►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – July 11, 2018
Description
Ottawa City Council meeting – July 11, 2018
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
B
You,
mr.
mayor,
it's
my
pleasure
to
introduce
a
very
talented
twelve-year-old
from
my
ward,
mr.
Mara
Leia
and
McLeod
and
I'll
say
I,
better
correct
that,
because
today
is
her
thirteenth
birthday.
So
maybe
after
she
does
this,
we
can
all
sing
happy
birthday
to
her.
Marley
is
a
passionate
singer,
songwriter
and
performer
mr.
McLeod,
as
she
is
known
on
social
media,
plays
the
piano
guitar
my
favorite
instrument
the
ukulele
and
is
currently
the
lead
singer
in
an
amazing
band.
B
This
past
year
she
released
her
very
own
indie
EP
of
original
music
that
she
wrote
composed
and
produced.
The
proceeds
from
her
CD
release
party
were
donated
to
the
Kannada
food
cupboard
Millea
loves
to
sing
and
inspire
others
who
have
been
through
a
rough
time
and
need
a
little
pick-me-up.
She
also
works
with
many
different
groups
to
give
back
to
our
community
I'd
like
to
ask
you
to
join
me
now
in
welcoming
mr.
Marley
McLeod
to
City
Hall
today
to
sing
our
national
Apple
Oh.
C
A
B
A
Sir
Cloutier
welcome
Samia
has
worked
tirelessly
for
the
world
partnership,
walk
an
initiative
of
the
Agra
confound
ation
Canada
and
applies
her
organizing
skills
and
enthusiasm
for
fund
rate
for
their
fundraising
efforts
in
2008
Sameera
joined
the
foundation
as
a
volunteer
tour
guide,
and
two
years
later,
she
expanded
her
volunteer
efforts
by
participating
in
the
world.
Partnership
walk
as
a
marketing
lead
on
the
Ottawa
walk
team.
A
The
world
partnership
walk
is
Canada's
largest
annual,
fundraising
movement
dedicated
to
finding
global
poverty
funds
raised
by
the
annual
walk
support
development
initiatives
that
enable
millions
of
women
and
men
to
lift
their
communities
out
of
poverty
and
build
a
brighter
future
as
an
integral
part
of
Ottawa's.
World
partnership
walk
corporate
engagement
team.
She
led
by
example,
and
commitment
and
passion
invested
over
100
volunteer
hours.
It's
my
honor
to
acknowledge
these
contributions
with
a
city
builder
award.
A
A
Volunteered
with
the
walk
sister
event,
world
partnership
golf
where
her
energetic
personality
and
interpersonal
skills
helped
make
the
annual
event
a
memorable
success.
This
year,
Samiha
also
raised
funds
by
engaging
her
own
workplace
through
their
youth
network
and
creating
the
public
servants
shattering
poverty.
She
has
raised
funds
for
programs
to
improve
living
conditions
for
people,
regardless
of
their
faith
or
origin,
and
she
continues
to
serve
as
a
role
model
for
others
to
get
involved
in
causes
beyond
our
borders.
A
Through
her
volunteering
efforts,
more
teachers
are
being
trained,
impoverished
children
receive
quality,
education
and
more
mothers
have
access
to
quality
health
care
services
and
facilities
through
her
efforts.
In
her
example,
more
people
are
aware
of
international
development
issues
and
their
own
ability
to
step
forward
and
make
a
difference.
Although
Samia
volunteers
in
the
Ottawa
area,
her
impact
contributes
to
positive
change
across
the
global
community.
She
has
never
shied
away
from
hard
work
and
long
hours,
because
her
dedication
to
finding
global
poverty
has
always
come.
A
E
Thank
you,
your
worship,
Jim
Watson
councilmembers.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
warmest
thanks
go
to
his
worship,
Jim
Watson
and
his
staff
for
this
wonderful
award
and
for
the
other
Khan
Foundation
Canada
for
nominating
me
for
the
city
builder
award.
I
am
truly
grateful
and
humbled
growing
up.
One
of
the
main
values
I
learned
was
volunteerism
and
one
of
the
first
memories
I
have
as
a
child
is
being
a
junior
volunteer,
helping
to
provide
water
to
the
senior
citizens
serving
food
or
even
helping
to
Windex
the
mirrors
in
the
bathroom
at
the
time.
I.
E
Remember
thinking,
I,
don't
really
like
doing
these
tasks,
but
as
I've
gotten
older
I've
come
to
understand
the
value
of
those
tasks.
It
was
not
about
the
action
itself,
but
about
giving
my
time
to
my
community
and
to
those
in
need
as
I've
matured
and
taken
on
various
roles
within
my
community.
This
sentiment
has
strengthened
within
me.
Being
part
of
the
fundraiser
like
the
world
partnership.
Walk
has
shown
me
how
small
acts
can
make
a
a
big
impact
in
another
part
of
the
world.
E
That's
because
the
funds
raised
through
the
world
partnership
walk
go
directly
to
support
the
development
programs
in
Africa
and
Asia
initiatives
that
give
girls
the
opportunity
to
go
to
school
and
get
an
education
or
that
provide
much-needed
access
to
health
care
by
providing
mobile
clinics
in
rural
areas.
These
are
just
a
few
examples
of
how
millions
of
people
unlock
their
potential
to
build
a
better
life
before
I
close
I'd
like
to
thank
my
husband
for
supporting
me
in
all
my
voluntary
efforts.
E
My
parents,
who
have
ingrained
in
me
a
sense
of
service
to
my
community
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
leaders
in
my
community
and
my
friends
who
inspire
me
daily.
When
you
see
others
take
on
voluntary
responsibilities
along
with
other
personal
obligations,
it
really
truly
inspires
you
to
be
your
best
self
I'd
like
to
close
with
a
quote
in
his
speech
in
1983.
His
highness
Agha
Khan
spoke
about
the
responsibility
to
spark
hope
in
the
poor.
E
There
are
those
who
enter
the
world
in
such
poverty
that
they
are
deprived
of
both
the
means
and
the
motivation
to
improve
their
lot.
Unless
these
unfortunates
can
be
touched
with
the
spark,
they
will
only
sink
back
into
renewed
apathy,
degradation
and
despair.
It
is
for
us
who
are
more
fortunate
to
provide
that
spark.
End
quote.
Sometimes
we
forget
how
fortunate
we
are
and
have
access
to
our
basic
needs
and
the
resources
to
succeed
in
our
future
being
a
part
of
the
world
partnership.
E
F
G
H
F
A
A
Great
thank
you
conformation
two
minutes
adoption
des
postes
bilbo
for
the
27th
of
June
2018
carried
declaration
of
interest,
including
those
originally
arising
from
prior
meetings.
Dr.
I
assumed
the
coal
feed
into
that.
None
communications
is
presented,
regrets
counselors,
minik
motion,
71
13
of
13
June
2018,
counselor,
brockington
and
counselor
bley
advised
they'd,
be
absent
from
the
council
meeting
of
the
11th
of
July
motion
introduced
reports,
most
important
office,
Tesla,
rapport
counselor
Dean's
second,
by
a
counselor
Manette
at.
A
Carried
carried
reports,
Ottawa
committee
lands,
Development,
Corporation,
I,
think
we'll
we'll
come
back
to
that,
we'll
just
go
through
the
consent
agenda.
Councillor
Wilkinson
committee
reports,
agricultural
affairs
committee
report
number
36
repelling
the
metatarsus
to
committee.
They're,
like
you
could
sue.
It
is
a
fair
trial
by
law
for
for
for
837,
Albion
Road
and
for
nine
one
zero
Bank
Street
carried
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
two
six,
eight
Mackay
Road
c-suite
wash
I
mean
Mackay
is
a
technical
amendment
by
councillor
Moffat
you'd
like
to
bring
that
forward.
Councillor.
I
Thank
you
just
in
their
report.
It
speaks
to
the
zoning
needing
to
be
a
g6
or,
as
it
should
actually
be,
a
g8
due
to
the
lot
size
so
therefore
be
resolved.
That
council
approved
the
document
details
recommend
a
zoning
be
replaced.
The
following
the
proposed
changed.
The
City
of
Ottawa
zoning
bylaw
2008
to
f250
for
part
of
263
Mackay
Road
is
to
reason
on
the
land
showing
document
one
from
a
g3
to
a
g8
and
pursuant
to
the
Planning
Act
subsection,
34
17,
no
further
NORs,
be
it.
A
Will
so
get
to
counselor,
also
interior?
Second,
that
agreed
on
the
motion
carried
on
the
report
is
amend.
It
carried
audit
committee
report
number
17
couple:
nematoda
set
the
committee
de
la
verification,
audit
of
the
fraud
and
waste
hotline
carried
or
received
rather
apologize
item,
5
off
the
auto
general
review
of
these
practices
for
the
procurement
of
commercial
vehicles.
Yes,
sir,
is
it
a
quick
question,
counselor
sure
le
on
this
item?
A
J
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I'll,
I'll
read
it
out.
I've
worked
with
staff
on
this,
given
the
significance
of
the
proposed
development
council
direct
staff
as
follows:
for
the
first
phase
of
development
subject
to
site
plan
control
that
a
prior
to
the
site
plan,
application
being
submitted
and
Dean
complete
staff,
so
encouraged
the
applicant
owner
to
host
a
public
meeting
with
local
residents
and
community
groups
in
effort
to
discuss
the
details
of
the
first
development
phase
and
an
opportunity
to
discuss
community
concerns.
J
The
applicant
owner
shall
work
with
the
ward
councillor
to
secure
an
appropriate
venue
and
notify
members
of
the
public.
Also
during
the
site
plan
control
process,
a
community
information
session
is
required
and
shall
be
scheduled
during
the
initial
comment
period.
More
details
on
the
proposed
uses,
such
as
the
grocery
store
and
childcare
facility,
must
be
evident
in
the
submission
detail.
The
number
of
affordable
housing
units
and
unit
type
must
be
confirmed
and
reflected
in
any
conditions
of
approval.
Design.
Details
must
demonstrate
how
commercial
deliveries
will
function
and
staff
acknowledge
that
delegated
authority
may
be
removed.
J
If
the
ward
councillor
is
not
satisfied
with
the
submission
details
in
response
to
community
interests-
and
this
is
simply
an
in
response
to
ongoing
concerns-
that
residents
have
mostly
with
site
plan-
and
obviously
you
know
the
the
councillor
for
the
the
ward
councillor
can
lift
delegated
authority
to
work
on
any
of
these.
But
I
just
wanted
it
on
record
as
to
what
staff
will
work
with
the
community
on
so.
A
A
You're
descending
on
the
report,
but
you
just
move
all
these
conditions.
Okay,
next
is
item
seven
application
for
demolition
at
new
construction
at
four
forty,
three
and
four
four:
seven
Kent
Street
and
alteration
at
four
two:
three
and
four
to
five
McCloud
Street
carried
item:
8
zoning
bylaw
amendment
four,
four,
three
and
four:
four:
seven
Kent
and
four,
two
three:
four
to
five
McCloud
Street
carried
zoning
bylaw
amendment
99
Fifth,
Avenue
counselor
cherish
Anka,
wants
to
hold
that.
