►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – May 22, 2013
Description
Ottawa City Council meeting – May 22, 2013
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
B
C
B
B
Almighty
God,
let
us
work
together
to
serve
all
our
people.
Jude
sip.
We
saw
ad
North
Ave
on
Psalm,
don't
Fanta
be
a
Sylvia
no
stay
on.
We
don't
have
our
special
guests
for
singing
the
national
anthem.
Counselor
Taylor
is
away
today,
and
he
wanted
to
be
here
to
introduce
some
so
we're
basically
on
our
own.
So
unless
the
magic
morning
show
would
like
to
come
up
and
sing,
o
Canada
and
I,
don't
think
we
want
to
put
them
on
that
spot.
B
E
B
D
F
B
A
good
morning
again,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
invite
the
magic
100
morning,
team
of
stuntman,
Stu,
Tricia,
Owens
and
Angie
Poirier
to
join
me
here
at
the
podium
and
I'd
also
ask
Trish
and
Angie's
counselor
Alan
hubely
to
join
us
and
Steve,
who
has
done
Matt's
dues
counselor
to
join
us.
And
thank
you
all
very
much
for
coming
and
members
of
your
family
and
counselors
hubely
and
rush.
B
For
far
too
long,
bullying
was
something
that
was
taken
to
be
part
of
adolescence.
People
knew
it
was
wrong
and
potentially
damaging
the
children,
and,
while
some
individuals
in
some
schools
tried
to
fight
bullying,
there
was
really
no
coordinated
effort
to
eradicate
bullying
on
a
large
scale:
leisure
safranin,
TB
deaths,
joie
de
issues,
a
pouf
war
of
wild
is
affair,
and
they
fast.
So,
let's
all
for
people.
C
B
Was
something
thats
to
Tricia
and
Angie
saw
and
decided
to
take
action
against
in
September
2011
when
they
launched
the
no
more
bullies
campaign?
Since
then,
the
trio
have
spent
most
Tuesday
mornings,
visiting
schools
in
Ottawa
to
teach
youth
about
the
perils
of
bullying.
They
do
this
by
sharing
their
own
experiences
with
bullying
and
those
of
the
guest
speakers
that
they
have
brought
on
board
to
fight
this
important
issue
in
the
fall
of
as
a
pal.
B
B
Who
to
turn
to
when
being
bullied
or
afraid
to
speak
out
for
fear
of
being
ostracized
further,
so
the
no
more
bullies
campaign
teaches
them
who
they
can
speak
to
it,
instills
the
essential
facts.
That
is
not
only
ok
to
tell
someone,
but
it's
encouraged
to
tell
someone
these
Tuesday
meetings
at
schools
across
Ottawa
are
only
a
part
of
the
way
that
Stu,
Trish
and
Angie's
message
is
being
spread.
B
They
have
leveraged
their
presence
on
the
radio
and
particularly
through
social
media,
to
extend
the
reach
of
their
message,
and
the
impact
they're
having
in
our
city
is
truly
remarkable.
Also,
the
bracelets
that
they're
all
wearing
the
no
more
bullying
bracelets
have
been
worn
by
some
of
the
biggest
names
and
entertainment
in
the
I'm.
Incredibly
proud
that
our
city
has
people
like
Stu,
Trish
and
Angie,
who
have
taken
up
the
fight
against
bullying
with
such
conviction.
Just
Navidad
I.
B
And
I
know
that
my
colleague,
Alan
hubely
in
particular,
has
been
a
big
part
of
this
campaign,
a
big
supporter
of
it
as
well,
and
it's
very
proud
of
the
work
that
you
have
done,
as
is
my
colleague
our
deputy
mayor,
steve
de
rush,
we're
a
better
city
for
having
the
no
more
bully's
campaign.
And
although
we
know
there
is
still
much
more
work
to
do,
I
want
to
present
these
three
remarkable
individuals
with
the
mayor
city,
Boulder
builder
award
for
the
tremendous
work
that
they
have
done
with
the
no
more
bully's
campaign.
G
C
C
We
started
no
more
bullies.
We've
been
fortunate
enough
to
speak
to
over
10,000
students
from
Rockland
to
Renfrew
and
a
visit
to
a
school
in
Barbados
last
year
on
behalf
of
the
no
more
bully's
team,
Angie
Poirier
Tricia,
Owens
Scott,
hey
Gert,
Ferran,
Go,
Go,
Aaron
young
and
our
support
staff
at
magic
100,
because
without
them
we
can't
pull
this
off
dan
kress
Sarah
gray,
Brittany,
a
slain
Amanda
Heller
Andy,
Smith,
junior
ello,
Todd
Hamilton
and
our
management
team
of
Ian
March
and
Richard
gray.
C
I
C
I
B
Thank
you
very
much,
and
congratulations
to
do.
Angie
and
Trish
I'd
like
to
call
now
on
our
counsellor
and
deputy
mayor
Steve
to
rush,
because
today,
I
believe
today
is
a
significant
day
for
a
number
of
families
in
Ottawa
in
particular
the
years
it
is
a
multiple
birthday
in
the
City
of
Ottawa,
and
you
have
some
experience
with
that.
Counselor.
J
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor,
as
you
mentioned,
on
May
28th,
the
city
is
going
to
declare
multiple
births.
Awareness
Day
in
the
City
of
Ottawa.
The
state
coincides
with
the
birthday
of
the
Dionne
quintuplets
and
is
meant
to
recognize
the
work
and
support
of
groups
like
the
multiple
birth
families,
Association
of
Ottawa.
She
deploys
ayudarnos,
secretive,
IDI,
katha.
J
Raising
twins
presents
unique
joys
and
challenges
with
double
the
fun
and
double
the
trouble.
This
can
be
particularly
challenging
for
single
parents
and
for
those
families
with
other
special
needs
or
difficult
circumstances
locally.
The
city
is
fortunate
to
have
the
help
of
the
multiple
birth
families
Association
of
Ottawa,
to
provide
support,
Ottawa's,
multiple
births,
families
through
offering
a
welcoming,
informing
and
safe
forum
for
parents
facing
similar
situation,
whether
an
individual
is
already
a
parent
of
multiples
or
as
expecting
multiples.
J
The
association
offers
a
wide
array
of
helpful
services,
including
a
prenatal
education
program,
send
you
an
semiannual
sales,
have
gently
used,
clothing
and
toys
telephone
contact
lines
with
information
support
regarding
preemies
special
needs,
single
parents,
breastfeeding
and
bereavement.
If
parents
would
like
more
information
on
the
association
work,
they
can
visit
the
website.
Mb
FATCA.
You
can
also
come
out
to
the
Claudette
Kane
park
in
Riverside
South
for
the
association's
annual
Awareness
Day
picnic
on
Sunday
May
26
from
10
a.m.
to
2
p.m.
je
vous
remercie
in
Fuad
applause.
Thank.
C
C
K
C
L
M
K
Hubs
here-
counselor
McCrae,
counselor,
Turner,
shank,
Oh,
counselor
Hugh
here.
N
C
L
B
B
C
N
N
Unfortunately,
the
clerk's
office
deleted
a
number
of
other
recommendations
that
were
properly
and
rightly
voted
on
and
approved
by
council,
and
we
are
now
having
the
minutes
amended
to
affect
what
council
actually
did
on
that
day
and
you
can
send
mr.
O
Connor
the
solicitor
and
miss
Donnelly
are
bringing
this
motion
forward
to
actually
correct
the
record
and
put
in
place
in
the
minutes.
What
counsel
actually
did
on
that
day.
O
O
O
Not
sure
why
this
is
coming
forward
now.
But
I
would
refer
you
to
another
legal
opinion.
That's
been
sent
to
us
this
morning,
which
contradicts
the
one
that
we've
received
from
our
own
staff
and
I
noticed
that
if
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
this
or
calling
yeas
and
nays
there,
some
members
missing-
and
some
of
those
members
happen
to
vote
for
that
meeting
at
the
time.
So
I
don't
believe
it
would
be
the
will
of
this
council
to
approve
those
a
correction
and
minutes
that
that
contradict
what
the
majority
of
council
has
already
decided.
B
P
B
O
Mr.
mayor
I
do
have
I,
have
a
couple
of
questions
on
this
and
I
want
to
start
with.
When
the
there
was
a
there,
was
a
motion
made
or
move
made
to
reconsider
the
motion
which,
which
was
quite
an
order
legit
councillor
Clark
made
that
move
and
at
the
time
it
met
the
basic
requirement
of
8
votes
in
order
to
come
back
at
the
following
meeting.
That
motion
was
subsequently
withdrawn.
Would
you
be
able
to
tell
us
why
that
motion
was
withdrawn
and
you
might
have
to
impute
some
motives
in
the
mover
at
this
point?.
O
I
believe
that
the,
if
you
listen
to
the
tape
from
that
meeting,
there's
a
reference
to
either
legal
legal
and
planning
staff.
Having
worked
this
so
and
I'm
not
sure
what
that
means,
because,
as
the
move
of
the
motion,
I
would
have
thought
that
if
there
was
anything
to
be
worked
out,
I
would
have
been
included
in
the
in
any
deliberations
or
discussions.
P
P
O
Let
me
ask
you
this:
the
motion
that
the
move,
the
motion
before
us
here
to
correct
the
minutes
or
allegedly
correct
the
minutes,
is
this
an?
Is
this
a
way
of
getting
around
a
backdoor
way
of
trying
to
move
get
reconsideration
through
and
when
it
was
quite
obvious
that
reconsideration
didn't
have
the
support
around
the
table
at
the
appropriate
time?
No.
O
O
Thank
you
so
today,
if
I
look
around
the
table,
there
are
members
missing.
Some
of
the
members
that
would
have
voted
for
some
might
have
voted
against
I'm,
not
doing
a
quick
count
right
now,
but
certainly
it
changes
the
changes
account
or
the
formula
from
you
know
from
what
would
have
happened
if
reconsideration
had
been
followed
through.
Is
that
would
that
be
a
correct
observation
at
this
point.
