►
From YouTube: City Council meeting - 9 novembre 2022
Description
City Council meeting - 9 novembre 2022
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
B
B
B
B
And
supporting
local
and
National
organizations
in
the
1980s
Gail
became
manager
of
finance
and
administration
at
The,
Cooperative
housing
Federation
of
Canada,
probably
worked
with
Harvey
for
some
time.
Everyone
knows
Harvey
and
played
a
vital
role
in
bringing
affordable,
Community
controlled
housing
to
a
quarter
of
a
million
Canadians.
Her
calm
and
sensible
approach,
combined
with
her
financial
Acumen,
helps
stabilize
the
operations
of
the
organization
during
a
period
of
rampant
Country-Wide
growth.
As
chair
of
the
Ottawa
Community
Credit
Union
Gail
was
instrumental
in
guiding
its
transition
to
CS,
Credit,
Union
and
later
alternative
savings.
B
She
served
on
the
founding
Board
of
the
direct
directors
of
the
abuin
Cooperative,
a
not-for-profit
that
provides
safe
and
affordable
housing
to
a
diverse
membership.
The
co-op
was
created
by
a
group
of
lgbtq2
Plus
members
to
provide
safer
and
secure
housing
for
the
gay
and
queer
Community,
along
with
other
my
minorized
groups
for
the
betterment
of
our
society.
Putting
your
financial
expertise
to
this
at
the
service
of
our
conviction
scale
was
treasurer
of
the
Ottawa
Community
Housing
Corporation.
In
the
late
80s
and
90s.
B
B
Gail
has
has
rejected
invitations
to
pursue
a
more
lucrative
business
career
choosing
instead
to
reserve
her
talents
for
her
community
she's
been
a
fierce
advocate
for
more
affordable
housing
and
her
commitment
to
social
justice
has
been
prominent
and
unwavering
for
your
exceptional
volunteerism
Gail
and
your
significant
contribution
to
the
community.
It's
my
pleasure
to
present
you,
along
with
your
counselor
councilor
McKinney,
the
mayor,
City
Builder
award,
and
we
thank
you
for
your
wonderful
contributions
to
estacio.
E
F
Thank
you,
mayor
Watson,
for
your
kind
words,
and
for
this
honor
and
good
morning,
counselors
and
citizens
of
Ottawa
friends
and
family
I'm
a
bit
shocked
at
receiving
this
award.
Actually
because
there
are
so
many
others
in
Ottawa
doing
Splendid
work
with
a
lot
more
impact
than
I've
been
able
to
achieve.
Despite
the
fact
that
I've
been
a
part
of
a
large
group
trying
to
provide
affordable
housing
in
Ottawa
for
some
35
years,
we
still
have
a
serious
homelessness
problem
and
affordability
is
beyond
the
reach
of
too
many.
F
Nevertheless,
it's
heartwarming
to
be
recognized
for
my
small
contribution
to
these
organizations
that
I've
worked
with
I've
enjoyed,
all
of
them,
whether
they
concerned
housing
or
other
issues.
I
guess,
if
I've
learned
anything
from
the
experience
of
being
a
volunteer
in
our
community,
it's
that
being
a
volunteer
is
really
really
important.
I
highly
recommend
it
not
only
because
these
organizations
need
competent
people,
but
also
because
it
is
very
fulfilling
when
your
work
is
appreciated.
Even
if
your
efforts
aren't
always
successful.
F
Like
me,
you
may
be
involved
with
groups
that
face
serious
changes,
challenges
I
should
say,
but
even
those
enhance
your
capacities,
which
you
then
can
have
more
to
give
to
share
to
other
organizations
in
the
future.
Volunteer
work
broadens
one's
own
experience
as
well
as
being
helpful
to
others.
So
I
challenge
all
of
you
to
volunteer
at
an
organization
to
enable
yourself
to
express
your
passion
and
someone
who
values
your
contribution
again.
Thank
you
very
much,
mayor
Watson
and
thanks
very
much
for
those
people
who
recommended
me
for
this
award.
I,
really
appreciate
it.
F
B
Thank
you
very
much
Galen,
it's
great
to
have
your
friends
and
family
with
you
here
today.
I
know
the
pleasure
presenting
our
final
mayor's
City
Builder
award
for
this
term
of
council
to
Rachelle
liqueur
I'd,
welcome
Cumberland
Ward,
councilor
Catherine
Kitts
to
join
us
for
the
presentation
and
ask
Rochelle
to
come
forward.
Bonjour
bie
Avenue.
B
After
retiring
from
the
public
service
in
2000,
Rochelle
became
involved
in
the
Portobello
South
Community
Development
Association,
which
is
now
the
greater
Avalon
Community
Association.
She
became
its
secretary
in
2008
and
has
chaired
the
Community
Association
since
2018.
Rochelle
has
been
the
voice
of
the
association
and
advocating
for
major
files
in
her
community
and
her
efforts
and
those
of
her
team
reach.
Far
beyond
greater
Avalon.
She
organized
many
community
building
events,
including
the
local
community
barbecue
and
the
FED
Franco
Ontarian
organized
as
part
of
the
franklintarian
day.
C
B
G
B
For
us,
with
Avalon
in
June
of
this
year,
city
council
unanimously
approved
a
land
exchange
with
regional
group
to
preserve
this
cherished
Urban
forest
in
the
Avalon
neighborhood.
Well
done.
This
positive
outcome
would
not
have
been
possible
without
the
tireless
advocacy
of
the
community,
led
by
the
greater
Avalon
Community
Association
and
its
president.
Rochelle
Rochelle
has
also
been
instrumental
in
implementing
many
wonderful
initiatives
enjoyed
by
the
community,
including
yoga
in
the
park.
B
The
maintenance
of
two
popular
outdoor
rinks
community
garage
sales
and
cleaning
the
capital
awards
for
knowledge
and
experience
in
the
neighborhood
has
ensured
successful
advocacy
on
behalf
of
the
Community
Association
on
development
files
and
improved
infrastructure
in
South
Orleans.
Our
tarless
advocacy
on
behalf
of
the
community
is
a
testament
to
her
belief
in
creating
a
Greener,
more
livable
community.
C
B
B
C
One
one
project
was
to
preserve
a
forest.
Another
was
to
to
plant
trees
or
to
maintain
skating.
Rinks
I
received
a
lot
of
help
from
my
loved
ones
and
from
the
community
I'd
like
to
thank
my
family
and
my
husband
to
especially
my
husband
who
supported
me
and
who,
who
has
always
been
there
to
advise
me
and
who
have
been
very,
very
patient
with
me
without
them,
and
without
the
help
of
my
husband,
I
could
not
have
done
what
I
have
done.
I
Who
supported
the
land
transfer
for
the
knotwoods?
Thank
you
so
much
everyone
around
the
table.
It's
really
appreciated
and
we're
going
to
do
something
really
beautiful
with
that
for
us.
I
can
promise
you
that
next
year
we
hope
to
dedicate
this
five
acre,
woodlot
or
Forest
as
a
healing
Forest
reconciliation,
slash,
Meditation
Center
for
both
indigenous
and
non-indigenous
people.
I
Thank
you.
Catherine
and
I
wish
you
the
best
in
this
new
term
of
office.
Thank
you
to
all
the
volunteers,
especially
and
organizations
who
worked
relentlessly
to
make
this
city
a
wonderful
place
to
live
work
shop
and
play
I.
I
share
this
award
with
all
the
volunteers
and
everyone
in
the
community
that
that
helped
out
with
this,
with
all
the
accomplishments
that
we've
that
we've
done
messages.
J
K
B
G
B
B
O
B
J
G
I
A
A
A
G
B
B
Q
Q
We
not
want
a
permanent
City
staff
or
someone
from
a
Social
Services
Agency
in
those
spaces,
particularly
when
there
are
a
lot
of
families,
so
I'm
I'm,
just
seeking
a
bit
of
clarity
on
finding
the
the
response
is
a
little
it
details.
