►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council - August 31, 2022
Description
Ottawa City Council - August 31, 2022
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
This
award
denise
recognizes
individuals
or
organizations
that
have
demonstrated
an
extraordinary
commitment
to
making
our
city
a
better
place
through
volunteerism
or
exemplary
action,
so
please
visa
they
want.
We
want
to
recognize
the
people
organization
that
try
to
make
from
our
city
the
best
a
nice
place
to
live.
A
This
has
volunteered
at
the
osgood
emergency
food
cupboard
for
over
25
years.
She
is
widely
considered
in
the
community
as
the
glue
that
holds
the
food
cupboard
together
in
the
basement
of
saint
john.
The
evangelist
catholic
church
denise
opens
the
food
cover
each
saturday
from
10
a.m.
To
noon,
to
provide
healthy
food
for
her
less
fortunate
neighbors.
The
food
has
to
come
from
somewhere
and
denise
works
closely
with
the
greeley
lions
club
at
area,
schools
to
run
food
drives
to
maintain
a
food
supply.
A
I'm
told
that
denise
will
sometimes
use
her
own
money
during
quieter
months
to
ensure
a
supply
of
staple
goods.
Food
shortage
is
often
the
case
at
this
time
of
year.
Schools
are
closed
for
the
summer,
which
means
students
aren't
holding
any
drives
and
the
food
cupboard
isn't
as
full
as
it
needs
to
be,
but
denise
will
stock
up
on
items
like
cereal
and
peanut
butter
to
make
sure
no
one
goes
hungry.
A
Denise
provides
the
lions
with
details
on
the
family
size
to
ensure
enough
food
is
provided,
and
the
lions
club
mentioned
that
this
is
their
favorite
annual
event.
They
think
they
find
it
very
rewarding
and
are
very
thankful
for
denise's
efforts
in
organizing
it
for
her
exceptional
volunteerism
and
her
important
contributions
to
the
community.
It's
my
pleasure
on
behalf
of
your
call,
my
colleague
and
your
counselor
george
derose,
to
present
the
mayor's
city
builder
award
to
denise.
Congratulations.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
It
became
a
fundraising
wing
for
the
organized
recreational
programs
for
residents
and
created
a
friendship
club
to
reduce
resident
loneliness.
The
association
the
association
became
a
fundraising
wing
of
the
center
and
they
are
there
to
help
the
residents
around
family
and
friends
to
ensure
the
well-being
and
best
quality
service
and
comfort
for
residents.
A
A
A
Mobility
friendly,
so
all
residents
can
enjoy
it
extraordinary
to
talk
about
the
extraordinary
action
of
the
organization
and
its
contribution
to
the
community.
It's
a
pleasure
for
me
to
give
her
the
builders
award
as
the
president
of
the
association
of
the
auxiliare
de
santra
decay.
I
would
like
to
invite
our
colleagues
to
come
over.
A
It's
a
real
honor
and
privilege
to
receive
the
builders
award
on
behalf
of
the
champlain
center,
it's
possible
to
work
with
them,
with
the
continued
support
that
we
have
from
the
council
in
the
city
of
ottawa.
This
is
a
work
that
we're
doing
to
improve
our
city.
I
would
like
also
to
thank
mr
metzger
fleury
over
the
last
few
years.
A
We
wanted
to
improve
the
quality
of
life
of
the
resident
and
that's
the
reason
why
we're
today
accepting
the
builder's
award
to
the
city
of
ottawa
residents
and
our
number
association,
of
which
there
are
too
many
to
name
for
their
financial
and
attendance
during
our
fundraisers
campaign.
Thank
you.
Merci.
A
A
Parkland
dedication,
bylaw
replacement
and
cash
in
lieu
of
parkland
funds
policy
revision,
councillor,
gower
and
moffat
have
a
an
amendment.
Councillor
gower,
please
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
So
this
is
a
technical
amendment,
whereas
the
report
proposes
the
repeal
of
bylaw
2009
95,
as
amended
being
the
parkland
dedication,
bylaw
and
adoption
of
the
new
parkland
dedication.
Bylaw,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
A
Okay,
thank
you!
So
counselor
meehan
is
yours,
a
quick
question,
or
should
we
come
back
to
this?
Well,
I
would
like
us,
mr
mayor
to
I
think,
come
back
to
us.
I
think
that
right
we'll
do
that.
I
think
this
is
important
that
we
should
have
a
bit
of
a
discussion.
Thank
you,
okay.
So
we'll
come
back
to
that
item.
13.2
zoning
bylaw
amendment
108,
nepean
street
and
257
lisker
there'll
be
discussion
on
that
same
with
the
next
item
on.
A
A
Therefore,
be
it
resolve
that
the
zoning
amendment
report
in
respect
of
100
stacey
drive
be
deferred
until
the
next
regular
meeting
of
council
and
be
it
further
resolve
that
no
further
notice
be
given
pursuant
to
the
planning
act.
Subsection,
3417.,
okay,
on
deferral
carried
right
next
excuse
me,
is
application
for
demolition
of
new
construction
at.
A
Thank
you.
Whereas
report
acs
2022
p,
I
e
g
n
zero
zero.
Four
zero,
zero.
Zero
four
sorry
proposes
implementing
a
community
benefit
charge
to
ensure
that
growth
pays
for
growth
and
whereas,
pursuant
to
principal
legislation,
section
37
of
the
planning
act
will
lapse
on
security
of
2022,
removing
the
ability
for
the
city
to
capture
density
bonusing
for
significant
developments,
and
whereas
there
are
developments
that
would
typically
be
subject
to
section
37
agreement,
but
for
which
an
agreement
has
not
been
made.
Unfortunately,
the
intent
is
to
finalize
an
agreement
prior
to
18th.
A
Council
approved
that
all
development
applications
for
which
a
complete
application
has
been
received
and
which
would
otherwise
be
required
to
enter
into
section
37
agreement,
but
for
which
there
is
no
agreement.
As
of
adoption
of
the
community
benefits,
charge,
bylaw
will
be
exempt
from
the
transitionary
provisions
under
clause.
26
of
the
proposed
community
benefits
charge
bylaw
as
detailed
document
3,
and
that
the
draft
by
law
be
amended
accordingly.
A
Just
a
quick
question
to
staff
on
the
motion
screen
right
right.
I
I
see
no
red
flag
immediately
when
I
read
the
motion
and
hear
it
now,
but
I
I
want
to
understand.
Most
properties
do
not
have
section
37.,
so
can
you
just?
Can
I
just
hear
it
in
terms
of
once
the
cbc
charge
and
this
transition
clauses
passed,
the
new
cbc
charge
would
apply
to
properties
who
typically
had
not
required
a
section
37
benefit
but
withstanding.
A
A
B
A
A
A
Which
is
zoning
bylaw,
101
and
201
nipissing
court
councillor?
If
you
want
to
just
introduce
the
the
motion,
do
you
have
a
seconder?
I
believe
it's
councillor
curry,
because
it
is
in
toronto?
Oh
yeah,
I
think
your
counselor
created
for
all
three
of
yours.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
is
that
correct?
Yes,
so
I
think
you
can
just
do
the
summary
counselor,
because.
C
E
C
And
the
purpose
of
the
report,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
report
be
amended
and
the
clerk's
team
is
scrolling
it
on
the
screen
there
I'll.
Let
you
go
through
that.
I
won't
read
all
of
these.
All
of
these
changes,
therefore,
be
it
resolve
that
there
be
no
further
notice
pursuant
to
section
3417
of
the
planning
act.
B
And
commercial
at
525,
leggett,
drive
and
359
terry
fox
drive
and
whereas
staff
identified
ambiguity
and
document
two
details
of
recommended
official
plan
amendments
and
whereas
staff
identified
an
error
in
document
three
details
of
recommended
zoning,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
The
document
two
be
amended
by
deleting
the
words
and
the
attached
schedules
from
document
to
part
b.
The
amendment
section
1
introduction
and
therefore
be
it
further
resolve.
The
document
3
be
amended
by
replacing
the
words
at.
B
A
B
B
A
B
In
document
to
detail
of
recommended
zoning,
therefore,
we
resolve
that
document
to
be
amended
by
replacing
the
tax
in
document
2
section
1b
with
the
text
and
replacing
the
text
in
document
through
section
2a
with
the
text
and
replacing
the
text
in
document
2,
section
3
with
the
text
hn
replacing
the
text
in
document
2,
section
4a
with
the
text
and
further
and
therefore
the
result
and
then
no
further
notes.
Pursuant
to
subsection
3417
after
planning
out
there's
a
lot
of
replacement
of
x's
there.
So.
B
B
I
A
D
E
Piling
on
to
the
people
who
we
require,
we
need
to
build
our
homes
in
this
city,
so
I'm
wondering
if
and
there's
one
provision
actually
in
in
the
the
motion
that
I
just
want
to
read,
because
I'm
wondering
if
this
should
be
discussed
before
we
actually
approve
it
says
we're
going
to
direct
staff.
As
part
of
this,
this
proposal
direct
staff
to
review
the
accumulated.
