►
From YouTube: Planning Committee - April 10, 2018
Description
Planning Committee meeting – April 10, 2018 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Okay,
this
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
one
and
two
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
just
mentioned.
Only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
Appeal
Tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
to
appeal
tribunal.
A
If
counsel
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
150
days
of
receipt
of
the
application
for
zoning
in
one
in
210
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment
that's
30
extra
days.
The
comment
sheet
is
available
at
the
door
for
anyone
wishing
to
submit
written
comments
on
these
amendments,
so
welcome
to
agenda
61
declarations
of
interests.
None
confirmation
of
minutes
from
the
meeting
of
March
the
27th
2018
any
changes.
Are
they
Carrie,
Carrie?
Okay?
A
B
Great
thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair
BIA,
for
resolve
the
planning
committee
request.
Council
suspend
to
notice,
apply
it
under
subsection,
29,
3
and
34
one
of
the
procedural
bylaw
to
consider
this
report.
At
the
meeting
of
the
11th
of
April
2018
BIA
further
resolved
that
Planning
Committee
approved
that
the
site
and
proceed
to
Council
for
consideration
on
April
11th,
recommend.
Recommendation
2
of
the
staff
report
be
amended
to
replace
the
date
of
April
25th
2018
with
April
11th
2018.
B
A
Have
any
questions
on
why
I
I
personally
expected
this
to
come
to
zoning,
to
planning
committee
about
last
September
and
because
of
some
final
work,
that
we
were
doing
on
infrastructure
master
plan
and
on
the
BB
SS
building
better
smarter
suburbs?
It
got
delayed,
so
let's
make
hay
while
we
can
I
didn't
think
there
would
be
in
the
opposition
so
as
I
carry.
Thank
you
very
much.
Everybody.
Okay
item
number
two
is
the
in
councilor
miss
bombs,
Rita
walk
before
tits
in
the
old
Rock
l'affaire
base,
which
is
very
exciting.
A
A
Okay,
the
next
item
up
is
it's
a
an
exemption
to
permanent
signs
on
private
property.
Bylaw
forty
to
fifty-five,
strand
hair
drive
it's
a
strip
mall
in
my
ward
and
I
support
this.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
it?
No
is
it
caring?
Thank
you.
The
next
one
is
also
an
exemption
to
permanent
signs
on
private
property.
Bylaw
1795
Sanwa
boulevard
in
counselor,
Boucher's
ward.
We
have
Oh
Nathan
dart.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
here
on
the
committee,
so
Nathan
dark
pride
signs,
limited
Nathan
dark?
Did
you
want
to
speak?
A
Okay?
Well,
there
aren't
any
questions
for
you.
So
is
this
item
carried?
Thank
you
thank
you
for
coming
out
and
then
the
next
one
we're
holding
for
a
little
presentation
and
also
because
we
have
one
speaker-
and
that
is
the
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
department,
2017
year-end
report
and
2018
work
program.
I
already
said
we
have
questions
on
it
and
we
have
a
speaker,
okay
and
we're
having
a
presentation,
because
there's
lots
of
good
stuff
that
has
been
done
and
is
coming
up
exemption
to
permanent
signs
on
private
property
by
alice's.
A
Thank
you
for
joining
us
at
counselor.
Flurry
this
is
in
your
award
and
it
is
a
very
large
mural
oversize
mural
at
2:15
wuertenberg
street.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions?
Did
you
want
to
say
anything
before
we
vote
on
it?
So
is
this
item
carry?
Thank
you
thanks
for
coming
up.
I
personally
think
that
this
kind
of
life
that
it
brings
to
communities
have
done
well.
We
could
use
a
lot
more
of
in
the
city
and
then
we
have
one
which
will
be
held
for
sure.
A
It
is
the
traffic
signal
for
Terry
Fox
Drive
at
Huntsville
Drive,
it's
in
councilor,
Wilkinson's
area.
It
is
her
item
that
she's
bringing
forward
so
we'll
be
holding
that
because
we
do
have
some
speakers.
As
I
said,
then
we
have
information
previously
distributed
response
to
inquiry
on
short-term
rentals.
That
comes
from
the
councillor
Dean's
question
on
Airbnb
s,
and
so
that's
just
before
us.
No
one's
wanting
to
lift
that
I.
Take
it.
Okay,
that's
received.
A
B
C
A
A
A
And
thank
you
for
doing
this
on
relatively
quick
notice,
but
you
know
I
was
reading
it
again
over
the
weekend.
I
thought.
There's
a
lot
of
work,
that's
been
done
and
I
figured
some
people
might
have
questions,
but
I
thought
that
it
certainly
warrants
you
telling
a
story
of
how
busy
your
staff
has
been
pardon.
C
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
before
I
begin
mr.
resides
going
to
assist
me
with
the
presentation
and
if
technology
works
on
our
side
well,
I
should
be
able
to
show
you
material,
that's
actually
on
the
city's
website
for
the
general
public
to
get
a
bit
more
information
that
we
even
we're
presenting
today.
I
would
also
acknowledge
them
is
Sneden,
and
mr.
Schmitt
are
here
to
assist
me
in
responding
to
questions
in
the
respective
service
areas
today,
as
well.
D
Questions
will
come
up
today
on
the
2019
work
plan
which
were
not
yet
presenting
to
you
we're
not
yet
at
that
stage,
and
in
many
ways
we
must
wait
to
the
new
council
and
the
new
planning
committee
that
comes
with
the
new
council
to
get
that
approved,
but
certainly
comments
by
committee
and
we
are,
and
we
will
actually
be
seeking
comments
from
the
new
planning
Advisory
Committee
on
what
that
work
planet
should
be
so
just
put
that
in
context
where
how
we'll
deal
with
questions
like
that.
So
this
is
a
brief
presentation.
D
I
want
to
go
over
the
highlights.
So
if
we
take
the
first
slide
so
development
activity
and
development
applications
activity
has
in
20
in
2017
continued
the
upward
trend
that
we're
seeing
you've
seen
reported
in
a
number
of
different
ways.
We've
seen
increases
in
the
number
of
applications
and
we've
seen
increases
also
in
and
of
our
building
permits
that
have
been
taken
in
the
city
and
that
is
generally
reflection
of
improved
economic
conditions
in
the
city
and
more
development
activity.
D
D
Those
are
there's
a
variety
of
pool,
enclosures
and
other
sorts
of
permits
that
actually
are
was
a
really
long
list.
That's
in
the
report
of
the
non
building
code
permits
that
the
building
code
department
actually
issues
in
our
right-of-way
heritage
and
urban
design
group.
We
had
almost
6300
right-of-way
permits
and
approvals
and
the
total
value
of
building
permits.
It's
a
bit
of
an
indicator
of
economic
activity.
D
We
had
an
update
to
the
Riverside
set
of
community
design
plan
and
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
further
tweak
to
that
in
this
year.
Just
to
address
the
change
to
the
Trillium
Oien
that
was
announced
earlier
this
year,
we
did
work
on
minimum
parking
requirements,
reduced
minimum
parking
requirements
and
TOD
areas.
We
did
the
kanata
north
urban
expansion
study
area.
D
There
are
a
number
of
projects
that
we
as
a
department
did
that
don't
report
through
this
committee
and
I
thought
it
was
worth
reminding
this
committee
about
those
other
initiatives.
You
would
have
seen
them
at
Council,
but
they
are
significant
pieces
of
our
work
program
from
the
last
year:
Ottawa
2.0
Ottawa,
smart
cities,
strategy,
the
energy
evolution
phase,
1.
The
comprehensive
asset
management
plan
update
to
Council
that
our
infrastructure,
Services
Group,
did
the
transition
of
the
bioriod
and
Parkdale
markets
to
municipal
services
corporation
and
the
patio
bylaw
updates.
D
These
are
just
the
biggest
files
that
we
picked
but,
as
you
appreciate,
we
report
through
a
number
of
different
committees
of
council
for
the
work
of
our
department
in
terms
of
a
20-18
work
plan.
As
I
said
before,
we
have
completing
what
was
the
2017-2018
work
plan
previously
approved
by
committee
and
we're
focusing
on
completing
the
term
of
council
priorities.
D
This
has
been
affected
by
some
things
that
we
probably
didn't
anticipate
when
we
started
the
work
plan
back
in
2017
and
18
and
the
biggest
being
the
changes
to
the
OMB
to
the
local
planning,
Appeals
Tribunal,
and
what
that
will
do,
and
also
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
through
a
number
of
different
sources
on
inclusionary
zoning.
So
those
are
important.
D
The
other
thing
that
wasn't
contemplated
in
that,
but
as
a
significant
part
of
a
work
load,
is
the
R
for
interim
control
by
law
related
to
bunk
houses
and
the
study
and
we'll
be
reporting
back
to
Council.
Shortly
on.
First
phase
of
our
on
that
we
continue
we'll
be
continuing
to
dispose
of
matters
before
the
new
Local
Planning
Appeals
Tribunal
related
to
OPA.
115
180,
although,
albeit
mr.
D
mark,
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
there
under
the
old
OMB
regime,
it's
just
rebranded
and
we
are
doing
work
in
anticipation
of
a
review
of
the
Official
Plan
in
the
next
term
of
counsel.
So
we're
getting
ready,
we're
trying
to
figure
out
the
methodology
of
that
and
the
work
that
we're
doing
on
the
auto
annexed
program
beyond
2036
as
part
of
that
as
well.
I'll
come
back
to
that
in
a
moment.
D
D
We
have
other
community
design
plans
in
progress
and
trying
to
bring
them
to
completion
in
terms
of
mer,
bleue,
the
East
urban
community
and
the
Merivale
north
community
design
plan,
which
is
an
offshoot
of
the
building
better,
revitalize
neighborhoods
project
to
remind
committee,
our
for
phase,
one
I
talked
about
as
well,
and
we
also
have
the
implementation
related
to
the
first
to
be
brn
projects
and
Etherington
and
Vanier
south.
We
will
be
reporting
on
our
efforts
on
the
urban
creek
conservation
by
law,
review,
infill
one
and
two
monitoring
and
energy
evolution
phase.
Two.
D
D
One
of
the
things
we're
trying
to
do
is
within
the
department
is
to
look
at
process,
reviews
and
efficiencies
within
the
system
to
address
concerns
from
stakeholders
in
a
variety
of
areas.
So
we
have
five
specific
areas
that
we're
working
on
in
terms
of
process
improvements
this
year.
