►
From YouTube: Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee – July 3, 2014
Description
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee – July 3, 2014 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
C
B
B
This
is
a
public
meeting
needing
to
consider
the
proposed
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
2
to
12
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
listed
above.
Only
those
who
make
all
submissions
today
are
written.
Submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
interior
municipal
board.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
B
So
with
that
we'll
go
through
the
agenda.
The
first
item
is
the
ghazal
municipal
drain
modifications
and
my
understanding
that
that
is
going
to
be
withdrawn
from
today's
agenda.
Is
that
correct,
mr.
Ryan?
Okay?
So
on
that
item,
it's
recommended
to
be
withdrawn.
Is
that
good
item
number
two,
the
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw
2008
250
on
the
besson
bylaw
amendments?
The
motion
is
that
their
cultural
affairs
committee
recommend
council
approve
amendments
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
250,
as
shown
in
document
1
and
detailed
in
documents
2
&
3.
B
C
This
is
just
in
relation
to
an
application
to
the
location
in
Richmond
6335,
1650,
Pro
Street,
based
on
a
be
decision
that
was
come
to
you
month
ago.
So
therefore
be
resolved.
The
document
to
zoning
details
to
be
considered
by
both
planning,
I
cultural
and
where
all
affairs
report
SES
2014
PA
PGM
daily,
be
amended
by
adding
an
additional
item
being
an
amendment
two
exceptions:
seven,
seventy
eight,
seventy,
seventy
seven.
Seventy
nine
and
seven
eighty
are
to
exempt
the
lands.
C
B
D
Mr.
chair
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
on
this
I'm
nervous
motion
as
one
of
the
pieces
of
property
in
steps
well
at
six
to
seven
nine
Fernbank
was
supposed
to
be
included
in
this
motion
was
withdrawn
by
staff
because
of
a
pending
or
and
be
appeal
hearing
on
that
piece
of
property.
So
I
just
want
to
make
that
as
a
public
statement.
So
people
know
what's
happened
with
that
particular
piece.
Okay,.
C
I
just
wanted
to
commend
Carol
Brady,
who
was
the
staff
member
involved
in
this.
There
was
a
couple
items
here
that
she
had
worked
on
for
quite
a
while,
but
one
of
them
in
particular,
was
a
situation
where
undersized
laughts,
when
undersized
lofts
would
would
come
forward
and
see
tomorrow,
for
approving
to
build
on
they'd
have
to
get
a
minor
variants.
My
various
cost
about
seventeen
eight
hundred
dollars
every
single
time.
C
When
these
underside
Lots
come
forward,
there
wasn't
I
enough
to
go
to
a
community
adjustments,
beta
$700
and
then
get
approval
day
was
approved
every
single
time.
So
what
we've
done
through
this?
This
amendments
is
remove
that
requirement.
So
it's
going
to
see
a
number
of
laying
over
some
that
bit
of
money
because
it
usually
just
a
money
drive
at
the
end
because
they
kept
don't
get
informed
every
single
time.
So
I
appreciate
Carol
your
work
on
that
and
it's
it's
a
good
move
forward
for
Thank.
B
You
counselor,
Moffat
and
Carroll
is
a
commendable
person.
So
thank
you
for
that
item.
Number
three:
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
1575
diamond
view
rage
that
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
Council
approved
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
250
for
1575
Diamond
View
Road
to
permit
a
heavy
equipment
and
vehicle
sales,
rental
and
servicing
facility
is
detailed
in
document
2.
B
So
on
that
item,
is
that
carried?
Thank
you.
I
am
here
for
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
29:38
a
good
stone
made
that
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
design
bylaw,
2008
2008,
254,
2938,
Goods,
Town
Road,
to
change
the
zoning
of
a
severed
land
to
prohibit
future
residential
uses
and
to
change
the
zoning
of
the
retain
land
to
recognize
the
reduced
lot
size,
as
song
shown
a
document
1
and
detailed
in
document
2.
Is
that
carried
a
bylaw
amendment
2075
trim
Road?
B
The
motion
is
that
the
agriculture
may
Affairs
Committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
2008
254
2075
tree
made
to
them
in
an
office
park
and
recreational
and
athletic
facility
limited
to
indoor
sports
field
as
detailed
in
document
2.
Now
we
have
a
speaker
who
is
okay
with
that
item
and
that
speaker
is
Greg
Greg.
Are
you
happy
if
it
passes?
Okay?
So,
on
that
item
5
carried?
B
Thank
you
item
number
6,
some
violin,
amen,
20,
23:49,
24,
37
calculate
and
512
William,
Mooney
Road.
We
have
six
speakers
on
that.
So
we'll
hold.
That
item
item
number
seven,
zoning
bylaw
amendments
150
and
170,
the
sellers
Berry
Street.
The
motion
is
the
Dead
Cultural
Affairs
Committee
recommend
council
through
an
amendment
to
zone
by
2008
2008
250
for
150
and
170
Salisbury
Street
to
commit
15,
townhouse
dwellings.
Dwelling
units
as
detailed
in
document
2,
is
that
carried
I
am
number
8
by
our
amendment.
B
55
74,
Roth
Dale,
Road,
that
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
recommend
console
approve
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
2008
to
54
55,
74
Rockdale
road
to
permit
a
two-story
apartment
building.
As
detailed
in
document
1.
We
have
one
speaker
listed
on
a
rollin
Andre.
Are
you
happy
if
we
approve
this
okay
on
this
item?
Is
it
killed.
E
B
Zoning,
the
normally
report
to
update
the
flood
plain
mapping
in
the
armed,
eg,
Avenue
and
Baskin
beach
areas
motion
is
that
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
Council
approved
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
2008
250
to
update
the
flood
plain
mapping
in
the
Armitage
Avenue
and
Baskins
Beach
area.
As
detailed
in
document
1,
and
a
shounen
document
is
that
carried
carry.
F
Mr.
Chabot,
if
I
couldn't
take
a
moment
to
say
thanks
to
all
the
agency
and
staff
working
on
this
far
that's
a
long
time.
If
you
look,
it's
been
on
since
quite
some
times,
but
anyway,
it
took
us
long
enough
to
get
where
we
are
today
and
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
all
the
staff
and
the
agencies
involved,
Mississippi,
Valley
and
and
reader
Valley
Conservation
as
well.
Thank
you
mr.
chair
Thank,.
B
You
counselor
deputy
mayor
all
century
item
in
the
ten
new
zoning
bylaw
amendment
75
79
Spring
Hill
roads
in
beautiful,
downtown
Oscar
Ward,
that
agricultural
oil
phase
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
8-2,
54,
75,
79,
Spring,
Hill
Road
to
prohibit
future
residential
uses
as
detailed
and
document
2
is
that
carried
item
number
11,
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment,
seven,
zero,
eight
six.
Seventy
one
hundred
reader
Valley
Drive
that
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw,
2008
250,
four:
seven:
zero,
eight
six.
B
B
Okay
item
in
the
13
we
have
the
installation
on
use
of
a
boat
launch
on
a
property
known
as
part
lot.
A
concession
Long
Island
is
that
the
part
to
come
some
offer
that
used
to
belong
to
township
of
Osgood
years
ago.
There
was
a
section
that
they
stole
from
us.
Not
this
one.
The
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
that
council
approved
the
event.
Installation
and
use
of
a
boat
launch
should
be
permitted
on
the
property
known
as
part
lot.
B
Eight
concession,
Long
Island,
pin
number
0
4
5
8,
9,
0,
8,
6,
5
geographic
township
of
Gloucester
City
of
Ottawa
is
that
item
carried
with
the
indulgence
of
the
members
of
committee.
There
is
more
than
14
on
your
agenda,
but
there
is
an
item
that
I
would
ask
to
bring
forward
now
if
I
could
or
we
can
discuss
it
now
before
we
go
back
to
the
held
item.
B
B
This
I
think
you
have
the
wish
in
front
of
you
I'm,
just
gonna
read
it.
This
has
issue
has
come
up
in
the
last
two
or
three
months
and
I've
been
working
with
councilor
deputy
mayor
al
Shan
Tara's
office
on
this
item,
who
has
a
building
permit
is
required
for
the
legalization
of
gray
of
a
garage
at
5207,
Bank
Street,
which
is
understood
to
have
been
constructed
in
the
1990s
and
where
it,
where
is
where,
as
it
is
desirable
for
this
legislation
to
be
resolved
as
soon
as
possible,
therefore
be
resolved.
B
That
the
following
item
be
added
to
the
agenda
of
the
July
3rd
2014
meeting
of
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
pursued
Toula
by
law
procedure.
Bylaw,
subsection,
84
3,
when
has
a
grayish,
has
been
present
on
the
site
since
the
1990s
and
whereas
the
applicant
applicable
municipal
development
charges
in
force
today
are
thirty,
four
thousand
four
hundred
and
fifty
four
dollars.
B
Seventy
six
cents
and
the
municipal
development
charges
enforce
in
1999,
where
four
thousand
four
hundred
and
fifty
one
dollars
and
thirty
seven
cents,
whereas
it
is
deemed
appropriate
that
the
nineteen
ninety
nine
charges
be
confirmed.
Does
the
amount
to
be
collected
therefore
resolved
that
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommended
counsel
about
to
development
charges
applicable
to
the
garage
at
5207?
