►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council - May 9, 2018
Description
Ottawa City Council Meeting - May 9, 2018
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
C
Chorale
focused
the
choir
of
haiku
city
is
a
group
of
students
in
12th
grade
Alexandra
Leeds
men
with
Mrs
Millie,
so
Connor
a
teacher
gathered
some
students
to
constitute
a
choir
who
practices
every
Tuesday
after
school.
This
acquire
a
Gospels
style
likes
to
get
together
to
sing
a
very
well-known
songs.
They're
super
voices
are
here
today
with
mrs.
pocket,
a
teacher
under
the
direction
of
Alexandra,
so
the
choir
of
the
Catholic
farkles.
C
A
A
These
are
all
members
of
the
Capitol
regional
Interfaith,
Council
Ottawa,
Muslim,
Association,
Women's
Federation
for
world
peace
Ottawa
and
the
diamond
group
of
companies
that
is
helping
out
with
this
food
drive,
which
takes
place
on
may
11th,
12th
and
13th
this
year,
and
everyone
is
encouraged
to
bring
non-perishable
food
item
to
their
place
of
worship.
This
Mother's
Day
weekend.
We
all
can
do
more
to
touch
the
lives
of
those
who
do
not
have
enough
food
on
the
table,
and
this
initiative
is
one
of
the
ways
of
helping
those
in
need.
A
A
It's
now
I
honor,
to
invite
Karen
Taylor
to
the
podium
for
a
city
council,
city
builder,
award
and
Karen
is
from
the
beautiful
community
of
Fitzroy
Harbor
and
she's
brought
all
of
Fitzroy
Harbor
with
her
no
one's
left
in
Fitzroy
Harbor.
It's
great
and
I'd
also
like
to
invite
her
councillor
Eli
else
on
tiri,
who
is
where
is
Eli
here
he
comes
and
a
warm
welcome
to
family
and
friends
Karen
from
Fitzroy.
A
If
you
haven't
been
to
Fitzroy
Harbor,
it
is
one
of
these
great
gems
in
our
city,
with,
of
course,
the
provincial
park
there
and
Harbor
Pizza,
and
the
great
community
centre
that
Karen
is
so
involved
with.
This
award
recognizes
people
who
have
demonstrated
an
extraordinary
commitment
to
making
our
city
a
better
place
today
and
in
the
future
through
outstanding
volunteerism
or
exemplary
action,
as
the
long
serving
president
of
the
Fitzroy
Harbor
Committee
Association.
How
many
years
have
you
been
president
Karen
longer
than
Castro?
Was
president
of
Cuba
a
lot?
A
It's
been
18
years.
That's
that's.
Amazing.
Karen
is
the
embodiment
of
a
community
leader
who
has
worked
tirelessly
for
the
residents
of
Fitzroy
Harbor
as
a
lifelong
resident
of
the
community.
Karen
has
been
the
go-to
person
for
organizing
community
activities
and
for
mobilizing
volunteers
to
get
the
job
done.
A
Her
work
to
secure
funding
for
improvements
the
community
center
and
to
mobilize
others
for
fundraising
efforts
is
legendary.
Her
enthusiasm
and
her
willingness
to
work
on
community
initiatives
inspires
others
and
brings
the
community
close
together.
Karen
has
been
instrumental
in
running
major
events,
including
the
much
anticipated
annual
harboured.
A
summer
festival
the
Winter
Carnival,
the
New
Year's
Eve
community
event
and
the
Spring
Fling
fundraiser.
She
truly
cares
about
her
community
and
her
city
and
continues
to
use
her
talents
to
make
a
difference.
A
A
A
C
A
C
F
G
You
for
this
great
honor,
I
humbly,
accept
this
award
for
the
spirit
of
volunteerism,
that's
alive
in
us
all.
It's
what
makes
this
City
and
surrounding
area
an
example
of
how
engaging
with
your
community
on
a
volunteer
basis
can
build
strong
pillars
required
to
make
a
community
strive.
For
my
part,
I
come
from
a
small
town,
fill
a
harbor,
but
don't
let
the
fact
that,
because
we're
a
small
village,
we
have
no
impact.
There
are
dozens
of
wards
and
small
towns
within
the
Greater
Ottawa
area.
G
Each
of
these
areas
have
countless
volunteers
who
work
tirelessly
to
help
build
a
stronger
community.
The
some
of
these
pieces
represents
the
building
block
to
what
we
have
in
the
City
of
Ottawa,
the
city
rules
by
governance,
but
its
strength
is
true:
values
found
in
the
diversity
of
its
citizens
and
their
commitment
to
give
up
their
personal
time
to
volunteer
work,
I'm
proud
of
what
I've
achieved
over
many
years
of
volunteering
in
my
community.
G
It's
helped
build
soccer
fields,
ball,
fields,
children's
and
seniors
activities,
and
so
much
so
most
of
all,
lasting
friendships
amongst
our
residents,
we're
a
small
part,
but
the
spirit
of
volunteering
multiplied
across
all
communities
builds
a
strong,
caring
and
healthful
Society
of
which
I've
been
committed
to
again.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
this
award
I
will
cherish
it
forever
and
probably
display
it
as
a
symbol
of
what
volunteers
can
achieve
through
engagement
with
their
individual
communities.
H
Call
Sam
Annette
what
is
that
counselor
medic
counselor
harder
here:
counselor
Wilkinson
resident
counselor,
Lashon
teary,
professor
counselor
Qadri,
president
counselor
Taylor,
you
see
no
sir!
Surely
here
counselor
egg
lay
here:
counselor
Dean's
here,
counselor
Tierney,
president
cauce,
a
flirty
counselor
Nussbaum
here.
H
A
A
Confirmation
of
minutes
adepts
on
the
process,
Bilbo
pool
event,
Sankhya
vale
de
midi,
suites
carried
declaration
of
interests,
including
those
really
arising
from
prior
meetings,
declare
the
confident
today,
communications
as
presented,
we
have
one
regret.
Counselor
medic
is
not
able
to
attend
today's
meeting
motion
to
introduce
reports.
Most
potent
a
shield
are
appalled,
counselor,
Nussbaum,
say
my
counselor
Dean's,
please
that.
A
A
That
was
councillor
egg
lie,
I
should
I
believe
dr.
edges
is
here.
Where
is
dr.
etches
welcome,
and
we
just
received
great
news
yesterday
morning
that
the
Minister
of
Health
and
long-term
care
has
officially
signed
off
on
the
appointment
of
dr.
etches.
So
congratulations.
Our
new
medical
officer
of
Health.
A
A
Next
is
City
of
Ottawa
bylaw
zoning,
bylaw
2008,
250,
omnibus
amendments,
q2
2018,
Marie,
Claire,
Marshall,
Arizona's
de
Mille,
with
the
second
educational
dollars
general.
We
have
have
to
pass
the
Iraq
and
planning
committee
report
carried
on
both
site
alteration
by
logic:
lemma,
regular,
mostly
modification.
Don't
play
small
carried
audit
committee
report
number
15
coupled
event
of
canes
to.
E
You
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
do
so.
I
just
so
I
take
this
chance
to
thank
the
audio
general
Ken
Hughes
and
his
team
for
the
excellent
work
on
this
very
difficult
audit.
Mr.
mayor
typically
would
audits
what
we're
looking
at
is
just
the
numbers
in
this
case
here.
What
the
auditor
gemelas
team
had
delve
into
was
what
makes
a
difference
every
day
to
people
in
long-term
care
and
that's
our
parents,
our
grandparents
and
family
members.
E
A
And
thank
you,
the
members.
The
audit
committee
on
the
report
carried
adopted
a
MFC
community
Protective
Services
Committee
report
number
32
opponent
of
anaconda
committee.
Today,
the
Silvius
community,
Tara
DirectX
shown
and
it'll
assists
long
term
care
services.
Third-Party
review
examined
depend
on
the
Silvester
Swain,
the
Long's
are
they
carried?
Thank
you
for
all
of
the
good
work
on
the
part
of
the
committee
and
the
staff
item.
A
Number:
seven
is
emergency
shelters
rooms,
agreement
with
a
private
hotel
and
motels
on
Tomsula
shonda,
our
refuge
also
vecna's
hotel,
a
motel
Prive
carried
Finance
and
Economic
Development
Committee
report
number
34
upon
the
borough,
tonkatsu
created
the
phenol,
see
the
develop.
My
own
army
item
number
eight
is
the
2018
operating
a
capital
budget,
q1
status
report
budget,
the
function
L,
it
is
immobilization.
The
mill
dis
width
carried
in
congratulations
to
our
staff
item
number.
A
Nine
donations
to
the
city
for
community
benefit
policy;
politic,
I'm
at
sea,
added
on
a
vocation:
community
eldest
DNA
at
la
ville,
carried
item
number
10
zoning
bylaw
amendment
740
spring
land,
Drive
modification,
regular
motor
zone
as
set
cat
zero
from
an
ad
spring
land
councillor.
Brockington.
Did
you
want
to
hold
this
I
had
a
note
that
you
were
okay,
so,
on
the
report
carried
item
number
11
zoning
bylaw
amendment
473,
Albert
streets,
modification,
irregular
mother's
own
ash
cats
at
tois,
who
Albert
councillor
harder,
has
a
motion
seconded
by
Councillor
McKenney?
H
It's
very
technical
in
the
the
same
space
in
two
places
reads
as
a
different
number,
so
it's
correcting
that
and
it
was
intended
that
410
square
feet
square
metre
gross
floor
area
maximum
was
to
apply
to
the
bank
use
and
there
was
another
number
in
it
that
needs
to
be
corrected,
30
square
metres,
which
would
be
virtually
impossible
anyway.
So
that's
what
it
is
is
technical
to
change
that.
Okay,.
A
So
this
is
moved
by
Councillor
harder
second
about
councillor.
Mckenney
on
the
motion
area
carried
on
the
report
is
amended.
Carried
next
item
is
item
12
application
to
permit
the
demolition
of
the
Ugandan
High
Commission
231
Coburg
Street,
a
property
located
in
the
will
broad
Laurier,
Heritage,
Conservation,
District
and
application
for
new
construction
on
the
same
site
demanded
MLS,
EO
Tohoku
me
Sierra
Uganda,
and
we
have
a
motion
by
councillor
flurry
by
Councillor
new
sponsor,
for,
if
you
like,
to
introduce
the
motion,
please.
K
K
Whereas
the
city
wishes
to
support
the
efforts
of
the
Prime
Minister
was
initiative
and
whereas
the
city
has
the
legal
authority
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
to
require
a
combination
of
as
a
condition
of
approval
of
a
new
construction
and
whereas
a
commemorate
commemorating
the
building
at
2:31,
Kohlberg
Street
is
not
subject
to
the
commemorative
naming
policy
for
municipal
park
streets
and
facilities
because
of
its
because
it
is
privately
owned,
therefore
be
resolved.
That
council
require
the
owner
as
a
condition
of
approval
of
the
new
construction
to
bear
the
cost
of
physically
commemorating
the
history.
A
A
Oh,
no,
no
dissents,
okay
transportation
committee
report,
number
32
parking
services,
2017
annual
report.
