►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-Committee - August 23, 2022
Description
Built Heritage Sub-Committee meeting of August 23, 2033
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
Well,
I
do
see
that
we
have
Quorum
now
so
good
morning,
everybody
and
welcome
to
the
built
Heritage
subcommittee
meeting
of
August
23rd
2022
I'd
like
to
call
the
members
to
order.
Before
we
begin
our
proceedings,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
that
Ottawa
is
built
on
unseated
Algonquin,
anishinaabe
territory.
The
peoples
of
the
Algonquin
anishinabe
Nation
have
lived
on
this
territory
for
Millennia
their
culture
and
presence
have
nurtured
and
continued
to
nurture
this
place.
The
city
of
Ottawa
honors,
the
people
and
the
land
of
the
Algonquin
animal
Nation.
A
The
city
of
Ottawa
also
recognizes
and
respects
to
diversity
and
contributions
that
all
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
metis
people
bring
to
our
city.
Members
are
reminded
to
submit
any
motions,
visual
supports
or
Declarations
of
interest
in
writing
to
the
coordinator
at
their
earliest
opportunity.
Although
the
deadlines
have
passed
for
residents
to
register
to
speak
and
provide
written,
submissions
to
the
subcommittee,
residents
may
still
make
submissions
to
planning
committee
and
Council.
If
you
have
any
technical
difficulties
signing
into
the
meeting
you
can
contact.
A
The
committee
coordinator
by
calling
613-580-2424
extension
22953
a
reminder
that,
if
participants
have
technical
issues
with
their
Zoom
connection,
they
may
call
in
using
the
backup
telephone
number
provided
by
the
coordinator.
I
have
received
regrets
from
Vice,
chair
Quinn.
Could
the
committee
coordinator,
please
call
the
roll
a
reminder
to
members
to
unmute
themselves
when
they're
called.
C
B
A
C
I'm,
a
member
of
this
committee,
but
I'm
also
practicing
architect
and
Heritage
consultant.
Therefore,
there
were
three
items
that
I
wish
to
declare
interest
at
this
meeting.
The
first
is
35
37
Williams
Street,
where
I
was
the
architect
that
developed
the
concept
for
the
Reconstruction
of
this
property
after
the
fire,
and
so
I'd
like
to
declare
interest
for
that.
C
The
second
one
is
item
4.3
197
201
wheelbroad,
where
I'm
the
architect
for
the
infill
development
that
is
going
to
be
before
built
here
with
the
subcommittee
today
and
thirdly,
item
number
4.470
Nicholas,
the
former
city
registry
office,
development
for
Cadillac
Fairview
I'm,
the
Heritage
consultant
on
that
one.
So
I'm
wanting
to
declare
interest
on
that
one
as
well,
so
for
those
three
items,
I
will
withdraw
from
the
from
the
discussion.
A
B
A
Thank
you.
Well,
given
the
number
of
items
on
the
agenda
today,
I
have
decided
to
proceed
with
a
consent
agenda.
Our
first
item
4.1,
is
an
application
for
Demolition
and
new
construction
at
229,
231,
241
and
245,
as
well
as
247
Beechwood
Avenue,
a
property
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
act.
That
item
will
be
held
for
presentation
and
speakers.
A
The
second
item
is
the
reissuance
of
the
Heritage
permit
for
35
37
William
Street
Properties
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
act
located
in
the
byword
market,
Heritage
Conservation
District
now
I
do
see
that
councilor
Fleury
is
with
us
the
award
counselor
and
has
raised
his
hand.
Would
you
like
to
make
comments
on
on
this
item?.
B
You
I
believe
it's
I'm
just
looking
to
understand
this.
This
property
is
important.
It's
in
the
Bible
Market,
it's
in
a
specialty,
District,
it's
in
a
it's
designated
and
within
the
Heritage
conservation
districts,
just
curious
as
to
going
through
another
Winter's
period
and
and
what,
if
we
have
the
right
environment
if
we
have
the
right
requirements
to
protect
the
Integrity
of
what
is
remaining,
which
I
believe
to
be
the
friend
the
friend
facade.
B
Think
that's
a
question.
I'll
have
to
Circle
back
with
building
code
services
to
ensure
they
have
all
the
proper
studies
to
ensure
that
this
property
can
sustain
another
winter.
We
can
maybe
Circle
back
with
with
you
afterwards,
if
that's
appropriate,
absolutely
does
it
have
an
impact
on
the
report
in
front
of
us
today
or.
A
B
B
E
A
A
A
Excellent
well,
thank
you
for
those
comments
and
counselor
flurries
on
the
call,
so
he's
a
receipt
of
them.
If
there
are
no
other
comments
from
Dominic.
Is
this
item
carried
carried?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
4.3
application
to
alter
197
to
a
one
will
Broad
Street
Properties
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
acts
as
part
of
the
Sandy
Hill
West
Heritage
Conservation
District
that
Mr
Fleming.
B
Yes,
chair
I
did
want
to
bring
to
your
attention.
There
was
a
a
recent
media
article
in
Sandy
Hill
of
the
request
to
purchase
property
and,
and
this
this
is
the
same
portfolio
which
is
Mr
gork
Faye
I'm,
happy
to
see
that
there
is
a
new
ownership.
I
am
happy
to
see
the
engagement
of
the
last
number
of
years.
I.
Obviously
Barry's,
declare
and
conflict
on
this
matter,
but
it
is,
it
is
his
work.
B
E
A
B
A
A
Thank
you.
So
is
this
item
carried
Harry?
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
4.5
designation
of
York
Street
Public
School
310
York
Street
in
Glebe
Collegiate
Institute,
212,
glebees
Avenue
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
act.
This
item
will
be
held.
There
is
a
presentation
item,
4.6
application
to
alter
15
Linden
Terrace,
a
property
designated
under
part,
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
act
and
located
in
the
clemo
malklin
driveway
in
Linden
Terrace
Heritage,
Conservation
District.
This
item
will
be
held
for
a
presentation
as
well.
A
A
D
D
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
is
a
view
from
just
in
front
of
the
site
on
Beechwood
Avenue,
so
Beachwood
Avenue
is
is
different
from
from
any
other
Street
in
the
hcd.
It's
a
main
street,
and
this
section
in
particular,
serves
as
a
transition
point
between
the
more
commercial
character
towards
new
Edinburgh
west
of
Acacia
and
the
increasingly
residential
character
as
you
move
towards
Beachwood
Cemetery.
D
So
the
rock
of
Park
hcd
is
mainly
characterized
by
its
Park
and
Villa
Lots,
with
detached
buildings
set
into
their
park-like
setting.
But
the
plan
also
identifies
the
multi-unit
buildings,
the
smaller
lots
and
modest
houses
in
the
Panhandle
as
an
attribute,
and
while
the
plan
provides
General
new
construction
guidelines,
it
doesn't
provide
specific
ones
for
how
a
new
multi-unit
building
in
the
Panhandle
might
be
constructed.
D
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
I've
got
the
site
plan
drawings
here,
so
the
applicant
has
submitted
these
applications
in
order
to
demolish
the
existing
buildings
on
site,
consolidate
the
lot
and
build
two
new
low-rise
apartment
buildings
and
the
plan.