What
we
we
have
in
place
and
I'm
not
challenging
that
I'm
more
curious
about
hindsight.
If
we
could
look
at
providing
more
on-site
support
proactively.
S
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
so
the
the
inquiry
response
speaks
to
the
things
that
we've
been
doing
through
the
pandemic
and
I
think
what
we've
experienced
through
the
covid
pandemic,
particularly
for
families
and
singles,
is
increasing
needs
in
our
community
for
temporary
housing.
So
many
of
the
things
that
we
have
had
to
put
in
place,
you
know
have
been
to
respond
to
this
temporary
nature.
S
As
we
are
coming
out
of
the
pandemic,
we
really
are
starting
to
re-look
at
the
supports
and
services
that
we
need
in
order
to
be
able
to
support
and
the
appropriate
supports
that
we
need
for
the
city
in
the
long
term,
around
our
emergency,
shelter
and
our
emergency
housing
needs.
Our
transition
plan
that
Council
approved
in
the
spring
was
really
about
transitioning
out
of
covid,
and
how
do
we
move
out
of
our
temporary
emergency
situations
because,
as
you're
aware,
we're
still
running
a
number
of
temporary
measures?
S
So
as
we
look
at
that
and
move
forward
the
existing
temporary
measures
that
are
reported
in
the
memo
and
that
we'll
continue
to
think
about
as
we
move
into
the
future,
we
are
looking
at.
How
do
we
sustain
that?
In
the
longer
term,
looking
at
potentially
better
accommodations
better
supports,
but
then
better
wraparound
supports
with
our
community
to
do
that.
Okay,.
S
Thank
you
Mr
Mayor,
so
we
have
written
to
the
province
for
the
extension
of
funding
into
the
new
year
around
our
social
service,
Relief,
Fund
or
extending
of
temporary
measures
and
measures
that
we
need
in
the
city
around
that
response.
We've
had
initial
conversations
with
the
ministry
Administration
staff
on
that
need
and
have
detailed
that
need
there's
been
a
number
of
tables
that
have
been
convened,
provincially
around
the
needs
coming
out
of
covid,
particularly
around
families
and
singles
experiencing
homelessness.
S
B
B
U
The
divisional
Court
set
aside
council's
decision.
With
regards
to
the
first
Integrity
commissioner's
report.
However,
the
court
itself
encodes
the
same
penalty
of
270
days,
suspension
of
renumeration
on
councilor
shirelli
and
whereas
on
November,
25th,
2020,
counselor,
Council,
considered
and
approved
recommendations
set
out
in
the
Integrity
commissioner's
second
report.
U
And
whereas
the
Integrity
commissioner,
in
her
report,
entitled
report
to
Council
on
an
inquiry
respecting
the
conduct
of
councilor
shirelli,
has
found.
The
constant
shirelli
has
contravened
sections
four
and
seven
of
the
code
of
conduct
from
members
of
council
and
has
recommended
Council
suspend
the
renumeration
to
be
paid
to
the
respondent
in
respect
of
his
Service
as
a
member
of
council
for
90
days,
and
whereas
the
2018-2022
terminal
Council
ends
on
November,
14,
2022
and
Council.
U
Midterm
governance
review,
which
is
paid
to
a
member
upon
leaving
office
at
the
end
of
the
term,
whether
by
defeat
or
retirement,
equivalent
to
one
month's
pay
for
each
consecutive
year,
served
on
Ottawa
city
council
to
a
maximum
of
six
months
and
which
is
reported
to
council
as
part
of
election
elected
officials.
Remuneration
in
accordance
with
Section
284
of
the
municipal
act.
U
2001.,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
suspension
of
remuneration
for
councilor
shirelli
commence
effective,
November,
9th
2022
to
be
made
up
of
the
member
salary
to
be
paid
to
the
end
of
the
term
of
council.
With
the
remaining
balance
to
be
deducted
from
the
transition
assistance
allowance,
representing
a
combined
total
of
90
days
worth
of
suspended
remuneration
and
be
further
resolved.
The
council
approved
the
city's
Chief
Financial
Officer,
be
directed
to
consult
with
the
general
manager
of
community
and
social
services
and
invest
in
US
similar
manner.
U
The
total
remaining
numeration
being
suspended
from
member
of
council
due
to
the
contraventions
of
section
4
and
section
7
of
the
code
of
conduct
to
community
organization
that
supports
survivors
of
domestic
violence
and
or
sexual
assault
and
report
back
to
council.
Via
a
memorandum
on
the
final
amounts
donated.
U
U
Further
monies
that
would
have
gone
to
council
shirelli
from
this
fund
will
be
appropriately
directed
to
organizations
supporting
women
and
people
who
have
suffered
gender-based,
silencing
and
harassment
as
a
city
we're
moving
forward.
We
have
improved
our
internal
policies
and
practices
to
increase
transparency,
prevent
and
address
gender-based
harassment
in
our
workplace.
By
proving
this
motion,
we
can
send
a
further
message
to
the
community
that
it
matters
to
us
that
all
workplaces
across
the
city
are
safe
and
free
of
discrimination
as
well.
Thank
you.
P
P
I,
don't
know
if
my
question
should
be
asked
to
you
or
to
the
city
clerk,
but
we
have
an
ex
elected
rep,
Stephen
Blair,
who
proposed
a
provincial
legislation
and
during
the
debate,
the
provincial
government,
it
said
that
the
city
council
of
Ottawa
wanted
to
adopt
adequate
measures
on
that
issue.
So
it
is
important
for
us
to
have
all
of
the
information
and
all
of
the
tools
that
would
be
possible
for
this
term.
P
E
Q
P
Q
And-
and
so
are
we
are
we
aware,
I
know
this
is
getting
into
provincial
politics
and
I'm
sorry,
but
the
the
minister
during
that
debate
on
councilor
bless
bill
did
speak
to
the
city
of
Ottawa
having
the
necess
the
necessary
tools
to
remove
a
member
of
council.
So
are
we
is
that
is
that
something
under
the
privilege
of
parliament
at
Queen's
Park?
Or
is
this
something
that
we
really
need
to
look
in
in
legal
terms,
from
our
from
from
our
bylaws
from
our
code
of
conduct?
Q
V
Mayor
it's
the
city
of
solicitor.
I
can
respond
to
that.
There
is
nothing
in
the
municipal
act
as
it
stands
today
that
would
allow
a
municipal
Council
to
to
remove
or
revoke
the
appointment
of
one
of
its
own
members
that
Authority
resides
with
the
provincial
government.
The
municipalities
are
creatures
of
provincial
statute.
V
It
is
not
open
to
a
municipal
Council
through
a
code
of
conduct
or
anything
like
that,
with
respect
to
the
penalties
that
a
municipal
Council
can
impose
and
is
limited
in
that
regard
to
either
a
reprimand
or
a
suspension
of
the
remuneration
of
up
to
90
days.
Those
are
the
limits
of
a
municipal
council's
Authority
in
that
regard,.
Q
Of
we
following
that
debate,
that
happened,
provincially
that
would
have
impact
on
on
this
situation.
Have
we
communicated
to
their
respective
Ministries
provincially
on
what
we
believe
our
Authority
is
for
clarification
from
them.
Like
are
we
we
have
a
set
of
of
authorities,
and
the
province
doesn't
seem
to
to
understand
some
of
those
limits
or
believes.
Maybe
we
have
other
tools.
B
Well,
maybe
I
could
just
ask
I,
know:
Minister
Clark
and
an
associate
Minister
held
a
series
of
Roundtable
discussions
on
this
item
and
they
assured
us
that
there
would
be
action,
but
unfortunately,
the
election
came
about.
There
was
no
action
and
MPP
blay
has
reintroduced
the
bill.
I
think
this
is
for
the
third
time
we
did,
as
a
council
I
believe
stand
to
be
corrected,
but
I
know
it
was
at
least
a
letter
and
or
a
resolution
from
Council
asking
for
an
ability
to
remove
a
member.