That
report
on
us
de
midi
said
the
service
dis,
Ian's
mom,
received
item
15,
Leitrim
Road
realignment
and
widening
River
Road
Bank
Street
environmental
assessment
study
recommendations
at
SU
definition
of
a
tadpole,
a
modification
de
clase
de
Chimayo
Leitrim
de
volcán
I,
adopt
a
LC
item.
Number
16
can
add
a
light.
Rail
transit
planning,
environmental
assessment
study
moody,
drive,
Hazeldine
Road
recommendations
that
you'd
the
plan.
Forecasts
show
a
devaluation
of
immortality,
Ellijay,
so
al
proposed
a
vale
Kanata
councillor.
A
Excuse
me
item
number
17
bike
sharing
agreements
on
Tom,
Davila
path,
carried
City,
Clerk
and
solicitor.
Grapheme
is
ballet,
evoke
ash
and
allows
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
Planning
Act
explanation:
requirements
at
the
City
Council
meeting
of
April
25th
2018
as
medicinal
a
cleats
public
silica,
stone,
Jose,
occasional
por
la
la
de
la
mano,
small,
the
territoire
any.
What's
consider
events
like
average
the
mid
d
sweet
carried.
A
Does
anyone
wish
to
remove
anything
from
the
bulk
consent
agenda
at
this
time
so
on
the
bulk
consent
agenda
as
presented
carried,
adopt
a
MC
so
we'll
go
back
to
the
first
item
that
was
held
item
number
one
Public
Health
approach
to
reducing
harms
from
gambling
in
Ottawa,
councilor
egg
lie.
I
believe
has
a
motion.
B
Mr.
mayor,
but
rather
a
direction
to
the
clerk's
office,
just
a
quick
background,
I
want
to
thank
the
OPH
staff
for
moving
very
quickly
on
this
over
the
last
day,
or
so.
We
entered
into
discussions
about
creating
a
letter
of
commitment
with
hard
rock
similar
in
nature
to
what
was
arrived
at
through
councillor
de
Rosas
intervention.
But
this
time
on
issues
of
concern
related
to
the
the
public
health
implications
of
an
expansion
of
the
gambling
facility
and
gambling
in
general.
I
won't
read
the
whole
letter,
but
the
the
direction
is
basically
what
the
letters
does.
B
A
So
that
direction
is
to
staff
and
I
believe
also
it
becomes
it
the
next
item,
but
a
copy
of
the
letter
from
Rideau,
Carleton,
Raceway
and
Casino
was
also
sent
to
members
of
council
with
respect
to
infrastructure,
assists
and
so
on.
So
I
think
everyone
has
a
copy
of
that
as
well
and
councillor
Qadri
has
the
floor.
Please
thank.
L
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
and
I
want
to
thank
my
colleague
councillor
egg
life,
we're
putting
the
direction
forward
this
morning,
as
Ottawa
Public
Health
has
been
discussing.
These
issues
are
related
issues
too
similar
to
these
recommendations
this
morning,
where
the
hard
rock
and
our
two
or
three
meetings
that
we've
had
and
they're
in
full
support
of
these
recommendations
so
from
a
public
health
perspective
as
the
chair
I,
do
support
them
and
oblique
as
Ottawa
Public
Health,
or
do
support
these
two
recommendations
going
forward
as
part
of
the
motion.
Thank
You
mr.
mayor.
A
H
Before
the
second
anniversary
of
the
day
on
which
the
bylaw
was
amended
shall
apply
to
this
specific
amendment
and
council
will
not
grant
a
minor
variance
in
this
term
and
will
recommend
that
the
tooth
out
21:08
sorry,
this
is
a
typo
2018
2022,
it's
not
2108,
yet
I
won't
be
here
when
it
is
also
not
grant
permission
for
minor
variances
to
be
sought.
Maryann
might
be,
but
I
won't
be
so.
M
H
N
H
A
J
A
J
I'll
get
back
on
the
list.
You
introduced
a
motion
if
I
have
one,
but
no
the
reason
for
getting
on
the
speaker's
list
now
is
just
to
ask
some
questions
of
staff
on
this
item.
So
I
guess
I'm
curious
to
begin
with,
just
to
understand
a
little
bit
better
where
we
are
now
before
this
motion
is
voted
on
with
regard
to
the
issue
of
the
slots.
Cap
and
I
know
I
had
a
private
exchange
with
with
the
city
staff
over
the
last
few
weeks,
but
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
for
the
public
record.
J
What
staffs
position
is
on
the
current
status
of
the
exchange
of
letters
between
the
city
manager
and
OLG
from
the
fall
of
2013
stating
and
affirming
counsels
decision
to
limit
gambling
options
at
Rideau,
Carleton
Raceway
to
twelve
hundred
and
fifty
slots.
What
is
fast
view
on
the
current
status
of
that
exchange
of
letters?
Mr.
O
J
J
P
Mr.
mayor
I'm
not
sure
we're
in
a
position
to
respond
on
behalf
of
olg
I
can
say
that
council
has
not
enacted
enacted
any
performance
standards
related
to
the
number
of
slots
through
the
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw,
as
council
had
done
through
the
gaming
tables
council
did
do
it
on
the
tables,
but
did
not
through
the
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw
on
the
number
of
slot
machines.
So
I,
don't
think
staff
are
in
a
position
to
answer
on
behalf
of
OLG
but
I
hope.
J
Okay,
I'll
just
I'll,
just
read
out
the
key
sense,
so
o
LG
writes
to
the
city
manager
and
in
2013
and
says
that
o
LG
will
respect
by
municipalities,
choice
regarding
conditions
for
a
casino
for
Ottawa.
This
means
that
private
sector
service
providers
will
be
required
to
follow
the
decision
of
counsel
articulated
in
the
resolution
of
August
28th
2013
to
limit
gaming
offerings
at
Rideau,
calling
the
raceway
to
1250
slots
and
21
live
table
games.
So
what
is
the
status
of
that
commitment?
Now.
P
Mr.
maryk
only
reiterate
what
it
previously
said:
counsel
when
it
enacted
a
zoning
bylaw
limit,
enacted
it
solely
on
the
gaming
tables
and
did
not
enact
it
as
it
related
to
the
slot
machines.
This
predates
my
time
here
so
mr.
Schmitt
can
provide
more
information
on
that
if
required,
but
the
status
as
it
relates
to
the
council's
position.
Having
and
translated
into
the
zoning
bylaws
relate
only
to
the
gaming
tables.
At
this
point
in
time,.
J
Okay,
so
mr.
Connors
sent
sent
me
a
note
a
few
weeks
ago
and
I'll
just
quote
from
it,
that
the
September
13
2017
council,
a
decision
on
Ontario
regulation,
eighty-one
twelve
quote,
resulted
in
the
city
permitting
gaming
to
take
place
at
the
site
subject
only
to
such
limitations
contained
in
the
zoning
bylaw
of
the
city.
So
it
was
at.
Is
that
a
fairly
good
encapsulation
of
staff's
position
on
this.
J
P
J
So
it
just
so
that
I
understand
in
terms
of
understanding
what
advice
staff
would
have
so
the
next
time
councils
in
a
position
of
making
a
decision
that
staff
feel
is
not
enforceable
by
virtue
of
a
gap
in
the
city's
bylaws.
What
would
be
the
best
thing
for
council
to
do
to
ensure
the
enforceability
of
exchange
of
letters
of
the
kind
that
were
sent
in
2013,
so
sort
of?
Should
it
be
a
council
initiated?
Should
a
councilor
initiate
a
report
and
initiate
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment?
P
Mayor
there
are
two
scenarios
that
could
come
to
play
in
this
situation.
If
an
applicant
makes
an
application
seeking
relief
from
the
performance
standard
that
that
council
can
it
weigh
its
position
then,
but
in
the
absence
of
an
application
that
actually
addresses
the
performance,
standard
council
should
initiate
a
city
initiated
zoning
review
of
the
matter
and.
P
P
Mr.
mayor
I'm,
not
in
a
position
answer
that
question
I
was
neither
here
at
the
time
and
nor
can
I
a
pine
on
councils,
intent.
I
know
that
council
did
actually
require
required.
The
cap
on
the
gaming
tables,
so
my
only
my
assumption
would
be
council
did
seek
to
enforce
that
matter.
When
the
opportunity
presented
itself.
Okay,.
J
J
O
Mr.
mayor
I'm,
actually
gonna
read
from
the
response
that
mr.
mark
and
I
crafted
for
the
councillor
which
I
believe
this
is
question
number
three
and
I
stated
in
response
to
an
earlier
question.
The
finance
and
economic
development
MIDI
report
27
item
5
was
not
a
reaffirmation
of
the
council
decision
on
September
13
2017.
O
The
adoption
of
the
report
resulted
in
the
city.
Excuse
me
permitting
gaming
computing
to
take
place
at
the
site,
subject
to
such
limitations,
as
contained
in
the
zoning
bylaw
of
the
City
of
Ottawa.
A
reflection
of
this
interpretation
was
that
there
was
no
objection
made
by
the
city
to
the
ability
of
the
Hard
Rock
Casino
Ottawa,
to
seek
a
minor
variants
to
go
from
21
tables
to
31
35
tables.
Before
the
committee
of
adjustment.
J
O
J
O
J
Okay,
well
I'm,
just
trying
to
understand
I,
think
important
in
terms
of
understanding
when
this
happens
again.
That
council
is
fully
apprised
of
what
the
consequences
of
the
of
its
decisions
are
and
given
that
I
was
ruled
out
of
order
on
that
day,
because
it
was
deemed
a
technicality.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
because
it
apparently
wasn't
a
technicality
but
I'll
get
back
to
this
issue.
I'm
going
to
introduce
a
motion
shortly,
but
I
see
that
my
time
is
up.
Thank
You
mr.
mute,
so.
A
F
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
on
a
few
things
I'm
just
going
back
to
the
addition
that
was
placed
in
the
Ontario
regulation,
81
12
by
councilor
Dean's,
and
it
was
the
document
document
three
from
August
28
2013,
and
that
document
at
the
time
directed
OLG,
be
informed
that
the
City
of
Ottawa
recommend
that
the
successful
proponent
arising
from
their
request
for
proposal
implement
certain
public
health
measures.
F
N
Given
it
was
a
question
about
public
health
principles,
I'll
risk
on
the
the
four-point
plan
that
Ottawa
Public
Health
put
forward
is
one
that
hardrock
Ottawa
is
committed
to
supporting
and
carrying
out.
So
we
have
that
in
writing
and
it
is
a
strong
plan.
It's
stronger
than
the
the
initiative
that
was
put
forward
in
2013,
which
really
focused
on
just
the
gambling
casino
environment
and
Dorrie
I'm.
Sorry
that
wasn't.
F
N
F
N
N
F
C
F
Have
a
letter
from
the
community
health
center
in
my
ward
from
yesterday
quite
concerned
in
reiterating
their
position
of
2013,
they
have
a
problem
gambling
program
specifically
for
older
adults.
