►
Description
Finance and Economic Development Committee meeting – November 1, 2016 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
Good
morning,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
both
human
and
Monsieur,
and
welcome
to
the
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
meeting
for
the
1st
of
November
declarations
of
interest
declaration
dented
a
conformation
of
minutes
adepts
on
the
process
of
elbow
poor
cat
October
OD
mid-size
carried
communications
as
presented
office
of
the
city,
clerk
and
legislative
services.
Midterm
governance,
review
carried.
A
A
Direction
the
Silvius,
ofrecer
false
currency
lsanty
event
could
see
the
school
toss
up.
Merci,
merci
Monsieur
Donna
Gemma
raised
metrion
added
on
black
salon.
Travail
tilde
keep
the
surface
on
francais
she's,
remembered
the
committee
consultive
silver
service
on
France
ASG.
We
Dupree
lay
engagement,
the
set
the
keep
the
gila
needs
it.
The
report
indicates
at
and
me
and
call
Cal
Serbia
diri
diri
jl2
advice
for
lobbies
they
plant
the
plant.
Also
this
on
Francie,
a
less
son,
Debbie
wrote,
revived
que
vous
fait
exactly
direction.
Genera
mr.
A
mayor
I
like
to
add
a
comet,
a
great
appreciation
felicitations
for
Michelle
and
not
Lee
the
french-language
director
and
manager
on
a
job
well
done
and
reduce
and
complain
on
the
French
language
service.
Thank
you.
So
much.
No
an
Elsa
Baku
conceal
shanty,
regular
episode,
the
Tiff's
or
said
committee
su
la
langue,
française,
Marciano,
Corps
personnel
received
see
Corporate
Services
mid-year
purchasing
report.
2016
I.
Can
we
hold
on
mr.
mayor
request.
A
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
Samia,
and
we
have.
This
motion
is
by
law
to
authorize
a
70
million
debenture
issue
that
the
rule
of
procedure
be
waived
through
a
timeline
at
the
date
is
completion
in
November
3rd
2016
to
consider
the
following
motion:
where
accordance
with
finance
economic
development
committee
facto
journal
of
reference
vector,
has
their
authorities
to
enact
the
eventual
debenture
bylaw
to
authorize
the
assurance
of
debentures,
where
their
project
debit
authorized
has
been
approved
by
council
and
the
treasurer
has
proceeded
with
one
or
more
double
issue.
A
Pursuant
to
section
15
schedule,
a
of
bylaw
number
2014
435,
the
delegation
of
authority
by
law
and
whereas
the
treasurer
issued
a
32-year
debenture
issue
on
October
25
2016
with
a
closing
date
of
November
3rd
2016.
Therefore
be
it
resolved
that
FATCA
approved
the
addition
of
of
the
item
title
by
law
to
authorize
a
70
million
debenture
issue
for
consideration
by
committee.
At
today's
meeting,
pursuant
to
section
9
89
sub
3
of
the
procedures
by
lobbying
by
law,
number
2014
441.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
this?
This
is
pretty
standard.
The
treasurer
tells
me
this
is
the
time
of
year.
It's
done
on
the
motion
carried
next
is
so
we
have
to
observe
in
cement
all
joys
if
a
man
has
various
interior
with
the
by
law,
so
that
the
formal
and
by
law
of
the
City
of
Ottawa
be
given
3
reading
and
enacted
by
the
Finance
Economic
Development
Committee,
in
accordance
with
the
delegated
authority
by
law
by
law.
A
Number
2016,
3
5
9,
a
bylaw
of
the
City
of
Ottawa
to
authorize
the
ball
on
opening
additional
sinking
fund
debenture
in
the
principle
amount
of
70
million
toward
the
cause
of
certain
capital
works
of
the
City
of
Ottawa.
On
that
motion
carried
enactment
of
the
bylaw
al
jolson
theory
and
the
first
proportions
the
say
mr.
mayor
basins
were
set
at
3
reading
by
law
by
law,
number
2016,
3
5
9,
a
bylaw
of
the
City
of
Ottawa
to
confront
proceed
of
the
finance
economic
development
committee.
A
A
committee
of
Council
of
the
City
of
Ottawa
is
meeting
held
on
November
1st
2016
motion
carried
Dame
LC
Thank
You,
Simon,
Thank
You
councillor
item
number
7.
We
have
a
presentation
and
delegations,
auto
community
lands,
Development
Corporation,
a
corporate
real
estate
delegation
of
authority
acquisition,
sale
of
land
and
property,
July
1st
2016
to
September,
30th,
2016
and
I.
Guess
you
all
know:
pouvoir
Kuusisto
evolved
the
terrain
in
appropriate
elder
shoe,
yet
the
quenelle
she
had
the
massage
or
septembre
the
transept
embroider
mid
sized
perceived
item.
8
is
mahogany.
A
A
Planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
brownfield
grant
program
application
six
to
zero.
A
is
round
out
Boulevard
Demond
Donna
cargo,
the
program
to
serve
on
seanpauley
fish
industry,
l,
sister,
zero
wit
Boulevard
agenda,
and
the
recommendation
is
before
us
for
Habitat
for
Humanity
carried
councilors
items,
article
alt,
equal
c8,
magnetic
no
quarter,
Community
Development,
Corporation
disillusion
carried,
and
then
we
have
one
in-camera
item
on
a
personnel
matter.
So
we'll
come
back
to
the
first
item
that
we
have
a
delegation
for,
and
that
is
midterm
governance.
A
So
we
have
a
brief
presentation
by
the
city
clerk
and
then
we
have
I
believe
two
people
from
the
community
would
like
to
speak.
Donna
Dubray,
followed
by
Debbie
laws.
So
mr.
clerk,
the
floor
is
yours.
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
we
won't
go
through
the
the
PowerPoint
presentation.
I'll
just
give
you
a
bit
of
an
overview
with
regards
to
what
took
place
over
last
three
or
four
months.
Most
members
of
council
will
appreciate
that
the
midterm
governance
review
is
to
review
all
of
your
delegated
authority.
A
A
We
have
looked
at
the
legislative
mandate,
including
the
new
pieces
of
legislation,
bill
8,
which
came
out
on
January
1st
of
this
year
with
regards
to
more
increased
accountability
and
transparency
for
the
province
and
the
local
municipalities,
and
also
bill
73,
the
amendments,
the
Planning
Act,
which
took
place
on
July
1st.
Finally,
mr.
mayor,
we
also
consulted
with
senior
staff
to
produce
in
this
report
at
17,
rather
minor
changes
and
recommendations
for
staff.
Again,
these
are
tweaks.
We
look
at
some
things
with
regards
to
both
heritage
subcommittee
terms
of
reference
and
pilot
projects.
A
We
looked
at
some
changes
to
the
adaptations
we
made
in
July
under
bill
73.
We
responded
to
all
of
councils
and
committees
directions
and
we
looked
at
some
changes.
Mr.
mayor
of
a
minor
nature
for
the
procedure
Bawa-
and
we
will
be
doing
the
delegation
of
authority
as
a
result
of
the
changes
to
the
organizational
alignment
that
took
place
in
July
and
in
October,
so
I
miss
mayor,
that's
just
the
overview!
Thank
you,
okay,
thank
you
and
I
want
to
thank
you
and
your
staff.
Mr.
A
clerk
I
know
a
lot
of
work
goes
into
this
and
you
look
forward
to
doing
this.
Like
you
look
forward
to
going
to
the
dentist
I'm
sure
every
two
years,
so
we
have
about
two
motions
that
I'm
aware
of
one
is
by
councillor
Turner
Shenko.
If
you'd
like
to
introduce
your
motion
councillor
and
the
second
is
by
councillor
Brockington
and
councillor
Dean's-
going
to
move
it
on
his
behalf,
so
anyone
else
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
for
the
governance
report.
No
okay,
so
council
agenda
shake.
A
If
you
could
introduce
your
motion
and
then
councillor
Dean,
so
we
have
accounts
there
Brockington.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor,
as
members
of
this
committee
and
of
council
may
recall,
in
February
of
this
year,
a
motion
was
passed.
The
report
was
received,
which
essentially
raised
the
bar
raised
the
level
of
commitment
of
this
city
and
of
this
council
to
tackling
climate
change.
A
number
of
steps
were
included
in
that
motion
that
would
reduce
our
emissions
of
greenhouse
gases
and
how
to
to
protect
the
climate.
As
we
know
it.
A
There
was
also
an
acknowledgment
that
increasingly,
this
city
is
having
to
deal
with
and
spend
a
lot
of
money
in
dealing
with
the
impacts
of
weather
events
and
other
changing
climate
health
issues
being
dealt
with
by
public
health,
etc.
As
a
result
of
the
change
in
climate.
In
that
motion,
there
was
the
proposal
to
amend
the
name
of
the
Environment
Committee
to
become
the
Environment
and
climate
protection
committee.
A
Some
people
might
have
more
easily
understood
and
lending
it
to
be
environment
and
climate
change
committee,
because
that's
the
precise
wording
that
the
federal
and
provincial
governments
have
chosen
I
instead
was
proposing
and
am
proposing
a
slight
modification
on
that.
That
I
believe
is
actually
far
more
accurate
in
terms
of
the
challenges
ahead
of
us.
A
A
number
of
cities
are
now
and
the
FCM
is
using
the
term
climate
protection
because,
in
fact,
what
it
does
is
it
is
illustrates
that
the
challenge
is
both
to
protect
the
climate
from
human
impacts,
but
also
to
protect
humans
from
the
climate.
In
that
sense,
climate
protection
I
believe
to
be
far
more
accurate,
so
I
think
the
issue
before
us
today
is
is
an
opportunity
to
do
a
couple
of
things.
A
One
is
to
flag
how
important
climate
protection
has
become
as
an
issue
for
this
city
and
that,
although
many
of
the
steps
we
need
to
take
do
fall
under
the
mandates
of
planning
of
transportation
of
transit
and
others
as
well,
that
there
needs
to
be
a
quarterback
so
to
speak,
or
someone
keeping
an
eye
on
climate
protection
policy
as
a
whole.
This
proposal
is
quite
simply,
some
might
see
it
as
symbolic
I
believe
it
is
that,
but
that
it's
more
than
that,
so
it
is
to
rename
the
committee
to
environment
and
climate
protection.
A
A
2017
with
recommendations
in
a
draft
policy
for
consideration-
okay,
so
we
have
two
speakers
from
the
public
would
like
to
address
the
governance
issue.
Donna
debry
from
the
Ottawa
Carleton
Wildlife
Centre
is
first
if
she
could
come
up
to
the
delegation
seat
and
push
the
black
button.
Please
Donna
and
welcome.
A
Well,
first
of
all,
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
councillors
for
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
speak
today
to
the
matter
of
the
Environment
Committee
terms
of
reference
as
president
of
the
Ottawa
Carleton
Wildlife
Center,
an
organisation
that
will
be
celebrating
its
30th
anniversary
next
year,
a
very
long
history
and
with
the
community,
as
well
as
serving
as
a
stakeholder
on
a
number
of
city
initiatives
with
respect
to
protecting
biodiversity
on
wildlife.
It
is
our
strong
belief
that
wildlife
and
biodiversity
must
be
located
within
the
Environment
Committee
terms
of
reference.
A
These
raisins
Environment
Committee
responsibilities
include
the
administration
and
maintenance
of
green
space
and
urban
forestry
within
the
urban
boundary
trees,
true
by
roles
within
the
urban
boundary
and
recommendations
to
Council
on
environmental
policy
issues
such
as
open
spaces
and
natural
open
futures.
