►
From YouTube: Planning Committee - February 28, 2019
Description
Planning Committee meeting - February 28, 2019 - Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
2,
3
5
8
to
11
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
just
mentioned
only
those
who
make
oil
submissions
today,
our
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
Appeal
Tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning.
Appeal
Tribunal
counsel
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
150
days
of
receipt
of
the
application
for
zoning
and
210
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment.
B
A
That's
switching
the
two
of
them
and
so
Colin
the
appointee.
Until
we
vote
you
in
for
the
suburban,
do
you
need
to
speak
if
we're
prepared
to
carry
it,
and
thank
you
for
putting
your
name
forward.
It's
been
a
while,
since
you
were
here
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
working
with
you
so
on
the
vice-chair
to
knee
motion
is
a
carry
and
on
repos
amended.
Okay.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
the
we're
going
to
have
a
bit
of
a
presentation
and
I
know
that
councillor
egg-whites
here
and
he
would
like
to
speak
to
it.
A
A
A
A
Number
six
is
a
number
another
NCC
item.
It's
the
capital
illumination
plan
for
Ottawa's
downtown
that
we've
been
asked
to
support.
I,
don't
see
any
speakers
here
since
item
carried
the
next
one
is
significant
to
Woodlands
guidelines
which
we
will
hold.
We
have
speakers
on
that.
The
next
item
is
3598.
Innes
Road
in
counselor
do
Dez's
ward.
We
have
a
Matthew
Miguel
again
from
Fulton
here
to
speak,
but
does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
this?
This
is
for
the
car
wash
no
Matthew.
Are
you?
A
Do
you
need
to
speak
up
or
prepared
to
carry
this
item?
Thank
you
so
see.
I'm
caring!
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
807,
River,
Road
and
4720
Spratt,
Road
I,
don't
have
any
speakers
register.
This
is
in
councilor
means
Riverside
so
forth.
Any
any
any
questions.
No,
as
the
item
carry
thank
you.
A
Oh
well,
it's
true.
They
know
Marcel.
Where
are
you
you
don't
need
to
speak
to
that
item
good
because
we
already
carried
it,
but
thank
you
come
late.
I,
don't
see
it
in
time
to
have
it
here
so
number
10
is
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
4650
Spratt,
Road,
4800,
Spratt
Road,
and
an
unaddressed
parcel
between
River
Road
and
South
Bridge
Street
in
Riverside,
south
I.
Don't
have
anybody
to
speak?
Does
anyone
have
any
questions?
No!
Anyone
in
the
audience
the
war
council
is
aware
of
it.
A
She's,
aware
of
that
is
what
the
comments
say
right.
Does
anyone
have
any
anything
else?
Is
this
item
Carrie.
Thank
you
item
number
11.
Is
it's
only
bylaw
amendment
for
54th
Street.
We
have
a
couple
of
people
that
want
to
speak
to
this
item,
so
we're
going
to
hold
that
this
is
the
parking
lot
number
12
is
the
vacant
urban
residential
land
survey
2017
update
and
we
have
Natalie
Poe
seen
here
or
who
is
the
staff
person,
but
mr.
Smith?
This
is
our
annual
reporting
anything
that
you'd
like
to
say.
Yes,.
C
A
It's
interesting
the
part
that
talks
to
that
the
number
that's
connected
to
the
already
service
land
I
think
that
that's
you
know
of
definitely
in
the
suburban
areas.
That's
important
to
to
us
and
what
was
interesting
too
I
thought
was
that
for
all
the
years
we
were
told
that
the
single
residential
was
a
was
doomed
to
fail.
We
see
how
hearty
that
both
continues
to
be
so
on
this
item.
That's
just
receiving
I,
think
received,
and
then
we
have
counselors
items.
A
We
have
councillor
judith
her
item,
which
is
a
motion
direction
to
staff
regarding
alignment
of
official
plan
policy
and
zoning
bylaw
with
federal
land
use
approval
for
14:26
st.
joseph
boulevard.
We
don't
have
any
speakers
on
this.
Did
you
have
anything
you
wanted
to
say
quickly
or
you
just
want
us
to
support
it?
Well,
we're
happy
to
do
that.
I
think
anybody
have
any
objections,
so
it's
Kerry.
Thank
you.
Good
job
number
14
is
the
static
it.
A
It
is
a
big
deal
if
anybody
wants
more
information,
please,
when
counselor
Judas
is
available,
have
a
chat
with
her
14
status,
update,
Planning,
Committee
inquiries,
emotions
for
the
period
ending
February
11th
has
that
received
and
then
in
information
previously
distributed
the
Kasia
new
apartment.
If
anyone
wants
to
lift
this
item
for
discussion,
we
have
to
have
2/3
of
those
present
and
voting
required.
No
one
does
we're
happy.
We
have
money
and
we've
got
great
ideas,
including
hockey
stands
that
I
invented
awesome.
Ok,
we
see
all
right.
So
let's
go
back
to
the
beginning.
A
Well,
not
quite
the
beginning,
item
number
2
and
we're
having
a
presentation
and
the
speakers
we
have
in
addition
to
councillor
egg.
Why?
Who
will
be
our
last
speaker
on
this
item?
Is
catherine
calorie,
the
Ottawa
Film
Office
Board
of
Directors
and
Bruce
Harvey,
so
I'll
call
you
after
the
presentation.
E
F
Going
to
do
a
presentation
on
the
proposed
the
city
initiated
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
the
proposed
sound
stage
and
creative
hub
at
1740,
Woodruff
Avenue
say
this
property
is
owned
by
the
National
Capital
Commission.
It's
a
a
2.4
hectare
parcel
on
the
Greenbelt
research
farm
near
the
southwest
corner
of
West
Hunt,
Club,
Road
and
width
Avenue.
E
E
F
E
Other
words,
film,
television
and
animation
industry
has
significant
economic
impacts
on
our
local
economy.
The
industry
contributes
over
100
million
dollars
to
our
economy,
annually,
provides
hundreds
of
skilled
jobs
in
our
creative
sector
and
promotes
Ottawa
nationally
and
internationally,
by
supporting
and
enhancing
local
creative
industries.
E
It
is
widely
expected
that
the
proposed
development
will
present
new
opportunities
for
economic
growth.
A
2016
study
conducted
by
the
bar
Haven
BIA
identified
a
film
and
television
soundstage
as
a
key
potential
contributor
for
economic
growth
in
this
part
of
the
city.
The
proximity
of
the
proposed
site
to
established
animation
companies,
including
mercury
film
works,
makes
the
ideal
location
for
the
creative
hub,
while
the
proximity
of
the
Ottawa
International
Airport
provides
easy
access
to
commuter
and
international
carriers
and
flights.
E
The
site
is
also
near
Algonquin
College,
the
Algonquin
College
School
of
Media
and
Design
has
many
well-established
programs
with
ties
to
the
film
industry,
including
animation
broadcasting,
television,
game,
development,
script,
writing
and
music
production.
In
addition,
the
city
is
very
fortunate,
but
left
the
Tay
offers
similar
programming.
E
E
According
to
the
proponents,
the
proposed
40
million
dollar
development
is
expected
to
create
approximately
500
full-time
jobs
in
construction
once
completed.
It
would
generate
upwards
of
25
to
40
million
dollars
annually
in
new
economic
activity
and
create
500
full-time
jobs
in
our
creative
sector.
E
We
look
forward
to
working
with
the
NCC,
the
Ottawa
Film
Office,
and
try
those
studios
on
this
exciting
addition
to
the
National
Capital
Region
Ottawa
is
already
home
to
several
world-class
film
television
and
animation
companies,
and
we
are
very
confident
that
this
proposal
will
provide
an
opportunity
for
us
to
welcome
many
more.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
it
is
exciting.
It's
very
exciting
and
it's
an
opportunity.
This
Greenbelt
research
farm
is
like
Rip
Van
Winkle,
where
he
went
to
sleep
for
a
hundred
years.
It
opened
the
year
that
Pierre,
Elliot
Trudeau
was
first
elected
and
if
you
remember
the
first
mad
cow
disease
20-some
years
ago,
it
was
isolated
to
one
of
the
buildings
here
and
we
and
we
Geraldine,
is
in
the
room.
Where
are
you
Joey?
We
discovered
it
like,
we
literally
discovered
it.
It
like.
