►
Description
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
A
B
B
B
B
D
B
D
B
B
A
A
Good
morning,
colleagues,
our
staff
like
to
call
our
meeting
to
order
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
agenda
17
thursday
october
1st
2020.
This
meeting
be
held
through
electronic
participation
in
accordance
with
with
section
238
of
municipal
app
2001,
as
amended
by
bill
197,
the
kovic
19
economic
recovery
act
2020..
A
This
meeting
may
be
viewed
online
on
the
ottawa
city
council,
youtube
channel,
the
city
of
ottawa
continued
to
take
kovac
19
seriously
and
then
followed.
The
advice
of
provincial
and
federal
governments
is
making
significant
changes
to
the
service
and
programming
to
help
protect
health
and
well-being
of
the
community
city
hall
is
temporarily
closed.
To
help
stop
the
spread
of
kovac
19
in
person.
Committee
and
council
meeting
have
been
cancelled.
Such
meetings
as
warranty
will
be
held
electronically
under
further
notice
for
more
information
about
service
disruption.
Please
visit
our
kovic
19
webpage.
A
A
Declaration
of
interest,
I
see
none
confirmation
of
minute
minutes,
16
minute
meetings
of
september
3rd
2020
of
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
on
the
minutes.
Okay,
great
okay,
item
number
one:
it
was
postponed
and
deferral.
So
item
number
one.
Is
the
engineers
report,
a
branch
number
four
wilson,
johnson
municipal
drain,
that
the
agricultural
rural
affair
committee
recommend
that
council
adopt
the
engineer's
report
prepared
by
rob?
A
A
A
Do
we
have
any
question
anyone
speaking
on
this
item
mark
we
have
no,
no
one
sign
to
speak.
Correct!
No
speakers,
no
speaker
on
the
item.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Item
number.
Three
is
briefing
on
planning
and
development
charge
aspect
of
bill,
197,
kovic,
19
economic
recovery
act,
2020
and
that's
the
item
that
council
me
was
asking
about.
A
Does
the
committee
wish
to
have
a
presentation?
Because,
on
the
planning
committee,
where
I
sit
on
with
the
three
of
my
colleagues
card
and
plan,
we
didn't
have
enough
information
to
have
a
presentation
at
the
time,
but
now
it
seems
are
legal
willing
to
do
a
presentation
on
this.
So
should
we
hold
this
item
for
presentation,
I
see
acknowledging
that
okay,
so
we'll
hold
item
number
three
and
we'll
come
back
to
it
after.
A
B
A
A
2008-2504
part
of
2974
shea
road
for
the
purpose
of
pre-zoning,
a
portion
of
the
lands
from
agriculture
a.g
to
agriculture,
subzone
5
hg5,
to
prohibit
residential
use
on
the
retained
farmland.
As
detailed
in
document
2.
and
item
number
2,
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
brief
explanation.
This
is
another
surplus
formula
on
the
item
very.
B
A
Another
similar
item
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
4960
cannon
smith,
drive
item
number
one,
that
agricultural
rule
affair
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zone
and
bylaw
2008-250
for
part
of
4960
cannon
smith;
drive
for
the
purpose
of
re-zoning,
a
portion
of
the
land
from
agriculture,
hg
aeg
agriculture,
sub-zone
for
hg4
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
the
retained
farmland.
As
detailed
in
document
two
and
item
number
two
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affairs
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
brief
explanation
on
the
item.
B
A
Item
number
one
that
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008-2504
part
of
3964,
john
charles
road
for
the
purpose
of
rezoning.
The
lands
from
agriculture
zone
ag
to
agricultural
zone
subzone
5
hg5
to
prohibit
residential
uses
on
the
retained
farmland,
as
detailed
in
document
2
and
item
number
two.
That
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
approve
the
consultation
detail.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
pre-explanation
on
the
item.
A
A
E
Sure
it's
just
obviously
there's
a
number
of
things
in
here:
some
stuff
for
foul
field,
road
and
mansfield
road.
There's
one
other
thing,
and
I
I
could
ask
elsewhere,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
here:
it's
just
a
it's
with
regard
to
the
lear
that
we
did
a
few
years
ago
and
some
changes
along
mansfield,
road
and
bleaks
2016.
Four
years
later,
those
changes
still
haven't
haven't
occurred.
B
E
That's
just
it
right,
so
they
are
already
in
the
old
piece.
So
you're
right
it
would
be
the
comprehensive
zoning
by
law.