B
Unfortunately,
the
ball
is
in
the
court
of
the
provincial
government.
They
have
the
authority
to
make
the
amendment.
They
seem
quite
keen
on
it
about
a
year
ago
and
I
hope.
Their
interest
is
such
that
they
would
support
MPP,
Blaze
Bill
and,
if
not
bring
forward
a
government
bill
which
can
go
through
the
process,
a
lot
faster.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
Elsie
councilor
Deans.
Please
thank.
N
You
very
much
well
to
me
reading
this
report
on
these
allegations
are
extremely
serious.
They
seem
criminal
in
nature
to
me
so
I
guess.
My
question
is:
have
you
considered
the
criminal
nature
of
these
charges
or
these
allegations,
and
is
it
your
intention
to
refer
this
report
to
police
for
investigation.
E
The
sorry,
as
a
previous
commissioner
had
in
my
report
indicates
the
previous
commissioner
had
sent
something
over
to
the
police.
I
couldn't
proceed
until
the
police
had
finalized,
which
is
what
I
did
I.
Have
no
information
on
what
happened
with
the
police
I
mean
their
their
matters
to
look
into.
It
is
something
of
a
crime,
whereas
I'm
looking
at
the
breach
of
the
code,
so
I've
taken
the
action,
as
my
report
indicates
so.
N
W
E
V
Mr
Mayor,
as
the
Integrity
commissioner
has
indicated,
the
the
it
is
the
job
of
the
Integrity
commissioner
to
determine
whether
there's
been
a
breach.
It
is
the
job
of
council
to
determine
whether
what
the
appropriate
penalty
is
in
that
regard,
as
I
say,
with
respect
to
penalties,
council's
ability
is
limited.
W
B
B
Okay,
so
our
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item.
13
graphia
Municipal
status,
update,
Council
inquiries
received
Agriculture
Rural
Affairs
committee
report
number
35
that
agriculture,
it
is
a
fair
Corral,
770
Copeland
Road
Copeland
carried
fedco
a
report
number
41,
Canada
finance
economic
2022
mid-year
procurement
year
in
review.
Councilor
Cloutier
has
a
technical
amendment
seconded
by
councilor
DeRose,
please
counselor
crucier.
L
Whereas
the
report
from
the
chief
procurement
officer
entitled
2022
mid-year
procurement
year
in
review,
was
received
at
Finance
Economic
Development
Committee
on
November
1st
and
is
before
Council
for
information,
whereas
in
the
report
to
fedco
some
columns
in
document,
one
delegation
of
authority
contracts
for
the
period
of
January
to
June
2022
were
unintentionally
omitted
and
a
corrected
document
was
published
with
the
city
with
the
city
council
agenda,
therefore,
be
it
resolved.
The
council
replaced
document.
One
of
the
report
with
the
revised
document
one
issued
with
the
council
agenda.
B
A
K
The
the
two
parties
have
been
negotiating
the
the
noise
mitigation
measures
that
would
be
required
of
the
clb.
They
did
not
have
that
agreement
in
place.
As
of
the
the
planning
committee
meeting,
however,
they
have
mostly
executed
an
agreement
now
I'm
not
going
to
read
the
entire,
whereas
is,
but
there
are
one
outstanding
piece
of
a
future
project
to
which
they're
not
sure
whether
or
not
the
the
noise
requirements
are
going
to
be
applicable.
K
So
both
parties
have
agreed
that
it's
still
appropriate
to
put
a
holding
condition
on
it
to
the
effect
of,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that,
with
respect
to
the
report,
Council
replace
document,
one
zoning
map
and
document,
two
details,
the
recommended
zoning
with
the
revised
versions.
Enclosed,
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
there
be
no
further
notice
pursuant
to
section
3417,
and
my
thanks
go
to
the
parties
into
City
staff
for
making
sure
that
was
tidied
away
before
today.
X
Just
given
our
changing
climate
and
the
concerns
around
flooding
in
this
area,
as
well
as
some
of
the
hazard
risk
assessment
when
it
comes
to
landslides
and
so
City
environment
staff
got
back
to
me.
Specifically,
you
know
Nick
Stowe
and
Geraldine
Wildman,
who
I,
who
I
have
a
lot
of
trust
for
and
talked
about
the
process
of
that
120
meter
area.
X
That
would
trigger
two
things.
One
is
the
preparation
of
an
environmental
impact
study
to
demonstrate
that
there'd
be
no
negative
impact
and
the
second
is
an
application
to
the
conservation,
Authority
regulations
and
so
I
understand
that
the
city
and
our
conservation
authorities
rarely
asked
for
that
120
setback
and
typically
in
the
urban
areas,
it's
30
to
50
meters.
In
this
case
the
RVCA
recommended
a
setback
of
50
meters
to
match
the
setback
of
the
virtual
site
to
the
east,
but
they
were
prepared
to
issue
a
permit
for
a
smaller
setback.
X
X
So,
whereas
public
concerns
have
been
raised
about
potential
environmental
flooding
and
Landslide
Hazard
risks
associated
with
the
development
of
1015
twiddle
Road
and
whereas,
in
accordance
with
the
RVCA
requirements,
the
applicant
has
undertaken
a
third
party,
Landslide
Hazard
risk
assessment
and
an
evaluation
of
group
risk
within
its
study,
whereby
the
rvca's
landslide
Hazard
risk
assessment.
Peer
reviewer,
has
noted
some
issues
with
methodology,
whereas
the
RVCA
believes
that
the
study
should
reflect
appropriate
methodology,
as
outlined
by
its
reviewer
and
whereas
the
original
concept
reviewed
for
the
site
had
three
towers
and
a
fourth
Tower
was
added.
X
Without
this
risk
assessment
review
and
this
change
in
scope
should
be
accounted
for
in
the
risk
assessments,
particularly
given
the
fill
and
soil
conditions
identified,
and
whereas
the
city
has
agreed
that
the
update
can
be
completed
prior
to
site
plan
control
approval.
Whereas
the
applicant
is
aware
that
deferring
the
completion
of
the
study
to
site
plan
control
review
may
cause
changes
to
the
design
concept
which
they
are
willing
to
assume
because
the
design
is
subject
to
change
and
whereas
numerous
stakeholders
want
added
Assurance
from
the
city
that
the
study
update
will
be
completed.
X
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
at
Council,
one
amend
a
holding
symbol,
condition
to
require,
prior
to
the
lifting
of
the
holding
symbol,
a
that
the
landslide
has
a
risk
assessment,
be
updated
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
RVCA
to
reflect
accepted
methodology
for
group
risk
assessment
and
B.
A
review
be
undertaken
of
whether
the
site's
soil
conditions
and
environmental
risks
identified
can
accommodate
Four
Towers,
which
would
also
require
the
purchase
of
Remnant
right
away
from
the
city.
Z
Z
This
application
has
been
ongoing
for
over
two
years.
Geotechnical
slope,
stability
and
Environmental
Studies
were
completed
and
then
double
peer
reviewed
at
the
applicant's
cost,
since
the
application
was
submitted.
I've
shared
all
of
the
community's
comments
and
concerns
with
the
application,
with
City
staff,
urging
that
these
concerns
be
addressed,
and,
in
fact,
I
went
back
and
looked
I
believe
was
January.
2020
was
the
first
time
that
I
posted
about
this
specific
site.
Z
No
buildings
have
been
approved
today
or
will
be
approved
today.
Should
this
pass
and
no
buildings
will
be
approved
until
site
plan
review
and
they
should
they
be
approved.
It
will
because
it
will
be
because
the
applicant
has
met
or
exceeded
the
requirements
set
forth
by
legislation
and
the
Rideau
Valley
conservation,
Authority,
bolstered
by
Mr
or
councilor
Minard,
and
my
motion
today.
Z
There's
still
further
study
to
be
done
before
any
actual
building
is
approved
and
with
respect
to
distance
development,
site
alterations
will
will
not
be
permitted
within
the
120
meters
of
the
boundary
of
significant
Wetland,
unless
the
environmental
impact
statement
demonstrates
that
there
will
be
no
negative
impacts
to
the
Wetland
or
its
ecological
function.