One
is
the
adaptation
to
the
new
local
planning
at
Appeals
tribunal
system
and
working
very
closely
with
legal
services
that
will
affect
the
way
we
give
notices.
How
notices
will
work
it'll
probably
affect
them
way.
D
D
Engineering
on
reports,
which
is
twofold,
one
is
finding
more
efficiencies
in
the
system
of
review
and
also
trying
to
address
some
of
the
problems
that
we're,
seeing
and
and
basically
trying
to
create
space
in
the
staff
capacity
to
address
some
of
the
problems,
we're
seeing
and
things
like
some
of
the
engineering
issues
on
infill.
For
just
to
give
an
example,
we
at
council
early
Bru's
direction
and
inquiry.
We
had
raised
some
questions
about
our
process
on
Road
cuts
and
restoration.
D
We
will
be
doing
a
review
of
business
process
review
of
that
area
this
year
and
we
are
implementing
phase
one
of
our
land
management
system,
which
is
really
a
technological
solution
to
replace
very
outdated
technology.
We
use
right
now
on
the
building,
permit
side
and
ultimately
will
go
to
other
planning
applications
in
time
which
has
benefits
of
basically
having
a
software.
That's
supported,
helping
us
do
our
jobs,
but
it'll
also
make
it
easier
to
provide
data
to
pouty
inquiries
from
the
public,
because
it's
an
updated
system
that
will
be
easier
to
mine
for
data.
D
C
D
A
A
A
He's
president
cheese
here
was
the
president
of
Belltown
neighbours,
Association
and
he's
here
on
behalf
of
White
Haven
Community
Association,
wood
Park.
So
the
community
associations
of
Whitehaven
wood,
Park,
Lincoln,
Heights,
Parkway,
Queensway
Terrace,
north
Britannia,
Village
and
beltone
neighbors
Association.
G
G
Never
can
escape
I
know
beyo.
So
thank
you,
madam
chair
good
morning.
Yes,
my
name
is
Alex
Cullen
I
am
the
president
bell.
Town
neighbors
Association
in
other
was
West
End
and
I
am
here
representing
six
community
associations
that
surround
Lincoln
fields,
shopping
center
and
the
transit
way
station.
G
You'll
see
an
aerial
photograph
for
the
area
in
question,
I'm.
Looking
for
a
so
here,
Arthur's.
Thank
you.
So
there
we
go.
That's
the
shopping
center.
This
is
the
transit
weigh
station
very
close
by
the
area
that
we're
talking
about
is
actually
this
triangle
and
that
shopping
said
well.
I'll
continue
with
my
presentation,
so
you
should
also
have
received
copies
of
a
letter
dated
March
20
2018
sent
by
my
colleague,
Jonathan
Morris
of
the
Britannia
village,
on
our
behalf
regarding
our
request
for
a
city
led
Platten
planning
and
visioning
exercise
for
this
area.
G
I
do
have
extra
copies
if
case
people
don't
have
them,
but
I
believe
they
were
circulated.
Am
I
correct?
They
were
circulated.
Excellent.
Thank
you.
So
our
communities
became
aware
more
than
a
year
ago
that
the
owners
of
Lincoln
Field
shopping
center
ryokan
was
proposing
to
tear
down
the
shopping
center
and
redevelop
it
for
residential
uses
much
in
the
same
way
as
they
did
for
Westgate
shopping
center,
which
City
Council
approved
the
last
spring.
G
We're
also
very
aware
of
the
coming
out
LRT
to
our
community
at
the
Lincoln
Field
at
Lincoln
fields
and
the
effect
of
cities,
transit
oriented
development
guidelines
would
have
on
our
neighborhoods.
We
also
are
aware
that
there
are
other
redevelopment
opportunities
in
the
Triangle
bounded
by
the
trans
away,
carling
avenue
and
Richard
Road.
We
think
there's
a
need
for
a
coherent,
integrated
planning
approach
to
this
area
involving
urban,
firm
density
mix
of
uses,
pedestrian
and
cycling,
connectivity
to
rapid
transit,
green
space
mean
streets,
parking,
etc.
G
We
believe
our
request
of
planning
and
visioning
exercise
would
lead
to
a
better
planning
to
support
our
community
values,
redevelopment
opportunities
in
our
area
and
the
city's
policies.
From
this,
then,
a
more
appropriate
secondary
plan
can
be
developed
to
accommodate
real
plans
redevelopment,
as
well
as
the
case
in
Westgate
and
anvil
on
page
12
of
your
report.
If
you
can
go
to
page
12
of
your
report,
you
will
see
a
listing
on
page
12.
G
You
see
the
list
of
the
department's
2017
2018
plan
on
page
13,
the
opposite
side,
you'll
see
light
rail
transit
phase
to
station
area
plans
for
clearly
and
new
orchard.
The
two
stations
just
to
the
east
of
Lincoln
fuels,
plus
Pine,
Crest
Queens
view
the
station
just
to
the
west
of
Lincoln
fuels
as
well
as
for
Gladstone
station,
would
make
sense
to
include
a
planning
and
visioning
exercise
for
the
Lincoln
fields
area
on
this
list,
particularly
as
clearly
new
orchard
and
Pine
Crest.
G
Queens
view
are
allowing
stations,
whereas
Lincoln
fields,
this
would
be
a
major
hub
station
for
the
LRT.
Therefore,
our
six
community
associations
are
asking
that
this
committee
add
to
the
planning
departments,
2018
work
plan,
planning,
visioning
exercise
for
the
Lincoln
fields
area
to
be
led
by
the
city
involving
the
surrounding
communities
and
stakeholders.
2:7
place
planning
principles
to
guide
the
redevelopment
of
the
link
appeal
shopping
center
and
surrounding
properties.
That's
it
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
G
E
G
So
we,
mr.
Ellison
I,
just
had
a
conversation
just
prior
to
this
meeting
starting
up,
but
we
actually
met
with
planning
staff
early
in
the
thing
was
January
to
understand
better
the
city's
planning
process.
But
mr.
Willis
can
tell
you
the
results
of
our
conversation.
I
was
encouraged
by
our
conversation,
but
let
him
give
the
good
news.
D
D
G
Think
the
point
we're
making
is,
we
don't
want
to
be
reactive
to
a
planning
application.
The
area
is
larger
than
just
weaken
fields,
because
you
have
the
trans
away
station
the
LRT
station
and
you
have
the
other
properties.
So
we
would
like
to
be
ahead
of
the
curve
as
opposed
to
responding,
and
we
think
we
have
time,
because
our
understanding
is
real.
A
D
Chair
I
think
what
I'm
saying
is
is
that
we
would
meet
with
the
community
to
understand
the
issues
that
they
would
like
to
be
raised.
We
would
use
those
issues
to
help
scope
the
work
that
the
development
application
be
required
to
do
in
a
secondary
planning
exercise.
We
probably
encourage
the
owner
real
kin
to
involve
some
of
the
adjacent
landowners
in
their
application,
because
there
may
be
some
benefit
to
that,
and
then
we
can
identify
through
the
process
where
whether
there
should
be
some
additional
changes.
D
As
I
said
it's
much
like
the
aldo
lakers
process,
it
is
let
I
know
the
community
ideally
would
like
us
to
do
it
in
advance.
I.
Think
we're
not
that
far
apart
in
terms
of
what
we're
asking
I
think
we
can
address
the
issues
and
understand
their
issues
that
take
him
into
the
process
quite
legitimately,
and.
A
We
did
learn
from
the
and
you
are
the
first
speaker
up,
but
we
did
learn
from
the
Elm
Valley
acres,
for
example,
that
there
was
a
real
opportunity
and
understanding
from
both
sides
before
it
really
moved
forward.
It
definitely
did
evolved
through
that
process,
as
opposed
to
you
didn't
do
one
before
the
other.
You
did
it
together
right
yeah
anyway.
Thank
you.
Anyone
have
any
other
questions
for
councillor
cup,
sorry,
Norma
Desmond.
Oh
my.
H
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
mr.
Willis,
for
the
presentation
and
thank
you
for
your
kind
comments
on
on
Elm
Vale
acres.
It
it
sure,
was
a
successful
application.
I
believe
that
that
ended
up
addressing
a
lot
of
the
needs
now
and
in
the
future
and
as
we
look
forward
to
site
plan
coming
for
for
the
first
phase,
that'll
we'll
continue
to
to
engage
with
the
community,
and
my
question
is
mr.
Willis,
with
on
an
important
piece
of
planning
infrastructure.
That's
not
explicit
in
in
the
plan
and
I
recognize.
I
I
As
you
know,
the
Tremblay
station
in
an
Ottawa
Citizen
article,
was
was
noted
to
be
the
least
walkable
and
of
all
the
LRT
stations,
and
that's
acknowledged.
There
are
future
developments
going
on
at
the
train
yards
adjacent
to
the
vias
station
and
but
the
issue
of
a
connection
which
is
part
of
the
pedestrian
and
cycling
plan
of
the
City
of
Ottawa,
between
Terminal
Avenue
and
the
LRT
station,
either
a
tunnel
or
an
overpass.
Can
you
or
one
of
your
colleagues
mr.
I
D
Some
member
I'm
going
to
give
you
a
short
answer
in
a
if
you
require
additional
clarification.
Mr.
Smith
will
jump
in
to
provide
that
this
is
a
complex
file
in
that
not
all
approvals
for
this
concept.
Rest
within
the
city.
This
is
a
we're
talking
about
Via
Rail
and
over
which
National
Capital
Commission
actually
has
planning
approval,
Authority
and
via
has
a
number
of
requirements
of
Milliken,
a
transportation
act
related
to
their
facility
security
and
other
elements
of
how
they
actually
operate.
D
So
what
we
anticipate
in
2018
is
meeting
with
those
other
stakeholders,
the
NCC,
the
owners
of
the
train
yards
and
perhaps
Transport
Canada
if
they
are
required
as
part
of
this
discussion
to
scope
out
what
would
actually
be
required
so
that
we
could
frame
that
into
a
proposal
for
2019
in
terms
of
what
that
might
mean
in
terms
of
preliminary
design,
engineering
type
work,
but
we
do
need
to
meet
with
those
other
stakeholders
to
understand
their
requirements.
So
it's
on
our
radar.
D
We
do
need
to
bring
the
others
into
this,
and
colleagues
and
transportation
services
have
to
play
a
major
role
on
this
too,
because
it
is
part
of
our
pedestrian
cycling
network.
