►
From YouTube: Community Call Product & Protocol July 11, 2023
Description
Updates from Regen Network regarding recent governance initiatives, product updates, as well as a demo from Cosmos partner, Pulse.
A
A
So
with
that
upcoming
events,
Community
meets,
as
always,
we've
got
the
we're
generating
NewsHour
is
going
to
be
next
week
on
Thursday
and
then
normal
schedule.
Two
weeks
from
today
is
the
next
registry
of
Science
and
Foundation.
Community.
Call
that
same
day
is
going
to
be
the
environmental
stewardship
community
meeting
just
an
hour
earlier
in
the
morning
and
then
yeah
and
then
we've
got
the
original
news
either
the
next
week
and
then
four
weeks
from
today
will
be
the
next
product
in
protocol.
Community
call
so
yeah
with
that.
B
Hey
everyone
good
morning,
Christian
Foreman,
sir,
and
in
my
case
it's
now
the
evening
I'm,
actually
in
Lisbon.
Now
on
my
way
to
the
event
completely
yeah
I'm,
taking
the
the
trip
to
all
of
the
the
blockchain
tourist
events
right
now
in
Lisbon,
in
order
to
connect
with
some
folks
from
reply,
Dell
and
some
local
refi
communities
here
in
Portugal
and
then
I
will
be
heading
to
Paris.
B
You
can
find
me
first
at
finding
the
Commons
in
Chief,
I,
Summit,
free,
HCC
you'll,
be
able
to
find
me
around
HCC
in
general.
I
will
be
at
an
event
for
women
in
the
cosmos
called
Cosmos
on
the
vine.
If
anyone
is
a
woman
in
the
Cosmetics
ecosystem
and
would
like
an
invite,
please
hit
me
up
so
I
can
get
you
on
the
list
and
I
will
be
presenting
a
few
different
things
at
osmocon
and
nebular
at
osmocon,
I've
been
working
as
a
team
lead
for
the
cosmos.
B
Nebular
Summit
is
probably
the
second
or
third
largest
Cosmos
ecosystem,
technical
events
that
happens
every
year
at
sort
of
Cosmos
and
nebular,
and
a
few
other
events
like
Adam
Berlin,
which
is
happening
this
week.
So
I
will
be
all
around
Paris
at
lots
of
different
free
five
events
and
lots
of
different
Cosmos
events
and
lots
of
different
climate
impact
events
and
women
in
blockchain
events.
So
if
you
or
your
communities
will
be
in
Paris,
please
let
me
know
I
know
Siri
or
Community
manager
is
also
coming
to
Paris.
B
So
if
anyone
has
any
questions
or
would
like
to
get
involved
with
any
these
events,
if
you
are
a
woman
in
Paris
and
you
want
to
come
to
osmocon
I
have
a
code
that
I
can
give
to
all
the
women
to
basically
come
for
free
and
I
have
a
number
of
other
ways
to
get
community
members
involved
that
are
in
Paris.
So
hit
me
up.
A
C
I
can
take
this,
so
hey
guys.
So
if
some
of
you
didn't
already
know
our
ecosystem
team
has
created
a
new
LinkedIn
based
newsletter
called
the
Regeneration
Insider.
So
as
a
regen
Insider,
you
get
exclusive
access
to
articles
that
we've
written
on
both
the
basics
of
the
carbon
Market,
as
well
as
some
of
the
Innovation
happening
in
the
industry,
and
some
recent
articles
that
we've
shared,
like
the
one
pictured
here,
explores
going
Beyond
carbon
with
biodiversity
credits.
C
We
also
just
launched
a
new
five-part
series
today
on
urban
forestry
that
you
can
check
out
as
well
as
of
this
as
of
this
morning
and
yeah
as
a
regeneration
Insider.
You
also
get
early
access
to
new
carbon
and
biodiversity
credits
as
they
become
available
on
region
Marketplace,
as
well
as
free
white
glove
service
from
our
team
to
help
you
make
the
right
offsetting
choice
based
on
your
needs,
so
yeah.
C
If
you
want
to
sign
up,
you
can
go
to
our
LinkedIn
page
and
if
you
just
scroll
down
a
little
bit,
you'll
see
our
newsletter
section
and
you
can
just
hit
subscribe
and
if
you
want
to
just
get
it
straight
to
your
inbox,
I
can
plug
that
URL
into
the
chat
and
you
can
do
it
old
school,
but
a
lot
of
people
are
really
responding
to
the
LinkedIn
newsletter.
