►
From YouTube: Planning Committee – February 13, 2020
Description
Planning Committee – February 13, 2020 - Audio
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
one
and
two
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
just
mentioned.
Only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
Appeal
Tribunal.
A
Okay,
we
Gretz
we
have
a
counselor,
bleh
and
councillor
Ellie
have
provided
regrets
today,
declarations
of
interests,
confirmation
of
minutes
from
the
meeting
of
January
23
2020
Carrie
response
to
inquiries,
oh
and
I
should
say
that
councillor
suds,
who
is
not
on
the
committee,
but
does
have
item
number
two
and
the
inquiry
today
called
me
last
night
to
say
that
she
is
fully
in.
You
know
she's
happy
with
the
inquiry
she's
fully
in
support
of
the
application
and
she's
going
to
be
out
of
town,
so
I
promised
I
would
pass
that
along
the
first.
A
So
the
response
to
inquiries
that
was
the
club
link
application
right.
If
you
saw
that
so
we
have
a
the
first
item
up
was
deferred
from
the
last
meeting.
The
zoning
bylaw
amendment
30
809
borås
O'kane
Road,
and
if
you
recall,
we
deferred
it
because
the
applicant
had
come
in
with
some
nuances
that
stopped
one
more
time
to
look
at,
and
so
that's
what
we're
dealing
with
that's
a
new
part
of
today
and
we
have
it
before
us
today.
We
have
to
Murphy's
here
and
Hugo
alone
yeah,
so
we're
holding
it
anyway
they're
here.
A
A
B
And
I
spent
some
time
with
the
with
the
documents
over
the
you
know.
The
past
couple
of
days
and
I've
got
to
sort
of
areas
of
concern,
the
first
of
which
is
I've,
been
hearing
assertions
that
this
has
moved
in
the
wrong
order
that
it's
premature
to
include
the
land
within
the
general
urban
area,
because
it
hasn't
been
thoroughly
studied
through
the
CVP
process
and
therefore
it's
premature
to
do
zoning
amendments
that
would
allow
for
residential
uses
on
it.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
understand
how
this
has
played
out.
B
B
B
I
wouldn't
require
an
OPA
once
it's
been
studied
as
part
of
the
expansion
land
CDP,
it
wouldn't
require
an
OPA
to
become
general
urban.
That's
right,
so
the
the
expansion
lands
CDP
or
the
expansion
study
area
CDP
went
through
it
included.
Thirty
eight,
oh
nine,
Boris
okhane,
but
thirty,
eight,
oh
nine
was
simply
labeled
in
the
CDP
as
sand
in
gravel
areas.
I
think.
D
B
The
the
secondary
plan,
the
CDP
process,
moves
ahead.
This
is
referred
to
in
that
CDP
as
sand
and
gravel
madami
and
Minto
paid
for
the
study,
if
I
understand
correctly,
that
deals
with
the
lands
to
the
sort
of
southeast
of
this
particular
property,
and
it
was
intensively
studied,
there's
a
full,
a
full
set
of
studies
that
at
a
very
granular
level
for
the
madami
and
the
Minto
lands,
but
this
property
is
still
just
land
in
gravel
area
in
that
CDP.
Madam.
D
Chair
the
CDP
process
is
very
extensive.
The
with
master
studies
such
as
they
were
no
management
plan,
master
serving
studies,
and
you
know
many
other
studies
and
within
all
those
studies,
the
pit
lands,
including
the
subject.
Property
were
included
in
those
studies,
so
existing
conditions.
The
indications
recommendations
were
all
came
into
a
conclusion
and
a
guidance
in
terms
of
how
development
may
proceed
was
included
in
those
studies
and
the
subdivision
review
process
was
taking
those
recommendations
and
conclusions
into
consideration
in.
B
D
B
D
The
original
concept
was
two
ponds
wines
on
the
drama
land,
which
is
to
the
north
of
the
subject
site.
The
other
one
is
on
the
subject
site
through
the
subdivision
because
of
the
drumming
lands
who
was
going
through
the
rehabilitation
plan.
Actually
they
just
got
a
license
surrender
yesterday,
so
it
was
determined
that
it's
reasonable
to
combine
the
two
pounds
into
one.