The
HDD
plan
contemplates
the
demolition
of
grade
two
properties,
provided
that
the
new
construction
meets
the
HD
plan,
so
a
site
plan
application
has
been
submitted
for
this
project
as
well.
D
Concurrently,
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
we've
got
the
elevations
of
the
buildings,
so
both
both
buildings
have
been
oriented
to
face.
Beechwood
the
building
on
the
west
is
proposed
to
be
three
stories,
while
the
building
on
the
East
is
to
be
four-story,
each
will
have
a
small
rooftop
amenity,
space
and
mechanical
room,
as
well
as
a
sunken
basement
level,
where
the
main
entrance
of
the
building
will
be
located
as
well
as
an
underground
garage.
D
The
buildings
will
be
primarily
clad
in
a
mix
of
brick,
gray,
metal,
paneling
and
glazing,
as
well
as
stone
for
the
basement
level,
and
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
you
can
see
the
buildings
have
been
set
into
their
into
the
inclining
grade
of
the
site
and
the
top
floors
of
each
building
have
been
slightly
set
back
from
the
front
facade
on
the
next
slide.
We've
got
the
landscape
plan,
so
you
can
see
when
it
when
it
comes
up
the
scale
and
and
rectangular
massing
of
the
building
really
results
in.
D
D
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
this
I
think
this
has
been
quite
a
challenging
file
and,
in
principle,
stuff,
are
not
opposed
to
a
project
that
would
add
additional
density
and
units.
Here,
the
Heritage
planning
branch
has
approved
other
multi-unit
intensification
projects
in
the
Panhandle.
These
are
a
couple
of
examples
here
on
the
screen
and
certainly
across
the
city
as
well
in
the
bottom
left.
D
However,
there
are
remaining
concerns
about
the
way
in
which
those
units
are
being
proposed
to
be
added,
which
really
maxes
out
the
zoning
envelope
to
its
fullest
extent.
The
city
does
have
official
plan
policies,
both
in
the
new
newly
adopted
op
and
existing
op
that
speak
to
achieving
intensification
goals
in
hcds
through
contextually
sensitive
infill,
provided
that
it
respects
and
conserves
the
cultural
heritage,
values
and
attributes
in
SAS
opinion.
This
has
not
been
achieved
through
these
applications
and
therefore
our
recommending
refusal
of
them
this
morning.
D
They
relate
to
the
limited
soft
Landscaping
provided
on
the
site,
which
is
a
direct
result
of
the
proposed
scale
and
footprint
and
arrangement
of
the
mass
of
the
buildings,
which
in
turn
also
impacts
the
overall
design
and
expression
in
terms
of
its
compatibility
in
the
Beechwood
streetscape.
So
a
full
review
against
the
plan
has
been
provided
in
the
staff
report,
but
in
the
next
couple
of
slides,
I
just
want
to
pull
out
some
of
the
critical
guidelines
that,
in
staff's
opinion,
have
not
been
satisfied.
D
D
We
go
to
the
next
slide
for
guidelines
for
new
buildings.
There
are
no
grade
one
buildings
surrounding
the
site.
However,
the
guidelines
require
that
height
and
mass
of
a
new
building
respects
the
character
of
existing
buildings
in
the
streetscape,
and
although
the
applicant
has
made
efforts
to
mitigate
the
height
of
the
proposed
building,
the
arrangement
of
the
mass
Still
Remains
a
concern.
D
The
locating
the
main
entrance
in
the
basement
is
also
out
of
character,
with
typical
entrances
for
surrounding
properties,
which
are
usually
at
or
a
few
steps
above
grade
with
a
porch,
so
this,
together
with
the
design
of
the
windows
and
other
openings,
contribute
to
more
of
an
office
or
commercial
like
expression
of
the
buildings
that
doesn't
really
relate,
or
reference
patterns
on
the
north
side
of
Beechwood
Avenue.
So
in
these
ways
the
proposed
buildings
do
not
respect
the
character
and
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
Beechwood
streetscape.
D
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide
just
quickly
on
cons
consultation,
this
project
has
been
the
subject
of
several
meetings
with
the
rocker
Park
residents
Association
through
the
Heritage
planning
branches,
pre-application
consultation
program
and
also
through
the
development
review
process
and
staff
have
been
working
with
our
closely
with
our
colleagues
in
planning
on
this
file.
The
Rocco
Park
residence
Association
has
provided
comments
on
this
proposal.
D
Heritage
Ottawa
was
also
notified
and
has
provided
comments
and
neighbors
were
also
circulated,
and
the
chair
also
provided
comments
in
the
staff
report
and
then
just
quickly
on
the
next
slide
in
terms
of
the
the
Urban
Design
review
panel.
The
panel
did
review
this
most
recently
in
this
past
spring
and
they
did
Focus
specifically
on
some
of
the
Heritage
aspects
on
the
Heritage
context,
recommending
improved
integration
with
the
hcd.
D
Specifically,
they
recommended
considering
increasing
side
yard
setbacks,
rethinking
that
basement
level,
considering
ground-oriented
units
and
improving
that
pedestrian
connection,
and
also
picking
up
on
some
of
the
and
reflecting
some
of
the
elements
seen
in
the
area
like
porches
and
window
Styles
and
patterns
of
openings.
So
staff
agree
with
these
recommendations.
However,
they
they
were
not
able
to
be
implemented
into
this
proposal.
That's
before
the
committee
today
and
then
just
quickly.
D
C
A
Thank
you
Mackenzie
for
that
very
in-depth
report.
We
did
receive
correspondence
from
the
black
Maple
private
cotenency
committee,
as
well
as
a
resident
and
also
a
letter
from
from
Heritage
Ottawa.
We
do
have
a
number
of
registered
speakers.
The
first
set
of
speakers
are
from
the
applicant
team
who
I
understand
will
be
providing
a
presentation.
G
I
do
recognize
the
time
that
is
preferred
to
stay
within
the
five
minute
time
frame
for
presentations.
With
your
permission,
Mr,
chair
I,
would
ask
perhaps
for
a
bit
of
additional
time
just
to
allow
both
myself
and
our
clients
Heritage
consultant
to
speak
to
this.
In
light
of
stuff
recommendation.
I'll.
G
B
G
G
Perhaps
I
can
just
introduce
myself
and
our
team
while
we
wait
for
the
slides,
so
my
name
is
Caleb
Blakely
I'm,
a
planner
with
novatech
I'm,
acting
as
agent
for
our
clients,
Smart
Living
properties,
I'm
joined
today
by
their
Heritage
consultant,
John,
Stewart,
I,
believe
the
architect.
Bob
Woodman
is
also
available.
There's
representatives
from
Smart
living
here
as
well.
In
the
event,
there's
any
questions
just
to
introduce
Smart,
Living
properties,
they're
a
local
builder.
In
Ottawa
they
specialize
in
Quality
Rental
accommodations.
G
They
they
focus
their
units
to
Prime
locations
that
are
walkable
near
Transit,
just
to
appeal
to
a
wide
range
of
demographics
anywhere
from
Young
professionals
to
small
families.