I
know
a
lot
of
people's
inboxes
are
just
really
crowded
these
days.
So
we've
just
been.
A
D
Be
me:
okay,
hi
greetings
everyone.
This
is
Dave
Fortson,
I'm,
CEO
of
Love
Labs
long
time,
deep
partner,
regen
Network
development
and
the
region,
Network
Community,
also
validator.
So
today,
I've
got
my
validator
rollout,
validator
hat
on
so
low
Labs
validator
is
pretty
deep
into
across
the
cosmos
ecosystem
and
the
chains
that
we
validate
for
digging
deeper
into
kind
of
the
best
practices
and
optimizing
community-led:
government
governance,
public
governance
of
blockchains,
improved
State
Networks
and
our
Proving
Ground,
and
a
lot
of
the
kind
of
where
we're
sourcing.
D
We're
taking
a
little
bit
of
what
we're
learning
out
in
the
in
other
models
that
other
chains
are
doing,
we're,
obviously
taking
what
we're
learning
here
in
regen
and
at
least
in
this
discussion,
continuing
to
try
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to
bring
a
little
bit
more
standardization
to
regen
Network
governance,
as
as
governance
becomes
more
important.
Frankly
right
now,
anyone
with
a
deposit
can
put
up
anything
that
they
want
the
community
vote
on
in
some
ways.
D
Some
people
love
that
the
kind
of
freewheeling
wild
west
nature
of
that,
but
also
can
create
stability
issues
other
just
kind
of
General
crypto
fud
issues.
Where,
without
a
steady
approach
to
governance,
you
can
create
uncertainty
around
the
stability
of
something
that,
in
this
case,
is
going
to
be
a
globally
governed
public
ecological
ledger.
So
we're
trying
to
bring
some
more
professionalism
and
standardization
to
that.
So
we
have
a
commonwealth
post
up.
I'm
gonna
actually
put
it
here
in
the
chat.
D
If
you
want
to
jump
in,
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
comments,
but
this
this
post
is
the
summary
of
a
last
round
of
community
feedback
that
we
got
where
we
came
up
with
kind
of
two
main
parts.
One
is
like
a
standardization
of
like
a
governance,
template
basically
to
bring
something
on
chain,
including
the
socialization
in
the
community.
D
How
we
outline
data
make
sure
we
have
all
the
data
there
that
will
allow
token
holders
to
adequately
evaluate
and
then
Express
their
opinion
on
a
governance
proposal
and
then
part
two
really
deals
with
some
of
the
kind
of
conversations
we've
seen
internally.
Around
Community
spends
primary.
You
know
with
the
kind
of
big
one
being
you
know.
How
do
we
provide
accountability?
How
do
we
create
a
mechanism?
D
So
all
of
the
funds
just
aren't
released
right
out
of
the
gates
for
for
an
approved
proposal,
but
they
are
released
in
tranches
based
on
Milestones
met.
So
we're
hoping
that-
and
we
just
came
up
with
some
like
draft
stand
in
like
titles
and
language,
for
that
we're
hoping
for
people
to
take
a
look
at
that,
because
we
certainly
don't
want
to
codify
this
through
governance
without
some
additional
Community
feedback.
So
this
is
an
opportunity
to
jump
into
the
forum
share
your
thoughts.
D
But
this
will
end
up
showing
up
in
you
know,
having
the
community
formally
approved,
how
it
wants
to
signal
to
the
rest
of
the
community,
how
governance
should
run
and
and
establishment,
just
kind
of
additional
standardization
checks
and
balances
to
ensure
that
regen
governance
is
a
a
leader
in
this
space,
particularly
as
we're
getting
larger
and
growing
and
decentralizing
so
I'm
happy
to
take
any
quick
questions
or
comments.
Otherwise,
don't
jump
in
digitally
any
thoughts,
questions
comments.
A
D
A
B
Had
this,
it's
okay
you've
had
this
up
for
a
little
bit
for
at
least
a
couple
of
weeks,
so
I'm
wondering
at
this
point
you
know:
has
there
been
as
much
engagement
with
this
discussion?
I
mean
we
do
have
other
partners
in
the
classmates
ecosystem
that
have
very
well
structured,
Community
proposal
processes
and
governance
processes
like
Atmos,
so
I'm
wondering
at
this
point
with
your
proposal
or
your
discussion
here.
What
is
the
best
like
way
for
people
to
weigh
in?
Is
it
just
that
you
need
more
comments?