A
We
opened
the
door
to
opportunity,
and
fortunately
the
NCC
agrees
with
that.
So
in
May
at
fedko
we're
going
to
be
coming
back
with
a
report.
I
think
it's
mainly
Geraldine
and
John
add
to
and
hopefully
get
the
attention
of
it.
We've
been
trying
to
tell
you
what
we're
doing
that,
but
it's
it's
vast.
It's
like
overwhelmingly
exciting
on
a
global
stage
for
us,
so
I'm
going
to
go
to
Katherine
Galilee
is
Katherine
here,
come
on
forward.
A
E
You,
madam
chair
councillors
and
committee,
thank
you
for
providing
the
Ottawa
Film
Office
Board
of
Directors
the
an
opportunity
to
speak
today.
My
name
is
Katherine
Kelly.
My
job
is
as
president
of
destination
development
at
Ottawa
tourism,
but
I'm
here
today.
In
my
capacity
as
chair
of
the
Ottawa
film
office,
board
and
I
represent
those
interests.
The
board
is
made
up
of
stakeholders
both
directly
and
indirectly
engaged
with
Ottawa
animation
and
fed
production
industry
with
representation
for
models,
post-secondary
institutions,
federal
government,
entertainment,
industry,
tourism
and
hospitality
sector.
E
The
City
of
Ottawa
private
sector
businesses,
including
direct
and
indirect
industry
representation.
As
such
a
board
perspective,
is
a
high-level
perspective
from
across
sort
of
a
broad
range
of
sectors
in
Ottawa
I'm
pleased
to
provide
support
on
the
proposed
soundstage,
campus
and
creative
hub
today
on
behalf
of
the
board,
and
it
would
be
a
mess
to
add
or
not
to
add
that
the
support
also
comes
from
my
employer,
Ottawa
tourism.
E
This
would
be
an
exciting
addition
to
the
National
Capital
Region.
The
benefits
of
production
taking
place
and
destinations
has
been
documented
from
New
Zealand
and
the
Lord
of
the
Rings
trilogy
to
iPhone
and
Game
of
Thrones
to
Scotland's,
Wallace,
Monument
and
Braveheart,
and
recently
here
in
Vancouver,
shoot
of
Deborah
resonates
with
us
that
the
province
of
Ontario
has
had
to
turn
away.
E
260
million
dollars
of
production
in
2017,
due
to
lack
of
the
soundstages,
a
soundstage
inaudible,
will
help
attract
a
production
that
would
otherwise
film
outside
of
the
province.
Production
to
choose
Ottawa
as
a
filming
location
often
can
often
mean
a
large
cast
and
crew
and
entourage.
As
you
stay
in
hotels,
McDonald,
restaurants,
they
visit
our
attractions
during
their
time
their
free
time
and
the
use
of
transportation
options
and
they
add
two
Ottawa's
visitor
economy.
E
We
also
support
the
jobs
in
the
creative
sector
that
are
created
by
film
and
television
and
the
animation
community,
as
Jeremy
just
mentioned.
So
a
city
with
a
thriving
creative
community
tends
to
be
an
interesting
destination
for
people
to
visit
and
activity
that
surround
creative
people
will
also
lend
itself
well
to
Ottawa's
reputation
as
one
of
the
most
educated
and
culturally
rich
destinations
in
Canada.
E
The
proposed
soundstage
complex
will
contribute
strongly
to
ottawa's
economy
and
expect
it
to
increase
levels
of
production
in
the
region
which
I
already,
as
Jamie,
mentioned,
that
100
million
per
year,
those
mentioning
again
by
40
percent
in
the
first
few
years
of
production,
and
if
your
first
few
years
of
operation
and
creating
the
additional
five
hundred
full-time
equivalents
for
the
sector.
We
expect
the
proposed
purpose-built,
sound
stage.
Campus
and
creative
hub
will
act
as
a
gathering
place
for
the
city's
film
television
and
animation
sectors.
E
Organically,
created
networking
opportunities,
cross
collaboration
between
the
city's
cultural
sectors.
The
proposed
site
at
the
Greenbelt
research
farm
is
ideal,
since
it's
already
developed
land
and
it
won't
interfere
with
agricultural
conservation
activities
in
the
area.
It's
also
a
short
distance
from
the
airport,
the
downtown
core
education
facilities
and
production
industry
that
exist
area
already.
With
the
addition
of
the
autonomous
vehicle
testing
and
precision
agriculture
research,
the
area
will
soon
be
bustling
with
innovation.
E
We
look
forward
to
the
proposed
soundstage
campus
and
creative
had
becoming
a
reality
for
the
nation's
capital,
and
we
applaud
the
efforts
of
John
Smith
and
his
team
and
Thank
You,
Jamie
and
Allison
for
that
excellent
I
report
earlier
and
the
detailed
report
that
was
provided
and
moving
this
project
forward.
So
thanks
for
hearing
from
the
Ottawa
film
office,
Board
of
Directors
on
this
exciting
history-making
initiative,
we
look
forward
to
the
success
of
the
Ottawa
film
office
and
the
sound
stage
for
a
thriving
Thurman
animation
production
community
in
Ottawa.
Thanks
and.
A
Thank
you
for
coming.
It
is
really
exciting
and
I
know
that
Bruce
was
in
Toronto
at
Ottawa
Day
for
Ottawa
Day
at
Queen's
Park
this
weekend,
there's
a
buzz.
You
know,
I
mean
it
is
it's
long
I,
don't
know
that
it's
long
overdue,
because
I
don't
think
we
were
ready
before
I,
honestly,
don't
but
we're
ready
now.
So,
thank
you
very
much.
Anyone
have
any
questions.
No
thank
you.
Thank
you!
So
killer
egg
white
thank.
B
You
very
much
soon
I'm
sure
to
answer
councilor
Chevy's
question.
Yes,
the
word
council
is
aware-
and
he
said
and
he's
here
today
to
speak
very
enthusiastically
about
this
project.
I
was
part
of
a
Board
of
Trade
breakfast
panel
last
week,
and
one
of
the
questions
that
was
posed
to
me
and
to
the
panel
was:
what
does
the
city
need
to
do
going
forward
to
as
we
reach
a
million
people?
What
do
we
need
to
do?
B
What
do
we
need
to
keep
that
momentum
going
and
the
answer
that
I
thought
up
was
we
need
to
diversify
our
workforce?
We
need
to
be
know
for
more
than
the
city
where
federal
bureaucrats
live,
not
that
there's
anything
wrong
with
working
for
the
federal
government,
but
we
need
to
diversify
the
way
we
do
things
the
way
we
do
business
and
I
think
this.
This
creative
hub
is
a
perfect
example
of
how
we
can
do
that.
It
builds
on
our
strengths.
It
builds
on
our
educational
programs,
like
at
Algonquin
College,
just
down.
B
Both
which
help
to
be
more
nine
already
and
just
creates
a
whole
new
level
of
excitement
and
a
whole
new
area
of
endeavor,
so
the
students
that
come
to
Algonquin,
for
example,
that
are
in
the
in
the
programs
related
to
animation
and
and
and
film
and
music.
They
can
stay
here.
They
don't
have
to
go
to
Vancouver
they'll
have
good
tron
or
Montreal.
They
can
stay
here,
they're
trained
and
and
enhance
our
city.
So
I
again,
as
counselor
du
das
said
her
piece
all
I
want
you
to
do
is
to
support
this
so
and
again.
B
B
You
only
have
to
talk
to
him
about
this
project
for
I,
don't
know
30
seconds
and
you're
just
as
excited
as
can
be
about
it,
he's
just
bursting
and
I'm
going
to
give
him
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
that
that,
but
thank
you
so
much
Bruce,
because
I
don't
think
we
could
have
done
this
without
you.
It's
much
much
appreciated.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thanks.
A
Very
much
councilor,
englade
well
said,
and
just
you
know,
building
on
our
lengthy
conversations
yesterday
and
your
comment
about
Algonquin
and
last
CTA.
All
of
our
colleges
and
universities
will
be
linked
through
stage
two
when
it's
complete
and
this
location
is
right
on
the
Ella,
the
the
future
LRT
debar
Haven,
which
is
the
current
Southwest
BRT
Tabar
Haven.
So
it's
already
existing
there,
it's
a
fabulous
location
in
the
geographic
councillor,
surely
Monsieur
would
say,
was
and
councillors
well.
