►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council - June 26, 2019
Description
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
D
D
F
Hello,
I
am
senator,
you
see
ma
I'm
from
Ontario
as
we
celebrate
the
birthday
of
the
Confederation
of
our
great
and
beautiful
country.
I
wish
you
are
among
friends
and
family
to
commemorate
this
important
event.
We
can
be
proud
of
Canada
its
diversity,
its
inclusiveness
and
its
wealth
that
allows
each
and
every
one
of
us
to
live
fully
and
freely.
Let's
celebrate
together,
our
work
run
the
full
country
happy
birthday.
Canada.
B
B
J
B
B
I
E
I'd
like
to
invite
to
mr.
Rohit
Maxine
to
come
to
the
podium
for
the
council
city
builder
award
presentation
with
your
City
Council
accounts,
Carol,
Ann,
Mian
and.
I
I
Animals
that
are
sheltered
at
the
Ottawa
Humane
Society.
He
has
been
the
lead
photographer
for
over
10
years
and
has
volunteered
hundreds
of
hours
to
create
professional
studio,
portraits
of
Ottawa's
stray
animals.
His
work
helps
them
look
their
best
and
assures
that
they
will
have
the
best
chance
of
being
adopted
and
finding
their
forever
homes.
I
Rohit
is
a
mentor
for
new
photographers
and
he
photographs,
OHS
events
and
activities
for
publications
and
advertising
that
helps
to
raise
money
and
awareness
of
the
value
of
shelter
operate
adoptions,
in
addition
to
his
lead
role
in
photography,
Rohit
continues
to
put
in
countless
hours,
editing
and
creating
images
that
reach
out
to
the
Ottawa
community
and
help
animals
find
permanent
homes.
He
was
recognized
by
the
Humane
Society
at
their
2016
AGM
for
his
dedication
and
his
tireless
devotion
to
Ottawa
shelter,
animals.
I
Rho
heat
also
supports
the
Carleton
student
Engineering
Society,
where
he
has
doubled
student
participation
in
social
events
and
helped
to
raise
funds
for
local
charities.
In
his
honor,
the
Engineering
Society
created
the
Rohit
Saxena
award
to
recognize
a
graduating
student
who
has
made
an
unparalleled
contribution
to
CSCS
as
and
leadership
row.
He
was
recently
nominated
for
the
Governor
General
sovereign
Medal
for
volunteers
that
he's
scheduled
to
receive
here
at
City
Hall
in
September
Felicia
arohi
Davari
to
nominate
pool
I'd
like.
B
All
right
about
ten
years
ago,
I
took
up
photography
in
my
spare
time
and
took
a
series
of
college
courses,
a
friend
of
mine
who
volunteered
at
the
Ottawa
Humane
Society,
found
out
of
the
previous
photographer
left
and
gave
them.
My
name
I
quickly
discovered
that
photographing
at
that
optimal
animals
requires
help
not
just
a
photographer,
but
animal
Wranglers
as
well.
My
wife
helped
until
her
first
pregnancy,
at
which
point
my
friends,
Matt,
Welles
and
saliano
Sachs
joined
on
for
the
long
haul.
Their
friendship
and
love
for
animals
made
every
Sunday
a
joy.
B
Before
long,
we
were
helping
with
ohs
events
like
the
wiggle-waggle
walkathon
and
the
Pride
Parade
I
also
got
to
help
tell
stories
of
the
extraordinary
work
o
HS
does
for
animals
and
extreme
cases
and
the
trust
animals
could
have
for
people
even
after
severe
mistreatment
at
the
hands
of
others.
An
influx
of
dogs
from
puppy
mill
closures
in
Quebec
dogs
like
breezy,
beaten
and
left
to
die
in
a
dumpster
rescued
by
the
Ottawa
Humane
Society
they're
vets
and
the
family,
who
gave
her
a
forever
home.
B
Every
week
we
made
it
our
mission
to
bring
dignity
and
find
beauty
in
every
animal
we
met
with
over
5,600
animal
portrait,
animal
portraits
taken
already.
We
got
to
work
on
some
really
weird
and
wonderful
projects:
the
Ottawa
Citizen
showcasing
adoptable
animals
with
fun
and
wacky
themes,
including
Game
of
Thrones,
the
Superbowl
elections
and
even
just
cats
and
bowties.
B
A
few
projects
went
viral
like
I,
may
the
4th
Star
Wars
project
that
and
up
on
the
web
and
in
print
worldwide
in
hell,
it's
like
CBS
news
and
People
magazine,
even
Mark,
Hamill
Luke
Skywalker
himself
posted
about
it
every
Sunday
morning.
As
long
as
we're
healthy
and
in
town,
we
took
adoption
photos
the
Ottawa
Humane
Society,
when
my
wife
had
our
first
child
on
a
Sunday
night.
She
sent
me
to
HS
on
when
she
had
our
first
child
on
a
Saturday
night.
She
sent
me
to
OHS
on
Sunday
morning:
I
wouldn't
miss
it.
B
In
June,
2016
tragedy
struck
my
family.
We
lost
our
beautiful
daughter,
jettisons,
we
were
devastated,
I
forgot
how
to
live
and
how
to
work.
But
I
came
in
to
the
Ottawa
Humane
Society
the
next
Sunday
morning,
and
my
friends,
Sally
and
Matt
hugged
me
and
gave
me
their
support
and
we
helped
the
animals.
It's
probably
the
first
normal
thing,
I
remembered
how
to
do
at
that
time.
I
drew
upon
friends
and
the
community
for
strength
and
help.
B
We
found
in
groups
like
the
Roger
Nielson
house,
whose
staff
and
volunteers
me
back
to
work
and
back
to
hope.
Lotto
has
always
been
my
home.
I
went
to
school
here,
I
studied
engineering
here
and
I
convinced
my
wife
to
stay
here
as
I
returned
your
hometown
in
Nova
Scotia.
This
city
and
people
were
here
for
us
when
we
needed
it
thanks
to
everyone
for
this
tremendous
honor.
B
Thank
you
to
Sally
and
Matt
for
helping
out
every
week,
thanks
to
my
wife,
Leslie
for
making
sure
the
kids
are
taken
care
of
when
I
come
in
and
for
letting
me
spend
too
much
money
on
the
photography
equipment.
We
use
for
this.
Thanks
to
my
parents,
my
friends
and
my
work
colleagues,
and
to
the
amazing
people
at
the
Ottawa
humane
side,
you
make
it
all
possible.
B
Thanks
to
my
dog
sprocket,
whose
love
and
loyalty
inspires
me
to
want
to
share
the
love
of
a
pet
and
loving
home,
with
as
many
people
as
possible,
be
the
person
your
pet
thinks.
You
are
thanks
to
my
son's
Navin
and
Talon
for
sharing
their
data
with
the
animals
for
a
couple
hours
a
week
and
to
my
daughter,
Jo
know
that
I
do
this
for
you.
Thank
you.
F
E
I
I
E
I'm
hydro,
Ottawa
Holding
Inc
entitled
hydro,
Ottawa,
Holding,
Inc
2018,
and
a
report
community
and
Protective
Services
Committee
report
for
Standing
Committee
on
Environmental,
Protection,
water
and
waste
management
report.
Three
planning
committee
report,
nine
built
heritage
subcommittee
reports
two
and
three
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
in
solicitor
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
Planning
Act
explanation
requirements
at
the
City
Council
meeting
of
June
12
2009
teen
be
received
and
considered.
I
On
the
motion
carried
adopting
Elsi
reports,
Kapoor,
hydro,
Ottawa,
sociated,
Heathrow,
Ottawa
item
1,
hydro,
Ottawa,
Holdings,
Inc
2018
annual
report.
Well,
we
have
the
chair
of
the
board.
Mr.
Jim
Durrell
and
CEO
Bryce
Conrad
with
us
today,
and
the
lights
almost
went
out
just
as
we
introduced,
hydro
I
think
that's
for
the
screen
right.
That
is
so
just
a
quick
observation.
I
As
you
know,
hydro
was
really
punching
above
its
weight
during
the
the
aftermath
of
the
tornado
that
affected
so
many
communities
in
oak
councillor,
Dean's
and
Ally,
and
certainly
councillor
Elgin
tyrion
councillor
brockington
had
communities
that
were
severely
devastated
and
the
hydro
workers
did
us
all
proud.
So
if
you
could
pass
along
our
collective
thanks
to
those
men
and
women
who
worked
long
hours
to
get
the
power
restored,
we
very
much
appreciate
that
and
will
hand
the
floor
over
to
mr.
Durrell.
Thank.
K
You,
your
worship
and
members
of
council
I'm
joined,
of
course,
with
by
Bryce
Conrad.
Our
CEO,
also
here
in
attendance
with
me,
is
Jeff
Simpson,
our
chief
financial
officer.
We
have
Adnan
Kok,
our
chief
energy
officer,
and
we
have
Judy
Julie
lupinacci,
who
is
our
chief
customer
officer
and
done
an
outstanding
job
in
terms
of
getting
the
people
engaged
with
hydro
and,
of
course,
Tina
taro
Lee,
who
is
in
corporate
strategy
and
does
a
great
job
for
us
there.
K
As
all
of
you
know,
this
was
a
record
year
for
hydro
Ottawa,
and
it
was
done
so
under
some
very
trying
circumstances.
The
dividend
which
you
are
now
all
aware
of
is
was
420
2.3
million
dollars.
I
would
say
that
you
cannot
expect
the
same
next
year.
That
dividend
is
comprised
of
a
number
of
things,
but
included
in
that
was
our
conservation
demand
program,
which
we
have
excelled
at
the
provincial
government,
as
they
have
looked
at
hydros
everywhere,
have
decided
that
those
programs
will
be
cancelled.
K
Well,
if
they'll
be
replaced
with
something
we
do
not
know,
but
I
think
it's.
So
we
can
assure
you
that
the
dividend
will
be
somewhat
lower
next
year,
because
there's
a
number
of
new
council
members
here,
I'll
just
very
quickly
touch
on
how
the
dividend
is
paid,
because
a
lot
of
people
still
think
that
we
could
lower
rates
instead
of
paying
the
dividend
because
we're
a
highly
regulated
business.
Our
rates
are
established
by
the
entero
Energy
Board,
unlike
a
normal
company
that
gets
its
revenue
and
pays
its
dividends
out
of
its
net
income.
K
We
earn
our
revenue.
Our
operating
costs
are
basically
breakeven
their
flow
through.
We
really
make
our
money
from
a
regulated
rate
of
return
on
our
capital
costs,
and
the
thought
process
behind
that
which
was
established
many
many
years
ago,
is
one
to
ensure
that
we
continue
to
reinvest
in
our
assets
at
hydro
that
we
continue
to
ensure
that
the
quality
of
our
of
our
electrical
facilities,
our
generators,
our
transmitters,
our
poles,
etc,
are
at
the
highest
level.
K
And
out
of
that
comes
the
dividend
that
we
receive
or
that
you
receive,
and
so
it
has
absolutely
a
zero
impact
on
our
rates
and
other
than
I.
Guess
you
receive
22
million,
and
hopefully
you
I
know
you
use
it
wisely
and
keep
our
tax
rates
low.
If
I
could
I'd
like
to
highlight
three
things,
I
know:
you've
got
an
extremely
busy
agenda
here
today
and
I'm
so
grateful
all
of
these
people
came
out
to
listen
to
hydro.
It's
very
nice.
I
didn't
realize
that
hydro,
your
worship
was
such
a
popular
subject.
K
30%
of
our
growth
is
now
in
the
unregulated
end
of
the
business.
You
know
if
you'd
sat
here
and
this
previous
chair
had
been
making
a
presentation
to
this
council
8
10
years
ago.
95
to
98
percent
of
our
revenue
would
have
come
from
a
regulated
end
of
the
business
what's
happening
today
is
we
all
have
much
more
efficient
appliances?
Everything
is
becoming
more
efficient,
consumption
is
dropping
drastically,
and
so,
as
a
corporation,
we
are
forced
to
diversify
and
we
have
we're
at
this
time.
K
One
portage
power
that
will
handle
all
of
our
generation
facilities
and
to
an
area
that
we
anticipate
will
have
some
tremendous
growth
and
that
Adnan
is
looking
over
and
that's
an
very
and
a
very
of
course
handles.
Your
street
lighting
is
working
with
roe
Peck
and
we
think
this
is
a
by
working
with
the
ends,
the
NRC
in
a
number
of
exciting
issues,
working
with
zippy.
K
We
see
some
tremendous
growth
down
the
road
for
in
very
the
second
point,
I
would
like
to
touch
on
and
is
something
that
I
know
is
near
and
dear
to
this
council
and
that's
the
climate
change
that
we
are
facing.
As
you
all
ran
for
an
election
as
his
worship
had
mentioned,
we
faced
one
of
a
number
of
terrible
tornadoes
in
our
city.
K
This
flood
in
218
was,
as
we
all
know,
was
catastrophic
and
we
saved
probably
close
to
700,000
or
more
by
getting
out
in
front
of
it
by
learning
all
of
these,
the
things
that
we
had
done
back
way
back
in
2017
that
we
didn't
know,
then
the
effects
of
a
major
flood
on
shaadi
air
and
our
other
facilities.
So
we've
already,
we
are
making
those
changes.
K
We
spend
close
to
a
hundred
million
dollars
a
year
and
in
keeping
our
assets,
we've
got
almost
50,000
poles
in
this
city
and
when
poles
go
down
and
trees,
simple
little
things
that
we
see
what
happens
is
the
power
goes
out.
You
get
a
phone
call
and
all
hell
breaks
loose,
and
so
a
great
deal
of
money
is
spent
on
that
we
are
one
of
the
top
50
and
we
have
been
for
five
years
greenest
companies
in
Canada,
and
we
think
that
that's
a
great
testament
to
our
recognition
of
climate
change
and
street
lighting.
K
As
you
know,
hydro
Ottawa
is
engaged
with
with
the
City
of
Ottawa.
Before
we
started
this
program,
you
were
using
50
million
kilowatt
hours
to
light
our
streets
and
our
parks
in
three
years.
When
this
program
is
complete,
we'll
be
using
17
million
kilowatt
hours,
that's
30
percent,
that's
an
enormous
change
and
an
enormous
saving
and,
as
you
know,
we've
now
engaged
and
are
starting
to
renovate
many
of
the
older
facilities,
starting
with
a
Robert
Picard
Center,
and
we
will
be
moving
through
many
of
the
facilities
in
here
in
Ottawa
and
providing
further
savings.
K
K
I
was
at
with
the
mayor
and,
as
someone
said,
my
goodness,
that
board
is
the
quality
of
a
major
banks
board
and
it
is-
and
this
is
a
big
company
that
you
own
and
when
I
show
you
this
board,
you
see
yaprak
and
Kim
Butler.
Of
course,
yaprak
was
a
senior
Deputy
Minister
Kim
as
a
highly
regarded
chartered
accountant
and
CEO
in
our
region.
K
Matt
Davies
next
to
him
is
one
of
the
most
respected
cybersecurity
people
in
Canada
and
brings
an
enormous
benefit
to
our
board
that
other
fellow
next
Matt
I'm,
not
sure
who
he
is
I'm,
just
trying
to
remember
his
name,
but
that
we
are
very
grateful
and
I
will
say
this,
and
this
is
not
just
blowing
smoke.
That
council
has
appointed
two
excellent
people
in
and
in
Steven
to
represent
us
on
the
board.
They've
done
a
great
job
for
you
and
I'm
thankful.
Dale
Craig,
of
course,
was
involved
in
building
the
Palladium
as
we
knew
it.
K
The
Ottawa
Airport
Dale
and
I
worked
closely
together
and
now
at
hydro
Ottawa.
A
great
engineer
next
to
Jan
of
is,
is
Andrea
Johnson
and
Andrea's
partner
with
Denton's
brings
tremendous
legal
expertise
to
us
and
a
help.