D
From
you
know
so,
just
you
know
to
be
clear.
This
has
gone
essentially
some
round
of
like
review,
because
this
this
particular
Farm
post
is
based
on
a
previous
one.
That's
linked
out
here
in
this
current
the
accurate
link
that
I
just
put
in
there.
So
there
has
been
some
Community
feedback.
I.
Think
at
this
point,
I
mean
we're
we're
getting
into
like
formal
language
here
and
formal
structure.
D
We
thought
it
out
enough
like
what
needs
to
be
developed
still.
Should
we
have
some
more
underlying
analysis?
What
are
the
pitfalls
of
that?
As
you
know,
as
an
example,
you
know
again
not
to
play
Devil's
Advocate,
but
just
to
kind
of
pose
some
of
that
and
then
around
the
actually
template
itself,
where
and
the
suggestion
at
least
for
how
to
socialize
this
in
community
like
what's
missing,
you
know,
right
now
we
have
a
proposal.
D
What
we
call
pattern
of
a
title,
summary
authors,
abstract
motivation,
proposal,
type,
Financial,
analysis,
Forum
discussion-
is
that
too
much?
Is
it
too
little?
You
know.
Where
are
we
at
in
our
evolutionary
governance
Arc
it
region
where
we
don't
want
to
create
unnecessary
boundaries,
but
we
want
to
actually
professionalize
and
support
the
growth
of
regen
from
a
governance
perspective,
because
we're
dealing
with
something
you
know
these
are
going
to
be
big
decisions
for
the
global
ecological
Ledger.
This
is
not.
D
You
know
we're
getting
into
the
bigger
time,
I,
guess
and
and
so
we're
trying
to
bring
that
level
of
seriousness
to
governance.
So
any
way
you
want
to
share
feedback,
the
there's
also
Discord
the
governance
channels,
and
that
would
be
great
as
well
so
on
and
I
I'll
stop
there
I
saw
Donovan,
has
his
hand
raised.
E
Just
a
small
question:
I'm
quite
new
in
this
whole
principle
and
thumbs
up
because
I
I
have
a
very
developing
country
where,
where
the
concept
of
refi
and
blockchain
is
quite
A,
New
Concept,
so
how
do
you
guys
deal
with?
Let's
say
the
region
concept
it
reaches
out
through
the
world
right?
Currently,
it's
mostly
focused
on
the
Northern
American
part
of
the
world.
Right
but
let's
say
other
countries
join
and
they
assess
a
lot
of
region
tokens
and
there
will
be
an
imbalance
in
the
the
voting
structure.
E
D
So
there
has
been
an
effort
early
days
to
distribute
token
voting
power
to
the
community,
more
broadly,
where
it's
not
centered
on
frankly,
somebody
just
protecting
their
token
bags.
Basically,
so
there
has
been
some
effort
there
and
and
again
governance
can
be
calibrated.
A
bunch
of
different
ways
like,
for
example,
we're
considering
right
now,
permissionless
credit
classes,
is
a
topic
that
just
was
raised
yesterday
in
the
Forum,
where
it
will
give
communities.
D
You
know
developing
countries,
indigenous
communities,
groups
of
farmers,
the
ability
to
spin
up
their
own
credit
classes
without
needing
approval
from
the
whole
community.
In
order
for
that
to
happen,
so
that's
an
intentional
effort
to
again
continue
to
decentralize
and
hand
decision
making
more
granularly
over
to
bio
regions
and
remove
it
as
from
something
that
the
whole
Community
needs
to
vote
on
and
may
suffer
from.
You
know
you
know
apathy
or
you
know
weighted
voting
that
may
swing
too
far
at
the
other.
But
it's
a
good
question.
E
It's
it's
perfect
because
that's
a
great
Safeguard
through
you,
you
guys,
put
in
place
during
the
the
Genesis
of
the
blockchain,
because
that
was
my
biggest
concern.
Let's
see,
other
stakeholders
come
into
play
and
coming
years
and
people
who
are
who
do
not
have
the
same
intentions
like
the
the
pioneers
might
get
Veto
under
the
voting
and
their
intention
might
differ
from
the
whole
principle
of
region.
E
D
Yep,
at
least
that's
the
intention,
but
it's
it's
a
good
issue
to
continue
to
monitor
I'd,
say
from
the
community
perspective
and
also
create
you
know,
continue
to
evolve.