B
He
bought
the
property
applied
to
to
do
some
renovations
to
the
building
and
was
found
out
that
the
there
never
was
a
building
permit
issued
photos,
but
he
in
the
early
1990s
from
the
former
township
of
Gloucester.
So
he
came
to
me
to
discuss
this
because
and
he's
prepared
to
update
everything,
as
is
required
by
the
building
department,
but
he
felt
it
was
unfair.
B
Since
the
building
is
there
and
he's
remodeling
it,
but
he
would
be
charged
the
development
charges
as
of
this
year,
so
I
expect
to
city
staff,
and
they
prepared
this
motion
for
me
for
consideration
today
and
I.
Just
I
think
it's
a
fair
compromise,
giving
the
facts
that
are
listed
there,
so
I'm
moving
this
motion
and
asking
for
your
support
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
prepared
to
take
them
at
this
time.
G
F
D
B
I
could
do
mr.
vice
chair
and
answer
your
question.
The
applicant,
the
applicator
is
very
anxious
to
move
this
forward,
so
I
think
I.
Think
then
he's
explained
that
to
myself
and
mr.
mark
so
I
think
the
the
deadline
is
appropriate
and
he
sees
as
soon
as
it's
approved
he's
going
to
be
moving
forward.
B
B
B
The
motion
is
before
us
that
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
Council
approved
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
best
to
fifty
four
two,
three,
four:
nine
through
two
four
three
seven
cup
Road
and
five
twelve
amet
road
to
commit
the
expansion
of
a
solid
waste
disposable
disposal
facility,
subject
to
a
holding
provision,
an
increased
setback,
as
shown
in
document
1
and
as
detailed
in
document
2.
So
that's
the
motion
that
is
before
us
I
will
ask
mr.
H
Mr.
chair
I'm
not
sure
that
miss
MacWilliams
needs
any
introduction,
she's
our
senior
planner
in
the
rural
area
and
has
been
in
front
of
you
a
number
of
times
as
I
know,
but
for
the
members
of
the
audience
shel
McWilliams
is
the
file
lead
on
this
application
and
has
been
carrying
it
forward
through
its
process
and
will
be
providing
you
with
the
presentation
to
give
you
the
additional
background.
In
addition
to
what's
in
the
staff
report,.
E
Good
afternoon,
this
is
a
zone
application
for
a
series
of
properties
on
carp,
Road
and
a
property
on
don't
go
through
the
list
as
councillor
Thompson
has
already
gone
through
it.
So
the
staff
recommendation
is
to
rezone
all
of
the
properties
to
a
rural,
heavy
industrial
exception
zone
with
a
holding
provision
on
it
and
that
exception
zone
will
add
a
solid
waste
disposal
facility
to
the
world
or
the
rural
heavy
industrial
zone,
and
the
additional
exceptions
relate
to
increase
yard
setbacks
on
the
perimeter.
E
Property
are
the
properties
or
the
site
itself
and
to
make
sure
that
those
setback
areas
are
soft,
landscaped,
essentially
vegetated,
and
that
no
other
uses
would
be
permitted
within
that,
then
the
holding
zone
would
be
lifted
upon
completion
of
site
plan
control.
So
that's
what
the
recommendation
from
staff
is
about
with
respect
to
the
the
site
itself.
E
This
is
the
417
where
it
bends
this
split
down:
highway,
7,
carp,
Road,
Richardson,
side,
road,
William,
Mooney,
wrote
and
the
existing
landfill
facility
is
located
here
and
the
subject
site.
The
subject
to
this
rezoning
is
immediately
to
the
well
north.
If
you
consider
cart,
Road
running
north-south
Statesville
is
in
this
vicinity.
Kannada
is
to
the
rest
or
sorry
to
the
east.
There's
an
existing
quarry
in
this
location.
E
E
The
symbol
for
the
solid
waste
disposal
facility
is
the
black
dot
and
that
represents
the
general
location
of
existing
solid
waste
disposal
facilities.
The
gray
is
the
quarry
lands
and
the
sort
of
the
lighter,
yellow
color.
It
appears
on
the
screen
here,
our
general
rural
lands
and
again
the
urban
boundary,
is
located
in
this
area.
E
So
the
Official
Plan
designation,
the
carpod
corridor.
Will
employment
area
refers
back
to
the
carp,
Road
community
design
plan
for
guidance
in
terms
of
the
specific
zones
to
be
contemplated,
and
it
does
contemplate
that
larger
land
based
industrial
uses
are
identified
for
that
area?
The
solid
waste
disposal
symbol
it
does
contemplate
in
within
the
Official
Plan.
It
does
contemplate
that
with
an
approved
ei
expansion
is
possible,
but
it
does
require
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment.
E
E
This
is
from
the
carpod
corridor
plan
and
again
the
subject
site
is
here.
Carpet
is
running
in
this
direction
and
the
four
417
is
through
here.
So
this
is
the
existing
facility.
This
is
the
proposed
expansion
area,
which
is
in
the
car
Pro
corridor
plan
identified
for
heavy
industrial
area
in
the
darker
color
and
in
the
lighter
blue
for
a
light
industrial
area,
because
the
cop
Road
corridor
is
not
a
secondary
plan
and
the
Official
Plan
no
site-specific
and
daily
plan
amendment
would
be
required
for
the
rezoning
to
be
considered.
E
So,
with
respect
to
the
zones
that
we're
looking
at
the
existing
zones
are
the
the
beige
color
is
the
existing
mineral
extraction
zones.
Those
are
sand
and
gravel
pits
that
whose
license
have
been
released
so
they're
abandoned,
have
been,
to
a
certain
extent,
reclaimed
or
restored,
and
under
the
Official
Plan
Norment
is
needed
to
read
Ezek
NATO's
so
where
it
showed
in
the
Official,
Plan
is
being
mineral
or
pizza
or
sand
and
gravel
resource.
There's
no
need
for
an
official
plan
amendment
to
amend
it,
amend
the
zoning
or
not
the
lighter
blue
areas.
E
E
So,
with
respect
to
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
itself,
I've
gone
through
the
existing
zones
and
the
proposed
own
would
see
the
addition
of
the
solid
waste
disposal
facility
into
the
general
or
into
the
world
heavy
industrial
exception
zone,
and
it
would
also
have
a
holding
provision
with
respect
to
the
site
plan
control
approval.
The
yard
setbacks
that
we're
looking
at
would
not
allow
any
outdoor
storage
within
them
and
would
all
be
required
to
have
soft
landscaping,
with
an
exception
for
accesses
through
it
and
for
the
storm
pond
that
are
being
proposed
in
it.
E
So
this
is
the
concept
plan
that
was
filed
with
the
zoning
application.
Again,
it's
just
a
concept
plan.
The
applicant
still
has
to
go
through
site
plan
control
approval
and,
to
that
end
we
were
tailoring
the
zoning,
to
a
certain
extent,
to
reflect
what
the
concept
plan
was
showing
and
in
discussions
with
the
applicant,
they
had
no
particular
issues
with
that.
So
what
they
are
showing
here
is
again
the
417
Road
along
the
bottom,
the
proposed
new
entrance,
the
storm
facilities
at
the
front,
existing
racing
kitchen
facility
and
the
the
landfill
site
itself.
E
Apologize
for
the
quality
of
this
something
happened
to
translation
into
the
PowerPoint
present
presentation.
The
traffic
study
filed
with
the
application
does
show
a
new
proposed
entrance
and
they
they
are
proposing
and
turn
lanes.
Southbound
left
turn
and
northbound
left
turn
lanes,
they're
also
proposing
paved
shoulders.
The
details
of
that
will
have
to
be
dealt
with
through
a
roadway
modification
and
that
will
be
a
requirement
of
submission
at
the
site
plan
and
application
stage.
At
this
point,
staff
have
reviewed
their
traffic
study
and
have
no
specific
concerns
with
it.
E
Those
details
that
will
need
to
be
addressed
through
the
roadway
modification
at
the
time
of
site
plan
approval.
We
will
be
expecting
the
application
for
Road
modification
to
be
80%
design,
complete
so
we'll
know
if
they're
in
fairly
in
it
fair
bit
of
detail.
What
exactly
will
be
proposed
for
that
particular
entrance.
E
Those
matters
relate
to
odor
the
property
value
plan
for
properties
within
five
kilometers,
the
service
area
that
the
facility
will
be
drawing
from
and
often
it's
called
the
good
neighbor
area
or
service
area,
so
that
it's
only
the
immediate
neighbors
that
we
prefer
to
have
the
the
waste
coming
from
to
make
sure
that
the
diversion
priority
for
diversion
from
landfill
occurs.
And
then.
Finally,
there
was
a
public
liaison
committee
which
I
believe
is
now
up
and
running
with
respect
to
those
first,
four
matters.
E
Our
site
plan
control
will
deal
with
some
matters,
but
not
those
specific
ones,
and
then
there
will
be
also
the
the
host
agreement
or
third
party
agreement
that
the
applicant
I
believe
has
has
agreed
to
work
on,
and
the
public
liaison
committee
will
be
working
with
the
applicant
with
the
public
and
with
the
city
in
terms
of
providing
information
about
moving
forward
with
the
host
agreement.