L
E
A
Build
the
homes
make
them
as
affordable
and
when
we
add
on
those
prices,
are
going
to
go
back
onto
the
people
who
are
going
to
buy
them
so
if,
but
if
they
can't,
their
margins
are
getting
too
thin.
I
think
I'm
worried
that
some
of
the
developers
are
just
going
to
pick
up
and
move
someplace
else.
So
I
was
hoping
that
we
could
have
a
discussion
today
about
tipping
points,
and
you
know,
is
anyone
else
worried
that
this
will
have
the
reverse
effect
that
we
really?
You
know
that
we're
hoping
to
have
yes,
growth.
E
Should
pay
for
growth-
and
I
want
to-
I
would
love
to
see
more
green
space
everywhere,
but
if
it's
not
possible,
I
mean
yes,
the
developers
have
deep
pockets
and
you
know
they
they.
You
know
we
want
them
to
pay
their
their
fair
share.
But
are
we
at
that
tipping
point?
That's
what
I'm
asking
today
I.
I
would
hope
that
some
of
you
have
concerns
about
this
as
well.
A
A
This
is
any
any
policy
or
any
fees
that
we
add
have
an
impact
on
housing
in
our
city.
So
I'm
definitely
concerned,
I
would
say
I
take.
I
take
the
feedback
we've
had
from
developers
very
seriously.
They've
told
us
that
any
additional
fees
or
any
additional
policy
that
we
add
has
an
impact,
I
believe
them
the
extent
to
which
it
impacts
the
viability
of
housing.
I
think
I
do
take
with
the
grain
of
salt
and
we've
had
some
good
advice
from
our
staff
at
committee
around
what
the
true
impact
may
be.
A
K
Reasonable
targets
with
what
we
want
to
achieve
on
parkland
in
our
city
and
we
have
parkland
dedication
and
cash
and
you
as
a
financial
option
to
pay
for
that.
It
may
not
be
the
perfect
way
to
do
that,
but
it
is
the
option
and
it
is
the
legislative
ability
that
we
have
to
collect
money
and
to
collect
land
for
parkland.
K
K
G
A
A
Of
good
stuff
in
here
it's
just
when
you
add
it
to
all
the
other
things
that
I
think
we
we've
got
to
find
a
way
to
mitigate
the
impact
here
on
the
cost
of
new
homes,
so
that
we
can
continue
to
build
in
transit-oriented
development
areas
and
as
well
as
across
the
city,
to
meet
the
future
needs
of
residents
of
the
city
for
what
the
projected
housing
needs
are
going
to
be.
And
this
does
not
contribute.
E
E
A
N
A
O
The
problem
we
have
is,
we
may
have
the
money
to
buy
it,
but
there's
no
land
and
they're
not
making
any
new
land.
So
that
becomes
an
issue,
but
the
cost
of
housing
is
one
of
the
major
drivers
for
the
price
of
housing,
which
is
also
a
driver
regarding
affordable
housing.
So
I
think
we
should
have
kept
that
in
mind
and
had
this
discussion
earlier
so
I'll
be
dissenting
at
this
point:
okay,
kel's
dragging
lightly.
O
A
H
C
Done
so,
I
concur
with
with
co-chair
gower
that
this
is
a
prudent
way
forward
and
there
will
be
a
review
and
we'll
see
how
it
works.
But,
right
now
people
are
very
concerned
about
moving
into
neighborhoods
from
buying
homes
where
they
don't
have
any
facilities
where
they
don't
have
any
parks
and
so
to
cancer
means
point.
The
developers
are
going
to
pick
up
and
leave
equally.
C
I
think
people
could
pick
up
and
leave
and
say
we're
going
to
move
to
a
town
where
there
are
parks
we're
going
to
move
to
a
city
where
there
are.
There
are
recreational
facilities
close
by
and
we
can
have
a
15-minute
neighborhood.
So
we
have
to
balance
that,
but
I
think
this
is
a
reasonable
balance.
I
think
it's
good
work
by
staff
and
the
proviso
to
bring
it
back
after
a
reasonable
period
of
time
see
what
the
overall
impacts
have
been
and
to
amend
it
or
tweak
it.
C
A
Thanks,
I
just
know:
there's
a
bit
of
confusion
as
to
what
we're
talking
about
there
was.
This
is,
of
course,
the
parkland
policy.
The
community
benefits
charge
is
something
that
will
come
later.
I
know
they're
they're,
two
extra
things
that
do
seem
to
add
cost
to
to
housing,
but
I
mean
we
talk
about
cumulative
effects
of
the
various
policies,
including
high
performance
development
standards,
development
charges.
K
A
If
you're
going
to
vote
against
something
because
of
a
cumulative
effect,
what's
the
replacement,
so
section
37
is
gone
as
of
september.
18,
section
37
doesn't
exist.
That's
why
the
community
benefits
church
is
coming
in.
We
already
have
a
parkland
policy
on
cashflow,
parkland,
that's
what
this
is
we're
just
looking
to
revise
it
so
that
we're
making
more
sense
of
applications
as
to
when
they
come
forward
as
to
what
type
of
building
it.
A
Do
you
want
to
shift
away
from
charges?
Do
you
want
to
add
an
exemption
development
charge?
Do
you
want
to
make
the
downtown
core
once
again
development
charge,
free
or
tods
development
charge
free?
You
can
do
that,
but,
of
course,
you'll
have
to
say
well,
where's
the
money
going
to
come
from
what
that
it's
a
tax.
K
Base
and
bring
the
taxes
up
higher
to
accommodate
the
thing
that
you
just
pulled
away:
money
from
no
one
out
there
is
saying:
hey:
listen.
We
have
too
much
money
to
spend
on
on
dc
projects.
So
can
you
slow
down
with
all
the
dc
projects
that
you're
doing,
because
you
have
so
much
money?
No
one's
actually
telling
us
that
all
the
various
things
that
we
have
none
of
these
things
get
more
affordable
as
we
go.
K
So
if
you
want
to
defer
items,
if
you
want
to
freeze
development
charges,
if
you
want
to
defer
community
the
benefits
charge,
if
you
want
to
just
forego
certain
things,
you
can
do
that,
but
you're
not
actually
making
the
job
any
easier
for
the
next
term
accounts
to
determine
council.
After
that,
these
things
don't
become
less
expensive
in
the
years
ahead.
So
even
if
you
delayed
something
for
two
three
four
years,
none
of
this
becomes
cheaper.
A
To
do
the
problem
doesn't
go
away
just
because
we
push
it
off
because
we're
you
know
pretending
that
it's
going
to
make
things
more
affordable
for
people,
so
I
think
you
have
to
you
have
to
look
at
it
more
and
just
just
in
the
in
the
silo
of
someone
saying
that
hey
listen,
all
these
things
are
all
these
things
are
adding
pressures
to
us
nobody's
talking
about
any
solutions.
Every
time
someone.
K
K
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
This
is
certainly
going
to
make
parkland
dedication
a
little
more
expensive
for
the
developers,
but
we
need
the
parks
in
response
to
the
council
from
college
board's
question
about
how
much
is
being
spent
on
things
like
park
renewals
versus
acquisition.
I
can
say
that
in
kitchissippi
you
know
we
are
pivoted.
A
K
Proper
park
facility
without
crossing
a
major
road-
and
you
know
that
parcel
was
expensive.
Land
is
not
inexpensive
in
wellington
village.
So,
in
order
to
be
able
to
provide
a
park,
I
need
to
have
some
resources
available
in
order
to
be
able
to
do
that.
This
is
an
increase
in
how
much
we're
collecting
for
parkland.
But
it's
not
a
change
in
approach.
A
D
Have
been
so
clear
that
we
need
more
parks,
not
fewer,
we
don't
have
an
alternative
measure.
This
is
the
tool
that
the
province
has
given
us
and
I
will
absolutely
be
supporting
the
the
staff
recommended
approach.
Thank
you
very
much
mayor.
Thank
you,
council
center.
Please
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mia,
and
if
I
can
ask
dan
or
kevin
where
why
is
now-
and
maybe
you
can
explain
it
why
this
report
came
now.
D
Mr
mayor,
as
has
been
mentioned,
much
like
the
community
benefits
charge
september,
18th
is
a
deadline
that
the
province
has
set
by
which
the
city
has
to
replace
its
part.
Dedication
by
law,
and
so
staff
have
worked
quite
a
bit
over
the
the
last
year
to
be
in
a
position
to
bring
this
forward
in
time
for
the
deadline.
D
So
my
understanding,
if
we
don't
pass
this
today,
we
go
back
to
the
old
policy
which
is
you'll,
be
able
to
collect
less
targets.
That's
my
understanding,
correct.
That
is
correct,
mr
mayor.
If
this
policy
is
not
approved,
then
the
city
would
no
longer
be
able
to
take
the
take
the
same
level
of
parkland
dedication
as
development
applications
come
forward,
and
is
it
correct
my.
G
In
mind
so
based
on
the
consultant's
report,
we
did
pull
back
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
the
charge
that
would
go
to
high
density
development,
but
still
bring
us
a
step
forward
in
terms
of
a
more
equitable
application
of
the
food.
Okay.
Thank
you,
mr
shiny.
