►
From YouTube: Planning Committee - February 25, 2021
Description
Planning Committee – 25 February 2021 - video stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
start
because
on
somebody's
clock,
it's
9
30,
I'm
sure
welcome
everyone.
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
two
three
four
and
five
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
just
mentioned.
Only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
appeal
tribunal.
A
C
A
C
D
A
A
A
Seven
speakers
on
that
item
number
four
is
225:
coke
drive
zoning
bylaw
amendment
in
canada,
south
and
councillor.
If
you
please
ward,
we
have
two
people
here
to
speak.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
this
item,
so
mr
denemay
and
greg
winters
are
here:
do
either
of
you
need
to
speak
if
we're
prepared
to
carry
this
item.
A
A
A
Thank
you!
Okay!
So
back
to
number
five,
this
I
see
speaking
if
needed.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
this
zoning
bylaw
amendment
at
991,
carling
avenue
in
councillor,
lieber's
ward,
none
so
to
all
of
the
people
that
are
here
in
case
we
need
to
ask
questions.
Do
you
do
any
of
you
need
to
speak
if
we're
prepared
to
carry
this
item?
No,
madam
chair,
well,
christine.
Thank
you
very
much
for
speaking
on
behalf
of
everyone.
So
on
this
item,
is
it
kerry.
A
A
F
So
I'm
just
make
a
few
comments,
madam
share
in
advance.
So
clearly
this
was
considered,
as
you
indicated
at
the
last
planning
committee
meeting,
it
was
deferred.
We
appreciate
the
deferral
it
did.
Give
us
an
opportunity
to,
in
fact
reach
out
to
planning
committee
members
and
further
provide
some
further
context
to
the
development
charge
complaint.
The
one
thing
that
we
didn't
mention
at
the
last
planning
committee,
which
I
think
is
is
an
important
piece
of
information,
is
that
this
is
an
affordable
housing
project,
that's
being
advanced
under
cmhc
program.
F
Prior
to
april
1st,
again,
knowing
that
the
dc's
would
increase
so
and
again,
as
we
indicated
at
the
last
planning
committee
meeting,
there
was
an
email
that
indicated
that
the
cost
would
be
frozen
in
terms
of
dc's
until
october.
It
was
on
that
basis
that
the
urgency
to
pick
up
a
permit,
even
though
a
conditional
permit
was
offered
by
staff,
was
not
acted
on
and
and
hence
we
got
to
october
4th
and
the
realization
that
in
fact,
a
significant
increase
in
dc's
was
being
applied.
G
Okay,
so
my
question
to
staff
is:
do
city
staff
have
after
having
seen
the
chronological
order,
because
once
again,
we've
seen
the
emails
and
we're
receiving
it
from
solway
wright?
So
that
is
certainly
one
one
aspect
of
the
the
conversation:
do
staff
disagree
with
the
chronological
order
or
any
of
the
information
portrayed?
H
H
H
Staff
made
that
clear
and
they
requested
additional
information
on
march
25th
to
confirm
that
the
rsc
filing
what
the
status
of
the
rsc
filing
was,
and
that
was
done
through
the
zoning
examiner.
That's
that's
their
role
to
do.
I
appreciate
the
deficiency
letters
that
the
the
applicant
has
submitted.
H
Those
were
building
code
deficiencies
and,
yes,
those
were
cleared
off,
but
there
was
still
the
applicable
law
piece
that
done
through
the
zoning
examiner,
and
it
was
clear
then
that
they
were
waiting
for
management
to
to
look
at
the
the
report
from
the
consultant
as
to
determine
whether
or
not
you
know
some
risk
could
be
taken
at
that
point
with
staff's
determination,
then
that
you
know
we
weren't
prepared
to
do
that.
That's
not
our
normal
course
of
business.
H
So
we're
following
the
the
rules
of
the
time-
and
I
said,
as
I
said
last
meeting,
you
know,
there
was
a
another
level
of
extraordinary
circumstance
that
you
know
appeared
on
april,
the
3rd,
which
had
staff
reevaluate
that
position
for
the
benefit
of
the
industry,
and
we
made
the
decision
at
that
time
that
it
was
a
an
acceptable
level
of
risk,
considering
the
extraordinary
circumstances
so
yeah.
So
I'm
not
I'm
not
disputing
the
actual,
a
series
of
events
that
took
place,
but
just
interpretation
of
the
events.
G
But
when
I
read
through
the
emails,
there
was
at
least
two
instances
in
the
conversation
and
the
emails
from
staff
that
led
to
ultimately
this
confusion,
and
you
know
once
again,
I
I
fully
put
it
on
the
the
applicant
to
have
the
onus
of
meeting
deadlines
and
timelines.
But
there's
one
point
where
a
city
staff
member
has
said
it's:
okay,
it's
been
there's
a
sense
of
you've
got
extra
time
and
I
think
that
unfortunately
mike
unless
you
can
tell
me
that
that
was
there
was
another
aside
conversation.
We're
not
aware
of
that.
G
You
know
didn't
lead
the
applicant
to
believe
that
they
had
extra
time.
Then
I
I
can't
support
staff
on
this,
because
I
think
that
there
was
a
lot
of
confusion
and
unfortunately
we
have
to
be
fair
in
the
process
and
I
and
I
get
you
guys-
are
working
incredibly
hard
throughout
the
pandemic.
But
unless
you
can
tell
me
that
then
unfortunately
I
will
have
to
vote
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
G
A
I
I
was
at
the
last
meeting
going
to
uphold
staff's
decision,
and
then
I
met
with
the
the
proponents
and
was
enlightened
by
their
journey,
had
actually
time
to
listen
to
the
various
steps
and
stages
they
went
through,
and
I
do
believe
there
is
sufficient
evidence
to
indicate
that
they
thought
they
were
doing
everything
in
the
right
order
and
they
believed
that
even
after
april
first
passed,
they
were
able
to
to
do
this
so
similar
to
counselor
dudas,
I'm
I'm
now
leaning
towards
you
know
agreeing
with
the
proponent.
On
this.
I
A
A
We
more
than
any
other
city,
absolutely
in
ontario,
knew
that
it
was
vital
to
get
our
permits
through
and
ex
an
extraordinary
feat
when
undertaken.
I
think
it
was
185
or
187
permits
were
put
through
this
one.
This
applicant
actually
benefited
from
that
process
that
they
would
not
have
okay.
So
the
question
is
today:
is
it
likely
that
they?
Because
of
you
know
in
the
midst
of
the
whole
thing?
A
A
We
cannot
step
back
from
the
absolutely
outstanding
job
they
did,
which
literally
kept
ottawa's
economy
and
is
the
only
thing
that
ottawa's
economy
going
and
in
advance
of
an
uncertain
announcement
coming
from
the
province
as
to
you
know
when
construction
had
to
stop
etc.
It
was
very
important
to
us
and
we
conscientiously
and
with
the
support
of
an
outstanding
team
that
did
this
so
that
those
are
the
facts.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
belabor
them.
A
I
I
I'm
not
calling
into
question
staff's
good
work,
I'm
just
asking
since
our
last
committee
meeting
did
staff.
Did
our
legal
team
go
back
and
do
any
additional
review
or
analysis
to
see?
If,
if
they
didn't,
then
that's
fine,
I
want
to
make
sure
our
process
is
solid
because
there
could
be
other
proponents
like
when
I
first
came
to
office.
Madam
chair,
I
had
two
cases
that
came
represented
by
a
well-known
lobbyist
that
we
know
that
said:
hey
riley
before
you
got
elected,
two
planning
files
were
held
up
in
your
award.
I
A
G
Yes,
madam
chair,
the
there
is
a
time
limit.
I
recall
of
90
days
for
filing
a
complaint
in
respective
development
charges,
and
so
that
would
have
passed
around
july
4
2020
in
respect
of
the
permits
issued
on
april
4th,
so
the
opportunity
to
challenge
this
has
passed
for
all
the
other
building
permits
issued
that
day.
G
I
Okay,
I
won't
belabor
the
point:
dc's
go
up,
whether
it's
an
annual
basis
or
not,
and
people
could
make
similar
arguments
in
the
future
about
files
being
held
up,
and
I
had
to
pay
more
and
it
wasn't
my
fault.
So
I
just
raised
that
today
anyway.
Madam
chair,
I
appreciate
the
time.
That's
the
question,
that's
it
for
me.
A
B
I
learned
about
excavation
permits
and
foundational
permits
and
conditional
permits,
and
let
me
say
just
to
again
chair
harder
and
I
think
council
brockington
said
building
code
services
do
an
extraordinary
job.
They
do
an
extraordinary
job
all
the
time,
especially
at
this
very
complex
time,
and-
and
I
want
to
thank
them
and
for
for
the
work
they
do.
B
B
B
G
Madam
chair,
it
occurs
to
me
that
there
could
be
circumstances
where
those
the
type
of
factors
that
the
counselor
identified
would
lead
staff
to
authorizing
a
refund.
Without
going
to
committee
staff
reviewed
this
one,
they
considered
whether
or
not
such
circumstances
exist.