So
this
is
their
one
development
proposal
that
we
have
been
working
for
quite
some
time
with
the
city,
as
Mackenzie
noted
in
her
presentation.
A
G
Okay,
thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
we
appreciate
the
presentation
from
staff
and
they
recognize
a
lot
of
the
efforts
that
have
gone
into
this
project
over
the
years.
There's
been
a
number
of
iterations
to
where
we
are
today,
but
unfortunately
we
cannot
agree
with
the
recommendation
that
is
before
the
subcommittee
today,
as
in
our
view,
it
does
not
have
appropriate
regard
for
the
distinct
character
of
this
transitional
area
of
Rock
Cliff
Park,
nor
the
function
of
Beechwood
Avenue
as
a
main
street.
So
with
that
I
will,
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
G
Just
to
provide
brief
context
is
that
the
subject
properties,
as
as
staff
noted,
is
within
the
area
known
as
the
Panhandle
and
the
media
area.
There's
quite
a
number
of
contemporary
builds
containing
multiple
units,
there's
also
older,
more
modest
dwellings
that
are
more
typical
in
form
to
those
found
in
adjacent
neighborhoods
of
Vanier
and
new
Edinburgh
outside
of
the
Heritage
Conservation
District.
There
becomes
more
a
more
prominence
of
street
level.
G
G
Just
to
provide
some
photos
of
the
area
and
including
a
number
of
the
subject
properties,
they
are
each
individually
developed
with
two
to
three
story:
multi-unit
dwellings,
they're
set
relatively
close
to
each
other
and
have
presence
along
the
street.
There's
access
from
Beechwood
for
surface
parking,
there's
also
informal
parking
provided
along
Carsdale
Avenue,
which
bisects
the
two
sites.
If
we
continue
to
the
next
foreign.
G
And
this
just
shows
the
existing
conditions
and
the
next
slide
to
briefly
touch
on
the
planning
framework
for
these
properties,
so
the
the
properties
are
all
designated
as
traditional
Main
Street
in
the
city's
official
plan.
So
the
objective
of
the
traditional
Main
Street
designation
is
to
encourage
more
dense
and
mixed-use
development.
This
is
along
target
areas
that
are
accommodate
or
that
are
well
served
by
transit,
so
Redevelopment
and
intensification
is
encouraged
in
building
formats
that
enclose
the
street
to
promote
a
pedestrian-oriented
environment.
G
In
fact,
the
secondary
plan
was
amended
a
number
of
years
ago
to
remove
any
residential
density
restrictions
from
the
multiple
family
designation.
That
applies
on
the
west
side
of
Beechwood,
and
that
was
to
reflect
the
envisioned
envisioned
development
that
was
to
occur
along
here
in
keeping
with
the
new
Beechwood
Community
design
plan
that
was
being
brought
in
at
the
time
if
we
flip
to
the
next
slide.
G
G
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
some
of
the
the
efforts
that
have
been
implemented
to
ensure
a
Heritage,
sensitive
design
include
matters
such
as
maintaining
the
residential
character,
despite
being
on
a
Main
Street,
providing
that
in
a
low-rise
built
form,
that's
in
keeping
with
adjacent
development,
providing
for
articulation
and
step
back
of
upper
floors.
As
shown.
G
There's
been
efforts
in
terms
of
landscaping
to
reinterpret
former
lot
Fabric
through
use
of
the
front
Gardens
there's.
In
addition,
these
the
landscape
concept
was
designed
specifically
to
carry
forward
some
of
the
attributes
that
Define
these
properties
currently
in
terms
of
the
low
Stone
retaining
walls
that
Define
the
street.
The
narrow
breaks
in
the
streetscape
to
provide
for
narrow,
walkways
single
with
driveways,
and,
in
fact
this
plan
would
keep
existing
accesses
virtually
in
the
same
location
and
just
maintain
single
walkways
to
each
building
to
really
emphasize
soft
Landscaping
to
the
front.
G
And,
of
course,
the
consideration,
one
of
the
important
considerations
is
balancing
intensification
with
Heritage
conservation
I
will
let
Jon
Stewart
speak
to
more
detail
in
terms
of
the
Heritage
District
policies,
but,
as
mentioned,
this
area
is
distinct
in
character.
Beechwood
is
the
only
arterial
Road
within
the
neighborhood,
which
should
be
considered
in
this
proposal,
and
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,.
G
So,
to
conclude
on
this,
we
we
recognize
staff
have
raised
concern
with
ability
to
conserve
a
park-like
setting.
However,
the
Panhandle
is
not
characterized
by
a
park-like
setting
which
can
be
attributed
to
building
set
within
large
landscape
Lots.
In
fact,
the
Panhandle
is
characterized
by
buildings
which
have
presence
along
the
street,
which
have
narrow
side
yards
and
small
gaps
between
buildings,
properties
that
have
greater
lock
coverage
and
more
mix
of
Hardscape
and
softscape.
G
H
H
There
are
two
areas
that
are
highlighted
in
the
blue:
the
two
areas,
one
next
to
the
pond
and
the
one
that
we're
referencing
right
now:
the
lands
located
on
the
west
side
of
Beechwood
Avenue
between
Oak
Hill,
Road
and
Acacia
Avenue,
and
also
designated
multi
residential
multi-family,
allowing
for
family
dwellings,
two
family
dwellings,
semi-detached
duplexes
row,
houses,
apartments
and
accessory
uses
at
a
residential
density
shown
on
the
schedule.
A
next
slide.
Please.
H
H
Our
site
is
the
two
blocks
between
Carsdale
and,
if
you
go
to
the
right
hand,
side
on
the
the
five
lots
are
shown
there
next
slide.
Please
and
the
just
following
this
through.
When
you
look
at
the
Conservation
District
plan,
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage,
Valley
and
defining
Heritage
attributes
includes
a
statement
addressing
the
Panhandle
as
the
distinct
area
it
it.
H
H
H
Next
to
the
district,
the
official
plan
policies
do
not
set
up
specific
requirements
related
to
scale
or
density,
but
do
state
that
the
height
massing
setbacks
and
parking
areas
of
any
development
in
this
area
shall
be
compatible
with
the
development
in
the
adjacent
areas
designated
residential.
This
applies
to
not
to
the
overall
Village,
but
just
to
this
area
in
the
Panhandle
and
I.
Think,
just
more
than
anything
indicates
that
there
has
been
an
effort
to
integrate
the
the
with
in
terms
of
height
in
terms
of
materials
with
other
sites.
Next
slide,
please.
H
I'm
you
saw
this
earlier,
but
I
think
it's
an
interesting
illustration
in
what
the
architect
is
attempting
to
do.
You
see,
on
the
left
hand,
side
the
two
existing
buildings
are
set
in
place.
The
the
apartment
building
is
No
taller.
There
was
an
effort
taken
in
with
the
darker
materials
to
kind
of
establish
that
Rhythm
As
you
move
down
the
street,
along
with
the
with
the
driveways
and
and
walkways
leading
up
to
it
kind
of
in
an
attempt
to
reflect
some
of
the
character.
