
are
far
too
often.
D
This
plant,
I
particularly
believe,
will
not
create
any
jobs
that
cannot
be
created,
otherwise
being
a
businessman
having
studied
economics
and
management.
I
can
tell
you
this
will
actually
hamper
the
future
growth
of
that
area,
just
because
the
bulkiness
of
the
whole
operation-
I'm,
not
an
engineer,
I,
don't
know.
What's
there
in
the
report
was
not,
but
I
do
know
that
the
reports
are
not
very
conclusive.
In
fact,
most
of
the
reports
that
we
do
have.
D
Actually
sorry,
most
of
the
reports
are
still
awaited.
We
do
not
have
the
DIA,
we
do
not
have
environmental
assessments,
we
have
nothing.
We
are
just
making
a
decision
right
now
about
a
zoning
change
for
which
we
do
not
have
most
of
the
information.
Although
the
provincial
history
is
responsible
for
it,
but
I
think
it's
still
important
to
have
that
information
when
we
are
at
making
this
decision
right
here.
D
So
the
residents
and
other
small
businesses
in
the
area
will
have
their
health
and
wealth
impacted
by
this
zoning
change
and
the
applicant.
When
asked
about
the
same
thing,
they
are
acting
that
it's
not
in
demanded
and
they're
not
supposed
to
be
worried
about
the
health.
What
else
the
best
part
they
have
to
just
adhere
to
the
minimum
parameters
set
up
by
the
Ministry
of
Environment,
the
height
of
the
proposed
tower,
is
60%
more
than
what
is
allowed
and
in
the
report
asking
for
the
change.
D
D
D
Stantec
reports
claim
in
their
rational
report
that
it's
in
public
interest
to
approve
this
project
I'm
concerned
that
will
stand
tack,
tells
the
council.
Now
what
public
interest
is,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
I
myself
have
emphysema
already
I
moved
here
from
New
Delhi
trying
to
get
a
better
life,
and
now
it
seems
I'll
have
to
run
again.
I
will
leave
up
to
you,
guys
sorry
respected
members
of
the
committee
to
make
a
decision
as
whether
residents
take
a
precedence
over
businesses.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
F
G
B
F
Your
committee
should
not
dismiss
today
as
many
sincere
objections
as
mere
not
in
my
backyard
MB
ISM.
Our
area
already
has
plenty
of
unpleasant
development.
Nearby
south
of
Richardson
side,
road
down,
Karp
Road
to
the
Queensway.
We
already
have
Carson's
large
quarry
west
call
and
concrete
eMCON
precast
and
the
soon
to
expand
carp
dump.
F
Please
don't
allow
more
heavy
industry
both
to
get
ever
closer.
Please
let
Richardson
side
road,
be
the
redline
South
heavy
industry
north
light,
your
city
planners,
do
a
lot
of
fancy
footwork,
distinguishing
this
application
from
a
normal
heavy
industry.
Rezoning.
Oh,
they
say
it's
only
amendment,
not
a
rezoning.
Oh,
it's
only
an
exception
to
a
permitted
use.
Only
it's
only
a
site,
specific
part
of
the
property.
Please
don't
be
taken
in
these
are
distinctions
without
fronts
does
not
matter
what
label
you
apply.
If
that
concrete
plant
goes
in,
the
negative
effects
are
all
the
same.
F
F
Our
city
official
plant
contains
many
high-minded
statements
of
principle
about
protecting
the
natural
environment.
Please
don't
be
degrade
these
principles
to
me
lip
service,
your
planners
have
gladly
let
you
down
by
not
following
these
principles,
and
so
the
concrete
plant
does
not
conform
to
the
Official
Plan.
F
Your
plant
is
sure
what
the
handsome
a
lack
of
due
diligence
on
environmental
concerns
and
too
much
reliance
is
placed
on
the
proponents.
It
hired
gun
consultants,
of
course,
don't
see
any
problems.
Why
go
to
all
the
trouble
to
develop
an
official
plan
and
their
subsidiaries,
zoning
and
community
designs
when
ad
hoc
changes
can
be
so
easily
made
I've
written
a
limit
that
illustrates
this
problem.
F
A
F
A
A
F
F
F
F
Basti
points
no
offer
has
been
made
to
speak
to
the
federal
government
about
environmental
concerns
under
their
jurisdiction.
This
in
a
city
with
so
much
reliance
on
the
national
government
for
work
and
for
funding.
It's
almost
as
if
your
planners
want
to
sneak
down
the
hall
and
their
soft
feet,
I
hope.
No
one
notices
my.
F
F
A
F
A
Folks,
you
can
save
your
clapping
or
your
jib,
we're
here
respectfully
listening
to
everyone's
opinion,
so
please
no
clapping
and
no
jeering
either
will
hear
respectfully
and
please
do
not
point
the
finger
on
staff
staff
prepared.
The
report
to
the
committee
and
it's
up
to
the
committee
today
to
make
a
decision.
A
H
Thanks
folks,
so
we
have
a
whole
bunch
of
materials
that
we
wanted
to
share
with
you.
Obviously
we
have
five
minutes
I
plan
to
be
a
rule
follower
and
do
that
so
I'll
be
done
in
five
minutes.
These
are
a
number
of
the
topics
that
we
like
to
go
through.
Your
forum
won't
allow
us
the
time
to
go
through
all
them.
H
So
what
we're
showing
here
is
the
impacts
of
dust.
The
left
is
a
collapsing
silo
at
a
cement.
Factory
on
the
right
is
actually
a.
This
is
an
advertisement
from
Kavanaugh
his
own
page.
If
you
read
the
reports
that
were
filed
with
the
city
and
in
this
discussions
made
by
Kavanaugh,
they
said
repeatedly,
there's
no
dust
at
our
facility.
We
have
water
suppression,
there's
no
dust
and
yet
they're
bragging.
Look
at
that
I
mean
they're
bragging,
essentially
about
the
amount
of
dust
that
they
produce.
H
I'm,
focusing
here
on
the
toxins
in
Portland
cement,
I'm,
going
to
go
through
some
of
the
things
that
are
in
there
focus
on
one
I'm,
going
to
give
you
a
definition
of
the
by
the
PEO.
What
of
what
professional
and
competitions
in
engineering
and
then
I'll
jump
into
some
of
the
impacts
of
that
so
in
Portland
cement?
These
are
some
of
the
compounds
that
you
find
in
Portland
cement.
There's
lead,
there's,
nickel,
there's,
cadmium
and
there's
hexavalent
chromium.
H
Sure,
third,
the
reason
why
we're
not
allowed
to
put
batteries
in
the
landfills
they're
heavy
metals
they
stay
in
the
ecosystems
forever
and
they're
all
present
they're
all
present
and
in
Portland
cement.
If
you
go
through
the
reports
in
detail,
I,
don't
not
sure
if
you've
all
read
all
the
reports,
there's
a
lot
of
pages
there,
but
there's
some
very
clear
missions,
misleading
statements
and
actual
false
information.
H
This
is
the
definition
from
the
professional
engineers
of
Ontario
of
what
incompetence
means.
You
can
read
it
there,
but
basically
any
engineer
who
is
disregarded.
The
public,
the
public's
welfare
can
have
their
license
taken
away
and
I
believe
what's
been
demonstrating.
These
reports
is
the
definition
of
incompetence.
One
of
the
compounds
I
mentioned
is
hexavalent
chromium.
I,
don't
know
if
you've
heard
of
it
before.
H
If
you've
ever
heard
of
Erin
Brockovich
the
story
of
Hinkley,
it
was,
and
on
the
right
you'll
see,
it
was
the
largest
class
action
settlement
ever
because
PG&E
one
of
those
companies
that
seemed
too
big
to
fail,
like
essence,
even
like
Cavanaugh,
big
company
right
and
they
were
defeated
by
a
small
group
of
Concerned
people
who
were
dying
because
of
the
presence
of
this
in
the
water.
It's
not
lies
it's
in
materials.
H
We
brought
this
up
with
the
with
the
city.
This
is
the
response
we
got
back.
This
is
actually
quoting
your
city
document
officials.
Official
answer
back
to
me
saying
that
those
compounds
are
not
present.
You
rewrite
their
that's
what
they
say
in
the
same
reports
filed
to
the
city
you
can
see
down
here
specifically
calling
out.
There's
trace
elements
in
there
are
trace
amounts
of
chromium,
specifically
chromium,
six,
okay,
it's
being
diminished
as
if
it's
not
important.
Here's
here's
the
datasheet
says
it
looks
like
a
really
small
number
right.
H
You
multiply
it
by
a
small
multiplier
and
you
think
hey,
that's
in
that's
a
roller
right
guys,
but
when
you're
talking
about
2
billion
kilograms
of
concrete
being
made
a
year
that
little
multiplier
becomes
a
lot
of
material,
so
we're
talking
about
almost
10,000
kilograms,
specifically
guys
specifically
of
hexavalent
chromium
and
the
engineers
who
wrote.