Sir
leader,
known
to
all
of
you
as
a
past
president
of
senators
and
a
really
strong
businessman,
and
last
but
not
least,
is
Laurie
O'neill.
Who
is
a
CA
chairs
our
audit
committee
and
sits
on
the
board
of
a
number
of
public
companies.
K
This
board
counsel
is
as
good
a
board,
as
you
will
ever
find
anywhere
and
I
know.
Our
president
would
support
me
on
this
that
a
strong
board
holds
management
to
account,
and
if
we
hold
management
to
account,
then
we
have
done
the
job
for
each
of
you
as
counselors.
Our
senior
management
is
56%
of
female
and
diversity,
and
we
are
the
founding
signatory
on
leadership
accord
on
gender
diversity
in
the
electrical
industry
of
Canada,
so
that
your
worship
is
three
points.
L
L
It
reminds
me
that
we
have
a
significant
portion
of
the
city
of
ottawa
that
pays
higher
energy
rates
than
other
parts
of
the
city,
and
I'm
wondering
where,
if
there
have
been
additional
conversations
about
harmonizing
into
one
company,
have
we
discussed
with
the
new
government
that
potential
and
the
potential
ability
to
reduce
rates
for
tens
of
thousands
of
Ottawa
residents?
If
such
a
such
a
thing
were
to
take
place.
K
And
and
one
can't
help
but
be
sympathetic
to
those
of
you
that
represent
the
other
areas,
I
think
as
some
of
the
older
members
of
council
in
terms
of
service
would
recall.
Bryce
and
I
brought
the
president
of
hydro
one
and
the
chairperson
up.
Here
we
had
a
lengthy
meeting.
We
looked
at
how
we
could
acquire
first,
just
the
City
of
Ottawa.
K
We
then
expanded
it
to
say
if
we
purchased
the
entire
zone
with
hydro
one
so
that
we
would
hydro
Ottawa
would
handle
everything
to
the
Quebec
border
and
right
up
through
to
Kingston,
and
if
we
had
taken
that
I
would
have
been
back
before
you
hydro.
One
would
have
sat
on
our
board,
which
I
had
no
issue
with
and
would
have
had
an
equity
ownership
in
us
in
our
in
hydro,
one
which
again
we
would
have
presented
to
this
to
this
council.
K
It
was
not
financially
prudent
for
us
to
do
it.
We
would
literally
had
to
have
given
given
up
control
of
hydro
Ottawa
to
make
the
deal,
work
and
I.
Don't
think
that
would
fly
very
well
with
you
or
with
the
city
and
and
its
people.
As
you
know,
since
then
councilor
there
have
been
infinite
number
of
changes
going
on
at
Hydra
one
the
CEO
has
been
fired,
the
board's
been
fired,
the
chair
is
just
down.
We
will
pursue
this
again,
but
likely
not
for
another.
Six
months
to
a
year.
K
L
K
Had
a
very
strong
year,
but
in
that
in
dividend
was
almost
four
million
dollars
from
our
conservation
demand,
work
and
hydro.
Otto
of
being
one
of
the
greenest
employers
in
Canada
for
many
years
did
a
heck
of
a
job
in
that
regard,
and
we
maximized
almost
as
much
as
we
could
the
monies
that
we
would
receive
for
the
government
in
our
conservation
demand
programs.
K
L
Well,
I
appreciate
I
appreciate
that
mr.
Durrell
mr.
mayor,
given
the
news
on
the
dividend,
I
do
have
a
motion
and
I'm
wondering
if
it's
appropriate
to
introduce
that
at
this
time
or
yes,
it
would
be
I.
Thank
you
very
much,
whereas
at
its
meeting
of
March
6
2009
teen
as
part
of
consideration
of
the
2019
draft
operating
capital
budget,
City
Council
adopted
the
following
that
any
surplus
in
the
hydro
Ottawa
dividend
received
in
the
2018
to
2022
term
of
council.
L
That
is
the
amount
that
exceeds
the
projected
amount
in
the
long-range
financial
plan,
be
directed
towards
energy
efficiency,
conservation
or
renewable
energy
programs
within
Ottawa,
with
specific
projects
to
be
recommended
by
staff
and
approved
by
the
Standing
Committee
on
Environmental,
Protection,
water
and
waste
management
and
council.
Once
the
specific
dollar
amount.
If
any
is
known,
and
whereas
subsequent
to
the
adoption
of
the
draft
2019
budgets,
unforeseen
events
have
occurred
that
affect
the
assumptions
upon
which
to
the
2019
draft
budget
was
based,
including
as
follows.
L
She
recommends
that
the
hydro
dividend
surplus
be
used
to
balance
the
2019
budget,
as
required
by
province
by
the
province,
and
whereas
it
is
reasonable
to
assume
that
council
known
had
known
about
these
events
and
the
budget
impacts
honor.
Before
the
adaptation
of
the
2019
budget.
They
may
have
made
a
different
decision
and
that
the
city,
clerk
and
solicitor
has
advised
that,
in
his
opinion,
the
city
treasurer's
request
is
not
reconsideration
of
the
budget,
but
new
information
and
therefore
be
resolved.
The
City
Council
approve
any
surplus
over
the
hydro
dividend.
L
M
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
not
on
the
motion
yet,
but
just
a
question
to
mr.
x'
Conrad
and
Durrell
first
well,
thank
you
for
your
presentation,
appreciate
it
and
thank
you
for
the
dividend.
If
it's
not
clear,
we
appreciate
the
dividend
and
thank
you
very
much
needed.
Mr.
Conrad,
last
year,
I
asked
you
a
question
and
I
asked
you
what
keeps
you
up
at
night,
because
I
wanted
to
better
understand
the
risks
locally
and
more
globally
for
hydro
companies
and
in
the
context
of
climate
change
that
mr.
Durell
spoke
about.
M
We
know
that
the
projected
forecasts
for
Eastern
Ontario,
we're
going
to
include
include
in
the
future
more
ice,
storms
and
ice
events
and
I
just
want
to
know
with
the
impact
on
transmission
towers
and
residential
and
local
business
connections.
Are
you
able
to
protect
the
system
any
better,
or
is
it
still
going
to
be
more
reactive
to
these
events,
damaged
infrastructure
and
move
on,
or
is
there
any
way
that
we
can
strengthen
the
entire
system?
Knowing
that
this
is
going
to
be
coming.
N
Yeah,
thank
you
for
your
question.
If
I
had
the
opportunity
to
revisit
my
ass
from
last
year,
I'd
have
said
a
tornado
would
have
kept
me
up
at
night.
The
short
answer
is
climate
change.
Is
here
we're
seeing
it
yeah
the
slide
that
was
up,
there
showed
I
think
twelve
different
instances.
Last
year
we
had
an
ice
storm.
We
had
a
windstorm
yeah,
we
dispatched
crews
down
to
help
up
with
hurricanes
and
tornadoes
down
south
only
to
come
back
to
the
old
six
tornadoes
in
our
backyard,
followed
by
as
Ken
as
mr.
N
Darryl
said,
the
the
spring
flood
this
year,
which
was
a
1
in
a
1,000
year
level.
So
the
short
answer
to
your
question
is:
is
that's
what
keeps
me
up
at
night?
It's
that
climate
change,
it's
the
stuff,
I,
don't
know
to
call
Donald
Rumsfeld's
the
unknown
unknowns,
your
question
with
respect
to
hardening
the
infrastructure.
That
is
what
we
are
doing
on
a
day
to
day
basis.
As
part
of
our
next
rate
application.
N
We
will
be
undertaking
a
climate
change
adaptation
mitigation
strategy
that
goes
into
that
out
of
that
process
that
will
guide
how
we
build
going
forward.
So
the
short
answer
is
it's
going
to
be
a
question
of
both
reacting
and
proactively
building
new
infrastructure
and
building
that
new
infrastructure
to
a
to
a
higher
level.
So
the
1
in
100
year,
flood
level,
which
we
seem
to
hit
every
three
years,
is
no
longer
sufficient.
Okay,.
M
H
C
M
Past
not
surpluses,
but
additional
surpluses
and
above
what
was
anticipated,
we
had
identified
certainly
road
projects.
We
identified
some
environmental
initiatives
as
well,
so
there
were
some
other
priorities
council
have
identified
in
the
past
I'm,
not
saying
that
the
what
is
being
proposed
now
isn't
important.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
all
aware
that
there
are
some
other
options
out
there,
but
obviously
we
have
to
address
the
costs
associated
with
these
two
emergencies.
Thank
you.
Thank.
G
You
very
much
first
of
all,
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
efforts
on
on
gender
equity.
Not
only
it's
important,
it's
just
smart
and
and
efforts
on
on
being
green
and
the
ongoing
work
of
your
of
your
crew
out
there
I
know
they're
always
appreciated
I've
always
had
an
opportunity
to
go
up
and
chat
with
them
and
they're
very
friendly
and
welcoming
and
very
positive.
N
So
we
don't
control
the
mix
at
the
at
the
provincial
level.
So
just
try
to
answer
your
question
about
52
to
56
percent
at
the
base
load
in
the
province
of
Ontario
was
from
the
nuclear
reactors,
so
that
is
a
provincial
decision,
its
provincial
determinant.
We
have
grown
our
renewable
assets
to
represent
about
110,000
homes
worth
of
green
power.
We
feed
that
into
the
grids,
so
we
have
no
control
over
the
mix
at
that
at
the
provincial
level.
If.
N
We
are
where
we've
grown
our
renewable
generation
fleet
by
five
hundred
percent
six
years,
so
we're
doing
it
we're
doing
our
damnedest
to
become
greener
and
greener
and
make
it
more
more
and
more
green.
But
the
province
is
in
the
surplus
position
at
the
moment
with
having
surplus
electricity
so
they're,
not
in
the
world
of
procuring
new
sources
of
energy.
Well,.
G
N
D
Menard,
please
thanks
very
much
mayor.
Am
I
able
to
speak
to
the
motion
as
well
as
other
and
it's
okay?
So
maybe
I'll
just
start
actually.
First
on
another
item,
I
really
appreciate
all
the
work
you
folks
have
done
had
a
good
meetings
with
you
and
just
wanted
to
say.
I
also
appreciate
the
the
potential
willingness
to
work
with
us
on
our
on
the
retrofit
of
our
buildings
as
well.
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
deep
retrofits
that
we
could
use
that.
D
D
If
this
is
something
that
we
should
really
be
really
voting
on
here.
So
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
in
order
to
make
sure
that
we're
fully
considering
what
we've
already
passed
a
council,
this
should
be
referred.
This
motion
should
be
referred
back
to
Environment
Committee
we've
already
Environment
Committee
has
decided
this.
It
came
to
Council,
we
decided
on
it.
There,
and
so
in
any
event,
we
should
be
deciding
back
at
Environment
Committee,
for
where
these,
where
this
these
funds
go
so
I
guess
I
would
just
say,
motion
to
refer
back
to
committee.
D
I
D
Just
call
me
briefly
on
that
date:
you
have
a
seconder
for
referral,
sure
talk
to
number
council
colleagues,
so
councillor
Moffat
seconding
the
in
terms
of
the
the
total.
Certainly,
my
motion
required
that
yes
for
a
staffing
component
but
I
know,
staff
are
already
doing
their
planning
for
the
amount
that
they
feel
is
coming
forward
for
things
like
energy
evolution
and
our
next
phase
of
investment.
Therefore,
this
money
they've
already
started
booking
that
those
funds
for
climate
change
mitigation
and
adaptation.
So
this
would
be
a
real
concern.
D
I
O
Thanks
mayor,
the
the
motion
to
refers
I
think
the
the
appropriate
one.
We
need
to
understand
the
the
spending
plans
that
our
environment
staff
have
already
undertaken.
We
were
throwing
a
number
of
different
figures
out
into
the
air
I
think
it's
important
for
council
to
take
time
to
digest
what
the
implications
of
this
motion
would
be.
I,
don't
think
it
is
appropriate
to
have
something
this
important
come
to
the
table
in
this
fashion.
O
O
L
H
It's
been
coming,
mister
mayors
been
coming
out
of
the
the
operational
budgets
of
the
various
departments,
but
we've
been
coding
all
the
costs
to
a
central
account,
so
we
can
track
all
the
cost
and
then
the
treasurer
will
be
allocating
whatever
surpluses
we
have
or
Flugtag
stabilization
fund
of
funds
to
cover
off
those
those
expenses
in
the
various
departments.
But
it's.
L
Mr.
mayor,
the
the
two
committees
that
have
had
that
have
experienced
the
spending
crunch
are
the
community
Protective,
Services
Committee
and
the
transportation
committee,
and
yet
we're
going
to
send
the
decision
on
money
we've
already
spent
and
need
to
recover
to
a
third
committee
entirely.
It
doesn't
seem
to
me
that
that
is
reasonable.
This
is
not
deciding
on
if
we
want
to
do
something
extra.
L
This
is
money
that
has
already
been
spent,
and
so
we
need
to
figure
out
where
we're
taking
from
in
order
to
spend
that
that
is
a
decision
that
the
entire
council
as
a
whole
should
make.
Not
a
single
committee,
especially
when
the
expenses
that
are
off
or
out
of
Kelter,
are
from
two
different
committees
all
together,
so
I
would
not
support
referring
it
to
the
Environment
Committee.
P
P
That
does
the
fantastic
work
that
they
do
as
somebody
that
served
on
the
board
for
a
long
time
and
somebody
that
has
been
at
this
council
for
a
long
time
and
certainly
I,
look
at
councillor
Dean's,
councillor,
Sher
Ali
and
a
few
others
that
remember
after
amalgamation,
how
incredibly
difficult
it
was
to
keep
the
power
on
and
the
investments
that
this
company
is
made.
You
know
I
think
it
would
be
different.
P
We
having
this
conversation
and
sending
it
to
referral
if
we
hadn't
had
the
catastrophe
that
we
have
you
heard
councillor
Blais
say
the
the
pressures
financially
to
community
Protective
Services
and
to
the
transportation
department.
We
have
people,
I
guess
cause
public
consultation,
councillor
leaper
sure
who
you
gonna
go
talk
to
the
people
in
bar
Haven.
You
know
what
we
didn't
struggle
too
much
with
the
flood.
In
fact,
we
didn't
struggle
at
all,
maybe
we'll
go
to
Constance
Bay
and
talk
to
those
people.
P
Remember
we
had
to
engage
our
own
staff,
which
I'm
sure
we
don't
even
have
a
number
on
that
mr.
mayor
in
the
last
four
days
to
clean
up
the
rest
of
the
bags,
because
our
volunteers
in
this
city
were
just
too
damn
tired
and
couldn't
go
out
and
do
it
and
face
the
attack
of
the
bugs
from
the
cause
from
the
flooding
and
everything
else.
So
it
makes
absolutely
no
sense
to
have
a
public
consultation
about
something
that
truly
was
a
catastrophe
for
many
people
in
our
city.
P
P
Catastrophe,
then
that
is
really
makes
no
sense
to
refer
this.
It
makes
absolutely
no
sense
I'm
asking
you
all
not
to
support
referral.
This
is
not
a
shuttle.
This
is
not,
you
know,
Christmas
bonus
and
we
get
to
see
how
we're
going
to
spend
it.
This
is
this
is
money
that
we
need
to
spend
wisely,
and
this
is
the
right.
This
is
the
right
place.
To
put
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
You
mr.
mayor
I
will
be
supporting
referral,
but
I
do
want
to
make
the
point
that
you
know
the
the
notion
that
you
know
we
shouldn't
be
talking
to
our
own
constituents
or
that
we
should
be
going.
Oh,
not
me,
going
out
to
talk
to
constituents.
I
have
never
ever
thought
for
a
second
that
we
shouldn't
be
supporting
people
in
need
in
the
flooded
areas.
Of
course,
we
should,
but
I
just
want
to
point
out,
because
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
worth
noting
publicly
that
you
know
a
week
before
the
flooding.