We
know
that
seniors
are
harder
hit
by
problem
gambling
at
gambling
tables
and
electronic
gambling
tables,
and
they
have
asserted
with
me
anyway
and
I
can
I
can
read
it
out
loud
or
I?
F
Can
I
can
certainly
forward
it
to
anyone
who
would
like
to
see
it
that
they
will
need
additional
resources
to
to
you
know
address
the
increase
in
problem
gambling
in
in
the
in
the
catchment
area.
Have
you
heard
that
from
central
town,
Community
Health
Center
I
have
the
very
specific
email
that
I'm
happy
to
share
sure.
N
We
did
consult
with
all
of
the
treatment
agencies
that
support
people
with
problem
gambling
in
Ottawa.
What
they
told
us
was
that
they
see
the
biggest
gap
is
around
prevention
and
awareness,
so
they
mentioned
they
don't
have
wait
times
right
now
for
service
for
treatment
for
problem
gambling.
What
they
said
is
that
probably
points
to
people
not
knowing
that
there
are
supports
available
and
they're
not
coming
forward.
They
don't
identify
when
there's
a
risk.
That's
why
our
plan
is
to
work
with
these
treatment
providers
and
they
have
agreed.
N
They
support
this
plan
to
focus
on
prevention
and
awareness
of
treatment
options
as
well.
As
can
you
know,
bolster
our
surveillance
network
to
be
able
to
assess.
Is
there
a
change
in
the
patterns?
Are
we
seeing
an
increase
in
the
need
they?
They
were
in
support
of
the
four-point
plan
that
we
put
forward.
F
So
the
the
community
health
center
was
clear
with
me
that
in
fact
to
be
able
to
meet
the
demand,
they
actually
have
to
move
resources
from
from
other
areas.
So
it's
it
is
clear
that
this
is
going
to
have
an
impact,
especially
on
seniors
and
older
adults
in
my
community
and
I'm
really
quite
concerned
about
it
and
I'm
concerned
that
public
health
is
not
as
concerned,
but
that's
for
another
day.
I.
F
Think
that
suggesting
that
we
go
to
the
lynn
when
there
are
many
many
right
now,
we
have
several
asks
into
the
lynn
for
funding
for
different
programs
in
in
the
community
and
we're
not
getting
those
those
funding
agreements
met
or
the
funding
requests
met
doesn't
really
satisfy
me.
But
that's
for
another
time.
I
just
want
to
go
back
now
to
the
questioning
from
councillor,
Nussbaum
and
and
the
limit
on
the
slots.
F
So
if
I'm
clear,
then,
if
we,
if
we
include
a
limit
of
two
thousand
slot
machines
in
in
the
zoning
today,
if
we,
if
we
amend
the
exception,
528,
are
to
include
2,000
slot
machines
and
55
gaming
tables
it.
If
the
oil
G
decided
at
some
point
that
they
would
have
to
combat
they
that
they
wanted
to
increase
that
they
would
have
to
come
back
to
committee
and
Council.
Is
that
correct?
F
F
I
You
very
much
a
couple
of
points
I
wanted
to
raise
and
reiterate
here,
I'm
not
going
to
be
voting
against
this
rezoning
motion
today,
because
it
is
quite
simply
that
a
zoning
motion,
my
concerns
that
I
have
about
both
the
process
would
follow.
I
suppose
the
type
of
questions
that
councillor
Nussbaum
has
been
raising.
There
was
considerable
confusion
over
whether
we
had
the
ability
to
request
a
cap
thought
that
we
were
requesting
a
cap
would
have
this
returned
to
us
again
and
I
believe
that
better
explains
why
there
was
no
motion.
I
What
we
now
learn
to
have
been
the
time
when
someone
ought
to
have
raised
a
motion,
and
so
I
think
there
are
important
lessons
in
process
that
I
would
ask
staff
to
to
review
and
see
what
greater
clarity
could
have
been
offered
to
councillors.
At
the
time
we
were
tallit
told
at
various
stages.
This
is
not
yet
the
right
moment,
for
example,
which
leads
me
to
my
second
point.
I
want
to
make
here,
which
is
all
along
I,
have
had
health
and
addiction
concerns
about
this.
I
I
Logic
here
we
were
similarly
told
at
the
time.
This
is
not
really
the
moment
to
be
raising
health
issues
or
gambling
issues
or
what
can
be
done
to
provide
better
services.
That
is
for
another
time,
so
we
are
left.
Some
of
us
at
least
are
left
with
this
feeling
like
well,
when
exactly
was
that
right
moment
to
have
done
this?
Was
that
a
loophole
you
know?
Did
it
fall
between
the
cracks?
That
does
concern
me
in
terms
of
process,
so
I
do
want
to
raise
this
today.
I
M
Thank
You
mr.
mayor.
Well,
let
me
just
say
that
I
mean
there's
two
big
issues
for
me
here.
There's
one
there's
the
practical
word
counselor,
one
in
terms
of
the
transportation
and
transit
issues
around
the
site
and
I
want
to
thank.
They
come
erect
committee
who
and
the
counselors
who
worked
with
me
on
this
and
I-
think
that
we
did
a
pretty
good
job
and
there's
a
number
of
recommendations
coming
forward
that
I'm
quite
happy
with
him.
A
little
fussed
about
this
whole
limit
on
slots
and
I
guess
just
going
forward.
M
What
I'm
looking
for
is
some
way
of
ensuring
that
councils
will
can
find
a
path
forward.
I,
clearly
understood
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
limit
on
tables
and
a
limit
on
slots
in
2013
when
81
twelve
came
back,
surprised
to
hear
mr.
O'connor
say
that
he
wasn't
aware
of
that,
because
I
actually
upended
my
2013
motion
to
80
112
and
had
the
limit
on
slots
in
it
so
I
don't
know
how
we
could
not
have
been
aware
of
it.
M
But
just
when
you
look
at
a
go
forward
plan,
how
do
we
make
sure
that
councils
will,
if
our
will
now
we've
heard
as
2,000
slots?
Not
my
will,
but
it's
I
think
the
will
the
majority
and
it
seems
to
be
the
will
of
the
proponent
they've
took
they
said
at
Eric
the
other
day
that
it'd
be
20
years
before
they
needed
more
slots.
M
So
if
we're
all
have
sort
of
a
collective
understanding,
how
do
we
embed
that
collective
understanding
in
a
way
that
this
isn't
going
to
happen
again,
where
we
find
out
a
few
years
from
now
that
actually
we
didn't,
we
didn't,
do
it
right
and
I
think
that's
what
happened?
We
there
was
a
will
of
council.
There
was
an
intention.
The
stated
intention
that
there
would
be
a
cap
of
12
15
slots
somehow
that
slipped
away
from
us,
and
we
don't
want
that
to
happen
again.
P
Mr.
mayor
council
can
enact
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
to
put
a
cap
in
on
slots,
as
it
already
has
four
tables.
It's
it's
an
amendment
now
my
advice
to
counsel
and
I
have
responsibility
to
advise
council
that
moving
a
motion
today
on
a
matter
that
was
not
considered
during
the
zoning
bylaw
review
process
exposes
Council
to
appeal
for
it
being
outside
of
the
scope
of
the
amendment
before
it
today.
P
M
P
O
Mr.
mayor
just
to
indicate
that
and
preface
my
remarks,
person
I
don't
have
a
absolute
answer,
but
we
are
doing
governance
for
the
next
term
of
council.
Mr.
mayor
and
I
will
be
pursuing
this
with
each
and
every
member
of
council
to
try
to
find
a
better
system
to
make
sure.
As
the
counselor
said,
this
doesn't
slip
through
the
cracks.
I
also
think
it's
important
mr.
mark
is
not
here
today,
as
he
was
at
an
OMB
hearing
that
continued
and
he
is
unexpectedly
out
of
the
office.
He
did
it.
O
However,
at
9:30
9:00
this
morning,
send
me
the
following
information
which
I
want
to
share
with
members
of
council,
because
that
is
what
mr.
mark
is
like
talking
about
this
motion
with
regards
to
caps,
and
he
said,
and
I
quote,
my
opinion
would
be
that,
while
there
is
no
case
law
yet
from
l-pad
on
an
amendment
made,
it
counsel
not
recommended
in
the
staff
report,
given
that
it
is
providing
what
the
applicant
wishes
to
build.
It
stands
a
reasonable
chance
of
success.
O
What
mr.
Marc
was
trying
to
encapsulate
was
taking
into
consideration
what
the
GM
said
and
what
the
draft
motion
that
I've
seen
says.
He
believes
that
if
it
was
challenged
subsequently
in
front
of
the
new
tribunal
that
it
would
have
a
reasonable
chance
of
councils
will
being
upheld
and
I
wanted
to
share
that
with
you
before
you
made
the
vote.
O
About
public
health
just
to
reaffirm,
because
I
am
a
bit
confused
by
the
earlier
interaction
when
I
was
in
public
health.
Earlier
we
were
talking
about
getting
more
funding,
but
now
it
seems
to
be
around
350,000.
If
I
remember,
there
seems
to
be
a
gray
zone
here,
it
seems
that
they
need
more
support
services
for
people
who
are
addicted.
N
Putting
forward
for
this
plan
is
a
minimum,
so
we
did
adjust
our
letter
that
we
wrote
to
the
province
and
framed
this
as
a
minimum.
Ask
the
work
that
we've
identified
in
the
plan
remains
the
same.
We
think
we
need
to
work
on
outreach
to
populations
at
higher
risk,
which
includes
seniors
and
youth.
We
know
we
need
to
do
better
surveillance.
We
know
we
want
to
do
awareness
of
what
are
the
risks
of
problem
gambling
and
the
ways
you
can
access
treatment
and
we
know
we
want
to
have
a
network.
N
So
the
work
is
the
same.
We
kosta
that
out
we're
confident
in
our
request
as
a
minimum
of
200,000.
We
also
checked
back
with
the
treatment
agencies
to
ask
if
they
were
looking
for
additional
funds,
we
did
not
hear
that
they
they
were
recommending
that
that
be
built
into
this
request.
Since
we're
focusing
here
on
prevention
and
the
public
health
approach,
they
certainly
were
definitely
interested
if
we
go
forward
and
we
see
increasing
needs
to
be
able
to
have
additional
funds,
but
that's
that's
a
different
Avenue.
O
O
You
can
do
it
in
a
corner,
store
and
here
again
the
services
online,
but
in
a
world
where
everything
is
accessible,
I
think
we
have
to
focus
more
on
what
we
can
do
at
a
community
level
in
order
to
support
people
and
provide
services
when
they're
available
so
I'm
willing
to
support
a
motion
where
we
would
provide
more
funding
for
prevention
or
establishing
limits
on
the
number
of
tables.
But
gaming
is
available
everywhere.
We
have
to
recognize
it,
but
also
in
urban
districts.
O
We
have
been
successful
in
avoiding
having
those
in
the
downtown
where
socio-economic
conditions
are
worse.
So
I
am
reassured
by
that.
There's
still
discomfort,
but
it's
related
to
the
people
who
are
addicted
to
gaming.
