►
From YouTube: Planning Committee - 26 May 2022
Description
Planning Committee - 26 May 2022
Agenda and supporting documents available at www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
So
moving
to
quorum,
which
I
believe
we
have
I'll
ask
kelly
just
to
run
through
a
a
quorum
check,
we
do
have,
I
believe,
might
have
a
couple
counselors
that
aren't
here.
I
know
some
are
still
without
power,
but
but
we
do
have
enough
to
be
able
to
carry
on
with
the
meeting
today,
which
is
required
because
we
do
have
at
least
one
item
that
must
be
dealt
with
due
to
statutory
requirements.
C
B
A
A
People
think
there's
like
corruption
at
city
hall,
but
no,
no,
it's
just
because
the
walls
are
so
thin
that
we
just
hear
each
other
talk.
So
that's
what
we
always
know.
What's
going
on
behind
each
other's
backs,
see
there
riley
knew
how
to
get
on
because
jeff
was
able
to
yell
through
the
wall
all
right.
So
this
is
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
violent
amendments
listed
items
two
and
four
through
six
on
today's
agenda.
A
For
the
items
just
mentioned,
only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amounts
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
ontario
land
tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
ontario
land
tribunal.
If
council
does
not
adopt
a
man
within
90
days
of
receipt
of
the
application
for
zoning
by
amendment
and
120
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment
to
submit
written
comments
in
these
amendments
prior
to
consider
their
consideration
by
city
council
on
june,
8th,
please
email
or
call
the
committee
or
council
coordinator
declarations.
A
Ca,
none
confirmation
of
minutes
for
the
meeting
of
may
12
2022
you'll.
Note
that
the
statutory
statement
on
the
minutes
or
etcetera
statement
on
the
op
and
zone
items
which
I
just
read
was
not
included
in
the
minutes,
but
has
since
been
updated.
So
if
you
had
gone
through
them
with
a
fine
toothed
comb
like
I
know,
you
all
do
you'll
notice
that
that
wasn't
there,
but
now
it
is
so
everything's.
Okay.
A
So
can
we
carry
the
minutes
for
our
our
60-second
meeting
of
planning
committee
for
this
term
married
married
all
right
and
now
I
will
shift
to
co-chair
gower
who
has
a
motion
to
defer.
So
we
have.
We
have
a
number
of
nine
items
in
the
agenda
today
and
two
of
the
items
are
somewhat
substantive
and
have
a
number
of
delegations
and
people
interested
in
speaking
to
them.
So,
given
the
situation,
we're
gonna
defer
items,
one
and
seven.
A
A
Once
the
official
plan
is
only
violent,
the
other
one
is
the
heritage
permit
which
went
through
the
build
hair
subcommittee
a
couple
weeks
ago.
Item
four,
so
we're
holding
that
because
we
do
have
some
speakers
on
that
item.
Four
is
a
zoning
violin
limit
for
180,
canada
avenue?
We
do
have
one
or
two
speakers
on
that,
so
we
will
hold
that
as
well.
A
Item
number
five
is
zoning
by
amendment
for
353,
jerry
lalonde
drive.
We
don't
have
any
delegations
on
this.
It's
a
series
of
back
to
back
townhomes
in
subdivision
and
in
the
counselor
kitts's
ward.
We
have
the
applicant
here,
but
my
guess
is
the
applicant
would
be
okay
not
to
speak.
Where
are
we
to
approve
this
so.
F
A
So
item
five
is
that
the
planning
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
designed
by
a
lot
2008-250
for
353
jerryland
drive
to
permit
a
subdivision
consisting
of
on-street
townhouse
and
back-to-back
townhouse
units
on
public
streets
as
detailed
in
document
two
and
two
that
planned
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Section
of
this
report
is
that
I'm
carried
okay
all
right.
A
A
Okay,
I
see
counselor
fleury
is
here
as
well,
where
the
item
is
in
their
wards.
So
it's
just
the
plan.
Can
you
recommend
cancel
the
proven
amendment
designed
by
law
2008-250
for
257,
261,
269,
277,
king
edward
avenue
and
260
murray
street
to
print
an
eight-story
121
suite
hotel
with
ground
floor?
Commercial
is
detailed
document.
Two
cancer
flurry
any
comments.
Any
concerns
no
and
number
two.
That
plan
committee
approved
the
consultation
details
section
of
this
report.
A
A
The
idea
is
that
we
won't
have
to
do
that
anymore.
So
planning
committee
recommend
that
one
we
receive
the
2021
residential
mural
one
year
pilot
program
update
two
approved
amendments
to
the
residential
murals
by
law,
as
per
document,
one,
a
broadening
the
biologist
spyloscope
to
permit
murals
in
all
zones
beyond
residential
and
b
renaming
the
document,
the
ottawa
mural
bylaw.
A
That's
that's
a
pivotal
part
right.
There
renaming
the
document
and
three
that
prove
extending
the
mural
pilot
for
an
additional
year.
Ending
may
1st
2023,
after
which
the
ottawa,
mural,
bylaw
and
program,
would
become
permanent,
any
comments
or
need
to
hold
that.
Or
can
we
approve
that?
I
don't
know
if
you've
ever
said
the
word
mural
as
much
as
that,
but
it's
the
word
becomes
oddly,
you
know
strange
afterwards.
After
a
while,
you
see
mural
mural
mural
on
the
item.
A
D
So
they're
seeking
permission
to
go
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
to
normalize
that
I
put
it
in
my
newsletter
this
weekend
and
didn't
hear
back
on
that.