So
we
do
need
to
do
that.
Precursor
work
this
year
and
I.
Think
by
the
time
we
bring
the
2019
work
program,
we'll
have
a
better
understanding
of
a
path
from
here
to
there.
Okay.
I
Will
there
be,
as
you
might
know,
there
is
a
trigger
in
the
current
site
plan
for
some
offices
along
terminal
2,
to
ensure
to
to
obligate
control
x2
to
participate
in
this
in
this
just
want
to
bring
to
the
department's
attention
a
current
site
plan
application
for
phase
1
of
an
1800
unit
development
adjacent
to
the
central
post
office
in
an
old
truck
terminal
phase.
1
will
be
two
buildings
over
400
units.
D
Sure,
that's
very
much
a
consideration
why
we
need
to
bring
the
stakeholders
together
in
the
short
term,
to
understand
what
all
the
various
approvals
of
permits
who's,
contributing.
What
we're
obligations
exists
between
the
parties,
particularly
control
X.
So
it's
very
much
why
we
need
to
do
this
precursor
work
in
the
short.
D
Will
have
those
stakeholder
meetings
this
year
and
we'll
scope
out
what
this
means
for
a
future
work
program.
I
can't
at
this
point
commit
to
what
that
means,
because
we
have
other
budget
and
other
considerations
that
on
infrastructure
spending,
but
I
think
will
scope
what
it
means.
What
what
a
work
plan
would
be,
what
the
levels
of
design
who
has
approvals,
who
has
to
contribute
what
will
get
answers
on
those
this
year?
Thank
you.
A
E
J
Madam
chair,
there
are
a
number
of
factors
that
that
impact
those
timelines.
We
are
undertaking
process
reviews,
as
mr.
Willis
outlined
the
earlier
this
morning
and
we're
very
excited
about
making
some
change
just
to
give
you
an
example.
We've
started
this
year
with
new
digital
circulations
of
packages,
as
opposed
to
paper
copies,
not
saving
time.
We
just
finished
a
pilot
exercise
with
digital
approvals,
and
that
has
saved
five
to
eight
working
days
and
approximately
on
one
application.
J
E
Just
pulling
one
sentence
out
of
the
port
is
just
about
the
site
plan.
Applications,
delays
caused
by
a
combination
of
issues,
the
increased
development
complexity
and
scale
extensive
public
consultation.
That's
beyond
what's
required
internal
complications
such
as
workload
and
staff
turnover,
is
the
department
sufficiently
staffed
to
handle
the
number
of
applications.
If
the
trend
over
the
number
of
years
is
going
up,
does
staff
have
what
they
need
to
respond
to
these
applications
in
time.
J
Madam
chair,
that's
a
really
great
question:
we're
undertaking
a
review
this
year
in
terms
of
a
capacity
analysis.
I
can
certainly
state
that
the
past
few
years
we've
really
seen
an
increase,
we're
almost
close
to
a
30
percent
increase
over
the
past
two
years,
for
example
in
terms
of
applications,
but
we
have
not
had
any
increases
in
staff.
So,
of
course,
at
some
point
in
time
we
have
to
look
at.
Is
there
a
better
and
more
efficient
way
that
we
can?
We
can
operate
and
that's
what
we're
undertaking
to
look
right
now
in
terms
of?
J
D
Madam
chair,
if
I
may
add,
there's
a
couple
other
factors
that
are
worthwhile
point
out:
one
is
as
after
the
reorganization,
we
actually
had
a
very
high
level
of
staff
agency.
A
year
ago
we
were
as
many
as
almost
a
third
of
the
positions
and
miss
sneden's
group
were
actually
vacant.
We
have
been
very
aggressive
in
filling
that
we
think
that
will
make
significant
progress
on
some
of
the
issues.
These
are
existing
FTEs
already
approved
that
we're
vacant
or
addressing
that.
D
D
The
Planning
Act
meant
area
the
Planning
Act
allows
us
to
go
for
cost
recovery,
but
the
department
doesn't
at
this
point,
go
for
that
with
the
change.
We
did
an
organizational
structure
last
year
separating
long-range
planning,
which
is
paid
for
purely
by
the
tax
dollars.
We
will
have
a
better
results
once
we
get
the
full
year.
End
results
we'll
have
a
better
understanding
of
our
overall
fee
recovery
on
development.
D
E
Do
we
have
those
stats
you
presented
stats
which
I
assume
made
it
through
that
were
ultimately
approved,
whether
it
be
site
plan
or
subdivision
plans,
so
OPA
amendments?
What
about
the
applications
that
don't
make
it
here
where
your
staff
have
spent
a
significant
amount
of
I?
Think
that
there
would
be
some
value
in
understanding
those
numbers
Madame.
D
E
K
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
couple
of
questions
on
the
plan
follow
along
what
the
counselor
at
Buckland
was
just
saying:
the
figure
3
in
Figure
4
on
page
7,
which
is
the
site
plan,
Control
Manager
delegated
without
public
consultation
and
you've
all
already
excluded,
incomplete
or
file
pending.
So
that
tells
me
this
is
the
work
that
we
have
the
most
control
over
and
you're
only
on
target
one-third
of
the
time.
There's
that
to
me
that's
a
very
troubling
number
atom.
D
We
really
believe
on
site
plan,
particularly
engineering
process
review,
will
yield
improvements
to
those
overall
numbers
because,
as
we
try
to
understand
on
a
case
study
basis
where
files
are
getting
bogged
down,
it's
on
the
quality
of
the
engineering
submissions
and
the
timeliness
of
the
review
of
the
engineering
submissions
and
the
number
of
resubmissions
that
are
required-
and
we
genuinely
believe,
is
if
we
hack
that
problem,
the
overall
numbers
will
improve
significantly.
So
that's
where
our
focus
is.
D
In
addition,
we
are
going
to
be
looking
at
some
low
risk
types
of
files
where
we
might
actually
remove
the
requirement
for
a
site
plan
control
to
reduce
low
risk
files
from
the
system,
which
would
give
us
additional
energy
to
focus
on
the
ones
that
are
more
complex
and
that
is
a
proposal
will
ultimately
bring
back
the
committee
in
time,
but
we're
still
doing
work
on
that.
I
look.
K
Forward
to
seeing
that
proposal,
the
other
question
I
have
for
you
has
to
do
with
while
you
highlight,
is
one
of
your
five
areas,
you're
working
on,
which
is
the
inspection
work.
Does
that
also
include
the
inspection
of
the
right
away?
Work,
that's
being
done
because
I
see
on
page
10,
you've
had
over
a
thousand
circulations
per
year
and
I
know
in
my
area.
K
I'm
just
wondering
if
you're,
if
you
have
a
plan
to
and
increase
the
people,
doing,
the
inspections
or
maybe
perhaps
what
we
should
do
is
increase
the
consequences
for
the
contractors
that
are
not
living
up
to
the
standards
of
the
contracts
and
perhaps
that
might
be
a
better
way
to
get
better
compliance.
Madam.
D
D
We
have
plenty
of
evidence
in
front
of
us
that
we
need
to
do
a
rethink
of
the
way
we
do
this,
both
in
terms
of
what
we
charge,
how
we
actually
monitor
it,
how
we
inspect
whether
or
not
there
is
a
coordination
of
inspection
between
infrastructure
services
and
right-of-way,
and
whether
we
can
share
some
of
the
resources
to
make
sure
we're
higher
quality
inspections,
so
called
assurance
as
part
of
this
as
well
too.
So
it's
absolutely
part
of
the
review.
How
fast
will
that
part
get
done?
It's
a
complicated
file.
D
L
Obviously,
there
are
deficiencies
in
a
new
home,
not
of
old
which
our
building
code
issues,
but
when
I
have
a
list
of
30
building
code
issues
in
a
house
that
the
inspectors
miss.
That's
a
problem,
so
I'm
wondering
what
strategies
are
employees
to
one
address.
The
staffing
shortage
I
understand
exists
in
the
building
code,
Department
to
make
sure
that
our
inspectors
are
trained
properly,
to
understand
the
code
and
be
able
to
identify
these
kinds
of
problems
and
three
address
post
address
the
situation
post,
realization
of
the
problem
to
the
homeowner
satisfaction.
D
Spam
child
give
an
initial
answer
and
Miss
Snyder.
Mr.
ash
can
supplement
my
answer
on
this,
as
it
relates
to
the
staffing
issues.
This
is
one
area
where
recruitment
has
been
extraordinarily
complicated
in
that
in
Ontario.
We
don't
generate
many
people
in
programs
who
have
the
capabilities
and
skills
to
go
into
building
code
related
work,
so
we
in
every
municipality
in
Ontario
are
facing
the
same
problem.
Is
we
don't
have
enough
of
a
pipeline
of
candidates
on
this?
Mr.
D
burden
is
working
very
closely
with
the
educational
institutions
in
the
area
we're
doing
internships
with
Algonquin
College
in
particular,
to
try
to
create
a
pipeline
of
new
candidates
that
come
in
and
and
and
frankly,
we
have
stiff
competition
from
Toronto
Area
municipalities
to
recruit
people
with
the
skills
and
competencies.
That's
that
that's
the
underlying
problem.
On
the
issues
of
training
in
QA,
we
have
had
a
high
staff
change
in
the
last
year.
New
staff
have
come
in
mr.
ash,
in
particular,
has
been
heavily
involved
in
training,
new
staff
and
perhaps
I
could
ask
mr.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Yes,
we
have
a
mr.
Willis
indicated.
We
definitely
have
a
resourcing
issue
right
now.
We
have
a
number
of
vacancies
within
the
department
that
we're
working
hard
to
to
fill.
There's
been
half
a
dozen
competitions
over
the
last
year
to
fill
in
vacancies,
we're
still
running
in
about
a
ten
to
fifteen
percent
vacancy
at
any
one
time.
It
is
a
very
progressive
and
a
training
program
that
the
building
officials
go
through.
B
It's
a
multi-year
program
that
ensures
the
quality
of
inspectors
that
we
want
to
have
here
at
the
city
and
it
so
it
grows
above.
The
minimum
requirements
that
are
mandated
by
the
province
with
regards
to
inspections
is
specifically
we
right
now.
The
Inspection
Division
is
undergoing
a
process
review
to
clarify
expectations.
There
was
one
done
early
on
an
amalgamation.
It
needs
updating.
It's
it's
happening
right
now
and
should
be
done
by
the
end
of
the
year,
and
it
will
look
to
streamline
and
gain
a
greater
consistency
among
interpretation
with
inspectors
and.