The
report
basically
said
it's
not
there.
H
The
materials
are
toxic
to
the
creek.
I
can
go
through
this
quickly
because
I
don't
know
we're
out
of
time.
I
want
to
give
you
the
definition
of
lc50.
This
is
listed
in
the
MSDS
for
Portland
cement,
but
the
definition
of
lc50
is
the
concentration
of
a
material
which
leads
to
the
death
of
50
percent
of
the
species
in
a
single
exposure.
Okay,
lc50
of
calcium
oxide,
which
is
present
in
Portland
cement.
It's
50
milligrams
of
20.
H
A
J
I
I
I
G
K
K
So
these
are
the
these
are
the
characteristics
of
a
of
a
class-3
industrial
facility.
The
D
six
guidelines
objective
is
to
prevent
or
minimize
the
encroachment
of
sensitive
land
use
upon
industrial
land
use,
and
vice
versa,
as
these
two
types
of
land
uses
are
normally
incompatible.
Concrete
batching
plant
ticks
all
of
the
boxes
for
for
a
class
three
facility.
The
applications
planning
rationale
requests
that
this
be
treated
as
a
class
2
facility.
K
When
I
asked
about
this,
the
response
was
just
last
week
actually
or
the
week
before
some
of
the
variables
in
relation
to
the
concrete
batching
plant
identified
as
class
3
industrial,
but
you
know
most
are
in
our
class
2.
So
I
respectfully
submit
that
the
planning
rationale
document
reached
too
far
in
order
to
relax
evaluation
of
compatibility
for
the
benefit
of
the
applicant.
This
is
unacceptable
to
us.
The
neighboring
sensitive
land
uses.
K
This
is
a
class
3
batching
plant
taken
from
an
application
in
Ontario
that
was
identified
as
such
class
3
for
the
construction
of
a
nearby
residential
subdivision.
This
is
another
example
in
Burlington
class
3
facility
of
an
interrogation
for
I
think
the
construction
of
a
mosque,
aggregate
delivery,
trucks
and
concrete
trucks
or
heavy
trucks,
even
though
most
of
their
characteristics
are
common
with
a
car,
they
have
seats,
they
have
a
steering
wheel,
but
this
loud
dusty,
high-traffic
heavy
industrial
facility
is
a
truck.
It's
not
a
car.
K
K
Here's
a
little
bit
of
a
closer
look.
Sorry
to
rotate
your
view
for
you,
there,
a
red
dot
being
the
subject
property
to
review
the
the
uses
in
in
use
were
there
with
our
plan
here.
So
we
have
heavy
industrial
to
the
right
to
there
to
the
right.
That's
to
the
south
east,
as
you've
heard
about
already
the
quarry
and
the
and
the
dump.
Is
there
our
Richardson
side
Road,
which
is
our
red
line
in
between
the
heavy
industrial
area
towards
the
highway
and
where
it
goes
into
light
commercial
light?
K
Sorry
light
industrial
and
commercial
uses
from
there
toward
the
village
of
carp.
Of
course,
we
have
our
rear
of
Occidental
areas,
which
we
all
enjoy
on
either
side
of
that.
So
this
brown,
heavy
industrial
plant
is
asked
to
be
located
here,
encroaching
upon
our
rural
residential
areas
and,
of
course,
going
into
the
commercial
and
light
industrial
areas.
This
would
deliver
financial
losses
to
me
and
my
neighbors
and
impede
our
ability
to
enjoy
our
properties.
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
slippery
slope
of
precedent.
K
K
President
is
leverage
throughout
the
planning
rationale
and
in
the
planning
departments
report
look
here
at
our
Richland
red
line
again
and
where
our
heavy
industrial
is,
we
transition
into
light.
We
have
some
light
development
there
and,
of
course,
onward
through
throughout
and
we're
talking
about
transitioning
back
to
heavy.
This
is
not
a
transitional
area.
This
is
a
reversal
this.
This
ramps
up
the
heavy
industrial
use
tour
in
this
direction.
K
There
is
no
way
using
the
president's
habits
that
we
have
with
planning
that
the
city
could
say
no
to
further
and
heavy
industrial
development
adjacent
to
such
a
heavy
industrial
use.
Here
all
the
ambient
noise
report,
the
the
acoustic
reports
reference,
the
ambient
noises
this
plant
would
be
a
precedent
that
could
not
be.
It
would
be
excellent
to
compare
against
uses
in
these
two
areas
further
eroding
our
community
I
want
to
talk
again
here
just
about
the
project
description
which
is
missing
from
the
applicants.
K
K
A
K
Okay,
so
the
final
point
here
is
just
about
the
the
use
of
this
property,
so
this
is
the
quarry
down
to
the
south
and
the
site
to
the
north.
If
we
take
a
common
destination
here,
travel
time
from
these
two
locations
or
within
two
minutes
on
assuming
an
uninterrupted
left
on
the
car
proed,
we
ask
the
qapla
can't
have
made
sense
to
truck
aggregate
all
the
way
to
that
site
and
then
back
with
all
of
the
traffic,
the
safety,
the
dust,
the
noise
concerns
that
come
along
with
it.
K
K
A
L
K
So
these
batching
plants
I
specifically
took
those
pictures
because
they
were
of
small
batching
plants
with
a
single
tower
outdoor
gravel
storage.
Just
like
this
one
so
created
so
aggregate
is
delivered
to
here.
You
can
see
the
cement
places
to
the
right
there,
or
they
would
then
take
a
front-end
loader
dig
into
that
limestone
crushed
limestone
and
move
it
dump
it
back
into
the
hopper.
All
of
that
movement
is
exactly
this.
You
know
to
my
layman's
comparison
very
similar
and.
L
K
Are
actually
urban
well
they're,
more
urban
areas
than
others,
so
this
one
in
Pickering
was
referenced
in
a
they
were
wanting
to.
There
was
some
land
nearby
that
they
wanted
to
turn
into
a
some
townhouse
development,
Community
Development,
and
so
they
reference
all
of
the
land
uses
around
it
because
they
don't
want
to
build
houses.
If
those
residents
are
going
to
be
in
a
none,
sensitive
land
use
and
then
it
would
be
incompatible
with
existing
industrial
uses.
So
this
wasn't
an
application
for
the
batching
plant.
These
are
applications
for
lots
of
other
things.
K
K
Right
so
this
case
you
know
they're
applying
for
a
batching
plant,
so
it
is,
it
would
be
detrimental
to
all
the
comparators
and
all
of
the
all
the
decision
making
the
rationale
for
the
planning
report.
If
you
can
classic
you
know,
if
you
can
slide
through
that
this
is
a
class
two.
Then
everything
starts
to
relax
in
terms
of
buffers
and
comparators.
Okay,.
J
This
whole
operation
does
not
meet
the
carp.
Quarter
design
I
feel
what
it's
just
going
to
do
on
carp.
Road
is
going
to
cause
where
the
entrance
to
the
site
is
to
make
that
left
turn
for
these
heavy
trucks.
It
will
basically
cause
an
interest.
There
will
be
an
intersection
put
up
there
with
traffic
lights,
I
have
a
more
Road
adjacent
to
the
entrance
of
the
site,
so
you're
talking
14
ready-mix
trunk
trucks
in
an
hour,
12
raw
material
trucks
from
7
to
1,900.
So
that's.
J
At
a
busy
roadway
with
speeds
of
70,
kilometers
and
80
kilometers,
which
is
this
normal
speed,
these
trucks
going
in
and
out
of
that
site,
trying
to
make
their
way
to
417
that'll,
just
be
a
safety,
won't
be
very
safe
at
all,
so
I'm
asking
as
to
put
the
brakes
on
it
and
save
Huntley
Creek.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
J
So
I
want
to
talk
a
bit
about
limestone
and
limestone
dust,
and
why
is
that
relevant?
So
so
we're
talking
about
a
concrete
plant.
So
what's
what's
actually
concrete?
What
is
it
it's
approximately
10
to
15%,
Portland,
cement,
aggregate
of
60%,
primarily
limestone
or
there's
sand
and
other
things,
and
then
25%
water
and
they
mix
that
together,
and
so
we
have
this
limestone
and
so
limestone
is
the
thing
you
see
everywhere.
It's
this
crushed
stone,
granular
a
it's
got
many
names.
J
J
J
There
is
no
higher
level
than
one
one
a
so
it's
a
confirmed
human
carcinogen
and
they
talk
about
to
not
do
not
put
fine
particles
of
the
limestone
in
your
waterways
in
your
ponds.
