►
From YouTube: City Council - 30 November 2022
Description
Reunion du Conseil municipal - le 30 novembre 2022
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
B
C
A
A
A
We're
presenting
and
tabling
this
today,
questions,
debate
and
motions
related
to
the
governance
report
are
not
in
order
today,
as
members
have
not
yet
read
the
report,
but
will
be
in
order
at
our
next
meeting
on
December
7th,
the
city,
clerk
and
staff
will
be
able
to
will
be
available
between
now
and
December
6th.
To
answer
questions
or
receive
any
motions
on
the
report
do
have
do
members
have
any
questions
to
the
clerk
or
his
staff
on
process.
A
Okay,
before
we
receive
the
report,
I
would
like
to
advise
Council
that,
as
in
accordance
with
the
municipal
act
2001
as
amended
by
Bill
3,
the
strong
mayor's
Building
Homes
act,
2022
and
regulations
I
have
delegated
to
Council.
In
writing
the
mayor's
assigned
Powers
with
respect
to
committees
under
section
284.8
of
the
municipal
act
2001.
This
will
provide
for
Council
to
establish
or
dissolve
standing
committees,
appoint
committee
chairs
and
vice
chairs
and
assign
functions
to
committees
for
the
2022
to
2026
term
of
council
through
consideration
of
the
2022-2026
council
governance
review
report.
A
A
A
Seconded
by
counselor
Kitts
is
this
received
and
adopted.
You
see,
okay,
thank
you.
Everyone
now
see
moving
to
item
14
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure.
Our
first
item
is
a
motion
regarding
the
appointment
of
the
interim
city
manager.
So,
first
of
all
on
suspension
of
the
rules.
Is
this
carried
and
then
we'll
introduce
the
motion
so
carried
all
right
again:
councilor
Gower.
If
you
could
move.
G
The
motion-
please
thank
you
and
it's
seconded
by
councilor
dudas,
whereas
in
November
28
2022
Steve
kanalakos
advised
Council
that
he
would
be
resigning
as
city
manager
of
the
city
of
Ottawa,
effective
immediately
and
whereas,
in
accordance
with
the
statutory
officer,
recruitment,
appointment
and
contract
Administration
policy.
It
is
anticipated
that
the
city
will
initiate
a
comprehensive
executive
search
for
a
new
city
manager
in
the
coming
weeks.
G
Under
section
284.5
of
the
municipal
act
2001
to
appoint
an
acting
chief,
administrative
officer
of
the
municipality
in
accordance
with
subsection2e4.13
1
of
the
municipal
act,
2001
and
regulations,
and
whereas
by
virtue
of
bylaw
2019-390
Wendy
Stephenson
May,
retain
her
statutory
role
as
treasurer
for
the
city
of
Ottawa,
while
acting
as
city
manager,
but
requires
an
acting
Chief.
Financial
Officer
to
manage
the
finance
services
department
and
to
whom
those
statutory
duties
may
be
delegated.
G
A
Thank
you,
councilor
Gower,
that
seconded
by
councilor
dudas
I'll,
mention
here
again
that
I
want
to
advise
Council
that
I
have
delegated
power
to
Council.
In
writing.
For
the
purposes
of
considering
and
approving
this
motion
with
respect
to
the
appointment
of
an
interim
city
manager
in
accordance
with
sub
session
284.13
paragraph
one
of
the
municipal
act
2001,
the
clerk
will
post
a
copy
of
the
written
delegation
with
the
minutes
from
this
meeting.
A
H
You
very
much
mayor
colleagues
I
know
all
of
us
have
concerns
about
Bill
23,
which
has
passed
the
motion
as
originally
written
by
counselor
dudas
and
myself
has
been
reflected
or
updated
to
reflect
that
it
has
passed
and,
and
we've
changed
some
of
the
language
to
reflect
further
actions.
Council
would
be
asking
the
province
to
take
if
you
will
bear
with
me
for
just
a
moment.