H
In
the
staff
report
it
states,
the
applicant's
proposal
has
been
evaluated
against
The
Rock
Cliff
Park
hcd
plan,
and
although
the
plan
identifies
the
Panhandle
area
and
its
multi-unit
buildings,
it
does
not
provide
specific
guidelines
on
new
multi-unit
development.
In
fact
the
EOP
policies,
although
they
don't
specify
requirements
relating
to
scale
and
density,
they
do
state
that
the
height
massing
setback
and
parking
areas
of
any
development
in
this
area
shall
be
compatible
with
development
on
the
adjacent
area's
designated
residential
next
slide.
H
Please
surf
reports
also
states
that
the
applicant's
proposal
has
been
evaluated
against
standards,
1
and
11
of
the
standards
and
guidelines
for
the
conservation
of
historic
places
in
Canada
and
goes
on
to
State.
Concerns
raised
with
the
proposed
massing
compatibility
with
the
beach
with
streetscape
lawden
development
pattern
and
the
ability
to
to
conserve
the
important
Park
life
setting
through
soft
landscape
on
the
Lots
I
question.
Whether
or
not
the
park
like
setting
ever
existed
in
the
Panhandle
and
I
further
questioned
the
use
of
standards
and
guidelines.
H
A
I
Thank
you
chair.
This
question
may
be
best
for
for
Kayla,
perhaps,
but
we've
seen
a
lot
of
discussion
in
the
staff
report
and
again
today,
in
in
your
presentation
and
in
the
city
staff
presentation
concerning
setbacks
and
the
maintenance
of
green
space
and
Greenery
and
regardless
of
whether
you're
characterizing,
you
know
a
park-like
setting
it's
hard
to
dispute
the
fact
that
the
current
properties
do
have
fairly
significant
setbacks
and
quite
a
bit
of
greenery
udrp,
also
recommended
setbacks
increased
to
the
east
and
west.
G
C
B
C
D
Thank
you
for
the
question
and
through
you
chair,
so
the
the
site
has
sites
does
have
site-specific
zoning,
so
it
has
an
exception
at
the
applicant.
I
think
has
worked
to
ensure
that
there
are
no
variances
that
are
necessary
now
I.
Think
John
Bernier
is
the
Planner
on
the
file
he
can.
He
can
clarify
a
bit
further.
I
think
there
may
be
a
technical,
somewhat
technical
variance
required
that
has
to
do
with
the
definition
of
the
front
yard,
but
it
doesn't
impact
from
a
Heritage
perspective.
C
Okay,
thank
you
and
my
second
question
for
clarity
in
the
staff
report
is
suggested
that
the
Urban
Design
review
panel
had
made
a
number
of
recommendations
and
because
the
proponent
did
not
adopt
those
recommendations,
staff
is
recommended.
Refusal
had
the
proponent
amended
the
design
to
incorporate
the
Urban
Design
review
panel
recommendations.
Is
it
likely
that
the
staff
report
would
have
recommended
approval
of
this
proposal?.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
for
the
question
and,
through
your
chair,
I,
think
the
panel
made
some
really
excellent
recommendations.
I
think
they
are
very
much
in
line
with
the
comments
that
staff
have
consistently
been
providing
back
to
the
applicant,
so
I
think
if
some
of
those
recommendations
have
been
implemented.
Certainly
we
would
need
to
look
at
the
new
proposal
once
those
have
been
made
and
I
think
where
I'm,
where
I
was
going
in
my
presentation
is
that
it
wouldn't
be
just
one
change.
A
A
E
Supports
the
staff
recommendation
to
refuse
the
application
for
demolition,
the
new
construction
for
these
properties,
despite
its
location
on
what
is
considered
a
traditional
Main
Street.
These
properties
continue
to
be
part
of
the
panhandle
of
the
Rock
Cliff
Park
Heritage
Conservation
District,
and
are
subject
to
the
objectives
and
policies
contained
in
the
district
plan.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Fleming,
for
that
intervention
do
are
there
does
committee?
Have
any
questions
for
this
delegate,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
your
intervention,
and
the
last
set
of
speakers
who
are
registered
are
from
The
Rock
Cliff,
Park,
residence,
Association
and
I.
Think
I
saw
Michelle
Heyman
on
the
call
foreign.
B
B
I,
don't
have
the
means
to
to
show
you
that
graphic,
but
rock
cliff
is
specifically
outlined
as
not
as
being
accepted
in
in
that
particular
graph.
So
any
of
the
the
wording
that
applies
to
intensification
for
sector
a
does
not
apply
to
rock
cliff
I
know
that
one
of
my
colleagues
is
is
reading
a
statement,
but
I
wanted
to
ask,
or
have
someone
confirm
that
indeed,
Rock
clip
does
not
fall
under
sector
a.
A
A
B
B
G
F
While
this
proposal
for
two
apartment
buildings
may
meet
the
requirement
of
the
zoning
bylaw,
it
dramatically
fails
to
conform
with
the
legal
framework
protecting
Rockville
as
a
designated
heritage
heritage.
District
conflicts
with
the
provincial
policy
statement,
with
the
rock
of
Park
Secondary
plan
and
to
the
Rockwood
Park
Conservation
District
plan
in
Myriad
ways
our
opposition
and
the
reasons
for
it
have
long
been
shared
with
the
owner
and
City
staff,
and
so
just
I'll.
F
Try
and
summarize
briefly
sort
of
we
share
the
thoughts
of
the
Ottawa
Heritage
also
and
the
staff
report,
but
the
joining
of
lots.
New
Lots,
created
by
joining
smaller
laws
together,
shall
be
consistent
with
the
general
lot
sizes
within
the
associated
landscape.
The
Proposal
ignores
this
requirement
height
and
mass
New
Lots,
created
by
joining
smaller
Lots
together,
shall
be
consistent
with
the
general
law
sizes
within
the
associated
landscape.
F
It
doesn't
doesn't
follow
that
one
height
and
mass
multi-unit
development
is
permitted
on
this
part
of
Beechwood
in
Rock
of
the
park,
but
the
height
and
mass
size
and
scale
of
the
development
must
be
compatible
with
the
adjacent
residential
development
on
the
same
side
of
the
street.
This
is
clearly
possible,
as
illustrated
by
a
number
of
nearby
multi
multi-development
on
properties,
in
contrast
to
proposed
developments
dramatically
out
of
scale
and
dwarf's
adjacent
residential
property,
with
properties
of
conservation
of
the
defining
landscape,
character
of
Rockwood
Park.
F
New
development
is
conditional
on
the
conservation
of
existing
landscape
features,
including
trees
and
open
spaces,
and
the
dominance
of
soft
landscape
over
hard
landscape
as
an
essential
Heritage
attribute
of
the
hcd
and
shall
be
retained.
We
feel
that
this
is
totally
ignored
and
demolition
that
demolition
will
be
permitted
only
where
the
proposed
building
is
sympathetic
to
the
traditional
surrounding
natural
and
cultural
environment.
F
The
Proposal
fails
this
test.