This
is
right
in
the
data
sheet
for
the
product,
and
specifically
it's
it's
carcinogenic,
with
repeated
inhalation
of
the
crystalline
silica,
the
quartz,
and
it
will,
it
says,
may
cause
because
they're
trying
to
sell
the
product,
but
it's
silicosis,
which
is
a
scarring
of
the
lungs.
J
So
as
you
breathe
in
this
dust,
you're
going
to
scar
your
lungs
and
it's
irreversible
and
and
potentially
fatal,
just
like
like
smoking
over
20
years,
30
years,
it's
fatal,
they
they
have
in
their
datasheet
that
this
product
is
fatal,
and
so
is
it
is
it.
This
is
a
picture
we
saw
recently
previous
presentation.
This
is
the
whole
thing
is
dusty.
J
The
whole
thing
is
white
and
these
big
piles
of
limestone,
so
basically
they
bring
in
dump
trucks
of
limestone
and
dump
it
down,
and
then
they
take
a
front-end
loader
and
pick
it
up
and
put
it
in
their
machine
in
there
their
system,
so
they
have.
They
have
asked
for
two
thousand
cubic
meters
of
concrete
a
day
to
be
produced
two
thousand
cubic
meters
times.
Twenty
six,
fifty
kilograms
per
cubic
meter
divided
by
half,
so
fifty
percent
do
the
math.
J
It
ends
up
being
a
hundred
dump
trucks
a
day,
not
not
traffic
I'm
talking
about
piles
of
rock
like
and
they
talk
about
the
traffic
and
all
the
number
of
trucks
are
going,
the
road
that's
over
and
above
the
existing
traffic
on
Carrboro.
But
that's
not
what
I'm
talking
about
I'm
talking
about
the
dust
so
every
time
they
dump
it.
You
see
this
plume
of
dust
that
they
advertise
on
their
website
every
time
they
pick
up
a
pile
of
dot
of
scoop
it
to
put
it
in
their
machine,
it's
more
dust.
J
The
whole
thing
is
a
dust
factory,
it
simply
produces
dust
and
in
their
environmental
report
they
list.
That's
crystalline
silica
is
emissions
are
negligible
because
they're
only
talking
about
the
crystalline
silica
emissions
after
they
put
it
into
their
tower,
so
there's
additional
emissions
there
and
their
environmental
report
talks
about
that.
One
small
part
not
about
the
open
pile
that
produces
dusts
a
day,
a
hundred
dump
trucks
a
day.
That's
a
truck
every
15
minutes.
If
you
did
it
24
hours
a
day
and
it's
going
to
be
concentrated.
J
Obviously,
during
the
day,
but
every
15
minutes,
they're
gonna
put
a
pile
of
dirt
rock
down
producing
dust,
then
they're
gonna
pick
it
up
and
produce
more.
That's.
This
thing
produces
dust
constantly
and
no
one's
talking
about
this
issue
and
they
say:
oh
it's,
a
negligible
emission.
This
is
one
of
many
examples
of
the
environmental
impacts
that
this
class
three
high
heavy
machinery
industrial
site
will
have
on
the
environment.
Thank
you
thank.
A
E
J
A
M
So
my
name
is
Craig
Wilson
I'm,
a
resident
of
Canada
and
I
live
a
quite
a
comfortable
distance
from
the
site
of
the
proposed
project.
I'm
here
in
support
of
my
fellow
residents,
who
do
not,
who
do
live
in
close
proximity
to
this
area
and
I,
emphatically
oppose
the
construction
of
the
proposed
plant
first
off.
This
is
certainly
not
an
Envy
issue,
not
a
case
of
not
in
my
backyard
for
the
proposed
plant
housing.
Some
of
the
most
dangerous
and
sidious
carcinogenic,
poisonous
chemicals
should
not
be
in
anyone's
backyard.
M
I
asked
the
honourable
council
members
to
consider
whether
they
would
be
comfortable
having
their
own
children
or
grandchildren
going
to
school
or
playing
in
a
park
next
door
to
this
plant.
For
this
is
effectively
the
fate
you
would
be
imposing
on
the
families
that
live
nearby.
Now,
when
industrial
companies
proposed
new
plans
that
carry
out
work
with
hazardous
materials,
objecting
members
of
the
public
are
told,
don't
worry,
you're
being
alarmist,
risks
are
minimal
procedures
and
protocols
are
in
place.
Your
fears
are
unwarranted.
M
Nothing
will
go
wrong,
of
course,
until
it
does
just
ask
the
people
of
Bhopal
we're
in
1984,
the
Union
Carbide
pesticide
plant
experienced
the
cat's,
a
gas
leak
that
caused
thousands
of
fatalities
and
over
500,000
life
altering
injuries.
You
cannot
read
the
description
of
long-term
effects
of
this
accident
without
being
brought
to
tears.
What
about
the
people
of
true
noble,
who
had
a
nuclear
reactor
in
their
backyard?
Oh,
my
god.
Beyond
the
immediate
injuries
and
fatalities,
generations
of
families
are
still
dealing
with
a
high
incidence
of
birth
defects
and
cancers.
M
This
was
an
accident
that
changed
the
opinion
of
the
entire
world
regarding
the
relative
safety
of
the
production
of
nuclear
energy.
Well,
with
the
people
of
Lac,
Megantic
have
to
say
all
of
the
apologies
and
wringing
of
hands
that
come
in
the
wake
of
tragedy.
Do
nothing
for
the
people
whose
lives
are
forever
changed.
More
to
the
point.
I
beg
you
to
google
cement
plant
accident.
M
In
this
case
the
city
of
picked
and
received
complaints
regarding
emissions
described
as
a
gray
dust,
haze,
fog
smoke
or
smog
coming
from
the
S
Rock
Factory
and
coating
personal
property
and
area
homes.
S
Rock
admitted
to
these
incidents
like
guilty
and
was
heavily
fined,
and
that
is
my
concern
here.
Where
there
is
cement,
there
is
granular
dust
and
overtime
weather
due
to
accident
negligence
or
unforeseen
circumstances.
That
dust
will
escape.
M
Your
names
will
be
tattooed
on
the
skin
of
every
cancer,
patient
and
emblazoned
on
every
death
certificate,
and
you
will
not
be
able
to
say
that
the
outcome
could
not
possibly
have
been
foreseen.
Industrial
accidents
are
not
unlikely,
they
are
inevitable.
It's
only
a
question
of
when
so.
Why
would
you
not
simply
plan
in
a
perimeter
of
safety
away
from
populated
areas
now,
while
a
potentially
serious
negative
health
impacts
of
this
proposed
plant
may
not
reveal
themselves
for
years
to
come?
What
will
be
immediate
is
the
financial
impact
of
the
homeowners
living
in
close
proximity.
M
M
Cavanaugh
would
do
if
the
city,
a
competitor
or
another
business,
was
proposing
an
action
that
would
do
what
they
would
reduce
his
net
worth
by
50%
people
who
are
already
facing
financial
devastation
may
not
have
the
resources
or
be
willing
to
take
the
risk
to
fight
a
multi
year.
Legal
battle
battle
to
the
very
end
and.
M
A
N
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
for
us
to
participate
in
the
process.
My
name
is
Louisa.
Tremblay
I
am
a
resident
on
Oak
Creek
Road.
We
relocated
there
in
2012
investing
more
than
half
our
net
worth,
which
might
be
much
less.
If
this
process
goes
through
into
a
significant
woodland
property.
We
have
a
forest
plan
in
place.
We
are
planning
to
plant
upwards
of
five,
bring
through
a
participation
of
the
program
with
the
Rideau
Valley
Conservation.
N
Children
with
a
wholesome
wholesome
lifestyle
and
to
educate
them
on
where
their
food
comes
from
and
the
importance
and
fragility
of
the
environment.
There
is
a
good
reason
why
the
world
now
is
mobilizing
to
see
how
we
can
do
better
with
the
environment
this
morning,
I'm
here
to
find
out
how
the
interests
of
one
person
one
individual,
sorry.
N
I
hope
that
we
are
here
today
to
make
the
right
choice:
choose
the
interests
of
the
many
of
the
environment
and
not
that
of
a
self
vested
corporation.
With
a
track
record
of
blunt
disrespect
for
the
environment,
it's
I'm
not
sure
that
we've
heard
that
part,
but
I
know
that
the
community
has
prepared
a
lot
of
information
and
it's
a
well-known
fact
that
the
subject,
as
you
know,
choose
to
pay
fine,
instead
of
listening
to,
like
you
know,
the
process
and
the
rule
that
needed
to
be
followed.
N
So
I
am
extremely
concerned
because
our
treetops
are
300
meters
from
the
subject.
Property
and
I
I
want
to
see
my
tree
grow.
I
want
the
resident
of
our
community
to
enjoy
the
forest
and
the
trail
that
we're
making
in
that
land
so
I.