H
Realm
compromise
the
work
of
the
Urban
Design
review
panel
and
limit
staff's
ability
to
implement
good
urbanism
across
all
building
types
and
whereas
council
is
concerned
about
the
reduction
in
environmental
oversight
that
will
result
in
the
loss
of
diverse
and
mature
ecosystems,
which
will
have
immediate
and
long-term
environmental
and
climate
change
impacts,
including
increased
flooding
risk.
And
whereas
there
are
concerns
regarding
the
changes
to
Parkland
and
development,
charge,
collection
for
supporting
infrastructure
and
transportation.
And
whereas
DC's
development
charges
are
critical
to
build
the
infrastructure
needed
to
support
development.
H
And
if
the
city
doesn't
get
this
funding,
then
residents
may
not
receive
the
infrastructure
they
reasonably
expect
or
property.
Taxes
will
be
need
to
be
raised
in
an
inequate
Manner
and
therefore,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
city
council
requests
that
the
province
delay,
implementation
of
Bill
23,
the
more
homes
built
faster
act,
2022
to
allow
for
more
fulsome
analysis
and
meaningful
consultation
and
collaboration
with
municipalities
and
other
stakeholders,
and
be
it
further
resolved.
H
That
city
council
request
the
province
to
consider
further
amendments
to
Bill
23
to
preserve
the
city's
high
performance
development,
standard,
Parkland,
Provisions,
Community
benefits,
charges
and
development
charges
to
facilitate
responsible
growth
and
be
it
further
resolved.
City
council
requests
that
the
province
allow
a
review
of
the
reduction
in
environmental
oversight
that
will
have
immediate
and
long-term
environmental
impacts,
such
as
increased
flooding
risk
and
be
it
further
resolved.
City
council
requests.
H
The
Province
commit
to
considering
amendments
to
the
planning
act
to
enable
the
implementation
of
inclusionary
zoning
across
the
city
and
incorporate
definitions
of
affordable
housing
that
respond
to
low
and
moderate
household
income
and
be
it
further
resolve.
City
council
direct,
the
city
manager
and
the
City
Treasurer
make
public
the
financial
impacts
of
Bill
23
and
outlined
the
impact
on
specific
capital
projects
that
will
need
to
be
deferred
or
delayed
in
each
Ward
and
be
it
further.
H
Resolves
city
council
requests,
The,
Province
and
act
a
regulation
to
permit
the
use
of
conditional
zoning
paragraph
71,
124
and
subsection
3416
of
the
planning
act
and
be
it
further
resolved.
City
council
requests.
The
Province
delay
the
implementation
of
refunds
for
development
applications
pursuant
to
Bill
109.
H
In
light
of
the
significant
changes
to
the
planning
regulations
and
internal
City
processes
regarding
development
and
be
it
further
resolved
that
the
province
will
expedite
ongoing
consultation
with
municipalities
to
determine
a
province-wide
framework
to
protect
renters
who
have
low
household
income
and
existing
affordable
rental
stock
and
be
it
further
resolved.
City
council
requests
that
the
provincial
government
provide
additional
funding
and
funding
tools
to
the
city
matching
the
amount
of
Revenue
lost
through
development
charges.
H
Community
benefits,
charges
and
section
42
of
the
planning
act
in
Bill
23
to
ensure
the
services
needed
to
facilitate
growth,
continue
to
be
delivered
and
be
it
further
resolved
that
the
province
reconsider,
proposed
changes
to
the
Ontario
Heritage
act
and
its
regulations
and
convene
a
working
group
with
municipalities
to
review
this
issue.
Colleagues,
obviously
this
does
a
lot
with
a
single
motion,
but
I
know
that
we
have
concerns
right
across
the
full
gamut
of
the
planning
act.
Changes
and
other
act
changes
that
the
province
has
passed
with
Bill
23.
mayor.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you
to
the
Mover
for
introducing
this
motion.