Also,
the
rock
of
Park,
Heritage
and
secondary
plan
explicitly
explicitly
govern
the
whole
of
Rockwood
Park,
including
a
panhandle
which
includes
the
stretch
of
Beechwood.
The
fact
that
Beechwood
Avenue
is
at
the
edge
of
the
Conservation
District
does
not
alter
this
basic
fact.
We
we
acknowledge
that
the
applicants
have
made
various
iterations,
but
we
consider
they're
still
way
off
base,
and
we
would
seriously
like
to
see
many
many
changes
to
this
proposal
before
we
could
recommend
it.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
It's
just
a
few
little
ones,
looking
again
at
the
soft
scaping
just
trying
to
see
if
there's
any
opportunities
here
from
a
tree,
con
conservation,
standpoint
I
know
there.
The
report
indicates
there's
some
concern
that
replacement
planting
is
constrained
by
a
lack
of
soil
volumes.
I
was
wondering
if
City
staff
could
just
comment
on
whether
there
is
the
opportunity
to
perhaps
improve
some
of
the
soft
soft
escaping
with
additional
trees
or
otherwise
increased
perennial
plantings.
I
I
D
D
G
Yes,
thank
you,
so
you
Mr
Jack
could
probably
speak
to
that.
It
is
the
intent
that
the
landscape
concept
feature
more
ground
cover,
planting
beds
and
rather
than
sod
just
to
kind
of
emphasize
the
garden
like
character,
so
I
think
the
as
Mackenzie
kind
of
suggested
in
terms
of
some
of
the
renderings.
G
It
could
have
been
to
not
enough
to
not
screened
the
building
just
to
see
the
architecture,
but
it
would
be
the
landscape
plan
that
it
does
intend
to
show
just
more
plantings
and
ground
cover
and
similar
to,
as
Mackenzie
suggested,
there's
certainly
opportunity
to
work
through
these
details.
The
application
is
also
subject
to
site
plan
approval,
so
there's
I
think
still
Roots.
We
can
explore
in
terms
of
the
the
landscaping
and
even
Urban
Design
and
streetscape
foreign.
D
I
Through
you
chair,
there
are,
there
are
a
number
of
items
in
the
report
that
suggest
that
there
could
be
further
improvements,
fairly
substantial
improvements
to
this
application.
Mackenzie.
Are
you
in
your
team,
confident
that
you
could
work
with
the
applicant
to
see
so
more
of
these
changes
made
if,
if
more
time
was
given.
D
I
through
a
chair
thanks
for
the
question,
I
think
certainly
staff
are
open
to
exploring
you
know
different
versions,
different
iterations,
further
further
changes
to
this
project.
I
think
we
have.
We
have
sort
of
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
already
going
back
and
forth
and
I
think
you
know
we're
sort
of
at
an
impasse.
Basically,
but
and
I
think
we
would
need
to
see
some
substantial
changes,
but
but,
like
I
say,
we
are
open
to
to
further
exploring
different
options
with
the
applicant.
A
Seeing
none
I
just
wanted
to
relay
that
question
from
The
Rock
Cliff
Park
residence
Association
to
staff,
I,
guess
concerning
rock
cliff
Park's
status
in
reference
to
sector
a
for
schedule,
three
four,
two!
So
I
don't
know!
If
Mackenzie
you
can
speak
to
that,
it
seemed
very
Technical
and
that's
why
obviously
I
I'll
post
it
to
you
yourself
or
maybe
potentially
to
John
foreign.
D
A
C
Thank
you.
Chair
King,
on
Sunday
I
went
for
a
walk
in
the
whole
Panhandle
area
to
examine
the
conditions
of
the
site
in
detail
and
also
I've,
had
a
familiarity
with
the
former
Village
of
Rock
Cliff
Park,
having
been
the
consultant
along
with
Boyd
Phillips
that
updated
the
official
plan
of
the
village
of
rock
cliff
in
1993.
So
my
history
goes
back
quite
a
ways
in
the
planning
and
Heritage
conservation
in
Rockville.
C
Having
said
that,
I
think
that
what
we
are
facing
here
today
is
the
unfortunate
circumstance
of
a
conflict
of
direction
from
the
under
the
Heritage
Act
and
the
planning
act.
This
happens
from
time
to
time
in
the
city
of
Ottawa,
and
it's
obviously
facing
us
today
with
how
we
recommend
this
file
to
City
Council.
C
I
just
want
to
make
a
second
point,
and
that
is
that
in
the
Rockland
Park
Heritage
Conservation
District
study
that
was
done
by
Julian
Smith
in
the
entire
report.
There
was
only
one
line
that
relates
to
the
Panhandle
area,
and
the
same
thing
is
true:
in
the
you
know,
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
plan
is
one
reference
to
the
Panhandle
area,
and
what
this
shows
is
that
the
anomaly
of
the
Panhandle,
which
is
basically
you
know
between
Beechwood
and
Oak,
Hill
and
Acacia.
C
It's
a
unique
area
and,
in
particular,
the
properties
all
the
properties
facing
Beechwood,
are
a
distinct
part
of
the
Panhandle
that
are,
unlike
anything
else
in
Rockland,
that
creates
its
Heritage
character.
So
we
have
in
front
of
us
two
quite
valid
arguments
about
why
the
proposal
should
be
approved
or
not
approved
by
city
council.
Having
said
that,
I
think
that
it
is
certainly
conceded
that
there
have
been
no
specific
Urban
Design
guidelines
that
have
been
defined
for
the
purpose
of
dealing
with
all
the
properties
along
Beechwood
Avenue
in
the
R4
Zone.
C
And
that
way
not
just
this
property
can
be
appropriately
developed
to
complement
the
Rocks
apart
Heritage
Conservation
District,
but
the
adjacent
properties
to
the
west
and
the
east
as
well.
So,
having
said
that,
checking
I'm
interested
to
know
what
my
colleagues
on
the
committee
I
believe
as
well
with
respect
to
this
proposal.
Thanks
very
much.
I
I
You
know
in
a
short
period
of
time,
in
addition
and
and
perhaps
Christina
from
legal
may
have
further
comments
on
this
I
just
I
think
it's
important
to
remember
that
this
is
an
application
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
act.
So
while
the
planning
Act
is
not
irrelevant
here,
the
decision
that's
being
asked
for
by
the
committee
is
under
the
Heritage
act
as
it
relates
to
the
hcd,
as
opposed
to
under
the
planning
act
for
zoning
or
official
plan
Amendment,
or
something
similar.
A
Thank
you
so
much
I
really
appreciate
that
intervention
for
the
clarification
of
the
legislative
restrictions
and
potential
challenges.
I.
Think,
notwithstanding
the
fact
that
we
might
not
be
able
to
do
something
legislatively,
it
does
make
sense
to
have
continued
conversations
with
the
community
as
to
the
implementation
of
of
these
policies,
and
those
plans
and
I
know
that
that
goes
on
on
an
ongoing
basis.
A
Despite
the
concerns
noted,
the
applicant
has
decided
to
proceed
with
the
application,
as
presented
in
my
estimation,
as
Ward
counselor.
