►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – September 13, 2017
Description
Ottawa City Council meeting – September 13, 2017
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
B
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
this
morning
we
have
darcy
watson,
alert,
no
relation
to
your
worship
and
darcy
today
in
a
census
share
between
myself
and
counselor
cadre,
counselor
Qadri
as
ward,
it's
where
Darcy
lives,
but
she
is
a
student
at
Maryville
high
school
in
my
work
or
as
we
like
to
call
it.
Canterbury
West
Darcy
is
very
involved
in
the
school
she's
part
of
the
steel,
drum
performances
that
you
see
at
the
at
the
Senators
games
every
year.
B
She
was
also
part
of
the
cast
of
singing
in
the
rain
Spamalot
catch
me
if
you
can.
She's
also
worked
in
marketing
public
relations
for
the
Miravalle
theater
productions
and
she's,
looking
forward
to
being
involved
in
the
2018
musical
production
of
disenchanted
this
spring.
So
I'm
going
to
turn
the
microphone
over
to
Darcy
to
lead
us
in
the
national
anthem.
C
A
Well,
good
morning
that,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
pores
rule
madam
Jamis
yeah
before
we
start
with
our
mayor
city
builder
award,
one
of
our
colleagues
and
his
spouse
lie
had
some
great
news
a
week
or
so
ago,
when
they
delivered
a
brand-new
baby
boy.
Jacob
to
our
happy
father
met
you
and
mother
ly.
Who
is
right
over
there
a
little
lunch
break
for
Jacob,
so
I
won't
call
you
up
at
this
awkward
moment,
but
I
will
ask
Matt
to
come
forward.
We
have
a
little
presentation
we'd
like
to
present
you.
D
A
Plan
was
to
have
lie
here,
but
will
will
present
that
to
you
as
well
a
little
later,
it's
an
honor
now
for
us
to
present
the
mayor
city
builder
award
and
I'd,
ask
Allen
and
Judy
Graham
to
the
podium
and
thank
you
for
bringing
some
family
and
friends
with
you
come
on
up
here,
Allen
Judy
and
also
invite
George
des
rues
your
counselor
good
morning
welcome.
You
found
your
husband.
That's
good.
I
wish
to
extend
a
warm
welcome
to
the
family
and
friend
of
Allen
and
Judy
are
here
with
us
today.
A
A
Volunteer
efforts
and
their
wonderful
contributions
they
make
to
their
community
of
Osgood
and
the
surrounding
area.
Allen
and
Judy
grant
became
strong
sponsors
of
charitable
organizations
in
Osgood
during
their
30-year
business
career
with
AJ's
catering
after
retiring
from
the
business.
They
continued
their
volunteer
efforts
with
fries
Priti,
offering
a
french
fried
truck
to
local
charities
to
support
their
fundraising.
A
Events
and
I
have
been
served
many
dozen
times
by
that
french
fry
truck,
as
you
can
tell
by
my
waistline,
and
they
support
the
Osgood
care
center,
which
is
a
wonderful
community
facility
in
Osgood
and
helped
to
organize
the
annual
busting
out
the
Bruges
event.
Allen
served
as
the
emcee
for
the
event.
The
most
recent,
which
raised
over
71
thousand
dollars
for
the
Osgood
care
centers
redevelopment
fund.
E
A
Fair
car
show
judy
has
been
equally
busy,
volunteering
with
the
Metcalf
fair
and
the
annual
shroom
fest
for
five
years
and
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
Al
and
Judy
for
their
many
contributions,
not
just
to
their
community,
but
a
lot
of
these
events
have
be
wide
reach
to
them,
and
obviously
the
Metcalfe
Fair
is
such
a
great
big
event
as
it
comes
into
town
just
next
month.
As
a
matter
of
fact
is
my
associate
occasional
promise.
So.
A
F
I'd
like
to
thank
councilor
guru,
sand
jain
for
all
the
work
and
effort
they
put
into
making
this
possible.
It
is
a
true
pleasure
to
be
able
to
be
so
involved
with
our
community
and
that's
made
possible
by
hundreds
of
great
community
minded
people
who
are
on
the
committee's
with
us
and
come
out
to
our
events,
hope
to
see
you
at
some
of
them
got
a
brand
new
one
on
Friday
we're
looking
for
400
people
for
a
fish
fry
for
the
United,
Church
and
redcap.
Thank
you
and
see
you
at
some
of
our
great
charity.
E
F
A
And
now
gives
me
great
pleasure
to
announce
the
presentation
of
a
City
of
Ottawa
award
for
heroism
to
a
member
of
our
emergency
and
Protective
Services
Department
on
behalf
of
City
Council
and
senior
management.
I
extend
a
warm
welcome
to
everyone
here
this
morning
and
please
to
invite
our
guest
of
honor
James
Walton
to
come
forward.
It
also
asked
city
manager,
Steve
Cadillac,
Asst,
Tony,
Demonte,
general
manager
of
emergency
and
Protective
Services
and
ROC
Chapman
manager
of
bylaw
and
regulatory
services
to
come
forward
for
this
very
special
presentation,
Cesare
Beccaria
said
presentation,
I'm.
A
Nomination
nominees
rather
may
distinguish
themselves
by
going
beyond
the
scope
of
normal
responsibility,
to
perform
an
act
of
courage,
take
a
quick
action
to
provide
assistance
in
a
critical
situation
by
saving
a
life
or
preventing
serious
injury
damage
or
disaster.
This
honor
is
a
significant
acknowledgement
of
someone
who
provides
special
assistance
in
the
time
of
need
to
prevent
a
tragedy
so
now
wrong.
This
honor.
A
G
Thank
You
mayor,
it's
indeed
an
honor
and
a
pleasure
to
have
this
opportunity
to
recognize
one
of
our
own,
an
incredible
city
of
auto
employee,
James,
Walton
who's,
a
parking
control
officer
with
bylaw
and
regulatory
services.
I
think
he
might
have
given
me
a
couple
tickets
over
the
years,
but
I
don't
know
today
we're
representing
James
to
the
City
of
Ottawa
war
for
heroism
in
special
recognition
of
his'n
row,
ik
actions,
On
January,
16,
2017,
Oh
Jude.
We
knew
Emmett
Noah,
James
Liberty.
We.
G
Where
a
child
was
suffering
a
seizure
and
was
unresponsive,
he
acted
quickly
taking
control
of
the
situation
flagging
down
an
Ottawa
police
vehicle
together
with
officer
Abdullah
med.
They
provided
first
aid
to
the
unresponsive
child
until
the
Ottawa
paramedics
arrived
on
scene
James,
your
actions
undoubtedly
affected
the
outcome
of
what
could
have
been
a
truly
tragic
situation.
Emergencies
can
happen
anytime
anywhere,
and
it
makes
me
incredibly
proud
to
know
that
our
colleagues
neighbors
and
first
responders
are
there
looking
out
for
us.
It
truly
is
a
one
city.
G
A
E
Annette
is
that
counselor
minik
that
counselor
harder
here,
counselor
wilkinson
president
counselor
L
shan't
Erie,
Jason,
counselor
Qadri,
president
counselor
tailor
Europe
counselor
sure
le
yeah
counselor
egg
ly
present
counselor
deans
yeah,
counselor,
tierney
counselor
feel
it
flurry.
You
see
can't
say
Nussbaum
here.
H
I
A
E
A
And
I
have
your
written
declaration.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
sessions
as
presented
counts
where
tyranny
is
advised,
who'll,
be
absent
from
the
City
Council
meeting
of
September
13th
do
the
city
business,
as
you
know,
he's
our
FCM
rep
and
he's
at
an
FCM
board
meeting
motion
introduced
reports,
most
openers
intestinal
they're
up
all
councillor
hubely
saying
about
councillor
cactus,
please
Thank.
F
You
mr.
mayor
that
the
report
from
the
magnetic
mill,
Quarter
Community
Development
Corporation,
entitled
to
magnetic
mill
quarter,
Community
Development,
Corporation,
2016
annual
report,
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
report,
27
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
report
number
25,
fedko
report
number
27,
a
planning
committee
report,
number
49,
a
and
transportation
committee
report
number
26
be
received
and
considered
and
that
pursuant
to
subsection,
35
bracket
5
the
procedure,
bylaw
2016
377
council
receive
and
consider
the
Planning
Committee
report
number
50
Thank.
A
You,
mr.
on
the
motion
carried
q
item
number,
one
report
stop
all
magnetic
mill
corridor:
Community
Development
Corporation
carried
Thank
You
councillor
Moffat
committee
reports
committee
and
Protective
Services
Committee
report,
25
proponent
of
insynctive
committee,
the
Silvius
community.
At
the
protection
item
ottawa
paramedic
service
2016
annual
report
received
property
standards
by
logs
I
meant
if
I
get
them
all.
So
they
know.
Dom
ken
de
Byung
carried
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
report
number
27,
Nepal
Demento
event
said
the
committee
did.
If
you
notice
it
did
develop
more
economic
item
for
2017
operating
capital
budget.
A
E
Thank
you.
Mr.
Mehra's
therefore
be
resolved.
The
council
amend
the
document
to
with
a
report
by
removing
the
second
bullet
point
under
to
point
B.
The
minimum
rear
yard
setback
is
eight
and
a
half
meters
and
replacing
it
with
the
following
bullet
points.
The
minimum
rear
yard
setback
is
zero
metres
from
any
part
of
the
building
point,
six
meters
or
less
a
night
and
eight
and
a
half
meters
for
any
part
of
the
building.
A
A
My
counselors
Qadri
and
hubely
and
Wilkinson
Planning
Committee
report
number
50
at
our
poll,
numero
Cinco,
the
committee
de
l'aube
and
yzma.
The
zoning
bylaw
amendment
to
accommodate
reconstruction
in
areas
affected
by
the
flood,
so
counselor
LC
interior
will
leave
the
table
on
the
motion
carried.
Thank
you
item
number
10
traffic
and
parking
bylaw
update,
2017,
mrs.
alderman
descend,
irregular
missoula
circulation,
estación,
ma
old.
A
This
is
a
very
controversial
one:
coming
up:
11
Orleans,
Ribfest,
2017,
road
closure,
yeas
and
nays
on
the
motion
carried.