Thank
you
very
much
for
listening
and
I
sure
hope
that
you
make
the
right
decision
and
turn
down
their
application.
Thank
you.
A
N
P
And
I
just
want
to
qualify
Mary
Cavanaugh,
but
in
no
relation
so
I
am
living
on.
I
am
living
on
some
homestead
property,
though
that
was
originally
owned
by
the
Cavanaugh's
of
the
area
and
I
want
to
just
you
know:
strong
represent
my
strong
opposition
to
the
application.
I,
don't
I
know
we
Lisa
talked
about
it
and
you
know
the
ministry.
Will
you
know
I'm
sure
if
this
is
approved,
make
some
recommendations
about
how
the
land
or
how
the
you
know.
Cavanaugh
construction
should
be
operating
to
preserve
the
natural
environment,
and
you.
P
It
look
at
at
Google
Cavanaugh
finds,
and
you
can
see
that
you
know
there's
been
a
couple
of
situations
in
in
the
last
couple
of
years
where
mr.
Cavanaugh
has
shown
disrespect
to
you
know
the
wetlands,
so
Jacque
River
is
an
example
and
in
arm
prior-
and
you
know
we
use,
we
have
wells,
we
don't
have
city
water
on
our
Road.
So
if
there's
any,
you
know
and
there's
a
lot
of
natural
springs.
So
if
there's
any
contamination,
you
know
we're
going
to
be
drinking
it.
P
So
I
think
that
all
of
us
have
come
together
today,
because
we
believe
this
is
it's.
You
know
the
worst
thing
that
could
happen
to
our
community
carps,
a
great
community
and
we've
got.
You
know
it's
nice
to
see
the
development
coming
out
and
I
think
we
need
to
protect
that
we
need
to
support
having
the
the
residential
community
come,
come
toward
us
and
to
honor
and
respect
the
rural
community
that
exists
the
horse,
farms
that
are
there.
You
know,
we've
got
right
behind
me.
P
I've
got
I
can't
even
put
a
shed
on
my
backyard
by
the
way
because
of
the
wetlands
that
are
protected
and
you
know
and
I've
honored
that
I
won't
do
that.
So
you
know
my
asked
to
you
is
that
you
do
the
same
that
you
honor.
You
know
the
agreement
that
was
was
put
in
place
and
respect
the
wildlife
respect,
our
community
respect
our
children
and
our
our
people.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and.
C
A
P
P
Plus
Cavanaugh
is
asking
for
a
height
ultrafiltration
plus
there
are
school
buses
across
the
road
sitting
there,
many
many
school
buses
that
are
going
to
be
coated
with
dust
and
our
kids
are
going
to
be
getting
in
those
buses
every
goddamn
day
and
they
are
going
to
be
subjected
to
that
dust
or
the
bus
company
is
going
to
get
there
at
4:00
in
the
morning
and
a
nice
cold
day
and
wash
it
down
and
then
we're
going
to
add
more
water
dirty
into
the
system.
Now
we'll
go
to
my
notes,
my
name
is
sue.
P
Pryor
I
live
at
the
very
far
end
Oak
Creek
Road
on
the
200
year
old,
organic
farm
and
I
want
to
talk
about
the
costs
on
the
carp.
One
of
the
weaknesses
of
the
reports
that
I
have
seen
is
the
failure
to
count
the
cost
in
terms
of
the
impact
on
the
general
area.
This
is
an
area
where
I
and
other
people
have
been
investing.
The
city
has
many
wide
open
environmental
areas
that
they're
trying
to
save.
So
after
our
floods,.
N
P
Tornadoes
recently,
we
must
take
into
the
concept
into
that
into
account
about
you.
Eight
years
ago,
Doug
Nuttall
of
the
Mississippi
map,
Valley
Conservation
Authority,
and
the
Friends
of
the
carp
River
discussed
a
wish
list
for
the
rivers
restoration.
Oakley
wetlands
was
one
of
two
major
sites
on
that
list.
It
is
home
to
blending
Turtles.
These
are
a
species
at
risk.
I
have
seen
them
head
of
the
city
environment.
Nick
Stowe
has
seen
them
on
my
property.
P
They
have
been
seen
in
the
carp
river
behind
my
property
they've
been
seen
on
8:40
Hunt
Mar,
which
is
directly
in
line,
but
where
the
Huntley
Creek
flows
out.
So
we
have
that
half
a
million
dollars
the
city
invested
along
with
the
feds,
to
protect
my
land
and
to
restore
that
wetland.
That
project
restored
some
of
the
damage
created
in
1911
a
hundred
and
something
years
ago
that
wetlands
was
destroyed,
but
the
wetland
is
only
minutes
downstream
from
Huntley
Creek
and
therefore
the
proposed
facility.
P
Over
the
last
few
years,
many
of
you
have
watched
the
Terry
Fox
restoration
project
develop
along
the
carp
River,
that's
the
one
that
you
can
see
from
the
Senators
down
to
farm
boy,
that
project
cost
the
city
I'm
told
22
million
dollars
that
land
is
upstream
from
where
the
Huntley
Creek
flows
inches
of
these
carp
river.
But
it
is
downstream
and
downwind
from
the
facility.
P
The
designers
talk
about
filters,
but
they
haven't
found
a
way
to
filter
dust
from
those
trucks,
as
others
have
mentioned,
it
will
blow
and
then
the
rest
of
it
will
wash
into
the
holding
ponds.
Did
you
know
that
the
Mississippi
Valley
has
started
fundraising
for
their
new
car
Priven
classroom,
which
will
be
on
that
land?
Let's
hope
that
the
river,
the
otters
that
I
have
seen
there
and
the
fish
remain
as
a
living
classroom.
P
If
there
is
another
tornado
or
a
torrential
rainstorm
immediately
after
those
220
trucks,
and
the
silos
have
been
washed
down
for
the
day
where,
in
the
name
of
heaven,
is
that
water
going
to
go
it's
going
to
go
into
Huntley
Creek.
We
have
spent
twenty
three
million
dollars
recently
trying
to
correct
the
errors
of
1911.
P
How
long
will
we
be
correcting
the
ones
that
are
about
to
follow
if
you
go
through
with
this
Cavanaugh
construction
goes
to
court
and
it
pays
the
fines,
but
nobody
has
bothered
to
tell
us
how
much
those
court
costs
cost
the
public.
How
much
did
it
cost
the
environment
ministry
and
Ontario
to
su
Cavanaugh
for
275
thousand
dollars?
I
have
asked,
and
nobody
will
tell
me
those
fines
are
just
the
cost
of
doing
business
Cavanaugh.
My
family
was
in
business
for
many
years.
Designing
air
traffic
control
software.
You
please
help
my
supplier.
A
P
30
seconds
I
I
posted
large
bonds
for
many
years,
guaranteeing
our
design
that
our
designed
work
has
Cavanaugh
posted
a
25
to
$100
million
bind
to
guarantee
safety
for
the
red
fins,
the
Blanding
turtles,
the
birds
that
have
come
back
to
nest,
the
snappers,
the
cross,
hunt,
Meyer
and
Oak
Creek
all
summer,
and
what
about
the
health
of
our
kids?
That
health
is
priceless.
Thank.
B
E
Sue's
daughter,
I,
live
to
doubt
two
houses
down
from
her
I
was
just
congratulating
my
mom
last
week,
Saturday
or
Sunday
on
March
1st,
saying:
hey,
congratulations
on
our
anniversary
of
you
and
Dad
purchasing
the
property
back
in
1997
of
32
years
and
I
was
thinking
that
it's
pretty
crappy
that
now
we're
going
and
talking
about
this
issue.
That's
coming
up
for
our
environment,
so
I
just
thought
that
was
kind
of
a
yes
congratulations
on
the
anniversary
of
it,
but
also
it
really
sucks.
E
So
one
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
was
the
environment
most
important
to
myself.
My
family
is
a
sensitive
environment,
habitat
that
can
easily
be
threatened
by
the
construction,
the
implementation
and
the
running
of
the
concrete
plant,
the
water
soils,
air
light
pollution
and
sound
pollution.
That
will
probably
affect
this.
My
kids
love
playing
outside
when
we
go
down
to
my
mom's
ponds
in
the
back
and
they
play
in
the
creek,
and
they
don't
want
to.
E
Name
is
Juanita
gray
and
I'm
a
resident
of
Newell
place
before
1985
DUI
was
a
fine
fifty
to
three
hundred
dollars.
People
paid
these
fines
and
continued
to
offend
after
many
deaths.
Today,
duis
fall
under
the
criminal
code
because
lives
matter
how
many
deaths
and
cases
of
lethal
cancer
would
it
take
for
environmental,
infraction
laws
to
become
criminal?
Will
they
take
five
ten
or
twenty
deaths?
Cavanaugh
has
already
been
fined.