You
have
the
recommendation
that
resulted
from
that
review.
B
B
It's
acknowledging
that
the
complex
environment
that
we're
working
in
at
the
end
of
march
2020.,
so
thank
you
like,
like
others
like
counter
dudas,
has
has
said,
I
believe
at
the
last
meeting
I
was
ready
to
accept
staff's
recommendation.
I
have
revised
my
position
and
I
will
be.
I
will
not
be
supporting
staff's
recommendation,
but
I
I
really
appreciate
mr
ash
reaching
out
and
and
the
answer
that
you've
given
me,
mr
mark,
thank
you
very
much.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
chair.
I
moved
to
defer
this
at
the
the
last
meeting
and
I
I
think
many
of
the
committee
members
have
had
a
chance
to
take
more
time
to
review
this.
It
sounds
like
many
of
you
have
met
like
I
have
with
with
the
applicant
and
also
conferred
with
staff
on
the
issue.
Echoing
what
some
of
my
colleagues
have
already
said,
I
think
staff
did
apply
the
policy
and
the
bylaw
that
they
had
available
to
them.
C
They
adhered
to
the
deadlines
that,
as
as
council,
we've
directed
them
to
so
I
I
do.
I
do
want
to
acknowledge
that
that
staff
did
their
best
in
following
council
direction,
but
I
think
what's
happened
here
and
how
I've
reviewed
it
is.
That's
resulted
in
an
unfair
assessment
of
charges
against
this
particular
developer
and
we
certainly
do
have
a
role
of
committee
and
counsel
at
making
making
a
decision
to
ensure
fairness,
even
when
policy
and
bylaw
may
handcuff
staff's
ability
to
do
that.
C
To
me,
this
is
very
similar
to
the
file
we
had
in
britannia
and
bayward
back
earlier
in
the
summer
where
staff
applied
policy
on
development
charge
assessment
to
the
t,
but
it
resulted
in
an
unfair
situation
for
the
property
owners,
and
in
that
case
our
our
committee
decided
to
refund
those
development
charges
and
I
think
that's
the
appropriate
thing
to
do
in
this
case
as
well.
I
have
a
motion
share
that
would
sustain
the
development
charge
complaint.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
appropriate
time
to
introduce
that
to
committee.
C
A
J
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that.
Unfortunately,
I
missed
the
the
committee
meeting
a
couple
weeks
ago
when
we
discussed
this,
but
I
think
you
know
I
think
councillor
gower
mentioned
the
britannia
situation.
That
was
a
bit
more
of
a
slam
dunk.
It
was
a
bit
a
bit
more
obvious
that
there
was
a
situation
that
kind
of
arose
that
I
believe
staff
have
actually
taken
steps
to
avoid
situations
like
that
in
the
future,
this
one's
a
bit
more
gray,
you
know
to
counselor
brock
at
this
point
you
know,
are
we?
J
Are
we
really
equipped
with
this?
Well
counselor
harder
will
remember
quite
well
that
we
her
and
I
and
cancer
cadre
went
through
about
25
years
worth
of
applications
to
the
quarter
revision
a
few
years
back,
and
I
don't
think
we
felt
like
experts
there,
but
it
was
it
was.
It
was
judging
the
gray,
it
was
clearing
up
the
gray
and
some
of
the
the
different
things
that
that
had
come
up.
I
think
we
went
as
far
back
as
1992
in
an
area
that
even
predated
counselor
dean's
election
in.
J
I
think
I
want
to
say
kemp
park
with
with
a
local
improvement
process
down
there
that
was
wild
to
deal
with,
but
in
a
case
like
this,
I
think
there
was
there
was,
I
don't
think,
staff's
wrong
in
in
what
they
did.
I
don't
think
at
all.
They
they
didn't.
You
know.
In
their
estimation,
they
didn't
have
what
they
needed
to
issue
the
permit
prior
to
april
1st.
J
Now,
if
there
was,
if
it
had
been
more
clear
to
the
applicant
and
to
the
applicant's
point
in
the
email
exchange
that
we've
all
seen
now,
would
they
have
submitted
their
documentation
early
enough
to
give
staff
time
to
provide
that
permit
before
april?
First,
possibly,
I
think
that's
the
gray
and
that's
where
we
you
know
almost
you
almost
apply
that
lens
of
with
a
reasonable.
J
You
know
without
a
reasonable
doubt,
and
I
think,
in
this
case
there
likely
are
enough
concerns.
There
are
enough.
You
know
enough,
there's
enough
gray
there
for
us
to
side
with
the
applicants
the
the
appellant.
Sorry
in
this
in
this
case,
but
again
I
I
don't.
I
don't
lay
this
at
the
hands
of
staff.
I
think
that's
unfair
to
if
we,
if
we,
if
anyone
did
suggest
that
I
think
that's
unfair.
J
A
Thank
you
very
well
said,
so
that's
all
the
hands
that
I
see,
and
so
we
have
a
replacement
motion
which
vice
chair
gower,
has
introduced
on
the
on
the
motion.
That
is
to
prove
that
the
development
charge
complaint
in
respect
of
500
preston
street
be
sustained
and
that
the
applicable
municipal
development
charge
be
at
the
rate
in
effect
on
march
31st
2020..
A
A
K
K
K
This
is
a
recent
photo
of
the
site.
It's
generally
vacant,
and
this
is
looking
south
to
the
residential
development.
Next
slide.
Please,
the
site
is
currently
zoned
general
industrial,
subzone,
1,
exception
2663,
and
this
zone
permits
a
wide
variety
of
industrial
uses,
but
also
includes
uses
such
as
an
office
instructional
facility
and
recreation,
and
an
athletic
facility
up
to
1700
square
meters
in
gross
floor
area.
K
It
should
be
noted
that
the
amendment
applies
to
the
entire
site.
Although
the
boys
and
girls
club
will
only
be
leasing
a
portion
of
this
property,
the
survey
work
is
still
taking
place
to
confirm
the
lease
boundaries
and
plans
have
not
been
finalized
for
the
development
of
the
remainder
of
the
site,
but
will
include
residential
uses
and
a
public
park.
K
K
The
structures
that
you
see
on
that
aerial
have
been
removed
and
the
site
is
currently
vacant
next
slide,
please,
the
heatherington
neighborhood
revitalization
strategy
was
completed
in
2018
and
was
sparked
by
a
discussion
of
the
redevelopment
of
this
site
through
consultation.
The
top
priorities
included
a
youth
drop-in
center
sports
center
medical
center
cultural
center
and
mental
health
and
social
supports.
K
As
committee
members
may
recall,
council,
at
its
meeting
on
december
18
2020
approved
an
investment
of
five
million
dollars
of
its
covet
19
resilience,
funding
from
the
federal
government
for
youth
services
facility
and
a
partnership
with
the
boys
and
girls
club
for
a
facility
on
a
leased
portion
of
1770
hetherington
road.
This
amendment
is
one
of
the
approvals
to
facilitate
the
project
next
slide.
Please,
in
conclusion,
staff
recommend
approval
of
the
amendment
to
add
community
center
in
urban
agriculture
as
permitted
uses
and
reduce
the
parking
and
eliminate
the
loading
space
requirements
for
a
community
center.
A
A
A
No,
so
do
you
still
need
to
speak
if,
if
we
don't
have
any
questions
for
you
other
than
to
say,
thank
you
very
much
for
choosing
this
site
and
know
how
important
it
is
to
the
community
and
certainly
to
counselor
jeans
and
councillor
bluecha,
who
represents
across
the
street,
but
the
building
better
revitalized
neighborhood.
This
is
exactly
a
major
direction
that
we
hope
to
go
in,
and
so
we
thank
you
very
much
are.
Are
any
of
these
people
on
the
screen,
miss
stephanie,
just
dan
reese
and
so
dan?
G
A
No,
all
right!
Well,
thank
you.
Everybody
so
before
us
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
1770
hetherington
road
that
the
planning
committee
recommend
council
approve
an
amendment
to
zoning
bylaw
2008-250
for
1770
hetherington
road
to
permit
community
center
and
urban
agriculture,
as
detailed
in
document
two.
Is
that
kerry.
B
A
Thank
you
very
much
carried,
that's
great,
all
right
going
on
to
number
three
again.
We
have
a
presentation.
We
have
quite
a
few
speakers.
This
was
a
very
large
project.
I
know
that
counselor
mckenny
is
on
the
on
with
us
today.
I
saw
her
not
seeing
her
right
now,
but
I
know
she's
here
and
our
staff.
I
I
can't
even
tell
you
how
many
conversations
I've
had
with
allah
make
a
lesson
on
this
file,
but
we're
having
a
presentation
and
then
we'll
go
to.
I
think
counselor
leaper.
A
D
D
D
Like
those
other
districts,
the
study
area
will
undergo
significant
growth
and
change,
and
much
of
this
area
surrounding
the
station
is
designated
as
mixed-use
center.