A
There
was
a
fire
in
my
ward,
a
rooming
house
burned
and
30
people
ended
up
homeless.
23
of
those
people
a
week
later
were
sleeping
on
the
street.
They
had
nowhere
to
go,
the
shelters
are
full
and
there
was
nowhere
for
people
to
sleep.
So
I
just
want
to
take
offense
to
the
fact
that
by
referring
this
motion,
somehow
we're
hard-hearted
or
we're
not
thinking
about
people
in
need,
there
was
no
support
for
23
people
who
were
homeless.
I
got
one
extra
night
in
a
hotel
for
them.
H
Mr.
mayor,
the
you
know,
it's
everything
eventually
falls
to
the
bottom
line,
as
our
treasurer
often
tells
us,
and
so
if
the
funds
aren't
replaced,
that
money
would
have
to
be
made
up
from
other
services
from
now
to
the
end
of
the
year,
we'd
have
to
make
an
effort
to
cut
back
and
other
initiatives
that
we've
undertaken
at
the
direction
of
Council
and
at
the
end
of
the
year.
H
If
we
haven't
made
up
that
surplus
we'd
have
to
go
into
our
tax
Stabilization
Reserve
anyways,
to
be
able
to
fund
whatever
deficit
was
created
by
these
unexpected
events.
We
don't
build
these
into
our
budget.
We
we
do
a
risk-based
budget,
and
the
fact
that
this
happened
unexpectedly
is
something
that
has
to
be
made
up
somehow
within
the
various
services
within
the
year
or
from
reserve
funds.
Okay,.
D
Thanks
very
much
thanks
very
much
mr.
mayor
I,
guess
there's
a
couple
things
I
wanted
to
just
address,
because
this
has
come
forward
at
the
last
minute
of
councilman.
None
of
us
saw
this
motion.
It
was.
It
was
very
quick
and
I.
Think
you've
been
very
clear.
You
want
to
see
items
come
through
committee
that
that
is
the
proper
process
come
through
committee.
Come
to
Council
well,
in
this
case,
there's
a
lot
of
deliberation
that
should
go
on
about
what
is
needed,
which
areas
this
should
come
for
for
the
flooding.
D
How
much
money
is
potentially
going
to
be
needed
to
start
addressing
the
climate
change
emergency
motion
that
we
passed
here
and
that
deliberation
doesn't
happen
in
on
a
whim
like
this
I
think
I
think
you've
been
clear
in
the
median.
Otherwise
talking
about
that,
so
I
think
I
think
it's
important
that
we
send
this
back
to
the
the
committee
that
originally
brought
it.
This
council
passed
this
motion
already.
You
could
say
that
there's
new
information
about
a
number
of
motions
spending,
motions
that
we've
already
passed
here.
D
We've
spent
a
lot
of
money
in
this
term
so
far,
and
you
could
go
back
on
many
of
those
decisions
and
say
hey.
We
want
to
reallocate
that,
but
it's
been
chosen
for
this
one,
so
at
least
give
the
committee
the
chance
to
deliberate
on
it
to
make
sure
staff
can
bring
forward
more
information
before
we
passes.
I'm,
not
saying
that
this
that
some
of
these
funds
won't
go
towards
these
important
priorities.
D
Some
of
them,
of
course,
should
and
may,
but
let's
at
least
have
the
deliberation
properly
before
we
go
ahead,
and
just
do
this
willy-nilly
here,
especially
when
there's
other
potential
booked
funding
with
this,
so
I
just
wanted
to
raise
that
and
make
sure
that
that
people
understand
that
this
is
something
that's
happening
on
the
fly.
None
of
us
saw
this.
Let's
take
the
time
and
deliberation
to
consider
this
properly.
As
we've
been
saying,
thank.
I
You
I'd
encourage
members
of
council
to
not
support
referral
for
the
simple
reason
councilor
dude
ass
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
This
is
money.
That's
already
been
spent,
it's
not
a
new
request
for
future
spending.
That's
the
difference!
This
the
tornados
took
place.
The
flooding
took
place
in
the
various
communities
from
east
to
west
to
south
in
our
city.
So
we're
not
having
a
debate
about
whether
there
was
a
tornado
or
not.
There
was
a
tornado.
I
We
spent
the
money
we've
been
told
by
staff,
it's
now
well
over
five
million
dollars
that
we've
incurred
in
overtime,
sand
costs,
personnel
equipment
and
so
on.
So
it's
a
wide
difference
between
wanting
to
spend
money
in
the
future
versus
an
event
that
has
already
taken
place
that
we
didn't
budget
for.
I
Q
J
C
F
P
Now
your
next
investments
going
to
be
out
in
councillor
Moffat
in
my
area,
which
is
badly
needed
for
growth
in
that
and
I
applaud
you
on
your
your
plans,
your
long-range
plans,
I,
you
know,
as
somebody
who
has
watched
over
the
years,
I've
certainly
have
appreciated
it
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
know,
congratulations
for
all
of
your
award-winning
work
on
conservation
demand
management,
yeah!
That's
a
change
or
not!
It's
a
change
for
sure.
P
P
The
incredible
lineup
of
Chiefs
you
have
is
fantastic
and
I
have
all
confidence
and
I
wanted
to
say
on
a
personal
level
as
somebody
that
had
90,000
people
that
didn't
have
any
power
for
three
days
during
the
tornados,
we
didn't
have
the
the
terrible
damage
that
we
saw
in
other
areas,
but
just
having
the
information
that
you
led
on
that
information
was
crucial
to
I,
think
making
our
city
well
and
giving
us
information
and
information
is
always
power,
I
think
for
the
for
the
folks.
So
thank
you
for
that.
N
Thank
you,
Thank
You,
counselor
I
should
have
at
the
outset.
This
is
my
first
opportunity
speak
to
counsel
since
the
tornado,
but
which
wanted
on
behalf
the
company.
Thank
you
for
what
you
did
collectively,
but
also
for
what
you
didn't
do
waking
up
Saturday
morning,
realizing
that
half
the
city
was
dark
and
out
of
power.
There
was
plenty
of
opportunity
for
you
to
second-guess
us
and
and
so
to
start
to
fire
off
the
the
tweets
at
us
and
in
collectively
you
didn't.
N
N
It's
a
great
question,
thank
you
and
we're
obviously
happy
to
have
helped
out
in
that
situation.
The
project
was
initially
set
as
a
four-year
project.
We
projected
a
50
percent
savings
and
the
energy
threshold
of
them
that
mr.
Durrell
referred
to
the
project
will
come
in
six
months
faster,
so
it'll
be
done
by
the
end
of
this
calendar
year
and
the
current
projected
savings
are
about
67%,
so
the
savings
are
higher
than
we
anticipated.
So
it's
a
win-win-win-win
one.
N
We've
we've
explored
some
piloting.
We
have
some
pilots
going
on
in
the
Orleans
area,
I
believe
with
respect
to
meteorological
data
that
we're
picking
up
off
there,
but
those
polls
are
all,
are
the
lights,
are
all
created
and
and
they're
all
IP
addressable,
so
you
can
put
anything
on
any
one
of
those
poles
and
they're
there
ready
for
it.
We
tried
to
future-proof
the
technology
for
you
to
allow
you
to
do
that
so
gunshot
detectors
and
closed-circuit
TV
cameras
meteorological
devices
traffic
devices.
Any
of
those
things
can
be
put
on
those
poles
great.
O
You,
mayor
Bryce,
if
I
may
pick
up
on
the
the
last
point
you
made
with
respect
to
the
power
outages.
Obviously
in
kitchen
Sippy,
we
were
without
power
for
54
hours.
It
was
great
working
with
you.
Congratulations
on
getting
the
power
back
up
and
running
so
quickly.
At
the
time
you
spoke
with
residents
about
the
failure
of
the
communications
infrastructure
at
hydro
I
think
we
had
an
opportunity
to
chat
a
few
times
about
that.
But
where
are
you
in
terms
of
making
that
communications
infrastructure
more
robust
to
help
residents
get
more?
N
If
you
go
back
to
the
the
dark
days
of
the
tornado,
our
system
was
our
super
outage
map,
which
is
what
everybody
was
looking
for,
was
getting
in
excess
of
a
year's
worth
of
hits
in
a
matter
of
hours
and
and
the
database
that
was
underpinning
it
just
got
play
frankly
confused.
It
was
so
busy,
reloading
and
reloading.
It
was
never
yeah,
it
was
just
it
was
it
failed.
N
So
I've
made
the
commitment
that
we
would
fix
that
that
has
been
fixed.
It
is
capable
of
being
flexing
up
to
much
higher
number
I,
don't
want
to
test
it
at
150,000
again.
If
we
can
all
agree
on
that,
but
it
is
much
much
more
robust
than
otherwise
was.
We
also
have
the
ability
with
our
with
our
social
media,
which
I
think
was
one
of
the
success
stories
through
the
through
the
through
the
tornado.
N
We
have
effectively
created
a
bot
that
allows
that
pumps
out
Twitter
messages
automatically,
no
matter
what
time
of
day
or
night
basic
outage
information
kind
of
thing:
you're
not
gonna,
get
that
personal
stuff
that
you
were
getting
during
the
tornado,
but
just
the
general
information
would
be.
Would
be
getting
up
there
and
we
look
for
all
I
mean
all
other
opportunities
we've.
N
I
think
you
know
if
you
look
at
the
success
of
the
flood,
lack
of
them
poor
choice
of
words
on
my
part,
but
the
drone
footage
that
we
women
put
the
drone
up
over
shaji
air
falls
and
you
see
the
full
scale
and
scope
of
that
flooding.
It's
it's
it's
fantastic,
but
that's
something
that
we
can
do
now
with
with
the
drone
technology
we
have.
So
it's
always
gonna
be
a
working
progress,
counselor
well,
I
appreciate.
It
certainly
appreciate
your
support
and
getting
the
message
out.
As
I
said:
counselors
generally
were
fantastic.
N
O
S
That
councillor
hard
represents
by
that
Sunday
evening
was
somewhat
crazy
in
that
it
actually
worked.
I
mean
because
that
was
that
was
a
big
concern
in
those
communities
that
the
residents
out
there
understood
fully
that
what
they
were
going
through
with
the
lack
of
power
paled
in
comparison
to
what
other
communities
are
going
through.
So
they
were
very
understanding,
but
the
fact
that
you
were
able
to
succeed
in
that
was
incredible
and
that's
why
I
wasn't
sure
there
would
be
surplus.
S
The
fact
there
is,
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
that
we
did,
that
committee
was
speak
to
how
we
could
fund
energy
efficiency
projects.
A
lot
of
the
things
that
you
do
with
in
vari
are
very
similar
to
that:
finding
ways
to
be
more
efficient
throughout
the
city
with
our
buildings
and
a
number
of
other
projects
that
we
can
do
that
help
save
money,
but
also
relies
investments
for
the
city,
so
that
was
the
intent
of
the
motion.
That's
what
we
made
clear
that
was
approved
here.
Council
I,
understand
that
things
happen.
S
There
are
emergencies,
I,
don't
not
support.
The
motion
in
front
of
you
I
do
appreciate
the
fact
that
we're
retaining
some
of
the
surplus
for
its
intended
purpose
back
in
March,
but
I
do
want
to
mention
one
thing:
there
is
a
budgets
at
the
city
called
the
tax
Stabilization
Fund,
and
that
is
what
is
supposed
to
be
used
for
emergencies.
S
What's
gonna
happen
with
the
surplus
in
the
future,
there
might
not
be
a
surplus
next
year.
The
motion
that
council
approved
back
in
March
set
forward
a
path
for
the
entire
term.
What
I
don't
want
to
see
is
if
there
is
a
future
surplus
that
we
keep
on
coming
back
to
the
floor
council
and
revisiting
our
March
2019
decision
to
use
that
fund
for
energy
evolution
for
renewable
projects
under
the
leadership
of
Steve
Willis.
S
That's
where
that
money
was
to
go
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
maintaining
that
principle
that
we
set
earlier
this
year
and
that
things
like
the
tax
Stabilization
Fund
are
not
used
are
not
cherry-picked
to
balance
budgets
that
we
know
are
not
full.
That
fund
is
there
for
the
end
of
the
year.
If
there
are
issues
you
know,
it's
been
very
beneficial
to
have
a
very
healthy
reserve.
At
the
City
of
Ottawa,
we
haven't
touched
reserves
on
snow
removal
for
many
years.
S
That's
because
we
manage
the
budgets
and
we
have
we're
able
to
backfill
that,
if
necessary,
but
we
haven't
even
seen,
which
is
tremendous,
but
these
funds
are
for
emergencies
like
this,
where
we
wouldn't
have
to
be
worried
about
falling
short
and
having
to
use
funds
that
we
didn't
know
we're
going
to
come
so
in
the
future.
I'd
prefer
to
get
some
commitments.
O
O
The
tornado
was
a
was
a
very
challenging
time,
to
say
the
least,
probably
one
of
the
most
difficult
times
since
I've
been
elected,
and
you
and
I
had
many
talks
text
communications
at
all
hours
of
all
days
over
that
two
or
three
week
period.
There
was
never
a
time.
I
could
not
reach
out
and
hear
back
from
hydro
on
a
concern
from
a
resident.
So
I
wanted
to
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
publicly
thank
you
and
the
and
the
board
for
being
there
was.
O
O
What
they
do
is
a
thank
hydro
for
forgetting
the
power
back
on
before
being
very
solicitous
and
and
considerate
of
the
situation
that
people
were
in
so
I
just
I
wanted
to
pass
that
on
in
a
in
a
public
forum,
because
God
knows
you
don't
have
to
go
through
that
again,
but
if
we
do
have
to
I'm
happy
to
say
that
you'll
be
my
partner
in
that.
So
so
thank
you
for
that
now
to
turn
the
attention
to
the
motion.
O
Councillor
Moffat,
there's
really
not
much
I
can
add
when
the
motion
was
passed
was
passed
for
a
purpose
and
there
was
good
and
robust
discussion
around
it,
and
this
is
not
to
say
that
that
I
I'm,
not
supportive
of
helping
out
and
supporting
what
happened
in
my
colleagues,
colleagues
warts
but
like
councillor,
damoff
and
I
would
I
would
like
to
know
and
I.
Don't
know
how
you
do
that
mr.
O
Cantor
lacus
I'm
looking
at
you
because
the
treasures
not
here
how
you
give
us
some
some
confirmation
that
we
won't
come
back
year-over-year
I
mean
the
motion
was
quite
clear
for
the
tournament
council.
That's
what
was
going
to
happen
to
the
to
the
surplus,
so
I,
don't
know
what
you
can
say
today
or
do
today
to
answer
the
concern
that
the
councillor
Moffitt's
brought
up
and
that
I
share
is.
We
were
the
original
movers
of
the
motion
that
we're
not
going
to
keep
coming
back
year
after
year.
H
Mr.
mayor,
you
know
there's
no
way.
I
can
obviously
guarantee
that,
because
we
have
as
a
city,
we
have
many
unexpected
events
that
occur.
I
think
this
is
an
unusual
period
of
time.
My
I've
been
around
many
years.
34
years
now,
I've
never
seen
this
kind
of
activity
in
a
three-year
period
that
has
demanded
the
level
of
resources
that
we've
had
to
expend
to
be
able
to
manage
these
situations.
H
You
know
I
like
to
think
of
things
sort
of
over
a
longer
term
and
generally,
when
you
look
back
over
time,
we've
been
able
to
smooth
out
the
the
rough
edges
and
the
bumps
within
our
own
means
and
deal
with
the
budget
without
having
to
dip
into
many
of
these
areas.
I
think
this
is
a
unique
situation
where
you
couldn't
you
couldn't
make
this
up.
