►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council - July 10, 2019 - Part 2 of 2
Description
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
Part 1 of this meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8iIpsATtu0
A
There's
an
overview
of
mr.
Amin
Lalji,
who,
as
the
president
of
floor
Co
at
read,
very
carefully
I,
read
it
very
carefully
and
the
more
I
read
it.
The
more
angry
I
become
in
it.
Mr.
Raja
described
has
been
the
people
behind
the
shuttle.
Oriya
I
agree
with
that.
We
are
told
that
they
are
very
wealthy.
They
live
in
Vancouver
and
they
are
from
Uganda.
A
A
A
A
Lodge,
he
is
a
Canadian
citizen
and
for
those
of
my
colleague
who
challenged
say:
oh,
you
must
receive
funding
from
that
company
or
maybe
you
should
read
the
Municipal
Act,
because
I
don't
think
you
could
receive
the
donation
from
outside
the
the
problems
or
from
outside
the
city
in
a
municipal
election.
Imagine
if
we
talk
about
the
people
in
our
community
the
way
we
talk
about
the
owner
of
lorca.
Imagine
if
we
say
the
same
thing
about
mr.
A
A
We
don't
subject
people
to
arbitrary
actions
or
motions
where
one
day
a
right
is
granted
to
you
and
the
next
day
is
taken
away.
See
I
want
to
make
it
perfectly
clear
that
I
cannot
support
this
heavy-handed
motion,
a
motion
that
tries
to
reverse
a
previous
unanimous
vote
of
council.
This
motion
was
not
an
empty
gesture.
It
granted
someone's
right
and
the
motion
from
the
ward
Council
aim
to
take
those
rights
away,
I'm
very
proud
to
be
a
Canadian
and
I'm
proud.
A
C
Yes,
mr.
Anaya,
thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor
I'd,
like
to
start
by
thanking
the
city
who
which
has
worked
for
the
past
three
years
on
this
file.
I
think
there
have
been
high
points.
There
have
been
low
points
as
well.
I'd
also
like
to
thank
the
members
of
the
public
who
have
spoken
from
the
heart
and
spoken
in
emotional
terms
about
the
importance
of
the
shuttle
a
year
for
them.
Now,
despite
the
fact
that
the
shuttle
oye
is
in
my
community,
it
belongs
to
all
people.
Living
in
Ottawa
belongs
to
all
Canadians.
In
fact,.
D
Some
who
are
not
supporting
the
motion
going
back
to
the
motion
that
was
passed
in
June
of
2018
you
can,
you
can
look
at
it
from
all
sorts
of
ways
you
might
or
might
not
understand
the
intent.
What
I
can
share
with
you
is
the
intent,
although
it's
not
in
writing,
was
that
the
applicant
was
going
to
get
a
new
architect
that
was
never
achieved
and
there's
nothing
that
we
could
have
done.
That
could
have
written
that
into
the
the
emotion
itself.
Were
we
wrong?
D
Were
we
right,
I
think
Rick
Carelli
provided
the
timing
context
of
that
motion
and
I'm
I'm?
If,
if
there's,
if
that's
the
argument
that
we
take
the
mistake
that
that
notion
was
in
well-written
I'll
take
it,
the
motion
wasn't
well
written,
but
since
then
there's
a
new
application.
We
that
process
was
followed.
I,
don't
believe
that
the
intent
of
the
motion
was
respected
and
I.
Think
it's
important
that
members
of
council
to
mr.
Lee
/
Jeff
leapers
point
when
we
before
we
pass
that
motion
staff
were
comfortable
with
the
application.
D
We
passed
that
motion
with
key
indications
and
then
we're
coming
back
to
us
saying:
you've
achieved
the
goals
of
the
end,
the
intent
of
that
motion
politically,
we
can
say
no
and
where
I
I'm
Basel
about
this
is
that
no
one
has
told
me
they'd
like
it.
No
one
around
table
has
told
me
they
like
it.
So
if
you
don't
like
it,
the
only
action
that
you
can
take
is
for
to
vote.
D
Yes
for
those
who
argue
with
me
on
process,
you
had
two
weeks
to
write
an
amendment
two
weeks
to
bring
forward
a
different
motion
that
would
have
created
a
different
environment.
No
one
could
find
a
different
way
to
go
about
bringing
forward
a
stop
to
this
project
or
renewal
of
that
project,
I'm
open
to
friendly
amendments,
but
I
didn't
hear
any
because
this
at
this
point
is
the
only
legal
step
we
can
take
to
to
stop
this
and
to
reset
it
response
cast
a
panic.