Does
anyone
wish
to
remove
anything
from
the
bulk
consent
agenda
on
the
bulk
consent
agenda
is
presented
carried
okay,
so
we'll
go
back
to
the
first
item
that
was
held,
which
is
Ontario
regulation
81
12
minutes
will
requirements
for
the
establishment
of
Rideau
Carleton
raceways
a
gaming
side
leave
councillor
Nussbaum
had
asked
that
this
be
held
questions
in
comments.
Councillor.
K
First
just
I
guess
to
staff
on
I
read
in
the
report
that
there
is
an
expectation
that
should
municipal
permission
for
the
site
be
given
the
expectation
from
the
applicant
is
that
the
21
gaming
tables
that
had
been
I
know
the
subject
of
previous
councils.
Discussion
will
be
installed,
I'm
just
wondering
whether
the
revenue
share
of
those
gaming
tables
has
been
established.
I
know,
there's
mentioned
in
the
report
of
what
the
percentages
are
for
the
slot
tables
and
I
couldn't
see
anything
in
the
report
that
spoke
to
what
the
revenue
share.
E
L
K
K
It
is
clear
from
the
regulations
that
the
province
is
looking
for
the
city
to
do
a
number
of
things,
including
of
course,
seeking
public
input
and
then
providing
the
province
with
a
summary
of
that
of
that
input
and
I'm
just
noticing
on
in
the
report.
On
page
eight,
that
staff
mentioned
that
there
were
a
series
of
meetings
that
took
place
on
the
issue
of
casinos
and
gambling
back
in
2012
and
2013,
at
which
there
were
many
delegations
present
thirty-one
delegations
at
one
meeting
eleven
at
another.
K
Sixteen
at
another,
so
clearly
significant
public
interest
in
the
item,
and
they
are
mentioned
in
the
report
and
so
at
the
conclusion,
at
the
top
of
page
nine,
when
staff
indicate
that
as
part
of
the
regulation
requirements,
that
staff
would
intend
to
send
all
comments
received,
it
just
I
just
wasn't
clear.
Does
that
include,
then
the
comments
that
were
made
as
part
of
that
2012-2013
process.
M
Mr.
chair,
the
the
answer
is
yes,
what
I
was
planning
to
do
with
the
delegated
authority
of
the
council
gives
me
is
provide
the
regulatory
input
that
we
received
this
time
around,
but
also
provide
the
OLG
with
the
all
of
the
previous
discussions
and
reports
and
input
that
we
received
from
the
public.
K
Okay,
I
think
I
think
that's
a
great
thing.
I
mean
the
only
challenge
for
me
from
a
process.
Point
of
view
is
presumably
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
province
wants
that
and
I.
Think.
If
you
look
at
the
Reg,
they
in
a
particular
order
is
I
mean,
and
you
know,
I
guess.
I
could
have
gone
through
the
archives
and
tried
to
find
that
information.
K
But
without
having
that
before
me,
you
know
the
issue
is
I
I,
don't
have
a
copy
of
what
the
city's
going
to
be
sending
to
the
province
in
terms
of
the
public
input.
I
know
we're
delegating
Authority
for
staff
to
do
that
after
the
vote
is
taken,
but
it
does
strike
me
as
a
bit
awkward
because
I
mean,
for
my
part,
since
I
wasn't
here
in
2012-2013.
K
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
that
the
challenge
is
that
the
regulation
asks
council
to
provide
a
summary
of
public
input
and
presumably
the
public
input
spoke
about
the
costs
and
benefits
of
a
casino
in
establishing
a
gaming
site
and
some
of
the
costs
of
establish
a
gaming
site.
Our
public
health
related,
as
were
identified
in
the
2013
report,
that
public
health
agency
produced
called
health
and
social
impacts
related
to
problems
with
gambling
in
Ottawa.
K
So
in
considering
the
vote
on
the
regulation,
I'm
considering
the
costs
and
benefits
which
include
the
public
health
aspects,
so
we've
got
a
report
from
2013
that
makes
some
fairly
profound
conclusions.
One
of
them
is
that
it
is
estimated
that
only
10%
of
Ottawa
adults
with
severe
gambling
problems
we're
seeking
treatment.
The
report
says
that
more
than
40%
of
those
seeking
treatment
are
either
economically
vulnerable
or
have
been
treated
for.
A
K
E
As
you
know,
if
this
proceeds-
and
if
there
is
an
application,
it's
going
to
be
a
very
thorough
application
with
all
kinds
of
public
consultation
through
the
process
will
likely
come
back
to
either
planning
or
Eric,
and
that's
the
time
to
have
that
conversation,
because
we
had
that.
That's
not
what
we're
being
asked
to
do
today.
So
I.
A
Remind
the
member
again
it
is
before
us
is
the
regulation
only
and
that's
why
it
says
specifically
in
the
Box
Ontario
regulation,
eighty-one
twelve,
if
you
don't
want
to
have
gaming
at
the
Rideau
Carleton
Raceway,
please
to
vote
against
that,
but
we're
both
work
what's
before
us
really
is
a
technical
requirement
by
the
province
in
order
to
move
forward
and
as
the
count
councillor
harder
said
when
the
application
comes
in
from
the
hard
rock
group,
we
will
have
that
fold
fulsome
discussion
at
that
point,
yeah
I
mean
any
other.
Questions
are
common
region,
81,
I'm,.
K
I,
don't
see
the
chief
medical
officer
of
health
here
so
I'm
happy
to
seize
on
the
questions
on
public
health,
but
you
know
I
do
think
and
I
think
it's
important
for
me
to
put
on
the
record
that,
since
this
is
the
first
time
a
vote
on
gambling
has
happened
in
this
term
of
Council
and
given
another
province,
I
specifically
asked
that
municipalities
provide
public
input
and
provide
a
perspective
on
whether
it
wants
to
sanction
a
gaming
site.
You
know,
I
would
argue
that
the
costs
and
benefits
of
establishing
a
gaming
site
is
germane.
N
K
O
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
well,
I,
guess
picking
picking
up
on
that
makes
my
decision
a
bit
clearer,
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
us
support
establishing
a
gaming
site
which
is
I,
think
what
we're
being
asked
to
do
here,
which
will
add,
which
will
add
21
tables
so
and
that
I
don't
believe
that
we're
fully
prepared
or
informed
on
on
the
possible
repercussions
of
that
you
know
I.
O
We
do
know
that
that
that
that
gaming
is
is
a
public
health
concern
and
it
does
have
the
potential
to
cause
mental
health,
social
financial
impacts
to
individuals
and
families.
So
if
we're
going
to
vote
today
or
be
asked
to
vote
today,
I
guess
I'm
going
to
ask
the
city
solicitor
because
I
don't
see
the
medical
office
Healthcare.
O
A
If
I
could
just
offer
a
comment,
I
know
councilor
egg
lie.
Excuse
me
it
asked
that
question
of
councilor
Qadri
is
chair.
Public
health
and
my
understanding
is
councilor
Qadri
that
you
have
already
initiated
the
action
that
the
part
of
the
board
of
health
of
the
chief
medical
officer
of
health
meet
with
the
hard
rock
people.
You
can
comment
on
that
in
just
one
but
I
just
also
to
council.
A
O
We
do
know
I,
think
public
health
to
be
fair.
We
have
a
2013
report.
The
argument
is
that
it's
four
years
old,
so
we're
not
going
to
take
that
we're
not
going
to
take
it
at
face
value
four
years
later,
but
I
don't
think
that
I
think
that
public
health
could
certainly
look
at
health
impacts
of
gaming
without
an
application
in
front
of
us.
I
think
that
that
is
quite
fair
to
ask
and
I'm
more
than
happy
to
wait
until
I
get
to
public
health
on
Monday
and
put
it
to
the
board
there.
Okay,.
G
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor,
and
thank
you
too
McKenney
and
this
question.
As
you
mentioned
mr.
mayor,
that
council
I
posed
to
me
about
a
week
ago,
a
similar
question
and
I
said
to
mr.
Alcala
that
first
of
all,
you
know
thank
him
for
his
concern
on
the
gambling
issues,
and
this
did
this
speak
with
the
medical
officer,
health
to
say.
G
Look
at
the
present
time,
the
chair
or
the
board
has
not
made
a
decision
as
if
he
had
on
this
issue
and
as
counsel
McKenney
mentioned,
the
fact
that
the
data
that
we
currently
have
is
almost
five
years
old.
So
the
medical
officer,
health,
said
and
I
agree
with
them
that
we
should
bring
this
item
back
to
the
Board
of
Health.
Do
a
study
on
it
again
and
look
at
some
of
the
changing
environments
that
have
happened
in
the
last
five
years
in
the
city
and
then
come
back
to
the
board.
G
I
Thank
you
I'm
slightly
different
attack
this
morning.
I
did
already
raise
my
questions
at
two
fedko
and
was
assured
that
there
would
be
the
opportunity
for
this
kind
of
fulsome
debate
on
health
and
social
issues
when
we
get
to
that
point
that
this
is
really
as
you
described
it,
a
technical
amendment.
Certainly
people
could
vote
today
to
sort
of
stop
it
and
its
tracks
and
say
I
disagree.
So
profoundly
I,
don't
even
want
to
get
to
that
discussion.
I
I've
chosen
the
opposite,
where
I
did
vote
in
favor
of
this
at
fedko
and
will
again
today,
because
I
do
have
some
quite
profound
concerns
about
the
health
impacts,
health
costs
etc.
Cost
to
the
taxpayer,
as
well
as
the
social
implications,
but
I
will
bring
those
later.
My
question
today
was,
quite
simply:
will
we
also
have
the
opportunity
at
that
time
to
ask
questions
around
public
transit
and
transportation
issues
that
may
arise
out
of
an
expanded
site?
K
K
C
I
It
was
my
assumption
that
that
would
be
normal
standard
process.
I
just
wanted
to
have
that
verified.
If
you
will
that
we
would
do
that,
one
as
I
said
when
we
know
what
it
is
that
we're
dealing
with,
that
we
ensure
that
the
appropriate
transportation
and
transit
infrastructure
and
services
would
come
with
them.
Thank
you
great
thanks.
Councillor.
P
Thank
you.
Well
what,
before
what
is
before
us
today
is
regulation
eighty-one
twelve.
This
comes
to
us
from
the
province.
It's
very
specific.