He
is
here
he
would
say
it's
in
the
geographic
center
of
the
entire
city
of
Ottawa.
Mr.
D
Rodney
councilors
warning
stated
it
is
very
exciting
and
I
want
to
repeat
what
everyone
else
has
said
already,
but
I
do
want
to
set
a
bit
of
context
for
those
councillors
who
haven't
been
involved
in
our
portfolio
as
long
as
as
some
of
the
other
councillors
around
the
table,
and
certainly
a
councillor
Sher
Ali
in
people
that
have
been
involved
in
film
and
TV.
The
whole
lives.
D
Ottawa
is
the
birthplace
of
film
television,
animation
in
Canada
and
and
I
want.
To
reiterate,
we
are
the
birthplace.
The
very
first
feature
film
that
was
ever
projected
in
Canada
was
by
the
hall
and
brothers
in
Ottawa.
The
the
first
TV
series
that
was
ever
sold
to
the
United
States
was
produced
by
Crowley
films.
It's
I
have
that
wonderful,
show
called
wonderful
world
of
Oz
anybody
who's.
My
age
will
remember
seeing
that
on
TV
and
he
sold
the
subsequent
one.
D
The
first
Academy
Award
for
dramatic
feature
film
was
won
by
quality
films
for
the
many
skied
Everest.
We've
got
a
very
long
history
involvement
in
film
and
TV.
We
have
the
oldest
Film
Institute,
with
the
Canadian
Screen
Institute.
Here
in
Ottawa,
that's
been
in
place
for
over
70
years
we
have
the
biggest
animation
festival
in
North
America
here
in
Ottawa.
So
this
there's
a
lot
we
have
going
on.
D
And
so
we
haven't
been
able
to
compete
in
that
level.
Two
weeks
ago,
I
was
in
Los
Angeles,
with
our
partner
on
this
construction
of
of
the
studio,
tribal
Peter,
apostle,
appleÃs
and
without
exception,
every
single
company
we
met
with
expressed
interest
in
coming
to
Ottawa,
once
the
sound
stages
are
built
and
we
plan
to
go
back
there
as
soon
as
we
get
our
shovels
in
the
ground.
So
we
can
show
that
we
are
real.
Unfortunately,
in
our
industry,
people
talking
about
building
studios
all
time,
they
don't
come
through.
D
I
want
to
thank
all
of
the
counselors
here
and
I
think
we
have
as
good
support
from
our
city
from
the
federal
government
through
the
NCC
from
the
provincial
governments
I.
Certainly,
we
saw
that
this
week,
there's
there's
I
think
no
end
to
the
support
we
have
in
this
project,
and
I
also
want
to
say
that
this
week,
to
the
means
I
have
in
Toronto,
outside
of
what
we
did
in
in
Queens,
Park
are
leading
towards
having
the
most
cutting-edge
development
in
our
industry
for
decades.
D
I
want
to
give
you
a
term
that
you'll
hear
in
the
future
called
volumetric
motion
capture.
We
met
with
the
Canadian
film
center,
which
is
the
Norman
Jewison
school
that
was
created
in
Toronto,
and
we're
working
towards
having
their
campus
will
be
here
for
the
volumetric
motion
capture
it
is,
it
is
a
technology.
That's
going
to
advance
animation,
live
action,
film
and
gaming
industry
to
a
level
that
doesn't
exist
anywhere
in
Canada
and
anywhere
in
the
eastern
United
States,
either.
There's
only
one
other
stage
like
this
in
the
United
States
and
that's
in
California.
D
A
Just
awesome
see
now
you
should
have
come
out
to
the
last
meeting
when
there
was
asking
for
people
to
get
excited
because
you're
excited
so
we're
going
to
be
building
in
for
sure
a
future
in
film
in
that
industry,
in
our
official
plan.
What
that's
going
to
know
that
piece
of
it
so
look
for
your
help
and
then
anyone
have
any
questions.
A
D
A
A
A
Just
so
I
put
a
shout
out
again,
but
this
is
the
companion
piece
because,
because
the
NCC
you
know
is
the
steward
of
the
green
belt
and
so
much
more
in
order
to
accommodate
the
building
of
the
film
studio
on
the
doorstep
of
the
entry
to
this
Greenbelt
research
farm
is
necessary
to
take
back
a
land
that
was
previously
used,
then
return
it
to
itself
previous
to
its
original
use.
So
that's
what's
happening.
A
This
is
an
old
golf
course
that
they're
going
to
be
allowing
to
return
and
encouraging
to
return
to
it's
a
natural,
so
naturalize
it
so
they're
doing
that
intent
of
the
two
of
them
are
married
in
that
way.
Okay,
so,
on
this
item
is
a
carry.
This
is
this
is
being
rezoning,
bylaw
amendment
for
37
90
at
Bank
Street
in
Worcester,
South,
Gate
cancer
genes
in
okay.
Thank
you,
okay!
So
next
up
we
have
salary
cuts
and
then
O'connell
coming
forward.
A
A
So
this
item
is
the
designation
of
the
booth
Street
complex
at
5:52
to
568
through
Street
and
405
Rochester
Street,
and
apart
for
the
interior,
Heritage
Act
and
they'll
also
be
speaking
to
item
5,
which
is
the
official
plan.
Zoning
bylaw
amendment
at
5:52,
booth,
Street
and
Doug
James
has
joined
them
at
the
at
the
desk.
So
welcome
welcome.
A
E
You,
madam
chair
and
councillors,
I'm
joined
by
Sarah
Koontz,
as
mentioned
to
talk
about
the
heritage
component
of
this
property.
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
hard
to
top
the
excitement
of
the
last
presentation,
but
we'll
do
our
best
were
also
very
pleased
to
be
here
to
talk
about
the
boost
street
complex
and
the
associated
city
processes
with
that
complex,
so
the
site
itself
just
to
give
some
context
and
location.
That's
over
the
417
north
Abele's
lake
and
just
east
of
the
preston
curling
secondary
plan
area.
E
It's
north
east
of
the
new
hospital
campus
as
well
there's
a
number
of
high-rise
buildings
in
the
works
either
under
construction
or
approved
in
the
Preston
Carling
district,
and
it's
within
600
metres
of
two
future
LRT
stations,
the
Gladstone
and
the
Carling
station.
It's
about
six
and
a
half
acres
in
size,
and
it's
got
frontage
on
booth,
Rochester,
Orange
and
Norman
streets.
G
The
ds3
complex
seems
to
be
active
in
the
early
2000s
and
was
eventually
transferred
to
the
Canada
lands
corporation.
Well,
under
federal
ownership.
Five
buildings
on
the
site
were
designated
by
the
federal
heritage
buildings
Review
office,
which
I've
ever
fortune
as
Febo
the
city
on,
has
had
an
interest
in
the
heritage
assets
on
the
site
since
the
1990s
and
when
the
lands
were
inquired
by
Canada
lands.
G
The
aerial
photo
on
the
Left
annotated
by
er,
a
the
heritage
consultant
shows
the
ghost
of
the
complex
from
its
earliest
days
to
the
1950s
initially
chosen
because
of
its
proximity
to
the
railroad
tracks.
That
became
the
Queensway
as
time
went
on.
The
buildings
were
placed
small
houses
and
sheds
on
the
lands.
The
historic
photo
on
the
top
right
shows
the
fuel
testing
lab,
which
eventually
had
another
another
story
added
to
it,
and
it
was
constructed
in
1927,
29
and
the
photo
below
shows
the
sytem
of
late
1930s.
G
When
there
was
still
a
mix
of
land
on
it,
you
can
see
that,
oh,
it
doesn't
have
it.
You
can
see
that
there's
houses
in
the
background
and
again
the
location.
This
was
a
semi
industrial
area
where
there
were
houses
and
these
buildings.
The
railway
tracks
bells
lake,
a
lot
of
them
timber
yards
that
were
eventually
developed.
So
it's
a
sort
of
there.
The
presence
of
the
federal
government
were
moving
west
from
the
downtown
core.
G
Again,
I
showed
the
villagers
that
commit
every
building
and
told
them
a
little
bit
about
each
one
that
I'm
just
giving
you
a
representative
example.
Today,
the
image
on
the
Left
shows
the
ore
dressing
laboratory,
which
also
faces
the
Queensway,
like
all
the
logs
on
the
site
and
featured
a
distinctive.
