►
From YouTube: Planning Committee - January 23, 2018 - Part 2 of 2
Description
Planning Committee meeting –January 23, 2018 – Audio Stream - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
Counter
miss
Baum,
miss
Baum,
and
so
he
has
had
his.
He
has
had
his
questions
answered,
so
we
can
approve
that
that
was
the
part
lock
control
world
opening
applications,
part
of
300
Gulen
force
row.
We
had
the
we
had
the
motion
that
Vice
Chair
Tierney
moved
and
does
everybody
remember
what
the
motion
was.
C
D
A
C
A
A
Right
off
the
bat
we're
not
having
a
presentation,
the
planet
on
this
file
is
Jean
Charlot
alone
and
he's
accompanied
by
his
boss
down
the
wire,
and
we
have
two
motions
that
are
going
to
come
on
this
and
I
think
we
should
just
put
them
on
the
table
right
now.
The
first
one
is
the
one
that
Vice
Chair
attorney.
This
is
Vice
Chair
Channing.
You
have
a
motion
on
hunt
club
on
minimum,
wear
yard
setback.
E
Forgive
me,
madam
chair
where's.
The
report
recommends
zoning
change
to
lands
known
municipally
as
1026
1038,
1040,
1050
and
1050
for
Hunt
Club
Road,
where
it's
been
deemed
advisable
to
make
the
changes
to
the
zoning
provision
to
give
flexibility
to
the
development
should
the
proposal
the
hotel
building
be
replaced
by
a
residential
apartment
building.
Instead,
therefore,
if
you
resolve
the
document,
three
details
of
the
recommended
zoning
of
the
report
be
amended
to
add
the
following
text:
section
to
c5
a
minimum
rear.
Yet
year
minimum
we
are
yard
setback
on
the
apartment.
Dwelling
is
3
metres.
E
A
A
Thank
you
for
both
stating
those
motion
presenting
it's
important.
When
we
have
an
opportunity,
we
have
them
in
advance
that
the
public
hears
from
it's
our
first
speaker
is
Peter
binnacle
Peter
in
Macomb
for
computer
here,
the
secretary
of
the
hunt
club
community
organization
and
thank
you
for
your
comments
in
advance
have
a
seat
at
that.
First
make.
A
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you
Luke.
This
is
three
minutes.
30
seconds,
I'm
Peter
Brimmer
call
the
secretary
of
home
community
organization.
The
club
community
organization
is
opposed
to
the
development
Punk
Club
is
the
busiest
the
most
heavily
used
Road
in
the
city.
It's
at
capacity.
The
proposed
development
will
reduce
its
capacity,
increase
the
risk
of
accidents
and
reduce
its
reliability.
G
Considering
the
effects
it
will
have
on
her
Club
Road.
All
aspects
are
negative:
u-turns,
no
traffic
lights,
no
turning
lanes.
The
only
entrance
is
from
the
eastbound
lane.
It's
on
a
steep
downhill
slope.
The
existing
road
is
the
most
complex
intersection
in
the
city.
The
airport
parkway
goes
over
the
road
just
to
the
east.
There
are
eight
ramps
to
connect
it
to
Cobra
you
can
you
can
see
that
up
there
just
least
there's
an
exclusive
bridge
for
buses.
It
has
three
ramps
to
connect
it
to
Hunt
Club
Road.
G
The
existing
design
works
at
the
very
least.
The
proposed
development
will
be
a
burden
on
the
road
causing
delays
and
unsafe
conditions
out
of
proportion
to
the
traffic
generated
at
the
worst.
The
proposed
development
will
cause
accidents
which
caused
massive
delays.
A
secondary
parallel
road
to
services
site
would
mitigate
these
these
negative
factors,
but
there
is
no
no
such
road.
The
number
of
vehicles
generated
is
small
that
they
will
impose
a
burden
on
the
rest
of
traffic
out
of
proportion
to
the
number.
G
These
negative
effects
will
come
to
light
on
future
projects
when
you
widen
her
Club
Road,
adding
bustling
Stern,
Club
Road,
widening
widening
the
airport
Parkway,
the
propulsive
elements
will
add
extra
cost
and
delays.
Okay,
in
addition
to
the
transportation
problems.
There
are
the
concerns.
The
people
that
live
on
Bartlett
private,
which
is
just
across
a
river
cited
Road
with
the
propulsive
element.
Is
that
part
red?
Just
another
side
we
wrote
is
public
private
right
now
they
look
across
the
road
to
may
see
mature
trees,
but
they
will
be
cut
down
the
people.
G
They
are
concerned
that
the
proposed
development
is
out
of
character
with
the
existing
buildings
on
the
south
side
of
Road.
Right
to
the
west
of
there
is
a
is
a
church,
it's
a
one-story
building,
which
is
too
big
one
story
and
to
the
left
to
the
west.
Again,
there's
a
retirement
home
and
that's
a
three-story
building.
G
Okay,
so
it's
worth
noting
the
people
are
Bartlett
private
get
out
to
hunt
club,
buy
a
proper
intersection
at
traffic
lights
and
turning
lanes,
and
they
don't
generate
our
burden
on
the
road
conclusion
at
the
least,
the
proposed
development
puts
a
burden
on
mode
or
the
proportion
to
the
number
of
vehicles
generated
at
the
worst.
It
causes
accidents
which
caused
massive
delays.
G
G
G
I'm,
take
it
question.
Cuz
everything
just
call
question:
how
do
residents
support
let's
get
out?
Okay
across
you
know,
that's
part
of
private.
You
can
kind
of
see
it
it's
right
there
they
go
out
on
pattern,
Mead,
which
is
going
straight
north,
and
then
they
have
to
go
west
on
plant
where
I
live.
Then
you
can't
quite
see
it.
Then
you
go
to
McCarthy
and
there's
a
proper
intersection
with
traffic
lights
and
turning
lanes,
and
now
you
can
see
it
it's
just
though
it's
a
proper
intersection
and
they're
not
generating
problems.
A
H
A
I
That's
that's
easier,
said
and
done.
My
name
is
Lorna
Shea
I
am
a
resident
of
Bartlett.
Private
I
represent
ten
homes
in
our
community.
We
are
what
I
would
call
Mindy's.
We
are.
What
we're
looking
for
is
reasonableness
in
our
back
yard.
I
have
learned
a
lot
about
land
use
planning
since
that
this
application
came
into
being
and
I've
done.
I
My
best
I
did
send
you
in
some
information
before
the
weekend
and
what
I
tried
to
do
is
pay
attention
to
what
land
use
planning
is
all
about
and
what
your
rules
and
responsibilities
are,
and
so
what
I've
tried
to
do
is
point
to
places
where
I
think
there
is
discretion
and
there
is
you,
have
you
have
an
opportunity
to
make
some
decisions?
We
have
four
things
that
we'd
like
you
to
consider.
I
One
is
considering
the
height
of
the
proposed
development
that
we
height,
that
is
recommended
under
OPA
150,
which
I
understand
is
not
yet
in
fill
effect,
but
it
is
six
stories
within
800
meters
of
any
rapid
transit
outlet
or
hub.
That's
where
this
development
would
be,
and
yet
this
request
is
for
eight-story.
So
if
OPA
150
should
come
into
effect,
all
other
buildings
would
be
six
other
developments
across
a
long
hunt
club
for
great
distances
are
no
greater
than
six
storeys.
I
The
second
thing
that
we're
going
to
consider
is
to
delay
a
decision
on
this
pending.
What
I
understand
we
call
the
community
transportation
study
and
when
I
look
at
the
information
on
that
those
studies
are
often
commissioned
when
you
have
a
particularly
busy
intersection
and
there's
a
number
of
parameters
that
I'm
sure
the
city
could
speak
to,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
should
have
been
conducted
in
this
case,
and
it
was
not.