So
that
could
be
two
three
four
years
away
and
we've
already
been
waiting
four
years
from
the
council
decision
on
zoning
as
it
stands,
which
impacts
for
severances
and
stuff.
Like
that
sure.
B
A
Okay,
great
thank
you
very
much
item
number
nine
zone
and
bylaw
amendment
to
permit
reduced
parking
rate
for
the
large-scale
warehouse
and
industrial
building,
and
that's
a
city-wide
that
the
agricultural
rural
affairs
committee
recommend
that
council
won
a
proven
amendment
to
section
101
of
zoning
bylaw
2008-2504
warehouse,
light
industrial,
heavy
industrial
and
technology
industry,
minimum
parking
rate,
as
detailed
in
document.
One
item
number
two:
that
the
agriculture
and
rural
affair
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
be
included
as
part
of
the
pre-explanation
on
item
number:
nine:
okay,
great.
Okay,
thank.
A
For
the
item
just
mentioned,
only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
appeal
tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applica
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
appeals
tribunal.
If
council
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
90
days
of
recipient
of
the
application
for
zoning
120
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment
to
submit
written
comment
on
these
amendments
prior
to
their
consideration
by
the
city
council
on
october
14th,
please
email
or
call
the
committee
or
council
coordinator.
A
A
D
D
Okay,
so
next
slide
please
so
the
emily
project
was
initiated
in
2017
by
the
family
of
emily
trudeau.
Emily
was
critically
injured
in
a
farm
accident
at
a
second
farm,
no
buildings
and
no
911
on
the
property.
Her
family
called
9-1-1,
but
the
first
responders
couldn't
find
the
field
and
actually
drove
by
it
that
day
and
emily
subsequently
passed
away
from
her
injuries.
D
So
this
is
the
trudeau
family.
They
felt
they
needed
to
do
something
to
prevent
this
from
happening
again
to
another
farm
family,
so
they
initiated
this
project
and
put
together
a
committee
in
hastings
county
and
the
project
officially
launched
in
2017
at
the
hastings
county.
Plowing
match
next
slide.
D
D
So
whether
that's
teaching
farmers
to
have
a
phone
charger
in
every
tractor
or
go
through
an
emergency
plan
with
a
new
employee
just
so
that,
when
you're
put
in
an
emergency
situation,
people
know
what
to
do
and
how
to
do
it
quickly.
Next
slide,
as
I
mentioned,
the
official
launch
was
august
23rd
2017.
D
D
D
D
There's
15
municipalities
currently
participating,
I
believe
it's
nine
counties
and
six
individual
municipalities
across
the
province.
It
has
gained
a
lot
of
momentum
in
the
last
year.
Covent
has
certainly
slowed
it
down
a
bit
as
people
kind
of
regroup,
but
we're
starting
to
see
a
really
good
uptake
across
the
province
next
slide
and
that's
my
presentation.
Thank
you
very
much
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
it
today.
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much
deb
for
your
presentation
and,
if
I
can
say
thank
you
to
also
our
members
of
the
ofa
in
in
ottawa
and
prior
who
reached
out
to
us
about
the
emily
project
and
we
did
a
little
bit
of
work
with
our
staff
deb
and
I
believe
our
municipal
addressing
team
with
the
building
code
service
can
assign
civic
address
for
property
which
do
not
currently
have
one.
They
have
generic
email
addresses
and
and
it's
addressing,
and
we
can
provide
all
this
to
you.
A
I
reach
out
to
richard
ash
from,
and
we
got
a
pricing
on
those
those
sign
at
the
911
and
post
and
post
install.
If
it's
installed
by
the
city
is
a
94
911
replacement,
blade,
sign
and
post
still
94
and
that's
installed
by
the
city.
A
replacement,
blade
and
post
installed
by
the
owner
or
slash
developer
is
57
and
911
replacement.
Blade
sign
only
is
32
dollars
so
and
there's
no
additional
cost.
We
can
email
you
all
that
information
we
have.
A
You
can
share
it
with
your
member
and
and
now
will
open
it
to
my
colleague.
If
any
question
about,
or
from
deb
or
more
explanation
on
emily's
project
is,
it
was
quite
quite
a
bit
on
roma
rural
municipality
of
ontario.
They
spoke
about
this
and
the
need
for
farmer
to
to
basically
to
install
those
911
sign.
I
know
the
city
of
ottawa.