H
Terry,
please
great.
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor
aware,
as
the
report
recommends,
the
approval
of
the
zoning
bylaw
amendments
as
detailed
in
document
for
and
whereas
document
for
item
to
see
is
specific
to
the
five
eight
four
and
part
of
the
five
eight
seven
Wellington
Street
and
reasons
land
area
see
from
GM
seven
one
one,
nine
two
MD
H
83
H,
whereas
the
lands
are
in
Area
C
are
currently
zoned.
Is
our
r5
r5
zero
one
five
nine
each
20
has
shown
in
the
map
and
document.
One
therefore
be
resolved.
H
A
Okay,
so
that's
a
technical
amendment
on
the
amendment
carried
on
the
report
is
amended
carried.
Thank
you
planning
committee
report
number
67
900.
Are
we
have
a
number
of
motions
we'll
come
back
to
that
zoning
bylaw
amendment
eight
one:
five:
central
boulevard,
modification,
irregular
mother's
own
eyes
with
sank,
boulevard,
sale
at
all
carried
item.
Number
thirteen
zoning
bylaw
amendment
three,
three,
eight
seven
Boris
look
any
road!
A
A
Zoning
bylaw
amendment
five,
four,
four
one:
five,
four:
six:
five:
five:
five:
oh
five
and
five
five,
seven
one
four
in
Bank
Road.
But
if
you
guys
know
regular
mother
zone
I,
think
a
cat
in
a
sink
at
sea
sank
thanks
thanks
little
sank,
he
sank
same
definition
and
fair
Fernbank
carried
item.
21
zoning
bylaw
amendment
112,
not
Nelson,
Street
modification
with
irregular
mother
zone
saw
news
route,
Nelson,
Harry
deferral
and
waiver
of
development
charges.
Five,
two
two
five
and
five,
three
seven
one
boundary
road.
We
have
some
speakers
on
that
bulk
consent
agenda.
A
I've
been
informed
that
one
item
councillor
cash
would
like
to
remove
item
G
and
there's
a
technical
amendment,
I
believe,
counts
there:
cash
on
the
application
for
approval
of
expropriation
lands
at
Albion
and
Leitrim
Road
intersection.
Pursuant
to
section
for
the
expropriation
act,
you'd
like
to
introduce
your
technical
Thank.
C
You,
mr.
mayor,
yes,
it
is
a
technical
amendment,
whereas
after
consideration
of
this
report
by
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
on
July
7
2018,
it
was
noted
that
Schedule
E
contained
in
the
draft
bylaw
was
incomplete
and
did
not
align
with
the
property
requests.
Plans
contained
in
Schedule
B
to
the
draft
by
law
therefore
be
resolved.
That
Schedule
E
in
the
report
from
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
be
replaced,
be
revised.
Schedule
e
attached
to
this
motion
and
seconded
by
Councillor
leaper.
A
On
the
technical
amendment
carried
on
the
report
is
amended.
All
right
does
anyone
else
wish
anything
to
be
taken
from
the
bulk
consent
agenda
at
this
time
on
the
bulk
consent
agenda
as
presented
carried
all
right.
So
we're
going
back
to
item
number.
Oh
sorry,
we're
going
to
go
back
to
councillor
Wilkinson
in
her
capacity
as
chair
of
the
Ontario
or
the
Ottawa
Lands
Development
Corporation.
If
you'd
like
to
come
forward
and
mr.
McNair
and
is
there
as
staff,
support
and
I
believe
we
have
a
PowerPoint
presentation.
K
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
on
behalf
of
the
Auto
Keeneland's
Development
Corporation,
its
board
of
directors.
It's
my
pleasure
to
share
with
you
the
annual
report
for
2017.
The
corporation
was
established
to
take
parcels
a
city-owned
land
that
had
development
potential
and
meet
our
objectives
of
writing.
A
financial
return
to
the
city,
while
meeting
the
social,
environmental
and
cultural
need
of
community
corporation
consists
of
a
board
and
the
staff
is
shown
on
the
slide
up
of
this
up
above
there.
K
The
next
slide,
the
at
night
in
2017,
the
OSI
LD
target
was
five
point:
five
million,
but
growth
sales
generated
eighteen
point:
seven
million
for
a
total,
the
so
far
in
this
term
of
Council
of
twenty
four
point:
five
million,
our
five
a
four
year
total
for
net
costs
was,
is
22
million
in
our
total
cost.
So
far,
probably
raiding
the
range
of
two
to
three
million,
so
we
look
like
we're
going
to
exceed
the
amount
that
we
had
forecast.
We
would
do
for
the
term
of
council
this.
K
In
2018,
which
is
the
next
slide,
we
have
already
closed
to
sales,
which
we
have
secured
in
earlier
years.
We
have
closed
on
788
March
Road,
which
is
the
on
the
right
side
of
that
slide,
which
is
the
corner
of
Klondike
and
March
Road
for
a
residential
development,
and
when
the
on
651
long
fields
drive,
which
is
on
the
left-hand
side,
it's
a
smaller
portion
of
the
land's
we've
had
in
Nepean
in
the
bar
Haven
area.
K
So
the
our
community
lands
has
provides
at
the
added
value.
That's
not
just
to
get
money
for
the
city
but
to
meet
the
community
needs
and
the
community
improvement.
So
we
have
had
is
includes
open
space,
which
you
see
on
the
right-hand
side,
underneath
the
sign
about
development.
We've
also
had
lands
developed
for
social
housing
within
our
development
and
funding
that
gone
into
the
social
hand,
vote
envelope
that
helps
for
other
projects.
K
So
we
are
committed
to
doing
these
improvements
in
the
city,
because
not
only
on
financial
reports
but
to
contribute
to
the
social,
environmental
and
cultural
needs.
So
we
are
committed
to
me
to
maintain
and
continue
on
the
sale
of
surplus
property
to
achieve
both
optimal
value
for
financial
and
non-financial
community
values,
and
that's
an
important
part
of
what
we're
doing.
You'll
see
that
in
the
future
sales
as
well.
So
we're
happy
to
take
any
questions
that
any
member
of
council
may
have
on
on
either
these
properties
or
on
other
things.
A
L
K
We
have
to
remember
we
don't
the
calcaneal
ass
does
not
get
all
of
the
city
lands
make
the
court
McGarry
will
answer
the
question
more
because
there
are
small
parcels
that
are
sold
directly
by
the
city
and
we
only
get
lands
as
they're
transferred
from
counsels
money
that
we
get
counsel
actually
knows
about,
because
you've
transferred
them
to
us,
but
Gordon
McNair.
Okay,
probably
further
on
that.
M
A
C
C
Usually
the
big
money
is
found
in
the
the
regime
or
plan
for
selling
old
vehicles
and
acquiring
new
ones
and
I
know
what
amalgamation
the
city
had
to
put
30
or
40
million
dollars.
I,
don't
remember
exactly
how
much
into
catching
up
from
the
fact
that
we
had
fallen
behind
in
divesting
vehicles
at
the
right
time
and
acquiring
new
ones
at
the
right
time.
So
because
by
holding
on
to
older
vehicles,
it
actually
cost
us
more
money.
C
We
went
into
a
formula
that
took
into
account
the
age
the
hours
of
operation
of
vehicles,
kilometers,
make
model
and
specific
type
of
use,
and
that
produced
a
formula
or
that
formula
produced
a
schedule
of
when
each
of
the
vehicles
should
be
sold
to
reach
the
ultimate
best
value
for
taxpayers
over
the
long
term.
So
I'm
wondering
did
your
audit
include
a
look
at
what
our
new
practice
is
and
whether
that
has
started
us
down
the
wrong
road
again
and
if
not,
will
you
be
doing
one
on
that?
C
C
B
C
A
O
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
I
feel
I
need
to
speak
to
this
item,
because
I
am
actually
going
to
be
voting
in
favor
of
it
passing
while
at
the
same
time,
I
disagree
with
the
ultimate
outcome.
So
I
do
believe
that
needs
some
explaining.
Unfortunately,
I
have
found
myself
and
many
of
us,
particularly
the
urban
councillors,
and
more
and
more
inner
suburban
councillors
as
well,
are
finding
ourselves
in
a
situation
where
we
are
seeing
zoning
where
we
are
seeing
even
Community
Design
plans
that
are
being
routinely
ignored,
there's
no
softer
way
of
putting
it.
O
So
what
we're
finding
is
people
are
more
or
less
giving
up
on
trying
to
protect
existing
zoning,
protect
traditional
Main
streets
and
even
community
plans.
The
best
that
we
can
do
as
counselors
often
is
work
with
the
applicant
work,
with
staff
to
negotiate
small
changes.
So
we
find
ourselves
here
is
on
a
piece
of
property
that
is
zoned
as
15
meters.
That's
four
storeys
traditional
Main
Street,
but
Opa
150
anticipates
allows
for
possibly
six
storeys.
We
have
an
application
that
comes
in
at
eight
stories,
plus
rooftop
amenities,
which
was
negotiated
down
to
seven
stories.
O
That's
still
three
storeys
taller
than
is
supposed
to
be
allowed
on
a
traditional
Main,
Street,
so
I
know
when
we're
going
to
be
debating
65
stories
shortly.
That
makes
me
seem
like
peanuts,
but
we
are
talking
about
a
very
important
part
of
a
city
with
a
traditional
Main,
Street
and
so
I
and
the
Community
Association
find
ourselves
in
a
situation
where
we
can
negotiate
modest
changes,
bring
down
a
story
or
to
save
a
tree,
tweak
a
few
corners
off
change,
a
bit
of
the
facade
and
that's
the
best
we
can
get
I've
said
already.
O
O
O
So
that's
my
reason
why
I
will
be
supporting
in
favor
of
this
better
than
the
original,
not
good
enough,
but
I'm
still
going
to
have
to
vote
in
favor
of
it,
because
it's
something
that
I
helped
to
negotiate
and
I
can't
just
take
a
sideswipe
after
so
I
felt
that
needed
explaining.
It
is
another
illustration
of
a
project
that,
while
not
the
worst
we're
going
to
see
by
any
means,
is
still
a
significant
change
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
at
seven
storeys
abiding,
two
and
three-story
residences
on
residential
streets
at
the
back
and
I.
O
A
Okay,
anything
else
on
item
fire
I'd
mind
rather
carried
Thank
You
councillor
and
ischenko
dissent
by
councillor
leaper
Planning
Committee
report
number
67,
appalled,
the
middle
wasan
said
the
committee
de
l'aube
and
yzma
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
900
Albert
Street
modification
plan.
Officiel
irregular
Mazdas
on
Ash
Nassau
grew
Albert.
A
J
C
J
Three
continue
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
a
design
for
the
south
side,
loading
bay
area
that
accomplishes
a
more
significant
integration
of
the
broader
community
with
its
a
quasi
public
space
and
creates
an
inviting
pedestrian
and
cycling
friendly
environment
for
ensure
the
intersections
for
entry
and
egress
to
the
development
site
to
provide
cyclists
and
pedestrians,
a
level
of
service
of
a
five
that
the
number
of
provided
bicycle
parking
spaces
equal
or
extend
the
number
of
private
vehicle
spaces
for
each
phase
of
the
development.