This
is
disappointing,
since
the
Rock
Cliff
Park,
Heritage
Conservation
District
plan
provides
guidance
to
ensure
change
within
the
district
conserves
and
enhance
the
qualities
that
contribute
to
the
district's
cultural
heritage,
value,
for
instance,
protecting
its
park-like
landscapes.
A
Safeguarding
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
can
only
be
achieved
by
approving
proposed
built
forms
that
accommodate
the
historic
Urban
Design
fabric
of
the
street,
which,
if
appropriately
planned,
can
concurrently
allow
for
proper
densification
while
protecting
Heritage.
In
this
specific
case,
the
development
needs
a
better
tie-in
with
the
neighborhood
streetscape
and
needs
to
afford
Breathing
Room
on
either
side
of
the
proposed
buildings.
A
balance
needs
to
be
struck
between
mass
and
scale
transition
within
the
Urban
Design
fabric
of
the
streetscape,
along
with
the
landscape
features
which
are
protected
by
the
plan
and
I
noted.
A
A
A
J
J
Glee,
please
Institute
is
an
important
to
her
destruction,
the
Glebe,
the
building
its
function,
its
history,
have
contributed
and
continue
to
contribute
to
the
nature
and
character
of
the
neighborhood.
Gci
is
valued
by
residents
and
the
community
will
be
glad
that
it
receives
this
important
destination.
I'm
happy
to
support
the
recommendation.
Councilor
Matthew
Fleury
is
part
of
the
following
comments.
One
of
the
main
many
things
I
love
about
the
neighborhoods
I
represent
is
that
they're
full
of
Rich
history
much
preserved
in
the
historic
homes
and
buildings
that
remain
standing
after
all
these
years.
J
York
Street
public
school
is
just
this
a
piece
of
history
that
has
continued
to
open
its
doors
to
education
since
1922.
serving
generations
of
children
from
Lower,
Town,
East
and
other
surrounding
areas,
including
our
26th
government,
General
Adrian
Clarkson.
This
school
reflects
the
ever-growing
societal
and
demographic
changes
of
Lower
Town
since
the
early
20th
century
for
any
former
student
lucky
to
walk
through
its
doors.
Many
will
agree.
J
The
school's
character
and
charm
are,
unlike
any
other
this
year,
as
many
may
know,
will
Mark
its
100th
anniversary
with
this
exceptional
accomplishment,
to
add
to
those
efforts
with
Community
Partners
such
as
lower
Tech,
Community
Association,
and
the
ocdsb's
support
the
school
receiving
official
Heritage
designation.
This
fall
is
perfect
perfectly
in
time
for
the
school's
anniversary
celebrations
and.
A
K
K
So,
just
to
give
some
legislative
context,
designations
under
the
Ontario
Jack
are
assessed
against
regulation
906..
This
is
a
regulation
underneath
that
establishes
three
criterias
so
designer
physical
value,
historical
or
associative
value
and
contextual
value,
to
determine
overall
Heritage
value.
If
a
property
meets
one
of
these
criteria,
it
can
be
designated
so
staff
has
assessed
both
of
these
properties
against
the
criteria
set
out
in
the
regulation
and
we'll
speak
to
each
in
this
presentation.
Next
slide.
Please.
K
So
here's
just
a
quick
overall
look
within
the
city
where
these
are
located,
so
York
Street
public
school
is
up
in
the
top
right
corner
there
located
in
Lower,
Town
and
Glebe
Collegiate
Institute
is
located
towards
the
bottom
of
that
map
within
the
Glebe.
So
next
slide,
please
so
I'll
start
with
a
look
at
York,
Street,
Public
Schools.
So
here's
a
closer
look
at
the
site.
It's
located
at
the
corner
of
York
Street
and
Bosley
Drive
in
Lower
Town,
and
the
images
on
the
right
show
a
variety
of
views
from
around
the
property.
K
So
you
can
see
the
the
different
facades
and
the
way
that
the
say
occupies
the
corner
up.
Also,
you
get
a
pretty
good
view
of
everything
around
it
in
next
slide.
Please
so
just
some
quick
facts
about
the
property,
so
it
was
constructed
between
1921
and
1922
and
opened
in
September
1922.
So,
as
councilory's
comments
mentioned,
the
100th
anniversary
of
the
school
is
approaching
in
September,
its
architect
was
William
cavan
Beatty,
who
designed
the
building
in
the
Collegiate
Gothic
style
and
next
slide.
K
Please
so
now
we'll
take
a
look
at
the
criteria
for
York
Street
Public
Schools,
so
the
first
criteria
is
designer
physical
value,
so
the
property
has
design
value
as
a
representative
example
of
the
Collegiate
Gothic
architectural
style.
This
style
was
popular
in
the
early
to
mid
20th
century,
particularly
for
institutional
buildings.
K
So
you'll
recognize
some
some
common
features
with
you
know
many
University
buildings,
other
schools,
Etc
some
features
on
York
Street
public
school
that
reflect
this
style
are
its
long,
symmetrical
massing
the
monochromatic,
brick
cladding,
and
it's
the
decorative
use
of
stone
elements
throughout,
including
the
entrance
entrances
with
Stone
frontis
pieces
with
Gothic
detailing.
So
you
can
see
there
the
left
hand.
Image
is
the
front
entrance
and
some
of
that
detailing
throughout
the
property.
K
So
next
slide,
please
so
York
Street
Public
School
meets
the
historical
and
associative
value
Criterion
for
the
for
its
associations,
with
the
ongoing
delivery
of
English
language
education
in
Lower
Town,
beginning
in
1922.
So
it's
served
generations
of
children
from
Lower,
Town,
East
and
other
surrounding
areas.
K
K
So
finally,
contextual
value,
so
York
Street
Public
School
meets
the
Criterion
for
contextual
value,
because
it
is
a
landmark
in
Lower,
Town
East,
due
to
its
distinct
architectural
style,
its
prominent
Corner
location
on
Bosley
and
York
street,
with
significant
setbacks,
and
it's
long-standing
use
as
an
elementary
school.
It
has
further
contextual
value
because
it
contributes
to
and
supports
the
mixed
character
nature
of
Lower
Town
East.
So
this
slide
actually
highlights
some
of
the
changes
in
lower
Townsville
form
over
the
20th
century.
K
But
York
Street
public
school
has
remained
a
constant
both
in
its
setting
and
its
architectural
character
and
next
slide.
Please
so
now
we're
going
to
take
a
look
at
gleap
Collegiate,
so
this
property
occupies
a
city
block
size
lot,
Bound
by
Bronson,
Avenue,
Glebe,
Avenue,
Percy,
Street
and
First
Avenue
within
the
Glebe.
K
So,
on
the
right
hand
there
you
can
see
some
additional
views
of
the
property,
so
the
front
entrance
from
both
sides
and
then
also
sort
of
a
view
from
just
east
of
Bronson
Avenue
towards
the
rear
of
the
school
and
next
slide.
Please
so
again,
just
some
quick
facts
about
the
building.
It
was
constructed
between
1921
and
1923,
but
did
open
in
September
1922
a
few
months
before
the
building
was
fully
complete,
so
we're
actually
approaching
the
100th
anniversary
of
this
school
opening
as
well.