This
doesn't
at
the
student
to
have
on
a
stone
entablature
and
with
its
name
on
it.
The
image
above
on
the
upper
white
shows
that
chimney
associated
with
the
steam
heating
plant.
G
This
building
had
was
not
designated
by
the
federal
heritage,
buildings
and
review
office,
but
there
was
significant
community
interest
in
its
site
in
the
building
and
its
iconic
chimney
during
the
public
consultation
period.
So
we
decided
to
include
it
as
as
one
of
the
noteworthy
buildings
on
the
project.
E
So
the
proposed
concept
that
the
policies
are
based
around
today,
it's
essentially
a
concept
for
the
plan
as
five
new
high-rise
buildings
on
the
site,
additions
to
existing
heritage
buildings
and
more
than
a
million
square
feet
of
new
development
on
the
subject,
site
parking
will
be
underground
for
the
site.
They'll
be
shared
accesses
for
different
parcels
of
development
as
it
moves
forward
and
a
new
public
city
park
will
be
located
in
the
southwest
corner
of
the
site.
Some
of
the
placemaking
principles
that
came
to
develop
this.
E
E
This
shows
one
of
the
early
diagrams
in
terms
of
ensuring
connectivity
through
the
site
and
the
rendering
to
the
right
shows.
Some
one
of
the
challenges
on
that
particular
site
is
the
great
difference
between
Rochester
and
booth
Street.
So
the
consultants
have
worked
to
address
that
through
a
number
of
different
pathways
to
the
site.
It's
also
important
to
note
the
ability
to
access
the
site
for
the
public.
That
was
one
of
the
major
principles
in
moving
forward.
E
There
has
been
some
comparisons
through
the
project
to
the
distillery
district
in
Toronto,
so
these
are
a
number
of
photos
showing
some
images
of
that
area
and
twenty
years
ago,
that
area
in
Toronto
was
a
derelict
collection
of
Victorian
dust,
really
building
Zahn
a
13
acre
site,
there's
47
buildings
on
that
particular
site,
and
there
was
great
work
into
the
restoration
process.
It's
a
combination
now
of
industrial
architecture
and
21st
century
design
and
creativity.
E
Some
similarities
between
the
distillery
district
and
the
proposed
booster
II
complex
include
the
combination
of
health
architecture
and
the
potential
development,
the
connectivity
and
public
realm
elements
and
the
integration
into
the
existing
city
fabric
restrictions
on
vehicle
access
and
informal
public
spaces
are
also
two
similarities
between
the
two
sites
and
a
sense
of
place
is
also
important.
The
district
in
Toronto
is
a
National
Historic
Site
and
also
designated
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
G
The
the
recommendation
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
performing
today
is
from
a
designation
of
the
entire
parser
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
as
a
complex.
The
buildings
that
you
see
in
the
image
in
front
of
you
that
are
to
be
excluded
are
cross-hatched,
so
you
see
that
the
majority
of
the
historic
buildings
on
the
site
will
be
protected
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
G
The
buildings
that
are
crossed
touch
for
judges
were
not
included
because
they
were
judged
to
have
lesser
cultural
heritage
value
and
did
not
identify
the
history
and
character
of
the
complex.
The
proposed
site
development
affects
the
heritage
resources
on
the
site,
including
its
labs
offices,
testing
and
testing
facilities.
E
So
the
next
few
slides
show
the
amendments
in
terms
of
the
what's
proposed
as
an
official
plan
amendment
and
the
height
schedule
associated
with
that
which
takes
the
existing
distinctions
in
the
precedent,
chi-ling
secondary
plan
and
extends
it
onto
these
lands
before
you
and
the
zoning
amendment
includes
a
height
schedule
as
well,
but
more
specifically
ties
to
the
proposed
concept
there,
a
number
of
other
provisions,
and
we
can
speak
to
those
of
it.
It's
required
so
in
terms
of
consultation
and
process.
E
E
Canada
lands
has
been
extensive
in
their
public
consultation
efforts
throughout
the
process
and
I
just
want
to
note
to
this
committee.
It
resulted
at
the
end
of
the
day
and
six
comments
to
me
in
total
on
the
zoning
and
Official
Plan
amendments,
which
is
very
unusual
for
an
application
in
the
central
area
and
five
of
those
were
just
to
receive
notification
and
what
was
happening.
E
This
is
really
the
start
of
the
process
from
the
planning
departments
perspective,
we're
simply
setting
the
table
in
terms
of
permissions
of
land
uses
through
the
Official
Plan
and
zoning
amendment
process.
So
there
will
be
multiple
applications
that
move
forward
through
this
process
as
a
site
continues.
E
In
conclusion,
the
booster
II
complex
meets
the
criteria
under
the
interior,
Heritage
Act,
the
department,
the
developments
located
new
buildings
and
most
existing
heritage
assets.
It's
incorporated
compact
floor
plates.
It
has
separation
distances
to
each
seen,
towers
and
a
podium
tower
designed
to
maximize
minimize
the
impacts
on
existing
areas
all
while
introducing
a
new
city
park
to
the
site,
a
complementary
mix
of
potential
land
uses
within
600
metres
of
to
future
transit
stations.
So,
in
his
consideration
of
our
official
plan
policies
and
guidelines,
the
amendments
and
the
designation
are
recommended
for
approval.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
Anyone
have
actually
have
two
speakers
from
innovative
speakers
first
and
then
we'll
come
back,
but
any
of
the
counselors
at
work.
I'm
going
to
have
counselor
will
chair
of
the
built
heritage
fund
gallant.
Anyone
else
want
to
get
out
early,
no
good!
Thank
you.
So
the
first
person
up
is
Craig.
Spinner
Craig
you're,
with
passed
down
tech,
then
followed
by
Mary,
Jarvis,
hi,
Mary
I
didn't
see
you
come
in
sure.
You
have
five
minutes.
H
H
H
Me
my
name
is
Craig
Sklar
I'm,
a
senior
urban
designer
with
Stan
tech
services
groups
based
here
in
Ottawa
I,
have
over
15
years
experience
across
North
America
dealing
with
urban
regeneration
sites,
trans
original
bands,
inner
city
type
projects.
We
are
very
excited
to
be
here
today
and
very
honored
to
be
part
of
this
process,
I'm
a
very
short
presentation.
A
lot
of
it's
already
been
covered,
but
I
just
want
to
highlight
a
few
items.
H
Sorry,
we
have
a
little
bit
of
technical
failure.
I
do
want
to
thank
Canada
lens
company
for
trusting
us
and
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
this
process.
I
want
to
thank
the
community
organizations
as
well.
That
came
out.
It
was
a
very
extensive
process.
Over
the
last
two
years,
sorry
yeah
open
to
Rio.
H
One
thing
I
did
want
to
highlight
is
a
depth
just
flip
to
the
next
release.
One
thing
I
want
to
did
highlight
is
the
community
process.
I.
Think
part
of
a
success
of
this
project
was
the
creation
of
public
advisory
committee
as
well
as
follow-up
workshops
with
the
community
itself,
starting
with
more
of
a
blue
sky.
H
What
would
the
community
like
to
see
here
and
then
also
working
with
advisory
community
groups
that
that
detailed
component
to
ensure
that
we're
balancing
the
right
elements
between
public
needs
and
the
accommodation
of
heritage
buildings
and
the
investment
in
new
development
on
this
site?
Next
slide?
H
Please
we
developed
through
that
organization
through
that
process,
a
series
of
ten
placemaking
principles
that
were
our
guiding
forces
through
the
design
next
foot,
this
included
everything
from
the
creation
of
new
public
part
to
the
public
streets,
open
spaces
and
the
animation
required
for
that,
and
then
a
pattern
of
new
developments
that
would
be
consistent
with
the
existing
or
planned
developments
in
the
in
the
surrounding
community.
We
have
four
guiding
principles
that
I
do
want
to
highlight
here.
H
Next
slide,
please,
you
know
this
is
a
really
exciting
opportunity
and
I
think
it's
one,
that's
very
rare
in
all
the
way
that
we're
blending
a
significant
amount
of
heritage
buildings
within
new
development
itself.
This
is
one
of
the
largest
heritage
collections
of
industrial
buildings
in
the
area
and
heritage
was
the
driving
force,
so
we've
been
asked
a
numerous
times.