So
we
want
to
see
what
we
can
do
in
terms
of
Public,
Health
and
olg,
and
also
for
the
Lin,
so
that
it
won't
be
just
a
government
intervention
as
to
access
to
gaming
to
casinos
and
the
legitimate
services
of
OLG,
but
people
who
are
addicted
to
gaming
and
what
we
can
do
I'm
not
looking
for
an
answer.
N
I'm
lean
that
happens
outside
of
casinos,
and
that's
why
I
say
this
approach
in
2018
is
stronger
than
in
2013.
Our
outreach
is
exactly
there
on
the
ground
going
out
to
meet
with
youth
working
with
seniors
groups
and
it's
to
cover
all
forms
of
gambling.
We
know
that
online
is
important.
We
know
that
lottery
tickets
can
be
a
burden
on
seniors,
so
these
are
all
aspects
that
we
want
to
work
with.
Our
partners
work
with
the
community
members
that
are
affected
and
find
more
comprehensive
approaches.
J
J
So
the
operative
motion
is
the,
whereas
clauses
are
similar
to
what
was
sent
out
last
night
and
the
operative
Clause
is
therefore
it
be.
It
resolved
that
City
Council
approve
that
the
2019
draft
budget
process
consider
allocating
2%
to
the
city
of
Ottawa's
municipal
contribution
agreement,
revenue
from
the
Hard
Rock
Casino
for
Ottawa
public
health
collaborative
four-point
plan
to
reduce
harms
from
gambling
in
Ottawa,
and
so
just
by
way
of
explanation.
The
reason
for
that
is
first,
the
plan
is
conditional
on
provincial
funding.
So
if
there's
no
funding,
there's
no
four-point
plan.
J
I
think
there
is
no
question
and
speaking
to
treatment
providers
that,
having
that
as
ongoing
funding
would
be
highly
useful
and
third,
in
speaking
to
some
of
the
treatment
providers,
they've
indicated
that
they
very
clearly
and
strongly
would
welcome
additional
monies
for
treatment
that
they
feel
could
make
additional
inroads
and
see
better
outcomes
improve
the
efficacy
of
their
programs.
So
that's
the
purpose
of
this
motion.
The
2%
is
not
drawn
randomly
it's
the
number
that
OLG
provides
in
terms
of
its
gross
revenues
to
the
Ministry
of
Health
and
long-term
care.
J
And,
interestingly,
if
you
take
the
rough
numbers
that
we
get
we're
looking
at
really
an
amount
of
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in,
let's
say,
2019
revenues
building
up
to
something
closer
to
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand.
If
hard-rock
were
to
achieve
the
full
increase
in
revenue
that
it
anticipates.
J
As
per
the
motion
at
public
health
a
few
weeks
back,
because
I
think
I
got
the
sense
that
there
were
some
colleagues
around
the
table
who
support
getting
provincial
funding
but
may
not
support
additional
funding
from
the
municipal
contribution
agreement.
So
the
good
thing
about
this
change
is
for
those
who
are
around
this
table
in
2019.
J
Everyone
will
have
a
an
excellent
sense
of
whether
the
province
is
funding.
The
requested
ask
if
it
is,
then
those
who
don't
want
to
put
additional
monies
towards
treatment
can
vote
against
additional
monies.
Those
who
think
that
putting
in
additional
hundred
thousand
dollars
into
prevention
and
treatment
would
be
a
good
thing
can
vote
in
favor
of
it.
So
it's
giving
people
the
choice
to
wait
to
hear
what
happens
with
the
province
before
or
voting.
J
F
F
So
essentially,
what
that
does
is
it
you
know
in,
in
addition
to
having
Hard
Rock
come
back
on
the
gaming
tables
to
committing
counsel,
although
there
is
there
is
already
as
a
cap
on
on
slot
machines
with
OLG.
It
means
that
if
Hard
Rock
wanted
to
expand
that
that
they
would
have
to
come
back
to
committee
and
council
as
well,
Thank.
K
C
We
don't
have
details
on
that,
but
it
really
what
we're
doing
with
the
new
definition
of
the
casino
is
capturing
the
types
of
things
that
typically
would
be
associated
with
a
casino
right
now.
A
lot
of
these
things
in
fact
are
permitted
under
the
current
zoning,
either
as
as
accessory
or
in
this
ancillary
category,
because
we
didn't
have
a
specific
definition
rather
than
continuing
with
that
fragmented
approach
to
how
we're
dealing
with
this
use
rolling
it
all
into
one.
But
the
ancillary
financial
potentially
could
be
some
financial
services.
It
could
be
financial
counseling.
C
C
K
I'll,
let
let's
just
take
a
look
at
that.
Thank
you.
The
second
question
I
had
and
I
share
counselor
miss
Baum's
discomfort
with
how
this
has
rolled
out
in
terms
of
our
opportunity
as
a
council
to
say
that
we
continue
to
believe
the
the
2013
cap
applies
and
it
sounds
like
the
the
81
12
regulation
was
an
important
opportunity
that
came
by.
K
We
were
told
it
was
a
technicality
and-
and
we
voted
for
that,
I
note
that
in
their
recent
approval
for
the
gambling
in
Toronto,
that
City
Council
in
Toronto
has
voted
to
request
the
province
of
Ontario
to
amend
Ontario
regulation.
81
12
is
necessary
to
provide
a
clear
requirement
from
municipal
approval
prior
to
any
decision
to
substantially
expand
or
renew
gaming
sites
and
related
contracts
with
operators
within
the
municipality.
K
O
B
You
very
much
mr.
mayor
I
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
and
recognizing
the
work
that
chair
quadri
has
done
on
this
file.
It's
been
a
very
challenging
file
going
forward
and,
and
certainly
I,
think
dr.
etches
is
thinking.
This
is
certainly
a
challenging
file
to
be
taking
on
on
her
first
official
day
so,
but
I
know
the
hard
work
that
they've
they
put
on
this
file
in
in
moving
it
forward
and
and
addressing
the
concerns
that
have
come
up
so
I.
B
Just
I
would
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
to
just
start,
I'm
more
comfortable
with
counselor
a
new
swabs
motion
that
I
was
the
version.
I
saw
last
night
and
I
think
it's
it's
a
back-up
plan,
if
you
will,
if
what
the
Board
of
Health
came
forward
with
and
I
want
to
thank
councillor
Taylor
for
assisting
me
at
the
board
of
health,
that
I
don't
sit
on
and
bring
forward
a
motion
which
changed
the
recommendations
so
that
the
the
money
being
asked
for
wasn't
a
hard
cap,
but
rather
was
a
minimum
asked.
B
So
it
does
give
the
board
flexibility.
But
if
those
things
don't
work
out,
then
councillor
noose,
bombs,
motion
that
recommends
that
we
consider
that
as
part
of
the
2019
budget
is
certainly
as
a
back-up
plan.
It
can
still
concerns
me
a
little
bit
because
I'm
not
sure
we
should
be
taking
on
the
obligation
of
fixing
a
problem
which
emanates
from
the
province.
B
We
don't
really
have
a
lot
of
control
over
whether
there's
gambling
in
Ontario
or
not-
that's
all
provincially
driven,
so
that
part
still
makes
me
a
little
bit
nervous,
but
since
it's
it's
toned
down
somewhat
in
in
moving
it
forward
as
a
consideration
as
opposed
to
putting
that
discussion
in
front
of
us
today,
that's
a
motion
that
I
that
I
will
be
supporting.
As
for
councillor,
McKinney's
motion
I'll
be
supporting
that
as
well,
because
I
have,
to
be
frank,
my
name
was
batted
around
a
little
bit
as
the
councillor
that
asked
the
question.
B
I,
don't
think
the
question
that
I
asked
could
have
been
clearer.
It
was,
it
was
very
direct
as
to
whether
it
would
be
a
reaffirmation
or
not.
The
analogy
used
during
the
discussion
was
you
know.
Is
this
the
same
thing
as
somebody
buying
a
house
and
simply
turning
the
keys
over
to
the
house,
and
you
get
the
house
with
no
renovations,
no
changes
whatsoever.
You
just
get
the
house.
In
effect,
what
we
were
told
was
we
are
proving
a
new
owner
and
that
was
it
we're
approving
a
new
construction.
B
It
wasn't
like
the
again
didn't
embassy
that
we
are
proving
it
be
knocked
down
and
rebuilt.
We
were
transferring
the
house
as
it
was
without
any
any
additions,
any
new
construction,
any
renovations,
any
changes.
So
in
that
regard,
I
think
that
the
motion
brought
forward
by
councilman
Kenny
is
is
a
prudent
one
to
get
it
down
in
writing.
To
make
it
very
clear.
What
we're
saying
here
today,
I'm
heartened
by
legals
position
that
this
would
likely
be
successful
on
appeal.
B
L
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
and
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
of
dr.
etches
first
before
I
make
some
comments
on
what
the
discussion
that's
happening
this
this
morning.
The
dr.
hatch
is
a
doctor.
When
you
did
the
report
or
when
the
art
of
public
health
provided
the
report,
what
kind
of
work
went
into
producing
that
a
report?
Did
you
go
and
consult
with
the
community?
Did
you
consult
with
the
partners
in
the
community
along
with
some
of
them?
N
L
N
L
You
in
terms
of
the
recommendations
that
you
put
on
the
report,
the
four
recommendations
in
front
of
Council
this
morning,
where
those
recommendations
come
from.
Did
you
consult
with
like
the
Hard
Rock
Casino,
or
was
that,
based
on
evidence
that
you're
aware
of
in
terms
of
medical
fields
and
other
partners
in
the
community?
We.
N
L
If
you
want
to
call
it
that
and
I
think
the
recommendation
or
the
suggestion
that
was
made
to
Ottawa
Public
Health,
is
to
go
out
and
do
due
diligence,
and
we
did
that,
as
you
just
heard
from
dr.
Hatch's,
could
there
be
more
deal
more
work
done?
I,
don't
think
so.
I
think
the
work
was
completed.
The
recommendations
come
forward
in
the
report
and,
as
I
said
to
somebody
just
a
few
minutes
ago.
L
Here's
a
department
that
we
spend
money
and
you
know
how
to
ask
for
their
professional
help,
ask
for
their
knowledge-based
help
and
that's
what
the
Ottawa
Public
Health
does
and
does
provide
on
an
ongoing
basis.
The
item
that
we
were
discussing
this
morning
and
is
part
of
that
recommendations
from
the
public
health
I
mean
you
know
you
pay
professionals
almost
quarter
of
a
million
dollars,
yet
every
time
they
come
out
with
the
recommendations
we
sort
of
say.
Well,
you
know,
I,
don't
know
whether
we
should
follow
that
those
recommendations.
I
think
it's
about
time.
L
We
did
follow
those
recommendations.
In
this
particular
case.
These
recommendations
are
good
and
sound
recommendations.
Could
we
use
more
money?
Always
we
can
everybody
can
use
more
money,
but
the
money
is
not
the
solution.
You
can't
just
throw
money
at
a
problem
and
say
it's
gonna
be
solved.
People
talk
around
this
table
about
gambling.
Gambling
is
just
not
a
casino
issue.