Thank
you,
mr
man.
Thank
you.
Councillor
cavanaugh,
please.
G
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
very
much
like
my
colleague
in
kitchissippi,
I'm
seeing
the
need
for
acquiring
parkland
and
it's
going
to
be
happening
as
particularly
as
we
build
the
stage
2
stations
and
we're
having
development
around
those
stations.
We
need
to
balance
that
out,
and
this
is
the
only
way
we
can
developers
come
in.
They
have
a
parcel
of
land,
they're,
filling
it
with
residential
units,
that's
what
we're
asking
for,
but
we
need
some
balance
out
and
we
need
more
green
space.
G
A
lot
of
these
areas
don't
have
enough
green
space
as
it
is.
So
that's
the
one
pressure
point
that
we
need
to
deal
with,
so
I
appreciate
the
work
that
has
been
put
into
this
by
staff.
I
think
this
should
go
forward
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
very
beneficial
to
areas
that
are
seeing
this
intensification,
particularly
around
transit
stations.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you.
Counselor,
kids,
please,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
You
know,
I
think,
we've
heard
a
couple
times
today
that
this
seems
to
be
an
imperfect
solution,
but
you
know
deferral
would
obviously
have
a
detrimental
impact
on
what
we're
able
to
collect
for
our
community.
So
a
question
to
staff:
can
you
explain
why
the
review
on
the
accumulated
impact
is
set
at
three
years
and
would
it
be
helpful
to
have
that
review
conducted
sooner.
G
Mr
mayor,
the
cumulative
review
was
a
recommendation
by
councillor
gower
at
planning
committee,
and
we
agreed
to
it
because
there
are
several
items
still
to
come.
The
impact
of
community
benefits
charges
will
be
learned
as
we
go
plus
we
have
the
development
charge
bylaw
being
reviewed
by,
I
believe
it's
may
of
2024.
K
K
K
K
Community
housing
is
important
and
this
is
a
way
to
ensure
that
we
are
not
harming
in
any
way
the
viability
of
non-profit
housing
development
anywhere
in
our
city.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Okay.
So
we
have
the
motion
by
councillor
gower
seconded
by
councillor,
moffett
carried
and
then
the
main
report.
As
amended
yeas
and
nays,
I've
been
called.
Q
Q
H
Just
some
minor
procedural
note
in
the
final
agenda,
there's
a
note
that
says
the
position
of
ward
counselor.
This
report
is
city-wide
in
nature
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
note
for
the
clerk's
office
to
make
sure
that
it's
in
the
final
agenda
or
final
report
from
this
meeting.
It's
not
a
city,
ward,
a
city-wide
report,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
disposition
from
this
meeting
reflects
the
correct
information.
H
Okay,
clerk
has
noted
that
so
on
this
item,
carrie
carey
next
is
item
14
planning
committee
reports,
66,
sony,
bylaw
amendment,
142,
144
and
148
nepean
and
demolition,
142,
nepean
street
and
councillor
gower,
I
believe,
has
a
motion
signed
by
councillor
moffitt,
so
councillor
gara.
If
you'd
like
to
introduce
the
motion
on
item
14,
please
thank
you.
So
this
is
regarding.
C
H
Report
66
item
1
be
replaced
with
the
document
attached
to
this
motion.
The
very
quick
explanation
of
this
is
at
the
planning
committee
discussion
last
week
a
number
of
counselors
raised
concerns
with
the
applicant
or
asked
the
applicant
to
make
this
change
in
the
memorandum
of
understanding
staff
has
agreed
to
it.
The
applicant
has
agreed
to
it.
In
fact,
I
understand
the
applicant
has
already
signed
the
mou
reflecting
this,
so
procedurally
just
want
to
ensure
that
this
is
reflected
in
the
final
information
that's
approved
by
council
today.
P
P
This
is
a
difficult
file,
sometimes
to
follow,
because
we've
got
three
different
owners
asking
for
two
different
things,
and
these
these
reports
should
have
never
been
linked.
The
precedence
that
this
sets
at
council
at
this
council
really
is
could
lead
us
down
a
path
where
we
are
removing
missing
middle
housing,
affordable
market
housing
in
order
to
provide
more
parking
anywhere
in
this
city,
and
just
a
couple
weeks
ago
we
were
taught
you
know
I
like
to
talk
about
housing,
affordability.
P
What
we
don't
have
enough
of
in
this
city
is
this
type
of
housing.
We
do
not
have
enough
affordable
market
rental
for
individuals
for
families,
and
these
these
small
buildings
are
scattered
across
our
city.
What
we
do
have
a
lot
of
is
parking
excess
parking
in
what
is
a
housing
emergency
that
we're
living
through?
We
had
two
over
2
000
people
last
night,
sleeping
in
a
shelter
or
outside
in
this
city.
We've
got
hundreds
of
families,
children
living
in
motels,
our
staff
work
hard
to
house
people,
but
for
every
one.
O
You
know
new
housing
at
least
two
two
out
of
the
six,
but
people
fled
as
soon
as
they
heard
that
this
was
coming.
People
get
worried,
they
worry
about
their
children,
they
worry
about
their
kids
in
school.
You
know
having
their
their
housing
taken
from
them.
So
it's
a
it's
just
it's
it's
not
the
conversation
that
we
should
be
having
in
2022
in
the
middle
of
a
housing
emergency
and
a
climate
crisis.
O
So
we've
got
you
know,
we've
got
a
lot
right
beside
142,
where
two
homes
came
down
a
few
years
ago
and
I
worked
hard
to
with
staff
to
ensure
that
they
wouldn't
be
turned
into
a
parking
lot,
that
we
would
see
development
there
and
I
got
pushed
back
and
pushed
back,
and
here
we
are
today
and
we're
looking
at.
You
know
we're
looking
at
turning
the
entire
lot
into
a
parking
lot
and
there
are
hundreds
of
parking
spaces
not
being
used
within
a
two
block
radius
of
this
lot.
O
So
if
we
allow
ourselves
to
be,
you
know
held
hostage
here
with
an
applicant
that
says:
well,
I
won't
you
know.
We
can't
won't
build
this
unless
you
allow
us
to
take
down
this.
Where
does
it
end?
Where
do
we
say?
No,
and
quite
frankly,
if
there
were
you
know
if
this
really
was
just
about
more
stock,
which
we
all
want,
nobody
doesn't
want
more
housing
stock.
Why
not
take
down
a
142
and
then
build
on
that
entire
parking
lot
easily
could
accommodate
yet
another
trade.
M
Have
to
encourage
more
people
to
take
transit.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
councillor,
councilman
aaron.
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
and
I
want
to.
I
just
want
to
go
to
staff
just
to
make
sure
on
this
vote
that
we're
getting
to
where,
where
I'm
trying
to
get
to,
which
is
that
the
parcel
for
142
can
remain
residential
lot,
whether
it's
that
six
unit
or
another
residential
in
the
future,
it
remains
residential
and
that
the
rest
of
it.
The
rest
of
the
proposal.
You've
already
approved
the
300
units,
but
the
144
148.
M
Is
allowed
for
service
parking
where
there's
ample
space
with
no
residential
there
now,
so
I
just
I
want
to
get
to
that.
To
make
sure
staff
have
a
motion.
I
did
talk
to
the
clerk
earlier,
where
council
can
vote
on
that,
specifically
so
the
300's
passed
already,
but
the
142,
the
one
piece,
which
is
about
eight
parking
spots
by
our
map,
eight
to
ten,
that
one
would
remain
residential,
so
staff
can
work
on
that.
That'd
be
great,
and
here
here's
the
rationale
for
it.
M
We
had
60
parking
spots
here
before
in
total,
okay,
so
we're
trading
that
now
for
a
166
space,
underground
parking
garage
and
then
they're
also
asking
for
30
space
surface
lot
so
196
spots,
so
we're
giving
up
60
spaces
and
get
they're
giving
up
60
and
getting
196
in
return,
and
they
talked
a
lot
at
planning
committee
about.
I
think
their
term
was
controlling
their
own
parking
destiny,
okay,
and
so
I
think,
giving
up
a
60
space
parking
lot
to
get
196
in
return.
M
You
can
control
your
parking
destiny
that
way,
and
so
what
we're
saying
is
look,
let's
not
rezone
something
for
surface
parking
lot.
For
those
eight
spots
and
let's
keep
the
residential
there,
there's
no
way
that
that
27
story
development
is
going
to
be
contingent
on
tearing
down
142
for
eight
parking
spaces
there's
no
way,
and
if
it
is,
then
that's
just
foolish
and
completely
unreasonable
and
I
don't
think
we
want
to
negotiate
with
people
that
are
unreasonable.
M
So
in
this
case
I
guess
I'm
asking
staff
to
tell
us
how
we
can
make
sure
we're
voting
for
the
rest
of
this,
but
on
that
one
piece
for
those
eight
we're
talking
eight
parking
spaces
instead
of
the
residential
housing
and
rezoning
for
it.
Please
tell
us
how
we
can
vote
against
that
one
piece.
I
don't
think
it's
just
clause
b,
I
think,
there's
a
clause,
a.
