►
Description
Updates from Regen Registry, Science, & Foundation teams.
(Beginning of call not recorded.)
B
I
ask
you
a
clarifying
question
is:
is
this?
Is
this
for
the
first
issuance
of
the
era
Jaguar
credit,
or
is
this
for
the
ongoing
implementation
of
it?
I
wasn't
sure
if
how
you
phrased
it
at
the
beginning,
if
this
was
for
it
to
be
continued
to
be
used,
or
is
this
like
the
process
of
public
comment
for
the
methodology
to
be
implemented
from.
A
The
right
concept
yeah
for
the
methodology
to
be
accepted
into
region
registry
and
then
projects
to
be
run
off
of
it
through
the
region
registry,
good
question
yeah,
and
on
that
note
there,
during
one
of
the
last
environmental
stewardship,
calls
joao
from
era
Brazil
joined
and
did
a
really
fantastic
job
sharing
about
the
methodology,
and
so
you
can
find
in
the
Hilo
page.
You
can
find
a
link
to
that
recording
and-
and
he
did
some
just
great
screen-
sharing
of
a
slide
deck
that
helps
break
it
down.
A
Even
more
I,
highly
recommend
recommend
that
yeah
and
the
other
kind
of
update
and
forthcoming
public
comment
is
from
roots
and
if
Giselle
is
on,
it'd
be
great
to
have
her
share
some
context
around
that
and
that's
Landing
this
week,
and
that
is
a
protocol
for
regenerative
grazing
and
those
projects
will
be
coming
out
of
out
of
South
America
and
that
that
credit
class
will
be
also
in
the
public
comment
space
for
for
public
comments
to
be
submitted.
So
right
here,
Roots
credit
class
for
soil
carbon
sequestration.
A
A
So
we're
really
excited
to
to
have
this
land
working
through
a
lot
of
the
process.
Steps
right
now
around
it,
and
one
of
them
is
having
the
credit
class
go
through
public
comment.
So
the
engagement
is
similarly
to
what
I
shared
and
what
Tika
shared.
Where
you
can
get
on
here
to
review
the
credit
class
itself
and
submit
public
comments
that
they
are
will
be
responding
to,
and
then
the
Hilo
group
will
be
formed
to
be
able
to
have
a
discussion
around
that
as
well.
B
C
C
That
it's
going
to
be
applicable
to
come
in
quite
early
in
August,
but
we'll
just
have
to
wait
and
see
it's
really
we're
kind
of
at
the
mercy
of
of
the
reviewers.
At
this
point
and
then
there's
another.
That's
in
that
realm
courageous
lands.
They
went
through
the
first
round
of
review
of
expert
review
and
they're
just
now
in
the
process
of
starting
to
respond
to
those
comments.
C
A
B
B
Like
governance,
I
should
really
say
protocol
politics
and
origination
with
the
endowment
pool
and
how
should
that
be
supplemented
or
developed
or
like
what
is
the
Strategic
set
of
actions,
so
the
protocol
we
could
generally
refer
to
as
like
Community
stake
and
ownership,
some
more
conventional
part
of
the
Cs
style
and
also
related
to
token
economics.
Working
group,
which
we'll
say
a
little
bit
about
and
origination,
is
more
like
building
the
community
and
the
substrate
through
which
good
high
integrity
methodologies
can
emerge.
B
So
for
the
context
of
why
you
care
about
the
protocol
is
like
the
foundation
is
one
of
the
largest
token
holders
with
the
endowment
we
care
about
the
token
Health
very
actively
and
we'll
say
more
about
that.
We
also
are
in
discussion
around
sort
of
what
could
be
understood
as
a
region,
Network
Constitution,
which
is
a
long
project
to
Think
Through
in
collaboration
with
region,
Network
development
in
the
larger
ecosystem.
What
groups
govern
what
parts
of
this
network
is?
B
Currently
it's
pretty
much
everyone
voting
on
everything
now,
but
is
there
a
more
granular
and
specific
set
of
expertise
to
governance
proposals
and
things
like
that
that
we
can
develop
over
time
and
the
origination
side
is
sort
of
in
supplement
to
the
social
capacity
building,
which
I
think
has
been
really
the
core
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
of
the
foundation's
work?
How
can
we
support
science
methodology,
development
and
project
development?
And
what
do
we
really
mean
when
we
say
high
integrity
credits?
B
B
E
Jump
in
and
we've
shared
about
this
in
a
few
places,
but
in
case
anyone
missed
it.
Here's
the
the
link
again,
there's
this
collaborative
Finance
Gathering.