In
September,
this
property
was
designed
by
architect,
John
Albert.
K
You
were
also
in
the
Collegiate
Gothic
style
and
next
slide.
Please,
so
the
school
has
design
value
as
again.
A
representative
example
of
Collegiate
Gothic
architecture
features.
Exemplary
of
this
style
include
its
cerebral,
cladding
and
stone
foundation,
as
well
as
the
stone
detailing
throat.
This
is
particularly
notable
in
the
primary
entrance
facing
Percy
Street,
which
is
shown
on
the
left,
which
features
a
pedimented
entrance,
with
an
archway,
a
transom
wood
doors
and
buttress
Square
pillars
on
the
sides,
topped
with
a
relief
of
the
school's
original
Crest.
K
You
can
sort
of
see
in
the
left
hand,
side
there
there's
actually
an
oil
lamp
right
in
the
middle.
Another
notable
feature
that
really
exemplifies
the
style
is
the
turret,
that's
adjacent
to
the
front
entrance
you
can
see
in
the
central
picture
there
and
that
features
a
crenellated
parapet
as
well.
The
image
on
the
right
just
shows
a
few
of
the
secondary
entrances
throughout
the
building,
which
also
further
refer
back
to
that
primary
entrance
and
exemplify
the
Collegiate
Gothic
style
and
next
slide.
Please.
K
So
this
property
has
historical
and
associative
value
as
ottawa's
second
high
school
and
it's
direct
associations
with
the
development
of
the
public
school
system
in
Ottawa
in
the
early
20th
century.
So
at
the
time,
Ottawa
was
really
rapidly
urbanizing
and
there
was
a
act
from
the
federal
government
called
the
Adolescent
School
attendance
Act
of
1919
that
increased
the
age
of
compulsory
education
to
16
and
therefore
greatly
increased
the
number
of
students
and
the
need
for
educational
facilities
in
Ottawa.
K
At
the
time
this
school
was
actually
constructed
in
response
to
this
demand,
as
a
secondary
campus
to
the
Ottawa
Collegiate
Institute,
which
is
now
lisgar,
Collegiate,
Institute,
downtown
and
later
became
a
separate
institution
in
1931..
The
school
also
contributes
to
an
understanding
of
the
development
of
the
Glebe
neighborhood.
Historically,
it
was
the
primary
option
for
secondary
education
in
the
Glebe
and
other
Urban
neighborhoods,
like
old
west
south
and
although
East
and
also
has
a
long-standing
use
as
a
community
multi-use
space
outside
of
school
hours.
K
K
Finally,
gleap
Collegiate
Institute
meets
the
Criterion
for
contextual
value,
as
it's
a
landmark
within
the
Glebe,
given
its
distinct
style,
its
large
size,
which
occupies
an
entire
city
block
and
its
continued
use
as
both
a
secondary
school
and
its
community
space.
It
has
further
contextual
value
because
it
contributes
to
and
supports
the
historic
character
of
the
Khalid
neighborhood
and
next
slide.
Please
so
just
a
quick
slide
on
consultation.
So
the
war
counselors
are
aware
of
this
report
and
its
recommendations.
K
Finally,
these
are
just
our
staff
recommendations,
so
first
to
issue
an
ocean
attention
to
designate
York
Street
public
school
at
310,
York
Street
under
part,
four
and
second
two
issue:
a
notice
of
intention
to
designate
a
212
leave,
Avenue
Collegiate
Institute
under
par
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
and
next
slide.
Please
so
that
concludes
my
presentation
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
anything
else.
Thanks
very
much.
Thank.
A
You
Greg
for
that
very
in-depth
presentation.
We
did
receive
correspondence
from
Heritage
Ottawa,
the
Lower
Town
community
resource
center,
as
well
as
the
Lord
Town
Community
Association,
all
in
support.
We
do
have
one
registered
speaker
and
that
is
David
Fleming
from
Heritage
Ottawa.
So
if
he
can
be
promoted,
if
he's
still
on
the
call,
we
would
entertain
his
intervention.
E
Foreign,
thank
you
Mr,
chair,
no
I.
Don't
really
have
anything
to
add
to
that
excellent
presentation.
We
are
where
we,
you
know,
strongly
support
this,
and
we
support
the
initiative
of
City
staff
in
trying
to
look
at
our
schools
to
to
recognize
the
significance
of
them,
and
we
think
this
is
a
very
good
proactive
move
on
the
part
of
the
city
and
we
support
it
wholeheartedly.
Thank
you.
A
B
I
was
a
little
early
on
the
the
hand,
raising
I
I
apologize
I'm
quite
excited
about
this
report.
I
I
want
to
begin.
Obviously
this
property
is
owned
by
the
OCD,
esby
and
I.
Wonder
I,
wonder
Eric.
If
you
could
just
amend
my
comments,
I
think
there
was
an
extra
C
that
was
added
in
that
acronym
in
my
comments,
so
I
apologize
for
that.
B
J
Thanks
very
much
chair
similarly
just
want
to
thank
Steph
for
being
proactive
about
this
file.
I
was
at
actually
both
files.
I
was
actually
the
school
board
trustee
last.
You
know
four
years
ago
or
eight
years
ago,
when
I
started,
that
and
for
both
schools
because
of
the
overlap
with
York,
PS
and
Collegiate,
both
fantastic
amazing
institutions.
J
If
you
can
go
to
glebe100.ca
and
that's
going
to
be
the
weekend
of
October
14th
to
16th
in
2022,
so
celebrating
that
100
year
anniversary
as
well,
and
we're
really
excited
to
have
a
lot
of
students
and
faculty
come
back
staff
come
back
for
that,
for
that
amazing
event,
that's
being
organized
at
the
school.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you
again
to
City
staff
and
really
appreciate
all
the
work.
That's
gone
into
this.
A
I'd
also
like
to
Echo
that
seeing
no
other
hands
raised
I
can
understand
the
excitement
of
the
of
both
counselors
here
with
their
respective
schools
and
their
respective
Wards
I.
Think
both
buildings
have
design
value
that
really
do
are
wonderful
representations
of
the
Collegiate,
gothic's
architectural
style
and
have
historical
value
for
their
associations
with
local
Architects
and
the
growth
and
development
of
their
respective
neighborhoods
I
know
their
excitement.
A
Because
many
moons
ago
before
I
was
in
elected
office,
one
of
the
things
I
was
most
proud
of
as
being
a
president
of
a
Community.
Association
was
also
being
able
to
get
designation
of
Overbrook
public
school
on
its
100th
anniversary,
so
I
I
understand
the
excitement
and
I
share
it
and
I
thank
staff
and
the
community
for
all
their
work.
Hard
work
on
this
file
is
the
motion
carried.
A
D
Okay,
perfect,
thank
you
Eric
and
thank
you
chair.
So,
yes,
this
is
an
application
that
relates
to
the
property
at
15
Linden
Terrace
in
the
Kama
monklin
driveway
at
Linden,
Terrace,
Heritage,
Conservation
District.
It's
the
city's
newest
hcd
passed
in
2020..