D
C
D
C
D
Given
this
is
radon
lrt
and
we
have
a
new
official
plan
which
says
we
should
be
doing
the
opposite
to
what
this
this
motion
says.
So,
if
we
can
draft
that
up,
I
just
gave
a
heads
up
previously
and
I'm
asking
staff
to
draft
something
so
that
council
can
have
that
vote
on
that.
One
piece
councillor:
you
can
vote
against
the
specific.
C
Recommendation
item
two,
which
is
the
demolition:
if
you
don't
want
that,
so
I'm
not
sure.
Well,
no,
that's
the
concern
I
hear
saying
mayor
and
and
I'll
certainly
vote
against
the
item
b,
but
it's
that's
not
going
to
do
it
for
the
rezoning
and
that's
my
concern
is
we're
rezoning,
a
residential
for
surface
parking
for
eight
parking
spaces,
and
it's
just
it's
not
reasonable.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
in
clause
a
we
remove
142,
I'm
sure
staff
can
draft
this
up
fairly
easily.
C
R
R
We
are
building
a
27-story
development
here,
there's
going
to
be
166
underground
parking
spaces
there
they're
going
to
have
other
surface
parking
at
144
148..
All
we're
doing
here
is
preventing
eight
parking
spaces
from
taking
over
residential.
We
shouldn't
be
rezoning
residential
for
service,
no
matter
what
the
situation
and
councilor
mckinney's
comments
around
affordable
housing
and
surface
parking,
and
this
area
are
bang
on,
and
we
need
to
listen
to
that
in
terms
of
how
these
things
were
linked.
R
So
I
think
we
can
support
the
development
they're
going
to
build
it
here,
but
those
eight
parking
spaces.
I
think
they
can
find
eight
parking
spaces
somewhere
else,
so
let's
be
reasonable
and
and
work
together
on
this.
Thank
you,
mayor.
Okay,
councillor
shirelle,
thank
you,
your
worship,
when
we
I
I've,
listened
to
how
various
counselors
are
talking
about
dealing
with
this
and.
N
If
it's
actually,
what
council
wants
to
do
is
to
buy
the
property,
but
one
thing
everyone
seems
to
be
forgetting
here
is
we
do
not
own
this
property
and
the
property
owner
has
rights
and
has
come
forward
exercising
those
rights
with
a
plan
and
as
part
of
an
overall
proposal,
there
is
a
net
gain
of
housing
units
to
this
area
of
a
significant
number
over
290.
I'm
not
sure
what
the
exact.
C
C
K
A
K
K
You
know
a
bigger
picture.
This
is
a
block
that
is
entirely
transforming
from
surface
parking
lot
to
high
high
density
residential
development.
You
know
287
lisker,
already
already
switched
from
a
surface
parking
lot
to
a
to
a
high
rise,
and
we've
already
approved
buildings
to
the
west
of
of
these
properties.
For
that
same
that
same
switch.
A
E
E
And
where,
let's
say
och's
rentals
are
out
it's
it's
a
huge
discrepancy
and
something
needs
to
be
addressed
but
can't
be
addressed
by
a
municipality
alone.
It
needs
to
be
more
involvement
in
that,
but
on
this
one
alone
and
the
comment
I
made
at
that
committee-
there's
people
here-
there's
people
involved
here.
E
S
E
E
D
A
Residents
of
142
it
doesn't
make
it
brighter.
It
doesn't
guarantee
that
they're
going
to
have
a
better
deal
in
the
future.
I
think
that's
that's
again.
What
I
said
at
committee
is:
where
is
where
I
sort
of
fall
on
this,
that
it
we
can
make
a
decision
today
that
risks
that
memory
of
understanding
risks
what's
being
offered
to
these
tenants,
and
I
don't
think
it's
a
risk
that
I'd
be
willing
to
take
similar
to
other
agreements
that
we've
had
elsewhere,
that
I
can
sleep
at
night,
I'm
fine!
I
have
a
home.
A
K
All
together
and
it
becomes
a
better
scenario
for
the
downtown
core
and
less
surface
parking,
but
I
think
the
fact
that
this
isn't
being
zoned
for
permanence.
I
know
there's
a
concern
that
it'll
switch
that
way,
but
ultimately,
I
think,
what's
in
front
of
us,
it's
a
better
scenario
than
if
we
kick
this
down
the
road
and
just
hope
for
the
best
for
the
residents
at
142..
A
Council
right,
lively.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
could
just
firstly
a
question
to
staff,
so
the
the
motion
that
councilor
menards
asked
to
be
drafted
and
the
comments
that
councilmoff
had
just
made
about
not
being
a
permanent
change
in
zoning.
Can
staff
comment
on
that?
What
are
the
parameters
of
the
zoning
remaining
parking
under
what
conditions
for
how
long
assuming
the
council
bernard's
motion
doesn't
go
ahead?
What
what
does
that
look
like?
What
are
we
voting
on?
K
I'm
going
to
turn
that
to
mr
mcrate,
the
file
lead
on
the
on
this
phone.
Mr
mcrae,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Maybe
I
can
get
a
repeat
of
the
question
to
make
sure
I
understand
it
correctly,
but
if
there's
a
distinction
between
the
motion
that
counselor
menard
referenced
would
result
in
142
nep
in
the
existing
apartment
remaining
meaning
the
vacant,
lots
at
144
and
148
could
be
used
for
parking.
K
I
just
saw
the
motion
a
moment
ago.
I'm
not
confident
that
the
details
of
document
2,
which
are
the
zoning
details,
would
result
in
a
complying
parking
lot
of
a
smaller
parking
configuration.
I
simply
just
don't
know
if
you
could
clarify
if
your
question
was
going
somewhere
else.
The
question
is
without
councilman
art's
motion
assume
it's
not
on
the
table
and
the
comments.
Counselor
moffat
just
made
about
this
being
a
not
a
permanent
zoning
change.
So
what
are
we
voting
on
today?
In
terms
of
that
lot,.
A
I
That
are
recommended
in
the
staff
report,
for
this,
for
this
parking
lot
is
that
it
is
exclusively
used
for
the
office
building
at
190
o'connor.
So
there
is
a
relationship
there
with
190
o'connor.
So
if
that
office
disappears
and
this
site
gets
redeveloped,
it
is
not
a
parking
lot
that
can
stay
in
perpetuity
unless
it
is
serving
the
purpose
of
that
office
at
190
o'clock.
I
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
Just
a
couple
brief
comments,
mr
mayor,
you
know:
we've
heard
both
sides
of
it
that
these
shouldn't
be
tied
together
and
that
they
are
tied
together
and
there's
nothing.
We
can
do
about
that.
My
sense,
though,
is
we're
almost
being
asked
to
play
chicken
here
because
they
are
tied
together
in
normal
course.
That
wouldn't
be
the
case.
It's
it's
almost
like
we're
waiting
to
see
who
blinks
first
on
this-
and
I
gotta
be
honest-
I'm
not
all
that
interested
in
blinking
today.
I
I
I
think
that
you
know
I
I
I've
scratched
my
head.
I
sat
in
on
the
meeting.
I
have
talked
to
a
representative
of
the
developer
and
I
just
cannot
fathom
that.
There
is
no
other
way
to
achieve
these
parking
spots
and
that
the
whole
development
would
be
would
be
pushed
aside
and
not
carried
forward
over
this
minor
amount
of
parking
spots.
I
I
just
I
can't
connect
those
dots
and
because
I
can't
connect
those
dots,
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
support
that
approach,
so
I
just
want
that
right.
It
just
it
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
that
one
is
so
contingent
on
the
other
over
and
we've
heard
variety
8,
10
12
30
parking
spots,
whatever
the
number.
I
It's
not
that
much
in
the
downtown
core
in
the
present
circumstance-
and
I
just
cannot
understand
why
other
arrangements
can't
be
made
and
that
at
least
for
the
foreseeable
future,
that
property
will
remain
intact.
Those
people
will
remain
in
that
property
that
will
remain
a
reasonably
priced
property
because
the
the
units
are
going
to
come
in
the
new
building.
Yes,
they
will
be
affordable
but,
as
councilor
moffa
pointed
out,
there's
a
huge
difference
between
market
affordability
and
what's
really
affordable
for
people
who
need
housing.
I
So,
for
those
reasons
I
I
I
will
be
voting
with
with
councillor
mckinney
on
this
and
and
take
her
direction
and
and
her
understanding
of
her
own
ward,
very
much
in
the
context.
Thank
you.
Okay.
I
see
no
other
hands
so
we'll
have
counselor
gower's
motion.
First,
his
amendment
on
the
mou
carried
and
then
councilor
menard's
motion
is
be.
It
resolved
the
recommendation.
One
in
respect
of
item
14.1
be
amended
by
deleting
one.
Can
we
see
the
motion
on
the
screen?
I
Please
for
council
manager,
yeah
mayor
have
asked
for
it
to
be
distributed,
and
I
can
read
it
out
for
now
before
it
goes
up
on
the
screen.
It's
just
be
it
resolve
that
recommendation.
One
and
respective
item
14.1
be
amended
by
deleting
142
nippian
and
then
the
second
recommendations,
two
to
four
would
be
deleted
because
they're
related
to
142
to
pn
and
mr
mayor.