C
I
think
it's
important
also
to
consider
the
legal
aspects
of
the
case.
There
is
legal
risk.
There
always
will
be
all
decisions
we
make
at
this
council
have
a
risk.
Well,
we
can
stop
making
decisions.
If
you
don't
want
legal
risk,
we
can
do
that,
but
we
have
a
responsibility
to
the
public.
The
public's
be
very
clear
on
this
and
over
the
past
few
year,
if
it
faster
to
our
two
days.
In
fact,
two
weeks
there
been
thousands
of
comments
from
only
people
saying
that
one
favor
was
proposed,
saying.
D
This
is
in
largos,
hands,
you're
right,
but
it's
not
in
largos
hands.
If
we're
not
consistent
in
establishing
what
councils
direction
is.
If
today
we
pass
the
motion,
then
we're
clear
about
what
Council's
intent
you
did
not
achieve
what
our
objectives
were
out
of
as
part
of
the
June
2018
motion.
We
send
that
clear
message.
It
offers
hope
and
that's
why
we're
all
involved
in
our
community
is
why
we
all
want
to
be
elected
is
because
we
believe
that
politics
is
the
agent
for
hope.
D
D
You
know
it's
very
unanimous
in
terms
of
the
community
feedback
that
we
send
a
clear
direction
so
that
the
applicant
knows
where
we
stand
and
yes,
litigation
might
be
one
of
those
components
but
I've
seen
when
leadership
comes
to
the
table,
I've
seen
it
a
hospital
location
of
that
site.
That
was
going,
nowhere
was
making
the
news
everywhere.
D
The
leaders
in
this
community
came
together
did
a
hundred
day
truce
and
look
where
we're
at
today,
the
Ottawa
Hospital
is
well
underway,
will
be
built,
will
be
a
pride
of
our
city,
so
I
really
put
hope
in
Irish.
Our
roles
and
responsibilities.
I
think
that
if
we
vote
unanimously,
yes,
it
will
be
perceived
as
an
impasse
and
opens
up
the
opportunity
for
a
hundred
day
truce.
A
conversation
with
our
Co
involve
our
provincial
and
federal
partners
and,
yes,
maybe,
in
the
end,
we'll
lose
in
court,
but
that
will
be
largos
decision.
B
Now,
let
me
read
you
a
memo
from
the
former
chair
to
staff
quote
attached
as
a
draft
motion
that
I've
developed
with
the
vice-chair
after
speaking
to
members
of
the
built
heritage
subcommittee,
I've
tried
to
thread
the
needle
by
being
sufficiently
prescriptive
without
handcuffing
you
or
the
applicant
to
one
single
particular
architectural
outcome.
End
quote.
At
the
same
time,
the
motion
was
supported
and
enthusiastically
by
the
ward
councillor
and
in
fact,
in
September
2016,
when
the
original
design
was
released.
The
ward
councillor
said
in
a
written
statement
provided
to
the
media
on
Larco
news
release.
B
Paper
quote:
it
is
an
exciting
project
that
introduces
captivating
architectural
design
to
this
important
site
for
a
capital
city,
while
highlighting
its
important
heritage,
value
and
location
near
the
Parliament
Buildings
Majors
Hill
Park,
as
well
as
the
Byward
market
end
quote
so,
on
the
very
first
day
that
this
issue
came
to
the
public's
light.
The
local
councillor
wholeheartedly
endorsed
it
now
its
regret,
gret
'fl,
the
council
in
the
city
for
this
matter
have
been
dragged
into
this
mess
over
the
last
several
months.
Sydow
magically
concedes
galaxy.
B
Owner
of
Larco
investments
to
express
my
thoughts
on
the
matter
before
us
and
to
ask
if
they
would
be
willing
to
come
back
with
a
sixth
version
of
the
design.
After
a
very
thorough
discussion,
it
became
clear
to
me
that
they
remain
steadfast
in
their
position
and
are
not
prepared
to
invest
more
time
and
money
on
a
sixth
design.
Larco
believes
that
the
current
application
meets
all
of
the
conditions
set
by
counsel
and
the
heritage
regulations.
B
They
believe
that
the
current
design
is
in
is
the
outcome
of
a
rigorous
process
that
included
input
from
city
staff.