I
think
it
covers
many
of
the
concerns
that
we've
heard
from
the
community
and
other
stakeholders
I
wanted
to
ask
staff
about
your
plans
over
the
coming
days
or
weeks
in
terms
of
helping
to
interpret
the
legislation
and
what
it
means
for
for
planning
in
our
city.
What
what's
planned
over
the
next
little
bit.
I
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
certainly,
staff
are
are
working
through
the
the
changes.
There
will
be
a
an
update
memo
to
Council
in
the
coming
days
in
terms
of
what
happened
through
the
Royal
ascent
and
the
passing
of
Bill
23.
There
were
a
few
changes
that
were
made
that
we
will
highlight
it's
our
last
memorandum.
I
We're
also
working
to
you
know,
start
to
track
some
of
the
financial
impacts,
which
will
take
time,
there's
unknown
elements
of
that.
That
will
will
take
some
time
to
to
work
through
and
in
terms
of
the
impact
on
our
on
our
processes
and
reports.
We
expect
to
be
coming
back
to
you
in
q1,
with
a
more
fulsome
response.
G
I
Thank
you
for
the
question:
Mr
Mayor.
Yes,
we
are
planning
to
develop
a
site
on,
engage
Ottawa.
There's
a
lot
of
questions
around
Bill
23
that
communities
residents
all
stakeholders
have
so
we're
working.
You
know
to
prepare
a
free,
frequently
Asked
question
page
a
lot
of
the
memos.
The
council
will
be
reposited
there
and
and
further
analysis
as
we
develop
it.
So,
yes,
we
are
working
on
that.
Okay,.
D
D
No
one
is
disputing
that
issue,
but
the
proposed
and
now
the
past
legislation
is
going
to
be
detrimental
to
municipalities
across
this
province
and
the
financial
impacts,
as
our
now
acting
city
manager
laid
out
in
a
previous
memo
to
us,
are
very
clear.
The
the
impacts
will
be
significant,
so
I,
just
a
few
questions.
D
Mayor
I'd
like
to
know
if
staff,
through
their
workings
with
their
counterparts
across
this
province,
if
they've
heard
whether
or
not
the
province
has
even
acknowledged
that
there
will
be
significant
financial
impacts
and
downloads
to
the
municipalities
and
whether
or
not
the
province
has
acknowledged
any
type
of
financial
offset.
That
may
come
to
municipalities,
recognizing
that
there
are
some
significant
financial
or
Revenue
offlays
because
of
the
development
charges
in
particular.
So
what
are
they
hearing
through
their
professional
counterparts?.
I
Mr
Mayor
I'll
start,
and
perhaps
the
city
manager
may
add
on
in
terms
of
I,
think
I
think
the
counselor
has
characterized
it
well.
The
the
response
has
been
very
unified
across
the
Province,
from
municipalities
from
the
organizations
such
as
the
caos
city,
treasurers,
planning,
Commissioners,
you're,
right,
I've,
never
seen
a
more
unified
response
to
such
legislation
and
the
financial
impacts
have
been
front
and
center
on
all
those
responses.
I
D
D
But
my
expectations
mayor
is
that
we
will
send
communication
to
the
minister
of
Municipal,
Affairs
and
Housing
that
will
send
our
Communications
to
the
premier
that
we
will
send
Communications
to
the
party
leaders
of
the
NDP,
liberal
and
green
parties
that
we
will
copy
local
mpps
in
the
Ottawa
area,
and
I
would
also
like
to
request
that
Amo
get
a
copy
of
our
past
motion
as
well.
To
make
sure
Amo
is
aware
of
the
city
of
Ottawa
position.
Thank
you,
mayor.
J
Thanks
very
much
mayor,
thank
you
to
the
Mover
and
secondary
of
the
motion.