How
can
you
possibly
separate
wildlife
and
biodiversity
from
those
responsibilities,
as
they
are
totally
intertwined,
like
all
issues
from
the
overlap
with
those
of
other
committees?
A
Just
to
give
a
little
bit
of
background,
the
Environment
Committee
is
responsible
for
the
management
and
protection
of
the
urban
forest.
It
is
therefore
only
logical
that
would
also
be
responsible
for
the
management
and
protection
of
of
urban
wildlife
and
biodiversity.
The
background
addresses
were
well
my
strategy
motion
that
was
approved
by
council.
A
The
vast
majority
of
wildlife
and
biodiversity
concerns
with
inaudible
or
urban
lands,
which
is
not
surprising,
given
that
development
pressures
are
in
urban
and
suburban
communities,
for
example,
Iraq
is
not
the
lead
for
the
urban
forest,
rather
than
is
that
reasonable
for
Iraq
to
be
was
to
be
the
lead
for
urban
rural,
and
our
planning
committee
should
rightfully
be
closely
involved.
City's
commitment
to
wildlife
sent
to
the
planning
wildlife
was
not
mentioned
in
its
terms
of
reference,
and
the
fact
is
is
that
the
focus
of
the
Rio
strategy
is
on
public
education.
A
Awareness
is
another
important
reason
that
the
Environment
Committee
is
best
suited
to
take
this
on.
In
fact,
it
is
the
public
education
and
awareness
component
that
other
cities
are
pursuing.
Proactive
initiatives
that
involve
and
engage
the
public
are
not
only
effective
in
themselves,
but
they
reduce
conflict
and
controversy,
provide
valuable
volunteer
contributions
and
save
cities,
lots
of
money
in
moving
away
from
negative
reactive,
repetitive
and
costly
approaches
to
wildlife
issues
that
please
no
one.
A
It
was
suggested
by
this
committee
that
wildlife
and
biodiversity
matters
are
the
responsibility
of
the
Ontario
Ministry
of
Natural,
Resources
and
forestry.
In
fact,
the
ministry
stated
as
long
ago
as
like
to
later
on
that
urban
wildlife
concerns
are
the
result
of
development
and
therefore
the
responsibility
of
cities
they're
in
charge
of
land-use
decisions.
It
is
by
a
growing
number
of
cities
in
Ontario,
have
developed
progressive
wildlife
management
policies,
just
as
a
quick
example,
wherever
cities
are
doing
under
its
own,
but
environmental
umbrella
includes
environmental
stewardship,
education
of
learning
and
wildlife,
and
biodiversity.
A
Oakville
has
a
reputation
as
a
leader
in
the
field
of
wildlife
management
through
educational
outreach
programs
partnering
with
community
groups
to
improve
wildlife
corridors
and
habitat,
and
it's
taking
the
lead
on
a
road
ecology
strategy
working
with
other
municipalities,
the
region
and
conservation
authority.
London
Ontario
is
another
example.
It
is
developed.
Progressive
relative
policies
as
part
of
its
great
infrastructure
direction
in
areas
such
as
stormwater
management,
responding
to
public
criticism
over
its
management
of
wildlife.
A
The
city
has
developed
protocols
that
are
based
on
human
thought,
life,
coexistence
and
Edmonton
Alberta,
oversees
wildlife
issues
within
its
parks,
plus
biodiversity,
Department
I
think
that
man
reflects
the
city's
environmental
initiatives.
Today
is
an
opportunity
for
Ottawa.
Battle-Ax
is
no
in
fruits,
green
space
and
natural
environment
as
the
capital.
The
city
promotes
these
values
and
lifestyle
across
the
country.
It
is
only
fitting
that
Ottawa
now
take
the
wood
and
put
it
into
action.
With
these
words,
2017
celebrations
provides
an
excellent
incentive
to
do
so.
A
An
important
starting
point
today
will
be
to
include
wildlife
and
biodiversity
in
the
Environment
Committee
terms
of
reference.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
delegation?
Thank
you.
Mr.
Bray
next
is
Debbie
laws
from
the
Ottawa
Valley
wild
bird
care
center.
This
law
is,
if
you
could
take
the
seat
and
you
have
five
minutes.
A
Merle
Watson
counselors
first
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
today
regarding
the
Environmental
Committee
terms
of
reference,
but,
as
you
heard,
is
w
Alice
I'm
on
the
board
of
directors
of
the
Aravalli
wild
bird
Care
Center
each
year,
thousands
of
area
residents,
rescue
sick,
injured
or
orphaned
wild
birds
and
bring
them
into
our
Center
for
rehabilitation
and
release
back
into
nature.
The
vast
majority
of
these
birds
are
found
within
Ottawa's,
evan
and
suburban
areas,
and
the
number
of
birds
were
receiving
each
year
is
growing.
A
We're
predicting
3300
birds
will
control
our
doors
by
the
end
of
this
year.
That's
a
35
percent
increase.
Over
last
year.
Our
Center
has
cared
for
on
a
regular
basis.
More
than
130
bird
species,
including
species
at
risk
in
migratory
birds,
54
percent
of
the
birds
that
come
to
us
at
the
result
of
impacts
but
you're
hearing
with
windows
and
large
downtown
buildings
and
issues.
City
Hall
is
very
well
aware
of.
A
Nearly
30
percent
of
our
birds
are
the
victims
of
animal
attacks,
with
cats
being
the
main
predators
over
8
percent
of
the
result
of
human
interference,
such
as
rescuing
a
baby
bird
when
it
doesn't
need
rescuing.
Needless
to
say,
this
dramatic
increases
put
a
significant
strain
on
our
small
charities.
Limited
financial
and
human
resources,
I
have
to
admit,
I
found
it
odd
when
I
first
learned,
the
birds
and
other
wildlife
do
not
already
fall
under
the
Environment
Committee,
as
they
do
in
cities
like
Oakland
Edmonton.
A
Other
cities,
like
Sanya,
maybe
see,
have
gone
even
further
with
committee
sets
that
had
been
start
to
deal
exclusively
with
urban
wildlife
management
as
well
than
birds.
Do
not
respect
urban
eel
divides.
As
you
can
appreciate,
it's
our
strong
belief
that
wildlife
issues
are
much
more
suited
under
the
Environment
Committee.
It
stands
to
reason
that
a
committee
that
is
responsible
for
green
space
and
natural
areas
would
also
be
responsible
for
the
birds.
Another
world,
like
the
rely
on
these
areas
for
their
survival,
birds
and
other
wildlife,
are
first
and
foremost
an
environmental
issue.
A
When
I
read,
the
billions
of
birds
have
disappeared
from
North
America
since
nineteen
nineteen
seventy
and
there
are
thirty
bird
species
across
the
continent
or
threatened
with
extinction.
One
can
only
conclude
the
preservation
of
wildlife
and
biodiversity
among
the
greatest
environmental
concerns
of
our
generation,
but
the
help
of
our
members,
our
volunteers,
are
the
donors
and
our
many
supporters.
The
wild
bird
care
center
works
on
the
frontlines
to
save
as
many
of
these
birds
as
possible.
A
We
also
educate
the
public
on
the
importance
of
bird
habitat
conservation
and
how
humans
can
make
or
minimize
their
negative
impact
on
birds.
Let
me
say
that
I
do
understand
why
it
makes
sense
for
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
to
oversee
wildlife
issues
in
rural
areas,
I'm
sure
Eric.
You
already
has
a
third
plate
without
the
additional
responsibility
of
having
to
respond
every
time,
there's
an
injured,
goose
or
a
raccoon
in
West.
A
At
the
same
time,
however,
it
is
important
that
ottawa's
policies
and
programs,
as
they
relate
to
wildlife
from
bio
versity,
reflect
the
fact
that
these
issues
affect
and
are
affected
by
all
aspects
of
life
in
all
areas
of
the
city.
I've
heard
the
argument
for
wildlife
like
stormwater
management,
is
an
issue
that
cuts
across
community
lines
and,
as
such,
it's
okay
for
the
agricultural
affairs
committee
to
handle
wildlife
issues
even
in
urban
areas.
A
I
would
suggest
that
having
urban
wildlife
issues
place
over
the
environment
community
when
enable
of
this
community
to
develop
an
expertise
and
a
coherent
approach
to
wildlife
and
biodiversity
issues,
as
well
as
provide
evidence-based
advice
to
other
committees,
adds
needed.
Both
friendly
designs
for
buildings
are
one
example
where
the
environment
community
can
provide
valuable
advice
to
the
planning
committee.
A
As
such,
the
guayabera
Care
Center
strongly
recommends
that
wildlife
and
biodiversity
be
included
in
the
environment
committees,
terms
of
reference
and,
lastly,
and
a
positive
note,
I
see
this
as
a
real
opportunity
for
the
city
next
year.
Ottawa
will
play
a
key
role
in
celebrating
Canada's
150
years
as
a
country.
This
year-long
events
are
expected
to
attract
an
additional
1.75
million
tourists
to
Ottawa
as
much
as
220
230
million
to
the
GDP
Ottomans
birds
in
for
among
the
city's
most
valuable
natural
assets.
Their
future
depends
on
the
actions
we
take
today
as
environmental
stewards.
A
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
delegation?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Okay.
So
we
have
councillor,
tarnish
anko's
motion
and
councillor
parkington's
moved
by
councillor
dean's
motion,
any
other
motions
at
this
point,
no
questions;
okay,
that's
right,
Y
and
then
councillor
try
to
shrink.
Oh,
so
just
a
quick
question
on
on
councillor
Michelle
close
motion.
A
A
No
mr.
chair
so
continue
to
be
exactly
what
it's
doing,
but
we're
going
to
just
make
the
name
in
effect,
more
reflective
of
what
they're
doing
that's
the
intent
of
the
mister
as
I
understood.
Councillor
mischenko
is
the
introduction
of
the
motion.
He
did
indicate
that
this
was
possibly
a
symbolic
gesture
and
something
that's
other
gotten
levels
of
government
had
moved
towards
and
he
thought
it
was
appropriate
to
do
it
with
his
committee
as
well.
Okay,
thank
you
for
that
John
sort
of
shank.
A
Oh,
please,
I
actually
wanted
to
speak
to
the
other
issue
of
the
of
the
mandate,
which
is
the
wildlife
and
biodiversity
issues.
My
colleagues,
I'm
sure
will
be
will
want
to
know.
First
of
all,
I
have
no
interest
at
all
in
environment.
Community
taking
on
mandates
was
that
currently
fall
to
existing
committees
and
the
logically
fault
of
those
committees.
But
what
has
become
apparent
over
the
last
few
years
and
our
speakers
helped
to
highlight?
Is
there
actually
some
gaps?
There
are
some
issues
that
aren't
covered
by
any
committees
and
we're
left
when
those
come
forward.
A
Wondering
of
who
does
that
go
to,
and
sometimes
people
have
said
well
that
goes
to
Iraq
and
then
councilor
and
chair
Moffitt.
Here
has
the
sort
of
the
challenge
if
he
will,
or
perhaps
the
puzzling
issue
of
dealing
with
an
urban
wildlife
issue
going
to
Iraq
and
possibly
something
going
to
planning
that
isn't
actually
a
new
construction,
a
planning
issue,
but
rather
an
ongoing
one.
Like
bird
strikes
here
at
City
Hall,
the
building's
already
built.
The
question
is:
what
do
we
do
to
help
promote
bird
friendly
practices
and
window
treatments
on
buildings
in
existing
buildings?
A
Those
are
examples
of
things
that
seemed
more
logical
to
come.