But
in
this
case
an
environmental
impact
statement
was
completed
to
fulfill
requirements
of
the
provincial
policy
statement.
City's
official
plan
policies
and
Associated
provincial
regulations,
the
study
verified
the
provincially,
significant
Wetland
boundaries
and
established
development
limits
as
30
meters
from
significant
Wetlands.
Z
These
reports
have
been
reviewed
and
accepted
by
staff
and
the
Rideau
Valley
conservation
Authority.
Now
it's
also
important
to
note
about
this
site
that
the
land
that
is
that
is
here
for
future
development,
sits
upon
heavily
contaminated
Land
by
the
salt
plant
across
the
street.
We
are
the
ones
that
are
contaminating
this
land
and
this
is
going
to
have
to
be
remediated
before
any
development
continues.
The
applicants
will
be
remediating.
Z
This
mess
at
their
own
costs,
leaving
it
in
better
condition
than
what
than
when
it
was
purchased
and
returning
the
northern
portion
of
the
site
to
its
natural
state
by
removing
invasive
species
and
planting
natural
natural
local
species
just
wanted
to
set
the
record
straight
in
a
couple
of
items.
There
I
really
appreciate
council's
attention.
Thank
you
great.
R
You
Marin
I
appreciate
the
local
counselors
intervention
and
added
context.
Was
that
appreciates
I
appreciate
that
and
I
appreciate
the
motion
before
us
today
from
councilor
Menard,
because
I
do
think
this
makes
the
whole
thing
better.
I
I
do
want
to
see
this
development
happen,
but
similar
to
colleagues
that
planning
committee
I
do
believe
the
delegations
brought
up
some
legitimate
concerns
and
one
of
which
was
flooding
the
context
of
flooding
and
flood
risk.
R
In
particular,
can
staff
take
counsel
through
their
work
and
reassure
us
that
the
flood
risks
that
exists
that
members
of
the
community
have
raised
repeatedly
has
been
addressed
and
how
has
it
been
addressed
because,
obviously
we
do
not
want
to
see
a
major
development
built
here
and
then
be
submerged
the
next
time
we
have
a
significant
fresh
melt
in
the
spring.
We
did
see
pictures
I
believe
in
this
immediate
vicinity
of
the
land.
Submerged
we've
had
two
significant
floods
in
the
last
few
years.
2017
and
19.
H
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
Thank
you
for
the
question
in
terms
of
the
analysis,
I
think
the
ward
counselor
gave
a
very
good
outline
of
the
the
two-year
process,
the
interactions
with
the
conservation
Authority
and
the
further
resiliency
we're
adding
in
through
this
Motion
in
terms
of
what
will
happen
prior
to
site
plan
approval.
H
Certainly
it's
as
noted
is
is
outside
of
the
the
regulatory
flood
plain.
It
will
be
flood
proofed.
We
do
test
developments
for
the
one
to
350
Year
events
which,
as
we
heard,
is
a
very
negligible
difference
here.
If
you
require
further
detail,
I
can
see
if
either
Mr,
Stowe
or
or
Mr,
Moody
or
online
to
support.
R
One
thing
I'll
just
ask
to
follow
up:
counselor
Menard's
motion
talked
about
land,
Landslide
Hazard
and
the
second
part
was
talking
about
a
further
assessment
of
the
site,
soil
conditions
and
environmental
risks.
Will
that
cover
off?
Will
there
any
be
any
additional
work
done
with
respect
to
flooding
or
is
environmental
risk
covering
other
matters.
B
AA
AA
The
current
one
in
100
year,
flood
line,
is
at
an
elevation
of
approximately
45
meters,
the
existing
site,
where
the
development
is
going
to
be
taking
place
today
is
at
about
51
meters,
and
there
will
be
a
further
elevation
increase
to
the
site
as
they
build
up
to
provide
positive
drainage
to
the
to
the
to
the
road
of
an
additional,
approximately
three
meters.
So
we're
very
close
to
you
know
nine
meters
or
roughly,
you
know,
for
those
of
us
that
work
in
feet
30
feet
above
the
existing
floodplain
line.
R
AA
Chair
I
think
we
have
a
representation
from
the
conservation
Authority,
either
in
the
room
or
online
if
they
want
to
add
additional
detail,
but
the
conservation
Authority
participates
in
our
reviews
on
sites
like
this
in
a
number
of
different
perspectives,
they
do
review
the
impact
to
the
environment
with
respect
to
flooding.
Specifically,
they
they
undertake
a
review
to
determine
how
it
how
it
relates
to
the
to
the
flood
plain
and
and
where
that
flood
risk
could
be.
AA
You
know
they
are
the
the
regulator
of
the
hazard
with
respect
to
floodplain
and
looking
at
setbacks
and
things
of
that
nature.
So
they
have
reviewed
it.
They
are.
They
share
our
opinion
that
the
development
is
does
not
present
a
flood
risk
and
that
it
it's
you
know
suitable
for
recommendation
to
move
forward.
R
AA
B
W
I,
just
I
I,
just
can't
tell
members
of
the
council
how
good
this
project
is.
So
if
you
have
any
hesitation
at
all
about
voting
for
it,
I
urge
you
to
vote
for
it.
It's
a
supportive,
affordable
housing
development
in
partnership
with
salus.
It
fills
a
huge
gap
in
the
city
and
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
It's
a
wonderful
project
and
I
hope
to
support
it.
B
B
AB
It's
detailed
in
document
five
and
six
and
two
renaming
document
three
details
of
the
recommended
official
plan:
Amendment
new
official
plan
to
document
three
details
of
recommended
official
plan
Amendment
and
replacing
the
tax
new
official
plan
with
the
tax
official
plan,
wherever
it
appears
in
document
3
and
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
there
be
no
further
notice
pursuant
to
section
3417
of
the
planning
act.
Thank
you.
B
W
Miss
Marin
has
promised
to
have
a
slightly
longer
rant
on
this
one,
whereas
I
urged
you
to
to
vote
in
favor
of
the
the
Capilano
project.
I
very
much
urge
you
not
to
vote
in
favor
of
this
project
and
it's
not
because
I
don't
like
intensification,
it's
not
because
my
community
doesn't
like
intensification,
but
in
this
particular
location,
it's
too
much
too
soon.
The
the
basis
of
from
a
planning
perspective
for
this
particular
project
is
that
it
is
well
situated
for
Transit,
because
LRT
is
coming.
This
is
our
T
stage
three.
W
W
But
if
we
approve
this
today,
this
will
get
built.
This
will
get
built,
probably
within
the
next
year
to
18
months,
and
people
are
going
to
be
living
there
on
the
fantasy
that
they're
not
going
to
need
cars
and
therefore
there's
very
limited
parking.
There's
three
parking
spots
for
six
units:
six
units
that
are
replacing
one
home
to
me,
a
three
to
one
ratio.
W
Intensification
would
have
been
more
than
enough
and
there
would
have
been
parking
for
each
of
the
units,
whether
that's
adequate
parking
or
not
out
in
my
area,
in
a
situation
where
the
closest
grocery
stores
about
a
30
minute
walk
and
there's
one
main
bus
that
goes
through
the
community.
That
runs
not
bad
at
rush
hour,
but
during
the
day
the
service
is
is
once
a
half
hour.
W
So
there's
promise
for
this
location,
but
I
I
truly
believe
now
is
not
the
time
the
community
raised
a
number
of
concerns
about
problems.
They
have
already
with
on-street
parking
around
snow
removal.
Every
year
around
the
safety
of
children
playing
on
the
street.
We
put
six
units
in
there
where
there
was
one
in
that
part
of
town
with
that
sort
of
bus,
service
and
LRT
on
its
way,
but
not
there
for
probably
10
years.