This
is
the
latest
in
a
series
of
bills,
at
the
provincial
level
that
are
going
to
affect
municipalities
in
a
very
negative
way.
I
know
our
clerk's
office
is
dealing
with
this.
Our
finance
staff
are
dealing
with.
This
are
planning
staff
are
all
dealing
with
this.
Now
it
goes
along
with
changes
to
bill
with
Bill
39,
which
is
weaving
its
way
through
the
legislature.
J
So
the
cost
to
municipalities
I
mean
really.
What
this
is
is
a
tax
increase
for
ratepayers
all
across
the
province
of
Ontario.
We
were
heading
in
a
direction
of
changing
our
R1
or
R2
through
the
comprehensive
zoning
bile
review.
Anyone
on
planning
committee
knew
that
we
were
going
in
that
direction
and
in
some
cases,
I
think
there
was
going
to
be
stronger
changes
while
keeping
development
charges
and
maybe
changing
those
charges.
There
were
going
to
be
stronger
changes
to
R1
and
R2
in
that
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw
review.
J
Without
the
negative
impact
on
repairs
and
so
I
think
the
municipality
should
be,
you
know
if
we
have
tax
increases
as
a
result
of
what
the
province
is
doing
here,
we
should
call
that
the
Doug
Ford
provincial
Conservative
tax
increase.
We
should
put
it
right
on
the
tax
bill.
This
is
how
much
your
taxes
are
going
up,
because
they're
downloading
Municipal
costs
onto
the
city
and
providing
more
financial
support
to
large
development
corporations
through
Urban
boundary
sprawl
and
through
development
charge
reductions.
J
So
I
think
you
know
I
appreciate
this
motion
happy
to
support
it,
but
I
think
our
staff.
We
need
to
do
all
we
can
to
to
resist
this
at
the
local
level
and
spell
it
out
for
why
there's
pressure
on
our
taxes
and
where
it's
coming
from,
and
we
need
to
do
that
through
dating
of
lands
that
are
being
added
as
well.
J
As
you
know,
the
concerns
around
the
additional
taxes
coming
from
Bill
23
and,
of
course
the
mayor
has
been
steadfast
and
saying,
we'll
not
use
those
those
powers
of
a
third
being
a
majority
and
appreciate
those
those
comments.
I
think
that's
part
of
of
pushing
back
on
on
some
of
this,
these
this
legislative
moves
that
are
not
helpful
for
our
municipality
or
our
ratepayers
in
Ottawa,
so
appreciate
the
the
motion
and
happy
to
support
us
today.
Thanks
mayor.
K
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
that.
I
will
be
supporting
this
motion.
I
guess.
The
only
thing
I'm
not
happy
about
is
that
there's
so
much
in
this
motion.
I
think
I
would
have
preferred
to
see
some
of
this
stuff
separated
out
to
make
more
impact.
I
think
you
know
we're
trying
to
make
a
major
statement
here
that
we're
not
happy
with
a
lot
of
it.
We're
not
happy
with
the
way
it
was
brought
about
the
legislation.
That's
just
not
the
way.
We
do
things
or
should
do
things.
K
However,
I
think
there's
so
many
important
points
in
this
motion
that
some
of
it
might
get
lost
and
I.
Just
wonder
really.
This
is
a
boring
question
to
the
clerk,
but
the
way
this
is
written
does
this
stop
us
from
coming
forward
with
any
individual
emotions
on
specific
topics,
because
it's
all
in
one
now
and
it
would
just
be
redundant
if
we
brought
forward
a
separate
motion
on
a
topic.
L
I
M
What
affordable
housing
actually
is
in
this
bill?
I
think
we
can
agree
that
there
are
that
there
are
really
good
reasons
to
sometimes
discount
development
charges
for
the
kind
of
development
that
we
want
to
see
specifically
deeply
affordable
housing.