A
They
have
gps
technology
on
a
fire
truck
and
can
identify
property,
even
if
they
don't
have
the
blade
on
it,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
every
municipality
or
small
rural
municipality
in
ontario
have
that
technology,
but
also
it's
helpful
for
anyone
to
to
have
those
those
plate
signs
on
their
farm
gate,
especially
now
the
farm
are
hundreds
if
it's
not
thousands
of
acres.
So
anyway,
we'll
open
the
question
to
my
colleague.
I
didn't
see
any
hand
raid,
but
it's
anyone.
Oh
sorry,
councillor
moffat.
E
Yeah
thanks
for
this
and
thanks
deb
for
bringing
us.
I
know
that
you
actually
reached
out
to
us
last
year
about
this
in
2019
and
I
had
spoken
previously.
I
think
you
know
probably
some
twitter
exchanges
with
jeannie
and
frazier
who
used
to
live
in
val
field
now
lives,
I
believe,
over
in
southern
ontario.
E
E
It
was
just
a
comment
to
build
on
kind
of
what
eli
was
saying
that
different
musicalities
do
have
different
different
factors
when
it
comes
to
this
I
mean
I
actually
think
this
is
a
good
program
and
I
would
no
opposition
to
anyone
wanting
to
do
this,
but
just
from
the
effectiveness,
the
necessity
of
it
in
ottawa.
So
it
just
sort
of
says,
common
cell
providers
always
advise
us
of
which
cell
tower
received
the
call.
E
The
call
is
most
often
triangulated
off
multiple
cell
towers,
and
it
gives
them
a
degree
of
accuracy
to
that
location.
In
some
cases
it
states
within
three
meters
of
that
location
other
times
it
might
state
2000
meters,
that
location,
a
larger
variance
is
often
attributed
to
taller
apartment
buildings
or
nearby
hills.
E
If
we
can't
locate
a
caller,
we
can
request
in
most
cases
that
they
look
at
their
satellite
fix
on
a
mapping
tool
on
the
caller's
cell
phone,
which
is
often
very
accurate,
so
the
opinion
of-
and
this
was
andrew
orchard,
who
is
the
program
manager
with
paramedic
services?
His
opinion
is
that
the
suggested
feature
would
be
very
rarely
used,
as
we
have
not
experienced
trouble
locating
callers
within
the
ottawa
boundaries.
I
see
this
having
more
value
in
more
remote
areas
where
there
is
only
one
cell
tower
and
no
ability
to
triangulate
a
collar.
E
E
That
said,
I
think,
there's
also
there's
always
value
in
from
even
just
a
resident
perspective
when
you're
making
a
call
to
be
able
to
give
that
nearest
address.
We
just
had
one
last
a
couple
weeks
ago,
a
farm
accident
and
the
sharing
of
the
most
of
the
nearest
address
actually
led
to
confusion
in
the
community.
They
thought
it
was.
E
It
was
another
property
that
had
already
experienced
quite
a
significant
tragedy
from
a
farming
accident
a
few
years
ago,
just
by
that
that
misrepresentation
of
the
address,
so
it
so
there
are
there
are
there-
are
certainly
benefits.
I
know
at
least
in
in
ottawa's
case
we
haven't
had
issues
when
it
comes
to
locating
folks,
based
on
the
lack
of
address
signs.
But
again
you
know
no
opposition
in
my
mind
of
of
actually
offering
those
signs
to
make
sure
if
people
want
those
that
they
can
put
those
up.
B
Thank
you,
mr
chair,
for
you,
and
thank
you
very
much
deb
for
your
great
presentation,
and
I
know
that
this
is
very
important
initiative.
I
know
myself
and
counselor
strengthening
in
the
last
term.
He
we
work
very
closely
with
the
theory
of
arawa,
specifically
an
osgood
ward,
because
back
in
amalgamation
before
sorry,
not
magnification
back
in
the
ice
storm.
B
The
province
gave
money
for
farmer,
because
after
this
incident
we
had
the
loss
of
deficiency
and
9-1-1
calls
that
people
and
volunteer
could
not
be
able
to
reach
the
proper
farm
because
of
not
proper
efficiency.
911
blade
sign
at
that
time,
redrock
auburn
and
the
west
carton
and
the
gloucester
area.
They
actually
replaced
their
signs
with
aluminum,
911
blade
and
as
good
at
that
time.
Unfortunately,
they
used
the
metal
one
and
and
what
happened
is
with
the
snow,
clearing
and
the
wing
when
the
snow
plow
goes
by
the
combo
trucks
they
were.
B
Salt
was
hitting
those
9-1-1
and
they
were
all
rusty.