So
maybe
I
will
just
ask
the
scroll
down
to
the
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
planning
committee
recommend
council
approve
pursuant
to
section
45
the
planning
act
that
an
application
of
the
committee
of
adjustment
be
permitted
in
respect
to
the
properties,
411
415,
419
and
423
raven
hill
avenue.
I
think
we've
added
a
couple
of
addresses
to
that.
A
I
A
Thank
you.
So
we
will
go
back
then
to
item
numbers
two
and
three
which
we'll
deal
with
concurrently,
which
is
the
official
plan
amendment
zone
by
law,
311,
somerset
street
west
and
234
3236
o'connor
street.
I
know
several
members
of
this
committee
are
actually
on
build
air
subcommittee,
but
since
we
aren't
all,
I
will
ask
mr
gotcha
just
for
a
a
brief
summary
of
the
application
before
us
today.
J
J
J
So
this
is
the
height
schedule.
It
presents
the
mall
in
which
the
the
building
is
supposed
to
fit.
So
the
present
secondary
plant
designation
on
the
north
of
the
property,
including
one
of
the
consolidated
lot,
allows
for
16
stories
for
irise
is
also
zone.
R5
for
high
density
residential,
the
remaining
three
properties
to
the
south
are
designated
tm
and
under
the
secondary
plan,
are
permitted
to
go
up
to
nine
stories.
J
So
we're
talking
about
a
very
slim
power
on
a
podium
which
presents
significant
step
backs
if
you
look
along
somerset
street,
in
addition
to
the
setback
of
the
podium
where
public
art
entries
are
being
proposed,
an
additional
6.4
meter,
step
back
and
it's
being
put
at
6.4
just
to
allow
for
a
little
wiggle
room
during
construction,
but
in
reality
it's
going
to
be
closer
to
6.5.
So
you
you
get
on
top
of
the
four-story
podium,
a
6.4
6.5
step
back
for
the
tower
and
also
to
the
west.
J
J
J
J
I
I
think
there's
another
the
section
37,
the
cash
contribution
will
be
close
to
600,
a
thousand
most
of
it
going
to
the
wired,
affordable
housing
fund
with
5
50
000
to
future
community
gardening
needs
in
the
world
for
the
non-cash
contribution,
we'll
have
publicly
accessible
bicycle
parking,
a
bike,
repair
station,
11,
electric
vehicle
charging
stations,
energy,
efficient
building
technologies,
public
art
and
the
public
heart.
We
we
there's
a
potential
for
three
pieces
along
somerset
at
the
corner
and
along
o'connor
and
seven
large
units.
J
J
J
J
If
you
look
at
the
at
the
bottom
of
it,
you
get
to
see
the
ramp
enclosure
that
I
was
referring
to.
So
throughout
the
subsequent
siteman
approval
process,
we
will
deal
with
the
landscaping
plan
that
will
provide
for
landscaping
on
top
of
the
garage
enclosure
to
soften
its
appearance,
and
I
should
say
that
the
garage
enclosure
was
kept
to
a
minimum
of
four
meters.
In
reality,
the
the
enclosure
will
be
closer
to
2.9,
but
again,
we've
given
a
little
bit
wiggle
room
for
construction.
J
So
I
think
that
is
it
for
me,
this
is
the
datum
line
that
I
was
referring
to,
and
so
you
get
to
see
on
the
upper
left
image
the
office
building
and
you
see
the
podium
and
then
at
the
bottom.
You
see
the
projected
lines.
It's
also
important
to
see
that
across
o'connor
to
the
east,
you
see
an
existing
higher
mid-rise
building.
That
is
all
bricked.
J
J
There
will
not
be
sufficient
distance
for
tower
separation,
so
those
properties
to
the
north
will
remain
with
this
four-story
brick
podium
in
this
in
the
the
tower,
on
top
of
it,
for
a
total
of
18
stories,
what
could
have
ended
up
from
cooper
to
somerset
could
have
potentially
be
a
tower
on
the
corner
of
cooper
and
o'connor,
plus
a
nine
starry
mass
just
south
of
it.
Instead
of
that,
what
we're
getting
we're,
keeping
the
two
houses
there
and
we're
gonna
end
up
with
a
slim
tower.
J
A
B
F
Hello,
chair
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
tim,
beat
I'm
from
photen
planning
and
joined
here
by
my
colleague,
miguel
tremblay,
I'm
with
folktown,
as
well
as
roberto
campos
with
the
architecture,
team
and
josh.
They
are
with
the
property
ownership
group.
I'll,
be
brief
in
discussing
briefly
the
the
policy
context
for
the
site
and
then
pass
it
over
to
roberto
to
discuss
the
design
and
those
important
design,
revisions
and
changes
that
have
occurred
since
the
initial
application,
which
have
responded.
F
J
E
F
The
ward
councillor
to
try
to
find
that
best
design
fit
for
this
lot
in
terms
of
respecting
both
the
existing
character
along
somerset,
which
is
a
unique
heritage
corridor,
as
well
as
residential
intensification
objectives
of
the
official
plan
in
the
city
and
finding
that
balance,
as
well
so
I'll
just
to
just
aware
of
time
I'll
skip
ahead.
A
few
slides
just
to
the
the
policy
slides
here
for
the
secondary
plan
and
then
just
one
more
yeah
here
we
go.
This
is
a
good
one!
F
You
can
go
back
to
the
previous
slide
there.
Thank
you.