P
O
Speculating
I
don't
expect
you
to
speculate
so
so
mr.
mayor
I
think
we
do
have
a
dilemma,
whereas
the
mover
of
the
motion,
as
I
said
earlier,
I
do
believe
that
the
original
minutes
accurately
reflect
what
that
motion
was
intended
to
do
and
what
it
did.
In
fact,
the
vote
everybody's
vote
around
this
table
was
of
the
same
opinion
in
terms
of
what
that
motion
would
do
to
try
and
rewrite
that
rewrite.
The
minutes
now,
in
effect,
is
changing.
O
What
I
think
the
will
of
counsel
was,
and
the
intent
of
council
I
hate
to
say
that
becomes
a
rewrite
of
the
history
around
this
table.
I,
don't
think
it's
appropriate
I
would
ask
for
yeas
and
nays
on
this
and
I
would
ask
I
would
ask
mr.
Connor
to
comment
on
the
legal
opinion
that
we
received
this
morning
from
Soloway
right.
P
O
Thank
you
for
that
and
I
guess.
I
guess
we're
gonna
disagree
because
I
do
happen
to
agree
with
the
opinion,
the
opinion
offered
and
I
guess.
Ultimately,
it
may
come
to
a
to
a
different
test.
So
mr.
mayor
witness
I'm
not
sure
if,
if
there's
an
opportunity
for
wrap-up,
there
are
a
number
of
speakers
now,
however,
I
will
be
calling
for
yeas
and
nays
on
the
correction.
Okay,.
P
M
P
Mayor
I
take
full
responsibility
for
the
way
the
minutes
came
out.
I
did
not
undertake
the
due
diligence
to
read
the
minutes
with
the
greatest
amount
of
clarity.
So
when
the
draft
came
out
it
escaped
both
myself
and
mr.
murk
and
the
deputy
clerk
it.
We
should
have
reflected
that
recommendation.
3A
was
unaffected
by
the
motion.
P
M
P
To
carry
the
the
humo
ssin
that
mr.
mayor
with
regards
this
I
think
the
the
basic
way
I
would
look
at
this
and
I'll
share
with
members
of
council
is
on
April
24th
and
May
8th.
You
had
essentially
three
components
in
front
of
you.
You've
had
the
recommendations
from
the
reporting
question.
You
had
the
body
of
the
report
itself
and
you
would
have
had
the
documents
which
were
appendices
to
that
report.
P
The
motion
that
councilor
Blow
has
brought
forward
deleted
a
particular
aspect
of
only
the
documents,
so
it
did
not
affect
any
of
the
recommendations
which
I
would
remind
members
were
carried
unanimously
by
council,
nor
did
amend
anything
in
the
report.
So
therefore,
I
think
the
motion
should
clarify
that.
Okay.
M
Thank
you,
then.
I
would
hope
that
members
will
agree
to
the
legal
process
that
guard
that
governs
this
council
and
the
minutes
are
clear
as
to
how
they
should
have
been
written
at
the
time
of
the
minute
taking,
and
that
there
has
been
a
mistake
by
staff
in
the
writing
of
those
minutes.
What
happens
mr.
O'connor,
if
we
do
not
agree
to
the
legal
writing
of
the
rewriting
of
the
minutes,
to
correct
the
mistake?
Mr.
C
C
Q
Q
This
is,
in
fact
similar
to
what
happened
with
the
center
town
community
design
plan
at
the
last
meeting
of
council
councils
with
councillors
may
remember
that
there
was
a
proposal
for
a
small
moments
policy
and,
in
the
end,
that
didn't
make
its
way
into
the
document.
But
staff
were
directed
to
go
forward
and
study
it,
and
so
I
would
see
what
happened
with
the
small
moments
policy
and
what's
happening
happening
with
the
Meuse
as
being
identical
in
approach.
C
Q
C
H
P
Mr.
mayor
I
think
my
primary
concern
is
the
fact
that
Ms
Cohen,
as
she
writes
in
the
second
middle
of
the
second
paragraph,
the
clear
implication
of
the
amendment
adopted
by
counsel,
is
to
eliminate
recommendation
3a
mr.
Marion
in
the
legal
municipal
world.
We
would
look
for
expressed
language
with
regards
to
a
replacement
motion,
elimination
motion
that
sort
of
thing
we
do
not
deal
with
implications
or
intent,
because
that's
an
intangible
that
I
cannot
define.
H
If
this
motion
goes
ahead
this
morning
and
I'm
gonna
have
something
to
say
about
that
a
minute.
But
if
this
motion
goes
ahead
this
morning
and
is
successful,
is
that
then
going
to
allow
staff
to
do
something
that
they
couldn't
previously
do?
Based
on
the
motion,
the
way
ahead
of
planning
which
is
put
forward
for
reconsideration,
or
we
is
this
just
a
grammatical
clerical
fix,
or
does
it
actually
have
an
implication,
that's
going
to
allow
staff
to
do
something
that
they
currently
can't
do.
P
H
So
so
it
does
have
an
impact
I'm
going
to
suggest
I'm
going
to
suggest
we're
not
going
to
suggest
I'm
going
to
ask
I'm
going
to
bring
a
motion
for
deferral.
We've
just
found
out
about
that
this
morning,
I
think
to
properly
consider
this
we
need
an
opportunity
to
to
look
at
the
legal
opinion.
We
need
to
see
the
see
the
minutes
to
review
the
tape.
We
need
an
opportunity
to
to
look
the
original
motion.
The
answer
you've
given
me
right
now
disturbs
me
a
little
bit
in
that
this
clarification.
H
As
you
call
it
is
going
to
allow
staff
to
do
something
that
they
currently
can't
do
so
I,
don't
see
this
as
simply
a
tidying
up
of
the
minutes,
but
there's
a
real
implication
to
this
motion
and
and
I
believe
councillor
Dean's
is
prepared
to
second
the
motion
for
for
deferral,
so
we
can
have
a
real
opportunity
to
consider
the
impact
of
what
this
motion
may
do
and
also
go
back
and
look
at
the
base
supporting
materials
review.
The
the
minutes.
Look
at
the
original
motions,
so
we
can
make
an
informed
decision
here.
B
D
B
L
When
it,
when
it
comes
to
speaking
of
it,
deferral
I
was
actually
wanting
to
speak
to
some
of
the
points
that
of
my
council.
Colleagues
have
brought
forward
I'll
go
to
the
bottom
of
the
list.
If
this
doesn't
pass,
because
I
have
some
big
issues
with
how
this
is
all
rolled
out
in
the
last
twelve
hours
on.
N
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
deferral,
makes
this
very
clear
issue.
Quite
cloudy,
I,
don't
think
quite
frankly,
mr.
mayor,
that
we
need
to
defer,
because
council
speaks
by
motion,
it
doesn't
speak
by
intent,
staff,
don't
go
off
and
do
things
because
I
thought
my
that
I
was
clear
in
what
I
was
saying.
Council
speaks
by
what
is
written
on
the
paper.
It's
very
clear
staff
get
direction
by
what
the
motion
says
and
it's
clear
that
what
the
the
motion
was
because
it's
on
paper.
It
is
no
more
difficult
to
understand
than
that
issue.
Mr.
N
mayor,
so
there's
really
no
reason
to
defer
for
another
legal
opinion.
Unless
you
wish
to
challenge
the
the
principle
that
council
speaks
otherwise
other
than
by
motion.
Counsel
speaks
by
motion.
If
the
motion
here
had
said,
eliminate,
3a
and
ripple
and
eliminate
all
the
others
we
wouldn't
be
here
today.
That's
not
what
the
motion
said.
That's
not
what
the
words
on
the
paper
said
so
mr.
N
That
would
be
absolutely
clear
and
we
would
not
be
here
today,
but
that's
not
what
the
motion
did
and
that's
not
what
the
minutes
reflect.
So
I.
Don't
think
if
you
understand
that
basic
principle
that
we
speak
by
motion
and
by
what
is
written
on
the
paper
that
we
would
we
wouldn't
there
is
a
need
to
defer.
In
fact,
I.
N
Don't
think
there's
need
to
defer
and
quite
frankly,
I
think
that
there's
a
need
for
this
council
to
understand
that
principle
move
forward
with
it
and
amend
the
minutes
to
reflect
what
was
written
on
on
the
paper
and,
if
there's
a
lesson
in
any
of
this
for
all
of
us,
mr.
mayor
and
myself
included,
is
read
those
minutes
before
they
are
approved
so
that
these
things
don't
occur
again.
So
mr.
mayor
I,
don't
think
there's
a
need
to
defer.
There's
no
needs
for
other
legal
opinions.
N
O
You
mr.
mayor
I
would
actually
agree
with
the
the
chair
of
Planning
Committee
that
that
we
do
have
to
live
with
what
the
motion
says
and
I
think
the
minutes
adequately
reflect.
First
of
all,
the
motion
is
sufficiently
clear
and
the
minutes
sufficiently
reflect
that
motion.
So
the
real
thing
to
do
here
is
instead
of
deferral,
would
be
just
vote,
this
alleged
correction
down,
because
it
is
somebody's
interpretation,
there's
a
differing
interpretation.
Terp
rotational.
O
Talking
about
I'm
talking
about
why
we
don't
actually
need
to
defer
this.
If
we're
gonna
vote
this
motion
down,
because
there
was
already
a
reconsideration
on
the
table,
this
is
a
back
way
of
doing
reconsideration.
It
meets
a
lower
test
here
today,
because
there
are
people
missing.
The
only
reason
to
do
deferral
is
because
there
are
members
of
this
council
that
aren't
that
aren't
present
today
and
they
would
they
would
deserve
the
right.
O
A
A
Can
you
can't
abstain
here,
which
is
what
I
would
have
to
do
because
I
don't
know
which
way
to
vote
so
I
would
suggest
it
would
be
prudent
to
defer
how
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
if
what
the
the
our
legal
counsel
saying
is
correct,
then
I
would
be
glad
to
support
the
amendment
if
it
isn't
then
otherwise,
so
I
want
to
ask
that
people
vote
for
the
deferral,
because
I
do
think.