Two
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
in
2017
alone
and
all
they
do
is
pay
their
fines
and
walk
away
if
they
break
them
again.
E
It's
our
health
at
risk.
People
in
your
place
before
1985,
probably
wish
they
had
made
DUI
criminal
long
ago,
knowing
the
deaths
they
caused,
as
would
of
those
who
allowed
smoking
and
aeroplanes
and
in
hospitals
saying
now
we
know
better,
don't
make
the
wrong
decision
and
look
back
because
you
do
know
better
people
always
say
when
you
know
better.
You
do
better.
Please
make
the
right
decision,
as
we
now
all
know
better.
Thank.
I
L
Okay,
all
right,
my
name
is
Lyn
O'keefe
gravy
I've
recently
moved
back
to
Canada
after
having
lived
in
the
United
States
for
over
20
years.
During
my
time
over
there,
I
watched
as
the
air
and
water
quality
deteriorated
to
crisis
levels
in
some
communities,
I
saw
the
various
levels
of
government
do
nothing
to
ensure
that
citizens
would
be
protected.
L
They
provided
empty
promises
to
our
health
that
our
health
was
a
priority.
Yet
all
the
while
allowing
corporations
to
dump
toxins
in
our
water
and
on
the
land
I
was
keenly
aware
of
these
problems
because
of
my
son
Ryan,
who
was
born
with
a
compromised,
liver,
so
clean
water
and
air
has
always
been
critical
for
him.
L
It
became
so
bad
in
Phoenix
Arizona,
where
we
lived
that
I
convinced
my
husband
to
move
to
Canada
I
assured
him
that
we
could
be
certain
that
the
air
and
water
would
be
clean,
Canadians
care
about
these
things,
I
told
him.
We
can
count
on
our
government
to
do
the
right
thing.
Ryan
will
be
safe
there.
L
So
imagine
my
disappointment.
When
I
received
a
flyer
in
the
mail
stating
that
the
carp
road
corridor
community
design
plan
was
going
to
be
changed,
this
one
change
threatens
the
health
of
my
son
and
the
welfare
of
my
family.
If
you
approve
this
rezoning,
we
will
be
forced
to
move
concrete
plants
are
not
clean
or
green.
They
create
toxic
dust
that
causes
serious
health
issues
even
to
healthy
people.
Eventually,
those
toxic
chemicals
will
make
their
way
into
the
water
table,
and
this
community
will
be
ruined.
G
Our
property
we
did
so
knowing
that
the
vacant
land
around
our
property
was
zoned
as
light
industrial.
We
never
anticipated
that
the
natural
landscape
and
the
general
enjoyment
of
our
backyard
would
include
a
seven-story
concrete
batch
plant,
along
with
the
noise
of
dozens
of
trucks
and
reversing
truck
alarms.
G
I
would
suspect
that
the
lost
value
of
our
home
to
be
at
least
15
to
20
percent.
This
is
based
on
our
neighbor,
who
recently
lost
the
sale
of
his
home
as
a
result
of
the
proposed
rezoning
application.
My
wife
and
I
are
not
wealthy
individuals
that
can
absorb
the
lost
value
of
our
home.
The
proponent,
on
the
other
hand,
is
not
negatively.
Impact
is
nearly
to
the
same
degree
should
this
request
be
denied.
G
In
other
words,
the
proponent
has
materially
nothing
to
lose
with
this
application,
but
the
residents
of
the
area
have
a
devastatingly
sizable
portion
of
our
life
savings
gone
when
I.
Look
at
the
future
of
that
land.
Should
this
application
be
accepted.
I
am
terrified
that
it
will
be
much
easier
for
the
additional
heavy
industrial
use
to
be
introduced.
G
G
G
I've
reviewed
regarding
the
provincial
industrial
class
I've
reviewed
several
engineering
reports,
as
many
as
I
could
get
my
hands
on
and
I've.
Yet
to
find
a
single
classification
of
class
2
for
a
concrete
batch
plant
I've
seen
batch
plants
they've
listed
either
eyes.
Classification
3,
as
we
saw
earlier
or
they're
a
hybrid
of
2/3
class
3
land
uses,
recommend
a
distance
of
300
meters
from
sensitive
land
uses.
G
The
proponent
would
be
in
violation
of
this
recommendation
if
they
were
classified
as
a
class
3
page
21
of
the
report
from
the
director
of
planning
services
confirms
that
there
are
some
elements
of
class
3
industrial
use
present
in
the
expected
use
of
the
land.
It
goes
on
to
say
that
there's
also
class
2
elements
as
well.
What's
disappointing
is
that,
despite
the
presence
of
class
3
elements,
the
director
gives
the
benefit
of
the
doubt
to
the
proponent
and
concludes
on
a
class
2,
not
a
class
2,
3
hybrid.
G
Simply
a
class
2
dust
is
a
known
concern
to
patch
plants.
Yes,
there
are
monitoring
by
the
appropriate
regulators.
However,
the
reality
is,
there
will
be
additional
dust
in
our
neighborhood
and
our
houses,
our
kids,
toys,
our
play
structures
and
so
on.
I,
don't
know
what
makes
up
chemicals
in
the
dust
or
what
risks
really
exists
within
certain
rocks,
but
I
do
know
that
it
is
not
healthy
to
breathe
in
dust.
G
There
is
a
study
done
in
Italy
in
2012
that
found,
or
that
confirmed
additional
risk
to
children
and
seniors
that
live
within
the
area
of
a
concrete
batch
plant.
Essentially,
additional
hospitalization
I
would
hope
that
the
city
wouldn't
ignore
the
health
risks
of
our
residents
by
forcing
a
batch
plant
within
300
meters,
of
where
our
kids
are
playing.
The
city
wouldn't
put
a
batch
plant
within
300
metres
of
a
children's
park.
For
this
exact
reason,
we
don't
have
a
park
for
our
children
in
our
area.
G
G
The
short
term
and
long
term,
as
potentially
other
industrial
uses,
are
added.
The
heavy
industrial
use,
neighbor,
certainly
doesn't
add
value
to
our
property,
and
I
would
certainly
argue
that
it
devalues.
Finally,
the
health
of
our
children
and
our
seniors
on
our
street
is
most
concerning.
I
hope
that
you
consider
our
family's
financial
and
health
concerns.
Thank.
E
A
E
Yeah
I
understand
O'keefe
has
a
history
in
Canada
as
early
in
the
beer
industry
anyway,
I'm
as
I
mentioned
I'm
the
husband
that
my
wife
convinced
to
move
to
Canada
as
we
searched
for
a
place
that
offered
pristine
air
quality
and
an
uncontaminated
water,
primarily
for
the
benefit
of
our
son.
Who
has
those
health
issues.
E
We
thought
we
found
that
place
in
the
carp
Road
area
were
residents
of
Canterbury
estates,
which
is
just
west
of
carp,
Road
off
and
north
of
to
Richards
in
the
side,
road
referencing,
the
city
of
Ottawa's,
carp,
Road
corridor,
community
design
plan
dated
June,
20
2004.
It
lays
out
the
characteristics
of
both
light
and
heavy
industrial
uses,
as
the
term
implies.
Light
industrial
use
permits
commercial
enterprises
with
a
limited
environmental
or
aesthetic
impact.
E
In
contrast,
the
plan,
states
and
I'm,
quoting
here
heavy
industrial
uses
by
their
nature,
include
those
that
generate
noise,
fumes,
odors
vibrations
and
are
hazardous
and
obnoxious.
A
heavy
industrial
concrete
plant
certainly
checks
off.
All
of
those
criteria.
Concrete
plants
pose
a
threat
to
both
air
and
water
quality.
Cement
dust
is
unavoidable.
Indeed,
cement
is
an
ingredient
of
the
operation.
E
Cement
dust
can
contain
numerous
contaminants,
including
lead,
and,
as
mentioned
hexavalent
chromium
and
others.
The
dust
will
inevitably
be
carried
by
the
wind
into
neighborhoods
such
as
ours.
Perhaps
a
bigger
concern
is
water
quality.
The
proposed
location
lies
within
a
zone
that
is
designated
as
a
high
recharge
area
by
the
city
of
Ottawa's
Karp
Road
corridor
communities.
Design
plan
high
recharge
area
is
not
a
term
that
I'm
familiar
with,
but
the
plan
does
define
it.
It
defines
it
as
an
area
that
represents
a
location
where
surface
water
infiltrates
into
the
ground.
E
E
My
family
and
I
strongly
oppose
any
rezoning
of
the
area
to
accommodate
the
construction
of
a
heavy
concrete.
The
proposed
production
plant
such
an
action
or
rezoning,
would
represent
a
violation
of
the
protections
intended
by
the
original
carp
Road
card,
a
community
design
plan.