So
much
so
as
steve
was
mentioning
the
the
site-specific
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bile
amendment
are
meant
to
recognize
the
full
development
potential
in
the
subject:
lands
through
applying
what
we
believe
is
a
consistent
land
use,
designation
and
zoning
on
the
lots,
recognizing
their
consolidation
and
and
their
existence.
F
We
believe
the
amendments
are
modest
and
mostly
meant
to
reflect
this
current
condition
and
a
lot
ownership
and
consolidation
as
we
move
towards
cycling,
control
and
redevelopment
of
the
site.
The
design
changes
which
roberto
will
discuss
in
just
a
moment.
The
architect
will,
we
believe,
reflect
the
comprehensive
discussions
that
we've
had
with
planning
staff
heritage,
neighbors
and
the
ward
councillor
to
ensure
adequate
transition
from
the
the
rear
yard
of
budding
neighbors.
F
That
appropriate,
massing
and
scale
on
the
traditional
main
street.
The
relocation
of
the
massing,
as
steve
mentioned,
from
the
mid
rise
portion
of
the
building
to
the
tower
moves,
the
building
mass
away
from
that
sensitive
interface
along
somerset
street
and
retains
skyview
sunlight
and
the
visual
integrity
of
the
this
heritage
corridor.
F
G
As
you
can
see
here,
these
are
quick
matchings
that
we
had
done
at
the
very
beginning
that
we
do
really
just
to
kind
of
get
an
understanding
of
the
potential
of
the
site.
The
existing
zoning
constrained
to
the
site,
the
the
geometries
of
the
site
possible
options
for
where
parking
can
access
and
so
forth
and
so
forth.
Maybe
next
slide.
G
At
one
point,
we
were
asked
to
do
an
investigation
on
sites
abc
along
cooper
to
confirm
that
those
sites
would
never
alone
be
able
to
support
a
high-rise
tower.
We
did
that
study.
The
sites
were
too
small
to
ever
on
their
own,
be
able
to
provide
high-rise
in
the
end,
each
floor
would
consist
of
one
unit.
G
It's
just
not
we're
not
that
type
of
city
that
that
provides
that
type
of
development,
and
but
we
went
through
that
process
at
the
request
of
of
the
city's
planning
staff
next
line
again,
this
is
the
informal
udrp
presentation
that
we
went
for
again,
trying
to
overlay
now
a
bit
of
a
heritage
and
texture
to
the
building,
based
on
the
initial
massing
explorations
again,
also
looking
at
the
zoning
constraints
and
the
existing
fabric
of
the
street,
we
took
the
comments
from
them.
Obviously,
there's
discussions
about
height.
G
It's
always
a
point
of
discussion,
but
really
a
big
part
of
it
was
that
pedestrian
feel
that
public
realm
feel
that
integration
of
how
this
building
starts
to
work
with
the
existing
somerset
street
village
context,
you
can
see
the
brick
will
always
be
part
as
we
go
through
this
process
always
be
a
corner
piece
of
the
prop
of
the
proposal
concept.
Next
one.
G
G
Steve
gautier,
the
white
box
was
was
one
of
the
concepts
that
was
added
in
order
to
try
to
create
that
ground
floor
podium,
but
yet
still
provide
the
density
as
per
the
allowable
nine
stores
that
is
allowed
on
summerset
street
next
slide.
Again,
we
took
cues
from
planning
staff
again
from
the
urban
design
review
panel.
G
G
D
G
G
I
think,
overall,
what
we
really
wanted
to
highlight
was
over
the
last
year
we
were
collaboratively
not
only
addressing
the
feedback
from
planning
staff,
the
urban
design
review
panel.
Contrary
to
what
some
of
our
fellow
speakers
might
say:
heritage
staff
planning
staff,
the
counselor's
office
and
those
of
the
immediate
neighbor.
G
The
massing
was
adjusted
to
remove
the
nine
story
portion
away
from
somerset
street.
At
the
request
of
the
urban
design
review
panel
heritage
staff
and
the
counselor's
office,
the
tower
massing
was
slim
set
back,
an
additional
slim
set
back
to
6.4
meters,
as
steven
said
on
somerset
again
at
the
request
of
planning
staff
in
heritage
time,
the
steps
the
tower
was
set
back
along
the
north
facade,
another
1.4
meters
at
the
requested
planning
staff
in
the
immediate
neighbor.
The
tower
footprint,
as
mentioned,
is,
is
only
6
600
square
feet.
G
The
project
introduced
covered
garage
access
along
the
north
and
west.
Besides,
at
the
request
of
the
immediate
neighbors
and
the
counselor's
office
to
eliminate
a
steep
said,
noise,
car
flights,
exhaust
and
providing
further
security
concerns
with
regards
to
drug
use
and
homelessness
along
the
neighborhood
neighbors
property,
which
is
currently
happening,
this
covered
area
was
reduced
in
height
further
to
minimize
the
impact
against
the
neighbors.
We
were
adding.
We
are
adding
planting
boxes
along
the
roof
line.
To
further
eliminate,
eliminate
overlook.
G
A
Involved
to
try
to
make
this
project
happen
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
it's
nice
opportunity
to
see
the
beautiful
architecture
of
the
dominion
chalmers
church
in
that
last
damage
there,
just
on
the
block
to
the
north,
now
owned,
of
course,
by
the
best
university
in
ottawa,
carlton.
A
A
H
Thank
you.
So
I
am
a
director
of
the
condominium
corporation
643
at
364
cooper
street,
so
I'm
representing
the
owners
of
our
corporation
today,
so
I
was
just
wondering
I
noticed
I
looked
at
who's
on
them
on
the
panel
today
planning
committee.