J
L
A
very
specific
issue
and
I
think
the
entire
department
probably
knows
about
it
and
that's
not
the
only
reason
I'm
raising
it,
but
that's
primarily
the
reason
I'm
raising
it.
But
it's
one
thing
to
have
a
specific
issue
with
a
person,
a
specific
homeowner
to
specific
address
when
that
issue
is
replicated
throughout
the
entirety
of
the
subdivision.
L
That's
a
problem
right
and
when
the
homeowner
feels
that
they
have
to
include
me
on
every
single
conversation
they're
having
the
staff
because
of
lack
of
follow-up,
that's
a
problem
and
it
needs
to
be
dealt
with,
and
if
there
are
staffing
shortages,
if
there
are
policy
problems,
if
there's
a
pipeline
problem,
it
shouldn't
have
to
get
to
that
point.
To
get
dealt
with
is
I.
Guess
is
what
I'm
getting
at
I've
been
trying
to
deal
with
it
without
bring
it
up.
L
A
M
Thank
You
chair
first
I
just
want
to
thank
you
very
much
for
taking
a
look
this
year
at
the
road
cut
issue,
I'm
pleased
to
see
how
quickly
you've
picked
up
that
ball.
The
infill
is
resulting
in
trench
after
trench
across
our
streets.
I,
don't
think
we're
collecting
enough
money
to
take
into
account
the
the
diminished
lifespan
of
those
roads
as
a
result
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
what
you
bring
forward
moving
into
the
next
term
and
I
also
just
wanted
to
make
mention
in
the
report.
M
Some
of
the
residents
didn't
see
the
Island
Park
Drive
zoning
change
to
preserve
those
setbacks,
so
I
just
want
to
reassure
people.
If
that's
moving
ahead.
My
key
question
this
morning,
though,
and
I
know
you're
anticipating
it
is
I've,
been
chatting
with
planning
for
a
couple
of
years
now
about
Westborough,
we
have
a
secondary
plan
for
Westborough
Richmond
Road,
that
is
at
least
a
decade
old.
It
predates
the
arrival
of
light
rail.
The
Official
Plan
has
been
updated
a
couple
of
times
since
that
was
put
out.
M
It's
bookended
on
either
side
by
the
the
new
Scott
Street
secondary
plan,
which
has
been
providing
a
significant
and
important
up-to-date
guidance
in
light
of
the
most
recent
planning
thinking
about
how
it's
going
to
evolve.
Clearing
new
orchard
is
coming
along
really
well
and
I
have
to
congratulate
the
department
on
a
very
patient
and
thorough
job
of
consulting
residents.
On
that
Gladstone
station
is
coming
up.
M
The
Wellington
West
secondary
plan
has
been
a
defensible,
modern,
secondary
plan,
and
then
we
had
this
hole
in
Westborough
where
residents
are
simply
not,
they
simply
don't
feel
that
the
the
secondary
plan
Reserve
is
providing
any
kind
of
guidance.
We
know
that
it's
out
of
sync
now
with
the
Official
Plan
and
the
new
thinking
around
transit.
Surely
it
is
time
to
revisit
West
burrow,
which
was
one
of
the
first
secondary
plans
that
was
done
under
some
of
the
new
directions
from
the
province?
Are
we
going
to
take
a
look
at
West,
burrow.
D
So
I
have
asked
staff
to
prepare
some
options
too
for
us
on
how
to
tactically
update
that
plan,
because
it
is
out
of
sync
and
it's
my
anticipation
that
once
we
reviewed
those
options
and
try
to
understand
how
we
could
do
that
in
an
effective
way,
we'll
probably
be
working
that
into
a
2019
work
plan,
because
I
think
it's
self-evident
that,
with
the
work
we've
been
doing
in
Wellington,
West
and
now
clearly
new
orchard.
This
is
the
missing
piece
of
that
continuous
network.
So
I
would
anticipate.
M
D
Chair
procedurally
I
think
we
can
take
direction
to
develop
options
to
present
the
planning
committee
on
a
tactical
review
and
I
believe
we
can
do
that.
Ultimately,
planning
committee
will
have
to
agree
with
that
and
it's
what
plan
in
the
next
term
of
Council,
but
I
certainly
would
welcome
the
direction
because
I
think
it
is
our
intent.
Fantastic.
B
Thank
you.
Okay
thanks,
madam
chair.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
great
work.
A
lot
of
great
stuff
happens
here
and
I
think
Jen
said
it
before.
We
all
understand
that
planning
is
the
heart
of
council.
It
touches
every
aspect
of
every
committee
in
some
way
or
another,
and
it
really
goes
to
the
direction
that
the
general
managers
do.
Cadillac
I
set
it
to
say:
let's
stop
working
in
silos,
let's
work
together,
so
I.
B
Really
it's
real
quick
question,
because
I
already
have
the
enquiry
unit,
Council
and
I'm
already
seeing
how
this
could
work
in
regards
to
having
all
of
our
roads
infrastructure
available
online
and
I
noticed
that
in
your
presentation,
you
had
ArcGIS
for
the
hot
spots.
That's
good
news,
because,
obviously
that
is
one
of
the
you
know
the
leading
software
packages
that
gives
us
the
ability
to
be
able
to
have
all
our
streets
online
know
the
life
cycles
to
elect
great
stuff.
B
D
Sure
I
wish
mr.
Roger
was
here
to
help
me
and
mr.
Roger
runs
the
GIS
group
in
here
and
we're
actually
quite
proud
of
the
enormous
amount
of
information
that
group
processes
in
a
year
and
supports
every
function
of
the
city.
Last
year
they
were
heavily
involved
in
the
flood
response.
They've
been
involved
in
supporting
the
clerk's
office
on
a
number
issues,
transportation
on
the
others
and
I
think
that
group
is
in
the
process
of
responding
to
your
inquiry.
I
do
believe
that
the
answer
will
be
that
it's
doable.
D
B
And
just
as
a
quick
follow-up,
I've
looked
at
a
lot
of
examples
in
Los,
Angeles
and
know
them
all
over
the
place.
They
have
them.
Where
you
can
go
on
any
road,
see
the
life
cycle
when
there's
an
axe
resurfaces
do
all
that
great
stuff.
If
we
do
go
in
this
direction,
I've
noticed
they
use,
and
forgive
me
if
this
is
for
transportation,
we'll
have
to
wait
for
the
inquiry
they
use
PCI
for
pavement
condition
index
as
a
kind
of
a
benchmark
on
your.
Can
your
your
condition
of
your
asphalt
roads?
D
Don't
have
mrs.
McDonald
here
to
help
me
answer
this
question.
We
do
have
a
form
of
condition
index.
That's
based
in
the
comprehensive
asset
management
plan.
We
do
great
roads
bike
for
different
categories,
in
terms
of
condition
that
that
is
in
this,
the
cam
report
and
I
think
that's,
ultimately
what
we
would
draw
the
information
if
I'm
as
I
says
it
does
exist
in
our
database.
It's
a
question
about
making
it
graphically
represent
a
ball.
That's.
C
You
very
much
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
mr.
Willis,
for
the
presentation
this
morning
and
I
do
want
to
commend
fallen
mr.
Khan
for
Tony's
comments
about
the
great
work
that
the
Planning
Department
has
done,
as
continues
to
move
forward
the
2018
rest
of
2018
and
2019
in
the
future.
Just
a
couple
of
question.
Mr.
Wallace,
first
of
all,
on
page
14,
you
mentioned
for
your
28
2018
plan,
going
forward
significant
woodland
and
site
alteration
bylaws
those
two
items:
how
much
more
work
needs
to
be
done
on
those
two
items?
D
About
challenge
to
the
second
one:
first,
so
at
Council
tomorrow,
you
will
see
the
results
of
the
work.
The
Planning
Committee
in
Iraq
have
on
site
alteration.
Iraq
has
asked
us
to
address
some.
Some
concerns
related
to
agricultural
community.
I
think
we
can
discuss
this
further
at
Council
tomorrow,
but
our
they've
asked
us
to
do
some
additional
work
related
to
that,
and
we
will
be
able
to
do
that
quickly
and
bring
the
report
back
to
the
next
council.
D
We
believe
so
there's
some
bylaw
justments
that
they
have
asked
for
for
clarity
and
also
focusing
the
review
related
to
certain
issues
in
the
bylaw
to
an
area
in
the
urban
periphery.
So
a
wax
should
council
adopt
a
recommendation.
Will
we
should
wrap
that
one
up
for
certain
this
spring?
That's
easily
done
significant
woodlands.
We've
done
the
policy
work
that
we
have
had
to
do.
It
has
been
implemented,
there's
additional
work
that
relates
to
urban
forest
management,
that's
coming
as
part
of
the
urban
forest
management
plan
and
a
number
of
other
issues
to
support
that.
D
C
You
for
that
that's
I'll,
just
basically
look
around
looking
for
a
general
update
on
those
two
items
going
forward.
The
other
question
I
have
in
talking
about
what
you
mentioned
with
the
council.
Leapers
item
about
Road
cuts,
I
think
Road
cuts
are,
you
know,
are
very
severe
in
terms
of
this
city.
I
can
give
you
examples
or
in
my
ward,
where
a
road
will
bill
two
years
ago,
and
you
know
the
road
cuts
have
happened
in
that
road.
Having
said
that,
there
are
other
related
issues
to
Road
cuts.
C
Besides
the
road
cuts
themselves,
one
is
the
utility
vehicles,
the
heavy
vehicles
from
hydro
and
other
companies
that
damage
existing
sidewalks
when
they
climb
on
sidewalks
with
their
weighted
trucks
down.
Does
anybody
look
at
that
kind
of
infrastructure
and
see
before
construction
and
after
construction,
the
condition
of
the
road
infrastructure
Madame.
D
Sure
we
have
in
common
discussion
on
really
the
issue
of
quality
assurance
as
it
relates
to
Road
cuts
and
that's
very
much
part
of
our
review.
I
think
that's
just
another
example
of
call
the
insurance
and
inspections
requirements
that
have
been
raised
through
some
of
the
questions
today,
and
that
is
something
we
need
to
address.
So
that's
part
of
the
business
process
review
to
look
at
this
and
I'll.
Take
that
specific
point
back
to
stop
to
make
sure
that
it
is
actually
included
and.
C
I,
just
don't
mean
single
out
hydro
I'm,
just
saying
utility
companies
overall
do
that
work.