Governance
to
match
the
needs
of
a
decentralized
climate,
Finance
movement,
I
think,
is
something
that
we're
paying
attention
to
here
at
Loa
and
certainly
I
know
the
founder
early
Founders.
E
Yes,
the
end
balance
yeah
because
speaking
of
experience,
I
come
from
Suriname
with
93
Forest
and
we
deal
with
a
lot
of
so-called
third-party
interventions
and
when
we
as
a
as
a
nation,
try
to
even
up
for
a
carbon
credit
strategy,
there's
always
a
third
party
who
takes
the
course
by
itself
and
they
fail
on
a
lot
of
things.
I'm
really
talking,
I'm
playing
open
card
here.
E
People
agencies
like
the
undp
or
the
unep,
or
even
other
ngos,
so
I'm
happy
that
this
concept
takes
more
more
more
form
and
I
told
Ned
about
it.
That,
in
my
case,
that's
why
I
joined
the
group
and
it's
amazing,
stuff
I'm,
trying
to
reach
out
to
more
of
my
network
within
within
Latin
America,
to
discuss
refi
and
decentralize
carbon
credit
on
even
environmental
stewardship.
So.
A
F
Yeah
I'm
here
hi
everyone
I'm
not
usually
on
this
call.
I
am
Austin
white
Smith
on
the
Edith
region,
Foundation
the
same
entity
that
David
was
just
talking
about
with
the
30
token
Holdings,
to
give
Community
stake
within
the
larger
Network.
So
Donovan
I
just
dm'd
you,
but
we
should
chat
I.
Think
about
that
question.
We
think
about
that
question
at
the
foundation
every
single
day
so
incredibly
relevant
in
app
question
yeah
I'm
talking
about
something
that's
been
actively
discussed
within
r
d,
as
well
as
in
the
foundation.
F
Primarily,
the
focus
of
Wills
all
from
the
foundation
is
around
this
idea
of
the
region.
2.0
tokenomics
upgrade,
and
it's
a
large
topic
that
has
many
different
facets
to
it
and
perhaps
took
an
economic
working
group
might
be
a
bit
of
a
misnomer,
I
think,
what's
what's
really
essential
to
be
developed
and
incubated
through
our
dialogue
is
how
there
could
be
a
third
party,
another
entity
which
is
outside
the
region,
Network
development
and
outside
the
region.
F
Foundation
that
can
actively
steer
and
direct
governance
processes
upgrades
actually
contributions
to
the
code
base,
Etc
and
so
their
contributions
might
also
fundamentally
influence
like
what
the
token
economic
scheme
looks
like
and
as
part
of
being
a
decentralized
network.
That's
compliant
it's
important
that
we
incubate
and
support
more
and
more
entities
to
begin
to
contribute
directly
to
that
outside
of
foundation
and
r
d.
F
F
But
we
see
there's
certainly
consensus
amongst
a
lot
of
the
different
present
conversationalists
and
r
d
and
Foundation
that
an
absolutely
vital
step
in
moving
towards
a
number
of
critical
token
economic
and
larger
protocol
Network
Health
patterns
and
developments
is
for
another
entity
to
join
the
space
and
for
us
to
incubate
that
so
that's
an
informed
contributor
and
actively
developing
along
with
r
d
and
region
Foundation
yeah.
So
that's
the
region.
F
A
E
Just
one
question:
how's,
the
IVC
protocol
with
the
other
Cosmos
changed
it's
it's
already
in
place
because
I
I
started
discussions
in
Syria
now
and
if,
if
the
possibility
is
already
there
when
when
when
the
community
will
apply
for
any
other
credit,
they
want
to
maybe
exchange
it
to
a
more
popular
token.
Is.
C
E
H
So,
with
with
the
regen
token,
the
region
token
is
a
IBC
enabled
token
and
regen
as
a
network
is
IBC
enabled,
which
means
any
Cosmos
tokens
that
are
IBC
enabled
can
come
onto
regen
Network.
One
of
the
big
use
cases
that
we
have
for
that
today
is
on
our
Network.
We
have
an
on-chain
Marketplace
for
carbon
credits,
where
you
can
so
you
can
buy
carbon
credits
and
carbon
credits
can
be
listed
for
sale
in
either
region
right
now
or
in
usdc.
H
H
Just
the
regen
token
and
well,
but
but
there
is
a
mechanism
by
which
one
can
pool
different
carbon
credits
together
into
a
larger
fungible
asset
called
a
basket
token
and
and
those
when,
when
one
is
dealing
with
a
basket
token,
those
are
IBC
enabled
as
well,
and
they
basically
serve
as
like
a
fungible
wrapper
around
a
carbon
credit
that
wrap
the
the
retirement
functionality
around
found.