Well,
that
ought
to
be
addressed
by
someone
and
more
logical
to
come
to
a
Environment,
Committee
and
so
I've
been
working
with
the
clerk's
office
for
the
past
few
days
to
try
to
as
accurately
as
possible
define
what
exactly
are
those
issues
that
aren't
being
covered
by
other
committees
and
would
logically
come
to
to
the
environment,
and
we
are
that
close,
but
not
quite
ready.
Today,
with
emotion
and
with
with
the
support
of
this
committee,
I'd
like
to
give
direction
to
mr.
A
O
Connor
to
continue
that
work
and
come
back
to
us
with
a
motion
on
next
week
and
believe
it
will
be
at
Council
and
with
a
nod,
I
suppose
or
verbally
mr.
Connor.
It
is.
It
is
the
case
that
we
have
managed
to
identify
some
issues
that
are
that
are
loopholes
if
you
will
that
are
not
covered
at
the
moment,
but
we're
not
yet
comfortable
that
we've
tied
a
nice
bow
around
them,
and
that
is
correct.
Mr.
A
chair
we've
been
working
with
the
word
counselor's
office
and
we'd
be
pleased
to
do
so
for
council
next
week,
Thank
You
mr.
pony,
so
if
I
might
give
that
as
direction
and
that
we
come
back
to
Council
next
week,
and
we
can
have
that
discussion
then
thank
you.
So
that's
a
direction
from
Council
shrink.
Thank
you.
There
are
council
gotten
ten
Thank
You
mr.
deputy
mayor
and
good
morning,
everyone
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
clerk's
office
for
their
work.
With
respect
to
the
midterm
governance
review.
A
I
know
we
ran
out
of
time
during
my
session
with
him.
I
had
a
number
of
issues
to
review,
but
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
a
clerk
and
his
team
for
the
world.
They've
done
it's
quite
a
lengthy
report,
as
we
know,
and
thank
the
clerk's
office
for
assistance
with
the
drafting
the
motion
that
is
before
us
today,
which
was
finalized
yesterday.
A
Thank
you
to
councillor
Dean's,
who
introduced
my
motion.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone
which
I'm
sure
we
all
recall
two
cases
in
particular
in
live
award
in
2016
with
the
Canada
150
playground
that
manie's
Bay
and
the
mountain
bike
pump
track
and
skills
course
in
Carlington
Hill
that
amplified
the
need
for
a
more
significant
policy
regarding
donations
or
partnerships
with
the
City
of
Ottawa,
which
would
ultimately
benefit
the
community
of
public
use.
The
motion
before
us
asks
staff
to
come
back
by
June
of
2017
with
a
draft
policy
that
deals
specifically
with
donations.
A
Your
partnerships
with
the
City
of
Ottawa
would
be
looking
at
the
current
delegation
of
authority
to
staff,
public
engagement,
accountability,
transparency
policy
and,
ultimately,
a
draft
policy
that
will
help
improve
and
enshrine
how
these
future
partnerships
can
be
better
held
and
include
better,
of
course,
community
input
in
the
consultation.
So
we're
not
approving
a
policy
today,
we're
simply
asking
staff
to
go
back
and
create
something
and
come
back
to
us
by
the
end
of
June,
but
thank
you
very
much
Thank
You
councillor
Buffington
mr.
O'connor,
it's
mr.
comma
I
wanted
to
say
mr.
A
chair
that
we
are
supportive
of
the
councillors
motion.
Thank
You,
council,
Brockington,
councillor
Dean,
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
just
two
questions.
The
first
one
is
mr.
O'connor
Wing
came
around
to
visit
all
the
members
of
council.
You
had
a
number
of
issues
on
your
agenda
that
you
wanted
to
talk
about
reflected
in
the
report
today,
but
I'm
also
sad
as
a
two-way
street.
To
also
talk
about
a
number
of
other
issues
that
I
thought
might
be
appropriate
to
address
that
midterm
governance.
They
don't
seem
to
blend
it
in
the
report
and
I.
A
B
Question
and
it
is,
it
is
a
dialogue.
It
is
a
two-way
street.
Unfortunately,
with
regards
to
the
way,
the
process
goes
for
the
midterm
governance
and
final
governance
based
on
consensus
of
all
members
of
council.
So
if
we
didn't
receive
consensus,
we
wouldn't
have
moved
the
matter
forward
and
sometimes
it
said
it
is
the
larger
issue
of.
If
the
request
is
with
regards
to
a
significant
change
in
not
a
minor
tweak,
we
would
move
it
to
the
end
of
term
of
council
in
2018.
B
Okay,
just
a
bit
more
specific
issue
on
page
12
of
the
report,
it
says
recognizing
that
city
clerk
staff
may
request
that
members
of
council
smart
motions
in
advance
of
significant
and
procedurally
complex
reports.
The
proposed
change
will
not
preclude
a
member
of
council
for
moving
a
motion
at
the
committee
or
account,
but
what
a
lot
for
adequate
time
for
review
and
processing
and
for
operational
stopped
providing
Footwear
required.
So
that
makes
sense
to
me.
B
B
B
B
There's
no
fun,
that's
not
totally.
Okay,
then
I'll
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
I
want
to
speak
to
the
council,
cherche
ankles
motion
and
I
can't
support
that
motion,
because
basically,
the
climate
change
climate
protection
is
not
within
our
sandbox.
It's
a
federal
and
provincial
legislation
that
works
on
that
and
and
protects
the
the
environment.
B
B
Thank
you,
sir
Moffat.
Thank
you.
My
my
line
of
thinking
is
similar
to
councillor
Hugh
B's
on
this.
This
is
something
that
I
went.
First
came
to
Environment
Committee,
of
course,
I
said
Enron
committee
that
I
that
I
opposed
back
in
the
2014
governance
review.
I
had
actually
mentioned
to
staff
in
our
meetings.
That's
the
name
of
the
committee
as
Environment
Committee
is
somewhat
misleading.
People
look
at
it
as
an
environmentalist
committee.
They
don't
look
at
as
environmental
services
committee.
B
One
of
the
challenges,
too,
is
that
the
committee
generally
has
a
leg
workload
as
vice-chair
last
term.
The
workload
is
quite
light.
I
had
suggested
that
it
be
combined
with
Transportation
Committee
into
a
public
works
in
utilities.
Committee
I
thought
that
was
more
reflective
of
the
actual
work
done
by
the
committee's.
The
name
is
more
reflective.
Making
an
environment
and
climate
protection
committee
does
not
make
it
more
reflective
of
the
work
that
it
does.
The
work
that
it
does
is
involved
in
garbage
collection.
It's
involved,
it's
it's
it's
it's
that's
our
sewer
and
water
works.
B
It's
so
much
more
than
just
that.
One
focus.
The
reality
is
that
focus
is
a
part
of
the
committee
and
the
committee
is
well
within
their
rights
to
put
that
forward.
As
as
efforts
that
they'd
like
to
see
done,
you
don't
need
to
change
the
name
of
the
committee
to
make
it
look
like
you're
doing
something
just
go
and
do
something
name.
The
community
isn't
make
that
difference.
It's
not
the
transportation
and
kabhi
choice
to
committee.
It's
not
the
planning
and
intensification
committee.
Yet
those
are
fundamental
principles
of
those
two
committees.
B
You
know
keep
the
name
as
Environment
Committee
and
just
get
the
work
done.
Bring
forward
stuff
I
mean
instead
of
bringing
forward
a
climate
change
plan,
has
no
money
attached
to
it,
bring
something
forward.
It
actually
has
tangible
aspects
to
the
plan.
You
know
it's
great
to
sit
there
and
make
it
look
like
we're
doing
something.
Let's
actually
do
something
for
change,
something
making
it
look
like
what
they
are.
So
the
name
change
in
my
mind
is
completely
irrelevant.
You
know
focus
on
the
task
at
hand.
B
You
have
the
terms
of
reference,
it's
all
there
Thanks.
Thank
you,
I!
Think
your
customers
come
from
without
Thank
You.
Mr.
chair,
yeah,
consumers,
I
am
I.
Guess
are
very
similar.
If
you
look
at
the
motion
that
creates
a
consensus
that
the
federal
provincial
municipal
will
all
be
calling
it
the
same
thing:
climate
change,
I
guess
my
concern
is
and
question
that
I
have
is.
If,
right
now,
federal
and
provincial
are
doing
this
without
the
city
being
involved
as
we
move
forward.
B
Does
this
mean
that
any
decision
that
is
made
that
the
federal
and
provincial
level
will
be
automatically
a
position
of
the
city
and
no
mr.
chair?
So
it
will
have
to
come
up
to
debate
as
to
whether
we
want
to
involve
ourselves
and
financially
how
much
it
would
cost.
That's
correct.
Mr.
mayor,
mr.
chair,
sorry,
don't
you
mister?
Don't
you
think
your
custom
gonna
cost
a
table
there?
B
We
recently
had
something
call
us
our
desk
this
week,
where
somebody
was
asking
the
question
about
now
that
we're
not
using
pesticide
with
the
wand
along
the
sidewalk
would
have
a
plethora
of
weeds
coming
up
and
that
what
other
tools
do
we
have?
That's
that's
what
we're
doing
that's
our
job
is
to
protect
against
elements
that
are
changing
our
city
and
sometimes
costing
us
more
money,
but
definitely
giving
us
a
product,
that's
not
nearly
as
as
good
for
the
community
as
we
had
in
the
past.
So
that's
the
way,
I'm
looking
at
that.
B
Also
in
a
couple
of
hours,
I'm
going
to
be
speaking
at
a
hydro
conference
on
smart
cities,
those
smart
cities,
applications
are
a
definite,
definitely
in
many
ways
protecting
against
the
changes
that
are
influencing
the
the
infrastructure
and
more
in
our
city.
So
I'm
going
to
support
that,
because
I
don't
think
that
I
think
that
it
recognizes
what
this
city
is
already
doing,
and
the
word
protection
is
very
different
than
the
word
change.
Thank
you.
Thank
You
councillor
councillors,
Taylor
thanks
very
much
mr.
chair,
so
councillor
harder
stole
all
my
points
on
them.
B
She
didn't
steal
them.
She,
she
originated
the
articulated
them
first
on
on
my
thoughts
on
climate
change
versus
climate
protection.
So
on
that
piece
what
she
said,
I
I
certainly
support
that
just
a
broader
question:
if
I
could
chair
to
staff
on
the
issue,
that
was
a
first
waste
by
the
two
presenters
who
came
before
us.
B
Well,
that's
it's
not
our
role.
That's
the
older
adult
Department,
so
I
kind
of
feel
like
we're
in
the
same
box
with
wildlife,
so
any
thoughts
that
you
have
on
how
some
of
the
very
valid
concerns
they've
been
brought
forward
by
the
wild
bird
center
and
the
wildlife
center
can
be
captured
in
the
work
you're
doing
to
identify
those
loopholes,
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
and
in
fact
that
is
what
we
would
hope
to
do.
Over
the
next
seven
days.
B
We
went
down
working
with
the
Ward
council
with
regards
to
looking
at
the
mandates
of
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee,
the
the
soar,
the
planning
committee.
When
the
planning
committee
we
look
at
the
Official
Plan
and
it
has
some
34
references
to
wildlife
in
there.
So
we
were
trying
to
read
our
way
through
and
parse
out
what
has
already
been
assigned
to
that
committee
and
again
with
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs.
B
We
also
looked
at
environmental
assessments
on
with
transportation
mandate,
with
regards
to
the
fact
that
there
might
be
deer
other
animals
in
the
road,
and
how
do
you
accommodate
those?
So
we
are
trying
to
narrow
down
the
issue
as
the
as
the
chair
of
Environment
Committee.