I
The
third
thing
we'd
like
you
to
consider
is
the
impact
of
traffic
and
I
did
send
you,
in
with
the
information
I've
been
speaking
to
people
within
the
city
and
I.
Also
looked
at
the
transportation
impact
study,
worn
by
the
developers
consultant
consulting
for
them
and
I
draw
on
figures
from
there
as
well,
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
the
traffic
traffic
count
from
the
speed
disabled
or
just
west
of
our
rest
of
this
development
on
October
4
three
months
last
year,
the
number
of
travels
was
1.4
million
vehicles
in
three
months.
I
So
that
means
five
point.
Seven
five
and
three-quarter
million
vehicles
go
down
I'm
club
on
that
side
of
the
world
and
they
will
be
trying,
along
with
the
vehicles
that
are
coming
out
of
the
development
at
one
to
two
per
minute.
During
peak
periods
are
going
to
be
trying
to
share
the
same
mode,
and
the
fourth
thing
that
we'd,
like
you
to
consider,
is
directing
the
retention
of
more
trees
to
meet
the
newly
approved
urban
forest
management
plan.
I
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you,
ms
Shea,
for
coming
to
you
in
2
Peter
before
you
proceeded
you
for
the
file
today
and
thank
you
for
your
engagement
and
involvement
for
the
past
year,
or
so
we've
been
talking
about
hung
Club
Road
in
particular,
and
certainly
when
this
file
went
public,
can
you
you
live
right
across
the
street.
You
live
in
Bartlett
private,
which
is
on
the
north
side
of
Hunt
Club.
So
you're
already
aware
of
the
current
issues
at
Hunt
Club.
F
I
And
so
actually,
my
interest
as
I
listen
to
traffic
back
began
before
I
knew
there
was
an
application
or
before
the
application
came
to
be
and
I
started
to
make
queries
both
of
your
office
and
the
city
as
to
it
wasn't.
Maybe
it's
a
simplistic
question
that
I
was
interested
in
what
the
vision
was
for
Hunt
Club,
how
much
traffic
we
thought
there
would
be
here.
I
The
planners
thought
there
will
be
when
we
went
into
effect
and
how
much
there
is
now,
and
there
wasn't
a
straightforward
answer,
but
I
did
learn
a
lot
in
since
we
know
about
this
development,
in
particular
this
section
between
the
airport,
Parkway
and
the
intersection
up
on
the
top
and
which
is
McCarthy
and
down
Patrick.
My
concern
is,
of
course,
there's
lots
of
traffic.
It's
a
major
heartless
service.
I
tell
you,
though,
that's
just
the
way
it
is
and
that's
how
you
get
people
across
this
part
of
Ottawa.
I
But
my
concern
is
the
level
of
in
that
area.
There
are
removed
9
in
about
X
accesses
in
that
one
block,
which
is
kind
of
unusual
on
a
major
arterial
road.
The
intersection
of
Airport,
Parkway
and
Hunt
Club
is
an
LS
FET
F
I
mean
I've
learned
more
acronyms.
So
if
you
got
that
on
your
report
card,
you
wouldn't
want
to
show
your
mom
and
dad
because
it
means
that
the
intersection
it
fails
during
peak
times
and
now
we
will
be
adding
substantial
traffic
at
peak
times
right
onto
there.
So
we're
not
saying
don't
develop.
I
F
I
A
A
J
Am
as
well
a
homeowner
on
Bartlett
private,
directly
across
from
Claridge
proposed
development.
I'm
appealing
this
recommendation
based
solely
on
a
principle
of
common
sense,
also
Mike
strengths
living
in
this
community
and
walking
the
proposed
site.
I
am
baffled
absolutely
baffled
as
to
why
Planning
has
recommended
the
approval
of
this
application.
J
Cannot
possibly
convey
the
immense
traffic
consisting
of
tanker
trucks,
transport,
trucks,
emergency
vehicles,
delivery,
trucks,
city,
buses,
the
Vans
all
at
the
rate
of
a
total
of
35,000
vehicles
passed
by
backyard
in
a
day
the
computer
ate.
The
computer-generated
shadowing
report
does
not
convey
the
loss
of
privacy
as
well
as
sunshine,
which
I
welcome
during
the
darkest
days
of
winter.
Despite
what
planning
dismisses
as
minimal
as
Bartlett.
Private
is
homeowners,
25
homes
and
we
are
opposing
a
multi-million
dollar
development
of
280
units.
I
do
welcome
positive
change.
J
The
present
property
has
three
houses
and
Claridge
does
build
beautiful
retirement
homes
and
what
a
beautiful
view
they
will
have
out
the
back
end
on
to
MCC
property,
but
now
just
to
get
a
little
more
bang
for
Claridge's
buck.
They
want
to
put
in
a
hotel,
and
today
we
learn
we're
going
to
be
blindsided.
Oh,
maybe
not
a
hotel,
but
an
apartment
building
who
would
want
to
raise
their
children
in
an
apartment
building
at
such
a
busy
busy
intersection
in
the
lock
up
diagram
that
Fontaine
has
proposed.
J
Significant
impacts
on
the
current
flow
of
traffic
on
her
Club
are
dismissed.
Yet
Claridge
has
recently
agreed
to
reduce
the
hotel
or,
excuse
me,
maybe
the
apartment,
building
as
a
positive
impact
on
the
site's
transportation
needs
and
impacts.
So
they
recognized
one
story.
We're
asking
for
at
least
two
storeys
reduction.
J
Planning's
responsible
response
to
too
many
hotels
and
retirement
homes
is
dismissed
is
not
relevant.
The
policy
clearly
stay
compatibility
of
existing
buildings,
environment
emerald
ways
is
to
be
considered.
Claridge
is
proposing
a
positive
pedestrian
experience.
How
is
that
possible?
If
concur,
is
a
treacherous
busy,
smog-filled
arterial
roadway
period?
No
one
wants
to
walk
alone.
Thank.
A
No
I,
don't
have
any
questions,
but
I
have
a
question
of
staff
while
we're
talking
about
the
hotel
switch,
so
you
can
go
back
and
take
your
seat
because
I
don't
care
any
buddy
asking
questions,
but
thank
you
very
much
so
my
question
is
this:
it
is
a
last-minute
change
that
maybe
they
may
want
to.
Instead
of
the
hotel,
have
an
apartment,
so
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
number
one.
The
transportation
study
that
was
done
would
that
have
to
be
re
redone,
based
on
the
fact
of
a
different
use.
C
Madam
chair,
the
current
transportation
study
would
need
to
be
reviewed
if
the
site
blind
control
application
would
be
modified
in
order
to
reflect
apartment
building.
If
that
were
the
case,
it's
not
expected
that
there
would
be
any
concerns
related
to
that,
as
the
traffic
impact
would
be
less
for
department
dwelling
than
for
a
hotel.
A
A
Everybody
in
the
planning
committees
read
report
I,
don't
know
when
everybody
found
out
about
the
change
to
possibly
to
like
to
open
it
up
in
case
they
wanted
to
do
something
else,
but
what
would
normally
be
if
we
were
to
support
this
today
and
then
they
decided
a
change
I,
don't
you
know
in
a
year
or
two
years
or
whatever
the
market
will
bear,
is
what
we're
talking
about?
What
would
the
process
then
be
be
rezoning.
A
C
K
Next
time
madam
chair
well,
Kelsey
Bulkington
and
I
hosted
two
public
meetings
and
certainly
the
issues
around
transportation
and
access
and
egress
to
that
site
and
the
impact
on
her
Club
Road
was
central
to
concern
of
the
community.
