►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-committee – 8 December 2020
Description
Built Heritage Sub-committee - 8 December 2020 - live meeting stream.
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
It
is
impossible
to
acknowledge
our
built
heritage
without
acknowledging
the
algonquin
people
as
the
customary
keepers
and
defenders
of
this
land.
For
those
of
you
who
do
not
need
to
participate
in
the
meeting,
you
can
also
watch
these
proceedings
live
on
the
ottawa
city
council,
youtube
channel
a
reminder
to
participants
to
please
keep
your
microphones
muted.
A
Until
I
call
upon
you
to
speak,
I
will
provide
each
committee,
member
with
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
or
comment
on
each
item
in
the
order
in
which
they
raise
their
hand
in
zoom
the
panelists
four
panelists
the
raise
hand
option
is
found
at
the
bottom
of
the
participants
list
for
attendees.
You
will
find
the
raise
hand
button
at
the
bottom
of
your
zoom
window
for
those
calling
in
press
star
9.
To
raise
your
hand,
the
committee
coordinator
and
I
will
be
watching
for
those
cues,
the
usual
5-minute
speaking
limit
will
apply.
A
Members
are
also
reminded
to
submit
any
motions,
visual
supports
or
declarations
of
interest
in
writing
to
the
coordinator
at
their
earliest
opportunity.
Although
the
deadlines
have
passed
for
residents
to
register,
to
speak
and
to
provide
written
submissions
to
this
subcommittee,
residents
may
still
provide
written
submissions
to
counsel.
A
613-580-2424
extension
22953
a
reminder
that
if
participants
are
having
technical
issues
with
their
zoom
connection,
they
may
call
in
using
the
backup
telephone
number
provided
by
the
coordinator.
In
terms
of
regrets,
I
have
received
regrets
from
counselor
mckinney.
Could
the
committee
coordinator,
please
call
the
role
a
reminder
to
members
to
unmute
themselves
when
they
are
called.
B
A
Our
first
item
is
in
regards
to
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
right
away
heritage
and
urban
design
services
number
one:
an
application
to
altar
540
manor
avenue,
a
property
located
within
the
rockcliff
park,
heritage
conservation,
district
and
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act.
Can
staff.
Please
provide
an
overview
of
this
report.
C
C
C
C
The
house
was
built
circa,
1925
and
designed
by
alan
w
horwood.
It
is,
it
features
a
steeply
pitched
roof
painted
brick
and
stucco
cladding
multi-pane
casement
windows
and
two
tall
chimneys
over
the
years.
Numerous
changes
and
additions
have
been
made
to
the
building,
including
the
frontispiece,
a
new
garage
and
the
garage
link
next
slide
as
well.
Additions
have
been
made
to
the
side
and
rear
of
the
house
next
slide.
C
The
application
today
includes
the
removal
of
all
additions
and
the
construction
of
one
new
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
house.
Here
is
the
site
plan
on
the
left.
The
image
shows.
What
is
there
today
on?
The
right
is
what
is
proposed.
The
original
form
of
the
house
is
colored
in
dark
gray
and
the
yellow
areas
are
the
additions,
including
the
garages,
the
left
image,
the
yellow
areas
will
be
removed
and
on.
C
C
C
The
new
addition
will
include
living
space,
a
wrap-around
porch
at
the
rear
and
sides,
as
well
as
a
below-grade
three-car
garage.
A
single
car
detached
garage
is
also
proposed.
Next
slide
here
are
the
two
side
elevations.
The
addition
has
been
highlighted
in
by
red
box.
The
placement
of
the
addition
allows
for
the
existing
house
to
read
in
its
original
form.
The
steeply
pitched
roof
can
still
be
read
on
all
four
sides
and
a
step
back
from
the
original
house
form
next
slide.
C
C
C
The
proposed
landscape
plan
includes
the
retention
of
the
semi-circular
driveway,
the
creation
of
a
new
reverse
sloped
driveway,
as
well
as
a
pool
and
accompanying
pool
house
in
the
rear
yard.
Since
the
addition
will
be
generally
in
line
with
the
existing
house,
the
side
yard
setbacks
will
be
maintained
and
some
areas
increased.
C
C
C
Next
slide
as
a
property
located
within
the
rockland
park
heritage
conservation
district.
This
application
is
required
to
meet
the
guidelines
in
the
plan.