In
the
current
official
plan
in
the
future,
the
corso
italia,
o
train
station
will
serve
as
an
important
launching
point
to
access
the
downtown
in
the
broader
city,
but
also
as
a
destination,
even
more
so
than
the
neighborhood
is
today
within
the
36
hectares,
making
up
the
district.
D
Many
of
the
lands
are
vacant
and
underutilized,
and
if
we
can
move
to
the
next
slide,
this
aerial
photo
shows
a
number
of
the
large
parcels
in
the
district,
and
many
of
them
are
viable
and
have
important
uses
on
them.
But
a
number
of
the
sites
are
are
underutilized,
and
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
a
couple
of
them,
the
ottawa
community
housing
redevelopment
parcels,
there's
two
of
them
and
those
are
shown
with
the
blue
dash
lines.
D
These
are
large
vacant
sites
near
transit
station,
and
they
provide
us
with
a
rare
opportunity
to
develop
an
entirely
new
mixed
youth,
transit,
oriented
development
and
neighborhood
in
the
heart
of
the
city.
Next
slide,
please:
the
secondary
plan
has
been
prepared
through
an
extensive
consultation
process
as
a
result
of
the
input
and
collaboration.
D
D
D
Another
key
policy
direction
is
to
concentrate
density
and
taller
buildings
in
general
along
the
old
train
corridor,
which
allows
for
transitions
to
low-rise
areas,
so
this
helps
to
reinforce
the
area's
existing
character,
its
heritage,
qualities
in
certain
places
along
the
traditional
main
street
corridors,
and
it
also
helps
to
protect
pockets
of
low
rise
residential
uses
next
slide
so
very
quickly.
I'll
move
through
the
recommendations
and
the
first
recommendation
is
a
big
one.
It's
the
to
approve
the
official
plan
amendment.
Then
there
are
a
number
of
components
here.
D
D
D
D
D
So
the
city
of
ottawa
has
initiated
the
zoning
amendments
to
coincide
with
the
completion
of
the
secondary
planning
process
next
slide.
This
is
just
a
snapshot
of
the
of
the
amendment
at
gladstone.
What's
what
will
happen
here
is
the
site
will
be
rezoned
from
a
tm
zone,
an
r4
zone
to
a
tm-15
zone
and
an
r5bb
and
r4t
zone
which
expands
the
permission
of
ranges
and
built
forms.
D
So
it
includes
low-rise,
low-rise,
buildings,
mid-rise
and
high-rise,
as
well
as
some
exceptions
to
performance
standards,
and
it's
just
worth
noting
in
areas
d
and
e
that
we
would
permit
high
ride
buildings
along
the
southern
edge
of
that
site,
nearest
raymond
street
and
the
queen's
way.
Next
slide,
the
amendment
at
933
gladstone
results
the
site
from
the
current
mc
f
1.5
zone
to
an
mc17
sub
zone,
and
it
removes
the
maximum
floor
space
index
of
1.5
and
replaces
it
with
specific
height
provisions,
the
area
closest
to
the
residential
uses.
D
1D
recommendation
is
to
designate
the
entire
course
hotelier
study
area
as
a
special
public
realm
improvement
district,
and
this
will
allow
the
city
to
do
a
few
things.
It
will
be
able
to
direct
all
cash
and
the
park
land
collected
through
development
applications
within
the
district
to
be
used
within
the
district,
the
main
purpose
here
being
to
acquire
new
park
land
or
to
make
improvements
to
existing
parks.
D
The
second
is
similar
is
to
direct
all
contributions
from
section
37
or
the
future
community
benefits
charge,
bylaw,
which
would
be
collected
and
used
within
the
district,
and
the
third
is
just
to
do
a
review
and
assess
the
need
for
potential
area,
specific
development
charges
by
law
for
corso
italia.
So
that's
just
further.
Research
next
slide.
D
D
And
one
f
is
to
direct
basically
the
official
plan
process,
the
of
the
the
new
official
plan
process.
Existing
secondary
plans
are
being
reviewed
for
consistency
and
in
cases
consolidated
with
other
secondary
plans
for
areas
that
are
neighboring
each
other
and
where
there
is
some
policy
overlap.
So
this
recommendation
incorporate
the
coursewatalia
station
district
secondary
plan
as
part
of
a
broader
west
downtown
core
secondary
plan
that
would
include
the
baby
station
and
the
preston
carling
station
when
consolidated
as
well
next
slide.
D
A
A
M
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
planning
committee,
my
name
is
christine
mcquaig,
as
said
with
q9
planning
and
design,
I'm
here
as
a
planning
consultant
on
behalf
of
the
canadian
banknote
company
actually
is
the
presentation
being
shared.
I
had
to
switch
to
my
phone
because
my
power
went
out,
so
I
can't
tell.
M
Here
with
me
today
is
gordon
mckechnie
and
michael
besley
from
canadian
banknote,
as
well
as
greg
meads,
greg
cloones
and
pierre
guillond
next
slide.
Please,
as
many
of
you
are
aware,
the
canadian
banknote
facility
is
highlighted
here
in
yellow
the
dark.
Black
line
is
the
bordeaux
of
the
corso
italia.
Cdp
lands
next
slide,
please,
the
cvn
facility
was
built
in
the
early
1960s,
has
approximately
80
thousand
square
feet
of
manufacturing
use
with
four
hundred
direct
high-paying
jobs
and
supports
another
one
thousand
high-paying
jobs.
M
M
M
In
section
1.1.3
employment
of
the
provincial
policy
statement,
the
city
of
ottawa
shall
promote
economic
development
and
competitiveness
by
taking
into
account
the
needs
of
existing
and
future
businesses,
and
this
is
so
that
their
continued
operation
is
not
jeopardized
by
the
encroachment
of
noise.
Sensitive
uses.
Next
slide,
please,
when
discussing
land
use,
compatibility
of
course,
especially
on
the
matter
of
noise,
it's
important
to
review
what
the
ministry
of
compliance
means
next
slide
please.
M
So
in
this
case,
cbn
must
assess
and
maintain
compliance
on
an
ongoing
basis,
which
means,
when
likely
future
uses
of
reception
points,
have
changed.
For
example,
when
the
public
works
building
was
demolished,
cbn
had
to
change
their
assessment
at
that
time,
because
the
likely
future
used
changed.
Noise
compliance
is
based
on
points
of
reception
for
noise,
sensitive
uses,
and
these
receptors
apply
in
consideration
of
zoning
heights
contexts
and
that
likely
future
use.
M
The
guiding
noise
document
is
specific
to
say
that
these
considerations
are
required
to
be
assessed,
even
if
there's
no
approval
in
place
for
a
proposal
next
slide,
please
in
reviewing
sort
of
the
change
of
that
context
in
terms
of
likely
future
use.
This
is
an
overview
of
how
the
proposed
amendments
here
today.
Change
that
use
the
area
in
pink
are
the
proposed
official
official
plan
amendments
which
are
going
from
general
urban
area,
which
is
predominantly
low-rise
to
mixed-use
center,
which
readily
supports
high-rise
buildings,
which
means
higher
receptor
points.
M
The
area
in
blue
is
the
zoning
amendment
for
933
gladstone,
which
is
altering
the
existing
zoning,
where
there's
a
maximum
fsi
1.5,
which
informs
lower
density
and
generally
lower
building
heights
to
a
zone
with
a
very
specific
building,
height
schedule.
In
other
words,
the
number
of
stories
depicted
are
to
be
expected,
regardless
of
the
zoning,
including
an
actual
building,
is
part
of
that
amendment
next
slide,
please.
M
M
You
can
jump
down
to
not
the
next
slide,
but
the
one
after
that,
in
terms
of
what
needs
to
happen.
What
has
already
been
requested
earlier
in
the
cdp
process,
a
noise
study
or
noise
assessment
at
the
minimum
to
determine
what
mitigation
measures
are
required
and
even
if
compliance
can
be
obtained,
a
means
of
ensuring
the
cost
of
mitigation
does
not
fall
on
cbn.
This
needs
to
happen
at
the
forefront
of
land
use
changes
to
ensure
pps
compliance,
not
at
the
back
end.
M
Cost
mitigation
has
two
components:
immediate
and
long
term,
for
the
continued
operation
of
the
facility.
We
kindly
request
that
planning
committee
consider
the
implication
to
cbn
and
defer
or
hold
the
zoning
at
this
time,
to
allow
for
the
proper
process
to
follow
to
ensure
pps
compliance.
Should
the
zoning
proceed
at
a
later
date.
It's
the
responsibility
of
the
proponent
being
the
city
of
ottawa
to
enter
a
new
agreement
for
cbn.
M
A
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'll,
be
very
brief.
Miss
ms
mcquaig
has
covered
most
of
the
items
that
I
wanted
to
speak
to.
I
just
want
to
reiterate
from
my
perspective,
what
is
front
and
center
here
is
the
the
the
lack
of
consistency
with
the
pps
and
section
1.2.6.2
that
ms
mcquaid
referred
to
it's
clear
to
us,
and
it
doesn't
appear
anywhere
in
the
staff
report
to
the
contrary
that
this
this
provision
of
the
pps
has
not
been
addressed.