What
it
says
says
that
the
municipal
council
seeks
input,
seeks
public
input
into
the
establishment
of
the
proposed
gaming
sites
and
gives
the
corporation
in
writing
a
description
of
the
steps
it
took
to
do
so
and
a
summary
of
the
public
input
it
received.
Well,
I,
don't
see
anywhere
in
this
document
a
description
of
the
steps.
P
M
Mr.
mayor,
on
page
8
of
the
report,
staff
have
set
out
in
detail
the
posting,
the
public
service
announcement
that
went
out
the
posting
that
actually
under
your
direction.
Mr.
mayor,
then
we
ensure
that
the
fedko
agenda
with
regards
this
item
was
out
an
additional
six
days
in
advance
for
notice
of
the
public
man.
M
With
regards
to
the
ward
councillors
particular
question,
the
process
that
we
took
and
the
input
is
to
be
provided
to
OLG
and
we
are
continuing
to
get
it
as
we
do
from
the
time
we
produce
reports
till
the
time
that
council
has
already
made
a
decision
on
it.
So
I
anticipate
that
if
I'm
receiving
an
email
or
if
we're
receiving
an
email
on
the
on
the
online-
and
we
will
be
including
all
of
those
but
I-
don't
have
all
of
those
before
me.
Mr.
chair,
so.
P
Yeah
I
would
think
that
the
council
that's
making
the
decision
should
actually
see
the
summary
of
the
public
input
before
we
make
the
decision.
I
would
also
think
on
an
issue
that
has
a
specific
regulatory
requirement.
I,
don't
agree
with
those
who
said
it's
a
technical
requirement.
I
think
the
the
regulatory
requirement
is
there
to
encourage
meaningful
consultation
and
I
would
argue
that
we
have
not
met
that
test,
that
we
have
actually
flown
this.
P
So
under
the
radar
that
we
know
in
past,
when
we've
had
casino
discussions
and
debate
that
it
has
garnered
a
huge
amount
of
public
interest,
and
yet,
if
we
fly
under
the
radar
and
send
out
a
PSA
and
nobody
talks
about
it,
then
you
get
what
maybe
three
or
four
written
comments.
That's
it
and
I
think
to
me
this
is
not
meaningful
public
consultation.
P
I
think
the
community
expects
this
council
to
act
responsibly
and
part
of
acting
responsibly
is
to
ensure
that
we
engage
them
in
a
meaningful
way
on
issues
that
are
very
important
to
the
future
of
the
municipality
and
I
would
contend
that
that
has
not
happened.
I
would
also
contend
that
council
should
see
a
summary
of
the
input
that
we
have
received
and
we
should
have
made
a
far
greater
effort
to
engage
the
public.
Thank.
A
E
You
for
mentioning
that
mr.
mayor
and
I
agree
I
mean
we
have
before
us
what
we
have
before
us,
we're
being
asked
for
one
thing,
all
the
other
language
that
we've
heard
from
councilors
that
have
said
what
they
said:
doesn't
change
the
fact
that
I
don't
know
about
the
rest
of
you.
I
do
know,
councillor
Wilkinson
and
councilor
midok
didn't
receive
one
email
or
one
call
against
this
even
buy
from
people
who
possibly
didn't
understand.
Like
some
of
you
didn't
understand
what
was
before
us
today.
So
I'd
like
to
put
that
in
perspective.
E
Let's
look
at
the
350
million
dollar
investment
that
this
is
going
to
be
for
economic
development
in
this
city,
what
it's
going
to
mean
for
us
and
let's
have
a
very
fulsome
process
as
we
roll
through
to
either
planning
or
Eric
you'll,
have
time
to
do
all
the
stuff
that
you're
talking
about
we'll
see
how
many
people
come
out.
I
actually
forget
how
many
people
came
out
the
last
time,
but
it
wasn't
a
lot
so
put
in
perspective
of
what
we're
being
asked
to
do.
I'm
gonna
be
voting
for
this.
Thank
you.
Thank.
N
You,
mr.
mayor
and
good
morning,
just
on
the
report,
I'll
be
voting
in
favor
I'll,
be
in
favor
of
all
options
before
us
and
I
do
believe
that
we'll
be
having
a
greater
conversation
when
this
comes
to
planning
committee
in
what,
whenever
it
comes
in
a
month
or
so
a
couple
months,
there
were
a
number
of
consultations
that
were
undertaken
this
summer
by
the
city,
including
this
and
in
absence
of
any
type
of
public
meeting
hosted
by
the
city.
N
I,
do
see
it
as
the
role
of
councillors
to
engage
their
communities
and
that's
what
I
did
and
I
did
receive
a
fair
amount
of
of
comments
from
my
community.
All
except
one
comment
with
supportive
of
what's
before
us
today.
So
you
know
it's
summers,
maybe
not
the
best
time
to
do
consultation,
but
it's
certainly
up
to
councillors
to
decide
how
to
engage
their
communities
and
seek
input.
So
at
this
point,
I
am
satisfied
and
I
do
believe.
The
blick
will
be
further
engaged
and
consulted,
as
this
makes
its
way
through
planning.
N
I
appreciate
the
commitment
that
public
health
will
be
looking
at
with
the
social
impacts,
I
hope,
they'll.
Look
at
mitigation
strategies
as
well
to
be
part
of
the
report.
My
only
question
mr.
mayor
is
regarding
the
detailed
economic
analysis.
Is
that
done
in-house
by
City
of
Ottawa
staff
or
are
those
types
of
reports
submitted
by
the
hard
rock
corporation?
N
K
Willis
through
you,
mr.
mayor,
what
we
contemplate
at
this
point
in
time
is,
we
will
likely
be
provided
a
package
by
the
applicant
on
their
perceived
and
their
analysis
of
economic
impact,
but
we
would
probably
retain
an
external
peer
review
of
that
depending
again
again
at
what
point,
what
application
we
have
before
us.
So
if
it
was
a
significant
application
that
that's
how
we
see
that
unfolding
right
now,
excellent.
N
There's
a
lot
of
variables
I
would
like
to
see,
including
that
I'll
certainly
meet
with
you
offline.
It's
not
for
discussion
today.
But
yes,
there
are.
There
are
potentially
drawbacks
from
this,
but
there
a
significant
number
of
advantages
as
well
and
I
would
like
that
economic
analysis
to
cover
both
sides.
Thank
You.
Mr.
mayor,
thank.
B
This
question
is:
is
for
the
city
solicitor,
some
of
us
around
this
table
I
think
it's
become
abundantly
clear.
Some
of
us
around
this
table
we're
here
for
the
last
casino
vote,
some
weren't
and
those
who
weren't
are
concerned
that
there's
something
something
different,
something
new
that
we're
dealing
with
and
I
guess.
My
first
question
to
you
is:
how
does
the
vote
that's
in
front
of
us
today?
Mr.
O'connor
differ
from
the
vote
that
was
taken.
The
last
term.
M
Mayor
I
would
answer
and
sort
of
in
twofold
number
one.
It
is,
in
my
opinion,
largely
a
reaffirmation,
but
having
said
that,
the
last
time
around
the
thrust,
if
I
can
characterize
it
as
that
of
CalSTRS
view,
counsels
view
was
with
regards
to
putting
the
information
that
council
wanted
as
part
of
the
procurement
process
that
OLG
was
going
to
undertake
and
in
that
regard,
council
was
very
clear
that
they
wanted
RC
RC
R
to
be
the
site,
so
that
that's
my
response.
Mr.
mayor.
B
Okay,
so
in
some
ways,
if
I
can
kind
of
simplify
what
you
said,
Mr
O'connor,
this
vote
is
about
in
exchange
of
keys.
In
effect,
we
have
it,
we
have
a
new
operator,
but
the
question
of
whether
we
were
going
to
do
it
and
where
we
were
going
to
do
in
terms
the
location
that
vote
is
already
effectively
been
taken.
This
is
this
is
really
about.
Is
landlord
a
or
landlord
be
in
effect
going
to
be
operating?
The
facility
is
that.
B
B
So
I
I
want
a
first
of
all
I
want
to
thank
the
chair
knowing
full
well
that
he
walks
a
bit
of
a
tightrope
here,
because
council
is
not
allowed
and,
and
the
sister
can
jump
in
if
I
get
this
wrong.
We're
not
allowed
to
actually
direct
the
chair
of
Public
Health
or
the
board
itself
as
to
what
they
should
and
shouldn't
be
doing.
B
Think
we've
also
heard
from
at
least
I've
heard
from
the
chief
medical
officer
health
that
things
have
changed
over
the
last
four
or
five
years
and
in
order
to
have
a
report
that
Public
Health
wants
to
feel
comfortable
from
a
professional
perspective
standing
behind.
They
feel
that
more
work
needs
to
be
done
and
so
that
we
have
the
most
up-to-date
information
in
front
of
us
and
I.
B
I
think
we
all
know
they're
going
to
come
back
and
ask
for
more
and
that's
something
that
has
to
go
in
the
hopper,
as
well
as
part
of
that
discussion,
from
a
funding
perspective
from
measures
that
we
can
take
to
to
deal
with
gambling
in
a
responsible
fashion.
So
again,
I
want
to
thank
the
chair
of
public
health.
B
So
I'll
just
wrap
up
by
saying
you
know
further
to
what
council
harder
said
when
the
Folsom
application
comes
forward,
there
will
be
a
lot
of
the
public
coming
out
talking
about
all
of
those
issues.
I
welcome
that
discussion,
I
think
we
should
have
that
discussion
and
but
we'll
be
making
in
an
informed
way
on
the
on
the
plan.
That's
in
front
of
us
at
that
time.
So
thank
you.
You.
H
Thank
You,
chair
I,
do
need
some
some
clarity
in
light
of
the
answer
that
was
provided
to
to
the
councillor
with
respect
to
what
we're
doing
today.
Mr.
mr.
O'connor
you've
characterized
this
as
a
reaffirmation
of
the
council's
previous
decision.
I
assume,
though,
that
this
council
is
not
bound
by
the
previous
councils
decision.
M
H
M
H
You
and
you
know,
certainly
I
I-
don't
consider
myself
to
be
bound
by
the
previous
term
council's
decision.
This
was
an
issue
I
heard
a
lot
about
four
years
ago
or
at
the
door
in
a
male's
there
was
a
significant
discussion
and
I'm
not
comfortable.
Supporting
this
recommendation.