This
is
very
unclear.
Kiyo.
Q
I'll
save
the
the
question
piece
on
deferral.
I
would
support
the
Perl
because
I
I
for
one
believe
decisions
have
been
made
in
this
room
before
without
all
the
information
available
to
us
by
previous
councils
and
I
think
we
need
to
get
to
the
root
of
this.
Look
at
the
different
opinions
find
out
what
the
intent
was.
I
agree
with
councillor
blows.
I
voted
for
his
motion,
believing
that
what
we
were
doing
was
deleting
3/8.
Q
J
You
thank
you,
your
worship,
but
I'm,
going
to
support
deferral
and
the
reason
being
this
motion
creates
a
substantive
impact
on
the
community
and,
if
you're
going
to
create
a
substantive
impact
on
the
community,
then
two
things
should
happen,
and
one
of
those
two
things
is
there
needs
to
be
notice
given
to
members
of
council
beef
or
they
debate.
The
question
I
don't
see
any
overwhelming
reason
why
we
were
not
informed
of
this
motion
before
it
arrived
here
today
and,
secondly,
it
the
opportunity
exists.
R
P
O
An
appoint
of
mr.
mayor
on
a
point
of
order,
the
information
that
was
sent
to
us
last
night,
I
think
I,
believe
and
I
can
stand
corrected.
I
thought
I
heard
the
city
solicitor
say
that
information
was
offered
up
verbally
prior
to
the
last
council
meeting
prior
to
the
minutes
being
approved
and
prior
to
prior
to
the
reconsideration
being
withdrawn
and
as
a
result,
this
would
not
be
new
information
warranting
a
waiver
of
any
rules.
O
P
R
Mr.
mr.
mayor
on
deferral,
I
I
do
believe
that
we
need
to
defer
these.
This
has
come
last
minute.
It
is
not
technical
in
nature,
a
technical
amendment
to
the
minutes.
It's
a
substantive
amendment
to
the
minutes
that
actually
changes.
What
currently
is
in
place
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
the
opportunity
to
review
the
tapes
and,
by
the
way,
I
must
say.
R
This
is
an
excellent
example
of
why
we
should
never
have
gotten
rid
of
written
minutes,
so
we
could
easily
refer
to
them,
because
now
we
require
a
deferral
to
be
able
to
go
and
look
at
that
tape,
because
we
can't
just
pull
up
the
minutes
because
we
don't
have
any
so
I
think
if
we
want
to
reconsider
something
at
a
future
date.
It
would
be
a
really
good
idea
to
reconsider,
not
having
written
minutes
in
the
future.
R
R
M
Hope
that
we
do
not
defer
this
matter.
Mr.
mayor,
it's
quite
clear
on
the
order
of
consideration
that
we
all
have
before
us
today
exactly
what
happened
at
that
meeting
and
the
recommendation
from
the
legal
department
to
correct
the
minutes
that
were
incorrectly
taken
and,
finally
that,
in
that
lack
of
clarity,
was
discovered
by
our
legal
department.
So
it's
quite
clear
from
the
comments
from
legal
that
this
is
the
correct
way
to
correct
those
minutes
where
there
was
a
mistake,
made
I
think
it's
clear
that
the
intent
of
the
motion
was
clear.
M
The
motion
that
was
brought
to
this
table-
and
it
is
in
on
these
committee
recommendations.
The
recommendations
by
counsel
today
would
maintain
the
proposed
north-south
Road
Muse
running
from
Adeline
to
Beach
be
removed.
That
will
remain
because
that
was
carried
so
I.
Don't
understand
the
problem
that
people
around
the
table
have
that
removal
remains
in
the
recommendations
that
we
have
before
us
from
legal.
So
I
don't
understand
the
problem.
So,
if
there's
no
need
to
defer
this
item.
D
It
has
been
suggested
that
I
have
received
communication
from
legal
before
withdrawing
reconsideration.
It
has
been
speculated
a
couple
of
different
times
today
and
I,
don't
particularly
like
the
tone
or
the
suggestion
that
there
was
any
such
thing
because,
frankly,
I
did
not
receive
any
communication
from
legal.
Okay.
H
Mayor
the
issue
for
me
here
is
and
I
think
I'm
with
councillor
Wilkinson
on
this
is
I
want
to
be
able
to
make
an
informed
decision
on
this
particular
matter.
Many
of
us
don't
sit
on
the
committee
where
the
motion
came
from
in
the
first
place,
and
you
know
to
simply
ask
for
an
opportunity
to
do
our
due
diligence
to
review
the
tapes
to
to
consider
the
legal
opinion
to
ask
questions
offline
of
our
legal
counsel,
if
necessary,
in
order
to
make
an
informed
decision.
I
think
that's
our
job
I!
Think!
H
That's
why
we're
here
and
so
that's
why
I
move
for
deferral
and
I'm
happy
to
hear
so
many
of
my
colleagues
and
in
support
of
that
nothing
is
gonna
happen
to
the
Meuse
in
the
next
two
weeks.
This
gives
us
ample
opportunity,
however,
to
make
an
informed
and
proper
decision
going
forward
so
again,
once
again,
I
would
I
would
ask
everybody
to
support
deferral,
so
we
can
make
an
informed
decision
going
forward.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
B
On
deferral,
I'm,
not
gonna,
support
deferral.
This
is
a
an
error
made
by
our
City
Clerk's
Department.
He's
done
the
correct
thing
and
brought
it
to
our
attention
drafted.
A
motion.
That's
been
moved
by
the
chair
of
the
appropriate
committee
seconded
by
the
vice-chair
two
weeks
is
not
going
to
get
us
anything
more
than
more
lobbying
for
the
original
problem
that
was
caused
I
believe
by
the
counselor
who
moved
the
motion
did
not
consult
legal
himself
to
get
the
proper
wording
and
this
whole
notion
to
members
of
councillor
away.
B
They're
often
meetings
remembers
a
councillor
away.
There
was
a
councillor
away
when
this
was
voted.
Does
that
mean
that
the
next
meeting
he
doesn't
get
to
vote
because
he
wasn't
there
at
that,
meaning
it
just
doesn't
make
any
sense.
So
we've
taken
an
awful
lot
of
time
to
deal
with
an
issue
that,
quite
frankly,
is
very
clear-cut.
The
clerk
made
an
error.
B
If
we
have
confidence
in
our
clerk
and
our
solicitor,
which
I
do,
then
we
accept
his
his
word
and
his
comments
and
in
his
motion
and
his
counsel
a
human
to
get
it,
we
can
listen
to
the
tape.
All
we
want,
but
listening
to
a
tape
of
a
council
meeting,
doesn't
change
the
written
motion
that
was
put
before
council,
so
I
think
to
drag
this
out.
Another
two
weeks
give
lots
of
people
lots
of
time
to
be
lobbied,
I
suppose
we
can
get
another
two
legal
opinions
from
someone
else.
J
K
L
B
B
Q
A
F
A
F
A
Okay,
so
the
motion
says
that
the
pros
north-south
Road
Muse
running
from
Adelaide
to
Street
be
removed
from
documents
one
through
eight
in
a
report.
Now
that
my
understanding
and
voting
for
that
which
I
did
was
that
you
would
not
have
a
muse
in
that
location,
does
the
reach
the
minutes
that
you're
doing
still
safe
that
you
would
not
have
that
news,
that
particular
one
not
any
one,
but
that
particular
one
would
not
be
permitted.
I,
don't
read
that
in
what
you
put
in
the
motion?
That's
why
I'm
concerned.
Q
Mr.
mayor,
the
minutes,
as
they
would
be
amended
by
the
harder'
hume
heart
emotion,
would
allow
for
staff
to
study,
quote
the
proposed
Greenway
Mia's
concept,
which
will
allow
for
medium
profile
residential
development,
with
a
series
of
north-south
private
Mews
east
of
the
old
train.
So
would
reference
amuse
north-south
private
mules
ease
of
the
old
train?
But
that's
what
study
that
this.
A
Q
Mr.
mayor,
it
removes
it
from
the
documentation
but
by
3ei
being
present
and
allows
for
further
study
to
be
done.
As
I
said,
this
is
similar
to
what
happened
with
the
centre
town
community
design
plan
with
respect
to
the
small
moments,
whereas
it
wasn't
carried
forward
into
the
document
as
approved
by
council,
but
staff
were
directed
to
study
it
further.
F
Q
Q
A
Get
your
I
get
your
point,
but
the
there
is
in
motions
both
specific
wording
and
intent,
and
this
one
the
intent,
was
obviously
to
remove
the
Adelines
Street
one
from
the
area,
and
you
could
keep
in
studying
news
if
you
want
to.
But
it's
there's
other
places
where
you
might
have
news,
but
the
this
particular
one
should
not
be
there,
and
that
was
absolutely
what
we
were
voting
on
at
that
meeting
as
the
intent
and
there's
lots
of
other
motions
we
put
which
have
intent
which
then
get
followed
up
by
staff.
A
This
one
doesn't
seem
to
have
that.
That's
why
I
I
really
think
it
makes
me
difficult
for
me,
because
I
think
I
have
to
vote
against
this
amendment,
which
I'd
rather
not
have
to
do,
because
what
you've
done
here
is
change.
What
was
the
intent
of
Council
at
that
meeting,
because
I
don't
know
for
what
reason
I
don't
know.
I'm
you're
use
telling
me
that
having
an
intent,
there
is
something
that
you
don't
fall.
Mr.
P
Mayor
I'm,
saying
in
interpretation
of
such
resolutions
and
motions
legal
services
cannot
look
at
something
intangible
and
subjective,
as
intent
from
24
elected
officials.
What
we
do
know
is
the
fact
that
earlier
council
unanimously
approved
recommendation
3a
and
it's
no
longer
in
the
minutes,
and
we
are
seeking
to
put
it
back
in
I.
A
It's
both
a
question
and
a
statement
because
I
just
yeah
I
just
haven't.