That's
certainly
my
understanding
I'm
not
specifically
involved
in
that
process,
but
my
understanding
is
that
that
work
has
started.
E
They
have
conceptually
proposed
mitigation
and
compensation
and
will
be
looking
for
fine-tuning
that
and
having
details
of
for
that
as
part
of
the
site
plan
control
process.
In
addition,
with
respect
to
some
of
the
other
site
environmental
issues,
we
will
be
also
looking
at
site
plan
control
for
the
wetland
compensation
and
sorry
I.
Just
can't
remember
what
the
other
thing
is
again
with
site
plan
control.
There
will
be
some
additional
details,
we'll
be
looking
for
with
respect
to
ground
and
surface
water.
E
These
are
matters
for
the
nursery
of
environment,
typically
as
with
noise
and
odor
impacts.
So
what
we
will
be
primarily
focusing
on
is
the
site
servicing.
That's
the
last
point
on
the
side,
with
respect
to
traffic
I've
already
spoken
about
the
requirement
for
the
roadway
modifications
that
will
be
required
on
car
Road
and
at
the
new
entrance,
and
those
will
be
also
part
of
the
submission
for
site
plan
approval,
the
other
matter
that
staff
will
be
looking
for
in
terms
of
site
plan.
E
Just
quickly,
in
summary,
that
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
is
primarily
looking
at
land
use,
the
details
of
the
zoning
bylaw
with
respect
to
the
holding
and
the
exception
zones
for
the
increased
setbacks
are
in
in
a
way
looking
to
mitigate
and
address
some
of
the
concerns
that
still
have
to
be
dealt
with
as
part
of
site
plan
control
approval.
So
until
the
site
plan
is
approved,
we
won't
be
in
a
position
to
come
back
to
Council
to
look
to
lifting
the
holding
zone
as
part
of
the
process
as
I
understand
it.
E
The
environmental
compliance
process
will
be
well
underway
before
the
site
plan
Control
moves
forward,
and
so
we'll
have
a
much
better
understanding
of
the
details
of
the
site
before
we
go
to
lift
the
holding.
If
the
proposed
zoning
bylaw
with
the
holding
in
place
does
address
the
Official
Plan
and
does
comply
with
the
Official
Plan
and
staff,
therefore
recommend
that
that
you
approve
the
zoning.
Thank
you.
B
Michelle
and
it
was
an
excellent
presentation
and
it
shows
the
outstanding
results
of
the
outstanding
training
that
you
received
in
the
former
times
of
the
basket
just
website
just
want
to
show
if
you
could
wouldn't
mind,
putting
up
slide.
Ten
I
think
that
would
be
nice
to
have
when
we
have
this,
because,
let's
just
before
we
go
to
the
speaker's
council,
debonair
owl
century
had
a
couple
of
quest
for
questions
that
he
would
like
to
ask
so
councillor
Devin
Mayer.
Thank.
F
F
F
Environmental
compliance
comes
first
or
the.
How
long
can
you,
because,
as
of
today,
I
believe
or
yesterday,
120
days,
the
company
has
applied
for
zoning
changes
will
elapse?
Oh
there's,
therefore,
you're
recommending
approval
of
the
zoning
with
a
condition
of
hole.
Then,
how
long
can
you
put
the
holdin
on
and
how
much
power
that
hole
then
will
have
for
us
to
continue
negotiating
with
the
company.
E
F
E
F
H
Mr.
chair,
if
I
could
add
to
that,
the
holding
provision
is
that
can
actually
be
a
very
functional
tool
and
and
I
believe
staff
believe
that
it
is,
in
this
case,
a
functional
tool
to
help
bring
us
to
a
point
where
the
city's
satisfied
that
the
site
plan,
Road
modifications
and
other
required
agreements
meet
our
satisfaction.
The
benefit
of
the
holding
provision
is,
as
the
MS
McWilliams
has
said,
is
that
it
can
stay
on
indefinitely
and
until
that
holding
provision
is
lifted.
H
F
Chair,
if
I
can
ask
legal
one,
one
question
and
I'm
going
to
be
specific
to
option
on
the
front
of
us
today.
One
of
them
is
to
approve
the
zoning
with
the
Holden.
Can
you
tell
us
if
we
decide
not
to
so
that
we
lose
the
power
of
negotiation
and
the
proponent
can
go
automatically
to
OMB,
because
we
had
a
lapped
120
days
can
explain
to
me
what's
the
option
here
we
have
in
front
first.
I
Mr.
chair,
with
respect
to
to
understanding
the
question
the
the
lapsing
of
the
120
days
aside,
the
approval
of
our
holding
provision
is,
as
staff
has
suggested.
It
is
a
very
functional
tool
to
ensure
that
there
is
some
measure
of
forward
progress
with
the
proponent
on
their
development
application,
which
is
what
I
believe
the
ministry
is
looking
for,
but
at
the
same
time
as
an
effective
control
from
a
municipal
perspective
under
the
Planning
Act.
I
I
D
Thank
You
mr.
chair
just
a
couple
of
questions
on
the
presentation
itself
and
those
later
questions
with
staff,
miss
MacWilliams.
If
he
can
go
to
your
slide
number
two
or
sorry
for
it
mentions.
Subject
lands
solid
waste
disposal
facility
identified
there,
the
black
dot.
What
is
the
second
black
dot?
That's
on
the
far
left
hand
side
of
the
slide
under
number
14.
What
does
that
represent.
B
D
E
E
It
does
allow
for
that.
Entire
range
of
possibilities
within
it,
so
with
respect
to
the
zoning,
it's
not
eliminating
diversion
as
a
priority,
but
with
with
respect
to
their
concept
that
they
provided
with
the
zoning
they
other
than
the
public
facility
drop-off
facility.
At
the
front
of
the
car
broadside
of
their
site.
There
was
not
an
abundance
of
new
proposed
facilities
that
would
indicate
that
there
was
a
great
deal
of
diversion
happening
on
the
site.
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that
gets
to
your
question
or
not
sorry,
yeah.
E
And
that's
what
we're
hoping
to
see
with
the
site
plan
application
is
details
on
what
that
public
drop-off
facility
is
I
know.
There's
been
mention
of
some
other
proposals
that
waste
management
is
looking
for
on
the
site
and
we're
hoping
to
see
those
as
part
of
the
site
plan,
control
application
as
well.
Thank.
D
B
G
G
H
Mr.
chair,
that's
direction
that
we
can
take
and
bring
forward.
I'm
I
assume
that
there
will
be
a
delegation
from
waste
management
speaking
today,
and
it
may
be
something
you
may
wish
to
ask
them
directly,
but
from
a
staff
perspective,
that's
certainly
something
we
can
take
forward
as
direction
as
we
enter
into
discussions
with
respect
to
site
plan
and
the
host
agreement.
Whether.
G
B
B
B
J
J
First
of
all,
there
is
no
garbage
crisis.
We've
been
living
without
the
old
Karp
landfill
since
2011
and
the
earth
hasn't
to
imploded
and
the
sky
hasn't
fallen.
Secondly,
this
new
landfill
is
not
for
Ottawa
garbage
it's
for
garbage
from
all
of
Ontario,
whereas
most
words
most
of
that
garbage
come
from.
It
comes
from
southern
Ontario
in
the
GTA
area
area,
so
we
will
get
there
garbage.
J
The
other
thing
that
I
want
to
just
briefly
talk
about
is
what
makes
good
decisions
versus
bad
decisions.
I
won't
go
over
this
in
detail
with
you,
but
I
fear
we're
at
risk
of
making
a
very
bad
decision
today.
So
then
that
leads
to
me
to
exactly
what
are
we
deciding
on
today?
Well,
this
is,
it
picture,
says
a
thousand
words.
That's
what
we'll
be
voting
on.
J
When
visitors
and
shoppers
at
the
Tanja's
and
Bosco
outlet
store
and
mall
spend
a
day
there
and
they
catch
a
whiff
of
landfill
older
and
go
what's
that,
and
then
they
learn
that
it's
from
the
landfill
will
they
come
back
when
he'll
notice,
Jackson
trails
echo
it's
the
madami
Holmes
development,
Arcadia
catalyst
extraction,
shrimp
I
said
that
can't
enjoy
their
backyards
because
of
a
giant
landfill,
that's
in
their
neighborhood.
That
stinks.
J
That's
what
we've
decided
today
and
when
the
traffic
along
carp
Road
is
too
dangerous
because
of
the
additional
100
trucks
an
hour
that
this
project
will
put
on
the
road.
That
is
what
we're
looking
at
approving
today
and,
most
importantly,
when
more
of
the
local
aquifer
is
contaminated
or
if
other
source
drinking
water
source
wells
are
contaminated
by
this
landfill.
That
is
what
we're
contaminated
to
that's.
What
we're
deciding
on
today.
J
B
B
K
Issue
so
it's
hard
anyway
I.
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
speak
on
on
the
issue
of
the
version
which
came
up
the
question.
An
example
of
the
Corporations
commitment
to
diversion
is
well
illustrated
by
their
existing
transfer
of
processing
station.
They
got
their
environmental
compliance
based
on
a
worst
case
scenario
of
nine
percent
recovery
and
a
best-case
scenario
of
twenty
percent
recovery.