A
large
fungible
highly
fungible
token.
That
could
be
moved
over
to
something
like
osmosis
put
into
a
liquidity
pool
people.
G
H
Trading
it
back
and
forth,
and
then,
in
order
to
retire
the
underlying
carbon
credit,
they
would
bring
the
basket
token
back
to
regen
Network
unwrap
it,
and
then
they
could
retire.
The
carbon
credit,
but
the
actual
carbon
credits
themselves
cannot
be
moved
over
IBC
because
the
retirement
has
to
happen
on
on
regen
yeah.
F
H
I
had
a
question
too
so
about
the
fee.
Splitting
thing
it
was
more
of
a
comment
but
like
as
I
understand
it
the
if
we're
just
talking
about
fee
splitting
then
I
think
for
most
people.
What
they're
thinking
about
is
they're
thinking
of
the
existing
places
where
fees
are
in
place,
which
today
is
like
very
minimal
right
within
all
Cosmos
blockchains.
H
The
fees
that
are
charged
for
just
like
gas
fees
are
extremely
small
in
terms
of
the
value
that
you
know
is,
is
is
captured
by
those
by
those
fees
but
I
think
what
what's?
What's
really
in
this
point,
and
what
what
is
super
important
to
communicate
is
that
we
today
have
an
Unchained,
Marketplace
and
people
are
buying
carbon
credits
and
sometimes
they're,
buying
carbon
credits
for
a
lot
of
money,
they're
not
doing
a
high
volume
of
transactions.
H
So
it's
not
like
there's
thousands
of
transactions
per
day
happening
on
regen
network,
but
the
transactions
that
are
happening
are
quite
high
in
in
the
economic
value.
So
what's
on
the
table
here
is
not
just
about
fee
splitting,
but
it's
it's
now
that
we
have
an
on-chain
Marketplace,
you
know.
Is
the
network
wanting
to
move
in
a
direction
where
there
are
actually
fees
being
introduced
that
are
proportional
to
the
value
of
marketplace
transactions
so
introducing
a
feature
where,
when
you're
buying
a
bunch
of
carbon
credits,
let's
say
for
a
thousand
usdc
in
that
transaction?
H
Is
it's
not
it's
not
just
about
gas
fees?
That's
on
the
table
here.
We're
actually
talking
about.
You
know
accruing
value
to
the
network
based
off
of
the
marketplace
activity.
That's
happening,
that's
part
of
what
the
conversation
needs
to
be
about,
and
so,
if
folks
are
wanting
to
engage
in
this
conversation
like
it
is
one
that
has
quite
a
lot
of
economic
weight
for
the
network.
It's
not
just
about,
like
the
the
you
know,
50
cents
per
transaction
gas
fees
that
we
have.
A
H
We
at
r
d
have
been
talking
about
this
for
a
bit
and
I
think
it
might
have
even
been
socialized
on
one
of
the
last
regenerati
news
hours
that
that
you
know
this
proposal
or
this.
You
know
this
initiation
are
yeah
like
initiating
this.
This.
This
line
of
thinking
of
this
conversation
was
going
to
be
coming
from
r
d,
but
we're
we're
wanting
to
to
establish
a
conversation
around
permissionless
credit
classes.
H
Today,
credit
class
Creation
The
process
by
which
people
can
instantiate
new
categories
of
carbon
credits
onto
our
Network,
is
something
that
any
individual
who
wants
to
engage
in.
That
process
needs
to
directly
apply
through
a
governance
proposal
to
become
an
allowed
credit
class
Creator
or
they
need
to
engage
with
regen
registry,
which
is
which
is
currently
like
sitting
within
r
d,
Inc
or
r
d
public
benefit
Corp
and
go
through
a
process
with
regen
registry
for
us
to
basically
Steward
and
help.
H
You
know
the
instantiation
of
a
new
credit
class
as
a
partner
of
ours,
and
that's
something
that
we
thought
was
important
to
do
from
the
start
of.
When
we
first
introduced
the
Eco
credit
module,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
know
the
first
categories
of
assets
that
were
coming
on
chain.
Were
you
know
of
some
pretty
high
bar?