N
It's
very
clear
that
if
you
can't
avoid
that
potential
conflict,
then
prior
to
establishing
the
use
prior
to
considering
the
rezoning,
those
four
items
have
to
be
assessed
and
they
have
not
been
assessed.
Saving,
except
for
possibly
the
first
item,
which
is
the
the
need
for
the
use.
The
sensitive
land
use
the
affordable
housing.
No
one
disputes
that,
but
there's
been
no.
No
efforts
made
to
address
how
mitigation
will
be
made
into
an
agreement
with
a
canadian
bank
no
company
to
address
those
issues.
N
A
O
I
had
to
follow
the
instruction
press,
ctrl
alt,
a
or
something
so
I'm
sorry
to
delay
you
just
to
give
you
context.
I'm
a
senior
vice
president
of
canadian
banknote,
and
I
wanted
to
speak
to
you,
because
I
I'm
really
not
very
happy
that
we're
here
today.
At
a
time
when
I
have
to
object
to
a
proposal
that
I
think
is
in
the
interest
of
the
city
and
the
interest
of
of
citizens
of
ottawa,
but
we're
not
coming
to
you
at
the
11th
hour
either.
O
O
It's
a
very
challenging
thing
to
do,
and
and
it's
very
expensive
and
and
we
have
been
completely
compliant
on
this
facility.
I
mean
counselor
leaper
may
recall
that
I
made
him
a
promise
when
we
bought
the
facility.
He
was
then
the
the
head
of
the
community
association,
and
that
was
that
we
would
really
be
conscious
of
our
neighbors
and
we
would
be
very
compliant
and
we
have
kept
that
promise.
O
If
this
proposal
is
approved
today,
all
that
engineering
goes
out
the
window,
because
we
cannot
achieve
that
compliance,
and
now
I
have
to
re-engineer
the
whole
thing
if
this
had
been
done
in
a
different
way
with
with
compliance
with
the
city's
own
rules.
We
wouldn't
be
here
today
and
that's
why
I
am
upset,
I
think
it's
unfair
to
the
citizens
of
ottawa
and
I
think
it's
unfair
to
our
company.
O
What
we're
really
asking
now
is:
we've
abided
by
the
rules.
We
want
the
city
to
abide
by
the
rules.
That
is
only
fair,
and
you
know
if
the
approval
goes
ahead
today.
What
you're,
deciding
and
there's
really
two
questions
at
issue
here,
one
is:
is
it
important
for
the
proponent
to
be
compliant
with
the
rules?
O
O
We
are
close
now
to
inc
inking,
an
agreement
with
the
developers
of
the
property
adjacent
to
our
richmond
road
facility
and
so
there's
precedence
available
for
what
this
looks
like,
but
basically
it
has
to
look
like
we
cooperate,
but
we
don't
have
to
pay
for
it,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
asking
you
to
to
defer
this
this
approval
and
I
should
make
clear
our
objection-
is
only
in
relation
to
933.
Gladstone
818
is
far
enough
away,
but
it's
not
a
problem.
Thank
you.
A
C
C
I
just
wondering
if
any
of
you
could
give
us
a
better
sense
of
how
how
cbn
was
involved
in
the
or,
if
you
were
involved
in
the
overall
consultation
process,
leading
up
to
this
secondary
claim
report
in
front
of
us,
and
if
I'm
hoping
that
this
isn't
the
first
time
staff
have
heard
about
these
concerns
and
what
kind
of
correspondence
or
what
kind
of?
How
has
staff
responded
so
far
to
these
concerns,
I
guess
where
are
you
at
in
terms
of
formal
response
or
consultation
with
staff
on
this.
M
O
I
can
tell
you:
I've
been
involved
in
the
gladstone
station
secondary
plan
development,
since
2015.
I've
attended
the
the
public
meetings.
I've
made
clear
as
best
I
could
to
both
the
developers
that
were
interested
and
the
city
of
this
dilemma
and
this
problem
and
how
it
needed
to
be
grappled
with
and
and
frankly,
what
I
was
consistently
met
with
was.
This
is
too
important
for
us
to
worry
about
that,
and
and
how
can
you
think
that
we
should
have
to
worry
about
you
and,
and
that's
not
what
the
rules
say,
and
so
we
are.
O
M
Madam
chair,
we
also
submitted
a
letter
to
staff.
I
believe
it
was
in
december
but,
like
I
said
my
power's
out,
so
I
can't
open
my
computer
at
the
time
and
I
think
the
only
I
think
the
main
issue
city
was
aware
of
our
concerns
and
we
were
told
that
everything
would
be
taking
care
of
the
site
plan
control
stage
as
a
condition.
M
But
that
removes
a
lot
of
ability
from
my
client
to
have
any
sort
of
control
in
this
component,
and
it's
also
inconsistent
with
what
mecp
is
telling
us
when
we
need
to
be
compliant.
So
they're
telling
us
now
that,
because
these
amount
of
stories
are
expected
on
those
land
uses
that
we
need
to
consider
that
now,
as
opposed
to
at
site,
plane
control
stage.
M
A
C
C
M
E
E
I
think
one
of
the
questions
that's
going
to
arise
from
this
discussion
in
the
community
for
those
folks
who
are
watching
is
currently
the
operations
at
the
gladstone
location
are
largely
warehouse
locations
and
that
any
noise
mitigation
that's
going
to
be
required
is
would
be
typical
of
a
a
warehouse
type
facility.
Do
you
anticipate
that
this
would
start
moving
more
into
the
printing
again,
because
you'll
recall
the
discussion
we
had
not
about
noise,
but
about
the
the
odors
that
were
emanating
from
the
plant
as
a
result
of
of
printing
operations.
O
I
will
tell
you
I
can
tell
you
counselor
leaper,
that
we
currently
don't
have
any
plans
to
start
printing
in
that
facility,
but
it
is
much
more
than
a
warehouse
when
we
bought
it.
It
was
really
a
derelict
building,
although
it
did
have
a
secret
clearance
from
the
government
of
canada.
It's
been
restored.
Frankly,
and
now
it
is
very
high
tech
inside
we
have
a
high-tech
research
and
development
lab
located
inside
the
building.
O
We
have
the
new
canadian
passport
lines,
which
are
very
technology
intensive,
and
so
we
make
changes
to
our
processes
almost
constantly,
because
demand
is
driven
by
our
customers,
who
are
primarily
governments
around
the
world,
and
we
have
to
respond
to
new
technologies,
essentially
every
year
at
the
moment,
because
we
are
compliant
with
the
noise
regulations.
We
are
entitled
to
make
changes
to
the
facility,
provided
that
our
our
experts
in
environmental
controls
have
confirmed
that
we
will
remain
compliant.
E
I
know
our
our
staff
are
going
to
explain.
You
know
why
they
don't
agree
with
your
interpretation,
and
you
know
I
try
to
put
myself
in
the
hands
of
staff.
I
would
I
would
love
to
get
in
and
see
the
new
high-tech
stuff
that
you're
doing,
but
I
know
for
obvious
reasons
you
won't
won't.
Let
me
in
chair,
thank
you
very
much.
A
A
G
A
A
A
C
F
F
It's
it's
been
a
it's
been
a
long
journey,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
on
behalf
of
och
we're
very
thankful
about
the
process,
the
level
of
engagement.
It's
been
an
incredibly
thorough
process
and,
as
you
know,
we
have
already
identified
funding
through
cmhc
to
engage
in
both
these
sites
and
we're
eager
to
get
going.
It's
a
time,
constrained
funding,
so
we're
very
much
looking
forward
to
this,
advancing
and
and
seeing
the
the
redevelopment
of
both
those
key
areas.
So
really
just
a
thanks
to
all
for
for
engagement.
A
G
F
Thank
you
so,
yes,
just
to
expand
upon
cliff's
comments,
just
very
much
wanted
to
thank
our
city.
Colleagues,
thank
the
ward
councillor
and
councillor
scott
moffat
and
matthew
fleury
thank
the
staff,
ale
miguelez
and
tavi
sitam
kevin
weary,
robin
sushen.
We've
enjoyed
a
great
relationship
with
him
over
the
years
in
advancing
not
only
the
secondary
plan,
but
our
interests
in
our
two
sites:
gladstone
village
and
rochester
heights.
F
We've
had
a
presence
on
rochester
heights
going
back
to
1966,
and
so
we
are
going
to
be
revitalizing
that
property
our
second
go
at
it.
If
you
will,
we
already
have
a
building
coming
out
of
the
ground
on
the
north
side
of
gladstone,
a
six-story
building
with
two
blocks
of
stock
town
homes
that
we're
very
proud
of
we're.
Exciting
excited
very
excited
about
continuing
on
these.
F
These
added
lands
in
a
phased
manner
over
the
years
to
come
with
affordable
housing
with
some
private
sector
housing
retail
office
very
much
mixed
use,
mixed
density,
mixed
income,
mixed
life
stages,
and
so
yes,
we're
very,
very
pleased
with
what
we've
accomplished
with
the
city's
support
and
with
our
consultants,
support
as
well.