I
believe
that
mr
mark
had
added
an
amendment
to
that,
which
is
that
no
further
notice
be
given
under
the
planning
act
agreed
yeah.
I
So
this
would
this
would
allow
for
them
to
find
eight
other
parking
spots.
Keep
that
zoned
residential,
regardless
of
what
happens
to
it
in
the
future.
It
will
be
residential
in
the
future.
So
would
appreciate
the
support
on
this.
Thank
you.
You
want
to
wrap
up
counselor,
or
was
that
your
wrap
up?
Thank
you.
I
C
I
S
Comes
and
takes
over
this
file.
There's
no
commitment
at
all
for
those
last
two
remaining
tenants.
So
I
would
urge
members
not
to
support
the
menard
motion.
We
talk
a
lot
around
this
council
table
about
providing
more
housing,
particularly
in
the
downtown
core.
We
need
more
people
working
in
the
downtown
core.
Quite
frankly,
because
we
see
the
challenges
our
small
business
community
in
downtown
ottawa
is
facing.
An
urban
auto
is
facing
as
a
result
of
people
not
going
back
to
work
in
the
office
towers.
S
So
how
do
we
supplement
that
opportunity
to
help
those
struggling
small
businesses?
We
try
to
make
it
easier
for
people
to
come
and
live
downtown
if
they're,
not
necessarily
all
going
to
come
back
and
work
downtown
so
with.
If
this
project
fails
and-
and
you
know
some
people
have
said
who's
going
to
blink
first
well,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
property
owners
do
have
the
right
to
come
forward
and
ask
for
these
kinds
of
amendments
and
we
have
the
right
to
say
yay
or
nay
to
them.
S
So
I
would
urge
you
to
think
long
and
hard
about
the
importance
of
us
sending
the
signal
as
a
city
that
we
want
these
kinds
of
infill
projects
to
take
place,
to
get
people
to
live
and
to
work
and
to
visit
our
downtown
core.
So,
on
the
menard
motion
yeas
and
days,
please
counselor
cliche,
no
counselor
moffat,
no
counselor,
hubley,
counselor,
kids,
no.
S
Yes,
councillor
mckinney,
yes,
councillor
leeper,
yes,
councillor,
king,
yes,
counselor,
tierney,
no
counselor,
shirelli,
no
counselor,
dude,
ass,
counselor
menard;
yes,
counselor
brockington;
yes,
counselor
kavanaugh;
yes,
counselor,
harder,
no
counselor,
luloff,
no
counselor,
curry,
no
counselor
meehan!
Yes,.
S
The
report
as
amendment
the
same
vote-
yep-
reverse
reversal-
reverse
yeah
agreed
agreed.
Okay,
thank
you.
The
next
item
that
was
held
or
sorry.
It's
not
held
it's
an
in-camera
item,
city
manager
and
auditor
general's
performance
appraisal
to
be
considered
in
camera.
Pursuant
to
the
procedure.
Bylaw
2021-24,
subsections,
13-1-b,
personal
matters
about
an
identifiable
individual,
including
staff
in
13,
1-d,
labor
relations
or
employee
negotiations.
The
specific
matters
related
to
the
city
manager,
auditor,
general's
2021
performance
appraisal
will
not
be
reported.
S
This
he's
received
no
requests
of
a
confidential
matter
to
go
in
camera.
Is
that
correct?
And
what's
your
advice,
mr
clark,
that
is
correct?
Mr
mayor,
I
have
had
a
number
of
counselors
speak
to
me
directly
about
this
particular
issue.
I
have
shared
with
them
the
results.
I
would
be
pleased
to
do
that
with
any
other
members
of
council
and
I
respectfully
don't
think,
there's
a
real
need
to
go
in
close
session
today.
Thanks
hey.
Does
anyone
have
any
in-camera.
S
Motion
to
adopt
reports-
councillor
curry,
please
second,
to
buy
counselor
egg
lie,
but
the
bill's
heritage
subcommittee
report,
29
planning
committee
report,
65
and
66
the
reports
from
the
clerk
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
july
6
2022
and
the
status
update
council
inquiries
and
motions
for
the
period
ending
august
26
2022
be
received
and
adopted
as
amended
carried
adopted,
emotions
in
which
notice
have
been
previously
given
mostly
donald
trump
counselor
king.
Please
thank
you
by
councillor
harder.
S
H
134
000
people
in
our
region
are
without
a
family.
Physician
fewer
medical
school
graduates
are
choosing
the
specialty
of
family
medicine.
After
witnessing
the
rise
of
rising
expectations
placed
on
family
practices
without
appropriate
resources
and
the
resulting
physician
burnout
with
insufficient
administrative
support
and
stagnant
payment
models,
the
costs
to
maintain
a
family
practice
are
becoming
unsustainable.
H
Additionally,
some
physicians
have
decided
to
retire
from
family
medicine
practice
earlier
than
planned,
partially
related
to
the
exhaustion
resulting
from
working
through
the
coven
19
pandemic.
Indeed,
nearly
three-quarters
of
doctors
surveyed
by
the
ontario
medical
association
said
they
experienced
some
level
of
burnout
in
2021
and
40
say
they
are
considering
early
retirement
because
of
the
pandemic.
H
We
know
that
fewer
family
doctors
means
reduced
access
to
care
for
people
in
ottawa,
resulting
in
worsening
health
outcomes
and
a
less
efficient
health
care
system.
We
know
that
when
people
have
a
family
physician
who
knows
them
well,
people
actually
receive
better
care.
There
are
better
health
outcomes
and
the
cost
of
the
system
is
less.
I've
heard
from
physicians
who
are
running
family
practices
locally,
who
continue
to
ask
for
more
resources
from
the
province
so
that
they
can
provide
more
primary
care
to
ottawa
residents.
I've
also
heard
the
continuing
call
from
residents.
O
For
the
continuing
call
for
a
full
community
health
resource
center
to
service
communities,
east
of
the
rideau
river,
the
province
also
continues
to
lag
in
establishing
practice
ready
assessment
programs
to
rapidly
license
internationally
trained
physicians
who
live
here
with
so
many
deficiencies
with
primary
health
care
in
our
city.
It's
important
that
council
ask
for
the
substantive
action
for
substantive
actions
to
really
be
taken
to
reduce
waiting
times
for
ottawa
residents
in
need
of
a
family,
physician
and
request
that
support
be
made
available
to
establish
more
family
medicine
clinics
throughout
the
city.
O
O
Yeah.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
actually
asked
councillor
king
if
he
would
be
interested
in
working
on
this
with
me.
You
may
recall
it
was
either
the
last
council
meeting
or
the
one
before
where
we
talked
about
other.
You
know
benefits
that
we
could
provide
and
ask
questions
of
the
province
to
get
their
assistance
for
better
health
care.
O
When
we
first
discussed
this,
he
thought
I
was
speaking
about
people
with
lower
household
incomes,
people
with
with
more
specific
needs.
I
am
not.
I
represent
and
have
representative
for
25
years,
a
suburban
community
and
at
one
point
over
half
of
the
city
of
nepean.
As
far
as
the
geography
goes,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
the
need
that
we
have
in
the
suburbs
matches,
if
not,
is
greater
than
the
need
elsewhere
in
the
city
for
health
care.
That
is.
O
One
that
you
can
count
on
that
you're
not
desperately
trying
to
find
help
for
your
family
of
whomever
that
might
be
or
a
friend
and
you
are
further
burdening
the
hospital,
and
I
think
that
the
timing
right
now
in
this
province
is
perfect
for
us
to
move
forward.
With
this
ask
and
suggestion
the
province
is
looking
for
ways
to
provide
a
better
level
of
health
care.
This
is
having
our
support.
O
Second
largest
city
in
the
province,
I
think,
is
very
important
and
opening
up
the
door
for
various
ways
to
do
so,
so
that
people
can
count
on
the
fact
that,
when
their
physician
retires,
if
they
are
have
been
on
the
waiting
list
for
two
years
or
longer,
as
I
know,
many
people
have
just
waiting
to
get
a
family
physician.
Many
and
as
far
as
the
people
who
are,
who
have
the
greatest
socioeconomic
needs,
not
having
a
physician,
really
is
limiting
in
the
help
that
you
can
receive
through
many
of
the
agencies.
O
O
O
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
I'll,
read
this
out,
whereas
the
city
of
ottawa
has
declared
a
climate
emergency
and
whereas
the
new
official
plan
calls
for
an
ambitious
target
of
40
of
land
to
be
covered
by
trees
and
as
of
2017,
only
31
percent
of
land
was
covered
by
trees,
whereas
private
property
makes
up.
40
percent
of
land
in
ottawa
is
identified
in
the
urban
forest
management
plan.
P
Whereas
the
2018
and
2019
tornadoes
the
city
has
worked
with
tree
canada
to
initiate
the
operation
relief
program
for
the
replacement,
planting
of
trees
on
private
property
and
whereas
the
may
21st
tarantula
damaged
thousands
of
trees
across
the
city.