The
applicable
guidelines
relate
to
altering
grade
1
properties.
Addition
should
be
of
their
own
time
lower
than
the
original
structure.
Gladiator-Compatible
material,
subordinate
to
and
distinguishable
from
the
house
standards.
1
and
11
are
the
standards
and
guidelines
and
the
conservation
of
historic
places
in
canada
are
both
applicable
in
this
application.
C
The
heritage
value
of
the
house
and
district
will
be
maintained
and
the
new
work
will
be
physically
and
visually
compatible
with,
as
well
as
support
it
to
and
distinguishable
from
the
original
house.
The
roof
line
of
the
addition
is
lower
than
the
existing
building
is
set
back
from
the
front
facade
colliding
materials
that
reflect
the
character
of
the
original
house
and
are
typical
of
the
area,
although
somewhat
similar
in
expression.
The
addition
is
distinguishable
from
the
original
house,
since
it
is
stepped
back
from
the
front,
has
a
lower
roof
and
a
set
on
both
sides.
C
Providing
a
visual
break
between
old
and
new.
The
house
will
remain
compatible
with
the
heritage
attributes
of
the
hcd
in
terms
of
its
form,
massing
overall
height,
step
back
and
dominance
of
the
property's
landscape.
Setting
the
proposal
will
also
rehabilitate
an
existing
house
that
requires
repairs
a
cultural
heritage
impact
statement
was
also
completed
for
this
application.
C
The
report
found
that
the
addition
respects
orientation
cites
setback
and
height
requirements
outlined
in
the
hcd
plan,
as
it
retains
the
relationship
to
adjacent
buildings,
respecting
the
cultural
heritage,
value
of
the
streetscape
next
slide.
Far
as
consultation
goes,
the
rocklift
park
residents
association
heritage
committee
was
involved
in
the
pre-consultation
pilot.
C
They
have
been
supported
by
this
application
and
their
comments
can
be
found.
The
report
heritage
ottawa
was
notified
of
this
application.
They
have
submitted
comments,
I
believe
just
yesterday
and
are
supportive.
The
word
counselor
is
aware
of
the
application,
and
neighbors
within
30
meters
were
also
notified
next
slide.
C
A
As
you
had
mentioned,
we
did
receive
a
correspondence
from
david
fleming
from
heritage
ottawa
in
a
letter
that
was
dated
december
7th
7th
in
support
of
the
report,
recommendations
as
well,
we
do
have
a
speaker
available
for
in
support
of
the
the
project
dylan
o'keefe
of
o'keefe
forensic
design
group,
I'd
like
to
invite
mr
o'keefe
to
speak.
If
there
is
any
need.
B
A
A
B
Here,
thank
you,
chair,
just
a
quick,
quick
question
on
the
brick
testing.
Is
that
mainly
being
conducted
for
documentary
purposes,
or
are
they
actually
planning
to
restore
the
brick
to
its
initial
color?
Or
you
know?
I
just
noticed
that
the
design
for
the
edition
seems
to
be
predicated
on
the
assumption
that
the
white
paint
will
be
staying,
which
is
fine.
I
was
curious.
A
Thank
you
and
I
have
to
apologize.
I
am
having
some
technical
difficulties
with
my
computer,
so
I
am
going
to
have
to
make
some
alternative
arrangements.
I
don't
know
if
it
is
possible
for
the
committee
coordinator
to
just
proceed
with
just
a
short
recess
until
I
can
rejoin
and
get
my
my
screen
back.
So
I
do.
B
B
A
A
Sorry,
apologies
everybody.
This
is
one
of
the
problems
I
have
with
going
back
and
forth
with
different
platforms.
When
I
do
that,
unfortunately,
for
some
reason
my
screen
goes
blank
and
it
causes
for
the
utmost
an
embarrassment
here,
but
I
I'm
very
pleased
that
the
computer
has
resumed.
I
I
do
know
that
that
member
conforti
had
last
asked
a
question.
That
was
the
last
item
that
I
had
had
heard.
I
believe
of
the
of
the
architect.
I
believe.
E
A
F
So
I
think
that
this
meets
the
standard
of
communication
that
I
think
we
all
are
constantly
looking
for.
So
compliments
to
the
team
for
doing
that,
and
also
my
only
comment
is
that
I
endorse
the
proposal
and
the
approach.