Maybe
the
web
motion
wasn't
well
written
normally,
when
we
have
one,
that's
not
clear
staff
at
the
time
of
the
meeting
would
say
this
is
not
clear
and
would
help
people
and
I
was
unfortunately
that
didn't
happen,
but
the
intent
was
definitely
to
take
it
out
of
the
report
which
made
us
not
there
and
it
was
not
there.
It
shouldn't
be
sort
of
being
able
to
come
through
a
back
door.
That's
what
the
question
is:
I'm.
L
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
as
the
second
heir
of
this
motion,
I
thought
it
was
pretty
clear
when
this
all
came
out
so
I'm
kind
of
perplexed
and
but
I
think
this
is
part
of
the
bigger
issue
I'm.
Seeing
here
is
where
things
are
coming
far
too
late
in
the
game
to
this
council
for
time
to
be
able
to
digest
these
issues.
I
believe
we
got
a
update
on
these
minutes
last
night
at
6:03
p.m.
is
that
correct,
I
believe
that's
about
the
time,
mr.
L
L
Again
this
this
does
seem
a
little
bit
odd
and
we
are
being
asked
to
jump
into
the
time
machine
here.
I
have
a
big
issue
with
with
the
fact
that
these
things
continually
keep
hopping
at
this
council
where
things
show
up
days.
Hours
minutes
before
we
have
to
make
decisions
and
we've
already
voted
down
deferral,
so
I'll
be
supporting
the
original
motion
and
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I'm,
hoping
even
people
around
the
table.
I
did
not
support.
It
originally
really
see
that
this
is
affecting
the
way
we
do
governance
here.
G
G
P
Subsequent
to
the
May
8th
meeting
I
had
an
inquiry
from
a
member
of
Council
with
regards
to
the
implications
of
the
withdrawal
of
the
reconsideration.
I
asked
mr.
mark
to
go
back
and
review
that
and
in
effect,
pick
up
the
draft
legal
opinion
he
had
been
previously
working
on.
In
doing
so,
he
went
back
and
spoke
to
both
planning
staff
and
reviewed
the
minutes
and
found
the
error
that
way.
I
don't.
G
G
So
I
guess
my
reason
why
I
ask
that
is
because
I've
never
seen
this
is
it.
This
is
the
only
1211
volt
we've
had
at
this
council.
Mr.
McDowall,
this
is
the
only
vote
that
has
ever
been
proposed
to
be
reconsidered
and
once
that
reconsideration
dropped
somehow
we're
back
here
again
looking
to
change
the
will
of
Council
and
I
think
that's
exactly
what
this
does
to
change
the
world
Council
and
anyone
else
can
argue
differently
if
they
so
wish.
But
this.
G
If
we
approve
this
change
today,
we
we
definitely
changed
what
we
did
a
month
ago.
I
think
that's
wrong.
I,
don't
think!
That's
the
way
that
this
council
should
work
I,
don't
think!
That's
the
way
that
any
council
should
work.
We
had
the
vote
a
month
ago,
two
weeks
ago
there
was
a
chance
to
reconsider
it
was
withdrawn,
and
that
should
have
put
this
motion
to
bed.
So
I
will
not
be
supporting
the
change.
2
minutes
and
I
hope
that
I
heard
my
colleagues
to
do
the
same.
Thank.
B
P
Mayor
as
other
members
have
spoken
to
the
fact
that
council
acts
through
written
resolution
in
motion
and
council
passed
unanimously
recommendation,
3a
back
in
April,
so
I
think
by
putting
this
back
in
front
of
Council
to
amend
the
minutes
properly,
would
reflect
what
took
place
at
that
point
in
time.
Okay,.
D
You
mr.
mayor
well,
I
don't
support
the
motion
to
deny
the
minutes.
I
also,
don't
believe
that
the
motion
in
effect
denies
the
fact
that
the
the
portions
that
didn't
get
left
into
the
minutes
cannot
be
followed
by
staff.
So
I
guess
it's
sort
of
a
moot
point.
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
I
I
believe
on
inspection,
that
the
document
in
front
of
you
more
properly
reflects
what
was
in
the
in
their
report.
D
But
the
the
realities
are
the
notion
of
deleting
half
of
the
report
because
of
a
motion
that
didn't
ask
for
any
of
that
to
be
deleted
seems
to
me
to
be
problematic
and
I
really
do
believe
that
that
this
particular
set
of
minutes
was
flawed
and
therefore
correctable
I
did
not
have
any
communication
with
anybody
about
legal
opinions
or
anything
else.
Nor
did
I
see
that
one
that
you
apparently
got
this
morning,
which
also
doesn't
deal
with
the
issue
whether
or
not
something
was
specifically
excluded
or
not,
and
since
I
don't
believe
was
specifically
excluded.
D
I
think
it
might
be
tidier
to
have
it
in
here
through
the
correction
of
the
minutes,
but
I
don't
believe
it
should
bar
staff
from
doing
what
would
they
would
did
what
it
said
anyway,
since
that
was
passed
at
the
previous
council.
So
when
we
do
that,
we
leave
ourselves
with
a
bit
of
an
anomaly
but
I,
don't
think
it
bar
staff
from
moving
forward
with
this
set
of
things
that
we're
trying
to
put
back
into
the
Minister
day.
D
Think
I
think
they
can
do
that
anyway,
and
I
think
that
that
would
be
come
forward
as
a
report
to
planning
committee
and
Council
in
due
course.
So
we're
talking
about
something
that
may
or
may
not
have
any
impact
on
anything
I.
Don't
I
may
have
a
disagree
with
the
lawyer,
but
I've
disagreed
with
them
before.
Is
that
correct?
M
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
well
just
to
remind
people
what
we
have
before
us
today
is
the
Preston
Carling
district
strategic
direction.
It
is
not
a
CDP,
it
is
a
strategic
direction
and
the
staff
want
to
study
other
items
before
this
comes
back
as
a
CDP
in
the
fall.
There
are
many
issues
still
to
be
looked
at,
but
because
there's
so
many
applications
for
rezoning
in
the
area.
The
staff
wanted
some
direction
as
to
what
to
do
with,
in
particular,
the
high-rise
buildings
along
Carly.
M
We
have
many
applications
in
for
more
high-rise
buildings
and
the
staff
needed
some
direction
in
order
to
deal
with
that.
So
there's
going
to
be
six
months
of
more
Studies
on
many
items
in
this
area
and
one
of
those
items
was
the
muses
because
George
dark
specifically
said
no
Muse
no
height,
because
there's
no
transportation
capacity,
there's
no
traffic
capacity
on
those
dead-end
streets,
the
one
short
block,
very
narrow
street
there's
no
access
for
transportation.
M
Unless
you
do
a
little
road
around
those
blocks
and
connect
them
all,
then
perhaps
it's
appropriate
to
add
some
height,
but
without
that
it
is
not
appropriate
to
add
height.
So
if
you
take
out
the
Mews,
are
you
taking
out
the
height?
That's
what
the
the
immunise
is.
The
people
who
live
there.
That's
what
the
BIA
wants
to
know.
That's
what
the
staff
want
to
know,
and
they
wanted
to
do
some
study
of
that.
M
So,
when
council
agreed
to
take
out
the
small
piece
of
Mews
and
not
look
at
that
piece
of
news,
we'll
take
that
out,
it
left
other
pieces
of
Mews
sitting
there
that
the
staff
want
to
study.
It's
not
the
only
piece
that
has
been
deleted
and
we
need
to
know
whether
amuse
is
essential
or
whether
we
can
add
height
with
no
access
to
get
into
parking
garages
and
other
problems
that
are
going
to
accrue.
M
So
it's
not
unusual
that
the
staff
want
to
do
more
studying
before
a
CD
is
finalized.
As
mr.
Marquez
said,
there
are
other
CVPs,
where
further
studies
will
result
to
look
at
other
things
that
are
happening
in
the
area.
So
what
we
have
here
is
the
staff
wanting
to
look
at
the
Meuse
and
how
it
relates
to
height
and
also
that
the
Meuse
from
Atlanta
Beach
has
been
removed.
Those
are
both
before
us
I.
M
Don't
think
that
we
should
be
not
allowing
the
staff
to
correct
their
mistake
in
taking
the
minutes
when
has
counsel
ever
denied
staff
when
they
come
forward
and
the
legal
department
and
the
clerk's
department
are
saying
we
made
a
mistake
in
the
minutes
and
the
minutes
need
to
be
corrected
whenever
we
ever
said
no
we're
not
going
to.
Let
you
correct
the
minutes.
I,
don't
think
that
has
ever
happened.
M
I,
don't
think,
that's
legal
that
we
would
say
no
to
our
legal
staff
and
our
clerk's
department
that
they
made
a
mistake
and
we
need
to
correct
it.
It's
you
know,
I
mean
there
are
all
kinds
of
political
innuendos
today,
I,
don't
think
any
of
that
is
appropriate.
You
know
this
is
strictly
a
mistake
that
the
staff
made
and
they
want
to
see
it
corrected
so
that
we
do
have
correct
minutes.
So
you
know
you
can
say.
Oh,
this
is
all
politically
motivated.
It
is
not
politically
motivated.
M
We
all
discovered
this
at
about
the
same
time
when
the
staff
looked
at
the
minutes
and
made
sure
they
clarified
them.
So
what
we
have
before
us
today
is
a
clarification
of
those
minutes,
and
I
would
certainly
hope
that
counsel
will
agree
to
clarify
our
minutes
when
that
direction
is
coming
from
our
legal
department
thanks.
Mr.
Merritt.
F
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
well,
I
actually
agree
with
the
comments
from
many
people
around
the
table
today,
but
I
think
that
if
I
go
back
to
the
motion,
the
bluest
searing
emotion
back
whenever
that
was
I,
think
that
the
intent
was
specific
I'm
unless
I'm
wrong,
not
to
the
entire
Muse.
But
it
was
more
specific
than
that.
That
was
the
intent
and
so,
where
I
think
that
we
differed
from
that
point,
those
of
us
haven't
been
at
committee
and
having
understood
the
discussion
there
with
the
strategic
directions
which
councillor
Holmes
just
talked
about
remember.