That
had
happened
in
Austria
a
few
weeks
ago,
and
it
was
really
the
intersection
of
alternative
economics,
thinkers
who
are
working
on
Mutual,
Credit
and
mesh
credit
and
credit
clearing
and
then
crypto
folks
and
there's.
B
E
You
so
there
have
been
this
RFP
back
in
the
fall
and
request
for
proposals
related
to
token
economics,
and
we
hadn't
gotten
any
proposals
that
fully
addressed
what
we
are
looking
for,
and
so
the
the
kind
of
latest
iteration
is
there's
this
working
group
that's
forming
and
so
far
there's
someone
named
Max
who
has
been
starting
to
formulate
it
I
just
shared
a
link
here
in
the
chat
that
he's
he's
developed.
So
certainly,
if
you're
interested
in
being
involved,
you
can
reach
out
there
I
I.
E
Think
the
next
step
at
this
point
is
finding
some
co-fundors
for
the
work
due
to
this
being
a
an
effort
in
the
spirit
of
decentralization.
Neither
regen,
Network
development
or
the
foundation
should
be
majority
funders
of
the
project,
but
we
can
both
be
minority
funders,
and
so
that's
one
of
the
the
pieces.
That's
that's
moving
right
now
is
thinking
about
who,
who
else
might
be
a
co-fundor
and
certainly
will
need
other
working
group
members
yeah?
Maybe
that's
all
I'll
say
about
that
for
now,.
E
E
F
There
is
a
case
to
be
made
here,
that
ecological
State
protocols
or
like
natural
assets
should
be
part
of
a
regular
economy.
Kofi,
basically
what
it
says.
It
talks
a
lot
about
debt
clearing
and
if
we
could
include
the
debt
we
owe
to
our
natural
ecosystems
within
a
regular
economy,
then
probably
we
don't
even
need
markets
in
the
near
future
when
I
see
near
future,
it's
like
10,
15
years
down
the
line
but
yeah
and
with
the
our
rights
of
nature,
stack
that
is
being
built
by
Austin.
F
The
legal
stack
which
basically
allows
it
ecological
systems
to
have
bank
accounts
and
legal
status
in
the
whole
system.
Imagine
we
could
integrate
them
into
the
debt
clearing
system
and
the
communities
could
directly
be
supported
through
that
for
the
work
that
they
do
and
the
people
that
extract
from
it
have
to
be
a
debt
to
the
ecosystems
that
they
take
from,
and
that
could
be
a
cool
way
to
think
about
a
system
in
the
future.
F
I
can
share
a
little
bit
here.
The
CSR
Community
has
been
like
more
and
more
active
on
high
low
and
we
have
been
having
key
discussion
and
they
have
been
acting
as
advisors
for
the
development
of
the
region,
Commons
protocol
and
the
next
cycle
of
the
cohort
that
we're
going
to
run
pretty
soon,
I
think
at
the
moment,
the
Hilo
group
of
the
region,
Foundation,
is
very
closed
and
limited
to
people
that
are
actually
actively
involved,
I.
Think
from
the
registry
side,
it's
just
Becca.
F
That
is
a
part
of
the
group,
and
we
did
that
because
the
two
basically
encourage
the
CSR
communities
to
feel
confident
about
taking
part
in
the
discussions
and
we
feel
like
once.
We
are
at
a
point
to
open
that.
Up
to
you
know
the
larger
community
and
sort
of
get
more
comments
in
there.
I
think
we
will
incrementally
be
doing
that
as
we
grow.
One
of
the
big
things
that
we
are
all
working
on
is
a
code
of
conduct
which
is
in
its
draft
form.
F
B
What
kind
of
cultures
supported
in
conversation,
constructive
disagreement
and
also
like
a
backstop
against
harassment
or
discrimination
according
to
any
basically
any
set
of
criteria,
so
that
the
thought
might
be
that
the
code
of
conduct
and
developing
that,
at
least
within
the
Cs
Tower
region?
Foundation
space
is
a
good
pilot
scenario
for
the
community
to
bring
a
governance
proposal
forward.
All
the
way
up
to
Commonwealth,
rather
than
the
more
informal
kind
of
decisions
and
discussion
that
happened
in
Hilo
telegram
or
the
Discord
and
I.
B
Think
that
would
be
should
be
something
that
I
hope.
The
larger
ecosystem
has
on
their
radar.
As
it's
a
quite
legible,
like
the
the
crate,
the
content
of
the
proposal
and
what
it
means
is
quite
accessible
and
it's
an
experiment
in
making
sure
that
governance
is
tracking
in
many
different
sort
of
domains
of
our
larger
project.
So
yeah,
hopefully,
there's
a
governance
proposal
within
the
next
couple
of
within
the
next
month,
or
so
about
that
for
its
adoption
and
I.
