►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-Committee - December 10, 2019
Description
Built Heritage Sub-Committee - December 10, 2019
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
None
today,
confirmation
of
minutes
from
Tuesday
November
12th
are
the
minutes
for
the
meeting
confirmed
carried.
Thank
you.
Okay.
We
have
three
reports
today,
I
believe
the
first
one
is
designation
of
the
standard
Bread
Company
bakery
at
951,
Gladstone
Avenue
under
part,
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
want
to
remind
anyone
in
the
gallery
today
that
if
anyone
wishes
to
speak
on
any
of
our
items,
you
can
sign
up
at
the
front
and
after
the
presentation
we'll
have
an
opportunity
for
comments.
B
Good
morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
as
you
just
heard,
this
report
is
recommending
the
designation
of
the
standard
Bread
Company
bakery
at
951
Gladstone
Avenue
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
just
by
means
of
a
bit
of
background
I'll
start
by
saying
that
I'm
very
happy
to
have
this
in
front
of
the
committee
today.
This
is
my
longest
running
file
at
the
City
of
Ottawa.
It's
been
on
my
desk
for
nine
years.
B
B
The
building
is
a
three
storey
building
with
a
four-story
tower
and
a
high
basement.
It's
constructed
of
reinforced
concrete,
clad
in
brick
and
pebble
stucco.
The
brick
was
painted
white
at
some
point
in
the
past,
and
the
stucco
was
added
we're
not
sure
of
the
timing.
The
photo
on
the
left
shows
the
building
prior
to
some
storm
damage
that
occurred
in
2011.
That
required
the
removal
of
the
parapet
at
the
top
of
the
building
and
the
enclosing
of
two
windows.
The
photo
on
the
right
shows
you
the
building
as
it
looks
today.
B
The
proposed
redevelopment
of
this
site
that
you'll
see
later
on
in
this
presentation
does
include
retention
of
this
building.
This
is
the
photo
on
the
left.
Shows
you
the
rear,
facade
and
the
photo
on
the
right
is
the
west
facade,
which
is
connected
to
a
small
strip
mall,
which
were
the
former
loading
docks
for
the
for
the
factory.
B
This
is
the
East
facade,
so
standing
sort
of
slightly
below
the
building.
It
is
located
on
a
small
hill.
Just
up
from
the
train
tracks,
you
can
really
read
the
industrial
character
of
the
building.
From
this
facade,
you
have
garage
door
openings.
You
have
some
interesting
other
openings
that
have
been
bricked
up
over
time,
but
are
still
visible.
B
That
would
have
been
used
for
lifting
hay
and
various
materials
into
the
building
in
terms
of
the
policy
framework,
the
official
plan
and
the
provincial
policy
statement
both
encourage
the
designation
of
properties
of
culture,
heritage
value
under
part
for
the
Heritage
Act.
The
provincial
policy
statement
states
that
significant
built
heritage
resources
and
significant
cultural
heritage
landscapes
shall
be
conserved.
This
is
the
policy
framework
you'll
see
that
on
the
agenda
today
we
have
I
think
three
designations.
B
Rather
than
have
my
colleagues
repeat
this
again,
this
is
the
same
policy
framework
for
all
designations
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
this
slide,
as
well
as
the
same
for
all
three
so
section.
29
of
the
Heritage
Act
gives
municipalities
the
ability
to
designate
properties
of
cultural
heritage
value
as
long
as
they
meet
Ontario
regulation.
Oh
nine,
oh
six,
which
requires
that,
in
order
to
be
designated,
a
property
must
meet
at
least
one
of
the
following
criteria:
design
value,
historic
or
associative
value
or
contextual
value.
B
I'm,
just
going
to
give
you
a
brief
overview
of
how
of
the
standard
bread,
company
Factory
and
how
it
meets
the
criteria
for
designation,
as
I
mentioned,
it
was
constructed
in
1924.
The
building
is
a
good
and
a
rare
example
of
an
early
20th
century
industrial
building
in
Ottawa
constructed
of
reinforced
concrete,
clad
in
brick
with
large
windows.
It
is
simple
in
its
design,
but
it
does
feature
some
decorative
elements,
including
the
simple
brick
plasters
and
the
date
stone.
B
These
two
photos,
the
one
on
the
right,
is
historic,
photo
from
a
book
from
the
Ottawa
Public
Library
that
I'm
pretty
sure
over
the
last
nine
years,
I'm
the
only
one
who
has
ever
taken
it
out
called
the
happy
Baker
of
Ottawa.
You
can
look
it
up
if
you're
interested
about
Cecil
Morrison,
who
was
Jean
Pickett's
father
in
case
you
didn't
know,
and
the
photo
on
the
right
is
interesting.
I
just
actually
found
it.
B
Last
week,
despite
nine
years
of
research,
there
was
a
four-page
spread
in
the
Ottawa
Journal
in
1925
celebrating
the
opening
of
this
building.