He
stated
he's
not
interested
in
assuming
all
responsibility
and
I
think
you
make
a
good
point
counselor.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
find
a
where
those
one
or
two
gaps
are.
B
That
would
be
of
significance
that
we
could
all
end
that
credence
to
this
process
with
a
motion
by
next
week.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Come
staff.
Taylor
comes
third
egg.
Why
I
think
you
just
just
very
briefly
I-
am
going
to
be
supporting
this
motion
to
council
off
its
suggestion,
as
the
chair
of
the
Transportation
Committee
I
would
not
want
to
have
the
Environment
Committee
rolled
in
to
that
committee.
I
think
that
would
be
quite
unwieldy.
B
You
know
there
are
some
some
interrelated
issues
that
come
up
in
and
around
the
two
committees,
but
the
same
can
be
said
for
just
about
any
committee
in
the
city.
There
are
planning
issues
that
come
up
that
there
are
also
environmental
issues.
There
are
a
rack
issues
that
come
up
that
are
planning
issues,
so
I
think
it
makes
sense
that
it's
a
standalone
committee
but
but,
more
importantly,
I,
think.
The
term
climate
climate
protection
is
an
elegant
expression
of
of
the
evolving
role
of
this
committee.
The
environment
we
know
is
changing
around
us.
B
We
have
to
adapt
to
that
I
think
councilor
trim
the
shank
over
the
last
two
years
and,
and
members
of
the
committee
have
recognized
that
and
have
attempted
to
do
that,
and
this
is
just
another
step
and
making
that
committee
more
accessible
and
making
the
people
in
our
city
understand
what
that
committee
is
attempting
to
do
so.
I
think
it's
it's!
It's
not
a
dirty
word
to
put
environment
in
there.
B
It's
not
a
bad
word
to
say
to
say
climate
protection,
I
think
it
simply
reflects
the
changing
role
of
this
committee
and
again,
very
importantly,
makes
it
more
understandable
to
our
citizens.
So
when
they
do
have
a
concern
in
that
regard,
they
know
where
to
go
and
where
they'll
be
heard
and
where
there
can
be
reasonable
discussion
about
the
issues
and
so
I
will
be
supporting
it.
As
I
haven't
seen
the
wording
for
the
upcoming
motion
regarding
the
wildlife
protection,
but
in
all
likelihood,
in
that
same
spirit,
the
evolving,
changing
role.
B
B
We
want
to
take
the
committee
on
where
we
want
to
go
so
I
actually
think
it's
very
appropriate
to
to
change
the
name.
Okay,
Thank,
You
counsel,
I
know
Carlos
Franco
wants
to
speak
about
his
motion
that
have
question.
I,
have
counsel,
hardly
requests
to
speak
on
item
7b,
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
to
counselor
harder
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
Council
session
councilor
harder
on
7b.
Yes,
thank
you.
B
Because
of
all
we're
doing
and
all
we
already
do,
it
was
difficult
to
come
up
with
something
that
was
different,
so
I
thought
it
would
take
this
opportunity
to
highlight
that
in
what
we're
doing
already
this
is
this
committee
province
is
really
not
about
Ottawa.
We're
way
ahead
of
everybody
else,
Consulting
that
we
bring
the
industry
and
the
public
together,
and
we
do
it
from
the
beginning.
B
The
province
is
setting
new
expectations
to
raise
the
bar
in
the
province,
but
we
are
early
adopters
and
Ottawa
is
one
of
the
few
municipalities
that
consults
with
public
on-site
plants.
As
a
result,
it
takes
us
longer
to
process
applications
and
often
we
get
criticized
for
that,
but
just
a
fear
of
the
the
consultations
that
we
do
with
the
public.
B
In
our
city,
the
urban
design
review
panel,
the
built
heritage
subcommittee,
the
planning
part
of
primer
program,
development,
application,
search,
a
pre-application
consultation
cities,
development
review
in
an
urban
area,
open
houses
and
public
needs
of
planning
and
Eric
open
mic
at
Eric,
open
houses
and
public
meetings
and
site
plans,
plans
or
subdivision
zoning.
An
official
plan
amendments
over
100
year
lis
building
a
liveable,
Ottawa
3,000
people
in
this
city
participated
in
that
process.
The
official
plan
we
had
sponsor
groups
on
the
Official
Plan
on
the
transportation
master
plan.
B
We
had
counselors
that
we
offered
that
sponsored.
We
had
the
public
as
part
of
the
sponsor
group
and
we
had
the
industry
as
part
of
the
sponsor
group
on
official
plan
transportation,
master
plan,
implementation,
infrastructure,
master
plan,
pedestrian
plan,
cycling
plan
info,
one
info,
two
commercial
study,
the
building
better,
revitalize
neighborhoods,
which
currently
councillor
Dean's,
is
taking
the
lead
and
in
the
Hetherington
area,
is
absolutely
driven
by
the
public,
and
that
has
been
the
case
from
the
beginning.
B
The
street
side
spots
program,
I,
think
I
have
given
you
a
good
example
of
how
we
consult
with
this
study
with
this
city,
with
people
in
this
city
every
single
day,
so
to
have
a
public
advisory
committee
that
works
with
the
chair
of
planning
and
the
chair
of
Eric
and
the
mayor
that
goes
over
the
work
plan
for
the
next
year.
What
more
do
you
want?
That
is
absolute
complete
package?
B
We
never
have
a
situation
where
the
public
is
not
engaged,
so
I
thought
important
to
just
because
I
think
that
people
missed
that
if
you're,
not
one
of
the
people,
that's
engaged
in
our
processes
here
at
the
city.
You
just
expect
your
elected
person
to
make
these
decisions,
for
you
there's
every
opportunity
if
you
want
to
get
engaged
and
if
you
want
to
lead,
if
you
are
a
resident
of
our
city.
Thank
you.
Mister
Thank
You,
mr.
Raja,
pretty
rare.
B
Thank
you
any
other
question
before
we
turn
it
to
council
shrinko
to
rap
on
his
motion:
no
consolation,
co.
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair,
and
to
my
colleagues
this
was
never
meant
to
be
a
divisive
issue.
I'm
glad
it
hasn't
really
turned
into
a
divisive
issue,
even
though
some
clear
points
of
view
on
this
on
opposite
sides.
B
Quite
simply,
this
was
emotional
to
reflect
a
new
reality.
This
is
the
work
that
increasingly
the
city
is
doing
and
will
have
to
do
and
to
the
point
that
this
is
under
the
purview.
I
have
a
federal
and
provincial
governments.
Yes,
of
course
it
is
that,
but
increasingly
and
almost
a
majority
of
the
work
that
is
being
done
and
needs
to
be
done,
is
at
the
municipal
level.
We
are
the
the
grand
pronouncements,
the
international
treaties.
B
Even
the
signing
of
checks
are
being
done
at
higher
levels
of
government,
but
ultimately,
almost
every
point
of
action
is
coming
back
to
the
city.
It's
the
cities
that
are
designing
the
transit
systems
and
putting
in
the
bike
lanes
and
widening
the
sidewalks
and
improving
the
transportation
networks
so
that
people
can
move
around
well
without
as
many
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
It
is
the
cities
that
are
designing
the
the
sewer
and
and
stormwater
infrastructure,
and
increasingly
needing
to
expand
that
infrastructure
and
anticipate
the
once
in
a
hundred
year.
B
Storm
said
in
some
cities
are
now
happening
every
five
years
in
some
cities
three
times
in
five
years,
I
can
go
on
and
on
without
less
the
urban
planning
issues,
the
green
building,
design
issues
they
all
fall
down
to
the
city
in
the
end.
So
this
is
very
much
a
city
where
that
term
climate
protection
is
really
meant
to
indicate
a
new
reality,
but
also
to
highlight
the
importance
and
one
that
I
can
proudly
say
this
council
is
taking
on
were
not
divided
over.
We
ought
to
be
acting
on
climate
issues.
B
We
are
doing
it,
we
can
do
better
and
we
know
that-
and
we've
made
a
commitment
to
doing
better
I
believe
this
name
back
to
councilor
edgewise
question.
It
highlights
the
quarterbacking
where,
rather
than
giving
a
new
quarterbacking
role,
it's
saying
all
sorts
of
committees
and
commissions
have
parts
of
this
web
to
try
to
work
on,
but
at
the
policy
the
overseeing
level
one
committee
needs
to
be
tasked
with
creating
the
plan
and
the
policies
overarching
and
then
working
closely
to
to
actually
implementing
these.
Finally
on
does
this
name
come
out
of
nowhere.
B
It
grabbed
my
attention
when
we
were
in
our
exchange
in
the
last
two
years
with
Hannover,
Germany
and
I
realized
that
all
the
German
cities
had
adopted
this
term.
Climate
protection
and
I
know
that
I
will
immediately
get
feedback
from
some
around
this
city.
Well,
we're
not
German
and
don't
just
go
do
and
what
the
Germans
do
and
then
I
look
to
my
well
that's
interesting.
B
Federation
of
Canadian
Municipalities
has
since
1997
called
its
program
partners
for
climate
protection
and
all
of
us
being
a
member
since
1997,
and
his
action
has
actually
achieved
the
highest
level
in
that
membership.
So
it's
something
that
we've
acknowledged
and
we've
been
doing,
it's
not
new,
but
it
is
putting
a
particular
focus
on
it
and
I.
Believe.
That's.
Why
it
is
important
and
I
felt
important
enough
to
bring
it
forward
and
I
hope
I
can
count
on
your
support.
Thank
you.
Ten
o'clock
consolation.
B
So
on
the
icon.
K
Kerry
haziness
is
an
Esbern
Astra
for
the
council.
Shankazute
correct,
Ozzie
Blair,
we
councillor
Tina
Shenk.
Oh,
wait
can't
sardines
his
cancer
egg
line;
yes,
cancer,
harder,
yes,
cancer
to
be
no
cancer,
moppet,
no
cause
he
in
my
net.
Yes,
cancer,
Taylor,
yes,
cancer,
a
shanty,
a
yes
man,
Watson.
B
B
On
a
report,
as
amended
with
their
with
the
motion
from
counselor
Dean
is
a
kit
that
comes
with
their
movies
on
behalf
counselor,
so
on
their
on
the
other
motion
care.
Okay,
on
the
whole
report
as
a
amended
okay,
thank
you
very
much
mr.
O'connor
and
their
staff.
Mr.
chair,
if
I
could
just
apologize,
maybe
I
didn't
introduce
mr.
Kyle
Anderson.
He
was
sitting
beside
me.
I
know
you
have
known
when
I
truly
apologize.
He
is
actually
the
manager
of
policy,
and
he
and
his
team
wrote
this
report.
B
B
So
we're
go
to
the
next
item
with
a
public
delegation
which
is
Ottawa
committee
lands,
Development,
Corporation,
sale
of
3:07,
one
riverside
drive
with
revised
concept
plan.
We
have
number
of
speakers
that
would
wish
to
speak
to
this
item
and
before
we
do
that,
we'll
ask
staff
to
give
us
a
presentation
on
the
history
of
this
piece
of
land.
B
So
mr.
McNair
and
colleagues,
if
you
could
give
us
presentation
please
and
then
we'll
open
it
up
to
public
delegations
and
then
open
it
to
questions
from
councillors,
Thank
You.
Mr.
mayor,
the
purpose
of
today's
discussion
is
to
discuss
the
revised
concept
plan
for
3071
Riverside
Drive.
It's
sometimes
referred
to
as
the
former
baby
public
school
and
beside
me
is
Lauren.
Reeves
who's
been
the
project
manager
moving
forward
with
this
proposal.