I
am
I
am
not
comfortable
that
there
are
so
many
people
in
our
casinos
who
shouldn't
be
that
the
social
damage
that's
been
caused
by
gambling
is
is
unacceptable.
H
The
so
I
won't
be
supporting
today's
report.
I
do
have
a
question
about
the
the
movement
to
planning
committee
and
the
reasons
that
come
after
this.
On
what
basis
are
we
at
Planning
Committee
and
then
at
Council,
going
to
be
able
to
approve
or
not
approve
of
rezoning
on
the
basis
of
social
considerations,
I
believe
that
our
rezoning
applications
are
bound
by
Planning,
Act
considerations
and
I
want
to
understand
whether
or
not
the
health
implications,
for
example,
would
be
reason
for
us
to
turn
down
a
zoning
application.
K
Mr.
merriday
I
think
the
official
plan
sets
some
very
broad
objectives,
and
should
the
council
or
any
councilor
wish
to
raise
a
point
that
is
consistent
with
the
language
council
has
adopted
in
its
official
plan.
It
creates
a
line
for
exploration
of
issues
council
in
its
previous
2013
decision.
It
benchmark
a
number
of
considerations,
particularly
in
the
economic
and
and
the
board
of
health,
related
aspect
of
it
and
depending
on
the
application
again,
depending
on
what
they
were
actually
asking
for
at
what
time
and
what
phase
they
may
be
before
us.
H
That's
that's
a
lot
of
uncertainty
for
me,
colleagues,
I
I.
Don't
think
we
are
bound
by
the
2013-14
decisions.
The
the
opportunity
is
before
us
today
to
say
no
to
expanded
gambling
in
Ottawa.
There
is
gambling
all
around
us,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
the
municipality
needs
to
be
complicit
in
its
expansion
and
I
do
hope
that
folks
will
reconsider
and
the
approach
the
council
is
taking
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
thank.
C
C
When
we
dealt
with
the
consultation
on
consultations,
where
we
established
our
consultation
policy,
we
adopted
the
principle
that
consultations
only
real
if
the
opinions
that
are
gathered
are
delivered
to
the
decision-makers
before
the
decision
is
made,
and
that
probably
would
be
obvious
to
anyone
and
above
the
third
grade.
But
that
is
our
what
we
supposedly
adopted
as
a
principle,
so
I'm
wondering
in
this
case
that
didn't
quite
happen,
but
I'm
wondering
if
we're
seeing
a
creep
through
the
whole
organization,
where
that
type
of
thing
is
going
to
continue.
M
Mr.
Maer
I'll
begin
from
the
sort
of
legal
and
procedural
perspective
may,
if
I
recollect
our
public
engagement
model,
the
the
concept
with
regards
to
public
engagement
and
public
consultation.
That
I
think
a
couple
of
the
councillors
have
raised
is
virtually
this
two-way
dialogue
and
the
importance
of
having
that
information.
M
With
regards
to
Ontario
regulation
eighty-one,
twelve,
what
the
law
actually
says
is
seek
public
input
and
I
think
that
language
was
put
in
there
directly
by
the
olg
by
the
Minister
by
the
the
government
of
the
day,
because
it
was
not
meant
to
be
public
consultation
and
he
does
not
meant
to
be
the
city's
public
engagement.
It
is
meant
to
be
the
regulatory
seeking
of
input
from
the
public
and
with
respect
mr.
mayor
I
think
that's
rather
different
than
our
public
consultation
model,
but
I'll
I'll
leave
the
city
manager
dad.
If
he
feels
inclined.
M
C
G
Mr.
mayor
thee,
as
the
city
solicitor
said,
and
it
was
a
technical
portion
in
terms
of
whether
its
input
or
consultation-
and
he
just
provided
his
answer,
but
that
that's
that
response
is
not
reflective
of
what
the
public
consultation
responses
that
we've
developed
and
we
have
on
our
website,
and
that
was
before
council
there
to
me.
They're
two
different,
two
different
things:
okay,
well
I.
C
A
J
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
to
represent
you
with
that
group.
It's
a
very
good
group.
It's
the
host
news,
penalties
of
fall
OLG
sites
across
the
province,
save
Niagara
Falls
in
Toronto,
and
it's
it's
a
good
connection
between
the
miss
apologies
and
the
Ontario
Lottery
and
Gaming
Corporation.
J
When
you
look
at
this,
there's
no
question
that
the
current
council
isn't
bound
by
the
previous
council
decisions,
no
one's
suggesting
that
if
you're
principally
against
gaming
than
be
against
gaming,
no
one
ever
said
when
you
got
elected
yet
to
check
your
principles
at
the
door.
I
get
that
I
would
never
ask
you
to
do
that.
You
look
at
the
previous
votes,
though,
and
when
you
look
at
a
report
today,
the
report
today
asks
something
of
the
residents
we
want
input.
J
If
you're
saying
we
have
to
look
at
previous
reports
and
say
that
we
should
take
that
input
as
well
and
take
it
as
input
to
this,
it's
not
entirely
relevant
because
all
the
votes
were
different
in
2011.
You
had
a
vote
on
gaming
was
a
pilot
project
for
21
tables.
There's
unanimous
decision
for
council
in
favor
in
2012.
It
was
the
Ontario
corporation's
modernization
plan.
It
was
open-ended,
it
was
it
wasn't
our
CR.
It
was
gaming
in
this
city.
That's
where
we
had
the
30
delegations
October
of
2012.
J
There
was
a
nineteen
to
five
vote
on
council.
Those
opposed,
including
me,
were
opposed
for
various
reasons.
Councilor
mashenka
was
opposed
to
gaming.
At
that
time,
I
wasn't.
My
opposition
was
that
the
LG
itself
was
misleading
was
untrustworthy
at
that
time.
They
proven
that
to
be
true.
Unfortunately,
following
that
case,
because
of
their
experience
throughout
the
province
that
fundamentally
changed
how
they
went
forward
with
their
modernization
plan.
In
that
time,
they've
changed
their
CEO
they've
changed
their
chair.
The
new
CEO
Stephen
Rigby
is
quite
strong,
he's
very
good.
J
He's
engaged
with
the
municipalities
engaged
with
the
issues
they've
put
in
place,
an
executive
vice
president
of
horse-racing
Cal
Bricker.
This
is
when
they
came
up
the
marta's
ation
plan.
They
had
no
intention
of
protecting
horse-racing.
Every
single
plant
across
the
province
was
to
shut
down
racing
facilities
in
favor
of
larger,
larger
gaming
facilities
in
urban
cores.
Putting
caliber
corps
in
place
shows
that
they
have
a
commitment
to
horse
racing.
J
Protecting
that
rural
business
that
we
see
across
the
province,
the
2013
vote
also
had
opposition
and
proponents,
but
that
vote
was
on
isolating
the
site
to
RCR.
The
opponents
were
from
folks
that
wanted
this
site
elsewhere
in
communities
that
the
creator
might
not
have
wanted
it,
but
maybe
the
proponent
wanted
it.
So
when
you
take
the
input
that
we
got
Ottawa
tourism
was
one
of
the
one
of
those
that
spoke
in
favor
back
in
2012,
but
they
spoke
in
favor
of
gaming
options
in
the
city.
J
They
didn't
necessarily
in
favor
of
our
CR,
so
their
input
that
they
provided
in
2012
is
quite
irrelevant
from
Erie,
even
though
they
were
in
favor
I'd
love
to
take
that
as
as
input
to
this,
but
it's
irrelevant
because
it
was
speaking
to
something
different.
The
point
is:
we've
come
a
long
way
in
this,
and
the
og
has
come
a
long
way
and
when
we
did
approve
something
in
2012
the
intent
there
2013
story,
the
intent
was
not
just
a
gaming
sites.
It
was
something
more
than
that.
J
Unfortunately,
elsewhere
in
the
province,
they
haven't
seen
that
the
temperature
of
a
cabin
monoghan
they
might
lose
court
accounts
in
favor
of
a
new
facility
shorelines
Casino
in
Peterborough.
You
know,
that's
frustrating
for
them,
it's
something
that
that
that's
fear
they
had
when
the
martyrs
plane
came
forward.
We
haven't
been
unfortunate
in
that
regard.
We
have
a
proponents
that
is
not
just
a
name-brand
proponent,
it's
actually
the
corporation
hard
rock
is
the
partner
in
a
lot
of
cases,
Hard
Rock
partners
or
someone
else,
just
in
name
only.
J
J
That's
what
makes
this
important,
but
looking
at
the
input
today,
the
input
that
we
get
right
now
on
this
file
on
expanded
gaming
has
to
be
held
higher
than
the
input
that
we
got
in
11,
12
and
13,
because
it
was
a
different
time
and
there
were
different
reports
and
the
input
was
relevant
to
that
time
and
you've
heard
today,
I'm
councilor
I
mention
it.
You
know
councilor
cow
who's
mentioned
it.
Other
councils
mention
it.
There
is
a
commitment.
Hard
Rock
has
commits
responsible
gaming
they're,
a
leader
in
the
industry
and
responsible
gaming.
J
They
will
meet
with
the
Board
of
Public
Health.
They
will
meet
with
dr.
levy.
Those
are
all
important
things
that
we
all
are
asking
for
and
they've
committed
to
those
things.
So
there's
really
nothing
left
here
that
we
haven't
already
addressed.
There's
commitments
to
a
transportation
plan
in
the
future
to
make
sure
that
we're
covering
those
issues
around
the
site
around
the
Finley
Creek
community
in
toward
Greeley
those
areas.
You
know
working
continue
to
work
with
councillor
Drew's
counselor
harder
in
a
roll
share
planning
the
mayor's
office
and
what
they
bring
in
rub
up
course.
J
I
am
in
the
process
of
that
the
so
we're
getting
to
that
point.
But
until
such
time
that
we
have
that
application
to
see
what
they're
proposing
to
see
the
impact
of
what
that
proposal
would
be
on
the
community,
whether
it's
from
a
transportation
spective
weathers
from
a
socio-economic
perspective,
we
won't
know
until
we
get
that
application
and
we'll
vet
the
application
as
best
possible.
Thank
you.
A
Does
anyone
else
wish
to
talk
on
this
item
or
ask
questions
if
not
all
wrap
up
with
a
couple
of
observations,
I'm
supporting
the
recommendation?