So
this
is
just
another
sort
of
advertisement
for
the
concrete
work
of
Ross
meagre
company.
The
bakery
also
has
design
value
as
a
representative
work
of
British
born
architect,
Sydney
comer,
sorry
comer
emigrated
to
Canada
in
1907
and
took
position
as
the
chief
assistant
to
Montreal
our
je
adamson.
B
One
of
the
interesting
things
about
this
building
is
its
structure,
and
while
the
function
of
the
building
has
changed,
the
elements
of
the
interior
still
evoke
as
Houston
is
an
industrial
building.
Its
structures
supported
by
large
flared
and
washroom
columns
throughout
the
building,
so
the
photo
on
the
left
is
a
current
photo
showing
the
interior
columns
that
you
see
throughout
the
building
and
then
the
photo
on
the
right
is
also
from
that
four-page
spread
in
the
Ottawa
Journal
from
1925,
showing
the
concrete
work
of
the
building.
B
The
use
of
these
columns
emerged
in
the
early
20th
century
for
industrial
buildings,
as
it
allowed
for
a
large
open
spaces
on
the
inside
of
the
building
for
the
historical
and
associative
value.
The
standard
Bread
Company
is
associated
with,
with
with
the
company
and
with
Ottawa
businessmen
and
brothers-in-law
Richard
Lamaze
and
Cecil
Morrison.
B
The
two
opened
opened
the
standard
bread
company
in
1912,
with
a
small
bakery
on
Hilson
Avenue,
seen
in
the
sketch
above
from
the
Ottawa
Journal
Morrison,
was
born
in
1890
in
West
Quebec
and
moved
to
Ottawa
in
1908
to
live
with
his
grandparents.
He
quickly
worked
a
variety
of
jobs
and
then
joined
with
his
brother,
dick
lamothe
in
who
was
a
baker
to
start
the
standard
Bread
Company
in
1912.
B
Soon
after
they
opened
the
Hilton
bakery
lomasa
enlisted
in
the
world
first
world
war
and
by
the
early
1920s,
the
bakery
was
really
flourishing
and
they
required
of
larger
facility.
So
in
1924,
the
new
bakery
on
Gladstone
Avenue
was
built.
Bread
was
baked
and
sold
from
the
warehouse
building
and
delivered
around
Ottawa
by
horse
and
cart.
You
can
see
here
old
bill
who
was
the
first
horse
owned
by
the
standard
Bread
Company,
the
horses
and
the
horse
and
wagons
were
housed
in
the
adjacent
stables
which
still
exists
on
the
site.
B
However,
they've
been
extremely
altered
and
are
not
proposed
for
designation
through
this
application.
I
briefly
mentioned
Sydney
comer.
This
is
just
to
show
you
an
image
of
him
and
that
he
we've
been
joking
around
the
office
that
he
had
an
ad
in
the
paper,
knowing
calling
himself
the
Baek
attacked,
because
he
was
well
known
for
designing
bakeries
and
again.
This
is
just
another
historic
photo
showing
the
large
sign,
which
would
have
been
visible
from
the
railway
tracks.
B
The
contextual
value
of
the
building
lies
in
it
in
it
being
an
important
reminder
of
the
former
industrial
character
of
this
part
of
Hintonburg,
which
was
known
as
Bayswater.
The
bakery
is
a
landmark
in
the
neighbourhood
for
its
location,
at
the
top
of
a
small
hill
adjacent
to
the
railway
tracks.
You
can
still
sort
of
see
in
the
FO
in
the
aerial
photo
here
that
the
character
of
this
part
of
the
neighbourhood
remains
somewhat
industrial.
B
So,
just
to
recap,
the
standard
bread
company
bakery
meets
all
three
criteria
for
designation
under
on
under
Ontario
regulation,
Oh
906.
It
has
design
value
as
a
good
example
of
an
early
20th
century.
Industrial
building,
its
design
reflects
his
use
as
a
factory
associate
of
value
for
its
association
with
the
standard,
Bread
Company
and
Cecil
Morrison
and
dick
lamothe,
and
it
was
designed
by
Sydney
comer,
a
well
known
bakery
architect.
It's
contextual
value
is
that
it
is
a
landmark
for
its
location
on
a
small
hill
adjacent
to
the
railway
tracks.
B
In
terms
of
consultation,
councillor
Lieber
is
aware
of
the
proposed
designation.
The
Hintonburg
community
association
was
notified
and,
as
you
are
aware,
they
did
request
the
designation
and
I
believe
they've
submitted
a
letter
in
support
heritage.
Ottawa
was
also
notified
and
I
believe
a
letter
was
received
yesterday
also
in
support.
The
property
owner
is
aware
of,
and
doesn't
object
to,
the
proposed
designation
of
this
building.
