►
From YouTube: Planning Committee – October 13, 2015
Description
Planning Committee meeting – October 13, 2015 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
B
So
we
have
corn
so
we're
going
to
get
going.
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
1,
2
3
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
listed
above.
Only
those
who
make
oil
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
B
If
council
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
and
within
120
days
of
receipt
of
the
application
for
zoning
and
180
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment,
a
comment
sheet
is
available
at
the
door.
If
anyone
does
want
to
speak
any
declarations
of
interest,
none
conformation
of
minutes
from
the
agenda,
the
22nd
of
September
any
changes
are
they
carried
Mary.
Thank
you.
Kara
first
item
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
1627
maxium
Street
in
beacon
hills
survey.
I
have
no
speakers.
B
Does
anyone
on
the
committee
want
to
hold
that
vice-chair
Tierney
your
this
is
your
neck
of
the
woods
you're
good
good.
Is
that
carried?
Thank
you
and
the
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
for
350
Cresthaven
Drive,
that
planning
committee
recommend
council
approve
and
adopt
an
amendment
to
volume,
2a
of
the
official
plan
to
redesign
8,
350
crest,
dave
and
drive
from
mixed
density
residential
in
the
south,
the
P
and
secondary
plan.
B
There
is
four
five
and
six
two
mixed
use:
special
policy
area,
as
shown
in
document
1
and
detailed
in
document
2,
and
approve
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
2008
250
for
350
Cresthaven
Drive
to
permit
a
mixed-use
development
as
detailed
in
document
3.
We
don't
have
any
speakers
we
do
have
mr.
sterling
is
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
Do
you
need
to
speak
if
we're
prepared
to
carry
this
item
will
take
us
any
questions
from
committee
members?
This
item
carried
then
carried.
Thank
you
and
then
we
have
number
three.
B
Is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
2500
San,
Juan
Boulevard,
councillor
jeans,
SEO
services
in
her
Ward,
the
Planning
Committee
recommend
counsel
of
repeal
bylaw
2014
291,
as
it
applies
for
2500
700
Boulevard
as
detailed
and
document,
and
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008
to
that
250
for
2500
Cellular
Boulevard
to
permit
Business
Park
industrial
type
uses,
as
shown
in
document
1
and
detailed
and
document
2.
We
do
have
mr.
near
moles
here
from
the
Ottawa
Community
Land
Development
Corporation
to
speak.
If
anyone
has
any
questions,
does
anyone
have
any
questions?
B
You
don't
need
to
speak
correct?
Where
are
you
were
their
job?
You
need
to
speak.
If
ok,
so
is
this
item
Kerry
Mary?
Thank
you
number
four.
Is
the
vacant
urban
residential
land
survey
2014
update
anyone
wanna
hold?
This
will
hold
that
number
held
by
a
councillor,
miss
Bunn
and
number.
Five
is
the
Mannatech
area
specific
development
charges?
B
This
has
already
been
to
Iraq,
and
do
two
procedures
comes
here
after
that,
so
that
the
planning
committee
that
that
council
endorsed
by
law
2014
to
29,
be
revised,
such
that
the
applicability
of
the
area,
specific
development
charge
for
water
and
sanitary
sewer
services
be
in
respect
of
the
revised
schedule,
1
attached
as
document
1.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions?
B
C
B
This
is
advancing
out
of
the
norm,
but
normally
it
wouldn't
go
to
the
next
time
because
of
the
interim
Municipal
Board
hearing
on
the
15th
is
that
Carrie?
Thank
you
and
our
last
item
when
we
three
lovely,
ladies,
that
came
out
to
speak
to
it.
This
is
their
initiative
and
they
had
some
questions,
but
we
had
a
conversation,
and
this
is
with
regard
to
the
mural
at
373
Laurier,
Avenue
East.
If
you
remember,
we
had
councilor
leaper
had
won
at
the
last
meeting,
I
believe
in
his
ward
and
and
councillor
flurry.