This
is
the
province
several
years
ago
asked
our
opinion
as
municipal
leaders
and
his
community
and
after
many
meetings
and
months
of
work
and
deliberation,
Council
agreed
that
the
only
gaming
facility
should
be
located
at
Rideau
Carleton
Raceway,
with
an
expansion
of
a
number
of
table
games.
So
what
we're
being
asked
for
today
is
a
technical
requirement
by
the
province
for
us
to
pass
regulation,
81,
12
or
not
passed.
A
It's
supported
in
112
as
a
requirement
of
the
facility
to
continue
generating
jobs
and
economic
activity
for
the
Southend
and
the
rural
part
of
our
community.
The
whole
issue
of
there
wasn't
enough
public
consultation.
Well,
we
actually
in
the
the
city
solicitor
listed
what
we
did.
We
went
actually
and
brought
the
report
out
sooner
send
out
a
public
service
announcement.
Many
of
us
tweeted
I,
know
members
certain
members
of
council
actively
pursued
media
opportunities
to
talk
about
it
and
we
can't
force
members
of
the
public
to
come
here
and
speak
on
an
issue.
A
I
believe
we
had
six
letters
there,
all
in
support
of
the
committee
recommendation.
The
second
issue
with
respect
to
problem
gaming
I,
would
strongly
encourage
both
the
Health
Board
and
members
of
council
not
to
accept
responsibility
for
the
problem
gaming
file.
This
is
clearly
a
provincial
responsibility.
I
was
the
minister
responsible
for
that
strategy
and
I
fought
for
10
years.
Not
to
have
us
go
down
that
path
of
the
province,
downloading
responsibilities
and
cost
to
us.
A
The
province
is
responsible
for
gaming
policy,
the
operation
of
the
facility,
the
distribution
of
the
money
and
guess
what
they
keep
the
lion's
share
of
dollars.
They
should
be
putting
those
dollars,
as
they
are
I
believe
last
year
was
9
million
dollars
into
problem
gaming
programs.
So
let's
not
go
and
start
taking
over
a
prevent
responsibilities
where
we
have
no
expertise
and
we
have
no
money
and
we
have
no
legal
responsibility.
So
that
is
something
I'm
feel
very
passionately
about,
because
the
province
would
be
laughing
all
the
way
to
the
bank.
A
If
we
decided
to
take
over
and
put
the
four
point,
seven
to
five
million
dollars,
we
receive
every
year
into
problem
gaming.
The
other
thing
is
I.
You
know,
I
I
asked
for
a
list
of
Trillium
grants,
I've
been
in
every
single
one
of
your
wards,
where
many
of
you
have
been
happily
you've
been
happily
available
to
accept
grants
from
the
Trillium
Fund
pur
posh,
a
former
board
member,
was
at
many
of
those
presentations.
A
I
looked
at
the
list:
dear
Santa
Clara's
Austin,
Abbas
Ville,
over
BIR
Community,
Association
synopsis,
United
Way
of
Ottawa,
the
Anglican
Diocese
of
Ottawa,
a
causeway
work
centre,
epilepsy,
Ottawa,
Saint,
Mary's,
home
ten
Oaks
projects.
Many
of
us
have
been
very
happy
to
receive
those
dollars
from
Trillium.
You
know
where
Trillium
gets
its
money,
one
hundred
percent
from
lotteries
and
gaming,
so
I
assume
those
people
who
don't
support.
This
will
stop
going
to
those
giant
novelty
check
presentations
out
of
principle
because
they
don't
want
to
accept
that
money
from
Trillium.
A
So
let's
be
serious
about
this
application,
it's
a
technical
requirement.
Yes,
this
council
can
change
the
previous
councils
decision,
but
the
reality
is.
If
you
don't
want
gaming,
you
can
vote
against
this,
and
if
this
vote
loses
then
if,
for
all
intents
purposes,
the
horse
track
the
facility
out
there,
the
expansion
that
will
come
with
tens
of
millions
of
dollars,
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars,
investment
will
not
take
place
in
Ottawa.
A
So
those
are
the
choices
and
again
we
receive
last
year,
I
believe
we
received
about
4.7
million
dollars
and
since
2000
we've
received
66
million.
So
at
budget
time,
if
you
want
to
start
taking
five
million
dollars
from
fund
and
put
it
into
another
budget
item
you're
more
than
welcome
to
do
that.
But
you'll
also
have
to
explain
what
will
be
cut
from
the
city
budget,
because
it's
not
fair
just
to
simply
take
one
pot
of
money
because
those
dollars
are
shared
amongst
all
services
by
law,
health,
police
and
everything
else.
A
So
I'd
encourage
you
to
vote
for
the
recommendation.
Let's
move
this
project
forward,
it's
a
good
economic
investment
in
the
south
end
of
the
city
and
in
particular
rural
Ottawa,
with
respect
to
helping
to
keep
the
horserace
community
working
and
thriving
in
rural
Ottawa,
okay,
so
yeas
and
nays.
Please.
On
the
recommendations
before
us.
D
A
C
C
Leg
of
stage
2
and
you
and
I
have
had
a
chance
to
exchange
emails
on
this
and
believe
we've
landed
at
a
degree
of
specificity
that
will
satisfy
their
concerns.
So
we've
exchanged
that
email
and
I
just
wanted
to
get
confirmation
from
you
today
that
you're
comfortable
taking
those
points
that
were
raised,
that
fedko
refined
a
little
bit
between
then
and
now
as
direction.
A
L
You
mr.
mayor
first
I
want
to
say
thank
staff
for
the
way
that
they've
dealt
with
this
file.
I've
been
at
the
puppet
meetings
for
this
and
the
way
that
the
public
was
extremely
interested
in
this
particular
case
and
I
think
you
really
went
overboard
to
listen
to
them
to
take
their
concerns
into
account
and
I
was
really
very
pleased
when
you
actually
with
the
Maki
one
of
getting
them.
Maintenance
yard
moves
away
from
a
wooded
area
and
extending
further
west
to
put
it
beside
Wesley
clover
and
mr.
mayor.
L
That
also
is
a
great
benefit
for
kanata
in
the
future.
At
the
Kanata
Statesville
area
is
next
on
the
list
for
Phase
three
and
by
having
it
already
past,
Moody
Drive.
It
means
that's
one
less
structure
that
will
have
to
be
built,
and
it's
almost
entirely
grade-separated
already
to
get
as
far
as
terry
fox,
because
it's
only
the
March
Road
and
the
railway,
that's
between
there
that
isn't
already
grade-separated
and
that's
what
I
think
we
have
to
take
a
look
at
phase
three
note,
because
of
this
being
over.
L
It's
no
we're
going
right
from
phase
1
to
phase
2
starting
immediately,
and
we
should
be
prepared
to
go
right
from
phase
2
to
phase
3,
which
is
far
more
challenging
because
of
the
financial
obligations
and
I.
Think
that,
because
we
now
know
this
report
at
Planning,
Committee
yesterday
clearly
showed
that
the
largest
population
of
a
community
outside
the
Greenbelt
is
the
cadet
estates
field
area,
the
largest
employment
area
outside
the
green
builders
and
the
Canet
estates.
Larry,
there's
roughly
60,000
jobs
there,
many
of
them
very
high-level
high
technical
jobs
and
it's
booming
right
now.
L
Yes,
on
Monday
I
heard
one
company
wants
to
expand
in
Kanata
North
they're
there.
Now
they
can't,
because
not
enough
space
for
them.
That's
an
indication
of
what's
happened
in
the
last
10
years.
So
when
he
planned
this
light,
rail
to
go
I
would
originally
into
Moody.
They
kinetic
high-tech,
wasn't
doing
that.
L
Well
now
it
is
a
world
leader
in
many
many
different
areas,
and
next
month
we'll
have
the
great
joy
of
going
on
the
public
road
with
a
driverless
vehicle
for
the
first
time
in
Canada,
and
that's
because
of
the
technology
that
we
have
in
that
area.
So
I'd
like
to
sort
of
talk
about,
let's
get
going
now
with
phase
3,
you
need
phase
3
because
we
are
going
to
well.
L
L
mayor,
what
I'm
asking
is
that
we
actually
set
up
a
little
group
yourself,
the
three
of
us
from
the
area-
councillor
Chad,
recount
cert,
hopefully
and
myself-
that
are
the
urban
areas
in
the
transit
area
outside
the
Greenbelt,
and
we
started
strategizing
about
how
we
could
get
the
funding
to
do
this.
The
technical
part
can
be
done.
The
EA
is
shortly
going
to
be
finished
and
we
all
know
the
route
we'll
know
the
approximate
costing
within
the
next
few
months
and
week.
L
What
we
have
to
attend,
amend
and
change
around
to
get
that
funding
and
if
we
start
now,
I
think
they
do
a
lot
better
jobs,
so
I'm
just
asking
if
you'd
be
prepared
to
work
with
us
and
start
that
process
now
with
the
community,
so
that
we
can
in
fact
make
it
much
earlier
than
now,
because
at
the
moment
there's
no
date,
there's
no
timing,
we
don't
know,
and
the
community
is
constantly
asking
about
it.
This
way,
I
think
we
can
give
them
some
certainty
that
at
least
we're
working
very
hard
to
make
it
happen.
L
A
A
A
Big
time
for
us
that
will
determine
the
most
appropriate
route,
more
precise
costing,
but
there's
no
nothing
stopping
us
from
working
together
to
continue
to
lobby
the
other
levels
of
government
to
secure
funding.
But,
as
you
know,
that
would
have
to
be
at
this
stage
of
5050
cost-sharing
with
the
two
other
orders.
L
There,
because
I
think
that
may
or
may
not
happen,
and
we
have
to
also
take
heel.
You
search
hard
to
see
if
it
has
to
be
a
one-third
one-third
one-third.
What
can
we
do
that
doesn't
require
having
it
all
finished,
the
last
public
meeting
on
the
EI
will
be
next
month
and
at
that
point
way
they
will
put
forward
their
recommended
route.
They
will
be
put
forward
their
estimated
original
costing
and
they
will
fine-tune
that
over
the
next
year.
So
we'll
have
some
basic
yeah.
A
N
L
That's
not
looking
at
that
level
of
detail
right
now,
but
the
the
detail
I'm
looking
at
is
so
how
it
can
we
explore
our
own
financial
plan
to
see
what
we
can
do
there
to
release
funds,
what
we
can
do
with
that,
which
doesn't
in
fact
make
any
commitments.