How
do
we
arrive
to
this
plan?
H
That
represents
itself
much
like
the
distillery
district,
the
other
places
around
the
world,
even
in
Vancouver
like
the
gas
town
district
that
blends
that
sort
of
old
and
new
component.
Our
second
piece
is
connectivity.
We
really
wanted
a
porosity
of
the
sites
not
just
on
a
vehicle
axis,
but
really
a
priority
of
pedestrian
spaces
and
that
are
running
through
the
middle
of
the
site,
connecting
pedestrians
in
a
new
and
different
experience
here
in
Ottawa.
H
Actually,
through
that
connectivity
piece
was
then
the
creation
of
an
open
space
network
system.
This
is
not
just
the
the
public
park
itself
down
in
the
southwest
corner,
but
these
series
of
experiences
that
you'll
you'll
be
able
to
have
throughout
the
site
that
create
that
activation,
that
that
we're
looking
for
here
and
then
that
plays
within
our
art
from
our
open
space
system.
As
the
idea
of
animation,
we
really
wanted
to
look
at.
How
are
we
activating
those
spaces?
What
are
the
elements?
H
What
are
the
priorities
for
when
we
do
look
at
a
retail
strategy,
a
ground-floor
activation
component?
How
are
we
getting
eyes
on
the
street
inside
those
court
origins
of
those
public
spaces,
and
we
wanted
to
prioritize
that
through
the
the
mix
of
the
heritage
buildings
and
the
new
construction,
this
allows
us
to
create
a
variety
and
vibrancy
to
this
space
that
we
really
haven't
seen
before
in
parts
of
Ottawa.
H
Lastly,
was
the
idea
of
this
public
open
space?
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
with
the
community
talking
about
where
this,
but
this
public
open
space
should
be
how
big
it
should
be.
What
types
of
spaces-
and
this
would
continue
throughout
a
process
with
Canada
lands
post
approvals,
so
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
with
the
community.
Still.
This
sets
the
stage
for
us
to
actually
implement
this
vision
and
move
forward
today.
So
I'm
keeping
my
presentation
brief.
H
H
A
G
E
So
awkward-
and
that
was
one
of
the
principles
we
made
known
to
Canada
lands
from
the
beginning,
you
consulted
with
Parks
and
Rec
to
determine
whether
this
would
appropriate
site
for
actually
taking
a
new
city
asset
on
as
a
new
city
park.
So
AB
Tremblay
Park,
is
in
the
vicinity
and
there's
a
few
pokes
scattered
throughout,
but
it
definitely
was
an
opportunity
from
the
city's
perspective
to
to
get
an
actual
park.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
thanks
for
coming
out.
Next
up
is
Mary
Jarvis
moon
bring
your
cannon
away.
Yes,
yes,
my
my
my
new
top
hat,
my
name
is
Mary
Jarvis
I'm,
director,
real
estate,
camera
lens
corporation
and
Thank,
You,
chair
Heather
and
members
of
committee
for
being
here
and
unto
staff
for
getting
us
to
this
point.
We're
quite
excited
with
the
do
Street
project.
A
A
A
Just
saying
that
I
that's
a
compliment,
we
don't
know
you
know
we
don't
always
see
that
it's
difficult
enough
when
you're
dealing
with
the
heritage
project
and
and,
as
you
know,
I
think
somebody
said
that
well
I'm
saying
it
right
now
we
have
nobody
out
to
speak
from
the
community,
because
you've
consulted
so
well
and,
like
I,
said
I'm
talking
to
staff
at
the
same
time,
because
at
first
it
was
all
boy.
What
are
they
going
to
do
to
us
this
time?
A
And
so
to
get
to
this
point
where
we
are
in
this
location,
which
is
going
to
be
such
an
important
location,
close
to
the
Gladstone
Station
and
all
the
things
that
we're
doing
there
and
the
you
know
the
expansion
extension
of
the
Trillium
line,
and
just
really
it
takes
us
to
a
new
level,
I
mean
if
we
were
able
to
do
something
like
this
in
the
market.
Can
you
just
imagine?
Can
you
just
imagine
it
would
be
a
game-changer
for
us,
so
thanks
very
much
Mary
anyone
else
have
any
questions
for
Mary.
Don't
thank
you.
A
D
You,
madam
chair
I,
want
to
echo
the
thanks
to
Kenna
LANs
group
and
staff
and
Stantec
for
their
work
on
this
file.
I
was
told
at
one
point:
there
was
some
contemplation
that
this
whole
collection
of
buildings
might
not
be
worth
saving
at
all
and
might
be
bulldozed
so
I'm
glad.
We've
come
quite
far
from
that
point.
D
The
public
consultation
leading
to
things
like
the
retention
of
the
smokestack
minutes,
exactly
how
public
consultation
is
supposed
to
work,
to
understand,
what's
important
to
the
community
and
reflect
that
in
the
final
plan,
this
did
pass
unanimously
unanimously
at
Heritage
Committee.
There
was
some
discussion.
You
know
these
are
in
some
ways
utilitarian
or
bureaucratic
buildings.
Well,
first
of
all,
when
you
start
to
look
at
the
details
that
the
architect
put
into
them,
they
are
interesting
buildings
on
their
own,
but
really
the
collection
was
about
the
collection
of
buildings
and
the
character.
D
D
I
would
also
compare
to
what
we've
seen
with
the
transportation
of
Bayview
Yards
recently
similar
kind
of
building
and
look
at
the
exciting
space
that's
become
and
I
think
this
is
a
development
that,
when
it's
built,
that
will
be
something
well
proud
of
here
in
Ottawa
and
it's
close
to
LRT.
So
we
heard
yesterday
from
a
delegation
at
City,
Council
around
destination
tourism
and
how
people
are
looking
for
unique
communities,
unique
neighborhoods
within
a
city
like
that,
so
this
is
exactly
what
I
think
they
were
talking
about
so
well
done.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
I
just
I,
have
a
question:
can
you
put
up
the
photograph?
That's
the
life,
the
occurrence
photograph.
The
courts
are
closed
up.
Okay,
so
the
the
web
science
buildings
to
the
northeast,
I,
guess
or
east
of
there
see
the
on
the
other
side
of
booth
straight.
You
know
the
ones
are
kind
of
yellow,
yes,
celebrate,
obviously
they're,
not
the
same
age
and
obviously
it
always
appears
to
me
like
they
are
getting
closer
to
the
end
of
their
time.
A
I
mean
today
when
they
went
by
there
must
have
been
75
window
air
conditioners
hanging
out
the
windows.
Oh
that's
right,
I'm,
just
wondering
if
there's
anything,
you're
hearing
it
all
about
that
location
and
then
about
from
the
heritage
perspective.
I
mean
I'm,
not
a
heritage
expert,
but
I.
Look
at
that
and
I
go
like.
What's
there
to
say
the
air
conditioners,
you
know
I,
think
I'm.
G
Yes,
so
they
were
the
the
oldest
buildings
on
the
site,
for
example
the
one
with
five
six
eight
on
it.
It
was
built
just
a
few
years
before
they
need
to
cross
the
street
and
started
the
development
there.
I
have
had
meetings
over
the
years
with
NR
cam,
not
recently
about
the
buildings
on
the
east
side.
A
Just
thought
I
would
because
every
time
I
goodbye,
I,
look
at
my
go.
I
wonder
when
that's
going
to
happen,
probably
at
west
of
of
Rochester
is
probably
more
likely,
because
it's
closer
to
the
I
mean.
Is
that
part
of
the
question
corridor?
Yeah?
Okay,
anybody
else
awesome
work.
Thank
you
very
much
to
everyone
involved
in
everyone,
including
certainly
councilor
McKenney
and
her
very
committed
community.
That
is
always
engaged,
and
this
is
a
really
important
work
that
we're
doing
and
it's
very
exciting.
A
So
I
look
forward
to
some
shovel
some
struggle
down,
and
we
should
do
that.
You
know
what
we
should
do
that
well,
because
these
are
two
significant
things
that
are
different
than
what
we
usually
do
with
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
start
really
shining
a
light
on
all
of
these
neat
things
that
we're
doing
in
Ottawa,
so
I,
don't
think
the
heavy
technical
drug
testing
yeah.