I
don't
believe
that
you're
center
town,
but
perhaps
you've
been
to
somerset
village
and
there's
a
reason.
H
We
understand
that
new
housing
and
development
is
part
of
alderaan's
future
and
the
developer
first
reports,
a
16
story
which
is
now
increased,
18
story
and
I
believe,
as
steve
gautier
mentioned,
that
this
site
is
the
portion.
The
small
portion
of
the
start
is
a
maximum
of
16.
So
I
don't
understand
why
it's
now
18.
it's
much
too
high.
It's
twice
the
height
that
the
eodrp
recommended,
which
is
nine
stories
for
the
site.
It
also
creates
a
precedent
and
it
does
nothing
to
complement
the
character
of
somerset
village.
H
Finally,
the
architecture
of
the
building
itself
is,
I
have
to
say,
is
unattractive
the
four-story
portion
or
podium
is
the
is
a
nod
to
the
traditional
street
street
district.
But
the
14
stories
above
is
is
just
a
high
gray
tower
it's,
it
might
be
slim,
but
it
literally
towers
over
the
entire
streetscape
and
surrounding
city
blocks.
H
If
our
city
is
to
make
concessions
to
developers,
we
should
expect
that
they
come
up
with
something
architecturally
interesting
that
adds
to
the
beauty
of
center
town
instead
of
bringing
it
down.
So
our
request
to
you
as
a
corporation
is
twofold:
that
the
height
of
the
building
be
reduced
and
that
the
building
itself
has
a
better
architectural
design
that
complements
the
traditional
character
and
cachet
of
somerset
village,
our
city,
water,
whether
it
is
the
capital
of
canada
as
a
whole.
So
thank
you.
K
Oh
thanks
thanks
vice
chair.
Thank
you,
sylvia,
for
coming
out
to
speak
to
us
and
and
for
the
submission
that
you
made.
I
read
that
very
carefully
and,
as
you
know,
I've
been
working.
My
greatest
concerns
through
this
have
been
the
effect
on
residents
to
to
the
north,
but
also
I
just
wanted
to,
and
I
will
address
those
a
bit
later.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
from
your
perspective.
K
I
think
a
budding
abutting,
your
property
actually,
and
I
just
wonder
from
from
your
perspective,
if,
if
you
feel
that
any
of
the
design
has
sort
of
mitigated
the,
what
could
what
what
could
be
if
it
were
two
separate
developments,
what
do
you
feel
that
this
design
has
mitigated
any
of
the
the
negative
impacts
of
what
could
be
like
a
nine
story
and
a
16
story
kind
of
in
behind?
If,
if
you
know
those
heritage,
homes
would
have
to
be
removed,
but
it
would
be
as
of
as
of
right.
H
Yeah,
well,
the
I
my
understanding
is
the
16
porsche
16
story
portion
maximum.
The
r5
is
very
slim
and
the
nine.
The
nine
story
is
the
majority
of
the
site.
So
I
still
think
you
know
that
we
should.
I
don't
understand
why
it's
18.
So
you
know
we
are.
We
are
not
right
at
the
corner
of
o'connor
and
and
cooper
where
you
know
we're
after
mark
vanessa
is
home
and
the
other
traditional
home
for
the
first
condominium.
H
There
bars
is
a
seven
story,
and
I
it's
red
brick
it
it
does
represent
the
character,
so
I
think
it's
possible
to
have
a
nice
building.
I
think
I
I
think
it's
just
you
know.
We
understand
that
there
has
to
be
development,
but
you
know-
and
this
is
a
hard
conversation
to
have
just
off
the
cuff,
but
I
think
if
we
can
keep
it
to
nine
stories
or
lower.
This
is
what
we're
asking
for
is
to
lower
the
height
and
to
have
a
better
an
architecture.
That's
not
a
gray
tower.
H
That's
going
to
be
well,
for
you
know,
I
have
to
say
it's,
it's
not
it's!
It's
ugly!
I
understand
that
the
developers
I
don't
understand
why
it's
not
possible
to
have
greek
architecture,
especially
in
the
center
town,
where
there
are
interesting
buildings.
So
I
would
say
that
the
16
stories
would
have
less
impact
than
the
full.
H
A
C
C
The
udrp
said
and
I'd
like
to
quote
directly.
The
pdrp
opposed
this
tower.
Pardon
me
a
tower
at
this
site
and
the
strongest
language.
I've
ever
heard
the
udrp
use
I'd
like
to
quote
directly
from
the
verbal
remarks
and
chair
of
the
udrp
mark
remarks
that
he
made
at
the
conclusion
of
the
udrp's
consideration
of
this.
This
particular
proposal
he
said
quote:
we
always
thought
this
is
a
mid-rise
site.
Let
us
be
very
clear:
we
do
not
believe
this
is
a
tower
site.
It
is
overwhelming.
It
is
far
too
much
density.
C
End
quote:
the
udrp
understands
that
a
traditional
main
street
and
somerset
is
a
traditional
main
street
is
not
a
place
for
a
high-rise.
So,
given
the
udrp's
opposition
to
a
tower
at
this
site,
what
did
the
developer?
Do
they
revised
the
design
and
came
back
with
a
taller
tower?
I'll
repeat
that
the
udrp
said
no
tower
and
the
developer
came
back
with
a
taller
tower.
C
C
The
udrp
in
its
written
report
did
address
the
possibility
that
the
city
would
ignore
the
udrp's
advice.
It
did
say
if
you're
going
to
allow
a
tower.