So
we
were
able,
with
the
help
of
my
colleague
an
era
last
term
we
were
able
to
allocate
some
funds
and
we
changed
all
the
911
blades
and
they
were
free.
We
distribute
them
to
every
major
road
and
as
good
words
to
be
able
to
follow
the
lead
of
riddle
corbin
and
was
carlton
at
that
time
with
aluminum.
So
I
want
to
thank
you.
B
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
council
de
roos.
So
what
deb?
You
heard
our
support
for
this.
I
just
want
to
add
a
little
bit
to
what
council
moffatt
was
saying
and
sometimes
counselor.
The
cell
phone
itself
is
not
good
enough,
because
if
they
are
the
nearest
tower
and
it
happened
couple
accidents
in
on
the
ottawa
river
and
when
the
caller
called
the
car
got
picked
up
by
gatineau,
and
we
have
some
challenge
with
with
the
language
barrier
to
to
explain
the
accident.
A
A
So
we'll
send
you
all
the
information
and
the
address
in
ottawa
ca,
and
so
you
can
provide
it
to
all
your
member
and
if
they
wish
to
follow
through,
I
will
give
you
a
list
of
the
cost
as
well.
So
with
that
can
we
receive
deb
is
a
presentation
for
the
record
well,
thank
you
very
much.
Deb
really
appreciate
you
being
here
with
us
today.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
so
now
college
will
go
to
to
a
health
item
which
is
a
briefing
on
planning
and
development
charges,
aspect
of
bill,
197
and
garrett.
I
know
some
of
us,
the
vice
chair
and
council
moffitt
myself
on
the
planning
committee,
but
I
think
I'd
like
to
start
from
the
beginning,
because
some
of
my
colleagues
do
not
sit
on
planet
committee.
So
if
you
can
take
us
back
to
the
beginning
of
this
bill,
we'll
be.
C
C
B
C
Out
it
was
before
september
18th,
so
the
provisions
also
weren't
in
force,
so
this
presentation
has
been
updated
to
ensure
that
it
has
the
latest
information,
including
the
information
from
the
regulations,
so
to
the
extent
that
there's
anything
new
in
this,
it
won't
be
reflected
in
the
report
that
was
previously
issued.
It
will
be
reflected
in
this
presentation.
C
So
most
notably
bill
of
108
dealt
with
repealing
section
37
bonusing
and
replacing
it
with
a
community
benefits
charge
which
is
a
similar
to
a
development
charge
we'll
get
into
that
more
later,
and
it
also
had
some
provisions
dealing
with
parkland
so
that
later
on
on
june,
21st
2019
regulations
came
out
related
to
bill
108
december
10
2019
some
bill
138
came
out,
and
that
was
making
some
tweaks
to
the
bill.
108
proposal.
C
C
C
C
That's
what
section
37
did
permit
that
has
been
now
repealed
under
the
proposal
under
bill
108
and
then,
as
amended
by
bill
197
section
35,
7
bylaws
will
remain
in
force
for
a
period
of
time
until
either
we
enact
a
community
benefits
charge
by
law
or
or
a
specified
date.
Actually,
the
section
37
by
law
will
continue
after
that
specified
date.
A
C
Community
benefits
charges,
so
this
is
the
new
provision
that
came
into
effect.
It
was
first
proposed
under
bill.
108
bill
197,
substantially
changed
what
a
community
benefits
charge
can
be
applied
to
community
benefits.
Charges
are
now
much
more
limited.
They
can
only
apply
to
high
density
residential
development,
so
that
is
defined
as
a
residential
development
consisting
of
ten
or
more
residential
units
and
five
or
more
stories.
It
has
to
have
both
so.
C
B
C
It
can
be
applied
to
any
capital
costs
related
to
development
in
the
area
to
which
the
community
benefits
charge
applies,
it's
a
similar
definition
to
what
the
development
charge
could
be
applied
for
previously,
and
it's
not
limited.
There's
no
specific
types
of
services
that
can't
be
collected
through
community
benefits
charges.
They
do
have
to,
however,
be
tied
to
a
development
in
the
community
benefits
charge
area
and
that
question
of
whether
it's
tied
to
development
should
be
justified
through
the
community
benefits
charge
strategy,
which
is
similar
to
a
development
charge.
C
C
It
has
fewer
specific
requirements
in
the
development
charges
act,
so
the
development
charges
act
has
very
specific
regulations
about
what
goes
into
a
background
study
and
how
the
various
inputs
are
calculated.
The
community
benefits
charge
bylaw.