W
What
you're
doing
is
creating
a
scenario
where
you
might
well
have
if,
if
couples
rent
each
of
those
units,
you
could
have
12
cars
and
three
spots
and
I'm
not
trying
to
scare
anybody
I'm,
just
speaking
the
reality
of
it,
so
I
think
this
project
would
have
been
more
palatable
to
the
community.
Had
it
been
a
a
three
for
one
swap
I
think
it
would
have
been
more
palatable
if
there
had
been
parking
a
little
bit
more
parking
in
place
to
help
people
transition.
W
If
you
will
until
LRT
arises
I
thought
of
a
number
of
ways
to
deal
with
this
today
and
I
thanked
on
her
wire
for
discussions
that
I
had
with
him
and
Tim
Mark
everything
from
doing
what
I'm
doing
now,
asking
you
not
to
vote
for
the
project
at
all.
To
possibly
bringing
a
motion,
ask
you
put
a
holding
provision,
saying,
approve
it,
but
don't
allow
building
permit
until
LRT
is
funded
staff
were
not
thrilled
with
that
option,
but
we
talked
it
through
and
I.
W
Thank
them
for
that
and
and
frankly,
it's
it's
staff's
just
doing
their
job
they're
working
with
the
tools
that
we
gave
them.
We
told
them
one
parking
spot
per
unit
and
you
don't
have
to
give
any
parking
for
the
the
secondary
units.
That's
that's
the
authority
we
gave
them
they're
working
within
that
Authority
and
the
applicant
is
working
within
that
framework,
but,
as
I
said
to
Mr
hernwire
this
this
morning,
I
I
said
you
know
that
might
work
in
some
parts
of
the
city.
W
W
So,
on
behalf
of
my
my
residents,
who
many
of
who
signed
a
petition
which
was
filed
with
with
the
city
and
you
will
have
seen,
who
showed
up
in
the
large
numbers
at
the
community
meeting,
our
job
sometimes
is
to
say
no,
despite
staff's
best
efforts
and
to
respond
to
what
we're
hearing
from
the
community
and
again,
nobody
is
saying
it's
a
bad
project,
saying
it's
it's
a
project
before
it's
time.
If
you
will
so
I,
would
ask
you
not
to
support
it.
W
R
Thank
you,
Mr,
Mayor
and
I
do
appreciate
my
colleagues
words
this
morning
and
his
interventions
on
behalf
of
his
community
I
appreciate
that
this
week
I
spoke
with
a
developer.
Who's
kicking
the
tires
right
across
the
street.
Counselor
Eagle,
Eye
and
I
are
our
Geographic
neighbors
17
units
no
parking
in
a
neighborhood
very
similar
to
his
and
so
I
I
think
the
planning
merits
speak
for
themselves.
I.
R
Think
if
we're
just
going
to
look
at
this
from
a
planning
argument,
it
makes
sense
but
I
think
what
the
community's
concerns
about
are
once
these
developments
are
built,
the
ramifications
within
existing
communities
and
that
can't
be
ignored,
and
so
that's
the
Dilemma
that
we
have
with
with
infill
and
what's
coming
with
all
the
changes
that
we've
seen
lately
from
the
provinces,
there
will
be
much
more
infill
development
and
communities
not
aware
of
of
this
freight
train.
That's
coming
and
we
hear
that
through
counselor
egg
light
today,
so
to
staff.
R
H
O
Good
morning,
everyone,
yes
I'm,
the
manager
of
development
review
West
we
looked
at
this.
It
was
understood
to
be
quite
controversial
within
the
community,
but
it
is
three
townhouse
dwellings
within
an
R3
Zone.
The
relief
that's
requested
here
does
not
relate
to
parking
parking
is
required
only
for
the
units
not
for
this,
the
secondary
dwelling
units.
So,
in
answer
to
the
question,
yes,
it
meets
the
parking
requirements.
R
Okay,
so
I
mean
I
I
supported
the
staff
recommendation
at
committee.
I
will
do
so
again
today.
I
think
the
infill
itself
is
reasonable.
I
I
acknowledge
the
local
counselor
raising
issues
on
behalf
of
his
community,
but
from
a
planning
Merit
perspective.
I
think
this
is
a
a
reasonable
application
to
approve.
Thank
you.
B
AD
Thank
you
very
much.
This
topic
of
parking
is
one
of
particular
interest
to
me.
I've
been
fighting
the
parking
formula
in
the
suburbs
for
quite
some
time
and
I
have
to
say,
I
I,
don't
agree
with
allowing
this
development
to
go
ahead
because,
right
now
we
are
creating
parking
lots
with
every
home
that
we're
building
in
the
suburbs.
Right
now
we
are
creating
a
parking
lot
with.
You
know
diminished
size
of
driveways
decrease
setbacks.
AD
We
are,
we
are
creating
areas
where
children
cannot
play
and
I
see.
This
is
is
going
to
be
exacerbated
if
we
continue
to
go
forward.
Intensification
is
going
to
create
more
parking
along
streets
and
more
conflict.
Right
now
we
are
seeing.
We
couldn't
have
anticipated
what
happens
with
the
remote
learning
and
people
working
from
home
our
suburbs,
while
the
the
building
better
suburbs
plan
was,
was
great
in
intent
in
intent.
AD
What
has
happened
since
with
the
pandemic
is
that
we
are
seeing
more
people,
two
people
working
from
home
and
often
because
we
have
an
affordability
crisis
in
the
city.
Young
people
are
not
leaving
home
and
many
of
these
communities.
They
do
not
have
Transit.
So
we
are
seeing
sometimes
two
three
four
cars
where
there's
barely
room
for
one,
so
this
is
one
of
the
biggest
headaches,
I
think
for
people
in
the
suburbs.
AD
Right
now
there
are
neighbor
conflicts,
bylaw
is
called
out
continually
and
we
have
a
difficult
time
getting
plows
through
ambulances
in
some
instances,
I
understand,
philosophically
that
we
have
to
have
a
parking
formula,
but
that
parking
formula
does
not
current
work
currently
with
the
state
of
our
world
in
the
state
of
our
city.
It's
going
to
be
a
long
time
before
we
have
Community
bus
routes.
I
can
answer
to
meet
the
requirements
of
people
who
have
to
go
many
other
places
and
just
downtown.
AD
So
I
will
not
vote
in
favor
of
this
this
development,
while
it
might
make
sense
it
doesn't
make
sense,
we
need
those
homes,
but
what
we
are
doing
is
handicapping
people
who
are
going
to
move
in
and
also
handicapping
people
who
already
live
in
the
neighborhood.
So
if
we
continue
to
to
follow
the
parking
formula,
as
is
as
we
continue
to
develop
in
the
city
with
intensification
and
the
lack
of
money
for
OC
transport,
we
are,
we
are
creating
places
where
people
do
not
want
to
live.
AD
I
see
it
in
my
own
communities,
it
has
been
one
of
the
fights
I've
been
having
with
City
Hall
and
I
can
tell
you
and
Mr
Mayor.
When
you
came
out
to
visit
in
in
my
community,
I
talked
to
you
about
high
rises
that
are
going
in
without
a
parking
spot
for
each
and
every
unit
and
I
said
what's
going
to
happen.
Is
people
are
going
to
be
parking
on
the
street
because
the
busting
and
the
transit
doesn't
give
the
people
what
they
require
and
that's
specifically,
what's
happened?
AD
If
you
talk
to
the
snowplow
operators
and
the
head
of
operations,
this
is
increasingly
a
major
problem
in
our
residential
communities.
So
I
support,
councilor
egglei's
request
today
and
I
apply
appeal
to
planning
staff
to
take
a
serious
look
at
what
we're.
What
we're
allowing
to
happen
in
our
suburbs.
AD
So,
let's,
let's
try
to
plan
communities
that
are
more
responsive
to
the
needs
of
the
people
who
have
to
buy
those
residential
homes
and
I
will
take.
Take
this
opportunity
to
thank
everybody.