There
are
things
you
can
do
to
make
a
tower
more
palatable
and
the
city
and
the
developer
have
agreed
to
do
some
of
these
things,
but
to
be
clear,
the
udrp
opposed
a
tower
at
this
site
in
the
strongest
possible
language.
C
C
C
A
A
L
I
know
I
I
actually
think
I
work
for
the
city
now
and
maybe
the
developer.
So
thanks
for
having
me
on
the
line
today,
I
appreciate
having
the
opportunity
for
those
who
don't
know
who
I
am
my
name's
mark
banas
and
my
spouse,
and
I
lay
in
a
pietro
antonio
phone
354
cooper,
which
is
the
residence
at
the
immediate
north
of
the
property.
It's
a
heritage,
one
we
bought
it
about
a
year
and
a
few
months
ago,
so
we
actually
came
in
right
at
this
time.
L
Great
due
diligence
on
my
part
and
by
I
also
represent
today
my
immediate
neighbor
356
cooper.
That's
barry,
doucette
and
colleen
moore.
Now,
I've
heard
a
lot
of
things
today.
So
actually
my
my
intervention
today
is
not
going
to
be
that
that
significant,
because
I've
got
some
good
comfort
from
roberta's
comments,
tim
and
also
from
steve
gotchi
that
they're
going
to
be
sensitive
to
the
northern
and
the
western
property.
L
L
That
includes
four
properties,
that
is
our
my
property,
my
neighbor's
property,
the
one
on
the
corner
of
o'connor
and
the
property
that
is
owned
by
the
developer
that
was
demolished,
so
that
forms
a
big
red
rectangle
of
r5,
which
actually
the
intent
was
to
build
metropolitan.
Three,
the
domicile
third
condo
that
cindy
faulkner
was
alluding
to.
So
it
was
all
part
of
that
development
and
and
domicile
used
to
own
three
five
six
coopers.
So
that's
how
that
all
kind
of
came
in.
L
L
What
what
I'd
like
to
mention
specifically
today,
which
I
didn't
have
the
information
when
I
presented
at
the
build
heritage
subcommittee,
is
the
height
of
the
garage?
Is
I'm
gonna
just
round
things
off
13
feet?
So
it
actually
extends
three
feet
over
my
ten
foot
fence
of
black
cladding,
and
I
know
we're
going
to
work
on
that
softening
and
my
backyard
is
only
10
feet
from
the
foundation.
So
it's
actually
a
foundation
of
my
house
is
10
feet
away
from
this
garage.
L
We're
willing
to
look
raise
the
red
flag
on
the
the
the
sorry,
the
white,
the
white
flag,
thanks
elena
she's
actually
whispering
things
for
me.
We're
willing
to
lift
the
white
flag
and
say:
look
the
13
feet,
it's
three
feet
over
my
fence,
we'll
work
on
the
cladding
and
so
forth,
okay
good.
But
what
I
didn't
realize
last
time
is
on
the
western
side,
where
my
neighbor,
barry
and
colleen.
L
That
garage
actually
goes
from
the
four
meter
height
to
a
six
meter
height.
So
that's
just
about
20
feet
and
that's
black
plaid
in
a
great
chunk
of
their
property
on
the
west
side.
So
the
softening
for
my
three
feet
of
black
cladding
is
actually
pretty
easy
compared
to
what
barry
and
colleen
will
have.
L
So
I
know,
and
thanks
to
the
transparency
and
the
openness
the
developer
group
did
take
a
call
from
barry
ducette
to
say
look:
can
we
work
on
this
because
it's
actually
a
real
big
eyesore
on
these
two,
the
only
two
residential
heritage,
single
family
homes
that
are
in
that
corner
right
the
corner?
That's
not!
You
know
part
of
the
streetscape
right,
we're
always
looking
at
this.
L
From
somerset
and
o'connor
we're
looking
at
the
back
end,
so
I
I
asked
the
community
to
make
sure-
and
I
know
my
counselor
is
actually
working
hard
to
make
sure
that
this
actually
is
addressed
for
the
sake
of
those
heritage
homes.
So
on
that
note,
I
I
see
back
35
seconds,
which
is
34
seconds
better
than
I
did
last
time.
So
there
you
go.
Thank
you
very
much.
K
L
K
K
They
had
the
right
to
build
a
tower,
but
they're
they're
actually
seating
that
right
as
as
property
owners,
because
with
this
16
stories
there
would
not
be
that
there
would
not
be
the
room
for
that
that
tower
separation.
So
you
know
the
things
that
we
worked
on,
that
you
know
the
wraparound
podium,
the
red
brick
around
the
podium.
K
K
It
was
what
I
intended
when
I
gave
the
direction
at
at
built
heritage,
so
I
do
appreciate
you
coming
out.
I
appreciate
your
perspective
on
this.
This
has
been
a
long
process
and
I
did
just
want
to
re
reiterate
kind
of
the
concessions
that
that
you,
as
a
homeowner
gave
up.
You
know
to
get
some
of
the
improvements
back
on
on
this
on
this
development.
So
so
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
year,
and
always
you
know
ensuring
that
it
was
always
looking
towards
a
better
development.
A
Okay,
so
that's
that's
it
for
the
delegations.
Now
we
have
opportunity
to
ask
questions
of
the
of
the
applicant
followed
by
questions
to
staff.
So
do
any
members
of
committee
have
questions
to
the
applicant?
I
know
council
mckinney
likely
wants
to.
I
mean
I
know
they've
said
comments
about
what
they're
working
on
here
as
well
and
what
they've
already
been
working
on.