One
of
the
things
that
the
transportation
planners
that
were
hired
by
the
applicant
told
the
community
is
that
the
hotel
use
doesn't
have
peak
time
traffic
to
the
same
extent
as
other
uses
would
and
that
hunka
Brut
is
failing
at
peak
times.
So,
presumably,
if
you're
now
changing
to
an
apartment,
you
would
need
to.
K
Why
would
we
agree
today
to
make
that
change
when
neither
the
councilors
involved
in
this
have
heard
about
it
before
today
our
communities
have
been
told
that
hunka
Road
is
failing
at
peak
hours
and
that
the
hotel
use
was
not
a
peak
hour
thing
but
apartment
clearly
is
people
go
to
work
in
the
morning?
Come
back
at
night.
That's
peak
hours
so
like
I
feel
like
this
is
bait
and
switch
on
planning
day
and
I
have
a
real
problem
with
that.
C
A
Happening
is
councillor,
Dean's
asked
if
it
would
be
possible
to
deal
with
a
part
of
the
application
today
that
being
the
part
that
their
Shura,
which
is
the
retirement
home
and
have
the
other
piece,
come
back
when
they
make
a
decision
on
whether
or
not
they
want
it
to
be
a
hotel
or
an
apartment.
Building
that.
A
A
A
F
Just
first
of
all
to
clarify
I
was
informed
about
the
intent
to
the
applicant
today,
just
like
everyone
else,
there
was
no
advance
some
knowledge.
Secondly,
my
interpretation
is
the
applicant
wants
to
keep
their
options
open,
that
it
is
not
a
statement
that
they
are
building
an
apartment,
but
they
want
to
keep
that
as
a
possibility
and
I
think
it's
prudent
to
look
at
those
traffic
studies
before
making
a
decision.
F
K
It
would
necessarily
have
the
same
impact
because
once
you've
said
no
to
it,
they
couldn't
come
back.
I
mean
I.
Think
what
we're
saying
is.
We
would
like
to
have
more
information
before
we
consider
that
we're
not
saying
no
to
it.
So
we're
not
saying
necessarily.
We
want
to
vote
it
down,
we're
just
saying
we'd,
like
more
information,
so
we'd
like
to
separate
it.
They
are
way
ahead
on
the
retirement
residence
from
where
they
are
on
the
other
part
of
the
site.
K
A
I'm
not
going
to
get
staff
to
draft
it
yet
I
want
staff
to
come
in
on
what
the
work
that
they've
done
so
far
on
this.
If,
if,
if
the
thought
about
the
apartment
building
as
opposed
to
the
hotel,
when
mr.
you're,
not
when
the
representatives
who
are
here
come
up
to
speak
and
we
ask
them,
I
mean
the
thing:
is
the
application
fee
for
us
for
a
hotel
and
for
the
retirement?
Okay?
It's
not
print
apartment
building,
so
it's
pretty
easy
to
deal
with
that
you
just
don't
allow
the
apartment.
A
C
A
D
Don't
know
if
there's
urgency
in
approving
this
today,
but
given
this
last
minute
and
there's
some
confusion,
you
know,
can
it
wait
two
weeks
and
come
back
next
meeting?
You
know
I'd
hate
to
have
members.
The
public
I
had
come
back
again,
but
if
it
loads,
you
know
contentious
ongoing
thing
in
the
neighborhood
and
then
an
OMB
uphill.
It
might
be
better
to
just
say
two
weeks,
I.
A
Think
the
problem
is,
is
that
we
just
got
this
motion
this
morning
and
if
we
had
not,
we
would
have
been
dealing
with
the
application
as
it
is,
which
you
have
consulted
on,
but
to
delay
it
by
two
weeks
for
what
you're
not
going
to
go
and
consult
again
because
you'd
be
consulting
on
the
same
thing
at
Westar,
adding
a
new
use,
and
that
would
be
entirely
up
to
the
applicant.
Changing
it
right.
So
I
don't
know
that
that
would
be
under
results
with
one.
But
let's
go
on
with
some
more
of
these.
Yes,
articulate.
C
Check
can
we
just
bring
them
up
and
ask
the
question
and
get
to
the
chaser,
because
I
think
I
hate
to
say
this,
but
I
also
agree
with
counselor,
Dean's
I.
Think
at
the
last
minute
like
this,
then
a
we
may
want
to
hear
from
the
applicant
as
to
what
they
want
to
do
with
their
application
before
we
vote
on
something,
that's
pretty
flexible
right
now.
A
B
B
So
over
the
past
seven
years,
I've
driven
between
12
to
15
to
20
times,
unfortunately
a
week
to
see
my
animals
for
various
illnesses
and
whatever,
during
which
time
I've
almost
been
hit
by,
but
a
weekly
basis,
almost
hit
by
a
bus,
oftentimes
bus,
making
a
turn
a
right-hand
turn
off
of
Downpatrick
when
I'm
making
my
left
turn
at
the
uterine.
That
is
silly
but
making
a
u-turn.
B
You
know
it's
get
hit
by
a
bus
or
you
almost
get
hit
by
cars,
who
don't
don't
come
to
a
complete,
stop
or
jump
the
right,
pedestrian
they're,
also
dangerous
to
walk
at
the
watch
during
during
the
summertime
and
in
during
summer.
Well,
bikes
are
also
difficult
to
see.
So
it's
when
you
make
the
u-turn,
it's
a
very
short
light.
When
you
make
the
u-turn
to
head
back
east
on
Club,
you
end
up
you're
competing
with
all
modes
of
transportation,
foot
bike,
bus
and
car,
and
it
is
dangerous,
so
my
suggestion
would
be.
B
Can
we
make
maybe
staff
or
somebody
make
that
make
the
arrow
attorney
arrow
longer,
give
people
more
opportunity
to
do
it
and
also,
at
the
other
end
bridle-path
when
one
goes
down
when
one
makes
the
u-turn
of
oil
paths,
when
you
go
east,
you
want
to
go
west
on
hyung
club,
you
go
down,
you
make
the
u-turn
just
the
way
the
construction
of
the
we
make
the
u-turn
when
you
want
to
do
the
u-turn.
The
median
from
on
the
north
side
of
hyung
club
with
a
little
the
little
median
is
too
small.
B
So
lanes
are
very
tight.
So
it's
a
very
if
you
have
a
small
car
you're
fine,
but
if
you
have
an
SUV,
it's
difficult.
You
end
up
missing
the
turn
and
especially
no
into
the
snowbank.
So
it's
very
dangerous.
If
one
brings
in
the
apartment
building,
the
traffic
is
going
to
go
through
the
roof
and
I'm,
not
sure
everybody,
like
everybody
else.
B
First
time
here,
but
those
u-turns
are
very
dangerous
and
the
other
issue
that
I
have
is
last
year
was
involved
in
the
environmental
study,
with
the
wide
beam
of
hyung
club
of
the
airport
Parkway,
which
is
going
to
be
2020
2025
2022.
Whatever
going
to
widen
the
airport
carpet,
I
was
involved
in
environmental
study.
They
had
a
study
of
the
intersection
at
hyung
Club
in
the
airport
Parkway,
and
it
was
just
it
went
on
the
west
side
of
the
airport
Parkway.
B
It
stopped
just
far
enough
to
get
the
bike
lanes
because
they're
building
new
bike
paths
along
the
along
the
on
the
left
side
of
the
airport
population,
there's
new
bike
paths,
structure
coming
and
it's
going
to
be
at
grade
so
there's
new.
So
they
have
in
that
area
right
there.