Photon
consultants
and
hoban
architecture
have
been
there
along
the
way
and
we
couldn't
have
done
this
without
them
as
well.
So
thank
you
very
much.
P
A
P
Madam
chair,
my
role
has
been
to
support
ottawa
community
housing
and
their
efforts
and
in
in
this
case,
dealing
with
the
secondary
plan
and
then
working
with
the
city
on
the
zoning.
I
I
may
choose
to
use
my
time
a
little
differently.
I'll
be
honest,
I
don't
think
ottawa
community
housing
was
aware
in
any
meaningful
way
of
the
discomfort
by
the
canadian
banknote
it
was.
It
was
really
staff's
burden
to
deal
with
them,
because
this
was
a
city
initiated
zoning
by
law
member.
P
P
I
don't
think
there's
any
question
that
there's
an
identified
need
for
affordable
housing
and
I'm
I
recall
that
the
the
banknote
felt
the
same
way,
but
there
are
other
criterias
here
recall
if
you
will,
that
in
terms
of
assessing
the
appropriateness
of
the
land,
use
and
and
alternate
locations
you're.
Looking
at
this,
in
the
context
of
a
a
comprehensive
review
in
support
of
a
secondary
plan,
so
staff
did
entertain.
You
know
consideration
of
whether
these
properties
were
well
suited
working
with
ottawa
community
housing.
P
It's
no
secret
that
the
driver
as
to
why
ottawa
community
housing
purchased.
These
properties
is
because
of
the
proximity
to
transit.
So
there
is,
through
this
process
a
very
clear
understanding
of
what
och
is
trying
to
achieve
here
and
working
with
the
city
in
terms
of
providing
affordable
housing
and
proximity
to
transit.
P
So
I
would,
I
would
suggest
that
criteria
be
in
that
policy
is
addressed
and
then
criteria
c
and
d,
and
I'm
anticipating
staff's
response
here,
but
we'll
tell
you
that,
at
the
time
of
site
plan,
there
will
be
detailed
noise
studies
that
assess
what
the
obligations
are
for
ottawa
community
housing
in
terms
of
their
construction,
their
windows,
their
walls.
All
of
those
elements
will
be
factored
in
being
mindful
of
noise
sources,
noise
sources
and
in
proximity
to
the
site.
P
I
know
that's
not
what
the
banknote
is
is
angling
for,
but
at
the
same
time
they
should
take
some
comfort,
as
you
will
that
there
will
be
detailed
analysis
at
the
time
of
site
plan.
And,
lastly,
my
my
my
remaining
comment
is
this:
secondary
plan
is
implementing
policies
that
are
actually
well
within
the
op.
P
The
auto
community
housing
lands
and
the
majority
of
the
lands
within
the
secondary
plan
area
are
already
designated
mixed
use
center.
In
the
current
version
of
the
official
plan,
those
policies
already
support
30-story
buildings
in
proximity
to
the
transit
station.
If
you're
within
400
or
200
meters
of
its
station,
you
can
go
to
30
stories
and
all
the
other
heights
that
are
shown
in
the
auto
community.
Housing
lands
that
are
now
part
of
this
secondary
plan
and
implemented
through
the
zoning
are
actually
anchored
in
your
existing
policies.
C
C
P
No,
my
comments
were
that
the
the
op
already
contemplates
and
encourages
heights
in
these
locations
it.
The
zoning,
is
not
in
place,
but
the
secondary
plan
and
the
zoning
are
very
much
anchored
in
existing
policies,
and
I
just
don't
want
to
leave
the
impression
to
the
committee
that,
as
a
result
of
the
gladstone
secondary
or
the
corso
italian
italian
secondary
plan
and
the
zoning
that
these
are
new
notions
and
new
concepts
that
that
height
was
already
contemplated
in
your
council
approved
documents.
That
was
my
point.
A
Q
Q
Q
This
could
mean
that
some
kind
of
understanding,
even
if
not
written
between
the
city
of
ottawa
and
the
investors,
was
already
in
place.
And,
of
course,
the
alternative
view
to
this.
One
is
that
companies
investing
funds
on
these
type
of
projects
spend
fortunes
without
expecting
anything
in
return
from
the
city.
Q
A
R
R
Do
you
is
your
opposition
to
the
entire
block,
including
the
the
low
rise
like
the
town
homes
that
would
be
facing
booth
or
is
it?
Is
it
mostly
with
respect
to
the
high-rise
that
would
be
fronting
on
to
raymond
so
again,
recognizing
that
that
you're
on
booth,
you
know
and
and
that's
that
you
would
be
facing
that
that
section
of
the
block,
but
I
just
wanted
to
to
clarify,
is
it
the
entire
block
or
is
it?
R
Is
it
that
that
one
building
and
is
because
I
want
to
I
want
to
consider
if
there's
you
know
what
mitigating
measures
have
been
taken
or
can
be
taken
to
lessen
the
impact
on
on
you,
and
also
second
question
I
have
for
you
is:
is
your
concern
also
that
that
you
would
be
impacted
at
some
point
beyond
booth
street,
because
the
the
secondary
plan
ends
that
blue
streak
for
a
very
particular
reason?
And
that's
because
we
don't
want
to
see
these
changes
encroach
beyond
on
booth
street.
Q
Q
R
M
Q
R
A
C
D
Okay,
thank
you,
yeah
and,
and
sorry
just
just
to
elaborate
on
that.
That
was
specifically
in
recognition
of
of
the
of
the
because
the
development
application
for
951,
gladstone
and
145
gladstone
had
already
been
received,
and
there
had
been
some
work
that
had
been
advanced
by
our
development
review
services
with
that
application.
C
Okay
and
okay,
thank
you.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
clarified
that
for
the
with
the
delegation
that
emailed
us
on
that
one
on
canadian
banknote,
so
obviously
there's
concern
from
the
from
cbn
about
when
they're
required
to
update
their
noise
assessment
and
compliance
with
the
mecp
and
their
assertion
is
that
noise
compliance
is
as
soon
as
zoning
is
approved.
C
S
S
Note
it's
this
issue
of
when
the
canadian
banknote
will
be
required
to
update
their
compliance,
and
it
comes
down
to
the
definition
of
what
a
point
of
reception
is
in
the
ministry's
guidelines
for
noise,
our
our
staff
and
have
spoken
in
depth
with
canadian
banknotes,
legal
counsel
and
their
consultants
to
try
to
iron
out
this
issue.
But
we
continue
to
be
of
the
view
that
the
canadian
banknotes
should
not
be
required
to
update
their
their
compliance
noise
assessment
until
site
plan
approval.
S
Canadian
banknotes,
acoustic
assessment-
where
advised
already
does
this,
and
that's
on
the
basis
that
933
gladstone
already
is
zoned
for
a
residential
use
and
in
fact,
as
we've
already
heard,
it
is
zoned
for
a
residential
use
well
in
excess
of
4.5
meters.
Their
current
acoustic
assessment
is
consistent
with
this
interpretation.
S
They've
only
had
to
do
that.
4.5
meters
kind
of
basically
a
holding
a
placeholder
until
the
actual
proposal
comes
in
for
what's
going
to
be
constructed
on
that
property,
so
obviously
canadian
banknote
is
is
getting
different
information
from
their
consultants
and
I
would
imagine
their
consultants
in
turn
from
the
mecp.
We've
asked
for
canadian
banknote
to
provide
some
clarity
from
the
mecp
about
why
they're
they're
getting
a
different
interpretation.
S
Madam
chair,
that's
correct.
My
understanding
in
staff
planning
staff
can
clarify
further,
but
it's
already
zoned
for
multi-story
residential
use
based
on
the
size
of
the
law,
and
so
I
I
believe
from
when
I'm
advised
from
canadian
banknotes
consultants.
It
already
does
account
for
that
in
their
acoustic
assessment.
T
I
just
want
to
add
a
couple
of
things
to
what
mr
sram
has
indicated
in
the
current
zoning
bylaw
and
by
the
way
I
want
to
thank
mr
tremblay,
who
spoke
earlier
about
pps
compliance,
I'm
not
going
to
belabor
that
I
I
I
agree
with
what
he
said,
but
in
terms
of
the
current
zoning.
The
current
zoning
today
is
mc
with
an
fsi
of
1.5.
T
That
site
is
28
000
square
meters.
The
zoning
says
that
you
have
no
height
limit
within
30
meters
of
an
r4
zone,
which
means
that
on
80
of
that
site
today,
if
we
do
nothing
ottawa
community
housing
can
build
a
37-story
building.
Today,
that's
in
the
zoning,
that's
just
fact
now
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
done-
and
I
am
sorry
that
our
friends
at
canadian
banknote
said
that
we
did
not
consider
them
as
an
important
stakeholder.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
we
did
consider
them
as
an
important
stakeholder.
T
I
echo
councillor
leeper's
comments
that
they
are
an
important
employer
in
the
community
and
in
the
neighborhood
is
that
we
did
two
things
in
the
secondary
plan.