The
last
two
years
they've
had
two
and
three
percent
recovery.
So
there's
definitely
not
a
real
commitment
to
to
diversion.
K
Is
there's
only
application
compliant
with
the
provincial
act
and
the
planning
official
plan
and
the
bylaws,
the
Planning
Act
in
the
city,
application
files
required
proscribed
information
documents
to
be
provided
with
the
application
rezoning?
The
proscribed
information
is
defined
in
pre
consultation
with
the
city,
and
of
that
there
are
three
mandatory
documents
defined
by
the
city,
and
the
survey
plan
is
one
of
them.
K
They're
also
required
to
supply
all
of
the
supporting
document
and
information
in
a
PDF
form
which
can
be
made
public.
There
is
a
requirement
in
the
Planning
Act
that
armatures
provided
the
two
city
are
to
be
made
public
and
to
that
end
the
city
has
the
application
Department
application
website,
which
is
available
for
the
public.
The
staff
have
confirmed
that
there
are
five
survey
plans
that
are
required
for
designated
properties
that
only
one
of
them
was
filed
with
the
application
and
staff
also
confirmed
that
all
five
should
have
been
filed
with
the
application.
K
K
At
the
beginning,
the
site
site
address
is
in
the
primary
way
that
the
facility
and
the
public
referred
to
location
of
properties
and
therefore,
and
to
that
end,
the
zoning
application
zoning
amendment
application
recognizes
that
and
it's
the
first
field
to
be
filled
in
in
the
application
and
it's
a
mandatory
field.
Unfortunately,
at
the
beginning,
addresses
were
wrong
on
the
planning
rationale:
they're
wrong
on
the
road
signs.
They
were
wrong
in
the
public
notification
and
they
were
wrong
on
the
website
itself.
K
I
made
comment
at
the
open
houses
and
I
would
expect
that
they
would
have
been
corrected,
but,
as
of
this
state,
they're
still
wrong
on
the
revised
planning
rationale:
the
roadside
signs,
the
development
application
website
and
the
overview
datasheet,
which
is
provided
by
the
city
there's,
and
that
it
was
suggested
that
there
are
other
forms
of
defining
the
patient's,
such
as
the
location
map
in
the
application.
The
question
is:
if
there's
an
error
in
the
addresses,
which
one
is
right,
is
it
the
map
right
or
is
the
address?
K
Is
right
and
because
of
the
magnet,
a
requirement
of
the
application
process.
I
think
I
would
believe
that
the
addresses
take
precedence
and
therefore
again,
there's
a
problem
in
the
process
and
I.
Think
I.
Don't
think
we
really
have
had
a
proper
process,
the
one
thing
on
the
first
slide
and
that
I
hopes
sorry,
I'm
controlling
the
slides
on
the
first
slide.
K
K
K
The
ei
we
trusted
and
approved
only
only
approved
for
the
disposal
of
solid
non
hazardous
waste
that
didn't
define
what
type
of
waste
produced.
Well
waste
is
the
primary
source
of
landfill
orders
and
landfill.
The
order's
greatly
impact
impacted.
Thousands
in
the
past
then
make
you
so
again
they
had.
They
were
the
primary
problem
in
the
past
petruchio
waste
make
up
only
about
11%
of
the
ICM
wait,
I
see
and
I
waste,
which
is
the
primary
material
going
in
that
in
the
landfill.
K
K
D
D
Will
do
that
mr.
chair,
but
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
on
mr.
Moore's
presentation.
They
have
sort
of
thank
miss
the
rest
of
the
team-
that's
out
here
this
afternoon
and
for
your
dedication
to
this
file
over
the
number
of
years
that
you
were
involved
held
and
thank
you
very
much
for
your
participation.
Welcome.
B
G
The
residents
of
certainty
of
my
area
of
still
feel
that
this
new
footprint
for
the
dump
that
you're
being
asked
to
approve
to
rezoning
for
today
represents
a
backward
step
in
looking
after
the
health
and
welfare
of
your
constituents.
I
noticed
most
of
you
are
West
End
councillors.
That's
why
they
refer
to
your
constituents
when
I
attended
the
city's
public
meeting
on
the
rezoning
application.
I
was
astonished
to
learn
that
the
city
supposedly
cannot
address
the
very
important
issue
of
groundwater
contamination
and
that
it
can
only
be
dealt
with
by
the
ministry
of
the
environment.
G
Existing
facts
only
prove
that
this
is
not
the
case.
At
the
last
open
house
hosted
by
waste
management.
I
was
advised
that
the
existing
groundwater
contamination
was
contained
within
the
quarry
site
across
cart
Road.
This
is,
of
course,
the
existing
quarry
site
which
waste
management
has
purchased
due
to
contamination
from
the
original
dump.
Again,
I
would
reiterate
that
we
know
that
it
is
not
contained
there.
Third
has
moved
further.
Southeast
I
also
asked
the
waste
management
representative
how
this
contamination
was
going
to
be
cleaned
up.
The
answer
was
effectively
mother
nature.
G
We're
giving
everything
else
support.
Mother
nature
has
to
do
with.
We
know
this
is
going
to
mean
years
and
years
decades
and
decades
before
this
will
be
taken
care
of
also
given
the
amount
of
development
currently
underway
and
the
forecast
for
growth
in
the
West
End.
It
is
not
reasonable
to
allow
waste
management
the
opportunity
to
add
to
the
contamination
level
and
thus
extend
the
eventual
cleanup
time
required,
since
the
Ministry
of
the
Environment
will
not
protect
the
citizens
of
the
West
End.
G
It
is
up
to
you,
as
members
of
this
committee,
to
look
to
the
long-term
health
implications
of
what
this
rezoning
will
mean
to
the
residents
of
the
area
present
and
future.
It
is
up
to
you
to
set
a
precedent
for
all
the
other
businesses
who
wish
to
take
the
easy
road
in
dealing
with
waste
disposal.
It
is
up
to
you
to
say
no
to
this
request
as
I
do
not
see
how
you
are
going
to
get
the
many
serious
issues
that
are
still
outstanding,
addressed
at
the
site
plan
approval
level
web
based
management.
G
Take
this
matter
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board
only
they
know
the
answer
to
that
who
I
suspect.
We
all
know
what
the
answer
would
be,
but
should
they
decide
to
do
so?
I
can
think
of
far
worse
ways
for
the
city
to
spend
our
money
than
fighting
the
good
fight
to
end
industrial
contamination
of
our
lands.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
thank.
B
B
A
You
mr.
chairman
councillors,
I
have
been
involved
with
the
waste
management
proposal
for
a
new
dump
for
ten
years
now,
I
with
other
people
in
the
community
and
with
city
officials
have
attended
information
sessions
taking
part
in
discussions
read
extensively
and
responded
to
proposals
in
retrospect,
I
would
get
regret
not
being
more
forceful
and
demanding.
Throughout
the
process,
I
became
increasingly
concerned
that
waste
management
was
not
acting
in
the
interests
of
the
community
and
was
not
proceeding
in
a
manner
which
aided
participants
in
understanding
and
taking
part
in
the
process
in
a
meaningful
manner.
A
I
also
observed
that
waste
management
did
not
respond
to
stated
concerns
with
any
substantial
changes
in
the
undertaking.
I
think
that
this
was
the
experience
of
many
participants,
including
the
City
of
Ottawa.
As
a
result,
I
am
NOT
confident
that
waste
management
will
build
and
operate
a
facility
that
encompasses
the
most
current
practices
and
designs
for
environmentally
responsible
management
of
waste.
A
Therefore,
I
respectfully
request
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
refuse
or
defer
approval
to
amend
the
zoning
bylaw
to
support
my
position.
I
will
refer
to
a
few
examples
of
problems
with
the
process.
I
appreciate
very
much
that
the
city
submitted
a
response
to
the
EA
requesting
a
number
of
changes
and
conditions,
among
them
a
commitment
by
waste
management.
To
make
this
the
last
request
to
expand
the
dump
to
decrease
the
size
of
the
dump,
to
extend
a
property
value
protection
plan
for
several
kilometers
around
the
dump
and
to
limit
the
collection
area.
A
These
requests
have
been
ignored
by
waste
management
and
no
changes
made.
Even
when
the
city
repeated
these
requests
several
times,
I
have
been
a
bit
discouraged
that
the
city
has
not
been
more
forceful
in
its
reaction
to
ace
manager,
not
making
any
of
these
changes.
The
staff
report
being
considered
today's
day,
the
proponent
proponent,
proponent,
sorry
agreed
to
address
outstanding
concerns
raised
by
the
city
through
a
combination
of
zoning
site
plan
control,
the
host
or
third-party
agreement
and
the
environmental
compliance
approval.
A
I
am
concerned
that
this
may
or
will
prevent
participation
and
decisions
by
the
larger
community
community
and
that
the
city
will
meet
with
limited
success
and
effecting
change.
I
would
remind
console
that
waste
management's
original
proposal
several
years
ago
was
for
a
dump.
Only
there
was
widespread.
The
community
objection
and
many
suggestions
for
diversion
and
alternatives,
waste
management
with
the
dru
of
the
application
and
came
back
years
later
with
a
brand
new
name
and
a
new
proposal
which
included
various
diversions
facilities.