So
my
would
ask:
would
it
be
possible
for
Stata
for
somebody
to
look
at
widening
or
looking
at
the
core
Parkway,
the
feasibility
of
the
environmental
study,
to
widen
it?
B
A
couple
of
hundred
feet
down
to
include
the
new
clarity,
development
and
also
north
also
east,
towards
bridle
path
to
include
those
two
areas?
Because
now,
all
of
a
sudden
we're
introducing
a
lot
more
traffic,
which
wasn't
looked
at
two
years
ago
during
the
environmental
study,
so
my
question
in
the
game
to
whoever
would
be
consumed,
buddy
expand
this
study
by
a
couple
hundred
meters,
east
and
west
to
give
people
a
transportation
people
a
chance
to
look
at
it
and
figure
of
what
it's
going
to
be,
and
only
again
we'll
be
quiet.
B
After
this,
the
the
u-turns
are
the
most
dangerous
part
of
my
drive
to
seemly
in-laws,
my
mother,
one
now
mcfarland
festively,
but
it's
dangerous.
You
get
it.
You
always
like
in
three
or
four
times
a
week.
I'm
almost
in
an
accident
and
I
know
it's
one
of
those
things,
I'm
not
saying
I'm,
not
being
careless,
I'm,
just
being
normal
driver,
and
it
happens
quite
a
bit
and
it's
just
it's
just
dangerous
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
a
smart
way
to
plan
when
they
built
Tong,
Club,
Road
I,
don't
think
they
plan
to
have
every
intersection.
A
B
L
Is
I'm
with
transportation
services
and
that's
something
that
we'll
look
at
as
part
of
the
detailed
design
processes.
This
environmental
assessment
moves
into
the
design
phase,
so
I
can
get
a
further
information
from
you
right
now
outside
the
meeting,
Jordan
I'll
follow
up
with
the
design
team.
Okay,
thank.
H
H
My
name
is
rosemary
Clarke,
my
husband
and
I
purchased
our
home
on
Bartlett
private,
when
Hunt
Club
was
already
a
four-lane
arterial.
Road
I,
too
AM
opposed
to
the
proposed
development
in
its
present
form.
I
have
attempted
meetings
that
have
provided
input
to
the
city
on
this
subject
and
now
wish
to
add
my
own
perspective.
H
Unclogged
Road
has
always
been
busy,
and
traffic
has
increased
significantly
over
its
whole
length.
Since
the
opening
of
the
new
access
point
to
highway
417
at
the
east
end,
the
Penn
Club
Road.
Despite
assurances
that
the
increased
traffic
would
be
limited
to
the
stretch
between
Hawthorn
Road
and
Bank
Street,
this
is
a
given
and
will
only
intensify
as
housing
developments
such
as
Findlay,
Creek
and
Riverside
South
continue
to
increase
in
scope.
Delaying
the
widening
of
the
airport
Parkway.
Yet
again
will
only
compound
the
issue.
Legged
or
not.
H
H
Excuse
me,
but,
as
others
have
already
addressed
and
will
address
the
traffic
issues,
so
I
needn't
go
over
that
ground
again.
What
I
want
to
address
is
the
impact
the
proposed
development
will
have
on
the
individual
households
on
Bartlett
private,
with
respect
to
our
ability
to
be
environmentally
responsible,
our
street.
It
has
mostly
east-west
orientation.
This
means
that
our
routes
face
north
and
south.
Our
living
areas
are
at
the
rear
in
our
houses
and
include
large
areas
of
windows.
H
For
those
of
us
in
the
south
side
of
the
street
are
living
their
space,
huncle
Road
and
the
proposed
development.
We
currently
benefit
from
considerable
solar
gain
from
those
wide
areas
of
windows
and
the
proposed
development
auctioning
moves
up,
I
lost
my
place.
We
currently
can
benefit
from
consider
solar
gain
from
those
south-facing
windows
during
the
coldest
months
of
the
year
here
on
the
45th.
H
Let
me
illustrate
what
I
mean
by
this:
we
live
in
an
urban
area.
Alternative
power
sources
for
households
are
limited.
We
can't
use
windmills
or
heat
pumps,
but
we
can
use
technologies
such
as
solar
panels.
Our
roofs
cover
a
large
area
because
the
houses
are
bungalows
built
in
2004,
which
means
that
many
of
us
will
be
reaching
our
roofs
within
the
next
10
years.
H
This
will
be
the
perfect
opportunity
to
adapt
our
roofs
to
carry
either
solar
panels
or
even
one
of
the
newest
technologies,
solar
tiles,
which
combines
functions
of
solar
panels
and
roof
shingles
into
one
integrated
unit
like
the
panels.
Solar
styles
require
exposure
to
unobstructed
sunlight
to
function
well
in
a
Canadian
winter,
build
an
eight
story.
Buildings
so
close
to
our
homes
will
seriously
impede
this
potential
to
reduce
energy
consumption
and
mitigate
environmental
damage
by
shelling
us
to
20th
century
heating
and
technology,
which
has
proven
to
be
such
a
major
contributor
to
climate
change.
H
This
is
2018,
not
1918.
Unfitted
growth,
whether
in
industrial
infrastructure
and
output
or
spoken
sprawl
or
revenue
by
densification,
can
no
longer
be
considered
desirable.
So
when
a
neutral
tells
in
the
area-
and
none
of
them
exceed
the
height
of
six
stories,
obviously
their
builders
were
satisfied
that
this
was
financially
viable.
There
are
already
many
retirement
homes,
including
at
least
one,
that
is
a
hotel
conversion.
H
One
three,
whose
stated
commitment
is
as
a
carbon
six
one
three
members
City
can
continue
to
demonstrate
its
commitment
to
working
with
stakeholders
and
community
partners
to
reduce
community-wide
GHGs.
Please
don't
rubber
stamp.
This
proposal
either,
refuse
it
or
reduce
the
height
to
six
storeys
and
increase
the
setback
from
Hunt
Club
Road
and
actually
live
up
to
the
city's
commitment
to
the
environment.
K
On
this
whole
issue
of
this
side
in
the
height
and
cuz
I
know
you're
across
the
street.
One
of
my
constituents
said
to
me
the
other
day.
Have
we
taken
into
account
the
topography
of
that
site?
Because,
if
you
imagine
just
looking
at
the
site
now,
the
roof
master
building
is
actually
on
a
hill
on
a
hill
yeah.
So
when
you're
talking
about
setbacks
in
the
site,
are
you
imagining
that
the
new
buildings
are
going
to
be
constructed
on
the
top
of
the
hill
I.
H
A
M
Were
a
couple
of
points
that
have
been
raised,
I'd
like
to
address
the
first
one
would
be
with
respect
to
the
building
height
and
the
possible
motion,
as
we
made
my
councilor
Brockington
I,
just
like
to
walk
you
through
our
approach
to
deciding
whether,
in
our
professional
opinion,
the
building
height,
the
land
use
and
the
density
proposed
would
be
appropriate
for
that
site.
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
looked
at
was
the
surrounding
context.
So
this
is
a
relatively
isolated
site
compared
to
a
lot
of
urban
sites
across
the
street.
M
There's
low
density
residential,
so
it's
separated
by
uncolored
bias,
a
substantial
distance,
then,
to
the
east
side,
you
have
the
airport
Parkway
to
the
South
Sea
of
the
Greenbelt,
where
we
know
there's
going
to
be
no
development
and
on
the
other
side
to
the
west,
there
is
an
institutional
site
which
is
separated
from
any
proposed
development
on
the
Claridge
site
by
surface
parking.
So
with
that
in
mind,
we
thought
that
this
would
be
an
appropriate
area
for
intensification
and
some
additional
building
height.