So
let
them
wrap
up
before
we
do
any
vote
on
this,
but
just
any
questions
to
the
applicant.
B
K
Yeah,
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
to
confirm
again
with
the
applicant.
You
know
in
terms
of
the
the
landscaping
plan
that
we'll
work
on
through
through
the
site
plan,
control
process
that
that
we
will
look
at
the
entire
cladding,
not
just
what
is
backing
on
to
mark's
property,
but
the
the
six
meter
in
height
as
well,
that
we
will
look
at
the
that
entire,
a
space
area
for
for
softening
for
the
residents
to
to
the
north.
K
K
No,
I
I
can
now.
I
think
that
you
know
I
think,
we've
been
through
several
iterations
of
of
the
design.
Certainly-
and
you
know
this-
this
final
design,
there's
no
doubt
is-
is
an
improvement
over
the
first
two
submissions,
especially
the
removal
of
that
bulky
middle
portion
of
the
building,
which
really
did
make
it
a
nine
story,
high
rise
on
onto
somerset,
so
it
it
did
get
pulled
back.
K
K
So
this
you
know
well,
you
know
never
perfect,
certainly,
but
it
certainly
does
you
know
with
the
that
middle
portion
being
removed,
the
slender
tower
design
and
and
then
wrapping
the
the
brick
around
that
entire
podium
with
the
with
the
step
back
at
the
fourth
story,
certainly,
you
know
helped
define
the
podium
it
created.
Just
you
know
better
public
realm,
better
yeah
human
scale,
building
at
grades.
So
it's
you
know
it's
replacing
a
parking
lot.
K
K
If
you
will
that
you
know
that's
what
we
want
and
I
think
for
the
you
know
the
through
the
iterations
we've
gotten
much
closer,
so
you
know
I
look
forward
to
working
with
with
the
applicant
on
the
landscaping
plan,
how
that
will
happen
through
a
site
plan
and
we'll
make
sure
that
that
black
cladding
is
is
softened.
We've
got
plantings
on
that
garage
and
you
know
to
to
really
soften
the
the
interface
with
those
neighboring
properties
to
the
north.
K
A
Great,
thank
you
very
much
councillor
mckinney,
so
I
I
think
cancer
guy
was
okay.
Now
I
think
so
I
don't
think
we
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
nor
of
her
staff.
I
appreciate
councilman
kenny's
comments
on
this
file,
so
I'm
going
to
well
tim.
I
like
to
read
the
things
you
know
how
I
work
I
like
to
read:
oh
yes,
recommendation.
A
A
Each
building
is
detailed
in
document
2b
c
amend
the
zoning
bylaw
2008-250
for
311,
somerset
street
west
and
234
236
of
conor
street
to
permit
an
18-story,
build
mixed-use
building
as
detailed
in
documents
three
and
four
two
that
the
planning
committee
recommend
council
that
the
implementing
zoning
bylaw
does
not
proceed
to
council
until
such
time,
an
agreement
under
section
37
of
the
planning
act
is
executed
and
three
that
the
planning
committee
approved
the
consultation
details.
Sections
of
this
report
is
the
item
carried
timothy.
A
Is
item
number
three
carried
all
right,
so
we
moved
to
item
number
four,
which
is
zoning
by
law
amendment
for
180,
canada
avenue.
This
is
for
all
you
cheney
fans.
This
is
the
property
across
the
road
from
the
holiday
inn,
not
sure
how
many
early
2000's
hip-hop
fans
I
have
here
but
anyway,
so
it's
a
six-story
mixed-use
building
with
underground
parking
on
canada
injected
across
from
the
the
canada.
A
You
know
the
most
poorly
planned
mall
in
the
city
model,
so
personal
opinion
only
so
we
do
have
a
couple
speakers
on
this
item.
I'm
not
sure
that
we
need.
I
mean
it's
a
pretty
straightforward
application
in
terms
of
what
it
what
it
looks
like
if
you've
seen
the
report,
you
see
that
the
development
as
it's
laid
out
on
canada
avenue-
I
don't
know
if
that-
would
necessarily
need
a
presentation
from
from
staff
on
this,
but
we
do
have
a
couple
of
delegations.
So
we
can
go
straight
to
that.
A
Yeah
we
can.
We
can
you
know
if
it's
questions,
we
can
have
them
sort
of
queue
up
the
the
slide
deck
to
see
what
to
see
what
it.
But
again
it's
a
six-story.
Mixed-Use
building
one
story
has
a
certain
design.
Top
flash
stories
have
a
different
design.
It
fits
in
with
the
landscape
and
again
directly
across
from
the
commercial
plaza.
A
E
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
can
speak
briefly
to
this
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
and
I
guess
at
this
point
we
have
prepared
a
presentation
which
we'd
be
happy
to
offer,
but
perhaps
we
could
hold
off
and
simply
respond
to
any
questions
following
the
public
delegations.
If
that's
your
preference
well.
E
E
It's
approximately
one
hectare
of
vacant
land,
it's
bounded
by
city
park
land
to
the
west,
which
is
to
be
expanded
to
the
north
in
the
future,
as
well
as
to
the
east,
is
lands
for
future
development.
Similar
to
the
site
across
kanata
ave
is
the
centrum
which
is
a
regional
shopping
and
entertainment
center,
as
well
as
a
transit
hub
for
the
community.
E
If
we
skip,
I
guess
to
speak
very
briefly
to
policy
contacts
so
as
mentioned
this
is
part
of
the
canada
town
center,
which
has
been
had
detailed
plans
for
its
future
growth
for
many
years.