B
This
is
just
a
little
addendum
because
we
don't
normally
talk
about
this
in
a
designation,
applique
or
report,
but
just
sort
of
a
preview
of
what
might
be
to
come
if,
if
this
building
is
designated
a
development
application
for
an
official
plan
amendment
and
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
to
allow
for
redevelopment
of
the
property
was
submitted
in
November
2018
to
allow
for
a
mixed-use
geo
transit
oriented
development.
The
proposal
includes
retention
of
the
standardbred
building
and
its
rehabilitation
and
the
construction
of
three
high-rise
towers
of
30,
33
and
35
stories
with
five-story
podium.
B
The
application
these
these
applications
are
anticipated
to
be
considered
by
planning
committee
and
City
Council
in
the
new
year.
We
had
originally
hoped
to
have
both
reports
go
to
the
same
planning,
committee
and
council,
but
due
to
scheduling
changes
this
one
will
now
go
first,
but
it's
it's
not
a
big
issue,
because
this
is
a
designation
as
opposed
to
an
application
under
the
Heritage
Act.
B
A
C
Thank
you
very
much,
excuse
me
and
good
morning.
Yes,
it
has
been
a
long
time
since
we
first
requested
designation
of
this
building
and
were
convinced
by
the
owner
that
they
would
let
us
know
if
any
change
was
about
to
occur,
and
then
we
could
go
forward
with
the
designation.
Unfortunately,
they
didn't
follow
through
so
a
new
owner
acquired
it
and
is
proposing
the
development
that
you
see
before
you.
So
we
reinstated
our
request
and
I.
C
We
are
obviously
in
full
support.
This
is
a
very
important
building
in
the
community,
not
only
for
the
reasons
that
that
Leslie
Collins
has
outlined,
but
because
it
is
the
studios
of
the
enriched
bread
artists,
which
were
have
been
there
since
the
1990s
and
were
one
of
the
reasons
why
Hindenburg
declared
itself
an
Arts
District
a
number
of
years
ago.
C
We
are
very
concerned
that
the
artists
may
be
forced
to
leave,
so
we
will
be
working
with
the
city
enriched
bread,
artists
and
the
developer
to
ensure
that
there
is
that
the
building
remains
as
affordable,
studio
space
for
artists.
It's
not
your
purview,
of
course,
but
I
thought
you
might
like
to
know
that
the
other
thing
I
was
thinking
when
I
was
thinking
about
this.
It
occurred
to
me
that
we
actually
owe
those
artists
if
they
had
not
occupied
this
building
since
1990,
and
certainly
hasn't
had
much
worked
on
it
from
everything.
I
can
see.
C
This
building
might
have
been
subject
to
demolition
by
neglect
or
possibly
demolition.
So
I
think
we
need
to
be
grateful
to
them
for
maintaining
this
building
in
a
productive
use
for
this
many
years
and
I
also
wanted
to
thank
Leslie
and
her
colleagues
or
whoever
prepared
this
report.
I
had
done
some
preliminary
research
on
this
building
before
submitting
the
request.
I
was
absolutely
amazed
at
which
what
she
was
able
to
find
out,
even
if
it
did
take
nine
or
ten
years,
but
some
of
the
and
you
just
found
out
some
of
it
yesterday.
C
So
it
really,
if
you
haven't
had
time
to
read
the
full
report,
I
recommend
that
you
do
so.
It
is
really
very,
very
interesting
not
just
because
it's
in
Hintonburg,
but
because
it
is
a
part
of
Ottawa's
social
history
and,
in
addition
to
gene
Piggott,
the
other
morrison
girls
are
grete
hale
and
gay
kook
who
still
live
in
the
Pacific
Hospital
neighborhood.
So
it
has
a
real
real
background
in
Ottawa's
history,
so
I
urge
you
to
to
designate
it.
Although
I'm
sure
you
will
thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
Linda
yeah,
Leslie
I
think
I
just
mentioned
to
councilor
McKenney,
who
was
a
little
bit
late
arriving
I
said
you
missed
a
great
presentation,
I
think
Leslie's
just
raised
the
bar
very
high
for
all
of
your
heritage.
Colleagues,
with
that
presentation
and
the
report
as
well
anyhow
David
Fleming
did
you
want
to
speak
on
this,
add
anything
to
it
or
from.
A
D
I
appreciate
this
is
already
answered,
but
it
the
right
at
the
tail
end
of
your
presentation
is
just
that.
The
notion
that
the
way
the
building
looks
today
with
that
odd
hideous,
stucco
thing
on
the
front
and
then
the
white
paint
that
the
designation
won't
hinder
its
ability
to
be
restored
back
to
its
its
original
glory.
B
D
A
Any
other
questions
from
our
committee
members:
okay,
I'm
thrilled
with
this
recommendation.