F
This
is
what
we're
talking
about
we're
talking
about
a
really
important
neighborhood.
That's
going
to
take
a
whole
lot
of
intensification
density
over
the
next
many
years,
the
Carling
and
Preston
area,
and
there's
a
lot
more
work
to
be
done
exactly
what
councillor
Holmes
said.
What
we
can't
have
happen
is
we
cannot
restrict
all
the
development
based
on
not
having
the
right
access,
but
what
we
are
going
to
be
doing
is
looking
at
situations
that
are
unique.
For
example,
the
rich
crafts
site
very,
very
high.
Their
concept
plan
had
a
whole
lot
of
public
space.
F
My
question
to
George
dark
would
be,
and
I
was
you
know,
you're
saying
that
they
really
can't
have
the
second
tower.
Based
on
this
news
factor,
I
said
my
argument
would
be
they're
providing
public
space
and
public
access
to
that
in
a
different
way.
It's
through
their
property.
It's
a
huge.
It's
almost
like
a
last
rhombus
kind
of
a
thing
with
a
lot
of
activity,
a
lot
of
people,
pedestrian
stuff,
that's
open
to
the
public.
It's
a
different
way
of
looking
at
the
same
could
happen
down
along
the
strip.
F
But
what's
important
is
that
not
all
of
that's
going
to
be
turned
into
huge
high
rises
and
I?
Don't
think
we
want
to
restrict
that
community
to
being
developed
in
a
way
that
is
going
to
eliminate
opportunity
and
we're
at
the
opportunity
stage?
Yes,
we
have,
because
we
have
some
applications
that
are
at
a
certain
point.
We
have
more
that
we
know
are
coming
in
and
so
therefore
we
had
to
come
up
with
a
plan.
F
That
is
a
strategic
plan
and
it
accepts
certain
things,
but
one
of
the
things
we
need
to
consider
for
that
long
strip
of
that
I
mean
and
and
and
how
more
important.
If,
for
example,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
LRT
does
end
up
going
down
Carling
you
kind
of
kind
of
need
that
opportunity
along
there
so
having
the
opportunity
to
look
at
the
development
in
in
different
ways.
Maybe
it
will
be
a
linear
muse.
F
Maybe
there
will
be
a
plaza
that
it
comes
through
and
then
that
will
be
accommodated
through
an
application
and
through
site
plan,
etc.
There's
no
reason
why
that
can't
happen,
but
there
is
a
big
reason
if
we
don't
correct
the
minutes
which
were
incorrectly
put
into
the
council
for
us
to
approve
and
that's
I
think
that's
where
we
are
so
I
think
around
the
table.
H
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
just
like
to
respond
a
few
things
some
week
always
had
to
say,
with
all
due
respect
to
councilor
homes
and
to
our
fine
legal
counsel.
Of
course,
we
can
disagree
with
our
legal
counsel.
There's
nothing
illegal
about
that.
There
they're
giving
us
an
opinion
it
it
is.
It
is
a
an
informed
opinion.
However,
it
is
an
opinion.
It's
not
binding
upon
us
and
and
it's
our
job
to
make
the
decisions.
H
This
this
issue,
for
me
is,
is
not
just
about
the
Meuse
and
the
options
that
may
or
may
not
be
there,
but
this
is
about
process
and
and
I.
Think
process
has
been
put
to
the
side
of
the
road
this
morning
and
that's
why
it
asks
for
deferral
in
the
first
place
this
we're
looking
at
and-
and
you
know,
to
go
to
legal
and
respecting
what
legal
has
to
say.
H
You
know
we're
we're
being
pushed
into
the
corner
a
little
bit
here,
a
little
bit
into
a
box,
but
with
the
information
we
have,
the
notice
that
we've
had
I
certainly
feel
that
similar
to
councillor
Wilkinson
I
believe
that
I
have
no
choice
but
to
vote
against
this
motion
this
morning.
Thank
you,
Thank.
J
P
P
C
P
C
And
when
I
look
at
this
motion
near
53:4,
which
was
passed
12
to
11,
it
says,
and
whereas
a
news
will
not
serve
to
take
to
make
pedestrian
more
attractive
and
may
have
a
detrimental
impact
on
the
community
from
traffic
and
filtration,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
proposed
north-south
road
news
running
from
Madeline
Beach
Street
be
removed
from
documents
one
through
eight
in
this
report,
and
that
all
the
land-use
elements
remain
as
conceptually.
So
now.
The
minutes
that
I'm
reading
here
it
seems
like
the
muses
mean
put
back
into
the
equation.
Is
that
correct?
C
P
C
In
motion
of
the
previous
council,
we
had
been
very
clear
in
our
motion.
What
we
wanted
so
I
I
have
I
will
have
trouble
supporting
this
so
I'll
be
supporting
the
motion.
That
was
the
previous
council
and
if
a
change
should
have
been
made,
it
should
have
been
made
during
the
reconsideration,
Thank
You.
Mr.
mayor.
E
You
thank
you,
sir
mayor
and
I,
voted
earlier
to
defer
this
item
walk
into
council
today
and
I
think
12,
minute
or
13
minutes
before
council.
We
have
an
outside
legal
opinion,
tell
us
about
something
it
might
happen
here.
You
know,
I
am
a
little
bit
offended
for
I,
don't
know
about
the
rest
of
you
but
to
read
something
or
to
receive
an
outside
legal
opinion
about
something
might
happen
on
council
without
even
granted
the
opportunity
to
talk
to
our
legal
staff
to
clarify
it.
For
us.
E
Your
opinion
is
an
opinion
and
the
outside
opinion
is
an
opinion,
but
I
think
we
have
the
right
as
a
counselor
to
have
access
to
staff
and
ask
them
about
this,
and
now
we
see
ourselves
subject,
and
you
know
what
we're
trying
to
hide
here-
why
we
can't
why
we
can't
defer
this?
What
can
we
have
a
legal
opinion
with
you
and
tell
us?
You
know
the
background
of
this
and
and
the
information
we
need
to
go
for
and
I.
E
Don't
think,
none
of
us
really
we're
hooked
up
on
something
other
Today
Show
there's
a
process
and
this
integrity
and
I
really
don't
feel
comfortable
about
it
and
I
will
be
voting
no
for
this.
Just
under
that
said
not
because
I
wasn't
allowed
the
opportunity
to
ask
our
staff
and
get
a
clear
direction
from
them.
Well,.
B
E
Mayor
with
all
due
respect,
I
mean
it's
to
allow
us
the
opportunity
because
a
we
don't
sit
on
plant
committee
B.
We
didn't
know
the
background
of
all
this
so
to
have
the
opportunity
to
walk
in
to
mr.
O'connor
asked.
Why
would
I
get
an
outside
opinion?
I
never
asked
for.
Why
would
I
got
it
in
my
email
and
why
was
that?
E
If
you
see
and
and
and
the
reason
for
and
go
from
there,
we
ask
you
please
allow
this
to
be
defer
and
I
asked
my
is
that
I'm
gonna
move
it
I
said
that's
great,
but
now
we
seem
we're
denying
this
and
we
put
in
a
corner
like
is
this
is
about
a
decision
we
made.
No,
it's
somebody
didn't
like
it
or
it's
really
there's
a
mistake
in
a
minute
and
we
should
honor
our
staff
and
and
vote
for,
because
staff
came
in
to
us
many
time
in
their
past
say
we
made
a
mistake
here.
E
Can
we
clear
nobody
made
a
fuss
about
it?
Today's
taken
us
an
hour
and
15
minutes.
Something
is
not
adding
up
and
that's
why
it
makes
people
uncomfortable
to
vote
the
other
way
without
even
understanding
the
reason
why?
Because
look
if
I'm
not
clear
if
I'm
not
comfortable,
I'm,
not
gonna,
vote
for
and
that's
how
I
feel
about
it
and
I've
been
honest
about
it
to
you
and
to
all
of
my
colleagues
when
I'm
not
comfortable
about
something
I'm,
not
gonna,
vote
for
that's.
B
P
I
Mr.
mayor
I
just
want
to
clarify
again
so
I
understand
a
couple
of
things
to
you,
mr.
mayor
to
mr.
mark
or
mr.
O'connor.
First
of
all,
mr.
mark
did
I
hear
you
earlier
say
that
this
motion
will
amend
the
minutes
in
such
a
fashion
that
it's
a
material
change.
Is
that
accurate
or
did
I
misunderstand
that.
Q
P
And
mr.
mayor
I'm,
aware
of
that,
but
no
I
think
it
will
have
an
impact
because
now
that
staff
has
identified,
this
error
has
brought
it
to
Council
and
now,
if
council
denies
this
motion,
then
it
would
be
clear
to
me
and
I
think
all
planning
staff
the
3a
is
no
longer
on
the
boards.
It
would
provide
that
clarity
and
then
he
would
not.
It
would
not
go
forward
in
that
respect.
Okay,.
I
And
through
the
mayor,
I
think
that
was
the
intention.
I
don't
want
to
put
words
and
councillor
blows
his
mouth,
but
I
think
that
was
the
intention
of
the
drafter
of
the
original
motion
was
to
remove
that
from
from
the
the
plan
and
it
again
through
the
mayor,
mr.
O'connor,
in
terms
of
an
amendment.
This
would
then
not
be
a
technical
amendment
that
we
slap
up
quickly.
There
was
a
mistake
in
a
sentence
or
spelling
or
anything
like
that
where
this
is
a
procedural
anomaly.
P
I
P
Mr.
mayor,
the
way
I
would
clarified,
as
the
council
voted
in
favor
of
the
recommendations
in
the
report
arising
from
Planning
Committee
and
it
also
voted
in
favor
of
the
below
us
tyranny.
Amending
motion
and
I
believe
a
couple
of
others
which
were
not
mutually
exclusive.
So
it
wasn't
in
conflict
with
3/8
right.
I
I
Mr.
mayor
so
I
understand
it.