It
would
be
trade,
it
would
betray
the
representations
made
to
homeowners
such
as
ourselves
that
were
the
basis
or
individual
decisions
to
locate
our
families
to
the
area
which
we
currently
live.
In
the
end,
you've
had
the
chance
to
hear
the
objections
of
residents
of
the
area,
whose
vote
I
would
ask.
E
Q
Good
morning,
my
name
is
sandy
powell,
like
to
thank
the
committee
for
taking
the
time
to
allow
the
public
to
air
their
opinions
on
this
topic.
I
grew
up
in
a
desert
area
where
water
was
considered
to
be
more
precious
than
gold.
That
was
Scottsdale
Arizona,
where
I
had
a
ranch.
I
brought
the
stewardess
knowledge
of
keeping
pristine
water
to
the
forefront
to
my
property,
which
encompassed
an
area
of
acreage
along
the
second
line
for
over
20-some
years,
where
I
had
three
wells
and
they
were
all
pristine
and
of
good
quality.
Q
My
concern
is
with
the
water
and
with
the
environment.
In
this
case,
I
like
to
refer
to
a
couple
of
cliches
one
is
that
we
have
to
learn
from
the
mistake
of
others.
We
will
not
live
long
enough
to
make
them
all
ourselves.
I
would
also
like
to
recognize
the
fact
that
there
is
a
lot
of
truth
to
the
saying
that
act,
low,
act
locally
and
consider
that,
to
the
benefits
of
globally
to
that
I
have
liked.
I
would
like
to
acknowledge
that
there
is
a
publication
called
the
guardian,
calm,
which
everybody
here
should
access.
Q
Q
Cement,
the
key
component
of
concrete
and
when
the
most
widely
used
man-made
materials
is
now
the
cornerstone
of
global
construction.
It
has
shaped
the
modern
environment,
but
its
production
has
a
massive
footprint
than
either
the
industry
nor
governments
have
been
willing
to
address
because
of
the
heat
needed
to
decompose
rock
and
natural
chemical
processes
involved,
making
cement.
Imagine
this
every
tonne
every
tonne
made
releases
one
tonne
of
co2,
the
main
greenhouse
warming
gas
that
makes
concrete
the
most
destructive
material
on
earth.
Q
Q
Q
Annual
cement
production
has
quadrupled
from
nearly
1
billion
to
over
4
billion
tons
in
30
years
in
the
next
decade.
It
is
expected
to
increase
a
further
500
million
tons
a
year
unless
there
was
a
dramatic
change.
Cement
emissions
are
expected
to
continue
to
rise
beyond
2050
I
would
like
to
also
note
that
this
article
was
written
by
John,
Vidal
and
I.
Think
it's
a
clear
representation
of
what
we
have
to
take
a
look
at.
We
are
doing
our
best
here
in
Ottawa.
There's
no
doubt
about
it.
There
was
a
lot
of
concerned.
Q
People
here
and
they'll
have
justified
reasons
to
be
concerned.
We
have
to
take
a
look
at
the
what
has
been
happening
globally
to
recognize
that
this
is
our
moment
to
stand
up
say
not
here.
The
cement
industry
does
have
options
available
to
them.
They
should
be
encouraged
to
pursue
them.
We
don't
have
to
continue
with
cement.
It's
done
its
best
for
us
in
the
past,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
death
knell
to
us
in
the
future.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
A
R
R
We're
the
first
farm
that
is
below
the
entryway
of
the
Creek
onto
carp
onto
the
carp
river,
and
so
we're
downstream
from
this.
The
location
will
be
getting
a
lot
of
runoff
whenever
there's
a
heavy
rain
and
we
have
heavy
rains
every
once
in
a
while.
The
runoff
will
run
from
there
into
the
creek
down
the
faster
flowing
cleek
Creek
to
the
carp
river
and
that's
the
first
time
it
gets
to
flood
its
banks.
R
As
you
know,
the
carp
River
tends
to
flood
its
banks
regularly
and
that
flooding
starts
as
the
creek
enters
the
carp
river.
So
the
dirty
water
coming
from
the
cement
plant
and
you
notice
in
the
pictures
how
gray
those
sites
are
those
sites
are
gray
because
they're
covered
in
dust.
Well,
first
thing
you
get
Washington
is
the
creek.
R
Is
gonna,
be
the
dust
so
to
solve
that
problem,
you
have
to
put
a
restriction
on
all
runoff
from
that
site
being
fully
treated
so
that
the
particulate
and
all
of
the
dissolved
minerals
that
are
released
by
the
very
fine
particles
are
removed
from
the
water
before
it
enters
the
creek.
Are
you
going
to
do
that?
R
So
we're
gonna
have
runoff
so
that
runoff
will
travel
down
to
the
cart
river
and
then,
when
it
gets
the
carp
river,
it's
going
to
come
down
to
our
farm,
the
first
farm
below
the
creek
and
it's
gonna
flood
the
back
of
our
farm
right
now
it
gets
flooded.
Okay,
it
brings
in
a
bit
of
silt
a
lot
of
water
and
that's
not
a
bad
thing,
except
that
the
land
is
not
available
at
all
times.
With
this
change
they
will
bring
in
polluted
water
and
that
polluted
water
will
bring
minerals
that
I
don't
want.
R
Toxins
that
are
gonna,
pollute
my
land
they're
also
going
to
flood
my
irrigation
pond,
which
is
in
that
floodplain,
and
that
water
then
we'll
have
the
polluted
products
in
it
that
water
I
use
for
irrigating
crops,
vegetable
crops
that
are
sold
in
the
Ottawa
area,
so
I
do
not
sell
my
vegetables
anywhere,
but
in
the
Ottawa
area,
I
sell
to
restaurants,
I
sell
a
car
farmers.
Market
I
saw
the
Ottawa
farmers
market
and
I
sell
at
the
farm
gate.
All
of
those
are
local
there.
R
Your
residents,
people
you're
responsible
for-
and
this
will
then
pollute
the
water.
That
goes
to
them
very
unacceptable
for
me
now,
even
if
you
try
to
get
Cavanaugh
to
treat
all
its
water
with
the
reputation
the
great
reputation
they
have
for
obeying
the
rules,
can
you
trust
them?
You,
as
a
committee,
trust
them
to
do
what
you
impose
on
them,
even
if
she
could.
R
So.
This
is
an
aerial
map
of
the
area.
The
Kavanagh
site
is
located
in
the
lower
left
corner
of
the
picture,
and
the
blue
line
follows
the
creek
down
to
the
carp
river
I
haven't
shown
all
of
the
carp
River
flooding,
but
just
the
area
that
affects
me.
So
the
creek
runs
into
the
car
prover
in
the
light
blue
area
at
the
top,
and
instead
of
reaching
the
carp
river,
it
will
flow
sideways
on
the
surface
and
onto
my
land,
which
is
the
long
parcel
of
dirt.
That
first
comes
in
contact
to
the
carp
river.
R
R
R
It's
just
around
the
corner:
West
to
Stateville,
there's
no
residential
nearby,
none,
there's
no
farmland
nearby.
It's
located
here
where
you
saw
in
an
earlier
map
in
the
lower
left
corner
there.
Other
site
is
right
near
us.
That
combination
doesn't
have
to
be
there.
They
can
do
no
hauling
and
deposit
all
of
their
stuff
into
their
cement
plant
from
their
own
site.
They
don't
have
to
go
on
the
road
of
those
trucks.
The
dust
is
far
away
from
anybody
else
and
we
don't
get
polluted
water
Thank.
A
R
Not
sure
how
close
it
is
to
water,
but
they
do
have
a
very
large
quarry
there.
That
is
already
in
full
swing,
like
you've,
got
acres
and
acres
below
that
site
and
to
the
south
and
to
the
east
of
it,
which
is
to
the
right.
They
also
have
further
quarries
so
there's
not
as
if
it's
just
one
quarry.
So
if
they
have
to
have
a
water
issue,
they
would
have
a
water
issue
with
those
queries,
I
think.
L
A
E
E
Barb
Sharda
ball,
I
am
the
vice
president
of
the
Fallowfield
Community
Association,
and
our
association.
Our
community
has
two
Coreys
in
the
area,
so
as
an
association,
we're
always
watching
decisions
that
are
made
related
to
quarries
and
other
communities,
and
we
just
wanted
to
go
on
record
as
an
association.
Our
concerns
about
the
changes,
the
amendments
to
the
zoning.
E
The
encroachment
onto
the
residential
areas,
the
dust
issues
that
stuff
we
faced
in
our
community
as
well,
and
the
constant
kind
of
the
you
know
the
decisions
between
how
far
how
far
the
quarry
can
approach
encroach
and
how
far
the
community
to
change
the
life
of
the
community
at
what
point
is
the
point
where,
if
the
quarry
encroach
is
too
far,
does
it
affect
community
life?