H
If
you
look
at
the
last
three
years,
if
you
remember
in
2015,
we
had
a
42
million
dollar
deficit
operating
deficit
in
this
organization
from
2016
on
we've
had
a
surplus
every
year,
despite
the
fact
we've
had
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
happen,
a
lot
of
events,
everything
from
sinkhole
to
bus
crashes,
to
you
name
and
we've
had
a
lot
of
things
that
have
happened
and,
and
we
managed
to
to
eke
out
a
surplus.
That's
the
strength
of
our
management
team
here
at
the
table.
This
is
very
unique.
It
requires
a
unique
solution.
H
I
I
O
Thank
you
mr.
maryk,
and
thank
for
the
answer.
Mr.
Khanna
lacus
and
I
and
I
do
appreciate
its
it's
challenging
times.
I
guess,
I'll,
just
sum
up
by
saying
I
will
be
supporting
the
motion
that
I
do
see
the
need,
but
it
would
hope
next
time
around
if
something
like
this
did
happen
and
God
forbid
that
it
should.
O
But
if
something
like
this
should
happen
again-
and
we
have
to
have
this
discussion-
that
it'd
be
a
more
processed
driven
discussion,
that
there
be
more
notice
and
more
opportunity
to
have
dialogue
about
what
is
gonna
happen
to
this
collective
money
of
the
whole
city
and
and
where
it's
gonna
be
put
so
I'll
just
leave
that
on
the
table.
Thank
you
right.
Thank
you.
Can.
T
Mr.
mr.
Mehra
I
want
to
echo
our
councilor
Moffitt's
comments
and
put
parts
of
councillor
allies.
I
won't
revisit
those
comments,
but
I
have
two
questions
for
for
one
for
our
clerk
relating
to
the
motion.
So
when
I
read
that,
therefore
be
it
resolved,
there's
no
date
attached,
but
this
reflects
only
a
financial
contribution
of
whatever
is
in
excess
of
20
million
and
the
five
hundred
thousand
for
the
year
of
2019.
Or
does
it
include
beyond
that.
T
And
then,
mr.
mr.
Cana
lacus,
we
we
have
an
amazing
team
that
responds
and
adapts
to
to
the
various
situations
we
have
in
our
city,
I've
seen
it
firsthand.
Most
Ward's
have
seen
these
sorts
of
climate
emergencies
and
environmental
issues
and
fires
and
sinkholes
and
so
on.
I
want
to
know
from
your
perspective,
how
do
you
operationalize
those
pressures
year
after
year
and
and
why
is
it
different
this
time
around
because
I
feel
like
we
just
go
out?
T
H
Mr.
mayor,
you
know,
we
haven't,
you
know
in
terms
of
covering
it
in
the
past,
I
mean
I,
think
you
know,
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
get
some
clarification
from
our
finance
in
terms
of
how
we
covered
some
of
the
past.
We
had
a
pressures
in
the
past
the
extraordinary
thing
about
this
year,
particularly
in
the
flood
I,
would
say
recently
in
terms
of
the
cost,
we're
almost
triple
the
cost
of
what
we
were
in
2017
from
what
I
can
tell.
We
reached
a
level
of
engagement
because
of
the
protracted
nature
of
the
incident.
H
The
water
level
stayed
high
for
almost
three
weeks.
The
work
that
was
required
to
remove
the
sandbags
we
put
basically
five
times
the
number
of
sandbags
in
this
year
compared
to
2017.
We
had
the
army
here.
That
was
an
extra
thousand
personnel
filling
sandbags.
The
level
of
effort
for
this
time
surpassed
what
we
normally
can
absorb
within
the
natural
to-and-fro
surplus,
as
we
have
in
the
department's
and
that's
on
top
of
the
other
things
we
responded
to,
particularly
the
winter
we
had,
so
you
have
a
winter
where
you
know
we're
under
incredible
pressure.
H
T
You
for
that
and
just
to
follow
up
if
you,
if,
if
council,
was
to
not
make
a
decision
on
that
matter
today,
I
mean
we'll
we'll
have
we'll
make
a
decision
on
the
vote
in
a
few
minutes,
but
want
to
know
how
would
you
live
with
that?
How
would
that
pressure
be
adjusted
or
adapted?
Would
you
require
a
motion
of
council
or
would
you
like
councilor
Moffitt
spoke
about
going
into
pop
some
of
the
reserve
pockets
to
address
that
pressure?
Well,.
H
Your
option
is
always
the
tax
Stabilization
Reserve
ultimately,
but
we
need
that
for
future
years,
we're
trying
to
protect
that
amount
to
deal
with
unforeseen
circumstances
going
into
the
future
that
that
fund
has
been
consolidated,
as
you
approved
before,
and
the
challenge
now
being
July.
Is
we
basically
have
half
a
year
to
try
and
find
that
money
within
the
departments,
in
addition
to
what
was
reported
to
the
deficit,
we're
running
or
the
deficit
in
the
snow
budget
we're
running
based
on
the
bad
winter?
H
So
it
would
really
mean
a
rethinking
of
an
in
a
in
a
delving
back
into
budgets
for
the
remainder
of
the
year
and
a
half
a
year,
we
basically
had
to
found
double
the
amount
to
be
able
to
to
fund
this
and
get
ourselves
back
into
a
surplus
situation.
I
also
want
to
remind
council,
mr.
mayor
that
we
are
expecting
provincial
impacts
going
into
2020.
H
So
you
may
want
to
fund
going
into
2020
and
I
think
that
long
view
is
what's
important
here
and
that
we're
able
to
come
out
of
2019
in
a
balanced
position
so
that
we
can
address
the
2020
pressures
which
we
know
based
on
early
assessments,
are
going
to
be
significant
challenge.
On
top
of
all
the
normal
pressures
we
face.
Building
the
2020
budget.
T
T
This
is
obviously
we've
all
had
to
live
with
the
the
impacts
over
the
last
few
months
and
certainly
want
to
make
sure
that
our
financial
abilities
to
to
adapt
continue.
But
that
said,
I
think
this
needs
like
we
need
to
find
a
structure
so
that
if
and
when
floods
happen
or
if
and
when
fires
happen
or
if
and
when,
there's
other
issues
that
we
go
back
to
the
accounts.
So
you
know
for
me,
I
really
treat
this
personally.
T
J
Thank
you,
Thank
You,
mr.
mayor
and
I,
want
to
thank
my
colleagues
both
of
them
for
moving
that
motion.
Mr.
Cannella
is
first
speak
about
the
motion.
The
amount
of
money
we
spend.
We
will
not
be
able
to
recover
any
of
it
from
the
province
because
the
rules
is
if
I,
remember
correctly
and
I
think
somebody
can
correct
me.
We
have
to
spend
three
percent
of
our
total
infrastructure
budget
before
we
qualify
for
provincial
assistance.
Is
that
correct.
H
J
In
order
to
qualify
for
provincial
funding
to
this,
like
we
have
to
spend
basically
the
hundred
million
dollar-
that's
correct,
mr.
mayor,
so
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say.
Mr.
mayor
other
than
I
know
again,
I
might
have
to
declare
conflict
of
interest
I'm,
not
sure
mr.
Connor
will
tell
me
if
I
would.
J
This
is
this.
You
said
no
good
folks
when
I
hear
around
the
table,
or
would
you
know
we
should
be
prepared
or
we
should
be
budgeting
for
the
unforeseen
I,
don't
know
how,
unless
somebody
have
a
crystal
ball
share
with
us,
I'm,
not
sure
what
you
can
see.
This
part
of
the
country
we
never
saw
tornado
is
probably
in
100
years
we
saw
six
of
them
in
in
West,
Carlton
2018
2017
flood.
They
told
us
what
there
was
the
flood
of
the
hundred
years
and
we
bought
into
it
with
us.
J
This
is
that
this
is
the
hundred
years
flood.
It
was
91
years
exactly
and
2019.
We
had
26
centimeters
of
water
more
and,
if
you
ask
me
today,
I
would
say
the
Ottawa
River
on
averse
to
flooded
again
today
today
is
still
considered
to
be
high
water
compared
to
another,
so
I'm,
not
sure
I
mean
really.
If
we
are
really
concerned
about
the
environment,
you
know
climate
change
or
environmental
change
or
whatever
those
unforeseen
event.
J
I
think
the
way
we're
doing
this
with
this
motion
I
think
they
will
address
all
this
concern
and
I'm
not
sure,
honestly,
why
we're
debating
this
because
really
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction
to
be
able
to
deal
with
the
unforeseen
weather
effect
on
all
of
us,
so
I
hope
you
will
support
this
motion.
I
wanna
thank
both
my
colleague,
the
mover
and
a
seconder
for
for
bringing
up
this
motion.
Thank.
L
L
This
is
unforeseen
money
and
while
and
this
motion
asks
that
a
half
a
million
dollars
of
it
be
directed
towards
the
the
area
of
funding
that
council
had
asked
for
the
surplus
to
be
directed
the
five
plus
million
dollars,
we've
already
spent,
we've
all
spent.
We
need
to
find
it
from
somewhere
and
the
departments
in
which
it's
been
spent
are
the
departments
that,
in
fairness,
we
have
most
of
the
pressure.
L
It's
the
guys
that
plow
the
snow
in
the
winter
time,
the
sand
they
put
on
the
streets
and
the
sidewalks
in
the
winter
time
is
a
lot
of
the
sand.
We
use
to
fill
the
sandbags,
it's
our
firefighters
and
our
paramedics
and
all
the
other
emergency
service
personnel.
So
last
winter
we
heard
we
didn't
have
enough
money
for
snow
clearing,
and
now
we
don't
want
to
refresh
the
money
for
winter
operations.
We
used
for
flood
mitigation
that,
to
me,
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense.
I
think
the
city
manager
is
absolutely
right.
L
We
need
to
take
the
long
view
on
this.
If
there
are,
if
there
are
corrections,
people
want
to
make
you
areas
of
funding
for
the
budget
going
forward.
We're
gonna
be
into
that
exercise
in
the
fall,
but
right
now
we
have
five
million
dollars
in
expenses.
We
need
to
cover.
We've
got
two
million
plus
that
we
weren't
expecting
to
have.
That
still
leaves
us
two
to
three
million
dollars.
I
I
I,
don't
number-8
repealing
sections
of
the
property
maintenance
by
law
and
standards
by
law,
decide
by
counterplay.
He
said:
Standing
Committee
on
Environmental
Protection
waste
and
water
management
report
number
three:
Eastern
sub-watershed,
stormwater
management.
Retrofit
study
carried
item
number
ten
City
of
Ottawa
energy
conservation
and
demand
management,
planned
carried
item,
11,
single-use
plastic
bottles
at
city
facilities
buried.
T
I'm
very
supportive.
The
motion
and
I
wanted
to
carry
but
I
have
a
technical
question
relating
to
and
I've
asked
mr.
O'connor
this
and
want
to
make
sure
we
clarify
mr.
O'connor.
When
will
you
be
coming
back?
We
see
other
jurisdictions,
pass
external
by
laws
relating
to
plastic
bags
relating
to
styrofoam
really
relating
to
other
single-use
plastics
and
we're
not
sure
in
Ontario
and
this
our
city's
context.
What
are
our
authorities?
So
when
do
you?
When
do
you
plan
to
share
that
legal
legal
opinion
of
this?
Mr.
I
Barry
I,
don't
12
membership
of
counsel,
climate
change.
Sponsors
group
married
planning
report
number
nine,
as
a
number
30
item:
13
zoning
bylaw,
my
special,
my
regular
Monday
zone
as
song,
kettles,
shimei,
Richmond
and
counselor
leaper
has
two
motions:
were
your
secondary
sconce
I?
Don't
have
a
second
log,
both
of
them?
Okay,
okay,
we'll
have
to
hold
that
then
we'll
come
back.
Zoning
bylaw
amendment
twenty
or
two
one,
one
Loretta
Avenue
Avenue
Loretta,
hold
item,
15
modification
or
oops.
P
I
On
the
technical
amendment
by
councillor
Hardison,
my
counselor
tyranny
carry
on
the
report
as
amended
carried
item
16
Ontario
priorities,
housing
initiative
and
city
capital
investment
plan
for
affordable
housing
area,
build
Heritage
subcommittee
report,
number
2
item,
17
application
all
over
the
property
at
467,
betterer
Katzie,
said
best
or
adopt
a
carried
item.
18
designation
of
1820
essentials
at
Boulevard
under
part
4
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
carried.
I
I
Mulk
consent
agenda.
Does
anyone
wish
to
remove
anything
from
the
bulk
consent
agenda
at
this
point
on
the
bulk
consent
agenda
as
presented
carried
all
right?
So
we'll
go
back
to
the
first
item
that
we
asked
to
be
held
and
I
believe
that
was
the
paramedic
service
who
asked
that
the
paramedic
service,
counselor
Brockington.
M
Thank
you.
Your
worship
and
thank
you
to
the
committee
for
receiving
the
annual
report,
certainly
appreciate
the
stats
that
are
contained
2018.
We
see
yet
another
strong
increase
in
demand.
The
number
of
responses
up,
3.4
percent-
it's
gone
up
every
year,
well
above
the
rate
of
population
increase,
and
we
continue
to
have
decent
response
times.
My
question
to
the
chief
or
to
the
general
manager
is
regarding
what
I
find
is
a
disturbing
media
report.
B
Thank
you
for
the
question
counselor,
where
the
the
actions
taken
by
the
county
or
Pesce
Russell
are
being
investigated
by
the
ministry
as
we
as
we
speak.
There
have
been
some
incidents
where
there
where
they
haven't
responded.
Now
we
can't
say
that
that's
created
a
necessarily
a
risk
that
will
come
out
through
the
investigations.
The
the
outcome
of
the
patients
has
not
been
has
not
been
affected
negatively,
not.
M
Yet
that's
the
worry
I
have
that
when
we
have,
you
know
life-threatening
medical
emergencies,
people
expect
the
ambulance
to
show
up,
and
so,
when
we
have
cases
where
our
resident
in
Ottawa
has
called
for
service
and
that
service
is
being
denied
by
I
guess
the
closest
paramedic
in
the
area.
How
are
we
reporting
that.
B
Again,
thank
you
for
the
question
through
mr.
Mara.
The
reporting
of
those
incidents
is
an
automatic
function
at
the
dispatch
center
and
those
reports
are
being
funneled
to
the
province
for
their
review
and
for
their
investigation.
As
and
as
I
said,
those
investigations
are
underway.
As
we
speak.
Okay,
I.
I
G
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor.
This
is
something
that
I
I
found.
Incredibly
sad.
This
is
something
about
our
tradition.
We,
we
are
a
city
of
traditions.
We
celebrate
the
fact
we
have
many
roots,
for
example,
the
tulips
are
something
very
important
to
us.
It
was
a
gift
from
another
country
and
it's
something
very
important
to
us.
I
view
the
Swans
in
the
same
light.
G
I
Okay,
so
on
the
Royal
Swans,
just
to
remind
members
that
a
number
of
the
swans
were
were
killed
by
coyotes
last
summer,
we're
down
to
four
I
believe
of
the
original
descendant
or
four
four
of
the
the
white
swans
and
I'm
not
prepared
to
send
them
back
out
on
the
river
to
see
the
last
four
killed
by
coyotes.
So
I
strongly
support
the
staff
report.
I
think
it's
the
most
humane
thing
to
do,
and
yeas
and
nays
have
been
called
on.
The
staff
recommendation.
S
Q
F
I
O
You
mayor,
this
is
with
respect
to
the
the
convent
building
that
is
proposed.
The
we've
been
spending
the
last
year
so
last
summer.
Right
around
this
time.
Maybe
a
month
later,
we
were
here
to
approve
the
heritage
application,
so
I
think
most
councillors
are
familiar
with
this
little
visit,
SEO
convent
on
Richmond
Road.
Last
summer
we
approved
a
plan
that
would
see
Ashcroft
demolish
a
portion
of
one
of
the
wings
and
build
the
previously
approved
nine-story
building
into
the
convent.
So
it
effectively
becomes
one
structure.
I
am
supporting
that
rezoning.