We
have
the
regulation
now.
It
doesn't
provide
quite
as
much
detail
as
the
development
charges
by
law.
Background
study
provisions
do
we
still
have
to
articulate
what
growth
we're
anticipating.
B
C
C
B
C
C
C
A
C
C
B
B
C
In
force
for
two
years
until
september,
18,
2022
or
until
council
decides
to
elect
to
enact
a
community
benefits
charge
by
law,
whichever
is
sooner,
and
so
after
that
two-year
period,
any
development
charges
which
are
no
longer
legal
in
accordance
with
the
new
bill.
197
list
would
not
be
enforceable,
but
it
doesn't
appear
based
on
my
initial
review,
that
there
are
any
specific
development
charges
that
ottawa
is
collecting.
C
C
C
The
the
one
catch
is
that
the
current
act,
and
as
amended
as
well
continues
to
allow
us
to
collect
an
alternative
rate.
An
alternative
rate
in
the
act
is
calculated
on
the
basis
of
it
basically
applies
to
high
density
residential
and
we
would
apply
a
rate
of
one
hectare
per
300
units
for
dedication
of
of
parkland
and
there's
a
different
rate
for
cash
in
lieu
as
well.
That
is
an
alternative
to
the
easier
way
of
calculating
it,
which
is
based
on
a
percentage
of
land.
C
C
Finally,
the
minister
has
power
under
section
47
of
the
act
to
issue
orders
under
the
old
act.
The
minister
could
issue
orders
with
respect
to
zoning
or
subdivision
approvals.
The
bill
197
permitted
the
minister
also
the
power
to
issue
orders
with
respect
to
site
plan
approval
under
the
new
provision.
The
minister
can
effectively
exempt
a
property
from
municipal
approval
of
site
plan
and
direct
that
site
plan
b,
be
approved
by
the
minister
on
terms
dictated
by
the
minister.
C
The
municipality
still
would
enter
into
the
agreement
the
site
plan
agreement,
but
the
minister's
conditions
would
have
to
be
in
the
agreement.
This
hasn't
been
used
in
ottawa
very
frequently.
If,
at
all,
to
my
knowledge,
I
do
know
that
the
minister's
orders
have
been
issued
more
frequently
in
the
greater
toronto
area.
So
it's
unclear
whether
this
would
be
something
that
will
be
stating
more
in
ottawa
or
if
it's
mostly
going
to
be
relevant
to
the
gta.
C
A
C
D
D
Now
it's
going
to
be
quite
specific
one
hectare
per
100
units.
If
I
understand
that
correctly
many
of
the
plans
that
we
don't
really,
how
can
we
actually
determine
if
how
this
is
going
to
affect
us?
I
guess
in
essence,
will
we
see
smaller
parks
in
the
future,
or
will
this
actually
have
a
benefit?
A
higher
density
will
will
require
greater
parkland.
C
So
I
don't
I
thank
you
for
the
question
and
through
you,
mr
chair,
I
don't
have.
I
don't
anticipate
that
this
will
change
our
ability
to
collect
parkland.
Our
current
bylaw
remains
in
force
to
be
clear
for
at
least
the
next
two
years
we
currently
under
our
current
bylaw
have
this
alternative
rate
which
I've
been
referring
to
it,
as
we
have
one
rate
for
residential
development
that
is
just
based
on
a
percentage
of
the
land
or,
if
they're,
doing
cash
and
loots
it's
the
value
of
that
land.
C
My
reflection
is
it's
five
percent,
and
then
we
have
an
alternative
rate
which
currently
applies.
That
is
based
it's
for
higher
density,
residential
development,
so
we're
building
a
condo
or
a
apartment
tower
that
kind
of
thing.
That
rate
will
apply
currently
on
it's
one
hectare
per
300
units,
correct,
yes
and
then
there's
a
separate
rate.
C
D
D
C
D
The
but
the
intent
of
these
changes
really
is
to
allow
developers
to
allow
speed
up
to
speed
up
and
take
some
of
the
barriers
to
housing
development
away.
So
overall,
would
you
say
that
this
is
good
for
us,
or
would
you
say
that
you
know
we're
we're
gonna?
This
will
be
a
little
bit
more
problematic
and
in
the
way
that
we
we
development
is
allowed
yeah.
D
C
Legislation
that
we've
been
talking
about
is
to
reduce
barriers
to
housing
development.
I
think
the
the
changes
we're
seeing
in
bill
197
overall
are
favorable
to
the
municipality.