H
You
know
high
quality
that
we
were
able
to
kind
of
play,
an
active
role
in
in
sort
of
setting
that
standard
and
I
think
we're
we're
at
a
point
now
where
we
would
like
to
open
up
to
the
community
to
see
like
is
this
a
process
that
people
feel
ready
and
prepared
for
having
more
accessible
to
the
network?
So
technically,
what
this
means
is
it?
H
It
would
be
a
governance
proposal
to
actually
disable
the
credit
Creator
allow
list
this
would
this
would
transform
regen
Network
into
where
it
is
today
where
there
needs
to
be
some
kind
of
governance
or
partnership
process?
For
someone
to,
like
basically
add
Supply
into
the
carbon
credits
of
of
the
network,
to
a
system
where
there
are
basically
two
tiers
of
credit
classes,
I
mean
you
know
there
will
be
many
tiers,
but
you
know
like
from
that
day
forward
that
it
would
kind
of
feel
like
there
were
two
tiers
they're.
H
So
that's
this,
like
category
of
permissionless,
community
credit
classes
and
then
credit
classes
that
are
engaging
formally
with
regen
registry
would
be
sort
of
differentiated
on
the
marketplace
would
have
like
a
little.
You
know
an
icon
that
says
these
are
ones
that
have
gone
through
the
regen
registry
program
and
that
would
denote
ones
that
were
adhering
to
the
due
process
outlined
in
the
region
registry
program,
guide
and
yeah.
H
It
it
I,
think
we're
feeling
like
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
the
entirety
of
the
supply
to
be
bottlenecked
by
one
organization
and
wanting
to
move
towards
a
position
where
it
is
a
bit
more
of
a
collaborative
Community
process,
and
it
feels-
and
it
feels
more
open
in
that
light,
so
similar
in
theme
to
kind
of
the
stuff
that
that
you
know
Austin
was
talking
about
in.
You
know
us
wanting
to
engage
with
the
broader
Community
to
support
with
leading
some
of
the
token
Economics
work.
H
This
is
kind
of
another
different
type
of
invitation
where
we're
really
trying
to
to
solicit
and
and
see
what
people
think
about
they're
being
more
more
active
participation,
particularly
on
the
on
the
supply
side
of
the
of
the
kind
of
carbon
Market
platform
of
regen
Network.
So
I
want
to
also
note
that
there
are
two
supplementing
supplemental
proposals
that
are
in
the
Commonwealth
discussion.
H
One
of
them
is
updating
the
credit
class
creation
fee.
So,
currently
I
think
that
fee
is
20
regen
that
was
from
when
we
originally
launched.
The
regen
price
was
very
different
at
that
time,
so
it's
definitely
overdue
for
an
update.
If
we're
trying
to
keep
that
bar
of
I
think
20
region
at
the
time.
Maybe
it
was
around
like
it
was
somewhere
like
a
little
under
a
hundred
dollars,
I
think.
H
H
But
you
know
this
is
something
that
we're
also
kind
of
looking
for
input
from
the
community
on
in
terms
of
what
credit
types
would
it
make
sense
to
be
adding
to
this
initial
list.
You
know
our
intention
is
to
is
to
kind
of
like
have
have
an
active
discussion
on
Commonwealth,
get
some
input
from
people
and
when
it
feels
like
we've
got
alignment
not
just
on
permissionless
credit
classes
in
general,
but
also
on
what
the
fee
should
be,
and
what
this
you
know,
initial
set
of
credit
types
should
be.
H
D
Ton
yeah
a
ton
or
like
I
guess:
how
does
it
show
up?
So
if
it's
like
a
biodiversity
credit
or
if
it's
a
a
blue
carbon
credit,
how
do
you
normalize
or
standardize
in
that
case,
or
is
it
really
just
apply
to
that
you
know?
Are
there
going
to
be
a
thousand
different
versions
of
a
blue
carbon
credit
in
this
case
or
how
does
that
work
so.
H
We're
gonna
I
mean
I'll
answer.
The
generic
and
I
should
have
I
should
have
talked
about
that
when
I
was
running
through
the
credit
types
but
like.
Let
me
first
talk
to
what
you
were
speaking
about
at
the
end
here,
so
I
think
our
hope
is
that
we're
aligning
like
with
carbon
the
one
on
chain
literally
says:
if
you
query,
it's
like
carbon,
measured
in
metric
tons,
equivalent
or
whatever.
H
So
it
says
specifically
what
the
unit
is
and
for
each
one,
whether
it's
biodiversity,
whether
it's
water,
we're
going
to
want
to
have
units
that
we
think
the
community
will
be
like
galvanizing
towards
the
benefit
of
that
is
when
everything
is
speaking,
the
same
units,
it's
just
easier
to
decipher.