B
B
A
A
A
Is
registered
to
speak
and
we
will
be
doing
a
presentation
we've
received
from
her
yesterday,
which
I,
which
was
really
an
innovative
presentation,
so
we
do
have
that
on
file
and
Paula
use
your
pal
Johannes.
Okay,
thank
you
so
we'll
go
when
are
having
a
presentation
on
this
item,
but
so
Paul.
If
you'd
like
to
come
forward
as
the
chair
of
the
green
space,
Alliance
of
Canada's
capital.
C
C
So
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
piece
based
on
my
Spanish
capital,
that
as
well
as
a
member
of
the
working
group
that
worked
with
dr.
snow
and
the
number
of
other
people
in
developing
these
guidelines,
so
in
a
way
coming
here
today,
is
the
culmination
of
a
multi-year
effort
to
get
to
this
point
so
happy
to
be
here.
C
The
recognition
of
the
significance
of
wetlands
in
urban
areas
on
social
and
cultural
factors,
not
only
on
the
ecological
factors
that
are
traditionally
used
in
the
determination
of
significance,
and
we
support
this
bold
move
by
the
city.
This
is
really
something
new.
It's
a
big
step
and
we're
behind
it
in
a
sense
because
urban
woodlands
tend
to
score
low
on
the
traditional
ecological
values
because
in
general,
they're
smaller
they're,
fragmented,
they're
isolated.
So
if
you
apply
those
tests,
they
don't
usually
reach
the
level
of
significance.
C
But
if
you
add
these
social,
cultural,
economic
factors,
it
brings
their
importance
up.
So,
as
a
result
approaching
urban
woodlands,
so
it
means
inside
the
urban
boundaries.
What
we're
talking
about
here
really
tends
to
ensure
that
more
of
these
woodlands
will
be
protected
or
offered
whatever
protection
having
them
declared
a
significant
things,
which
basically
is
a
good
thing.
So
we're
happy
to
see
that
step
taken.
C
We're
pleased
to
see
as
well
that
the
completion
of
these
guidelines
has
come
has
opened
the
door
to
potentially
settling
some
appeals
that
were
brought
against
the
Official
Plan
amendment
that
introduced
the
policy
in
the
first
place
and
in
the
staff
report.
We
see
that,
in
fact,
this
is
kind
of
this
is
how
things
have
developed
that
those
proposal
for
settlement
in
the
staff
report
of
those
appeals,
we've
reviewed
all
the
changes
that
were
brought
to
the
guidelines.
C
There
were
some
tweaks
in
the
wording
of
the
guidelines
as
a
result
of
the
negotiations
and
in
general,
we
we
don't
have
any
real
problems.
That
guess
there's
one
wording
change
that
we
find
kind
of
objectionable,
there's
a
new
definition.
That's
been
added
on
page
four,
which
reads
when
applying
these
policies
a
tree
will
be
defined
as
a
woody
plant,
usually
with
the
single
main
stem
incapable
under
the
right
conditions
of
reaching
the
height
of
4.5
meters.
C
That's
kind
of
picky
the
there's
already
in
the
policy
a
clear
description
of
what
the
guidelines
cover,
what
the
policy
covers
and
that's
the
NE
woodland
that
meets
the
definition
of
either
the
ecological
rent
classification
of
the
forestry
act.
That's
already
there
that's
comprehensive!
That's
complete!
We
think
adding
this
additional
detail
on
heights
of
trees
and
so
on,
is
redundant
and
can
really
need
to
mischief.
So
we
suggest
that
be
removed,
but
overall,
the
fundamental
advance
of
the
policy,
which
is
the
recognition
of
the
significance
on
a
woodland.
C
C
The
proposed
settlement
will
change
that
2.8
hectares
in
size
and
60
years
old,
we're
not
happy
with
the
60
year
old,
but
looking
at
it
from
the
practical
perspective,
we
think
that
in
the
other
sighted
part
of
the
city,
that's
probably
not
going
to
have
any
any
impact
at
all
on
any
additional
green
sauce
in
that
part
of
the
city
in
the
urban
expansion
areas
that
we've
got
in
under
LPA
76,
the
policy
doesn't
apply.
So
that's
not
trying
to
change
anything
in
those
areas,
but
in
any
future
urban
extension
areas.
C
We
see
that
this
could
lead
to
a
loss,
a
reduction
in
the
number
of
woodlands
that
would
be
recognized
as
significant
in
those
areas.
So
in
that
sense
we're
happy
to
see
that
this
peri
urban
area,
the
potential
future
expansion
lands
and
not
yet
identified,
but
that
that
crown
of
land
around
the
Peregrine
boundary
is
excluded
from
the
guidelines
of
the
policy,
which
is
a
good
thing,
because
I
think
we
could
do
better
in
those
areas
than
applying
the
criteria
that
have
been
amended
in
the
settlement.
C
So
in
the
report
that
and
the
staff
report
it
it
talks
about
how
this
would
be
applied
in
any
future
of
an
expansion
area,
hypothetical
obvious
that
this
shouldn't
be
seen
as
definitive,
that
this
is
still
something
that
we
need
to
come
back
for
that
peri-urban
area.
In
the
official
plan
review,
like
any
official
plan
with
you,
we
are
going
to
have
to
revisit
what
is
an
x-15
so
dealing
with
urban
expansion
selection.
A
C
Heard
the
Bell
go
on
I'm
just
going
to
get
to
the
very
end
here,
so
I
think
with
those
considerations
of
keeping
open.
What
are
we
going
to
do
in
the
Perry
urban
area
because
we
are
going
to
be
looking
at
that
with
the
review
of
the
true
conservation
bylaw,
which
is
ongoing
and
looking
at
that
with
the
next
official
plan
review.
So
on
that
basis,
we're
happy
to
support
strongly
the
adoption
of
the
guidelines
and
we
would
not
oppose
the
settlement
agreement.
That's
been
brought
forward
in
the
staff
report.
A
Thank
you
very
much
thanks
for
coming
out
today
and
thanks
for
all
the
work
you
did,
I
can't
tell
you
how
many
times
I
saw
you
and
Heather
outside
the
elevator,
as
you
were
finished
yet
another
meeting
so
I
know
that
Nick
you
were.
You
had
lots
of
meetings
on
this
for
sure
I
don't
see,
Heather
pearl
sell
dry.
It.
C
A
It
makes
all
the
difference
in
the
world,
but
they
thank
you
for
thinking
of
us
and
tell
Heather
that
I
was
that
I
really
liked
her
her
presentation
that
she's
some
her
submission
yesterday.
That
was
well
done
thanks
a
lot,
so
everybody
have
a
technical
amendment
on
this.
B
B
Yes,
anyone
that's
working
in
a
city
here,
we're
upgrading
to
office
365
and
unfortunately,
things
get
bundled
together.
So
now,
I
got
to
read
this
today
about,
therefore
be
resolved.
The
planning
committee
amendment
staff
report
before
it
rises
to
Council,
to
include
the
Assembly
of
responses
to
eat
additional
public
submissions
that
were
found
in
the
attached
table.
So
it's
all
here
was
just
stuff
that
got
bundled
all
together
and
we
have
to
read
that
in
passing,
yeah.
A
And
as
as
JAL
Dean
said,
it's
not
that
they
weren't
considered,
they
were
all
considered,
they
just
didn't
make
it
into
the
attached
to
the
report.
So
that's
what
this
technical
motion
does
so
on
the
technical
amendment
carrying
and
on
the
item
as
amendment
and
so
again
thanks
very
much
a
big
big
big
job
and
appreciate
the
work
that
you
did
with
the
engaged
folks
in
the
community
and
the
industry.
Did
you
want
to
say
something
that.
D
Meant
a
if
you
wouldn't
mind.
I
would
just
like
to
acknowledge
the
people
who
are
on
working
group,
because
these
guidelines
are
very
much
a
collaborative
effort,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
my
colleagues,
Amy
Macpherson
Martha
copes
take
Birgit,
Eisenhart
Hagen
from
Ottawa
Public,
Health
and
Peter
Giles,
and
then
the
public
members
of
our
working
group,
sue,
Murphy,
Greg,
winters,
Tony,
Francis,
Heather,
Perle
and
Paul
Johannes.
This
truly
was
a
collaborative
effort.
Thank
you.
That's.
A
Awesome
thanks
very
much.
Okay
at
that
I
lost
how
about
you?
Oh
yeah.