I
I,
really
thought
when
I
first
heard
about
potential
development
on
this
site,
I
was
pessimistic
about
the
ability
to
save
this
one
so
credit
to
planning
staff
and
to
the
current
owner
an
applicant
as
well
for
taking
the
initiative
to
to
protect
this
and
to
the
Hintonburg
Community
Association
for
also
pushing
very
hard
over
the
last
several
years.
So
are
the
report
recommendations
carried
carried?
Thank
you.
A
So
this
this
report
will
go
to
planning
committee
on
January
23rd,
okay,
we're
moving
on
now
from
downtown
out
to
Cumberland
designation
of
the
former
traders,
Bank
of
Canada
1824
Farwell
Street
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
we
have
cast
the
squaws
arrow.
Sorry
Cass
with
the
presentation
you've
got
to
follow
that
presentation
from
Leslie
big
shoes
to
fill.
E
You
Jared.
This
is
also
my
longest
designation
report,
because
it
is
my
first
one.
It's
taken
about
three
months
so
a
good
morning
this
report
being
presented
today
recommends
the
designation
of
the
former
traders
bank
building
at
1824
Farwell
street
in
VARs
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
The
building
was
constructed
in
1910
by
the
traders
Bank
of
Canada.
It
became
a
Royal
Bank
branch
in
1912
and
was
converted
to
a
residence
in
the
1950s
I.
E
So
these
photos
show
the
front
and
side
elevations
of
the
building.
1820
excuse
me
1824
far.
Wall
Street
is
a
two-story
building.
It's
clad
in
red
brick
with
a
raised
partition
and
a
flat
roof
that
slopes
toward
the
rear.
The
three
bay
front,
facade,
features
evenly
spaced
windows
and
window
and
door
openings
in
a
small,
concrete
porch.
E
The
eastern
facade
features
a
trio
of
windows
on
the
main
and
second
floor,
and
the
western
facade
features
a
single
window
with
a
flat
arch
I
was
likely
a
later
addition,
so
detail
photos
show
some
of
the
characteristics
we
identified
for
design
value,
including
segmental
arches,
with
Foose
Juarez
over
the
window
and
door,
openings,
stone,
sills
and
a
transom
over
the
front
door.
The
front
facade
features
a
flush,
eaves
and
a
flat
projecting
cornice,
and
you
can
sort
of
make
it
out
in
the
in
the
photos.
E
But
the
faded
area
below
the
cornice
indicates
where
the
bank
sign
was
previously
mounted
a
small
bit
of
trivia.
The
owner
says
that
the
front
door
came
from
2020:
oh
no
24,
22,
Sussex,
Prime,
Minister's
residence,
its
24
20.
Why
I
always
get
that
mixed
up?
Anyway,
that
is
where
the
doors
from
apparently
so
I,
just
the
streetscape
for
context,
two
views
of
Farwell
streets.
The
first
is
looking
east
towards
soup,
gonna
walk
and
the
white
building
is
the
former
Fraser's
general
store.
E
E
So
in
terms
of
meeting
criteria
under
regulation,
906
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
the
former
traders
Bank
building
meets
the
design
or
physical
value
criteria
as
a
rare
and
representative
example
of
a
style
or
building
type.
It's
one
of
only
five
brick
buildings
and
the
only
brick
commercial
building
still
remaining
in
vars,
the
former
Bank
building
has
a
design
has
design
value
is
a
good
example
of
an
early
20th
century
village,
commercial
building,
constructed
in
the
vernacular
style,
with
a
symmetrical
facade,
segmental
arch
openings,
brick,
we
Suarez
and
stone
sills.
E
It's
also
a
rare
surviving
example
of
one
of
the
104
traders
bank
branches,
constructed
by
the
traders
bank
in
a
number
of
villages
across
the
province,
so
I
found
I
searched
through
every
village
that
had
a
traders,
bank
and
I
was
able
to
find
four
that
resembled
the
vars
branch
so
from
left
to
right.
There's
the
Chapleau
Burgess,
Ville,
Emran
and
Massey
branches
with
the
vars
branch
in
the
centre.
All
the
other
buildings
have
either
been
demolished
or
heavily
altered.
E
E
So
the
property
meets
this
historical
or
associative
value
criteria
for
its
association
with
VARs
as
a
prosperous
railway
village,
in
the
late
19th
and
early
20th
centuries,
and
with
the
traders
Bank
of
Canada
and
the
Royal
Bank
of
Canada
VARs
was
first
settled
in
the
1880s
as
a
railway
village.
At
the
junction
of
the
Canada
Atlantic
railway
between
Montreal
and
Ottawa,
and
the
bear
Brook
Road,
which
was
a
forest
road
connecting
the
village
of
Russell
to
the
Ottawa
River
at
the
time
the
settlement
was
known
as
bear
Brook
station.
E
Just
a
few
years
later,
the
village
had
been
renamed
vars
and
had
a
hotel,
a
sawmill,
a
church,
cheese
factory
and
several
stores.