Those
are
the
directions
as
we
go
through.
J
Eight
eight
be
amended
as
follows:
replace
the
text
and
index
contribution
of
450,000
towards
a
design
and
construction
of
a
future
pedestrian
and
cycling
bridge
over
existing
autre
in
corridor
along
former
Wellington
Street
with
an
index
financial
contribution
of
450,000
is
to
be
provided
to
ward
14.
100,000
is
to
be
directed
towards
the
ward
14
community
garden
fund
and
350,000
is
to
be
directed
towards
the
ward,
14
community
parks
fund,
and
what
this
would
do
is
it
would
help
us.
It
would
help
us
to
establish
better
public
space
along
that
south
side.
J
J
It
certainly
will
not
make
it
a
great
space
that
it
could
be,
but
it
will
make
it
better
than
a
loading
zone
and
my
last
my
last
motion
is
on
affordable
housing,
whereas
the
city
of
Ottawa's
official
plan
policy,
two
point
five,
two
point:
five
point
two
point:
two
encourages
the
production
of
affordable
housing
in
new
residential
development
and
redevelopment
to
meet
an
annual
target
of,
and
this
is
seconded
by
Councillor
taylor
of
25%.
Of
all
new
rental
housing
is
to
be
affordable
to
households
up
to
the
30th
income.
J
Percentile
b25
of
all
new
ownership
housing
is
to
be
affordable
to
hustles
up
to
the
40th
income.
Percentile
amendment
10
august
25th
2004,
and
whereas
the
city's
development
charge
for
affordable
housing
reinforces
that
new
development
should
contribute
towards
affordable
housing,
including
the
development
of
affordable
housing
in
the
vicinity
of
transit
stations
and
whereas
the
Bayview
station
district
secondary
plan
states
that
its
vision
is
supported
by,
among
others,
the
principle
that
investments
in
affordable,
supportive
and
accessible
housing.
J
25%
of
all
rental
and
ownership,
housing
shall,
and
it
does
say,
shall
be
affordable
meeting
official
plan
policies,
whereas
the
Bayview
District
secondary
plan
states
that
the
city
shall
facilitate
partnerships
with
the
nonprofit
and
private
sectors
to
develop,
affordable
rental
housing
for
households
below
the
30th
income.
Percentile
is
defined
in
the
Official
Plan,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
council
approved
that
the
applicant
be
directed
to
provide
25%
of
its
units
as
affordable
housing
at
the
30th
income
percentile,
including
units
of
at
least
2
bedrooms
for
households.
Thank
you.
J
P
Whatever
that
planning
committee
looks
like
whenever
this
comes
forward,
we
don't
you
know
it's
it's.
It
will
definitely
will
be
in
a
new
term
because
there's
a
lot
of
work
on
site
plan
to
do,
but
that
the
public
then
will
have
it
yet
another
opportunity
to
come
to
before
the
planning
committee
and
therefore
influence
the
council
of
the
day.
So
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
comprehensive
motion,
one
that
we
did
with
another
very
important
file,
which
is
Salvation,
Army,
ok,.
A
A
The
next
one
well
I,
think
we'll
carry
it
once
people
have
a
chance
to
speak.
The
next
motion
that
councillor
McKenna
has
put
forward
and
my
counselor
Taylor
is
with
respect
to
affordable
housing.
Mr.
mark,
my
understanding
is
that
this
may
not
be
permitted
because
we
haven't
passed
the
illusionary
zoning
bylaw.
Is
that
true
and
the
numbers
don't
allow
us
to
do
this?
That's.
R
Correct
in
cases
where
matter
was
subject
to
subdivision
approval,
mr.
mayor,
there
would
be
the
ability
to
impose
conditions
under
section
51
on
the
Planning
Act,
because
there's
a
very
broad
jurisdiction
for
conditions
under
Section
51
in
the
case
of
site
plan
approval
under
Section
41,
the
approval
ability
of
the
city
is
much
more
circumscribed
and
until
such
time
as
we
have
the
necessary
implementation
tools
for
inclusionary
zoning,
it
is
my
opinion
that
it
is
not
possible
to
implement
the
motion.
That's
been
presented
to
Council.
A
J
I
actually
have
issue
with
that,
because
the
Bayview
station
district
secondary
plan
is
very
clear
and
that
community
worked
very
hard
to
get
this
specific
language
into
it
and
Council
last
term
approved
this
plan
and
it
says
very
clearly
one
point
four
point:
eight,
affordable
housing,
a
range
of
housing
types
and
tenures
are
encouraged
for
residential
uses,
25%
of
all
rental
and
ownership,
housing
shall
be
affordable,
meeting
official
plan
policies.
It's
also
stated
in
the
Bayview
District
Community
Design
Plan.
That
again.
J
25%
of
all
rental
and
ownership,
housing
shall
be
affordable,
meeting
housing,
a
City
of
Ottawa
Opie
policies,
so
I
fail
to
see
why
we
would
I
mean
my
question
would
be
obviously
why
we
would
approve
a
secondary
plan.
That
says,
shall
provide
25%
and
then
have
to
come
back
at
the
very
first
time
we're
building
something
within
this
secondary
plan
and
make
it
a
target.
Why
would
we?
Why
would
we
have
ever
said
that
we
would
so.
R
Mr.
manna,
the
counselor
is
quite
correct
as
to
the
language
of
the
bayview
station
secondary
plan.
However,
as
I
indicated
earlier,
the
necessary
implementation
tool
in
the
case
of
site
plan
development-
it's
not
yet
available
to
the
city.
It
would
be
in
a
sub
them
in
a
development
proceeding
by
subdivision,
but
the
tool
is
not
yet
open
to
the
city
at
this
time
for
site
plan
development.
Alright.
A
A
Encourage
mr.
Mac
encouragement
and
I'll
put
that
one
aside,
then
counselor
harder
and
McKenney
I
think
there's
agreement
on
that
and
then
on
the
direction
to
staff.
It
reads
like
a
motion,
but
you
want
this
to
be
a
direction
to
staff:
counselor,
McKenney,
okay,
okay,
so
just
be
very
clear.
Mr.
Willis,
it's
a
direction
the
staff,
but
it
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
staff
agreed.
While
all
the
points
is
that
correct.
Q
Mr.
mayor,
if
you
wish
I
could
go
through
point
by
point
of
the
five
points
and
indicate
our
position.
Okay
on
the
first
matter,
related
accessible
spots
will
certainly
work
with
the
applicant.
There
may
be
unintended
consequences
of
that
action
on
dispersing
parking
to
adjacent
sites
and
on
street,
but
will
certainly
work
with
the
applicant
to
address
the
issue.
The
second
issue
is
related
to
phasing.
Q
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
tools
under
the
Planning
Act
to
enable
us
to
do
this,
but
well
we'll
certainly
work
with
the
applicant
to
bring
additional
clarity
to
address
the
concern
raised
by
the
councillor
on
the
third
issue
related
to
the
design
staff,
support
recommendation
or
the
direction
by
the
councillor
on
the
fourth
related
to
this
level
of
service.
A
for
the
pedestrians,
cyclists
I
understand
from
transportation
staff
that
is
not
technically
possible
because
we're
budding
an
arterial
road,
but
we
would
certainly
work
to
ameliorate
and
improve
the
conditions.
Q
The
best
possible
capacity
on
that
site,
and
certainly
we
understand
the
intent
of
this-
is
to
prioritize
the
quality
of
pedestrian
cycling
experience
and
would
work
towards
that
and
might
take
a
better
wording.
What
we'd
be
able
to
support
that
and
in
the
fourth
point,
we're
certainly
willing
to
negotiate?
This
is
related
bike
parking
with
the
applicant
from,
but
the
applicant
is
already
exceeding
what's
required
in
the
zoning
bylaw.
So
we
would
have
no
legal
position
to
require
that
okay.
A
O
Ultimately,
what
I'm
seeing
here
is
when
the
city
has
passed
plans,
when
we
have
community
design
plans,
when
we
have
Tod
plans
around
stations,
we
routinely
ignore
them.
So
unless
you
call
a
plan
to
ignore
plans,
a
plan,
we
don't
actually
have
a
plan.
We
deal
with
these
items
willy-nilly.
An
applicant
brings
forward
something
which
is
so
outside
of
what
is
anticipated,
either
by
existing
zoning
bar
an
existing
CDP,
and
we
as
a
council,
deal
with
them
in
isolation
and
tend
to
approve
all
of
them.
O
O
O
There
are
issues
around
very
tall
buildings,
I've
seen
the
studies
about
social
engagement
when
you
start
to
get
very
tall
buildings,
I've,
seen
studies
around
delayed
emergency
response
time
out
of
Toronto
up
to
three
minutes
or
longer
delayed
emergency
response
to
heart
attacks
and
other
emergency
calls
in
tall
buildings.
I
won't
get
into
that
debate
today.
It's
not
the
right
time
to
do
that,
but
those
are
all
concerns
that
I'm
not
seeing
being
considered
when
we
deal
with
an
application
one
by
one
like
this.
O
L
Mr.
Matt,
my
question
is
to
mr.
Willis
mr.
Willis,
we've
heard
yesterday
at
committee.
The
the
questions
and
the
concerns
relating
to
plans
and
I
want
I
want
to
hear
from
you
some
reassurance
or
some
concerns.
As
to
the
process,
we
engage
the
community
for
the
secondary
plans
or
community
design
plans.
Q
Mayor
number
of
critical
points
I
want
to
put
on
the
table
on
mr.
James
may
add
to
it.
So,
first
of
all,
it's
important
to
recognize.
The
density
in
this
application
is
the
same
density
that
was
previously
approved
with
DCI
Phoenix.
It's
a
redeployment,
architectural
II
of
how
that
density
was
approved.
So
we
are
not
actually
talking
about
an
increase
of
density
over
a
previously
approved
plan.
Q
Secondly,
going
back
to
25
tene,
when
the
community
design
plan
was
done,
900
Albert
was
identified
as
one
of
the
sites
in
the
city
where
we
would
put
one
of
the
tallest
buildings
in
the
city,
because
we
cannot
put
tall
buildings
in
the
central
core
area,
the
city,
because
the
parliamentary
views
protection.
So
at
that
time
we
thought
30
storeys
is
the
tallest
that
would
be
built,
but
over
time
the
market
has
changed
considerably
and
particularly
in
the
last
five
years
across
Canada.
Q
When
you
get
truly
mixed-use
buildings
which
we're
seeing
now
for
the
first
time
as
opposed
to
just
buildings,
with
condos,
with
ground-floor
retail,
we're
actually
like
truly
mixed-use
buildings
across
Canada,
they're
being
built
higher
and
they're
examples.
In
many
other
Canadian
cities
of
heights
in
this
range
and
not
talking
about
Toronto
I'm,
talking
about
a
whole
range
of
mid
sized
Canadian
cities
just
like
us,
so
we
always
contemplated
one
of
the
tallest
buildings
being
at
the
junction
of
the
two
transit
lines.