It's
really
really
just
searching
right
now,
because
I
think
that
it
looks
at
how
long
it's
taken
us
to
arrange,
funding
and
all
the
work.
L
That's
been
done
in
phases,
1
&
2,
which
has
been
incredibly
a
lot
that
and
it
made
these
thing,
looks
a
long
time
away,
but
they're
supposed
to
be
finishing
phase
2
in
2023
or
2024.
When
you
start
looking
at
that
with
the
time
has
taken
for
the
rest
of
it,
because
I
started
working
on
his
file
in
2006.
The
original
plan
for
where
the
roof
would
go
was
done
in
that
term
of
council.
This
is
the
third
term
of
counsel
that
I've
been
working
on
it.
L
So
it
does
take
a
lot
of
time
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
before
I
leave
council,
which
I
may
do
it
some
time
they
that
we
have
things
moving
forward,
so
I
just
think
getting
started,
doesn't
hurt.
We're
going
to
be
meeting
together.
Mister
bear
the
the
West
End
councillors
will
start
that
ball
rolling.
That
way,
then
get
back
to
you
on
that.
Okay.
H
Thank
You
mayor
with
respect
to
the
the
governance
portion
of
this
report,
I
just
want
to
get
some
comfort
around
some
of
the
new
delegated
authorities
in
and
sorry
I've,
a
notice
that
in
December
2013,
when
we
were
doing
some
governance
changes,
we
made
the
change
such
that
any
changes
to
designs,
as
approved
by
City
Council
in
December
2012,
requires
concurrence
from
the
mayor
and
ward
councillor
in
the
report.
That's
before
us,
the
ESC
is
going
to
have
a
mandate
around
making
design
changes.
H
K
You
mr.
mayor
yeah,
just
I
also
had
just
a
couple
of
questions
on
the
governance
portion.
I
think
they're
pretty
straightforward,
but
on
page
29
of
the
report,
one
of
the
bullets
of
increased
delegated
authority
for
the
ESC
and
I'm
reading
from
the
report
here
is
increased
project
funding
outside
of
approved
funds.
K
G
K
And
then,
similarly,
the
second
bullet
design
changes
requiring
funding
outside
of
the
existing
delegated
authority.
So
similarly
that
would
be
within
the
context
of
the
existing
project,
budget
and
I
guess.
My
only
question
because
it
didn't
come
out
clearly
in
the
report,
is
the
rationale
for
that
it
was
it
deemed
too
complex
to
go
through
fedko
and
council?
Is
there
a
timeliness
issue
I'm
just
curious?
What
the
rationale
is.
Mr.
G
Mayor
in
the
report
back
in
November,
26
2013,
the
the
report
basically
outlined
a
number
of
factors:
five
factors
that
were
taken
into
consideration
for
the
delegated
authority
and
one
of
the
main
considerations
was
the
timeliness
of
the
project.
It
is
a
project
management
structure,
it
is
a
complex
project.
G
We
are
meeting
weekly
and
and
ensuring
they're
on
top
of
the
project,
and
we
have
checks
and
balances
built
in
to
report
back
to
Council
and
ensure
that
we
stay
within
our
budget
and
if
we
do
have
to
go
outside
that,
we
do
come
back
to
council.
But
the
primary
reason
is
that
decisions
on
any
changes
within
the
scope
that
and
and
budget
the
council
approved,
can
be
dealt
with
in
timely
manner
and
not
be
not
be
delayed.
Due
to
some
of
the
legislative
processes
that
we
have
in
place.
Okay,.
K
Thank
you
for
that
answer,
and
I
presume
that
granting
this
delegated
authority,
this
additional
delegate
authority
sought,
does
not
preclude.
In
fact,
one
would
still
anticipate
seeing
reports
on
what
occurred
in
a
timely
fashion.
So,
let's
say
a
decision
needs
to
be
made
by
X
date.
It's
made
presume
within
a
short
time
thereafter,
particularly
if
it
does
involve
significant
changes
or
significant
expenditures
of
the
contingency
fund.
That
Fed
Cohen
counsel
would
be
told
about
that.
C
P
Thank
you
and
I
want
to
start
by
thanking
mr.
Mahoney
for
answering
my
specific
questions
around
delegated
authority,
because
what
concerns
me
in
this
report
is
that
we're
asking
for
more
and
more
delegated
authority
to
staff.
This
is
the
largest
project
in
the
city's
history
of
inherit
long
enough
to
remember
the
Cirelli
line
that
ultimately
got
counseled
but
cancelled,
but
I.
P
Remember
how
council
was
seized
with
that
project
and
really
every
step
of
the
way
had
a
pretty
hands-on
approach
to
understanding
the
decisions
that
were
being
made
along
the
line
and
why
they
were
being
made
and
I
feel
that
the
pendulum
has
swung
so
far
in
the
other
direction.
Now
I
mean
that
might
have
been
excessive.
But
this
is,
in
my
opinion,
also
excessive
that
really
we're
narrowing
the
scope,
we're
taking
away
infrastructure
Ontario,
where
we're
concentrating
in
the
hands
of
a
very
few
people
in
this
city.
P
A
lot
of
delegated
authority,
including
the
delegated
authority
for
the
contingency
of
a
hundred
million
dollars
and
I.
Just
think
that
council
shouldn't
be
delegating
all
that
authority
to
staff.
I.
Think
that
it's
reasonable
that
if
there
were
to
be
changes
along
the
way
that
it
come
back
to
Council,
come
back
to
fedko,
come
back
to
Transportation
come
back
to
transit,
whatever
it
is
in
a
timely
fashion,
so
that
council
is
made
aware
and
has
the
decision,
not
a
delegated
authority,
to
to
a
staff
body.
P
And
for
me
you
know
this
is
the
largest
project,
billions
of
dollars
and
there's
two
pages
dedicated
to
process
and
delegation
of
authority
in
this
and
I.
Just
to
me
it
doesn't
make
sense:
I,
don't
I
I,
don't
think
that
we
should
say
here's-here's
2.1
billion
dollars.
Let
us
know
when
we
can
cut
a
ribbon.
I
think
the
council
needs
to
be
much
more
engaged
than
we
are
and
I
think
that
it's
somewhat
irresponsible
to
just
delegate
all
of
the
authority
for
all
the
decision-making
to
stop
and
so
mr.
mayor.
P
A
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
wish
to
speak
on
the
item.
I'll
offer
a
couple
of
comments.
First
of
all,
thanks
to
our
staff,
our
staff
have
been
working
on
this
particular
project
for
some
time
now
and
I
have
done
I
believe
a
very
good
job
of
keeping
us
informed,
keeping
the
public
informed
attending
many
public
consultation
meetings
when
we
thank
our
city
manager,
Steve
Cadillac,
Asst,
John,
Mann,
Coney,
Chris
whale
their
respective
teams.
E
A
That
all
parts
of
our
city
will
benefit
from
the
expedited
procurement
of
stage
2
LRT,
as
we
bring
LRT
farther
east
to
trim
Road
farther
south
to
Riverside
south
farther
west
to
Algonquin
College
and
a
moody
Drive
now
and
in
fact,
farther
in
all
directions
than
had
been
thought
possible
at
the
outset.
There's
no
doubt
in
my
mind
that
these
investments
being
made
collectively
with
our
provincial
and
federal
partners
and,
as
you
can
imagine,
a
lot
of
meetings
and
time
and
effort
went
into
those
meetings
both
at
the
political
and
the
bureaucratic
level.
A
But
it
was
a
signal
of
that.
We
were
one
of
I
believe
only
two
projects
that
received
a
pre-approval
on
stage
two
funding
of
the
infrastructure
program
in
all
of
Canada,
and
that
I
think,
is
something
we
could
be
very
very
proud
of,
because
we
know
that
it's
going
this
program.
This
project
of
LRT
will
help
to
contribute
to
the
growing
confidence
that
individuals,
families,
businesses
and
organizations
are
feeling
about
our
future
with
well
over
five
billion
dollars
in
LRT
infrastructure,
work,
planned
or
underway
in
the
city.
A
It's
no
wonder
that
families
are
purchasing
homes
and
greater
numbers
and
planning
for
prosperous
future
here
in
the
nation's
capital,
and
also
business
confidence,
as
you
see
with
the
Ottawa
Chamber
of
Commerce,
is
on
the
rise.
With
today's
approval
in
hand,
staff
can
now
continue
to
advance
the
procurement
for
both
the
Confederation
line
and
the
Trillium
Lion
extensions,
oh
cool,
the
approach
and
male
personnel
level
over.
A
Mistake
there
are
still
lots
of
challenges
ahead
when
you're
building
a
train
system
in
a
built
up
part
of
a
community.
There
are
always
going
to
be
disruptions
and
challenges
to
the
neighborhood
and
we've
seen
that
in
phase
one,
and
we
will
see
it
again
in
Phase
two,
but
at
the
same
time,
I
believe
the
staff
have
gone
above
and
beyond
to
ensure
that
disruptions
and
inconveniences
and
challenges
to
neighbourhoods
are
met
with
sensible
and
affordable
solutions.
A
So
these
procurements
are
both
innovative
and
groundbreaking
and
will
serve
as
a
model
for
jurisdictions
here
in
Canada
and
around
the
world
and
I
think
anyone
who
receives
some
of
the
kinds
of
publications
that
I
have
the
honor
of
receiving
infrastructure
Canada's
publication.
They
show
case
our
LRT
project
very
frequently,
which
is
something
I
think
we
can
all
be
very
proud
of.
A
So
staff
will
continue
the
important
work
of
preparing
the
evaluation
criterion
process
to
ensure
a
robust,
fair
and
competitive
procurement
process,
and
to
see
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
receives
excellent
overall
value
with
this
historic
investment
and
as
councillor
Wilkinson
and
other
Western
councillors
have
been
pushing
for
for
a
farther
west
option.
We
are
going
through
with
the
EI
and
I
mentioned
Karen
Makram
ins
involvement,
which
was
very
helpful.
We
also
want
to
go
over
the
Prince
of
Wales
bridge.
A
You
know
the
old
train
to
the
to
the
tache
rapi
bus
system
is
something
that
mayor
Panozzo,
been
I,
have
discussed
and
he's
supportive,
and
obviously
that
is
another
project
that
is
on
the
horizon.