What.
E
They
built
another
Road
directly
from
the
quarries
onto
old,
Richmond
Road,
so
that
they
could
bypass
our
community
because
I
was
an
issue
and,
along
with
the
truck
traffic,
is
the
dust
issue
and
a
lot
of
other
concerns
which
comparison
to
to
the
cement
plant
is
is
fairly
minor,
but
it
did
are
in
fact
impact
our
community.
Thank.
C
I
E
I
A
E
E
E
H
E
But
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
this
property
has
been
purchased
much
more
recently
than
a
lot
of
the
speakers
that
you
have
listened
to
her
today
and
I'm
one
of
them,
the
name
Richardson
I,
grew
up
on
this
property.
I
grew
up
on
Richardson
Side
Road
I've
had
to
swallow
my
fair
share
of
development
and
I
understand
it.
I
benefited
from
it,
but
I
think
we've
heard
an
awful
lot
opposing
this
and
I
to
oppose
okay.
J
S
S
S
We
always
knew
that
there
would
be
concerns
with
the
property,
no
matter
what
was
going
to
be
developed
and
therefore
our
intent
was
to
not
go
into
this
blindly.
We
set
forth
with
an
application.
The
application
has
been
with
the
city
for
some
time
now,
and
we
knew
that
in
doing
that
application
we
were
going
to
have
to
meet
some
some
criteria
we
were
gonna
have
to.
You
know,
look
at
all
the
issues
that
were
to
come
forward
and
one
of
the
first
things
that
we
knew.
S
We
had
to
do
was
speak
with
the
locals,
and
so
we've
we've
done
that
and
in
fact,
we've
done
that
on
two
occasions
we
we
met
in
November
of
2018,
along
with
the
city
staff
and
the
councillor
himself,
and
we
listened
to
the
concerns
and
we
took
those
away
and
we
tried
to
implement
as
much
as
we
could.
That
was
reasonable,
appropriate
into
the
application
and
and
continued
to
work
with
the
city.
S
In
that
way,
we
also
met
with
the
locals
separately
by
ourselves,
Kavanagh
only
at
the
table
with
most
of
the
people
that
are
here
tonight
or
this
morning,
and
we
listened
to
their
concerns
and
I,
and
we
really
haven't
heard
any
new
concerns.
I
haven't
come
out
of
any
of
those
meetings
that
we
had
and
in
doing
so
we
feel
that
the
application
that
we've
now
got
in
place
has
tried
to
deal
with
all
of
those
concerns.
We
we
know
that
water
is
an
issue
we've.
S
You
know
we
do
now
have
in
place
of
permit
to
take
water,
which
was
you
know,
vetted
by
not
only
the
city,
but
it
was
vetted
by
the
DME
CP
or
the
whole
provincial
regulations,
and
they
looked
at
that
and
from
their
review,
which
is
the
highest
level
they've
determined
that
you
know.
We've
met
the
criteria,
we've
heard
the
concerns
related
to
environment.
You
know
we
met
with
the
local
conservation
authority,
we've
done
our
site
yeses
and
we've
applied.
What
we
feel
is
the
necessary
and
appropriate
measures
to
our
plan
to
deal
with
that.
S
In
fact,
this
application
is
completely
outside
of
those
boundaries
and,
and
that
puts
the
maximum
distance
from
the
from
the
creek
and
therefore
you
know
preserving
it
to
the
best
we
can
and
and
of
course
the
big
concern
is
the
dust
and
the
noise
and
so
on,
and
the
technology
that
we're
implementing
is
new
technology
to
the
best
of
our
ability
where
this
plan
is
not
a
refurbished
plan,
it's
not
something
that
came
from,
and
you
know
from
the
example
I
don't
know
how
long
those
plants
were
in
place.
You
know
the
plants
are
new.
S
This
plan
is
new.
It's
new
technology,
we're
applying.
You
know
the
best
noise
and
dust
reduction.
The
in
terms
of
stockpiles
we're
confining
the
stockpiles.
We
have
spraying
systems
that
knock
down
the
dust.
The
hard
surfaces
are
not
going
to
be
gravel,
they're
going
to
be
concrete
and
asphalt,
and
so
we're
looking
at
all
the
different
components
of
the
concerns
and
the
and
and
in
fact,
and
all
the
minimum
requirements
and
we're
not
doing
the
minimum.
S
You
know,
because
of
the
the
separation
distance
between
us
and
the
existing
new
place
residents
that
will
implement
further
measures
related
to
screenings,
plantings
and
we've
asked
them
to.
You
know,
be
part
of
that
and
be
involved
in
what
it
is
we're
proposing,
so
I
think
ultimately,
cavanaugh
construction
is
is
as
being
is,
being
proactive
and
is,
it
is
not
negligent
in
in
this
application
in
terms
of
what
is
required
and
we
continue
to
want
to
work
forward
and
and
and
in
fact,
the
site
plan.
S
S
You
know,
after
you
know,
after
we
moved
forward
with,
with
this
specific
site
plan
zoning,
you
know
we
have
to
go
into
the
site
plan
application
process,
and
it
has
most
of
these.
Concerns
can
be
dealt
through
that
process
today.
We're
here
to
talk
about,
is
it
appropriate?
We
feel
it
is.
It
meets
the
intent
of
the,
in
our
opinion,
the
intent
of
the
carp
Road
corridor
zoning
and
therefore
we
recommend
that
you
get
approved.
Okay,.
A
B
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
telling
us
that
you
tried
to
mitigate
some
of
the
problems
that
you
recognize.
The
concerns
of
the
residents
I'm
just
wondering
why
Cavanaugh
decided
on
this
location.
If
you
decide
if
you
were
planning
this
kind
of
plant,
and
you
knew
that
it
was
light
industrial,
what
why
did
you
choose
this
location?
Knowing
you're
gonna
have
to
go
through
this
process?
Well,.
S
I
think
well.
The
reason
that
we've
chose
this
is
is
because
of
the
proximity
of
the
plant
to
for
a
number
of
reasons:
proximity
to
for
the
417
and
the
access
that
it
provides,
and
the
amount
of
work
that
we
have
related
to
concrete
is
west
of
where
Karp
Road
intersects
was
417.
Currently
right
now
we
ship-
you
know
several,
you
know
hundreds
of
loads
of
concrete
on
busy
days
from
Carlton
place
and
beyond,
and
that
in
itself
is.
S
It
became
an
economic
decision
on
our
part,
because,
if
most
of
our
trucking
is
is
going
from
carp
or
urban
place
past
to
the
inner
areas
of
the
city,
it
made
more
sense
that
we
reduced
that
and
cut
that
travel
time
and
cut
the
emissions
and
cut
fuel.
You
know
and
all
of
those
things
in
half
by
relocating
and
and
serving
a
better
serving
our
community.
That
way
and.
L
L
S
S
My
expertise,
I
was,
he
is
in
the
land
side
of
things
and
the
development
of
it
it
from
what
I
understand.
It's
we're.
Looking
at
the
newest
technology
that
is
available
and
whatever
that
is,
it
meets
the
MOA
standards
and
meets
you
know
and
I
guess
it
goes
above
and
beyond,
or
it's
it's
better
than
what
the
current
plants
are
operating
at.
S
Don't
think
I
would
say
that
we
anything
that
we
do
would
ever
meet
their
concerns.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
mitigate
to
the
best
of
our
ability
meeting
the
standard
that
the
Ministry
of
Environment
is
put
out
there.
So
we're
doing
that
and
we're
adding
what
we
can
through
negotiations
through.
You
know
measures
that
we
think
will
help
in
that,
whether
it's
you
know,
trees,
shrubs
I,
don't
know
you
know
we
can.
We
can
look
at
a
lot
of
different
options
and
that,
basically
will
come
out
of
the
site
plan
application
process.
L
S
O
S
S
As
we
understand
it
should
be
responding
to
that
later
this
month,
as
we
understand
it
and
a
final
application
would
be
related
to
stormwater
and
that
application
has
not
gone
in
yet
it's
part
of
the
process
as
we
move
along
a
little
bit
further
and
we
get
more
detailed,
detailed,
you
know,
design,
completed
and
so
on.
Okay,
next.
O
S
O
Guess
two
parts:
can
you
very
briefly
describe
what
concrete
batching
actually
entails
and
because
I
don't
know
and
we've
seen
a
lot
of
photos
presented
by
the
delegations
of
what
they
say
are
similar
sites
in
Ontario
and
in
other
places,
how
accurate
or
how
close
will
this
facility
would
be
to
what
we've
seen
from
some
of
the
delegations?
Well.
S
O
J
In
general
terms,
there's
stockpiles
of
sand
and
stone
on
the
site
itself
through
the
use
of
a
front-end
loader.
It's
loaded
into
a
loading
hopper
which
is
put
into
the
plants
and
with
the
addition
of
water
and
admixture
chemicals.