That's
the
the
second
point.
Q
I
would
like
to
make
so
it's
important
for
sure
that
we
address
some
of
the
design
issues
that
come
about
as
a
result
of
a
tall
building
the
difference
between
a
20
and
a
50
or
60,
or
a
30
story,
tall
building,
they're,
all
tall
buildings,
so
I
think
councilor
McKenney,
quite
articulate,
Lee
related
the
issues
which
is
really
the
how
the
ground
level
functions
and
they
are
the
greatest
concern,
but
other
than
shadow
and
wind
impacts
which
are
studied
through
our
planning
review
process.
There
aren't
a
lot
of
significant
planning.
Q
Differences
between
tall
are
very
tall
and
very
ear
taller
if
you
want
to
put
it
that
way.
So
mr.
mayor
I
believe
the
process
has
worked
as
it
was
intended.
Opa
150
contemplated
a
possibly
taller
building
on
this
site
and
the
Ontario
Planning
Act
allows
anyone
at
anytime
to
file
an
application
and
we're
obligated
to
assess
it
on
its
own
merits.
Okay,
okay.
L
L
How
do
we
reconcile
those
objectives,
around
transit,
oriented
development
and,
in
this
context,
the
amount
of
the
amount
of
parking
that
the
applicant
is
requesting?
I'm
I
happen
to
be
very
concerned
because
we
we
want
to
see
the
development
and
we
want.
We
want
to
see
the
sends
out.
Lebreton
flats,
I
think
we're
concerned
as
to
would
this
property
and
its
parking
be
used
for
future
purposes
out
of
lebreton
flats,
rather
than
the
actual
needs
of
that
development
and
then
per
specifically,
how
do
we
increase?
How
do
we
ensure
the
increase
in
transit?
M
So
we
can
work
to
that
through
the
through
the
site,
plan
control
process
and
with
respect
to
transit,
and
this
application
in
says.
Damita
there
be
about
1.6
million
trips
coming
from
the
proposed
development,
a
complete
build
out
when
it
is
constructed
in
the
future.
I
think
it
was
only
25.
So
we
anticipate
because
of
its
location
within
200
metres
of
a
transit
station.
Exactly
where
you
want
this
kind
of
height
there
will
be
about
55%
or
65%
of
use
by
transit
to
another
25
percent
by
not
cars,
but
by
cyclists
and
pedestrians.
L
Are
there
any
levers
that
the
Planning
Department
is
used
in
this
review
to
to
incentivize
the
use
of
transit?
For
example?
You
know
the
first
ten
years
of
I
believe
most
of
these
units
are
rental
and
I
might
be
wrong,
but
it
from
what
I
understand
they
are.
Are
we
able
to
you
know
it
because
of
the
offset
of
parking
and
so
on?
I
left
that
number
to
continue
to
reduce,
but
are
we
able
to
provide
bus
passes
for
units
as
part
of
the
application
itself.
M
Mr.
mayor,
that's
something
actually
we've
done,
for
example,
at
the
sisters
of
visitation
we
give
our
bus
passes
or
presto
cards
with
some
money
on
them,
and
certainly
there
was
initial
meeting
in
that
regard
to
see
about
incentivizing
the
amount
of
transportation
by
public
transit
there
and
that
can
be
looked
at
through
the
site
plan
control
process.
That's
the
process
where
you
would
look
through
to
see
if
you
could
implement
that
through
a
condition
so.
L
M
L
M
L
I
I'd
love
to
find
a
mechanism,
a
tool
for
us
to
revisit
that
and
ensure
that
that
becomes
the
city's
position
going
into
this.
These
discussions,
because,
like
this
in
my
mind,
would
be
a
lost
opportunity
where
both
transit
corridors
there's
there's.
Obviously
an
incentive
to
encourage
transit
use
were
allowing
heightened
density
because
of
the
proximity
to
transit,
but
we
can't
seem
to
coordinate
both
components,
so
mister
Willis,
I,
assume.
Q
Mr.
mayor,
we
certainly
have
the
intention
of
attempting
to
negotiate
this
with
the
applicant
and
we
shared
with
the
councillors
views
about.
This
is
being
a
really
great
opportunity.
We're
putting
a
lot
of
effort
to
design
this
building
to
be
highly
integrated
with
the
station
was
one
of
the
most
successful
design
exercises
we've
had
to
date,
because
section
37
was
previously
negotiated
with
the
previous
approval
council
granted
to
the
DCR
Phoenix
application,
and
there
is
no
change
in
density.
Q
L
Wait
a
minute
we,
we
are
the
negotiation
around
the
parking
reduction,
so
we're
going
from
I,
think
I
believe
mr.
James
said
2,000
down
to
around
1,000
I
would
maybe
there's
a
couple
of
hundreds
there,
but
that
is
a
cost
to
the
developer.
We
know
that
parking
is
an
expensive
cost
to
developer.
That
has
some
financial
value.
Can
we
not
use
the
waiver
of
those
requirements
to
transfer
it
into
a
transit
component?
Mr.
Q
Mayor
mr.
James
can
correct
me:
we
don't
have
a
minimum
parking
here.
We
had
a
maximum
limit
which
they
had
chosen
to
not
build
to
the
maximum,
so
we
have
no
legal
mechanism
on
this
instance.
Council
has
previously
tried
to
prioritize
non-automotive
traffic
in
Tod
areas
by
removing
the
maximums
okay.
L
I
only
have
45
seconds
so
I'll
go
to
my
last
point,
which
is
more
of
a
comment
to
other
members
of
council.
I.
Do
think
that
councillor
McKinney
is
on
to
something
with
the
25%,
affordable
housing
component
on
this
I
recognize.
What
mr.
mark
is
telling
us,
but
we
know
full
well
that
the
likelihood
of
this
application
going
to
the
the
Altab
the
tribunal
is
high,
so
I
would
much
rather
ass,
take
a
position
saying
the
CDP,
the
CDP
states
25%,
and
that
we
go
in
the
negotiations.
L
B
Gonna
suggest
a
another
alternative
on
that
motion
that
mr.
mark
has
concerns
about
that.
Hopefully
won't
mean
that
we
have
to
go
to
an
appeal,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
the
the
community
has
endorsed
this
approach.
Council
endorsed
this
approach
through
a
vote,
and
all
we
seem
to
be
missing
is
the
tool
to
put
it
in
place.
So
what
I'm
going
to
suggest
or
ask
mr.
mark
is?
B
Could
we
not
reword
the
the
motion
that
you
have
the
concern
about
and
build
in
essentially
an
if
and
when
clause?
So
in
that
way,
we
preserve
the
principle
that
the
community
is
endorsed.
We
support
the
principle
that
council
has
passed
and-
and
we
say,
but
we
won't
do
it
until
we
can
do
it,
in
other
words,
until
inclusionary
zoning
or
whatever
other
tool
comes
down
the
road
rather
than
encouraging
I
think
this
is
a
bit
more
bite
to
it,
and
I
would
be
hard-pressed
as
to
why
that's
not
a
viable
option.
R
Mr.
mayor,
what
I
have
suggested
to
the
ward
councillor
is
that
legal
services
be
directed
to
look
at
the
ability
to
adopt
something
of
that
nature
subsequent
to
adopting
the
parent
zoning
and
that
we
report
back
to
the
next
meeting
of
Planning
Committee
as
to
what
tools
are
are
available
to
us
either
at
that
point
or
in
the
future.
That
would
be
my
recommendation.
Mr.
mayor.
B
Okay,
I'd
still
like
to
hear
an
answer
to
my
question,
though
I
don't
think
he
did
answer
it
with
all
due
respect
as
to
what
is
wrong
with
an
if
and
when
approach
is
something
used
legally
from
time
to
time
to
anticipate,
what's
coming
down
the
road,
we're
not
going
to
do
it
now,
but
if
this
happens,
we
will
do
it.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
you
specifically
on
that
point.
R
R
A
J
I
would
suggest,
then,
is
that
point
two
so
that
the
applicant
I
would
change,
therefore
be
it
resolved?
The
council
approve
that
the
applicant
be
encouraged
to
provide
rather
than
obligated,
and
that
that,
at
the
point
in
time,
if
and
when
council
has
a
legal
ability
to
mandate
a
minimum
number
of
affordable
units
staff
bring
forward
a
subsequent
report
to
request
affordable
units,
as
per
the
Bayview
District
secondary
plan
should
such
be
legally
possible.
Does.
O
J
A
A
S
To
point
to
point
to
of
the
Official
Plan
was
very
clear:
that
high-rise
buildings
above
30
stories:
okay,
because
well
what
the
Official
Plan
does
is
it
separates
high-rises
from
10
to
30
stories
from
high
rises
above
30
stories,
so
here
I'm
reading
from
Oh
point
13
high-rise
buildings
above
30
stories
will
only
be
permitted
when
they
are
identified
in
a
secondary
plan,
and
it
goes
on
to
also
list
conditions.
So
there
is
a
double
requirement
that
a
secondary
plan
identify
an
openness
to
30-plus
buildings
and
that
it
satisfy
a
whole
bunch
of
different
conditions.
S
So,
in
fact,
what
OPA
150
did?
Is
it
strengthened?
It
strengthened
the
guidance
that
the
secondary
plan
and
the
CDP
had
within
it,
which
were
approved
by
this
body.
So
that's
very
important.
One
cannot
claim
that
OPA
150
somehow
negates
all
of
the
work
that
we're
done
in
the
council,
approved
CDP
and
secondary
plan,
which
were
blessed
as
part
of
two
point.
Five
point:
six
of
the
Official
Plan.
That
is
the
first
point.
S
The
second
point
is,
there
are
a
number
of
other
elements
within
the
secondary
plan
which
are
frankly
ignored
in
the
proposed
application,
and
they
may
seem
like
minor
issues,
for
example,
step
backs.
We
have
guidance
in
the
CDP
and
in
the
secondary
plan
on
step
backs.
We
have
guidance
in
the
high-rise
guidelines
just
passed
by
council
within
the
last
month
on
on
step
backs.
The
zoning
schedule
patently
ignores
all
of
that
guidance.
S
Next
point
we
talked
about
in
the
secondary
plan
the
need
for
a
revised
master
plan
to
integrate
the
public
realm
on
the
Southside,
with
two
with
250
city
centre.
Colleagues,
yesterday
identified
and
members
of
the
public
a
number
of
issues
with
the
Southside
and
how
they
in
fact
did
not
integrate
with
the
public
realm
on
the
Southside,
there
was
no
discussion
of
the
master
plan
to
make
sure
that
that
integration
takes
place
with
that
site.
So
again,
not
addressed
in
this
application.
We've
already
talked
about
the
affordable
units
element,
it
looks
like
councillor.
S
That's
a
debatable
point,
but
what's
not
a
debatable
point?
Is
we
created
an
expectation
that
this
is
how
planning
staff
and
City
Council
we're
going
to
interpret
development
applications
in
this
area
and
I
think
we
are
doing
a
grave
disservice
to
the
planning
process
by
a
not
calling
out
the
fact
that
neither
planning
staff
nor
it
appears
if
the
vote
planning
committee
holds
council
are
respecting
that
that
that
magical
word,
which
we've
promised
four
years
now
that
secondary
plans
and
CDP's,
should
provide
planning
certainty.