You
know
in
terms
of
their
lines
and
stuff
that
are
there,
but
they
never
seem
to
come
back
and
finish
it
properly
or
completed
properly
to
its
original
standard.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
aware
of
those
issues
as
a
city
and
as
a
plan
to
put
Department
process
to
you
know,
don't
let
those
they
go
by
the
wayside.
D
M
You,
sir,
and
precipitating
setback
on
the
list
here.
One
of
the
things
that
was
raised
was
the
urban
tree
conservation
by
law
review.
As
you
now
chatted
about
a
fair
bit.
There
are
residents
in
ketchupy
are
particularly
interested
in
that
we
are
losing
our
canopy
to
infill.
Can
I
just
seek
your
assurance
that,
as
we
move
through
the
bylaw
review,
that
there
will
be
a
lens
on
particularly
the
effects
of
infill
and
whether
or
not
there
are
any
changes
that
we
can
make
to
try
to
better
preserve
our
tree
canopy?
M
D
Chair
we
will
bring
further
information
back
to
a
CPC
committee
and
others
on
the
urban
forest
conservation
by
law.
Urban
tree
conservation
by
law,
as
well
as
this
committee
I,
think
there's
three
things
that
are
working
in
tandem
right
now.
One
is:
we've
had
devastating
effects
of
invasive
species.
There
have
been
some
effects
of
infill
development.
That's
certainly
part
of
the
equation
and
there's
also
been
some
issues
just
in
planes
of
coordination
with
utilities
and
other
elements
as
well.
So
these
are
being
looked
at
in
the
bylaw
I.
D
Think
what
we'll
find
when
we
get
there
is.
We
are
looking
at
what
powers
does
the
city
have
under
various
bylaws
under
the
Planning
Act
on
the
municipal
act,
to
address
this
issue?
I?
Think,
of
course,
us
will
probably
identify
that
we
don't
have
sufficient
powers
in
certain
areas.
I
would
expect
that
staff
will
recommend.
We
seek
additional
powers
from
the
province
in
certain
areas,
but
certainly
we're
trying
to
address
the
issues
in
every
corner.
D
M
That
is
encouraging
me.
The
basic
understanding
I
have
from
the
city
is
that
largely
development
Trump's
trees,
and
if
we,
if
we
want
to
change
that,
that
will
need
to
seek
provincial
provincial
changes.
But
the
exact
nature
of
what
needs
to
change
is
something
that's
a
matter
of
some
debate
and
discussion
around
the
community,
so
I'm
pleased
to
hear
that
will
hone
in
on
that
and
develop
that
foundational
level
of
information.
First.
Thank
you
very
much
chairman
thank.
D
Thank
you
chair
a
just
very
a
couple
of
very
brief
comments
and
I've
started
by
echoing
the
comments
of
my
colleagues
that
when
you
look
at
the
list
there
had
been
some
great
things
done
this
term.
Mr.
Willis
mentioned
coach
houses.
I
would
add,
the
reduction
of
parking
minimums
was
I,
think
a
very
important
project,
infill
one
and
to
the
pre-consultation
pilot
and
the
er
boards
has
been
very
productive.
In
my
experience,
just
a
couple
of
quick
things,
mr.
Wilson
I
spoke
about
infill
one
and
two.
D
A
So
on
the
report
has
I've
received.
Yes,
thank
you
thanks
everyone,
okay,
so
now
we're
going
on
to
the
next
held
item
were
the
only
other
held
item
which
councillor
Wilkinson.
This
is
her
report.
We
do
have
some
speakers
and
she
has
a
short
presentation
to
show
you
so
that
you
can
identify
clearly
where
she's
talking
about
okay.
H
Whatever
you're
ready,
okay,
thank
you.
I
just
have
a
very
brief
slideshow
just
to
explain
this
a
bit
because
of
some
confusion,
the
list
of
the
19
that
are
waiting
to
get
traffic
signals.
This
is
not
related
to
that
at
all,
because
this
is
a
development
charge,
one
that
would
be
a
hundred
percent
paid
for
by
development
charges
and
not
by
tax
dollars.
So
it
is
sometimes
a
little
bit
confusing
because
of
that.
H
But
in
the
meantime
we
have
a
real
crisis
of
a
dangerous
situation.
Developers
will
in
to
pay
the
extra
cost
to
build
it
now
and
get
paid
later.
So
this
is
not
going
to
cost
taxpayers
anything,
nor
is
it
going
to
interfere
with
the
priority
of
the
other
ones
that
are
in
the
list
that
the
city
has
that's
really
important
to
know
they
have.
H
So
this
abruptly
a
thousand
units
has
almost
no
access.
I
would
not
show
you
why
that
is
so.
This
road
becomes
very
critical
that
they
will
be
paid
through
a
funding
agreement,
so
in
the
city
pays
nothing
up
front.
They
expect
that
that
most
the
rest
of
sedition
regret
they
sure
about
another
250
units.
So
you
just
imagine
how
much
worse
it's
going
to
get
as
the
year
goes
on.
H
On
top
of
that,
we
have
one
school
already
accessing
into
this,
because
all
the
kids
have
to
be
bused,
because
there's
no
access
any
near
the
school
and
there's
another
school
opening
in
September.
So
we're
going
to
have
even
more
then
so
this
is
just
to
give
you
a
brief
outline
of
where
it
is.
You
can't
actually
see
the
housing
in
this
one.
Unfortunately,
it
doesn't
come
out.
It's
very
faint,
and
this
see
if
this
works
now
supposed
to
this
doesn't
still
so
faint.
You
can
hardly
see
it
there
if
I
put
it
on
here.
H
If
you
look
near
the
upper
part
of
that
there's
actually
a
natural
environment
area
that
causes
directly
along
so
this
developed
that
has
no
connection
at
all
with
the
other
developments
and
the
the
next
map
may
show
that
a
little
clearer
then
the
result
of
that
is
that
there's
only
three
actual
exits.
These
two
subdivisions
together,
two
of
them,
are
on
Terry
Fox.
The
one
furthest
to
your
left
is
one
we're
talking
about.
It
serves
the
largest
of
the
developments.
H
It
is
a
three-way
stop
because
across
the
river
from
that's
Terry
Fox,
the
rotor
on
there
is
the
clap
River.
So
it
can
never
be
a
fold
intersection
at
that
point.
It's
also
a
rocky
ridge.
So
as
the
hill
coming
down,
so
traffic
tends
to
be
moving
a
bit.
The
one
you
see
on
Terry
Fox
towards
the
east
is
a
right
in
and
right
out
only
it's
so
close
to
the
intersection
that
they
put
a
median
there's.
You
cannot
turn
left,
people
come
up
and
there
is
actually
a
traffic
light.
H
Just
unfortunately,
this
thing
doesn't
seem
to
want
to
show
itself
on
here.
Oh
there,
it
is
now.
That's
the
one
that
Mike
talked
about.
This
is
the
one
that's
right
turn
right
on
it
right
about
here
is
where
in
which
the
side
road
comes
across,
which
ends
at
this
point
and
there's
a
traffic
light
there.
But
people
from
this
one
have
to
come
and
do
a
u-turn
there,
because
they
cannot
turn
left
and
it
had
been
a
number
quite
a
few
accidents
because
of
that,
because
the
right
Turner's
don't
notice
it
are.
H
This
is
kanata
Avenue,
which
is
fig,
goes
all
the
way
up
to
the
Queensway.
It
is
actually
has
a
traffic
light.
You
can
do
a
very
convoluted
weather
all
through
the
subdivision,
turning
and
sleeping
around
and
going
up
like
that
to
get
there
to
get
out
as
a
long
way
around.
Many
people
do
that
anyway,
because
it's
safer
the.
H
So
that
is
what
we
situations
like
there.
Now
you
look
at
the
area.
The
this
is
the
intersection
again
we
talked
about.
You
can
see
a
little
clearer
whether
the
side
row
comes
up
here.
These
are
the
schools
Terry
Fox
between
this.
If
this
intersection
here
with
the
traffic
and
all
the
way
around
to
here,
has
no
entrances
or
exits
on
to
it,
exalt,
except
than
one
we're
talking
about
result
of
that
they
are
going.
It's
an
80
kilometer
limit.
H
It's
a
major
arterial
they'll
go
100
120
through
there,
and
that
makes
this
there's
been
a
number
of
accidents
already,
but
tons
of
near
misses
and
people
say
they
take
their
life
enhance
every
day.
It
takes
a
long
time
at
rush
hour.
To
get
a
note,
this
is
a
school
that
already
exists
as
an
elementary
school.
The
children
in
this
area
go
to
that
school.
If
they're
in
the
public
board,
this
school
under
construction
is
opening
a
September.
It's
a
separate
school
board.
Again
this
area
will
go
with
that
school.
H
It
could
burn
both
of
that
the
school
buses,
because
this
is
part
of
the
KL
lands
or
somebody
heard
about
they're
not
built
in
that
area,
yet
there's
no
housing
next
to
the
school
at
the
moment.
So
all
the
children
are
bused.
This
black
line
here
is
the
existing
Ruben
force
road,
which
goes
across
this
area.
It
is
closed
for
construction
to
take
a
watermain
up
to
the
new
school
as
a
start,
building
the
revised
location
of
that
road,
which
is
to
go
this
way.
So
that
means
that
a
lot
of
people
used
to
come.
H
This
way
now
have
to
come
all
the
way
around,
and
it's
added
that
they
did
even
worse
this
summer
and
that
will
be
going
wait
until
school
opens.
That
will
be
closed.
The
result
of
that
is
that
you
have
a
very
difficult
situation.
There's
one
of
stress:
it's
a
hundred
percent
development
charge
paid
for
not
tax
paid.
It
is
one
that
the
developer
is
quite
willing
and
they
will
speak
to
that
that
they
took
fight
any
agreement
now,
staff
have
indicated
will
be
after
the
next
file
are
before
they
can
get
repaid.
H
That
accepted
that,
and
so
it's
not
to
take
advantage
over
any
other
one,
whether
it's
a
development
charge
one
or
not
to
to
get
priority,
is
just
to
make
sure
that
we
get
it
safely
done
in
a
way
that
doesn't
cost
the
taxpayers
anything.
Thank
you.
Any
questions
I
might
ask
I
think
you
might
ask
them
for
a
developer,
something
questions.