So.
B
Just
do
I'll
provide
a
bit
of
history
on
this
site
back
in
2008,
the
city
purchased
this
ten
acre
parcel
from
the
Ottawa
Karlin
District
School
Board,
to
preserve
the
soccer
field
as
green
space
and
to
recover
the
purchase
price
through
controlled
development
of
the
Romanian
land.
Back
in
2009
there
was
a
concept
land
that
was
developed
in
consultation
with
the
community
and
approved
by
council.
As
far
as
the
public
consultation.
At
that
time
there
was
significant
public
consultation.
B
B
Subsequent
to
that
in
2014,
council
transferred
the
property
to
the
Iowa
community
lands
as
well
Corporation
to
move
forward
with
the
sale
council
at
that
time
also
passed
a
motion
requiring
that.
If
the
concept
plan
was
to
change
from
what
was
originally
approved
by
council
of
2009,
there
was
to
be
reported
back
to
Council
and
committee,
and
hence
the
reason
for
being
here
in
front
of
you
today
is
to
present
the
revised
plan.
B
I'd
also
point
out
that
already
an
issue,
we
went
through
a
whole
process
as
directed
board
the
Board
of
Directors
of
the
Okhrana
last
committee
to
go
through
an
REO
I
processes
the
results
ago.
He
notes
that
expression
of
interest
process
will
receive
significant
interest
in
this
property.
Subsequent
to
that,
there
was
agreed
that
would
move
forward
with
a
formal
RFP
process
and
leaving
for
that
formal
request
for
proposal
process.
Part
of
the
criteria
was
that
all
proponents
were
to
look
at
the
2009
concept
plan,
because
I
was
important.
B
So
what
was
approved
in
the
2009
as
you'll,
see
in
green
there
was
a
buffer
requirement,
was
surrounded
the
perimeter
of
the
site.
Also,
you
know
to
the
north.
There
was
low
density
in
the
reason
for
the
north
density
of
that
particular
location
is
that
it
was
in
close
proximity
to
the
existing
residential
development.
B
So
the
residents
wanted
to
have
low
density
in
that
area,
and
you'll
also
note
that
in
the
middle
of
the
site
was
the
medium
density,
residential
and
in
the
bottom,
was
the
low
density
and
over
on
the
Left
fronting
on
Riverside
Drive
was
the
soccer
field,
along
with
the
the
field
house,
what
is
now
being
proposed,
as
per
the
2016
concept
plan
and
staffs
opinions
very
similar.
We
have
the
buffering
requirement,
as
outlined
by
council
back
in
2014.
B
With
the
motion
that
came
forward
to
ALDC
you'll
see
we
have
the
buffer
requirement
surrounding
the
perimeter
of
the
site.
You'll
also
note
at
the
top
end
of
the
site
at
North
End,
we
have
the
low
density,
which
is
respecting
the
original
concept
plan.
Also
on
the
east
side
of
the
site.
We
have
low
density,
rezulin
you'll,
see
that's
part
of
that,
but
the
residential
development
down
in
the
corner
in
the
southeast
corner,
you'll
notice
that
there's
a
change
in
terms
of
medium
density.
B
The
reason
for
that
change
is
that
that
does
not
about
residential
land
that
abuts
institutional
developments,
along
with
the
road
you'll
also
note
another
change
is
taking
place,
is
that
the
park
was
fronting
on
your
side.
Drive
it's
now
down
at
the
bottom
of
the
site
and
went
from
our
two
acres
from
before
soccer
field
and
field
house
to
multi-use
park
site
at
one
point:
five
acres
and
again
it's
down
south
into
the
site
and
surviving
the
current
residential
site.
B
B
But
their
thing
that
I
think
is
important
to
know
as
far
as
moving
forward
is
that
the
intent
is
to
come
forward
today
and
us
on
this
matter
will
rise
to
council
next
week
and
subject
getting
the
concurrence
of
moving
forward.
The
concept
plan
will
then
move
forward
or
be
in
a
position
to
move
forward
with
the
closing
of
this
transaction.
B
But
what's
important
to
bear
in
mind,
there
will
be
significant
public
consultation
as
as
we
move
forward
through
this
process,
because
the
current
site
is
zone,
institutional,
so
varies
for
the
various
use
that
are
being
proposed.
Obviously,
the
beer
zoning
bylaw
a
requirement
for
that
which
engaged
public
consultation
to
be
the
subdivision
process
to
be
a
site
plan
process
which,
once
again,
will
involve
significant
public
consultation.
B
So
it's
not
only
public
consultation
on
the
various
components
but
off
obviously
on
the
park
design
itself
and
then,
after
that's
completed
in
the
national
construction,
will
develop
and
in
closing
this
should
to
shows
that
the
2009
concept
plan
decide
if
a
false
concept
plan.
That
concludes
our
presentation.
Mr.
maryk,
so
just
just
to
be
clear.
Fedko
is
not
selling
the
land.
That's
been
done
by
the
Lyons
Development
Corporation.
We're
simply
receiving
this
correct.
B
B
A
The
vice
president
of
the
Riverside
Park
Community
and
Recreation
shishun,
and
also
its
land-use
director,
we
represent
approximately
10,000
residents
in
our
area
and
I,
live
in
the
neighborhood
abutting
the
former
Bayview
school
and
have
been
involved
in
this
process
since
inception
in
2008.
I
recognize
that
it
is
very
rare
for
a
revised
concept
plan
to
come
back
to
City
Council
I
appreciate
that
former
councilman
McCray
implemented
a
safeguard
in
the
motion
passed
by
council
in
2014
to
review
any
proposed
changes
to
the
concept
plan
before
the
final
signing
of
the
contract.
A
Yesterday
I
sent
councillor
blocking
ttan
an
email
requesting
that
he
approached
mara
hwachun
to
defer
this
item
for
a
minimum
of
2
months
to
allow
meaningful
public
consultation.
With
respect
to
the
changes
being
proposed
to
the
committee
report,
there
has
been
absolutely
no
opportunity
for
the
community
to
meet
in
an
open
and
transparent
fashion
with
city
staff
to
meaningfully
discuss
this
report.
B
Will
be
no
opportunity
to
make
any
material
changes?
Public
consultation
needs
to
be
done
to
discuss
key
changes
to
the
previously
approved
concept
plan.
The
new
concept
plan
references
the
addition
of
a
mixed-use
area
along
the
Riverside
Drive,
which
mr.
McNair
mentioned,
but
did
he
didn't
commercial
and
retail
part
of
that?
That
is
proposed
to
accommodate
two-story
construction
that
includes
small-scale
neighborhood
commercial
uses
on
the
ground
floor
with.
A
Residential
uses
on
the
second
story:
this
is
new
and
at
no
time
was
the
community
informed
about
the
possibility
of
any
commercial
development
on
this
site.
At
the
public
meetings
held
in
2009,
concern
was
raised
about
possible
commercial
usage
residents
deserve
the
opportunity
to
discuss
this
fundamental
change
to
the
concept.
Furthermore,
city
staff
changed
the
terms
of
the
concept
plan
on
page
3
of
the
earth
rfo
when
they
stipulated
a
mix
of
uses
permitted
which
may
include
small-scale,
retail
or
commercial
use.
You
use.
A
This
clearly
contradicts
the
old
approved
concept
plan
and
is
not
compliant
as
mr.
Putin
Ayer
said,
it
makes
no
sense
to
have
a
mixed-use
residential
commercial
development
facing
Riverside
Drive.
This
would
undermine
the
sight
of
the
million
dollar
view
of
the
river
and
also
undermine
the
view
of
the
Royal
ceremonial
route.
Traffic
onto
Riverside
Drive
from
the
proposed
single
access
route
would
be
a
nightmare
and
all
the
already
congested,
Riverside
Drive,
a
teenage
girl,
was
killed
crossing
at
that
exact
location
last
summer.
A
The
new
concept
plan
does
not
clearly
indicate
that
the
movies
they
place
accesses
for
pasture
and
zoning.
The
proposed
of
the
approved
concept
states
the
existing
access
of
Mothe
communities
they
place
be
converted
to
pedestrian
access.
Only
the
community
needs
certainty
about
access
to
the
site,
while
production
cycling
only
be.
B
A
A
Field
and
field
house,
this
is
being
replaced
by
a
multi-use
Park.
The
RFP
CRA
has
asked
previously
about
what
public
consultation
has
occurred
before
this
change,
and
when
was
the
public
consulted
about
the
removal
of
the
field
house
from
the
plan,
the
community
should
have
an
opportunity
to
meet
with
councilor,
brockington
and
city
staff
to
openly
discuss
this
fundamental
change.
The
RP,
CRA
and
local
community
strongly
believe
that
if
the
field
house
is
not
built,
the
equivalent
proceeds
of
the
sale
should
stay
in
the
local
community.
A
Position
as
to
whether
the
sports
field
and
field
house
should
be
funded
in
whole
or
in
part
from
the
proceeds
of
the
sale
of
parcel
B,
a
meeting
will
give
everyone
a
chance
to
ask
questions
before
the
committee
or
council
approved
these
fundamental
changes.
I
find
it
hard
to
see
medium
density
residential
units,
no
higher.
B
Than
sticks,
six
storeys
will
be
permitted.
Will
the
man-made
Hill
be
subside
the
school
be
leveled,
so
that
six
storey
units
will
no
longer
be
Saint
Elias
Cathedral,
as
the
community
wanted.
If
the
original
concept
plan
was
a
result
of
community
consultations,
how
can
fedko
and
City
Council
approve
a
revised
concept
plan
without
consultation?
Further
consultation
should
come
before
council
approved
this
new
plan.
B
I
was
surprised
to
see
that
the
evaluation
of
the
office
received
was
based
was
based
on
both
financial
and
qualitative
data
were
closing
before
year
and
2016
with
the
financial
submission
was
given
more
points
60
than
the
planned
planning
design
at
compliance
with
the
city's
concept.
40,
sorry
you're
over
time.
Those
of
you
drop
that
thank
you.
This
seems
quite
strange
or
a
closing
date
is
much
more
important
to
design
in
closing.
Please
defer
this
item
a
minimum
of
two
months
to
allow
public
consultation
be
applauded
before
approval
of
this
new
council
plan.
B
If
this
design
has
approved
that
developer,
who
will
have
easier
a
much
easier
way
to
appeal
to
the
OMB?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
for
the
delegation?
Okay,
thank
you.
Next
is
Ravi
Singh,
followed
by
Karen
Howard
mr.
Singh,
the
seats
right
there
just
push
the
block
button
and
your
five
minutes.
B
Good
morning,
mr.
mayor,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
address
you
on
this
matter.
I'm
a
resident
at
7:06,
Bay,
a
property
adjacent
to
this
land
and
I've
moved
them
14.
It's
extremely
significant
for
me
about
this
property.
It's
not
simply.
A
real
estate
matter
has
in
fact
an
opportunity
for
better
consultation
with
the
community.
It's
a
better
chance
for
us
to
find
a
true
solution
for
this
property
and
for
the
air
and
I'm.
C
This
is
not
simply
a
one
property
that
we
should
be
looking
at
piecemeal,
but
there's
a
lot
of
activity
going
on
in
the
entire
world
and
is
creating
pressures
and
strings
on
the
community
in
terms
of
constructive
consultation.
A
concern
to
me
as
a
fact
that,
when
we
really
rise
in
this
plan
in
2015
minute
was
about
to
come
to
RFP
as
a
new
member
to
the
community,
I
was
told
that
it
was
a
2009,
extremely
consulted
collaborative
plan
extensively
developed
with
City
Council
of
staff
and
members
of
the
community.