A
However,
no
details
about
these
diversion
facilities
have
been
included
in
the
documents
related
to
the
zoning
application
and
the
environmental
compliance
approval
application.
This
application
is
for
a
dump
and
a
dump.
Only
for
some
years
now
the
city
has
revised
its
waste
management
plan,
adding
black
box
blue
box
and
green
bin
recycling,
the
city
hosted
sessions
and
included,
or
Ottawa
residents
and
decision
making
I
attended
some
of
those
sessions
sessions.
I
was
encouraged.
That
Ottawa
is
making
efforts
to
develop
new
to
alternatives
for
managing
waste.
A
It
has
been
my
experience
that
waste
management
management
has
ignored
most
community
input
and
frequently
has
not
completed
commitments
made
at
sessions
that
were
intended
to
inform
and
respond
to
the
community
as
an
example
of
site
one.
Instead,
this
instance
relates
to
the
ECA
submission,
but
it
is
representative
of
all
waste
management
responses.
A
Thank
you
and
the
zoning
application.
The
open
house
2
was
held
last
week
on
June
26.
The
meeting
notice
stated
that
waste
management
would
address
the
questions
and
concern
that
have
been
raised
at
the
previous
open
house.
This
was
not
done.
The
material
presented
consisted
solely
of
the
questions
and
concerns.
Only
waste
management
presented
no
answering
comments.
When
questioned
about
this,
mr.
Murphy
stated
that
the
results
of
the
session-
that
is
the
questions,
the
comments
and
their
responses,
would
be
posted
on
the
website
management.
A
The
following
day,
June
27
I,
checked
on
July,
2nd,
there's
nothing.
There
I
have
little
faith
in
waste.
Management's
promises
and
I.
Ask
that
the
city
be
concerned
that
commitments
made
by
waste
management
will
not
be
honored
and
not
approve
any
application.
That
does
not
state
full
commitments
and
details.
A
L
I
will
try
to
maintain,
with
myself
within
the
five
minutes
and
we'll
be
speaking
directly
to
the
slide
presentation,
making
references
occasionally
to
the
notes
that
I
have
with
it.
I
intend
to
address
four
items.
Rezoning
goes
to
the
Official
Plan
amendment,
the
provincial
policy
statement,
not
council
priorities
per
se,
but
rather
the
planning
rationale
associated
with
the
report
and
I'm
going
to
speak
to
the
rural
and
city
implications.
L
We
maintain
the
coalition
and
I
that
this
is
not
and
should
not
be
a
zoning
application.
This
should
be
an
Okie
amendment,
because
this
is
a
new
property
for
a
new
site.
We
questioned
the
city
planner
at
the
public
meeting
as
to
what
defined
a
site.
She
told
us
that
it
wasn't
done
with
similar
on
the
opiate
was
done
by
the
Ministry
of
the
Environment,
the
Ministry
of
Environment
environmental
compliance
approval
for
six
one
zero
zero
two
defines
the
sole
and
waste-disposal
boundary.
That
boundary
is
some
of
the
proposed
proposal
before
you
today.
L
We
strongly
suggest
that
this
is
a
new
footprint
and
not
an
expansion.
Every
aspect
of
the
application
speaks
solely
to
the
footprint
and
not
really
any
related
facilities.
They're
there
in
that
also
includes
the
EA,
which
was
an
environmental
assessment
for
a
new
landfill
footprint.
I
would
point
out
to
all
members
of
the
committee
that
if
you
compare
the
existing
situation
to
that
before
you
in
the
West
:
Environmental
Center,
the
only
significant
difference
is
the
brand-new
footprint.
L
L
You
will
see
that
the
policy
statement
says
that
the
appropriate
size
and
type
of
facility
should
be
looked
at
to
accommodate,
present
and
future
requirements
and
facilitate,
encourage
and
promote
reduction,
reuse
and
recycling
objectives.
You've
already
heard
about
the
lack
of
detail,
respecting
the
latter
reduction,
reuse
and
recycling.
L
L
Staff,
amongst
many
other
points,
it
is
anticipated
that
the
mo
e
ECA
will
have
been
submitted
further
to
detailing
the
mitigation
of
marking
the
ground
water
noise
oder.
These
will
not
be
addressed
until
such
time.
I
do
not
believe
that
pressure
is
put
on
the
municipality
move
to
move
forward
with
the
application.
I
reiterate
that
the
diversion
and
material
recycling
facilities
are
totally
admitted
from
the
jury.
L
Quickly,
I
would
turn
your
attention
to
staff
references
to
the
Royal
and
City
implications
in
the
term
of
council
priorities.
I
did
a
review
of
those
and
found
that,
at
best
and
I
say
at
very
very
best
these
references
to
support
the
pool
of
this
application
are
tenuous.
The
details
of
this
can
be
found
in
submission
that
I
provided
to
all
by
email
today
and
in
the
event
that
you
did
not
receive
them.
I've
got
hard
copies
for
each
of
the
members,
as
well
as
hard
copies
of
my
wife's
presentation
to
you.
L
D
L
D
B
B
Click,
thank
you
and
the
last
speaker:
Michelle
Armstrong,
okay,
you're,
okay,
satisfied
with
the
presentation.
That's
made
okay,
so
we
have.
We
have
completed
the
speaker
roster,
so
we
will
move
that
back
to
the
item
that
is
before
us:
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
23
49,
24,
37
cup
road
and
512
William
Mooney
Road.
B
This
is
a
motion
that
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
council,
approving
member
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
250
for
two
three:
four:
nine
through
two
point:
three:
seven
cup,
Road
and
512
way
in
any
road
to
permit
the
expansion
of
a
solid
waste
disposal,
disposal
facility,
subject
to
a
holding
provision
and
increased
setbacks,
as
shown
in
document
1
and
as
detailed
in
document
2.
So
we'll
open
it
up
to
questions
to
staff
in
light
of
the
presentations
or
your
own
questions
and
then
we'll
go
to
debate
so
first
counselor
Kadri
thank.
D
H
Chair
the
the
delegation
did
highlight
that
there
was
in
fact
some
errors
with
the
addressing
initially.
However,
staff
are
confident
that
we've
met
the
necessary
notice
provisions
and
met
all
of
the
required
obligations
with
respect
to
the
zoning
amendment
and
providing
accurate
information
at
this
time
with
respect
to
the
the
advertisements
and
the
and
the
recommendation
of
the
report.
H
D
You
for
that
mr.
moody
and
what
I
would
suggest
also
ask
staff
to
if
that
information
still
discrepancies,
maybe
that
should
be
corrected
before
this
item
comes
to
council.
Is
that
possible?
Certainly,
mr.
chair,
thank
you.
I've
got
some
other
question.
Mr.
chair.
Some
of
these
questions
came
from
the
residents
in
the
area
and
that
provided
the
list
to
mr.
moody
already
on
these
questions
and
I
just
want
to
read
them
out
and
maybe
get
a
response
from
staff
publicly
in
terms
of
some
of
those
questions.
Thank
you.
H
Mr.
chair
is,
as
I
indicated
briefly
to
the
to
the
councilor,
giving
the
late
timing
of
this
question
being
identified
in
the
detailed
nature
of
it.
We
will
require
a
little
bit
of
time
to
compose
a
fulsome
response
to
some
of
these
questions
and
I
apologize
for
having
to
provide
that
answer
to
you
right
now,
but
we
will
provide
a
written
response
to
that
question
in
advance
of
council
and
you.
D
This
item
goes
to
council,
yes,
mr.
chair
and
to
our
committee
members,
but
the
rest
of
the
council.
That's
correct
mr.
chair,
thank
you
and
just
for
the
question
one
further
question
again
from
the
questions
for
added
earlier:
the
reference
to
site
planner
failure
is
not
clear.
With
the
site
plan
nepali
will
apply
to
all
of
the
wcwc
ec
property
lands
or
solely
to
the
additional
lands,
and
with
that
approval
address
or
address
all
the
infrastructure
proposed
in
the
environmental
assessment.
That
should
be
number
six
on
your
list.
Mr.
muddy.
M
F
D
G
A
quick
question
in
the
reporting
under
the
brief
issue.
It
says
that
some
of
the
issues
are
not
addressed
by
the
older
management
puppy
values
up
to
five
corners
service,
any
limits,
good
neighbor
policy,
except
to
which
were
listed
before
because
we're
putting
a
holding
zone
on
it.
Where
can
we
be
sure
that
we
don't
lift
that
hitting
zone
until
such
time
as
all
of
those
issues
have
been
resolved?.
H
Mr.
chair,
those
issues
were
identified
by
the
city.
You
know,
through
the
environmental
assessment
process
and
following
the
environmental
assessment
being
approved,
the
items
of
staff
will
take
as
direction
to
negotiate
as
part
of
those
the
various
agreements
that
planogram
at
host
agreement
and
various
other
agreements.
However,
at
this
point
in
time,
I'm
not
in
a
position
to
confirm
that
that
we
will
be
able
to
achieve
satisfaction
on
all
of
those.
H
However,
the
host
agreement
and
I
guess
the
clarity
would
be
provided
to
Council
on
that
prior
to
coming
back
with
with
the
proposal
to
lift
the
H
there.