Many
on
private
property,
resulting
in
a
significant
loss
to
our
urban
canopy,
therefore
be
resolved.
That
staff
report
back
to
council
in
20
q2
of
2023
on
options
to.
P
I
do
know
I've
had
residents
reach
out
to
me
asking
about
our
city's
trees
and
trust
program,
which
provides
for
the
opportunity
for
trees
to
be
planted
on
the
city's
right
of
way,
but
also
inquiring,
if
there's
any
opportunities
to
add
trees
to
private
spaces.
So
I
would
really
look
forward
to
count
to
staff
coming
back
with
recommendations
on
how
we
can
not
only
encourage
residents
to
replace
the
lost
trees.
C
P
The
counselor
or
staff,
I'm
not
sure
who
is
best
suited
to
answer
we.
We
do
have
a
treason,
trust
which
I'm
often
referred
to
by
city
staff
in
terms
of
a
program,
and
I
wonder
first
off
if,
if
we
have
remaining
trees
in
that
program
and
if
the
motion
in
front
of
us
brings
new
funding
for
these
sorts
of
initiatives
like
I'm
I'm.
P
Mr
mayor,
I
can
take
that
one.
The
treason,
trust
program
as
the
as
a
counselor
indicated,
is
for
planting
of
trees
on
on
the
city
right
away,
not
on
private
property.
So
part
of
this
direction
right
now
would
be
looking
at
there's
a
program
that
would
be
focused
on
planting
trees,
on
on
private
property
in
terms
of
funding
requirements
and
all
that
we
we
would
bring
that
back
as
part
of
our
report
in
q2
of
2023..
P
P
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
anna
for
the
answers
and
and
thank
you
councillor,
dudas,
for
bringing
this
forward.
I
do
think
long
overdue
conversation
I'd
say,
but
I
hope
that
when
it
comes
back
we're
able
to
find
synergies
between
you
know
what
I'll
call
a
successful
program
entries
and
trust
and
this
initiative
so
that
they
work
in
in
communities
where
we're
finding
either
a
loss
of
trees
through
the
various
climate
impacts
or.
A
S
S
That
the
onus
is
on
the
resident
if
they've
lost
their
tree,
to
contact
the
city
to
ask
for
a
replacement
that
there
is
not
an
automatic
replacement
of
trees
that
have
come
down
and
residents
just
expect.
Well,
my
tree
has
come
down.
Therefore
the
city
will
replant
it.
They
don't
know
that
the
onus
is
on
them
to
contact.
A
The
city
and
register
or
apply
for
a
new
tree
so
with
some
just
if
I
could
ask
staff,
how
are
we
proactively
enumerating
the
trees
that
we've
lost
and
how
are
we,
making
residents
and
even
business
owners
aware
that
if
city
trees
have
come
down
on,
roa
lands,
basically
on
their
property,
that
they
need
to
call
in
and
register
apply
for
new
trees?
How
are
we
doing
that
so
missed
america?
A
couple
points
to
to
address
the
counselors
questions.
A
The
first
one
is.
We
still
have
the
treason,
trust
program,
that's
still
active,
which
is
already
fully
committed.
So
we
are
still
planning
trees
under
that
program
in
terms
of
notification
with
with
homeowners
that
have
law
surgeries
to
the
extent
possible
when
we
are
either
giving
them
notification
on
uprooted
trees
or
when
we're
going
to
be
coming
back
to
grinder
trees.
A
We'd
use
that
opportunity
to
be
able
to
remind
them
that
if
they
want
a
tree
replacement
to
apply
for
it
to
make
sure
that
one
is
that
they
still
want
a
tree
and
also
to
ensure
that
we
can
coordinate
the
type
of
tree
that
they're
going
to
be
looking
for,
because
it's
not
always
the
same
replacement
that
they're
that
they're
looking
for
plus
in
terms
of
media
outreach.
We
will
continue
to
have
that
message
out
there,
so
that
residents
also
have
different
channels
to
be
made.
A
Aware
of
the
reason
why
we
haven't
just
leveraged
the
the
notification
to
the
resident
is
just
because
of
the
sheer
volume
of
trees
that
we've
been
dealing
with.
So
we
didn't
want
residents
to
assume
that
we
knew
of
all
of
them
that
that
it
was
automatic.
So
that's
why
we're
trying
to
put
multiple
barriers
or
communication
channels
for
them
to
be
able
to
communicate
with
us.
So
how
many
trees
does
the
trees
in
trust
program
normally
facilitate
in
any
given
year?
A
And
how
will
staff
adjust
its
budget
and
resources
in
2023
and
going
forward
to
make
up
for
what
we've
lost?
Because
of
the
the
may
2022
storm
yeah
mayor,
I
don't
have
that
number
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
can
certainly
follow
up
with
that
with
that
number
as
part
of
our
planning
for
2023,
we,
we
know
that
there's
been
a
significant
loss
and
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
pressures,
so
we
will
be
looking
at
opportunities
in
terms
of
how
do
we
supplement
tree
cam
planting
capacity?
A
C
E
M
E
C
E
E
A
H
A
As
well,
I
just
want
assurances
from
staff
that
the
public
property
trees
are
not
going
to
lose
the
priority
because
we
need
to
get
into
these
areas
and
do
the
replanting
as
early
as
possible
next
year.
So
can
I
get
some
assurance
from
you
that
that
will
remain
a
high
priority
to
get
in
there
and
get
that
done
next
year?
A
Yes,
mr
mayor,
absolutely
there's
there's
a
number
of
city
areas,
green
spaces
parkland
that
have
been
significantly
impacted
by
loss
of
trees,
and
that
will
remain
a
priority
in
terms
of
replanting
right
now
the
focus
has
been
on
the
removal
of
trees.
Next
year
the
focus
is
going
to
be
on
the
replanting
of
trees.
A
C
E
For
that,
but
what
we
couldn't
look
at
is
when
we
bring
the
report
forward.
Is
look
at
that
point
in
terms
of
funding
opportunities
for
for
the
program,
because
then
we'll
have
a
better
sense
in
terms
of
quantum
that
we
may
be
dealing
with,
there's
also
certain
times
of
the
year
that
we
can.
We
can
do
the
planting,
it's
not
something
that's
done
year
round,
so
it
will
be
a
part
year.
Impact.
A
L
L
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
I'm
sure
you're
going
to
do
a
good
job
on
behalf
of
the
city
on
that.
My
concern
is
to
make
sure
that
you
have
the
money
for
this.
So
if
you
don't
think
you
can
quantify
this
before
your
budget
discussions,
I
wonder
maybe
the
question
for
the
city
manager
would
be.
Can
we
put
some
money
aside
in
the
budget
that
you
would
be
able
to
tap
into
once?
You
can
quantify
what's
needed,
or
maybe
I
I
see
the
same
match
is
not
here
ellen.
L
If
you
know
the
answer
that
story,
I
I
thought
he
was
there
yeah.
No,
mr
mayor,
the
the
piece
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
expenses
that
have
been
incurred
on
this
on
this
cleanup
that
weren't
really
planned.
We've
already
started
forecasting.
Basically,
the
additional
cost
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
into
2023,
so
those
are
items
that
we're
already
working
with
finance
in
terms
of
identifying
for
for
2023.
So
I
don't
think
there's
a
lost
opportunity
just
at
this
point.
L
We
haven't
quantified
all
of
it,
but
I
think
there
is
opportunities
when
we,
when
we
bring
a
report
forward,
to
also
indicate
how
we're
going
to
be
able
to
implement
okay.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
thank
you
for
your
answers.
Ella
all
right!
Thank
you,
counselor.
Anyone
else
wish
to
speak
before
counselor
judas
wraps
up
this
item.
L
Counselor
dude
asks
to
wrap
up.
Please,
yes,
no.
I
want
to
thank
all
my
colleagues
for
their
comments
and
I
think
we
all
know
that
this
is
going
to
take
many
many
years
to
recover.
We
may
not
fully
recover
the
the
trees,
the
the
old
trees
that
we
lost
or
during
this,
and
this
doesn't
even
scratch
the
surface
of
what
some
of
our
other
community.
L
Some
of
our
rural
communities
are
even
going
through
to
recover
from
this
storm,
but
I
do
know
that
many
of
my
residents
have
reached
out
and
said:
what
can
we
do
to
recover
the
trees
to
get
you
know
back
from
this,
I
wanted
to
thank
staff.
They
worked
closely
with
me
on
this
report.
Their
timelines
aligned
with
their
planting
season
their
timelines
aligned
with
their
ability
to
deliver
on
recommendations
that
would
bring
forward
not
only
a
budgetary
recommendation,
but
also
the
ability
to
actually
deliver
on
tree
requests.
So
I
wanted.
A
F
F
Working
closely
with
our
community
groups
and
to
all
of
council
to
get
the
word
out
that
trees
and
trust
is
available,
other
tree
programs
are
available
and
to
start
to
replace
our
tree
canopies.
So
I
thank
everyone
in
advance
for
their
support
on
this,
and
I
do
look
forward
to
taking
every
opportunity
to
get
past
what
we've
been
dealt
with
in
terms
of
mother
nature
in
terms
of
the
storm.
Thank
you.