C
A
new
person
I
accepted
that
wholeheartedly
a
new
person,
a
new
resident
saying
that
this
is
a
plan
that
the
city
of
the
community
come
together
on,
and
so
let's
go
ahead.
I'm
not
going
to
raise
any
concerns
and
in
fact
there
was
no
opportunity
for
me
as
a
new
resident
or
raised
concerns.
So
in
this
respect,
I
went
to
head
thinking
as
a
resident
having
confidence
in
this
plan
now
I'm,
not
the
only
one
in
this
situation.
B
We
find
out,
through
the
good
work
of
our
concert,
we
were
able
to
find
out
information
about
what
the
new
concept
plan
looks
like
it's
called
analyze,
Casa
plan.
It
is
definitely
not
a
community
plan.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
what
we
want
in
terms
of
having
a
new
use
introduced
and
again
to
the
point,
but
the
previous
became
says
we
need
to
have
consultation
on
this.
Perhaps
community
has
changed.
E
In
a
voice,
their
concerns
there
needs
to
be
a
chance
for
the
community
members
to
come
out
in
an
evening
and
voice
concerned
about
this
change,
which
was
done
race
naked
ly,
as
a
wrestler
my
opinion
basically
to
the
community.
This
speaks
to
a
larger
issue
that
I
have
about
the
area
in
terms
of
having
a
full-on
concert
plan
for
the
area.
E
Park
with
the
playground
structure
on
Brookfield
Park
is
going
to
be
rain.
Tightening
on
walking
there's
a
lot
of
pressures,
that's
happening,
and
this
drives
me
to
believe
that
the
city
needs
to
move
forward
with
the
idea
of
having
a
larger
comprehensive
plan
for
the
ward.
This
is
more
important
because
prioritize.
E
It's
characterized
and
I've,
seen
the
presses
being
very
stable
and
very
mature.
It
does
not
need
a
corrective.
We
use
a
plan,
D
prioritizing
our
ward,
because
it
does
not
compare
to
the
high
rate
of
development
of
proposals
in
other
areas
of
the
states
in
November.
It's
not
strategic
as
a
former
provincial
minister
to
prioritize
infrastructure
funding
to
Ottawa,
because
it
does
not
compare
to
the
infrastructure
needs
of
Toronto.
That's
not
responsible,
as
I
passed,
the
city.
E
This
piece
of
land-
it's
not
simply
a
school-
that
we
need
to
develop
into
I,
take
it
to
maximize
amount
of
money.
It's
actually
a
place
where
residents
have
lived
there
for
30
years,
I'm,
a
new
taxpayer
be
paying
taxes
for
10
years,
but
think
about
the
people.
Who've
been
paying
that
the
30
years
summer
food
right
here
today.
E
Those
will
pay
for
the
construction
of
the
school
to
their
school
taxes,
people
the
repurchasing
in
the
land
to
the
property
taxes
and
now
a
virtually
cut
out
of
having
any
say
in
to
how
this
can
contribute
to
a
greater
city.
City
development.
We're
asking
the
city
and
I'm
asking
you
council
members
each
to
engage
with,
send
that
this
I'm
consulted
plan
to
the
planning
department,
freeze,
the
sale
of
the
parts
of
the
land
begin,
the
development
of
integrated
and
cohesive
plan
for
the
entire
ward.
Thank
you
very
much.
E
F
The
reason
why
I
would
like
to
speak
to
you
is
because
I
believe
there
has
been
a
slight
of
hand
on
two
grounds:
number
one.
The
presentation
you
just
received
from
staff
said
that
the
RFA
went
out
on
the
basis
of
the
terms
of
the
2009
consultation
and
that's
not
right,
because
I've
read
the
terms
the
chairs
made
number
one
was
that
there
would
be
commercial
or
retail
use
in
a
proposal,
and
that
was
another
one
mm.
F
G
People
were
away
from
the
Community
Association
and
haven't
been
able
to
deal
with
us,
but
has
heard
about
commercial
or
retail
uses
yet
and
that's
as
of
Wednesday.
It
came
out
so
we
haven't
had
time
to
deal
with
this
and
if
you
are
told
that
there
was
consultation,
this
was
the
consultation
document
as
far
as
I
know,
and
there
is
not
one
mention
of
any
commercial
or
residential
use
so
to
prefer
to
developers.
Let's
not
set
up
an
antagonistic
situation.
G
The
community
was
perfectly
happy
with
the
council
approved
to
plan
and,
if
you're
going
to
make
changes,
let's
do
it
so
that
the
businesses
who
invest
in
our
land
don't
have
to
do
with
community
dissent.
We
do
need
a
little
more
time
to
pull
ourselves
together
and
defuse
the
opposition
with
the
help
of
our
councillor.
Thanks
I
have
any
questions
for
cancer
for
Karen
Howard,
not
councillor
Howard.
G
Okay!
Thank
you.
Next
is
fastball
Bouchard.
The
country
grocer
is
Susan
Murphy,
here,
okay
from
yeah,
so
Bouchard
you,
the
final
speaker
that
thank
you,
mister
man,
Thank
You
counselors.
You
may
remember
me:
I
was
here
earlier
this
year
to
talk
about
store
hours.
It
didn't
go
very
favorably
for
me,
but
I
am
certainly
back.
It's
a
big
issue.
It's
an
important
issue
and
I
think
that
what
I
can
bring
to
the
table
here
is
the
sensitivity
of
that
issue.
G
Obviously
the
Moonies
Bay
Area
Riverside
Park
community
during
the
last
year
at
the
giver,
Park
and
everything
else.
There
was
a
lot
of
commotion.
There
was
a
lot
of
courting
called
questioning
the
process
and
everything
else
as
the
local
grocery
store,
I,
see,
tons
and
tons
of
residents
that
are
really
really
concerned.
G
G
And
then
the
decisions
you
made
here
to
be
recommended
to
Council
makes
it
very
difficult
for
the
community,
except
that
you
know,
given
the
nature
of
what's
happened
to
last
year,
it's
a
very
sensitive
issue,
so
I
think
the
community
wants
to
work
in
good
faith.
The
developer,
the
land
will
be
sold,
it
needs
to
be
sold
to
the
highest
bidder
for
the
benefit
of
all
community
and
all
residents,
but
I
think
that
you
need
to
understand
the
concern
and
certainly
I'm
living
it
day
to
day.
G
So
that's
what
I'm
here
to
bring
forward
is
that
you,
obviously
the
community
is
just
looking
for
a
little
bit
of
time
to
consult
a
little
bit
more
than
a
week.
Obviously,
given
the
changes,
that's
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
have
a
question
to
you
from
councillor
Dean.
Mr.
Bush
I
just
want
to
be
clear
is
what
we're
hearing
from
the
community
today.
The
one
concern
is
with
the
addition
of
a
commercial
hero
into
that
property.
I.
G
Think
that
there's
a
couple
changes,
obviously
they're
concerned
about
the
change
they
haven't
really
digested,
I
mean
in
true
fairness,
I
mean
we
received
it
late
Wednesday,
so
it's
been
less
than
a
week
that
we've
had
to
do
it
I
think
some
people
may
have
some
other
concerns
about
access
traffic,
but
certainly
commercial
is
one
of
them
for
the
reasons
being
ill
trafficking.
What
kind
of
commercial?
How
does
that
work?
They
may
be
other
issues.
G
I
mean
some
people
are
concerned
about
the
parts
I
can't
say
it's
the
only
one
truthfully
I've
heard
a
lot
of
things,
I
think
the
reality
of
it
and
what
I
can
truthfully
say
is
I.
Think
everybody
in
the
ward
was
expecting
the
site
plan
to
come
back
the
same
because
it
has
change
and
given
less
than
a
way
to
even
look
and
consider
I
mean
everybody
is
scrambling
over
the
weekend.
Would
emails
trying
to
understand
what
the
changes
were
so
I'm
not
even
sure
that
truthfully
most
residents
truly
understand
what
the
changes
are?
G
So
I
think
that's
what
I
can
bring
to
the
table
commercial
for
sure,
but
I
think
there
may
be
some
other
things
they
may
want
to
tweak,
but
generally
speak
and
I.
Think
that's
the
biggest
concern
that
I
heard.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
So
I
have
a
number
of
members
of
council.
This
is
questions
and
debate
counselor
harder.
Please!
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
and
Jim,
you
know
I
just
want
to
remind
everybody
that
this
item
that
the
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
receive
received
the
revised
concept
plan.
G
It
says
that,
because
the
time
for
the
discussion
with
the
community
comes
when
we
get
into
the
planning,
when
we
have
a
planning
application
before
us-
and
that
will
happen
in
the
new
year
and
just
like
every
other
planning
application
through
site
plan,
I
think
to
potentially
some
rezoning
that
has
to
be
done.
Miss
Steadman
is
here
today
to
speak
further
to
that.
That's
when
the
community.
B
H
H
As
we
understand
it
would
be
mid-year
with
years,
so
we
will
be
receiving
it
today
or
not.
That's
all
we're
being
asked
to
do
and
we'll
be
asked
to
receive
a
concept
plan.
Miss
then
enjoy
a
sizzle
mr.
Mehra,
that
that
is
correct.
That
consultation
will
occur
through
the
site
plan
process
plan.
A
subdivision
zoning,
that's
required,
there'll,
be
a
fair
amount
of
consultation
as
part
of
our
regular
process
going
forward,
and
certainly,
as
the
council
has
pointed
out,
this
is
a
for
committee
to
receive
today
concepts
change.
H
I
mean
it's
been
seven
years
since
the
initial
concept
that
was
submitted,
so
that
is
often
anticipated,
and
we
certainly
will
ensure
ample
consultation
on
this
going
forward
and,
as
you
know,
mr.
mayor,
the
ward
councillor
can
lift
delegated
authority
on
site
plan
and
have
that
come
back
to
Planning
Committee
as
well.
H
So
today
it's
about
receiving
a
concept
based
on
a
deal
from
our
corporation
that
we
established
to
sell
land
within
the
city,
and
then
the
process
will
start
mid-year
next
year
with
the
conversation
about
an
application,
that's
a
real
application
and
then
it
will
come
to
planning
committee
and,
of
course,
after
after
much
consultation
and
then
we'll
go
to
council.
So
today
is
just
about
receiving
a
concept
and
I
think
that
that's
important
that
the
public
understands
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
H
It's
been
dev
that
perspective
Celts
Lib
lay
please
thanks
very
much
just
to
confirm.
This
will
require
a
rezoning,
applying
a
subdivision
and
then
site
plans,
if
not
all
at
once,
but
potentially
for
every
single
doling
individually,
depending
on
how
they
staged
the
development
that
is
correct.
Mr.
mayor,
so
we're
talking
about
at
least
three
more
opportunities
for
public
engagement,
zoning
subdivision
and
say
plain
am
I
getting
that
right.
That
is
correct.
Mr.
Mann
excellent,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Calibrate
cassadines,
Thank
You
mr.
H
You
see
there
since
that
time.
The
land
heads
of
course
have
been
transferred
over
to
the
Ottawa
community
Development
Corporation,
and
they
have
proceeded
with
the
development
process
and
there
is
a
division
of
responsibilities
that
have
occurred
as
a
result
of
that.
The
motion
from
2040
indeed
require
that
the
concept
plan
come
through
committee
and
in
hindsight
the
motion
should
have
also
said.
H
The
report
also
said
the
council's
of
the
motion
before
a
committee
to
have
it
go
through
council,
so
that
council
will
be
able
to
observe
if
there
are
any
changes
and
if
it
wished,
it
could
speak
to
those
by
way
of
motion,
but
otherwise
the
planning
process
west's
with
council
the
sale
post,
wet
process
lays
with
the
Ontario
community
lands.