The
next
step
in
this
process
does
involve
council
again
and
that
is
lifting
in
the
holding,
but
also
the
approval
of
the
ultimate
host
agreement.
G
G
H
Mr.
chair,
there
typically
is
not
a
report,
a
specific
report
going
to
committee
to
deal
with
the
lifting
of
a
holding
provision.
It
is
something
that
goes
to
counseled
with
with
the
violence,
however,
the
the
host
agreement,
which
I
think
it's
deals
with
a
number
of
the
issues
you're
dealing
with,
will
be
coming
back
to
council
in
advance
of
that
H
being
Lester.
Could
I
ask.
G
G
H
B
D
I
D
B
H
F
You
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
I
believe
in
discussion
with
legal
I
had
asked
him,
because
I
would
like
to
continue
being
involved
with
the
site
plan,
approval
and
the
host
committee.
We
had
an
hour
drafting
the
host
committee
agreement
is
going
to
be
between
legal
staff,
but
at
the
same
time
I
would
like
to
share
one
sister
he's
been
drafted
with
their
with
their
with
my
5%
colleague
and
see
what
can
we
add
as
and
I
think
that's
in
discussion,
but
I
know
not
for
this
meeting,
but
mr.
F
F
We,
the
city,
submit
conditions
today
today,
EA
and
as
we
know
that
didn't
go
very
far
in
206
and
in
2010,
I
submit
the
same
motion
with
the
same
condition
and
also
the
province
choose
to
ignore
those
condition,
and
now
obviously
we
are
working
together
to
with
the
holding
provision
to
make
sure
some
of
those
five
items.
The
environmental
assessment
talked
about.
We
need
to
work
with
with
the
working
group.
Mr.
chair
I
do
I'm
the
one
who
said
it
on
council
once
before
and
I
say
it
again.
F
No
one
wants
to
have
a
landfill
in
their
backyard.
No
one
I,
don't
care
who
you
are.
No
one
wants
to
see
that
question
is
here.
We
say
no
and
walk
away
from
it
and
our
responsibility
will
see
yesterday,
zoning
withholding
on
it
and
work
together
to
make
sure
some
of
the
community's
concern
will
be
met
through
the
site
plan,
approval
and
and
the
host
community
agreement.
So
mr.
chair
I
would
ask
legal
to
make
sure
the
holding
will
stay
on
till
at
leas.
F
C
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
think
as
council
century
and
councillor
category
have
both
said.
No
one
wants
a
landfill
in
their
backyard
and
their
neighborhood
in
their
community,
certainly
in
this
day
and
age,
where
our
focus
at
least
as
a
municipality
on
household
garbage,
is
on
recycling
and
on
diversion
as
new
technologies
are
continuing
to
be
explored.
C
C
I'm
also
very
discouraged
to
be
perfectly
frank,
with
the
government
of
Ontario's
hesitation
and
lack
of
action
earlier
this
year,
pushing
bill
91
forward
and
letting
it
die
with
the
election.
My
hope
I've
been
reading
the
throne
speech,
I
didn't
see
any
reference
to
it.
My
hope
is
that
the
government
of
Ontario
will
bring
the
waste
reduction
act
back
with
haste
so
that
we
can
start
to
address
this
issue.
C
You
know
given,
given
that
the
Ministry
of
Environment
has
continually
rejected
the
sea
of
Ottawa's
advice
and
recommendations
relating
to
this
application
and
others,
and
given
that
they've
chosen
to
approve
the
environmental
assessment,
I
think
it
is
probably
current
at
this
point.
You
know
the
likelihood
of
our
being
able
to
fight
it.
Much
further
is
probably
not
high
in
terms
of
stopping
the
expansion
but
giving
the
local
councillors
the
opportunity,
through
the
holding
provision,
to
get
some
of
those.
Those
additional
features.
C
They're
looking
forward
to
in
some
ways
reduce
the
impact
on
the
community
as
much
as
possible.
I
think
is
probably
probably
the
best
way
to
go
and
just
towards
the
discussion
about
the
holding
provisions
and
others
coming
back.
You
know,
and
it
might
simply
be
I'm,
not
sure
it
was
war,
that's
in,
but
you
and
councilor
lnterior.
You
may
wish
to
simply
lift
delegated
authority
on
the
site
plan
right
now
and
have
that
recorded
in
the
minutes
of
the
meeting,
so
that
there
is
absolutely
no
confusion
down
the
road
as
to
what
might
happen.
C
D
D
The
Ward
6
I'm
opposed
to
landfill
of
garbage
anywhere
in
the
city,
not
just
in
our
in
our
yards
but
everywhere
in
the
city
and
that
we're
in
the
province.
Having
said
that,
the
reality
today
is
that
some
of
the
technologies
that
are
out
there
have
not
been
investigated
far
enough
or
deep
enough
in
order
to
say
what.
B
B
Some
kind
gentleman
flown
and
left
a
message
saying
if
I
voted
in
favor
of
this
I,
better
wear
a
bulletproof
vest
wherever
I
went
I'm
still
here
and
I
didn't
put
a
bolt
or
a
vest
on,
but
and
we
know
we,
there
are
cases
across
the
problems
where
people
have
been
shot
in
when
landfill
expansions
were
being
debated.
But
it's
unfortunate
that
and
has
been
pointed
out
by
our
colleagues
that
really
at
the
mercy
of
the
province
and
their
position
on
landfill
expansions
and
but
I
did
ask
that
sure
put
up
slide.
B
12
and
I
just
want
to
bring
to
attention
for
those
people
who
hear
speaking
against
the
the
proposal.
If
you
look
at
the
public
liaison
committee,
there
are
three
and
Osgood
Ward.
One
and
I
sit
on
all
three
and
the
Spring
Hill
landfill,
Advisory
Committee,
it's
a
public
liaison
committee
and
it
was
set
up
and
it
works
really
well.
The
residents
who
are
around
there
were
very
much
opposed
to
the
existing
landfill,
but
over
the
years
they
we
meet
three
or
four
times
a
year
and
they're
very
happy.
B
Now,
honestly,
they're
happy
with
the
landfill
that
their
property,
sir
Alan,
because
they're
made
aware
of
what
changes
and
what
safeguards
are
put
in
there
there's
also
public
liaison
committee
for
all
the
world,
which
is
also
the
plant,
is
an
Oscar
Board.
There
was
a
great
deal
of
opposition
to
it,
but
now
there's
public
liaison
committee.
It's
made
up
of
members
who
and
residents
around
it,
they're
very
happy
with,
and
we
have
not
had
one
complaint
about
that
to
facility
and
I.
B
Think
part
of
it
is
because
we've
had
this
public
liaison
committee
and
and
we
meet
for
five
three
four
or
five
times
a
year
and
people
are
aware
of
what's
happening
and
it's
the
unknown
that
made
people
very
concerned
and
also
there's
a
third
public
liaison
committee
in
Oscar
Ward.
It's
a
reader
will
Liat
public
liaison
committee.
B
Nadir's
with
number
of
clays
are
on
the
Rideau
Road
area
in
ASDA,
ward
and
the
people
are
very
happy
with
the
ploy
believe
it
or
not,
because
they're
aware
of
issues
and
they
can
bring
for
the
issues
that
arise
in
regard
to
those
quarry
operations.
So
I
I
presume
that
this
motion
will
pass,
but
I
would
just
say
to
those
who
are
opposed
down
the
road
that
the
public
liaison
committees
can
work,
and
so
with
that,
I
would
just
ask
that
on
this
item
number
six
are.
Is
it.
F
If
I
may,
I
would
like
to
direct
legal
staff
to
prepare
a
motion
for
council
date
to
make
sure
the
Holden
provision
will
not
be
removed
without
the
councillors
consent.
So
I
think
that's
emotional
legal
can
prepare
not
for
today,
but
for
Council.
They
won't
decide
and
come
to.
Council
I
spoke
to
legal
and
they
can
prepare
the
motion
just.
B
I
B
B
B
M
Okay,
thank
you,
I'm,
going
to
read
this
because
I'm,
it's
five
minutes,
there's
a
lot
to
memorize
for
me.
So
good
day,
councillor
Thompson
good
day,
counselor
bleh
good
day,
counselor,
L,
shan't,
Erie
and
councillor
Moffat
and
councillor
quadri
I
come
today
to
represent
2,000
City
of
Ottawa
residents
and
a
companion
animals.
My
name
is
Shannon
juste
I
am
the
resident
of
Osgood
and
I
own
and
operate
Sharat
a
successful
pet
supply
store
in
Riverside
South.
M
My
previous
role
was
a
supervisor
at
the
Iowa
Humane
Society
I
am
joined
by
my
colleagues,
I
mean
Woodside
from
Ottawa
East
and
good
saigo
from
Stateville.
We
are
here
today
to
ask
for
an
amendment
to
bylaw
2011
two
for
one
with
respect
to
the
sourcing
of
pet
Sylvan
pet
stores,
specifically
puppies
kittens
and
rabbits.
The
current
bylaw
fails
to
protect
consumers
and
promotes
poor
animal
welfare.
Our
city
has
an
ever-growing
population
of
homeless
and
unwanted
pets,
and
these
pets
are
being
cared
for
by
your
residents.
Today.