Gambling
is
all
now,
whether
we
like
it
or
not
in
our
basements,
whether
you're
doing
a
computer
gambling
or
whether
you
do
a
no
lgt,
you
know
mine
lottery
tickets.
That's
all
gambling
and
I.
L
Just
wanna
caution
the
motion
that
the
concern
those
funds
put
forward
about
the
money
I
don't
want
to
take
on
as
a
municipality,
a
responsibility
that
belongs
in
the
provinces
basket.
Leave
it
there,
because
today
we're
talking
about
casinos
tomorrow
we
could
be
talking
about
cannabis,
related
issues.
How
much
of
those
issues
do
we
want
to
own
I?
Think
the
plan
that's
here
today
based
sound
and
reasoning,
plan
I,
think
we
should
look
at
this
plan
and
say:
let's
move
forward,
what
happens
in
the
future
in
terms
of
money
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
L
We
can
look
at
that
in
the
future
right
now.
This
recommendation
to
ask
for
one-time
funding
of
150,000
plus
ongoing
funding
or
200,000
recommended
by
the
Ottawa
Public
Health
and
again
I'll
reiterate
the
fact
that
they
have
consulted
with
the
partners
that
funding
for
now
I
think
is
sufficient.
Let's
move
forward
with
that,
and
then,
if
in
the
future,
we
need
that
money
or
we
need
extra
money.
L
Q
You
Mara
and
I'll
start
off
with
a
couple
of
questions
to
dr.
riches,
and
we
did
have
an
extensive
debate
that
Board
of
Health,
which
I
sit
on
and
so
I'm
very
comfortable
with
the
report
and
the
recommendations
that
we
came
up
with
there.
In
terms
of
the
letter
that
we,
the
request
for
funding,
has
that
been
shipped
to
the
province
yet
and
have
there
been
any
preliminary
discussions
between
staff
and
the
province
about
their
intentions
about
funding
the.
Q
And
generally
speaking,
historically,
our
gambling
programs
fully
funded
by
provincial
funding
I
know,
though
the
Board
of
Health
funding
is
75,
25,
I
think
so,
generally
speaking,
when
it
comes
to
gambling
programs
are
those
solely
funded
through
the
province
or
is
there
a
city
share
that
goes
towards
that?
So.
N
Gambling
isn't
mentioned
specifically
as
a
public
health
mandate
in
the
cost
shared
requirements
for
public
health.
That's
why
we're
seeking
an
additional
base
funding
from
the
province
and
we
so
the
other.
The
other
sector
that's
been
mentioned
today
here
in
terms
of
treatment,
is
funded
from
the
province.
Sorry.
Q
That's
happening
there,
but
nonetheless
they've
been
very
receptive
and
working
to
working
with
us
with
councillor
Drew's
with
city
staff
to
help
advance
some
of
the
infrastructure
projects
that
we've
been
working
on
for
for
Bank,
Street
oral
Armstrong
and
the
other
ones
as
well
and
I
know,
they've
sent
a
letter
of
commitment
as
well
to
reflect
that
so
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
them
for
being
at
the
table
and
being
good
corporate
citizens.
Thank
You
mayor.
O
O
Acting
on
councilor
allies,
presentation
I
was
pleased
to
move
a
motion
that
expanded
the
opportunity
for
OPH
to
pursue
further
funding
from
the
province
to
address
gambling.
Well
I
understand
where
councilor
news,
Baum's
emotion
is
coming
from
in
his
intent:
I,
don't
support
it
and
and
councilor
Qadri
very
eloquently
articulated
why
council
couldn't
decide
at
any
point
in
its
budget
cycle
to
allocate
further
funding
to
OPH
for
any
program
area
that
we
want.
We
don't
need
a
motion
today
to
signal
to
a
future
council
that
we
can
do
that.
O
But
what
a
motion
today,
if
approved,
would
signal
is
it
would
signal
to
the
province
that
we're
willing
to
step
up
and
fund,
which
means
that
they
in
turn
can
respond
to
our
letter
and
say
if
you're
willing
to
step
up
and
fund
it?
Why
would
we
that's
a
clear
signal
to
the
province
that
they're
off
the
hook,
so
why
would
we
send
that
signal
and,
as
councillor
Qadri
clearly
articulated,
this
could
be
the
thin
edge
of
the
wedge
on
many
many
other
health
issues
where
we
let
the
province
off
the
hook
for
funding.
O
You
know,
while
I'm
not
a
fan
of
gambling.
The
discussion
at
the
board
of
health
was
quite
interesting
and
became
very
clear
that
the
real
expansion
in
gambling
was
taking
place
online,
not
on
the
ground
and
the
largest
share
of
it.
It
was
gray
market
and
trying
to
cap
or
constrain
today.
What
happens
at
this
site
is,
in
many
respects,
a
small
part
of
the
puzzle,
seeing
the
gambling
or
not
seeing
the
gambling
is
not
a
measure
of
whether
the
gambling
is
taking
place.
O
That
measurement
is
one
that
we're
gonna
have
to
rely
on
OPH
for
using
evidence
and
one
that
the
Board
of
Health
we
heard
at
the
Board
of
Health
that
the
OLG
is
committed
to
helping
inform
our
health
unit
with
data
that
they
collect.
So
so
in
some,
you
know,
as
a
board
health
member
there
a
lot
of
things
that
that
I
believe
our
community
would
be
better
off.
If
nobody
partook
of
that
includes
smoking,
it
includes
drinking.
It
includes
gambling.
O
It
includes
substance
misuse,
but
OPH
is
brought
forward,
I
believe
a
responsible
strategy
to
say
recognizing
that
people
are
going
to
engage
in
some
of
these
behaviors
we're
gonna
work
to
try
and
constrain
the
harm,
promote
education
and
I.
Believe
that's
a
sound
recommendation
and
a
sound
path
forward.
A
O
R
Mm-Hmm,
thank
you,
your
worship
and
good
morning.
Colleagues,
just
a
few
comments.
First,
the
matter
before
us
just
on
the
planning
rationale.
This
is
a
planning
decision
that
we're
trying
to
have
a
conversation
on
today
and
I
thought
I'd
start
off
on
on
the
planning
point.
I
do
believe
this
is
an
appropriate
planning
use
for
the
site
and
for
what's
being
proposed.
R
If
you
offer
a
high-quality
product,
we
can
keep
money
in
our
own
province
and
in
our
own
City.
So
there
is
some
some
benefit
to
that,
and
I
certainly
recognize
that
there
are
problem
gamblers
and
there
is
a
a
plan
to
address
that.
But
you
know
we
gambling
is
not
the
only
area
where
people
have
problems.
R
Mr.
mayor,
through
you
to
staff,
I
have
some
questions
about
the
actual
motion.
That's
before
us
part
three
talks
about
basically
a
partnership
between
all
parties,
particularly
looking
at
some
transportation
options.
Private
driveway
from
Bank
fronting
a
portion
of
Earl
Armstrong
to
Bank
Street
working
with
the
developers
with
respect
to
Leitrim
can
I
just
have
some
more
information.
How
these
are
some
some
pretty
significant
options
that
are
being
considered
to
improve
traffic
flow.
How
exactly
are
these
conversations
going
to
evolve?
R
P
Mayor
a
lot
of
these
issues
outlined
in
item
number
three
relate
to
matters
of
site
design
that
would
be
addressed
through
the
site
plan
control
process,
which
will
be
a
subsequent
step.
Once
the
zoning
is
in
place,
we
would
be
entering
into
a
site
plan
agreement
with
the
applicant,
regardless
for
the
application,
and
many
of
these
matters
could
be
addressed
in
that
as
well,
and
we
would
be
in
a
position
at
that
point
to
provide
further
information
on
how
these
matters
were
resolved.
R
Plans
usually
roll
or
evolve
fairly
quickly
after
zonings
been
approved,
but
again
this
is
development
that
will
be
more
than
one
phase.
I
noticed
the
next
part
of
the
motion
talks
about
another
study
for
Albion
starting
next
year.
That
could
be
a
year
long,
so
is
that
all
congruent
with
in
one
another
we're
not
or
what
are
the
timelines?
What
are
the
expected
timelines
for
the
site
plan.
P
Mr.
mayor
I
can
answer
mr.
Smith
might
be
able
to
give
you
more
precise
information,
but
I.
You
know
this
is
going
to
be
very
much
over
the
next
couple
months
into
the
next
year.
To
address
many
of
these
matters,
the
transportation
area
transportation
study
can
initiate
on
its
own.
It's
not
tied
quite
the
same
to
the
other
matters,
but
the
other
matters
will
be
addressed
as
we
evolved
through
the
site
plan
process
and
Albion.
R
P
Mr.
mayor
I
think
at
this
stage
is
premature
because
we
haven't
commissioned
the
work
yet,
but
I
think
we're
looking
at
further
improvements
to
manage
traffic
safety
at
that
intersection,
and
so
we'll
be
looking
at
intersection
configuration
matters
primarily
through
this
work.
I
think
at
this
stage
it's
that's
the
extent
of
my
help
am.
R
I
am
I
reading
the
subsequent
parts
of
this
motion
correct
that
we're
going
to
allocate
150,000
dollars
for
this
study
that
we're
talking
about
the
study,
not
modifications
to
the
intersection.
So
what
is
the
objective
of
the
study?
Are
we
concerned
that
there's
going
to
be
an
overflow
of
traffic
on
Albion
and
we
want
the
study
to
talk
about
options
to
help
mitigate
that
or
is
there
some
other
issue
that
I'm
not
aware
of
mr.
P
So
what
this
motion
does
is
reinstates
the
money
that
had
been
previously
decided
by
council
to
examine
the
broader
traffic
issues
at
this
intersection,
which
are
not
directly
related
to
this
application,
but
of
interest
in
consideration
of
this
application
and
the
the
additional
money
really
reflects
the
fact
that
the
cost
of
these
studies
have
gone
up
in
the
last
five
six
years.
So
we
do
need
to
need
additional
funds
in
order
to
complete
it
will.
P
A
C
You
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
and
I.
Don't
have
a
question
per
se.
I
just
have
a
comment.
Mr.
mayor
I
find
it
ironically,
someone
might
call
it
they
love
to
enter
their
motion
and
try
to
debate
them
for
as
long
as
they
can
and
then
one
time
to
vote
for
the
vote
against
the
item
itself.
So
I
have
asked
mr.
O'connor
and
a
new
government
modern
mr.
mayor.
C
Maybe
we
need
to
look
at
some
of
these
practice
and
see
if
there's
a
better
way
to
do
this
and
the
current
system
and
for
some
of
those
people
who
are
listening
to
us
I
hear
time
and
time
again,
I,
don't
gamble,
I,
don't
go
there,
I,
don't
know
why
I
go
to
the
casino
I
support
them.
I
support
the
horse
race
in
my
community,
because
a
lot
of
those
people
from
my
community
I
love
their
food,
I
love,
their
hospitality
and
I.
Think
everyone
should
try
that
experience
and,
let's
stop
being
a
nanny
state.
A
S
Thank
you,
I,
just
first
didn't
want
to
just
start
by
thanking
everyone
around
this
table.