They
kind
of
take
into
account
some
of
the
comments
that
the
province
had
had
received
to
bill
108,
which
we
had.
We
had
comments
from
counsel
and
staff
as
well
on
those,
and
so
I
think.
B
D
C
C
A
E
Thanks
just
briefly,
I
think
I
mean
I
think,
garrett
sort
of
summed
it
up
there.
There
were
some.
There
are
certain
bills
that
come
out
of
the
province,
regardless
of
which
government
it
is,
I
think,
of
bill
181
with
some
election
changes
back
in
in
2016,
but
certainly
bill.
108
was
confounding
from
a
municipal
governance
perspective
and
saying
well:
did
anyone
even
consult
municipalities
on
a
bill
like
this?
E
It
was
the
same
with
bill
181
it
it's
almost
as
though
the
people
who
write
these
bills
don't
actually
know
anything
about
the
444
municipalities
in
the
province
of
ontario.
So
I
think
bill
won
any
set.
197
helps
to
correct,
regardless
of
covid.
This
needed
to
happen.
If,
if
they
want
to
use
covet
as
a
as
a
cover
for
for
amending
bill
108,
then
then
so
be
it
I'm
fine
with
it.
But
those
changes
needed
to
happen
because
they
weren't
they
were
detrimental
to
the
operation
of
a
municipality.
A
B
B
A
A
A
We
have
no
one
to
speak
inquiries
and
inquiries
other
business
for
some
of
my
colleagues.
We
will
be
adjourning
from
iraq
momentarily,
but
we
will
reconvene
under
the
court
of
revision.
I'm
not
sure
if
all
my
colleagues
like
to
stay
but
they're
welcome
to
stay,
but
we
need
at
least
three
of
us
to
be
on
the
next
item.
A
A
There's
a
statement
to
be
read
here
by
the
chair
of
the
court
of
revision.
At
the
beginning
of
the
hearing
on
october,
1st
2020
for
the
printing
ball
municipal
drain
for
the
purpose
of
hearing
appeals
under
section
52
of
the
drainage
act
by
owners
of
land
assessed
for
drainage
works
under
the
engineers
report
for
the
renjimbal
municipal
drain
and
title
court
of
revision,
amendment
to
the
engineers
report
for
the
rinjan
paul
municipal
drain,
dated
february
2020.
This
court
will
now
convene
for
the
first
setting
of
the
court
of
revision
under
section
46
of
drainage
act.
A
The
following
appeal
has
been
received
by
the
city.
Clerk
dave
ryan.
Is
the
city
of
ottawa,
a
drainage
engineer
any
owner
a
flat
assessed
under
the
engineer's
report,
who
has
not
provided
written
notice
of
appeal
to
the
clerk
in
advance
of
this
should
identify
themselves
with
the
clerk
assistant
at
this
time
with
a
request
to
be
heard.
B
A
A
B
A
Chair,
okay,
so
any
question
from
carly
no
at
the
conclusion
of
the
hearing
of
the
appeal
has
been
granted
to
the
court
has
decided
that
there
shall
be
a
change
to
the
assessment,
slash
assessment,
slash
assessment
schedule.
As
stated
in
the
engineers
report,
then
the
chair
may
wish
to
state
the
following.
This
court
adopted
the
following
update
to
the
assessment
schedules
in
the
engineers
report
dated
february
2020.
A
Our
reference
to
the
roll
number
associated
with
the
parcel
152
shall
be
corrected.
Two
five:
zero:
zero:
three:
zero
one:
five:
five:
four:
zero:
zero:
zero:
zero,
zero
zero.
The
decision
rendered
by
the
court
maybe
appear
to
the
agriculture
food
and
rural
affair
appeal
tribunal
within
21
days
of
today
october,
1st
2020.
A
613-580-2424
extension
25008
with
that
the
court
adjourned
at
the
conclusion
of
the.
If
his
no
appeal
has
been
filed
or
if
appeal
had
been
filed,
the
court
has
decided
there
shall
be
no
changes
to
the
assessment.
As
stated
in
the
engineer's
report
and
the
sheriff
stated,
the
following:
this
court
adopt
the
assessment
in
engineers
report
dated
february
2020.
A
B
A
So
with
with
that
again,
if
someone
need
a
sample
of
appeal
notice,
they
can
call
the
city
of
ottawa
number
613-580-2424
extension
25-0
with
that
the
court
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
folks
and
have
a
great
long
weekend
in
in
october,
and
our
next
meeting
will
be
november
5th
happy
thanksgiving
everyone.