Ottawa
community
plans
Development
Corporation,
and
that's
why
it's
now
only
being
received.
H
H
B
2014,
but
with
respect
to
in
the
rezoning
and
the
subdivision,
come
open
with
respect
to
when
the
zoning
comes
before
committee
and
the
subdivision
and
site
plan
come
before
staff
under
delegated
authority.
Unless
target
Authority
is
lifted,
the
concept
plan,
that's
not
in
any
way
bind
decisions
made
with
respect
to
those
three
planning
applications
and
in
your
professional
opinion
it
would
not.
I
I
I
E
Okay,
we
don't
have
anything
to
add
to
that
to
what
mr.
Marcus
said.
Mr.
mayor,
certainly
in
terms
of
what
mr.
mark
has
indicated
to
have
official
legislative,
a
status,
it
would
need
to
be
an
official
plan,
a
secondary
plan.
They
have
legislative
status.
A
concept
plan
does
not
so
reduce
development.
In
order
to
add
commercial
uses
to
this
site
require
an
official
plan.
Arad,
for
this
particular
site
require
zoning
change,
but
not
an
Opie
amendment.
Why?
Why
not
an
Opie
amendment.
E
E
Understand
what
a
concept
plan
is
in
terms
of
the
overall
planning
process?
I,
don't
I
get
the
impression
it
doesn't
have
the
same
status
as
zoning
or
or
peers.
Is
that
right,
miss
meadows,
correct?
It's!
It's
sets
an
intention
at
Occident
speaks
about
what
people
are
thinking
about
in
terms
of
what
they
want
to
submit
it's
a
concept.
It's
not
a
detailed
plan.
It's
not
a
site
plan,
it's
not
their
submission
for
plan,
a
subdivision.
E
C
J
You
Kel
sir
Kelso
a
riot.
Please
just
really
one
question:
it's
for
staff
and
just
shows
how
did
we
get
from
the
2009
to
the
2016
plan?
They
are
somewhat
different.
They
all
involve
mixed
use
for
the
sites
and
the
ANA
Park
and
all
that.
But
there
are
some
so
I'm
just
wondering.
What's
that's
the
rationale?
How
do
we
get
there.
J
Through
there
how
we
got
there
is
basically,
we
went
out
through
the
ROI
process,
as
well
as
the
RFP
process
and
having
gone
through
that
process.
We
indicated
to
the
market
that
this
was
the
approved
plan
by
council
in
2009,
and
we've
made
very
clear
throughout
whole
process
that
we
were
going
to
be
giving
weight
to
whatever
offers
came
in
from
the
market.
With
respect
to
this
development
plan,
I
can
tell
you
we
received
numerous
offers
on
this
site
and
not
one
of
them
came
in
with
this
exact
concept
plan
what's
being
proposed.
J
Excuse
me
and
last
warning:
please
do
not
disrupt
and
show
some
respect,
so
the
individual
staff
member
who's
answering
to
the
best
of
his
ability.
Thank
you
very
much,
councillor,
glasses
and
and
I
guess
this
question
as
a
follow-up
to
I
guess
to
miss
Medan
as
part
of
this
receipt.
If
you
will
of
the
of
the
concept
plan
from
what
you've
said
and
I
don't
sit
on
Planning
Commission
I'm.
A
C
F
Will
be
submitted,
staff
we'll
be
reviewing
in
terms
of
the
site
plan,
the
plan,
the
subdivision,
and
then
you
Changez,
Ernie
opa
x'
to
the
secondary
plan.
So
this
concept
certainly
is
what
would
be
the
high
level
thinking
of
what
the
proponent
is
anticipating
to
do?
But,
as
we
all
know,
the
Devils
in
the
details,
and
so
we
were
beginning
applications
once
they're
submitted,
we'll
be
consulting
with
with
the
public
on
what
is
submitted
so
to
be
ample
opportunity
for
feedback
to
go
back
to
the
applicant.
C
To
planning
committee
and
Council
for
approval,
okay
and
one
one
final
question
in
the
proposal
that
that's
in
front
of
us
today,
I'm
assuming
a
portion
of
that
ought
to
be
reported,
but
just
again
for
the
public
and
clay
a
portion
of
that
certainly
speaks
to
affordable
housing.
That
would
be
would
be
part
of
that
site.
Development
tract
I
can
confirm
that
the
affordable
housing
policy
has
been
respected
in
this
matter
and
that
we
did
consult
with
our
the
housing
stuff.
F
So
that
matter
has
definitely
been
addressed
in
the
sale.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Hey
thanks
got
through
like
Elsa
Washington,
please.
Thank
you.
Your
worship,
members
of
the
committee
I
ask
you
to
consider
two
main
questions
as
I
address
you
this
morning.
The
first
is:
is
the
revised
concept
plan
influential
on
future
planning
decisions?
F
Please
think
about
that
for
a
second
and
the
second
main
theme
of
my
remarks
today
is
if
the
original
concept
plan
included
community
input
through
the
visioning
exercise
and
the
public
open
house,
why
would
we
not
give
the
public
an
opportunity
at
this
point
to
comment
on
the
revised
concept
plan
if
we
respected
their
input
and
feedback
that
got
us
to
the
2009
plan?
Why
would
we
not
respect
the
desire
to
them
opportunity
to
reflect
on
common.
F
D
Plan
a
mixed-use
proposal
illustrated
in
the
concept
plan
that
was
basically
residential
and
parkland
or
green
space.
I
was
not
part
of
that
process,
but
there
were
many
ideas,
floated
many
potential
opportunities
for
this
land,
many
possibilities
and
ultimately,
what
the
concept
plan
that
was
derived
because
of
community
input,
which
City
Council
approved,
was
for
residential
and
green
space
park.
K
For
legal
counsel
is
what
was
the
true
intent
behind
that
clause
to
come
back
to
us,
if
it's
simply
to
give
us
a
heads
up?
Well
thanks
very
much,
but
if
there
are
concerns
with
revised
concept
plan,
then
that
should
have
been
built
in
there.
There
was
no
consultation
built
into
that,
but
my
question
is
what
was
the
intent
in
2014
to
come
back
to
fedko
if
there
were
changes?
K
Mr.
mayor,
my
understanding
of
the
motion
that
was
passed
in
2014
is
that
if
a
concept
plan
came
back
with
changes,
that
would
be
the
ability
and
is
the
ability
in
committee
and
council
to
say.
No,
we
don't
accept
those
changes
and
we
don't
want
you
to
move
forward.
But
if
community
council
are
content
that
the
process
move
forward,
then
they
would
receive
it.
Thank
you
all.
K
We
certainly
heard
from
members
of
the
public
today
who
have
communicated
their
desire
to
have
some
opportunity
in
time
to
assess
and
digest
the
proposals
and
certainly
meet
with
me
and
staff
over
the
next
few
months.
Did
the
rfo
permit
any
uses
to
the
property
not
covered
off
in
the
original
concept?
Limb.
K
L
Zones
as
guidelines
for
respondents,
the
residential
zoning
for
medium
density
permits
and
ciliary
commercial
uses,
where
ancillary
use
that
is
its
a
minor
use,
the
main
use
is
residential
in
this
concept
plan.
The
commercial
use
that's
proposed
was
not
something
that
was
requested
in
the
RF.
Oh,
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
much
authority
the
OSI
LDC
has
when
this
transfer
occurred
in
2014
from
counsel
how
much
leeway
dinner
does
the
corporation
have
when
the
City
of
Ottawa
transferred
the
land
to.
M
M
Mr.
Mehra
I
think
the
motion
from
2014
speaks
to
that.
If
Ottawa
and
Ottawa
community
advance
Development
Corporation
wished
to
differ
from
the
motion
than
it
had
to
come
back
here
and
that
that
is
in
fact
what
is
happening
in
this
process
very
well.
So
let
me
go
back
to
one
of
my
main
theme
questions,
and
that
is
to
mr.
mark
is
the
revised
concept
plan,
influential
on
future
planning
decisions
and,
if
so,
how.
M
Mr.
mayor
I
would
anticipate
and
I
believe
the
the
the
process
and
the
Ottawa
community
the
corporation
went
through,
but
mr.
McNair
hands-on
mysteries
can
speak
to
that
anticipates
that
the
development
applications
that
one
will
see
coming
forward
in
midterm
year.
2017
are
anticipated
to
be
in
accordance
with
the
concept
plan
should
be
received
by
community
council
as
it
was
received,
and
so
I
would
expect
that
it
will
provide
direction
as
to
the
development
application
set.
Committee
and
council
will.
D
As
well
that
if
council
receives
the
revised
concept
plan
or
giving
a
signal
that
this
is
the
plan
that
we
want
going
forward,
of
course,
the
developer
is
going
to
submit
a
plan
that
is
congruent
with
the
revised
concept
plan.
So
that's
in
2009
there
was
no
embracing
no
embracement
of
the
commercial
retail
component
that
was
considered,
but
it
didn't
make
the
plan,
and
so
that
sentiment
remains
that
there
is
no
desire
to
see
this
in
the
10-acre
site.
There's
no
desire
to
see
it
along
Riverside
Drive.
D
So
my
mandate
in
that
particular
piece
and
I
know
there
are
other
changes,
has
not
changed,
and
so
it
goes
back
to
the
second
fundamental
question
is:
why
would
we
not
defer
this
item
a
couple
months
to
allow
for
fulsome
community
input,
and
if
there
are
other
options
to
be
considered,
then
I
can
come
back
at
that
point,
it's
a
very
fair
question
right
now,
my
understanding.
Mr.
mayor,
is
you
have
a
concept
plan?
D
C
We
as
a
council,
approved
the
revised
plan
that
has
a
commercial
retail
component
and
we
fight
that
at
Planning
Committee
and
we're
successful.
They
don't
go
to
the
OMB
because
it
was
part
of
the
contract.
The
revised
concept
plan
will
be
part
of
the
contract
and
that
will
be
the
expectation
going
forward
so
that
there's
a
real
risk
here
that
the
revised
concept
plan
does
influence
future
planning
decisions.
This
was
not
part
of
what
the
community
wanted
in
2009.
Why
would
we
approve
that
today?
C
I
Hasn't
proved
that
it's
in
a
hurry
to
get
this
sale
off
and
I
think
when
you
look
at
the
importance
of
an
opportunity
to
include
community
input
in
public
input,
but
that
has
a
very
strong
merit
in
this
process.
So
there
were
questions
raised
at
about
the
minis
Bay
access.
Mr.
mayor,
if
you
could
wrap
up,
we've
put
you
back
on
the
list
co-chair.
I
I
I'm
just
wondering
if
our
financial
implications
in
if
we
were
to
receive
this
report
today,
does
that
wok
counsel,
as
opposed
to
the
OTC
LDC
into
commercial
obligations
or
potential
lawsuit
from
the
purchaser
as
a
result
of
them.
Having
bid
and
negotiated
in
good
faith
with
is
awfully
murky,
because
this
is
a
highly
unusual
process
to
have
OSI
LDC
do
one
thing
and
then
have
it
come
and
report
to
fedko
really.
But
back
to
my
question,
that's
my
side
are
we?
I
Are
we
tying
ourselves
into
I,
don't
want
to
say
something
like
a
light
rail
contract
and
then
have
to
pay
after
that,
mr.
mayor,
the
contract
is
subject
to
getting
the
approval
of
the
concept
planner
coming
here
and
go
through
this
process.