A
A
L
By
adding
this
to
the
development
charge
or
approving
the
funding
agreement
early
before
the
development
charge
by
law,
review
is
completed,
presumably
the
developers,
presumably,
the
developer-
wants
to
get
paid
back
within
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
Really,
that's,
typically
my
understanding
of
how
their
business
practices.
L
By
proving
it
today
before
amending
the
bylaw
and
seeing
the
projects
that
will
be
included
in
the
bylaw
and
the
prioritization
of
those
projects,
are
we
basically
putting
this
project
as
a
higher
priority
before
the
full
review
is
done
and
I
say
that?
Because
obviously,
the
Builder
is
going
to
want
their
money
back
within
a
reasonable
amount
of
time.
A
L
Can
you
so
we
are
before
we
do
a
review
of
all
intersections
and
all
projects
and
I'm
sure
there
are
lots
within
the
growing
parts
of
the
city
that
need
modifications
and/or,
as
they
build
out,
will
need
controls
in
the
first
place.
What
is
the
logic
in
pre
determining
the
priority
prior
to
the
wholesome
analysis
being
completed.
C
F
Sure
there's
a
list
of
approximately
70
intersections
in
the
DC
bylaw.
This
is
one
location
that
is
not
currently
in
the
bylaw
and
we
regularly
review
the
one
analysis
for
all
of
those
intersections
and
reviewing
where
we
are
with
those
intersections.
We
see
an
opportunity
for
payback
in
2022
and
when
we
review,
you
know,
do
a
more
fulsome
analysis
as
part
of
the
2019
update,
we'll
be
reviewing
and
prioritizing
all
of
that
long
list
of
intersections,
but
currently
right
now,
with
the
list
of
intersections
that
we're
looking
at.
F
You
know
the
budget
authority
that
we
have
in
the
warrant
analysis
that
we
have.
You
know
our
program
is
full
up
until
2021
and
we
see
an
opportunity
here
for
payback
in
2022.
So,
although
the
developer
is
willing
to
build
the
intersection
as
a
front
ending
agreement-
and
it
can
go
in
much
earlier-
they
wouldn't
get
paid
back
until
2022,
no.
L
I
appreciate
that,
and
thank
you
for
that
clarification,
I
guess
my
point
is
we
already
have
a
list
of
projects
we
would
want
to
pay
for
in
2022
and
as
a
result,
how
does
adding
this
before
the
fulsome
review
is
done,
affect
either
the
timing
or
the
financing
of
those
2022
projects?
You
know
we
can
proceed
an
intersection
at
tenth
line
in
such-and-such
a
street
that
might
come
online
or
need
to
get
warranted
in
2022
and
as
a
result
of
this
project
or
others.
L
F
F
Sure
the
staff
support
this
recommendation
because
we've
reviewed
the
one
analysis
for
all
of
the
semi
intersections.
This
location
is
near
warranted
that
97%
we
expect
it
will
soon
hit
those
warrants,
there's
only
four
or
five
intersections
that
are
currently
at
warrants
on
that
list
of
setting
intersections,
so
we're
comfortable
with
positioning
it
for
2022,
because
it's
not
bumping
in
terms
of
the
MTO
one
analysis.
You
know
it's
there
isn't
any
other
intersections
on
that
list
of
70
intersections
that
it
is
sliding
being
sliding
slotted
ahead.
F
There's
intersections
on
buying
Cobra
Boulevard
that
we're
currently
working
on
and
it
and
all
of
those
are
near
are
near
the
hundred
percent,
if
not
warranted
today,
and
we're
not
bumping
any
of
those
or
moving
forward
with
the
program
and
we're
we're
slotting.
This
program
in
at
2022,
we
believe,
is
ahead
of
all
the
other
warrant.
It's
more
warranted
than
any
of
the
other
intersections
on
that
list.
From
our
perspective
at
this
point
and
we're
going
to
review
that
more
closely
as
part
of
the
2019
update
as
well
so.
L
By
supporting
this
motion
today,
are
we
formalizing
we're,
not
formalizing
the
details
of
the
front
ending
agreement?
Are
we?
We
are
asking
staff
to
begin
negotiations
on
a
front
ending
agreement
and
that
front
ending
agreement
will
have
to
come
back
to
this
committee
for
approval
and
that
front
ending
agreement
will
have
the
payback
period
on
it.
L
D
L
Am
happy
to
support
asking
staff
to
begin
working
on
this
I'm,
not
at
all
convinced
that
we
should
be
adding
projects
to
a
priority
list
before
a
holistic
review
of
what
those
priorities
need
to
be
has
started
and
is
anywhere
close
to
being
done
if
the
developer
wants
to
do
it
with
an
open-ended
payback
period.
Sometime
in
the
mid
2020s,
it's
one
thing:
if
all
of
a
sudden
we're
going
to
be
changing,
how
we
prioritize
projects
and
growth
areas,
I
think
that's
a
problem.
A
Really
good
points
raised,
I
want
to
ask
Gary
to
chime
chime
in
on
the
you
are
really
the
person
that's
most
respected
for
development.
I
know
you
hate
it
when
I
say
that
you,
but
it's
true
for
development
charges
and
you've
had
some
pretty
firm
opinions
on
this.
So
I'd.
Just
like
you
to
speak
to
that.
B
A
A
You
have
any
idea
and
then
my
question,
because
what
I
want
you
to
think
about
so
think
about
this
before
you
know
if
it
passes
before
council
for
sure,
but
how?
What
would
the
pressure
be
on
the
city
treasurer
and
saying
you
know
with
the
long-range
financial
plan
which
we
just
approved
updated?
What
does
that
mean
that
the
ones
that
are
already
in
green
in
the
queue
last
year?
We
we
had
another
one
that
we
had
to
put
in
if
you
remember,
for
Leitrim
and
Finley
Creek
area
on
Bank
Street.
A
Remember
that
and
I
know
that
the
city
treasurer
was
adamant,
that
the
payback
couldn't
be
till
2026
or
something.
But
we
ended
up
working
out.
A
deal
to
come,
I
think
was
2022
and
I.
Think
we
need
to
have
that
kind
of
consideration.
But
one
thing
that
sounds
conflicting
is
the
difference
between
what
mr.
Simpson
saying
mr.
Willis
is
saying
and
Gary
you're,
just
consistent
of
what
you're
saying
about
how
development
charges
are
gathered.
So
they
are
different.
A
K
Madam
chair
I
think
you
know,
congratulations
to
councillor
Wilkinson
that
she
was
able
to
work
out
an
agreement,
what
the
developer
for
the
area
to
do
the
front
ending
because
that's
not
always
possible,
but
it
highlights
a
problem
here
and
we're
seeing
one
in
in
Statesville
Kannada
area
as
well,
where
it's
created
a
very,
very
unsafe
situation
because
of
the
delay
to
get
the
singles
in
and
I
think
as
a
direction
the
staff,
whether
if
the
committee
supports
or
what
I'd
like
to
see,
is
staff.
Look
at
how
this
happened
in
the
first
place.
K
How
did
this
get
missed
in
the
DC
bylaw?
Why
was
it
not
on
the
list
for
coming
in
there,
since
the
planners
already
knew
they
were
approving
these
houses
and
to
provide
some
context?
Councillor
Wilkinsons
talking
about
a
couple
of
hundred
homes
in
that
area
and
hundreds
more
being
built
in
concert
cadres
area,
it's
in
the
thousands
of
homes
that
have
been
built
and
existing
and
we're
still
waiting
for
the
like
I
have
a
picture.
I
can
share
with
committee
of
a
cement
truck
coming
across
what
where
the
median
should
be
coming
right
out
head-on.
K
At
traffic
to
make
an
illegal
left-hand
turn
to
get
in
a
road
that
shouldn't
even
be
open
because
the
light
isn't
there,
yet
we
have
an
OSI
transfer
bus
going
down
that
road.
It's
been
approved
to
go
down
that
road,
even
though
the
lights
are
not
in
place
or
any
of
the
safety
measures.
So
I've
got
real
issues
with
this
I
think
we're
going
to
have
a
tragedy
on
our
hands.
K
If
they
cannot
get
the
lights
up,
we
should
be
barricading
these
roads
or
doing
something
to
prevent
somebody
getting
hurt
here,
because
the
public
trusts
us
to
do
that
and
I
in
this.
In
the
case,
I'm
thinking
of
in
council
cadres
area
we've
let
the
public
down.
So
can
we
give
that
as
direction
that
they
take
a
look
at
what
happened
here
and
what
can
we
do
to
put
some
measures
in
place
until
we
get
this
situation
with
the
lights
and
other
traffic
measures
looked
at
well.
A
And
and
more
so
in
the
suburbs,
because
they
are
not
funded
through
taxpayers
dollars,
so
the
changes
that
happen
downtown
consistently,
never
get
out
of
line
of
the
time
that
they
are
developed
right,
elkins
on
track,
O'connor
was
done,
clean
streets
now
closed,
etc,
etc.
There's
never
a
heartbeat
because
every
taxpayer
in
the
city
pays
for
that
every
single
one,
and
so
the
pot
that's
going
to
pay
for
the
meandering
way
which
is
beyond
lower
than
75
on
that
list
is
a
pot.
A
That's
you
know,
the
taxpayer
is
all
happy
to
pay,
for
this
is
entirely
different
and
I
just
will
remind
you
that
Airport
Parkway
has
been
pushed
off
two
years.
At
least
now,
I
had
to
steal
eighty
million
dollars
from
the
Green
Bank
realignment,
which
included
two
two
bridges
over
the
Jacque
River,
for
where
the
greatest
growth
in
the
city
was
in
order
to
pay
for
strand
hurt.
Okay,
so
am
I
going
to
say:
hey,
let's
get
on
board
and
understand,
intersection,
I
think
it's
a
bigger
discussion.
A
We
have
to
have
and
I
think
that
it's
one
that's
appropriate,
certainly
on
the
development
charges
through
us,
but
definitely
at
the
Transportation
Committee.
So
if
you
I
think
that
that's
a
discussion
that
we
have
with
that
counselor
and
but
I
think
that
this
is
second
meeting
in
a
row
where
the
same
topic
continues
to
be
the
most
important
issue.
A
It's
about
safety
right,
it's
about,
and
we
know
and
well
you
don't
maybe
know,
but
the
as
you
know,
we're
in
a
Smart
City
challenge
and
the
we
had
a
phenomenal
number
of
people
that
participate
in
overwhelmingly
their
number.
One
issue
is
transportation
and
safety,
and
that
sort
of
thing
in
our
city
to
be
smart
city
looked
at.