By
1908
there
were
four
churches:
a
sash
indoor
factory
and
a
telegraph
office,
and
the
bank
arrived
in
1910.
The
traders
Bank
served
primarily
agricultural
communities
across
Ontario
in
the
late
19th
and
20th
in
early
20th
centuries
in
1912,
the
traders
Bank
was
acquired
by
the
Royal
Bank
of
Canada,
and
all
traders.
Bank
branches
became
royal
banks.
E
The
vars
branch
served
residents
in
and
around
VARs
and
navin
until
a
royal
bank
opened
in
navin
in
the
1920s
as
road
transportation,
improved
between
vars
and
Ottawa,
and
automobile
ownership
increased
and
as
residents
found
work
in
Ottawa
and
thus
had
easier
access
to
the
shops
and
services
offered
there.
The
stores
and
services
in
Varis
saw
less
business
and
most
eventually
closed.
Daily
passenger
train
service
between
bars
and
ottawa
ceased
operation
in
the
1950s
around
this
time.
E
So
1824
or
Farwell
meets
criteria
for
contextual
value
because
of
its
historical
connection
to
its
surroundings.
The
building
is
one
of
a
few
one
of
a
few
remaining
former
commercial
buildings
in
vars,
all
of
which
have
also
since
been
converted
to
residences.
The
building
is
located
on
what
was
once
the
villages
secondary
commercial
street
running
east
from
the
main
commercial
area
on
Buckland
Road
and
parallel
to
the
railway.
E
When
the
bank
was
constructed,
the
street
was
home
to
a
general
store,
the
Methodist
Church
and
the
doctor's
office,
so
the
photo
on
the
Left
shows
far
Wall
Street,
looking
west
toward
the
Methodist
Church
in
1909,
so
just
before
the
bank
was
built
and
it
was
actually
built
on
the
empty
lot.
Next
to
the
church,
the
Birdseye
photo
shows
vars
in
1976.
E
It's
not
a
great
photo,
but
the
arrow
is
pointing
toward
the
bank,
the
railway
bisects,
the
photo
from
top
to
bottom
right
through
the
center
and
then
Buckland
Road,
which
is
the
main
commercial
strip.
It
kind
of
goes
left
to
right
across
the
photo
near
the
top.
So,
as
for
consultation
and
1824,
Farwell
was
first
identified
for
its
cultural
heritage
value
through
the
heritage
inventory
projects
I,
which
I'm
sure
you're
all
familiar
with
the
owner,
was
notified
in
April,
2000
and
19.
E
That
staff
intended
to
add
the
property
to
the
register
as
a
non
designated
listing
and
following
the
notification
the
owner
actually
initiated
the
designation
herself
staff
met
with
the
owner
in
person
in
April
in
August
of
2019
to
conduct
site
visits.
The
owner
had
already
conducted
significant
research
into
the
property
and
had
a
massive
binder
of
information
about
the
property
about
the
Royal
Bank
about
the
traders
bank
and
about
VARs
in
general,
and
she
was
very
happy
to
share
this
information
with
me.
E
To
help
me
prepare
the
the
report
and
I
was
in
regular
communication
with
her
throughout
the
process,
including
up
to
8:30.
This
morning
the
property
was
listed
on
the
Heritage
Register
following
council
approval
on
November
27th
2019
councillor
Blair
was
notified
of
the
designation
heritage.
Ottawa
was
notified
of
the
designation
and
the
vars
Community
Association
was
notified
of
the
designation.
The
virus
community
association
said
that
is
cool
when
I
notified
them.
So
they
are
in
support
of
the
designation.
A
F
E
Think
from
the
question,
so
it
was,
it
was
mostly
procedural.
We
knew
that
the
property
was
kind
of
in
the
docket
for
being
designated,
but
because
the
report
was
going
to
the
report
for
the
Heritage
inventory
project
was
going
to
council
before
today.
We
wanted
to
add
it
to
the
register
as
a
listed
property
just
for
our
records
in
case
that,
for
some
reason
at
the
last
minute
there
was
a
delay
or
anything
with
with
getting
this
report
through.
So.
F
G
E
So
the
question
she
she
actually
has
a
ton
of
family
members
that
work
for
the
Royal
Bank.
She
bought
the
property
knowing
a
little
bit
about
the
history
and
she
was
she's
always
been
into
research
in
history
and
and
she
she
was
actually
able
to
obtain
the
old,
the
gate,
the
tellers
kind
of
cage
that
protected
the
tellers
from
like
I
guess
it's,
the
angry
mobs
in
bars
from
the
neighbor
next
door
and
another
relative
found
an
old
bank
counter
from
another
Royal
Bank
branch
and
gave
it
to
her.
E
So
she
has
that
as
her
kitchen
counter
her
whole
front.