M
So
this
is
this
is
an
appropriate
site
for
additional
density
and
height
as
compared
to
other
areas
that
would
have
similar
uses
and
zoning
along
Hunt
Club
Road
I'd
also
like
to
highlight
the
fact
that,
just
to
the
northeast
within
the
south
keys,
mixed-use,
Center
you'd
have
building
heights
of
up
to
12
stories.
So
we
thought
that
locating
eight
stories
in
this
location
would
be
an
appropriate
transition,
as
you
move
westward
along
Hunt
Club.
With
respect
to
the
last-minute
motion
for
the
rear
yard
setback.
M
What
we
had
spoken
to
in
our
planning
rationale
was
an
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
to
allow
for
a
mix
of
uses
the
site
plan.
Application
speaks
to
a
retirement
home
on
one
side
and
a
hotel
on
the
other
side.
But
really
what's
before
you
today
was
was
a
request
for
a
mix
of
uses
on
this
site,
and
so
that
would
include
as
well
an
apartment
dwelling.
M
We
see
that
as
an
appropriate
use.
We
also
see
GM
zoning
throughout
the
city,
where
someone
could
go
in
and
develop
a
property
based
on
the
parameters
in
the
zoning
with
a
number
of
different
uses,
so
so
we're
not
entirely
sure
why
an
apartment
rolling
would
not
be
a
permitted
use.
In
this
case,
it
seems
to
be
that
the
traffic
would
be
analyzed
at
the
site
plan
stage.
M
A
Well,
I,
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
questions
but
I'm
sure
they
do,
but
I
just
think
that
the
problem
that
we
have
today
is
this
is
very
last-minute
it's
entirely
last-minute
and
that's
a
surprise.
Maybe
we
all
prepare
to
come
to
the
planning
committee
based
on
the
reports
and
we
don't
allow
and
I'll
tell
you
miss
Devin
mr.
Schmitt,
mr.
Willis
myself,
we
don't
allow
or
by
searching,
don't
allow
reports
component
and
aren't
ready
and
we
don't
think
that
are
fully
ready
to
come
forward.
A
This
one
was
ready
and
what
you
did
really
by
last
minute.
That's
what
that's!
What
the
game-changer
is
here,
so
we
have
before
any
questions
going
I'll.
Just
let
you
know
that
Vice
Chair
Jimmy
has
has
another
motion
to
put
forward
and
please
explain
a
little
Oh
we'll
get
to
mr.
women
have
either
done.
Have
you
seen
this
VIN
Volusia?
Okay?
Can
we
get
a
copy
of
the
motion
to
JC
and
down
her
wire?
Please
you
don't
have
a
copy,
okay,
yeah.
E
D
E
Have
the
three
metre
setback
so
that
is
now
withdrawn,
but
the
new
motion
which
will
ensure
that
gets
circulated
great
now,
I
think,
is
going
to
satisfy
some
of
the
items
that
we've
heard
here
today.
Where's
the
report
recommends
zoning
changes
to
the
lands
known
as
1026
1038,
1040,
1050
and
1054
on
Club
Road,
where
it's
been
deemed
advisable,
make
the
changes
to
the
zoning
provision
to
give
flexible
development
changes
in
the
fly
here
to
the
proposed,
held
hotel
building
being
replaced
by
residential
apartment
instead,
therefore
be
result.
A
Before
we
go
any
further
we're
going
to
all
get
a
copy
about,
when
do
we
see
that
happening?
Two
minutes?
Ok,
so
we're
just
going
to
take
pregnant
pause
or
not
a
pregnant
pause,
we're
going
to
take
a
pause,
we're
going
to
all
get
a
copy
of
that
and
and
also
staff.
Please
make
sure
that
donned
her
wire
has
a
copy
and
Jaycee.
A
C
C
So,
madam
chair,
as
I,
understand
the
motion.
The
holding
provision
would
apply
to
any
residential
use
on
the
property
and
the
condition
of
the
holding
would
require
a
traffic
study
for
the
apartment
use
to
confirm.
There's
no
adverse
impact
on
the
surrounding
world
network,
so
the
holding
provision
would
apply
to
the
potential
of
the
dwelling
apartment,
but
not
to
the
seniors
project
or
the
hotel
use.
C
K
And
what's
just
one
thing,
I
mean
I
think
this
is
good
and
I.
Think
this
address
is
like
the
last-minute
big
switch
on
the
floor
and
makes
sense
anything
and
I'm.
Just
no
100%
sure
about
is
that
the
traffic
study
confirming
no
adverse
impacts
on
the
operation
of
road
network
is
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
manager
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
that's
normal
make.
K
K
A
I
think
you
weren't
here
this
morning
when
we
get
into
this
because
it's
come
up.
This
is
the
third
time
now
that
it
doesn't
get
god-given
rights
to
the
glocal
counselor
that
at
some
point
the
Director
of
Planning,
myself
or
the
general
manager
can
bring
forward
the
planning
committee
with.
If
there's
just
you
know,
undue
delays
that
are
more.
A
D
M
D
L
11
level
of
service
tiger
for
vehicles
in
this
area,
because
it's
so
close
to
the
rapid
transit
station,
would
be
a
level
service
D
and
currently
the
intersections
in
this
area
are
in
the
E
and
F
range.
So
we
would
be
most
concerned
about
safety
issues
and
any
way
to
really
boost
the
sustainable
modes
and
connections
that
way,
so
the
focus
really
should
be
on
the
connections
to
the
rapid
transit
station
and
unsafety
sure.
D
A
We
recommend
we're
not
going
to
rate
worse.
Ok
at
this.
We
already
know
that
the
top
10
worst
intersections,
almost
half
of
the
mid
directly
related
to
bar
Haven
traffic,
and
some
of
them
do
include
one
club,
but
we
have
more
traffic
on
Woodruff
Avenue
committed
by
Haven.
Then
we're
talking
about
at
this
location,
which
is
phenomenal
to
me,
I'm,
shocked
by
it.
A
N
Ok,
thank
you.
I
just
thought,
I'd
review
and
quickly.
First,
the
transportation
documents
that
have
been
prepared
to
date
to
attempt
to
address
these
concerns.
So
initially
there
was
a
transportation
impact
study
prepared
in
May
2017,
and
that
is
a
more
detailed
level
of
study
than
the
community
level
of
study.
N
It
goes
right
down
to
intersection
level,
so
it
has
more
information
than
the
community
study
does
and
following
that
there
was
prepared
in
September
to
address
staff
comments
asking
for
more
detailed
analysis
at
home
club
and
dossier
and
vital
path
which
that
was
provided
following
the
second
public
meeting.
There
was
a
request
regarding
the
standard
industry
rate
trip
generation
rates
that
were
used
in
the
study
for
the
retirement
home,
and
it
was
requested
that
we
actually
survey
the
Windsor
Park
Manor
two
sites
over
to
the
west
to
get
actual
data
to
that.
N
The
industry
standard
rate
which
we
did
and
we
prepared
a
memo
with
the
results
of
that
in
November
and
quickly.
The
findings
were
comparable.
The
industry
rates
were
found
to
be
a
little
bit
low.
In
the
morning,
we
had
estimated
for
the
retirement
home
less
than
ten
vehicle
trips
an
hour.
The
survey
results
when
we
prorate
it
based
on
the
number
of
units
so
that
retirement
homes
135
units
the
proposed
150.
N
N
As
a
result
of
increased
traffic
on
Hill
Club
just
too
quickly,
I
guess
and
summarize
the
findings
of
our
study.
We
did
find
that
the
retirement
and
I
guess
based
on
the
updated
survey
data,
would
contribute
around
30
vehicles
an
hour
in
the
p.m.
peak
and
the
hotel
would
be
in
the
order
of
80
vehicles
an
hour
during
the
same
time.