If
we
can
go
to
the
next
Slide,
the
property
is
located
sort
of
mid-block
between
the
Queen
Elizabeth
driveway
and
O'connor
Street
on
the
north
side
of
Linden
Terrace
across
from
Patterson
Creek
Park.
D
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
get
a
view
of
of
the
property,
so
the
property
contains
a
two
and
a
half
Story
red
brick
house
constructed
Circa
1913..
It
features
a
stone
foundation,
bay
windows,
a
gamble,
roof
with
double
chimneys
and
a
prominent
front
porch
and
Dormer
at
the
third
floor.
This
is
a
contributing
property
in
the
hcd.
D
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
this
property
was
purchased
by
the
by
the
current
owners
back
in
2020
and
they've
they've
undertaken
some
work
to
the
exterior
of
the
house
since
moving
in,
unfortunately
without
a
Heritage
permit.
So
that
includes
some
replacement
windows
last
year
and
then
also
some
repair
and
alterations
to
the
cladding.
On
the
side,
facades
in
in
the
third
floor,
as
well
as
the
third
floor,
Dormer
the
soffits
and
fascia
and
some
corresponding
work,
which
all
of
which
is
currently
underway.
D
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
these
are
are
some
images
of
just
one
side,
the
east
side
of
the
house.
So
the
new
owners
were
working
on
addressing
some
previously
failed
repairs
to
the
previous
stucco
and
and
faux
half
to
bring,
as
well
as
some
water
infiltration
issues
that
had
been
occurring.
They
also
had
a
a
desire
to
add
some
new
insulation,
so
this
stucco
and
and
half
timbering
that
has
been
removed
throughout
throughout
the
house.
D
New
installation
has
been
added
and
new
PVC,
horizontal
cladding
is,
is
being
added
on
both
the
East
and
West
sides
of
the
house.
If
we
go
to
the
next
Slide,
the
application
also
seeks
approval
for
new
metal,
soffits
and
fascia,
which
replaced
the
previous
wood
elements
and
also
new
metal
Eaves
troughs
to
replace
the
existing
aluminum
ones.
D
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide
in
terms
of
the
hcd
plan,
the
plan
encourages
the
retention
of
original
material
and
that
repairs
be
made
before
considering
replacement
when
replacement
is
necessary,
it
should
be
like
for
like
and
sympathetic
to
to,
the
existing
buildings.
In
those
cases,
the
plan
does
contemplate
the
use
of
modern
materials
if
they
can
appropriately
replicate
the
appearance
of
the
original
and,
if
they're,
compatible
with
the
building's
character
in
streetscape,
and
it
does
place
an
emphasis
on
conserving
the
primary
front.
Front-Facing
facade.
D
So
you
know
these.
These
enforcement
situations,
I
think,
are
always
incredibly
complicated
and
no
two
are
alike
and
staff
have
to
consider
I
think
a
number
all
of
the
factors
I
think
in
recommending
any
kind
of
appropriate
action.
So
in
this
case,
the
owners
have
indicated
that
they
were
unaware
of
the
requirements
of
the
hcd
plan
when
they
purchase
the
property,
which
would
have
happened
right
around
the
time
of
the
designation
by
law,
and
they
didn't
receive
any
letters
advising
of
the
designation.
D
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
we
have
been
working
with
the
owners.
They
are
now
aware
of
the
permit
process
and
I
and
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
intent
of
the
hcd
and
the
plan
and
have
agreed
to
focus
their
repair
and
restoration
efforts
on
the
front
facade.
So
this
includes
revising
their
previous
plans
to
use
the
PVC
cladding
for
the
front
Dormer
and
instead
reinstate
its
appearance
using
composite
stucco
and
trim
and
that's
part
of
this
application
and
and
at
their
expense.
D
So,
while
the
the
the
cladding
and
metal
soffits
don't
fully
meet
the
HC
guidelines
once
completed,
the
work
will
allow
for
a
uniform
appearance
around
the
house
as
viewed
from
the
street.
The
alterations
will
be
subtle
and
not
detract
from
the
cultural
heritage,
value
of
the
building
or
the
contribution
it
makes
to
the
hcd
and
as
the
owners
are
taking
steps
towards
compliance
overall,
the
work
will
address
previous
issues
and
allow
for
the
building's
long-term
conservation.
So
staff
have
no
objections
to
that
work.
Proceeding
included
as
part
of
this
application.
D
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
this
application
has
followed
our
standard
consultation
practices.
Staff
have
also
briefed
the
chairs
of
the
lead,
Community
Association
on
this
file
and
I
think
their
comments
have
also
been
provided
to
the
committee
and
then
just
quickly
to
summarize
on
the
last
slide
here
in
consideration
of
all
the
factors
and
the
steps
being
taken
towards
compliance
with
the
hcd
plan
that
have
no
objection
to
the
approval
of
this
application.
D
A
E
A
A
F
A
We
appreciate
your
cooperation
and
we
we
understand
the
scenario
as
described
by
staff.
I
mean
it's
a
new
hcd.
You
want
to
work
in
compliance
with
staff
to
enhance
the
beauty
of
and
the
aesthetic
of
your
of
your
property,
as
well
as
maintain
your
property.
So
we're
very
much
appreciative
as
members
of
this
committee
and
that
you're
doing
that
and
I
know
that
staff
is,
is
pleased
to
be
working
with
you.
So
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you
absolutely.
A
A
C
Yes,
sir,
thank
you
chair
just
in
terms
of
getting
guidance
from
you
on
the
procedures
here,
I'd
like
to
table
this
notice
of
motion
relating
to
the
potential
designation
of
the
former
CPR
rail
bridge
over
the
Rita
River
under
park
for
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
Is
it
appropriate
that
I
read
this
notice
of.
C
Thank
you
very
much,
whereas
the
recent
city
of
Ottawa
infrastructure
services,
staff
reports
and
memos
recommend
that
Demolition
and
replacement
of
the
former
CPR
rail
Bridge
constructed
in
1898
over
the
Rita
River
at
the
Herdman
Junction
next
with
Queensway
Bridge,
whereas
a
2018
engineering,
Consultants,
condition,
assessments
and
options.
Analysis
report
on
the
former
CPR
rail
Bridge
includes
option
number
one
Rehabilitation
as
a
viable
option,
if
more
expensive
alternative
but
more
expensive
than
the
alternative
to
option
number
two
which
is
replacement
and
whereas
the
infrastructure
services
staff
report
recommending
option.
C
Two
replacement
is
based
on
the
assumption
that
the
CPR
rail
bridge
is
of
no
Heritage
value
and
that
the
cost
of
replacement
is
lesser
than
Rehabilitation
and
whereas
the
CPR
rail
bridge
is
likely
to
be
found
to
have
significant
Heritage
value,
when
it's
designed,
historic
and
contextual
attributes
are
evaluated
in
accordance
with
the
Ontario
Heritage
act.
Regulation
0.906,
whereas
the
city,
by
the
way
heritage
staff,
have
prepared
a
memo
indicating
that
a
cultural
heritage
evaluation
report
must
be
undertaken.