That's
before
you
today
we
have
a
policy
that
says,
and
that's
policy
4.1.4.5,
which
says
new
residential
development
that
is
built
close
to
established
industrial
operations
are
responsible
for
mitigating
their
proximity
in
a
matter
that
has
no
effect
or
impact
on
the
established
operations.
Ability
to
continue
operating
and
any
studies
or
mitigation
measures
shall
be
done
at
their
own
cost.
T
Madam
chair,
that's
additional
protection
for
cbn
because
you
don't
find
that
policy
today,
either
in
the
preston
champaign
secondary
plan
that
we're
repealing
or
in
the
parent
official
plan-
and
the
second
thing
I'd
like
to
say,
is
that
we
are
introducing
building
height
limits
that
gives
security
and
and
certainty
to
the
community
as
to
the
profile
of
buildings.
But
the
mc
zone
today
has
no
height
limits.
It
has
none
past
30
meters
of
an
r4
zone,
so
these
are
just
some
facts
that
I
wanted
to
leave
with
with
committee.
Thank
you.
A
That's
great
that
you
pointed
that
out,
and
that
was
our
conversation
yesterday.
That
was
my
understanding
too.
I
know
that
it's
it
just
didn't
seem
logical
that
an
existing
built,
a
business
that
had
been
there
for
x
amount
of
time,
and
it
meant
all
the
hurdles
you
know,
targets,
rules
etc.
All
of
a
sudden,
an
application
comes
along,
and
now
the
business
that
was
there
has
to
do
a
whole
bunch
of
things
in
order
to
comply
for
the
new
build.
A
That
did
not
make
sense
to
me,
meaning
we
have
that
even
out
in
the
suburban
communities,
where
we
have
by
subdivision
written
into
the
subdivisions
that
they
have
to
have
error
conditions
they
have
to
have
when
there's
a
when
there's
an
issue
of
heavy
traffic,
or
you
know
a
large
business
and-
and
so
I'm
glad
that
you
put
that
out,
there
is
who,
where
am
I
now?
Are
you
finished
now
vice
chair
gary?
Well,.
C
I
have
one
other
question
about
one
of
the
one
of
the
statements
from
the
consultants,
and
it
was
this.
They
said
the
city's
responsibility,
it's
the
city's
responsibility
to
mitigate
the
cost
of
change
for
canadian
banknote
and
there's
a
requirement
to
have
an
agreement
in
place
to
mitigate
those
costs
before
zoning
is
approved.
Can
staff
comment
on
that?
I'm
not
clear
what
what
that
who's?
Who
would
compel
that
agreement
or
what
the
actual
requirement
is
there.
T
So
again,
madam
chair,
the
introduction
of
the
policy
in
the
secondary
plan
is
a
way
for
the
city
to
signal
and
actually
to
signal
internally
as
well
to
our
colleagues
in
development
review,
that
this
is
a
requirement
and
it
has
to
be
imposed
on
parties
that
are
developing
buildings
by
changing
the
zoning.
The
city
is
not
developing
a
building.
The
city
is
not
the
proponent.
T
The
city
is
putting
in
place
the
zoning
that
creates
the
ability
for
any
any
land
owner
to
apply
to
the
city
to
construct
a
building
until
we
are
in
receipt
of
an
application,
and
we
know
what
that
building
contains,
it
may
contain
residential
it
may
not.
It
may
contain
offices,
it
may
contain
a
hotel.
C
E
E
This
has
been
a
very
long
conversation
with
the
community,
but
a
very
productive
one.
I
think
it's
noteworthy
that
this
morning
the
community
associations
are
not
here
opposing
this.
The
community
associations
are
supportive
and
it's
more
than
just
an
affordable
housing
development
at
gladstone
village.
This
secondary
plan
is
going
to
allow
for
the
development
of
tall
dense
buildings
on
the
hintonburg
side
along
the
spine
of
the
o
train,
but
I
think
you
know
folks
recognize
the
importance
of
supporting
that
transit
and
of
keeping
that
transit
or
sorry
keeping
that
tall
development.
E
You
know
where
the
transit
actually
is.
I
do
have
one
question,
though,
for
you-
and
this
is
something
that
we've
already
gone
back
and
forth
on
tavi,
but
I
just
wanted
to
get
a
commitment
on
the
record
today.
The
hintonburg
community
association
has
noticed
a
difference
in
treatment
of
heritage
properties
where
some
are
mentioned
as
being
on
the
registry
and
others
are
not
the
standard
bread
building
the
standard
bread
factory
is
a
very
important
heritage.
Building
to
the
community,
the
secondary
plan
does
not
highlight
its
heritage
status.
D
Yes,
thank
you
three,
madam
chair,
that
that
that
would
be
no
problem.
The
the
buildings
that
are
heritage
designated
currently
in
the
study
area
they
weren't
included
in
the
secondary
plan
because
that
has
been
established
they
are,
they
are
registered
under
part
for
the
planning
act,
so
all
of
the
appropriate
regulations
and
process
will
apply
to
them.
D
The
the
ones
that
were
mentioned
were
ones
that
are
on
the
heritage
registry
list,
so
that's
sort
of
still
a
work
in
progress.
So
that's
why
we
focused
on
that.
That
said,
we
understand
that
at
1010,
somerset,
for
example,
there
will
be
redevelopment
that
will
be
happening
and
plant
bath
recreation
center
is
one
of
the
heritage
registered
properties.
D
So
we
just
want
to
make
sure.
I
don't
think
it
would
hurt
to
to
add
that
language
in
there.
I
think,
actually,
an
additional
a
previous
version
of
the
secondary
plan
did
have
that
we
thought
it
was
redundant.
We
took
it
out,
but
it
might
not
hurt
to
put
it
back
in
just
to
reassert
that,
and
that
applies
to
the
standard
brad
building
as
well.
Given
that
there's
a
an
application
ongoing
there.
E
Our
friend,
linda
hode,
at
the
hamburg
community
association,
would
very
much
appreciate
appreciate
just
that
additional
reinforcement
of
its
status,
but
I
am
really
pleased
that
the
hintonburg
community
association
and
pacific
hospital
neighborhood
association
are,
are,
you
know
very
supportive
of
the
direction
in
which
the
secondary
plan
has
gone.
Thank
you
very
much
for
getting
us
to
this
point
and
we'll
look
forward
to
seeing
the
the
rest
of
the
properties
develop.
E
A
A
That's
it.
However,
I
would
say
that,
whatever,
if
this
item
should
pass
today,
it
will
be
at
council
on
march
the
10th
so
there's
time
for
you
to
connect
individually
with
counselors
as
well.
So
we
have
counselor
kluche,
counselor,
fleury,
counselor,
brockington,
counselor,
cloche
questions
and
or
wrap
up.
Okay.
B
A
B
B
Thank
you
very
much
and
mishimi
guerrez
said
that
or
a
certain.
Maybe
it
wasn't
that
any.
But
someone
said
that
their
staff's
interpretation
is
that
compliance
further
compliance
with
another
point
of
reception
which
I'll
get
to
in
a
moment,
is
not
required
until
site
plan
approval,
while
canadian
banknotes
are
saying
it
is
required
at
zoning
approval
is
that
do
I
have
that.
B
S
So,
madam
chair,
that
that
does
depend
on
the
specifics
of
the
guidelines.
So
the
guideline
sets
out
specific
requirements
as
to
where
each
point
of
reception
is.
I
think
it's
a
simplification,
but
yes,
generally
it's
at
a
at
the
plane
of
the
window
at
each
each
level
of
the
residential
development
that
could
be
receiving
noise.
B
The
correct
term
escapes
me
and
alain
migueles
said
that
new
residential
plans
are
responsible
for
those
mitigating
so
that
they
don't
impact
an
industrial
entity
like
canadian
banknote.
How
do
we
reconcile
at
the
face
of
a
window
versus
the
inside
at
the
point
of
reception
and
how
an
improved
window
that
might
be
installed
by
ottawa?
Community
housing
would
impact
that
measurement.
S
Madam
chairs,
I
apologize
if
I'm
I've
confused
things
a
bit
here,
but
my
understanding-
and
this
is
getting
a
bit
more
into
the
technical
aspects
that
are
a
little
outside
my
legal
expertise
and
more
on
the
the
noise
engineering
side
of
things.
The
the
guideline
does
permit
mitigation
measures
like
improved
windows
and
and
other
measures
to
allow
a
noise
emitter
like
canadian
banknote,
to
achieve
compliance.
So
what
we
would
do
at
the
site
plan
stages
require
a
detailed,
a
noise
study
that
would
be
done
by
och.
A
L
And
I
want
to
thank
a
number
of
folks
here.
I
want
to
thank
the
community
association.
I
want
to
thank
councillor
mckinney.
I
want
to
thank
the
ottawa
community
housing
and
tenants.
Who've
been
engaged
throughout
the
process,
as
councilor
liepers
said
earlier,
it's
been
a
journey
and
we
ochs
and
and
and
and
the
city
and
counselor
mckenny
met,
and
I
met
a
number
of
times
to
make
sure
that
all
components
were
properly
understood
and
and
and
presented.