N
So
a
total
of
110
vehicles
an
hour
and
the
PM
peak
at
full
build-out
of
the
site,
and
that
equates
to
about
two
vehicles
a
minute
or
just
under
and
the
effect
with
respect
to
the
u-turns.
It
would
be
adding
six
to
eight
additional
u-turns
at
does
a
and
bridle-path
which
currently,
the
count
showed
that
there's
about
as
many
people
doing
it
today.
So
it
is
increasing
that
that
would
be
an
additional
vehicle
doing
the
u-turn,
eastbound
new
trim,
every
7
to
10
minutes
and
then
at
McCarthy
and
Dan
Patrick.
N
N
So
currently,
at
dozen
bridle-path
there
are
dual
left
turn
lanes
and
a
fully
protected
trophies,
as
well
as
a
southbound
light
smart
channel.
So
all
of
those
things
currently
provide
for
u-turns
happening
there
today
and
at
McCarthy
and
Dan
Patrick.
We
have
a
single
left
early
with
a
protected
and
permitted
fees.
So
I'm
going
to
ill,
but
I'm
also
allowed
to
go
in
the
green
ball.
If
I
find
a
gap,
that's
acceptable
fully
protected
phases
are
usually
when
you
have
dual
left,
turn
news
or
there's
a
visibility
issue.
There
is
historical
collisions
or
hydrophobic.
F
You,
madam
chair
and
you've,
attended
the
public
sessions
that
councilor,
Dean's
and
I
have
co-host
you've
heard
from
people
who
actually
live
in
the
area.
Work
in
the
area
visit
family
members
in
the
area
that
the
u-turn,
the
reliance
on
u-turns
now
is
not
ideal.
Many
people
think
it's
unsafe
now.
To
begin
with,
we
are
not
disagreeing
with
the
volume
of
traffic
on
Hunt
Club
and
that
many
intersections
are
failures
and
at
peak
times
the
road
just
doesn't
adequately
move
traffic.
F
So
when
we
look
at
your
proposal
in
isolation
of
everything
else,
some
people
might
say
it's
reasonable
right,
but
we
have
to
factor
in
what
the
current
challenges
are
and
what
this
will
do.
Well,
how
will
compound
those
types
of
issues
just
for
everyone's
understanding?
There's
the
proposal
development
there.
If
you
are
exiting
this
site
and
you
want
to
go
westbound,
you
will
need
to
turn
right
pass
the
F
what
purposes
under
the
bridges.
F
You
cannot
do
u-turns
here,
you're
going
to
come
all
the
way
up
here
to
da
say
this
is
da,
say
and
that's
bridle
path.
This
is
the
South
Keyes
mall,
so
you
have
lots
of
cars
turning
right.
So
every
time
I
go
to
the
mall
and
someone
abruptly
stops
to
do
a
u-turn,
there's
a
near
accident
and
as
I'm
leaving
here
to
come
home
I.
F
Take
the
Parkway
home
you're,
looking
due
east
you're,
making
sure
that
there's
no
oncoming
traffic
you're,
not
looking
at
the
guy,
that's
doing
a
u-turn
here,
so
collision
stats
might
be
low,
but
I
can
tell
you
on
a
daily
basis.
There
are
near
misses,
I'm,
coming
from
the
airport
I'm
a
tourist
I'm,
going
to
come
off
I'm
going
to
come
here.
D
F
Go
hey,
there's
my
hotel:
how
do
I
get
in
there
got
it
all
the
way
down
here
to
McCarthy,
and
this
is
Dan
Patrick
and
I'm
going
to
do
a
u-turn
here.
Heavily
use
bus,
stop
here,
lots
of
pedestrians
from
the
south
end
and
again
I'm
going
to
come
all
the
way
back
and
come
in
here.
So
what
I've
looked
at
with
staff
and
Claridge's?
Could
you
do
a
mid
median
block?
F
This
is
the
Windsor
Park
seniors
residence
here
and
you
could
do
you
can't
do
it
here
because
there's
a
left-hand
turning
lane
to
go
northbound
on
the
Parkway,
so
you're?
Not
it
wouldn't
be
wise
to
do
that
here.
But
if
you
did
it
here,
you
could
actually
serve
Windsor
Park,
but
you
could
also
allow
people
to
get
into
that
property
now.
So
that's
something
that's
been
proposed.
Claridge
was
not
interested
in
that
request
and
city
staff
didn't
back
up
the
local
councilors
on
that.
F
So
people
who
live
in
the
community
know
the
issues
here
know
that
this
is
a
safety
issue.
So
there's
some
frustration
there,
so
I
mean
what
is
Claridge
willing
to
do
to
make
this
safer.
There
really
hasn't
been
anything
offered
from
Claridge
there's
no
cyclists,
very
few
cyclists
on
Hunt
Club,
because
you
take
your
life
into
your
hands
and
that's
not
an
exaggeration
cars
go
80
above
80
kilometers
an
hour
Volume
I
I
cannot
in
good
conscience,
recommend
to
my
residents
to
bike
on
on
Hunt
Club
and
you
see
few
pedestrians.
F
Can
you
imagine
senior
citizens
here
trying
to
get
to
the
South
Keyes
malls
about
here,
so
you're
going
to
ask
seniors
to
cross
Hunt
Club
and
then
get
up
there?
There's
a
bit
of
a
pedestrian
pathway.
I
just
cannot
see
that
happening.
I'll
comment
in
a
few
minutes
about
what
staff
and
I
are
working
on
to
improve
safety.
But
what
is
Claridge
Claridge
comes
with
cities,
collision,
stats
and
say
we'll
look
because
of
a
few
collisions.
Therefore,
it's
not
unsafe
and
I'm
saying
it
is
unsafe.
F
People
who
live
in
the
community
who
experience
this
every
day
know
what
those
challenges
are
and
that's
why
the
transportation
issues
with
this
particular
proposal
is
one
of
the
been
the
biggest
sticklers
for
me
and
councillor.
Dean's
can
speak
for
her
residents
as
well,
so
it's
Claridge
willing
to
put
anything
else
on
the
table
at
this
time
to
stond
improving
overall
safety.
N
Is
that
a
question
that
I
can
respond
to
because
I
I
can
thank
you
so,
regarding
the
mid-block
median
break,
&
Klarich
has
advised
us
that
go
ahead
with
it.
If
that's,
what
makes
people
happy?
We
have
advised
them.
Don't
do
it
it's
unsafe.
It
is
more
unsafe
than
doing
it
at
a
signal
at
a
signal.
I
can
make
it
safer.
I
can
give
you
full
protection,
so
you
don't
get
the
chance
to
decide.
Is
that
gap
big
enough
for
me
or
not?
You
can't
go.
N
You
only
go
on
your
face
or
I
can
make
peak
hour
all
day
turn
restrictions
if
residents
are
comfortable
with
that
for
people
turning
right
on
red
out
of
Downpatrick,
so
you
take
the
bus
factor
out
of
it
as
well.
There
are
ways
to
make
it
safer
at
that
signalized
intersection,
then
throwing
it
to
the
wind
and
letting
people
judge
for
themselves
mid
block
with
nothing
to
help
them.
Is
it
safe
to
turn
now
against
that
1500
vehicles
per
hour?
Opposing
me,
I,
don't
think
it's
a
good
idea,
then.
F
I'm
sure,
just
on
that
note,
because
staff
and
I
have
had
a
number
of
discussions
about
a
mid
median
break
when
the
example
I
always
give
is
the
one
on
Riverside
Drive
in
front
of
the
st.