M
There
are
eleven
hundred
and
sixty
three
dogs,
1689
cats
and
525
rabbits
and
other
small
animals
within
160
kilometers
of
Ottawa
looking
for
permanent
homes.
This
number
fails
to
include
the
number
of
animals
that
are
euthanized
daily
due
to
unadoptable
'ti
for
poor
health,
temperament
or
lack
of
space.
That
is
nearly
3500
pets.
Looking
for
homes
today
in
our
nation's
capital,
in
2013,
the
Ottawa
Humane
Society,
along
with
the
support
of
our
local
pet
rescues,
admitted
over
13,000
pets
for
care.
M
Do
you
see
a
problem
as
each
year
passes,
the
intake
members
of
our
shelter
and
rescues
are
increased,
an
unmanageable
rate
restrictions
like
the
one
we're
asking
for
have
been
brought
into
force
in
five
minutes.
Polities
and
another
six
are
in
front
of
committee
at
this
time,
in
Ontario
alone
to
Canada
in
the
US,
fifty
seven
jurisdictions
have
put
a
pet
cell
restriction
in
place
successfully.
M
We
ask
you
today
to
listen
to
your
residents
and
industry
experts
to
support
an
amendment
to
include
a
restriction
on
the
sale
of
the
above
sub
pets
in
City
of
Ottawa
pet
stores.
We
recognize
that
the
public
has
a
right
to
purchase
pets.
However,
making
this
purchase
from
the
pet
store
is
a
poor
representation
of
the
pet
industry
and,
more
often
than
not
leaves
consumers
robbed.
M
Consumers
may
be
told
they're
purchasing
a
purebred
dog
when,
in
fact,
the
Canadian
Kennel
Club
and
the
animal
pedigree
act
state
that
no
breeder
shall
sell
or
donate
dogs
for
the
purpose
of
being
auctioned
raffled
or
to
pet
stores.
The
CKC
also
states
that
all
dogs
must
be
uniquely
and
permanently
identified.
This
is
not
the
case
when
making
this
purchase
from
a
pet
store.
Identification
facilitates
tracking
of
any
potential
viral
migration
in
the
event
of
any
public
health
concerns,
as
they
arrive
further.
M
The
Ministry
of
long-term
care,
long-term
health
and
care
believe
that
offering
animal
adoptions,
as
opposed
to
the
retail
sales
of
cats
and
dogs,
promotes
community
protection
from
zoonotic
diseases
such
as
rabies.
Bringing
a
companion
animal
into
one's
home
is
often
an
emotional
decision,
but
decisions
such
as
these
need
to
be
measured
and
deliberated,
since
they
are
meant
to
be
for
a
lifetime.
M
Sadly,
this
is
often
not
the
case
when
pets
are
purchased
from
a
pet
store.
Purchases
through
pet
store
channel
are
often
on
impulse
and
come
with
few.
If
any
checks
and
balances
studies
show
that
animals
bought
under
these
circumstances
are
much
more
likely
to
be
found
on
the
street
or
surrendered
to
a
shelter
by
restricting
sources,
we
will
juice
the
economic
burden
of
our
over
euthanasia
in
our
shelters.
Some
pet
store
owners
will
argue.
The
banning
the
sale
of
pets
in
their
establishment
will
negatively
impact
their
ability
to
conduct
a
profitable
business.
M
However,
as
the
owner
of
an
independent
and
successful
pet
store,
together
with
others
such
as
Pet,
Smart,
Pet,
Valu
and
other
pet
foods,
we
have
all
willingly
undertaken
a
responsible
and
compassionate
approach
to
pet
ownership.
Having
introduced
the
humane
model
of
operating
satellite
adoption,
centers
and
our
business
continued
to
flourish
as
well.
By
welcoming
local
rescue
groups
into
our
stores,
our
businesses
actually
benefit
with
the
sale
of
necessary
supplies.
Accessories
such
as
food
betting,
collars
harnesses
toys
and
grooming
supplies.
M
Rather,
we
are
asking
you
to
champion
our
efforts
to
bring
Ottawa
in
step
with
the
many
other
municipalities
in
the
province
and
across
Canada
that
have
already
put
bylaws
in
place
or
working
to
bring
changes
to
restrict
the
sale
the
morning
that
stores
so
again,
I
urge
you
to
hear
a
request
for
an
amendment
to
by
law,
to
11-2
for
one
to
include
restrictions
on
the
sale
of
puppies
kittens
and
rabbits
in
pet
stores
and
other
retail
outlets
throughout
our
nation's
capital.
I.
M
B
You
very
much
Shannon
and
it's
nice
to
see
you
here
and
I
know
your
mom
worked
for
the
township
I
believe
she
is
here
yeah
now
she
works
for
the
city.
So
it's
nice
to
see
you
out
nice
to
thank
Shannon
coming
out
and
I
appreciate
your
sincerity
in
this
issue
and
we
will,
as
provided
in
the
in
our
policy.
We
are
city
staff,
to
review
what
you
presented
to
us
and
gives
back
some
detail
because
they're
the
ones
who
advise
us
in
what
actions
we
can
take.
H
B
N
N
N
I
was
quite
forward
with
the
development
charge,
educational
charge
of
building
permit
fees
at
forty
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
per
building
for
myself,
based
on
a
4,500
square
foot
self
storage
building.
So
I
did
a
little
research
with
regards
to
what
other
municipalities
within
our
region
charge:
Mississippi
Mills
with
a
population
of
11,000
charged
29
cents,
a
square
foot
at
thirteen
hundred
and
five
dollars;
educational
charges,
zero
building,
permit
three
thousand
four
hundred
and
sixty
five
dollars
for
a
total
cost
of
four
thousand
seven.
N
Charge:
zero
dollars
for
educational
charge
and
their
building
permit
there's
two
thousand
dollars
for
a
total
of
two
thousand
dollars
Castleman,
which
is
a
Prescott
wrestle
with
a
population
of
four
thousand
charge.
Ten
thousand
three
hundred
ninety
five
dollars
for
development
charge:
zero
dollars
for
an
educational
charge;
three
thousand
three
hundred
fifty
dollars
for
a
building
permit
for
a
class
of
13,000
745
they're,
the
most
expensive
volumen.
N
Next
to
us,
Richmond
village,
although
in
Ottawa,
has
a
population
of
four
thousand.
The
development
charge
is
thirty,
two
thousand
one
hundred
and
thirty
dollars
the
educational
charge
which
we
have
and
no
other
municipality,
has,
is
six
thousand
three
hundred
and
ninety
dollars
the
building
permit.
Is
it
on
par
at
nineteen
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
for
a
total
cost
of
thirty
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
N
This
to
me,
at
four
hundred
percent,
higher
than
what
other
municipalities
are
charged
is
seems,
unreasonable
and
really,
when
I
look
at
the
difference
between
the
municipalities,
I
see
that
Richmond
offers
public
transit
and
they
have
that
listed
at
a
dollar.
Ninety
three
per
square
foot,
which,
for
a
total
value
of
eight
thousand
six
hundred
and
$85.
If
you
added
that
to
the
highest
of
the
outline
polities
Ottawa,
the
total
would
be
twenty
two
thousand
four
hundred
and
thirty
dollars,
which
is
just
over
fifty
percent.
N
Yeah,
it's
fifty
percent
lower
right.
So
to
me,
with
regards
to
our
rail
on
serviced
development
charges,
I
feel
that
there's
something
wrong
with
the
city
of
Ottawa's
methodologies,
for
calculating
DC's
and
ECS
and
I
would
like
for
council
to
take
a
look
at
our
staff
to
take
a
look
at
the
scenario.
What
it
is
that's
going
on,
I
know
that
counts
them
off
and
I've
made
you
aware.
N
26
councillors
I'm
not
sure
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
and
realistically
you're,
governing
a
huge
we
used
to
have
who
knows
upwards
of
80
or
90
councils,
so
much
much
more
oversight.
So
unless
this
is
brought
to
your
attention-
and
so
my
little
barbs
that
I
that
I
offered
to
you
guys
is
just
to
give
you
the
ammunition
that
you
need
to
do
your
job
effectively.
N
N
Wrap
up
to
me,
it
looks
like
a
money
gap.
I
would
ask
that
you
please
redirect
staff
to
take
a
look
at
this.
We
are
offering
up
a
roadway
but
has
been
asked
of
of
shell
and
ways
we're
offering
that
up
as
part
of
a
bargaining
process
there
with
regards
to
development
charges,
and
if
you
could
redirect
staff
with
and
take
a
look
deeper
into
this,
we
would
appreciate
it.
Okay,.
B
Thank
you
very
much,
and
you
know
council
lady,
wants
to
make
one
quick
comment
and
I
think
as
provided.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
Thank
you
for
the
research
and
I
think
you.
You
speak
to
the
converted
about
the
issues
of
development
charges,
but
we
will
have
staff
prepare
a
response
based
on
the
city's
position
and
the
city
in
the
city
has
established
these
development
charges
so,
but
we
will
have
staff
respond
to
your
your
requests
here
and
comfortably.
B
C
You
very
much
and
you've
you've
brought
up
a
point
which
is
very
near
and
dear
to
my
heart,
which
is
a
comparison
of
the
city,
especially
our
villages,
to
the
municipalities
that
surround
us.