But
if
someone
is
representing
one
of
the
neighborhoods
in
the
city
with
the
highest
rate
of
poverty,
I'm
very
concerned
about
about
this
incredibly
broad
category,
including
attainable
housing,
which
is
not
even
a
term,
that's
that
that's
defined
in
the
bill,
essentially
making
this
a
huge
cash
grab
for
developers.
M
So
I'm
I'm
very
committed
to
working
with
developers
to
build
deeply
affordable
housing
in
our
community,
but
to
further
dilute
what
that
actually
means
does
a
real
disservice
to
the
people
living
in
poverty
in
our
community.
Just
one
question
to
City
staff:
do
we
have
any
sense
of
what
the
global
that,
if
we
wanted
to
replace
the
income
to
the
city
that
would
be
lost
from
this
bill?
What
that
would
represent
in
terms
of
a
percentage
tax
increase.
N
F
F
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
my
colleague
about
what
the
goal
is
now
that
the
bill
has
been
passed
and
it
seems
like
a
you
know.
The
the
image
I
have
is
that
a
wrecking
ball
is
is
placed
on
the
field
and
my
goal
now
is
whether
I
can
delay,
because
if
this
motion
is
about
delaying
the
implementation
of
the
bill,
what
might
happen
during
that
delay?
F
And
and
how
can
we
best
be
served
by
it
and
whether
that
means
we
delay
the
wrecking
ball
from
swinging
or
if
we
diminish
the
wrecking
ball
in
size
and
therefore
impact.
So
my
question
I'm
not
sure
if
my
question
is
to
staff
or
to
the
mayor
to
council,
but
staff
was
making
reference
to
the
fact
that
we
have
an
unprecedented
United
response
from
municipalities
in
response
to
Bill,
23
and
I.
Think
we
can
and
should
take
advantage
of
that
unified
response
and
so
I
think.
F
My
question
is
similar
to
how
there
was
response
to
Bill
28
and
how
that
unified
response
led
to
a
repeal
of
that
bill.
Are
there
initiatives
either
from
staff,
or
will
there
be
initiatives
from
Council
to
take
advantage
of
that
unified
response
among
municipalities
and
work
with
municipalities
to
somehow
present
a
unified
front,
and
can
that
be
a
tangible
action
that
either
staff
or
we
take
forward.
F
Question
because
I
I,
whether
it's
shall
ask
staff
because
staff
has
colleagues,
but
we
have
colleagues
as
well
so
I'll
offer
I'll
direct.
My
question
to
staff.
Is
there
an
opportunity
and
are
we
taking
advantage
of
an
opportunity
to
work
with
your
counterparts
to
take
advantage
of
the
unified
response
that
you
are
seeing
from
municipalities
across
the
province.
I
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
In
terms
of
the
question.
Certainly
we
are
working.
You
know
through
our
various
professional
organizations
we
heard
Amo
has
weighed
in
various.
You
know
the
conservation
authorities
Urban
Design
review
panels.
There
have
been
unified
submissions
made
across
the
province
so
that
this
this
motion,
I
think,
would
would
build
on
those
efforts
and
continue
those
efforts.
I
Until
you
know
the
bill
has
not
been
proclaimed
as
of
yet
so
certainly
we're.
We
are
continuing
to
share
information
with
our
colleagues
across
the
province,
and
you
know
the
messaging
is,
is
being
informed
by
that
in
terms
of
websites
and
pushing
out
social
media.
That's
another
aspect
that
that's
being
worked
on
and
we're
we're
sharing
information
across
the
province.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
answers
your
question
completely,
but
thank.
O
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
Mayor,
thanks
to
the
Mover
and
secondary
I,
agree
with
much
of
what's
what's
in
this
motion
a
great
deal
of
what's
in
this
motion,
I'm
very
concerned
with
the
tax
increases
that
may
be
required
to
make
up
the
difference
here.
My
residents
in
the
city
can't
afford
another
three
percent
tax
increase
on
whatever
else
we
may
be
discussing
throughout
this
term.