S
D
D
There
are
several
ways
in
which
this
application
fails
and
I
go
back
to
the
community
design
plan
and
the
principles
that
it
sets
out
for
how
developments
in
this
critical
area
of
the
city
at
the
intersection
of
our
light
rail
lines
should
precede
the
one
of
the
principles
that
is
in
place.
There
is
that
the
developments
near
the
Bayview
station
should
contribute
to
a
public
realm
that
better
connects
our
existing
communities
in
this
area
with
with
the
station
and
with
the
river
and
I
think.
D
One
of
the
traps
that
we
are
falling
into
is
to
take
a
look
at
the
connections
that
are
being
proposed
in
this
application
that
essentially
lead
people
through
a
shopping,
mall
private
space
and
treating
those
as
though
they
are
public
space.
A
mezzanine
in
a
shopping
mall
that
has
coffee
shops
is
not
public
space.
D
It's
available
to
the
public.
On
the
grounds
that
the
private
land
holder
determines
and
I
think
we
have
a
real
failure
here
to
enhance
the
public
realm,
which
is
a
failure
to
follow
through
on
the
planning
principles
and
the
design
objectives
that
are
in
place
in
the
community
design
plan.
The
other
principle
is
that
it
will
establish
context-sensitive
development
that
respects
existing
neighborhoods
I.
Don't
believe
that
this
does.
This
is
an
island
in
a
couple
of
vibrant
neighborhoods,
Intan,
Berg
and
Dalhousie.
It
turns
its
back
on
them.
D
The
connections
that
are
going
to
be
public
are
not
particularly
attractive.
We
know
that
we're
going
to
ask
people
to
cycle
through
what
is
essentially
a
loading
bay
in
order
to
take
advantage
of
the
various
different
connections
that
are
out
there.
This
is
an
island.
The
public
space
is
is,
is
private
space
in
reality
and
I.
D
Don't
believe
that
three
months
of
the
year
when
that
park
is
actually
not
going
to
be
particularly
useful
for
anyone
that
we're
doing
anything
except
to
create
a
barrier
between
the
residents
of
particularly
Catherine,
McKenna,
sward
and
and
the
transit
station,
the
opposite,
in
fact,
is,
is
looking
to
be
come.
True
in
this
that,
rather
than
following
through
on
the
promise
in
our
community
design
plan
to
create
complete
mixed-use
communities,
this
development
appears
set
to
actually
create
a
burden
on
the
existing
neighborhoods.
D
We
don't
see
the
schools,
we
don't
see
the
community
centers,
we
don't
see
the
recreation
centers.
That
should
be
the
the
indoor
public
space
that
should
be
coming
along
with
these
kinds
of
developments
and
because
of
flaws
in
our
method
of
charging
development
charges.
I
don't
see
that
development
that
continues
along
this
path
is
going
to
result.
In
those
we've
talked
a
lot
about
the
the
plant
bath.
We
can
talk
about
Tom
Brown
arena.
D
We
can
talk
about
the
various
different
overburdened
public
public
spaces
in
our
community
that
are
just
going
to
see
more
people
yet
I
do
not,
and
I
will
continue
to
challenge
legal
on
the
affordable
housing
piece.
This
is
a
clearly
stated
directive
in
our
community
design
plan
that
has
is
attached
to
our
official
plan.
We
have
an
official
plan
policy
to
create
affordable
housing
in
this
geographic
area.
One
of
the
reasons
why
many
of
us
supported
the
reform
of
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board
to
the
new
Local
Planning
Appeal
Tribunal-
is
that
we're
in
control?
D
Now
the
only
bar
is
to
demonstrate
in
our
decisions
as
a
council
that
we
have
adhered
our
official
plan.
Our
official
plan
says
one
thing,
but
for
some
reason
we
are
afraid
to
implement
that
you
know
this
morning
we
passed
a
report
that
speaks
to
an
interim
condition
for
I.
Think
it's
the
Riverside
South
Community
design
plan
in
light
of
the
failures
of
this
application
to
achieve
the
the
vision
of
our
community
design
plan
for
the
Bayview
station
area.
D
T
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
I'm
pleased
to
support
councilor,
McKinney's
emotion
on
the
affordable
housing
piece
and
thankful
to
councilor
egg
life
for
helping
Sherpa
some
of
the
language
so
that
we
could
arrive
at
a
place
where
it's
seemingly
likely,
probably
more
more
likely
going
to
happen.
I
would
know,
take
a
moment
just
to
jump
off
of
councilor
libros
point
and
and
request
that
a
planning
staff
or
or
perhaps
wider
planning
and
social
service
staff
do
a
bit
of
homework
as
to
the
other
places
where
we
may
have
approved
language.
T
Where
council
believes,
we
have
approved
language
that
blesses
the
inclusion
of
affordable
housing
only
to
be
told
later,
if
an
application
came
forward
that,
in
fact
that's
not
the
case,
you
know
I
think
we
do
have
to
provide
surety
to
the
community
and
and
certainly
to
those
who
are
interested
across
this
city
and
housing.
Affordability
and
the
growing
pressure
on
that
that
when
we
do
get
to
a
point
where
we
believe
we
have
a
document
that
says
that
future
development
in
area
X
will
include
affordable
housing.
And
that's
what
that
looks
like
in
this
area.
T
Then
that
document
should
be
real,
it
should
be
enforceable
and
all
the
parties
who
embark
on
a
development
in
that
area
should
know
upfront
what
their
what
they're
dealing
with
we
shouldn't
have
to
default
back
to.
Well,
we
don't
have
a
tool
yet
in
place,
that's
kind
of
like
saying
we
have
a
cure
for
you
know
what
ails
you
show
up
the
hospital
on
Friday
only
to
show
up
at
the
hospital
and
say
well
when
we
said
we
had
a
cure.
T
What
we
meant
was
as
soon
as
the
cure
is
available,
then
we'll
provide
it
to
you.
So
my
request
is
that
staff
do
a
bit
of
a
environmental
scan
any
other
places
and
perhaps
highlight
for
council,
where
the
language
that
we
passed,
that
we
think
is
enforceable
might
not
actually
be
enforceable.
Thank
You
mr.
mayor.
B
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
just
a
question
to
staff
based
on
this
motion.
That's
coming
forward
the
fact
that
how
can
we
tie
a
business
down
20
years
from
now
or
10
years
from
now
on,
this
item
may
actually
develop
in
terms
of
putting
those
conditions
in
I
know
the
CDP
suggests
or
says
that
we
can
ask
for
25
percent
in
affordable
housing.
Anything
beyond
that.
How
do
we
commit
a
business
or
ask
that
business
to
commit
itself
on
a
project?
They
don't
even
know
when
it's
going
to
be
completed.
Q
J
R
Mr.
mayor,
there
are
provisions
in
okay
150
that
aren't
enforced,
yet
the
however
council
seeks
to
implement
them.
There
are
provisions
of
150
that
are
in
force
with
respect
to
the
provisions
that
are
enforced.
The
tests
in
front
of
l-pad
are
that
the
by
law
can
only
be
overturned
if
it
is
inconsistent
with
the
Official
Plan.
Pardon
me
inconsistent
with
the
parental
policy
statement
or
not
in
conformity
with
the
Official
Plan.
J
So
then,
nothing
about
secondary
plans,
nothing
included
in
secondary
plans
essentially
would
be
appealable.
Is
that
is
that
correct
Thanks?
How
would
you
appeal
something
that's
in
the
secondary
plan?
What
weight
does
this?
If
that's
the
case,
what
weight
does
the
secondary
plan
hold
within
our
rules
within
provincial
rules
within
the
appeal
process?.
R
R
Mr.
mayor,
the
secondary
Official
Plan
amendment,
if
adopted,
will
permit
the
additional
height
that's
being
sought
by
the
applicant,
so
it
would,
it
would
be
appealable
by
a
third
party,
perhaps
a
member
of
the
community.
In
order
for
their
appeal
to
succeed,
they
would
have
to
show
that
what
was
adopted
by
council
was
inconsistent
with
the
provincial
policy
statement.
R
J
M
J
I'm,
just
gonna
I'm,
just
gonna,
carry
on
because
I
feel
like
I'm
in
Wonderland.
Here
you
know
this.
This
has
been
an
application
that
we've
worked
on
in
the
community
really
going
back
to
2013,
because
we
we've
known
it's
coming.
We
worked
very
diligently
of
long
hours
with
staff
with
the
development
community
with
residents
on
community
design
plan,
which
is
now
part
of
a
secondary
plan.
That
we're
being
told
today
really
can
just
be
changed
at
the
at
the
will
of
Council.
J
So
you
know
on
the
on
the
you
know:
on
the
the
the
whole
you
know:
application
as
a
whole.
You
know
I've
said
it
before
you
know
height.
You
know
we
have
an
issue
with
the
heights
because
it
was
not.
It
was
not.
What
was
in
the
plan,
but
height
is
you
know,
is,
is
not
in
itself
good
or
bad.
It
really
is
what
happens
on
the
ground
and
how
we
live
on
the
ground
and
we
are
never
going
to
live
on
the
ground
in
and
around
this
development.
It
will
never.
J
We
will
never
be
encouraged
to
travel
along
that
south
side.
We
will
never.
As
I
said
yesterday
at
Planning
Committee.
We
will
never
bring
our
kids
to
play
with
each
other
on
that
south
side
so
will
not
meet
our
neighbors.
We
will
not
meet
the
you
know,
thousands
of
people
who
will
be
living
in
this
building
because
we're
not
going
to
hang
out
in
a
loading
zone
quite
frankly,
and
it
doesn't
matter
how
safe
you
make
that
pedestrian
cycling
pathway.
Nobody
will
go
there
first
off
if
you
put
a
gender
lens
over
it.
J
The
fact
that
there's
nothing
on
either
side
on
one
side,
its
loading
zone
and
a
and
a
blank
wall
and
the
other
side
really
is
nothing.
If
you
stick
a
gender
lens
on
that,
it's
quite
unsafe,
especially
for
women
and
and
young
children.
So
we
will
not
be
on
the
ground.
This
is
you
know
we.
We
also
have
this
motion
for
to
provide
some
affordable
housing.
We
know
what's
being
passed
today,
we're
not
going
to
get
25
percent,
affordable
housing.
P
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
just
a
few
comments:
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
affordable
housing
and
I
I
met
a
few
times
with
councilor,
McKenney
and
I've
talked
to
others
on
this
particular
file.
But
we
can't
look
at
this
particular
file
with
regard
to
affordable
housing
on
its
own
merits
as
a
standalone
as
large
as
it
is,
it's
a
large
complex.
P
It's
only
have
a
large
podium,
there's
going
to
be
three
high
towers,
but
the
success
or
the
availability
of
affordable
housing
does
not
hinge
on
this
one
site
and
if
you
look
at
the
work
that
we
did
in
the
last
term,
I
think
or
at
the
beginning
of
this,
this
term,
like
three
years
ago
on
the
Preston
file,
for
example,
we
looked
at
that
holistically
now.