I've
enjoyed
my
four
years
terrible
Town
Council,
and
this
is
the
last
time
I'll
be
speaking.
So
thank
you
for
listening.
Thank
you.
K
You
very
much
you
know
this
is
this
is
a
backdoor
way.
I
think
to
oppose
intensification,
most
of
our
city
is,
is
not
within
walking
distance
of
a
transit
station
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
voted
against
the
official
plan
was
because
I
was
cynical,
that
this
Council
would
Embrace
intensification
equitably
across
the
city
and-
and
these
are
the
kinds
of
justifications
for
refusing
gentle
densification
outside
of
the
downtown
core.
That
I
and
and
residents
of
kitchissippi
Ward
are
largely
expecting
to
continue
to
see
such
that
intensification
happens
in
kitchissippi.
K
Ultimately,
if
this
Council
wants
secondary
units
to
require
parking
change,
the
policy
I
cannot
imagine
that,
when
the
developer
at
this
proposed
site
appeals
this
to
the
Ontario
land
tribunal,
to
say
why
am
I
being
refused
slightly
larger
or
smaller
rear
yard
setbacks
and
other
performance
standards
that
the
Olt
is
going
to
give
this
very
much
consideration
at
all.
The
planning
decision
that
we
need
to
make
is
on
the
performance
standards.
The
planning
decision
here
is
not.
K
Are
we
going
to
approve
a
development
that
doesn't
have
as
many
parking
spots
as
it
has
units
and
the
reason
that's
not
a
decision
is
because
this
Council
has
said
that
secondary
dwelling
units
Apartments
don't
require
a
parking
spot.
This
is
a
really
simple,
open
and
shut
case
at
the
Ontario
land
tribunal,
refusing
it
today
just
downloads
a
politically
difficult
decision
to
the
tribunal,
instead
of
making
it
ourselves.
K
If
we're
not
going
to
require
parking
of
Apartments
of
those
secondary
dwelling
units,
then
we
have
to
defend
the
choice
we've
made
on
a
policy
basis
rather
than
making
the
tribunal
do
it
for
us,
so
I'm
certainly
going
to
be
supporting
this
development.
This
is
the
kind
of
gentle
densification
that
everyone
around
this
table
has
been
talking
about
for
several
years
now,
and
it
is.
K
It
is
disappointing
to
me
that
Council
might
be
willing
to
refuse
a
simple
addition
of
of
three
units
with
apartments
in
in
one
neighborhood,
even
on
the
same
day
as
without
blinking
an
eye
we've
approved
something
like
130
floors
of
new
residential
developments,
much
of
which
is
being
built
without
parking
in
my
ward.
Thank
you
mayor.
AE
Please
thank
you.
Mayor
I
supported
this
at
planning
committee
and
I'm
going
to
support
it
today.
I
think
one
of
the
challenges
I
have
with
this
one
is.
It
really
looks
like
it
reads
like
a
six
unit.
Apartment
building
and
I
do
feel,
like
the
applicant
in
this
case,
was
taking
advantage
of
of
the
existing
rules
bylaws
that
allow
secondary
units
along
with
the
main
units.
So
it's
in
this
case
being
presented
as
three
town
homes
with
three
secondary
units.
Therefore,
they
only
require
three
parking
spots
minimum.
AE
Although
to
me
it
really
looks
like
a
six
unit
apartment
building
with
three
parking
spots.
Anyhow,
it's
interesting
the
discussion
around
parking
in
the
suburbs
in
Bill,
23
I,
believe
the
the
new
legislation
would
prevent
Council
from
requiring
more
than
one
parking
spot
in
any
unit
in
anywhere
in
the
city.
So
that's
a
a
big
change
that
people
should
be
aware
of,
and
it's
interesting
at
the
same
time
with
their
changes
to
the
official
plan
on
Friday.
AE
They
also
watered
down
our
ability
as
a
city,
to
require
a
good
transit
in
a
neighborhood
before
that
neighborhood
gets
built
and
to
a
councilor
egglei's
point
about
the
length
of
time
before
LRT
arrives.
I
think
it
just
underlines
how
important
it
is
when
we
have
these
major
Transit
projects
in
our
planning
documents,
a
transit
station
that
may
be
over
a
decade
away,
we're
already
approving
apartments
and
homes
all
across
the
city.
AE
We're
doing
it
here
along
this
LRT
Line
we're
doing
around
the
future
phase:
3
LRT
Line
in
Canada
and
Statesville
we're
doing
around
corridors
such
as
Carling,
Avenue
and
Heron,
road
and
Baseline.
We
will
really
need,
as
a
as
a
council
next
term,
to
get
serious
about
funding
these
Transit
projects.
Our
official
plan,
two
of
the
major
goals,
were
that
we
achieve
more
growth
through
intensification,
that's
a
very
good
goal
and
the
other
goal
was
that
we
have
more
than
half
of
all
trips
in
our
city
by
2046
being
in
a
sustainable
mode.
AE
T
T
You
should
see
this
situation
when
there's
school
buses,
four
different
School
boards
school
buses
coming
down
here
every
morning
with
wall-to-wall
parking
and
I
will
say
to
the
argument
that
you
know
in
this
is
something
that
is
an
indication
we're
against
infill.
Well,
when
you
have
an
infill
apartment
building,
you
have
the
opportunity
to
put
parking
underground
parking.
That
is
an
option
that
we
can
demand
or
create
so
that
people
can
park
there
or
store
their
electric
cars
and
the
parking
is
there,
but
this
isn't
after
the
fact
situation.
T
So,
yes,
we
can
all
hope
and
dream
that
LRT
will
come.
We
see
the
delay
till
2028
with
stage
three,
but
that
again
is
hope.
Is
our
strategy,
so
I
really
feel
that
yes
may
this?
This
may
go
to
the
Olt
and
it
may
be
overturned.
However,
this
Council,
the
people
now
and
in
the
future,
are
going
to
have
to
determine
what
they're
going
to
do
and
if
it
is
something
that
we
have
to
pass,
make
a
new
policy.
Something
we're
gonna
have
to
do
something,
because
this
will
continue
and
I.
T
M
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
I
did
not
support
this
at
committee,
because
the
planning
rationale
pointing
to
the
Future
stage
three
LRT,
which
is
many
years
away
and
unfunded,
really
touched
a
nerve
with
me.
As
you
know,
you
hear
me
talk
about
this
all
the
time
the
Phantom
brt
in
South
Orleans
is
routinely
used
as
a
a
planning
rationale
with
no
path
forward.
M
So
but
after
I
took
a
closer
look
at
this
site,
you
know
I
am
satisfied
that
there
is
existing
Transit
that
could
take
you
to
Algonquin
College,
for
example,
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time,
and
there
are
walkable
amenities
close
by.
So
in
that
respect,
while
not
perfect,
I
find
it
does
differ
greatly
from
the
challenges
that
I'm
experiencing
in
my
community
and
I
have
already
warned
my
colleague
I
will
be
supporting
it
today.
Thank
you.
B
J
D
D
D
W
K
G
B
T
That
the
Integrity
commissioner's
report
entitled
report
to
Council
on
an
inquiry
respecting
the
conduct
of
council,
shirelli,
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
committee
report,
35
built
Heritage
subcommittee
report,
30A
finance
and
economic
development
committee
report,
41
planning
committee
report
69
and
the
reports
from
the
city
clerk
entitled
status,
update,
Council
inquiries
and
motions
for
the
period
ending
November,
4th,
2022
and
summary
of
oral
and
written
public
submissions
for
items
subject
to
the
planning
act.
Explanation
requirements
at
the
city
council,
meeting
of
October
5th
2022
be
received
and
adopted
as
amended.
B
Q
I
think
there's
food
playing
here
in
the
castle
Chambers,
so
that
staff
be
directed
to
explore
ways
in
which
zoning
amendments
and
Heritage
considerations,
including
Heritage
conservation
districts,
were
appropriate,
may
be
used
to
offset
the
removal
of
exterior
design
and
sustainable,
sustainable
design,
control
and
other
matters
previously
addressed
through
site
plan
control
in
Sandy,
Hill
and
other
neighborhoods.