Should
we
secured
funding
sooner?
We
can
have
the
Train
going
over
there
sooner
as
well,
so
I'm
very
much
looking
forward
to
moving
into
this
next
exciting
step
in
the
second
half
of
2018,
when
we
expect
the
successful
proponents
to
be
presented
to
Council
for
approval
on
both
of
those
projects,
both
Confederation
of
trillium
line
and
I.
A
Thank
members
of
council
very
much
for
their
support.
Continued
support
of
this
amazing
city
building
opportunity
so
I'd
like
to
call
yeas
and
nays
on
the
whole
report,
and
if
someone
would
like
to
dissent
I
believe
councillor
Dean's
would
like
to
dissent
a
number
four.
So
on
the
main
report,
yeas
and
nays.
Please.
I
A
P
P
They
feel
very
much
as
though
these
are
many
hotels
that
are
being
established
in
residential
areas
and
you'll
recall
that
I
asked
in
June
for
a
report
back
on
the
planning
tools
that
we
might
have
to
address
this.
But
when
it
comes
to
parking,
I
just
wanted
to
specifically
ask
staff.
If
we
have
looked
at
the
impact
of
relaxing
this
regulation
on
Airbnb.
C
Through
you,
mr.
mayor,
no,
we
haven't
looked
at
specifically
with
Airbnb,
but
what
I
can
say
is
if
there's
a
three
that
the
task
concerns
with
people
parking
more
than
four
or
five
six
hours
on
the
weekend.
They
can
do
through
our
regular
process
and
petition,
and
we
would
sign
it
as
a
three
hour
or
two
hour
or
one
hour
parking
based
on
what
the
community
would
want.
Okay,.
C
The
the
proponent
the
resident
lives
on
the
street
would
contact
the
city.
We
would
provide
them
with
a
petition
with
all
the
addresses
on
that
street
would
also
say
what
the
parking
request
was.
So
it
was
for
three
hour
parking
on
the
weekends
and
then
they
would
go
out
and
survey
the
residents,
and
if
we
get
66%
approval,
then
we
would
and
concurrence
from
the
councilor.
We
would
then
implement
that
change.
The
parking
regulations,
okay.
E
E
Say
that
there's
not
a
lot
of
sensitivity
as
to
the
bike
lanes
and
the
road
itself
and
those
regulations
that
don't
allow
us
to
have
both
unless
there's
a
physical
barrier.
So
could
you
comment
on
that?
Because
there
were
many
situations
that
you
are
aware
of
that
have
created
a
lot
of
tension
towards
bikers
or
residents
or
businesses,
where
we
could
find
a
common
solution?
If
the
regulation
is
changed,
we
haven't
changed
the
regulation
so
right
now
you
can
park
at
15
70s
from
the
sidewalk.
E
If
there's
no
sidewalk,
it
could
be
from
the
side
of
the
road.
So
we
haven't
changed
the
regulation.
What
you're
talking
about
I
think
is
bike
lanes
where
you
can
park
a
meter
or
meter
and
a
half
from
the
road.
This
is
more
for
problem.
We've
seen
that
on
Laurier,
where
there's
only
paint
used
and
cars
are
blocking
the
bike
lanes.
So
we
need
that
sort
of
border
to
make
sure
that
people
stay
on
the
right
side
and
do
not
block
the
bike
lanes.
E
Obviously,
I
think
there's
a
domino
effect
because
as
soon
as
you
ask
for
a
boarder
that
zone
has
to
be
maintained
during
the
winter.
So
that's
not
really
a
solution,
so
maybe
you
could
take
a
direction
that
is
to
make
a
decision
internally,
because
it's
very
tiring
to
try
and
manage
that
we
tried
to
please
residents,
but
the
bureaucratic
solution
is
not
efficient.
E
Yes,
we're
working
with
our
colleagues
in
order
to
find
a
solution.
We've
had
a
meeting
over
quite
a
few
days
in
order
to
put
in
place
and
what
residents
want
on
their
street
so
you're
confirming
that
will
you
will
make
the
proper
analysis
internally?
Yes,
we'll
be
working
with
the
road
department
and
you'll
provide
a
report
to
the
Transportation
Committee.
E
E
A
C
C
F
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
before
I
ask
my
question:
I
just
want
to
talk
about
something
mr.
Landry
mentioned
in
his
response
to
councilor
Dean's
about
the
petition
process.
I
can
share
with
my
colleagues
that
I've
done
that
process
a
number
of
times
in
my
community.
It's
worked
well,
the
majority
of
the
residents
really
liked
it.
It's
not
that
time-consuming
and
you
end
up
getting
a
much
better
product
out
of
it,
because
mr.
Landry
staff
can
recommend
exactly
how
to
sign
a
street
so
that
you
still
get
good
on
street
spots.
F
F
Should
we
be
looking
at
adding
some
more
parking
control
officers
into
this
in
the
city
as
well,
because
part
of
the
issue
here
is
the
number
of
complaints
being
received
for
a
parking
infringement
so,
along
with
the
long
term
solution
of
your
exercise
with
the
petition
and
everything
I'm
just
wondering
mr.
mayor,
if
it'd
be
a
good
direction
to
staff,
to
take
a
review
at
the
staffing
levels
as
well
the
full
and
part-time
officers
and
see
if
we
need
a
few
more.
A
Q
Q
Work
and
with
regards
to
that,
with
regards
to
where
volumes
are
now,
we
can
better
deploy
the
assets
we
have
so
with
the
work.
That's
being
done.
We'll
take
that
as
part
of
the
analysis
currently
we're
identifying,
perhaps
we're
investing
in
areas.
We
can
reinvest
some
I
think,
maybe,
with
the
current
resources,
we
may
be
less
what
the
counselor
wants
and
be
more
effective,
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
hear
what
they
have
to
do.
The
work
they're
doing
in
the.
F
I
I
That
has
a
number
of
problems
to
come
with
it.
One,
of
course,
is
that
residents
there
will
find
it
even
more
difficult
to
find
parking
when
it's
already
very
difficult
another
is.
It
may
actually
be
an
enticement
to
people
now
choosing
to
drive,
whereas
they
had
taken
us
up
on
our
encouragement
to
to
be
using
transit,
and
they
may
feel
now
that
well,
hey
I
can
park
for
up
to
six
hours.
I
Why
not
do
that
and
the
third
one
of
course
is
said:
well
we
often
find
that
our
two
City
parking
garages
around
Lansdowne
are
underwhelmed,
and
so
that
would
be
even
more
the
case
where
there
would
be
lost
revenue
in
the
parking
garages
and
more
people
circling
competing
for
those
spaces.
What
I'm
getting
to
this
is
all
sort
of
somewhat
known.
I
really
saw
this
proposal
initially
as
being
something
that
I
had
heard.
Suburban
councillors
were
asking
for,
and
I
saw
nope
that's
what
people
are
asking
for.
I
had
no
problem
with
that.
I
I
It
can
be
time
in
intense
if
it
can
be
particularly
time
intensive
if
you
have
quite
a
number
of
streets
that
now
find
themselves
with
the
possibility
of
becoming
6hours
owns,
and
that
could
be
as
many
as
15
20
or
30
streets.
Just
in
the
circumference
of
easy
walking
distance
of
Lansdowne,
that's
a
lot
of
staff
time.
That's
a
lot
of
people
you're
giving
address
list
and
saying
fill
your
boots.
Go
out
talk
to
your
80
neighbors
and
come
back
with
with
with
signatures.
I
What
I'm
wondering
is
if
there
are
entire
zones
where
we
know
there's
an
issue
or
we've
got
the
studies
with
lands
down
to
traffic
where
we
might
actually
do
it
on
a
zone
basis
and
a
councillor
bring
a
motion
to
say.
Based
on
this
knowledge,
can
we
do
multiple
streets
with
a
clear
rationale
for
that,
as
opposed
to
requiring
a
street-by-street
petition.
M
C
Mr.
Merrit,
with
the
we
just
back
in
June
I,
believe
it
was.
There
was
report
that
was
approved
on
the
petition
process
and
there
it
looked
at
street
by
street
because
there
might
be
requirements
from
one
Street
versus
another.
If
there
was
a
zone
we
would.
We
would
recommend
that
maybe
a
report
to
committee
would
be
brought
forward
from
the
councilors
saying
that
there's
an
area
that
you
know
there's
a
desire
based
on
the
community
that
you
could
bring
the
yuta
like
that
change
for
that.
C
I
And
thank
you
and
I
suppose
that's
how
I
would
try
to
approach
at
the
NSU
to
work
with
staff
to
identify
you
know.
Here's
a
circumference
here
are
the
streets
within
it
and
the
known
behavior
and
come
forward
with
with
the
report
for
for
committee
and
council
to
approve,
because
it
it
isn't
just
game
time.
We're
talking
about
this
is
I
mean
we're
trying
to
get
people
to
come
to
Lansdowne
all
the
time
all
weekend,
long
for
all
sorts
of
things,
but
recognizing
the
limited
capacity
of
the
streets
and
our
own
policies.
I
We're
also
trying
to
get
as
many
as
possible
to
use
transit
to
do
that
so
I
hate
to
have
one
policy
change,
undermine
many
of
the
very
good
efforts
and
while
we,
what
we've
achieved
so
I
guess,
I
will
continue
to
vote
for
it
with
reservations
and
likely
will
be
working
with
staff
to
see
what
the
rollout
has
meant
for
some
of
the
streets,
particularly
red
Lansdowne.
Thank.
N
You,
your
worship,
I,
certainly
will
be
supporting
this.
It's
not
just
a
suburban
issue.
There
are
plenty
of
requests
in
the
past
and
concerns
from
residents
who
have
very
legitimate
needs,
their
hosting
family
and
friends
on
weekends,
and
it's
hard
to
accommodate
all
cars,
and
one
lane
way
in
three
hours,
according
to
some
resonance,
is
unreasonable.
So
I
do
think
this
is
about
balance,
balancing
the
needs
that
exist
with
a
reasonable
extension
and
it's
weekends
and
I
believe
stat
holidays.
So
if
concerns
are
raised
locally
like
councillor,
Dean's
is
raised
then
locally.
N
You
can
address
that
and
we
do
that
now.
We
do
that
now
in
our
wards,
where
residents
want
parking
changes
or
speed
changes,
as
mr.
laundry
stated,
you
can
petition
it
and
you
can
engage
your
community
and
have
a
maid
in
your
own
ward
solution.