B
D
It's
a
great
collaboration
between
me,
the
community,
the
the
condo
owners,
as
well
as
the
group
leading
the
Prime
Minister's,
real
idea
and
and
that
pathway
and
as
you
have
added
madam
chair,
it's
always
graffiti.
It's
been
such
a
an
issue
for
the
condo
board.
We've
had
ongoing
discussions
with
them
to
fight
to
try
to
find
solutions
and,
and
now
I
think,
what's
presented
in
terms
of
mural,
reflecting
the
the
Prime
Minister's
heritage
along
that
that
area
as
well.
D
B
You
very
much
you
know
what
I'd
like
to
see,
because
we
have
these
two
murals
and
in
opposite
sides
of
the
downtown
really
well.
Yours
isn't
really
opposite
sides
of
downtown.
You
are
the
downtown
and
you
are
just
a
little
bit
to
the
west,
but
because
we
have
to
at
the
same
time,
I'd
really
like
to
have
a
conversation.
Next
fall
on
how
successful
they
are
at
at
changing
the
the
amount
of
graffiti
and
and
that
sort
of
thing,
because
it's
something
that
probably,
if
really
successful,
we
should
be
looking
at
where
other
opportunities
exist.
B
C
B
E
It
says
here
as
all
potential
than
that
area
is
some
form
of
intensification
to
find
us
for
the
city's
official
plan
rather
than
greenfield
development.
So
does
that
mean
that
the
that
the
definition
has
changed
then
so
vacant
urban
residential
land,
as
defined
by
the
city,
now
only
refers
to
vacant
urban
residential
land
outside
the
Greenville.
F
I'm,
madam
chair,
the
way
the
Defiant
intensification
in
the
city's
official
plan
include
a
number
of
items,
including
redevelopment
that
creates
creation
of
new
lots.
Use
relies
on
previously
developed
lining
existing
communities,
as
well
as
the
development
of
vacant
or
underutilized
slots
within
previously
developed
areas.
So
previously,
when
the
survey
originally
started
in
1992
lands
inside
the
Greenbelt
could
have
been
part
of
new
community,
that's
developing,
but
through
assessment
this
year
we
find
that
lands
within
the
green
bells
are
largely
developed
and
parcels.
They
can
either
sue
redevelopment
or
within
previously
developed
area.
F
E
E
It's
a
bit
counterintuitive
right
because
when
you
hear
the
term
vacant
her
urban
residential
land
that
doesn't
obviously
tell
you
that
that
does
not
include
land
inside
the
Greenbelt.
For
example,
in
my
award
we
passed
around
this
table
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
a
development
which
is
going
to
end
up
in
somewhere
in
the
tune
of
6,000
new
units
on
vacant
urban
residential
land
in
the
form
of
brownfields
development.
So
so
that
is
not
included.
It's
not
captured
in
this.
It's
viewed
as
intensification
and
then,
by
definition,
it's
not
included
in
this
definition.
That's
correct!
E
E
E
So
the
conclusion
is,
overall,
the
supplied
land
for
new
housing
in
Ottawa
at
the
end
of
2014
met
all
policies
of
the
provincial
policy
statement
for
greenfield
residential
land.
Could
you
explain
I'm
not
familiar
with
any
portion
of
the
PPS
that
has
policies
related
to
Greenfield
residential
land?
Could
you
explain
that
to
me.
F
Mom
cheers
guys
provincial
policy
section.
One
point
four
point:
one:
to
provide:
an
appropriate
range
and
mix
of
housing,
types
and
densities
required
to
meet
projected
requirements
of
current
and
future
residents
of
regional
market
area
planning.
Authorities
Shou
and
it
goes
on
to
say,
AM
B,
which
is
C
requirement,
maintained
at
all
time.
The
ability
to
accommodate
residential
girls
for
a
minimum
of
10
years
through
residential
intensification
or
redevelopment
and
if
necessary,
language
are
designated
and
available
for
residential
development.