That
would
be
affected
by
the
proposal
proposed
changes
to
Bill
23
through
the
interim
measures
in
advance
of
the
development
of
the
new
zoning
bylaw
to
ensure
the
continued
alignment
with
the
city
of
Ottawa
planning
policies.
B
AF
B
AF
You
Mr
Mayor,
be
it
resolved
that
the
general
manager
of
emergency
and
protective
services
consider,
including
a
review
of
the
fireworks
bylaw
on
the
2023-2026
bylaw
review
work
plan
to
allow
the
discharge
of
consumer
fireworks
without
a
permit
in
celebration
of
Diwali
and
Report
bindings
as
soon
as
feasible.
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
B
B
Q
Please
Mr
Mary,
okay,
if
I
just
read.
It
therefore
beat
yourself,
therefore
be
resolved
at
Sea
ham,
rabba
be
appointed
to
the
Ottawa
Community
Housing,
incorporation
board
of
directors
as
a
community
member
for
a
term
effective,
immediately
and
expiring
at
the
2026
OCH
annual
general
meeting.
Be
it
further
resolved
that
the
mayor
and
the
clerk
be
authorized
to
sign
a
written
resolution
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Ottawa,
as
shareholder
of
OCH,
setting
out
the
resolution
approved
by
Council.
B
AC
The
motion
is
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
Council
approve
an
exception
to
section
5.1
of
the
council
expense
policy
to
allow
the
community
maintenance
of
this
section
of
Bridgeport
Avenue
for
the
2022
to
2023
winter
maintenance
season
to
be
funded
from
the
outgoing
counselor.
That's
me:
a
portion
of
the
2022
constituency,
Services
budgets,
if
you
want
to,
if
you
want
to
know
more
about
it,
just
come
meet
me
on
Bridgeport.
We
can
walk
around
and
talk
about
it.
I
have
a
lot
of
free
time
coming
up.
R
B
B
T
Q
B
AG
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
the
procedure
bylaw
section
70,
subsection
5,
provides
that
bylaws
are
to
be
adopted
in
bulk.
That
is
as
a
group
unless
the
mayor
is
satisfied
that
the
subject
matter
of
the
bylaw
has
not
been
previously
adopted
in
a
report
to
council.
So
if
I
can
speak
for
to
bylaw
FF,
which
is
a
lifting
of
a
holding
Zone,
that
topic
was,
in
my
opinion,
subject
of
a
report
to
council.
AG
It
was
in
the
recommendations
adopted
by
Council
on
November
22nd
2017,
specifically
item
2B
on
the
325
Montreal
Road
item,
which
specifically
referred
to
the
holding
provision.
Therefore,
in
my
opinion,
it
requires
a
three-quarters
suspension
of
the
rules,
a
three-quarters
vote,
I
I,
simply
note
that,
in
my
experience
since
the
beginning
of
The
Amalgamated
city
of
Ottawa,
in
January,
2001
no
holding
bylaw
has
ever
been
listed
lifted
from
the
bulk
consent
agenda
for
bylaws
Mr
Mayor.
B
Q
Q
So
would
you
like
me
I,
want
to
keep
Quorum
I
want
to
be
fair
to
members
here.
So
would
you
like
me
to
address
both
in
one
word
sure
yeah,
so
members
of
council?
You
know
that
this
is
a
a
tough
matter
that
there's
disagreement
around
this
table
and
we
don't
need
to
go
into
details
around
that.
There
are
two
areas.
One
is
the
part
lot
last.
Q
When
I
met
with
staff
through
the
site
plan
process,
there
was
a
staff
comment
that
there
would
be
a
requirement
to
go
to
the
committee
of
adjustment,
which
the
Community
Association
saw
as
a
an
area
to
engage
on
the
particular
matter.
It
is
now
not
through
the
committee
of
adjustment,
which
would
which
would
engage
my
community
so
it
for
me.
Q
It's
just
what
staff
and
for
my
community
of
relating
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
has
has
been
is,
is
a
different
process
now
so
I'm
seeking
to
have
what
was
committed
to
my
community,
so
I
believe
the
way
to
do
it
would
either
be
a
motion
to
send
it
to
Committee
of
adjustment
or
a
motion
for
for
planning
committee
to
look
at
it.
Next
term,
on
the
other
matter,
so
there
is
a
holding
provision
which
was
created
by
the
the
council
that
was
at
this
table
in
2014..
Q
This
was
on
the
zoning.
So
when
we
reviewed
the
Zoning
for
that
matter,
there
was
a
holding
provision
that
was
added
that
looked
at
two
matters,
a
safety
plan
and
and
an
outreach
program
and
and
no
documents
were
shared
with
me
relating
to.
Why
that
the
holding
provision
needed
to
be
removed,
I
met
with
staff
in
September
when
they
were
looking
to
add
it
to
the
agenda
and
I
saw
sought
additional
information,
which
was,
as
you
saw
by
the
email
to
colleagues
yesterday,
was
not
provided
so
I.
Q
Think
for
public
disclosure
as
to
why
that
holding
provision
was
released.
That
I
think
it'd
be.
It
should
be
referred
to
planning
committee
so
that
staff
can
prepare
report
as
to
how
the
documentation
was
prepared
for
the
the
release
of
the
holding
provision,
so
Mr
Mayor.
That's
the
the
two
reasons
why
I'm
seeking
I'm
seek
I,
guess:
referral
procedurally,
I'm,
sorry,
I'm.
B
K
B
B
L
AF
D
J
B
B
AG
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
I
reviewed
the
record
on
this.
One
I
cannot
find
that
the
part
lock
control
matter
was
discussed
in
a
council
report
and
therefore
it
would
subject
be
subject
to
Severance
by
a
simple
majority
vote.
I
simply
note
again
that
since
January
1
2001,
no
part
lot
control
bylaw
and
these
there
are
several
on
every
Council
agenda.
No
part
lot.
Control
bylaw
has
ever
been
lifted
from
the
bulk
consent.
Bylaw
agenda.
B
B
X
On
other
business,
is
there
another
business
item
or
on
inquiries
I,
just
I
just
wanted
to
raise
mayor.
We
have
outgoing
counselors
here
and
I
would
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
if
we
gave
the
opportunity
for
outgoing
counselors
if
they
wanted
to,
if
only
if,
they
wanted
to
to
say
a
few
words
the
last
council
meeting
here,
and
so
you
could
ask
them
if
they
would
want
to,
but
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
for
the
public
to
hear
from
outgoing
counselors
if
they
would
like
to
to
speak
yup.
R
Thank
you
mayor
just
inquiry
just
a
table
so
last
week
on
November
2nd
a
70
year
old
pedestrian
was
fatally
struck
by
two
vehicles,
while
crossing
marivel
near
Thames
Road.
This
is
actually
a
block
away
from
the
crossing
guard
that
we
just
approved.
This
tragic
and
preventable
death
has
renewed
calls
within
the
carlington
community
to
advance
a
complete
Street
design
and
construction
for
Maryville
Road
from
at
least
the
residential
and
Commercial
stretch
of
Maryville
from
Kirkwood
to
Carling
question.
R
What
are
the
timelines
to
complete
a
complete
Street
for
Maryville
Road,
despite
a
chronic
request
from
the
public
and
local
counselors
for
Speed
enforcement
by
the
Auto
police
services?
No
consistent
presence
and
enforcement
is
undertaken
question.
Will
the
Ops
commit
to
significantly
increasing
their
presence
on
Maryville
road
to
enforce
speeds,
given
that
the
neighborhood
Response
Team
assigned
to
carlington
has
a
traffic
resource
other
questions?