I
think
it's
a
sensitive
intervention
and
it's
respectful
to
standards
and
guidelines
for
store
places
in
canada,
and
I
just
wanted
to
give
my
positive
comments
on
that.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I'll
support
the
motion.
A
F
B
A
Thank
you.
The
report
is
scheduled
to
be
presented
to
council
on
january
27th.
Our
next
item
is
an
application
to
demolish
and
rebuild
rear,
detached
garage
at
114
stanley
avenue
a
property
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
located
on
river
lane
can
staff
please
provide
an
overview
of
this.
A
G
Okay,
good
morning,
everyone
good
morning,
mr
chair
members
of
the
bill,
herrera
subcommittee
for
anybody
who
has
not
met
me.
My
name
is
greg
mcpherson,
I'm
a
junior
heritage
planner
here
with
the
city
of
ottawa,
so
today
I
will
be
presenting
on
proposed
alterations
to
114
stanley
avenue
a
property
located
in
the
new
edinburgh
heritage,
conservation
district
and
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act
next
slide.
Please.
G
G
So
from
stanley
avenue,
this
is
what
the
property
currently
looks
like.
It
features
a
relatively
simple
front:
gable,
design,
along
with
decorative
barge
board
along
the
roof
line.
The
property
was
constructed,
circa
1872
by
henry
avery,
who
is
a
local
notable
local
contractor
within
new
edinburgh
and
next
slide,
please
so.
The
subject
application
relates
not
to
the
main
dwelling
on
the
property,
but
the
detached
garage
which
runs
onto
river
lane
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
G
So
this
garage
is
believed
to
have
been
built
at
approximately
the
same
time
as
the
main
joint
on
the
property,
and
you
can
see
in
this
photo
here
the
existing
garage.
It
features
a
side,
gable,
design
and
clad
with
board
and
batten
siding.
As
you
can
see,
the
condition
of
the
garage
is
relatively
deteriorated.
Some
of
the
siding
has
begun
to
warp
and
the
roof
has
begun
to
buckle
a
little
bit
and
just
to
note
as
well.
You
can't
really
see
it
here,
but
the
garage
does
not
have
a
foundation.
G
G
This
report
found
that,
due
to
a
lack
of
foundation
and
successive
freeze
thaw
cycles
over
the
courses
of
many
years,
the
garage
was
no
longer
structurally
stable.
So
the
report
therefore
recommended
the
demolition
of
the
garage
and
the
salvage
and
reuse
of
materials
where
possible
next
slide.
Please.
G
G
So
this
just
is
the
zoomed
in
picture
of
that
proposed
garage
and
then
on
to
the
next
slide.
Please
so
highlighted
in
red.
Here
is
kind
of
the
approximate
outline
of
the
existing
garage
and
then
next
slide,
and
then
tacked
on
in
green
here
is
sort
of
the
proposed
extension.
So
this
pose
bit
it's
a
bay
entrance
and
it
will
be
facing
the
existing
dwelling
and
not
visible
from
river
lane.
G
So,
just
because
of
this
increased
size,
three
variances
are
required
primarily
in
relation
to
the
heritage
overlay,
just
to
permit
a
slight
ext,
a
slight
addition
in
the
volume
and
floor
area
of
the
property.
So
the
variance
process
will
be
undertaken
following
the
heritage
permit
process
and
next
slide.
Please.
G
So
this
elevation
shows
the
proposed
elevation
from
river
lane.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
most
notable
difference
between
the
existing
garage
and
the
proposed
garage
is
the
new
carriage
style
garage
door.
That's
approximately
twice
the
width
of
the
existing
garage
door
and
again
the
board
and
batten
here
will
be
a
mix
of
salvage
board
and
batten,
siding
as
well
as
new
board
and
batten,
siding
that
is
stained
to
match
slide
11.
Please.
G
So
this
slide
shows
the
elevation
actually
facing
the
house
towards
stanley
street.
So
you
can
see
in
the
sort
of
middle
there
is
the
projecting
entrance.
That's
proposed
as
well
as
a
dormer
above
that,
so
the
windows
and
doors
here
will
be
salvaged
from
the
existing
garage,
if
possible,
and
this
dormer
and
this
bomb
are
not
visible
from
river
lane.
Just
due
to
the
width
of
the
lot
in
the
width
of
the.