E
Right
so
the
language
through
residential
intensification
and
redevelopment
and
if
necessary,
lands
which
are
designated
and
available
for
residential
development
suggests
that
the
PPS
is
actually
encouraging
municipalities
to
increase
population
growth
or
manage
growth
within
intensification
or
brownfield
development.
Yes,
there
is
to
talk
about
range,
but
if
you
take,
you
know
a
city
like
Toronto
which
doesn't
have
green
fields,
they
would
be
managing
all
of
the
growth
within
existing
residential
intensification,
correct,
maybe.
A
Just
to
clarify
Madame
chair
so
that
the
PBS
really
speaks
to
develop,
move
in
the
urban
area
and
we
do
have
green
field
sites
within
the
urban
areas.
So
that's
where
it
refers
to
the
statement
and
the
PPS
lands
zone
for
or
ready
for
designator
for
residential
development.
So
there
is
a
reference
to
intensification,
absolutely
and
that's
been
acknowledged
and,
as
mr.
Sheehan
indicated,
there's
a
separate
report
that
comes
out
on
that.
A
E
A
G
F
F
B
B
B
G
A
If
I
might
step
in
madam
chair
the
38
units,
that's
reported,
that
was
actually
what
was
built
in
2014
the
table
of
the
table
of
9.
That
averages
out
to
33
it's
based
on
the
average
of
the
last
five
years.
So
you
see,
densities
have
been
going
up,
but
if
you
take
the
five
year
average
it's
going
to
be
lower
than
2014.
G
A
B
B
Right,
okay,
so
we
all
know
that
in
some
parts
of
the
burbs
they're
achieving
43,
which
is
causing
an
incredible
pressure
on
the
livability
of
the
people
that
are
moving
in
there
and
those
of
us
that
have
been
working
directly
on
the
sponsor
group,
definitely
see
the
correlation
between
that
kind
of
density
and
and
its
force.
Because
of
the
fact
that
we
take
more
than
50%
of
the
land
that
a
developer
has
for
things
other
than
where
people
live.
But
it's
causing
the
solution
is
that's.
B
G
The
reason
I
say
that
is
because
that
number
that
we
want
to
get
to
that
34
is
based
or
to
be
applied
to
this
vacant
land.
So
that's
where
it
fits
in
here
and
and
what
I'm
worried
about
is
any
more
of
this
vacant
land
getting
developed
at
38
or
44
or
50.
It's
going
to
cause
the
suburban
councilors,
a
lot
of
grief.
So
we've
got
to
get
back
to
that
approved
number
of
34
as
soon
as
poss,
and
we.
B
G
B
C
Madam
chair,
in
accordance
with
the
procedural
bylaw
2014
for
for
one,
the
Planning
Committee
resolved
in-camera
pursuant
to
subsection
13
1e
litigation
of
potential
litigation
affecting
the
city,
including
matters
before
administrative
tribunals,
section
13,
1f,
the
receiving
of
advice
that
is
subject
to
sir
clown
beverage,
including
communications
necessary
for
the
purpose.
With
respect
to
the
resolution
of
development
charges,
bylaws
appeal
before
the
materials,
the
board
by
the
Greater
Ottawa
Builders
Association,
and
the
building
owners
and
managers
Association
of
Ottawa.
B
Well,
thank
you
is
that
Carrie
and
just
so
you
know,
I
mean
I.
This
is
the
first
in
camera
that
we
have
been
at
planning
committee
and
I.
Don't
even
know
how
many
years,
but
it's
been
a
while
hasn't
it
mr.
mark
yeah.
So
we
don't
take
that
lightly
anyway,
so
I
would
ask
everybody
who
is
not
a
counselor
or
court
courage
on
Moser
Marian's
Similac
to
leave
please
Oh
Jim
mark
has
to
say
you
have
to
say,
and
please
good.