The
urban
design
review
panel,
the
heritage
working
group,
the
NCC
the
bill
here
subcommittee
planning
committee
and
extensive
public
consultation
I
recognize
that
most
decisions
to
locate
a
modern
design
next
to
an
historic
design
are
controversial.
But
I
remind
you
that
the
chateau
laurier
at
the
end
of
the
day
is
not
our
property.
B
B
B
I
asked
our
legal
team
to
research
if
a
municipality
had
ever
revoked
a
heritage
permit
and
they
could
not
find
a
single
instance
of
this
ever
happening
in
Canada,
and
let
remind
us
all
that
our
heritage
staff,
who
have
a
very
excellent
reputation,
recommended
the
issuance
of
this
heritage
permit
if
they
had
felt
it
was
not
up
to
their
high
standards.
Heritage
staff
would
not
have
issued
a
permit
over
a
year
ago.
The
city
cannot
require
a
building
to
be
built
in
a
particular
style
or
by
a
particular
architect.
That's
the
choice
of
the
applicant.
B
We
had
one
counselor
go
on
TV
and
demand
that
this
privately
held
firm
hire
a
new
architect,
and
there
was
never
any
consideration,
as
was
stated
here
today
and
I,
confirmed
that
with
mr.
Lodge
II
that
they
were
going
to
change
architects.
In
this
instance,
the
owner
has
opted
to
pursue
a
contemporary
design.
There
is
a
lot
of
false
information
circulating
right
now.
B
A
resident
spoke
to
me
just
a
few
days
ago
and
asked
me
if
Marko
will
be
putting
up
a
wall
all
around
the
chateau,
laurier
and
I've
heard
that
the
historic
views
of
the
shadow
Larry
from
Wellington
Street
will
be
covered.
I
can
assure
residents
watching
today
that
the
dominant
view
of
the
chateau
laurier
seen
from
Wellington
Street
the
front
entrance
will
be
preserved
for
residents
and
visitors.
No
changes,
prom
nights
and
wedding
receptions
will
continue
to
be
held
at
the
Chateau
Laurier
for
years
to
come.
B
The
ward
councillor
claims
there
is
no
back
to
this
building.
Well,
that's
completely
nonsensical.
Let's
not
forget
that
the
back
of
the
chateau
laurier
was
an
antiquated,
concrete
parking
garage.
It
was
the
place
where
the
garbage
and
recycling
containers
were
kept
and
where
two
parking
booths
and
snow
removal
equipment
is
stored.
Pathology
on
Chateau,
ax
Silva
pond
on,
but.
B
An
enclosed
glass
gallery
facing
majors
Hill
Park
allows
east-west
movement
with
pedestrian
access
to
Mackenzie
Avenue,
now
Ottawa
City
Council
unanimously
delegated
authority
to
both
the
Planning
Committee
and
to
our
highly
capable
staff
to
move
this
issue
forward
at
the
urging
of
the
ward
councillor
the
end
of
the
day.
It's
not
about
my
opinion
on
the
design.
The
decision
before
us
today
is
not
about
an
aesthetic
agreement
or
disagreement.
This
group
included
a
number
of
national
experts
and
was
co-chaired
by
the
NCC.
B
It
also
included
the
author
of
the
NCC
heritage
guidelines,
tuvok
documents
that
were
specifically
completed
to
guide
the
design
of
any
addition
to
the
chateau
laurier.
This
group
was
instrumental
in
recommending
the
building,
massing
and
height
of
the
current
proposal.
We
know
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
heritage
experts
have
confirmed
that
the
conditions
imposed
by
Council
have
been
met.
No
clue,
Bilson,
Elkin
film.
C
B
Larco
also
hired
a
Heritage
Expo
architect,
Michael
McClelland,
one
of
Canada's
leading
heritage
experts.
Mr.
McLelland
and
our
heritage
staff
agree
that
the
new
design
meets
the
three
conditions
set
by
Council
you're
being
asked
to
sustain
the
decision
of
council
within
the
rules
of
the
planning
heritage
and
Municipal
Act
and
our
own
Official
Plan.
As
council
members,
we
must
act
within
the
rules
that
govern
our
decision-making.
This
is
a
fundamental
rule
of
fairness
and
transparency.
We
can't
change
the
rules
because
we
do
not
agree
with
a
design
choice.
B
The
motion
before
you
has
been
stated
by
a
number
of
members
of
council
will
not
stop
this
development.
We
have
read
in
the
media
that
Larco
will
defend
their
position
of
the
city,
revokes
the
heritage
permit,
and
we
have
heard
our
staffs
opinion
that
LARC
OHS
case
is
strong.