Previous
chair,
mister
we've
come
a
long
way
on
this.
The
reality
is
we
sat
here
almost
six
years
ago
at
this
table.
Listen
to
the
OLG
Seles.
What
was
at
the
time
a
bill
of
goods
on
what
this
plan
was,
what
this
meant
for
the
city?
There
was
a
lot
of
concern.
S
I
found
myself
on
the
on
the
wrong
end
of
a
votes,
City
cost
at
that
time
and
I
was
pleased
to
be
able
to
following
that
work
with
you
know
those
around
this
table
work
with
the
city
work
with
the
OLG
the
OGIS
evolved
over
the
last
six
years
as
new
leadership.
The
previous
leadership
is
for
some
reason
running
for
provincial
Parliament.
S
Kuran
Raceway
is
a
positive
step
for
the
city,
I
think
looking
at
certain
things
we're
talking
about
caps,
the
oil
G
set
o
caps
in
their
gaming
zones
through
their
monetization
plan
back
in
2012
through
their
request
for
pre
qualifications.
That
reports
specifically
spoke
to
up
to
2000
slots
up
to
2000
redeeming
positions.
We
aren't
looking
at
zoning
for
600
gaming
positions,
we're
looking
at
zoning
for
55
tables,
because
that's
the
application
before
us.
It's
a
planning
application
that
seats
55
tables.
If
we're
gonna.
S
If
we're
gonna
looking
at
zoning
to
align
ourselves
with
provincial
requirements
from
the
olg,
then
we
should
look
across
the
board.
It
should
be
2600
that
way
the
applicant
doesn't
have
to
come
forth.
They
want
to
increase
from
55
tables
to
65
tables.
They
don't
have
to
come
for,
because
we've
already
adopted
the
provincial
requirements.
I,
don't
think
we
should
do
that.
I
think
we
should
leave
it
up
to
the
ology
sets
those
limits
we
did.
You
know
in
2011
we
started
the
process
by
zoning
for
tables.
S
You
know
in
hindsight,
I,
don't
think
that
was
really
the
right
choice.
I
think
we
should
leave.
Leave
the
there
work
the
minimum
there
any
requirements
to
the
OLG,
but
we
didn't
do
that
on
on
tables,
but
I
thought
I.
Don't
think
we
should
do
that,
though,
on
on
I,
don't
think
we
should
be
zoning
force
law
itself.
Law
cap
one
already
exists,
it's
clearly
there
in
the
RFP
queue
and
I
believe
it
was
also
in
the
RFP.
S
That's
not
a
public
document,
but
I
believe
it
was
also
in
the
RFP
and
the
proponent
has
committed
to
that
mm
slot.
Cap
I.
Think,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
positives
here
in
what
we're
and
what
we're
doing
going
forward.
I
think
the
site
plan,
the
cooperation
between
councillors
to
ruse,
councillor
Dean's
and
councillor
caki
SH
in
working
in
the
in
the
in
the
neighbourhood.
On
on
what
the
impacts
of
this.
We
all
know
that
there's
other
impacts
in
this
community
there's
other
those
roads.
S
The
casino
itself
isn't
gonna
increase
substantial
traffic
on
those
roads.
The
problem
exists
today,
but
having
those
counselors
work
together
on
what
could
be
done
if
there
are
issues
that
they
could
work
together
on,
those
I
think
is
a
positive
step
and
thank
you
to
counselor
to
ruse,
for
from
being
a
part
of
that
and
councillor
Dean's
for
your
cooperation
at
committee
last
week
appreciate
your
presence
and
your
comments
on
this
application.
So
we
just
want
to
thank
everyone
involved.
Theology
RCR
hardrock,
the
community.
S
You
know
John
Macmillan
was
here
last
week
at
committee
from
the
representing
the
horse,
people
as
he
calls
them
and
the
position
they
were
in
back
in
2012
in
2013
position
of
uncertainty
that
hurt
their
business.
This
provided
them
some
certainty
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
support
groups
in
our
city
and
we
supports
local
business.
The
impact
of
this
property
on
rural,
auto
on
terms
of
jobs
in
terms
of
certainty
in
our
area
is
such
an
important
step
that
we
felt
so
far
away
from
six
years
ago.
S
So
really
want
to
thank
thank
you
and
happy
to
support
this
I
I.
Don't
support
the
motions
brought
forward.
You
know
to
councillor
Cosby's
point
his
provincial
responsibility.
The
city
can
work
with
the
province.
Oph
can
work
with
the
province
on
how
that
can
be
administered,
but
in
terms
of
trying
to
take
something
over
from
the
province,
that's
purchase,
responsibility
that
just
leads
to
more
downloading
I,
don't
think
that's
necessary.
Thank
you
right.
A
D
Thank
You
mayor
and
thanks
for
my
colleague
at
City,
Council,
that
this
is
a
I
wanna
I'm,
not
I,
don't
have
a
questions
because
I've
been
asking
a
lot
of
questions
on
the
last
six
months.
I
probably
would
like
to
wrap
up
and
like
to
say
a
few
word,
and
thank
so
many
people
that
have
been
involved
in
this
project.
I
look
around
the
table
and
councillor
always
responsible
and
to
bring
in
project
and
to
bringing
a
jobs,
creation
and
the
city,
not
only
a
rule
in
history.
D
This
file
has
been
on
the
table
since
2013
I
know
the
councillor.
Some
of
them
are
here
on
the
table
worked
very
hard
with
OLG,
but
two
years
ago
things
change
o
LG
and
hard
rock.
They
decided
what
Rideau
Carleton
to
create
a
membership
partnership
and
the
venue
change.
We
still
sitting
here
as
a
councillor
talking
about
gambling
and
we're
talking
about
public
health,
we're
talking
about
zoning,
but
really
none
of
know
all
these
issues
they're
good
and
they
work
together.
D
But
people
need
to
look
at
this
as
a
city
project
we
work
and
on
Landsdowne
we
work
on
ey
centre.
There
was
a
lot
of
people
agreed
at
this
agreed
and
then
by.
Finally
now
we
all
enjoy
them
in
this
city
and
I
want
to
talk
about
Rideau
Carleton
as
as
a
destination
as
a
source
and
destination
and
job
creation.
We
need
to
talk
about
the
theater.
That's
gonna
create
2,500
seats
that
venue
we're
gonna,
have
some
some
artists
coming
and
entertain
the
City
of
Ottawa
and
the
residence
with
we're
gonna.
D
It's
gonna
become
a
tourism
we
keep
talking
about.
We
keep
talking
about
gambling
and
councillor
Brockington
made
a
great
point
right
now:
the
city
lose
seventy
million
dollar
every
year
to
cross
the
border,
and
yet
the
City
of
Ottawa
and
the
public
health
that
that
exists
in
the
city
of
Faribault.
We
are
handling
all
the
gambling
issue
that
we
have
right
now.
Gambling
is
in
your
in
people's
bedroom.
The
people
basement
on
your
devices
in
the
gas
station
everywhere
you
turn
around.
D
We
need
to
talk
about
this
project
and
look
at
the
seriousness
about
it
as
job
creation.
What's
going
to
do
to
the
south
and
what's
gonna
do
to
the
resident
and
rural?
What's
gonna
do
the
horse
racing
I
want
to
thank
you,
mr.
mayor,
for
your
leadership
and
allowing
the
conversation
going
and
making
an
understanding.
This
is
as
job
creation
economy
for
not
only
the
Osgood
Ward
it's
for
this
city,
because
it's
gonna
have
2,000
job.
Look
at
around
these
stables
and
most
of
the
people
that
in
your
ward,
that
can
be
working
and
discuss.
D
You
know
not
only
people
from
Osgood
Ward,
so
we
had
an
issue
and
we
had
some
we're
gonna
talk
about
a
little
bit
the
traffic
issue
and
some
some
challenging
having
against
having
with
us,
but
around
this
table.
Councillor
caucus
myself
and
councillor
Dean's
we've
been
talking
about.
What's
the
impact
on
a
community,
but
also
my
community
Osgood
world
and
really
community
association,
Osgood
Ward's
Association,
the
Findlay
Creek
Riverside
South,
all
of
them
came
in
support
of
this
and
they
understand
that.
D
Yes,
we
do
have
a
challenge
and
we're
gonna
have
some
traffic
issues,
but
we
will
deal
with
this
staff.
Mr.
Schmidt
and
mr.
Steve
Willis
they
work
very
hard,
was
counselor
harder
and
counselor
Moffitt
on
addressing
all
the
issue.
So
to
me
today
is
a
historical
win
for
not
only
for
us
good
word,
but
the
city
of
ro,
because
this
is
a
project
that
it's
gonna
bring.
Job
is
gonna
bring
economy,
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna,
bring
a
venue
and
it's
gonna
be
a
destination
and
rural
South.
So
I
encourage
you
to
support
this.
D
This
a
good
vanity
and
a
good,
and
welcome
the
great
partnership
that
we're
going
to
have
with
Rideau
Carleton
and
hard
rock,
because
the
Lido
Carlton
they've
been
contributing
to
our
communities
since
1962
the
Warren
family
and
I
see
and
Andrew
Wright
the
one
of
the
the
grandson
of
the
son-in-law
of
mr.
Warren
sitting
in
a
room
here,
they've
been
contributing
to
every
events.
They've
been
a
great
community
leader
in
our
area
and
they've,
been
supporting
everyone.
A
You
does
anyone
else
wish
to
speak
to
this
item.
I'll
offer
a
couple
of
comments.
First
of
all,
on
the
three
emotions
motion
won
by
counter
councilors
harder
in
Moffitt
I
echo
councillor
drew
his
comments.
Thank
you
for
the
good
work
that
you
have
done
on
this
planning
issue
and
I'm,
going
to
support
that
first
motion.
Second
motion
by
councillor,
Nussbaum
and
McKenney
I'd
urge
councillors
not
to
support
this.
We
just
received
from
the
health
department
a
recommendation
that
increased
funding
come
from
the
province
of
Ontario.
A
The
Inc
isn't
even
dry
on
that
document
and
then
we're
undermining
her
own
position
by
saying.
Well,
don't
worry,
we'll
fund
it
from
our
own
resources
and
councillor
Qadri
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
This
is
a
classic
example.
If
we
go
down
this
path
of
provincial
downloading
gambling
and
OLG
is
a
hundred
percent
responsibility
of
the
province
of
Ontario.
The
province
has
100%
responsibility
of
the
problem.
Gambling
strategy
and
funding
and
I'm
somewhat
familiar
with
this,
because
I
used
to
be
the
minister
in
charge
of
that
funding.
A
So
the
reality
is
that
we
should
not
be,
in
essence,
subsidizing
the
province
of
Ontario.
They
get
the
biggest
cut
from
the
casinos
and
yet
we're
being
now
asked
by
this
motion
to
take
portion
of
our
funding
and
put
it
into
a
provincial
program.
You
know
it's
the
same
as
you
know.
Why
not
support
the
operating
budgets
of
the
hospitals
or
take
over
the
highway
system.