We
have,
of
course,
added
to
that.
We've
got
the
new
civic
trauma
center.
What
we
don't
know
yet
and
then
councilman
Kenny.
P
There
were
time,
but
this
is
the
gladstone
site.
That's
a
large
parcel
of
land,
the
Bayview,
more
development
there,
the
tom
brown
arena.
We
know
that
we're
building
on
the
lebreton
we
just
have
proved
the
lebreton
east,
and
now
we
have
the
another
piece
which
is
the
900
Albert,
so
I
think
that
it
would
be
wrong
to
look
at
and
only
think,
I
think
that
we
have
forsaken
our
responsibility
on
affordable
housing.
We
have
a
very
comprehensive,
affordable
housing
policy
in
this
city.
P
Every
application
that
comes
forward
is
assessed
on
its
own
merits
by
our
staff.
They
work
very
hard.
This
one
they
have
as
our
Director
of
Planning,
Leanne,
Sneden
and
I,
were
saying
yesterday
at
the
beginning
of
our
tour
of
duty
as
the
chair
of
planning
and
the
Director
of
Planning.
This
was
on
our
radar,
so
in
February
2015.
We
were
talking
about
this
very
project,
so
here
we
are
today,
I
think.
The
other
thing
that's
just
important
too,
is
that
every
two
weeks
planning
committee
gets
together.
Okay,
we
get
together.
P
Yesterday,
I
forget
we
had
14
items
more
than
that
the
week
before
we
do
our
due
diligence
and
we
look
at
them
individually
and
I.
Don't
want
anybody
to
think
that
that
hasn't
happened.
So
in
this
case
we
have
the
only
one
of
its
kind
that
we're
going
to
see
a
location
at
the
confirm,
the
where
you
have
the
Trillium
and
the
Confederation
line
meeting.
It's
incredibly
important,
I
think
that
what
we're
seeing
too,
without
having
assurances
is
the
gatineau
starting
to
get
in
the
game.
P
I
think
that
you
know
in
everyone's
life
time
you're
going
to
see
that
a
connection
to
get
know-
and
this
is
going
to
this-
will
have
influence
on
this
site
as
well.
So
I
think
about
the
fact
that
council
supported
the
brownfields
development
just
a
few
last
year.
I
think
it
was
an
eight-point
to
five
million
dollar
grant
last
year,
and
at
that
time
we
heard
that
this
project
fulfills
the
Official
Plan
strategic
directions
and
policies
related
to
intensification
and
helps
us
reach
our
transit
oriented
goals.
P
P
The
proposal,
then,
was
three
tap
tall
towers
when
we
dealt
with
the
encode
weight
with
waiving
the
encroachment
fees
and
reduced
the
development
charges
to
allow
for
the
relocation
of
municipal
infrastructure,
municipal
infrastructure-
that's
been
there
from
the
time
when
the,
when
the
Canadian
rail
system
used
to
a
chug
outside
of
the
underground
of
the
City
of
Ottawa
back
in
those
days
and
to
make
that
land
more
valuable
and
able
to
accommodate
more
people.
I
think
you
know,
as
you
saw,
we've
approved
the
lebreton
East,
which
is
a
forty
five
story.
P
P
A
You
does
anyone
else
wish
to
speak
on
the
matter,
I'd
like
to
say
a
few
words
about
the
the
development
I
think
it's
important
to
remind
ourselves
and
members
of
the
public.
What
this
site
is
all
about.
This
was
a
contaminated
site
that
was
never
going
to
be
developed
without
Council's
support,
as
councilor
harder
mentioned
for
the
brownfield
decontamination,
we
would
have
had
a
vacant
lot
in
perpetuity
with
a
city
sewer
running
through
it.
A
The
proposal
before
us
meets
many
of
our
official
plan
goals
for
intensification,
because
we
talk
a
lot
about
urban
sprawl
and
the
need
to
contain
urban
sprawl
by
intensifying
within
the
green
belt
for
transit
oriented
development.
You
can't
pick
a
better
site
for
Tod,
simply
because
it
is
at
the
junction
of
the
Confederation
line
and
the
Trillium
Line.
A
It's
a
mixed
use
proposal
for
residents
who
need
rental
accommodation,
as
you
saw
just
last
week,
Ottawa
has
the
lowest
rental
vacancy
rates
in
Ontario
and
it
cleans
up
a
decontaminated
site
that
has
been
sitting
there
vacant
for
years.
This
is
a
very
significant
private-sector
investment
to
revitalize
these
lands
that
were
not
really
developable
until
quite
recently,
and
it's
also
a
significant
vote
of
confidence
in
the
future
of
the
lebreton
area.
Recently.
As
you
know,
council
voted
to
proceed
with
the
new
Central
Library
adjacent
to
lebreton
flats.
A
Rental
accommodation,
office
and
retail
space
at
the
juncture,
as
I
mentioned,
of
the
Trillium
and
the
Confederation
lines
on
the
western
edge
of
lebreton
flats
staff,
anticipate
this
development
will
add
over
1.6
million
transit
trips
per
year,
helping
to
sustain
the
long-term
success
of
our
transit
investments.
We
need
this
kind
of
density
at
transit
stations,
we're
seeing
at,
for
instance,
councillor
Tierney's
ward,
significant
towers
in
the
East
End
next
to
some
of
the
stations
on
on
the
Confederation
line
and,
as
everyone
knows,
some
of
question,
the
height
of
the
proposed
towers.
A
Well,
as
members
of
council
know
in
our
city,
legal
staff
have
confirmed
this.
This
proposal
meets
the
test
established
by
counsel
under
OPA
150
to
secure
additional
height,
including
the
following.
The
proposed
development
is
a
mixed-use.
This
is
it's
within
200
metres
of
a
transit
station.
It
is
and
it
meets
the
requirement
for
a
transition.
Staff
are
recommending
an
amendment
to
the
height
at
this
location,
because
this
proposal
meets
the
test
created
by
counsel
under
OPA.
A
150
members
of
council
will
recall
that
o
P
150
was
carried
by
council
six
months
or
so
after
the
passage
of
the
Bayview
station
secondary
plan,
and
it's
quite
clear
to
me
that
the
Official
Plan
tests
are
met
under
this
proposal.
In
closing
I'd
like
to
remind
members
of
council
that
Ottawa
secured
a
number
of
wins
recently
in
spurring
the
creation
of
jobs
across
our
city
surveillance,
new
at
cava,
LC,
I,.
A
In
terms
of
the
jobs
it
will
create
both
full-time
and
construction,
so
we
have
before
us
a
number
of
emotions,
we'll
take
them
in
order
move
by
Councillor
mckinney
second
of
a
councillor
leaper.
This
is
section
37
allocation
of
funds
carried
next
is
by
councillor
harder
side
by
councillor
McKenney,
with
respect
to
delegated
authority
carried
next
is
the
revised
motion
by
councillor
mckinney,
signed
by
councillor
taylor,
with
respect
to
affordable
housing
carried
on
the
motion,
as
amended
carried
percent
by
the
five
here?
A
N
Q
Mr.
mayor,
just
as
our
I
don't
have
traffic
transportation
engineering
staff
who
are
involved
in
this
file
but
I
understand
with
the
improvements
to
the
Boundary
Road
conditions
and
the
fact
that
this
is
located
at
an
interchange
to
highway
417
that
the
the
company,
primarily
for
the
extreme
vast
majority
of
their
trips,
will
be
using
417
just
to
the
interchange
just
to
the
site.
Any
any
trucking
outside
of
that
would
be
primarily
local
traffic
to
making
local
deliveries
so
I
would
not
anticipate
any
significant
change
to
meet
Jones.
Thank.
N
Q
Mr.
mayor,
this
is
different
in
the
from
the
Taggart
Miller,
in
that
Taggart
Miller's
receiving
of
materials
comes
from
city
wide
and
whereas
this
app
facility
receives
bulk
shipments
into
the
facility
through
the
highway
for
17
and
then
redistributes
into
local
delivery
vehicles,
minor
impacts,
distributed
broadly
across
the
city's
transportation
system.
Thank.
N
N
We
work
in
we're
very
happy
to
hear
about
the
traffic
that
we
gonna
put
signalization
on
Mitch
owns
and
whatnot
I
just
wanna.
This
was
gonna,
create
a
lot
of
job
to
our
community
and
it's
very
good
news
for
the
City
of
Ottawa,
so
congratulation
and
congratulation
to
considerably
I
know
he's
not
here
today.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
I
Thank
you
just
to
follow
up
on
what
councillor
drusus
was
referring
to.
I'm
I
did
some
discussions
with
the
mere
Shahadah
the
transportation
engineer
on
this
file.
Understanding,
that's
a
final
model
destination
site.
That's
the
actual
trucks.
The
longer
trucks
are
gonna
be
coming
directly
off
the
site
into
the
facility
will
not
be
using
the
Magellan's
pert
Street
banks
field
corridor,
however,
is
the
next
step
right.
It's
that
it's
the
pure
laters
FedEx,
that's
where
they
go,
knowing
that
FedEx
has
moved
and
that
FedEx
is
over
at
Fallowfield
and
moody
just
off
the
416.
Q
Q
I
G
You,
mr.
mayor
this,
this
motion
is
very
important,
I
think
for
especially
for
the
East
End.
What
we
look
at
in
this
motion
will
create
six
hundred
full-time
jobs
and
they'll
be
middle-class
jobs,
I've
earned
some
people
say,
oh
well.
No-
and
this
is
just
starting-
you
know,
base
salary
type
of
jobs,
but
actually
these
middle-class
jobs,
there's
1,500
jobs
during
the
construction
phase
alone
and
the
you
know
some
issues.
G
G
And
it's
important
to
also
remember
that
when
we're
looking
in
the
East
End,
especially
in
the
Orleans
area
for
my
ward,
is
we've
always
said
that
there's
a
four
percent
of
employment
in
our
community
is
the
lowest
in
Ottawa,
and
that
is
something
that
we've
tried
to
rectify
it.
We've
worked
on
the
CIA,
CIA
CIP
account
and
that's
been
very
successful.
G
In
fact,
CIP
has
been
supported
in
other
areas
of
the
city
and
I
believe
that
this
motion
air
is
a
big
step
forward
for
Orleans,
and
it
is
only
the
start
is
once
LRT
arrives
in
2022.
That
will
show
the
all
levels
of
government
that
Orleans
is
a
destination,
a
choice
and
finally
we're
starting
to
see
some
movement.
Some
very
positive
movement
and
I
encourage
all
members
around
the
council
table
to
strongly
support
this
motion.
Thank
You
mr.
LC.
F
Also,
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
negative
with
this
proposal,
because
we're
in
globalization
err
it's
important
to
stay
connected.
The
East
of
Ontario
Western
Quebec
I,
see
how
we
can
play
a
dominant
role.
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
from
the
East
End.
What
confuses
me?
Don't
I
only
read
the
media
report
this
morning,
but
I
don't
quite
understand.