L
So
I
want
to
personally
thank
my
colleague
I
want
to
thank
also
tavi
and
alain
and
specifically
cliff
and
rob
for
for
their
work,
so
this
is
very
important
for
for
och.
As
you
know,
we
are
the
city's
builder
of
choice
and
there's
a
number
of
project
here
from
rochester
phase
2
to
gladstone
village
that
are
all
coming
together
with
additional
green
space
and
schools.
So
really
counting
on
on
the
committee's
support
to
help
us
advance
och's,
new
and
increased
units
within
within
that
community.
I
Thanks
chair,
I
will
be
supporting
this
motion.
I
I
think
that
this
is
a
very
strong
and
sound
development
proposal
and
appreciate
all
the
work
that's
gone
into
it.
I
used
to
work
when
I
was
in
university
on
brees
hill,
which
is
basically
a
block
to
the
west
and
thought
that
this
area,
you
know,
needed
some
additional
development
and
really
happy
to
see
the
proposal.
I
You
know
back
in
2001
when
the
trillium
line
started.
Gladstone
and
walkley
stations
were
dropped
to
save
time
and
money.
They
were
not
seen
as
the
most
busy
of
stations.
So
it's
really
great
to
see
a
station
coming
here
through
the
lrt
phase
two
and
the
development
proposal
that
we
see.
So
it's
it's
an
excellent
for
this
part
of
of
our
town.
I
Just
one
question,
because
I've
been
number
I've
been
really
following
the
concerns
from
the
banknote,
and
I
just
want
to
get
some
clarity
in
my
mind,
with
respect
to
the
site
plan
agreement
and
at
the
time
that
the
site
plan
agreement
gets
signed,
the
onus
this
is.
This
is
a
question
for
clarification.
The
onus
is
then
on
banknote.
To
make
required
changes,
then.
Is
that
correct.
S
Madam
chair,
through
you,
if,
if
site
plan
at
site
plan
approval
stage,
och
would
have
to
complete
a
noise
study
which
would
recommend
mitigation
measures
to
ensure
that
the
their
use,
the
sensitive
land
use
of
residential
use
isn't
going
to
be
receiving
noise
levels
in
excess
of
the
ministry's
requirements
which
which,
as
I
spoke
about
with
counselor
clutier,
is,
could
include
upgrading
windows.
That
sort
of
thing
canadian
banknote
would
then
be
able
to
go
to
the
ministry
and
prove
that
they're
not
emitting
noise.
S
I
S
Issued
madam
chair,
just
as
a
point
of
clarification,
I
think
the
banknote
our
interpretation
of
the
guideline
is
that
banknote
won't
be
required
to
do
the
work
now
of
upgrading
their
acoustic
assessment,
although
banknotes
getting
different
advice
from
their
consultants,
but
our
interpretation
is
that
they
won't
have
to.
It
won't
be
until
the
site
plan
stage,
which
will
be
following
this
zoning
approval
at
a
later
point
and
and
then
in
terms
of
why
not
require
it
at
the
building
permit
stage.
S
The
guideline
refers
to
either
building
permit
or
site
plan
approval,
as
the
the
trigger
for
when
a
new
point
of
asset
reception
is
is
created,
and
you
have
to
do
that
update
to
your
assessment.
So
in
some
cases
some
buildings
don't
require
site
plan
approval
when
you,
when
you
submit
your
building
plans
for
a
building
permit,
you
would
also
trigger
that
that
requirement.
S
I
It's
not
binding
on
my
decision
today,
man,
I'm
sure
so
I'll,
just
leave
it
for
now.
It's
just
more
of
out
of
curiosity,
but
all
this
to
say
I
to
repeat
what
I
said
the
beginning.
I
think
this
is
a
very
sound
proposal
for
this
part
of
town.
I
will
be
supporting
it.
Recognizing
there's
still
some
work.
That
needs
to
be
done,
but
we
really
need
to
get
going
on
this
and
I'm
happy
to
see
all
the
work
that's
happened
today.
So
thank
you.
G
S
Madam
chair,
through
you,
I
I'm
advised
that
45
decibels
is
the
is
the
level
that
cbn
has
to
achieve
at
points
of
reception.
That
would
that
would
depend
on
the
ministry
and
their
guideline
and
how
cbn
is
classified
in
terms
of
a
noise
emitter.
It's
it's
a
more
of
a
technical
question
than
a
legal
question,
but
that
is
what
cbn
is
advising
currently
that
they
have
to
comply
with.
G
G
A
A
E
A
I
E
Yeah,
my
understanding
is
that
this
deals
with
a
concern
that
och
had
with
respect
to
a
the
underpass
at
city
center
and
and
gives
them
some
certainty
that
they
need
with
respect
to
the
language
and
what
they
might
be
required
to
do
so.
It's
therefore
be
it
resolve
the
planning
committee
replace
document,
seven
with
the
revised
documents.
E
Okay,
sorry,
I'm
looking
at
a
different
motion.
I'm
happy
to
move
this,
therefore
be
it
resolve
the
planning
committee
replace
document
7
with
revised
document
7
attaches
appendix
1
to
this
motion,
showing
the
modifications
in
red
and
be
it
further
resolved
the
pursuant
to
the
planning
act,
subsection
3417,
no
further
notice
be
given,
but
I
might
just
ask
staff
to
provide
a
quick
note
of
color
on
that.
One.
A
D
D
A
Can
I
just
ask
you
also
whether
or
not
it
would
be-
and
I
don't
know
what
the
direction
is:
councilor
mckinney
that
you're
moving,
but
you
know
to
address
that's
to
address
the
concerns
of
och.
We
also
heard
very
clearly
the
concerns
of
canadian
banknote
today
and
I'm
wondering
if
direction
should
be
tabled
and
sent
to
staff
on
that
just
for
clarification
for
for
their
part.
So
mr
shrum
I'll
ask
you
to
think
about
that
and
I'll
go
over
to
counselor
mckinney.
A
R
R
So
this
is
just
that
staff
be
directed
to
include
the
following
texts
to
describe
the
desired
future
streetscape
typology
for
the
portion
of
rochester
street
within
the
corso
italia
station
district
secondary
plan
boundaries,
and
that
is
that
rochester
street
will
be
designed
as
a
complete
street,
with
wide
sidewalks
bicycle
facilities
on
street
parking
and
street
trees,
taking
into
account
the
context
of
the
corridor
and
the
available
right-of-way.
So
that's
gone
through
transportation
staff
and
they've
agreed
to
that.
A
I
think
you
know
what
they
they're,
not
trusting
the
site
plan
being
the
time
to
pull
the
trigger
on
this.
So
I
you
know,
I
would
like
to
have
some
kind
of
a
direction
that
vice
chair
gower.
If
he's
willing
to
can
can
give
today,
you
know,
even
if
it's
tied
into
the
sight
plan,
I'd
just
like
to
have
something
we
need
to
cut.
Yes,.
T
Madam
chair,
I'm
hoping
that
we
that
what
we
might
do
is
to
provide
a
letter
through
canadian
banknote
to
outline
the
the
points
that
we've
presented
through
mr
schram
and
as
well
confirm
the
existing
zoning
and
reiterate
the
effect
of
the
policy
that
we're
introducing
into
the
secondary
plan.
That
does
provide
the
protection
that
I'm
thinking.
They're
looking
for
and
staff
has
no
difficulty
doing.
That.
C
Yeah
I
was
gonna
say
I
mean
it's:
it's
we
can't
tell
the
mecp
how
to
interpret
their
own
rules,
but
certainly
at
least
providing
our
own,
our
own
interpretation,
and
how
we've
attempted
to
address
those
issues
within
the
within
the
documents
that
are
in
front
of
us.
I
think
that's
reasonable
and
if
we
could
direct
staff
as
elaine
has
outlined,
and
do
that
before
this
comes
to
council.
A
G
So,
mr
chair,
I
remember
I'm
sure
I
saw
it
come
up
on
the
screen
and-
and
it
was
not
clear
to
me-
and
perhaps
mr
michaels,
mr
satan-
can
can
enlighten
the
situation.
The
language
that
was
suggested
by
councilman
kenny
in
her
direction.
Is
that
an
amendment
to
the
text
of
the
opa?
Because
if
it
is,
then
it
should
be
a
motion
manager.
G
A
E
A
E
E
Because
it's
going
to
impose
costs
on
them
if
it
is
passed
as
is,
and
then
the
second
thing
that
they're
asking
for
is
that
we
assure
them
of
compensation
for
any
modifications
to
their
facility
that
they
need
to
do
as
a
result
of
the
the
new
zoning
that's
in
place,
our
staff
disagree
with
the
interpretation
that
cbn
has
made.
I'm
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
what
further
work
needs
to
be
done
here.
We're
we're
at
an
impasse.
We've
shared
our
interpretation
with
cbn.
E
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
that
was
clarified,
I
think
by
mr
miglis.
I
just
was
looking
for
something
that
was
on
the
table.