G
G
And
here
are
some
renderings
which
have
superimposed
the
proposed
garage
within
images
of
the
existing
river
lane.
So,
as
you
can
see,
the
form
of
the
garage
is
relatively
identical
to
what
is
existing,
the
most
notable
difference
again
being
that
double
garage
door
and
next
slide-
and
here
is
just
a
view
of
the
proposed
rear
of
the
garage.
So
this
would
be
if
you
were
standing
on
the
within
the
backyard
of
the
property.
This
is
what
you
would
see
here,
all
right
and
next
slide
so
applicable
guidelines
and
policies.
G
So
as
this
property
is
located
within
the
new
edinburgh
hcd,
it
is
required
to
or
any
alterations
are
required
to
conform
to
the
policies
of
the
new
edinburgh
act
plan.
So
the
specific
guidelines
that
that
relates
to
here
are
the
guidelines
for
garages
and
accessory
buildings,
as
well
as
the
guidelines
for
laneways.
G
Similarly,
the
laneway
guidelines
require
that
new
accessory
buildings
be
simple
in
character
and
reflect
the
character
of
other
garages.
There
are
not
specific
policies
within
the
hcd
plan
for
the
demolition
of
accessory
buildings,
but
salvage
and
reuse
is
considered
a
good
practice
when,
in
relation
to
any
demolition
related
to
contributing
buildings.
So
we
are
supportive
of
the
reuse
of
some
of
the
materials
here
as
well
standards,
1,
10
and
11
for
the
courses
in
canada.
All.
G
G
Consultation,
so
there
was
some
early
consultation
with
heritage
staff,
as
well
as
the
community
association.
We
have
to
receive
support
from
the
new
edinboro
community
alliance
heritage.
Ottawa
was
also
notified
of
the
application,
and
I
believe,
last
night
or
this
morning
we
also
received
support
from
them.
The
award
counselor
has
been
notified
of
the
application,
as
well
as
neighbors,
within
30
meters
of
the
property
and
next
slide.
Please.
G
So
we
recommend
that
the
application
be
approved
conditional
upon
the
applicant
salvaging
any
historic
materials,
including
wood,
cladding
windows,
doors
and
structural
beams
prior
to
demolition
and
reusing
them
wherever
possible,
as
well
as
delegating
authority
for
minor
design,
changes
to
the
general
manager
and
issuing
the
heritage
permit
with
a
two-year
expiry
date
yeah.
That
is
my
report.
A
Thank
you
greg
that
was
very
detailed.
We
did
receive
correspondence
on
this
file
from
david
fleming
from
heritage
ottawa.
In
a
letter
that
was
dated
december
7th,
that
was
in
support
of
the
report
recommendations.
We
also
received
a
letter
from
an
adjacent
neighbor
james
trottier,
dated
december
7th,
which
was
posing
the
the
application.
A
I
think,
due
to
navigation
issues
around
the
lane
and
size
of
the
of
the
building.
We
do
have
two
speakers
who
are
registered
mario
poulet
of
cloud9
drafting
and
design.
Who
is
an
agent
for
the
owner?
I
will
invite
mr
poland
to
speak
if
he
has
a
has
a
presentation,
if
not
obviously
he
he
can
be
made
available
to
the
subcommittee
for
for
any
questions.
H
So
you
couldn't
you
couldn't
back
a
car
up
into
the
garage
in
our
situation.
The
reason
for
the
bump
up
being
bigger
is
so
that
one
we
can
potentially
park
two
vehicles
and
two
be
able
to
back
up
the
vehicle
in
order
to
accommodate
exactly
the
tightness
of
waiver
lane.
So
I
know
that
river
lane,
with
the
utility
pole
there
and
the
width
of
the
street
limits
a
little
bit
of
what
the
turning
radius
is.
H
For
that
reason,
we've
adjusted
a
few
things
accordingly
or
as
best
as
we
could
in
the
proposal,
so
the
property
itself.
The
garage
now
is
about
a
foot
over
onto
the
neighboring
property.
We
brought
that
back
onto
our
side
to
limit
the
width
and
help
with
that
first
corner,
and
then
we,
the
the
the
reason
for
the
wider
door,
is
exactly
that
to
be
able
to
maximize
the
radius
as
best
as
possible.
A
A
B
H
I
There
we
are
okay,
all
right
now
we
can
okay.