So
one
minimize
the
cost
and
the
impacts
requirement
so.
B
A
A
A
B
D
B
D
I'm
chaired
the
moving
the
pond
by
perhaps
150
meters
to
the
north,
closer
to
the
Cambrian
wood.
It
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
it
will
cause
negative
impacts
to
the
can
bring
a
wood.
The
impacts
to
the
wood
is
more
based
on
the
pre-development
and
opposed
to
valen
imbalances
in
terms
of
ground,
water
infiltration
and
a
surface
drainage,
and
this
information
is
reviewed
as
through
the
injury
in
design
as
he
dropped.
Approval
stage
and
I
will
be
further
refined.
I
do
in
that
detail
deal
a
stage
how.
B
B
Okay,
if
I
can't
I
want
to
move,
you
just
mentioned
that
the
the
license
to
surrender
was
granted
and
I
want
to
I
want
to
try
to
understand
that
process
as
well,
because
I
still
don't
understand
from
our
council
meeting
at
which
some
of
these
questions
were
addressed,
who
gets
to
say
that
the
resource
is
exhausted,
there
was
some
back-and-forth.
This
is
a
there's.
A
gravel
pit
here
in
2017
Patterson
said
that
it
would
be.
B
D
Chair
just
to
be
clear,
there
are
two
pits
surrounding
this
site.
The
one
is
the
site
itself
is
known
as
a
Brazil
pit.
The
other
one
is
one
immediately
to
the
north
known
at
the
Drummond
pit,
so
the
drama
pit
just
got
a
confirmation
from
the
ministry
Ministry
of
the
natural
resources
in
the
forestry
that
it
is
surrendered.
So,
therefore,
the
development
of
residential
to
the
nearby
operations
is
not
a
concern
anymore.
D
So,
coming
back
to
the
site
itself,
the
Brazil
pit,
there
are
two
levels
and
documents
that
ensures
the
long-term
protect
protection
to
aggregated
resources.
The
first
one
is
the
provincial
policy
statement,
so
protecting
the
long-term
provision
of
the
aggregated
resources
is
a
provincial
interest
and
when
the
Ministry
of
Natural
Resources
the
forestry
reviews,
the
applicants
proposal
to
surrender
the
license,
they
wouldn't
need
to
take
that
into
consideration
and
the
ministry
is
a
proceeding.
D
Their
license
surrender
process
working
with
staff
clarifying
with
us
that
we
need
to
drive
to
prove
it,
and
we
need
to
provide
a
zoning
before
they
can
actually
proceed
the
surrender
of
the
license.
That
is
a
very
reasonable
for
staff.
To
conclude
that
the
Ministry
has
no
concerns
for
the
land
to
be
developed
as
the
residential
uses.
D
Secondly,
the
Official
Plan
has
a
requirements
to
protect
our
aggregate,
a
resource
and
land,
and
the
applicant
already
provide
sufficient
studies
by
Professional
Engineers,
indicating
that
remaining
materials
on
the
site
are
mostly
Grandda
sand
and
gravel,
which
is
not
on
you,
which
is
calming
Ottawa
area,
which
means
it
doesn't
deserve
to
be
protected.
The
applicant
the
further
plans
to
rehabilitate
to
the
site
with
remaining
materials.
D
B
So
in
the
in
the
staff
report
it
notes
that
the
mineral
resource
extraction
operations
were
recently
wound
down,
as
the
Ministry
of
Natural,
Resources
and
forestry
had
confirmed
that
the
aggregate
resources
on
the
site
have
been
exhausted
and
I'm
still
coming
back
to
to
that
sentence
from
a
couple
weeks
ago,
at
Council
it
sounds
like
Ministry
of
Natural
Resources
have
told
the
city
that
we
are
looking
at.
Oh
sorry
was
Planning
Committee,
weird
in
the
council
chambers
yeah.
D
B
D
B
Those
are
my
questions
I.
Do
wonder
why,
under
the
opie
designation
section
of
the
staff
report,
it
says
the
subject:
property
is
designated
as
general
urban
area
according
to
schedule,
B
of
the
official
plan,
when
Schedule
B
of
the
Official
Plan
still
reads
as
community
expansion
area
and
gravel
or
resource
area.