O
Today
there
is
a
significant
concern
in
the
in
the
community
with
respect
to
making
sure
that
the
convent
is
properly
restored.
The
previous
construction
can
be
argued
to
have
damaged
the
convent.
We
don't
want
to
see
it
further
damaged
and
I
have
two
motions
this
afternoon.
That
would
provide
some
level
of
guarantee
to
the
community
that,
in
the
course
of
building
the
the
new
building
it
would
be
properly
restored.
O
So
the
first
is
that,
where,
as
an
application
for
an
addition
and
alteration
to
the
property
of
114,
Richmond,
Road
known
as
sisters
of
the
visitation
and
designated
under
part,
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
was
considered
by
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
on
august,
2nd
2018
by
Planning
Committee
on
August,
28,
2018
and
approved
by
Council
on
August
29th
2018.
And
whereas
the
report,
zoning
bylaw
amendment
114
Richmond
Road,
proposes
an
amendment
to
harmonize
the
zoning
schedules
to
reflect.
O
The
above
noted
approval
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
whereas
the
protection,
conservation
and
restoration
of
the
monastery
needs
to
be
ensured.
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
following
additional
recommendation
be
added
to
the
report
as
a
condition
to
be
contained
in
the
site
plan
control
approval
report.
The
applicant
shall
provide
a
letter
of
credit
for
the
conservation
and
restoration
of
the
building
envelope,
as
well
as
the
exterior
heritage
attributes
of
the
monastery
in
consultation
with
the
applicant.
O
The
amount
of
securities
to
be
provided
will
be
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
manager
of
planning,
infrastructure
and
economic
development.
So
this
motion,
if
passed,
would
collect
securities
from
the
developer
with
the
amount
of
those
securities
to
be
determined
that
authority
essentially
delegated
to
to
staff
so
that
the
the
amount
is
a
reasonable
amount
and
then
the
second
motion
reads
almost
the
same
there,
but
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
following
additional
recommendation
be
added
to
the
report.
O
When
the
zoning
report
is
submitted
to
Planning
Committee
for
the
southern
portion
of
the
property,
the
proposed
zoning
shall
include
a
holding
provision
to
prohibit
development
on
such
lands
until
an
occupancy
permit
is
issued
for
the
monastery,
so
the
building
permit
or
sorry
an
occupancy
permit
for
the
monastery
can't
be
extended
until
the
monastery
has
been
restored.
This
motion
would
put
the
the
final
phase
of
the
Ashcroft
development
on
hold
until
staff
are
satisfied
that
the
building
is
ready
for
occupancy.
P
Wanted
to
say
that
I
support
these
motions
and
that
I'm
comfortable
with
the
fact
that
the
general
manager
of
planning,
infrastructure
and
economic
development
will
have
a
jurisdiction
over
the
delegation
of
authority
of
how
much
money
that
looks
like,
etc.
So
I'm
comfortable
with
that
I
just
thought
because
it
didn't
come
up
with
planning
committee.
So
I
thought
that
I
would
just
add
that
so
I
support
your
motions.
O
Thank
You
mayor
and
this
one
is
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
repeat
the
discussion
here
of
the
triplex
to
four-plex
rezoning
that
I
think
we
had
a
discussion
around
a
month
or
so
ago
and
and
I'm
going
to
keep
doing
this
until
we
get,
we
get
this
process
under
control.
Once
again,
a
developer
has
gone
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
and
asked
for
the
variances
that
are
required
in
order
to
build
a
triplex.
O
The
community
had
a
chance
to
weigh
in
with
the
committee
of
adjustment,
the
committee
of
adjustment
approved
the
variances,
and
now
the
developer
has
come
back
looking
for
the
zoning
permission
in
order
to
be
allowed
to
put
a
fourth
unit
in
the
bill.
This
process
is
seriously
undermining
public
confidence
in
the
planning
process
at
the
city.
There
is
a
better
way.
O
It's
a
little
bit
looser,
you
see
err,
but
what
we
see
is
that
some
developers
are
now
telling
the
community
ahead
of
time
that
this
is
their
intended
path,
that
they're
going
to
go
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
and
they
tell
the
committee
of
adjustment
we're
applying
for
a
triplex,
but
we
fully
intend
to
apply
for
the
rezoning
necessary
for
the
fourth
unit.
They
tell
it
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
ahead
of
time.
They
tell
it
to
the
community
ahead
of
time.
O
My
intention
is
that
when
a
developer
has
followed
a
transparent
process
with
the
community
I'm
not
going
to
continue
to
raise
this
objection
around
this
table,
I
just
want
the
process
to
be
transparent.
The
developer
is
not
doing
anything
illegal,
but
they
have
a
path
that
we
are
unable
as
a
city
to
deal
with
due
to
various
gray
areas
or
or
overlapping
jurisdictions.
O
I
am
asking
you
today
to
reject
this
rezoning
in
order
to
send
the
clear
message
to
developers
that
when
they
want
the
fourth
unit
in
the
building,
they
should
tell
that
to
the
committee
of
adjustment.
They
should
tell
that
to
residents
ahead
of
time.
Please
turn
this
one
down
so
that
developers
begin
to
follow
that
more
transparent
process
and
I
don't
need
to
do
this
every
month
and
a
half
mayor.
Thank.
I
L
B
Mayor
they
can
go
for
rezoning
for
four
units,
that's
their
option,
but
they're
also
entitled
untitled
under
Ontario
law
to
seek
relief
from
the
setbacks,
because,
in
this
instance
of
the
specific
application
of
mr.
James
can
correct
me,
there
were
very
modest
requirements.
Some
variances
from
the
zoning
bylaw
on
built
form
the
addition
of
a
unit
to
a
basement
does
not
change
built
form.
It's
modification,
the
nature
of
the
use
and
that's
why
they
would
come
in
later
for
rezoning
on
that
element.
It's
it
the
councillor
leapers
quite
correct.
B
F
S
F
I
M
Right
mr.
mayor,
thank
you
very
much.
First
of
all,
as
a
member
of
the
built
heritage
subcommittee,
we
received
a
number
of
delegations,
members
of
the
public
or
those
representing
them.
With
respect
to
the
list
that
staff
have
compiled
for
the
next
round
of
additions
to
the
register,
it
became
clear
that
a
number
of
people
who
spoke
were
under
a
false
impression
about
what
being
added
to
the
register
actually
means
to
their
property.
M
There
were
many
people
who
thought
they
would
need
permission
from
the
city
to
renovate
their
property
to
expand
their
facility,
that
there
would
be
immediate
property
tax
implications
on
them
that
their
assessment
would
be
affected.
We
even
had
a
lawyer
state
that
there
would
be
a
notation
on
the
title,
which
is
not
correct,
so
staff
have
enclosed
in
the
notices
that
went
to
property
owners,
a
document
called
heritage,
inventory
project,
identifying
properties
of
cultural
heritage,
values,
a
pretty
good
information
flyer.
M
But,
however,
given
the
number
of
concerns
that
were
raised
with
really
don't
have
any
validity
to
them.
My
direction
to
staff
in
speaking
with
councilor
cour,
who
is
the
chair
of
the
committee
and
is
in
agreement
with
this
direction,
that
the
following
direction
be
made
to
staff
that,
prior
to
the
next
heritage,
update
staff,
be
directed
to
review
and
update
the
heritage,
inventory
project,
identifying
properties
of
cultural
heritage,
value
information,
flyer
and
related
communication
materials.
With
input
from
myself,
the
chair
of
built
heritage
subcommittee
and
any
other
interested
members
of
council.
I
B
M
Mr.
mayor,
thank
you.
There
were
a
number
of
River
War
properties
added
or
proposed
to
be
added
certainly
spoke
to
a
number
of
residents
in
advance
who
were
listed.
Only
yesterday
did
I
hear
from
one
property
owner
who
was
not
aware.
He
claims
that
he
had
received
notification
from
the
city.
He
is
asking
to
be
lifted
from
the
list
of
properties
simply
to
give
him
time
to
consider
what
is
being
proposed
and
to
seek
legal
counsel.
R
Support
the
motion
I
think
what
what
we
saw
built
heritage
was
very
predictable,
every
person
with
an
objection
at
the
heart
of
it
considered
their
property
being
on
the
registry
as
equivalent
to
a
heritage
designation,
just
because
the
two
things
have
the
word
heritage
in
them
and
I've
checked
into
whether
we
can
change
the
title
of
the
registry.
So
it
becomes
something
like
historical
value
properties
or
something.
But
apparently
we
can't
do
that
so
with
the
situation
facing
counselor
brockington
I'm
going
to
support
this.
I
I
Disposition
of
items
approved
by
committees
under
delegated
authority
suite
that
donate,
is
optically
30
feet
by
a
committee
now
else
to
prove
all
delegate.
The
council
received
a
list
of
items
approved
by
its
committees
under
delegated
authority
attached.
As
document
one
received
motion
to
adopt
reports,
motion
Paulton,
topstone
de
rapport
councillor
slides,
please.
E
That
the
report
from
hydro
Ottawa
Holding
Inc
entitled
hydro,
Ottawa,
Holding
Inc
2018
in
a
report:
community
Protective
Services
Committee
report
for
Standing
Committee
on
Environmental,
Protection,
water
and
waste
management
report.
Three
planning
committee
report,
nine
built
heritage
subcommittee
reports
two
and
three
and
the
report
from
the
city
clerk
and
solicitor
entitled
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
Planning
Act
explanation
requirements
the
City
Council
meeting
of
June
12th
2019
be
received
and
adopted
as
amended.
I
I
I
G
So
this
is
on
the
legal
services
cuts
and
there's
something
that
hurts
us
eventually,
as
a
city,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
mayor
right
to
the
province
of
Ontario,
to
us,
at
the
provincial
funding
for
community
legal
clinics
be
maintained
and
that
a
copy
of
this
motion
be
sent
to
the
provincial
Minister
of
Finance
and
Attorney
General.
This
is
a
something
that
is
hurting
us
across
the
city.
These
are.
These
are
the
kind
of
people
that
end
up
in
our
casework
and
it's
it's
another
burden
on
us
as
a
city.
G
The
executive
director
is
actually
here
today.
Gary
Stein
he's
been
working
very
very
hard
for
many
years
on
these.
On
these
cases,
this
involves
people
with
employment.
This
involves
people
on
housing.
They
help
people
keep
their
housing,
they
make
sure
that
they're,
okay
and
they
don't
lose
their
housing,
because
once
they
do
they
end
up
on
our
lists
of
homeless.
We
need
their
services,
we
need
them
as
partners.
I
urge
you
to
support
this
motion.
I
T
I
F
F
I
Q
Thank
you.
Your
worship
without
parole,
ideally
am
speaking
to
this
motion,
because
I
want
to
see
substantive
action
be
taken
to
prevent
any
further
escalation
of
gun.
Violence
in
Ottawa
empirical
evidence
demonstrates
that
gun
crime
is
rising
in
2017
firearm
related
violence
reached
a
25
year
high
and
nationally,
with
7,500
incidents
of
violent
crime
involving
handguns
reported
to
police
in
2018,
76
total
shooting
incidents
occurred
in
our
city,
resulting
in
six
people
killed
in
24
people
injured.
Q
That's
why
I'm
proposing
a
motion
today
to
address
the
growing
issue
of
gun
violence
in
our
city,
starting
with
a
call
for
greater
resources
and
tools
that
our
municipality
can
leverage
in
order
to
reduce
violence,
especially
in
our
most
marginalized
communities?
Gun
crime
is
a
complex
issue
which
requires
a
multi-faceted
approach,
including
early
education,
for
children,
on
the
dangers
of
guns
and
gangs
to
better
enforcement
measures.
Q
I
know
about
the
call
of
these
neighborhoods
firsthand
since,
as
a
former
president
of
a
community
association
that
has
been
directly
affected
by
gun
violence,
I've
listened
directly
to
the
concerns
of
parents
of
residents
of
people
whose
children's
children
were
affected
and
endangered
by
gun
battles.
Another
reason
why
I'm
encouraging
you
to
vote
for
this
motion
is
because
it
calls
upon
our
mayor
to
write
to
the
senior
levels
of
government
to
seek
more
funding
to
address
the
root
causes
of
crime
in
November
2017.
Q
The
federal
government
announced
a
three
three
hundred
and
twenty
seven
point:
six
million
dollars
over
five
years,
starting
in
2018
2019
and
a
hundred
million
annually
thereafter
in
new
federal
funding
to
tackle
the
increase
in
gun,
related
violence
and
gang
activity
in
Canada.
Their
initiative
is
designed
to
bring
together
federal,
provincial
territorial
efforts
to
support
community
level
prevention
and
enforcement
efforts,
and
also
to
build
and
leverage
unique,
federal
expertise
and
resources
to
advance
intelligence
related
to
the
illegal
trafficking
of
firearms
and
and
border
security
to
introduct
illicit
goods,
including
guns
and
drugs.
Q
Our
city
should
be
tapping
into
this
resource,
along
with
asking
the
federal
government
for
stronger
enforcement
measures.
Since
strategies
for
reducing
gun,
violence
must
also
include
enhanced
regulatory
and
control
measures.
That
is
why
my
motion
will
also
call
upon
our
senior
levels
of
government
to
ban
the
sale
and
possession
of
handguns
and
ammunition
in
our
city,
along
with
implementing
stronger
penalties
for
illegal
gun,
possession
and
trafficking,
and
reviewing
rules
related
to
bail
for
people
charged
with
gun
crimes.
Q
As
Ottawa
passes,
the
1
million
person
mark
the
issues
our
city
faces
will
change,
while
a
large
population
means
increased
market
and
cultural
opportunities
that
will
give
our
city
greater
global
visibility
and
presence.
It
also
means
Ottawa
will
be
the
subject
of
more
big-city
problems
that
will
require
sophisticated
big-city
solutions.
Gun
violence
is
a
growing
concern
and
it
is
our
duty
to
get
ahead
of
this
problem
and
seek
out
solutions,
especially
solutions
that
seriously
address
poverty
in
our
city.
I,
believe
this
motion
and
our
thoughtful
dialogue
around
it
can
be
a
beginning.
J
J
Whereas
in
Canada
that
legislation
governing
the
sale
of
handgun
ammunition,
he
says
fully
with
the
provincial
government
and
well
under
the
Police
Service
Act.
The
police
service
board
determines
police
in
priority,
established
policies
and
provide
oversight
to
the
Ottawa
police
service
in
accordance
with
the
act
and
whereas
the
City
Council
has
no
authority
to
direct
the
chief
of
police
or
other
member
of
the
RO
Police
Service
pursuant
to
the
Police
Service
Act.
J
Therefore,
Beatrice
of
that
the
City
Council
referred,
the
council
gain
Flurry's
motion
regarding
measures
to
curb
gun
violence
to
the
Ottawa
Police
Service
board,
for
their
consideration
and
to
support
best
practice
and
research
done
by
the
Canadian
Association
of
Chief
of
Police
under
one
of
crime,
an
origin
of
crime
guns.
So
they
can
continue
to
look
at
ways
to
work
with
and
better
support,
vulnerable
youth
to
help
prevent
them
from
getting
involved
in
violent
and
crime
in
consultation
with
crime
prevention.
Ottawa.
Mr.
J
J
You
support
that
and
who
said,
can
you
attend
the
Ottawa
police
service
board
meeting
and
speak
about
it
because
that's
the
place
where
you
have
experts
like
a
chief
of
police
and
senior
that
senior
leadership
from
police
and
can
speak
to
this
item
in
more
what
they
call
in
a
police
base
evident
on
the
gun?
Violence.
So
with
that
I
move
the
ferals
to
me.
Okay,.
I
Just
a
point
of
clarification,
counselor
brockington
was
going
to
amend
I
think
with
a
friendly
amendment.
Counselor
Kings
motion,
I'll,
just
read
it
out
here
and
if
councillor
King
is
agreeable.