Clearly,
then,
to
vote
in
favor
of
this
motion
would
be
in
favor
of
upholding
the
original
staff
report.
Although
the
motion
would
take
the
the
the
sentence
out
of
the
report,
the
staff
action
would
continue
to
vote
against.
This
would
be
to
vote
in
favor
of
what
the
spirit
and
intentions
seem
to
be
of.
The
original
Bluest
motion
is
that
accurate?
Mr.
P
Will
I
would
qualify
my
words
again
to
reiterate
that
I
really
can't
speak
to
a
subjective
intention
of
members
of
council?
Having
said
that,
this
recommendation,
the
motion
before
you
is
to
repair
what
staff
inadvertently
recommended
or
inadvertently
took
out
recommendation
3a,
which
counsel
did
pass
and
the
lowest
tierney
motion
did
pass
12
to
11
and
they
are
not
mutually
exclusive
and
I
believe
that
they,
the
minutes.
The
official
record
of
counsel,
must
reflect
that.
Okay.
R
R
I
think
if
minutes
have
been
carried
by
council
and
passed
and
they're
to
be
altered
after
they've
been
passed,
that
should
be
done
with
the
two-thirds
vote
of
council,
because
that's
a
significant
change
and
to
change
something
that
counts,
decided
within
the
same
term
of
counsel,
always
requires
two-thirds,
so
I
can
understand
the
ruling
that
makes
an
exception
in
this
case.
I
also
think
it
is
highly
unusual
for
counsel
to
change
minutes
after
they've
been
carried
by
counsel
and
I
haven't
seen
that
happen
before
that.
R
I
can
recall-
and
this
is
not
technical
in
nature-
it's
substantive
substantive
in
nature,
and
it
changes
the
outcome.
And
earlier
when
we
saw
deferral,
it
was
because
many
of
us
around
the
table
don't
feel
that
we
can
vote
for
the
muse
today
because
of
the
significant
process
issues
that
we
have
before
us.
That
we
believe
need
more
clarity,
and
so
for
that
reason,
mr.
mayor
I'm,
going
to
move
seconded
by
Councillor
Sher
Ali
that
this
item
be
laid
on
the
table.
P
B
O
Mr.
mayor
I
mean
it
sounds
the
same
as
a
deferral.
We
just
had
a
deferral
vote,
not
sure
why
we're
gonna
repeat
put
ourselves
through
this
misery
twice.
There
I
think
the
minutes.
Let's
vote
on
the
minutes
and
let
the
chips
fall
where
they
may
and
then,
if
necessary,
we
can
have
reconsideration
it'll
achieve
the
same
thing.
Thank
you.
O
B
J
The
slight
difference
between
deferral
and
laying
on
the
table
is
that
it's
open
to
members
of
council
to
lift
it
from
the
table
at
any
time
which,
theoretically,
it
could
be
as
early
as
the
end
of
this
meeting,
so
it
and
if
members
of
council
are
comfortable
with
dealing
with
it
at
the
next
or
subsequent
meeting,
and
they
can
lift
it
from
the
table
at
that
time.
Is
that
correct?
J
O
C
N
G
E
C
N
You
mr.
mayor
to
wrap
up
on
on
my
motion
and
I
think
we
need
to
say
you
know:
we've
amended
minutes
at
Planning
Committee
when
they've
come
forward
and
someone
have
set,
as
pointed
out,
an
error,
or
this
is
not
what
has
happened.
Yes,
it's
a
unique
opportunity
at
council,
but
it's
not
something.
That's
not
have
not
been
done
before
and
you
know.
We've
never
had
Hansard
minutes
at
council.
They've
always
been
the
minutes
that
reflected
the
the
written
word,
our
written
directions
to
staff
because
our
staff
don't
interpret
the
the
will
of
council.
N
The
will
of
council
is
expressed
by
a
motion
and
that's
why
this
is
so
difficult
because
the
will
or
the
you
know
there
was
different
interpretations
of
what
the
intent
was.
You
know
and
if
I
were
to
take
the
intent
issue,
I
would
say
the
intent
was
to
deal
with
the
Tigerettes
lands
and
not
deal
with
everything
else,
because
the
motion
was
in
the
benefit
of
the
tiger
companies.
If
we
were
talking
about
intent
but
were
not
counsel
doesn't
speak
by
intent,
the
staff,
don't
don't
ask
councillor
Dean's.
N
What
were
you
thinking
when
you
wrote
this
Oshin?
No,
they
go
out
and
they
say
this
is
what
she
wrote.
Here's
the
piece
of
paper
and
what
was
written
in
what
was
before
you
is.
There
is
no
other
way
to
interpret
it.
I
wish
there
was,
but
there
there
was
no
other
way
to
interpret
the
written
word.
Do
this.
Our
staff
I
already
told
us
and
I
think
that
everyone
would
understand
that
motion
didn't
delete
3a
that
that
might
have
been
what
he
wanted
to
do.
That's
not
what
he
said.
N
That's
not
what
the
that's
not
what
sorry.
He
may
have
said
that
that's
not
what
the
motion
said
and
what's
important
members
of
council
and
it's
an
important
principle
that
we
all
should
adhere
to
is
that
counsel
directions
are
not
given
by
intent
their
manifest
themselves
in
the
written
word.
What
did
counsel
do
by
motion?
N
It's
not
what
a
counsel
think
they
were
doing.
What
did
counsel
do
here's
the
direction
it
gave
on
paper
and
when
you
look
at
that
very
objectively
counsel,
carried
recommendation,
3a
and
carried
the
blows
motion,
because
the
blower's
motion
didn't
delete
3a
that
had
been
crafted
a
little
bit
differently.
We
wouldn't
be
here,
but
it
wasn't,
and
so
members
of
counsel
I
know
that
you
don't
like
this
I.
N
You
think
that
this
is
messing
in
indeed
it
is,
but
what
you
have
to
look
at
and
why
this
is
here
is
because
you
have
to
determine
not
the
where
Oz's
the.
What
the
therefore
be
it
resolved
said
and,
quite
frankly,
you
shouldn't
be
trying
to
interpret
a
members
will
because
that's
not
the
way
we
make
decisions.
We
express
our
decisions
by
the
motions
that
we
approve,
and
in
this
case
we
approved
a
motion
that
said,
delete
these
the
Meuse
from
these
documents.
N
It
did
not
say,
delete
3a,
so
council
rightly
carried
3a
so
and
the
minutes
are
an
expression
of
that
approval.
So
I
know
you
know
we
can
deter
try
and
what
did
he
say?
What
didn't
he
say,
what
what
was
his
intent?
Yeah?
That's
all
very
good
and
that's
all
very
interesting,
but
it
is
not
how
we
make
decisions.
We
make
decisions
by
voting
on
motions
and
motions
are
written.
That's
why
they're
written,
and
so
we
have
written
this
down.
The
mover
wrote
this
down.
N
We
voted
on
it
and
staff
are
saying
yes,
that
was
what
council
did
and
that
should
be
reflected
in
the
minutes
now.
I
know
if
some
members
don't
like
that
and
and
that's
that's
difficult,
but
council
should
be
moving
to
ensure
that
they're
meant
minutes
reflect
what
actually
happened.
What
was
on
what
was
on
the
pieces
of
paper,
mr.
N
B
N
B
On
this
item,
I
think
is
the
last
speaker
indicated,
and
it's
indicated
in
the
motion
number
three,
whereas,
whereas
due
to
an
error
on
the
part
of
the
City
Clerk's
office,
that's
what
this
is
all
about.
This
was
an
error
that
was
made
by
the
clerk.
The
clerk
has
brought
it
to
the
chair
of
planning
committees
attention.
The
chair
of
planning
committee
seconded
by
the
vice-chair
have
brought
it
forward
and
I
think
it's
it's
as
simple
as
that,
I'm
not
sure.
B
What's
transpired
in
the
last
24
hours,
where
people
have
told
me
well,
I
promised
not
to
support
this
I,
don't
know
who
they
promised.
You
I
look
forward
to
finding
that
out
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
what
activities
gone
on
in
the
lobbyists
registry
in
the
last
24
hours.
This
is
a
simple
error
by
the
clerk
he's
admitted
it
and
I.
B
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
that
it
says
it
right
here:
committee
recommendation
3a
said:
Oh
below
was
incorrectly
emitted
and
I
believe
when
that
vote
came
for
it.
It
was
unanimous
vote,
including
the
mote,
the
mover
of
the
original
motion,
so
it
was
intended
to
keep
item
number
three
a
in
the
original
staff
report,
so
I
would
hope
that
we
would
do
the
right
thing
and
simply
accept
the
clerk's
error
and
correct
the
record,
yeas
and
nays
on
the
hue
Marder
motion.
Please.
C
O
C
K
B
F
Of
minutes
of
the
write
your
mayor,
I,
don't
even
know
anymore,
where
we
are
with
this,
but
this
is
important
and
I
would
be
willing
to
to
have
reconsideration
considered
and-
and
hopefully
that
would
achieve
what
we've
all
been
trying
to
find
a
way
to
achieve
today,
which
is
actually
getting
some
paper
before
us.
So
the
past
the
present
and
the
future
and
happy.
F
B
E
You
mr.
mayor
move
I'm
a
soft
secular
council
home
that
the
report
from
Ottawa
community
health
and
corporation
and
title
Ottawa,
Community
Health,
incorporation
annual
report,
an
annual
general
meeting
of
the
shareholder
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
report,
31
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
report,
23
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
report.
32,
a
planning
committee
report,
49
and
Transit
Commission
report
21
be
received
and
considered
carried.
L
L
Q
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
whereas
the
clerical
error
has
been
detected
in
the
report,
titled
2012
purchasing
year
in
review,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
description
for
the
last
line
item
on
page
3
of
document
to
be
amended
to
delete
the
words.
I
quote
clear,
liners
needle
disposal
and
bench
repair
and
replace
these
with
the
words
quote:
supply
and
installation
of
Park
furniture.
Unquote.
N
N
So
what
we're
proposing
to
do
is
to
deal
with
two
items
that
they
brought
forward.