F
Thank
you
very
much
on
the
motion
is
presented,
carried
at
update,
very
good
motions
requiring
suspense
the
rules
procedure
motion
by
councillor
kavanaugh,
saying
by
myself,
with
respect
to
strong
marriage
building
homes,
act
on
suspension,
carry
carrier
just
to
clarify.
There
was
some
small
changes
by
the
clerk's
office,
yeah
there's
the
last
paragraph.
The
word
provincial
has
been
added
to
government
and
city
of
ottawa.
F
Okay.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
for
seconding
it
I
think,
we're
all
concerned
about
the
concept
of
a
strong
mayor
model.
Constituents
rely
on
their
elected
officials
to
bring
their
voice
to
the
table.
This
model
implies
that
the
concerns
from
councillors
and
their
residents
on
such
things
with
development
in
their
communities
will
not
hold
weight.
The
legislation
was
introduced
into
the
legislator
without
consultation
and
during
a
municipal
election.
F
The
minister,
stephen
clark
has
stated
that
this
is
about
getting
more
housing
bill,
but
what
is
the
cost?
The
city
of
ottawa
put
together
an
official
plan
that
took
much
effort
in
consultation
showing
up
their
commitment
to
housing,
and
it
was
support
supported
by
the
majority
of
council.
The
provincial
government
has
yet
to
give
its
feedback
and
approval
on
the
official
plan
so
that
our
city
may
move
forward
on
the
hard
work
that
was
put
into
this
extensive
plan
for
the
future
of
our
city.
F
A
T
Consultation
with
communities
remains
the
priority
to
maintain
and
build
liverpool
communities.
The
model
for
stronger
mayors
would
essentially
take
the
voice
away
residents
at
the
very
least
lessen
it.
I've
always
been
a
strong
advocate
and
supporter
of
affordable
housing,
and
I
believe
that
we
can
accomplish
much
more
with
equal
representation
around
the
council
table.
T
T
T
T
Whereas
august
10th,
the
government
of
ontario
introduced
bill
3,
the
strong
mayor's
building
homes
act
2022,
and
whereas
this
legislation,
if
passed,
would
give
mayors
of
the
city
of
toronto
and
the
city
of
ottawa
additional
powers
beyond
those
currently
were
in
the
city
of
toronto
act
and
the
municipal
act
2001,
including
the
party
the
power
to
veto.
Certain
significant
council
decisions,
unless
two-thirds
of
the
council
overrides
the
veto,
whereas
the
rationale
given
for
this
legislation
was
to
fast-track
housing
projects
which
has
not
been
discussed
during
the
provincial
election.
T
Whereas
the
ottawa
city
council
has
worked
closely
with
residents
on
many
development
projects
over
the
years
and
many
projects
have
been
successfully
modified
and
improved
based
on
local
input.
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
council
requests
that
the
mayor
write
to
the
premier
of
ontario
to
request
that
the
province
provincial
government
consult
the
city
of
ottawa,
the
public,
as
well
as
the
professional
and
municipal
organization,
on
the
detailed
regulations
in
advance
of
passing
bill.
3.
The
strong
mayor's
building
homes
back
2022.
H
Yourself
for
moving
this
motion,
I've
been
opposed
to
the
planned
legislation
since
it
was
first
introduced,
and
the
question
I
keep
asking
is:
what
is
the
problem
that
exists
that
we're
trying
to
fix
or
that
the
province
is
trying
to
fix
and
mayor?
I
believe
I've
heard
correctly
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
this
is
not
a
power
that
you
as
mayor
of
ottawa
council
has
have
requested,
and
certainly
no
pre-consultation
with
the
city
of
ottawa
before
the
provincial
government
made
this
announcement.
H
M
H
A
new
transit
general
manager
how
many
new
houses
will
that
build?
And
I've
said
this
at
amo
as
well.
If
you
go
down
every
specific
new
power
authority
that
the
american
veto
or
have
the
ultimate
decision-making
authority
over,
how
does
that
translate
to
new
housing
because
the
province
continues
to
say
this
is
about
housing,
so
there's
no
problem
in
ottawa
in
this
regard.
What
is
the
problem
that
we're
trying
to
fix?
So
I
appreciate
my
colleague
moving
this
motion.
J
This
week
and
are
taking
a
position
on
this
matter
and
unlike
toronto,
ottawa
is
a
member
of
amo
toronto
is
not,
and
so
they've
been
speaking
up
basically
on
our
behalf
this
week.
So
if
that
letter
could
be
copied
to
amo,
that
would
be
appreciated.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
Maybe
we'll
just
take
note
of
that
to
send
it
to
amo,
as
well
as
the
ontario
big
city,
mayor's
coalition
as
well.
Anyone
else
on
the
motion,
I'll
just
offer
a
couple
of
comments.
I
I
agree
with.
Obviously
the
motion
I'm
happy
to
second
it.
J
Thank
you,
councillor,
cavanaugh,
for
approaching
my
office.
Thank
you,
councillor
brockington.
I
know
you've
worked
on
this
file
on
our
behalf
as
our
amo
representative
at
the
board
of
directors.
This
came
out
of
the
blue
folks.
I
didn't
know
anything
about
it.
It
affected
two
people,
john
tory
and
jim
watson,
and
neither
of
us
were
given
a
heads
up
and
it
affected
our
positions.
J
Obviously
there'll
be
a
new
new
mayor
in
in
ottawa
and
I'm
not
going
to
predict
what's
going
to
happen
in
toronto.
It
looks
like
john's
doing
very
well
well
there,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
this
is
something
that
no
one
has
ever
asked
for
that
I'm
aware
of
at
the
city
of
ottawa.
I
also
find
it
a
little
strange
trying
to
connect
affordable
housing
with
more
powers
for
the
mayor.
M
M
You
know
when
a
member
of
council
has
an
issue,
that's
very
important
to
them
in
their
ca
in
their
wards.
They
know
I
have
an
open
door,
they
come
and
see.
How
can
we
work
together
to
get
something
done?
There
are
other
cases
where
we're
obviously
diametrically
opposed
to
a
particular
issue
and
there
won't
be
any
middle
ground,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
they're.
M
Giving
too
much
power
to
one
person,
namely
the
mayor
is
a
dangerous
precedent
for
our
democracy,
and
I
would
urge
members
of
council
to
support
this
motion
to
send
a
very
clear
signal
to
the
province
that,
at
the
very
least,
we
need
some
kind
of
public
consultation
by
community
groups
by
professional
associations.
This
issue
came
up.
We
thought
we
were
going
to
have
a
discussion
with
minister
clark,
but
he
cancelled
his
meeting
at
amo
at
the
last
minute.
M
Unfortunately,
so
we
still
try
to
get
in
touch
with
him
to
let
him
know
as
a
former
mayor
himself
that,
if
you're
an
effective
mayor,
you
don't
need
all
of
these
extra
powers.
Quite
frankly-
and
I
think
the
benefit
that
I
derive
from
members
of
council
is
that
you
know
your
communities
better
than
anyone.
You
know
you
know
when
that
stop
sign
went
up
when
the
zoning
issue
is
coming
forward
on
that
neighborhood
when
site
plan
control.
J
J
M
Similar
motion
by
council
menard
we'll
debate
that
in
a
moment,
so
all
in
favor
of
the
motion
by
kavanaugh
watson
carried
adoption
potential
for
our
support,
I'd
like
to
say
a
few
words
in
french.
Now
it's
not
a
priority
for
me.
That's
not
a
priority
for
the
city
of
ottawa,
either.
I'd
like
to
thank
councillor.
J
Thanks
very
much,
certainly
important
to
ask
for
the
regulations
to
be
released
and
for
them
to
be
broadly
consulted
on
this
motion
by
counselor
myself
and
counselor
dean
asks
that
you
write
a
letter
similar
to
your
comments
in
the
public,
opposing
this
new
legislation.
So
I'll
read
it
out
and
appreciate
support
on
it,
whereas
on
august
10
2022,
the
province
of
ontario
introduced
bill
3,
the
strong
mayor's
building
homes
act
2022
and
whereas,
if
passed,
the
legislation
would
give
the
mayors
of
the
city
of
toronto
and
the.
Q
By
granting
the
mayor
additional
powers,
as
it
relates
to
proposing
a
budget
for
council's
consideration
and
the
authority
to
appoint
or
terminate
the
chief
administrative
officer,
city
manager,
as
well
as
other
senior
city
staff,
and
whereas
this
legislation
was
introduced
into
the
legislature
without
consultation
and
during
a
municipal
election
and
whereas
the
province
claims.
These
powers
will
allow
more
homes
to
be
built.
And
whereas
no
evidence
has
been
provided
to
support
this
claim.
Q
And
whereas
recent
history
demonstrates
that
the
mayor
of
ottawa
has
been
able
to
consistently
secure
majority
support
for
his
motions
at
the
council
table.
Whether
we
all
love
that
or
not.
Whereas
the
head
of
council
meeting
the
mayor
is
already
the
most
influential
position
at
the
council
table
and
whereas
further
empowering
the
mayor
at
the
expense
of
ward
councillors
undermines
the
ability
of
work
counselors
to
effectively
represent
their
constituencies
at
the
council
table.