Entry
is
decorated
with
like
Royal
Bank
and
traders
bank,
like
memorabilia,
and
she
actually
works
in
a
nursing
home
and
one
of
her
her
residence
used
to.
Does
she
I
think
she
said
she?
She
worked
at
the
Royal
Bay
or
the
traders
Bank
in
in
VARs.
So
she's
got
all
these
amazing
connections
and
and
yeah
she's
she's,
just
very
interested
in
the
history
of
it,
she's
very
proud
of
her
community
and
and
actually
she's.
G
Well,
that's
fantastic
one,
more
thing
that
just
sort
of
came
to
mind,
as
you
were
talking
about
this
binder,
that
she's
compiled
and
all
the
people
she's
got
on
board
with
this
I.
Don't
know
if
the
City
of
Ottawa
archives
is
in
the
habit
of
collecting
material
relating
to
designated
properties.
But
maybe,
if
you
have
the
time
amid
all
your
fantastic
presentations,
if
this
is
the
sort
of
thing
they're
looking
for
it
may
be
worth
dropping
a
line
to
the
property
owner
yeah.
E
I
think
I
think
she's
happy
to
share
I
know
a
lot
of
the
things
she
received
came
from
the
Royal
Bank
archives
and
they
are
less
forthcoming
with
their
material.
But
it's
possible
that
if
we
keep
it
internal
with
the
city
that
we
can
share
that
with
the
archives.
But
that's
a
great
suggestion
and
thanks.
A
Any
other
questions
for
members
all
right.
We
did
get
a
letter
on
file
correspondence
on
file
from
heritage,
Ottawa
and
I
wanted
to
highlight
this
at
some
point
today
we
have
three
reports
recommending
designation
and
they
all
come
proactively.
They
all
come
from
the
owners
and
in
at
least
well
at
least
this
case
was
also
there
was
a
relation
to
the
inventory
project,
but
the
letter
from
David
Fleming
who's
here
just
highlights
how
heritage
ATO
has
been
advocating
the
city
and
I
think
a
lot
of
us
here.
A
Council
and
committee
members
have
as
well
to
be
more
proactive
in
our
approach
to
heritage
and
I'll.
Just
note
the
letter
says
we
are
pleased
that
the
excellent
work
on
the
recently
completed
heritage
inventory
project
has
provided
a
foundation
for
these
and
futures
designation.
So
you
know
we
often
hear
a
lot
about
some
of
the
bad
news
stories
that
come
through
this
committee
and
others,
but
I
think
we've
got
three
really
good
news
stories
about
being
proactive
in
in
preserving
and
enhancing
or
built
heritage.
So
I
think
that's
worth
noting.
A
Are
the
report
recommendations
carried
carried?
Thank
you
so
this
that
report
that
we've
just
carried
goes
to
Council
at
the
end
of
January,
and
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
in
capital
ward.
Councillor
Menard
is
here
thanks:
Council
Menard,
its
designation
of
the
Ottawa
tennis
and
lawn
bowling
club
at
176,
Cameron
Avenue
under
part
4
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
our
planner
for
this
file
is
Ashley
Catawba
good
morning
all,
but
okay
Kass
is
doing
no.
Oh.
A
H
H
We
prepared
a
very
brief
presentation
for
you
following
the
other
two:
it's
going
to
be
a
bit
shorter,
but
certainly
not
any
less
significant.
So
this
report
in
front
of
you
today
recommends
the
designation
of
the
property
at
176
Cameron
Avenue.
This
is
the
Ottawa
tennis
and
lawn
bowling
club
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
H
The
property
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
Cameron
Avenue
in
old
Ottawa,
south
the
property
rears
on
to
the
Rideau
River
just
and
you
can
see
in
the
photos
just
to
provide
some
additional
context.
There's
an
aerial
view
on
the
right,
and
it
shows
the
clubhouse
tennis
courts,
volleyball
courts
and
an
outdoor
swimming
pool.
H
Built
in
1922
to
1923
the
Ottawa,
tennis
and
lawn
bowling
club
is
a
two
and
a
half
story:
building
with
a
hipped
roof,
roughcast
stucco,
cladding
and
mark
half
timbering.
The
club
itself
was
founded
in
1881
and
it
tennis-wear
through.
That
club
was
first
played
here
near
where
we
are
now
at
Elgin
and
Lisgar.
The
club
moved
a
number
of
times
as
it
grew
and
it
moved
further
and
further
south
out
to
the
city
limits
and
eventually
opened
a
location
on
Cameron
Avenue
in
1923.
H
H
So,
just
briefly
on
design
value,
the
Ottawa,
tennis
and
lawn
bowling
club
does
have
a
design
value
as
a
good
example
of
a
recreational
Clubhouse
and
of
recreational
clubs,
architecture
from
the
1920s.
It
features
a
number
of
design
elements
associated
also
with
Tudor
Revival
style,
such
as
the
stucco
cladding
and
mark
half
timbering.