If
this,
if
we're
not
successful
in
terms
of
receiving
sorry
receiving
it
and
significant
changes
are
made
as
a
result
of
what's
being
proposed,
then
we
haven't
position
what
we'll
be
going
back
to
the
performant
and
possibly
would
lose
the
current
sale
it's
in
front
of
us.
The
other
concern.
F
That
now
mean
that
we
go
through
the
whole
procurement
process
all
over
again,
that's
basically
the
question
that
I
would
love
to
know
sounds
like
it's
an
unknown.
We
would
go
back
to
the
successful
developer
here
with
whom
we're
negotiating
and
say,
there's
been
some
changes,
there's
being
a
community
meeting
now
now
here
is
what
you're
dealing
with.
Can
you
work
with
that
I
guess?
The
answer
was:
yes,
we're
fine.
M
So
if
I
was
on
the
other
side
of
the
table,
I
I
guess
I
would
resent
the
fact
that
the
rules
just
got
changed
on
me.
Midstream,
but
you're,
saying
that
there's
and
and
I'm
not
going
to
ask
mr.
mark
to
give
me
a
ten
percent
or
ninety
percent
or
whatever
a
number,
but
a
do
you
believe
they
would
have
grounds
for
legal
proceedings
for
our
having
forced
them
effectively
into
accepting
a
different
set
of
rules
and
asked
them
to
take
it
or
leave
it.
M
M
Celso
Lynette,
please.
Thank
you,
sir.
Most
of
the
comments
today,
I'm
in
on
consultation
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
some
of
the
process.
As
we
move
forward
once
you,
an
application
is
brought
forward
to
south.
What's
the
process
at
that
time
and
before
it
goes
to
committee
and
before
it
goes
to
Council
for
final
approval,
mr.
mayor
will
have
a
pre
consultation
meeting
and
at
which
time
during
the
pre
consultation
meeting,
one
community
representative
may
sit
in
on
the
pre
consultation
meeting.
M
Average
time
family
a
session.
Yes,
mr.
mayor,
that's
a
really
good
question
is
really
dependent
upon
the
applicant
and
what
they've
submitted,
and
so
at
that
time
frame
it's
hard
to
predict
yep.
So
once
you
receive
it,
you
go
to
the
public.
At
that
time,
you
sent
an
application.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct
staff
will
work
with
the
board
counselor
and
with
the
community
and
with
the
applicant,
with
with
the
plan
that
is
submitted,
and
there
would
be
public
consultation
on
on
those
plans,
and
that
would
all
happen
prior
to
coming
to
Planning
Committee.
M
Okay,
during
that
process,
you
can
the
public
give
comments
at
and
they
prefer
what
was
originally
proposed
in
2009,
as
opposed
to
what's
proposed
today.
Mr.
mayor
staff
would
receive
any
comments
that
were
received
from
the
public
and
that
would
be
brought
forward,
obviously
had
planning
in
council.
That
is
correct.
Mr.
mayor.
M
A
E
Of
how
a
corporation
works
is
quite
important,
it
would
be
information
that,
for
those
of
us
that
don't
serve
on
the
Auto,
commune,
Development,
Corporation
and
understand
the
operations
are
that
which
we
do
I
think
that
that's
a
benefit,
but
the
only
reason
this
is
here
before
us
today
is
absolutely
because
of
the
emotion
that
can
previous
council
McClain
made.
Having
said
that,
any
time
anybody
makes
any
application,
no
matter
who
the
developer
is
in
this
city
within
a
course
walk
in
the
door.
It
is
a
concept
they
likely
because
they
are
skilled
developers.
E
They
know
a
lot
about
the
planning
process,
etc.
So,
when
they
come
in
an
individual
could
come
in
and
not
know
as
much
as
somebody
who's,
perhaps
an
intro
or
madami
or
such
like
that.
But
it
is
a
concept
only
they
get
together
with
staff
and
they
go
over.
Here's.
What
we're
thinking
correct,
miss
them
aspect,
mr.
Mann.
This
is
what
we're
thinking.
This
is
what
we're
thinking.
E
It's
going
to
take
some
work
for
them
to
get
that
ready,
they'll
be
working
with
staff,
as
you've
heard
and
as
we've
made
an
exception
in
the
last
couple
of
years.
We
have
the
ability
for
a
member
of
a
community
association
to
be
in
that
room
from
day
one.
They
have
to
sign
a
confidentiality,
but
that's
just
the
way
business
is
done
there.
No
one
should
be
thinking
that
in
any
way,
the
public
is
not
going
to
have
a
chance
to
be
involved
in
this
and
actually
a
large
part
in
it.
E
Then
it
will
come
to
the
committee.
After
all
of
that
is
done,
then
it
will
go
to
Council.
Today
we're
just
asking
to
receive
the
concept.
The
auto
Community
Land
Development
Corporation,
has
operated
absolutely
under
the
business
Act
of
Ontario,
and
those
of
us
on
the
corporation
know
that
clearly
so
I
ask
you
to
please
receive
this
today
and
then,
when
the
application
comes
in,
when
were
at
the
point
to
have
all
the
public
work,
then
we
all
know
that
councillor
brockington
is
going
to
do
his
part
in
this.
E
What
we've
heard
today
that
what
the
concept
is
does
not
force
us
to
make
that
decision
as
a
council
whenever
that
time
comes
up.
Thank
you
right.
Thank
You,
Kelsey
Bulkington.
Mr.
chair
we've.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
about
future
processes,
planning
subdivision
site
plan
when
we're
not
discussing
that
today,
we're
discussing
our
and
I
understand
the
opportunities
in
the
future,
but
we
today
have
no
obligation
to
the
developer.
We
have
no
obligation
to
the
auto
Camille
Ann's
Development
Corporation.
E
A
C
K
K
B
A
B
B
Just
a
little
bit
stuck
on
this
receiving
this
report
in
the
status
because
an
answer
to
councilor
mishchenko,
it
sounded
like
there's
a
tacit
approval
associated
with
that,
but
our
tradition
here
has
been
we
can
either
approve
the
report
or
we
can
receive
it
merely
receiving
is
just
being
made
aware
that
the
taking
no
action
on
it
and
I
want
to
just
be
a
hundred
percent
clear
that
in
receiving
the
report,
we
are
not
pronouncing
yes
or
no
to
commercial
uses
or
mix.
Those
mixed
juices
on
that
site
is
that
right.
That
is
correct.
Mr.
B
Mann,
okay,
because
I
think
that's
a
really
important
point,
because
I
don't
think
we
want
somehow
to
be
seen
as
having
a
grade
to
that
through
a
concept
plan
that
in
a
wonky
process
that
doesn't
normally
come
here.
But
having
said
that,
did
the
purchaser
place
any
conditions
on
the
sale,
because
certainly
they
could
ask
that
the
sir
be
conditional
on
planning
process
is
on
rezoning
or
in
site
plan
approval.
Did
they
put
any
conditions
on
the
purchase
of
the
property.
P
Purchasers
are
a
greener
purchase,
sale
with
the
city
right
now.
The
only
thing
is
is
that
it
is
subject
to
this
being
received
by
committee
and
by
council.
That's
the
only
condition.
That's
in
the
agreement,
it's
just
so
confusing
right,
that's
just
so
confusing,
because
I
mean
I
would
say
if
I'm
buying
a
property
and
I
want
to
have
another
use,
I'm
going
to
put
a
condition
on
this.
The
purchase
that
I
get
that
rezoning
with
that
site
plan.
Member
goes
wherever
I'm
looking
for
as
a
condition.
P
My
interpreter
I,
don't
understand
what
they're
looking
for
that
because,
like
they
seem
to
have
a
different
impression
than
we
have
of
what
we're
doing
here
today,
we're
just
simply
being
made
aware
that
they're
looking
to
change
the
concept
plan,
but
they're
purchasing
the
property
without
condition.
So
if
they're
dead,
they
don't
get
it
and
I
think
perhaps
mr.
McNair,
you
need
to
make
it
clear
to
them
that
there
is
not
a
tacit
approval
by
this
committee
of
their
new
concept.
We
just
simply
received
it.
That's
all
they're
gonna
have
to
go
through
a
process.
P
They're
gonna
have
to
meet
face
to
face
with
the
community.
They're
gonna
have
to
get
those
planning
approvals
if
if
they
wanna
go
ahead
with
that
process,
but
if
they're
purchased
the
property
without
condition,
then
it's
bad.
Beware
and
like
that's
the
way
I
interpret
it
and
I.
Think
we
better
be
clear
that
that's
the
way
the
purchaser
is
interpreting
it.
P
Yes,
mr.
Maris,
yes,
miss
Mac,
okay,
so
that's
the
way!
You
said
that
we
have
not
agreed
to
anything
here,
we're
just
being
made
aware
that
they
have
not
placed
conditions
on
the
purchase
of
the
property,
so
it's
totally
up
to
them
to
get
work
with
the
community
and
get
those
planning
approvals.
Yes,
mr.
mayor,
okay,
okay,
so
Kelsey
option
two!
If
you
could
introduce
your
motion,
this
is
just
to
confirm
that
it
does
go
to
council.
That's
right!
That's
right!
Mr.
mayor
yep,
I'm
gonna
read
the
motion.
Mr.
P
measures
to
put
in
the
contact
auto
Community
Land,
Development,
Corporation
sale
of
3071
Riverside
Drive
with
the
revised
concept
plan,
whereas
the
disposition
of
theory,
71,
giver
side
Drive
to
Ottawa,
community
Ladd's,
Development
Corporation
was
authorized
by
council
and
well,
as
such,
a
council
decision
provide
for
revisions
to
the
concept
plan
to
be
reported
through
the
appropriate
Standing
Committee
and
well
as
up
and
review
it
deems
appropriate.
That
revision
to
the
concept
plan
should
also
be
received
by
council.
P
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
recommendation
be
modified
as
follows
that
the
Finance
Economic
Development
Committee
recommended
council
received
that
revised
concept
plan
contain
and
document
true
to
permit
the
financial
closure
of
an
agreement
of
purchase
and
sale
between
the
Ottawa
Community
Land,
Development
Corporation
and
the
purchase
of
37
Riverside
Drive
okay,
so
that
is
just
a
technical
amendment
to
ensure
this
matter
goes
to
council
on
councillor,
Olson
Terry's
motion
carried
on
the
item
received,
see
item
number
for
2016
mid-year
purchasing
report.
Councillor
hubely
had
a
question.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
P
mayor,
on
page
five
of
the
report,
it
talks
about
the
first
two
quarters
of
2016
the
city
obtained
$341,000
on
prompt
payment
discounts
representing
an
81
percent
increase
from
the
same
period
in
2015.
This
comes
out
of
a
previous
audit
that
was
done
in
this
area
were
stopped.
We're
encouraged
to
go
after
the
opportunities
to
receive
prompt
payment
discounts
and
so
I'm
pleased
to
see
it
in
the
report.
However,
what
I'd
like
to
get
an
answer
on
is:
what
is
the
of
all
the
potential
prompt
payment
balances?
What
percentage
does
this
341,000
represent?
P
Are
we
getting?
In
other
words,
are
we
getting
every
opportunity
to
get
this
bonus
good
morning?
My
name
is
Wil
McDonald
on
the
chief
procurement
officer.
As
a
result
of
the
audit
of
accounts
payable,
a
number
of
system
and
process
enhancements
were
put
in
place
to
maximize
the
achievement
of
prompt
payment
discounts.
So,
as
a
result
of
that,
we
were
able
to
obtain
67%
of
the
total
potential
opportunity
in
the
first
two
quarters
of
2016
6
to
7%
6
to
7.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor.
Thank
you.