So
the
site
is
part
of
the
designation
for
the
central
business
district,
so
that
envisions
a
mix
of
uses
at
transit,
supportive
densities
and
with
a
mix
of
uses
to
accommodate
both
residential
and
non-residential
uses.
E
If
we
skip
to,
we
can
skip
the
slide
so
the
site
to
accommodate
a
a
six-story
mixed-use
building
will
accommodate
approximately
300
residential
units
with
commercial
uses,
that
line
canada
avenue
and
wrap
the
corner
of
the
building,
as
shown
on
this
rendering
if
we
skip
to
the
next
plan.
So
this
is
the
site
plan.
That's
to
show
the
development.
E
E
So
the
purpose
of
the
zoning
amendment
is
to
modify
certain
provisions
of
the
existing
mixed-use
center
zone.
So
the
first
amendment
relates
to
the
maximum
floor
space
index.
So
that's
to
permit
a
slight
increase
in
additional
gross
floor
area
of
up
to
about
15
percent
beyond.
What's
otherwise
permitted-
and
this
is
given,
the
the
zone
itself
has
a
floor.
Space
index
that
is
relatively
low
for
this
site
and
its
intended
use
is
very
much
inconsistent
with
the
maximum
height
which
actually
contemplates
high
rise
up
to
11
stories.
E
The
second
amendment
similarly
relates
to
floor
space
index
and
it
is
to
permit
a
reduction
to
the
minimum
non-residential
component,
so
that
would
allow
for
a
reduced
gross
floor
area
associated
with
commercial
uses,
while
ensuring
that
kanata
have
remains,
as
envisioned
as
a
main
street,
supported
by
street
level
commercial
uses.
So
the
site
is,
is
designed
in
keeping
with
this
it'll
accommodate
retail
shops.
Restaurants,
small
businesses,
all
kind
of
lining
on
the
street-
and
this
is
the
reduction,
is,
is
in
light
of
a
couple
considerations.
E
One
is
that
the
the
minimum
requirement
is
kind
of
well
beyond
what
would
be
viable
at
this
site,
particularly
in
a
nearing
post,
covid
environment.
There's
little
demand
right
now
in
the
market,
especially
for
commercial,
which
would
perhaps
be
on
an
upper
story
further,
there's,
of
course,
across
the
street.
The
centrum
is
expected
to
be
the
focus
of
more
larger
scale,
commercial
in
the
future,
given
the
availability
of
land
and
develop
redevelopment.
E
E
I
see
I
am
out
of
time,
but
I
I
guess
I
would
conclude
the
last
amendment
is
in
relation
to
parking
for
the
residential
and
that's
just
in
light
of
proximity
to
rapid
transit,
which
is
in
400
meters
of
the
site
and
just
considerations
to
limit
the
extent
of
blasting
that
has
to
occur
to
accommodate
this
parking.
That's
to
be
below.
A
A
M
M
I
I
grew
up
in
the
neighborhood
and
it's
like
I
I
I
think
I
understand
the
vision
that
the
the
city
has
for
the
architecture
or
something
of
of
this
place
like
I
get
the
concept
and
what
they're
looking
to
aim
for
the
problem
is:
there's
something
else.
That's
been
living
in
that
forest
for,
like
I
don't
know,
probably
about
15
years,
something
like
this
and
there's
a
whole
freaking
history
behind
it,
but
basically
like
there's.
I
don't
know
how
to
say
it.
M
M
Canada
was
really
the
prototype
suburb
for
the
the
nation
in
its
design
concept,
and
it
was
a
very
good
model
for
aids.
You
know
it
is
it's
a
very
good
moral.
We
still
are
living
in
the
in
the
model,
but
there's
there's
something
tricky
about
it,
because
with
time
and
growth,
it's
like
there's
just
more
space
that
gets
taken
over.
You
know
there's
kind
of
like
this
densification-
and
you
know
this
stuff,
but
it's
like
in
the
neighborhood
growing
up
here.
M
M
The
best
place
since
you
were
a
child
was
the
playground
and
as
that
with
time
and
age
and
like
it
is
the
first
prototype
model
there
that
that
space,
especially
for
the
youth
it
it
kind
of
like
almost
devolves
into
like
a
return
to
the
free
space
that
is
unowned
like
it.
This
is
gonna
be
too
difficult
to
explain,
but
I
don't
know
like
if
you
knew
the
neighborhood
so
well
that
you
had
to
live
in
it
you
would.
B
B
A
B
A
M
M
And
that's
kind
of
the
opposite
of
what
canada
actually
means.
So
it's
like
a
paradox
and
it's
that
it's
and
it's
actually
the
way
we
come
to
understand
like
what
the
landscape
means.
You
know
you
guys
talk
a
lot
about
like
streetscapes
and
like
all
these
architectural
trends
and
stuff,
which
are
nice.
M
Those
are
things
right,
but
in
the
context
of
what
the
new
world
was
sought
for
and
what
canada
meant,
even
the
heritage,
like
it's,
it's
the
environment
that
that
needs
to
be
it's
our
understanding
and
ability
to
connect
to
our
environment
in
a
pristine
way,
which
is
what
gives
us
our
sense
of
space
and
freedom.
None
of
these
environments
are
free,
they're,
all
owned,
they're,
all
someone's
property,
even
when
you
say
public
stuff,
that's
that's
a
property,
and
it
it
it.
A
I
So
I
guess
I
commented
a
question
really
dustin,
so
I
did
wanna.