We'd
never
do
that
in
a
million
years,
because
it's
not
our
responsibility.
A
You
know
we
remember
remember
what
happened
when
there
was
downloading
of
a
highway
174
and
we're
still
suffering
the
great
issues
with
that
particular
download.
So
I'd
urge
you
not
to
vote
for
the
motion
that
basically
is
sending
it
off
to
the
next
budget.
That's
the
easy
thing
to
do:
push
it
off
and
feel
good.
If
the
motion
passes
so
I'd
urge
you
not
to
support
that
and
same
with
councillor
McKenney
and
leapers
motion
with
respect
to
the
caps
I
think
councillor
Brockington
said
it
right.
A
You
know
what
we
can't
micromanage
every
single
project
that
comes
before
us
number
one.
Secondly,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
don't
have
that
responsibility.
We
can
bring
forward
all
the
motions
we
want
and
a
number
of
motions
I
think
we're
really
intended
to
try
to
kill
the
project.
You
know
hours
of
operation,
an
ATM
machine
this
that
the
other
thing,
if
you
don't
want
a
casino,
don't
kill
it.
A
A
death
of
a
thousand
cuts
just
vote
against
it,
but
I
think
the
overwhelming
evidence
is
that
this
is
going
to
be
in
a
significant
job
creator
in
rural
South
Ottawa.
We
have
taken
as
a
result
of
representations
from
members
of
the
public
and
members
of
council
consideration
into
dealing
with
traffic
issues
that
are
going
to
be
a
challenge
if
the
site
is
successful.
This
is
about
the
zoning
to
allow
a
hotel
by
the
way,
didn't
even
hear
the
word
hotel
on
this
whole
debate.
A
It's
gonna
create
3,000
construction
jobs
and
almost
900
permanent
ones
in
rural
South
Ottawa
up
from
the
current
400
jobs,
and
we
know
the
impact
that
the
the
slots
program
that
was
brought
in
originally,
quite
frankly,
to
help
stabilise
the
horse
racing
industry,
and
we
all
know
that
we
have
a
large
agricultural
community
in
the
City
of
Ottawa
82%
of
our
land,
masses,
agriculture,
rural
and
forest,
and
so
I
would
hope
that
members
of
council
recognize
that
we
have
gambling
all
around
us.
We've
got
you
go
to
the
Senators
game.
A
There's
a
50/50
draw
you
go
to
the
Catholic
Church
on
Wellington
Street,
there's
a
sign
up
there
for
bingos
every
once
a
week.
We've
got
internet
gambling.
You
can
argue
whether
you
like
gambling
or
not,
but
the
reality
is
that
the
gaming
and
gambling
is
before
us
and
so
I
would
urge
members
of
council
to
support
the
harder
Moffatt
motion
to
reject
the
nussbaum
McKenney
and
the
McKinney
lis
promotion
and
to
vork
before
the
report
as
amended.
So
we'll
take
these
in
order
that
we
receive
them.
A
L
H
C
B
I
C
C
L
C
H
K
A
I
You
very
much
since
participating
in
the
debate
and
Transportation
Committee
and
voting
in
favor
of
this
and
the
report.
It
came
to
my
attention
many
others
through
some
media
reports
and
some
individual
constituents
writing
that
there
are
wetland
issues
affected
by
this
recommended
route.
Ie
that
did
not
come
up
at
the
meeting.
I
would
certainly
have
asked
questions
there.
K
Yes,
mr.
mayor
I
can
I
saw
those
reports
and
I
can
tell
Council
that
they're
not
accurate.
We
are
not
proposing
to
build
through
the
wetlands
algaas,
miss
Qi
she's
here
somewhere,
to
give
you
a
quick
overview
of
the
specifics,
but
I
can
assure
you
that
we
are
not,
and
nor
would
we
obviously
build
through
wetlands.
Mr.
chief,
you
just
elaborate
a
little
bit
on
these
specifics.
T
Mr.
mee,
mr.
merry
that's
correct:
it's
the
feedmill
Creek
Watershed,
that's
that's!
In
the
area
around
compost
station
and
our
station.
Our
facility
is
not
in
the
floodplain
at
all.
We
would
never
build
in
the
floodplain.
There
is
a
study
around
this
area
for
the
the
watershed
study
and
it
will
come
to
committee
next
year
and
it
is
taking
into
account
the
development
in
the
area
as
well
as
our
light
rail
corridor,
and
we
did
our
work
with
the
team.
That's
working
on
that
watershed
study,
as
well
as
the
MVC,
a.
I
T
Yes,
our
report
speaks
to
the
environmental
implications
and
we
in
our
presentation.
We
said
that
there's
very
minor
issues
and
if
we
we,
if
through
the
detailed
design,
if
we,
if
there's
any
implication
on
the
the
remedial
area
which
is
outside
of
the
floodplain,
that
would
be
addressed
through
the
through
the
detailed
design
and
again,
we
would
work
with
the
conservation
authority
on
these
issues.
Okay,.
I
T
L
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
mayor,
and
just
a
couple
of
questions.
First
of
all,
in
terms
of
the
mr.
McCarney,
you
provided
a
memo
to
us
regarding
the
ridership
on
the
LRT.
Could
you
just
give
us
a
little
bit
of
an
explanation
from
behind
the
scenes
as
to
what
those
numbers
are
based
on?
Are
they
based
on
current
population
or
the
including
future
population,
as
well
as
the
ridership
I'll.
K
T
Now
we
also
talked
about
the
overall
10800
forecasted
ridership
crossing
the
Greenbelt
for
the
peak
period.
But
if
we
multiply
that
by
approximately
four
to
get
the
all-day
ridership
that
would
come
out
to
about
43,000
and
today's
current
ridership
is
crossing,
the
Greenbelt
all-day
ridership
is
23,000.
T
L
L
T
T
If
we
were
to
compare
that
to
the
all-day
again,
you
multiply
that
by
four
to
get
the
all
day
and
that's
the
incremental
difference
purely
based
on
technology
now
by
providing
fast
and
reliable
transit
you're
going
to
see
from
23,000
today
to
to
43,000
by
2031,
because
that's
our
model
looks
at
that
time
frame.
All.
G
G
Mr.
mayor,
this
is
something
I've
been
bleeding
about.
I
guess
for
quite
a
while
is
that
the
ability
to
increase
ridership
and
transit
is
the
greatest
in
this
area.
First,
because
we
don't
have
a
good
system
at
all
right
now,
which
means
people
aren't
using
it
a
little
the
few
that
have
to
do,
but
they
only
do
it
if
they
absolutely
have
to
and
result
of
that,
of
course,
as
traffic
is
increasing
in
the
traffic
now,
even
in
the
last
year,
has
become
almost
impossible.
G
I've
talking
to
some
of
the
businesses
they
the
traffic,
is
actually
in
the
morning
rush
hour
to
kanata
is
actually
backing
up
on
the
Queensway
now
at
Marsh
Road,
because
they
can't
get
through
to
get
their
carling
avenue
was
solid,
almost
play
back
to
moody
and
terry
fox
is
now
over
drove
up
by
it.
The
other
day
at
9:15
in
the
morning,
when
you
think
most
rush
hour
is
over.
He
went
back
about
three
kilometers
so
that
getting
this
out
here
is
extremely
important.
G
I
know
we
can't
build
light
relative,
get
it
to
moody,
but
I.
Think
the
important
thing
is
that
we
got
the
AAA
now
we
know
a
rough
estimates
of
costs,
etc
that
to
get
that
leased
to
kanata
to
start
with
and
then
proceed
as
far
as
quickly
as
we
can
is
really
getting
to
be
very,
very
essential
and
I
think
my
Brett
raised
this
earlier
in
the
year
with
you
about
getting
a
committee
together
of
the
West
End
councils
in
yourself,
and
you
wanted
to
wait
till
the
EI
was
finished.
G
So
I
understand
that
so
I'm,
hoping
now
that
this
is
done,
that
we
can
start
those
meetings,
because
the
development
charge
bylaw
is
being
reviewed
next
year
and
if
transportation
master
plan.
Just
after
that,
we
know
that,
if
things
aren't
in
those
documents
they
don't
get
done
and
the
light
rail
phase
two
is
starting
immediately
on
the
completion
of
phase.
One
I
think
we
have
to
look
for
how
we
can
find
it.
G
G
However
far
we
can
get
it
with
the
money
we
can
raise
at
that
point,
and
it's
one
of
the
advantages
through
the
Canada
itself
is
that
some
of
his
already
great
separated
pedestrian
bridge
is
already
grade-separated
that
they,
the
valor
bridge,
went,
was
built,
left
and
opening
for
it.
So
there
aren't
as
many
structures
in
that
part,
but
there
could
be
a
huge
amount
of
ridership.
It
would
hit
the
first
part
of
Canada
and
Terry
Fox,
even
if
in
us
all
we
can
get
to.
G
The
first
part
is
almost
where
the
three
different
Ward's
come
together.
So
we
can
have
buses
going
out
from
that
location
that
would
serve
a
large
part
of
the
population
until
we
can
get
it
to
go
further.
So
I
just
like
to
say,
if
you
can
make,
we
free
your
firm,
your
commitment
that
we
could
set
that
committee
meeting
up
and
start
working
to
reach.
G
That
objective,
which
I
think
is
very
important
for
the
entire
West
End
of
the
city,
which
is
growing
like
crazy
right
now,
houses
are
selling
in
a
day
because
they're,
not
enough
of
them
and
even
then
they're
building
it
so,
and
the
high
tech
this
year
we're
doing
an
update
of
the
study
we
did
a
few
years
ago
to
find
out
how
many
people
are
actually
working
there
now,
because
they
know
it's
a
lot
more.
We
don't
have
the
actual
numbers,
but
I
think
that
would
help
to
feed
into
this.
G
It
also
creates
a
lot
more
revenue
coming
into
the
city
because
they
all
pay
taxes
and
I.
Some
of
the
people
are
getting
rather
tired
of
the
development
charges
collected
in
Kanata,
mostly
going
to
build
light
rail
in
the
center
in
East
part
of
the
city,
and
they
want
to
see
not
the
word
I'm
a
personally
not
opposed
to
that.
As
long
as
we
have
a
plan
to
get
it
to
us
when
it
can
can
be
debt
there.
G
So
I
just
like
to
know
if
you
would
be
willing
to
make
that
commitment
and
start
to
meet
now,
because
if
we
don't
get
it
into
these
documents,
then
we
can't
do
it
right
after
2023,
because
the
development
charge
pile
has
only
done
every
five
years,
and
that
would
be
the
next
time
they
did.
It
would
be
2024,
which
is
a
year
after
the
light
rail
is
at
Moody's
and
that's.
We
need
to
be
thinking
further
ahead
than
that.
Okay,.
K
Thank
You
mayor
fairly
quickly,
as
we
push
the
Train
note
further
and
further
west
I'm,
really
encouraged
by
the
the
ridership
ridership
uplift
that
you've
described.
It
is
critical
that
we
get
more
of
our
suburban
riders
on
mass
transit.
Are
there
implications
for
system
capacity?