I
support
the
work
that
city
staff
have
done
on
this
file
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
members
of
the
planning
committee
and
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
for
their
careful
consideration
of
this
application.
B
Residents
do
have
the
right
to
advocate
for
what
they
believe,
but
I
would
like
to
remind
members
of
council
that
Friends
of
Lansdowne
legal
challenge
ended
up
costing
city
taxpayers
well
over
2
million
dollars
in
legal
fees
and
delay
the
revitalization
by
two
years
to
staff
I'd
like
to
take
a
moment
to
recognize
your
efforts.
The
motion
being
considered
today
has
unintended
negative
implications
for
staff
I,
for
one
do
not
support
the
removal
of
delegated
authority
to
the
very
staff
who
have
done
to
the
letter.
B
What
we
directed
them
to
do
as
a
council
after
years
of
work
for
my
staff
to
have
their
recommendations
publicly
challenged
through
this
motion
is
not
in
the
best
interest
of
the
municipality
I
know.
This
has
been
a
extremely
difficult
decision
and
I
want
to
recognize
your
professionalism.
Throughout
this
debate,
the
chateau
laurier
has
had
a
robust
legislative
review
that
has
taken
well
over
three
years
with
extensive
public
consultation
and
hundreds
of
hours
of
staff
consideration
the
dossier
at
this
file.
B
That
has
form
that
wants
to
stop
the
owners
of
the
chateau
laurier.
From
proceeding,
some
would
suggest
that
the
government
should
expropriate
this
property,
a
move
that
would
require
upwards
of
300
million
dollars
of
taxpayers
money,
300
million
dollars
to
stop
a
private
property
owner
from
designing
a
privately
funded
addition
to
their
own
building,
and
the
notion
and
suggestion
that
we
want
to
give
a
grant
to
this
multi-millionaire
is
ludicrous.
B
I'm
sure
taxpayers
in
Alberta
would
like
to
see
their
tax
dollars
used
to
buy
a
hotel
in
Ottawa
on
private
property.
I
acknowledge
this
debate
has
been
difficult
for
many
residents
and
has
been
difficult
and
troubling
for
members
of
council.
I
agree
with
you,
many
of
you
that
we
have
a
duty
to
represent
the
public
and
I
believe
that
is
what
we've
done
over
the
last
few
years
to
push
this
design.
B
As
far
as
we
could,
we
also
as
councillor
eglee,
a
lawyer
pointed
out
have
to
make
informed
decisions
based
on
the
Planning
Act,
the
Heritage
Act,
and
the
city's
official
plan
we're
a
regulatory
body
at
the
end
of
the
day,
with
duties
to
fulfill
based
on
the
law.
Not
on
who
can
send
the
most
emails
or
publish
the
most
OP
ads,
and
we
also
have
a
duty
to
be
respectful
of
taxpayers
money
and
to
not
throw
scarce
city
resources
at
legal
fights
that
we
cannot
win.
B
Some
have
claimed
this
decision
is
a
matter
of
leadership
and
I
couldn't
agree
more
I.
Believe
leadership
is
about
making
informed
decisions
based
on
the
rules
that
govern
us
collectively
in
a
civil
society,
even
when
that
decision
is
difficult
or
unpopular
I'm
asking
you
to
show
leadership
today
and
to
reject
this
motion
and
sustain
the
recommendation
of
staff
and
the
decision
of
Council
and
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
reject
the
motion,
as
it
will
not
accomplish
what
it
says.
It's
going
to
do.
So
we
have
yeas
and
nays
on
the
motion
before
us.
F
A
E
H
G
F
F
E
E
F
F
F
B
Whereas
subsection
68
11
of
the
rules
of
procedure
state
that
have
a
notice
of
motion
for
reconsideration
is
accepted
by
the
council,
then
subject
to
section
61.
The
consideration
of
the
motion
to
reconsider
shall
be
the
first
item
of
business.
The
next
count
at
the
next
meeting
of
the
council,
unless
the
council
decides
to
do
with
the
motion
at
some
time
earlier,
whereas
the
mayor
has
stated
then,
in
accordance
with
section
14
of
the
rules
of
procedures,
he's
prepared
to
call
a
special
meeting
of
Council
on
July
11th
at
2:00
p.m.