My
well-documented
reasons
for
not
supporting
inclusionary
zoning.
O
The
way
that
our
city
has
decided
to
structure
it
without
incentives
precludes
me
for
being
able
to
support
the
motion.
However,
a
direction
to
staff
moved
at
the
meeting
where
inclusionary
zoning
was
adopted
has
not
been
responded
to
and
remains
outstanding
right
now.
So,
in
my
opinion,
as
written
in
the
Ottawa
context,
Iz
is
a
bad
policy
that
will
not
achieve
the
stated
outcomes
and
will
in
fact
have
the
reverse
effect,
as
it
has
in
San,
Francisco,
California
and
Portland
Oregon.
O
So
I
can
in
good
conscience,
support
this
motion,
despite
the
fact
that
I
agree
with
so
much
of
what's
in
it,
I
agree
with
my
friend
from
Canada
North
that
this
would
have
been
better
as
separate
motions
and
rather
not
throw
the
baby
out
with
the
bath
water
on
this,
but
I
can't
be
a
party
to
requesting
that
we
apply
a
poor
policy
to
a
larger
area,
possibly
worsening
the
situation
that
we're
already
in
and
again.
Unfortunately,
my
descent
will
have
a
very
similar
outcome
to
this
motion
as
a
whole.
Very
little.
P
P
The
newly
passed
law
puts
at
risk
ottawa's
ability
to
build
and
maintain
the
infrastructure
that
our
residents
expect
the
bill
simply
transfers
the
cost
of
growth
from
developers
to
Residents
by
eliminating
development
charges.
The
province
has
put
us
in
an
impossible
situation.
We
will
not
have
enough
Revenue
to
pay
for
our
infrastructure
needs.
Bill
23
will
deplete
the
city's
budget
and
cost
Ottawa
over
60
million
dollars
in
Lost
estimated
Revenue
per
year
by
2025..
P
These
are
the
much
needed
dollars
that
we
use
to
build.
Parks,
maintain
roads
and
improve
public
transit
under
the
new
bill.
The
city
will
not
have
the
financial
resources
to
provide
local
infrastructure
to
facilitate
new
development,
leading
to
both
increased
costs
for
taxpayers,
as
well
as
less
infrastructure.
As
we
know,
development
charges
are
earmarked
for
capital
projects
such
as
Bridges
fire
stations
and
and
community,
and
recreational
facilities
that
allow
our
city
to
grow.
P
Bill
23
eliminates
those
development
charges
purportedly
to
incentivize
developers,
but
we
know
that
all
this
bill
does
is
take
money
earmarked
to
improve
the
community
and
gives
it
directly
to
developers
without
any
guarantee
that
it
will
lower
the
costs
of
housing,
increase
the
tempo
of
construction
or
result
in
new,
affordable
housing.
The
bill
will
force
this
Council
to
undertake
rigorous
Universal
review
of
city
finances.
P
We
know
market
conditions
determine
the
cost
of
housing,
not
the
cost
to
build
eliminating
development
charges,
won't
reduce
housing
prices,
but
will
only
guarantee
that
the
city
will
have
to
examine
the
starkest
choice
between
exponential
property
tax
increases
or
reductions
in
capital
projects
and
city
services
to
make
up
the
revenue
shortfall
bill.
23
is
also
an
affront
to
Residents,
since
it
removes
their
capacity
to
meaningfully
engage
in
a
fair
and
transparent
urban
planning
process.
P
Due
to
the
Law's
removal,
a
planning
file
considerations,
the
new
legislation
will
also
result
in
the
loss
of
built
Heritage
protections
and
will
facilitate
sprawl
and
ecologically
vulnerable
areas
such
as
Wetlands.
While
we
can
all
agree
on
the
need
for
more
affordable
homes,
it
is
evident
that
this
legislation
will
not
achieve
this
goal.