It
has
gone
through
another
loading
belt
into
the
truck
itself
and
then
all
mixed
within
the
truck.
O
J
A
L
J
J
Is
equipped
with
latest
technology
of
dust
collectors
on
the
silos
itself,
which
stores
of
cement
and
we've
also
gone
above
and
beyond
the
requirements
of
having
a
loading
bay
dust
collector.
So
essentially,
it's
a
giant
vacuum
within
the
clothes
loading
area
which
sucks
up
any
residual
cement
during
the
loading
process.
It's
cycled
back
into
the
silo,
so
yeah.
A
A
A
I
Question
about
the
community
design
plan,
there's
been
some
talk
about
the
not
adhering
to
the
Official
Plan,
why
that
was
the
case,
and
this
would
be
an
official
plan
amendments
and
a
zoning
bylaw
mm.
But
it's
just
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment.
So
can
you
explain
that
about
how
this
fits
in
with
the
Official
Plan?
How
the
community
design
plan
fits
into
the
Official
Plan.
B
Yep
yes
through
the
chair,
and
so
the
designation
in
the
Official
Plan
is
Rural
Employment
Area
and
in
that
designation
does
state
that
use
is
permitted
in
this
area,
our
new
heavy
and
light
industrial
uses
such
as
steel
and
concrete
fabrication.
We
do
then
also
have
our
community
design
plan,
which
are
guidelines
that
we
look
at,
do
not
officially
form
part
of
the
Official
Plan.
However,
there
is
a
section,
then
there
that
says
we
must
look
at
the
CDP.
The
CDP
does
look,
does
identify
this
portion
as
light
industrial.
B
When
you
look
at
similar
permitted
uses
on
the
property,
there
are
a
number
that
are
similar
in
intensity
to
the
use
that's
being
proposed,
so
there
are
uses
that
include
heavy
industrial
vehicle
sales,
rental
and
servicing
truck
transport
terminals,
warehouses
and
waste
processing
and
transfer
facilities.
So
looking
at
the
permitted
uses,
this
does
act
as
a
transition,
because
we
are
assume
we
are
adding
the
one
use
and
transitioning
from
the
heavy
on
the
south
side
of
Richardson
Side
Road.
B
I
E
I
T
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
the
residents
have
made
comments
with
respect
to
this
application.
It's
my
understanding
from
the
proponent
that
they
have
not
yet
submitted
their
stormwater
component,
which
would
normally
occur
in
and
around
the
time
of
site
plan,
at
which
time
the
municipality
will
also
have
its
own
consultation
process
through
that
planning
application.
O
Thank
you,
I
wanted
to
thank
the
delegations
for
the
comments
today
and
I
know.
You've,
probably
all
spent
time
off
of
work
or
off
of
other
commitments
and
I'm
very
sympathetic
to
the
concerns
about
environment,
but
many
of
those,
in
fact,
perhaps
everything
that
we
heard
is
really
the
provincial
approval
process
and
I
hope
as
much
as
you've
shared
those
concerns
with
us
today
that
you're
also
sharing
them
with
the
appropriate
provincial
body.
O
Usually,
there
is
a
public
opportunity
to
comment
as
part
of
that
process
and
they
do
listen
and
take
those
into
account
wanted
to
continue
in
the
report
said.
The
Mississippi
Valley
Conservation
Authority
generally
did
not
object
to
this
proposal.
Can
you
provide
some
more
detail?
What
does
generally
not
abject
mean?
Yes,.
B
Through
the
chair,
the
conservation
authority
has
been
reviewing
both
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
the
site
plan
application
concurrently.
There
are
still
some
outstanding
questions
and
comments
from
the
conservation
authority
that
they
would
like
to
have
addressed,
but
they
have
said
they
have
said
they
would
have
liked
both
applications
to
continue
concurrently.
But
if
we
were
to
move
ahead
with
the
zoning
at
this
point,
they
are
generally
satisfied
enough
to
approve
for
the
zoning,
whereas
they'd
still
like
to
have
their
comments
address
through
the
site
plan
application.
Okay,.
O
And
then
I
think
my
last
question
is
this
seems
to
be
a
borderline
class
two
or
class
three,
and
there
are
variables,
there's
also
a
reference,
so
this
would
be
similar
intrusion
to
a
nearby
tomlinson
waste
transfer.
So
in
that
context,
can
you
provide
some
clarity
as
to
what
the
variables
were
and
how
your
decision
was
made
to
classify
this
as
class
2
versus
class
3?
Yes,.
B
Through
the
chair,
there
are
a
number
of
variables
that
are
considered
in
a
d6
compatibility
between
industrial
facilities
document
prepared
by
the
ministry.
If
you'd
like
me
to
list
all
of
them,
I
could,
however,
it
is.
There
is
a
lengthy
variable
list
and
I
would
note.
This
I
did
speak
to
staff
at
the
Emmy
CP
regarding
these
guidelines,
and
these
are
guidelines
to
help
local
planning
authorities
to
make
a
decision
on
what
that
classification
is
in
order
to
review
those
setback
and
influence
areas
that
are
noted
in
this
by
Allah.
B
A
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
my
resident
money.
My
neighbors,
who
made
the
trip
today
here
to
present
to
our
committee,
I,
see
her
from
the
Vice
chairs
question.
Today
we
are
dealing
with
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
really
most
of
the
question
we
heard
is
concerned
and
they're
valid
concern,
but
my
question
to
our
legal
staff.
T
A
So
folks
we
have
heard
today
the
art
concern
from
nearby
a
resident
about
the
traffic
increase
on
carp.
Road
I
would
like
to
us
by
way
of
motion
I'm
going
to
transfer
the
chair
to
the
vice-chair
when
I
introduce
my
motion
to
have
a
hold
in
some
holding
provision,
basically
placed
on
such
an
application.
A
So
I'm
looking
for
such
a
time
that
the
applicant
complete
a
transportation
impact
assessment
and
review
the
finding
of
the
satisfactory
of
services
can
also
let
me
and
asked
the
same
question.
We
don't
know
how
much
impact
of
traffic
we
know
the
property
can
have
a
warehouse
and
warehouse
can
have
just
as
many
trucks.
A
We
need
to
understand
this
so
I'm,
going
to
ask
the
vice
chair
to
take
that
chair,
I'd
like
to
introduce
the
motion
and
the
motion
read
article
3
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
25
96,
Karp
Road,
as
in
a
holding
provision
until
a
transportation
impact
assessment
has
completed,
move
I
myself
would
report.
The
report
recommended
a
zoning
change
to
their
land,
no.1
municipal
II
as
a
25,
96
Karp
road
and
where
the
Huntley,
Community,
Association
and
property
owners
in
the
area
have
expressed
concern
with
respect
to
traffic
generated
by
the
proposed
concrete
patching
plan.
A
Might
only
be
removed
at
such
a
time
what
is
demonstrated
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
of
planet,
infrastructure
and
economic
development
that
I
err,
noise
and
dust
environmental
compliance
approval
is
the
vice-chair
talk
about
approving,
obtain
from
the
Ministry
of
Environment
conservation
and
parks
and
to
study,
as
per
city
transportation,
impact
assessment
guideline.
Considering
traffic
impact
of
the
proposed
concrete
plan,
a
submitted
city
staff,
we
had
further
resolve
that
there
is
no
further
notice
pursuant
to
subsection
34:17
of
the
Planning
Act.
So
this
is
the
folks.
A
This
is
that
something
this
committee
can
do
can
can
put
a
provision
holding
to
satisfy
with
our
staff
with
the
traffic
study
but
and
the
other
stuff.
The
vice-chair
talked
about,
obviously
in
the
hand
of
the
Ministry
of
Environment,
and
we
hope
our
staff
will
keep
an
eye
on
this.
So
this
motion
boom
myself.
Mr.
vice
chair.
O
T
Staff
has
reviewed
it,
it
is
an
acceptable
motion
and
just
for
clarity
for
the
committee.
This
means
that
even
if
the
environmental
approvals
are
granted,
the
holding
provision
will
not
come
off
and
development
cannot
occur
until
the
traffic
impact
assessment
has
been
provided
and
reviewed
by
the
city.
Thank.
A
Recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw,
2
0,
0,
8,
2,
5
0
for
part
of
25
96
car
pro
to
permit
a
concrete
patching
plan
with
an
increased
maximum
height
of
25
meter
as
permitted
use
on
subject
property
and
and
to
the
rezoning,
a
portion
of
Huntley
Creek
mainlander
belt
as
open
space
with
allowance
for
continued
use
of
an
existing
building
as
an
office
as
detailing
document
to
an
item
to
that
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
approved
that
consultation
to
date
section.
So
that's
one
on
the
front
of
us
on
the
item.