That
was
part
of
some
kind
of
a
formality,
because
I
think
that
it
was
confirmed
to
us
that
the
cost
would
not
be
borne
by
canadian
banknote
and,
in
fact,
would
be
borne
by
the
measures
that
would
need
to
be
taken
to
mitigate
any
noise
from
them
on
the
new
build
and
it's
the
new
build
that
would
have
to
assume
the
cost
of
extra
insulation,
windows,
etc,
etc.
A
S
Madam
chair
I'm
happy
to
respond
and
it
is
correct
that
staff
has
outlined
our
position
to
canadian
banknote
in
the
past
and
and
your
summary
of
what
what
staff
has
said,
I
think
is.
I
agree
with
that.
Canadian
banknote
should
be
held
should
be,
can
rely
on
cities,
site
plan
approval
process
to
ensure
that
they're
not
responsible
for
mitigation
measures
of
a
new
build
being
put
in.
A
G
R
A
N
Yeah
I
mean
it's
the
same.
The
same
discussion,
my
understanding
is
ochs
are
looking
for
some
certainty
around
a
multi-use
path,
and
this
motion
is
therefore
be
it
resolved
at
the
text
in
the
asset
management
implications
section
be
replaced
from
policy
section
525
to
5216
proposes
the
city
center
underpass
pathway,
a
primary
active
transportation,
move
for
the
secondary
plan
study
area.
If
limited
vehicular
access
is
to
be
permitted
using
the
city
center
underpass
pathway,
it
would
be,
it
must
be
subordinate
to
pedestrian
cycling
circulation.
N
This
would
require
the
width
of
the
underpass
to
be
enlarged
and
would
require
modification
of
the
existing
bridge
structure.
That's
been
proposed
to
be
changed
too.
There
is
major
water
and
sewer
infrastructure
that
encumbers
the
largely
vacant
lands
controlled
by
the
city
and
lands
expected
to
be
conveyed
to
the
city
from
the
federal
government
in
2021
area,
east
of
railway
cut
north
of
gladstone
west
of
existing
development
from
plant-based
south
to
balsam.
A
coordinated
plan
will
be
required
to
relocate
this
infrastructure
and
or
to
ensure
that
development
avoids
the
alignment
of
this
infrastructure.
N
A
financial
plan
will
also
be
required
to
support
the
funding
of
infrastructure
relocation.
This
plan
may
also
need
to
address
advancement
of
renewal
of
some
infrastructure
in
this
area,
while
plans
specific
to
infrastructure.
Relocation
servicing
for
this
area
are
not
within
the
scope
of
the
infrastructure
master
plan
to
be
updated
in
2022.
The
strategies
for
servicing
increased
levels
of
intensification,
as
would
be
permitted
by
the
proposed
official
plan,
and
zoning
by
law.
R
R
T
Madam
chair,
if
nothing
happened
today
and
we
continued
with
existing
zoning
ottawa,
community
housing
would
submit
a
development
application
under
the
mc
zone
and
they
would
be
subject
to
studies.
They
would
be
subject
to
the
studies
that
kick
in
because
of
the
closeness
of
the
canadian
banknote,
and
they
would
do
the
regular
noise
and
vibration
studies
with
with
respect
to
their
proximity
to
the
old
train
line.
T
What
we've
done
is
that
we've
introduced
a
policy
in
the
secondary
plan
to
make
it
clear
that
these
studies
have
to
be
done,
and
those
are
specifically
there
in
response
to
concerns
that
were
raised
to
us
by
the
canadian
banknote
company
to
make
sure
that
nobody
forgets.
This
would
be
done
as
a
matter
of
development
review.
R
T
Yes,
so
because
of
the
the
nature
of
this
location
and
how
close
and
adjacent
it
is
to
sources
of
noise,
be
it
ottawa
community
housing,
whoever
it
is
that
owns
that
land
and
develops
is
responsible
for
mitigating
the
the
the
impacts
of
the
noise
that
exists.
It's
it's
the
principle
of
agent
of
change,
the
canadian
banknote
was
there
it's
there
already.
T
R
Okay,
thanks
for
that
clarification,
and
just
on
mr
uh's
concerns
earlier
this
morning,
the
two
questions
and
for
staff
are
the
what
what
is
being
done
to
mitigate
the
impact
of
that
26
stories
tower
on
residents
that
are
directly
across
the
street.
From
from
you
know,
the
that
block
on
on
raymond
or
that
part
of
that
block
on
raymond.
D
D
R
R
So
I
do
want
to
start
by
thanking
staff.
This
has
been
a
long
time
coming,
which
actually
started
in
2001
when
we
agreed
to
build
the
o
train,
and
we
knew
from
then
on
that
we
would
have
to
put
people
along
that
that
train
that
that
rail
line,
so
you
know
to
to
tavi
and
alain
who
I've
worked
with
since
2014
on
this,
I
think
I
met
lieber
at
one
of
those
open
houses
before
we
were
elected
actually
in
2013,
so
it's
been
a
long
time
coming.
R
Thank
you
to
och
as
well.
This
would
we
wouldn't
be
here
today
had
och
not
made
that
bold
move
to
purchase
the
property
that
it
did
at
933
gladstone.
It
was
the
right
thing
to
do.
It
was,
you
know,
very
progressive
forward,
thinking
of
of
ottawa
community
housing
to
to
look
at
a
community
that
really
had
so
much
unused
space
and
needed
such
you
know
this
type
of
development,
dca
hca,
our
community
associations.
R
R
You
know
it.
I
remember
back
when
staff
came
to
me
and
said
you
know
what
I
want
to
put.
We
want
to
put
this
on
hold
2015.
We
were
ready
to
come
to
planning
and
you
know
all
I
could
tell
the
community
was
look.
It'll
come
back
the
same
or
better,
and
it's
come
back
better
och
made
the
purchase
that
they
did.
R
It's
you
know
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
mixed
income,
mixed-use
community
on
a
transit
station
and
it
it's
you
know
it
will.
People
will
be
able
to
live
together,
rochester
heights,
the
way
it
was
developed
at
one
time.
Nobody
went
there.
I
never
went
there
because
there
was
no
need
to
go.
There
were
no
stores,
there
were
no.
R
There
was
no
library,
there
was
no
community
space,
there
was
no
public
park,
so
you
just
you,
just
didn't
go
so
people
people
are
excluded
from
daily
life
if
they
live
in
a
neighborhood
and
they're
raising
their
kids
in
the
neighborhood,
where
you
know
where
we
don't
integrate,
we
will
integrate
in
this
neighborhood.
We
will
live
together
in
this
neighborhood
and
kids,
who
grew
up
together.
R
Take
the
train
together
go
to
school
together
play
in
the
park
together,
you
know,
go
to
the
store
together,
we'll
we
will
that
will
build
equity
into
a
neighborhood
because
those
kids
when
they
hit
60
and
17.
They
want
a
job.
You
know
if
they
go
to
their
local
pool
or
their
local
store,
they're
on
more
of
an
equal
footing.
So
it's
it's
the
right
thing
to
do.
R
It
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
expand
our
recreation
space
in
the
downtown
and
it's
an
opportunity
to
build
an
arts
hub
in
a
part
of
the
the
city
that's
connected
now
or
will
be
connected
to
almost
every
other
part
of
the
city.
You
know,
through
transit,
we'll
be
able
to
go
from
there
to
canada
to
orleans
south
to
bar
haven.
R
The
notion
that
we're
going
to
get
a
real
park,
a
continuous
park
1010
and
that's
coming
to
that
that
land
purchase
purchases
coming
to
fedco
next
week
again
is
significant
in
terms
of
its
impact
on
on
the
downtown
and
on
the
the
green
space
available
for
us
and
for
everyone
in
in
the
downtown.
So
this
is,
you
know,
and
a
school
a
possible
school,
it's
just
it.
R
We
are,
you
know,
we've
taken,
you
know,
we've
taken
almost
15
acres
of
land
and
we
are
going
to
be
moving
forward
and
it
it.
It
really
should
be.
It
really
should
be
a
a
lesson
on
how
to
to
move
forward
on
development
for
lebreton
flats,
which
is
just
down
the
street
and
has
stalled
time
and
time
and
time
again.
This
is
the
type
of
community
that
we
need
to
be
building
everywhere
in
the
city
and
with
your
approval
today.
This
will.
R
This
will
kick
it
off.
So
thank
you
to
to
committee
for
for
considering
this
for
for
the
questions,
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
this
through
and
also
my
colleague,
councillor
reaper,
who
who
actually
straddles
both
of
the
the
awards
and
and
also
councillor
fleury
chair
of
och,
for
for
moving
this
along
and
and
getting
us
to
where
we
are
today
and
again
back
to
kudos
to
staff.
It's.
R
A
Thank
you,
okay.
So
the
direction
that
we
talked
about
with
regard
to
canadian
bank
note
that
staff
be
directed
to
provide
a
letter
to
canadian
bank
note
with
staff's
interpretation
of
when
the
environmental
compliance
needs
to
occur
and
that
the
secondary
plan
4.1.4.5
clearly
states
that
new
residential
developments
need
to
do
the
studies
and
implement
mitigation
to
ensure
that
canadian
banknote
continues
to
operate.