Unfortunately,
whether
you're
in
Richmond
or
Cumberland
or
carp
or
any
of
the
other
smaller
villages
and
hamlets
within
the
City
of
Ottawa
developers,
are
are
collected
to
pay
for
the
citywide
and
network
and
given
that.
C
But
if
you
live
in
Castleman
or
if
you
live
in
Rockland
or
Carleton
Place
or
Kim
Phil,
you
only
have
to
pay
for
the
development
charges
for
those
tiny
municipalities.
Even
though
the
majority
of
those
populations
are
coming
into
the
city
of
Ottawa
for
work
each
every
day.
So
it
puts
an
undue
burden
on
infrastructure.
C
And
if
there
be
some
fairness
brought
into
the
system
and
allow
us
to
in
some
way
not
have
to
frankly
subsidize
smaller
municipalities
on
our
periphery,
so
I
would
encourage
you
to
contact
your
member
of
provincial
Parliament
and
have
have
him
or
her
support.
The
cities.
Requests
to
the
government
as
the
session
has
come
back,
has
to
come
back
at
Queen's
Park.
So
thank
you
very
much
in.
B
Case
very
much
for
that
done
and
we
will
have
a
response
for
you
and
I.
Think
as
I
said,
we
we
appreciate
your
concern
and
what
you
have
expressed
to
us
today.
Is
we
hear
that
repeatedly
and
as
you
indicated
to
me
before
the
meeting
that
your
small
business
person
that
just
wants
to
have
a
business
in
the
city
and
it's
almost
it's
out
of
reach
laughter,
I'm.
N
B
G
I
Here
today
to
speak
to
you
about
poison
parsnip,
this
is
about
my
seventh
year
coming
to
present
two
committees
and
councils.
It
is
hog
weeds,
little
cousin,
everyone
hears
about
horribly,
but
not
as
many
people
here,
but
the
poisoned
parsnip,
but
it
does
have
the
same
effects.
It
can
cause
blindness,
it
can
cause
severe
burns.
My
oldest
son
was
burnt
eight
years
ago.
The
scars
have
finally
healed
over
I
was
burnt
about
six
years
ago,
and
it
took
six
months
of
treatment
to
have
that
disappear.
I
I've
been
to
the
former
forest
and
green
space
committee,
the
rural
issues,
Advisory
Committee,
the
Royal
Affairs
Office
and
I've
sent
emails
to
all
the
councillors,
not
anything
this
year.
So
you
haven't
missed
anything.
This
year,
I
spoke
to
the
public
health
nurse,
as
recently
as
last
week.
They
have
no
handouts,
no
information,
no
warnings
that
they
give
it
to
people
other
than.
I
If
somebody
asks
them
about
it
in
Stormont,
Dundas
and
Glengarry
counties,
they
have
been
spraying
for
about
two
years
and
they
have
a
90%
effective
rate
because
they
can
get
to
spray
right
up
to
the
fence
lines
and
to
the
trees.
Around
signs
around
guardrails
and
everything
part
of
the
issue
is
that
the
province
doesn't
state
that
poison
person.
That
is
a
noxious
weed,
even
though
hogweed
is
the
cutting
that
is
being
done
right
now.
It
is
slightly
effective,
but
once
again
it
doesn't
get
around
the
guardrail.
I
So
around
signs
trees
only
gets
one
side
of
the
ditch
and
is
often
happening
too
late
for
the
past
five
or
six
years.
What
I've
been
doing
is
I've
five
local
schools
in
our
community,
the
worst
one
is
Castro
Valley,
because
it
has
farmers
fields
on
two
sides
of
it
and
I've
personally
pulled
over
five
hundred
poison
parsnip
plants
that
were
all
within
reach
of
the
school
kids,
Metcalf
public,
Osby,
Township,
High,
School,
st.
Catharines
and
Metcalf
community
Christian
school
due
to
our
patients
do
not
have
quite
as
much
but
at
Castro
Valley.
I
It
is
a
real
hazard
to
the
kids.
There
I've
also
received
phone
calls
from
other
people
within
Metcalf
burn
and
Kenmore
in
the
last
couple
years,
because
they
don't
know
what
this
plant
is
facing.
My
facebook
post,
they
hear
me
talk
about
it
and
they
don't
know
how
to
identify
it.
So
I've
actually
gone
out
when
three
one
one
was
called
and
they
said
well,
there's
nothing
we
can
do
about
it.
I
go
out
and
help
identify
it
and
help
keep
all
the
neighbors
and
their
kids
safe.
I
B
Thank
you
very
much.
Let
Kim
and
I
know
that
mr.
moody
is
a
farmer
by
heart,
he's
and
I
think
we're
all
well
aware
of
the
issue
with
with
this
noxious
weed,
and
there
are
restrictions
that
we
have
on
how
we
deal
with
it.
I
know,
for
example,
that
there
was
a
young
person
from
Osgood
Ward
who
worked
with
the
city,
roads,
crew
and
they
were
cutting
it
and
he
had
all
on
all
the
protective
gear,
and
he
still
was
impacted
by
that.
So
it
is
a
very
serious
item.
B
I
O
This
afternoon,
gentlemen,
I'd
like
to
talk
about
the
interior
landowners
Association,
who
we
are,
what
we
do,
and
it's
been
suggested
that
we
are
the
stuff
of
nonsense
and
I'd
like
to
assure
you
that
nothing
is
further
from
the
truth.
We're
an
organization
of
twenty
County
chapters
governed
by
the
Interior
landowners,
Association,
Executive
I'm,
the
president
of
one
of
those
chapters,
the
Carlton
Ottawa
chapter
and
I
am
also
a
member
of
the
Ola
executive.
O
Like
many
other
organizations,
each
chapter
has
a
board
of
directors
and
a
male
General
Meeting
and
members
who
support
our
most
important
mandate
of
providing
information
to
public
to
the
public.
Regarding
private
property
rights,
we're
all
volunteers,
we
have
no
paid
staff,
we
have
a
team
of
researchers
for
read
legislation
and
regulations
and
provide
the
County
chapters
with
useful
information
regarding
the
many
laws
governing
the
province
and
authorities.
They
provide
us
where
the
heads-up
on
regulations
and
policies
that
will
impact
our
use
and
enjoyment
of
our
property.
O
We
receive
calls
on
a
daily
basis
from
people
who
are
trying
to
make
a
life
for
their
families,
often
by
profiting
from
their
property.
The
calls
are
generally
about
by
laws
and
regulations
that
reduce
their
ability
to
earn
a
living.
There
are
many
instances
where
it
appears
that
provincial
and
useful
officials
are
overstepping
their
authority
and
I'll
just
provide
one
such
example,
and
that's
the
forest
inventory
and
ecological
warning
survey,
which
the
Ministry
of
Natural
Resources
is
currently
conducting
in
the
Ottawa
Valley.
You
may
be
familiar
with
it.
O
The
work
has
been
contracted
to
Thunder
house
for
services
from
cursed
Ontario,
with
the
understanding
that
work
on
private
property
will
not
be
conducted
within
without
their
property
owner's
consent.
However,
we
have
had
reports
that
crews
are
showing
up
on
private
grant
land
with
no
notice
to
the
landowner.
We
anticipate
that
the
result
of
this
study
will
be
designation
of
lands
as
not
natural
heritage,
where
restrictions
will
be
put
on
development.
O
This
is
one,
but
one
of
the
land
use
controls
that
we
perceive
resulting
from
the
provincial
policy
statement,
2014,
which
maybe
some
of
all
of
you
are
familiar
with
I'm
sure
Derek
is
familiar
with
it
I'm
just
wondering
how
many
of
you
have
had
the
opportunity
to
read
the
provincial
policy
statement
and
have
you
understood
it
and
are
you
able
to
explain
to
your
constituents
landowners?
The
impact
will
have
on
their
ability
to
own
years
and
enjoy
their
land.
O
O
Our
researchers
have
read
the
provincial
policy
statement,
the
planning
that
the
Municipal
Act
and
many
many
other
acts
and
regulations.
Some
of
what
we
are
reading
is
disturbing,
and
in
some
instances
it
appears
that
government
officials
are
acting
beyond
their
mandate.
In
the
past,
the
proud
landowners
Association
has
asked
City
of
Ottawa
staff
and
counselors
to
attend
our
meetings
to
hear
our
position
on
property
rights
and
some
of
our
concerns
as
well.
O
To
attend
our
international
property
rights
conference,
which
is
taking
place
on
Saturday
October,
the
4th
at
the
Holiday
Inn
in
Canada
there's
also
another
room.
That's
there's
also
another
meeting
which
I've
included
in
the
package,
but
I
won't
mention
that
about
here,
but
we'd.
Also
like
you
to
come
to
our.
O
O
B
B
Thank
you
very
much
sure
you
really
appreciate
you
coming
out
today
and
I.
Just
I
know
you
didn't,
but
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
again
for
your
work
with
councilor
deputy
Mary
Nelson
to
you,
because
we
I
think
we've
moved,
maybe
not
as
far
as
you.
You
would
have
hoped
that
I
think
we
are
moving
forward
and
so
I
appreciate
the
leadership
you've
shown
in
moving
that
forward.
Some
of
your
pre
Dorset
predecessors
in
the
organization
we're
a
little
more
difficult
to
work
with
than
you
are.