So
thank
you
for
meeting
and
thank
you
for
the
the
presentation.
I
just
did
want
to
point
out
that
that
that
the
way
that
the
current
situation
is
in,
I
just
moved
in
september,
and
I
have
no
parking
at
all
period.
None
because
the
street
has
no
parking
and
the
back
lane.
The
the
current
garage
is
unusable.
It's
unsafe
and
it's
it's
not
usable
at
all.
So
this
is
not
a
oh!
I
It's
a
nice
to
have
it's
actually
kind
of
an
essential
piece
of
the
property
for
me,
and
I
don't
know
if,
if
you're
familiar
with
the
house,
but
the
work
that
we've
done
here
has
been
extremely
sensitive
to
the
heritage
community,
we're
we're
very
heritage
focused.
You
can
see
that
the
wood
behind
me
is
the
original
150
year
old
wood
that
we
we
maintained
and
it
looks
like
the
church.
So
so
we
are
we're
very
appreciative
of
the
the
heritage
committee
and
the
substance,
but
but
it
has
to
function.
A
A
A
D
A
Thank
you
vice,
chair
quinn.
I
also
concurred
with
all
of
those
comments,
including
the
the
fact
that,
obviously,
the
the
concern
of
the
adjacent
neighbor,
in
my
mind,
was
valid
and
obviously
very
serious,
but
unfortunately
is
not
the
purview
of
this
of
this
committee,
but
my
hope,
of
course,
being
a
very
neighborly,
a
wonderful
community
that
neighbors
will
talk
with
one
another
and
we'll
make
accommodations
for
for
one
another.
So
I
will
also
be
in
favor
of
this
report.
D
A
Sorry.
Okay.
Our
next
item
is
an
update
concerning
the
ontario
heritage
act
proposed
our
regulations
pursuant
to
a
bill
108
before
we
proceed
with
receiving
an
oral
update
on
this
matter,
I'd
like
to
ask
for
a
motion
to
suspend
the
rules
so
that
staff
are
not
required
to
provide
a
written
report
at
ask
vice
chair
quinn,
to
read
the
motion.
A
E
E
E
So,
as
you
may
remember,
bill
heritage
subcommittee
and
council
endorsed
a
letter
from
the
mayor,
including
staff
comments
on
the
proposed
regulations
under
the
ontario
heritage
act.
This
was
sent
to
the
ministry
at
the
beginning
of
november.
We
have
not
had
a
response
to
that
letter
to
date.
The
only
additional
information
we
have
at
this
point
is
that
the
ministry
confirmed
to
us
by
email
near
the
end
of
november,
that
they
are
continuing
to
target
january
21
2021
as
the
date
for
the
legislative
changes
to
come
into
full
force.
E
In
effect,
as
a
result
of
this,
we've
been
working
on
a
work
plan
to
ensure
that
we
are
as
prepared
as
possible
to
deal
with
these
changes.
As
you
remain
remember
from
the
october
report,
we
are
anticipating
quite
a
heavy
workload
resulting
from
the
changes
to
the
act,
so
we're
trying
to
position
ourselves
as
best
we
can
given
the
short
timeline,
and
the
ministry
has
also
informed
us
that
they
intend
to
release
the
revised
ontario
heritage
toolkit
in
draft
form
at
some
point
this
month.
E
That
again
was
at
some
point
in
november.
They
advised
us
of
that.
We
have
not
received
it
yet
and
we
will
advise
the
committee
when
the
draft
is
circulated
for
comment.
I
expect
the
committee
would
be
circulated
as
well,
but
this
is
an
important
supporting
document
that
we
we
will
need
to
consider
when
it's
released
next
slide.
E
So
this
slide
shows
a
high
level
version
of
some
of
the
items
that
will
be
undertaken
both
internally
at
the
staff
level,
but
also
several
of
these
items
will
come
forward
to
the
subcommittee
in
the
next
few
months.
So
the
high
priority
items
to
be
undertaken
early
in
the
new
year
include
developing
an
internal
tracking
system
to
respond
to
the
prescribed
timelines
in
the
new
legislation.
E
This
is
a
high
priority
item.
It
will
not
be
done
overnight,
but
we
are
aiming
to
have
a
work
plan
in
place
early
in
the
new
year
to
address
these
issues,
and
we
expect
that
to
come
forward
to
the
committee
for
review.