We
have
Louisa
Street,
now
I,
remember
eleven
Kimberly
Baldwin
as
our
planner
drink,
jugs
coming
up
again:
54
degrees,
the
street.
This
is
an
existing
parking
area
that
is
looking
for
three
year
extension.
We
do
have
two
people
here
to
speak:
Kathryn
Boucher
did
I
see
there,
you
are
thrown
up
Kathryn
and
is
Mike
Saunders.
Here,
okay,
I'll
call
Mike
I'll
call
Mike
again
after
you
speak
Kathryn.
A
F
Okay,
because
your
involvement,
no
I,
just
thought
there
was
a
staff
presentation,
no,
no
okay,
good
okay!
Good
morning,
chair
Harden
and
members
of
committee
I
want
to
start
by
stating
I
was
here,
I
think
last
week
that
I'm
one
of
those
people
who's
excited
about
the
upcoming
official
plan
and
looking
forward
to
many
conversations
about
how
our
wonderful
city
will
grow
over
the
next
few
decade,
also
I'm
very
excited
that
the
district
names
I
think
it
would
be
a
great
addition
to
my
neighborhood
mm-hmm.
F
A
community
association,
as
well
as
the
building
community
together
table
at
the
center
set
West
Health
Center
for
over
40
years.
The
live
apartments
were
better
known
in
as
the
Bell
Street
towers,
they're,
probably
in
the
early
60s.
It
provided
deeply
affordable,
private
sector
rental
housing
for
many
new
arrivals
students
and
families
of
modest
incomes.
You
probably
know
somebody
who
lived
there
if
you
didn't
for
all
these
years,
parking
is
not
a
problem.
F
A
few
years
back,
a
major
and
in
calling
it
rent
eviction
of
the
building
led
to
the
transformation
of
bell
towers
into
give
a
high
rent
building
with
amenities
like
a
pet
spa,
full
gym
cafe
and
a
rooftop
terrace
party
space
and
parquet
became
a
problem
to
address
this.
The
owners
came
here
just
last
year
asking
for
his
owning
amendment
to
allow
front
yard
parking,
as
well
as
deleting
the
15%
landscaping
and
an
exemption
from
the
bike
parking
requirements
these
were
granted
in.
F
Additionally,
the
owners
asked
to
be
able
to
provide
60
spaces
off-site
also
granted.
The
building
now
provides
a
hundred
and
six
parking
spaces
on-site
and
60
off-site
in
two
locations
within
one
block
of
the
building,
and
now
they
are
back
asking
for
another
40
spaces.
Why
is
that
I
believe
the
answer
can
be
found
in
the
TripAdvisor
and
Expedia
reviews
of
their
hotel
service,
which
includes
valet
parking
with
prices
averaging
250
a
night.
It's
easy
to
see
how
some
additional
parking
will
go.
A
long
way
to
securing
guests.
F
F
So
parking
for
a
short-term
rental
use
in
amateur
and
transit
oriented
neighborhood
does
not
in
any
way
meet.
The
current
official
plans.
Vision
Senate
can
in
the
nineties,
was
riddled
with
temporary
parking
lots
that
existed
for
decades.
I
spent
many
years
working
with
staff
and
council
to
revitalize
that
part
of
our
city
and
would
hate
to
see
West
Center
can
fall
prey
to
the
same
situation
if
it's
temporary.
Where
is
the
development
plan
for
this
site?
If
it's
redeveloped
and
the
parking
that
live
disappears?
Why
do
they
need
now?
F
A
F
A
D
F
D
D
D
In
general,
that
with
respect
to
the
cars
that
are
specifically
associated
with
the
use
on
that
property,
we
know
that
there's
another
one,
a
little
bit
further
I
think
it's
to
the
to
the
west,
but
closer
to
the
live
apartments,
which
is
the
tall
building
on
the
right,
but
other
than
that
I'm
not
aware
of
any.
So
it
just
want
to
be
clear.
So
in
terms
of
that,
what
would
be
asked
today
is
a
three
temporary
approval
for
three
years
of
a
parking
where
it
doesn't
comply
with
the
current
zoning.
Is
that
a
common
thing?
D
A
D
D
They
do
there's
one
actually
I
think
it
might
be
over
in
councilor,
leapers
warden
you
that
Ms
Baldwin
did
along
carling
avenue,
but
there
are
a
few
of
them
around
yes,
and
do
we
typically
see
that
the
intention
of
the
developers
to
develop
after
the
temporary
extension?
Do
we
typically
see
that
actually
happening?
Does
it
happen
at
the
end
of
three
years?
Do
we
get
developers
coming
back
and
saying
we
need
another
two
or
three
years
at
the
end
point?
D
Where
do
we
typically
see
you
know
in
terms
of
the
number
of
years
I
couldn't
say,
madam
chair
it
doesn't,
it
is
a
temporary
use.
Ultimately,
I
know
that
every
time
that
these
do
occur,
the
developer
did
have
their
druthers.
They
were
preferred
to
put
a
building
on
that
site,
so
there
they
are
sort
of
temporary
in
nature
and
I
said
there.
Certainly
you
wouldn't
consider
this
to
be
allowed
in
perpetuity
and
that's
why
we
had
ability
to
look
at
it
every
three
years
to
decide
if
it's
still
a
good
idea
or
not
okay.
D
E
D
We
heard
from
the
public
delegation
around
the
number
of
parking
spaces,
so
this
is
a
question
for
the
proponents.
How
many
units
are
in
the
apartments
on
Bell
Street
and
how
many
existing
parking
spots
are
there
on
site,
because
we
will
presumably
some
numbers
just
want
to
make
sure
we
understand
what
the
actual
numbers
are.
B
I
guess
without
madam
chair
I'd
said
Brian
Casa
Grande
from
for
ten
consultants
good
afternoon,
members
of
committee,
I'm
with
Nikko
Church
from
my
office
and
Nikko,
has
managed
the
significant
components
of
this
file
site
I,
actually
like
him
to
have
the
opportunity
to
present
and
answer
some
questions
and
then
I'm
certainly
likely
to
chime
in
here
and
there
as
needed.
So
I
hope
we
can
answer
your
question
right
off.
Councillor
Gower.
I
Morning,
madam
chair,
so
we
are
the
applicants
for
54
Lisa
with
respect
to
its
its
connection
to
live
there
than
nearby
I'm
told
by
the
bevy
property
owner
who's.
Also,
here,
there's
444
dwelling
units
currently
on
side.
The
106
resident
parking
spaces
that
that
are
on
the
site
of
the
live
building,
so
54
Lisa.
Just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
history
is
a
former
on
mobile
service
garage.
It
was
acquired
by
Co
V
to
assist
in
the
renovation
of
the
existing
building
the
lift
building.
I
I
Their
thought
was
that
by
acquiring
this
site
they
would
pose
less
of
a
hindrance
less
of
an
inconvenience
to
surrounding
property
owners.
If
all
these
operations
were
happening
on
the
surrounding
streets
now
as
the
building
was
renovated,
the
parking
demands
did
not
change,
so
there
continued
to
be
an
issue
with
with
not
enough
parking
being
provided
so
Co
V
was
faced
with
two
options.
The
first
one
was
to
ignore
the
so
the
live
building
the
the
under
provided
parking
units
was
an
as
of
right.
I
I
So
in
a
short
term,
they've
done
many
improvements
to
the
existing
building
on
the
site,
which
was
in
a
great
sea
of
disrepair
before
they
acquired
it
and
in
the
long
term,
we've
proposed
certain
improvements,
in
particular
landscaping
along
there,
the
streets
on
Arlington
Avenue
and
lose
the
streets
to
add
more
greenery.
If
and
when
there
is
a
redevelopment
in
the
future,
if
that
granulating
will
have
matured
over
over
the
next
few
years,
so
it
will
already
provide
some
mass
and
landscaping
improvements
over
time.
I
At
that
meeting,
there
was
a
majority
of
residents
who
expressed
support
for
this
application.
In
our
mind,
the
supports
for
three
reasons,
number
one
is
that
the
demand
on
the
surrounding
streets
for
parking
is
real
and
the
residents
in
the
area
are
experienced
in
that
number
two
is
that
they've
already
seen
improvements
to
the
site
and
that
we
are
proposing
additional
improvements
to
the
property
of
54,
Issa
and
number
three
is
that
it
is
temporary.