And
whereas
this
increased
asymmetry
of
power
at
the
council
table
diminishes
the
value
of
local
representation
in
local
democracy.
M
This
legislation,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
ottawa
city
council
opposes
bill.
3
the
strong
mayor's
building
homes
act
2022,
and
ask
that
the
government
of
ontario
reconsider
this
legislation
and
be
a
further
resolve
that
the
mayor
be
directed
to
write
a
letter,
communicating
council's
opposition
to
bill
3
to
the
premier
of
ontario
and
to
the
minister
of
municipal
affairs
and
housing
and,
of
course,
email.
It
would
be
good.
Q
To
copy
there
too,
so
I
appreciate
the
time
there
and
support
on
this
great
anyone
on
the
motion
carried
that
update.
The
next
motion
requiring
suspension.
The
rules
of
procedure
is
by
councillor
gower
seconded
by
councillor
moffitt,
with
respect
to
pool
enclosure
update
on
suspension
kerry.
Thank
you
yeah.
Essentially,
this
is
a
technical
amendment.
Council
approved
a
report
back
in
june
and
the
accompanying
bylaws
in
front
of
council.
Today,
staff
have
identified
a
number
of
errors
and
inconsistencies
in
the
documents
and
the
wording.
M
2022
and
whereas
the
report
recommends
updating
the
city
of
ottawa's,
pool
and
closure,
bylaw
bylaw
number
2013-39,
and
whereas
errors
and
inconsistencies
were
identified
in
documents,
one
and
two
summary
of
proposed
changes
to
the
pool
and
closure.
By-Law,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
rules
of
procedure
be
suspended
to
permit
the
introduction
of
the
following
motion
and
therefore
be
further
resolved.
Q
Requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
and
procedures
by
councillor
brockington
decided
by
councillor
mckinney,
with
respect
to
advocacy
on
social
assistance
and
odsp
rates
on
suspension
carrying
councillor
brockington.
Please
thank
you,
mayor
for
that,
and
first
I'd
like
to
thank
my
colleague,
councillor
mckinney,
for
their
support
on
this
motion
very
very
important,
most
recent
provincial
election
earlier
this
year.
This
was
a
an
issue
that
all
parties
discussed
through
one
form
or
another,
and
we've
heard
from.
M
Multiple
service,
social
service
providers
and
agencies,
not
just
in
ottawa
but
across
ontario,
about
the
completely
inadequate
levels
of
support
that
both
odsp
and
social
assistance
provides
beneficiaries
of
those
programs.
This
is
a
very
lengthy
motion.
I'm
not
going
to
read
it.
In
essence,
the
provincial
government
has
committed
to
reviewing
these
payments.
They
still
fall
quite
short
of
what
needs
to
happen
and,
in
particular,
I'd
just
like
to
read
a
few
clauses
to
hammer.
T
T
How
could
you
live
on
those
sums
if
you
were
to
take
your
family
or
yourself,
singly
and
survive
when
you
need
to
have
rent
covered
when
you
need
to
have
food
purchased,
when
you
need
basic
needs,
transit
and
others?
The
fact
is,
it's
not
possible
and
these
rates
needed
to
be
augmented
years
ago
and
the
levels
that
our
current
provincial
government
are
considering
are
still
grossly
inadequate
to
the
realities
that
residents
are
faced
and
in
fact
it
keeps
people
living
in
poverty
in
poverty.
T
A
Community
and
social
services
and
the
minister
of
municipal
affairs
and
housing
to
advocate
for
an
immediate
increase
to
odsb
rates
and
ontario
work
rates
for
basic
needs
and
sell
shelter
so
that
the
rates
are
commensurate
with
what
they
would
have
been
if
they
were
linked
to
the
consumer
price
index
back
in
2018.
So.
R
R
Thank
you,
councilman
kenny.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
and
I
want
to
thank
councillor
brockington
for
removing
this
motion.
There
was
a
time
in
this
province
where
actually
homelessness
didn't
exist.
We
did
not
see
people,
we
did
not
have
large
shelters,
people
were
able
to
have
low,
paying
work
and
still
afford
rent
and
the
benefits
that
were
paid
to
people
who
were
unable
to
work
for
a
number
of
reasons
were
adequate.
R
They
were
adequate
to
keep
them
housed,
it
were
adequate
to
keep
them
and
their
families,
their
kids,
adequately,
fed
and
and
clothed
and
and
that
wasn't
very
long
ago
it
it
was
in
my
lifetime.
You
know
there
was
a
time
that
I
actually
was
on
what
was
at
the
time
called
mother's
allowance,
and,
and
you
could
you
could,
you
could
survive
you
could
get
by?
R
So
we
can,
you
know
we
can
get
back
there
without
you
know,
without
these
types
of
basic
supports,
once
people
fall
into
that
type
of
poverty
or
if
that's
the
poverty
that
they
they
live
in
today,
there
really
is
no
way
of
getting
out
for
myself.
It
took
at
least
a
decade,
maybe
more
before
I
was.
You
know
one
paycheck
away
from
being
back.
R
You
know
into
what
would
have
been
homelessness
because
10
15
years
on
there
just
wasn't
that
it
just
wasn't
that
safety
net
and-
and
it's
not
there
today
for
people.
So
I
I
do
want
to
thank
my
colleague
and
all
of
you
for
supporting
this
motion.
It's
really
important
that
cities
demand
better
from
from
their
province.
Thank
you
great.
Thank
you.
Any
other
comments
carried
at
that
day.
Thank
you.
Next
motion
is
by
councillor
el
shantiri,
signed
by
councillor
moffat,
the
ditch
alteration
and
maintenance
sponsors
group.
How
do
I
get
on
that?
R
A
J
J
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
This
is
highly
administrative.
Just
regarding
a
new
antenna
system
in
cumberland
ward,
so
I'll
skip
ahead.
I
don't
think
anyone
wants
me
to
read
this
entire
thing,
but
whereas
the
three-year
period
has
expired
and
cities
process
does
not
allow
staff
delegated
authority
to
extend
municipal
concurrence
and
whereas
the
2019
application
for
2375
frank
kenny
road
remains
unchanged
and
whereas
the
proposed
antenna
is
an
opportunity
to
improve
service
for
the
hundreds
of
cell
users
in
the
area.
J
J
Where
and
do
would
you
like
me
to
read
the
whereases,
mr
mayor
yeah,
I
think
this
is
one
that
there's
probably
support
to
wave
the
rules
and
deal
with
now,
because
it's
saint
john
ambulance
and
it's
the
next
available
so
agreed
to
suspend
the
rules
on
this
great.
So
maybe
you
should
read
them
out.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
A
Whereas
section
41
41.4
of
the
city's
procurement
bylaw,
which
is
2000-50
as
amended,
states
that
the
sale
of
surplus
furniture
vehicles,
equipment,
stock
supplies
and
other
goods
and
materials
shall
be
made
to
the
highest
responsive
bidder
and
the
sales
shall
be
made
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
this
bylaw,
where
applicable
and
whereas
ottawa
city
council
has
previously
waived
this
provision
in
order
to
donate
the
surplus
surplus
ambulances
to
specific
causes.
Organizations,
for
example,
the
salvation
army,
community
and
emergency
response.
Team
and
organizations
doing
work
in
ghana
and
ethiopia.
A
A
Thank
you
next
council
meeting
I'll
be
asking
council
to
vote
in
favor
of
a
motion
to
designate
wednesday
october
5th
2022
right
to
food
day
in
recognition
of
the
work
that
parkdale
food
center
and
other
partners
have
done
to
increase
food
security
for
low-income
residents
across
ottawa,
and
I
know
since
partel
asked
me
to
do
this-
that
the
issue
has
become
higher
profile
in
the
city.
So
thank
you
mayor.
C
S
We
are
now
I
can
confirm
we
are.
We
are
live
with
sound
on
the
youtube
channel
and
the
last,
if
council
brocking
could
just
read
into
the
record.
The
therefore
be
resolved
of
his
last
motion
to
ensure
that
is
captured
on
the
live
stream.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor,
for
your
patience.
Thank
you.
Madame
debit
kirk.
S
Thank
you,
okay.
Thank
you.
Next
is
counselor
fleury
and
tierney,
it's
a
long
series
of
where,
whereas
is
counselor,
and
it's
a
notice
of
motion,
so
maybe
just
go
to
the
be
it
resolved.
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
Yes,
this
would
have
been
brought
to
the
next
transportation
committee
if,
but
as
it's
there's,
no
none
left.
This
would
be
a
counselor's
report.
So
if
you
want
to
scroll
down
to
the
therefore
be
it
resolved.
S
S
A
K
K
Okay,
thank
you.
Any
other
motions
for
some
consideration.
Subsequent
meeting
notice
of
intent,
evie
notice
of
intent
from
the
ottawa
community
lands
development
corporation.
They
will
submit
their
annual
report
for
consideration
at
the
city
council
meeting
of
september
21st
2022
item
22
motion
to
introduce
bylaws
councillor,
curry,
please.
If
the
bylaws
listed
on
the
agenda.