There
are
seven
outstanding
hcd
plans
to
update
that
are
pre-2005
in
the
medium
category.
E
But
primarily
we
need
to
include
an
assessment
of
whether
or
not
applications
meet
what
are
called
the
prescribed
principles
that
have
been
outlined
in
the
regulation
and
that
that
requirement
basically
says
that
in
making
any
decisions
under
the
heritage
act,
council
or
its
delegate
being
staff
have
to
consider
these
prescribed
principles
in
making
that
and
making
their
decisions.
So
we
have
to
include
something
in
our
report:
template
that
that
illustrates
how
we've
addressed
those
prescribed
principles.
E
Also,
a
large
piece
under
the
medium
category
that
will
be
coming
before
the
committee
in
the
new
year
are
updates
to
our
heritage
register
procedures.
So
this
is
related
to
listing
removing
demolition,
as
well
as
a
new
objection
procedure,
because
properties
that
are
added
to
the
register
going
forward
in
2021
owners
will
have
ability
to
object,
formally
object
to
the
listing
and
then
have
that
have
that
objection
considered
by
committee
and
counsel
and
then,
along
with
that,
we
are
developing
some
standardized
evaluation
criteria
for
future
listings
on
the
heritage
register.
E
The
next
pieces
are
sort
of
developing
a
well
a
new
designation,
bylaw
content
and
templates
is
going
to
go
along
with
the
report.
Template
update,
so
that's
more
of
an
internal
document
to
reflect
the
requirements
of
the
of
the
legislative
changes
and
then
finally,
is
developing
a
new
process
to
deal
with
the
removal
of
heritage
attributes.
E
So,
any
time
that
a
heritage
attribute
is
removed
in
the
future,
we
will
committee
and
council
will
be
required
to
basically
reconsider
whether
or
not
the
property
continues
to
have
cultural
heritage
value.
So
we're
still
working
to
figure
out
how
this
will
work
in
terms
of
delegated
authority
versus
properties
that
come
forward
to
committee
and
what
exactly
constitutes
removal
of
a
heritage
attribute.
So
if,
for
instance,
somebody
is
changing
windows
and
they're,
replacing
them
with
something
slightly
different,
but
the
windows
are
listed
as
a
heritage
attribute.
E
So
again,
these
are
our
low
priority
items
at
the
at
the
moment,
and
as
I
mentioned,
I
think
this
is
a
very
high
level
look
of
what
we
have
to
do.
There
are
a
lot
of
other
little
bits
and
pieces
that
I
think
will
come
across
as
as
things
move
along,
so
this.
This
is
what
we
think
we
have
to
do
right
now,
but
I
expect
that
we
may
we
may
uncover
some
other
items
next
slide.
E
Please-
and
this
is
just
the
last
slide
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
timing,
so
the
items
that
we've
put
in
the
high
priority
category
we're
hoping
to
have
a
system
in
place
to
deal
with
them
by
the
end
of
january.
The
medium
would
be
by
the
end
of
q1
2021
or
earlier.
If
we
are,
if
something
comes
up
that
we
have
to
deal
with,
and
then
the
low
category
would
be
in
place
by
the
end
of
next
year
or
earlier,
if
the
need
arises.
E
A
F
So
I
think
that
as
soon
as
things
like,
the
toolkit
and
other
information
come
forward,
if
you
could
circulate
them
to
the
ability
to
subcommittee
members
as
soon
as
possible,
that
would
be
great,
and
although
this
is
just
a
verbal
update,
you've,
given
the
slides
that
you
have
used,
I
find
are
quite
helpful
cues.
So
maybe
after
the
meeting,
if
they
could
just
be
informally,
circulated
to
the
members
of
the
bill
clear.
The
subcommittee
because
they're
a
little
checklist
of
your
priorities,
and
that
would
be
helpful.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
A
Seeing
none
a
german
on
adjournment
is
the
motion
carried
carried
carried
carried.
We
are
adjourned
and
thank
you
everyone,
and
especially
for
putting
up
with
some
of
the
technical
difficulties
that
I
unfortunately
experienced,
but
I
think
that
that
unfortunately
comes
with
the
the
new
world
of
virtual
meetings
and
zoom.
The
next
regular
meeting
for
the
subcommittee
is
scheduled
for
wednesday
january
20th
2021..