A
Maybe
part
of
the
solution
is,
let's
get
it
open,
but
we
don't
know
that
yet
so
I
go
to
the
other
speakers
and
then
we'll
come
back
and
have
the
speakers
that
have
come
here.
The
delegation
that
has
come
here
today
and
then
maybe
some
more
discussion:
okay,
all
right,
councillor,
Brockington
and
councillor
Tierney's.
Anyone
else
want
to
okay.
So
but
that's
okay,
that
we're
still
going
to
do
that
this
bomb
go
ahead.
Counselor
thank.
E
You,
madam
chair,
just
for
me
colleagues,
this
issues
about
safety.
That's
that's
the
issue
and
we
can
arm-wrestle
about
the
impact.
The
Treasury,
the
payback
period
and
I
think
it's
very
valid
to
make
sure
that
we
understand
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things
about
whether
other
priority
projects
are
going
to
displaced
or
not.
E
The
focus
for
me
is
you
have
an
intersection,
that's
if
I
heard
correctly
at
97%
warrants,
there's
more
development
coming
and
we've
got
schools
at
least
one
school
opening
up
this
fall,
and
so
the
issue
really
how
to
improve
safety
in
that
neighborhood,
and
if
this
were
to
be
rejected,
what
will
staff
do
to
improve
the
safety
of
this
intersection?
If
traffic
lights
don't
go
in,
that's
something
we
haven't
heard
of,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
to
the
main
issues.
E
One
staff
have
said
this
will
not
displace
other
priority
projects
from
the
list.
I
think
I
heard
that
correctly
and
the
other
issue
that
I
think
I
need
more.
A
better
understanding
on
is
how
this
impacts
the
Treasury
or
the
payback
period.
If
the
developer
is
willing
to
be
paid
back
or
wants
to
be
paid
back
sooner
rather
than
later,
the
Treasury's
been
working
out
agreements
is
that
the
issue
is
the
amount
of
money
the
city
has
to
pay
back.
E
B
I
think
it
paybacks
always
subject
to
discussion
and
review
I.
Think
initially
we
were
looking
at
a
pay
back
in
2025,
I,
guess:
staff
reviewed
the
situation
is
that
it
was
possible
to
pay
back
earlier
in
2022
the
I
guess
the
the
account
that
the
funds
are
being
allocated
from
isn't
a
deficit.
We
are
trying
to
recover
that
deficit.
E
So
if
this
is
approved
today,
that
payback
period
is
something
that
is
to
be
negotiated,
correct,
we're
giving
sort
of
a
high
level
approval
we're
being
asked
to,
but
those
parameters
between
the
city's
challenges
and
the
developers
expectations
get
hammered
out.
Okay,
so
so
I
will
am
willing
to
support
this.
You.
A
For
us
so
I'm
just
going
to
read
the
recommendations,
I
haven't
said
it
out
loud
because
it's
different
than
what
the
rest
of
your
talk
and
I
talked
back
to
councilor
bleh
you're.
Talking
about
you,
want
the
DC
sponsor
group
to
come
together
and
have
information,
and
this
report
would
come
back.
But
what
this
motion
says
is
the
Planning
Committee
recommend
council
approved
one
approve
that
the
city
staff
be
directed
to
bring
forward
an
amendment
to
the
development
charges.
A
Background
study
at
the
earliest
possible
date
to
include
a
traffic
signal
for
the
intersection
of
Terry
Fox
drive
and
Huntsville,
and
number
two
that
the
report
addressed
the
necessary
steps
to
approve
a
front
ending
agreement
as
soon
as
possible.
So
the
signals
can
be
installed
this
year
before
school
starts
in
September.
Okay,
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
the
floor,
because
I
think
that
we're
talking
future
some
people
are
talking.
Okay,
look
clarification.
L
L
My
concern
is
that
the
approval,
the
the
refund
of
the
money
to
the
developer,
needs
to
happen
at
a
date
that
is
appropriate
within
the
context
of
our
complete
understanding
of
the
system
and
just
so
that
the
community's
expectations
should
be
clear
that
perhaps
the
developer
may
not
want
to
be
paid
back
in
2025
and
2026
and
having
spent
a
quarter
million
dollars
and
not
getting
paid
back
for
you
know
almost
a
decade
right.
My
experience.
B
B
A
thank
you
and
I
kind
of
agree
with
the
chair.
We
almost
need
a
joint
transportation
and
planning
committee.
We
were
talking
so
much
about
roads.
These
days,
I
think
yeah,
I
think
you've
heard
a
lot
about
my
concerns
in
my
area
and
it
seems
like
a
two-tier
system,
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
It
truly
is:
we've
got
our
DC,
we've
got
our
city
funded
and
a
lot
of
our
colleagues
around
the
table.
B
Wish
we
had
access
to
DC
funds
to
be
able
to
expedite
things
for
sure,
but
it's
a
two-tier
system,
that's
governed
by
one
set
of
rules,
is
my
understanding.
So
when
you
talk
about
97%,
it's
close
to
the
warrant
level
similar
to
the
intersections
I've
violated
several
times,
it's
95
to
96
percent.
Are
you
telling
me
staff
have
authority
to
wave
a
wand
and
say
well,
it's
close
enough.
B
F
Madam
sure,
there's
certain
rules
and
policies
associated
with
the
development
charge
by
law,
that
for
payback
of
DC
funded
infrastructure
that
the
funds
would
be
fully
wanted
and
that
they
would
not
be
used
for
temporary
measures.
So
in
this
case,
with
a
payback
in
2022.
We're
confident
that
those
two
policy
pieces
would
be
achieved
that
the
wants
would
be
achieved
at
that
point
and
the
work
that
we're
doing
here
is
obviously
going
to
be
in
the
ultimate
State
and
of.
B
B
F
We're
confident
that
we'll
be
a
hundred
percent
before
the
payback
period
in
2022,
with
the
other
program
that
traffic
services
manages
those
are
intersections
that
are
in
existing
built
up
developed
areas,
and
so
it's
managed
differently.
It
uses
tax
dollars
and
we
go
through
our
infrastructure
services
department
to
build
those
that
infrastructure
and
we
secure
the
budget
Authority
before
that
proceeds
with
the
development
charge.
F
F
B
B
F
B
F
B
B
Is
there
like
a
DC
team
that
gets
there
there
and
builds
one,
and
then
the
city
funded
one,
or
how
does
this
work
because
I'm
afraid
of
resource,
saying
if
we
start
saying
yeah,
let's
start
building
like
crazy,
but
we'll
do
the
DC's
first,
because
you
know
that
the
money
there
it's
a
low-hanging
fruit
is
that
going
to
take
away
from
our
ability?
If
we
have
the
money,
let's
say
we
would
make
it
a
big
budget
discussion
next
year
and
we
have
the
money.
F
Madam
chair,
typically,
the
construction
is
undertaken
through
a
private
contractor,
so
the
regardless.
If
it's,
if
it's
a
developer,
built
intersection,
they
would
tender
the
product.
The
the
work
and
a
private
developer
would
do
that.
Work
in
B
city
resources
to
do
the
inspection
for
final
inspection
before
the
release
of
the
securities
yeah.
B
And
I'm
asking
this
specifically
because
I've
had
developer,
funded
intersection,
modifications,
I,
have
a
shopping,
plaza
and
I
know
how
then
I
felt
they
were
stretched
and
there
are
some
challenges
with
that
intersection
in
a
major
way.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're,
not
you
know
short
sheeting
ourselves
on
this
one
and
and
not
having
the
appropriate
number
of
people,
so
just
all
food
for
thought.
If
we're
going
to
start
saying,
yeah,
let's
go
ahead
and
start
rushing
stuff
through.
Thank
you,
madam
true.
Thank.
A
H
H
It
had
industry
and
its
approval
that
they
had
to
have
this
traffic
light,
and
that
was
done
before
the
bylaw
was
even
written,
that
put
in
the
40
and
I
was
told
it
was
in
because
there
was
a
street
one
on
Terry
Fox,
but
there
were
two,
and
so
some
I'd
often
haven't
blame.
Who
did
it?
It
happened
I
just
saying,
because
it
should
be
there
already
to
see.
You
can't
do
it.
They
make
any
sense
at
all
when
the
need
is
very,
very
acute.
This
is
a
high
high
speed.
Road,
it's
not
it's.
H
Even
it
doesn't
kick
at
put
a
threeway
stop
here,
as
you
have
some
of
the
other
ones,
waiting
for
them
on
the
list
have
three-way
or
boy
stops.
That
has
a
little
bit
of
control.
It's
not
enough,
because
when
traffic
gets
tied,
those
don't
work
very
well.
I
have
nothing
and
the
people
that
are
scared
to
death.
You've
seen
some
of
the
emails
that
have
come
through
and
the
and
the
endless
children
involved.
This
is
OC
transport
buses.
H
Turning
left
at
that
case,
there's
all
sorts
of
things
happening
already
and
plus
the
construction
is
still
going
on
means.
You've
got
a
lot
of
construction
vehicles,
you
put
all
that
together,
that's
a
real
mess
and
so
I'm
just
saying
we
have
to
correct
that
in
DC
fund
it
ones
often
they
aren't
at
100%
when
they
put
in
because
a
developer
takes
the
risk
they
take
a
wrister,
then
they
have
to
pay
operating
costs
forever.
If
that
never
missed
the
risk,
the
risk
is
not
with
the
city,
and
so
that's
why?
H
Financially,
it's
not
something
that
is
going
to
and
on
our
other
other
plans,
Ben
I,
don't
getting
the
payback,
isn't
my
concern
as
much
as
the
developers
I'm
concerned
about
the
safety
and
I
want
it
before
we
had
another
school
and
more
buses
and
things
going
in
there.
Another
300
residents
waiting
2025
minutes
even
try
to
get
out
and
take
another
life
their
hands
every
time
they
do
it.
That's
what's
happening.
Okay,
so.
A
C
My
name
is
Farrah
Fowler
I'm,
a
structural
engineer
with
one
of
the
most
reputable
consulting
firms
in
r1
I
hold
a
PhD
in
civil
engineering,
but
today
I'm
going
to
talk
about
this
intersection
as
a
concerned,
citizen
I'm
from
a
country
that
the
streets
are
no
way
close
to
what
we
see
here
in
Canada.
That
is
pretty
lawful
and
I
scared
to
death.