R
Will
staff
commit
to
reviewing
the
length
of
time
it
takes
for
the
traffic
light
to
change
at
Maryville
and
coldrey
once
a
pedestrian
has
pushed
the
call
button
and
will
staff
commit
to
reviewing
the
physical
layout
of
Maryville
road
Southbound
immediately
following
the
bend
in
the
street,
approximately
100
meters,
south
of
Carling
traffic,
comes
around
this
corner
way
too
fast.
How
can
the
immediate
area
along
Maryville
be
improved
to
increase
safety
for
all
Road
users,
but
particularly
for
vulnerable
Road
users?
Thank
you,
mayor.
B
K
K
K
Planning,
real
estate
and
economic
development
for
the
owner,
acknowledges
and
agrees
that
they
entries
to
be
removed
shall
be
removed
in
accordance
with
an
approved
tree
permit
and
tree
conservation
report
and
in
accordance
with
the
city's
true
protection,
bylaw
being
bylaw
of
2023-40
as
amended.
The
owner
further
acknowledges
and
agrees
to
post
on
the
property
the
approved
tree
permit
at
all
times
during
tree
removal,
grading,
construction
and
any
other
site
alteration
activities.
K
Five,
the
owners
shall
prohibit
the
use
of
the
property
for
any
other
interim
uses
and
maintain
the
property
in
accordance
with
the
Property
Standards
by
law.
Six,
the
owner
agrees
that
a
replacement
building
shall
be
substantially
completed
within
five
years
from
the
date
of
disapproval
and
in
default
thereof,
the
city
clerk
shall
enter
on
the
collector's
role.
The
sum
of
thirty
one
thousand
five
hundred
and
seventy
dollars
for
the
three
residential
dwelling
units
to
be
demolished.
K
The
owner
shall
enter
into
an
agreement
with
the
city
of
Ottawa
to
include
the
foregoing
conditions
and
pay
all
costs
associated
with
the
registration
to
set
agreement.
At
such
time
as
a
building
permit
is
issued
to
redevelop
the
site
and
replacement
buildings
in
place,
the
agreement
will
become
null
and
void
and
will
be
released
upon
request
to
the
owner.
The
owners
will
pay
all
costs
associated
with
the
release
of
the
agreement.
Eight,
the
owner
agrees,
the
demolition
permit
will
not
be
issued
and
the
building
cannot
be
demolished
until
such
time
that
the
agreement
is
referenced.
K
N
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
say
a
few
words
I
think
it's
appropriate
actually
of
members
of
council
have
an
opportunity
in
a
public
forum
to
say
a
proper
goodbye
after
well.
Somebody
like
me,
being
here
closer
to
the
makers,
actually
I,
never
dreamed
when
I
walked
into
Council
chamber,
which
at
the
time
was
on
Sussex
Drive
that
I'd
be
here
for
28
years,
but
I
also,
don't
think
I
really
got
this
job.
N
I
didn't
get
the
passion
that
we
developed
for
a
city
I,
don't
think
I
understood
exactly
how
much
a
member
of
council
can
do
in
terms
of
changing
lives
and
setting
a
new
direction
for
a
city
and
being
so
involved
in
the
life
of
the
city
and
that
it's
really
My
Jam
I
Really
I
I
really
enjoyed
every
day
here
and
I.
Think
I
owe
a
debt
of
gratitude
to
a
lot
of
people
that
gave
me
that
opportunity
to
do
that
and
I
have
to
say
it
hasn't
all
been
fun.
N
You
know
I
think
that
as
a
council,
there
were
also
a
lot
of
successes
for
all
of
us.
I
mean
those
of
us
who
were
here
long
enough
to
remember.
The
smoke-free
bylaws
know
that
we
were
the
first
municipality
in
North
America
to
bring
in
smoke-free
bylaws.
We
charted
the
course
for
a
lot
of
councils
across
North,
America
and
I.
Think
we
save
countless
lives.
N
I
was
also
on
the
First
Council,
that's
considered,
bringing
LRT
to
Ottawa
and,
although
we've
you
know
had
a
few
hiccups
since
maybe
not
running
perfectly
I
still
am
really
proud
that
we
brought
LRT
because
I
think
it's
a
game.
Changer
to
ottawan
I.
Think
is
something
that
great
that
this
council
did.
I
mean
in
my
own
Ward
I'm
have
lots
of
successes.
N
I
I
managed
to
get
the
First
District
Library
in
the
chain.
The
Greenboro
Community
Center,
the
Greenberg,
District
Library
and
I
mean
I
have
to
admit
it.
It
took
12
years
to
get
it
but
and
and
I
think
that
my
colleagues
maybe
voted
for
that
as
much
to
silence
me
about
it,
as
they
did
for
more
noble
reasons.
N
So
I
just
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
say
a
lot
of
thanks
to
a
lot
of
people,
my
staff
over
28
years,
who
you
know
we
did
all
of
it
together-
and
this
is
this-
is
a
team
sport.
It's
not
an
individual
thing
and
your
success
is
their
shared
successes
and
I
wanted
to
say
a
special
thanks
to
City
staff
that
are
really
unsung
heroes
in
this
in
this
community
that
work
hard
every
day
to
make
the
quality
of
life
in
our
neighborhood
so
important
and
to
the
senior
staff
who
carry
a
heavy
burden.
N
Thank
you
all
for
the
work
that
you
you
do
to
my
Council
colleagues
past
and
present.
It's
been
a
ride.
It's
been
quite
the
thing
to
work
with
all
of
you
and
a
lot
of
others
along
the
way
and
I've
appreciated
that
and
to
the
citizens
of
Ottawa
many
of
Britain
to
me.
I
I
really
called
you
all
dear
my
heart,
and
especially
the
good
people
of
Gloucester
South,
Gate
Ward,
who
sent
me
here
who
believed
in
me
and
who
trusted
me
to
be
their
representative
for
28
years.
N
I've
really
appreciated
the
faith
and
the
trust
they
put
in
me
and
I
hope,
I
earned
it
every
single
day.
So
people
ask
me
what
I'm
gonna
do
and
I
don't
know:
I,
don't
know
we'll
see,
but
this
is
the
end
of
a
long
chapter
and
hopefully
the
beginning
of
an
exciting
new
one
to
the
new
Council
I
just
want
to
say
to
all
of
you.
N
AC
B
G
Thank
you,
worship.
It
has
been
my
honor
and
privilege
to
serve
as
the
elected
representative
for
college
board
since
amalgamation
at
the
city
of
Ottawa
and
before
that,
as
your
city
councilor
in
the
city
of
Nepean.
As
early
as
Elementary
School,
I
was
enthralled
with
politics
and
read
up
and
watched
and
worked
with
many
local
politicians
as
many
as
I
could
in
the
early
1980s.
While
still
a
teenager,
I
was
elected
to
the
Carlton
Catholic
School
Board
and
became
the
youngest
person
ever
elected
in
Ontario.
G
I,
never
expected
that
my
passion
for
politics
would
lead
to
such
a
wonderful
location.
Over
the
more
than
30
years,
I
have
been
in
public
life.
I
have
always
strived
to
help
each
constituent
to
the
best
of
my
ability
and
to
provide
oversight
on
important
city
initiatives.
Looking
back
I'm
very
proud
of
the
connections
I
made
with
individuals
in
our
city
and
I'm
glad
as
part
of
many
vital
improvements,
fun
activities
and
community
building
events.
G
In
my
position
as
chair
of
audit
committee,
I
encourage
the
creation
of
the
auditor
general
position
for
the
city
of
Ottawa
to
help
find
Savings
in
the
city.
I
questioned
the
city
of
ottawa's
partnership
in
plasco
and
Oregon.
World
audits
later
proved
that
these
Partnerships
have
been
ill-advised
moves.
I
demanded
him
counselor.
J
B
Foreign
okay,
so
we
have
a
motion
to
adjourn
motion
to
adjourn
carried,
adopt
a
married.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
very
much.
This
meeting
is
adjourned
and
we
welcome
our
our
counselors
and
their
guests
to
the
luncheon,
where
we'll
be
able
to
hear
from
councilor
egg
Lyon
counselor
glizzier
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you.