The
cost
to
the
environment,
to
the
municipal,
Finance
structure
and,
most
importantly,
to
our
Democratic
rights,
is
too
high
a
price
to
pay.
This
legislation
needs
to
be
opposed
vigorously
and
therefore
I'm
in
full
support
of
this
motion.
Thank
you,
mayor.
Q
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
and
thank
you
to
the
Mover
and
seconder
on
this
motion
and
welcome
everyone
to
our
first
day
of
council
I'm,
very
encouraged
to
be
sitting
at
the
table
with
everyone.
I
just
wanted
to
put
forward
that.
We
have
acknowledged
that
this
bill
has
passed,
and
so
now
it
becomes
a
question
of
leadership
as
to
how
we
move
forward
to
address
the
goals
that
we
espouse.
Q
So
we
do
have
options
on
the
table
here
for
the
city
of
Ottawa
to
further
our
affordable
housing
goals,
but
it
will
require
bold
political
leadership
to
perhaps
remove
land
out
of
the
purview
of
the
province
and
decide
that
someone
else
will
be
the
steward
of
this
land.
So
I
look
forward
to
to
furthering
the
conversation
on
non-market
housing.
I
think
it
could
be
an
interesting
opportunity
for
us.
Thank
you.
H
Just
I'll
express
my
gratitude
to
colleagues
for
their
strong
support
for
this
motion.
The
and
I
would
point
out
as
well.
The
city
of
Ottawa
has
not
been
a
laggard
in
terms
of
approving
new
housing.
My
my
challenge
to
the
province
had
we
had
a
full
process
and
a
good
discussion
in
the
province
about
whether
or
not
this
bill
is
needed
would
be
to
put
on
the
table
the
evidence
that
demonstrates
this
bill
is
actually
needed.
H
I
I
still
think
about
the
planning
committee
meeting
that
was
held
the
last
planning
committee
meeting
of
the
last
term
of
Council,
in
which
I
believe
something
like
the
172
floors
of
new
high-rise
building
were
approved
in
kitchen
sippy
Ward
alone.
There
are
thousands
of
units
that
have
been
approved
to
be
built
that
are
not
moving
forward.
My
my
question
to
the
premier
would
be:
is
the
public
interest
being
served
by
getting
the
tools
that
we
need
in
order
to
build
a
sustainable
City
in
order
to
solve
a
problem
that
I
am
not
convinced
exists?
R
R
L
D
G
I
T
M
T
A
J
T
I
just
want
to
thank
you
and
I
want
to
thank
Council
I
love
representing
the
city
of
Ottawa
at
fcm
and
again
having
Sean
and
Ariel
a
part
of
council
now
is
something
monumentous.
It's
going
to
be
great
their
participation
within
fcm
over
the
next
four
years.
So
thank
you
very
much
councilman
Eric
for
moving
that
motion.
A
E
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
Ottawa
city
council
opposes
Bill
39
and
requests
that
the
province
of
Ontario
maintain
the
requirement
under
the
municipal
act,
2001
to
have
majority
approval,
50,
plus
one
to
pass
by
law
or
resolution
at
Ottawa
city
council
and
be
further
resolved.
That
a
copy
of
this
motion
be
sent
to
the
premier
of
Ontario,
the
minister
of
Municipal
Affairs
and
Housing,
and
the
clerk
of
the
standing
committee
of
Heritage
infrastructure
and
cultural
policy
for
distribution
to
committee
members.
Thank
you.
A
A
R
But
whereas
the
documentation
be
sent
to
the
property
owners
has
not
been
finalized,
as
thus
additional
time
is
required
to
allow
for
the
property
owners
to
request.
The
funding
therefore
be
a
resolved
at
the
deadline
for
the
property
owners
to
request
funding
pursuing
to
council
item
24.7
adopted
on
June
22nd
22
to
be
extended
to
be
the
end
of
the
calendar
months.