H
The
here's
a
summary
so
the
historical
value
built
in
1920
to
223,
as
I
mentioned,
the
Ottawa
Tennyson
long
bowling
club
reflects
early
20th
century
middle-class
life
in
Ottawa,
and
also
an
era
when
tennis
and
lawn
bowling
were
becoming
popular
sports
for
the
middle
class
in
Canada.
The
Ottawa
Tennis
Club
has
historical
value.
As
with
its
association
with
John
Albert,
you
were
or
recognized,
Ottawa
architect
who
lived
on
Cameron
Avenue.
His
parents
also
lived
on
Cameron
Avenue,
so
he
knew
the
area
well.
H
H
So,
as
with
the
last
report,
this
property
actually
was
identified
also
through
the
heritage
inventory
project
through
it's
one
of
its
earliest
reports,
back
in
2017
for
old,
Ottawa,
south
and
east,
and
since
that
time
the
property
owner
has
come
forward
and
asked
for
the
property
to
be
designated.
So
the
club
requested
its
designation
and
recently
its
Board
met
on
it,
and
the
board
is
supportive.
Word
councillor
Menard
who's
here
as
aware
of
the
recommendations
and
is
supportive
and
also
heritage.
Ottawa
was
notified
of
the
designation.
I
Thanks
for
a
chair
appreciate
that
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
The
plan
at
this
site
in
the
future
is
to
look
at
doing
some
renovations
to
the
building.
How
will
designation
affect
some
of
those
plants?
Most
of
them
are
on
the
interior
of
it
of
it,
but
will
that
affect
any
of
the
plans
for
renovation.
J
Thank
You
councillor
the
plans
as
the
clubhouses
circle
club
has
notified
us
of
our
to
do
renovations,
you're,
correct,
mostly
interior,
and
the
exterior
is
being
included
and
designation.
Only
no
interior
elements
are
being
included,
so
only
if
they're
touching
the
exterior,
which
I
think
they'll
be
doing.
Maybe
some
window
changes
or
restoration
work
will
be
required
to
have
a
Harris
permit
for
those
types
of
work,
so
anything
inside
will
not
be
included
with
that.
Okay.
I
J
The
whole
parcel
will
be
designated
as
part
of
this
applicator.
That's
a
proposal
here
and
any
changes
to
if
they
want
to
construct
any
other
outbuildings
or
take
something
else
down.
They
do
have
some
sort
of
shed
I'm,
sorry
sheds,
and
that
would
need
to
be
a
pass
through
us
and
we
look
at
that
for
to
see
where
the
premise
required.
Okay,.
J
Yes,
I
do
actually
I've
also
applied
for
another
grant
through
the
federal
government
called
the
second
tier.
The
building
communities
through
arts
and
heritage,
Heritage's,
Legacy,
Fund
they're,
hoping
to
be
successful
in
getting
I,
think
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
the
federal
government
for
their
restoration
plans
and
in
order
to
help
support
their
application.
They
were
so
is
recommended
by
the
government
to
apply
for
designation
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
to
help
support
and
improve
the
chances
of
getting
this
grant.
Okay.
F
F
F
A
Should
note
too,
this
report
will
be
presented
to
Council
tomorrow,
and
part
of
that
reason
is
to
allow
allow
the
property
owner,
in
this
case,
to
complete
their
application
of
the
federal
government
for
that
grant.
I
believe
so.
We've
agreed
to
move
a
little
quicker
in
terms
of
rise
in
Vista
council
member
Podolski.
K
My
only
disappointment
in
a
report
was
that
it
was
so
short
as
a
tennis
player.
I
was
expecting
the
next
hour
to
hear
a
full
history
of
the
Ottawa
Lawn
Tennis
Club,
but
I'll
try
to
withhold
my
disappointment
in
that
I.
Just
wanted
to
add
my
voice
to
what
the
chair
has
said
about
the
designations
that
have
come
forward
this
morning
from
three
property
owners
that
voluntarily
come
forward
to
designated
property.
I.
K
G
Yes,
I
think
it's
fantastic
that
we've
had
three
applications
come
forward
this
morning
and
I.
Won't
repeat
all
of
the
praise
that
the
chair
and
member
Podolski
and
and
the
rest
of
us
already
said.
I'm
curious,
though,
is
the
city
keeping
track
of
requests
that
have
come
forward
as
a
result
of
the
heritage
inventory
project.
It
might
be
sort
of
interesting
to
keep
tabs
on
what
changes
we've
seen
and
citizen
requests
and
procedure.
G
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
All
right
are
the
report
recommendations
carried
carried.
Thank
you
all
right
and
our
final
report
today
is
an
application
to
alter
1:24
bottler
Street,
a
property
in
lower
the
Lower
Town
West
Heritage
Conservation
District
designated
under
part
5
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
we
have
a
brief
presentation
from
McKenzie
Kim
this
morning.