Pat's
home
very
similar
distance
between
Brookfield
and
the
Moonies
Bay
entrance
two
lanes
of
traffic
in
each
way,
similar
Henley
heavy
volumes
heavy
at
rush
hour,
northbound
heavy
going
south
band
in
the
afternoon
in
front
of
the
st.
Pat's
home,
we
have
a
mid
median
break,
no
traffic
light
very
similar
situation
to
what
the
consultants
referring
to.
L
F
We
have
people
running
to
catch
the
bus
where
you
have
cars
to
vary
they're,
both
very
active
intersections
I'm,
not
the
expert
but
I,
know
what
I
see
and
I
know
what
my
residents
tell
me
and
I
can't
see
when
you
have
a
mid
median
break
you're
going
to
have
as
many
variables
at
play
as
at
those
intersections
you're
not
going
to
have
pedestrians
you're
not
going
to
have
cyclists
you're
going
to
wait
until
it's
clear
to
make
that
turn.
People
will
make
that
judgment
to
make
that
that
turn.
F
A
K
And
I
just
want
to
follow
up
with
something
call
and
spoke
about
earlier,
because
I
think
that's
really
important.
I
mean
this
whole
is
she
would
understand
why
the
staff
are
kind
of
moving
toward
agreeing
to
something
on
this
site,
because
you
know
it's
part
of
our
intensification
policies
and
it's
a
significant
site.
The
significant
cross-section
of
up
to
significant
roads
in
the
city
of
Ottawa's,
okay,
I,
can
kind
of
follow
that.
K
So
that
is
a
big
problem
for
me.
You
don't
want
to.
If
the
last
110
doesn't
want
to
get
boozed
more,
but
wait
a
second,
what
about
all
these
residents-
and
we
heard
in
the
two
public
meetings
from
the
residents
that
they're
very
concerned
about
safety-
and
so
am
I
I'm
a
daily
user
of
that
role?
I
counsel,
Bulkington
did
a
really
good
job
of
describing
the
challenges
at
that
intersection.
K
That
does
a
and
that
that
one,
when
the
truck
when
the
cars
are
coming
out
of
the
mall
they're
not
expecting
a
u-turn,
it's
I've
seen
it
firsthand
it's
a
challenging
intersection
at
best
and
I.
You
know
we
were
contemplating
allowing
two
eight
story:
buildings
and
everyone
that's
going
in
the
opposite
direction
to
either
the
right
in
a
whiteout
are
going
to
be
doing.
You
turns
on
hung,
Club
Road,
a
road-
that's
already
failing
at
peak
time,
so
the
question
I
wanted
to
ask
Colin
is
he
said?
K
L
L
K
L
A
A
We
know
that
there's
so
many,
whether
it's
crossing
guards
or
whether,
whatever
the
process
says
in
our
capacity,
we
have
the
ability
to
do
X
amount
of
work
and
we
do
accrue
development
charges
for
projects
in
this
case,
which
is
why
I
asked
councilor
Brockington
to
talk
about
what
measures
that
mr.
Simpson
is
alluding
to
that
he's
going
to
talk
about
that.
He
has
already
started
getting
ready
for
the
next
transportation
master
plan
and
talking
specifically
about
this
area
for
pedestrians,
he
started
that
work.
K
Well,
I'm,
not
necessarily
assuming
it's
diverse
in
the
city,
but
I
am
assuming
that
it
is
bad
enough
that
it
needs
to
be
addressed
in
the
interests
ot
of
the
residents
that
council,
Bulkington
and
I
serve
and
I.
Don't
think
we
should
be
approving
things
that
we
sense
are
unsafe
without
some
sort
of
the
strategy
for
making
them
safer
than
I
think
they
are
today,
which
I
guess
kind
of
things
made
to
the
point.
K
I
understand
this
balance
between
intensification,
infill
development,
good
and
development
that
all
the
other
buildings
in
the
area,
all
the
other
hotels,
and
let
me
tell
you
how
Club
Road
is
hotels
and
retirement
homes,
that's
where
we
got
and
we've
got
plenty
of
them
already,
they're,
all
six
storeys,
so
I,
don't
understand
the
rationale
for
agreeing
to
add
more
when
we
already
have
this
transportation,
if
accan
transportation
challenge.
So
can
somebody
maybe
explain
for
Oliver
why
we
would
go
above
and
beyond
everything
else
in
the
neighborhood.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'll,
start
and
perhaps
column
JC
can
fill
in
any
blanks.
So
certainly
we
bug
earlier
it's
a
Tod
area,
so
that's
on
the
competing
address
in
the
Official
Plan,
so
it's
transit
support.
These
are
the
kind
of
areas
where
we
wants
the
intensification.
The
site
is
also
unique,
as
we
heard
earlier.
If
you
look
at
some
of
the
other
seniors
projects
that
touch
right
on
to
the
backyards
of
homes,
perhaps
an
eight
or
a
nine
story
would
not
be
appropriate.
That
suggests
it
wouldn't
be.
K
C
A
And
with
all
due
respect,
they
are,
you
know
we
have
had
several
applications
for
Bank
Street
in
the
recent
past
and
I'm
talking
to
last
two
months
where
the
height
has
been
the
been
hired
by
two
stories
than
on
Bank
Street
than
what
the
Community
Association
etc
were
anticipating
they
have
the
right
to
make
the
application.
We
have
the
right
to
refuse
it.
K
J
Chair
just
want
to
reiterate
what
Ted
mr.
Hoyer
had
said
that
each
and
every
time
that
we
review
an
application,
we
we
review
it
on
its
specific
merits.
So
in
some
cases
staff
may
support
additional
stories
and
then
there
are
other
cases
that
don't
come
to
planning
committee
when
we
really
don't
support
it.
So
there
are
certain
circumstances
that
that
staff
are
always
reviewing
and
certainly
the
each
and
every
site
is
beaut
under
its
own
merits.
K
So
I
just
wanted
to
ask
about
the
topography
of
the
site,
because
some
residents
have
expressed
concern
about
height
and
when
I
look
at
that
site,
it's
it's
got
quite
a
significant
grade.
Change
on
it.
So
are
these
buildings
going
to
be
built
on
the
top
of
the
hill,
or
is
that
going
to
be
all
graded
out.
C
K
The
residents
that
means,
like
me,
said
his
impression
was
because
of
that
significant
grade.
It
would
actually
probably
look
more
like
ten
stories.
Then
it
would
eight
because
it's
going
to
sit
where
up
on
a
hill
and
I
would
think
the
kinds
of
Parkinson's
residents
that
might
even
be
more
of
a
concern.
We'd.
C
K
And
just
one
last
thing,
and
that
is
counsel
Brockington
I
have
one
little
difference
of
opinion
on
this,
and
that
is
that
mid
block
access
that
he
suggested
I
I
just
can't
see
how
that
would
be
safe
or
not.
That
I
think
that
this
is
so
that
always
being
proposed,
but
I
just
don't
know
that
a
mid
block
you
turn
with
with
cars
coming
as
fast
as
they
do
and
huncle
would
actually
be
safer.
That's
Thank.
F
You,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
to
members
of
the
committee
for
your
interest
on
this
matter
to
staff
and
the
residents
of
the
community
of
come
here
today.
Just
a
few
comments
before
we
vote.
First
of
all,
the
good
news
staff
will
be
undertaking
ape
a
pedestrian
safety
study
of
this
particular
intersection
that
hum
Club
in
the
Parkway.
F
They
will
review
data
analysis
of
volumes,
collision,
history,
speeds,
they'll,
do
a
site
visit
and
we'll
be
making
some
recommendations,
so
that
is
part
of
the
pedestrian
and
cycling
safety
initiative,
and
that
I
think
is
good
news
for
the
immediate
community.