We
say
we
are
gonna,
give
8
million
in
infrastructure,
so
for
us
we
and
and
also
removing
$800,000
of
redevelopment
charges.
Could
we
have
more
explanations
on
this?
Do
we
have
the
power
today
to
say?
F
Q
Developer
here
is
broccolini
and
broccolini
is
the
beneficiary
of
this
motion
today,
not
Amazon
Amazon's
the
tenant.
However,
broccolini
has
put
an
enormous
amount
of
work
to
bring
this
tenant
to
Ottawa
and
should
be
congratulated
for
their
effort,
the
development
charges
they
will
pay
if
they
paid
the
bill
today,
it
would
not
be
subject
to
any
interest
premium.
They
pay
it
today
we're
just
saying
that
if
they
pay
that
bill
a
year
from
now
we're
charging
them
the
same
amount
without
an
interest
payment.
So
the
forgone
interest
payment
in
this
situation
is
a
hypothetical.
Q
It's,
not
revenue,
we'd
ever
counted
on
having
it's
not
revenue.
We
ever
budgeted
for
it's
not
part
of
our
development
charges,
revenue
and
in
this
specific
instance,
there
is
in
exchange
for
foregoing
that
interest
revenue.
As
councillor
Manette
indicated,
multi
million
dollars
worth
of
infrastructure
improvements
to
this
area
that
benefit
more
than
just
broccolini
site.
They
benefit
all
of
the
sites
in
this
industrial
park
and
that's
money.
We
don't
have
to
spend
ourselves
to
bring
that
infrastructure
there,
so
they
are
creating
a
public
benefit
in
this.
Q
So
the
rationale
we
believe
for
this
motion
is
actually
quite
strong,
above
and
beyond
the
significant
job
creation
in
the
East
End
600
jobs
at
a
time
is
not
something
that
that
happens
here.
So
we
believe
that,
in
addition
of
the
construction
jobs
over
a
thousand
as
well,
we
have
multiple
public
benefits
that
justify
the
motion
before
you
today
and.
L
Q
Mayor
legal
services
and
clerk
staff
did
go
through
a
file
and
we
did
find
a
number
of
instances
in
this
term
of
council,
where
we
have
entered
deferral
arrangements
and
some
instances
where
we
deferred
the
interest.
There
was
one
at
least
one
example
of
another
private
development
on
Richmond
Road
in
councilor,
Taylor's
Ward
during
this
term
of
council,
where
this
was
done.
So
this
is
not
the
first
time
and.
Q
Mr.
Medlin
accounts
was
correct.
They
will
pay
their
everything.
They
were
required
to
pay
on
to
development
charges
just
one
year
later
and
we're
just
not
through
this
motion
charging
them
interest
on
waiting
a
year,
because
the
developer
is
putting
all
this
money
into
infrastructure
construction.
This
year,
they're
not
earning
any
rent
during
this
year,
while
they're
putting
infrastructure
in
and
construction.
So
once
we
get
that
we
will
get
the
development
charges
as
required
under
the
bottle.
As.
C
Q
Mayor
the
proponent
pays
us
development
charges
as
required
they,
above
and
beyond
that
they
are
at
their
own
expense.
Installing
multi
million
dollars
worth
of
infrastructure
upgrades
to
make
the
site
suitable
for
development
that
is
not
coming
through
our
city
tax
dollars.
It's
not
something
we're
required
to
take
money
off
of
other
projects
in
order
to
finance.
So
in
this
situation,
where,
with
the
aggressive
delivery
timeframes,
that
Amazon
requires
at
the
site
be
ready
for,
there's
no
drawn
public
resources
to
get
the
infrastructure
in
place,
the
developers
do
I
not
so.
Q
H
Tierney
great,
thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
Mariner
I'll
tell
you.
First
of
all,
I
was
a
little
bit
disappointed,
unfortunately,
that
we
couldn't
get
unanimous
support
of
Planning
having
two
councillors
vote
against
it
and
again
that's
totally
the
right
is.
That
being
said,
the
confusion
comes
at
when
we
support
arts
court
Innovation,
Center,
G,
CTC
and
as
well
as
community
improvement
plants.
We've
all
supported
those
items
so
when
it
came
to
this
I'm,
just
really
hoping
it's
not
flawed
logic,
and
it's
just
election
fever,
because
this
is
a
great
project
for
the
East
End.
H
This
is
a
great
project
for
the
city.
So,
when
I
look
at
all
I
think
we
all
can
agree
that
if
we
can
live
work
and
play
in
our
communities,
it's
better.
It's
a
lot
less
crosstown
traffic.
It
makes
for
better
communities
in
general
just
by
way
of
history,
just
so
that
people
know
D
and
E
when
they
left
left
Orleans.
It
left
a
void,
amazons
willing
to
come
in
and
fill
that
void,
and
this
is
great
news
not
only
for
the
reason
that
these
600
jobs
with
benefits
are
gonna,
have
to
have
homes.
H
They're
gonna
have
to
pay
taxes.
This
is
very
important
to
the
East
End
when
we
lost
out
on
our
military
moving
out
of
the
neighborhood.
So
I
want
to
be
very
proud
of
this,
and
as
much
as
and
I
know,
it's
not
John
willings
fault
in
the
photo
in
the
Ottawa
Citizen
bobbinet
cropped
out.
But
that
being
said,
the
Eastern
Block
has
worked
very
hard
together
to
ensure
I'm
just
highlighting
that
that
that
working
very
closely
together,
Steve
blame
myself
Bob
and
the
mayor
were
able
to
drive
these
kind
of
results
and
I.
H
A
From
that
area
councillors
blame
on
that
tyranny,
councillor
de
Roos
as
well
for
their
efforts
in
their
support
of
this
project,
which
is
great
news
to
the
East
End.
As
we
all
know,
there
is
a
jobs
to
population
ratio
challenge
that
is
not
favor.
The
East
End
for
some
time,
and
we've
heard
many
many
politicians
over
many
many
years
talk
about.
We
got
to
get
jobs
to
the
East
End.
This.
A
My
friends
is
the
very
first
significant
job
announcement
for
the
East
End,
literally
in
the
memory
of
my
time
on
in
on
City
Council
I,
can't
think
of
another
opportunity
when
a
single
employer
was
bringing
this
number
of
jobs
to
the
East
End
and
we've
all
been
talking
about.
Addressing
that
balance.
Canada
does
very
well
South
End
as
well.
A
The
central
core,
the
East
End,
has
a
need
for
a
greater
job
to
resident
ratio
and
I'm
pleased
that
we
can
finally
continue
the
balance
of
our
economic
growth,
including
the
announcement
and
the
decision
by
riedle
Carlton
Raceway
to
invest
significantly
in
the
south
end
and
now
Amazon
in
the
East
End.
I
also
want
to
thank
Steve
Willis
and
his
team
for
coming
up
with
an
innovative
proposal
that
enabled
us
to
win
out
against
other
municipalities
and
attract
this
investment
to
Ottawa.
A
You
can
well
imagine
the
competition
was
fierce
to
get
600
jobs
in
your
community
and,
as
part
of
this
project,
broccolini
will
invest
a
significant
amount
up
front,
close
to
10
million
dollars,
as
mr.
Willis
pointed
out,
to
bring
water,
hydro
and
gas
to
the
site,
as
well
as
major
required
road
modifications.
Now,
bringing
this
critical
infrastructure
to
these
employment
lands
will
support
more
economic
and
more
job
creation.
In
the
East
End
of
the
city
and
in
exchange
we
will
agree
to
waive
interest
charges
that
would
have
never
been
received
in
the
first
place.
A
Had
the
DC's
not
been
deferred.
This
is
a
two
hundred
million
dollar
investment,
including
bringing
city
infrastructure
to
the
site
and
is
coming
absolutely
no
cost
to
the
city
or
its
taxpayers.
It's
a
great
deal
for
the
residents
and
taxpayers
of
Ottawa,
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
all
members
of
council
to
support
the
motion
that
councilor
blade
brought
forward
yesterday?
Suppose
it
ball
pool
no
residue
in
a
coop.
This.
F
A
I'm
hoping
they
have
had
an
opportunity
to
rethink
after
they've
heard
the
information
from
our
staff.
That
shows
that
this
is
a
good
deal
for
taxpayers
and
it
also
talks
about
our
greater
responsibility
to
act
as
city
councillors,
not
ward
councillors.
You
know,
members
of
the
rural
caucus
have
strongly
supported
a
number
of
very
important
initiatives
throughout
the
city,
mostly
in
the
downtown
core
things
like
the
library,
the
Innovation
Center,
the
Ottawa
Art
Gallery.
These
were
all
very
important
projects
that
everyone
got
behind,
because
it
was
about
city
building.
A
Now
we
have
an
opportunity
for
a
little
bit
of
reciprocity
for
those
individuals
who
would
like
to
support
some
economic
development
in
the
East
End.
So
I'd
encourage
you
to
vote
for
this
resolution.
I
think
it's
a
reasonable
resolution
and
most
important
I
think
it's
a
very
good
deal
for
the
residents,
the
taxpayers
and
the
eastern
part
of
our
city
that,
for
too
many
years
has
been
deprived
of
the
economic
gains.
Other
parts
of
the
city
have
received
so
yeas
and
nays
on
the
motion.
Please!
A
N
C
C
C
A
F
Sorry
that
report
from
the
Ottawa
community
lens
Development
Corporation
entitled
Ottawa
community
lands,
Development
Corporation,
2017
annual
report
annual
our
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
report
committee
report,
36
audit
committee
report,
17
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
report,
36
planning
committee
report,
66
1867,
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
and
solicitor's
office
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
Planning
Act
explanation
requirements
at
the
City
Council
meeting
of
June
27
2018.
They
received
and
adopted
as
amended
very.
A
O
Thank
you
very
much.
I
am
thrilled
to
bring
forward
this
motion.
It's
important
to
me
when
we
see
a
major
piece
of
infrastructure,
especially
like
a
bridge
being
built
that
before
people
start
giving
it
a
name
that
isn't
the
right
name,
that
we
actually
pick
a
name
that
we
that
we
wanted
to
have,
and
so
we
engaged
in
a
in
a
process
very
early,
a
very
public
process
to
take
to
take
names
and
I
tried
to
stay
out
of
it
as
much
as
possible.
O
I
did
not
want
it
to
be
a
case
where
the
counselor
was
trying
to
impose
some
kind
of
name.
I
had
only
one
idea
secretly
in
the
back
of
my
head.
That
was
oh,
please
not
another
male
politician,
sorry
to
rest
of
you
guys
around
the
table.
We
failed
on
one
of
those
fronts.
It
is
another
politician,
but
not
just
another
politician.
In
fact,
the
choice
of
flora
MacDonald
for
this
bridge
is
really
a
choice
of
someone
who
I
would
describe
as
had
a
life
well-lived.
O
O
Some
people
have
asked
I've
received
when
this
was
put
out
as
a
notice
of
motion.
I
received
a
lot
of
feedback
and
it
was
all
positive
with
a
number
of
really
interesting
anecdotes,
except
for
one
question
which
I
think
it's
important
to
ask:
why
just
the
flora
footbridge?