L
Okay
good
morning,
so
this
application
to
alter
relates
to
the
property
at
124
bottler
Street.
As
you
heard,
it's
a
property
designated
under
part,
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
as
part
of
the
Lower
Town
West
Heritage
Conservation
District.
The
property
contains
a
one
and
a
half
story:
wood
frame
building
and
it's
a
category
two
building
in
the
district.
This
property
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
bottlers
street
mid-block
between
Dalhousie
and
Cumberland
at
the
Northeast
boundary
of
the
Lorton
west
HCD.
L
So
this
house
is
a
very
early
example
of
the
front
gable
house
form
in
Lower
Town
constructed
circa
1864
and
since
its
construction,
the
building
has
undergone
a
number
of
alterations,
including
the
addition
of
the
dormers,
the
removal
of
its
front
porch,
Andry
cladding,
as
well
as
changes
to
the
windows
and
their
openings
and
alterations
to
the
foundation
in
order
to
raise
the
basement.
So
this
property
might
seem
familiar
to
the
committee
as
the
owner
received
approval
earlier.
L
This
fall
for
the
construction
of
a
new
two-story
rare
addition,
as
well
as
some
repairs
to
the
main
house,
including
reinstating
a
sympathetic
front
porch.
So
today,
this
application
is
before
the
committee,
because
after
receiving
that
approval
and
starting
with
the
work
the
owner
and
his
engineers
have
found
that
the
foundation
is
in
a
very
advanced
stage
of
deterioration,
so
much
so
that
they
need
to
be
completely
replaced.
So,
accordingly,
this
application
is
requesting
permission
to
lift
the
building
in
order
to
remove
the
existing
foundation
and
pour
new
ones.
L
A
condition
of
approval
has
been
included
to
ensure
that
the
overall
height
of
the
house
is
maintained,
and,
additionally,
as
noted
in
the
report
in
the
conditioner
report
provided
by
the
engineer,
given
the
age
of
this
building,
as
you
can
imagine,
there's
a
potential
for
the
integrity
of
some
of
the
other
elements
of
this
building
too.
That
are
currently
stable
to
become
unstable.
L
L
So
this
proposal
has
also
been
reviewed
against
the
standards
and
guidelines
and
staff
are
satisfied
that
they
that
this
proposal
meets
those
those
standards
and
guidelines
and
are
recommending
approval,
as
outlined
on
in
the
report,
subject
to
the
conditions
outlined
in
that
report,
as
well
as
the
standard
delegation
of
minor
design
changes.
The
two-year
expiry
for
the
heritage,
permit
you'll,
also
notice,
there's
a
fifth
recommendation,
and
that's
for
council
to
to
be
able
to
consider
this
application
at
their
meeting
tomorrow
on
December
11th
and
that's
in
order
to
meet
the
standard.
A
M
You
yeah
my
question
pertains
to
because,
of
course,
this
has
we've
seen
this
property
before
and
I.
Remember
the
last
presentation
there
was
some
discussion
around
the
possibility
of
the
owner
reinstating
the
front
porch
I'm,
just
wondering
if
there's
been
any
any
news,
I
mean
we
hear
that
they'd
like
to
make
additional
changes
to
the
extension
with
the
dormer.
Was
there
any
discussion
around
the
reinstatement
of
the
porch?
Thank.
L
You
we
have
been
discussing
the
the
front,
porch
and
I
think
it's
still
we're
still
working
out
some
of
the
details.
There's
some
issues
with
some
of
the
encroachments
but
I
think
I
think
we're
close
and
working
with
the
other
city
departments
on
that
and
we're
looking
into
you
know
eligibility
for
the
grant
program
as
well.
So
it's
certainly
still
on
the
table.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I
I,
certainly
understand
the
logic
behind
yeah.
The
staffs
recommendation
and
I
have
no
issues
with
that.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
before
staff
agrees
to
make
this
recommendation
that
you
go
through
all
of
the
reports
regarding
the
foundation,
everything
that
they're
engineers
have
provided
with
the
City
of
Ottawa
reviews
that,
before
you
make
a
recommendation,
is
that
correct?
A
A
So
this
rises
to
Council
tomorrow
and
we
have
no
in
camera
items
information
previously
distributed.
We
have
a
summary
of
designation
refusals
from
2019
and
we
have
received
the
memo
by
email
and
it's
been
listed
on
the
agenda
as
well,
and
he
notices
a
motion
for
consideration
at
a
subsequent
meeting.
K
K
Don't
make
the
cut
when
you
apply
at
the
criteria,
so
I
think
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
that
to
draw
the
committee's
attention
to
this
process,
which
shows
the
work
that's
being
done
in
the
background,
and
it's
not
all
what
some
people
might
think
as
being
the
committee
that
will
designate
anything
that
moves.
Thank
you.
Okay,.