That
is
90
days
after
information
package
is
mailed
to
the
resident
Mr
Mayor.
Thank
you.
A
S
S
My
name
is
Tim
Mark
I'm
with
legal
services.
There's
a
this
Council
carried
a
demotion
in
June
which
allows
for
a
compensation
package
or
compensation
amount
to
be
paid
to
the
owners
in
portions
of
Country
Hill
because,
as
the
motion
says,
they
are
not
getting
the
ditches.
The
landscape
ditches
that
they
expect
the
deadline
for
requesting
the
package
is
December.
31St
staff
have
not
yet
sent
out
the
material
there
was
information
to
Garner
and
so
to
ensure
that
the
residents
have
an
adequate
time
to
respond.
S
S
R
Mr
Mayor
just
to
clarify
this
subdivision,
we
own
it
and
there's
no
other
situation
in
the
city
of
Ottawa.
We
had
we
inherited
this
and
we
tried
to
clean
the
Osgood
Township
inheritance
that
we
got
since
amalgamation.
Just
clarification
to
my
colleague,
we
already
discussed
that
and
we've
done,
we
put
the
motion
forward.
We
have
the
package
highlighted
in
the
motion,
we're
just
going
to
extend
the
time,
because
if
you
send
them,
if
you
mail
the.
R
A
K
K
K
First
bullet:
the
need
to
ensure
that
the
police,
Service
Board
is
representative
of
the
area.
It
serves.
Having
regard
for
the
diversity
of
the
population
in
the
area.
Second,
bullet:
the
need
for
the
Police
Service
Board
to
have
members
with
the
prescribed
competencies
if
any
and
third
bullet
any
applicable
diversity
plan,
and
whereas
the
community
safety
and
policing
act
2019.
K
Therefore
be
it
resolved
that
Council
approve
an
increase
in
the
honorarium
for
a
public
member
of
the
Ottawa
Police
Services
Board,
who
was
elected
as
chair
to
54
4000,
to
be
funded
from
the
existing
honorarium
and
the
council
Administration
budget
credit.
That
would
otherwise
go
to
the
constituency
services
budget
of
a
member
of
council
who
was
elected
as
chair
of
the
board
and
be
it
further
resolve
that
Council
direct
the
office
of
the
city
clerk
to
revise
the
recruitment
process
and
advertisements
for
the
auto
Police
Services
Board
public
member.
K
To
reflect
that
Council
May
recommend
to
the
board
that
this
public
member
be
appointed
as
chair
and
that
the
candidate
recommended
for
appointment
May
be
required
to
undertake
a
police
records
check
and
be
it
further
resolved
that
the
selection
panel
for
the
Ottawa
Police
Services
Board
be
directed
to
take
into
account
the
provisions
of
the
community
safety
and
policing
act.
2019.
When
recommending
the
appointments
due
Council.
O
I'll
do
the
same,
so
we
can
get
out
of
the
way
for
the
next
meeting.
So
whereas
the
alcohol
and
Gaming
Commission
of
Ontario
has
introduced
a
manufacturer's,
limited
liquor,
sales
license
also
known
as
a
buy.
The
glass
license
to
permit
Ontario
alcoholic
beverage
producers
that
already
hold
a
manufacturer's
license
from
the
AGCO
to
sell
and
serve
their
own
beverages
to
patients
patrons
for
consumption
in
single
servings
at
their
manufacturing
sites
under
certain
conditions
and
whereas
because
buy
the
glass
license,
applicants
are
exempt
from
the
public
advertising
process.
O
The
glass
license
therefore
be
resolved
that
the
city
hereby
supports
the
application
of
any
manufacturer
already
duly
licensed
by
the
AGCO
in
the
city
of
Ottawa,
seeking
a
manufacturer's,
limited
liquor.
Sales
license
by
the
glass
license
from
the
AGCO
until
revoked
by
Council
or
the
AGCO
changes
the
requirements.
Thank
you
very
much.