B
I
really
welcome
everyone's
participation
in
that
to
sort
of
follow,
through
with
the
intended
aim
of
region,
Network
to
really
bring
the
voice
of
land
stewards
into
this
larger
economics
or
crypto
economic
space
yeah,
and
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
active
discussion
also
on
the
high
low
about
the
size
of
the
next
cohort
of
the
community
stake
in
Dao.
The
landscape
within
which
we
work
is
changing
all
the
time.
So
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
make
a
big
cohort
towards
that
responds
to
the
present
tense.
B
But
maybe
more
many
more
smaller
cohorts
is
a
more
agile
and
adaptive
model
and
that's
being
actively
discussed.
So
it's
cool
to
see
the
community
stake
in
Dao,
basically,
the
first
cohort
of
it
really
architecting.
What
the
subsequent
cohorts
would
look
like,
so
that's
just
a
pin
in
there
and
you
can
step
forward.
B
B
You
know,
I
I
think
it
could
be
interesting
to
understand
that
there's
different
Community
agreements
for
different
arms
of
the
larger
organ-
they
don't
have
to
be
the
same
thing
I
think
it's
interesting
if
they
actually
are
tailored
better
towards
the
particular
audiences
and
and
context
within
which
different
members
of
the
overall
Network
work.
So
I,
don't
assume
that
this
should
be
applicable
to
all
of
region
network,
but
if
it
prompts
discussion
as
to
why
it
is
or
isn't
good.
B
For
that,
then
I
think
it's
successful
like
it's
something
to
react
to,
and
so
yeah
I
think
as
an
organization.
That's
particularly
oriented
around
high
integrity
relation
between
people
in
the
environment,
right
relations,
so
to
speak,
that
this
kind
of
entity
is
relevant
to
us,
not
just
so
that
we
can
like
have
clear
boundaries
around
how
we
interact
with
people
online,
which
you
know
can
be
intense
or
toxic
in
some
ways.
G
Yeah
I
totally
understand
that
and
I
would
put
in
a
vote
for
this
to
be
more
protocol
wide.
Just
in
the
sense
that,
like
it's
really
needed
work,
and
it
is,
you
know,
I
think
when
these
things
come
up,
it
does
affect
the
whole
protocol
and
so
yeah.
Maybe
that's
a
discussion
that
we
can
take
offline,
but
I
really
appreciate
the
work
being
done
there.
B
Brad,
maybe
that
would
be
a
great
thing
to
add
on
Commonwealth
when
it
goes
up
to
be
like.
Oh,
should
this
be
protocol?
Why
not
I
will
obviously
precisely
what
it's
there
for
cool,
so
this
is
sort
of
a
high
level,
some
reflection
of
some
of
an
ongoing
conversation
with
the
registry
and
the
foundation,
that's
in
their
really
early
stages,
but
I.
B
B
This
is
an
early
part
in
the
conversation,
I'm
really
enthusiastic
about
that
and
how
to
structure,
funding
and
allocating
resources
to
this.
This
is
something
we
can
discuss
so
I
wanted
to
put
that
out
into
the
larger
space.
To
ask
like
what
types
of
members
of
the
scientific
Community
should
be
prioritized.
What
are
your
opinions
about
this?
You
can
step
to
the
next
slide.
Becca.
B
How
is
it
beyond
beyond
like
scientific
rigor,
which
is
obviously
incredibly
important-
the
sort
of
notion
of
community
identity,
The
Narrative
and
the
context-specific
aspects
of
the
credit,
the
sort
of
fungible
and
non-fungible
dimensions
that
make
regen
what
we
are,
and
not
just
purely
an
abstraction
or
purely
a
one-dimensional
carbon
tunnel
vision
project
I
would
argue
that
you
know
this
social
and
the
scientific
rigor
are
coming
together
to
produce
what
we
would
consider
to
be
high
integrity.
So
how
can
we
do
that
and
I'm
curious?
This
is
an
open
question.
B
This
is
an
open
invitation
as
region
Network.
You
know
as
well
as
I.
Have
you
all's
ear
to
invite
reflection
on
that,
because
I
think,
as
regen
really
develops
a
name
for
itself
along
the
trajectory
it's
already
on
of
high
integrity,
credit
origination,
that
the
foundation
has
a
sort
of
pivotal
role,
an
important
role
to
play
in
this,
so
I
invite
that
and
I'll
I'll
close.
B
So,
if
you're
interested
in
the
relationship
of
like
non-human
legal
standing,
legal
personhood
and
how
it
interfaces
with
Regina,
what
what
region
does
definitely
reach
out,
it's
it's
going
to
have
a
lot
more
air
time
in
a
subsequent
session,
but
I'm
just
going
to
point
at
that
just
to
keep
the
iron
hot
yeah,
that's
it
for
what
we've
got
thanks
for
thanks
for
hanging
out
and
listening.