Why
not
the
flora,
MacDonald,
footbridge
and
I
guess
here
sorry
to
all
the
other
McDonald's
out
there,
but
we've
got
a
lot
of
McDonald's
on
various
pieces
of
infrastructure
in
this
city,
but
but
more
important
than
that.
We
knew
that
flora.
O
Macdonald
was
known
to
so
many
people,
again,
very
positively,
simply
as
flora
and
her
own
family,
when
they
heard
about
this
felt.
That
was
very
positive.
In
fact,
I
have
a
quote
from
them
saying
she
would
be
thrilled
to
know
that
this
name
flora,
flora
footbridge,
would
be
going
forward.
It's
how
she
was
known
affectionately
to
many
people
across
this
country
and
and
even
internationally
in
a
lot
of
her
development
work
as
as
well
so,
I
know
that
I've,
given
all
of
this
as
background
to
this
motion,
you've
seen
it
before.
O
But,
quite
simply,
the
motion
before
you
is
to
approve
the
possible
flora
footbridge
as
the
name
for
a
very
important
link
that
is
now
half
complete.
If
you
haven't
seen
it
I
encourage
you
to
go
and
come
down,
Queen
Elizabeth,
driveway
or
or
Colonel
buy
drive,
or
the
Rideau
Canal,
and
a
watercraft
and
you'll
see
a
bridge
now
half
complete
with
another,
really
important
piece
to
go
in
on
Friday
morning
as
well
and
I.
O
A
She
did
that
up
until
near
her
death,
so
she
was
very
much
a
part
of
the
community,
even
though
she
represented
Kingston,
and
she
was
a
great
contributor
to
international
issues
dealing
with
the
treatment
of
women
poverty.
She
was
obviously
very
much
implicated
with
the
Canadian
government's
project
and
the
city
a
project
under
the
leadership
of
former
mayor
Dewar,
with
project
4000
and
the
Vietnamese
boat
people.
She
was
involved,
obviously
in
the
hiding
the
American
diplomats
in
the
Canadian
embassy
during
the
Iran
situation,
but
she
was,
you
know
very
much,
a
leader.
A
The
next
motion
is
by
myself
saying
about
councillor
McKenney.
This
is
a
change
of
date
from
July
14th
to
Monday
July
16th,
as
the
garage
will
be
closed
over
the
weekend.
This
is
to
provide
free
parking
for
people
who
are
coming
on
to
elegance
students.
We
know
there's
significant
construction
taking
place
now
and
there'll
be
even
more
significant
construction
next
year
and
in
order
to
assist
the
res
the
businesses
and
for
that
matter,
the
residents
and
visitors
who
are
coming
down
to
Elgin
Street.
A
We
felt
that
this
was
a
good
investment
to
ensure
adequate
parking
for
people
who
want
to
come
and
take
part
in
shopping
or
eating,
and
some
of
the
fine
establishments
on
Elgin
Street
so
therefore
be
it
resolved.
City
Council
approve
that
free
parking
at
City
Hall
garage
located,
110
Laurier
will
be
provided
during
weekday
evenings
after
6:00
p.m.
and
on
weekends,
beginning
on
July
16th,
and
continue
until
completion
of
the
major
construction
work
on
Hogan
Street,
as
described
in
this
motion
councillor
Manette
thank.
G
You
Miss
Rogers
and
a
quick
clarification
from
staff
right
now.
There's
a
agreement
in
place
with
no
saying
when
there's
a
football
games
and
I'm
believing
for
concerts
also
for
parking
at
City
Hall.
Will
this
affect
the
contract?
Don't
we
have
without
saying
for
games
that
when
they
have
football
games
or
concerts,
and
now
when
we
assured
that
there's
enough
parking
areas
to
accommodate
it,.
Q
Mr.
mayor
mr.
mayor
I,
think
the
instances
of
overlap
are
very
limited
and
we
actually
have
very
substantial
parking
capacity
within
this
building.
So
I
think
it's
unlikely,
there's
a
problem,
but
we'll
certainly
mention
your
concern
to
parking
operations
staff.
Mr.
mr.
Wylie
will
take
that
back
just
to
make
sure
there
are
no
conflicts.
Thank.
A
D
A
motion
with
respect
to
the
speed
reduction
on
Holland
during
the
harmer
Avenue
bridge
replacement,
whereas
the
existing
Harbor
Avenue
pedestrian
bridge,
is
at
the
end
of
its
lifecycle,
is
being
demolished
and
replaced
with
the
new
bridge
that
will
form
part
of
the
city's
active
transportation
network.
And
whereas
construction
has
recently
started
and
is
expected
to
continue
to
the
summer
of
2020.
During
which
time
the
bridge
will
be
closed
to
pedestrians
and
cyclists.
D
And
whereas
the
Holland
Avenue
temporary
detour
from
Kenilworth
street
to
byron
avenue,
was
put
in
place
to
assist
pedestrians
and
cyclists
and
moving
through
this
area.
While
the
construction
of
the
new
Harmar
Avenue
bridge
is
ongoing,
and
whereas
the
community
has
provided
feedback
from
the
temporary
detour,
including
concerns
about
temporarily
reducing
parking
along
Holland
Avenue.
To
facilitate
bike
lanes
during
construction
as
well
as
concerns
about
cyclists
and
pedestrian
safety
in
this
shared
corridor
during
the
construction
period
and
whereas
staff
considered
feedback
from
the
community
and
explored
options
for
a
solution
on
the
temporary
detour.
D
School
speed
zone
on
Holland
Avenue
between
Kenilworth
street
and
Tyndall
Street
would
help
maximize
safety
for
all
users
during
this
temporary
detour.
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
council
approved
the
maximum
speed
limit
on
Holland
Avenue
between
Kenilworth
street
and
Tyndall
street,
be
reduced
from
50
kilometers
per
hour
to
30
kilometers
per
hour,
and
the
school's
own
school
speed
zone
of
40
kilometers
per
hour,
be
removed
during
this
temporary
detour
and
that
all
speed
limit
signage
be
changed
to
reflect.
The
new
designation,
including,
but
not
limited
to
all
road
signs.
D
School
zone
signs
and
sign
is
related
to
temporary
traffic.
Calming
measures
be
it
FURTHER,
RESOLVED
that
council
approved
that
the
cost
for
the
installation
of
new
speed
signs
on
Holland
Avenue
between
Kenilworth
and
Tyndall,
be
funded
by
the
Harmer
Avenue
bridge
replacement
project
budget
and
installed
by
staff
in
coordination
with
the
project
schedule
in
detour.
Okay,.
T
T
A
financial
statement
and
section
88,
3
1/4
of
the
MEA
requires
that
any
surplus
funds
in
the
campaign
it
cannot
be
paid
to
the
clerk
and
whereas,
although
a
candidate,
the
withdraws
will
still
have
some
campaign
expenses
that
must
be
incurred,
including
those
associated
with
hiring
an
auditor
for
preparation
of
a
financial
statement.
The
MEA
does
not
currently
permit
candidates
who
withdraw
to
return
unused
contributions
directly
to
contributors.
The
candidate
can
only
return
contributions.
T
They
are
their
spouse
as
made
to
the
campaign
and
we're
as
unused
contributions
that
were
donated
in
good
faith
to
a
particular
candidate
should
not
become
an
unattended
windfall
for
the
City
of
Ottawa
and
whereas
the
next
review
of
the
MEA
is
expected
to
occur
after
the
2018
municipal
elections.
At
which
point
in
time,
the
city,
clerk
and
solicitor
will
include
a
recommendation
for
the
remediation
of
this
issue
as
part
of
the
standard
process.
T
In
this
regard,
such
that
an
option
be
provided
for
the
return
of
contributions,
with
relief
to
contributors
and
commencer
relief
to
the
donation
cap
for
those
contributors
who
may
be
affected
and
whereas
the
only
tool
available
to
the
City
of
Ottawa
helped
mitigate
the
unintended
consequences
to
contributors
of
withdrawn
candidates.
For
the
2018
municipal
election
is
the
contribution
rebate
program.
T
Whereas
the
MEA
enables
a
municipality
to
pass
a
bylaw
that
provides
for
the
payment
of
rebates
to
a
persons
who
contribute
to
candidates
for
office
on
municipal
council
and
may
establish
conditions
under
which
such
a
rebate
is
paid.
Whereas
the
City
of
Ottawa
first
established
a
contribution
rebate
program
in
2002
and
the
most
recent
updates
to
the
program
were
approved
by
council
on
November
22nd
2017
in
advance
of
the
2018
minutes
of
Elections.
Whereas
under
the
contribution
rebate
program,
individuals
have
contributed
to
participating.
T
Candidates
are
eligible
for
rebate
in
accordance
with
the
formula
provided
for
in
the
bylaw
and
whereas
the
contribution
rebate
program
does
not
specifically
contemplate
a
scenario
where
a
participating
candidate
withdraws
their
nomination
prior
to
the
filing
deadline.
And
whereas
the
city
clerk,
who
solicitors
of
the
opinion
that
a
formula
based
on
75%
rebate
of
contributions
from
individuals
to
withdrawn
candidate,
would
be
a
reasonable
ratio.
T
Should
the
province
not
amend
the
MEA
to
provide
for
these
situations,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
contribution
rebate
program
set
out
in
subsection
13
of
bylaw
2018
33
be
amended
to
provide
that
eligible
contributions
from
individuals
to
those
campaigns
where
the
candidate
has
withdrawn.
Prior
to
the
2018
filing
deadline.
July
27
2018
at
2
p.m.
are
eligible
for
a
75%
rebate
for
their
contribution
to
that
campaign.
T
A
P
P
A
B
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
Jesus
said
that
this
secondary
by
councillor
Manette,
whereas
first
responders,
including
paramedics,
fire
fighters
and
police
officers,
provide
an
invaluable
service
to
the
community
and
whereas
first
responders
in
Ottawa
helped
thousands
of
people
each
year
at
some
of
the
most
difficult
times
of
their
lives.
B
And
whereas
the
city
fathers
support
the
are
out
ongoing
and
tireless
efforts
of
all
of
our
first
responders
and
whereas
first
responders
are
often
the
unsung
heroes
of
an
emergency
situation
and
whereas
around
the
world
first
responders
are
recognized
with
appreciation
weeks
at
different
times
of
the
year.
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
Ottawa
City
Council
declare
October
8th
to
the
15
2018
to
be
the
first
responder
Appreciation
Week
in
the
City
of
Ottawa.
B
A
F
T
Thanks
very
much
mr.
mayor,
this
inquiries
to
mr.
Willis
and
the
planning
departments
a
little
bit
of
background.
The
property
located
at
975
Woodruff
Avenue
in
my
ward,
originally
received
approval
through
site
plan
control
for
eight
townhouse
units
comprised
to
four
bedrooms
each
and
with
one
garage
per
townhouse.
This
project
has
changed
to
now
contain
approximately
97
bedrooms
and
the
loss
of
all
garage
space,
all
without
further
notification
or
consultation
with
the
community.