Some
concerns
about
noise
were
raised
about
many
before
today's
meeting
and
we
heard
from
some
delegations
about
noise
again
a
commitment
from
mr.
Simpson
that
he
will
work
with
me
in
the
community
to
do
an
updated.
F
He
called
an
investigation,
but
at
least
a
review
of
current
noise
levels
to
make
sure
that
any
negation
in
place
now
is
sufficient.
So
I
appreciate
that
commitment
from
from
Colin
I'm
Madame
Chen
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
issues
I
raised
with
the
consultant
work
Laird.
Certainly
my
main
concern
from
the
beginning
was
traffic.
F
In
and
out,
and-
and
certainly
it's
been
said
many
times
about
many
of
the
challenges
that
we
have
on
Club
Road
now
people
refer
to
the
street
in
many
cases
at
the
Hunt
Club
Parkway,
and
you
know
my
vision
or
thoughts
of
a
Parkway
as
a
scenic
route.
It's
quick
to
get
from
point
A
to
point
B
and
there
are
few
interchanges
intersecting
that
road.
That's
certainly
not
the
case
of
hung.
Club
anymore
I've
lived
in
this
neighborhood.
F
My
whole
life
born
and
raised
in
Ottawa,
just
like
the
airport,
Parkway
I,
would
go
to
the
airport
Parkway
bridge
at
Lockley
biking
with
my
dad
we'd
stop
for
break
I
could
count
one
car
wait
a
few
minutes
another
car.
Now
it's
a
major
north-south
arterial
road,
certainly
not
a
a
Parkway,
that's
just
a
name
and
not
an
actual
designation
with
the
opening
of
the
access
at
the
417
in
the
East.
When
we've
seen
the
the
developments
along
hung
Club
over
the
years,
the
commercial
developments
around
Merivale.
F
It
has
slowed
and
clogged
this
major,
east-west
artery
in
the
city
and
people,
and
my
word
keeps
saying
councillor.
How
are
you
going
to
fix
the
problem?
How
are
you
going
to
fix
the
hyung
Club
Bridge
congestion,
the
congestion
on
hum
Club,
which
starts
about
2:00
in
the
afternoon
2:15
in
the
afternoon?
Now
people
going
westbound
in
the
ward,
and
certainly
it
is
a
concern,
but
safety
is
a
number-one
concern
for
us.
I.
Think
the
request
by
the
community
to
lower
the
height
to
six
is
reasonable.
F
You've
heard
from
councillor
Dean's
that
other
building
is
in
the
area
about
six
storeys
and
when
you
factor
a
lot
of
the
safety
issues
that
we
have,
that
is
reasonable.
You're
not
having
a
strong
number
of
residents
come
out.
That
says,
don't
support
this
at
all,
don't
build
it.
They
many
people
have
said
publicly.
They
support
a
reasonable
development
at
this
site
that
they
could
accommodate
and
could
welcome
something
into
the
neighborhood,
but
to
eight
story.
F
Buildings
is
not
something
that
the
community
has
embraced
and
that's
why
you
see
a
motion
here,
a
reasonable
motion
to
cap
the
heights
at
6:00,
which
again
is
consistent
with
what
we
see
in
the
in
the
immediate
community.
There
are
other
things:
I
will
work
with
staff
with
a
site
plan
trees.
Madam
chair
oldest
comment
publicly
has
been
a
major
issue
as
well.
There
has
been
a
greater
commitment
by
Claridge
to
retain
more
trees
on
site
and
certainly
with
the
site
plan
with
staff
to
ensure
that
they
follow
through.
F
On
that
commitment,
I
promised
a
colleague,
I,
wouldn't
answer
a
question,
but
just
one
question
of
clarification.
It's
been
noted
in
the
staff
report
that
we
could
make
some
changes
to
the
traffic
light
patterns
at
McCarthy,
Downpatrick
and
Hunt
Club
that
if
people
are
going
to
do
u-turns
on
the
western
side,
we
can
maybe
put
a
right-hand
turn
restriction
on
red
to
improve.
Overall
safety
are
those
types
of
changes,
basically
more
or
less
cost
neutral
or
very
low
cost,
and
who
would
be
responsible
with
it
was
a
cost.
L
F
So
if
this
goes
through,
I
do
believe
that
would
make
that
intersection
safer
if
this
proceeds
and
I
will
be
following
through
with
staff
on
that
matter.
So,
madam
chair,
I
I,
am
putting
my
motion
on
the
floor
about
the
height
reduction
to
six
storeys
that
was
introduced
when
we
first
debated
this.
So
I
would
like
the
committee
to
make
a
decision
on
that
and
I
appreciate
again
the
debate
and
discussion
that
we've
had
on
this
item.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
A
C
E
Therefore,
be
resolved
that
document
three
details
of
the
recommended
zoning
of
the
report
be
amended
to
add
the
following
Texas
section
to
see
that
the
holding
provision
be
added
to
the
zoning
permitting
a
hotel,
but
restricting
the
residential
use
for
the
proposed
apartment
area
to
be
lifted.
Subject
to
the
acceptance
of
a
traffic
study
for
the
apartment.
A
F
They're
all
therefore
clauses
be
resolved
at
document
three
details
of
recommended
zoning
be
amended
to
reduce
the
recommended
maximum
permitted
height
from
26
meters
to
20
such
that
both
buildings
cannot
exceed
six
stories
for
the
resolve
that
any
further
details
and
document
three
be
revised
to
implement
the
recommended
six
story,
development
and
be
for
the
result
that
there
be
no
further
notice.
Pursuant
to
subsection
34
17
of
the
Planning
Act.
A
It's
a
maze:
cancer
brain
cancer,
Brockington,
yes,
cozy
rally,
yes,
counselor
food
chain,
counselor
bring
cancer
leap
in
counselor,
miss
bond;
no
coaster,
Kadri,
no
vice-chair
Channing,
no
myself.
No,
that
is
eight
to
two
okay.
So
on
the
report
is
amended:
okay,
dissent
by
noted
by
councillor
Brockington,
okay,
thank
you
thanks
everybody
for
coming.
This
is
going
to
be
going
forward
to
council
mix
next
week
week
after
next
week
next
week.
That's
it!
Next
week,
next
week,
Wow.
A
C
E
And
that's
the
day
of
work
available
soon
from
here.
All
right
therefore
be
resolved.
They
council
approved
the
comments,
approved
the
comments
to
the
Ontario
Ministry
Municipal,
Affairs
and
housing
on
its
proposed
regulations
and
inclusionary
zoning
as
described
below,
and
further
detailed
and
staff
technical
submission
set
out
in
Appendix
A
of
this
motion
a
that.
E
The
regulation
include
a
companion
inclusion
area,
zoning
regulation
addressing
rental
housing
B
that
the
province
of
Ontario
recognises
the
current
municipal
investments
and
incentives
for
fordable
housing
and
reconsider
the
requirements
for
municipalities
to
offset
the
40%
of
the
cost
through
the
specific
incentives,
as
it
would
impede.
The
crude
programs.
E
Municipalities
are
offering
see
that
the
province
of
Ontario
provide
the
funding
to
municipalities,
employees
to
offset
the
cost
of
implementing
the
regulations,
indeed,
that
the
munis
and
municipal
decision-making
be
permitted
and
key
provisions
such
as
unit
set-aside
rates,
offset
replacement
restrictions
and
the
equity
sharing
models
and
be
a
further
result
that
council
direct
the
city
clerk
and
the
solicitor
Ford
a
letter
to
the
Ontario
Ministry
of
municipal
affairs
in
housing.
With
a
copy
of
this
motion
and
the
staff
tactical
submissions
attached
as
Appendix
A.