The
overall
I
know
residents
may
be
concerned
about
trains
that
are
full
by
the
time
they
get
inside
the
Greenbelt.
Do
we
have
the
capacity
to
manage
a
lot
more
riders
coming
from
further
and
further
afield?
K
Mr.
mayor,
that's
a
great
question.
We're
fine
in
that
regard
on
a
couple
of
fronts:
there
planning
horizons
30
years
for
for
the
LRT.
You
also
bought
those
trains
that
are
expandable
for
capacity.
They
can
be
lengthened,
you're,
also
designing
the
system,
so
you
can
reduce
the
headway.
We
go
down
to
92nd
headway,
we're
also
buying
some
more
trains
through
the
PTF
program,
so
staff
both
miss
Chi
in
the
long
term
planning
and
my
operational
staff,
always
look
to
the
long
view
and
to
ensure
that
we've
got
whatever
we
build.
K
We're
gonna
have
the
capacity
you're,
also
building
a
light
storage
maintenance
and
facility
at
the
top
of
cork
Sam
Road
there,
which
is
critical
to
getting
trains
deployed
in
a
timely
fashion.
So
it's
all
part
of
the
the
customer
experience
throughout
the
system
at
which
stations
do
we
have
the
capacity
to
start
runs.
K
We
can
start
a
run
from
Lincoln
field,
start
to
run
from
Tony's
pasture,
so
trains
are
deployed
from
Belfast
a
little
bit
from
that
maintenance
facility,
but
they
split
at
Lincoln
fields
with
that
with
stage
2
so
and
then
we
can
do
other
things
with
with
turns
on
trains,
terms
of
peak
loads
and
off
peak
loads,
okay,
No.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it.
Thanks
Jeff.
E
Thank
You
mr.
mayor
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
our
Member
of
Parliament
for
the
Kannada
area
and
as
well
as
your
office
for
obviously
helping
us
to
get
the
funding
needed
to
complete
this
environmental
assessment
so
that
we
could
receive
this
report
today.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
we're
more
than
a
decade
ahead
of
schedule
for
getting
that
work
started.
E
Hopefully,
we
can
now
leverage
this
excellent
report
into
an
ask
of
the
federal
and
provincial
partners
to
get
us
to
the
top
of
the
hill.
I
also
want
to
thank
staff
for
acknowledging
the
importance
of
new
and
emerging
technology
in
this
report,
and
I
should
add
homegrown
technology,
I
hope
as
the
next
step
in
this
process.
We
also
explore
with
potential
partners
the
use
of
driver
assisted
buses
to
significantly
improve
the
service,
not
just
in
Canada
but
Statesville,
bar
Haven
and
elsewhere.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
mayor
aft.
A
H
You,
mr.
mayor
and
congratulations
to
all
my
West
End
colleagues,
so
it's
a
it's
great
news
to
have
this
before
us.
I
think
it's
unexpected
that
we
would
have
at
this
soon,
so
I'm
very
glad
to
see
that,
because
we
are
going
to
see
the
tremendous
uplift
and
uptake
of
transportation
in
a
different
mode
in
our
city
very
very
soon,
and
it's
very
exciting.
H
That
being
said,
we
do
have
the
area's
Bar
Haven
being
number
one
and
the
kinetise
dis
Ville
is
number
two
is
the
major
growth
areas
and
we
have
not
been
focused
on
LRT
for
from
a
development
charge
been
effective,
so
I
echo
councillor,
Wilkinsons
comments
that
way.
I
think
we
need
to
be
nimble
on
that
and
find
a
way,
because
a
tremendous
amount
of
growth
that
we
have
is
certainly
happening
in
the
south
and
the
West
End.
H
Very.
If
you
haven't
been
to
bar
Haven
I
know
many
people
have
not
been
an
open
counsellor.
Leaper
has
been.
We
have
the
great
good
fortune
of
having
the
only
bus,
rapid
transit
corridor
dedicated
corridor
where
it
falls
short,
is
that
Woodruff
and
Hunt
Club
and
I'm
proud
to
be
working
with
you,
mr.
mayor
on
how
we
take
that
little
distance
from
Hunt
Club
to
the
LRT
and
stage
to
a
baseline
station
that
will
make
a
tremendous
difference
and
benefit
keeping
you
today,
I
was
on
Woodruff
Avenue
and
I'm.
H
Looking
at
the
sign,
that's
newly
put
up
in
front
of
a
sports
bike
that
says
high
collision
area.
Well,
guess
what
that's
exactly
where
all
those
700
buses
every
day
get
dumped
right
into
the
middle
of
that
that
that
high
collision
area
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
doing
that
in
advance
of
the
usual
way
we'd
be
proceeding
to
find
out
like
we
did
today
what
the
opportunities
are
for
bar
Haven
as
we're
looking
at
before
Kanade
in
Statesville
today.
Thank
you.
Anyone.
A
Else
wish
to
speak
on
this
just
offer
a
couple
of
comments:
I
think
councilor,
harder
and
Wilkinson
and
and
the
West
Bank
councillors
you
bleeeh
and
con
Elson
theory.
Just
to
recap
a
couple
of
things.
You
know
the
original
plan
for
phase
2
sauce
going
just
to
plaster
leans
in
the
east,
just
really
to
an
empty
field
in
the
south
end
and
just
a
to
Bayshore
at
Algonquin
College
in
the
West
End
and
as
a
result
of
work
that
we've
collectively
done
over
the
last
year
or
so.
A
We've
been
able
to
reach
agreements
with
the
federal
provincial
governments
for
50/50
cost-sharing
between
those
two
levels
of
government
for
the
trim
extension,
which
is
great
news
for
Cumberland
and
Orleans,
and
the
people
in
the
East
End
50/50
cost
arrangement,
with
the
federal
provincial
government
again
for
the
airport
spur
line
to
also
go
to
the
ey
Center
and
then
just
last
week,
a
partnership
between
the
private
sector
through
a
increased
development
charge
levy
and
the
provincial
government,
450
million
dollars
and
thirty
million
dollars
respectively
for
the
south
end.
But
councillor
harder
is
quite
correct.
A
We
still
need
to
finish
that
one
piece
of
the
puzzle
which
we
see
every
day,
I'm
living
that
neck
of
the
woods
out
by
Woodruff,
and
you
see
the
challenge
is
that
the
buses
have
coming
in
getting
back.
You
know
getting
off
the
transit
way
onto
Woodruff
and
then
turning
into
Algonquin
College-
and
you
know
we
were
many
of
us-
were
at
councillors.
Rally
and
councilor
harder
and
I
were
at
the
wonderful
new
addition.
A
So
when
we
announced
the
trim
in
the
airport
looking
for
5050,
there
were
some
skeptics
who
said:
you'll,
never
get
it
done.
You
know
that
you'll
have
to
put
some
city
money
in
and
we
worked
hard
the
rolled
up
our
sleeves
and
we
actually
got
that
done.
Then
we
did
the
same
with
Riverside
south
and
obviously
we
are
going
to
need
the
provincial
and
federal
government
support
to
go
farther
west
into
kanata,
which
I
think
everyone
around
this
table
recognizes.
A
So
there
are
lots
of
options,
but
I
think
as
more
people
see,
the
train
and
I
saw
it
again
today
at
Ottawa
you,
the
more
excitement
there
is
and
the
more
demand
they'll
be
at
the
provincial
and
federal
levels
to
come
on
board
with
their
continued
support.
So
thank
you
to
all
who
have
put
forward
this
motion.
I
know,
councillor
McKinney
I
believe
has
a
direction
of
the
staff.
If
you
would
like
to
introduce
that
now
and
seems
to
be
a
reasonable
suggestion,
councillor
the
floor
is
yours.
F
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr.
mayor
just
you
know,
with
our
official
plan,
guidance
is
provided
to
facilitate
opportunities
to
increase
our
supply
of
affordable
housing
and
that
plan
calls
for
developing
strategies
to
build
that
housing,
affordable
housing.
Those
plans
include
you
know:
the
use
of
municipal
property,
development
of
air
rights
at
transit
stations.
So,
given
the
detailed
response
to
councillor
leapers
recent
inquiry,
I'm
submitting
the
following
direction
to
staff
in
transportation,
services,
Housing,
Services,
corporate
real
estate
and
planning
and
economic
development
that.
F
A
So
that's
the
direction
the
staff
it's
acceptable
agreed.
Thank
you
on
the
motion
carried,
congratulations
and
thank
you
to
our
staff
and
vivi
and
John,
and
all
of
the
folks
that
have
worked
on
this.
This
has
been
a
long
time
coming,
as
you
know,
and
it
was
I
think
very
well
received
by
the
public
at
the
various
open
houses
as
well
disposition
of
items
approved
by
committee
under
delegated
authority
sweeter
than
it
is
optically
ratify
peril.
A
A
A
Carrie,
okay,
thank
you.
That
was
I
think
next
time
it
was
not
councilors
fault.
There
was
a
we
needed
to
add
something
else.
Technically
so
I
appreciate
the
councillors
good
patience
with
with
us
on
that
next
discount,
sermon
at
Santa
by
Councillor
tyranny,
with
respect
to
Cardinal
Creek
community
of
Orleans,
known
as
Park
18,
a
quelle
sir.
A
A
I
don't
know
what's
wrong
with
such
an
innovative
name
like
Park
18a,
it
seems
so
warm
and
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure.
Most
elección
español
de
negative,
the
procedure
we've
received,
none
notice.
The
motion
for
consideration
of
subsequent
meeting
I've
eats
the
most
0.70
Seekonk
councillor
McKenney,
please
sired
by
councillor
leaper
respect,
Thank.
F
You,
mr.
mayor,
this
is
just
a
notice
of
motion
that
council
approve
road
closure
for
Cambridge
Street
north
from
Somerset
Street
to
the
dead
end
from
3:00
p.m.
on
Wednesday
June
13th
to
7:00
p.m.
on
Wednesday,
June
13th
for
the
apartment,
620,
the
event
providing
it
meets
the
requirements,
conditions
and
approvals
of
special
events,
advisory
team.
A
M
A
A
A
R
Thank
You
mr.
chair
just
looking
for
some
detailed
information
about
some
of
the
arterioles
in
my
ward,
so
River
warts
north-south
arterial
roads
are
not
only
used
by
River
Ward
residents,
but
approximately
200,000
residents
who
live
south
of
Hunt
Club.
The
condition
of
these
rows,
which
shuttle
tens
of
thousands
of
vehicles
in
cyclists
every
day
are
in
poor
condition
in
a
number
of
areas
and
are
not
subject
to
repaving
this
year.
R
What
are
the
timelines
to
repave
Hunt
Club
Road
between
Airport
Parkway
in
the
river
Riverside,
between
hon
Club
and
Herron,
Merivale
between
Caldwell
and
Carling
and
Prince
of
Wales,
between
Fisher
and
Meadowlands
and
part
2?
What
is
the
2018
budget
for
pothole
repair
and
how
much
has
been
spent
to
date
and
what
is
the
2018
budget
for
road
resurfacing?
Repaving,
so
I'm?
Looking
for
some
information
in
my
word,
Thank
You,
Jeremy.