We'll
put
this
on
as
part
of
the
package.
I
think
it's
to
be
added
to
recommendation.
Three
additional
resources
be
provided
to
and
greater
attention
to
be
provided
by
the
Canadian
Border
Services
Agency
to
infiltrate
the
illegal
smuggling
of
firearms
at
Canadian
ports
of
entries
that
friendly
counselor,
King,
okay.
H
Like
to
encourage
my
colleagues
to
refer
this
to
the
police
board,
as
it
is
probably
the
better
venue
to
discuss
this,
there's
no
use
in
enacting
unenforceable,
bylaws
much
less
ones
that
will
make
no
material
difference,
given
that
criminals
by
their
very
nature,
do
not
tend
to
follow
federal
law
anyway.
Much
less
municipal
bylaws,
what's
at
the
heart
of
this
matter,
is
that
there
is
a
supply
of
illegally
obtained
weapons
on
our
streets.
H
Putting
citizens
of
Ottawa
at
risk
I'd
be
much
more
apt
to
support
initiatives
that
would
remove
those
weapons
while
dealing
with
the
issues
that
turn
people
to
criminal
activity.
So
let's
give
our
social
services
and
our
Police
Services
the
resources
and
tools
they
need
to
make
a
real
difference.
Thanks,
Thank.
B
Too,
will
support
referral
motion
because,
quite
frankly,
I'm
disappointed
in
the
motion
that
my
colleagues
would
want
to
blame
the
60,000
legal
gun
owners
and
sports
shooters
in
the
city
who
have
not
contributed
to
this
crime.
There's
no
evidence
in
here
linking
any
of
them
or
any
of
the
legal
guns
to
the
crimes
that
are
taking
place.
I
would
have
rather
would
have
liked
the
scene.
My
colleagues
take
the
lead
from
councillor
Tierney
to
how
he
handled
the
crisis
at
jasmin
Crescent.
He
didn't
call
for
a
ban
legal
gun
owners.
B
He
stepped
in
worked
with
his
community
resolved
the
issues
in
the
community
and
I
think
he's
biased,
he's
my
friend,
but
I
think
he
should
be
applauded
for
his
actions
and
he
certainly
got
results
in
his
neighborhood,
where
this
motion
here
would
get
no
results
for
anybody
and
as
a
land,
18
or
older,
so
I'll
support
referral.
Mr.
mayor,
hey.
B
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
I
will
echo
some
my
colleague
concern.
This
is
I,
think
where
we
sending
and
referring
I
will
supporting
that
motion,
because
councillor
King
has
a
really
good.
The
motion
really
speaks
to
lots
of
good
stuff
and
I'll
community
and
I.
Think
that
will
be
where
the
value
should
be
deal
with
it
and
I.
Don't
think
that
a
legal
gun
owner
are
the
criminal
and
this
and
this
motion
kind
of
paint
a
little
bit.
B
B
R
You
your
worship,
the
the
only
way
this
is.
This
is
normally
in
the
jurisdiction
of
the
federal
government
and
we
should
be
letting
them
handle
it
nationwide.
By
referring
it
I
think
we
give
an
opportunity
to
express
to
the
Police
Services
Board
the
importance
that
we're
placing
on
the
gun
violence
issue,
and
that
really
is
the
best
progress
we
can
make
towards
fixing
this
issue.
So
I
support
referral,
hey.
E
T
E
Up
social
programs
for
young
people
who
get
involved
in
gang
violence,
they
need
opportunities,
there's
a
lot
of
money
in
gangs.
There's
a
lot
of
money.
That's
made
from
drugs
and
kids,
don't
feel
on
an
equal
footing
with
other
kids.
There's,
not
one
neighborhood,
that's
not
being
affected
by
shootings
and
each
time
there's
a
shooting.
E
We
sit
down
and
we
say
it
has
to
end
right,
but
I
think
that
the
initiative
here
is
the
right
thing
to
do
it's
in
good
faith
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
as
a
council
is
to
say
that
we
don't
have
all
the
tools,
but
we
do
have
tools.
We
have
social
services,
we
have
the
police.
There
are
lots
of
youth
services
that
we
can
actually
boost
and
do
more
with
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
were
also
able.
The.
T
E
I
M
You,
your
worship
just
on
referral,
I
need
to
have
a
better
understanding
of
how
this
will
pan
out
at
the
Police
Services
Board.
So
we
are
going
to
refer
this
motion
as
amended
to
the
board
and
at
a
board
meeting
they're
going
to
debate
and
discuss
the
merits
of
this
and
then
what
happens?
It
comes
back
to
council,
or
are
we
delegating
the
authority
to
act
to
the
board
to
do
X,
Y
Zed,
what's
spelt
out
here?
Can
that
be
explained
to
me?
Please.
I
Well,
it
really
is
once
we've
passed
emotional
referral.
The
whole
matter
goes
to
the
police
board
and
it's
up
to
the
chair
and
the
board
to
decide
how
to
answer
it.
I'd
assume
that
would
be
put
on
one
of
their
agendas
and
the
public
would
speak
at
that
time.
So
that's
the
normal
process.
Blue
refers
something
back
to
a
committee
or
a
board,
so.
M
I
M
Are
definitely
merits
in
councilor
Kings
motion
that
I
agree
should
be
debated
and
discussed
at
the
board.
I,
as
a
member
of
this
council
want
feedback
from
the
board.
The
Police
Services
Board
deals
with
police
matters
more
or
less
internally
to
their
board,
so
I'm
looking
for
some
really
concrete
action,
so
I
am
gonna
support.
M
Referral
in
that
matter,
but
I
do
have
to
provide
this
comment,
and
that
is
things
similar
to
councilor
lulav
and
until
we
dress
really
the
root
causes
of
poverty
and
why
people
are
attracted
to
gangs
and
we
don't
address
the
lack
of
educational
attainment
and
employment
opportunities
for
marginal
youth.
We'll
only
be
dealing
with
this
problem
at
the
very
end
and
not
focusing
our
resources
at
the
beginning,
where
we
should
be.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
C
As
the
deputy
mayor
as
deputy
mayor
lulav
said
quite
correctly,
criminals
don't
follow
the
law,
criminals
don't
have
licenses
and
the
majority
of
gun
crimes
are
illegal,
are
done
with
the
illegal
weapons
which
would
have
no
impact,
which
would
not
be
impacted
at
all.
With
respect
to
banning
the
possession
of
guns
in
Ottawa
and
so
those
those
are
my
comments.
C
Q
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
I
will
be
supporting
referral
because
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
have
a
very
thoughtful
dialogue
and
that's
what
I
had
said
from
from
the
outset
about
the
serious
issue.
That's
affecting
many
communities,
especially
marginalized,
low-income
high
needs
communities
in
in
our
city.
It's
important
for
us
to
look
at
all
the
facets
and
I
think
that
that's
the
most
important
thing
in
terms
of
gun
violence
is
to
not
just
look
at
the
gun
ban
component
of
it.
Q
We
should
have
a
wholesome
fulsome
debate
and
in
in
a
thorough
one
that
does
look
at
issues
such
as
the
social
determinants,
but
we
can't
do
one
without
the
other.
That's
that's
just
my
perspective.
I!
Don't
want
to
be
completely
ideological
about
this,
it's
more
of
a
philosophical
of
our
entrepreneurial
counselor.
Q
Yes,
yes,
so
I'm
going
to
support
referral
I
do
believe
that
we
can
have
a
greater
greater
conversation
about
this
and
look
at
the
root
causes
of
the
issues
of
gun
violence
but,
as
I
said,
there's
a
different
perspective
and
that
perspective
is
if
there
are
less
guns
on
our
streets
in
our
cities,
there
is
less
homicide
in
our
cities
and
I
will
continue
to
to
hold
to
that
view.
Thank
you.
Mister
ma'am,
hey.
I
I
T
H
E
H
E
H
Scope
of
the
project
is
shrunk
considerably.
The
project
will
now
include
housing,
something
that
our
city
desperately
needs
and
something
that
we're
committed
to
investing
15
million
dollars.
In
this
year,
drug
counseling
has
been
moved
off-site.
The
Salvation
Army
told
me
this
morning
that
they
will
have
dedicated
private
beds
for
homeless
veterans,
something
that's
near
and
dear
to
my
heart
as
well.
These
are
all
wins
for
SOS
Vanier,
but
I
still
don't
think
it's
an
it's.
Only
Victoire
cool.
H
H
H
Duct
tape
on
deepwater
horizon.
They
also
go
against
our
plan
to
invest
in
housing.
First,
we're
investing
15
million
dollars
in
this
budget
on
affordable
housing,
because
it's
the
right
model,
emergency
shelter
beds
are
not,
but
we
need
them
for
now
and
they
could
save
a
life
on
a
frigid
winter
night.
I
wanted
the
community
to
be
heard.
I
wanted
the
Salvation
Army
to
listen
and,
quite
frankly,
I
wanted
this
matter
settled
before
I
sat
at
this
table,
Monica
drew.
E
Dobson
ear,
so
my
team
met
with
two
dobson
from
SOS
so
funny
yesterday
and
I
called
him
personally.
This
morning,
I
listened
to
I
listened
to
the
representatives
of
the
Salvation
Army
I
took
the
time
to
read
each
of
the
emails
that
I've
received
in
favor
of
this
motion
and
I've
also
taken
the
time
to
listen
to
councillor
flurry
as
point
of
view
as
well,
but
in
all
good
conscience,
I
can
to
support
a
motion
which
is
this,
which
is
designed
to
disqualify
this
shelter
on
a
technical
point.
H
More
work
could
have
been
done
at
the
earlier
stages
of
this
process
to
come
to
a
more
amicable
agreement
between
the
residents
of
vania
in
the
Salvation
Army
process
matters.
When
was
the
last
time
the
City
of
Ottawa
withdrew
joining
amendments
for
a
not-for-profit
providing
services
to
our
vulnerable.
The
answer
is:
never
would
we
even
be
considering
this
motion
today
if
it
was
for
bono
or
for
Cornerstone
I'm
troubled
by
the
lack
of
nuance
on
this
issue
as
well,
especially
in
the
media
and
in
the
and
in
the
emails
that
I'm
receiving.
H
E
H
Is
home
to
Lata's
by
mal
fall?
They
provide
supportive
living
for
those
suffering
from
mental
health
and
addiction
and
I
know
that
Laura,
dudas
and
I
are
proud
to
have
them
in
our
community
and
I
realized
that
if
I
wasn't,
if
I
was
in
the
same
position
as
the
member
for
Vanier
I'd
be
pushing
for
a
new
location
off
the
Main
Street
as
well.
H
We
need
to
hold
Salvation
Army's
feet
to
the
fire
to
ensure
that
the
modifications
that
were
announced
yesterday
at
the
11th
hour
actually
happened
and
I
want
them
to
continue
to
work
with
SOS
Vanier.
To
take
these
modifications
a
step
further,
if
we
want
to
free
up
emergency
beds,
build
affordable
housing
and
build
supportive
housing.
If
you
really
want
to
work
yourselves
out
of
a
job
of
providing
these
beds,
be
a
part
of
the
solution,
build
affordable
housing
on
this
site,
Thank
You
mr.
Mann.
A
A
We
have
a
very
dedicated
staff
to
in
in
the
shelter's
I've
been
in
all
of
most,
if
not
all
of
them
and
and
the
the
work
that
they
do
day
in
and
day
out
with
with
the
absolute
most
vulnerable
people
in
our
community
is,
is
to
be
recognized
and
I
also
represent
a
ward
in
this
city.
That
has
how
many
halfway
homes,
shelters,
rooming
houses,
but
I
also
represent
people
who
are
sleeping
outside
and
point
I
made
earlier
about.
A
You
know
having
some
23
people
who
lost
their
home
and
a
rooming
house
fire
sleeping
outside
it's
not
because
they
couldn't
go
to
this
shelter,
but
they
chose
not
to
and
and
and
I
hear
that
from
a
lot
of
people-
and
this
is
not
the
fault
of
the
shelters
we
built
this
system.
I
can
go
back
into
the
history
of
why
we
built
the
system,
but
we
did
and-
and
we
are
now
housing
people
for
a
year-
two-
sometimes
three
years
and
they're
in
there
and
they're
not
well
they're,
they've
suffering
from
mental
illness.
A
They
develop
mental
illness.
Well,
while
they're
well
they're
in
the
shelter
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
and
it
can
be
a
frightening
place
and
people
don't
want
to
go
into
them,
and
the
reality
is
is
that
we
have
to
make
pretty
tough
decisions
when
we
get
to
City
Council-
and
you
know
it's
for
me
to
say
no
to
a
new
shelter
with
you
know.
New
rooms
and
new
beds
is
is
difficult.
A
When
I
see
you
know,
we
have
a
mother
and
son
who
sleep
out
on
the
Adirondack
chairs
every
night
here
at
City,
Hall
and
we've
got
some
forty
to
fifty
people
who
sleep
either
in
Confederation
Park.
There's
a
couple
bridges,
they're
allowed
and
a
few
few
grates
along
along
Canton
sparks
that
they're
allowed
to
be
at,
but
they
have
to
be
up
before
the
Sun
rises.
A
It's
one
pot
of
money
and
the
only
way
we're
going
to
do
that
is
to
make
difficult
decisions
and
we've
got
to
end
homelessness
and
ending
homeless,
doesn't
start
by
building
a
new
shelter.
Ending
homelessness
starts
with
all
of
us
with
the
community
with
the
sector.
That's
got
the
expertise
in
in
in
our
in
our
housing
sector
and
our
staff
to
come
together
with
a
plan
with
real
targets
and
real
actions
on
how
we're
gonna
end
chronic
homelessness
and
also
how
we're
going
to
move
people
out
of
unaffordable,
affordable
housing.
A
The
people
who
are
on
our
wait
list
today
for
the
registry,
for
example,
who
need
housing,
can't
afford
what
we
call
affordable
housing
we've
got
to
build
deep
affordability
into
our
system.
We've
got
to
start,
we've
got
to
start
standing
up
to
the
challenges
in
front
of
us.
We've
got
to
make
sure
that,
as
we,
you
know
we're
moving
forward.
We've
got
a
new
official
plan.
It's
a
really
exciting
time.
A
In
this
city,
we've
just
hit
a
million,
but
we
can't
leave
people
behind,
and
the
reality
is
is
that
building
a
new
shelter
is
not
the
direction
we
should
be
going
in.
It's
not
ideological
I
understand
the
work,
that's
being
done
by
Salvation.
Army
by
the
mission
by
cornerstone
by
shepherds,
but
we've
got
to
look
at
how
we're
going
to
approach
this
problem
as
a
growing
city
as
a
wealthy
city
and
around
this
table,
we've
got
a
decision
to
make
today
on
which
direction
we're
going
to
take
Thank
You
Telstra.
E
C
Irma
Kenny
just
said:
I
would
say
that
this
is
not
a
motion
with
respect
to
revisiting
the
substance
of
the
decisions
by
planning
committee
and
Council
in
November
2017.
This
is
a
completely
different
attacked
and,
and
it
the
evidence
of
that
is,
and
councillor
lulav
referred
to
it
in
the
lack
of
nuance.
C
How
short
that,
therefore,
is
just
repeal
the
bylaw
and
and
thus
I
guess
we
depend
on
the
we're
asses
in
in
the
motion,
because
that's
what
we're
dealing
with
to
to
get
some
some
guidance
and
and
and
there
are
six
there
are
six
of
them
and
they
generally
deal
with
the
ownership
of
the
property
and
so
I
guess.
My
question
is
with
respect
to
this
motion,
as
it
is
presented,
tell
Ken
Edick
it.
My
question
is
to
mr.
O'connor
with,
given
that
they
deal
with
the
ownership
of
the
property.
C
The
Salvation
Army
had
a
signed
declaration
at
the
outset
of
the
planning
process,
with
respect
to
the
ownership
of
the
property
which
was
later
corrected
later
corrected
in
the
written
record
in
the
report
and
with
with
questions
by
Councillor
flurry
at
at
the
Planning
Committee.