So
if
the
six
hour
limit
poses
localized
issues
in
my
work
will
deal
them
deal
with
it
locally
and
come
up
with
a
river'
word
solution
for
those
areas.
Just
a
few
questions.
First
of
all,
the
start
date
is
June
1st
2018.
Why
is
that?
So
far
from
from
now.
C
N
N
How
do
you
plan
to
monitor
and
enforce
this
I
think
the
issue
at
committee
was
that
if
an
officer
shift
is
approximately
seven
hours,
it
may
be
difficult
for
the
same
officer
to
mark
tires
within
the
first
half
an
hour
of
her
shift
and
then
within
the
last
half
an
hour
of
her
shift,
actually
issued
tickets
so
to
the
GM
of
Protective,
Services
I'm,
just
saying
that
monitoring
is
important.
We
need
to
have
an
understanding
how
and
within
the
six
hours.
If
there
are
infractions,
this
will
be
monitored.
Given
an
officer
shift.
Q
Mayor
as
a
result
of
the
of
the
change
staff
are
at
currently
looking,
and
that
was
part
of
the
earlier
answer-
we're
looking
at
the
whole
model
with
regards
to
how
we're
going
to
enforce
because
of
shift
hours
and
changes
etc.
But
we're
already
seeing
there
are
ways
but
we're
going
to
have
to
readjust
our
models
so
both
from
a
resourcing
perspective
and
the
way
we
do.
Our
enforcement
there's
gonna
be
necessary
changes,
but
we
don't
think
that's
that
is
a
hindrance
to
the
policy
you
want
to
put
in
place.
N
Before
June
first,
would
you
commit
to
just
informing
the
community
and
Protective
Services?
How
you're
going
to
do
that?
Yes,
where
I
can
do
that
great?
My
last
question
is-
and
this
may
seem
seem
odd,
but
there's
some
confusion
in
the
public
about
what
a
statutory
holiday
is.
Certainly
some
of
the
big
ones.
There
are
no
dispute,
but
I'm
concerned
that
there
may
be
confusion
on
certain
holidays
which
aren't
deemed
statutory
that
people
may
or
may
not
get
a
ticket
on.
N
Are
we
gonna
have
any
type
of
communication
on
street
parking
banned
for
snow
removal
where
that's
well
communicated
by
the
city
tonight
you're
not
allowed
to
park
because
we'll
be
clearing
snow?
Will
there
be
any
type
of
communication
where
this
coming
holiday
is
deemed
statutory
and
members
of
the
public
can
park
for
up
to
six
hours?
Maybe
we
haven't
got
that
far
yet,
but
I
just
I,
don't
want
people
to
be
getting
tickets
because
they
thought
it
was
a
holiday
when
in
fact
it
isn't
whether.
A
Would
it
just
to
follow
up
on
councilor
Balkans
point
what
it
makes
sense,
just
to
simply
say
recognize
holidays,
because
I
think
family
day
is
not
a
staff
holiday,
but
Christmas
is
maybe
you
can
look
look
into
that
I
know
what
it
says
that
here
in
the
I
believe
in
the
report
is
a
statutory
but
I
think
councillor
bargain
to
brings
up
a
good
point.
If
people
have
some
people
have
family
day
off,
they
think
that's
a
statutory
holiday
and
I
don't
want
us,
you
know
getting
in
that
confusion
where
people
are
being
ticketed.
Q
D
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
being
the
councillor
who
brought
the
suggestion
forward
to
review
this
issue
and
a
suggestion
of
six
hours
as
a
potential
option
for
the
weekends
and
sets
all
the
days
I'm,
very
pleased
with
the
comments
that
were
received
at
Transportation
Committee.
It
seemed
like
every
community
or
in
general,
in
favor
of
it.
It
does
not
change
the
aspect
during
the
week
during
the
week
five
days
a
week.
It
will
remain
three
our
parking
unless
it's
stated
otherwise.
I
agree
with
councillor
Turner's
ankle
for
for
the
ward
that
he
represents.
D
It
is
a
different
type
of
ward,
known
as
many
special
events,
and
something
needs
me
looked
at
for
his
own
consideration,
especially
when
the
special
events
are
in
the
in
effect,
which
would
be
redblacks
games.
Soccer
games,
67
games
during
2017.
We
had
major
events,
almost
every
Sunday
at
an
alliance
known,
so
you
know
it's
something
that
really
needs
to
be
looked
at
in
the
ward,
like
an
account,
sir
Turner
shrinko.
D
That's
all
the
days.
I
also
agreed
that
a
clear
definition
needs
to
me
outline
so
that
no
confusion
is.
Is
there
on
the
afternoon
general
public
man
I'll,
tell
you
when
it
comes
to
Christmas
time
Easter,
you
know
any
major
holiday.
The
residence
well
appreciate
being
able
to
visit
to
her
parents
or
families
and
not
without
the
fear
of
having
to
move
their
vehicles
every
three
hours.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor.
No.
A
F
You
mr.
Mehra,
that
the
report
from
the
magnetic
mill
quarter,
Community
Development
Corporation,
entitled
the
magnetic
mill
quarter,
Community
Development,
Corporation
2016
annual
report
and
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
Committee
report
number
27
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
report,
number
25,
fedko
report,
number,
27
and
planning
committee
reports
49
a
and
50,
and
that
the
Transportation
Committee
report
number
26
be
received
and
adopted
as
amended
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
on.
A
B
Thank
you
very
much.
This
is
more
procedural
than
anything
else.
I'll
just
jump
to
the
be
resolved
if
you
will
and
as
we
introduced
last
week,
what
will
your
council,
you
and
I
are
asking
council
to
do?
Was
delegate
authority
to
yourself
the
City
Court
can
solicit
er
to
finalize
next
few
payment
and
transfer
agreements
with
Robinson
chair
for
the
PTF
fund
and
the
clean
water
and
wastewater
fund,
as
set
out
the
motion
and
therefore
also
designating
the
manager
of
asset
management.
B
Its
authorized
representative
for
all
other
administrative
purposes
of
the
agreement
in
such
delegation
not
extend
the
established
delegation
of
authority
for
changes,
additions
or
deletions
to
the
list
of
projects
previously
approved
by
council.
So
it's
really.
The
motion
is
to
facilitate
the
projects
going
forward.
Get
all
the
paperwork
signed
sign
off
on
all
the
various
approvals
in
agreement.
So
I
ask
everybody
to
support
it
right
on.
A
The
motion
carry
that
update
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure,
motions
a
journalist
on
Sunday
regulate
the
posted
due
motion
by
councillor
Brockington
seconded
by
myself.
It's
time-sensitive,
obviously
because
of
the
natural
disasters
in
the
south
on
suspension
of
the
rules
carried
the
councillor
brock
and,
if
you
like,
to
introduce
it,
please
thank.
N
N
N
N
Many
really
don't
have
the
means,
the
financial
means
or
ability
to
address
the
immediate
needs
of
their
communities
and
I
think
you
know
we
have
an
obligation
to
be
mindful
of
the
needs
of
others
and
if,
if
people
have
the
means
to
contribute
to
charities
like
the
Red,
Cross
or
Oxfam,
World,
Vision
or
food
for
the
poor,
that
they
consider
doing
that
if
they
can
earlier
today,
mr.
mayor
and
members,
the
FCM
released
a
statement.
I'm
I'll
just
read
two
brief
paragraphs.
N
They
say:
FCM
stands
in
solidarity
with
the
people
of
Haiti,
cube
in
other
countries
and
territories
in
the
Caribbean
in
the
United
States,
as
well
as
their
loved
ones
in
Canada,
as
they
deal
with
the
devastation
brought
by
Hurricane
Irma
over
the
next
weeks,
the
FCM
will
continue
to
monitor
situation
and
offer
our
assistance,
if
required.
In
this
emergency
phase,
the
FCM
encourages
members
wishing
to
help
to
donate
to
the
Red
Cross.
So
certainly
there
are
communities
within
Canada
who
are
making
public
statements
to
their
members
to
their
residents
to
businesses.
N
I
It's
my
assumption
that
the
organizations
that
are
identified
here
would
similarly
have
programs
to
to
direct
donations
to
other
zones
as
well,
so
I
don't
really
suggest
to
change
to
the
to
the
motion
and
start
adding
in
every
disaster.
That's
happened
in
the
last
couple
of
months.
That
could
be
very
long
list,
but
simply
to
make
the
point
that
that
we
are
aware,
as
a
council,
that
similar
disasters
are
happening
elsewhere
and
giving
what
you
can
to
to
help
people
in
need,
wherever
it
may
be.
It's
a
is
something
we
encourage.
Thank
you.
A
I
I
It
did
catch
up
some
applications,
people
who
were
well
on
their
way
to
with
with
applications
that
we
didn't
really
want
to
that
were
not
the
type
of
development
that
that
we
as
counselors
or
a
staff,
have
problems
with
so
I'm,
bringing
a
motion
that
identifies
the
property
and,
in
my
ward,
as
well
as
in
collaboration
with
councillor
Nussbaum
one
in
his
where
we
are
exempting
two
properties
from
from
that,
our
staff
are
in
agreement.
They
have
agreed
that
was
really
on
it
on
a
technicality
in
a
matter
of
timing.
I
A
Carried
thank
you.
Any
other
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure
notice.
The
motion
for
consideration
a
subsequent
meeting,
most
shoal
for
examine
your
subsequent
none
motion
to
introduce
bylaws,
most
important
presentation,
irregular
mala,
counselor
hubely,
say
if
I
counselor
cactus.
Please
thank.
F
C
Mr.
now,
what
are
what
are
the?
What
is
the
city's
response?
What
is
the
city
of
Ottawa's
responsibilities
as
a
service
manager
designated
under
the
social
housing
Reform
Act
2000
by
the
province,
more
specifically,
relating
to
the
management
standards,
outcomes,
tracking
payments
and
expectations
relating
to
offering
of
emergency
shelters?
And
the
second
point:
when
was
the
last
time
the
City
of
Ottawa
conducted
procurement
relating
to
the
offering
emergency
shelter
beds?
What
agreements
and
contracts
are
in
place
with
the
various
providers
of
emergency
shelters
and
wondering
if
this
inquiry
could
be
responded?