One
is
the
issue
of
park
space
around
Tom,
Brown
arena,
and
the
second
issue
is
with
regards
to
lands
that
could
be
used
for
affordable
housing
and
provide
clarity
around
that
when
the
land
has
identified
within
the
Bayview.
District
is
declared
surplus
to
our
needs.
It's
a
city
lands
for
sale
or
lease
for
development.
They
shall
be
it.
N
They
can
be
identified
for
the
development
of
affordable
housing
consistent
with
the
city's
local
housing
priorities
and
the
city's
housing
strategy
as
a
manager
or
place
from
time
to
time,
as
approved
by
council.
So
what
what
this
does
is?
It
provides
clarity
around
the
affordable
housing.
How
lands
when
we
declare
them
surplus,
are
to
be
allocated
for
housing
according
to
our
housing
strategy,
provides
cleared
around
that
and
it
provides
clarity
around
the
issue
of
the
land
surrounding
the
tom
brown
arena.
N
H
N
B
Carrie
item
number
of
nine
official
plan,
335
Roosevelt
Avenue
plan
official
1200
sank
every
new
Roosevelt
like
to
hold
that
gonna
fold,
that
for
counselor
Hobbs
item
number
ten,
a
waiver
of
section
1
2
4,
a
of
the
permanent
signs
on
property,
private
property,
bylaw
2005,
4,
3,
9,
4,
95,
Somerset,
Street,
carried
item
number
11th
Transit
Commission
report
number
21,
temporary
reduction
of
para
Transpo
cash
fares
that
reduction
tempo
del
detective
on
our
she'll
call.
The
para
Transpo
carried
st.
D
B
By
councillor
Clark,
does
anyone
wish
to
take
anything
off
the
bulk
consent
agenda
alter
the
rule?
The
group,
a
as
gather,
shows
anything
off
that
on
the
bulk
consent
agenda,
as
presented
carried
all
right,
so
I
think
we're
back
now
with
Ottawa
community
housing.
So
councillor
Wilkinson
as
the
new
chair
and
Madame
Fourier,
and
we
have
a
copy
of
the
annual
report
on
a
very
copy
that
I
can
pull
on
you
al
and
I
believe
you
have
a
10
minute
presentation
and
then
we'll
open
it
up
for
questions
and
answers.
A
And
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
the
City
of
Ottawa
for
continued
support
of
community
housing
and
her
demonstrating
and
unwavering
commitment
to
the
cause
of
social
housing
in
the
nation's
capital.
I'm,
good
old.
Merci,
a
I'd
like
to
emphasize
that
on
an
ongoing
focus
of
the
organization,
is
to
maintain
all
the
buildings
in
our
portfolio
at
acceptable
standards.
While
working
within
the
limitations
imposed
by
insufficient
housing
budgets,
we
are
committed
to
finding
long-term
financial
solutions
that
will
address
the
housing
needs
of
our
tenants.
A
Thanks
to
you,
mr.
mayor,
the
City
of
Ottawa
dedicated
14
million
annually
under
its
housing
and
homelessness
investment
plan.
Part
of
this
was
for
building
new,
affordable
housing
and
och
received
a
four
million
dollar
grant
to
build
27
new
stack
townhouses
in
the
carson's
Road
community
and
1.23.
A
million
dollar
grant
to
replace
the
duplex
containing
two
apartments.
With
ten
stacked
townhouses
at
old,
st.
Patrick,
the
strong
partnership
that
exists
between
the
city
and
och
benefits
our
tenements
in
many
ways
and
a
dissociation
forming
new
partnerships
with
community
level
agencies
and
service
providers.
A
2012
represented
an
important
milestone
for
o
CH
of
staff
and
tenants
and
supporters
marked
the
10th
anniversary
of
the
corporation's
formation.
Since
2002
the
leaders
and
dedicated
staff
working
at
the
Ottawa
colors
new
housing
have
succeeded
in
modernizing
many
aspects.
The
organisation's
many
functions.
We
need
to
enhance
service
delivery
and
efficient
work
environment
with
the
10th
anniversary
offered
staff
a
chance
for
paused
reflection
and
celebration
is
important
to
note
that
the
process
of
planning
for
the
future
never
stops
at
och
North
renovacell
new
economy.
To
celebrate
this.
A
Business
transformation,
integrated
business
condition,
assessment
and
innovative
refinancing
demos,
his
commitment
to
continue
to
improve
service
and
make
things
better
for
our
tenants.
Och
is
embarking
on
the
second
year
of
its
2012
to
2015
strategic
plan
ensuring
that
their
benefit
they
tenants
benefit
from
the
organization's
efforts,
both
in
service
delivery
and
housing
repairs.
T
T
Brief
and
I
just
want
to
start
by
thanking
everyone
in
this
room.
We
are
certainly
the
envy
of
our
housing
providers
across
the
province
because
of
the
sincere
commitment
that
has
been
made
by
Mayor,
Watson
and
city
council
year
after
year.
I
also
want
acknowledge
our
board
and
also
our
tenants
and
our
staff,
many
of
whom
are
here
today
for
their
continued
support
and
hard
work
and
dedication
next
slide.
Please
so
I
won't
belabor
that
you
know
very
well
who
we
are
and
how
many
people
we
have.
T
So
it
is
an
important
mandate
and
we're
very
pleased
to
talk
to
you
about
that
today.
Next
slide,
please,
as
you
know,
last
year,
in
our
strategic
plan,
we
landed
on
what
our
pillars
are,
and
you
see
them
in
front
of
you,
and
certainly
we
continue
to
all
our
efforts
and
strategic
objectives
are
aligned
accordingly.
T
Next
slide
after
that,
thank
you.
So,
in
terms
of
some
accomplishments,
in
the
last
year,
we
did
refinance
some
pooled
mortgages
that
allowed
us
to
bring
more
capital
dollars
to
the
table.
We
are
completing
an
integrated
business
or
building
condition
assessment
that
will
tell
us
exactly
where
we
need
to
go
with
respect
to
capital
repair
and
we're
developing
a
long-range
strategy
accordingly,
to
help
support
those
initiatives.
We
also
want
to
thank
the
city
of
Ottawa's
investment
thanks
to
the
dollars
coming
from
the
City
of
Ottawa.
T
We
are
completing
a
development
occurs
Road
and
our
capital
contribution
will
assist
in
that
we
are
also
benefiting
from
a
grant
from
the
city
to
build
the
ten
stock
homes
in
old,
st.
Patrick
that
is
now
getting
rid
of
a
derelict
building.
So
again,
thank
you
for
that.
So
you'll
hear
a
lot
about
our
focus
on
service
and
technology
will
enable
us
to
do
this
over
the
next
few
months.
T
We
when
we
do
go,
live
in
the
fall
to
provide
better
services
and
have
better
information
so
that
we
can
provide
efficient
services,
smart
deployment
of
resources
and
again
always
an
emphasis
on
service
excellence.
We
have
been
very
busy
with
our
greening
initiatives.
Our
utility
retrofit
is
garnering
some
savings,
which
we
are
now
reinvesting
in
our
housing
as
well,
and
looking
at
waste
management
strategies
to
continue
maintaining
safe
and
healthy
communities.
T
Our
partnerships,
we
have
a
very
thriving
volunteer
partnership
program
where
we've
benefited
from
30
partners
that
have
assisted
us
in
garnering
4,000
hours
of
services
donated
materials
of
supplies,
and
we're
very
grateful
for
that
as
well.
We've
created
a
foundation
to
benefit
attendants
with
respect
to
education
and
leadership
and
are
just
waiting
for
CRA
designation
in
that
regard.
So
we
do
spend
a
lot
of
time
working
with
partners
and
bringing
additional
resources
to
the
table
that
we
wouldn't
otherwise
have
next
slide,
please
so
our
business.
T
We
are
always
looking
for
ways
to
conduct
better
business
and
to
improve
our
services,
and
to
that
extent
we
did
a
review
of
our
purchasing
program
and
Enterprise
Risk
Management
to
make
sure
that
everything
we
do
on
a
daily
basis.
Has
that
lens
in
mind
so
that
we
can
be
as
effective
and
efficient
as
possible
and
provide
the
best
quality
of
service
to
our
tenants.
B
A
Before
here's
mr.
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
our
former
chair,
if
that
would
be
permissive,
they'd
like
to
publicly
thank
councilor,
Dheeraj,
diverse
leadership
of
associations,
board
of
directors
over
the
past
two
years
ago,
specia
concierge
rushed
a
big.
Thank
you.
Many
numerous
initiatives,
including
refinancing
the
postal
mortgage
and
introduction
of
technology,
enable
of
business
transformers
so
and
he's
also
helped
us
with
green
practices
to
reduce
long-term
operating
costs,
which
also
benefit
the
tenants.
A
He
led
the
work
on
the
comprehensive
strategic
plan,
and
he
is
also
this
fight
recently
had
an
event
here
to
enable
in
veterans
to
be
a
partnership,
so
that
veterans
can
have
received
the
kind
of
services
that
they
need
in
our
city.
So,
on
behalf
of
och,
if
you'd
like
to
come
forward,
councillor
rush
I'd
like
to
make
a
piece
presentation.
B
S
Question
on
the
annual
report,
councillor
fury
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
just
to
talk
about
the
board.
I
can
tell
you
that
we
have
a
very
active
and
involve
the
board
of
directors
who
is
really
concerned
by
the
quality
of
the
housing
unit
and
who
makes
sure
to
follow
up
on
everything.
Community
housing
I've
noticed
in
the
past
few
years
that
it
is
a
fantastic
group
of
staff
who's
there
for
the
community
and
they
know
the
importance
of
having
a
decent
housing
unit.
So
I
want
to
emphasize
once
again
this
working
environment,
which
is
very
pleasant.
O
When
we
go
into
communities
and
we
go
quite
often,
we
hear
positive
things
about
och
about
the
staff
about
the
house.