What's
going
on
right,
so
part
of
the
process
that
we're
going
to
have
to
go
through
both
internally,
like
with
the
registry
team
and
our
partners,
but
also
here
on
this
discussion
is
like
okay
for
biodiversity.
H
There's
a
lot
of
discussion
around
what
units
might
make
sense
for
that,
like
you
know,
let's
decide
is
it?
Is
it
about
something
to
do
with
hectares,
or
is
it
about
something
to
do
with?
Acres,
you
know
how:
how
are
we
measuring
these
and
just
a
line
on
one
that
doesn't
mean
that
everything
needs
to
file
under
that
single
unit?
There
can
be.
H
You
know
there
could
be
Reason
by
why
people
really
want
to
use
a
different
unit,
and
you
know
we
would
have
to
have
that
be
a
separate,
a
separate
credit
type
on
chain
if
there
was
a
different
unit,
but
but
the
hope
is
that
the
community
is
kind
of
like
galvanizing
towards
towards
one
and
then
that's
what
they're
actually
like
denominating
in
so
for
each
category.
There's
maybe
like
you
know,
there's
maybe
one
one
unit
is-
is
the
hope
now
for
things
like
environmental
stewardship.
That
may
be
a
lot
more
challenging
right.
H
You
know
I.
If
you
talk
to
Ned
and
the
work
that
he's
doing
with
fiber
shed
we've
been
talking
about
this
kilo
sheep
hour,
credit
we'll
have
to
decide
like
okay
great.
Is
that
what
we're
calling
it
on
chain
or
is
there
a
more
generic
version
of
that
that
we
want
to
be
instantiating
such
that
other
related
credits
could
be?
You
know
attributable
or
sort
of
denominated
in
a
similar
kind
of
way,
and
so
so
that's
like
to
sort
of
the
latter
part
of
your
question
now
this
generic
credit
type.
H
They
can
like.
The
thought
here
is
that
we
could
have
one
credit
type,
which
was
called
generic
and
the
unit
was
just
named
unit
and
that
credit
class
could
otherwise
denominate
in
its
metadata
what
that
unit
represented
and
it
wouldn't
be
registered
on
chain
in
the
same
way.
But
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
reason
for
these
being
registered
on
chain
is
that
multiple
credit
classes
can
point
to
the
same
unit
when
that
makes
sense.
H
But
if
someone
is
doing
a
credit
class
where
they
don't
presume
that
anyone
else
is
going
to
deal
with
the
same
unit,
you
know
the
the
idea
is
that
a
generic
credit
type
allows
for
them
to
do
that
and
have
something
very
bespoke
to
them
without
having
to
go
through
a
governance
process.
For
for
like
a
very
narrowly
scoped.
You
know.
G
H
You
know
enable
the
the
community
engagement
that
we
want,
but
there
is
another
option
where
we
actually
I
don't
know
if
we
would
turn
credit
types
totally
permissionless,
but
the
thinking
was
that
maybe
we
would
make
registering
a
credit
type
optional,
registering
a
governance
credit
type
optional
such
that
you
know.
If,
if
someone
wanted
to
like
make
their
own
bespoke
one,
they
could
do
so.
But
the
issue
is,
if
you,
if
you
make
it
if
we
were
to
just
say
that
oh
credit
types
themselves,
are
totally
permissionless
you're
kind
of
dealing
with.
H
That
credit
classes
are
using
to
sort
of
all
point
to
the
fact
that
they're
like
running
under
the
same
unit
I
think
it
still
makes
sense
to
to
have
that,
be
something
that
that
governance
is
involved
in
and
managing.
But
but
there
is
an
option
that
we
outline
where
we
potentially
do
like
a
software
upgrade
to
make
registering
with
one
of
those
like
governance,
like
endorsed
units
is,
is,
is
optional
thanks.
H
H
These
days,
that's
being
matched
with.
What
we're
seeing
is
like
a
lot
of
inquiry
and
excitement
around
things
from
introducing
the
liquid
staking
module
to
all
the
token
economics
upgrade
that
that
David
was
posting
about.
So
with
that,
like
we're,
wanting
to
to
make
sure
that
we're
like
holding
space
and
actually
inviting
the
community
to
to
sort
of
step
up
and
be
engaging
more
on
a
maintainership
basis
with
regen
Ledger,
this
is
a
process
that
we're
going
to
be
communicating
about
and
we'll
be
taking
some
more
time
but
yeah.