Given
that
mr.
O'connor
does
that
in
of
itself
dictate
or
require
a
repeal
of
the
bylaw.
C
C
B
Mr.
mayor,
when
these
applications
were
brought
forward
and
passed
by
council
in
November
of
2017,
there
was
a
motion
that
council
approved,
which
stated
that
if
the
Governing
Council
is
Salvation,
Army
of
Canada
ceased
to
operate
the
facility
at
Montreal
Road.
The
bylaws
would
be
repealed
at
that
time
and
therefore
it
can
be
inferred
that
if
the
Salvation
Army
never
starts
to
operate
them
at
Montreal
Road,
then
the
bylaws
would
not
come
into
effect
or
would
be
repealed.
C
C
B
R
You,
your
worship,
I,
wasn't
able
to
take
part
in
the
debate
when
we
first
stopped
with
this,
because
I
had
a
distant
deemed
potential
pecuniary
interests
between
translation.
Being
that
my
daughter
worked
at
the
shelter
until
just
recently,
the
the
issue
in
front
of
us
I
think
rests
a
lot
on
the
legal
interpretation
of
it
and
I've
heard
in
the
news
about
a
number
of
changes
that
were
proposed.
A
number
of
changes
that
were
accepted
and
I'm
wondering
how
many
of
those
happened
after
the
approval
and
what
is
the
legal
status
of
the
approval?
B
B
R
Okay,
the
second
question
is
I've,
been
on
planning
committee,
probably
over
25
years,
and
I've
always
been
told
that,
in
that
we
are
not
supposed
to
consider
or
so
there
are
a
lot
of
things
we're
supposed
to
consider,
but
we're
not
supposed
to
consider
who
actually
owns
the
property
and
is.
Is
that
still
the
case?
Because
the
planning
principles
were
supposed
to
apply
relate
to
rezoning
applications
that
can
come
from
the
property
owner?
They
can
come
from
a
constituent,
they
can
come
from
a
corporation
or
anyone
else.
B
O
You
know
I,
think
back
to
Osterman
Council
and
the
amount
of
days
committee
days
council
days
that
were
devoted
to
a
discussion
and
a
debate
around
this
topic
and
the
opportunity
provided
to
the
public
to
come
in
and
speak
to
the
matter
and
I.
Don't
see
chair
harder
in
the
room
right
now,
but
and
you
know
how
she
Shepherd
it
so
to
speak
the
the
issue
through
the
public
process
over
over
a
number
of
days.
O
O
My
colleague
has
has
built
an
argument
around
the
statement.
I'm
not
going
to
say
fact
the
statement
that
the
Salvation
Army
was
not
transparent
as
to
the
question
of
ownership
of
the
property,
and
yet
we
know
independently
that
the
staff
report
reflected
that
they
did
not
own
the
property
and
the
councillor
himself
asked
the
question
in
the
public
forum
at
the
committee
meeting
of
the
Salvation
Army
and
was
given
the
answer
that
they
were
not
the
owners
of
the
property
at
that
time.
O
So
none
of
that
is
new
and
to
suggest
that
it
is
new
to
use
that
as
the
basis
the
foundation
of
this
motion,
that's
a
very
shaky
foundation
and
to
councilor
couch
A's
point.
When
we're
looking
at
this
motion,
we
have
to
look
at
the
where
asses
and
the
where
asses
don't
stand
very
tall.
They
don't
they
don't
have
a
substance
because
we
know
independently,
they
are
not
accurate.
O
We
know
that
it
was
fully
public
knowledge
and
in
front
of
the
voting
members
of
council
at
the
time
who
did
and
did
not
own
the
property.
So
none
of
that
is
new
and
there
again
there
was
fulsome
debate
and
more
than
ample
opportunity
for
the
public
to
come
out
and
speak
to
this
matter
and
to
councillor
Ellie's
points.
It's
it's
not.
It's
not
a
point
of
planning
law
to
even
ask
that
question.
It's
not
relevant
to
too
decision
made
so
I
understand
fully
white
councillor
flurry
has
to
try
this
on.
O
O
But
the
decision
was
taken.
The
decision
was
taken
on
the
information
that
was
available
and
that
same
information
is
available.
Today,
it's
not
different,
it
hasn't
changed.
The
community
has
a
right
of
appeal:
they've
exercised
that
right
of
appeal.
The
appeal
is
currently
ongoing
and
if
we
made
the
wrong
decision,
if
we're
going
down
the
wrong
path,
the
appeal
process
can
speak
to
that,
but
I
don't
think
it's
appropriate
for
council
to
re-engage
on
this
issue
that
we've
already
talked
about
heard
about,
discussed,
analyzed
debate
it.
O
O
We
made
our
decision
and
we
made
it
again
after
very
careful
deliberation,
very
careful
consultation
with
community
stakeholders
and
staff
and
I
think
we
should
stick
with
that
decision
and
again.
Why
recognize?
What
counsel
you
may
want
to
try
to
do
this?
There
really
is
no
basis
for
it
whatsoever
in
his
motion.
Thank
you.
I
think.
Q
Council
has
changed,
and
maybe
I'm
just
thinking
about
myself
at
the
table
here,
but
it
has
changed
and
one
of
the
other
things
that
that
I
think
has
changed.
That
my
colleague
councilor
flurry
has
pointed
out
is
that
the
perception
has
changed
in
our
in
our
minds.
I
would
say
that
noting
that
I
was
a
president
of
a
Community
Association
once
again
that
was
adjacent
to
Vanier
and
who
had
requests
from
that
community
to
to
protect
it
in
a
sense
and
protect
planning
principles.
Q
I
think
that's
what
it
comes
down
to
I
mean
in
in
our
submission.
I,
unfortunately,
didn't
have
the
honor
to
make
the
deputation
to
a
planning
committee,
but
I
think
I
do
see
somebody
in
the
audience
who
who
did
on
our
behalf
on
a
neighboring
community
that
understands
the
challenges
with
the
concentration
of
poverty,
because
that
is
a
central
issue.
Q
One
of
the
driving
principles
that
that
the
Community
Association
looked
at
was
trying
to
adhere
to
our
10-year
homeless,
list
homelessness
strategy
that
the
city
had
committed
itself
to
a
housing.
First
model,
which
purported
which
reported
aim
is
to
prioritize
housing
based
on
need.
You
know.
Unfortunately,
multiple
reports
on
ending
homelessness
in
the
city
showed
a
continued
persistent
use
of
emergency
shelters
due
to
a
lack
of
new,
affordable
housing
being
built
by
the
city
for
the
housing
first
model
to
be
effective.
Q
Q
They
believed
at
the
time
that
the
housing
first
model
should
have
been
should
have
been
followed,
that
we
should
have
reinstated
the
four
million
dollars
of
discretionary
spending
on
a
new,
affordable
housing
that
was
eliminated
from
the
budget
in
2015,
and
they
also
believed-
and
this
is
a
philosophical
approach,
despite
the
fact
that
I
commend
the
Salvation
Army
for
the
wonderful
work
that
it
does,
because
I
do
believe.
It
contributes
in
a
major
way
to
in
a
major
positive
way
in
our
community.
Q
But
we
did
contend
that
the
city
should
commit
to
a
21st
century
public
social
housing
model
for
his
residence,
rather
than
one
that
reflects
another
time
frankly.
So
these
were
the
issues
that
were
in
front
of
us
when
I
was
at
the
community.
Community
Association
and
I
know
that
the
perception
that
we
had
was
that
the
the
property
around
the
issues
of
the
property
than
it
was
a
done
deal
and
I
think
that
the
community
does
want
that
reflected
in
the
decisions
that
are
made
by
this
new
council
in
this
term.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you.
Your
worship,
I
too,
am
a
new
counselor,
just
like
you
Wilson,
and
when
this
issue
was
Galvan
a
galvanizing,
the
city
in
2015
I,
was
watching
it
with
great
fascination
and
I
questioned
myself
at
the
time.
Thinking
if
I
had
to
make
a
decision,
how
would
I
vote
because
voting
against
the
Salvation
Army?
It
just
seems
it's
it's
it's
just
it's.
It
would
be
unthinkable
because
I'm,
a
great
supporter
of
the
Salvation
Army
and
the
work
that
they
do
in
the
community
as
I
think
most
of
us
are.
G
They
do
wonderful
work
and
we
truly
appreciate
what
what
they
do
for
the
needy
in
our
community.
But
that
said,
I
also
recognized
that
a
mega
shelter
in
a
community
can
change
a
community
and,
at
the
same
time,
that
studies
are
showing
that,
as
councilor
King
said
that
there
is
a
new
way
of
thinking
about
housing,
the
most
needy
in
our
community,
and
that
is
housing
first.
So
I've
done
some
reading.
G
I've
done
a
lot
of
reading
over
the
last
few
days
and
having
this
opportunity
to
have
a
say
in
this
in
this
very
contentious
issue.
Is
it's
really
daunting?
It's
going
to
be
one
of
the
toughest
decisions
we
have
to
make.
I
was
in
consultation
with
the
Salvation
Army
yesterday
and
I
do
appreciate
that
they
have
scaled
down
their
plans
for
Montreal
Road,
but
it
disturbs
me
that
they
came
at
the
last
like
the
eleventh
hour
and
that
they
are
not
legally
binding
on
the
Salvation
Army.
So
that
bothers
me.
G
G
I
I
do
not
want
this
vote
to
be
taken
as
an
T,
Salvation,
Army
or
anything,
but
I
am
putting
my
myself
in
the
shoes
of
people
who
live
in
Vanier
by,
but
in
keeping
the
addiction
center
downtown
on
George
Street
by
reducing
the
number
of
shelter
beds.
I'm
not
sure
that
anybody
is
well
served
by
this,
because
they
don't
can't
say
for
sure
whether
or
not
the
shelter
beds
number
will
be
actually
decrease.
It's
between
70
and
100.
It
there's
still
going
to
be
a
good
component
of
shelter
beds.
G
M
Thank
you.
Your
worship,
I
was
here
last
term
of
council
for
the
three
days
of
debate
and
discussion
on
this
item.
I
voted
against
the
zoning
bylaw
exemption
application.
As
I
believed
it
was
inappropriate
for
a
traditional
Main
Street.
That
is
the
planning
rationale.
I
do
believe
that
the
concentration
of
services
in
one
particular
neighborhood
is
inappropriate
already
facing
its
fair
share
of
challenges.
That
was
certainly
a
secondary
issue.
That
was
on
my
mind.
I
never
saw
this
as
a
vote
against
the
Salvation
Army.
M
I've
been
overwhelmed
like
many
members
of
council,
with
a
flurry
of
email
and
statements
over
the
last
week
and
I
think
councillor
lulav
referenced
the
11th
hour
and
now,
all
of
a
sudden
there's
this
proposal
to
amend
the
initial
multi-use
Center
with
something
that
may
be
reduced.
It
doesn't
say
anything
about
a
reduced
building.
They
are
enumerated,
their
services
that
will
be
within
it
develop
new
supportive
housing
and
partnership
with
a
supportive
housing
provider,
reduce
the
number
of
emergency
shelter
beds,
keep
the
addictions
treatment
program
at
the
George
Street
location.
That's
a
surprise.
M
I
thought
the
city
wanted
to
have
one
of
its
three
centers
within
the
market
area,
the
Shepards
of
Good
Hope,
the
mission
Salvation
Army
to
relocate
and
reaffirm
its
commitment
of
60
special
care
medical
beds,
supported
by
Ottawa
and
their
health,
so
just
so
I'm
100
percent.
Sure
mr.
O'connor,
a
question
to
you
through
the
mayor.
M
Whatever
decision
Council
makes
today,
Salvation
Army
has
released
a
press
release
stating
its
its
new
intentions.
It's
not
binding.
It's
they're,
just
making
a
statement
that
this
is
a
new
direction.
They'd
like
to
go.
This
you
know,
may
provide
some
comfort
to
folks
who
are
struggling
with
the
motion
before
us,
but
I
just
want
you
to
confirm
that
what
they're
proposing
is
just
that
it's
a
proposal
they
could
tomorrow,
say
you
know
what
that's
now
off
the
table.
We're
gonna
go
right
back
to
the
multi-use
Center
that
we
have
proposed
two
years
ago.
Mr.
B
M
B
Mr.
mayor
I
think
the
question
is
the
status
of
the
current
application.
Should
the
motion
pass
today
and
it's
the
opinion
of
legal
services
that
if
the
motion
is
successful,
the
position
under
the
Planning
Act
would
be
that
City
Council
has
failed
to
make
a
decision
on
either
the
official
plan
or
the
zoning
bylaw,
which
would
then
permit
the
Salvation
Army
to
file
an
appeal
for
non
decision
at
the
tribunal,
as
their
applications
have
been
in
since
2017.
B
B
M
B
Mr.
mayor,
the
city,
legal
services
would
seek
a
position
from
City
Council
to
bring
forward
to
the
tribunal.
But
if
we
are
in
fact
on
a
status
of
non
decision,
then
it
is
probable
that
that
appeal
would
be
moot
the
present
appeal,
and
we
would
then
be
looking
at
whether
the
Salvation
Army
takes
action
to
bring
an
appeal
for
non
decision
to
the
tribunal.
M
P
P
Those
of
us
that
were
on
the
on
the
council
in
the
last
term
certainly
remember
the
the
work
that
was
undertaken
by
the
staff
by
the
community
by
the
ward
councillor
by
the
applicant,
and
always
the
Salvation
Army
said
that
they
were
going
to
continue
to
work
with
the
community,
continue
to
listen
to
the
community,
so
I
find
it
disheartening.
If
you
will
for
anyone
to
say
that
you
know
all
of
a
sudden
they've
come
up
with
a
with
a
a
different
rendition.
P
I
also
find
it
disheartening
to
hear
somebody
saying
that
it's
just
a
stance
that
they're
taking
that
they're
just
you
know
trying
to
get
another
win.
They
already
had
the
support
of
a
council
that
listened
for
three
days
that
listened
to
everyone
that
read
copious
amounts
of
submissions
that
were
hard
worked
on
hard
by
the
community
by
various
groups.
P
P
I,
don't
know
whether
some
of
you
have
and
I
haven't,
haven't
had
time
to
read
the
paper
to
this
morning
and
I
think
that
that
meeting
was
maybe
yesterday,
but
to
think
that
they
don't
work
in
good
faith
for
the
betterment
of
our
city
would
be
absolutely
wrong
and
I.
Don't
think
that
that
should
in
any
way
I.
P
Don't
think
it's
right
that
that
come
that's
brought
up
at
in.
In
fact,
you
know
what
we
look
at
all
the
disasters
we've
gone
through
in
the
last
two
years
and
the
significant
role
that
they
play
doing,
what
they
do
taking
care
of
people
taking
care
of
our
people,
and
you
know
if
we
had
built
all
the
affordable
housing
that
we
think
that
we
we
need.
We
keep
throwing
out
the
ten
thousand
people
on
the
on
the
on
the
list.
P
I
mean
we
know
that
there's
other
people
that
are
homeless
people
and
and
add
them
that
we
don't
even
know
that
corner.
If
we
built
every
unit
that
we
think
that
we
know
we're
a
prosperous
city,
people
would
continue
to
come
here
for
support
from
us.
We
do
our
very
best,
as
as
a
Salvation
Army
I
encourage
you
to
let
the
process
play
out.
P
I
T
B
T
G
T
Reality
this
is
a
new
council.
This
is
a
new
council,
we're
allowed,
as
the
memo
from
mr.
O'connor
presented,
we're
allowed
to
vote
on
the
matter,
we're
not
being
challenged
on
the
the
consequences
of
that
mr.
O'connor
says
that,
and
the
legal
team
is
saying
we're
up
for
appeal.