B
for
consideration
of
the
motion
to
reconsider,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
motion
to
reconsider
the
decision
of
council
respect
to
the
Fleury
Lee
promotion
on
the
chateau
laurier
be
dealt
with
at
the
special
meeting.
Accounts
will
be
held
on
July
11th
2019
at
2:00
p.m.
yeas
and
nays
yeas
and
nays
on
meeting
tomorrow.
E
E
A
A
mic:
okay,
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
and
just
to
put
it
in
a
little
bit.
This
is
about
election
contribution
rebate.
Program
extension
due
to
the
state
of
emergency
is
moved
by
myself
seconded
by
Councillor
of
Cavanaugh.
Where
is
the
municipal
election
act?
1996
MEA
enable
a
municipality
to
pass
by
a
law
that
provides
for
payment
of
rebate
to
a
person
who
contribute
to
candidate
for
office
on
a
municipal
council
and
my
established
conditions
under
which
such
a
rebate
as
paid.
Now?
What
is
the
City
of
Ottawa?
A
First
established
a
contribution
rebate
program
in
2002,
and
the
most
recent
update
to
the
program
were
approved
by
Council
on
July
11,
2018,
bylaw,
2018,
3
3
in
advance
of
2018
municipal
elections
and
whereas,
under
the
contribution
rebate,
program,
individuals
who
have
contributed
to
them
in
to
participate
in
candidate
are
eligible
for
a
rebate
in
accordance
with
the
rules
set
out
by
bylaw,
2018,
3
3
and
well.
As
the
bylaw
2018
3
3
set
out
a
deadline.
May
28
29
teen
at
the
2
p.m.
A
And
whereas
the
following
declaration
of
all
city
department,
emergency
response
and
we
are
and
our
review
and
how
services
could
be
adjusted
in
the
light
of
the
state
of
emergency
to
eat
the
burden
on
affected
resident
and
well
as
the
office
of
the
city,
clerk
and
solicitor.
As
aware
that
some
contributors
to
candidate
of
2018
municipal
election
may
have
been
affected
by
the
flood
and
whereas
bylaw
20
18-4
III
does
not
specifically
contemplate
a
scenario
where
an
extension
might
be
required.
A
Has
the
authority,
under
the
MEA
to
amend
this
contribution
rebate
by
law
in
a
matter
that,
as
fair
and
compassionate
and
what
providing
an
extension
for
contributors
to
file
their
application
for
their
rebate
will
have
no
financial
implication
to
the
cause
of
the
program,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
deadline
for
contributors
to
submit
a
rebate,
application
for
initial
campaign
and
for
the
2018
municipal
election
be
aligned
with
the
deadline
for
submitting
a
rebate
application
for
supplemental
campaign
for
2018
municipal
election
ie,
November,
2019
and
2
p.m.
so.
B
F
My
question
is
I
think
to
the
city
solicitor,
and
the
question
relates
to
the
timing
of
when
ultimately
people,
if
this
passes,
ultimately
when
will
they
receive
their
rebate
checks,
mr
and
secondly,
because
I
have
recently
learned
that
the
initial
rebates
won't
even
begin
till
2020
and
I've
already
had
I
understand,
I've
had
one
contributor
already
passed
away
and
I'm
wondering
how
long
this
could
go
on
and
will
that
extend
that
deadline
or
that
yeah
remittance
of
the
checks
as
well.
Mr.
F
B
Okay,
thank
you
so
on
anyone
else
to
speak
on
this
on
the
motion
carried
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedures.
We
have
one
by
Councillor
hardier,
signed
by
councillor
Tierney
on
part,
lot,
control
exemption,
there's
a
timing,
sensitivity
with
respect
to
August
28th
on
suspension,
married
councilor
harder.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
your
motion?
Please
sit.
H
Off
it
often
occurs
the
subdivisions
are
registered
in
blocks
and
for
title
to
be
conveyed
to
the
first
homeowners
that
move
in
while
the
rest
of
its
still
being
built
and
the
city
has
to
exempt
by
law
such
blocks
from
part
lot
control,
and
this
routinely
happens
by
bylaws
listed
at
the
end
of
each
meeting
of
council.
Such
bylaws
must
contain
the
plan
of
subdivision
number,
which
is
only
known
when
the
subdivision
is
registered
so
for
all
a
period
from
2001
to
date.
H
There
has
not
been
a
case
where
a
subdivision
is
registered
after
the
July
meeting
of
council
and
there's
a
need
to
have
a
part
lock
control
exemption
bylaw
before
the
August
meeting
of
council.