H
You
know
repository
that
is
basically
the
the
regen
Ledger
node
binary
and
so
we've
got
in
our
head.
You
know
a
list
of
epics
and
features
that
will
be
circulating
soon
with
the
community
to
try
and
just
stimulate
some
ideas
of
the
the
different
types
of
things
that
we
see
as
like
high
priority
to
potentially
work
on,
but
yeah.
This
is
a
process
that
we've
spoken
about
with
some
folks
and
you
know
I
think
it's
just
worth
like
holding
space
for
here
and
yeah
more
to
come.
A
I
A
I
But
what
we
started
is
like
getting
into
Cosmo
was
a
little
bit
harder
for
us
as
individuals,
and
we
wanted
to
like
be
able
to
track
everything
like,
but
not
only
Cosmos
goes
beyond
it
and
we
decided
to
build
sort
of
a
dashboard
that
allow
us
to
track
from
nfts
to
all
the
order,
defined
positions
and
as
I
was
hearing
you
guys,
I
was
like
well.
That
would
be
interesting.
How
can
we
actually
display
carbon
credits
on
the
platform?
I
think
we
can
find
a
way
at
the
moment
we
are
doing
regen.
I
We
are
showing
a
token
and
staking,
but
would
be
interesting,
actually
talk
with
the
team
and
figure
out
a
way
to
display
that
for
users,
but
that's
something
I
was
just
hearing
your
conversation
and
thinking
ways
to
display
that
and
because
tracking
everything
all
over
the
place
was
hard
and
time
consuming.
What
we
decided
was
to
to
create
Pulsar.
So
once
you
get
in
and
our
site
is
very
straightforward,
don't
even
need
to
connect
your
wallets.
I
You
can
create
multiple
portfolios
as
many
as
you
like
I
got
to
create
55
last
month
just
to
try
how
it
goes,
but
you
can
you
can
push
it
and
track
everything
we
do
get
to
see
it
over
time
and
have
to
track
here.
The
positions
like
not
all
just
over
time,
but
in
real
time.
So
you
can
see
like
how
your
portfolio
is
behaving
over
the
last
month,
but
also
have
it
like
give
it
like.
How
can
you
see
the
the
behavior
of
a
specific
token
over
time
as
well?
I
So
you
can
see
all
that
from
within
the
platform
as
you
logged
in
and
you
can
make
all
proposals,
we
are
more
and
more
afford
the
fact
that
the
community
should
in
a
lot
of
ways,
dictate
what
should
we
integrate
next,
what
are
their
needs,
and
recently
we
launched
our
proposal
page.
We
go
through
it
every
Friday
and
see
the
results
of
every
user.
So
it's
pretty
simple
to
vote
on.
You
can
create
your
own
proposal,
but
you
can
also
like
vote
on
others
that
are
available.
It's
pretty
easy
to
like.
I
A
I
I
Apparently,
I
cannot
I
think
he's
an
issue
with
my
avoiding
my
with
my
Mac
I'm.
Sorry,
so
I'm
really
sorry
about
that.
But
once
you
logged
in
the
first
thing
that
you
see
is
like
you
can
just
put
a
wallet
and
you
don't
need
to
connect
it
to
verify
all
your
tokens
and
you
will
see
that
we
can
display
nfts
as
well.
H
I
I
I
I
So
we
won't
have
historical
data
before
you
log
in
your
wallet
and
then
we'll
separate
either
your
dead
positions,
your
your
Holdings
and
the
value
that
you
hold
on
nfts
and
from
then
you
can
see
it
will
take
tokens
staking
whatever
positions
you
have.
Overall,
we
deliver
on
Cosmos.
We
cover
features,
depth,
Health,
Farms,
liquidity,
pools
everything
all
of
the
positions
that
we
find
till
now,
but
I
would
be
interesting
to
chat
with
the
team
and
see
how
we
can
show
the
carbon
credits
here.
A
Thank
you
so
much
for
for
showing
us
the
yeah,
the
site
looks
pretty
cool,
I,
look
forward
to
exploring
it
more
cool.
Well,
thank
you.
So
much
everybody
for
joining
in
for
sticking
around
the
next
call
is
in
two
weeks,
and
we
generally
do
news
hour-
is
next
Thursday,
so
I
hope
to
see
you
guys
at
those
events
as
well
and
have
a
wonderful
rest
of
your
day.