I
After
that
happens,
the
residents
at
your
building
will
enjoy
a
much
more
convenient
access
to
the
LRT
system,
at
which
point
we
hope
that
the
parking
demand
will
be
reduced.
It's
important
to
note
that
Co
V
is
a
local
property
owner,
a
local
company,
it's
one
of
the
biggest
and
one
of
the
best
in
the
city,
and
they
are
not
going
anywhere.
They
understand
the
city's
long
term.
I
Intention
intentions
with
respect
to
this
site,
and
our
team
understands
that
the
rationale
for
a
temporary
parking
lot
will
be
profoundly
different
once
the
improvements
to
stage
2
LRT
happen.
So
we
do
certainly
intend
for
this
to
be
temporary.
I
just
want
to
add
one
last
note
with
respect
to
the
intent
of
the
rezoning
at
2:07
Bell
Street
north,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
there
are
already
several
non-conforming
rights.
I
That's
the
property
owners
at
207
Bell
can
enjoy,
including
the
parking
rates
we
applied
for
the
amendment
to
permit
certain
ground
floor
uses,
as
well
as
a
reduction
in
the
distance
between
an
outdoor
commercial
patio
and
nearby
residential
buildings.
As
part
of
the
amendment
city
staff
asked
us
to
clean
up
the
zoning
on
the
site
and
add
a
number
of
additional
amendments,
including
putting
a
cap
are
including
adjusting
my
apologies.
The
number
of
parking
spaces
that
were
provided
on
site
I'll
also
highlight,
as
one
last
note,
that's
the
live.
A
Have
more
you
passed
your
time?
I!
Don't
know
whether
you
know
that
because
it
doesn't
come
up
before,
but
you
also
run
over
time
right
so
I'm
going
to
stop
you
all
right.
Pretty
little
are
you
can
get
back
on
the
list
once
you
never
know,
I
have
you
speaking
for
yourself
only
or
for
funny.
Okay
perform!
Thank
you!
So
I,
just
I,
just
I,
just
think
it's
helpful
and
the
other
thing
I
want
to
point
out.
It's
not
just
developers
that
come
in
and
ask
for
extensions.
A
G
G
G
B
I
can
answer
that
and
we've
had
discussions
with
CLV.
You
know
really
from
the
perspective
of
what,
if
this
isn't
approved,
ultimately
they
don't
have
any
any
aspirations
at
this
point
in
time.
It's
in
our
four
zone,
the
natural
inclination
and
my
mind
is
it
might
be
a
low-rise
apartment
site,
but
it
really
remains
to
be
seen
that
I
don't
know
if
LRT
and
other
community
planning
initiatives
might
change
and
increase
the
intensification
opportunities
beyond
that
in
this
community.
Okay,.
G
So
to
staff
that,
unfortunately,
I
wish
you'd
come
back
with
a
little
bit
more
of
a
plan,
because
that
doesn't
give
me
a
lot
of
confidence
that,
once
this
expires,
that
we're
going
to
have
a
fulsome
plan
for
how
to
revitalize
this
space,
to
something
that
would
be
conducive
to
to
something
that's
close
to
an
LRT
station.
So
maybe
my
question
to
stop
is
what
reassurance
if
we
were
to
pass
this
temporary
extension
to
ode
this
temporary
zone
amendment?
G
D
Met
madam
chair
I,
guess
the
reassurance
is
one
one
hand
you
can't
force
the
landowner
to
redevelop
when
the
market
is
right.
The
economy
is
right,
they'll
use
what
they
have
the
rights
under
the
zoning
bylaw,
or
even
ask
for
change
the
zoning
as
a
to
have
a
greater
intensification.
But
what
we
have
is
the
the
limit.
That's
why
temporary
uses
under
the
Planning
Act
can
go
up
up
to
three
years.
D
So
when
it
comes
back,
you
can
evaluate
whether
or
not
it's
been
a
success
or
with
disruption
it
has
had
on
the
community
or
if
is
it
gotten
cars
off
the
street
to
put
on
there
or
is,
as
have
been
a
disruptor
disruption
for
whatever
reason,
then
you
have
the
reevaluation.
You
have
a
tool
under
the
Planning
Act
for
that
three-year
limit
to
reevaluate.
Whether
or
not
temporary
use
is
a
good
use
on
that
site.
So.
G
My
understanding
of
the
use
of
the
site
right
now
is,
is
that
it's
for
some
storage
you're
currently
parking
in
vehicles
there.
There
is
a
building.
What
happens
if
we
don't
pass
this
amendment?
Does
that
change
anything?
Is
you
use
for
parking
at
this
moment?
I
knew
staff
wanted
to
clean
yourself
with
an
amendment,
but
I'm
just
wondering
what
happens
if
this
just
continues
as
it
is,
because
that's
somewhat
temporary
anyways,
isn't
it.
D
In
other
words,
madam
sure,
it
would
stay
the
way
it
is
cars
associated
with
any
use
on
that
property
would
be
able
to
take
up
as
much
space.
It's
just
that
as
Ms
Baldwin
said,
people
from
the
live
apartments
couldn't
couldn't.
Those
are
the
cars
that
couldn't
park
there,
but
other
cars
associated
with
the
use
could
and
nothing
else
would
change-
would
stay
the
way
it
is
today.
So
we.
G
E
D
B
The
timing
of
the
landscape
plan
would
be
immediately
following
approval.
That's
that's,
what's
been
committed
and
maybe
seasonal
restrictions,
if,
for
example,
yeah
I,
don't
think,
would
be
too
easy
to
install
trees
right
now,
but
certainly
come
to
thaw
in
terms
of
the
three
access
points.
It's
really
just
because
of
the
the
way
the
existing
building
and
site
is
configured.
So
you
have
one
natural
access
point
on
Louisa
and
then
you
have
two
coming
out
to
Arlington.
B
So
the
good
thing
about
that
from
our
perspective,
is
that
it's
drivers
that
are
coming
and
parking
in
the
in
the
building
and
they're
trying
to
orient
those
drivers
so
that
the
late-night
parking
happens
within
the
building,
so
that
you're
not
hearing
alarm
beeping
and
so
on
that
you
would
be
concerned
about
otherwise.
So
it
gives
them
the
ability
to
manage
that
the
impacts
of
this
better.
But
the
egress
to
and
from
the
building
is
important
on
both
sides.
B
Because
of
that,
and
so
it
leaves
you
the
third
access
point
you
could
come
in
in
front
of
the
building
and
then
try
and
quickly
maneuver
over
to
the
other
parking
space,
but
as
a
result,
you've
actually
be
eliminating
the
landscaping
that's
proposed
kind
of
in
between
those
pods.
So
we
weren't
sure
that
it
was
actually
achieving
much
and
it
was
making
navigability
on
the
property
more
difficult
and
I.
B
Think
I'd
like
to
just
point
out
one
important
thing
that
if
I
may
is
that
this
proposal
is
responding
to
a
challenge
that
exists
in
this
community
as
a
result
of
the
parking
demands.
So
even
though,
yes,
it
could
operate
in
the
future
as
parking
for
the
use
on
site.
It
wouldn't
necessarily
be
a
relief
valve
for
the
parking
demands
that
are
triggered
as
a
result
of
the
live
building.
Now,
and
that's
really
what
the
community
was
was
support.
B
Why
the
community
was
supportive
in
a
public
consultation,
because
they
saw
this
as
an
opportunity
to
alleviate
a
temporary
problem
that
we
expect
is
going
to
go
away
when
LRT
is
there
and
I
think
it's
really
important
to
also
point
out
that
when
our
RT
comes
forward,
we've
made
it
clear
to
CL
V
from
the
beginning
as
planners
who
are
cognizant
of
the
city's
interests
and
their
official
planned
policies
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
rationalize
this
type
of
application
before
the
Planning
Committee
again,
if
the
stations
they're
inactive.
Now,
if
that
gets
delayed.
B
A
A
A
For
there
any
notices
of
motion
any
employees
any
other
business
on
Monday,
as
I
mentioned
yesterday,
there
be
two
opportunities
for
the
launch
of
I've
got
beyond
2036
right
here
at
City
Hall.
So
if
you're
around
I
would
love
to
see,
you
come
up
for
either
or
both
of
them
and
otherwise
we're
adjourned,
and
we
get
a
bit
of
a
break
as
hard
work
and
planning
committee
people
tell
much
c28.