If
we
repeal
it,
I
have
external
a
community,
a
legal
opinion
that
I've
shared
with
Council
that
says
otherwise,
so
you
take
it
to
where
it
is.
We
might
not
be
appealable
on
that
we
might
be.
T
What
I
live
with
the
Salvation
Army
I
cannot
express.
It
is
not
an
organization
that
I
try
to
be
against,
but
the
last
48
hours
is
what
I've
had
over
the
last
two
years.
It's
only
how
we're
engaging
we're
engaging
with
you
we're
engaging
with
you.
We
take
your
feedback
and
then
BOOM
lines,
something
that
again
is
against
what
the
commutes
talked
about.
T
What
does
that
mean
for
this
council's
waiting,
saying?
Oh,
this
will
happen
and
you
know
what
let
the
process
be.
We
have
a
new
council
we've
approved
a
budget
of
2019
with
15
million
dollars
in
new
initiative,
we're
coming
back
with
the
term
of
council
priority.
We
want
to
invest
in
housing.
Why
do
we
keep
having
this
cloud
of
hope
that
something
will
happen?
We
are
the
control
of
our
destiny
as
the
requirement
from
the
province.
The
City
of
Ottawa
is
the
service
manager
for
the
sector.
T
If
we
look
at
the
2016
numbers,
the
City
of
Ottawa,
not
the
residents
of
Ottawa,
but
the
City
of
Ottawa
funded
this
organization,
close
to
80%
of
their
of
their
revenue
from
that
year,
came
from
the
city
of
Ottawa.
So
when
we
hide
on
our
hands
and
say,
look
yeah,
we
might
be
happy
with
the
organization.
You
might
be
proud
of
the
work
they
do,
but
at
the
same
time
we
need
to
bring
some
leadership
around
the
table
as
to
where
are
we
going
in
terms
of
our
investments
in
housing?
T
And
we
can't
on
one
hand,
saying
well
we're
gonna
continue
to
manage
this
issue
and
on
the
other
end
saying
we
want
to
resolve
almost
this.
We
either
cure
it
or
we
continue
to
manage
it,
and
if
we
man
we're
gonna,
continue
to
see
an
increase
in
our
operational
budgets.
So
I,
you
know
I'm.
We
have
today
10,000
people
on
the
waiting
list.
We
have
every
night
a
thousand
people
that
sleep
in
our
shelters
and
that
demographics
shifted
to.
We
have
way
more
families.
The
proposal-
that's
in
front
of
us,
has
no
family
options.
T
No
family
bedrooms.
We
have
indigenous
communities,
we
know
the
historic
challenges
between
the
Salvation
Army
and
our
indigenous
population.
We
have
women's
women
needs
for
housing,
there's
no
there's!
No
women
do
shelter
beds
at
the
Salvation
Army
we've.
Never,
we
haven't
had
the
chance
to
ask
them
about
the
residential
component
because
it's
been
it's
presented
in
the
last
24
hours.
T
So
all
that
I'm
asking
for
is
for
council
and
that's
why
I
am
I
therefore
be
resolved,
is
so
simple
is
to
really
take
a
position
regroup
as
a
as
a
council,
get
the
term
of
council
priority
and
align
our
strategies
around
investment
in
housing.
That's
what
I'm
asking
of
council
and
if
not
well,
don't
don't
fake
yourself
we're
going
to
the
entire
Municipal
Board
and
after
the
board
the
courts
are
done.
T
We're
gonna
keep
going,
so
it's
not
like
if
the
Salvation
Army,
if
it
continues
to
require
OPA,
we'll
get
capped
a
block
after
the
B,
no
matter.
That
decision
will
continue
to
be
in
court
for
years.
So,
council
wake
up
because
you're
not
gonna
see
that
investment
ever
we
need
to
see
investments
in
housing
and
to
do
so
we
need
to
bring
a
term
of
council
priority
and
we
need
to
continue
to
focus
city
dollars
like
we
did
last
budget
15
million
dollars
our
record
that
this
council
decided
to
invest
strategically.
I
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Members
of
council
were
faced
with
an
extraordinary
and
challenging
issue.
Today,
a
not-for-profit
charitable
organization,
the
Salvation
Army
applied
for
a
rezoning,
an
official
plan
amendment
in
the
last
term
of
council.
They
succeeded
in
securing
these
approvals
and
the
city
is
already
preparing
a
defense
for
the
l-pad
hearing
on
this
issue.
Mr.
O'connor,
can
you
inform
council
the
amount
of
money
spent
to
date
for
the
city
to
the
and
counsels
position.
B
I
You
so,
let's
take
a
moment
to
review
the
facts
Polonia
in
stomp
pool
of
wildly
fed
nos
to
do
so.
Let's
review
the
facts
in
this
file
publicly
acknowledged
that
the
initial
development
application
did
not
clearly
indicate
that
they
were
the
conditional
owner
of
the
property
that
was
later
clarified
in
exchange
between
the
ward
councillor
and
the
Salvation
Army
at
Planning,
Committee
Rick
O'conner
sent
a
detailed
memo
to
Council
on
June
21st
detailing
these
facts.
In
the
memo
he
advises
council
that
the
city
has
taken
the
position.
I
That
counsel
was
aware
of
the
fact
that
the
Salvation
Army
was
the
site
owner
through
a
conditional
purchase
and
sale
agreement.
Anyone
who's
bought
a
house,
90
percent
of
people
buy
a
house,
have
a
conditional
offer,
that's
pretty
standard
practice
pending
a
building,
inspection
and
so
on.
So
mr.
O'connor
went
and
took
the
further
step
to
send
around
a
memo
and
a
quote
from
the
Salvation
Army
representative,
who
spoke
at
Council
mr.
I
Jeff
Barrett,
who
stated
in
response
to
the
ward
councillors
question
that
I
quote:
I
confirm
that
we
do
not
own
the
site,
but
we
do
have
a
firm
conditional
offer
in
place.
End
quote:
that
is
the
crux
of
the
argument
that
the
councillor
is
bringing
this
forward.
That
council
did
not
know
that
it
was
not
the
the
Salvation
Army
did
not
own
the
property.
That
is
fundamentally
untrue.
I
The
ward
councillor
himself
asked
the
question
and
the
reply
was
I
can
confirm
that
we
do
not
own
the
site,
but
we
do
have
a
firm
conditional
offer
in
place,
and
this
quote
is
available
on
audio
from
the
November
14
2017
Planning
Committee.
So
the
facts
are
very
clear:
council
knew
before
voting
on
the
Salvation
Army
rezoning
that
the
Salvation
Army
had
to
made
a
conditional
offer
to
acquire
the
property
at
3,
3
3
Montreal
Road.
I
So,
let's
get
back
to
the
issue
of
a
proposal
to
revoke
the
zoning,
because
I
think
one
member
of
council
pointed
it
out
it's
one
paragraph
that
would
revoke
the
zoning
of
the
Salvation
Army
for
333
Montreal,
Road
and
ask
of
clerk
a
couple
other
questions
from
a
planning
perspective.
Mr.
O'connor,
what
would
be
the
legal
effect
in
your
opinion
if
council
acted
today
to
revoke
their
zoning.
I
B
Mr.
mayor,
that
would
be
quite
frankly,
a
hundred
and
eighty
degrees
in
the
other
direction.
It
would
be
a
do-over
of
sorts,
I
anticipate
the
planning
staff
and
others
might
be
subpoenaed
by
the
Salvation
Army.
That
would
leave
us,
then
engaging
external
planning,
consultants
and
other
people,
and
also,
as
a
result
of
that
I
think
there'd
be
a
low
probability
of
success.
Thank.
I
I
I
So,
once
again,
the
outcome
is
crystal
clear
and
taxpayers
will
be
on
the
hook
for
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
in
legal
fees
to
hire
experts
to
testify
against
the
city's
original
position,
a
position
which
the
city
has
already
started,
defending
a
t'elp
at
as
we
speak.
In
fact,
our
own
expert
planning
staff,
as
I
mentioned,
will
be
called
to
as
witnesses
for
the
Salvation
Army
to
defend
their
position.
Now
on
Monday
June
24th,
the
Salvation
Army
met
with
local
stakeholders
to
discuss
options
to
modify
their
proposals
to
address
a
number
of
community
concerns.
I
The
revised
proposal
seeks
to
address
the
precise
issues
that
some
members
of
council
used
in
opposing
their
initial
application,
including
the
president
of
Ottawa
Community
Housing
and
our
housing
and
homelessness.
Liaison
this
week,
the
Salvation
Army
issued
a
public
statement
in
which
they
pledged
to
work
with
the
community
to
build
the
montreal
road
community
hub
into
a
community-based
facility
that
will
include
one
a
significant
support
of
Housing
Partnership,
as
some
members
of
council
had
sought.
I
Secondly,
the
new
supportive
housing
partnership
will
serve
disadvantaged
residents
from
all
walks
of
life,
including
men,
women,
families,
seniors
and
veterans,
in
so
doing,
they're
directly
addressing
the
concerns
raised
by
some
members
of
council
that
the
organization
was
only
focused
on
serving
men,
they're
proposing
to
reduce
the
number
of
shelter
beds
from
140
to
between
90
to
100.
When
the
last
term
of
council,
we
heard
repeated
calls
from
the
Salvation
for
the
Salvation
Army
to
reduce
the
size
of
the
shelter
proposal.
I
Further,
they
are
now
proposing
not
to
move
the
addictions
treatment
program
to
the
new
montreal
location,
much
overrode,
location,
you'll,
recall
the
ward
councillor
and
community
representatives
argue
in
favor
of
a
more
decentralized
model
for
the
delivery
of
certain
elements
of
the
Salvation
Army's
service
model.
I
want
to
make
it
perfectly
clear
that
these
proposed
changes
are
not
before
us
for
approval.
The
Salvation
Army
has
the
zoning
in
place
to
continue
consulting
with
the
committee
to
undertake
these
changes.
I
Now
the
same
people
who
called
for
the
Salvation
Army
to
compromise
and
reduce
the
scope
of
the
proposals
are
now
moving
the
goal
posts
and
saying
that
no
proposal
from
the
Salvation
Army
is
acceptable
to
them.
So
members
of
council
I'd
urge
you
in
the
strongest
possible
terms
to
say
no
to
this
attempt
to
essentially
revisit
the
previous
council
decision
based
on
a
complete
fabrication
about
which
there
is
ZERO
confusion.
Every
member
of
the
previous
council
knew
exactly
the
ownership,
because
the
question
was
asked
at
Planning,
Committee
and
all
of
the
final
documents
indicated.
I
J
J
F
I
J
For
the
signs
of
public
roadway
for
the
next
federal
election
and
an
all
future
municipal,
provincial
and
federal
election
and
we're
at
under
bylaw
2003
5
0
San
Florida
on
a
city,
road
signs
on
public
property
are
only
permitted
30
days
before
voting
days
and
whereas
under
bylaw
number
2004,
2,
3,
9
temporary
sign
on
private
property.
Sign
on
public
property
are
only
permitted
30
days
before
they
voted
and
we're
under
section
57
Afghan
ADEA
election
act.
J
The
federal
election
period
must
last
between
a
minimum
of
36
days
and
maximum
of
50
days
ie
at
an
election,
and
this
period
does
not
align
with
the
30
days
period
set
out
by
bylaw.
2003
5
to
0
and
well
as
enforcement
of
signed
by
lot
during
an
election
period
requires
significant
municipal
resources.
J
I
J
O
B
Mr.
mayor,
if
I
may,
clarify
council
previously
repealed
this
size,
restrictions
that
were
in
effect
is
roughly
in
2003,
okay
in
advance
of
the
2018
election,
the
provincial
government
amended
the
missable
Elections
Act
and
introduced
a
framework
regulating
third
party
advertisers,
because
staff
wanted
to
be
able
to
enforce
science
not
only
for
candidates
but
also
for
third
party
advertisers.
We
sought
to
amend
the
definition
section.
Unfortunately,
when
we
did
so,
we
referred
to
the
wrong
version
of
the
bylaw.
So
what
we
did
is
we
reintroduce
something
that
council
had
already
repealed?
B
O
Councils
previously
expressed
intent
16
years
ago,
was
not
to
have
restrictions
on
the
signs.
Okay,
yes,
mr.
Bratton-
and
this
is
just
constantly-
did
the
need
to
remove
this.
It's
just
consequential
to
an
amendment
that
was
made
at
some
point.
I
forgive
my
asking,
but
do
we
are
we
still
able
to
control
the
size
of
signs
that
those
are
unsafe?
For
example,
if
somebody
puts
up
a
big-ass
sign
somewhere
in
a
corner
that
restricts
sight
lines
and
that
sort
of
stuff
are
we
still
able
to
work
with
roads?
O
I
Anything
else
counselor
leaper,
so
thank.
G
B
In
terms
of
regulating
signs,
that
is
jurisdiction
and
municipal
council,
and
in
this
case
we
would
like-
or
we
recommend
that
council
clarify
by
way
of
this
resolution,
to
correct
staff.
Sir
sorry
just
add
to
that,
mr.
mayor
part
of
the
resolution
was
also
to
bring
this
back
during
midterm
governance.
When
this
was
introduced
as
a
notice.
Two
weeks
ago,
a
number
of
councilors
asked
if
we
could
look
at
a
number
of
other
options,
including
not
having
any
signs
on
public
property,
and
we
said
we
would
do
that
at
midterm.
G
B
The
legislation
that
governs
federal
and
provincial
elections,
the
writ
period
in
the
case
of
a
federal
election,
is
36
to
50
days.
In
the
case
of
a
provincial
election,
it's
36
to
50
days
the
election
kicks
off
in
earnest
with
the
issuance
of
the
Ritz.
However,
the
city's
by
law
restricts
signs
on
public
property
for
30
days.
That
means
at
a
minimum
of
at
least
six
days.
C
Mission
mouth
Thank
You
mr.
mayor.
This
is
similar
to
the
motion
that
the
councillor
egg
Lai
introduced
and
on
May
8th
and
it's
with
respect
to
an
ISD
project
in
a
neighborhood
where
the
private
approach
bylaw
is
normally
enforced
on
a
complaint
driven
basis
and
that
there
has
been
no
complaints.
The
request
is
for
city
staff
to
reinstate
the
private
approaches
as
per
they
currently
are
when
the
reconstruction
of
the
Tampa
Avenue,
Denver,
Gibson
and
Orlando
are
completed
this
summer.
Mr.
mayor,
thank
you.
I
T
R
I
K
E
T
F
Flirty
no
counselor
Moffitt
counselor,
harder,
counselor
DeRoos,
yes,
counselor
ocean
teary,
yes,
counselor,
Gower,
counselor
sense.
Yes,
counselor
egg
lie;
yes,
counselor
bleh,
yeah,
counselor,
leaper,
no
counselor,
McKinney,
no
call
say
coochie.
We
counter
Cavanaugh.
No,
don't
sir
me
him.
No
Carol,
sir
sure
Ellie,
no
counselor
Brockington,
no
counselor
King,
no
counselor
Menard!
No
counselor
do
death.
Yes,
counselor
Dean's,
no
mara,
Watson,
yes,
12,
yeas,
10
knees.
So.
I
J
I
I
think
it's
pretty
straightforward.
This
is
a
technical
requirement
because
of
those
people
who
are
dealing
with
the
flooding
and
so
on
half
time,
in
extension,
so
so
we'll
deal
with
that
at
the
next
meeting.
Okay,
any
other
notice
is
a
motion
for
consideration
of
subsequent
meeting
motion
to
introduce
bylaws
councilor
sides.
Please.
D
This
next
mr.
mayor,
the
inquires
just
would
any
emergencies
such
as
flooding
or
a
tornado?
Allow
us
to
revisit
any
previously
approved
council
spending
decisions?
What
criteria
is
used
to
determine
which
emergencies
would
warrant
a
revisiting
of
council
approved
decisions?
What
fund
is
normally
used
for
emergencies
in
our
city.