So
thank
you,
and
you
know
I
think,
you're,
probably
speaking,
for
a
lot
of
people
in
canada
that
really
love
our
natural
green
spaces,
and
you
know
probably
watched
the
trees
coming
down
and
felt
very
sad
about
that
to
counsel
them
off
this
point.
This
is
a
private
piece
of
property
where
a
building
is
allowed,
but
I
understand
your
larger
point.
Your
much
bigger
vision,
the
center
area
that
councilor
moffatt
was
referring
to
is
bill.
I
Tarran
park
named,
I
think,
aptly
because
it
was
bill.
Tarran's
vision,
well,
not
just
bill
tarrant's
vision,
but
many
people,
but
bill
taran
brought
it
to
fruition.
The
center
area
will
always
remain
as
a
park
with
a
big
lake
in
it,
for
you
know,
people
to
enjoy
with
pathways
and
access
to
it
where
there
are
stairs
up
off
of
canada
avenue.
I
M
M
You
could
say
lo
like
what,
by
the
indigenous
of
the
place,
you
really
could,
because
people
from
both
sides
of
the
river
come
here
even
as
far
as
carp
boys
on
their
bicycles
are
biking
further
to
come
to
this
particular
place,
because
it's
a
natural
playground
realized
by
the
boys
in
and
on
the
rocks
and
that's
very
different,
and
because
also
I
basically
followed
this
for
a
long
time.
I'm.
A
M
A
I
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
was
clear
to
everybody
that
the
bill
terran
park
will
remain.
These
buildings
are
going
to
be
circling
that
park
and
close
to
an
lrt
and
close
to
commercial.
I'll
have
other
comments
on
that
later,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
was
not
confusing
for
people
yeah.
B
B
No
I'm
just
saying
by
my
personal
experience
and
the
thing
is,
I
agree
with
dustin
as
well
like.
I
know
that
I
know
people
who
go
in
those
forces
a
lot
on
the
on
the
adjacent
side
to
the
plan
I
feel
like
it
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
construct
something
right
there.
Instead,
just
you
know
somewhere
in
like
a
field
like,
why
does
it
have
to
be
right
near
the
bill
terran
park
where,
like
everyone
enjoys
himself,
why
does
it
have
to
be
there?
That's
like
my
big
question.
B
A
Okay
thanks
the
way
planning
works
is
that
people
buy
property.
If
they
want
to
build
something
on
the
property,
they
apply
to
build
some
other
property
and
they
come
to
us
and
say:
can
we
build
this
on
the
property?
If
it
meets
the
policies,
we
say?
Yes,
we
don't
say,
can
you
sell
it
to
someone
else,
so
it
can
just
not
build,
and
people
can
just
scott
and
forrest.
I
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
make
a
couple
of
comments
about
the
commercial,
so
we
in
meeting
with
pen
equity,
who
own
centrum
and
meeting
with
the
canada
central
bia
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussions
about
what
particular
commercial
will
go
there,
because
the
end
vision
is
that
canada,
avenue
avenue,
will
be
a
main
street,
and
you
know
we
talked
about
this.
I
think
in
councillor
king's
ward,
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
about
how
main
street
sometimes
are
kind
of
a
hot
hodgepodge.
I
It's
a
massive
parking
lot
that
is
supposed
to
have
a
commercial
in
it
as
well,
but
right
now
it
kind
of
looks
and
feels
nothing
like
a
main
street,
but
in
meetings
with
pennecoy
and
canada,
central
bia
we're
going
to
be
having
doing
some
surveys
finding
out
what
people
want
and
pen
equity
is
actually
committed
to
putting
the
commercial
there.
That
would
make
it
look
and
feel
more
like
a
main
street.
I
So
this
is
step
one
of
a
larger
vision
for
canada,
app
so
stay
tuned
for
the
next
building
that
will
be
coming,
and
this
building
will
be
more
family
units.
The
next
building
will
be
55
plus
and
we're
also
going
to
be
surveying
the
people
who
live
in
the
buildings
all
around
bill
tarrant
park
to
ask
what
type
of
commercial
they
would
like.
The
builders
are
not
saying
they
will
absolutely
do
whatever
we
say,
but
they're
going
to
try
very
hard.
So
it
was.
I
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much,
counselor
curry.
So
the
recommendation
for
this
is
that
the
planning
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
designed
by
a
lot
2008.250
for
180
canada
avenue
to
prevent
sixth
story.
Mixed
use,
building
underground
parking
has
detailed
document.
Two
and
two.
The
planning
committee
approved
the
conversation
detail
section
of
this
report.
A
Thank
you.
So
that's
the
e,
that's
it
for
the
the
agenda.
There
are
no
in-camera
items,
there's
no
notices
of
motion,
I'm
not
aware
of
any
inquiries,
no
other
business,
so
on
adjournments,
so
kerry.
Thank
you
and
best
of
luck
to
everyone
out
there.
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
folks
that
are
still
coming
online.
I
know
half
of
the
world
I
represent
is
still
out
of
power
and
like
kathy
emptying
there.
A
Well,
if
you're
lucky
enough
to
have
a
sound
pit,
you
get
an
empty
or
some
pit
and
flush
a
toilet
using
your
sump
pit,
but
the
upcoming
rain
is
quite
it's
quite
concerning
for
everyone.
So
hopefully
we
can.
We
can
get
some
progress
on
this
today
and
connect
all
those
folks
to
we
don't
have
running
water
as
well
as
the
folks
that
do
have
running
water.
So
thank
you
appreciate.
Everyone
today
enjoy
the
rest.