If
you
have
any
questions,
now
is
a
good
time
or
you
can
always
DM
us.
A
Yeah
I
mean
now.
This
is
great
time
and
I
think
those
are
some
really
great
questions
to
to
ask
to
the
group
both
around
on
the
previous
slide
around
the
kind
of
scientific
Community
to
incubate
methodologies
and
who
should
be
prioritizing
in
these
questions
around
who
would
be
involved
in
kind
of
the
out
of
house
work.
A
B
A
So
if
we
have
like
you
know
those
that
are
like
kind
of
practicing
scientists
out
in
the
field
versus
those
that
are
just
maybe
more
actively
publishing
bringing
all
of
that
all
of
those
different
Lanes
to
bear
on
on
these
kind
of
gaps.
Around
methodologies,
I
think
is-
is
really
powerful
when
I
think
about
our
our
experience.
So
far
with
with
methodologies
and
with
the
blockers
and
barriers
are
particularly
with
communities
that
don't
historically
have
access
to.
B
Oh
wait:
maybe
if
I
can
just
chime
in
to
like
help,
give
context
and
yeah
consider
this
a
question:
that's
going
to
keep
coming
back
around
and
I
I
think
there's
a
lot
there
and
it's
a
big
one.
So
I
understand
that,
like
it
really
merits
time
and
space,
you
know
within
a
particular
rigor
of
buyer
region
and
and
ecosystem
type
and
particular
ecosystem
service
and
or
set
of
services
and
benefits,
and
the
best
practices
and
management
practices
related
to
that
there's.
B
A
lot
of
really
high
level
specificity
in
order
to
make
something
high
integrity
and
that's
difficult,
you
know
in
expertise-
is
absolutely
required
in
order
to
produce
something
of
that
caliber
in.
In
what
way
can
there
like?
Can
this
broader
Community
Support
getting
something
so
that
doesn't
have
to
have
exact
like
domain
specific
knowledge
per
se,
but
getting
it
in
the
ballpark
so
that
it's
not
off
I?
B
Think
that
there's
a
way
with
which
it
can
be
like
primed
and
prepared
to
enter
into
sort
of
internal
review
processes
and
not
be
and
be
pretty
close
and
the
question?
Might
the
question
invites
itself
a
bound
if
this
happens
over
and
over
again?
How
is
there,
how
do
we
build
upon
a
kind
of
taxonomy
of
of
practices
so
that
people
aren't
Reinventing
the
wheel
not
to
say
that
they
are?
B
But
what
is
the
rule
of
foundation's
role
in
supporting
that
process?
I
think
that's
a
really
important
and
Urgent
conversation
to
discuss
and
it's
happening
pretty
actively
in
the
registry
calls
with
the
foundation
so
I
wanted
to
socialize
it
within
the
larger
Network
I
see.
Ed.
Has
this
hand
raise
so
I'll
give
Ed
the
mic,
but
thanks
for
thanks
for
taking
the
time
to
to
show
up
and
listen,
everybody.
D
A
Thanks
Ed
I
feel
like
you're,
your
pulse
on
region.
Ag
is
always
welcome
and,
and
it's
a
good
example
of
that
space,
where
you
have
everything
from
I,
don't
know:
avant-garde
practices
like
lots
of
different
flavors
of
of
how
region
how
is
being
applied
in
different
places
and
and
at
the
same
time
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
it
because
of
of
soil,
carbon
and
all
the
while
there's
just
kind
of
grasping
for
economic
opportunities
and
a
need
to
support
regenerative
work.
A
You
know
creating
carbon
projects,
things
like
that,
so
how
how
between
the
registry
work,
you
know
our
work
to
try
to
make
accessible
processes
and
and
have
the
ability
to
create
your
own
sit
next
to
the
foundation
work
to
to
incubate
and
and
like
prioritize
the
the
pushing
the
boundaries
I
feel
like
it's.
It's
really
important
to
hold
it
off.
A
H
C
H
C
A
Think
that's
a
I
think
it's
a
good
point
like
the.
What
is
the
the
full
life
cycle
of
all
of
these
different
types
of
credit?
Look
like
from
these
early
moments,
where
you
know
someone's
working
with
Regent
foundation-
and
you
know
touching
on
registry
and
registry
processes
and
then
actually
going
to
govern
and
and
use
our
functionality
and
our
in
our
interfaces.
Yeah
I
mean
it
really
touches
on
the
full
circle
of
what
we're
trying
to
achieve.
It's
a
good,
a
good
reflection.