Madam.
D
B
I'm
gonna
dissent
on
this
one
I
think
the
the
inclusion
in
the
general
urban
area
is
subject
to
it
being
subject
to
the
rigor
of
a
CDP
process
and
I
I,
don't
see
the
same
level
of
rigor
for
this
property.
As
for
the
madami
Minto
lands
that
were
obviously
very
thoroughly
studied
in
the
expansion
study
area.
Cdp
thanks.
A
Jeremy
want
to
wait
until
the
speakers
come
up
because
they
actually
it's
only
in
the
last
few
months
that
they
are
now
here,
come
on
up
sue,
Murphy
and
Hugo
along
worked
for
Chi
van,
but
they
were
mental
for
a
long
time.
So
they
can
speak
specifically
to
ease
any
of
your
concerns
about
what
was
done
or
not
done.
I'm
sure,
so
in
particular,
would
know
about
that.
If
you
have
any
other
questions,
but
you've
asked
a
lot
I.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
myself
and
Hugo
Lala
were
very
involved
in
the
CDP
process
and
the
this
specific
site
came
forward
with
a
concept
planned
near
the
probably
the
in
the
two
and
a
half
years
out
of
the
three
years.
We
did
those
studies
and
we
considered
that
we
brought
into
the
concept
plan.
We
looked
at
it
in
terms
of
continuity
with
the
land
use
plan
and
the
pedestrian
network,
the
road
network,
we
also
included
in
the
master
servicing
study.
E
Therefore,
the
sanitary,
water
and
stormwater
management
solution
was
determined
through
the
master
servicing
study
that
was
approved
by
council,
so
the
servicing
scenario
for
the
lands
were
considered.
As
Lilly
mentioned,
it
went
through
and
included
into
the
CDP,
the
EMP,
the
transportation
master
plan
and
the
MSS,
and
then
any
additional
site-specific
matters
were
addressed
to
the
plan,
a
subdivision
through
the
required
studies
through
the
subdivision,
where
more
details
provided
in
terms
of
the
servicing
solution,
the
environmental
ie
are
the
transportation
impact,
study,
etc.
A
A
A
C
Yes,
this
is
all
truly
technical,
so
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
read
therefore
be
resolved.
That
planning
committee
recommend
council,
amend
the
staff
report,
items
two
three
8:09
Barsky
and
wrote
as
follows:
one
replaced
document,
one
location
map
and
zoning
key
with
the
revised
attached
document,
one
to
replace
document
two
proposed
zoning
bylaw
amendment
with
the
revised
attachment
document.
C
Two
three
replaced
the
statement
found
in
the
section
summary
a
request
of
zoning
bylaw
amendment
proposal,
the
Ministry
of
Natural,
Resources
and
forestry
has
confirmed
the
aggregate
resources
on
the
site
have
been
exhausted,
with
the
Ministry
of
Natural,
Resources
and
forestry
have
confirmed
that
the
pit
license
surrender
process
has
been
initiated
and
four
replaced.
The
statement
the
Ministry
of
Natural,
Resources
and
forestry
has
deemed
the
site
to
be
exhausted.
Of
aggregate
no
longer
require
protection
found
in
the
planning
rationale.
C
A
A
C
C
A
Good,
no,
it's
not
I
can
tell
you
have
something
else.
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
so,
on
the
technical
amendment
carried,
are
you
always
hang
on
a
minute?
Are
you
ready
for
that?
Counselor
we've
heard
you
want
us
just
to
pause
for
a
minute,
okay,
so
on
the
technical
amendment
area
and
on
the
report
as
amended
carried
dissent,
but
maybe
changing
by
council.
B
A
Gonna
get
you
that
yeah
well
I'm
going
to
make
sure
you
get
that
Lily,
we'll
make
sure
you
get
that
and
I'm
sorry,
yeah,
Greg
and
James
I
didn't
see
you
were
here,
but
I.
Imagine
that
you're
good
with
hello
right!
Okay!
Thank
you!
Okay!
So
it's
don't
have
to
worry
about
whether
we're
going
to
go
along
for
lunch
or
anything.
Knowing
camera
items,
any
notices
of
motion
inquiries.