The
housing
and
I
have
to
say
that
you
know
there
was
recent
comments
around
the
IT
service
and
the
son
of
maybe
questioning
about
it
and
I
have
to
say
that
it's
a
bit
like
3-1-1,
when,
when
the
city
went
to
3
1
1,
it
took
a
while
to
get
the
system
really
going
and,
and
we
and
responsive
I
think
that's.
O
What
we're
going
through
with
och
is
being
able
to
respond
to
a
broken
toilet,
faster,
being
able
to
respond
to
bed
bugs
faster,
being
able
to
there's
an
issue
with
a
particular
address.
We're
better
able
to
respond
so
we're
tooling,
ourselves
and
I
have
to
say
that.
Not
only
are
we
hearing
from
the
staff
some
positive
review,
but
we're
hearing
it
from
the
communities
and
that's
the
important
part
at
all.
Sadako
Mishra.
S
J
Your
worship,
my
question,
relates
the
fact
I
was
on
the
board
a
couple
of
years
ago,
and
at
that
time
we
had
a
major
effort
underway
where
the
administration
was
going
to
take
steps
to
ensure
that
service
providers
and
suppliers
to
the
corporation
lived
up
to
the
same
standard.
They
went
to
private
sector
individuals
who
were
procuring
them
I'm
on
during,
for
the
example
snow
plowing
in
the
parking
lots
it
used
to
happen
last
on
the
list
of
the
of
the
plow
people
and
maybe
not
to
the
standard,
it
would
be
for
others.
T
You,
mr.
mayor,
we
have
taken
many
measures
to
work
more
closely
with
our
contractors
and
to
make
very
clear
with
the
service
agreement,
states
and
the
quality
of
the
service,
and
we
filled
complaints
as
they
come
in
and
address
the
issues
and
have
regular
meetings
with
our
contractors
to
ensure
that
the
quality
of
service
is
the
best
that
it
can
be
all.
C
You
I
just
wanted
to
add
my
voice
to
those
that
have
already
comments
of
praise
to
date.
I've
had
two
particular
on
two
particular
och
sites
and
on
a
number
of
occasions,
I've
had
considerable
interaction,
one
pretty
much
entirely
at
a
building
that
focuses
particularly
on
seniors,
where
I
see
quite
a
strong
relationship
between
och
and
its
clients.
C
Tenants
in
that
building
another
where
we
had
some
security
related
issues,
not
just
in
that
building
not
to
stereotype,
but
in
that
building
and
some
adjacent
buildings
and
through
the
teamwork
of
och
staff
and
their
security
people,
our
community
police
officer
by
law
and
others.
I
have
gone
knock
on
wood
over
a
year
now,
with
any
reported
recurrences
of
what
was
almost
a
nightly
problem.
C
M
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
thank
och
for
coming
forward
with
two
of
my
seniors
buildings
and
that
needed
new
boilers
knowing
how
costly
they
are
and
how
tight
our
money
is
that
we
finally
felt
we
did
have
to
replace
those
boilers
and
how
thankful
the
residents
are,
but
knowing
that
this
is
a
big
chunk
out
of
our
maintenance
budget,
that
we
don't
have
nearly
enough
money
for
our
maintenance
budget,
but
to
commend
you
for
getting
all
kinds
of
groups
to
come
in
and
help
us
with
our
buildings.
M
Last
week
we
were
there
as
a
group
painted
one
of
our
buildings
for
us
all
volunteers,
taking
a
day
off,
work
to
come
and
paint
an
interior
of
our
building,
so
that
is
great
work
to
get
the
community
involved.
The
tenants
love
that
they
also
the
people
who
are
doing
the
painting
were
very
happy
to
do
that.
There
was
a
little
party
and
a
nearby
paint
store
with
barbecue
lunch.
It
was
a
great
event
and
just
a
really
positive
experience
for
everybody
concerned.
So
congratulations
on
getting
that
kind
of
involvement.
Thanks
all.
I
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor.
Thank
you
very
much.
Chef
respond
to
the
chair
will
consent
and
also
to
miss
poor.
Yet
I
want
to
say
mr.
mayor,
the
great
leadership
miss
poori
that
you
showed
I
know
as
the
CEO
you
take,
or
you
hear
a
lot
of
the
praise.
You
hear
a
lot
of
II,
the
other
stuff
too,
and
you're
very
gracious,
always
in
telling
us
that
you
rely
on
your
staff
and
and
that
you
have
great
staff
that
that
work
with
you
and
I
would
agree
with
that
as
well.
But
mr.
I
I
speak
with
our
tenants,
often
and
I
know
that
if
I
felt
comfortable
with
a
way
a
tenant
maybe
has
been
spoken
with
or
if
I
don't
feel
that
they're
being
given
a
proper
voice
in
our
community,
you
always
make
sure
that
that's
looked
into
and
and
make
sure
that
our
tenants
feel
that
they
are
just
as
much
at
the
table
as
we
are
as
the
shareholder.
The
company
as
you
are
as
a
staff
member
of
the
company.
So
mr.
mayor
I
want
to
say
thank
you
again
to
mr.
I
Poirier
to
salute
you
and
your
staff.
You
have
very
very
difficult
jobs
to
do
under
under
extraordinary
circumstances,
but
you
value
what
we
value
as
members
of
council,
which
are
the
people
and
and
mr.
mayor,
it
takes
a
special
CEO
to
be
good
at
operations,
but
also
come
to
the
job
with
a
big
heart.
So
again,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
and
miss
Poirier
on
behalf
of
the
residents
that
I
have
the
privilege
to
represent.
Thank
you
on
behalf
of
them
as
well.
They
are
very
well
looked
after.
B
S
Thanks
mr.
mayor
I,
just
I
wanted
to
be
on
the
record
today
that
I'm
opposing
this
recommendation,
because
the
need
for
an
official
plan
amendment
should
and
considered
with
the
original
application
and
I
take
the
CDP's
and
the
secondary
plans
that
we
pass
in
our
area
very
seriously,
and
so
do
the
people
that
live
in
our
neighborhoods.
So
they're,
not
something
I
want
to
see
amended
based
on
just
technicalities
like
this,
and
and
we
got
the
process
wrong
here.
S
I
D
C
B
B
B
H
I'm
pleased
that
councillor
harder
asked
me
to
move
this
motion
that
she
suggested
I
think
that
it's
an
elegant
way
to
get
us
out
of
a
difficult
situation
and
allows
the
people
today
who
have
been
concerned
about
the
lack
of
advance
notice
and
the
lack
of
information
to
deal
with
this
matter.
It's
not
today
is
not
about
disrespecting
staff.
H
Far
from
it,
it's
not
about
what
lobbying
may
or
may
not
have
happened,
it's
not
about
whether
the
Meuse
is
a
good
or
a
bad
thing,
plain
and
simple
for
me
anyway,
and
a
lot
of
us
around
the
table
I
think
it's
about
process.
It's
about
having
an
opportunity
to
have
advance
notice
of
a
situation
that
we're
being
called
upon
to
vote
again,
as
I
said
earlier
on.
In
the
day,
this
was
not
about
dotting
an
eye
or
crossing
the
tea.
H
It
was
about
a
substantive
change
to
something
that
had
already
passed
through
Council,
so
I
think
all
anybody
was
asking
for
today
was
an
opportunity
to
consider
the
significant
issue
with
all
of
their
faculties,
all
the
information,
all
the
proper
vamps
notice
and
I
again,
thank
counts
were
harder
for
coming
up
with
this
idea,
because
I
think
it
allows
that
opportunity
to
occur.
People
can
ask
the
questions
offline
if
necessary,
of
staff.
They
can
review
the
the
tapes
of
the
of
the
meeting.
H
They
can
look
at
the
original
motion
and
go
through
all
the
due
diligence
that
they
think
is
required
in
order
to
do
the
job
properly
and
I
think
if
this
vote
passes
next
time.
This
comes
forward
for
consideration.
People
may
vote.
Yes,
they
may
vote
no,
but
they
will
know
why
and
how
they're
voting
and
to
to
quote
counselor
L
shan't
Erie.
They
will
feel
comfortable
in
their
vote
because
they
will
be
doing
it
from
an
informed
position.
So
that's
what
this
motion
intends
to
do.
H
B
H
O
K
C
B
E
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
move
by
myself
central
council
home
that
the
report
from
the
Ottawa
Community
Housing
Corporation
entitled
Ottawa
Community,
Housing
Corporation
annual
report,
an
annual
general
mission
of
the
shareholder
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
report,
31
community
Protective,
Services
Committee
report,
23
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
report,
32,
a
planning
committee
report,
49
and
Transit
Commission
report
21
we
receive
and
adopted
as
amended
airy.
E
R
Mr.
mayor,
if
I
could
just
ask
them
to
put
the
motion
on
the
screen,
this
is
in
a
nutshell,
to
declare
June
seniors
month.
This
is
a
tradition
that
we
have
long
held
at
City
Hall
to
recognize
the
important
contributions
of
seniors
in
our
community,
and
we
just
asked
city
council
to
approve
the
motion.
Okay,.
B
R
B
R
2006,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
for
those
local
improvements
approved
by
council
prior
to
November
30th
2006,
no
interest
shall
accrue
prior
to
January
1st
2019
on
the
conditions
that
the
equal
annual
payments
are
made
commencing
no
later
than
June
30th
2014,
and
that
such
annual
payments
are
not
in
arrears
and
be
it
further
resolved
that
this
interest
waiver
shall
end
in
respect
of
any
property
sold
subsequent
subsequent
to
the
notice
of
the
first
applicable
court
of
revision.
Meeting
for
such
property.
Okay,.
B
J
You
mr.
mayor
miss
you
now
see
mr.
DeMaio
have
a
motion
moved
by
myself
seconded
by
Councillor
L
shan't
Erie,
which
essentially
calls
on
the
City
of
Ottawa
to
participate
in
Veterans
Affairs
Canada's
hire
a
veteran
program
where
we
would
share
our
job
postings
with
that
ministry,
so
that
veterans
would
have
an
opportunity
to
compete
for
vacant
positions
that
would
be
available
within
the
city
of
ottawa.
Thank
you
great.