However,
staff
anticipate
this
year
that
one
such
case
likely
in
councilor
Gower's
area
will
occur.
Therefore,
staff
are
recommended:
an
ad
hoc
committee
of
four
members
of
council
being
the
mayor,
the
chair
of
planning
committee
or
the
vice-chair
the
ward
councillor.
H
Be
created
to
approved
the
enactment
of
such
bylaws,
and
that
would
be
like
another
person
which
councillor
deputy
mayor
de
Roos
does
a
great
to
do
if
a
meeting
is
required
is
not
likely
that
it
would
last
more
than
five
minutes.
So
it
will
be
it's
a
it's
just
part
of
a
procedure,
but
it's
a
necessary
procedure,
so
people
can
move
into
there.
Okay,.
F
F
F
Otherwise
people
can
bait
for
blocks
of
homes,
they're
broken
up
by
part
lot
control
and
otherwise
people
wouldn't
be
able
to
close
in
their
homes
until
August
28th
as
come
as
chair
harder
said,
this
hasn't
been
a
problem
for
19
years,
but
we
are
aware
it's
going
to
be
a
problem
this
summer
and
that's
why
we've
asked
for
this
motion
to
be
an
act
is
motion
to
be
enacted
by
Councilman
awesome.
Thank
you,
chair,
okay,.
B
Anything
else
on
the
motion
carried
adopt
a
the
next
motion
that
requires
a
suspension
of
the
rules
is
by
councilor
harder
seconded
by
councillor
Tierney,
364
old,
green
Bank,
Road
minor
variances
council,
a
resolution
regarding
section
34
of
the
Planning
Act,
because
planning
is
not
going
to
be
able
to
meet
until
August
22nd.
So
on
suspension
carried
councilor
harder.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
your
motion
saying
by
councilor
tyranny?
It's.
H
B
Any
questions
or
comments
on
counselor
Harder's
motion,
saying
to
my
counselor
tyranny
on
the
motion
carried:
are
there
any
other
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure
as
yet,
these
ultimate
motions,
the
general
response,
only
regulate
the
presidio
notice?
The
motion
for
consideration
of
subsequent
meaning
of
its
most
simple
xmf
in
your
account
counselor
sides,
please
seconded
by
Councillor
Hart.
I
Yes,
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I've,
emotion
in
essence,
it
is
enabling
that
cannot
North
Business
Association
to
move
forward
with
installing
unique
stylized
street
signs
or
blades
within
the
Condors
Technology
Park
being
Canada's
largest
technology
park
with
over
500
companies
and
24,000
employees.
I'll
read
just
the
therefore
be
it.
Resolved.
I
Council
approve
an
exemption
of
the
city's
tourism
and
public
service
signs
policy
to
permit
the
installation
of
unique
stylized
street
name
blades
on
any
Street
within
the
canal,
nor
tech
park
and
further
be
it
resolved
that
the
installation
and
maintenance
of
these
signs
and
any
additional
signs
erected
in
the
area
will
be
paid
for
by
the
canal.
North
Business
Association
and
be
it
FURTHER
RESOLVED
that
director
of
traffic
services
be
delegated
the
authority
to
approve
the
final
design
and
locations
for
the
sign.
I
G
B
F
D
Can
stuff
provide
the
following
information:
one,
the
number
of
3-1-1
complaints
related
to
rats
per
year
over
the
last
five
years?
How
has
the
increase
increase
in
complaints
inform
the
approach
from
the
city's
internal
working
group
on
the
issue?
Three?
What
operational
improvements
are
underway
to
better
equipped
city
staff,
to
provide
residents,
provide
support
for
residents
for
traveling
surface
rats
and
for
what
measures
and
resources
plan
to
be
implemented
to
reduce
the
population
of
sewer
rats
that
are
now
living
at
the
surface
and
negatively
impacting
residents
and
businesses?
Citywide.
G
G
G
If
staff
could
one
identify
the
specific
delegated
authority
staff
relied
on
to
negotiate
the
lease
for
the
stadium,
where
the
terms
and
conditions
are
different
from
the
terms
and
conditions
of
route
by
Council,
including
the
assignment
of
naming
rights,
and
to
identify
the
specific
dates,
staff
and
timelines
associated
with
the
request
for
a
change
in
the
terms
and
the
various
steps
taken
to
establish
the
new
agreement.
Such
lease
could
stop.
Please
provide
this
information
in
advance
of
the
August
28
2019
council
meeting.
Thank.