Every
time
that
I'm
passing
this
intersection,
I've
been
driving
in
Ottawa
for
the
last
12
years
and
I
can't
find
any
intersection
that
is
anywhere
close
to
this
one.
I.
C
Heard
a
lot
about
the
talks
today
and
I
understand
that
the
way
that
decisions
are
made
are
they
in
a
bigger
picture
and
looking
at
the
policies.
But
here
we
are
talking
about
safety
of
the
citizen
in
a
road
that
people
go
way
more
than
hundred
kilometers
an
hour,
and
then
you
want
to
come
out
of
a
community
and
turn
left
into
that
traffic,
especially
in
the
mornings
and
in
the
afternoons.
It's
if
you
want
to
go
to
that
intersection.
C
You
have
to
wait
more
than
10
or
15
minutes
to
get
the
chance,
my
wife,
for
instance,
she
she
doesn't
take
the
risk
and
then
go
through
the
community
and
sometimes
she's
stuck
behind
a
school
bus
that
will
take
another
20
minutes
to
get
out
of
the
community.
So
here
we
are
talking
about
one,
the
safety
of
the
people
and
then
at
the
97
percent
weren't
that
was
calculated
last
year
in
the
July
of
2017
in
the
summer
times.
C
The
other
point
that
I
want
to
express
in
that-
and
it's
not
very
clear
in
this
picture-
is
that
the
Huntsville
Drive
that
comes
to
the
Terry
Fox.
There
is
two
lane
from
the
Huntsville,
so
two
lanes
each
way.
So
there
is
four
lane
coming
and
the
Terry
Fox
at
that
points
becomes
two
lane,
so
both
cars
that
are
coming
into
the
intersection
one
of
them
wants
to
turn
right.
The
other
one
wants
to
turn
left.
C
They
obstruct
the
view,
so
people
cannot
even
see
that
the
car
coming
at
at
such
a
high
speed
and
then
they
have
to
take
the
chance
go
further
in
the
middle
of
the
road
to
be
able
to
even
see
that
they
can
go
or
not.
So
I
believe
that
we
have
a
very
high
risk
situation
here
at
the
point
and
I
appreciate
the
considerations
of
the
council
today.
Thank
you.
A
Sorry,
thank
you
very
much
for
coming
up.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions?
Okay,
thank
you.
Next
speaker
is
the
actually
the
the
bank.
If
you
will
the
Richardson
Ridge
development,
folks,
Steven
Cohen,
Demetri,
Sen,
WAP,
general
lopoliths
and
David
Hook.
Are
you
all
coming
up
or
is
just
okay,
so
I
think
the
question
for
you
is
going
to
be
or
the
statement
would
be.
Thank
you
very
much
for
offering
to
front-end
the
money.
A
C
History
to
this,
so
we
actually
started
designing
this
intersection
over
three
years
ago,
and
it
was
part
of
a
part
of
the
normal
progression
of
the
development.
As
the
number
of
houses
got
up,
we
knew
we
had
to
design
the
intersection
and
put
it
in
we.
We
were
going
on
the
basis
that
Street,
1
and
Huntsville
was
our
street
1
and
Huntsville
and
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
It
took
us
over
a
year
from
when
we
first
submitted
to
the
city.
C
This
is
three
years
ago
to
get
approval
of
the
design,
and
the
design
ended
up
being
exactly
the
approval
that
the
design
that
I
VI
had
submitted.
We
then
sat
down
with
Derrick
booty
Daniel
into
a
fun
ending
agreement
again
under
the
supposition
either
Street
one
was
Street.
One
and
development
charges
been
that
way
for
years.
Well,
as
we
got
into
it
further,
we
discovered
our
Street
one:
wasn't
the
Street
one?
A
C
C
C
So
we
feel
very
upset
about
this.
The
residents
were
told
from
the
beginning
that
the
intersection
was
in
was
in
DC's
that
we're
going
to
move
through
we're
going
to
design
it
we're
going
to
build
it.
They
had
that
expectation.
That's
why
we're
here
we
feel
very
strong
about
the
other
thing
to
understand
is
Huntsville.
Road
is
an
existing
bus
route.
A
What
what
what
is
at
the
crux
of
the
matter
is
that
there
was
an
error
that
was
made.
So
my
question
is,
with
the
confusion
of
the
street
one
and
the
new
street
one.
Would
there
have
been
two
streets
that
should
have
been
collecting
for
development
charges
or
was
the
wrong
address
wrong
Street
put
in
as
the
one
that
was
accruing?
Does
anybody
know
that
they
won't?
They
won't
know,
but
do
you
know
it?
That's.
A
C
Months,
I
just
want
to
add
that
we
staffer
the
ones
that
proposed
the
2022
payback
we
agreed
to
it.
We
need
to
get
on
and
move
on.
Do
this.
We
have
a
design,
we're
quite
prepared
to
get
going
on
that
and
build
it
this
year
in
time
for
school,
it's
we've
been
working
with
the
counselor
now
for
probably
a
year
and
a
half
longer.
C
A
K
I
take
a
point
I
want
to
make
to
the
delegations
a
sense
that
I
get
here,
and
certainly
my
own
is
not
frustration
with
what
you're
trying
to
do.
It's
that
we
put
you
in
this
position.
What
was
our
processes
that
we're
dealing
with
the
warrants
as
councillor
tunity
mentioned
and
and
the
delay
in
getting
this
work
done
and
and
what
it's
creating
so
I
hope
you
don't
take
away
from
this
meeting
that
we're
in
any
way
blaming
you
for
this
process.
K
J
Thank
you
ma'am
chair
to
me
what
I'm
hearing
today
is
really
two
key
issues,
so
the
first
being
an
omission
or
an
error
that
was
made
internally
within
the
city
to
exclude
or
not
include
this
particular
intersection
in
the
DC
by
a
list
and
I
would
hate
to
see
our
community
pay.
The
price
for
that.
The
second
issue
that
I
can't
understate
is
the
safety
issue,
and
so
when
we
look
at
this
map-
and
we
see
one
school,
that
is
a
full
and
a
capacity
and
a
second
school
that's
about
to
open
in
September.
J
J
I
have
been
out
canvassing
in
this
area,
other
areas
as
well,
but
particularly
in
this
neighborhood
and
speaking
with
the
great
work
actually
that
the
canal
Lakes
Community,
Association
Association,
has
been
doing
and
there's
there's.
This
has
really
reached
a
boiling
point
within
this
community
people,
as
it's
been
said,
expected
that
this
traffic
light
was
going
to
be
there
when
they
made
the
decision
to
live
in
this
community,
and
now
their
safety
is
at
jeopardy.
A
D
D
Criteria
to
come
up
with
a
list,
but
in
the
end
we
are
responsible
for
that
list
and
so
I
think.
If
you
look
at
this,
you
see
the
amount
of
time
we're
spending
on
this
sort
of
exemption
to
the
list
or
amendment
to
the
list,
and
it's
a
very
reasonable
one
and
compared
to
the
amount
of
time
spent
on
the
list
itself.
When
it
comes
out,
I
think
you'll.
You
should
be
able
to
understand
that
paying
attention
to
this
kind
of
thing
is
the
fulfillment
of
our
responsibilities.
A
Yeah,
okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Anybody
else
on
anything
to
say
all
right.
So
on
the
Wilkinson
report
on
the
recommendation,
the
council
approved
that
the
city
staff
be
directed
to
bring
forward
an
amendment
to
the
development
charge.
Background
study
the
earliest
possible
date
to
include
a
traffic
signal
for
the
intersection
of
Terry
Fox
Drive
at
Huntsville,
and
that
the
report
address
and
necessary
steps
to
approve
a
funding
agreement
as
soon
as
possible
to
the
signals.
So
the
signals
can
be
installed
this
year,
which
the
applicant
is
prepared
to
do.
A
A
A
So
as
mr.
Willis
still
here,
okay,
so
I
would
the
two
meetings
the
last
one
on
this
one
have
been
spending
a
lot
of
time
on
safety
from
a
transportation
perspective.
So
I
would
ask
that
as
quickly
as
possible.
You
start
the
DC
process,
or
at
least
we're
managing
that
and
I
think
that
if
you
were
to
pull
together
the
appropriate
chairs
of
the
various
committees
and
have
a
discussion
with
Keith
egg
with
councilor
egg,
why
cherub
lay
of
transit
certainly
solve
and
vice-chair
tyranny.
A
I
think
that
there
would
be
value
in
that
because
I,
don't
I
mean
every
meeting
that
we
had
like
two
meetings
in
a
row
to
to
have
discussions
on
two
very
different
lists.
Obviously,
there's
a
connection
to
transportation
that
we
have
to
be
talking
about.
Okay,
thank
you,
the
oh
yeah.
We
have
the
additional
item.
We
have
the
additional
item.
Don't
call
anyone,
it's
not
a
big
deal.
A
B
Sorry,
I'll
be
a
very
brief
attempt.
Sheriff,
therefore
be
resolved.
That
planning
committee
recommend
the
council
approve
the
following
that
document
for
of
the
report,
the
amended
as
follows:
one
principle
three
be
amended
replacing
the
last
sentence.
Furthermore,
consequences
to
entry
will
be
required
from
the
city
with
further
more
parameters
for
the
more
consent,
with
further
more
consent
to
enter.
A
C
C
Mr.
meyen,
madam
chair,
the
front
ending
report
was
written
on
the
basis
that
the
land
would
be
in
the
city's
hands
before
the
work
commenced
in
staff.
Having
further
examined
this
more,
that's
not
going
to
be
possible.
There
are
some
investigations
that
knee
be
done
as
part
of
a
routine
real
estate
transaction.
That
will
mean
that
the
land
will
be
coming
to
the
city's
hands
later,
so
this
is
to
permit
the
work
to
commands
while
we,
the
state
real
estate
side,
is
being
handled.
Madam
chair,
okay,.
A
So,
just
so
for
all
of
you,
which
he
didn't
say,
but
we
all
want
to
know
from
any
report:
stormwater
management
ponds
one
and
shoe
Leitrim
world
storm
drainage
system,
north-south,
swale
and
oversize
trunk
storm
sewers
in
Leitrim
community.
Previously
we
approved
it
On
February
14th.
The
motion,
as
here
material
changes
to
document.
Fourth
of
that
of
that
fund,
any
principles
Urbandale
construction,
victoria,
corporation
and
clara
chose
Bank
Street,
pawn
one
extension
and
expect
expediting
it
to
Council
tomorrow.